Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA Packet 2025-02-25Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Tuesday February 25, 2025, at 6:00pm 215 N. Tioga St. AGENDA Public Hearing and Consider: ZBAS-25-1 Appeal of Cornell University, Owner of 170 McGowan Woods Rd., Ithaca NY, 14850; Davies Orinda, Applicant/Agent; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 225-3 (New buildings required to have sprinkler systems) for a proposal to construct a storage building without a sprinkler system. The property is currently located in the Cornell Precinct 7 Special Land Use District, Tax Parcel No. 64.-1-2.2 Public Hearing and Consider: ZBAA-25-2 Appeal Cornell University, Owner; John Pillar, Agent: is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-254 (Residential and Conservation Zones) for a proposal to install a sign that would exceed 50 square feet for a single sign, exceed the maximum freestanding sign height of 6 feet, and such sign is proposed to be internally illuminated, where it is not allowed to be internally illuminated in the Residential and Conservation Zones. The property is located in the Low-Density Residential District Zone, Tax Parcel No. 60.-1-9.2 Public Hearing and Consider: ZBAA-25-3 Appeal of Jared Webb, owner of 412 Worth St., Ithaca, NY, 14850; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270- 82 (Yard regulations). Town of Ithaca Code section 270-82C. requires a side yard setback of 10’, where a new house is proposed to be constructed and have a side yard setback of 0’. The property is located in the High-Density Residential Zone, Tax Parcel No. 59.-1-10. Public Hearing and Consider: ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct., Ithaca, NY, 14850; Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-16 (Height limitations). Town of Ithaca Code 270-16 requires a maximum height of 30’ for all nonagricultural structures, where the proposed personal wireless service facility tower/structure would exceed the 30’ maximum height requirements. The property is located in the Conservation Zone Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22. Comments on the appeal(s) can be made in person or via the ZOOM platform during the meeting. You can also email comments (or questions up until 3pm the day of the meeting) to Codes@townithacany.gov. All comments become part of the official record. Links to the full materials and ZOOM are available on the Town’s website, www.townithacany.gov under “Public Meetings”. HOW TO ACCESS ZOOM: Virtually - Go to www.zoom.us - Click Join Meeting - enter Meeting ID 852-5587-1576 the Host will let you in. By Phone - Call (929) 436-2866 - You will be prompted to enter the Meeting ID: 852- 5587-1576 - the Host will let you in. Page 2 of 2 The recording of the meeting is archived on the Town’s YouTube Live Meeting Channel. Youtube.com/@TownofIthacaVideo. Town of Ithaca January 22, 2025 ZBAA-25-2 Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 1/13/2025 Primary Location 210Pine Tree RdUnit Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner Cornell University Thurston Ave 223 Ithaca, NY 14850 Applicant JohnPillar 443-831-1246 jp2495@cornell.edu 223 Thurston Avenue Ithaca, New York 14850 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 60.-1-9.2 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes GML-239 Reason for Review* The right of way of any existing or proposed county or state road Type of Variance Area Variance Appearance Date for Variance 2/25/25 Variance Code Language Variance Code Section ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 1 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance)Materials For GML-239 Were Sent Deadline for Hearing Notice to Journal Public Hearing Notice Was Sent Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent Date Sign Was Picked-up Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members Historical Only Address affiliated with request Status Applicant's Information Applicant is* Property Owner Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No Description ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 2 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 270-254 Brief Description of Variance Request* Variance from section S270-254 Section C. The proposed sign would be 18' in height from ground. Variance from section S270-254 Section E6. The proposed sign would be 96 square feet. label for="32571259_input" style="flex: 1 1 0%; scroll-margin-top: calc(var(-- code-content-top) + 16px);"> Residential and Conservation Zones. label> Area Variance Criteria Form label for="32571259_input" style="flex: 1 1 0%; scroll-margin- top: calc(var(--code-content-top) + 16px);"> label> C. Freestanding signs shall not exceed six feet in height. E. Notwithstanding Subsection D above: 6) If the square footage of all principal buildings on a parcel exceeds 8,000 square feet: a) Signs up to 32 square feet in the aggregate are permitted, and no one sign shall be larger than 24 square feet in area. b) In addition, signs up to 100 square feet in the aggregate on any one parcel are permitted for signs that are located at least 500 feet from a public right-of-way; no one such sign shall be larger than 50 square feet in area. 270-254 Residential and Conservation Zones. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 3 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties?* No Reasons: The proposed sign is set back significantly from the road, more than 1,000 feet, and it will not be a detriment to nearby properties as there is significant tree cover on 3 sides of the proposed sign. Also, rugby matches cannot be played at night because the field has no lights, so the sign will not be illuminated at night. It will not produce any sounds. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance?* No Reasons: Spectators for the club rugby team cannot identify time and score from the grandstands by alternative means. Other sign locations have been explored around the field and the southwest corner is the only feasible location. 3. Is the requested variance substantial?* No Reasons: The proposed sign would be well below the top of the existing goal posts at the field. And, due to its setback from the road, would not be intrusive. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 4 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood?* No Reasons: Caution will be taken during construciton to not allow excavation spoils or disturbed earth to remain on site. The area of earth disturbance is minimal. Power will not need to be run to the sign, as it is anticipated to be provided locally by either a small generator or battery only during matches. 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created?* Yes Reasons: This proposed scoreboard sign is a self created zoning variance due to the restrictions of the town sign law, but in my opinion, is not a significant variance, nor would it have a detrimental impact on the surrounding neighborhoods or properties. Affidavit The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 5 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM Digital Signature* John Pillar Jan 10, 2025 Meeting Date 01/10/2025 PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E-check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Attachments Message received about 210 Pine Tree Rd_ Cornell University.msg Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 13, 2025 at 1:03 PM SCL ZBA Application.docx Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 13, 2025 at 3:57 PM SCL Sign Permit Application for Rugby Scoreboard.pdf Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 10, 2025 at 12:58 PM Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1.pdf Uploaded by John Pillar on Jan 10, 2025 at 12:56 PM Determination/Denial Letter Narrative Survey and/or Plans Environmental Assessment Form ZBAA-25-2 about:srcdoc 6 of 10 1/22/2025, 10:52 AM 1 Lori Kofoid From:Town of Ithaca <noreply@opengov.com> Sent:Monday, January 13, 2025 12:13 PM To:John Pillar Subject:Message received about 210 Pine Tree Rd, Cornell University Town of Ithaca Marty Moseley commented on Code Department Review : Message: Based on my review of the sign proposed. The sign would need the following area variances: 1. A variance from section 270-254 C of Town Code, as the height is proposed to exceed 6' 2. A variance from section 270-254E6 of town code, as the sign area being proposed exceeds the maximum of sign area allowed of 50sq.ft. Additionally, the Planning Department will be reviewing this application in the near future and may have additional comments or concerns. Please feel free to use this message to apply for an area variance if you desire to do so. " Where: 210 Pine Tree Rd, Cornell University Type: TOI - Sign Permit Application Number: SGN-25-1 View Details TOWN OF ITHACA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION Contact Information: John Pillar, jp2495@cornell.edu, 443-831-1246 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Location Address: 210 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca NY 14850 Property Data: MBL 60.-1-9.2 Lot Area 31.22 Acres Public water Public sewage Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR) Site Information: Zoning District Residential/Conservation Zone Physical Location on the Property – see Image 1 Sign Information: Freestanding Sign 8’ high x 12’ wide – see Image 2 Sign area 96 ft2 Setbacks: 75’ from West property line 585’ from South property line 1,120’ from East property line Overall Height 18’ (10’ offset from ground) Internally Illuminated center portion Property Owner: Cornell University 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Jp2495@cornell.edu 443-831-1246 Sign Company: Daktronics Clayton Huisken, 605-692-0200 clayton.huisken@daktronics.com Installation: CU grounds will excavate foundations and place concrete piers CU carpenters will install pier formwork and reinforcement CU sheet metal shop will install columns Daktronics to attach scoreboard to columns Powered by small generator only during daylight matches (no field lights) Appendices: 1 Daktronics Scoreboard cut sheet 2 Supporting structure 95% Construction Documents 3 Photos from Pine Tree Road Narrative Reorganized in 1938, Cornell Rugby has a storied history which the current Big Red players honor with their on-field performance that traces all the way back to 1879. Cornell University Rugby Football Club is an elite group of scholar-athletes and represents Cornell in the Ivies, nationwide and abroad. Both men’s and women’s teams compete on the club rugby field behind the Oxley Equestrian Center in 80 minute matches. Combined, the two teams host approximately 12 games at the field per year during daylight hours, as the field does not have lights for evening play. Therefore, there would be no impact to the night sky. The grandstands are located on the east edge of the field looking west. Therefore, the two locations that would best suit the proposed scoreboard are the northwest corner and the southwest corner of the field, as both the players and fans could view the game information. However, game day logistics rule out using the northwest corner location, since that is the primary vehicle access to and from the field. The southwest corner was therefore chosen to develop the structural design of the scoreboard frame and create photo renderings of the view from Pine Tree Road. The proposed scoreboard would point to the northeast. Strict adherence to the Town sign law would mean that both of the text banners would need to be removed to limit the sign area to 48 square feet (leaving only the portion within the white rectangle on Image 2), and the 4’ tall scoreboard could be at most 2’ above grade. This would be problematic when viewing the scoreboard, since perspectives from both the players and fans would be interrupted by the players. It would also be a safety hazard to have the scoreboard located at such a low elevation in an area that routinely sees players careening towards it while trying to stay in bounds or corral the ball. The practicality of such a scoreboard would not suit the needs of Cornell Rugby, and the Town sign law creates an undue hardship for a team that has coexisted peacefully with its current home for many years and has become part of the local fabric of the community. Image 1 – sign location on property Image 2 – sign elevation Illuminated center portion outlined in white: 4’x12’ Non-illuminated upper and lower text banners: 2’x12’ each TOWN OF ITHACA SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION Contact Information: John Pillar, jp2495@cornell.edu, 443-831-1246 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Location Address: 210 Pine Tree Road, Ithaca NY 14850 Property Data: MBL 60.-1-9.2 Lot Area 31.22 Acres Public water Public sewage Zoning Low Density Residential (LDR) Site Information: Zoning District Residential/Conservation Zone Physical Location on the Property – see Image 1 Sign Information: Freestanding Sign 8’ high x 12’ wide – see Image 2 Sign area 96 ft2 Setbacks: 75’ from West property line 585’ from South property line 1,120’ from East property line Overall Height 18’ (10’ offset from ground) Internally Illuminated center portion Property Owner: Cornell University 223 Thurston Avenue, Ithaca NY 14850 Jp2495@cornell.edu 443-831-1246 Sign Company: Daktronics Clayton Huisken, 605-692-0200 clayton.huisken@daktronics.com Installation: CU grounds will excavate foundations and place concrete piers CU carpenters will install pier formwork and reinforcement CU sheet metal shop will install columns Daktronics to attach scoreboard to columns Powered by small generator only during daylight matches (no field lights) Appendices: 1 Daktronics Scoreboard cut sheet 2 Supporting structure 95% Construction Documents 3 Photos from Pine Tree Road Image 1 – sign location on property Image 2 – sign elevation Illuminated center portion outlined in white: 4’x12’ Non-illuminated upper and lower text banners: 2’x12’ each WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2167442 091620 Page 1 of 8 This outdoor LED soccer scoreboard displays period time to 99:59, HOME and GUEST scores to 99 and HALF (or PERIOD or QTR) to nine. When period time is less than one minute, the scoreboard displays time to 1/10 of a second. Scoreboard shown with optional striping and amber PanaView® digits. DIMENSIONS UNCRATED WEIGHT POWER (120 VAC)* 4'-0" H x 12'-0" W x 8" D 1.22 m, 3.66 m, 203 mm)180 lb (82 kg) Red/Amber Digits 120 Watts, 1.0 Amp White Digits 260 Watts, 2.2 Amps Scoreboard requires a dedicated circuit. Models with 240 VAC power at half the indicated amperage are also offered (International Use Only). CONSTRUCTION Alcoa aluminum alloy 5052 for excellent corrosion resistance PRODUCT SAFETY APPROVAL ETL-listed to UL 48, tested to CSA standards, and CE-labeled OPERATING TEMPERATURES Display: -22° to 122° Fahrenheit (-30° to 50° Celsius) Console: 32° to 130° Fahrenheit (0° to 54° Celsius) DIGITS All digits are 18" (457 mm) high. Select red, amber, or white LED digits. Scoreboard features robust weather-sealed digits see DD2495646). Digits may be dimmed for night viewing. CAPTIONS HOME and GUEST captions are 10" (254 mm) high. All other captions are 8" (203 mm) high. Standard captions are vinyl, applied to the display face. DISPLAY COLOR Choose from 150+ colors (from Martin Senour® paint book) at no additional cost. DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST HALF Choose one of three vinyl captions Optional changeable caption panels also offered) 2'H x 12' W BANNERS TOP AND BOTTOM APPENDIX 1 WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM 201 Daktronics Drive, PO Box 5128, Brookings, SD 57006 Phone: 1-800-325-8766 or 605-692-0200 Fax: 605-697-4746 DD2167442 091620 Page 2 of 8 DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS SEGMENT TIMER MODE The segment timer mode is ideal for keeping practices on schedule. The horn at the end of a segment allows coaches and athletes to focus on the practice and to listen for the horn when it is time to change drills (see SL-04004). TIME OF DAY MODE This scoreboard features a Time of Day (TOD) mode that allows it to act as a clock when the control console is unplugged or off. Refer to the scoreboard installation manual for instructions on how to enable the Time of Day mode. MOUNTING Scoreboard is typically mounted on two vertical beams or poles. Hardware to mount scoreboard on two beams is included; hardware for more beams is at additional cost. Standard mounting uses I-beam clamps. Optional mounting method using angle brackets is also offered; maximum beam width is 12" (305 mm) and maximum beam depth is 22" 559 mm). Refer to attached drawings for more information on mounting methods. SERVICE ACCESS Digit panels and electronics are serviced from the front of the scoreboard. GENERAL INFORMATION Scoreboard provides scoring capabilities for two teams. 100% solid state electronics are housed in an all aluminum cabinet. Scoreboard is shipped in one section. Scoreboard power is to be provided on a dedicated circuit to prevent loss of game information due to failure of another component on the circuit. Specifications and pricing are subject to change without notice. ADVERTISING/IDENTIFICATION PANELS Backlit & Non-Backlit: 1'-6" H x 12'-0" W (457 mm, 3.66 m) 2'-0" H x 12'-0" W (610 mm, 3.66 m) 2'-6" H x 12'-0" W (762 mm, 3.66 m) For additional non-backlit panel sizes, see SL-03761. OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES Scoreboard border striping Multiple caption and striping colors (see DD2101644) Team name caption in place of HOME Team names on changeable panels Baseball, football, and lacrosse/field hockey captions on changeable panels Horn Individual digit protective screens (see SL-04939) Protective netting (see DD2690927) Optional angle bracket mounting method Advertising/identification panels Decorative accents Electronic message centers and video displays in multiple sizes FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Installation Specifications: DWG-1157186 (attached) Standard I-beam Mounting: DWG-1052565 (attached) LVX I-Beam Mounting: DWG-3918361 (attached) Optional Pole Mounting: DWG-1048184 (attached) Component Locations: DWG-1073981 (attached) Architectural Specifications: See SL-05182 The Bluetooth® word mark and logos are registered trademarks owned by the Bluetooth SIG, Inc. and any use of such marks by Daktronics, Inc. is under license. CONTROL CONSOLES CONTROL OPTIONS All Sport® 1600* see SL-04352) May be upgraded to All Sport 5000 see SL-03991) Wired (standard): One-pair shielded cable of 22 AWG minimum is required. A cover plate with mounted connector and standard 2" x 4" x 2" (51 mm x 102 mm x 51 mm) outlet box is provided. Connector mates with signal cable from control console. Wireless (optional): 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio features 64 non-interfering channels and 8 broadcast groups (see SL-04370). RC-200 see DD3715714) Optional wireless handheld controller features 2.4 GHz spread spectrum radio with 64 non-interfering channels and 8-10 hours of operation via internal rechargeable battery. DAK Score & MX-1 see DD3888368) CUSTOMER-SUPPLIED mobile device or tablet with DAK Score app installed communicates via Bluetooth® wireless technology to an MX-1 Interface Box that controls the scoreboard through 2.4 GHz radio or wired connection. WWW.DAKTRONICS.COM E-MAIL: SALES@DAKTRONICS.COM All Sport® and PanaView® are trademarks of Daktronics, Inc. Martin Senour® is a registered trademark of its owner. DD2167442 091620 Page 3 of 8 Copyright © 2011-2020 Daktronics, Inc. Baseball Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown Football Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown Lacrosse/Field Hockey Mode – Optional vinyl captions shown PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST INNING PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST QTR PERIOD QTR HOME GUEST PERIOD ALTERNATE CAPTIONS & SCORING MODES DAKTRONICS SO-918 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCE BY ANY MEANS WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF DAKTRONICS, INC. COPYRIGHT 2013 DAKTRONICS, INC. DAKTRONICS, INC. AV DRAWN:DATE: SHEET JOB NO:REV OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD INSTALLATION 12' WIDTH SCOREBOARD INSTALLATION SPECS RSCHWAR 27 NOV 13 P 1647 E 10 A 1/16"=1' RSCHWAR 115718602 DATE:REV BY: 02 27 OCT 15 AMP UPDATED WIDE FLANGE AND FOUNDATION VALUES DATE:REV BY: 01 23 JUL 14 TJT UPDATED CLAMPS IN REAR AND SIDE VIEWANDADDED170WINDSPECCOLUMN REV DATE:BY: 01 21 FEB 12 CHANGED ROCKER TO I-BEAM KDD 02 07 MAR 12 ADDED STANDARD MOUNTING METHODS NOTES KDD 03 23 OCT 13 PER EC-12382; CHANGED BOLT TORQUE FROM 30 FT-LB TO 40 FT-LB NJM 04 06 JAN 14 ADDED ALLOWABLE TENSION AND SHEAR CAPACITY DETAILS JAVA 05 22 DEC 15 PER EC-22871; ADDED LUBRICANT NOTE PJS18704 THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THISDRAWINGARECONFIDENTIALANDPROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCEBYANYMEANSWITHOUTTHEEXPRESSWRITTENCONSENTOF DAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2016 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD TITLE:P1647; I-BEAM CLAMP MOUNTING DATE:22-DEC-15 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/8 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 05 DESIGN:MCARSRU JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE1052565DRAWN:MCARSRU P 1647 E -07 -A MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. PLACE SPRING NUTS INTO SCOREBOARD CHANNEL IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF VERTICAL BEAMS 2. LIFT SCOREBOARD INTO POSITION 3. MAKE SURE THE 1/2-13 BOLTS ARE AS CLOSE TO THE I-BEAM FLANGES AS POSSIBLE 4. WHEN SCOREBOARD IS ADJUSTED TO FINAL DESIRED POSITION, TIGHTEN BOLTS FIRMLY 5. IF FLANGE THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 3/4" THICK LONGER BOLTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CUSTOMER'S EXPENSE. STANDARD MOUNTING METHOD ALLOWABLE CAPACITY PER EACH CLAMP: SHEAR = 160 LBS TENSION = 2300 LBS SHEAR AND TENSION LOAD DIRECTION ARE AS INDICATED ON REAR ISOMETRICVIEWTENSIONSHEAR X SHEAR-Y CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES TOP VIEW VERTICAL BEAM - FLANGE THICKNESS MUST BE 1/4" - 3/4" OF SPRING NUT. BOLT MUST BE TIGHTENED TO 40FT-LB TORQUE 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT - BOLT THREAD MUST ENGAGE ENTIRE DEPTH 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER TO I-BEAM AND NUT I-BEAM CLAMP - ASSURE CLAMP IS TIGHTLY ENGAGED SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD FRONT OF SCOREBOARD EXPLODED REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW SPRING NUT CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT PPaarrtt ## -- DDWWGG--0011005522556655 VVeerrssiioonn -- 0055..11 DDeessccrriippttiioonn -- NN AA PP11664477;; II--BBEEAAMM CCLLAAMMPP MMOOUUNNTTIINNGG LLiiffeeccyyccllee SSttaattee -- FFuullll PPrroodduuccttiioonn LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd BByy -- ppsscchhrrooee LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd -- 22001155--1122--2222 6.000[ 152,4] TYP. SPACING REV DATE:BY: THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THISDRAWINGARECONFIDENTIALANDPROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCEBYANYMEANSWITHOUTTHEEXPRESSWRITTENCONSENTOFDAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2018 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARD TITLE:P1647; LVX I-BEAM CLAMP MOUNTING DATE:18-MAY-18 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/5 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 00 DESIGN:KDRAGT JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE3918361DRAWN:KDRAGT P1647 E -07 -B MOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. PLACE SPRING NUTS INTO SCOREBOARD CHANNEL IN LOCATIONS SHOWN IN TOPVIEW2. PLACE SPRING NUTS IN UNISTRUT IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF VERTICALBEAMS2. LIFT SCOREBOARD INTOPOSITION3. MAKE SURE THE 1/2-13 BOLTS ARE AS CLOSE TO THE I-BEAM FLANGES ASPOSSIBLE4. WHEN SCOREBOARD IS ADJUSTED TO FINAL DESIRED POSITION, TIGHTEN BOLTSFIRMLY5. IF FLANGE THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 3/4" THICK LONGER BOLTS WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE CUSTOMER'S EXPENSE. STANDARD MOUNTING METHOD ALLOWABLE CAPACITYPERCOLUMNCONNECTION: SHEAR = 185LBSTENSION = 2400 LBS SHEAR AND TENSIONLOADDIRECTIONAREASINDICATEDONREARISOMETRICVIEW CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES RECOMMENDED METHOD OF INSTALLATION:- INSTALL 1 1/2" BOLT, 1/2" LOCK WASHER, 1/2" FLAT WASHER USING SHALLOW SOCKET WITH EXTENSION.- ENTER FRO MSIDE OF UNISTRUT SECURING INSIDE BOLTS FIRST AND MOVING OUTWARD. VERTICAL BEAM - FLANGE THICKNESS MUST BE 1/4" - 3/4" 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT - BOLT THREAD MUST ENGAGE ENTIREDEPTHOFSPRINGNUT. BOLT MUST BE TIGHTENED TO 40FT-LB TORQUE 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER I-BEAM CLAMP - ASSURE CLAMP IS TIGHTLYENGAGEDTOI-BEAM AND NUT LONG SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD FRONT OF SCOREBOARD TOP VIEW EXPLODED REAR ROTATED VIEW SPRING NUT*** CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRINGNUTISTURNEDTOVERTICALPOSITIONINSIDEUNISTRUTCHANNEL I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCKWASHERTENSIONSHEAR X SHEAR-Y SCALE 1/8 3-1/4" UNISTRUT VERTICAL BEAM UNISTRUT SCOREBOARD I-BEAM CLAMP 1/2-13 X 3.000 BOLT 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" FLAT WASHER LONG SPRING NUT SIDEVIEWSCOREBOARDATTACHEMENT EXPLODED SIDEVIEWUNISTRUTATTACHMENTSCALE1/15 SEE DETAIL A DETAILASCALE1/4 SHORT SPRING NUT 3-1/4" UNISTRUT SCOREBOARD 1/2" FLAT WASHER 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2-13 X 1.500 BOLT PPaarrtt ## -- 00AA--11664477--11007744 VVeerrssiioonn -- 0000..22 DDeessccrriippttiioonn -- LLVVXX II--BBEEAAMM MMTTGG;; PP11664477 FFBB EEXXTT,, 44 CCOONNNNEECCTTIIOONNSS LLiiffeeccyyccllee SSttaattee -- FFuullll PPrroodduuccttiioonn LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd BByy -- kkddrraaggtt LLaasstt MMooddiiffiieedd -- 22001188--0055--2244 REV DATE:BY: 01 06 OCT 11 REPLACED VERTICAL I-BEAM WITH 6" X 6" SQUARE TUBE JAVA 02 20 SEP 12 PER EC-7114; REMOVED CHAMFER FROM 0M-133259 LMG 03 03 JULY 13 ADDED STRUCTURAL NOTE TTF 04 22 DEC 15 PER EC-22871; ADDED LUBRICANT WARNING PJS 18704 THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THISDRAWINGARECONFIDENTIALANDPROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCEBYANYMEANSWITHOUTTHEEXPRESSWRITTENCONSENTOF DAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2016 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION PROJECT:OUTDOOR SCOREBOARDS TITLE:P1647; POLE MOUNTING OPTIONS DATE:22-DEC-15 DIM UNITS:INCHES [MILLIMETERS]SHEET REV SCALE:1/5 DO NOT SCALE DRAWING 1 OF 1 04 DESIGN:DOPPELT JOB NO.FUNC - TYPE - SIZE1048184DRAWN:DOPPELT P 1647 E -10 -A NOTES: THREADED RODS RUN ALONG BOTH SIDES OF BEAM RODS DO NOT PASS THROUGH THE FLANGES OF THE BEAM NO DRILLING NECESSARY MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNEL OPENING ON SCOREBOARD CRITICAL*** DO NOT USE ANY LUBRICANT ON ANY MOUNTING HARDWARE OR WARRANTY WILL BE VOIDED STRUCTURAL NOTES: BOLT TORQUE: 30 FT-LB SIDE VIEW 1/2" FLAT WASHER, LOCK WASHER, AND NUT VERTICAL BEAM 1/2" THREADED ROD SPRING NUT SCOREBOARD REAR MOUNTING ANGLE TOP VIEW SCALE 1/10 1/2" FLAT WASHER LOCK WASHER, AND NUT 1/2" THREADED ROD VERTICAL BEAM FRONT OF DISPLAY SPRING NUT DISPLAY REAR MOUNTING ANGLE CRITICAL*** MAKE SURE SPRING NUT IS TURNED TO VERTICAL POSITION INSIDE SCOREBOARD CHANNEL REAR ISOMETRIC VIEW EXTRA THREADED ROD CAN BE CUT OFF THE CONCEPTS EXPRESSED AND DETAILS SHOWN ON THISDRAWINGARECONFIDENTIALANDPROPRIETARY. DO NOT REPRODUCEBYANYMEANSWITHOUTTHEEXPRESSWRITTENCONSENTOFDAKTRONICS, INC. OR ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES. COPYRIGHT 2018 DAKTRONICS, INC. (USA) THIRD ANGLE PROJECTION AH REV TITLE: PROJECT: INCHES [MILLIMETERS] DESIGN: SCALE: DIM UNITS:DATE:SHEET DO NOT SCALE DRAWING FUNC - TYPE - SIZE DRAWN:- JOB NO. OUTDOOR LEDSCOREBOARDSCOMPONENTLOCATION; SO-918-R/A/W LGROOTW 31 OCT 11 P1647 E 10 A 1=25 KDRAGT 107398105 REV DATE:BY: 01 17 DEC 13 KDD PER EC-12908, ADDED TEXT FOROPTIONALPERIODORQTRCAPTIONS REV DATE:BY: 02 14 APR 14 KDD PER EC-14117REMOVEOPTIONAL COLON NOTE REV DATE:BY: 03 27 FEB 15 KDB PER EC-17119, REMOVED DETAILAADDEDSIGNALOPTIONNOTECHANGEDMASTERTOPRIMARY REV DATE:BY: 04 08 JAN 19 KDM PER CN-70689, UPDATED LOCATION OF DAKTRONICS LOGO REV DATE:BY: 05 10 AUG 20 TAN PER CN-107858REMOVEDLABELS TO MOVE TO NEW STANDARAD FP FP S/P S/P PARKING C B A HAY BARN 2665 REIS TENNIS CENTER BELKIN INTERNATIONAL SQUASH COURTS 2667 JOHN T. OXLEY EQUESTRIAN CENTER 2664 NEW SWINE BARN 1059 NIEMAND ROBISON SOFTBALL FIELD 5032 SWINE BARN COMPLEX 1056 Multi-Pupose Fields Precinct 9 5032A VISTING DOUGOUT 5032F HOME DOUGOUT 5032G PRESS BOX 5032H SHED 5032E 5032A RUGBY SHED 2640 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 X-100 X-100 1 1 INTERIOR ELEVATION 1 X-100 SECTION MARKER 1 X-100 ENLARGED DETAIL CONSTRUCTION KEYED NOTE DEMOLITION KEYED NOTE DRAWING REVISION NOTE LINETYPE: TO BE PROVIDED / NEW LINETYPE: DEMOLITION / TO BE RELOCATED LINETYPE: EXISTING TO REMAIN 1 11 11 PHOTO/ VIEWREFERENCE1/ A-101 FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE: FACILITY: DESIGN:DRAWN:WWW.FCS. CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 Cornell University F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION T- 001 16315661 TITLE SHEET FE DESIGN EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 GENERAL T-001 TITLE SHEET CIVIL C-001 NOTES, LEGENDS, AND ABBREVIATIONS C-101 SITE UTILITY PLAN STRUCTURAL S-101 STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATIONS S- 501 DETAILSBUILDINGCODESUMMARYGENERAL SYMBOLS LEGEND SHEET INDEX PROJECT SCOPE SITE LOCATION -CORNELL UNIVERSITY RUGBY FIELD APPLICABLE CODES 2020 NYS BUILDING CODE PROJECT SUMMARY THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF 20 SF NEW STRUCTURE. BUILDING LIMITATIONS CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: N/A CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDS: N/A HIGH-RISE BUILDING: N/A EXTINGUISHING REQUIREMENT: N/ A OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: NOT APPLICABLE THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE THE CONCRETE FOOTINGS AND STEEL SUPPORT POSTS FOR THE NEW SCOREBOARD (BY OTHERS) AT THE RUGBY FIELD OFF PINE TREE ROAD. CORNELL UNIVERSITY RUGBY FIELD 5032A PINE TREE ROAD1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW MITCHELL STREET ELLIS HOLLOW ROAD 6"X 6"X 10"XX 10"XX E E E E E(DB)E(DB) T T T T E&T E&T T T T T TC TC TC(FO)TC(FO) 6"W 6"W HW HW HWD HWD 24"CW 24"CW CP CP 6"S&2"R 6"S&2"R 6"PCR 6"PCR 6"G 6"G x x SANITARY SEWER UTILITY SYMBOLS STORM SEWER OPEN DRAINAGE DITCH ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DIRECT BURIED TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELEC. & TEL. UNDERGROUND T.V. CABLE OVERHEAD T.V. CABLE UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOM. FIBER OPTICS WATER (POTABLE) HOT WATER (HEATING) HOT WATER (DOMESTIC) CHILLED WATER (SUPPLY & RETURN) CATHODIC PROTECTION (ANODE) CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATIONCP TS STEAM & CONDENSATE RETURN PUMPED CONDENSATE RETURN GAS VALVE UTILITY POLE OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE HYDRANT POST INDICATORVALVEP.I.V. STREETLIGHTOR TUNNELS VAULTS FENCE 815.6 GRADE ELEVATION 818 GRADE CONTOUR TREE REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY MATERIALS DESIGNATIONS EARTH BACKFILL GRAVEL BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CRUSHER-RUN LEDGEROCK CONCRETE SAND PAVEMENT REMOVAL/ REPLACEMENT EXISTING GRADE (TURF) CIVIL SYMBOLS TRAFFIC SIGN A.D.A. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SCOPE AREAS GROUND SNOW LOAD, Pg 40 PSF FLAT-ROOF SNOW LOAD, Pf N/A SNOW LOAD IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Is 0.80 THERMAL FACTOR, Ct 1.2 DRIFT SURCHARGE LOAD, Pd SNOW DRIFT WIDTH, w BASIC WIND DESIGN SPEED, V 103 MPH WIND EXPOSURE CATEGORY C RISK CATEGORY I FORCE COEFFICIENT, Cf MWRFS DESIGN PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, qz 19.7 PSF SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR, Ie 1.00 Ss 0.15g S1 0.05g ASSUMED SOIL SITE CLASS D SDS 0.160g SD1 0.08g SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY B SEISMIC FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM(S)STRUCTURAL STEEL NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED FOR SEISMIC RESISTANCE BASE SHEAR, V 40 LBS SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, CS 0.053 RESPONSE MODIFICATION COEFFICIENT, R 3 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE DESIGN PARAMETERS EXPOSURE FACTOR, Ce 1.0 SLOPED ROOF FACTOR, Cs N/A ALLOWABLE WIND DESIGN SPEED, Vasd 80MPHSNOW LOADSWIND LOADSSOIL DESIGN PRESSURE, ASSUMED 1500 PSF RAIN INTENSITY, i 2.35 INCHES/ HR SEISMIC LOADSN/A N/A 1.75 W_X__STEEL BEAM OF SIZE W_X__ STEEL COLUMN NEW CONCRETE A ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM AVG AVERAGE B BLDG BUILDING C CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLR CLEAR CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONT CONTINUOUS CRS COURSE( S)D DEMO DEMOLITION DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DN DOWN DWG DRAWING E EA EACH EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION EPDM RUBBER ROOF MEMBRANE EOR ENGINEER OF RECORD EQ EQUAL E), EXISTING EXIST EXT EXTERIOR F FDN FOUNDATION FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FRP FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER FT FOOT/FEET FTG FOOTING G GA GAGE GALV GALVANIZED H HT HEIGHT L LB(S) POUND( S)M MFR MANUFACTURER MAT MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM N N/A NOT APPLICABLE NTS NOT TO SCALE O O.C. ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER P PLUS OR MINUS PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PT PRESSURE TREATED Q QTY QUANTITY R REQ REQUIRED REV REVISION S SIM SIMILAR SF SQUARE FOOT/ FEET SS STAINLESS STEEL STL STEEL STD STANDARD T TOS TOP OF STEEL TYP TYPICAL U UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE V VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W W/ O WITHOUT WD WOOD SYMBOLS AND @ AT POUND(S)WIDE FLANGE MEMBERS A992, Fy = 50 KSI STRUCTURAL STEEL GRADES HSS RECTANGULAR MEMBERS CHANNELS AND ANGLES A500 GRADE B, Fy = 46 KSI A36, Fy = 36 KSI HSS ROUND MEMBERS A500 GRADE B, Fy = 42 KSI PLATES A572, Fy = 50 KSI PIPES A53, Fy = 35 KSI THREADED RODS F1554 GRADE 36, Fy = 36 KSI FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL: DATE:FACILITY:DESIGN:DRAWN: WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION. WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION C-001 16315661 NOTES,LEGENDS, AND ABBREVIATIONS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 GENERAL ABBREVIATIONS ADJ ADJACENT AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ALT ALTERNATE CC CENTER TO CENTER CLG CEILING CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COL COLUMN CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS DIM DIMENSION DTL DETAIL DWG DRAWING EXT EXTERIOR FF FINISHED FIN FINISHED GA GAUGE H HEIGHT INCL INCLUDED INT INTERIOR L LENGTH MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER RO ROUGH OPENING SHT SHEET STD STANDARD STL STEEL TYP TYPICAL VERT VERTICAL VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W WIDTH UTILITY ABBREVIATIONS ABND ABANDONED BITUM BITUMINOUS CB CATCH BASIN CO CLEANOUT CONC CONCRETE COND CONDENSATE CW CITY WATER (CITY OF ITHACA DOMESTIC AND FIRE WATER)CWS/ CWR CHILLED WATER SUPPLY/ RETURN DIA DIAMETER DW DOMESTIC WATER E ELECTRIC(AL) EL ELEVATION EXST EXISTING FT FEET FW FIRE WATER (CORNELL UNIVERSITY FIRE AND DOMESTIC WATER)HP HIGH POINT HYD HYDRANT ID INSIDE DIAMETER INV INVERT LP LOW POINT MH MANHOLE NG NATURAL GAS OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER PCR PUMPED CONDENSATE RETURN PIV POST INDICATOR AND VALVE PVMT PAVEMENT R RADIUS RD ROAD REF REFERENCE REQD REQUIRED STA STATION STM STEAM T TELEPHONE UD UNDERDRAIN W/ WITH W/ O WITHOUT X SANITARY XX STORM WATER DIG SAFELY NOTES (UDig NY)1.0 CLICK OR CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. STATE LAW REQUIRES YOU TO PLACE A LOCATION REQUEST WITH UDig NY PRIOR TO DIGGING OR EXCAVATING. CALL 811 OR 1-800-962-7962, OR SUMBIT A REQUEST ONLINE AT UDIGNY.ORG. YOU WILL RECEIVE A LOCATION REQUEST NUMBER AND A LIST OF MEMBER UTILITY COMPANIES THAT WILL BE NOTIFIED OF YOUR PLANNED DIGGING PROJECT.2.0 WAIT + LOCATE. ALLOW THE UTILITIES TIME TO LOCATE YOUR PROPOSED DIG SITE BY CONTACTING UDig NY AT LEAST 2 AND NOT MORE THAN 10 FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTING YOUR WORK, NOT COUNTING THE DAY OF YOUR CALL,WEEKENDS, OR HOLIDAYS.3.0 CONFIRM UTILITY RESPONSE. AFTER UDig NY HAS NOTIFIED MEMBER UTILITIES OF THE PENDING EXCAVATION, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE EACH OPERATOR HAS RESPONDED PRIOR TO DIGGING ON YOUR STATED COMMENCEMENT DATE.4.0 RESPECT THE MARKS. FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH THE MARKINGS AND THE LOCATIONS OF BURIED FACILITIES AT THE SITE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.5.0 DIG WITH CARE. DIG TEST HOLES TO VERIFY LOCATION, TYPE, SIZE,DIRECTION-OF-RUN, AND DEPTH OF THE MARKED FACILITY. C-001 GENERAL NOTES 1.0 COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHER ACTIVE CONTRACTORS IN PROXIMITY,SPECIFICALLY AWARDED CONTRACTOR FOR PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE WHICH INCLUDES WORK AT BOTH HUMPHREYS AND TRANSPORTATION.2.0 CONSTRUCTION OF APRONS, WALKS, CURBS, AND GUTTERS SHALL BE COMPLETED SUCH THAT ONE DRIVEWAY REMAINS ACTIVE AT ALL TIMES.3.0 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CLEAN, SAFE, AND ORDERLY WORKSITE AT ALL TIMES.1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEW CODES & GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. PERFORM ALL CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2020 NEW YORK STATE BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING CODES AND STANDARDS ARE REFERENCED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS:A. ACI 318-14 BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE B. AISC 360-16 SPECIFICATION FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS C. AISC 341-16 SEISMIC PROVISIONS FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL BUILDINGS D. ASCE7-16 MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES WITH SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TEMPORARY SHORING INCLUDING PROVIDING TEMPORARY SHORING DESIGNED UNDER THE SUPERVISIN OF A NEW YORK STATE-REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER WHERE NEEDED.TESTING & INSPECTIONS 1. OWNER SHALL RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN INSPECTION AGENCY TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING SERVICES. ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.2. CONCRETE CYLINDERS SHALL BE TAKEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. IN ABSENCE OF LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS, ONE SET OF 5 CYLINDERS SHALL BE TAKEN FOR EACH DAY'S POUR: (2) 7-DAY, ( 2) 28- DAY, AND 1) HOLD. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE 1. CLEAR COVER FOR REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE 3". 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD:A. SHOP DRAWINGS WITH REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT B. CEMENT PRODUCT DATA a. PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE I, TYPE II, OR TYPE I-II AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-150.C. AGGREGATE PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING GRADING D. MIX DESIGN PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING STRENGTH TESTS E. ADMIXTURE PRODUCT DATA a. WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494. HIGH RANGE WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES, OR SUPERPLASTICIZERS, SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494 TYPE F OR TYPE G.b. AIR-ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-260. AIR-ENTRAINMENT SHALL BE PER ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.3.1 WHERE AIR- ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES ARE USED.c. RETARDING AND ACCELERATING ADMIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-494. F. REINFORCEMENT MILL CERTIFICATES a. STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-615 AND SHALL BE GRADE 60. EPOXY COATED STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-775 AND SHALL BE GREADE 60. STAINLESS STEEL REINFORCING BARS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-955. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-1064. STAINLESS STEEL WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-1022.G. HOT WEATHER PROCEDURES AND/ OR COLD WEATHER PROCEDURES AS APPLICABLE 3. FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO MOISTURE, 15% TO 20% OF THE CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH CLASS F FLY ASH CONFORMING TO ASTM C-618. 4. NORMAL WEIGHT AGGREGATES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C-33 AND THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:a. COARSE AND FINE AGGREGATES MUST BE FROM A NYSDOT APPROVED SOURCE AND NOT BE FLAGGED FOR ASR.b. THE MINIMUM BULK SSD SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF THE COARSE AGGREGATE ON THE NEW YORK STATE DOT POSTED TEST RESULTS SHALL BE 2.67.c. THE MAXIMUM ABSORPTION OF THE COARSE AGGREGATE ON THE NEW YORK STATE DOT POSTED TEST RESULTS SHALL BE 1.2%5. THE DENSITY OF THE CONCRETE MIX SHALL BE 145 PCF +/- 5 PCF FOR NORMAL WEIGHT CONCRETE.6. CONCRETE DURABILITY DESIGN CLASSIFICATIONS PER ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.1.1 SHALL BE F3, C1, S0, AND W1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ACI FOR THOSE CATEGORIES. 7. CONCRETE PRODUCER SHALL VERIFY THAT SUBMITTED CONCRETE MIXES DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM WATER-SOLUBLE CHLORIDE ION LIMITS PER THIS EXPOSURE CLASS AS STATED IN ACI 318-14 TABLE 19.3.2.1. 8. THE WATER CEMENT RATIO SHALL BE 0.42 +/-0.03. THE CONTRACTOR IS NOT PERMITTED TO ADD MORE WATER THAN IS SPECIFIED ON THE SUBMITTED MIX DESIGNS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DELIVERY TICKET THE QUANTITY OF WATER WITHHELD AT THE BATCHING PLANT THAT CAN BE ADDED ONSITE.9. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4500 PSI UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.POST-INSTALLED ANCHORS 1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS ARE TO BE USED: HILTI HIT HY200R, DEWALT AC200+, DEWALT AC100+ GOLD, OR EQUAL EARTHWORK 1. THE VERTICAL BEARING PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 1500 PSF AND THE LATERAL BEARING PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 100 PSF PER THE 2020 BCNYS TABLE 1806.2 PRESUMPTIVE LOAD- BEARING VALUES. NO GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONDUCTED AT THIS LOCATION.2. IF UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL IS FOUND AT THIS LOCATION, FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE OVEREXCAVATED AND BEARING MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LEAN CONCRETE WITH A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2000 PSI.STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES STRUCTURAL STEEL 1. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE ASTM FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISC STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL" AND ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH AISC "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES."2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD:A. STEEL PRODUCT DATA INCLUDING STRENGTH OF MATERIAL B. STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS INCLUDING ERECTION PLANS AND PIECE DETAILS a. DEVELOPMENT OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE DETAILS FOR APPLICATIONS AND ASSEMBLY OF ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS; INCLUDE DETAILS OF CUTS, CONNECTIONS, HOLES, AND OTHER PERTINENT DATA; AND INDICATE WELDS BY STANDARD AWS 2.1 SYMBOLS SHOWING SIZE, LENGTH, AND TYPE OF EACH WELD. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION.b. NO FABRICATION SHALL PROCEED PRIOR TO SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL. SHOP DRAWINGS MARKED "REJECTED" OR "REVISE AND RESUBMIT" MAY NOT BE FABRICATED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL CHANGES BEING MADE.C. WELDERS' CERTIFICATIONS D. WELDING MATERIALS PRODUCT DATA 3. GRADES OF STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE PER TABLE THIS SHEET U.O.N.4. ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS TO BE MADE WITH GALVANIZED BOLTS CONFORMING TO ASTM A153, CLASS C AND SHALL BE HOT-DIP GALVANIZED.5. ALL NUTS SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A-563 DH OR ASTM A-194 2H.6. ALL WASHERS SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F-436. 7. ALL BOLT HOLES IN STEEL MEMBERS SHALL BE 1/16" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE NOMINAL SIZE OF THE BOLT USED, U. N.O. ON DRAWINGS.8. WELDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE" AWS D1.1-2006. ELECTRODES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 70 KSI AND BE LOW -HYDROGEN TYPE. THE LENGTH OF WELD SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS IS THE MINIMUM EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF THE WELD. ALL WELDS TO BE A MINIMUM 1/4" FILLET WELD U. N.O. ON DRAWINGS.9. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL SHALL BE PRIMED AND THEN PAINTED WITH TWO- PART SOLVENT-BASED EPOXY BY TNEMEC, PPG (E.G. PPG AMERLOCK 2 / SIGMACOVER 2, TNEMEC SERIES 27) OR EQUAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. STEEL WILL THEN RECEIVE A TOPCOAT OF CORNELL RED COLORED PAINT. COLOR OPTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR OWNER'S APPROVAL. ALL PAINT SELECTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER FOR APPROVAL.10. ALL STEEL SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH CAMBER UP EXCEPT WHERE NOTED OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS AND AT CANTILEVERS WHERE STEEL SHALL BE INSTALLED W ITH CAMBER DOWN.11. SPLICING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS WHERE NOT DETAILED ON THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AS TO LOCATION, TYPE OF SPLICE, AND CONNECTION TO BE MADE.STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES CONT'D 6" XX X X X X X XXX XXD IS IN TEGR ATO R HAY BARN 2665 JOHN T. OXLEY EQUESTRIAN CENTER 2664 RUGBY SHED 26408 7 0 875880X 878. 8 X 879. 5X 876. 3X 876. 5X 876. 5X 876. 4 8 7 5 8808808808 8 0 890890890X 881. 3 X 880. 1 X 895. 8X 886. 6 X 878. 9X879. 7875880885885885 885 8858908908 90 8908908 9 08958 9 5 895895895900X 900. 4X890. 5 XX 884. 0X 891. 2X 891. 4X 890. 2 875880880885X879. 5 X 883. 4 89089089589 5 9 1 0915920925930935X 911.7X 917.7X 925.3 X 933. 7X929. 2X 918. 6X 909. 0X902. 5 X 910.6X 917.4X 924. 1X 936. 2X935. 8X 889. 3X 889. 5X 889. 9X889. 6X 890. 7X 889. 6X 889. 7X 890. 5X 890. 6X 890. 6X 891. 1X 891. 6X 897. 5 8 9 5 895 8959 0 0 9 0 0 9009009 009 0 5 9 0 5 9 1 0 9 2 0 925 92 5925 93 0930930 9 3 5935X932. 9X931. 9X 932. 1X 932. 6X928. 6X 929. 2 X 931. 6X 934. 2X 901. 1X 912. 8X 906. 4X907. 9X915. 7X 909. 8X 902. 1X 933. 7X 934. 6X 934. 6X 933. 4X 934. 4X900. 2X 901. 4 X 901. 1X 900. 5 X 899. 2X 900. 0X 905. 6X 902. 9 X 904. 6X 933. 2X 933. 5X 933. 6X 931. 6X 935. 9X936. 5 9 3 5X 935. 6X 935. 7X 935. 6X 935. 3 885890890 8958 9 5 895 895 9009 0 5 905 9109 1 0915920925930935X 896.6X 904.2 X 910.3 X 919.5X 927. 4X933.1X 927. 8X918. 8X 910. 1X 898. 2X882. 1 94 0940940X 942. 2X 940. 9X 938. 4X 935. 7X 935. 3X 943. 9X 942. 8X 939. 7X 939. 7X 935. 6X935. 8X 936. 3X936. 4 9 4 0 940X943. 7909.80910.15POND 2POND 3POND 1A PP R OX . L O CAT I O N 1 6 " W PT- 5 8 "W 3 15" XX 1 2 "X X 1 2 "X X 1 2 " X X X X 1 76 27 27 ESA NI TARY DI SIN TEG RATO R APPROX. FIELD PERIMETER SEE 1/S- 101 FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL:ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:DATE: FACILITY:DESIGN:DRAWN:WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION C-101 16315661 SITE UTILITY PLAN Q. OLSEN-BIEBER EWK 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 1 05/15/24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/24 ISSUEFOR COORDINATED REVIEW SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"1 SITE UTILITY PLAN 0' 30'60'120'SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" 1. COORDINATE FOUNDATION LOCATIONS WITH EXISTING UTILITIES. 2. FOUNDATION LOCATIONS 7' - 6" NOTES: 1. COORDINATE SPACING OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WITH SCOREBOARD MANUFACTURER. 2. LOCATION OF SCOREBOARD HAS BEEN MARKED IN THE FIELD. 3. SEE DETAILS SHEET FOR BASE PLATE AND KICKER CONNECTIONS. FIELD WELDED KICKER CONNECTIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE IN LIEU OF BOLTED CONNECTIONS. W12X26 W12X26 CONCRETE FTG, TYP. 2 LOCS S-101 2 S-101 3 L4X4X5/ 16 SL O P E D U P ø 4 ' - 0 " ø 4' - 0" SCOREBOARD BY OTHERS NOTES: 1. COORDINATE CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS WITH SCOREBOARD MANUFACTURER 2. SLOPE TOPS OF PIERS OUTWARD SLIGHTLY SO THAT WATER CANNOT COLLECT ON THE TOP.3. STEEL POSTS AND KICKERS SHALL HAVE BASE PLATES PER DETAIL ON S-501.4. ELEVATIONS WERE MEASURED AT STAKE LOCATIONS. CONFIRM IN FIELD.T/PIER EL. 0'-3"B/PIER EL. -8'-6"T/COLUMN EL. 18'-0"GRADE EL. 0'- 0"CONCRETE PIER T/KICKER EL. 7'-0"GRADE EL. -1'-7"T/PIER EL. -1'-4"B/PIER EL. -10'- 1" GRADE VARIES SCOREBOARD, BY OTHERS POST, SEE PLAN FOR SIZE FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL: ELECTRICAL: MECHANICAL:DATE:FACILITY:DESIGN: DRAWN:WWW.FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION " ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION S- 101 16315661 STRUCTURAL PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER QCO 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 0' 2' 4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"1 STRUCTURAL PLAN 1 05/15/ 24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 2 09/03/ 24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATED REVIEWSCALE: 1/ 4" = 1'-0"2 ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/ FINISHED COLUMN END SURFACE CL COLUMN ANCHORRODCOL 2" NON-SHRINK GROUT T/CONCRETE EL SEE PLANS, DETAILS, OR SCHEDULES CL COLUMN CL COLUMN PROVIDE FOUR (4) 3/4" DIA. ANCHOR RODS EMBEDDED 1'-4" 5/16 NOTES: 1. POST BASE PLATE IS 1'-6" X 1'-0" X 1". 2. COLUMN STABILITY DURING ERECTION IS RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR 3. SEE TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4. PROVIDE 1-5/16" DIA. ANCHOR HOLES IN BASE PLATE WITH MIN. 2" X 1/4" THICK WASHER (SQUARE OR ROUND) 1' - 0" 1' - 6"2"7" 7"2" T/CONCRETE SETTING NUT AND PLATE WASHER 1/2" MINIMUM WASHER THICKNESS) OR SHIM AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION/ COORDINATION SQUARE OR ROUND PLATE WASHER WITH STANDARD HOLE SIZE HEAVY HEX NUT FULLY TIGHTENED DOUBLE NUTS OR HEX HEAD BOLT 3/4" DIA. ANCHOR ROD 1'-4" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT BOTTOM OF BASE PLATE ANCHOR ROD DETAIL 2" NONSHRINK GROUT 2" 4" 4"2" POST BASE PLATE 2"6"1/2"NOTES: 1. PROVIDE 8" X6"X1/2" PLATE FOR CONNECTION BETWEEN KICKER AND POST. 2. TYPICAL CONNECTION BOTH ENDS OF KICKER 1/4 1/4 2 1/4"2 7/ 8"ELEVATIONSECTION3@16" O. C. 2"( 23) #8 LONGITUDINAL BARS NOT TO SCALE1BASE PLATE DETAIL FACILITIES ENGINEERING ARCHIVE BAR CODEARCH/ CIVIL:ELECTRICAL:MECHANICAL:DATE:FACILITY:DESIGN:DRAWN:WWW. FCS.CORNELL.EDU IT IS A VIOLATION OF NEW YORK STATE LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT IN ANY WAY. IF THIS DOCUMENT IS ALTERED, THE ALTERING ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL AFFIX TO SUCH DOCUMENT THEIR SEAL AND THE NOTATION "ALTERED BY" FOLLOWED BY THEIR SIGNATURE, THE DATE OF SUCH ALTERATION, AND A SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERATION.WARNING REVISIONS ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 201 HUMPHREYS SERVICE BLDG ITHACA, NEW YORK 14853-3701 F O R R E V IE W P U R P O S E S O N L Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T IO N RUGBY SCOREBOARD FOUNDATION S-501 16315661 DETAILS Q. OLSEN-BIEBER QCO 5032A SEPTEMBER 03, 2024 210 PINE TREE ROAD ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850 1 05/15/ 24 ISSUE FOR 95% REVIEW 209/ 03/24 ISSUE FOR COORDINATEDREVIEW SCALE: APPENDIX 3 PHOTOGRAPHS FROM PINE TREE ROAD PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 PHOTO 1 GOAL POSTS PHOTO 2 GOAL POSTS Chris Balestra (she/her) Feb 12, 2025 at 8:48 am All - here is the Planning Department recommendation - I will also place this same comment in the "Detail" section of the sign permit: Planning sta has reviewed the proposed Rugby Scoreboard sign at 210 Pine Tree Road and compared it to Town Code Section 270-260B (sign review criteria), outlined below: 2) The Director of Planning or their designee shall consider the following criteria to make their recommendation on the acceptability of the proposed signs as to design, materials, illumination, placement, and size: a) Signs should be legible in the circumstances in which they are seen and layout should be orderly. The proposed sign is legible and the layout is orderly. b) Freestanding signs should be designed to be compatible with their surroundings and appropriate to the architectural character of the buildings near which they are placed. Sign panels and graphics on buildings should relate with and not cover architectural features or details and should be sized in proportion to them. The proposed freestanding sign is not located near a building – it will be installed on an existing Cornell Rugby athletic field that is more than 1,000 feet west of Pine Tree Road and placed more than 850 feet behind the nearest building, which is a Cornell-owned agricultural building that is not associated with the athletic use of the field. The sign is typical of an athletic scoreboard in terms of size and design, and, at 96 square feet in area, is much smaller than other existing scoreboards in the Town of Ithaca (e.g., 400s.f. Ithaca College Butterfield stadium sign, 350s.f. Ithaca College Freeman baseball field sign, 175s.f. Ithaca College Carp Wood Field sign, 115s.f. Valentino baseball field sign at Tutelo Park, etc.) c) Illumination should be appropriate to the character of the surroundings and shall be in accordance with the Town’s Outdoor Lighting Law. There is no exterior illumination associated with the sign. The proposed sign has elements of internal illumination (display of numbers/scores) that is not in accordance with the Sign Law. However, most of the sign is not illuminated, and the portions that contain illumination are designed to strictly show the scores during rugby games. Additionally, the sign is oriented away from residences and there will be no light spillage onto other properties. The nearest residences are more than 450 feet west, with thick woods between them and the proposed sign that will block any views and impacts of the sign on the residences. Finally, the application materials indicate that the field will not be used at night, so the sign will not need to be lit after dark. d) Monument signs are preferable to pole signs. Pole signs should be as low to the ground as practical. The proposed sign is a type of pole sign. A monument sign would not be practical in this case. e) Multi-use or multi-tenant signs located on the same premises should meet the requirements of §270-256C and F. The proposed sign is not a multi-tenant sign. This criterion does not apply. f) Landscaping should be installed and maintained at the base of a freestanding sign if such landscaping would improve the overall appearance of the sign. Landscaping would not improve the overall appearance of the sign and is not recommended. The Town Sign Law does not contain provisions that would accommodate a typical athletic scoreboard, so variances will be necessary to allow it. The height of the proposed sign exceeds the maximum height permitted in the Sign Law. The sign is also larger than permitted and contains elements of internal illumination. As noted in (b) above, there are other athletic scoreboards in the Town of Ithaca that are significantly larger (and have received similar approvals by the town). The proposed sign is oriented away from residences, so any potential visual impacts will be mitigated. The primary issue associated with the location of the proposed sign is its potential impact on a scenic view of known importance, per the Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory. The Inventory lists the view from Pine Tree Road as #9 of the top ten most scenic views in the town. However, given “Photo 1” in the application packet, and Planning sta s site visit of the property (photos listed in the attachments), it does not appear that the proposed sign will impact the scenic view in a way that will damage or impede the view. Given the design criteria above, we recommend approval of the proposed design, illumination, materials, and placement of the proposed sign. COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. February 21, 2025 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Sign Variance for proposed Cornell Rugby Sign located at 210 Pine Tree Road, Tax Parcel # 61.-1-9.2, Cornell University, Owner; John Pillar, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. Urban Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify): Forest Agriculture Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ NO YES b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, January 10, 2025 11:02 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]No Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1ShortEnvironmentalAssessmentForm - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Lori Kofoid From:heidi decoo <lastcedoo@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 7:50 PM To:Codes Subject:Request for variance ZBAA-25-2 I am writing in response to the request for variance ZBAA-25-2, Cornell's request re: the site known as the Cornell Rugby Field. My husband I request that you please deny granting Cornell's variance request. The area involved is close to the East Hill Recreation Way which is parallel to our community of Eastwood Commons. The Rec Way is a popular park for our immediate neighborhood and the many homes along the periphery, and the rest of the extended neighborhood. It is a source of great comfort to a lot of people, being as it is, a chance to walk, jog and contemplate nature's bounty. The proposed variance would produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and we believe would be a detriment to nearby properties. We hope that you will take our concerns under consideration as you reach your decision. The East Hill Recreation Way is a special place for anyone lucky enough to be able to use it. Thank you, Heidi DeCoo Carl Norton 1 Lori Kofoid From:chet gates-lupton <chetlupton@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 4:42 PM To:Codes Subject:Variance requst ZBAA-25-2 WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department I am writing in response to the request for variance ZBAA-25-2, Cornell’s request re: the site known as the Cornell Rugby Field. I strongly urge the Board to decline to grant that variance request. I am a rugby fan, and have attended a number of rugby matches at the site in question. And I agree that some type of scoreboard” displaying scores and possibly a game clock might be of benefit. However, I am also a resident in Eastwood Commons, a neighborhood very close to the site. In addition, I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD 1 Lori Kofoid From:Julie Tryon Brumsted <jtbrumsted@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 6:06 PM To:Codes Subject:Zoning Board Appeal for sign at 210 Pine Tree Road WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals: I have received a notice of this variance request because I live within 500 feet of the property seeking relief from the Town of Ithaca Code. Note that the letter I received regarding this matter was addressed to a previous owner, I have lived at 231#3 Strawberry Hill Circle for the past 6 months. My unit is in the back of the building, my patio, front porch and living room face the East Hill Rec Way and the open field beyond it. There is an entrance to the Rec Way just above my patio with little vegetation blocking my view. I can see all the way to barns on the far side of Pine Tree Rd. from my living room. It is unclear to me from Image 1 of the ZBA packet for this appeal where, exactly, this proposed sign would be and whether I would be able to see an 18-foot-high sign from my property. I am also not clear on where the location of the "significant tree cover on three sides" of the proposed scoreboard is. A very tall scoreboard in an open expanse is not something I want to see from my living room window. In my opinion, an 18' tall illuminated sign with banners is not compatible with the open fields and horse paddock surrounding the rugby field. If the Rugby Team has "coexisted peacefully with its current home for many years," why is there now a hardship that requires such a mismatched structure for the adjoining expanse of land? Please preserve the status quo as much as possible, it is a pleasant viewshed for me, my neighborhood and for the many users of nearby section the East Hill Recreation Way. Julie Brumsted 231#3 Strawberry Hill Circle Ithaca 1 Lori Kofoid From:Cora Ellen Luke <coraellen@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 9:43 AM To:Codes Subject:Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department I am a resident at Eastwood Commons and have lived here for 27 years. Through all that time I have also walked nearly every day on the recreation path very near the Rugby field. On that path I have walked to and from work, to and from shopping at East Hill Plaza, and for pleasure and exercise. Thus the path has enabled me to use my car less. The quiet and the natural beauty of the path has been a steady balm to the spirit, much needed now in these increasingly troubled times. I know this is true for me, and I have heard numerous others say the same. Children and adults alike enjoy the use of this path on a regular basis. The natural area through which the path travels is home to many animals, including birds, some of them rare species. Thus the path is used by many bird-watchers, including myself. Extra light, noise, and smells (some of which would likely occur due to the generator) would most certainly have a strongly negative impact on all of the above. I am most distressed to hear of the request for a variance. My neighbor, Chet Gates-Lupton, wrote the following letter to you. I strongly agree with everything he said. He said it so well, I am quoting, in italics, a part of his letter below (with his permission). I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD" Thank you for your consideration of these points. Sincerely, Cora Ellen Luke 1 Lori Kofoid From:Carolyn Young <carolynmaryyoung@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:19 AM To:Codes Subject:Comment on variance request WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Ithaca Town Planning Commission, I am writing in response to the proposed variance that Cornell University is requesting regarding a variance for signage at the rugby field on Pine Tree Rd. My husband and I are residents of Eastwood Commons and live close to the East Hill Recreation Way. We walk almost daily on this path (which is extremely well maintained by the Town of Ithaca). We have made many friends during these walks and it allows us to get to the grocery store, gym, bank, drug store, etc - meaning we use our car much less than we would otherwise. One of the best features of the trail is its wild nature. Despite being close to residential neighborhoods, it is filled with animals, plants and birds, making it an enjoyable, relaxing place to walk. It is used by a great many people for various forms of exercise, and those we talk with often speak of its beauty and serenity. The rugby field located behind the trail is currently unobtrusive. We have gone to watch rugby matches, and it does seem that it would be helpful to have some sort of sign to indicate scoring and timing. However, there does not seem to be any need for a large, lighted sign. The presence of such a sign would clearly affect those of us who use the trail regularly, as well as residents of Eastwood Commons. It doesn't seem to us that this variance is necessary or appropriate, and we strongly request that it be denied. Sincerely yours, Carolyn Young/ Richard Gerber 311 Strawberry Hill Circle, Unit 4 Ithaca, NY 14850 1 Lori Kofoid From:Cathy Mulvey <cathyathome48@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:24 AM To:Codes Subject:Cornell's Rugby Field area variance WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Greetings, I wanted to share that I moved to my neighborhood along the recreation trails near the location of the rugby field a few years ago. Yes, this home was the right fit for me, YET more importantly within my world is the "fit" I enjoy with the biking and walking trails nearby. They provide a way for me to transport myself to so many locations without using my car. Of course, since I am 76 years old, I appreciate the fact that they also provide a place for exercising. How much I enjoy the wildlife, peace, and quiet along the various trails is more delightful than I can express.The nearby rugby scoreboard, etc, would affect my neighborhood and our Ithaca community walking trails. I am not alone with these feelings regarding the recreational trail delights! An acquaintance sent the following letter to the town, and he has given me permission to include it within my letter. I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons. The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print): 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties. 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 2 Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD" Thank you for "listening," Regards, Cathy Mulvey 1 Lori Kofoid From:Mary Jacobus <mlj25@cam.ac.uk> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:42 AM To:Codes Subject::Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department As a resident of Eastwood Commons who backs onto the Eat Hill Rec Way which I use every day, I would like to second and third the comments copied below. Although a small wood across the EHRec Way blocks the sightline of any large board from my immediate condo, and I assume I recievedno notice because of this, the overall impact a few hundred yards along the ECRec way is not sheltered. The current spaort use is not a nuisance but a large illuminated board represents a potentiaion incursiion into an otherwise rural and undeveloped space. Mary Jacobus, 251 #2 Strawberry Hill Circle, Ithaca, NY 14850. Forwarded messages from other members of the EastHill Commons Residents' Assocation. From: Cora Ellen Luke <coraellen@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:43 AM Subject: Cornell's request for a variance at Rugby Field area To: <codes@townithacany.gov> I am a resident at Eastwood Commons and have lived here for 27 years. Through all that time I have also walked nearly every day on the recreation path very near the Rugby field. On that path I have walked to and from work, to and from shopping at East Hill Plaza, and for pleasure and exercise. Thus the path has enabled me to use my car less. The quiet and the natural beauty of the path has been a steady balm to the spirit, much needed now in these increasingly troubled times. I know this is true for me, and I have heard numerous others say the same. Children and adults alike enjoy the use of this path on a regular basis. The natural area through which the path travels is home to many animals, including birds, some of them rare species. Thus the path is used by many bird-watchers, including myself. Extra light, noise, and smells (some of which would likely occur due to the generator) would most certainly have a strongly negative impact on all of the above. I am most distressed to hear of the request for a variance. My neighbor, Chet Gates-Lupton, wrote the following letter to you. I strongly agree with everything he said. He said it so well, I am quoting, 2 in italics, a part of his letter below (with his permission). I am (as are many, many others) a daily user of the East Hill Recreation Way, which I believe is a Town Park, and which extremely closely parallels the rugby site. A scoreboard of the size that Cornell wants to erect would very very, negatively affect both my neighborhood and the rec. trail patrons.* The Zoning Board’s Criteria for Area Variances include the following, along with my comments thereon (in bold print):* 1. Whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance. The proposed variance would definitely produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and would be a detriment to nearby properties.* 2. Whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some other method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than the area variance. The benefit sought by Cornell can certainly be achieved by other methods, such as a very significantly reduced scoreboard size, or adoption of different methods of posting on-going match scores. * 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested variance is substantial, given the character and nature of the area in which the site is located.* 4. Whether the proposed area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed variance will have an adverse effect and impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood.* Chet Gates-Lupton, LCSW, JD"* Thank you for your consideration of these points. Sincerely, Cora Ellen Luke You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Eastwood Commons, Ithaca" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to eastwood-commons-ithaca+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/eastwood-commons- ithaca/CAJTRN_YsZziBN8Nm510hp1szBJ3GouEBRJjt-ys6JQ7PtnwKpA%40mail.gmail.com. Town of Ithaca January 22, 2025 ZBAA-25-3 Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 1/14/2025 Primary Location 412Worth StUnit Ivan Martynenko Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner Rachel & Jared Webb 2426 Eunice St Ithaca, Ny 14850 Applicant JaredWebb 801-709-0637 jeejaw@gmail.com 108 Elston Pl Apt 3 Ithaca, NY 14850 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 59.-1-10 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes GML-239 Reason for Review* A municipal boundary Type of Variance Appearance Date for Variance 2/25/25 Variance Code Language TBD - Side yard setback Variance Code Section ZBAA-25-3 about:srcdoc 1 of 9 1/22/2025, 10:26 AM Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance)Materials For GML-239 Were Sent Deadline for Hearing Notice to Journal Public Hearing Notice Was Sent Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent Date Sign Was Picked-up Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members Historical Only Address affiliated with request Status Applicant's Information Applicant is* Property Owner Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No Description ZBAA-25-3 about:srcdoc 2 of 9 1/22/2025, 10:26 AM Brief Description of Variance Request* We own this parcel and the adjacent parcel to the west, number 66.-4-3. We bought both parcels in 2023 in a single transaction with the intention of building our home. We have submitted a site plan that treats the two parcels as a single parcel that respects the required city and town setbacks. Per Marty Mosely, the Director of Code Enforcement, the code requires a 10' setback from the town/ city boundary. Since the boundary passes through the middle of the lot, the buildable area on the lot is much too small to build a reasonable home. For this reason we are requesting this variance. Area Variance Criteria Form 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties?* No Reasons: There are several other homes in the immediate vicinity that build across the boundary as well, so this is not a unique exception. We are building a modest 3 bedroom home that is similar to many of the other homes in the immediate area. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance?* No Reasons: The setback from the town/city boundary reduces the buildable area on the lot so that a house cannot be built. ZBAA-25-3 about:srcdoc 3 of 9 1/22/2025, 10:26 AM 3. Is the requested variance substantial?* No Reasons: In my opinion this is not a substantial variance. It is a request to build in line with what has already been built in the neighborhood. 4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood?* No Reasons: Building here will improve water management in the neighborhood and add single family housing to an otherwise difficult lot. 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created?* No Reasons: Affidavit ZBAA-25-3 about:srcdoc 4 of 9 1/22/2025, 10:26 AM The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. Digital Signature* Jared Anthony Webb Jan 14, 2025 Meeting Date 02/25/2025 PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E-check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Attachments denial_letter.pdf Uploaded by Jared Webb on Jan 14, 2025 at 10:18 AM narrative_for_appeal.pdf Uploaded by Jared Webb on Jan 14, 2025 at 10:52 AM Determination/Denial Letter Narrative ZBAA-25-3 about:srcdoc 5 of 9 1/22/2025, 10:26 AM Jared Webb <jeejaw@gmail.com> 412 Worth St. Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 9:29 AM To: Jared Webb <jeejaw@gmail.com> Cc: Gary Bush <gbush@specconsulting.com>, Cassie Ryan <cassie@carinaconstruction.com>, Matt Haney matt@carinaconstruction.com> Jared, Based on my review of the project, it appears that you would need one area variance for a side yard setback. Per section 270-82C, of Town of Ithaca Code, a side yard setback of 10’ is required, where you are proposing a 0’ side yard setback. Please feel free to use this email as an official denial notice to apply for an area variance. An area variance can be applied for at the following link: Zoning Board of Appeals - Zoning Board of Appeals - ViewPoint Cloud If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Quoted text hidden] 1/14/25, 10:18 AM Gmail - 412 Worth St. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=e418d1de4b&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1820781962009904714&simpl=msg-f:1820781962009904714 1/1 COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. January 31, 2025 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Area Variance for proposed Single Family Home located at 412 Worth Street, Tax Parcel #59.-1-10, Ivan Martynenko, Owner; Jared Webb, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, arH adjoining Rr near the proposed action 5. Urban Rural (non-agriculture) ,ndustrial Commercial Residential (suburban) TXaWLF 2WKHr 6SHFLI\Forest Agriculture Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? F.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near WKH site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable ZaWHr: _________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ NO YES a. 'RHV WKH SrRMHFW VLWH FRnWaLn Rr LV LW VXbVWanWLaOO\ FRnWLJXRXV WR a bXLOGLnJ arFKaHRORJLFaO VLWH Rr GLVWrLFW ZKLFK LV OLVWHG Rn WKH 1aWLRnaO Rr 6WaWH 5HJLVWHr RI +LVWRrLF 3OaFHV Rr WKaW KaV bHHn GHWHrPLnHG b\ WKH RPPLVVLRnHr RI WKH 1<6 2IILFH RI 3arNV 5HFrHaWLRn anG +LVWRrLF 3rHVHrYaWLRn WR bH HOLJLbOH IRr OLVWLnJ Rn WKH 6WaWH 5HJLVWHr RI +LVWRrLF 3OaFHV" arFKaHRORJLFaO VLWHV Rn WKH 1< 6WaWH +LVWRrLF 3rHVHrYaWLRn 2IILFH 6+32 arFKaHRORJLFaO VLWH LnYHnWRr\" NO YES a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ NO YES b. ,V WKH SrRMHFW VLWH Rr an\ SRrWLRn RI LW ORFaWHG Ln Rr aGMaFHnW WR an arHa GHVLJnaWHG aV VHnVLWLYH IRr Page 3 of 3 4.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that ZRXOG result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g.retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain WKH purpose and size RI WKH LPSRXnGPHnW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been WKH subject of remediation (ongoing Rr completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor name: BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB______________________BBBBBBBBB __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________7LWOH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, January 14, 2025 10:22 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]No Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] No Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] No Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1ShortEnvironmentalAssessmentForm - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Lori Kofoid From:Vivek Iyer <iowagrad@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:20 PM To:Codes Subject:Re: variance for 412 Worth St Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hello, My name is Vivek Iyer. My address is 309 Worth St in the City of Ithaca. My wife and I built our house in 2013. I am emailing you in support of the variance appeal made by the owner(s) of 412 Worth St. I am happy that someone is building a house on that lot. The requested variance is entirely reasonable. I hope the Town grants the appeal and makes the homebuilding process easy for the owner(s). Thank you. Sincerely, Vivek Iyer 309 Worth St To whom it may concern: We are seeking a variance to construct a modest single-family home on our property, which consists of two contiguous parcels bisected by the boundary between the City of Ithaca and the Town of Ithaca. Strict adherence to the Town Code requiring a 10-foot setback from this boundary would render the lot unbuildable, leaving no usable area for construction. The unique circumstances of the lot’s location create a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship. The property currently sits vacant and underutilized, contributing neither to local housing needs nor the tax base. Without relief from the setback requirement, the property cannot be developed. We have spoken with the directors of code enforcement for both the City and the Town of Ithaca, who have expressed support for development of this lot and recognize the setback requirement as a barrier in this case. Our proposed home will comply with all other zoning and building code requirements and will be designed to align with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. We respectfully request relief from the 10-foot setback requirement to make reasonable and productive use of this property and contribute to the community’s housing stock. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jared Webb 10' - 0"10' - 0"2 5' - 0"25' - 0" 100' - 51/2"90' - 9 1/2" Neighboring StructuresNeighboring StructuresNew HouseTown/City BoundaryCity of IthacaTown of IthacaP ri v ate Driv eway 30' - 0"W al kw 854' 855' 856' 8 5 7 ' 858' 859' 8 6 7 ' 850' 851' 852' 8 5 3 ' 8 5 4 ' 855' 8 5 6 ' 8 5 7 ' 8 5 8 ' 8 5 9 ' 8 6 0 ' 8 6 1 ' 862' 863' 864' 865' 866' 8 6 0 ' 861' 862' 863' 864' 8 6 1 Lori Kofoid From:Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 10:18 AM To:Lori Kofoid Subject:FW: Comment on ZBAA-25-3 Appeal of Jared Webb, owner of 412 Worth St., Ithaca, NY 14850 Attachments:412 Worth St original easement for access to lot from Worth Street.pdf Emily Banwell Administrative Assistant II Code Enforcement & Zoning Dept Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850 607-273-1783 From: Rowland Laedlein <rskclaedlein@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 9:53 AM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Subject: Comment on ZBAA-25-3 Appeal of Jared Webb, owner of 412 Worth St., Ithaca, NY 14850 WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department I received notice of the above noted appeal and wanted to submit comments. First, the appeal request to reduce the side setback from 10 feet to 0 feet does not appear to me to create any problem. I would support such a change. Secondly, and this may not even be the appropriate place to raise this issue, it is difficult to determine from the documents found on the Public Hearing site exactly what the plans are for the area designated on the Grading Plan C4 as a Driveway 1400 sq.ft. Part of the identified area is actually owned by the Belle Sherman Cottages Homeowners Association and an easement was granted and filed on November 18, 2016, a copy of which is attached. This easement grants access to the lot from Worth Street and the easement remains with the lot in perpetuity. We are writing to ensure that any permanent change in the area of easement, such as paving or asphalting, not be permitted without discussion and approval of the Belle Sherman Cottages Homeowners Association. Since the lot owner will likely be reviewing the appeals hearing, comments, and results, I am submitting this concern for their attention. 2 Rowland Laedlein 107 Walnut Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Town of Ithaca February 18, 2025 ZBAS-25-1 Zoning Board of Appeals Sprinkler Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 1/10/2025 Primary Location 170McGowan Woods RdUnit Cornell University Grounds Storage 1 Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner Cornell University Cornell Real Estate Dept 15 Thornwood Dr Ithaca, NY 14850 Applicant DaviesOrinda 607-255-0441 doo4@cornell.edu Cornell University 119 Humphreys Service Building Ithaca, NY 14853 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 64.-1-2.2 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes Type of Variance Sprinkler Variance Appearance Date for Variance 2/25/25 Variance Code Language ZBAS-25-1 Appeal of Cornell University, Owner of 170 McGowan Woods Rd., Ithaca NY, 14850; Davies Orinda, Applicant/Agent; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code sec on 225-3 (New buildings required to have sprinkler systems) for a proposal to construct a storage building without a sprinkler system. The property is currently located in the Cornell Precinct 7 Special Land Use District, Tax Parcel No. 64.-1-2.2 Variance Code Section 225-3 Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance)Materials For GML-239 Were Sent 01/13/2025 ZBAS-25-1 about:srcdoc 1 of 7 2/18/2025, 12:22 PM Public Hearing Notice Was Sent Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent 02/14/2025 Date Sign Was Picked-up 02/12/2025 Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members 02/14/2025 Applicant's Information Applicant is* Property Owner Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No Description Brief Description of Variance Request* Cornell University is proposing to construct a new pole barn style storage building for the Grounds Department at their location at McGowan Woods Road. The proposed pole barn storage will include: 1. Approximately 4,800 SF enclosed single-story structure with an open layout and metal panel siding. The space will be served by two, 10’ wide overhead doors on both sides of its 40’ width and a total of three, man doors. 2. Approximately 2,400 SF roof covered area with open sides. 3. It will be unconditioned with no heating or cooling equipment in the building. The university is requesting a variance from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board for sprinkler coverage in the storage building. Sprinkler Variance Criteria Form Examples of Information for Question (1.): Estimated cost of a sprinkler system for this structure Cost of the structure or assessed value Size and shape of structure (architectural drawings) Presence or absence of water or heating systems in structure 1. Will the strict application of the Sprinkler Chapter of the Town Code create a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship?* Yes ZBAS-25-1 about:srcdoc 2 of 7 2/18/2025, 12:22 PM Proof: The storage building will be unconditioned; therefore, a wet sprinkler system cannot be installed. A dry sprinkler system would also require that a portion of the building must be heated in the area that contains the dry sprinkler valve. There is no other reason to provide heat in the building which aligns with the University's sustainability goals. Providing heat in the building would significantly add to the complexity of the building and provide an additional possible source of ignition. Examples of Information for Question (2.): Building use and layout (floor plan) Site Plan (location of building on property and relation to other structures) Building construction materials and methods Occupancy and number of occupants Forms of alternative mitigation 2. Will the omission of an approved sprinkler system from all or part of the building significantly jeopardize human life?* No Proof: The building is intended for equipment storage, not human occupancy. The open layout, proposed three man doors, two overhead doors and fire extinguishers will provide suficient egress options and safety in case of a fire hazard. The longest travel distance to an exit will be 30', so anyone dropping off or picking up equipment can exit in less than a minute. The lack of heating equipment also substantially reduces the sources of ignition. Affidavit The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. Digital Signature* Davies Orinda Jan 10, 2025 ZBAS-25-1 about:srcdoc 3 of 7 2/18/2025, 12:22 PM PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E- check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Historical Only Address affiliated with request Attachments Permit Denial for BLD 24-244.pdf Uploaded by Davies Orinda on Jan 10, 2025 at 10:16 AM Cornell Grounds Department Storage Building Site Plan and Proposed Floor Plan.pdf Uploaded by Davies Orinda on Jan 10, 2025 at 2:15 PM REQUIRED SEAF_Cornell Grounds Dept Pole Barn Storage.pdf Uploaded by Davies Orinda on Jan 10, 2025 at 2:13 PM REQUIRED 2025.01.11_Grounds Department Storage Building Sprinkler Variance Application.pdf Uploaded by Davies Orinda on Jan 10, 2025 at 12:53 PM Record Activity Davies Orinda started a draft Record 01/09/2025 at 6:01 pm Davies Orinda added file Permit Denial for BLD 24-244.pdf 01/10/2025 at 10:16 am Determination/Denial Letter Survey and/or Plans Environmental Assessment Form 2025.01.11_Grounds Department Storage Building Sprinkler Variance Application.pdf ZBAS-25-1 about:srcdoc 4 of 7 2/18/2025, 12:22 PM 1 Davies O. Orinda From:Mark Stonier <MStonier@townithacany.gov> Sent:Monday, December 30, 2024 12:47 PM To:Davies O. Orinda Subject:Permit Denial for BLD 24-244 Davies, This permit from Cornell for the proposed new storage barn will remain on hold until a variance is potentially approved by the towns ZBA board. A sprinkler variance will have to applied for and might be approved as our local law dictates that new commercial structures in the town of the size Cornell is proposing must be sprinklered for fire protection. Best, Mark Stonier Electrical Inspector/ Code Enforcement Officer Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 mstonier@townithacany.gov 607)273-1783 ext.116 The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and intended only for the individual or entity to whom or which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, alteration, or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e- mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone (607-273-1783), or by return e-mail, and delete this e- mail message. Cornell - Grounds Department Pole Barn Storage Building 1 Ground Department Pole Barn Style Storage Building Sprinkler Variance Application Materials Cornell University Ithaca, NY January 11, 2025 Cornell - Grounds Department Pole Barn Storage Building 2 January 11, 2025 Zoning Board Members, Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Sprinkler Variance for the Grounds Department Storage Pole Barn Dear Town of Ithaca Zoning Board Members: Cornell University is proposing to construct a new pole barn style storage building for the Grounds Department at their location at McGowan Woods Road. Cornell University is requesting a variance from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board for sprinkler coverage in the storage building. Enclosed please find zoning board of appeals applications, proposed project narrative and the preliminary drawings for the project. The application fee will be provided separately. Sincerely, Davies Orinda, Project Manager Cornell - Grounds Department Pole Barn Storage Building 3 Contents 1.0 Project Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Illustrarive map ................................................................................................................................ 5 3.0 Proposed Plan Layout ...................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Sprinkler Variance Criteria Form ...................................................................................................... 7 Cornell - Grounds Department Pole Barn Storage Building 4 1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY Cornell University is proposing to construct a new pole barn style storage building for the Grounds Department at their location at McGowan Woods Road. a. Program needs i. Approximately 40’ x 120’ enclosed metal panel structure on reinforced concrete floor w/10’ overhangs on either end. ii. The storage building will be unconditioned. There will be no heating or cooling equipment in the building. iii. Overhead and man doors at either end of the structure plus an additional man door at mid-point of the length of the structure. iv. 15’ wide aisle for moving equipment. v. Basic electrical for utility lights and a few convenience outlets. vi. Four Fire Extinguishers, one on each wall. vii. No toilet rooms are required; the facility will be within 500’ of the Grounds Department’s office building with toilet room facilities. viii. Storm water mitigation, vehicular and pedestrian site improvements. b. Code Compliance i. Project will fully comply with New York State Codes. ii. Project will fully comply with Town of Ithaca Codes other than sprinkler coverage in the building. Cornell - Grounds Department Pole Barn Storage Building 7 4.0 SPRINKLER VARIANCE CRITERIA FORM NYS Code does not require a sprinkler system to be installed in an S-1 occupancy, single story storage pole barn with an area that is less than 12,000 SF. The Town of Ithaca has a more restrictive sprinkler system requirements that requires a storage building exceeding 400 SF to have a sprinkler system that complies with NY State code requirements and NFPA standards. NFPA 13 is the standard that regulates sprinkler systems in non-residential buildings. The proposed pole barn storage will include: Approximately 4,800 SF enclosed single-story structure with an open layout and metal panel siding. The space will be served by two, 10’ wide overhead doors on both sides of its 40’ width and a total of three, man doors. Approximately 2,400 SF roof covered area with open sides. Town Code requires sprinklers in any storage structure larger than 400 SF. We are requesting a variance to not require sprinklers in the storage pole barn. 1. Will the strict application of the Sprinkler Chapter of the Town Code create a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship? Yes. The storage building will be unconditioned; therefore, a wet sprinkler system cannot be installed. A dry sprinkler system also requires a portion of the building to be heated in the area that contains the dry sprinkler valve. There is no other reason to provide heat in the building which aligns with sustainability goals. Providing heat in the building would significantly add to the complexity of the building and provide an additional possible source of ignition. 2. Will the omission of an approved sprinkler system from all or part of the building significantly jeopardize human life? No. The building is intended for equipment storage, not human occupancy. The open layout, proposed three man doors, two overhead doors and fire extinguishers will provide sufficient egress options and safety in case of a fire hazard. The longest travel distance to an exit will be 30’ so anyone dropping off or picking up equipment can exit in less than a minute. The lack of heating equipment also substantially reduces the sources of ignition. COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. January 16, 2025 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Sprinkler Variance for proposed Cornell Pole Barn located at 170 McGowan Woods Road, Tax Parcel #64.-1-2.2, Cornell University, Owner; David Orinda, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability Page 1 of 3 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 – Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, administrative rule, or regulation? If Yes, attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. NO YES 2.Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: NO YES 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? __________ acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? __________ acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? __________ acres 4.Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. Urban Rural (non-agriculture) Industrial Commercial Residential (suburban) Aquatic Other(Specify): Forest Agriculture Parkland Page 2 of 3 5.Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? NO YES N/A 6.Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? NO YES 7.Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes, identify: ________________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 8.a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? b.Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed action? NO YES 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements, describe design features and technologies: NO YES 10.Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? If No, describe method for providing potable water: _________________________________________ NO YES 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ______________________________________ NO YES 12. a. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? NO YES 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: _____________________ NO YES b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Page 3 of 3 14.Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: Shoreline Forest Agricultural/grasslands Early mid-successional Wetland Urban Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal, or associated habitats, listed by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? NO YES 16.Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan?NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? If Yes, briefly describe: NO YES 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g., retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)? If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment:______________________________________________ NO YES 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste management facility? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes, describe: _______________________________________________________________________________ NO YES I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Date: _____________________ Applicant/sponsor/name: ____________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature: _____________________________________________________Title:__________________________________ EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, January 10, 2025 1:39 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental Area] No Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] No Part 1 / Question 12b [Archeological Sites]Yes Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Regulated Waterbodies] No Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal] Yes Part 1 / Question 15 [Threatened or Endangered Animal - Name] Rusty-patched Bumble Bee Part 1 / Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain]Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 / Question 20 [Remediation Site]No 1ShortEnvironmentalAssessmentForm - EAF Mapper Summary Report EXHIBIT GG Network Engineering Group 225 Jordan Road Troy, New York 12180 N e t w o r k E n g i n e e r i n g - U P N Y 1 2 7 5 J o h n S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 0 W est H e n r iet t a , N e w Y o r k 145 8 6 Oct. 21st, 2024 Hon. Members of the Planning Board Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY, 14850 RE: Evidence from a licensed engineer that smaller and shorter towers will not achieve the necessary coverage goals sought by VZW (not smaller towers on the same property, but smaller/shorter facilities in the area, possibly collocated on existing structures and/or telephone poles, and the like) Honorable Members of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board: During the PB meeting held on Oct 1st, 2024, some members of the public raised the suggestion of shorter towers located elsewhere, instead of a 134’ tall monopole at 111 Wiedmaier Court. Verizon RF engineering team reviewed these suggestions and concluded that shorter towers (or smaller cells) will fail to achieve the site objectives for the following reasons. The proposed “Sunny View” site is proposed as a macro telecommunication tower since it is designed to be the backbone (anchor) network solution throughout the area it is intended to provide coverage. When compared with a small cell site alternative (or a cluster of smaller cell sites) in a rural area like this which is subject to significant terrain, large geographic coverage area and laced with foliage challenges the small cell coverage capability is unsuitable. Small cells or smaller macro tower sites would be blocked (shadowed) by terrain and foliage rendering them ineffective. This macro tower site will provide the requisite coverage throughout the objective area, contiguous for several miles, making this solution appropriate for the challenging morphology and less densely populated area. Small cell sites are intended to cover a much smaller area, typically a few hundred feet, and are better suited for dense urban environments or specific locations where their smaller footprint can be engineered to provide hotspot coverage or capacity enhancements (complimentary to the area macro site). Macro sites have the structural capability of deploying Verizon’s numerous licensed bands of spectrum through the more capable macro antennas where small cells are limited in antenna size/number/weight not to mention small cells do not offer the necessary physical space to house all of the equipment needed to support this proposed site’s radio configuration. A macro site must be installed on a strategically and centrally located tall structure (relative to the objective area) for several key reasons. For instance, LOS (Line Of Sight), towers that are above area “clutter” provide a clear line of sight between the antenna and the devices it serves, which is crucial for maintaining adequate and reliable signals, especially for higher frequency bands including but not limited to AWS, PCS, and C-band. These higher frequency bands have shorter wavelengths but wider bandwidth capabilities. Another reason is coverage footprint (service area). As antenna height increases so does the site’s coverage capabilities. In order for the proposed site to be effective throughout this objective area the antennas must be located above area clutter in order to overcome physical obstructions such as buildings, trees, and terrain features. By strategically locating the antenna above these obstacles, the signal can propagate without excessive and unwanted signal degradation allowing the site to serve the users as intended. In this case Verizon Wireless RF has determined that one centrally located solution of adequate elevation (130’ ACL at the proposed location) will resolve the identified area problems and minimize community impact (minimize tower proliferation). Previously discussed alternatives of lowering the antenna centerline will result with the site being incapable of solving the area problems. Further discussion of adding additional smaller sites resulting with a higher number of towers in this area is counterintuitive to minimizing community impact and results with multiple sites that do not achieve objectives perpetuating the need for even more sites and greater community impact. In summary an alternative deployment located on new or existing smaller structures including utility poles) is impractical as they have too many limitations including but not limited to low antenna centerline, equipment space/size/power constraints, and structural limitations causing gaps in coverage and inability to achieve objectives stated in the RF Justification. Simply put utility poles or other smaller towers or structures are not capable of supporting the equipment and coverage requirements needed for this project area. In view of the aforementioned details, in order for the “Sunny View” facility to successfully achieve the necessary RF objectives, it must be a macro site on a new 134’ tall monopole (130’ ACL) instead of a small cell site (or a cluster of smaller cell sites) on new or existing structures. This macro solution will provide adequate and reliable coverage to the southern portion of the Town of Ithaca known as the “Sunny View” project area. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Wasif Sharif Wasif Sharif Radio Frequency (RF) Design Engineer EXHIBIT HH Network Engineering Group 225 Jordan Road Troy, New York 12180 N e t w o r k E n g i n e e r i n g - U P N Y 1 2 7 5 J o h n S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 0 W est H e n r iet t a , N e w Y o r k 145 8 6 October 28, 2022 Hon. Members of the Planning Board Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY, 14850 RE: With respect to Town Code and the stated limitations on analysis there is arguably no finding of “significant gaps” based only on the RF propagation plots for existing low-band RF coverage. Honorable Members of the Town of Ithaca Planning Board: Verizon RF engineering team reviewed Mr. Bill Johnson’s letter dated 10/21/2024, and would like to provide further explanation on comment made by Mr. Johnson “with respect to Town Code and the stated limitations on analysis there is arguably no finding of “significant gaps” based only on the RF propagation plots for existing low-band RF coverage”. Exhibit H slide 17 displays existing low band coverage of Verizon Wireless, note that the coverage shown on slide 17 is outdoor coverage and for an RF signal to reach out to an in- building (or in-vehicle) user, it must penetrate through different structures (or vehicle) which introduces additional 10-20dB losses. As stated on Slide 17, the large orange coverage areas near the proposed site are subject to variable coverage conditions including fading and seasonality gaps, which means if outdoor coverage is orange (refer Exhibit H, Slide 12), indoor coverage (RSRP) will be 10 to 20dB below -105dBm, which is a significant coverage gap. Below is zoomed image from Slide 17 that displays a number of dwellings (located in targeted service improvement area) are in orange coverage areas and are suspected to have either no or unusable indoor coverage. In view of the aforementioned details, Verizon Wireless’ RF team re-emphasizes that the Sunny View” project area has significant coverage gaps in adequate LTE service in both high and low frequency bands and the Sunny View site with proposed ACL will resolve these substantial and significant gaps in coverage. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Wasif Sharif Wasif Sharif Radio Frequency (RF) Design Engineer EXHIBIT II Verizon Wireless Communications Facility Engineering Necessity Case –“Sunny View” Prepared by: Wasif Sharif, RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Project: The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co-located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Ithaca (the “Project Facility”). Town Boundary Town/City Border Existing ITHACA HD Site Search Area Project Location Route 79 Existing DANBY Site Existing BROOKTONDALE Site Oct 24th, 2024 Alternative Sites 2 The following slides display the individual footprint of Sunny View site from proposed and other alternative site locations and it can be seen that alternative locations fail to provide the adequate coverage that is needed to resolve the significant coverage gap in targeted service improvement area. Candidate Name Lat (decimal NAD83) Long (Decimal Nad83) GE ft) ACL raw land, WT, collo) A Six Mile Creek Vineyard 42.415761 -76.453288 847 Raw Land B Gary Foote #1 42.417643 -76.448339 1035 Raw Land C Gary Foote #2 42.415457 -76.447856 957 Raw Land D Gary Foote #3 42.416553 -76.446923 1026 Raw Land E Suzanne Roberts 42.412417 -76.450629 823 Raw Land Sunny View Low band footprint –Suzanne Roberts 3 4 Sunny View Low band footprint –Six Mile Creek Vineyard 5 Sunny View Low band footprint –Gary Foote #1 6 Sunny View Low band footprint –Gary Foote #2 7 Sunny View Low band footprint –Gary Foote #3 William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant PO Box 20263 Rochester, NY 14602 February 24, 2025 Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Attn: Marty Mosley Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Services Facility - RF Site Review for Verizon Wireless / “Sunny View” Site 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56-4-1.22) Proposed 134’ New Monopole Tower plus 4’ Lightning Rod (138’ overall) Dear Mr. Mosley, The 2/10/2025 supplemental submission by Verizon Wireless (Applicant) is in response to the ZBA request for analysis of the proposed “Sunny View” facility for a hypothetically shorter tower. Applicant’s new Exhibit OO includes a series of RF propagation plots that compare area mid-band RF coverage for eight (8) locations that Applicant deems important. The analysis is for a set of reduced antenna center lines (ACLs) of 130’, 110’, 90’ and 70’. Verizon’s RF engineer cited eight (8) specific areas where coverage drops below threshold and provides objective area characteristics (e.g. count of residences, gathering places, etc.) and Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) to argue why they are deemed important for gap remediation. We find no reason to disagree with Applicant’s engineering analysis. Background and Discussion Applicant previously submitted Exhibit H (May 31, 2024) that shows similar information, without explicit analysis of the eight (8) locations for reduced ACL heights of 130’, 120’ and 110’. Exhibit H also includes neighbor site LTE capacity information “Ithaca HD” and Brooktondale” sites that currently serve the proposed “Sunny View” target area. The LTE capacity metrics show these sites exceed their the Forward Data Volume (FDV) bandwidth capacity at times. Exhibit H propagation plots also shows that there is no significant mid- band coverage in the area near the proposed “Sunny View” site that could relieve low-band FDV from the existing sites. Note that both RF coverage issues and base station capacity Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, February 24, 2025 Page 2 of 2 exhaustion will affect voice calls. The analysis of voice call performance in the targeted improvement area was presented by Applicant in the recent submission Exhibit OO and previously in Exhibits Z and AA (8/7/2024). Those exhibits show dropped calls and call access failures on the roadways near and within the target improvement area. Town Code uses only voice calls as the valid measure of a significant gap in coverage. Our previous reports discussed the low-band coverage and service issues for the target improvement area. In summary, low-band represents about 10% and mid-band represents about 90% of Applicant’s licensed bandwidth. In order to relieve the low-band capacity issues at neighboring sites, the proposed site’s RF coverage must overlap the existing low- band RF coverage with a stronger signal to draw traffic to the proposed site. Reduction in proposed height will cause a commensurate reduction in RF coverage overlap. Reduction of overlap results in less traffic off load from the “Ithaca HD” and “Brooktondale” sites. Applicant does not currently have a way to quantify how much traffic off load will occur until the proposed site it on the air other than by comparison of the coverage footprints. Exhibit OO shows the mid-band RF coverage from the proposed site is reduced for lower ACLs for the eight (8) focus areas. Each focus area is shown by a satellite image to help characterize the area and a narrative that explains the nature of the focus area. Applicant correctly argues that reduction of RF coverage below their reliability threshold at lower ACL will cause continued dropped call and call access failure gaps in those areas. In order to quantify the gaps that form at lower ACL, Applicant presents vehicle traffic volume, structure counts, and location uses to support their contention that the proposed ACL is necessary to avoid on-going gaps in those areas. We find no engineering reason to disagree with Applicant’s RF engineering coverage and base station capacity arguments in Exhibit OO. Very truly yours, William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant PO Box 20263 Rochester, NY 14602 October 21, 2024 Town of Ithaca Planning Board Attn: Ms. Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Services Facility - RF Site Review for Verizon Wireless / “Sunny View” Site 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56-4-1.22) Proposed 134’ New Monopole Tower plus 4’ Lightning Rod (138’ overall) Dear Ms. Balestra, Per your email of October 3, 2024, this revised preliminary report will address only the RF engineering issues specified in Town Code §270-219 R (2) that the planning board must consider whether there is a showing of current “need” and an existing “significant gap” in wireless telephone service. We were directed during the planning board’s October 2, 2024, meeting to revise our preliminary report and follow only Town Code requirements for purposes of RF engineering analysis. NEED Town Code §270-219 R (1) (c) [2] contains specific RF engineering requirements necessary for special permit approvals and defines the limitations for evaluation of those requirements. Need. The applicant has proven a compelling need to address any significant gaps in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) through the proposed facilities and not through any other solution, and the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. Verizon Wireless (“Applicant”) uses LTE (acronym for “Long Term Evolution”) technology that dynamically allocates available bandwidth for user transmissions using “resource Town of Ithaca Planning Board, October 21, 2024 Page 2 of 5 elements.” Resource elements are small bandwidth channels contained within their licensed spectrum bands that can be dynamically aggregated based on the momentary throughput demands of users. Generally, aggregation of more resource elements corresponds to higher information rate transfers measured in “Bits per Second” (BPS). Traditionally there was a distinction of how analog voice calls and digital signaling data exchanges were transmitted to and from Personal Wireless Services Facilities (PWSFs). Using LTE technology, whether the exchange of information relates to voice information that has been digitally transformed or digital data, the entire transmission is sent and received using digital information signaling formed in packets. Packets are collections of digital information “bits” that are framed with headers, cyclic redundancy code information for forward error correction, and other information to facilitate reliable decoding within limits of system capability and subsequent reconstruction of the information in a useable form. If the encoded information arrives at a receiver (i.e. the mobile device or the PSWF) with less than sufficient signal strength to allow reliable decoding, the transmitted information will contain “bit errors” due to system noise levels that are inherent in any electronic communication system. Bit errors ultimately prevent proper reconstruction of the original information. When this happens, the communication link breaks down (e.g. a “dropped” call) and may be disconnected by the LTE controllers. Applicant proposes deployment of several frequency bands of operation. The frequency bands discussed in the permit application materials are “low-band” (700/850 MHz) and mid-band” (1900/2100 MHz). We suspect Applicant will also deploy additional mid-band spectrum in the 3700-3980 MHz range (the partially re-purposed satellite downlink C-band) that is used by Applicant for fixed-wireless broadband service. Neighbor site “Brookdale” gamma sector provides existing low-band RF coverage and capacity to the target improvement area as shown in Applicant’s Exhibit H page 15 and 17. The “Brookdale” site is too far away to provide any usable mid-band RF coverage or capacity. In accordance with Town Code, Applicant must show not just “need” but a “compelling need” that is affected by not just “gaps” but “significant gaps” in their service area. Town Code defines the meaning and limitations of these terms. Town Code requires the analysis relate only to “the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network.” Town Code is silent on the evaluation threshold of acceptable levels of access failure due to low signal level or capacity- related issues, only that there is the ability to make and receive voice calls. Town Code §279- 219 R (2) (a) states that “an applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap.” Town Code does not specifically envision use of digital LTE metrics for real-time evaluation of reliable communication or user capacity limitations but instead relies upon “In-kind call Testing” as defined in Town Code §279-219 B. The LTE capacity metrics such as those presented in Exhibit H are plotted for the worst-case capacity demand levels each day. When the board considers the existence of a “significant gap,” Town Code §279-219 R (2) (a) requires evaluation of “whether the applicant's customers are Town of Ithaca Planning Board, October 21, 2024 Page 3 of 5 affected for only a limited period of time.” Applicant provided Exhibit Z materials to meet the requirements of Town Code definitions of compelling need and significant gap. We will address these in order: Compelling Need - Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [2] In addition to the existing low-band RF coverage shown in Exhibit H pages 15 and 17, Exhibit Z slides 10 and 11 shows “dropped connections” and “access failure” locations for all frequency bands discussed in the exhibit. Low-band signals propagate with less loss than mid-band signals but low-band spectrum represents only about 10% of Applicant’s bandwidth. These data are collected by the LTE controller using GPS data reported from the user’s mobile device. We note that the maps are titled “Dropped Connections” and “Access Failures” which, from an LTE perspective, may not be only voice call dropped connections or access attempts. However, the fact that LTE sessions were dropped or could not be initiated implies generally that voice calls in progress could also be dropped or attempts to dial out may not be successful. Based on the map locations markers, the dropped connections and access failures were in a mix of outdoor, in-vehicle and in-building locations along and between area roads and demonstrates the potential inability to place and receive phone calls for convenience and emergencies. The wireless communication environment is such that when unavoidable “fading” occurs, connections may be dropped, but it does not mean that every existing connection or access attempt will fail as long as conditions provide at least minimal signal strength and user capacity at the PWSF serving the area. The issue in either case is predictable reliability. The data shows that reliability is poor in the test area. We therefore conclude that Applicant has shown a “compelling need” since wireless reliability in the targeted improvement area is poor. Significant Gaps - Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [2] Application materials Exhibit H slides 15 and 17 show existing low-band RF coverage. Slides 19 and 21 show existing mid-band RF coverage. Using the Town Code, §279-219 R 1) (c) [2] [a] requirements, identification of a “significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap.” Since Applicant shows RF coverage for low-band in Exhibit H slides 15 and 17 above -105 dBm, a minimal level for outdoor service, and some areas where RF coverage is above -95 dBm, Town Code arguably precludes a finding of a “significant gap” even though there is no mid-band service in most of the targeted improvement area. Based on the information in Exhibit H for low-band, we would anticipate that low-band mobile device connections inside vehicles and inside buildings may be unreliable for in-vehicle and in-building users since penetration of vehicles and structures reduces signal strength. Applicant’s Exhibit Z page 9 states that the Dropped Call Rate Town of Ithaca Planning Board, October 21, 2024 Page 4 of 5 DCR) for the proposed service area is 11.84% compared to their standard DCR of 1%. The stated DCR is for both low-band and mid-band operation. If a call is in progress in mid-band frequencies when a user transits into an area the mid-band call will drop. If a user is already in an area that lacks mid-band service and there are either low-band capacity limitations or insufficient low-band signal strength (e.g. in-vehicle or in-building locations) it is likely that access will be denied or, if initiated, the connection may drop. We note here that considering the lack of RF coverage shown for mid-band in Exhibit H pages 19 and 21, the capacity issues presented in Exhibit H for neighbor site “Brookdale” gamma sector, and the in-vehicle drive test results for low-band in Exhibit Z a different finding may be possible in accordance with Town Code §279-219 R (2). With respect to Town Code and the stated limitations on analysis there is arguably no finding of “significant gaps” based only on the RF propagation plots for existing low-band RF coverage. We recognize that low-band may not be Applicant’s preferred frequency of operation since mid- band frequencies provide approximately 90% of Applicant’s licensed operational bandwidth and it heavily used for mobile device data services such as Internet access, mobile navigation applications such as Waze and Google Maps, and text access to the E911 system. Minimal Intrusion on the Community Town of Ithaca Code §270-219 R (1) (c) [8] states requirements for mitigation of aesthetic impacts. Mitigation can include changes to location, height, and design. Alternative Sites Application materials Exhibit I discusses the site selection and alternate sites. Applicant considered five sites, of which one (Ste E) is the proposed site. Four of these sites (A, B, C and D) were dismissed for further consideration by RF because “… this location would not have adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location.” No technical evidence was initially provided by Applicant for those conclusions in the record. During the planning board’s meeting on October 2, 2024, Applicant’s RF engineer presented propagation plots to the planning board that showed the alternative sites did not provide the same service levels for low-band RF coverage along Route 79. We recommend that those plots be included in the record to document the reasons for rejecting the alternative sites. If the planning board eventually finds that both a compelling need and a significant gap have been adequately demonstrated by Applicant outside of Town Code limitations or that the provisions of Town Code §279-219 R (2) apply, we recommend further analysis that includes mid-band services RF coverage and capacity issues regarding any rejected sites that appear to have an aesthetic advantage that may provide service to the targeted improvement area. Town of Ithaca Planning Board, October 21, 2024 Page 5 of 5 Minimum Height Applicant provided parametric height analysis for both low-band and mid-band RF coverage at Antenna Center Line (ACL) heights of 140’, 130’, 120’ and 110.’ Since Town Code precludes the use a frequency band that may be preferred by Applicant to justify a significant gap area, we note that absent finding of an existing significant gap in the targeted improvement area or that the provisions of Town Code §279-219 R (2) do not apply, the question of proposed height is moot. If the planning board later finds that there is a significant gap or that Town Code §279-219 R (2) applies, we recommend use of mid-band RF propagation plots and neighbor site “Brookdale” gamma sector LTE capacity data offered in Exhibit H, and/or the drive test and dropped connection data in Exhibit Z to evaluate minimum height justification to address that aspect of minimal intrusion on the community. Design Stealth designs disguise a support structure to blend in with the surrounding area. Stealth designs such as artificial trees or clock towers may be applicable in some cases. In the present case, the proposed tower structure to support the proposed ACL is 134’ which likely precludes effective use of most stealth designs. Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical. Some design approaches impact RF engineering issues. The applicant has not proposed any such stealth or other mitigation measures at this time. Very truly yours, William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant 1 Lori Kofoid From:Susan H. Brock <brock@clarityconnect.com> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 11:29 AM To:Lori Kofoid; Marty Moseley Subject:FW: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Bill Johnson’s response should go in the ZBA packets (along with the resident’s two prior emails on the topic). Just checking to make sure the packet is updated with these messages. Susan Susan H. Brock, Attorney at Law 12 Pheasant Way Ithaca, NY 14850 tel.: 607-277-3995 fax: 607-277-8042 brock@clarityconnect.com This electronic transmission contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (607) 277-3995 collect) or send an electronic mail message to brock@clarityconnect.com. In addition, please delete all copies of this message from your computer. From: William P Johnson [mailto:bill@williampjohnson.com] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 12:14 PM To: 'CJ Randall' <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; 'Susan Brock' <brock@clarityconnect.com> Cc: 'Marty Moseley' <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Subject: RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! CJ, I hope all involved with carefully consider that a professional recommendation from other professionals, arguably an adversary, on LinkedIn or any other publicly accessible platform does not constitute a conflict of interest. True conflicts of interest, rather than mere inuendo and disagreement with inconvenient opinions, involve an unmanaged and compromised objectivity that facilitate inappropriate actions. As one of many possible sources of information on the subject, the Defense Acquisition University, DAU, provides training on identification of conflicts of interest to DoD personnel involved with financial responsibilities within the agency. DAU frames the issue with three categories taken from the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) in FAR Part 3 (Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest). The categories are (i) Unequal access to information; (ii) Impaired objectivity; (iii) Biased ground rules. 2 Unequal access to information. The information supplied by Verizon Wireless is sent to the town, and that information is posted to the town’s web site. There is no access we have to other information. That information is interpreted in light of engineering principles as to it shows and whether Verizon Wireless’ statements are accurate with respect to that information. Our reports are intended to vet that information. Impaired objectivity. The materials provided by Verizon Wireless were reviewed and explained in light of the engineering principles regarding wireless communication facilities. Just because a professional agrees with another professional’s opinion does not constitute a conflict of interest. Especially in the context of engineering review, if the conclusions do not match the facts then it is not difficult to point out error using sound analysis. Beyond the facts, it may surprise the lay person that engineering is not a “True or False” proposition. Engineering involves significant trade-offs between conflicting goals of operational efficiency, reliability, and cost of deployment. Engineers can disagree on the use of the facts in light of those and other objectives. Professional agreement does not mean there is a conflict of interest. Naturally, in the present case, the town boards are free to accept or reject any of the statements in our reports or our public testimony when taken in context. We stand by those statements nonetheless in light of our knowledge and experience with wireless communication facilities and the issues surrounding deployment in the last several decades. Biased ground rules. Our work does not involve establishment of ground rules – those are developed by the town’s zoning laws and procedures, published, and applied by the appointed boards under advice from their legal counsel. I hope those concerned will scrutinize my reports that show a different picture than selectively framed in the Babjak email. For example, until Attorney Brock clarified the “preferred frequency” meaning, if taken at face value our conclusion would have been on the face cause to deny the permits. Hardly what one would expect would happen in an actual conflict of interest. There are other examples as well. Verizon made statements to the effect that an area cannot be serviced by shorter towers or small-cells. I volunteered a contrary opinion to the planning board that, indeed, an area can be serviced in such a way but that there are technical and operational engineering limitations under present technology and regulatory constraints. I explained in some detail that the total equipment inventory for a multi-band cell site cannot be installed in a package that will fit the size required for a small-cell deployment. Small cells will not have the backup power capability of a macro site. Small-cells have limited RF coverage capability. Infrastructure connecting the small-cells on utility poles are subject to disruption by trees falling through lines, road accidents that take out utility poles, ice damage on the lines, and a host of other possibilities. Yes, small-cells can be used but there are compromises that may also have legal implications. I offer my humble opinion that it was actually not necessary for me to annunciate the information at the public hearings that it is indeed possible to use small-cells and shorter macro sites to provide RF coverage and capacity and, doing so, was contrary to Verizon Wireless’ goal to deploy a single-site solution. Again, not what one would expect if an actual conflict of interest existed These are just some examples. Ultimately, the final decision given the competing goals within the present application are under the final authority of the planning board and ZBA. In summary, I am trying to help the town staff and boards vet the technical information provided by Verizon Wireless to facilitate planning board and ZBA decisions regarding their permits and variance applications. While the materials can stand alone to speak to the engineering issues, the complexity of interpretations and jargon often elude very smart people who do not immediately understand the engineering issues. If engineering findings in our reports or public testimony are perceived to be inaccurate or misleading, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss them – especially in light of the recent email arguing a conflict of interest exists. Naturally an accusation of duplicitous actions is professionally offensive. The fact that people in the telecom industry know me and choose to voluntarily recommend me based on character, knowledge, and professional background is not a conflict of interest. It is an honor to be so recognized by my professional adversaries, who are also professional whom I generally respect. It is also telling that an arguably professional adversary would risk their own professional reputation with a recommendation to an unqualified and duplicitous connection. 3 Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Bill William P Johnson Independent Radio-frequency Engineering Consultant and Professor Emeritus | Rochester Institute of Technology PO Box 20263, Rochester, NY 14602-0263 Voice/Text: (585) 201-8744 Email: Bill@WilliamPJohnson.com Do not send any confidential information by any means without making prior arrangements. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The preceding e-mail message and attachments contain information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges. The information is intended to be conveyed only to the intended recipient(s) of the message. If you believe that you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by reply to this email. Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 9:19 AM To: Susan Brock <brock@clarityconnect.com>; William P Johnson <bill@williampjohnson.com> Cc: Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Subject: Fw: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! FYI From: Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:01 PM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov> Subject: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar- looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page 4 attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in 5 coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, 6 Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of 7 multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant PO Box 20263 Rochester, NY 14602 November 4, 2024 Town of Ithaca Planning Board Attn: Ms. Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: Proposed Wireless Telecommunications Services Facility - RF Site Review for Verizon Wireless / “Sunny View” Site 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56-4-1.22) Proposed 134’ New Monopole Tower plus 4’ Lightning Rod (138’ overall) Dear Ms. Balestra, On October 29, 2024, the planning board asked for our collaboration to develop some ideas regarding alternatives for Applicant’s proposed “Sunny View” site. In addition, discussions with the town’s attorneys today has clarified my more restrictive interpretation of the Town Code §270-219 R (1) (c) [2] regarding identification of a “significant gap” and preferred frequency bands. Their explanations have reconciled the meaning of the Town Code and my interpretation with the engineering issues associated with reliable wireless communications. This report will address (1) the finding of a “significant gap” in the target improvement area and (2) scenarios for alternate approaches to remedy the “significant gap” for your consideration. SIGNIFICANT GAP Our revised preliminary report hesitated to acknowledge a “significant gap” as we interpreted Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) in a manner that was, on review by town counsel, narrower than intended. Applicant’s propagation plots for low-band (700/850 MHz) showed usable signal strength in some of the target improvement area. We therefore concluded that, if there is a gap, it may not be a “significant gap.” By contrast the dropped call data shows more than 11% dropped calls which exceeds the 1% national goal. While there are likely several factors that are causing such a high dropped call rate, one of the causes is due to lack of mid-band RF coverage in the target improvement area. Calls in progress using mid-band spectrum will Town of Ithaca Planning Board, November 4, 2024 Page 2 of 4 drop when a mobile user enter the area where there is no mid-band RF coverage. As a result, part of the 11% dropped call rate is due to an RF coverage gap in mid-band. Mid-band spectrum accounts for about 90% of Applicant’s licensed spectrum and is necessary to avoid dropped calls as mobile users enter the coverage gap area. Given the high dropped call rate it is arguably reasonable to then conclude that there is a “significant gap” in mid-band RF coverage. That gap is confirmed by the propagation plots in application materials Exhibit H. By way of explanation, our over-interpretation that was corrected by town counsel derived from the statement that a] significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap.” Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [2] [a]. Therefore, based on town counsel’s explanation of the meaning of the section quoted above in light of an excessive dropped call rate, as is the case here, results from some form of a coverage gap. Whether the gap is the result of weak low-band signals in building or vehicles as noted in our last report, or whether it is the result of mid-band calls-in-progress dropping as a mobile user enters the target improvement area, the results point to a “significant gap” regardless of reference to a preferred frequency band. The remedy for the “significant gap” requires a new base station or other hybrid solution in the vicinity of the target improvement area that can provide sufficient low-band and mid-band RF signal strength to initiate, maintain and hand-off voice telephone traffic. Sufficient signal strength and capacity will also facilitate availability of data services since both the transmission and reception use the same LTE technology to allow two-way exchange of information. POTENTIAL “SUNNY VIEW” SITE ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS As evidenced by the high-level view of Applicant’s wireless network, huge geographic areas can be serviced by many relatively small-diameter “cells” that allow sufficient signal levels and user capacity for safe and reliable voice communications. Where there are large numbers of wireless users, cells must be small to allow enough user capacity for reliable service. This is called “network densification.” Network densification adds additional user capacity and targeted signal strength improvement in areas such as business centers and sport complexes where wireless subscribers congregate. Network densification often takes the form of splitting an existing cell into several smaller cells with commensurately smaller support structures or co-location on, for example, existing buildings or utility poles. In addition to network densification for capacity there are times when zoning considerations and aesthetic concerns could benefit from a similar approach. Town of Ithaca Planning Board, November 4, 2024 Page 3 of 4 In the present case, the alternate sites considered by Applicant are in close proximity to each other. Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [5] and following address the aesthetic impacts, property values, community character, and mitigation of those affects through siting, location and design. These items were discussed in the revised preliminary report last month. During the October 29th meeting, the planning board concluded that the close proximity of alternate sites did not offer much advantage to mitigate aesthetic concerns expressed during hearings. While Applicant did not offer any additional possible approaches identified by their site acquisition personnel, we offer some scenarios for the benefit of the planning board’s consideration that have been found to work in other situations where (1) land control can be obtained and (2) technical performance was adequate when zoning a proposed macro site did not fit comfortably into the community. We offer these scenarios for possible consideration and comparison to the proposed site to assess whether the proposed site meets the minimum intrusion into the community test. First, there are parcels closer to Route 79 in the search area identified by Applicant on the south side that have hills on which a structure might be located that has a view through the Route 79 valley and has potential for RF propagation from a similarly sized tower. We acknowledge that those parcels may not improve some of the issues of concern since there are homes in the area, but the locations may offer a shorter tower structure. With the advice of town planners, it is possible that one or more of those parcels might provide some improvement to the proposed “Sunny View” location – at least for minimum intrusion comparison purposes. This approach will need RF analysis by Applicant to determine the minimum height to achieve acceptable RF coverage, assuming land control is possible. Second, the land features to the north of Route 79 provides a backdrop of foliage in the vicinity of the search area that, arguably, could provide a backdrop for a stealth tree structure. Normally a structure that is dramatically taller than the existing tree canopy is not a good candidate for a stealth tree, but in this case there are similarities to a stealth tree that was deployed on the east side of Lake George where a ridge provided a foliage back drop when viewed from the lake. From the middle of the lake, it was nearly impossible to pick out the structure that was taller than surrounding trees from the backdrop canopy. The observer’s viewpoint will affect the perception of the stealth structure, but we offer this suggestion in case there are locations where the balance of other concerns may overcome the concerns for the proposed site. Third, we note that it is generally desirable to provide area coverage from a single site for impact on the broader community (i.e. one tower to mitigate rather than multiple although somewhat shorter towers, each with its own set of concerns) and cost of deployment. In the present case, the target improvement area is mainly located along Route 79 and the areas slightly to the south. Two properly positioned shorter base stations long or near Route 79 would likely have the ability to illuminate the Route 9 valley and provide some RF Town of Ithaca Planning Board, November 4, 2024 Page 4 of 4 coverage to the south despite the lack of need for enhanced capacity that would be provided by two sites. Fourth, there has been much information about the pros and cons of small-cell deployment. The limitation of equipment facilities, susceptibility to damage to utility pole wiring from wind gusts and falling trees, and the coverage limitations from a low-mounted set of antennas might balance the aesthetic concerns of residents while providing some reasonable service along Route 79, nearby roadways, and residences in the vicinity. We recognize that none of these options are likely preferred by Applicant, and that they have not proposed any of these options. We offer these scenarios to allow the planning board and staff to consider which, if any, might be viable and then allow Applicant to address their viability to the board. The result will provide the board an opportunity to assess the minimal intrusion on the community and decide whether the proposed site or another approach is preferable. We will be glad to assist as the board deems appropriate. Very truly yours, William P. Johnson RF Engineering Consultant to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board 1 Lori Kofoid From:James W Hamilton <jameswaldo@bluefrog.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 20, 2024 11:49 PM To:Lori Kofoid Subject:please deny variance to ZBAA-24-18 Appeal for Verizon "Sunny View" wireless service tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct Thanks, Marty Moseley, for inviting my comments on the proposed Verizon Sunny View tower height variance appeal. I received your notice of public hearing in today’s mail. Please do not allow S Roberts WC Land LLC to lease his Conservation Zone property to Verizon for the proposed “Sunny View” 138-foot wireless service tower. The destruction of this wooded land broke both state and town laws when Wiedmaier had the ridge top removed and adjacent hillsides buried under the bulldozed soil. The site plans provided by Verizon falsely claim there is an EXISTING TREE LINE,” where in fact no trees have survived, and a supposedly “EXISTING FORESTED LAND,” where only a few trees from an incomplete and insufficient forest restoration effort 15 years ago failed dismally to restore the site to woods. In 2008, the Planning Board resolved that “approximately 250 trees” should be planted to remediate Wiedmaier’s criminal destruction. Less than 25 trees have managed to hang on to the very edges of the flattened ridge. I attended the first Planning Board public hearing for the Sunny View project on October 1, 2024, where I heard the lawyer Jared Lusk claim that the current owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct did not know there was any problem with hilltop removal or the need to restore once-forested land to woods. But S Roberts WC Land LLC shares the same address as Wiedmaier at 1129 Avenida Sevilla #5C, Walnut Creek, CA 94595; the two of them are listed as owners of 4 of the other 5 lots in the subdivision. S Roberts bought the 111 Wiedmaier Ct lot for $1 from Clare George Wiedmaier on December 6, 2021; this was not an arms-length sale, and a lawyer claiming Roberts knows nothing of Wiedmaier’s problems with the site does not convince me this is a good way of avoiding responsibility for an ecological disaster. If Roberts can profit from the horrifically cleared land, now so simply and in its ruin ready-made for a 138 foot tall monopole antenna, in what way is Conservation Zoning, or any kind of zoning for that matter, effectively enforced? If Verizon is serious about leasing a 50’X50’ fenced compound, then the once forested land around it should be restored as woods. It seems Verizon is hoping the Town of Ithaca will forget Planning Board’s Resolution No. 2008 - 013, which called for the remediation of Weidmaier’s hilltop woods removal. But I have owned my home at 1603 Slaterville Rd since 1980, and remember the woods that used to grow on the ridge just south of my property. I remember Weidmaier’s excuses for the laws broken at 111 Wiedmaier Ct: his landscaper misunderstood his plans for the property, the conversion of woods into firewood there did not need a forest management plan, since it was just a landscaping project. Now, 16 years after turning the wooded ridge into a wasteland we should not pretend that a cell phone tower is the proper reward for a fictional “existing forested land” with a fake “existing tree line” around “existing meadow/range land.” These terms on Verizon’s “aerial map with proposed overlay,” a project sheet No. ESC-1 in Verizon’s application material, may be buried under the many pages of minutiae, but they do not stand up to fact checking. Five members of the Town’s Conservation Board visited the “Sunny View” site October 8th last month and found no “forested land” or “tree line” in the areas falsely labeled on Verizon’s planning sheets. 2 The fact is, this lot at 111 Wiedmaier Ct still needs restoration. It does not need to provide a profitable lease to anyone who shares an address with Wiedmaier in Walnut Creek CA. Please require that this neighboring woods in the Sixmile Creek Conservation Zone be restored in fact, where just now it is restored only in fiction. Its proximity to Sixmile Creek, just upstream of the City’s water reservoir, makes its return to woodland ecologically important. Please deny the variance requested in the ZBAA-24-18 Appeal! Wiedmaier did not respect Town Conservation Zoning code; don’t let him (or anyone sharing his address) get relief from Town height limitations. I hope you understand my strong concerns in this matter. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to discuss them further. James Hamilton 1603 Slaterville Rd Ithaca NY 607) 273-1335 1 Lori Kofoid From:Diane Allyn Florini <diflorini@hotmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 21, 2024 9:31 PM To:Lori Kofoid Subject:Please deny the height variance to ZBAA-24-18 tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Mr. Moseley, I received your mailed notice of the public hearing regarding Verizon's proposed appeal for a height variance for its proposed Sunny View cell phone tower. I was disappointed when the Planning Board decided to allow the Zoning Board to consider allowing the construction of a 138-foot personal wireless service facility tower in a Conservation Zone near a neighborhood at the eastern border of the Town of Ithaca. Mr. Wiedmaier originally planned to build one house in the Conservation area where Verizon wants to site the tower. This house would have been consistent with housing that he planned to build on four other lots outside of the Conservation Area. One of the four lots needed to have a strange shape to allow it to meet the town code requiring road frontage, so my neighbors and I attended a board meeting where Mr. Wiedmaier's agent explained that there would be minimal disturbance to the forest covering the land. We did not object to the planned development. However, we ARE now objecting to a cell tower whose height exceeds heights permitted by town code. The standard of approval for a dimensional variance is 'practical difficulty'...the 'practical difficulty' standard could be amplified and clarified as follows: Does strict compliance with the ordinance totally prevent improvement of the property in a manner which is reasonable, customary and consistent with other properties in the area" (Local Government Law Bulletin April 9, 2018 by James F. Scales, cited in https://www.mikameyers.com/practical-advice-for-variances/). A tower 138 feet tall is NOT an improvement of the property in a manner which is reasonable, customary and consistent with other properties in the area. Verizon proposes to build the tower in a Conservation Zone located above Six Mile Creek which provides the City of Ithaca with drinking water. This natural area may not be among the 10 most scenic views of the Town of Ithaca, but it is a haven for wildlife and a soothing sight for people traveling on Route 79 and Burns Road. Many citizens mentioned this at the Planning Board hearings. If a 10-story building were being proposed for this Conservation Zone, you can be sure that neighbors would NOT want you to grant a variance for the building. Why would we treat a cell phone tower which is not consistent with the neighborhood any differently? Verizon proposes mitigating the ugliness of the tower by planting some trees, but even mature redwoods would not make the tower look like it belonged in the neighborhood. A variance should only be available when a unique circumstance of the property results in a practical difficulty or undue hardship." (Local Government Law Bulletin April 9, 2018 by James F. Scales, cited in https://www.mikameyers.com/practical-advice-for-variances/). Denying a height variance to Verizon for this tower will NOT result in a practical difficulty or undue hardship for the company. Maps of alternative sites show that distances to residences were 2 measured from sites close to the residences as opposed to sites that could have been chosen further back on each property. The NYSEG site was rejected because the 207-foot distance separating the proposed tower from the high-tension wires was "more" than the 250 feet required. What kind of math is that? Furthermore, the consultant William P. Johnson suggested that a backdrop of foliage on the north side of Route 79 could help hide a tall cell phone tower. He also suggested that Verizon could deploy small cells to provide reasonable service to the Route 79 corridor which would obviate the need for Verizon to get a variance for the monstrosity they now plan to build in many people's backyard. Having Verizon move the tower north of Route 79 or build small cells is not "undue hardship." Please deny Verizon's request for a height variance on the cell phone tower proposed for 111 Wiedmaier Court, Ithaca. Sincerely, Diane Florini 1603 Slaterville Road Town of Ithaca 1 Lori Kofoid From:Grace Grace <windowchair@yahoo.com> Sent:Sunday, November 24, 2024 11:50 PM To:Codes Subject:Please deny height variance for 140 ft cell tower in conservation area To the Ithaca town planning board, Please deny the height variance for 140-ft cell tower in a conservation area because it goes against town codes, and it is not the least intrusive means possible. Small cells to fill the gap would be the least intrusive means possible. It is unthinkable to put this giant, unsightly tower in a beautiful conservation area. It will hurt property values and the health of the nearby residents. Sincerely, Grace 1 Lori Kofoid From:Heyltje Bond <heyltjerose@yahoo.com> Sent:Sunday, November 24, 2024 2:00 PM To:Codes Subject:Verizon cell tower I’m writing to oppose the height variance for the proposed Verizon cell phone tower at Burns Rd 79. Ithaca’s town codes' say that we are to use the least intrusive means possible to fill gaps, which would most certainly be small cells. Verizon does not want to use small cells because they will lose the ability to gain rents from other telecom carriers. They do not have the town’s best interest in mind but their own profit. I also oppose the height variance as it will intrude on a beautiful conservation area. Further, I have personally felt the detrimental health effects that have been proven to exist from the radiation emitted by such towers. I urge you to really consider the multitude of reasons why smaller towers should be used as opposed to this behemoth they’re proposing. Thank you for your time, Heyltje Bond Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 1 Lori Kofoid From:Ravindra <ravi@raviwalsh.com> Sent:Sunday, November 24, 2024 12:21 PM To:Codes Subject:Oppose the variance WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or a achments. Any ques ons please contact the IT department Hello, I am stymied as to why this commi ee agreed to Verizon’s first hyped up pitch for a tower! What were you thinking? Secondly, now they “need”, but that’s not really true, a variance from you. Corpora on Games! They just keep pushing, which is inten onal, for wearing you out so you will just agree. Please DON’T. Know ma er how much money they promise to give back, the variance isn’t necessary. But you know that already bc you read and heard what I heard. Thank you 607-220-6088 www.heartpathme.com 1 Lori Kofoid From:Britton Dougherty <great.britton@hotmail.com> Sent:Sunday, November 24, 2024 12:43 AM To:Codes Subject:height variance WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Planning Board members, Thank you for your time and diligence. I urge you to reject the height variance that Verizon is seeking based on multiple factors. First, property values of the homes near the tower will decline. A study published in the Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics found that for properties located within 0.72 kilometers [2362 feet] of the closest cell tower, property values declined 2.46% on average, and up to 9.78% for homes within tower visibility range compared to homes outside tower visibility range. “In aggregate, properties within the 0.72-kilometer band lose over $24 million dollars.” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11146-017-9600-9 Also here is an article by REALTOR magazine, "An overwhelming 94 percent of home buyers and renters surveyed by the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy (NISLAPP) say they are less interested and would pay less for a property located near a cell tower or antenna." "The NISLAPP survey echoes the findings of a study by Sandy Bond of the New Zealand Property Institute and past president of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES). “The Impact of Cell Phone Towers on House Prices in Residential Neighborhoods,” which was published in The Appraisal Journal in 2006, found that buyers would pay as much as 20 percent less for a property near a cell tower or antenna." http://realtormag.realtor.org/daily-news/2014/07/25/cell- towers-antennas-problematic-for-buyers Here is a compellation of realtors documenting the property devaluation possible from a cell tower to a home. https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Cell-Towers-Drop-Property-Values-Oakland-Township-Realtor- Letters-2024-1.pdf It was wrong of Verizon to state that denying their tower would have been an effective prohibition. Verizon has NOT PROVEN that their LARGE tower is the least intrusive means possible to fill this gap, they just stated that it was the least intrusive of all the 12 that they had looked at. The least intrusive MEANS, NOT LOCATION is what is relevant here to you all. The least intrusive means is almost guaranteed to be a few small cells, which Verizon does not want because then they can't charge other carriers rent to use their GIANT 140-foot tower. Verizon needs to provide a burden of proof that small cells couldn't work for this situation, and they did not provide that proof. If you previously approved this, and upon further contemplation and review, see that because this is infact not the least intrusive means possible and because it will certainly lower property values and be a HUGE eye sore for the conservation area and community, I urge you to retract your vote. I must say, also, that watching Fred Wilcox bully the members of the board, as a community member watching in on the process, was so disturbing. Once a few board members expressed concern, he said, "We all know the answer is a yes!," and then demanded that you all take a "straw pull" to see who was out of line. As someone 2 who has been on many boards, I have never seen such egregious behavior from a chair. It was absolutely appalling. And how horribly unethical it was for him to have worked off the approval resolution, once he saw that many were ready to deny the tower! A decent chair would have worked off the denial resolution. I talked to a member of the board directly afterwards who thought they had just voted on the landscaping, not understanding what they even were voting on because of how convoluted that was. I urge you to turn down this height variance and seek out safer small cells which are far less likely to lower property values and won't be a GIANT (literally) eye sore in a beautiful conservation area. The 140-foot tower is in no way the least intrusive means possible when we can fill the gap with small cells. Thank you, Britton Dougherty 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jerone Gagliano <jeronegagliano@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 25, 2024 5:04 PM To:Codes Subject:Deny Verizon's Height Variance Application WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Zoning Board Members, Please deny Verizon's height variance. This will force them to look at smaller cell tower options which they are supposed to anyway as the monopole is not the least intrusive means. I want to remind the Zoning Board that: Verizon is purposefully lying and misleading the Board when they stated that denying their tower would be an effective prohibition. This is not true since our independent consultant attested that smaller cell towers would be a viable solution and therefore they did not meet the requirements of least intrusive means from our Codes. Verizon has yet to prove that there is a gap in service as defined by our local wireless codes. As I stated during a previous meeting, I reviewed their dropped data records and conclude that these were not actual drop calls like the user experiences but likely network data package drops which is different than what our code requires. Once you approve this large monopole tower, more will follow and use this as precedent, and these monstrous eye sores will be here forever. Below is what I wrote to the Planning Board: I am appalled by the actions of Chairman Fred Wilcox for using the approval resolution when the majority of the board was ready to deny it during the last meeting! He ignored the proper procedure to work off the denial resolution and ignored the board member who questioned this. He manipulated the process and put each member on the spot to say why they were voting against it. From these actions, I can only conclude that Fred Wilcox will personally benefit from approving this application and would like to hear Chairman Fred Wilcox to explain his actions at the next meeting I encourage any members who were brow beaten into changing their vote to have the courage to vote their conscience. I also want to remind the Board, again, that: Verizon is purposefully lying and misleading the Board when they stated that denying their tower would be an effective prohibition. This is not true since our independent consultant attested that smaller cell towers would be a viable solution and therefore they did not meet the requirements of least intrusive means from our Codes. Verizon has yet to prove that there is a gap in service as defined by our local wireless codes. As I stated during a previous meeting, I reviewed their dropped data records and conclude that these were not actual drop calls like the user experiences but likely network data package drops which is different than what our code requires. 2 Once you approve this large monopole tower, more will follow and use this as precedent, and these monstrous eye sores will be here forever. 1) Please retract your vote if you felt coerced to voting yes when you wanted to deny the application. 2) Please deny Verizon's height variance. This will force them to look at smaller cell tower options which they are supposed to anyway as the monopole is not the least intrusive means. Thank you, Jerone Gagliano PE, CEM, CMVP 1 Lori Kofoid From:Daniel Seib <danielcseib@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 25, 2024 8:50 PM To:Lori Kofoid Subject:Please deny variance to ZBAA-24-18 Appeal for Verizon "Sunny View" wireless service tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hi Lori, I am writing to add my name to the list of Ithaca residents who are asking that the Zoning Board deny Verizon's appeal for a height variance for their proposed tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court. I and my family live nearby and have been to all the meetings so far with the Planning Board, and I was present when the Chair of that Board pulled his underhanded tactics (which I'm sure you've already heard about) to the benefit of Verizon and to the detriment of the people of Ithaca. That tower shouldn't have passed the environmental review and its site plan subsequently shouldn't have been approved. You have a chance to stop it though, as it clearly violates the height that our codes allow. We don't want this tower near our homes and our families, there are plenty of other places to put it, it will be an eyesore for those entering our beautiful city, and it will lower our property values. Verizon wants it here because it will maximize their profits, plain and simple. We don't exist just to be profitable for Verizon, or any other corporation, and I hope the Zoning Board chooses the people of Ithaca over corporate profits. Thank you, Daniel Seib 1581 Slaterville Road Ithaca, NY 1 Lori Kofoid From:Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2024 8:11 AM To:Marty Moseley; Lori Kofoid Subject:FW: Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower Please see email below. Thank you, Emily Banwell Administrative Assistant II Code Enforcement & Zoning Dept Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850 607-273-1783 From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 8:27 PM To: Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Cc: robertbergesq@aol.com; Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; DCurren@wbng.com; nysag@ag.ny.gov; mbutler@ithacavoice.org; Bill Chaisson <editor@ithacatimes.com>; ffigueroa@ithacavoice.org Subject: Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Planning Board (and Zoning Board) members, We are writing to ask you to reconsider your approval of the Wiedmeier Court application and to file a formal complaint concerning the unethical and potentially illegal Ithaca Town Planning Board meeting on November 19, 2024. At that meeting: 1. Verizon untruthfully claimed that denying their new proposed cell tower would be effective prohibition' when in fact, they had not shown any proof, as our codes require, that their large tower is the least intrusive means to fill the gap in service coverage. In fact, when pressed by Town Attorney Susan Brock about the effective prohibition, the Verizon rep stated "of all the 12 different options that we looked at, this was the least intrusive." And elsewhere Verizon stated that their large tower was the least intrusive means to meet their “project goals”. Neither of these is the least intrusive means to remedy the gap in service (i.e. the small area with the 11% of dropped calls). What was glaringly apparent was that no one from Verizon 2 could explicitly say that the tower is the least intrusive means to fill the gap in service. Instead, what we heard was carefully evasive language. When the subject of small cells came up, consultant William Johnson attested that they are a viable solution. Verizon “respectfully disagreed”, referring to their Exhibit GG, the subject of which was their conclusory “evidence” that small cells were not viable to achieve “the necessary coverage goals sought by VZW” (again, not for remedying the gap). Tellingly, neither the RF engineer nor the Verizon rep ever explicitly said that small cells could not remedy the gap in service. More obfuscation. Thus, it was highly misleading for Verizon to claim that denying their tower would constitute effective prohibition, given that they never showed proof that small cells couldn’t remedy the gap. 2. Given what we heard at the meeting, we are concerned that Board members' decision to approve was based on this false claim, especially since a majority of the Board said they were going to deny the tower before Verizon's statement about effective prohibition. It seemed like the Board members felt that it was a done deal and that they couldn't deny the application. 3. Allowing Verizon to give further input, while denying the public an opportunity to respond is, according to our lawyer, a violation of due process. Had we been given the time, we would have questioned Verizon on their misleading statements, asking them directly if it is absolutely impossible to fill this service gap with small cells, and, if so, why they didn’t offer proof. 4. Lastly, the meeting process was shocking to witness. A straw poll indicated a majority of the Board was in favor of denying the tower, then Board inexplicably changed from working off the denial' resolution to working off the ‘approval’ resolution. Board member Cindy Kaufman even questioned this saying, "I don't understand why we're reviewing the approval [resolution]." She was ignored. Unfortunately, it seemed that Chairperson Fred Wilcox was biased in favor of approving the resolution, when at the beginning of the discussion he said, "I'm concerned right now that members of this board are trying to find reasons to say no when the answer is YES.” ?!? This and his subsequent demeanor/actions made it seem that he was manipulating the process to meet the end he wanted. This behavior is unethical and a disgrace to our town. Therefore, we ask the Planning Board to reconsider this action as soon as possible. We know that a path of recourse is to file an Article 78, but for everyone’s sake we are hoping that we might resolve this “in house” to simply ensure that there is a fair process and that the Board has the correct facts and is not unduly influenced in their decision. Thank you for your careful attention to this matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology PS: Zoning Board members: we are asking you to deny the variance. Tohelpprotectyourprivacy, Microsoft Office prevented automaticdownloadofthis picturefromtheInternet.Virus-free.www.avast.com 1 Lori Kofoid From:Caroline Ashurst <hello@carolineashurst.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:46 AM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Chris Balestra Cc:Fernando Figueroa; CJ Randall Subject:Zoning Board Follow-Up from 111 Wiedmaier Cell Tower WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear ZB Staff: I am following up from the board meeting last Tuesday. Thank you for reflecting the concerns that our community has been expressing for the past 2 months regarding this proposed project. Your inquiries about defining the -actual- necessity of this location (which again, is truly subjective). I am grateful that you engaged in critical questioning in regards to this specific location, the actual types of gaps who- drivers vs residents, what- texts vs calls, etc, why-the actual quantity of calls and tiny area actually affected by this, and how- least intrusive means, size of pole to fill small gap which you expertly identified through your very astute questioning). THANK YOU. We are asking now that Verizon carry the burden of proof. They have neglected to show us WHY they cannot accomplish their task with small cells, ie the LEAST intrusive means. I will reiterate what the Ithacans for Responsible Technology have shared regarding the small cells: Fact #1: As Susan Brock has repeatedly pointed out, voice calls are the only applicable standard per our code. Fact #2: Almost all voice calls and texting are done using the low-band frequencies. Fact #3: Low band frequencies (like Verizon’s main low band 700 MHz (Band 13) or even 850 MHz (Band 5/n5) are particularly suited to this gap area as they offer excellent broad/distant coverage as well as the most effective building and foliage penetration (more than mid- or high-band frequencies). Fact #4: Small cells use considerably less energy than a macro tower. Fact #5: Small cells can often use already existing poles. Fact#6: How much mid-range bandwidth Verizon has to use is irrelevant to our situation of remedying a gap. It has been extremely problematic for the residents of the Town of Ithaca to hear the consultant hired by the Planning board change opinions throughout this process (starting with the Planning Board), and I ask this quite seriously: Has the consultant signed a non-compete agreement with the Planning Board solidifying his allegiance to neutrality, the Town of Ithaca’s best interests and the Planning Board for his consultancy? In his initial letters, he was clear that small cells would work, which he reiterated in the Zoning Board meeting. But then he backpedaled in his declaration. First he said they were technically feasible many 2 times, then tried to assert that in practice they might be more complicated. It’s problematic that he declares small cells are feasible in his written documentation then backpedals in our meetings. If it is feasible to use small cells in this situation, they would likely constitute the least intrusive means to fill this gap, and likely mollify most of the community concerns. Another important piece I would like to reiterate from IRT is that: The Planning Board’s consultant raised the issue that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and that (mid-band) is ‘90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band...Along Route 79 there's adequate coverage at low band. ...90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services.’ " Fortunately, Susan Brock reminded all that "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." Midband is rarely used for phone or text coverage. This investment of mid-band (which primarily utilizes macro towers) is based on Verizon's projections of fixed wireless broadband and other data heavy uses (streaming, gaming, video conferencing, etc). Our concern is that they are utilizing a relatively small gap in phone coverage to justify a macro tower for the companies' larger projected needs. Additionally, and unrelated- we also are aware that according to the FCC’s website about Tower and Antenna siting: it clarifies how it’s obligation under NEPA requires them to follow the Endangered Species Act. Following their link to the iPaC online mapping tool for the Endangered species locator, we see that this site is a home to an endangered species. This potential site will require additional inquiry from the US Fish and Wildlife Service because of its impact on the endangered Northern Long-Eared bat which is an integral part of our local ecosystem and agricultural longevity as they naturally kill predator insects from attacking local food growth on agricultural land. Was this addressed at any point in the process? If not, I wanted to make sure there was an awareness about this requirement in the environmental assessment as I question the comprehensiveness of the Planning Board's address of this. In closing, again I thank you again for your commitment to understanding this decision through a varied, comprehensive lens. I am grateful that you honored the citizens’ voices and gave us the respect we all deserve to share without feeling reproach from the board (unfortunately this is not the case for the public’s recent experiences with the Planning Board - and NOT just with this zoning issue particularly). Thank you for your decorum (which our community also felt was not present at the Planning Board meetings). We are grateful that you reflect our concern with the choice of location and for representing what we truly feel Ithaca is: a place where ecological preservation should be paramount. In closing, we urge you to request that you ask Verizon to follow through on what several of you said earlier in the meeting: showing (having the burden of proof) how a small cell or 2 could remedy the existing gap in voice coverage. So far, all we have heard is claims, not proof. 3 Thank you so much again for your diligence and devotion to Ithacan Values, Caroline Grace Ashurst With Gratitude, Caroline Grace Ashurst, L.Ac., M.Ac. www.carolineashurst.com @restorativeharmony The Fertility Formula Functional Fertility Coaching Restorative Harmony Acupuncture 2022|2020|2019 Philadelphia Family LOVE Award Best Acupuncture in Philadelphia! To helpprotect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download ofthispicture from the Internet. 2024 Restorative Harmony Acupuncture, LLC. All rights reserved. This document is for educational and informational purposes only and solely as a self-help tool for your own use. I am not providing medical, psychological, or nutrition therapy advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting your own medical practitioner. Always seek the advice of your own medical practitioner and/or mental health provider about your specific health situation. For my full Disclaimer, please go to https://www.restorativeharmony.com/legal-disclaimers 1 Lori Kofoid From:Caroline Ashurst <hello@carolineashurst.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:55 PM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Chris Balestra Cc:Fernando Figueroa; CJ Randall Subject:White Deer vs. Verizon - A Deeper Look Into Effective Prohibition WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hi, I respectfully wanted to follow up about what constitutes "a significant gap" as well as the circumstances surrounding the often-referenced White Deer vs. Verizon case. Verizon has claimed that a "significant gap", by definition, is 1% in service loss. Have we established where they are getting that information from? There seems to be no known official determination available for public consumption, other than a "he said, she said" commentary. I'm citing a case about the effect of prohibition here from the Liberty Towers, LLC v. Zoning Hearing Board of Falls Township, Bucks County, PA (2011 WL 6091081(E.D.Pa.)) case. Also- Is there something more recent that has determined what that is exactly? I think it should be requested that this determination be uncovered for obvious reasons, if so): In the Liberty Towers case, the court did not reach the question of whether it should adopt the multiple-provider approach over the user-oriented approach currently favored by the Third Circuit because it determined no “significant gap” existed regardless of which approach was adopted. The court noted “there are no magic numbers or percentages that constitute a significant gap.” Neither the TCA, the FCC, nor the courts have established the significant gap” threshold. In order to determine if there is a significant gap in coverage, courts are required to consider “the quality of the service in the area and the effect on the users.” This involves a number of factors, including call failure rates and the number of people impacted by the gap. In analyzing the evidence presented at the hearing by Liberty Towers, the court was unable to determine that a “significant gap” existed. I am aware that since then, there has been a precedential case which has further determined what effective prohibition" is. I encourage you to read this report of the "precedent" closely as the circumstances of 111 Wiedmaier are different and do not quantify our particular situation (Link to case report). It seems as though Verizon was able to win this case on a loophole due to the proceedings and determinations (and their timing) on behalf of the ZB: Verizon satisfied two requirements under applicable case law, first by presenting evidence of a significant gap in wireless coverage in the township and showing the proposed tower would fill it, said the opinion. White Deer’s zoning board “acknowledged 2 the gap in its variance application denial and does not challenge its existence on appeal,” it said. To be noted is that in their formal Application Denial, White Deer accepted that which Verizon claimed was a significant gap. This became a fatal error in their argument, having no leg to stand on in a court of law. And further: On appeal, the zoning board argued for the first time that Verizon should have challenged an indefinite 2000 Pennsylvania moratorium on the building of new cell towers on state forest land because the moratorium severely limited Verizon’s options for filling the service gap, said the opinion. In its application denial, the zoning board said Verizon couldn’t have exhausted all reasonable alternatives unless it legally challenged the Pennsylvania moratorium. But the zoning board didn’t renew that argument in district court, said the opinion. The district court also found that the zoning board provided no evidence or argument suggesting another location or technological means to address the service gap, it said: We agree with the District Court’s assessment of the record.” Because the zoning board didn’t raise its arguments before the district court, “it did not preserve them for appeal,” said the opinion. Notable here is that: a.) The ZB failed to provide alternative strategies for alternate locations as well as any argument relating to that. Documentation on Draft Denials is of paramount importance. b.) The ZB did not adequately reference the FCC and NEPA limitations for federally designated wildlife land (aka they lost an opportunity to address and leverage this important point adequately being they did not assert it originally, and therefore had no power in asserting it for the appeal). Again, very important to identify that Denial Appeal documentation must be clear, comprehensive and detailed to represent the position of the ZB. I share this information because it's obvious White Deer lost opportunities for protecting their community by making errors in the initial stages of their process; errors that the ZB of The Town of Ithaca can be aware of moving forward. I also believe that this case didn't have a shot at winning because of these errors, and therefore being that we have established conservation land (local vs federal, duly noted regardless), and that we have yet to give official determination with reasoning, that we perhaps will not fall into the same category as this overly-mentioned case we keep hearing about meant to threaten and subdue our efforts. Of course, I am not a professional of the law, so I acknowledge any lack of information that may be needed for the full scope of understanding of this particular case. However, I feel it necessary to point out these issues now while there has been no official declarations made. 3 Thank you. With Gratitude, Caroline Grace Ashurst, L.Ac., M.Ac. www.carolineashurst.com @restorativeharmony The Fertility Formula Functional Fertility Coaching Restorative Harmony Acupuncture 2022|2020|2019 Philadelphia Family LOVE Award Best Acupuncture in Philadelphia! To helpprotect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download ofthispicture from the Internet. 2024 Restorative Harmony Acupuncture, LLC. All rights reserved. This document is for educational and informational purposes only and solely as a self-help tool for your own use. I am not providing medical, psychological, or nutrition therapy advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting your own medical practitioner. Always seek the advice of your own medical practitioner and/or mental health provider about your specific health situation. For my full Disclaimer, please go to https://www.restorativeharmony.com/legal-disclaimers On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 12:45 AM Caroline Ashurst <hello@carolineashurst.com> wrote: Dear ZB Staff: I am following up from the board meeting last Tuesday. Thank you for reflecting the concerns that our community has been expressing for the past 2 months regarding this proposed project. Your inquiries about defining the -actual- necessity of this location (which again, is truly subjective). I am grateful that you engaged in critical questioning in regards to this specific location, the actual types of gaps (who- drivers vs residents, what- texts vs calls, etc, why-the actual quantity of calls and tiny area actually affected by this, and how- least intrusive means, size of pole to fill small gap which you expertly identified through your very astute questioning). THANK YOU. We are asking now that Verizon carry the burden of proof. They have neglected to show us WHY they cannot accomplish their task with small cells, ie the LEAST intrusive means. I will reiterate what the Ithacans for Responsible Technology have shared regarding the small cells: Fact #1: As Susan Brock has repeatedly pointed out, voice calls are the only applicable standard per our code. 4 Fact #2: Almost all voice calls and texting are done using the low-band frequencies. Fact #3: Low band frequencies (like Verizon’s main low band 700 MHz (Band 13) or even 850 MHz (Band 5/n5) are particularly suited to this gap area as they offer excellent broad/distant coverage as well as the most effective building and foliage penetration (more than mid- or high-band frequencies). Fact #4: Small cells use considerably less energy than a macro tower. Fact #5: Small cells can often use already existing poles. Fact#6: How much mid-range bandwidth Verizon has to use is irrelevant to our situation of remedying a gap. It has been extremely problematic for the residents of the Town of Ithaca to hear the consultant hired by the Planning board change opinions throughout this process (starting with the Planning Board), and I ask this quite seriously: Has the consultant signed a non-compete agreement with the Planning Board solidifying his allegiance to neutrality, the Town of Ithaca’s best interests and the Planning Board for his consultancy? In his initial letters, he was clear that small cells would work, which he reiterated in the Zoning Board meeting. But then he backpedaled in his declaration. First he said they were technically feasible many times, then tried to assert that in practice they might be more complicated. It’s problematic that he declares small cells are feasible in his written documentation then backpedals in our meetings. If it is feasible to use small cells in this situation, they would likely constitute the least intrusive means to fill this gap, and likely mollify most of the community concerns. Another important piece I would like to reiterate from IRT is that: The Planning Board’s consultant raised the issue that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and that (mid-band) is ‘90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band...Along Route 79 there's adequate coverage at low band. ...90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services.’ " Fortunately, Susan Brock reminded all that "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." Midband is rarely used for phone or text coverage. This investment of mid-band (which primarily utilizes macro towers) is based on Verizon's projections of fixed wireless broadband and other data heavy uses (streaming, gaming, video conferencing, etc). Our concern is that they are utilizing a relatively small gap in phone coverage to justify a macro tower for the companies' larger projected needs. Additionally, and unrelated- we also are aware that according to the FCC’s website about Tower and Antenna siting: it clarifies how it’s obligation under NEPA requires them to follow the Endangered Species Act. Following their link to the iPaC online mapping tool for the Endangered species locator, we see that this site is a home to an endangered species. This potential site will require additional inquiry from the US Fish and Wildlife Service because of its impact on the endangered Northern 5 Long-Eared bat which is an integral part of our local ecosystem and agricultural longevity as they naturally kill predator insects from attacking local food growth on agricultural land. Was this addressed at any point in the process? If not, I wanted to make sure there was an awareness about this requirement in the environmental assessment as I question the comprehensiveness of the Planning Board's address of this. In closing, again I thank you again for your commitment to understanding this decision through a varied, comprehensive lens. I am grateful that you honored the citizens’ voices and gave us the respect we all deserve to share without feeling reproach from the board (unfortunately this is not the case for the public’s recent experiences with the Planning Board - and NOT just with this zoning issue particularly). Thank you for your decorum (which our community also felt was not present at the Planning Board meetings). We are grateful that you reflect our concern with the choice of location and for representing what we truly feel Ithaca is: a place where ecological preservation should be paramount. In closing, we urge you to request that you ask Verizon to follow through on what several of you said earlier in the meeting: showing (having the burden of proof) how a small cell or 2 could remedy the existing gap in voice coverage. So far, all we have heard is claims, not proof. Thank you so much again for your diligence and devotion to Ithacan Values, Caroline Grace Ashurst With Gratitude, Caroline Grace Ashurst, L.Ac., M.Ac. www.carolineashurst.com @restorativeharmony The Fertility Formula Functional Fertility Coaching Restorative Harmony Acupuncture 2022|2020|2019 Philadelphia Family LOVE Award Best Acupuncture in Philadelphia! To helpprotect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download ofthispicture from the Internet. 2024 Restorative Harmony Acupuncture, LLC. All rights reserved. This document is for educational and informational purposes only and solely as a self-help tool for your own use. I am not providing medical, psychological, or nutrition therapy advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting your own medical practitioner. Always seek the advice of your own medical practitioner and/or mental health provider about your specific health situation. For my full Disclaimer, please go to https://www.restorativeharmony.com/legal-disclaimers 1 Lori Kofoid From:Daniel Seib <danielcseib@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, December 5, 2024 5:23 PM To:Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Codes Subject:Zoning Board Vote for 111 Wiedmaier Court Verizon Tower Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hello again, I'd like to thank you all for your thoughtful questioning of the Verizon lawyers and landmen who are pushing that gigantic cell tower for the Wiedmaier Court location. I want to repeat my objection to it based on the fact that it will look horrible, we don't need it (my Verizon cell service is fine and I live right there on Slaterville Road), it will lower my property's value, and it is not the best option for us, the people who live there. Its the best option for Verizon because it will make them the most money, but we live here and they don't. I really hope that you push them to look into, and hopefully adopt, using low band frequencies and small cells, hopefully on existing poles. The Verizon lawyers will claim it can't be done, but they are just saying that because they want that huge pole to make money on, so rent space to others and make it even more of an eyesore to us, the residents. Please stand strong against them, and stick up for us and the community. Thanks for doing this...I know its a thankless job, but we appreciate you, Daniel Seib 1581 Slaterville Road 1 Lori Kofoid From:Dara Riegel <darariegel@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, December 5, 2024 6:01 PM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Chris Balestra Subject:Wiedmaier Court Cell Phone Tower Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Zoning Board, I was unable to attend the board meeting last Tuesday due to a family commitment but have been in contact with others who attended and said it was a fruitful conversation. Thank you for considering the concerns and issues our neighborhood and community have been expressing about this project. We, like you, deeply question the necessity of having this tower in this specific location, given its proximity to our homes, growing children, and ecological area. According to Verizon's own website (see page here), it certainly seems that small cells would be the most appropriate and least intrusive choice to address the communication needs without disrupting this residential neighborhood in a rural setting and disrupting the natural area. I will also reiterate what the Ithacans for Responsible Technology have shared regarding the small cells: Fact #1: As Susan Brock has repeatedly pointed out, voice calls are the only applicable standard per our code. Fact #2: Almost all voice calls and texting are done using the low-band frequencies. Fact #3: Low band frequencies (like Verizon’s main low band 700 MHz (Band 13) or even 850 MHz (Band 5/n5) are particularly suited to this gap area as they offer excellent broad/distant coverage as well as the most effective building and foliage penetration (more than mid- or high-band frequencies). Fact #4: Small cells use considerably less energy than a macro tower. Fact #5: Small cells can often use already existing poles. Fact#6: How much mid-range bandwidth Verizon has to use is irrelevant to our situation of remedying a gap. I do hope you will ask Verizon to demonstrate (having the burden of proof) how a small cell or 2 could remedy the existing gap in voice coverage. Thank you, Dara Riegel 607-346-6062 107 Wiedmaier Ct, Apt A, Ithaca, NY 1 Lori Kofoid From:Andrew J. Molnar <andrewmolnar11@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, December 6, 2024 1:48 PM To:Codes Cc:Chris Balestra; CJ Randall; Marty Moseley Subject:The important larger context WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Zoning Board members, Thank you again for your work in working through the proposed cell tower issue. This email is to address the elephant in the room: besides aesthetics and property values, a significant concern of citizens all over the country is how these towers are negatively affecting our health. Literally thousands of peer-reviewed studies have shown harm from this radiation. It is this clear science that convinced almost all of Ithaca's City Council and Town Board members, initially skeptical of our claims, to pass new codes limiting new towers. While the telecoms continue to disseminate misinformation to obfuscate this issue, they have told their shareholders they are indeed open to risk around the health issues (see quotes below). Remember, it is in their absolute financial interest--perhaps even their survival--for this issue to be ignored by the general public. To give you insights on the complexity of this issue--including why, shockingly, local towns cannot officially consider health when citing towers--I ask you to read through my letter below. While you cannot publicly state your opposition to this tower in terms of health, you can certainly keep it in mind as you consider the variance (as did, I believe, the members of the Planning Board who voted to deny the tower). After reading through this material, I think it will become clear why reasonable, educated people around the world are outraged about this issue. Though I've been otherwise healthy for my five decades, I suffer from 'Electro-Magnetic Sensitivity' (EMS), a condition affecting millions of Americans and covered under the American Disabilities Act. Whenever I get near a cell tower or high- powered wifi router (same radiation), I start to get a headache and feel dizzy. Within minutes of me moving away, I fully recover. Before Covid, I was traveling in Europe and saw widespread opposition around the significant expansion of cell towers, often right next to homes. This didn’t hit home until I discovered the attempt to do the same in Ithaca. Ignorant of the issues involved, I spent dozens of hours researching the topic. I was shocked by the massive amount of science - literally thousands of peer-reviewed studies (including a 10-year, $30 million one by the NIH) - showing how pulse-modulated microwave (cell) radiation is harmful to humans, especially children, who are 2-10 times more vulnerable. (For an in-depth explanation of how cell radiation negatively impacts our health, see Berkeley's Joel Moskowitz at https://www.saferemr.com/2024/09/health-hazards-of-wireless-technologies.html.) I was even more alarmed by the fact that it seems to have gone under the radar in national media and does not seem to be being addressed at the national level. The millions of dollars of misinformation and lobbying sponsored by the telecom industry certainly hasn't helped, nor has the FCC who is supposed to represent citizens but instead is 'captured' by the telecom industry, according to experts like the Harvard University Center for Ethics. (Propublica has a great article on how the FCC shields telecom firms from safety concerns.) The massive amount of science showing harm is why the World Health Organization classifies this radiation in the same category of carcinogen as DDT and lead. 2 This science is why countries and regions around the world have taken significant steps to minimize the impacts of wireless radiation. This science is why firefighters across America oppose cell antennas on their facilities. This science is why insurance companies will not cover cell antennas - they deem them too “high risk”. And this science is why CELL TOWER COMPANIES THEMSELVES HAVE WARNED THEIR SHAREHOLDERS OF THE RISK OF LAWSUITS DUE TO THE EFFECTS OF CELL RADIATION! (*quotes below). In fact, an Ecolog Institute Report commissioned by T-Mobile and DeTeMobil Deutsche TelekomMobilNet recommended an exposure limit 1000x lower than the FCC’s current power density limit after reviewing the research on biological effects. New Hampshire is the first state to study the science of this issue in depth. After a year of review, their official Commission recently voted overwhelmingly to raise the red flag on cell antennas, and they recommended that any cell antennas should be at least 1640 feet from homes or schools. From their report: This Commission acknowledges the large body of peer-reviewed research that shows that the type of radiation generated by wireless devices can have a deleterious effect on humans, especially children, as well as animals, insects, and vegetation.....The World Health Organization and the whole insurance industry are hedging their bets against this radiation because of potential harm…A large number of independent scientists have concluded that the thresholds for Japan and the U.S. are unsafe…Why are the FCC exposure limits set for the United States 100 times higher than countries like Russia, China, Italy, and Switzerland?...Why have thousands of peer-reviewed studies showing significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and many other ailments, been ignored by the FCC?...A likely explanation is that they] are 'captured'...whose Commission members come from the industry they are overseeing. Particularly interesting is this 1-minute clip from an engineering professor emeritus on the official NH Commission studying this issue. He is an expert in this field and was originally a skeptic of the dangers. And here is a 1-minute clip of an EPA scientist speaking on this. Because of this, I helped lead the effort in both the City and Town of Ithaca to pass new codes limiting unnecessary towers. (The initial skepticism I felt from virtually all Board and Council members evaporated as they each learned about the clear science showing harm.) This fight is happening in towns across the country, all with critical implications for the health of Americans. Despite the changes in codes around the country, telecom companies are still rushing to install literally hundreds of thousands of new cell antennas around the country, sowing the seeds for a massive health crisis unfolding under the radar. Perhaps the most frustrating thing about this issue is the fact that in 1996, the telecom industry lobby inserted a clause into the Telecommunications Act saying that local governments are not allowed to officially consider environmental/health effects regarding siting cell towers. (According to experts, this is because they already knew the research showing this danger and wanted to inoculate themselves against risk. After all, why would they need to do this if they were confident of their safety?) I believe this is one of the most immoral and outrageous laws ever passed in our country, especially since the very stated purpose of most local codes (including Ithaca) is to protect the health and safety of its citizens. The expert attorney who Ithaca hired to write its codes, Andrew Campanelli, has said: The Telecommunications Act [of 1996] not only violates the 10th Amendment by stripping local governments of their power to protect their local citizens, but violates a fundamental right of self-defense under the Constitution, because it prevents individuals from protecting themselves against intrusion into their homes of illegally excessive levels of RF radiation. Given the significant negative impacts of this issue, several lawsuits have been set in motion. In a victory for our cause in 2021, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals (with Ketanji Brown-Jackson as a member) ruled against the FCC, essentially saying their cell radiation guidelines have not addressed the science of harm on this issue (the FCC's outdated guidelines are the most lax in the world, 100 times higher than in countries like Italy, Switzerland, Russia and China!). A good 2-minute clip on this. I and the millions of Americans who suffer from EMS are the living proof of the veracity of the science...the canaries in the coal mine' for the significant health challenge this poses to humanity. 3 Six decades ago, we knew the science regarding tobacco's harm. Little was done, and millions died prematurely. Four decades ago, we knew the science of global warming. Nothing was done, and we are now facing the consequences. Let's not make the same mistake with wireless radiation. I hope you will take all this into consideration as you deliberate on this new, dangerous tower in town. I welcome any of you contacting me personally if you would like to have a confidential conversation. Thank you. Andrew J. Molnar Cornell A&S, '94 Illumine Consultants 607-277-9420 Cell Tower Companies Warn Shareholders of Risk From Cell Tower Radiation: Verizon 10-K Report Our wireless business also faces personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits relating to alleged health effects of wireless phones or radio frequency transmitters. We may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits. In addition, we may be required to pay significant awards or settlements.” Crown Castle 10-K Report We cannot guarantee that claims relating to radio frequency emissions will not arise in the future or that the results of such studies will not be adverse to us...If a connection between radio frequency emissions and possible negative health effects were established, our operations, costs, or revenues may be materially and adversely affected. We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.” AT&T 10-K Report In the wireless area, we also face current and potential litigation relating to alleged adverse health effects on customers or employees who use such technologies including, for example, wireless devices. We may incur significant expenses defending such suits or government charges and may be required to pay amounts or otherwise change our operations in ways that could materially adversely affect our operations or financial results.” T- MOBILE 10-K Report Our business could be adversely affected by findings of product liability for health or safety risks from wireless devices and transmission equipment, as well as by changes to regulations or radio frequency emission standards Vodaphone 2017 Report ranks EMF as a "Principal Risk with “High” impact Electro-magnetic signals emitted by mobile devices and base stations may be found to pose health risks, with potential impacts including: changes to national legislation, a reduction in mobile phone usage or litigation.” 1 Lori Kofoid From:Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 11, 2024 11:49 AM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Planning; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Cc:CJ Randall; Chris Balestra; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Rod Howe Subject:I'm concerned about bias in the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. review process WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going 2 to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST 3 INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:James W Hamilton <jameswaldo@bluefrog.com> Sent:Thursday, December 12, 2024 4:18 PM To:Codes Cc:Lori Kofoid Subject:Shot Clock extension for variance to ZBAA-24-18 Appeal for Verizon "Sunny View" wireless service tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct Attachments:sunny view aerial map with proposed overlay.jpg Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Thanks, Marty, for your notice about the requested extension of the shot clock for lawyer Jared Lusk's shady Sunny View deal. I would hope you might take this opportunity to kill the horrible Verizon project at your Monday December 16th meeting! Would the extra weeks allow Verizon to correct the lies they print on their "aerial map with proposed overlay," and perhaps admit that the "existing forested land" never really got reforested after Wiedmaier removed the woods there? Would Verizon ever admit that the "existing tree line" on that aerial map does not, in fact, exist? (I attach this bogus map, from the October 22, 2024 supplemental application materials Verizon sent for their project application.) Would lawyer Lusk ever admit that maybe S. Roberts knows that Wiedmaier is hoping everyone will forget that he was supposed to restore the woods to the conservation zoned lot he ruined? I am sure there are many ways Verizon could improve cell phone coverage in the short stretch of Slaterville Road where some calls are dropped when drivers hit the darkest hillside radio shadows. But a big huge tower that Verizon can use to rent space to other wireless communication providers will be real profitable if they can get away with it. I am not at all sure how a shot clock works. I know it's supposed to be spelled "shot," and not "shock," though for sure I am severely shocked to imagine that the Town of Ithaca could possibly approve of Wiedaier's nefarious plans. He ruined the woods in his Conservation Zoned lot, never managed to remediate the mess, which is not even really "existing meadow/range land" despite Verizon's false representation of that lot at 111 Wiedmaier Ct, and it may now be up to the ZBA to prevent a scofflaw landowner from profiting from such arrogant repudiation of our town's zoning laws. The longer we wait to stop the terrible tower, the more ways that elusive "S Roberts WC Land LLC" may find lawyers to make a mockery of our notion of Conservation Zoning. I include a copy of my 20 November 2024 email to the ZBAA, as it's still relevant to the notion that Conservation means something very different from a Limited Liability Corporation's plan to profit from environmental degradation. Yours sincerely, James Hamilton 1603 Slaterville Rd 2 Ithaca NY 14850-6337 607) 273-1335 Original Message -------- Subject: please deny variance to ZBAA-24-18 Appeal for Verizon "Sunny View" wireless service tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 23:48:54 -0500 From: "James W Hamilton" <jameswaldo@bluefrog.com> To: lkofoid@townithacany.gov Thanks, Marty Moseley, for inviting my comments on the proposed Verizon Sunny View tower height variance appeal. I received your notice of public hearing in today’s mail. Please do not allow S Roberts WC Land LLC to lease his Conservation Zone property to Verizon for the proposed “Sunny View” 138-foot wireless service tower. The destruction of this wooded land broke both state and town laws when Wiedmaier had the ridge top removed and adjacent hillsides buried under the bulldozed soil. The site plans provided by Verizon falsely claim there is an EXISTING TREE LINE,” where in fact no trees have survived, and a supposedly “EXISTING FORESTED LAND,” where only a few trees from an incomplete and insufficient forest restoration effort 15 years ago failed dismally to restore the site to woods. In 2008, the Planning Board resolved that “approximately 250 trees” should be planted to remediate Wiedmaier’s criminal destruction. Less than 25 trees have managed to hang on to the very edges of the flattened ridge. I attended the first Planning Board public hearing for the Sunny View project on October 1, 2024, where I heard the lawyer Jared Lusk claim that the current owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct did not know there was any problem with hilltop removal or the need to restore once-forested land to woods. But S Roberts WC Land LLC shares the same address as Wiedmaier at 1129 Avenida Sevilla #5C, Walnut Creek, CA 94595; the two of them are listed as owners of 4 of the other 5 lots in the subdivision. S Roberts bought the 111 Wiedmaier Ct lot for $1 from Clare George Wiedmaier on December 6, 2021; this was not an arms-length sale, and a lawyer claiming Roberts knows nothing of Wiedmaier’s problems with the site does not convince me this is a good way of avoiding responsibility for an ecological disaster. If Roberts can profit from the horrifically cleared land, now so simply and in its ruin ready-made for a 138 foot tall monopole antenna, in what way is Conservation Zoning, or any kind of zoning for that matter, effectively enforced? If Verizon is serious about leasing a 50’X50’ fenced compound, then the once forested land around it should be restored as woods. It seems Verizon is hoping the Town of Ithaca will forget Planning Board’s Resolution No. 2008 - 013, which called for the remediation of Weidmaier’s hilltop woods removal. But I have owned my home at 1603 Slaterville Rd since 1980, and remember the woods that used to grow on the ridge just south of my property. I remember Weidmaier’s excuses for the laws broken at 111 Wiedmaier Ct: his landscaper misunderstood his plans for the property, the conversion of woods into firewood there did not need a forest management plan, since it was just a landscaping project. Now, 16 years after turning the wooded ridge into a wasteland we should not pretend that a cell phone tower is the proper reward for a fictional “existing forested land” with a fake “existing tree line” around “existing meadow/range land.” These terms on Verizon’s “aerial map with proposed overlay,” a project sheet No. ESC-1 in Verizon’s application material, may be buried under the many pages of minutiae, but they do not stand up to fact checking. Five members of the Town’s Conservation Board visited the “Sunny View” site October 8th last month 3 and found no “forested land” or “tree line” in the areas falsely labeled on Verizon’s planning sheets. The fact is, this lot at 111 Wiedmaier Ct still needs restoration. It does not need to provide a profitable lease to anyone who shares an address with Wiedmaier in Walnut Creek CA. Please require that this neighboring woods in the Sixmile Creek Conservation Zone be restored in fact, where just now it is restored only in fiction. Its proximity to Sixmile Creek, just upstream of the City’s water reservoir, makes its return to woodland ecologically important. Please deny the variance requested in the ZBAA-24-18 Appeal! Wiedmaier did not respect Town Conservation Zoning code; don’t let him (or anyone sharing his address) get relief from Town height limitations. I hope you understand my strong concerns in this matter. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to discuss them further. James Hamilton 1603 Slaterville Rd Ithaca NY 607) 273-1335 1 Lori Kofoid From:Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:01 PM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Planning; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Cc:CJ Randall; Chris Balestra; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Rod Howe Subject:URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar- looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. 2 I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of 3 wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency 4 which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Diane Allyn Florini <diflorini@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, December 13, 2024 11:51 PM To:Codes Subject:Wiedmaier Court Cell Phone tower Attachments:Wiedmaier tower comments 12-13-24.rtf WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Director Moseley, Attached, please find some comments pertaining to the proposed Verizon tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court. Please share with the Zoning Board. Thanks for your attention to this matter, Diane Florini 1603 Slaterville Road Dear Director Moseley and Planning Board members, December 13, 2024 At the Zoning Board hearing of 26 November 2024, I appreciated the thoughtful opinions and questions of Zoning Board members as they examined Verizon's request for a height variance for a cell tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court. Thank you. Could you please ask Verizon more questions before your next meeting with their representative? Consultant Johnson wrote that wireless companies develop plans for the build-out of their networks on a 3-year schedule. Has Verizon given the Town its plans for covering other areas of the Town as is required when filing paperwork for a particular site? For example, it looks like the Snyder Hill area has no coverage at all. Would a tower on Snyder Hill help cover some of the gaps Verizon wishes to address? Before the next meeting with Verizon's representatives, Zoning Board members need more information from Verizon concerning the "least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services." Verizon has submitted neither sufficient "evidence showing that the applicant considered other sites and other means of addressing the gaps, and evidence showing the feasibility of addressing the gaps through the use of other sites and other means" nor sufficient evidence that the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community." Does the facility present a minimal intrusion on the community? No. It is not minimal. Reason 1 Exhibit G from 11-13-2023 submission - VZW Sunny View 111 Wiedmaier Ct- Initial Application to Town of Ithaca mistakenly intimates that the tower will be minimally intrusive when it answers the question: Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties? And replies: The proposed location of the Site is set back from the public rights of way and residential neighborhoods and will result in minimal to no visual obstruction to the neighborhood." IN REALITY, THE TOWER WILL BE THE FOCAL POINT IN AN UNPOPULATED NATURAL VALLEY IN A CONSERVATION ZONE. IT WILL BE IN THE BACK YARDS OF THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CALLED WIEDMAIER COURT AND VISIBLE FROM THE BACK AND FRONT YARDS OF MANY HOMES ALONG SLATERVILLE ROAD. HOW CAN THAT NOT BE CONSIDERED A VISUAL OBSTRUCTION—WHICH IS NOT A MINIMAL INTRUSION? A tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court will NOT be a minimal intrusion on the community. Reason 2 Article V. Conservation Zones (https://ecode360.com/8661513#8661581) § 270-22 Additional requirements and restrictions says: F. Scenic views, in particular those with viewing points from adjacent roads (and, in the case of the Conservation Zone along Six Mile Creek, from Six Mile Creek and the gorge) should be preserved using practices such as the following: Buildings should be sited below the crest or ridgeline of hills to preserve a natural topographic and vegetative profile. EXHIBIT Q (Photosimulation Report) in 11-13-2023 submission - VZW Sunny View 111 Wiedmaier Ct- Initial Application to Town of Ithaca SHOWS A RED BALL INDICATING THE TOP OF THE TOWER FAR ABOVE THE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHIC PROFILE AS SEEN FROM HOUSES IN WIEDMAIER COURT AND BURNS WAY. Buildings proposed to be located within significant viewing areas should be screened and landscaped to minimize their intrusion on the character of the area. THIS WILL BE DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF THE HEIGHT OF THE TOWER. TREE PLANTINGS SUGGESTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD WILL TAKE YEARS TO GROW. Where possible, buildings and structures should be located on the edges of open fields and in wooded areas to minimize visual impacts. NOT PRACTICAL AS THE EDGES OF THE SITE SLOPE DOWNWARDS. Visibility of proposed buildings or structures from public trails within Conservation Zones should be considered so as to minimize visual intrusion on views from the public trails. A GOOD REQUIREMENT--RESIDENTS SHOULD HAVE THE SAME CONSIDERATION. Verizon's proposed tower at Wiedmaier Court satisfies none of the Conservation Zone requirements intended to minimize the ruin of a natural topographic and vegetative profile. Reason 3 Zoning section 270-219 regarding Personal wireless service facilities [Amended 5-9-2005 by L.L. No. 5-2005; 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-2014; 6-26-2023 by L.L. No. 12-2023] https://ecode360.com/8662692#8662691) says: J. Visual impact analysis. Each application shall include a visual impact analysis that contains an assessment of the proposed facility's visual impact on abutting properties and streets, taking into consideration any PWSF structure that is to be constructed, as well as the rest of the facility. The visual impact analysis shall, at a minimum, include the following for Personal wireless service facilities which do not meet the definition of a small wireless facility: a) A visibility map to determine locations from where the facility will be seen. ONLY DONE FROM ROADS, NOT BACKYARDS OF NEIGHBORS. b) Line-of-sight drawings. WHERE ARE THESE? c) Detailed elevation maps. WAS DONE FOR THE WIEDMAIER COURT SITE. WHAT ABOUT FOR THE BEST TWO ALTERNATE SITES? d) Visual simulations, including photographic images, depicting the height at which the proposed facility shall stand when completed, taken from the perspectives of the public right-of-way, and of any properties situated in closest proximity to the location being proposed for the facility siting. Photos should also be taken from the perspectives of any properties that would reasonably be expected to sustain significant adverse aesthetic impacts due to their elevation relative to the site, or due to the facility location and the property location. ONLY DONE FROM ROADS, NOT BACKYARDS OF NEIGHBORS. NEED TO DO THIS FOR THE BEST FEW ALTERNATE SITES. e) Before-and-after renderings. DONE FOR A FEW PHOTOS BUT NOT THE WIEDMAIER PHOTO. Some of these evaluations of Visual Impact were done, but visual evaluations should also be done for the most promising alternative sites. We in the neighborhood will still see the tower if it is located on property north of Slaterville Road; however, it won't be close to eye level as it is in the backyards of homes along Slaterville Road and Wiedmaier Court. How the Planning Board could have concluded that a cell tower in a barren landscape would not inflict a significant adverse aesthetic impact on these properties is incomprehensible. The Planning Board wisely recommended "additional plantings of native trees located closer on the site to the closest-affected residences" (which IS possible since the no-disturbance zone" is supposed to have been reforested!). Unfortunately, such trees will barely obscure the bottom of the tower even if they grow reasonably quickly. Exhibit G from 11-13-2023 submission - VZW Sunny View 111 Wiedmaier Ct- Initial Application to Town of Ithaca asks: Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance? Suggestion 1 HOW ABOUT PUTTING THE TOWER ON THE HILLSIDE TO THE NORTH OF SLATERVILLE ROAD? ACCORDING TO WASIF SHARIF OF VERIZON, THE TOWER NEEDS TO BE HIGH. towers that are above area “clutter” provide a clear line of sight between the antenna and the devices it serves, which is crucial for maintaining adequate and reliable signals..." PB Packet 2024-11-19, pages 56–83 (Exhibits KK and LL) show alternative sites and their low-band Rf plots. Gary Foote's parcel 4 (called 2 in PB Packet 2024-10-29) showed a very extensive lowband footprint which covered many areas not covered in other Rf maps provided by Verizon. If the tower site were moved to an open field closer to the east of the property, the Rf signal might be as good as Verizon needs it to be with significantly less intrusion than a tower in Wiedmaier Court. The neighbors along Route 79 already have trees in their back yards which would mask the tower base. It is, however, hard to judge whether the Foote property or others would be a reasonable alternative to the Wiedmaier site because Verizon did not provide mid-band footprints for the alternate sites. Additionally, landmarks allowing comparison of various maps (such as the MAP - RF Report from Sept 25, 2024 showing the Supplemental – Height Justification Mid-Band Coverage(AWS/PCS/C-Band) are not clear enough to permit comparisons. On the Supplemental – Height Justification Mid-Band Coverage(AWS/PCS/C-Band) page showing four maps comparing Rf plots for different tower heights, many areas show NO coverage at all. On South Hill, parts of King Road and the Chase Lane neighborhood have poor coverage. Too bad we can’t really tell if we are looking at Chase Lane. It is hard to compare these mid-band maps to the Rf maps for alternative sites because: 1) the Rf band depicted is not the same, 2) the area covered is not the same, and 3) the landmarks or roads that are distinct enough to permit comparisons are almost impossible to see. Suggestion 2 HOW ABOUT GETTING SIMILAR Rf PLOTS FOR STRATEGICALLY PLACED SMALL CELLS? Hard evidence is what you need to see. For the two best alternative tower locations and for strategically placed small cells, please ask Verizon for Rf plots in all bands that can be OVERLAID on the plots from Wiedmaier Court. Last but not least, Zoning section 270-219 regarding Personal wireless service facilities [Amended 5-9-2005 by L.L. No. 5-2005; 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-2014; 6-26-2023 by L.L. No. 12-2023] https://ecode360.com/8662692#8662691) explains conditions in which a cell tower height may be increased without Verizon or a co-locator returning to the Planning Board. Site plan and special permit approvals are not needed if the tower height is increased by less than 15% (20.1 ft. for a 134-foot tower) or adds only a few antennas or a microwave dish. Please keep this in mind as you are evaluating Verizon's request for a height variance. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Susan H. Brock <brock@clarityconnect.com> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 11:29 AM To:Lori Kofoid; Marty Moseley Subject:FW: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Bill Johnson’s response should go in the ZBA packets (along with the resident’s two prior emails on the topic). Just checking to make sure the packet is updated with these messages. Susan Susan H. Brock, Attorney at Law 12 Pheasant Way Ithaca, NY 14850 tel.: 607-277-3995 fax: 607-277-8042 brock@clarityconnect.com This electronic transmission contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (607) 277-3995 collect) or send an electronic mail message to brock@clarityconnect.com. In addition, please delete all copies of this message from your computer. From: William P Johnson [mailto:bill@williampjohnson.com] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 12:14 PM To: 'CJ Randall' <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; 'Susan Brock' <brock@clarityconnect.com> Cc: 'Marty Moseley' <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Subject: RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! CJ, I hope all involved with carefully consider that a professional recommendation from other professionals, arguably an adversary, on LinkedIn or any other publicly accessible platform does not constitute a conflict of interest. True conflicts of interest, rather than mere inuendo and disagreement with inconvenient opinions, involve an unmanaged and compromised objectivity that facilitate inappropriate actions. As one of many possible sources of information on the subject, the Defense Acquisition University, DAU, provides training on identification of conflicts of interest to DoD personnel involved with financial responsibilities within the 2 agency. DAU frames the issue with three categories taken from the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) in FAR Part 3 (Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest). The categories are (i) Unequal access to information; (ii) Impaired objectivity; (iii) Biased ground rules. Unequal access to information. The information supplied by Verizon Wireless is sent to the town, and that information is posted to the town’s web site. There is no access we have to other information. That information is interpreted in light of engineering principles as to it shows and whether Verizon Wireless’ statements are accurate with respect to that information. Our reports are intended to vet that information. Impaired objectivity. The materials provided by Verizon Wireless were reviewed and explained in light of the engineering principles regarding wireless communication facilities. Just because a professional agrees with another professional’s opinion does not constitute a conflict of interest. Especially in the context of engineering review, if the conclusions do not match the facts then it is not difficult to point out error using sound analysis. Beyond the facts, it may surprise the lay person that engineering is not a “True or False” proposition. Engineering involves significant trade-offs between conflicting goals of operational efficiency, reliability, and cost of deployment. Engineers can disagree on the use of the facts in light of those and other objectives. Professional agreement does not mean there is a conflict of interest. Naturally, in the present case, the town boards are free to accept or reject any of the statements in our reports or our public testimony when taken in context. We stand by those statements nonetheless in light of our knowledge and experience with wireless communication facilities and the issues surrounding deployment in the last several decades. Biased ground rules. Our work does not involve establishment of ground rules – those are developed by the town’s zoning laws and procedures, published, and applied by the appointed boards under advice from their legal counsel. I hope those concerned will scrutinize my reports that show a different picture than selectively framed in the Babjak email. For example, until Attorney Brock clarified the “preferred frequency” meaning, if taken at face value our conclusion would have been on the face cause to deny the permits. Hardly what one would expect would happen in an actual conflict of interest. There are other examples as well. Verizon made statements to the effect that an area cannot be serviced by shorter towers or small-cells. I volunteered a contrary opinion to the planning board that, indeed, an area can be serviced in such a way but that there are technical and operational engineering limitations under present technology and regulatory constraints. I explained in some detail that the total equipment inventory for a multi-band cell site cannot be installed in a package that will fit the size required for a small-cell deployment. Small cells will not have the backup power capability of a macro site. Small-cells have limited RF coverage capability. Infrastructure connecting the small-cells on utility poles are subject to disruption by trees falling through lines, road accidents that take out utility poles, ice damage on the lines, and a host of other possibilities. Yes, small-cells can be used but there are compromises that may also have legal implications. I offer my humble opinion that it was actually not necessary for me to annunciate the information at the public hearings that it is indeed possible to use small-cells and shorter macro sites to provide RF coverage and capacity and, doing so, was contrary to Verizon Wireless’ goal to deploy a single-site solution. Again, not what one would expect if an actual conflict of interest existed These are just some examples. Ultimately, the final decision given the competing goals within the present application are under the final authority of the planning board and ZBA. In summary, I am trying to help the town staff and boards vet the technical information provided by Verizon Wireless to facilitate planning board and ZBA decisions regarding their permits and variance applications. While the materials can stand alone to speak to the engineering issues, the complexity of interpretations and jargon often elude very smart people who do not immediately understand the engineering issues. If engineering findings in our reports or public testimony are perceived to be inaccurate or misleading, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss them – especially in light of the recent email arguing a conflict of interest exists. Naturally an accusation of duplicitous actions is professionally offensive. The fact that people in the telecom industry know me and choose to voluntarily recommend me based on character, knowledge, and professional background is not a conflict of interest. It is an honor to be so recognized by my professional adversaries, who are also professional 3 whom I generally respect. It is also telling that an arguably professional adversary would risk their own professional reputation with a recommendation to an unqualified and duplicitous connection. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Bill William P Johnson Independent Radio-frequency Engineering Consultant and Professor Emeritus | Rochester Institute of Technology PO Box 20263, Rochester, NY 14602-0263 Voice/Text: (585) 201-8744 Email: Bill@WilliamPJohnson.com Do not send any confidential information by any means without making prior arrangements. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The preceding e-mail message and attachments contain information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges. The information is intended to be conveyed only to the intended recipient(s) of the message. If you believe that you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by reply to this email. Unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2024 9:19 AM To: Susan Brock <brock@clarityconnect.com>; William P Johnson <bill@williampjohnson.com> Cc: Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Subject: Fw: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! FYI From: Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:01 PM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov> Subject: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar- looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. 4 Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, 5 I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding 6 whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. 7 If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Daniel Seib <danielcseib@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 12:59 PM To:Codes Subject:Verizon tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Zoning Board Members, I am writing in regards to the public meeting planned to address Verizon's appeal to the Zoning Board for their requested height variance for their cell phone tower. I have written many of these letters at this point, so I'm sure you get the idea of my, and many of my neighbors', objections to this project. This tower will be an eyesore, and no amount of landscaping will hide it, it will lower property values of surrounding homes, and this tower is not the least intrusive means of getting this cell coverage. I appreciate the Zoning Boards' questions to the Verizon lawyer in the last public meeting and I am heartened that your members asked for additional information from Verizon. I hope they provide that information, and I hope that the Board not only carefully evaluates what Verizon provides, but also ask for more information. There is no rush on this project, and any sense of false urgency on Verizon's part is most likely a ploy to rush this process. I hope ultimately that this project looks for an alternative site, as the proposed Wiedmaier Court site would be an eyesore which will dramatically affect the character of the neighborhood. It is my understanding that parcels to the north of Slaterville Road are available, and at higher elevations, but Verizon doesn't want those. Parcels on the north side of Slaterville Road would have less of an impact on the landscape. Smaller towers or towers on existing telephone poles would also be a better alternative. Verizon doesn't seem to want those, possibly because they have intentions of renting space on their giant pole they want to force onto the Wiedmaier Ct. parcel. If they are allowed to build there, they will most likely raise the pole height, with no need for consultation with local agencies, and definitely without input from us residents of the area. It sounds like there are many other alternatives to this massive tower that Verizon is pushing, but they don't want to do them because it doesn't maximize their profits. But we live here, and we are the ones who will be left with the ruin to our landscape while they make money off us. Please don't let this happen. We are not opposed to have this cell coverage, but we shouldn't have to sacrifice the beauty of our town and our neighborhood because of Verizon's strong arm tactics. Please use our laws for the benefit of the people of Ithaca, and not for corporate profits. Thanks you, Daniel Seib and family (and neighbors) 1581 Slaterville Road 1 Lori Kofoid From:CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 3:06 PM To:Marty Moseley; Codes Cc:Susan Brock Subject:Fw: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! FYI From: Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:01 PM To: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Hello C.J., I was hoping to get a response from someone on the Town staff in regards to my email concerning the perceived bias of independent consultant William Johnson. There are grave concerns from many in the community about his slippery analysis; i.e. vacillating on the feasibility of small cells and whether a significant gap" in coverage actually exists, and his ties to Verizon lead counsel Jared Lusk. I'm sure I don't need to tell you that in 2024, perception is reality. Especially in politics. The confidence and trust of the American people in our government is at its lowest point since the Pentagon Papers were released. Local government is one of the last institutions where citizens feel like their voices can be heard. If a large collection of residents believe that the Town has ceded independent review of building applications to the applicants themselves, then corrective measures need to be taken immediately. I am not alone here. I know there are many other people who feel the same way as me, several of whom have probably written to you as well. All we want is to have faith that the application process is conducted fairly, and that sense of faith is lacking right now. C.J., does the Town plan on reviewing William Johnson's continuing involvement in the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. tower proposal process? Will the repeated requests for Verizon to submit actual proof, not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data regarding the efficacy of small cells housed on existing utility poles within the coverage zone be granted and pursued? Since the Zoning Board is pushing a decision on this back to the Jan. 28th meeting, you have ample time to address these issues. I appreciate all the hard work that the various Boards and Town staff have to do. Thank you for taking the time to hear my concerns, which echo the concerns of every neighbor and concerned citizen of Ithaca with whom I have discussed this matter. I'll see you at the Zoning Board meeting tonight. Thank you, Bob Babjak 2 On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 1:21 PM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Bob, I received your voicemail — thanks for your inquiry. How can I be of assistance? C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. From: Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:01 PM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov> Subject: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar- looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported 3 propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the 4 telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this 5 whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:59 AM To:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Planning; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Chris Balestra; Marty Moseley; CJ Randall Cc:Rich Depaolo; Rod Howe Subject:Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Attachments:Comi - Richard updated 6.2021.doc We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar- looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! 2 This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted 3 to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded 4 that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. 5 Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. RICHARD ANGELO COMI 70 Cambridge Road Glenmont, New York 12077 518)439-3079 SUMMARY OF RELATED SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS Systems Excellent understanding, from a practical use and technical perspective, of telecommunications systems including hardware, line systems and data/voice system enhancements. Recognized for ability to analyze system needs, determine appropriate technical and organizational enhancements and implement to achieve results. Practical, hands-on experience in on-line management of systems including switches, interfaces and other equipment requiring attention to detail, responsiveness and accountability for in-filed operations. Experienced in troubleshooting; strong skills in managing networks and complex system/line configurations. Management/Administration Significant senior level management experience with bottom-line accountability for sales, marketing, finance, profitability, operations and distribution. Skilled in business development; initiated new business reaching sales level of $3 million in 18 months and profitability in nine months. Excellent record of accomplishment in managing cost reduction programs while concurrently improving service to the users. Able to manage multiple organizational units and priorities with efficiency and results. Experienced in supervising craft, management and support personnel. Fiscally accountable… managed with accountability operating budgets in excess of $17 million. Skilled in budget preparation, analysis and subsequent management to profit and cost standards. Skilled in personnel/human resource development including training, career planning and organizational development. Specific focus on determining training and development needs and implementing targeted programs to meet needs. EXPERIENCE REVIEW COMI TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES/ THE CENTER FOR MUNICIPAL SOLUTIONS Glenmont, New York 1995-Present Owner/Founder Utilizing his extensive industry background, he established a municipal consulting and master agent organization. With his in depth knowledge of cellular, PCS and other wireless industries, he provides leadership and organizational skills to a nationwide group on independent municipal consultants. As a zealous advocate of local government, he is virtually unique in the wireless consulting arena, as he exclusively serves local governments. He has worked with over a hundred communities on Wireless Ordinances, Siting issues, and municipal leases. He has prevented numerous communities from making drastic mistakes, some of which would have been virtually irreversible. In addition, his ability to deal with operators as a true equal has resulted in gains for municipalities that they never expected. His knowledge goes well beyond the mere technology and operations of a company, and includes the legal and procedural requirements associated with telephony, cellular and PCS applications and permitting. continued… RICHARD ANGELO COMI Page two GFCC (GLENS FALLS COMMUNICATION CORP.) Glens Falls, New York 1993-1995 President, Owner Responsible for all aspects of established business including financial, management, sales and operations. Purchased business as 100% owner; developed staff of 16 including management, technical and clerical support; negotiated large customer contracts, purchase equipment to include new DSC600 and new PC LAN billing system. CELLULAR ONE OF UPSTATE NEW YORK Delmar, New York 1990-1993 Vice President-Chief Operating Officer Retained to organize, launch and manage this start-up cellular phone service organization. Established cellular system in five months. Brought to level of profitability in first nine months… exceeded sales objective by 42% in year one… negotiated major contracts with vendors, suppliers and joint venture partners resulting in rapid growth, profitability and overall market share. Developed distribution base (dealer) and directed sales force management. Recruited and directed executive management staff with accountability for finance, sales, marketing, dealer services, customer service and technical operations. Directed business operations employing 20 and generating $3 million in annual revenues. Organized administrative, finance, customer service and operational units with bottom-line responsibility for budgeting and control. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY Syracuse and Albany, New York 1971-1989 During tenure, served as Director, Network Operations, Maintenance-Northeast Director of Operations, Network Services Administration-Northeast and Central Operations Supervisor-Upstate New York Traffic Superintendent- Syracuse Dial Service Supervisor-Syracuse In most recent management capacity, assumed responsibility for operations, maintenance and general management of system involving 95 switches, 100K special services (private line, data, voice, 1.5 service and DDS) and various switching technologies. Administratively responsible for staff of 365 and budget resource allocation of over $17 million. In previous capacity as Director of Operations, Network Services Administration, managed a 2 million subscriber network, 225 employees and budget over $8 million. Recognized for accomplishments in planning and implementing central office consolidations, reducing labor and operations costs and concurrently improving service levels. Contributed to technical enhancement of systems, networks and service levels. EDUCATIONAL/SPECIALIZED TRAINING Masters in Business Administration SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, 1977 Bachelor of Science UNITED STATES MILITARY ACAMEMY, WEST POINT, 1967 MILITARY UNITED STATES ARMY, 1967-1971 Captain; Honorable Discharge; Vietnam Era Veteran Received Bronze Medal for Meritorious Service and Army Commendation for Achievement RICHARD A. COMI My name is Richard A. Comi. I am owner of Comi Telecommunication Services and co-founder of the Center for Municipal Solutions (“CMS”), which provides services exclusively to local government, relative to regulation of the siting, placement, construction, and modification of wireless telecommunications facilities. I hold a Bachelor of Science in engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point; and a Masters of Business Administration from Syracuse University. I have over thirty-two years of experience in the telecommunications industry. During my career in the telecommunications industry, I have attended hundreds of hours of training on network design and operation of telecommunication systems. Moreover, as a Chief Operating Officer, I had complete responsibility for the design, construction, marketing, and operation of one of the largest Cellular RSA’s in the country. I have been asked, as an industry expert, to conduct seminars at numerous conferences for municipal organizations on the regulation of the siting, placement, construction, and modification of wireless telecommunications facilities. Some of these organizations include the National Association of Small Towns; the New York State Association of Towns; The Florida Municipal League; The New Mexico League of Cities; the New Mexico Association of Counties; and numerous other municipal counties and groups. By request I have also conducted seminars on these subjects for scores of individual local governments. I have drafted and designed wireless siting ordinances that are now in effect in hundreds of communities, and have further reviewed hundreds of other wireless ordinances. I have reviewed thousands of wireless siting applications, including inspecting the construction of the site when appropriate. The “siting process” used by CMS, including preparation of ordinance and review of applications and site construction, when permitted, are endorsed “services” of the West Virginia Municipal League. Expert Witness Experience: Court Testimony: Nextel v City of New Rochelle; NY, Federal District Court Manhattan New York; November 2001: Provided expert testimony on proof of need, site value, call and drive testing and Ordinance preparation Court Testimony: American Tower v. City of Huntsville, Alabama, United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Northeastern Division, June 2005; Provided expert testimony on proof of need, RF emissions, structural, aesthetics, and nearby property value. Affidavit Testimony: Nextel v City of Mount Vernon, NY, U.S. District Court of Southern New York; November 2003: Provided affidavit on proof of need, call and drive testing. Affidavit Testimony: American Tower v. City of Huntsville, Alabama, United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Northeastern Division, March 2004: Provided affidavit on proof of need, RF emissions, structural, aesthetics, and nearby property value. Affidavit Testimony: New Cingular Wireless v City of Rye, NY, United States District Court Southern District of New York, January 2006: Provided affidavit on proof of need, RF emissions, structural, aesthetics, and nearby property value Publications: Towers and Wireless Facilities . . . 1 Million More - Are You Prepared to Deal with the Situation? Co-authored for PSATS (The Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors); 2002 TOWERS AND WIRELESS FACILITIES . . . THEIR IMPACT AND HOW TO DEAL WITH IT (Co-authored originally for the CMS web site, but subsequently picked up and widely distributed in the Internet); 2003 TOWER AND WIRELESS ORDINANCES – Co-authored for The Missouri Municipal Review; 2008 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:47 PM To:Chris Balestra Cc:CJ Randall; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Town Of Ithaca Planning; Codes; Rod Howe; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo Subject:Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew 2 On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the 3 page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this 4 letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are "technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter 5 support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member (incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would "fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of 6 multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:21 PM To:CJ Randall Cc:Codes; Rod Howe; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Chris Balestra; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Subject:Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Attachments:wjohnsonlinkedin.png; image.png; image.png; Outlook-ekpn2x32.jpg Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Thank you, CJ. This is the first time we have heard this. In the past, we were told by staff that just including that email address would ensure it was delivered to the Planning Board members (same for the Zoning Board email and Zoning Board members). But, now that we hear differently, we will be sure that we address notes as such. So, to be totally clear, are you saying that any time emails are directly addressed to a Board (e.g. Dear Zoning Board members), they will always be forwarded on to all the members of that Board? Also, given this confusion, could you please verify if the following emails of ours were sent on to all the Board members? 1. 11/25 email with the subject "Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower" (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) 2. 12/3 email with the subject "A timely note for the Zoning Board" (sent to just the Zoning Board members) 3. 12/6 email with the subject "The important larger context" (sent from Andrew's email andrewmolnar11@gmail just to the Zoning Board members) 4. 12/17 email with the subject "Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! " (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) Thank you for this clarification, Marie and Andrew On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov 2 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. 3 On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once 4 that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're 5 talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 6 On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. 7 Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: 8 Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the 9 Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. 10 As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:34 PM To:Marie/Andrew Molnar; CJ Randall Cc:Codes; Rod Howe; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Chris Balestra; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Subject:RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hmm, I am now wondering if the email I sent to planning@townithacany.gov from my gmail account, jrzorn001@gmail.com, made it to the planning board at all. planning@townithacany.gov acknowledged receipt of the email, but I’ve no clue now whether the right people got it. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:21 PM To: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Thank you, CJ. This is the first time we have heard this. In the past, we were told by staff that just including that email address would ensure it was delivered to the Planning Board members (same for the Zoning Board email and Zoning Board members). But, now that we hear differently, we will be sure that we address notes as such. So, to be totally clear, are you saying that any time emails are directly addressed to a Board (e.g. Dear Zoning Board members), they will always be forwarded on to all the members of that Board? Also, given this confusion, could you please verify if the following emails of ours were sent on to all the Board members? 1. 11/25 email with the subject "Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower" (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) 2. 12/3 email with the subject "A timely note for the Zoning Board" (sent to just the Zoning Board members) 3. 12/6 email with the subject "The important larger context" (sent from Andrew's email andrewmolnar11@gmail just to the Zoning Board members) 4. 12/17 email with the subject "Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! " (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) Thank you for this clarification, Marie and Andrew On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, 2 Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct fileand location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew 3 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, 4 I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. 5 In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from 6 landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov 7 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. 8 On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once 9 that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're 10 talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 11 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 2:00 PM To:CJ Randall; Marie/Andrew Molnar Cc:Codes; Rod Howe; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Chris Balestra; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Subject:RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Great. Good to know it made it in. Thanks. From: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 1:54 PM To: Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu>; Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Hi Jeff, Yes, your comment received 12/16/2024 at 11:17 am was addressed to the Planning Board and delivered as such; the record associated with the 12/17/2024 Planning Board meeting is linked here: https://lfweb.tompkins-co.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=291205&dbid=9&repo=TownOfIthaca C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov From: Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:34 PM To: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com>; CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! 2 WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hmm, I am now wondering if the email I sent to planning@townithacany.gov from my gmail account, jrzorn001@gmail.com, made it to the planning board at all. planning@townithacany.gov acknowledged receipt of the email, but I’ve no clue now whether the right people got it. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:21 PM To: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Thank you, CJ. This is the first time we have heard this. In the past, we were told by staff that just including that email address would ensure it was delivered to the Planning Board members (same for the Zoning Board email and Zoning Board members). But, now that we hear differently, we will be sure that we address notes as such. So, to be totally clear, are you saying that any time emails are directly addressed to a Board (e.g. Dear Zoning Board members), they will always be forwarded on to all the members of that Board? Also, given this confusion, could you please verify if the following emails of ours were sent on to all the Board members? 1. 11/25 email with the subject "Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower" (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) 2. 12/3 email with the subject "A timely note for the Zoning Board" (sent to just the Zoning Board members) 3. 12/6 email with the subject "The important larger context" (sent from Andrew's email andrewmolnar11@gmail just to the Zoning Board members) 4. 12/17 email with the subject "Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! " (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) Thank you for this clarification, Marie and Andrew On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: 3 Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct fileand location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! 4 Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. 5 On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! 6 This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct fileand location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, 7 I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. 8 The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 9 On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. 10 From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. 11 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: 12 Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. 13 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going 14 to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. 15 If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 2:00 PM To:CJ Randall; Marie/Andrew Molnar Cc:Codes; Rod Howe; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Chris Balestra; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department Subject:RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Great. Good to know it made it in. Thanks. From: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 1:54 PM To: Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu>; Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Hi Jeff, Yes, your comment received 12/16/2024 at 11:17 am was addressed to the Planning Board and delivered as such; the record associated with the 12/17/2024 Planning Board meeting is linked here: https://lfweb.tompkins-co.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=291205&dbid=9&repo=TownOfIthaca C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov From: Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:34 PM To: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com>; CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: RE: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! 2 WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Hmm, I am now wondering if the email I sent to planning@townithacany.gov from my gmail account, jrzorn001@gmail.com, made it to the planning board at all. planning@townithacany.gov acknowledged receipt of the email, but I’ve no clue now whether the right people got it. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:21 PM To: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Thank you, CJ. This is the first time we have heard this. In the past, we were told by staff that just including that email address would ensure it was delivered to the Planning Board members (same for the Zoning Board email and Zoning Board members). But, now that we hear differently, we will be sure that we address notes as such. So, to be totally clear, are you saying that any time emails are directly addressed to a Board (e.g. Dear Zoning Board members), they will always be forwarded on to all the members of that Board? Also, given this confusion, could you please verify if the following emails of ours were sent on to all the Board members? 1. 11/25 email with the subject "Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower" (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) 2. 12/3 email with the subject "A timely note for the Zoning Board" (sent to just the Zoning Board members) 3. 12/6 email with the subject "The important larger context" (sent from Andrew's email andrewmolnar11@gmail just to the Zoning Board members) 4. 12/17 email with the subject "Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! " (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) Thank you for this clarification, Marie and Andrew On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: 3 Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct fileand location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! 4 Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. 5 On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! 6 This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. Thelinked image cannot bedisplayed. Thefilemay have beenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct fileand location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, 7 I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. 8 The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 9 On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. 10 From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew Thelinkedimagecannotbedisplayed. Thefilemayhavebeenmoved, renamed, ordeleted. Verifythatthelinkpointstothecorrectfileandlocation. 11 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: 12 Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. 13 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going 14 to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. 15 If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 3:51 PM To:CJ Randall; Marty Moseley Cc:Codes; Rod Howe; Rich Depaolo; Chris Balestra; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; Town Of Ithaca Planning Subject:Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Attachments:Outlook-gvz50aff.jpg Thank you. We've spoken to both Abby and Lori to gain some more clarity, and it seems that the general rule is that emails are not sent right away to all members (with exceptions as decided by you, CJ), but rather bundled as a part of a packet for the next meeting. Did we understand that correctly? If so, what happens if there is a timely element to an email? For example, is there a way to notate that and have those emailed on to the members right away? Same question for you, Marty, since we know now there are two different processes for two departments (new information for us). Thank you. On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 1:13 PM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Marie and Andrew, Correct — if correspondence is addressed to a particular board or committee, it is distributed to said board or committee members (i.e., Planning Board). Correspondence received as of 11/21/2024 is included in the Planning Board's current (that is, 12/17/2024) agenda packet, located here: https://lfweb.tompkins- co.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=291205&dbid=9&repo=TownOfIthaca; that packet is still being updated, as written comments submitted at the meeting or after posting of the official mailout packet and 24 hours after the meeting are filed permanently with the project folder along with any other comments received after the post meeting deadline (e.g., correspondence received from you last night at 7:46 pm). Recent past Planning Board meeting (2022-2024) agenda packets are located here: https://lfweb.tompkins- co.org/WebLink/Browse.aspx?id=41815&dbid=9&repo=TownOfIthaca. Best, C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov 2 Thelinked image cannot be displayed. Thefilemay have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify thatthe link points tothe correct file and location. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:21 PM To: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> Cc: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe <RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo <rdepaolo@townithacany.gov>; Chris Balestra CBalestra@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Thank you, CJ. This is the first time we have heard this. In the past, we were told by staff that just including that email address would ensure it was delivered to the Planning Board members (same for the Zoning Board email and Zoning Board members). But, now that we hear differently, we will be sure that we address notes as such. So, to be totally clear, are you saying that any time emails are directly addressed to a Board (e.g. Dear Zoning Board members), they will always be forwarded on to all the members of that Board? Also, given this confusion, could you please verify if the following emails of ours were sent on to all the Board members? 1. 11/25 email with the subject "Request to Reverse the Vote on Verizon's Wiedmeier Ct cell tower" (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) 2. 12/3 email with the subject "A timely note for the Zoning Board" (sent to just the Zoning Board members) 3. 12/6 email with the subject "The important larger context" (sent from Andrew's email andrewmolnar11@gmail just to the Zoning Board members) 4. 12/17 email with the subject "Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! " (sent to both the Planning and Zoning Board members) Thank you for this clarification, Marie and Andrew On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov 3 From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. 4 Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: 5 Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those 6 objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:00 AM CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thanks for your inquiry; planning@townithacany.gov is not the Town of Ithaca Planning Board's direct email address but is for any correspondence directed to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. As noted during last night's Planning Board meeting, the two respective email messages (received 12/11/2024 at 11:50 am and 12/12/2024 at 10:01 pm, respectively) were addressed 'Dear Town staff and Zoning Board members' and thus were delivered as addressed. This said, we regularly forward correspondence addressed to Planning Board, and we are happy to forward the attached correspondence as well. C.J. C.J. Randall, LEED AP ND Director of Planning Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850-4357 607-273-1721 x120 cjrandall@townithacany.gov From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:46 PM To: Chris Balestra <CBalestra@townithacany.gov> Cc: CJ Randall <cjrandall@townithacany.gov>; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov>; Town 7 Of Ithaca Planning <planning@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov>; Rod Howe RHowe@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Rich Depaolo rdepaolo@townithacany.gov> Subject: Re: URGENT UPDATE: William Johnson conflict of interest!!! Chris, We were a bit confused in the Planning Board meeting tonight when you stated that Bob Babjek had NOT sent his email regarding concerns with William Johnson to the Planning Board. When we look at his original note, the email address of planning@townithacany.gov is included. Is that not the Planning Board email? Furthermore, we also sent a note to the Planning Board earlier this morning, with a copy of his note in the chain under ours (also below). It seems this was also not forwarded to the Planning Board, nor did you reference that in the meeting when a Board member asked for his email.Could you clarify what is going on? Also, could you please confirm that this note in its entirety, and the previous two, have been sent to all the Planning Board members? Thank you. Marie and Andrew On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 10:58 AM Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> wrote: We received this letter and are glad to see that someone else is on top of this. We have been shocked to witness the way that the RF consultant William Johnson, while perhaps avoiding untruths, has seemed to show bias toward Verizon throughout the cell tower review process with the Town Boards. Whether including extraneous biased information, changing his statements, or his meandering indirect responses to questions, he certainly does not seem to be an advocate for the implementation of the town codes. We are not at all surprised to see his connection to Verizon's lawyer Jared Lusk. We are concerned because it seems the Town staff and boards are relying so heavily on this person's opinions. We urge the Town to replace him. In our own quest to understand the technical possibilities here, we have spoken with other independent consultants, and been told that small antennas would be a less intrusive means of filling this gap in service. Through this process we have come across a truly independent consultant, Richard Comi, who has an engineering degree from West Point, an MBA from Syracuse University, and over thirty years of experience with the telecommunications industry. His consultancy, the Center for Municipal Solutions (telecomsol.com), works full-time with towns on wireless issues. They are currently working with several town Boards in NY. If you want to educate yourself further on the industry's tactics in local communities (including the misleading use of propagation maps), there is a wealth of information on their website. We respectfully ask that he, or someone like him, replace William Johnson and become the Town's consultant for any future needs. Thank you for your attention to this timely and important matter. Marie and Andrew Molnar Ithacans for Responsible Technology On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 9:01 PM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Members, 8 I need to make a correction to the email I sent yesterday regarding the bias of the Town's "independent" consultant, William Johnson. I unfortunately included a link to the wrong LinkedIn page; it was a similar-looking, but completely different, man named William Johnson who also worked in the telecom industry. I apologize for this error. Here is the correct LinkedIn page, and I'm sorry to say his alleged bias is actually much more disturbing than I thought. If you scroll down to the "Recommendations" section, you will see a glowing review from none other than the applicant's lead counsel, Jared Lusk! (I also included a screenshot of the page attached to this email). He actually closes with, "I recommend him to any municipality..." Oh, I bet he does. Especially to municipalities where he currently has a pending case! This is unacceptable! How does no one from the Town know about their previous relationship? Why did Mr. Johnson not recuse himself from this case? This is an obvious conflict of interest. How can he maintain the basic appearance of independence when the applicant's lawyer is singing his praises on LinkedIn!?! As someone who recently moved to the area and has an outsider’s perspective on local governance, I must say that I’m appalled by what I’ve witnessed. From Fred Wilcox’s patronizing attitude and obvious favoritism toward the applicant to his strong-arm tactics employed on the Planning Board, along with the lack of notice given to nearby residents about this project, the refusal to allow public comments on the day of the vote, and the Planning Board’s inability or unwillingness to require the applicant to provide evidence—not just the opinion of their engineer, but actual data-supported propagation maps as they did for the alternate sites—on the effectiveness of small cells to address the coverage gap, it all raises serious concerns. And now, the independent consultant appears to be in bed with the applicant’s attorney! With all due respect, it looks like a clown show! I am formally requesting that William Johnson be relieved as the independent consultant and replaced with someone who has no prior connection to the applicant's attorney, Jared Lusk; and the Planning Board reopen its evaluation of the 111 Wiedmaier Ct. site plan and demand the applicant produce in-kind RF propagation analysis for multiple small cells deployed on existing utility poles along 79, Burns, and Coddington as they have for alternative tower sites. Once that evidence has been presented to the Board and reviewed by a new and truly independent consultant, then the Board can have a legitimate re-vote on the site plan. I, along the rest of the Town of Ithaca, eagerly await your response to the serious issues brought up in this email. We have put our trust in you to be stewards of this sacred land. Do not let us down. On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:49 AM Bob Babjak <bobbybabjak@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Town Staff and Zoning Board members, I live at 106 Wiedmaier Ct, the house closest to the massively intrusive proposed "Sunny View" PWSF. I have several grave concerns about this project, from the actual existence of a "significant gap" in coverage (for which there is no legal definition or universally accepted determination) to the alarming way it has been handled by Fred Wilcox and the Planning Board. The issue I want to address with this letter, though, is the "independent" RF consultant hired by the Town to evaluate new cell tower applications, William Johnson. In researching Mr. Johnson, I heard from those familiar with his work that he is biased toward the telecom industry (a glance at his LinkedIn page shows that he is fairly embedded within it), but I wanted to give him a chance. Unfortunately, even with the limited technical knowledge I have, it is obvious to me that he is biased in favor of Verizon. I imagine that some of you have also picked up on that. Here are a few examples that I believe call his objectivity into question: Johnson's initial report contained a number of extraneous and irrelevant one-sided opinions on the specific matter at hand of evaluating Verizon's proposed cell tower. This report was so egregious that the Town lawyer, Susan Brock, requested he resubmit his report after removing all those items (as outlined in an email to Mr. Johnson from Chris Balestra on 10/3/24). One of these topics was his opinion denying any harm cell radiation causes humans, a viewpoint the telecoms have been pushing to save their industry, but clearly outside his purview (and proven wrong by thousands of studies). I know health concerns are not 9 legally allowed to be discussed when considering PWSFs, but denying the very existence of adverse health effects connected to RF radiation exposure is like calling climate change a hoax! At best it's ignorant, at worst it demonstrates a willingness to obscure the facts for the benefit of telecom corporations like Verizon. Either way, it's a bad look for a supposed expert. In the discussion regarding the new proposed tower, Johnson could have made it clear that the vast majority of voice calls use low band, and these voice calls are the only thing required by law for Ithaca to consider (as set forth by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals: "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network"). He did not do so, and in fact did the opposite by highlighting in his revised 10/21 preliminary report that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and emphasizing that mid-band is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band....90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." All of this is totally irrelevant to the Town's consideration. Fortunately, Susan Brock again reminded everyone, "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." But, this clearly indicates a biased view in favor of the industry and more misdirection. In another instance of misdirection/distraction, Johnson goes into a long diatribe about other scenarios in which small cells are often used (all true), but he stops short of saying that they are also used to patch a gap in coverage - the very situation the Board is considering. In both his written materials and verbal comments, Johnson repeatedly made it clear that small cells are technically" a feasible alternative to a monopole cell tower (a core question in deciding whether or not they could be the least intrusive means to fill the gap and render an applicant's claim of Effective Prohibition null in the case of denial). In his 10/21 revised preliminary report, Johnson even writes, "Other approaches can include use of multiple shorter support structures, co-location on existing shorter structures, distributed antenna systems, and small-cell installations where visual impact is critical." He then follows up these statements with caveats that they might be less effective, or might require them to submit more applications, or could fail in the case of a catastrophic weather event toppling utility poles (again, not the Town's issue). Toward the end of the Zoning Board meeting, after one of his convoluted explanations, a Board member incorrectly) surmised that the consultant concluded that small cells would not be technically feasible, and Johnson did not correct him. His silence was curious and again seems to support the idea that he favors Verizon getting the pole they want. I was happy to see that Susan Brock has called this out a few times, and I hope his bias is so obvious that The Board, or at least some of its more discerning/knowledgeable members, have to acknowledge it. However, my concern is that the various Boards and staff are making decisions based on a (in my opinion) misplaced trust that the "independent" consultant is a neutral party. I urge the Town to find a more neutral consultant in the future. The bottom line is this: At the 10/1/24 Planning Board meeting, the Board requested more information on whether the "gap in coverage (can) be achieved with several microcells on telephone poles." In return, they only received a statement from Verizon engineer, Wasif Sharif, stating issues such as terrain, foliage, and coverage area as their reasons why small cells would "fail to achieve the site objectives." Notice how he didn't say they would fail to fill the coverage gap. In fact, throughout this whole process, Verizon has never stated that a small cell strategy would fail to fill the coverage gap." They only ever use language like "fail to achieve the site objectives," but the issue at hand is not the objectives of their proposed site. As per Town Code 270-219.R(4)., the purpose of the proposed PWSF is to address "a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap." So while Verizon's objectives may be to utilize the mid-range band frequencies that occupy 90% of their licensed bandwidth, and create a space they can rent out to other carriers in the future (and small cells would not meet those objectives), the Zoning Board's objective is to discern whether the LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS TO ADDRESS A GAP IN COVERAGE is a monopole that exceeds the allowable height limit by over 100 feet. Verizon has provided copious graphs and charts of colorful propagation plots for towers of various sizes at various locations, but they have steadfastly refused to do the same for co-located small cells strategically placed along the areas with the highest concentration of dropped calls. Verizon needs to be pressed on this matter, as it is THE key point in the entire review process. If small cells can fill the coverage gap, then they would be the least intrusive 10 means to remedy the problem, thus negating the need for a giant monopole and nullifying grounds for an Effective Prohibition declaration. If the Town's "independent" consultant is simply accepting Verizon's evidence-free justification for not using small cells, then he is grossly shirking his duty. Why do we have Verizon provide hard data to support their claims on dropped calls, communication failures, and the coverage propagation of multiple sized towers at multiple sites but then accept their unsupported opinion about the efficacy of small cells? Especially in light of Mr. Johnson's constant flip-flopping on the matter, the Board needs to request, no, demand the same level of data-supported evidence for the coverage of small cells that Verizon provided for everything else. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Bob Babjak 106 Wiedmaier Ct. 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Sent:Thursday, December 19, 2024 3:38 PM To:Chris Jung; Connor Terry; Dana Magnuson; David Squires ; Larry Sallinger (larry14850 @gmail.com); Marty Moseley; Matthew Minnig; Ritter, Kim Cc:Codes; Susan H. Brock Subject:FW: A timely note for the Zoning Board Categories:Red Category Good Afternoon Zoning Board Members, We were requested to send this email to you prior to the January mailout for the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting that will occur on January 28, 2025. It is unusual that we send our correspondence prior to the mailout, but I agreed to send the email early. It will also be in your packet for the January 28th meeting, as usual. Thank you, Marty Moseley Director of Code Enforcement Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 P: 607-273-1783 F: 607-273-1704 www.townithacany.gov The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and intended only for the individual or entity to whom or which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, alteration, or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e- mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone (607-273-1783), or by return e-mail, and delete this e- mail message. From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2024 3:34 PM To: Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov>; Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Subject: Fwd: A timely note for the Zoning Board Thank you for talking today. The timely email is below. 2 Could you please confirm once you've sent it on to the ZB members? Thank you. Andrew Forwarded message --------- From: Marie/Andrew Molnar <marieandrew93@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:29 PM Subject: A timely note for the Zoning Board To: <codes@townithacany.gov>, Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department <clerks@townithacany.gov> Zoning Board members, Thank you for your careful attention to details around Verizon’s proposed cell tower. We were relieved to finally hear some critical discerning questions asked concerning the need for this specific macro tower in this specific location, including distinguishing the size of the actual gap NOT the entire "Sunny View project area", questioning the need for such a large pole to fill a relatively small gap, and the proof (not simply conclusory statements) that this tower is the least intrusive means to fill the small gap. We have a timely request: We ask that you request that Verizon also show the least intrusive way to remedy the gap for voice coverage using small cell(s). Somebody brought this up earlier in the meeting, but then it seemed to get forgotten. Some relevant facts: Fact #1: As Susan Brock has repeatedly pointed out, voice calls are the only applicable standard per our code. Fact #2: Almost all voice calls and texting are done using the low-band frequencies. Fact #3: Low band frequencies (like Verizon’s main low band 700 MHz (Band 13) or even 850 MHz (Band 5/n5) are particularly suited to this gap area as they offer excellent broad/distant coverage as well as the most effective building and foliage penetration (more than mid- or high-band frequencies). Fact #4: Small cells use considerably less energy than a macro tower. Fact #5: Small cells can often use already existing poles. Fact#6: How much mid-range bandwidth Verizon has to use is irrelevant to our situation of remedying a gap. For some reason the consultant raised the issue that Verizon has no mid-band coverage in the gap areas and that mid-band) is "90% of their usable licensed bandwidth that they can provide to their subscribers; the other 10% is low band...Along Route 79 there's adequate coverage at low band. ...90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has available is not even on the map in this particular gap area....Without something in this gap area, we're going to be dealing with that outdoor marginal kind of coverage that Mr Lusk described in a lot of the target area, and not have the other 90% of the bandwidth for high-speed data and other types of services." Fortunately, Susan Brock reminded all that "We're talking about voice calls only, nothing about other things." It is not our concern that Verizon recently invested $52 billion purchasing C-band/mid-band (such that it now makes up 90% of their usable licensed spectrum). Midband is rarely used for phone or text coverage. This investment of mid-band (which primarily utilizes macro towers) is based on Verizon's projections of fixed wireless broadband and other data heavy uses (streaming, gaming, video conferencing, etc). Our concern is that they are utilizing a relatively small gap in phone coverage to justify a macro tower for the companies' larger projected needs. It has been confusing to hear the consultant change opinions throughout this process (starting with the Planning Board). In his initial letters, he was clear that small cells would work, which he reiterated in the Zoning Board meeting. But then he added that they might be more complicated (more project applications) or expensive for Verizon if multiple ones were 3 needed, or they are not ideal in a rare total power outage. None of these changes the fact that he has repeatedly said that small cells are "technically feasible." If it is feasible to use small cells in this situation, they would likely constitute the least intrusive means to fill this gap, and likely mollify most of the community concerns. So, in addition to the good information you asked from Verizon for the next meeting, we are requesting that you also ask them to follow through on what several of you said earlier in the meeting: showing how a small cell or 2 could remedy the existing gap in voice coverage (not the "Sunny View coverage area" or "project goals" as Jared Lusk repeats in this meeting: "we have uh stated I believe multiple times that uh this is the uh least intrusive uh manner of delivering service to the sunny view coverage area". Feel free to contact us if you have any questions. Thank you again for your work in our beloved community. Marie and Andrew Molnar 607-277-9420 We hope that Verizon, by having more realistic expectations of the amount of service it needs to provide, can find a better site for this tower or can use small cells. Please demand robust evidence that will allow you Board members to make real comparisons based on what is needed to cover the small demand in our rural area. Thank you, Diane Florini Corner of Slaterville and Burns Roads LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS is defined in Zoning section 270-219 regarding Personal wireless service facilities [Amended 5-9-2005 by L.L. No. 5-2005; 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-2014; 6-26-2023 by L.L. No. 12-2023] (https://ecode360.com/8662692#8662691). The location and design of a personal wireless service facility that would remedy a significant gap in personal wireless service coverage and 1) does the least disservice to the objectives stated in 270-219A(2) which include: f) Protect Town residents, businesses and institutions from potential adverse impacts of personal wireless service facilities, to the maximum extent permitted under law; h) Protect the physical appearance of the Town and preserve its scenic and natural beauty by avoiding and minimizing adverse visual and aesthetic impacts of personal wireless service facilities to the maximum extent practicable through careful design, siting, landscaping, screening, and innovative camouflaging techniques; k) Minimize the impact of such facilities on residential properties;], and 2) deviates as little as possible from: a) the preferential order of location in Subsection K (Priority of siting) Essentially: industrial zones, then commercial zones, then elsewhere) b) applicable design standards in Subsection L All PWSFs shall be sited, designed, and constructed in a manner which minimizes to the maximum extent practicable i) visual impact, and ii) adverse impacts upon migratory and other birds and other wildlife. Aesthetic criteria applicable to non-small wireless facilities include: The facility shall have the least practical visual effect on the environment. The facility shall be located at least 300 feet from any structure that contains a dwelling unit.) 1 Lori Kofoid From:Caroline Ashurst <hello@carolineashurst.com> Sent:Sunday, January 5, 2025 6:43 PM To:Town Of Ithaca Planning Cc:Codes; Town Of Ithaca Clerks Department; CJ Randall; Chris Balestra; Marty Moseley; Rich Depaolo; Rod Howe Subject:Dear Planning Board Members (CC: Town Board, Zoning Board) WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Planning Board Members: NOTE: Please make sure this email is sent to all the planning board members as we recently were told that in order for them to receive these emails and have them in the official register, we have to specifically request that by addressing them directly. Here is my specific request in writing to assure their receipt and documentation in the Wiedmaier/Verizon docs. Thank you.] I am writing today to request the board to re-vote and reject the Wiedmeier Court cell tower application before the Zoning Board's January 28 meeting. At the November 19 Planning Board meeting, the board members were misled into believing that denying the tower would be an "effective prohibition." However, Verizon failed to prove, as required by code, that their 138' monopole is the least intrusive way to address the service gap. The town's independent consultant confirmed that smaller, less obtrusive solutions, such as small cell antennas, are viable alternatives—something Verizon never - actually- disproved in their burden of proof. Instead, they relied on vague claims without solid evidence, misleading the Board into approving the application. We are deeply concerned that the Board’s decision was based on this misinformation, especially since a majority initially supported denying the tower before Verizon’s misleading statements. It appeared some members felt pressured into approval rather than exercising their authority to deny. Additionally, I would like to point out that the town lawyer seems to deny this claim. She mentioned at the zoning board meeting that the residents here at that meeting overreacted to what occurred at that planning board meeting in question- which is plainly untrue and concerning. Why is the public's experience of this meeting being gaslit? We have the right to voice our observations of this process and the events of the meetings. Let it be known that the town lawyer is essentially claiming that a group of people who all experienced the same thing in that room/on that zoom are all exaggerating/misinterpreting the situation. Please do not further gaslight this community. We will not have it. The voting process seemed biased and unprofessional. A straw poll initially favored denial, yet the Board suddenly shifted focus to an approval resolution. Chairperson Fred Wilcox’s comments, such as accusing members of “trying to find reasons to say no when you should be saying yes,” revealed a troubling bias toward approval. This behavior undermines public trust. The town lawyer downplaying this whole incident is disturbing and we will not stay quiet about it. 2 At timestamp 1:33 on 11/19's meeting, this is what was said: I’m concerned right now that members of this board are trying to find reasons to say no when the answer is yes. And that concerns me. People are struggling right now to figure “how can i say no and get away with it”. (Fred Wilcox) Fred then asked “Can a cell phone tower EVER be unobtrusive?” Caitlin said "Yes” and Fred started laughing when she was answering. Don't you find this concerning? I sure do. (Also, side note: why are there no meeting minutes available for that meeting on 11/19 available on the town website?) Here's something else that's alarming that I'm only sharing now as well: That day at that meeting on 11/19, one of the male members of the board came over to our group and started chatting with us. He encouraged us to contact the town papers, etc, to share our concerns. It was odd, and also gave us hope that he supported our case. We then asked him how he was voting. Do you want to know what he said? He said he was: "against it but I'll probably just vote for it because it's going to pass anyway." He told this to my face. What kind of attitude is that to have on the planning board? This man who is supposed to represent the community just admitted he caved into some agenda he was already aware of---and TOLD me? Unbelievable. At this point, for all of these reasons, we ask the Planning Board to correct this error, conduct a re- vote, and deny the cell tower application. You are in a position where you have to regain the public's trust because it has eroded significantly in this whole fiasco. EVERY MEMBER OF YOUR BOARD DESERVES THE RIGHT TO VOTE IN A WAY THAT REFLECTS THEIR TRUTH WITHOUT BEING BULLIED INTO THEIR DECISION. We are grateful for every one of you who tried to follow your truth and the values that guide our community here. You are on that board because you don't want to greenwash these agendas, and WE ARE GRATEFUL FOR YOU. RE-VOTE RE-VOTE RE-VOTE NOW. With Gratitude, Caroline Grace Ashurst, L.Ac., M.Ac. www.carolineashurst.com @restorativeharmony The Fertility Formula Functional Fertility Coaching Restorative Harmony Acupuncture 2022|2020|2019 Philadelphia Family LOVE Award Best Acupuncture in Philadelphia! 3 To helpprotect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download ofthispicture from the Internet. 2024 Restorative Harmony Acupuncture, LLC. All rights reserved. This document is for educational and informational purposes only and solely as a self-help tool for your own use. I am not providing medical, psychological, or nutrition therapy advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat any health problems or illnesses without consulting your own medical practitioner. Always seek the advice of your own medical practitioner and/or mental health provider about your specific health situation. For my full Disclaimer, please go to https://www.restorativeharmony.com/legal-disclaimers 1 Lori Kofoid From:Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 11:00 AM To:Codes; Lori Kofoid Subject:Re: Please deny the height variance on the proposed Verizon tower Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Lori, As usual, please send this email to the Zoning Board or Appeals . Thank you, Marty Moseley Director of Code Enforcement Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 P: 607-273-1783 F: 607-273-1704 www.townithacany.gov The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and intended only for the individual or entity to whom or which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, alteration, or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e- mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone (607-273-1783), or by return e-mail, and delete this e- mail message. From: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 8:20 AM To: Lori Kofoid <LKofoid@townithacany.gov>; Marty Moseley <MMoseley@townithacany.gov> Subject: FW: Please deny the height variance on the proposed Verizon tower Please see email below. Thank you, Emily Banwell Administrative Assistant II Code Enforcement & Zoning Dept Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850 2 607-273-1783 From: Sheila Out <sheilaout49@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 4:32 PM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Subject: Please deny the height variance on the proposed Verizon tower WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Zoning Board members, Verizon has claimed that denying their tower/monopole would constitute effective prohibition. They have, however, never shown proof that small cells couldn’t remedy the gap in cell phone coverage. Verizon is pushing for the monopole in order to maximize profits by renting out spaces on it to other companies. They could also use it for their 'fixed wireless broadband" rollout, but this is completely irrelevant to a gap in voice coverage. A monopole with a height exceeding the code's 30 foot limit by more than 100 feet in order to remedy a small gap in phone service would constitute unnecessary massive overkill. Please deny the requested height variance. Sincerely, Sheila Out Ithaca 1 Lori Kofoid From:Bob Babjak <bobbabjak@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, February 21, 2025 3:10 PM To:Codes; Chris Balestra; CJ Randall Cc:caroline grace ashurst; Andrew Molnar Subject:Verizon tower at 111 Wiedmaier Ct. Dear Zoning Board members, Thank you for receiving this email, and I appreciate the work you do for the Town of Ithaca. I am writing today to urge you in the strongest possible terms to DENY Verizon's request for a height variance at 111 Wiedmaier Ct. for their Sunny View tower project. Approval for this variance, which would exceed the current height limit by 108 feet, would be a blight on the beauty of the Six Mile Creek Valley and set a precedent for future PWSF approvals that would significantly alter the character (both aesthetically and philosophically) of Ithaca. Aside from being 108 feet over the currently zoned height limit, I also request the variance be denied for the following code violations: Applicant has repeatedly failed to prove that this tower is the "Least Intrusive Means" of remedying their claim of a significant gap of coverage (Town Code 270-219). While they have provided reams of data supporting this site as the best option for their tower, they have not produced a shred of data in regards to the efficacy of small cells co- located on existing utility poles in filling the alleged coverage gap. They have only submitted the opinion of their engineer that the small cells would not "meet the objectives of this project." As pointed out to the applicant time and again, the legal standard is not the "objectives of applicant's project" but the least intrusive means to fill a coverage gap of voice from mobile phones to landlines connected to a national telephone network as outlined by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. By failing to submit evidence addressing the feasibility of small cells, the applicant is in violation of Town Code 270-219G(s)[5] and should be denied a variance. The applicant's Visual Impact Analysis inexplicably states that there will be no significant aesthetic impact from the tower. This is simply not true. They are proposing a 138" tower in a surrounding area where the tallest trees are less than 40" high. That means the tower will be 100" higher than anything else remotely near it, as well as clash with the forested hill that serves as its backdrop when viewed from Route 79. Speaking of Route 79, it is one of the few main arteries into Ithaca from the south. Where visitors arriving to the area are currently greeted by the majestic natural beauty of the Southern Tier, this tower would serve as an immense disrupter to the character of The Town. So not only would this be an eyesore to visitors traversing Route 79, but also to all the nearby residents of Slaterville Rd. and Burns Rd. For the applicant's intentional misrepresentation of the project's aesthetic impact, it should be denied a variance. I also want to reiterate the approval standards in our Town Codes for PWSFs: o 270-219R(3)(b)[1] A significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant’s Personal Wireless Services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant’s claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. - Just because the applicant may wish to have better wireless internet service, our Town Code defines coverage as "the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network." Applicant's desire for future uses are irrelevant when determining approval. o 270-219R(3)(e) Aesthetic impacts: The proposed PWSFs will not inflict a significant adverse aesthetic impact upon properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s), or upon any other properties situated in a manner that such properties might reasonably be expected to sustain adverse aesthetic impacts. - As established above, the project would most definitely inflict a significant aesthetic impact on neighboring properties. 2 o 270-219R(3)(g) Impact upon the character of the surrounding community: The proposed PWSFs will not be incompatible with the use and character of properties located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s), or with any other properties situated in a manner that the PWSFs might reasonably be expected to be incompatible with such properties. - As established above, the project is undeniably incompatible with the use and character of both the surrounding area and the neighboring properties. Honorable Zoning Board members it is for all these reasons (as well as the myriad adverse health issues associated with RF radiation that are recognized by the WHO, countless peer-reviewed studies, and adopted by over 100 countries around the world as justification for their own PWSF regulations, but which the FCC continues to ignore, and are therefore inadmissible in this process) that I request you deny Verizon's request for a height variance on a 138 foot monopole at 111 Wiedmaier Ct. Thank you, Bob Babjak 1 Lori Kofoid From:Diane Allyn Florini <diflorini@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, February 21, 2025 4:14 PM To:Codes Subject:Wiedmaier cell tower WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Director Moseley, I would love to attend the Zoning Board meeting on Tuesday but am taking minutes at another meeting. Please let the Zoning Board members see my comments below or read them at the meeting for me. Dear Zoning Board members, Verizon needs to realize that if it builds a cell phone tower on the NORTH side of Route 79, it will be in our neighborhood, we will all see it, but it will be LESS INTRUSIVE on a hillside than at eye level in a Conservation Zone. At an early Zoning Board meeting, the members wondered if the amount of cell signal that Verizon is proposing is excessive for the area which includes a rural highway (Route 79), portions of South Hill, and the South Hill Recreation Way. A tower on the north side of Route 79 will give great coverage to South Hill and a better line-of-sight to the South Hill Recreation Way. A cell phone signal from a Wiedmaier tower will have to go through lots of trees on the properties along Route 79 so the tree blockage along Route 79 from a Wiedmaier tower would be similar to that of a tower on the north side of the road. The hillside parcels owned by Gary Foote on the north side of Slaterville Road could support towers significantly above "area clutter." Verizon's maps of Gary Foote's parcels showed the towers close to residences, but those alternative plots of land were large enough to put the tower farther from the residences; these locations should be examined more in depth because they might give good enough coverage of the gap while being less intrusive. Looking at separate pictures of Rf plots is not easy. Verizon needs to present overlay plots of the Rf signal coverage from both small cells and from the alternative sites on those properties north of Route 79—including the one in Dryden—where towers could be sited. We all would still see a tower on the north side of Route 79, but it would not be intrusively AT EYE LEVEL and NOT in a Conservation Zone. Please balance the poor choice of a Conservation Zone against the a slight decrease in coverage. Thank you, Diane Florini 1603 Slaterville Road 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jeff Zorn <jrz3@cornell.edu> Sent:Sunday, February 23, 2025 2:06 PM To:Codes Subject:Verizon Monopole WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Dear Zoning Board members, Trying to keep Verizon from running rough shod over well-thought out local ordinances is a wearying task for community members. It seems like it should be a commonsense procedure. Always go for what will be least intrusive and least harmful. Yet Verizon is close to skirting our local guidelines regarding their intent to erect a 138’ monopole (trying to get around our limit of 30’). Verizon has not shown that this monumental pole is the least intrusive means of providing coverage or that small cell antennas are not feasible for their project. They want the big pole so that they can rent out space on it to other companies. I.e. the want to maximize corporate profits and the expense of local interests. I can only hope that a local planning board will put local interests over Big Tech interests. Make them prove their points with real data, not generic claims. Sincerely, Je Jeff Zorn 202 Pine Tree Rd. Ithaca, NY 14850 C: 607-339-7328 E: jrz3@cornell.edu 1 Lori Kofoid From:Jill Ullian / Dennis Anello <judax214@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 23, 2025 5:52 PM To:Codes Subject:Verizon's application for a large cell tower Dear Zoning Board members, I am opposed to Verizon's requested 138 foot tower. It is my understanding that Ithaca codes require proof that their 138' tower is the least intrusive means to fill the gap in service coverage. Verizon claims that it is the least intrusive means to fill the gap. This despite independent consultants attesting that small cell antennas would be able to provide viable solutions to filling the gap. It is my understanding that small cells use considerably less energy than a large cell tower, and can often use already existing poles of only between 25 - 50 feet, instead of the requested 138 foot tower. It is Verizon's burden to demonstrate that this large scale cell tower is in fact the "least intrusive means of filling the gap" by providing credible proof that small cell antennas could not viably fill the gap. I am therefore requesting that the board deny the height variance on this issue, since they have not met Ithaca codes at this time. I ask that the Board members re-read the 2 articles I submitted earlier (copied below) before making any final decision. As I stated in my earlier email to the Board, though I do not live in the vicinity of the new proposed Verizon tower, I do live in the Town of Ithaca, and am concerned about my neighbors' being exposed to unnecessary levels radio frequency radiation. Sincerely, Dennis Anello Former Physics Teacher (high school), Former Adjunct Faculty, Physics & Math (Springfield Technical Community College) Ithaca On 9/30/2024 2:43 PM, Jill Ullian / Dennis Anello wrote: 2 Re: Verizon's application to place a new large tower in the Town of Ithaca at 79 and Burns Road Hello, Though I do not live in the vicinity of the new proposed Verizon tower, I do live in the Town of Ithaca, and am concerned about my neighbors' health and safety. Please see the below 2 resources, which I believe give reason for prudent caution on the addition of this new large tower. I am a former physics teacher, and I would like to ask that you read these resources, and that they be included in the information you make available to the public. 1. WITH GOOD REASON radio program interview with Deborah O’Dell, professor of biology at the University of Mary Washington: Does the radiation emitted by our cell phones harm us?" https://www.withgoodreasonradio.org/episode/do-cell-phones-cause-cancer-2/ Does the radiation emitted by our cell phones harm us? Professor Deborah O’Dell recently finished a study that found cell phone radiation can cause changes to our cells. 2. Article from The Nation magazine: How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation The disinformation campaign—and massive radiation increase—behind the 5G and cell tower rollouts. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that- cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/ I am requesting that Verizon's application to place a new large tower in the Town of Ithaca at 79 and Burns Road be denied. Thanks for your work on this issue. Dennis Anello Former Physics Teacher (high school), Former Adjunct Faculty, Physics & Math (Springfield Technical Community College) Ithaca 1 Lori Kofoid From:Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 8:36 AM To:Lori Kofoid Subject:FW: ZBAA-25-2 Please see email below. Emily Banwell Administrative Assistant II Code Enforcement & Zoning Dept Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga St Ithaca, NY 14850 607-273-1783 From: nancy leeming <nanleeming@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 8:26 AM To: Codes <codes@townithacany.gov> Subject: ZBAA-25-2 I am writing response to the request for a variance, ZBAA-25-2. I understand the need for a scoreboard at the Rugby field. However I see no need for it to be larger that the zoning permits. Eliminating or shrinking the banners would have less of an impact while still serving the purpose of a scoreboard. This proposed sign location will impact visually the town park known as the East Hill Recreation Way. I fail to see how the need for a larger sign should be allowed to disturb the many who use the walkway daily. There is a town bench along the path which would look directly at the proposed sign. At the very least Cornell should be required to plant and maintain evergreens of sufficient size as to mitigate any visual impact to the walkway and neighbors. Nancy Leeming 221 Strawberry Hill Circle #2 Ithaca, NY 14850 1 Lori Kofoid From:Ithacans For Responsible Technology <ithacasafetech@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 24, 2025 11:33 AM To:Codes Subject:Petition signed by 169 citizens to stop this cell tower WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department Ithaca Town Zoning Board members, Please note that 169 people signed the below petition asking the Planning Board to re-vote and deny the cell tower. At their January 7 meeting, PB members indicated interest in this (clearly showing they had some misgivings) and asked the Town lawyer how to do so. After research, the Board ultimately chose not to, given the parameters expressed by the lawyer. We disagree with their conclusion that they were legally unable to re-vote. But, the same logic in the petition applies to you, the Zoning Board. We ask that you read the petition below and follow the clear will of your citizens, whom you represent. Please correct the error that happened with the Planning Board and deny the tower. Ithaca Planning Board members, We the undersigned concerned citizens of Ithaca are urging you to re-vote and deny the Wiedmeier Court cell tower application before the Zoning Board's January 28 meeting. At the November 19 Planning Board meeting, the Board members were given incorrect information that denying the cell tower would be 'effective prohibition' when in fact, Verizon had not shown any proof, as our codes require, that their 138' tower is the least intrusive means to fill the gap in service coverage. In fact, this large, obtrusive monopole is likely not the least intrusive means of filling this gap in service when there is the option of small cell antennas, which are viable solutions as attested to by independent consultants. Verizon “respectfully disagreed”, referring to their 'evidence' in Exhibit GG, which was simply conclusory statements that small cells were not viable to achieve “the necessary coverage goals sought by VZW” (not for remedying the gap). Tellingly, neither Verizon employees ever explicitly said that small cells could not remedy the gap in service. Thus, it was highly misleading for Verizon to claim that denying their tower would constitute effective prohibition, given that they never showed proof that small cells couldn’t remedy the gap. Given what we heard at the meeting, we are concerned that Board members' decision to approve was based on this false knowledge, especially since a majority of the Board said they 2 were going to deny the tower before Verizon's statement about effective prohibition. It seemed like some Board members felt that it was a done deal and that they couldn't deny the application. Ultimately, it is the Planning Board's responsibility to ensure that due diligence and adequate proof has been shown for a tower that will negatively affect countless Ithacans. Additionally, a re-vote would ameliorate what seemed like an unprofessional and biased process. In the meeting, a straw poll indicated a majority of the Board was in favor of denying the tower, but then the Board inexplicably changed from working off the 'denial' resolution to working off the ‘approval’ resolution. Board member Cindy Kaufman even questioned this saying, "I don't understand why we're reviewing the approval [resolution]." She was ignored. Unfortunately, it seemed that Chairperson Fred Wilcox's words/actions were biased in favor of approving the resolution, for example when he said, "I'm concerned right now that members of this board are trying to find reasons to say no when the answer is YES.” This behavior is unethical and an embarrassment to our town. Therefore, we ask the Planning Board to right this error, re-vote, and deny the cell tower. Andrew Molnar Natalie Lester Jeff Zorn Marie Molnar Cara Robertus Madeline McCann Dennis Anello Jill Ullian Lisa Bertuzzi Jill Kellner Mary Murphy Sherri Bennette Brittany D Johnson Lisa Robinow Jennifer Heatley Eamonn Murphy Amanda Moretti William Gauger Pam Millar leeny sack Mary Archin Louise Mygatt Josie Judge Emma Peila Ashley Schiller Natasha Keller caroline ashurst Wendy Ives Anna Sidor Jessie Vassallo 3 Bob Babjak Dara Riegel Rigel Bissonette Barbara Harrison Molly Donovan Sujata Gibson Lillian Tomik Tom Clausen Florinda Larkin Mary Alm Barbara Appel Vanessa Wood Henry Fitzgerald Alex Kowtun Molly Kornblum Dakota River I Peress Judith Jones Isabel Rachlin Helena Cooper Lori Yelensky Adam Monzella Deborah Loewe Kelly Hook Joan Jedele Daryl Mclain pat shea Kaori Teramura judith barker Rebecca Sydney Angelo Abdalla Melissa Jackson Dianne Ferriss Florian Chaubet Amala Lane Jerone Gagliano Emmett G James Riegel Jessica Lindsay Rhiannon Cobb Krisra Bellavigna Kelsey Hicks Nellie Wallace Colleen Cole Valletta Megan Allen Melissa Heslop sara garner Courtney Sullivan Kyra Coleman Christina Haltom Kalleen Grey Patricia Keen 4 Alison Gelsleichter Alisa Shargorodsky Andrea Davis Amy Wiiki KJ Jin Jennifer Oursler Kristine Wills Kate Nicholson Suzanne Beltz Yuliya Kim Katherine Hayes Helena Prieto Sarah Bannister Rachael Tissot Karlem Sivira Gimenez Kenzey Simon Crystal Keller Justin Hicks Dani Ferriss elizabeth mcever Marion Gunderson Bethany LeBlanc Virginia Smithson Damaris Vazquez Abigail Sisson Anne Schneider Daniel Seib Shula Stern Francine Rivera Reynolds Kaide Magee Jennifer Whitaker Heather Fowler Aaron Rakow Angela Brodie Britton Dougherty Jenn Feingold Emily Paul Beatrice Olesko Erin Fierst Morgan Dart Meghan Valesente Whitney Elrod Elana Maragni Jenniffer DeSimone Lynsay Ayer Marla Walkuski Esther Boissin Tonya Lower-jordan Jeanette DeVita Erika Rikhiram Caitlin Hunter Alaina Boyett 5 Ariana Carvell Austin Ward Mirjana Neskovich susan devereaux Rosa Cabrerizo Cassie Harrison Consuelo Serena Velasco Gonny Stevens Tiffany Robbins Nelly PRESTAT Renata Cheferrino Madeline Greenwood Asakura Yumi Analía Caiazza Russell Robinson Tanya Krebs Roxana Moya Ahunesti Chisolm Susanna Rogers celine duburg anchen Diane Pleickhardt Elizabeth Hardin Mara Alper Odette Wilkens Melinda McCann Joyce Lawrence Dianea Kohl Deanna Nassar valentin klinnert Rosemary Rukavena James Hamilton Jony Thomas Unknown Unknown Mary Lou Bagchi Miriam Epstein https://www.change.org/p/please-re-vote-on-the-cell-tower 1 Lori Kofoid From:Andrew J. Molnar <andrewmolnar11@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 25, 2025 3:28 PM To:Codes Subject:URGENT INFO FOR ZONING BOARD! WARNING** This email comes from an outside source. Please verify the from address, any URL links, and/or attachments. Any questions please contact the IT department We've just learned that Verizon is misleading Ithaca around the gap in service. What often happens when they are trying to build new cell towers is that they show a 'false' gap to towns, i.e. what they present in the gap DOES NOT MATCH WHAT THEY HAVE FILED WITH THE FCC. This FCC filing is the most trusted one, as they do so under penalty of perjury. If you look at the FCC map for the area of the proposed tower in Ithaca, THEY HAVE 100% COVERAGE FOR 4G IN JUST ABOUT THE ENTIRE AREA! This means that there's a major discrepancy in the maps shown to the town with what they have officially filed with the government. Keep in mind, federal law does not guarantee coverage for 5G - only to provide phone service in one frequency, which they clearly have. In the Second Circuit, if there's enough network coverage to make and receive cell calls, there's no significant gap in coverage even if the carrier wants to increase its capacity or to improve the network's ability to transmit data. In other words, just because they might have some 5G deficiencies, THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS TO BUILD ANOTHER TOWER UNDER FEDERAL LAW! Here is the FCC map: https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/location- summary/mobile?version=jun2024&location_id=3e629b6c-9da3-4449-8ab7- b90083def0bf&addr1=309+SUNNYVIEW+LN&addr2=ITHACA%2C+NY+14850&zoom=13.00&vlon=- 76.453580&vlat=42.411995&env=0&tech=tech4g Simply go to the "Mobile Broadband", Click on the check mark next to Verizon under "4G LTE". It will turn green and show you the 100% coverage all around the area of the proposed cell tower. The purple hexagons show the coverage area for Verizon. I urge you to take this into consideration tonight. Yet another piece of information to deny the tower. Thank you Andrew Molnar To: The Zoning Board of Appeals From: Chris Balestra, Senior Town Planner Re: Telecommunications Height and Town Code Town Code height provisions: Zoning Or.l. wp51 \zon. 11/27/93 10. In Residence Districts R30, no building shall be erected, altered or extended to exceed thirty-four feet in height from the lowest interior grade or thirty feet in height from the lowest exterior grade, whichever is lower. No structure other than a building shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed thirty (30) feet in height. Zoning Or. i, wp5i \zon, 12/3/97 10. In Residence Districts R30, no building shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed thirty-eight (38) feet in height from the lowest interior grade or thirty-six (36) feet in height from the lowest exterior grade, whichever is lower. No structure other than a building shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed thirty (30) feet in height. 2024 Town Code, §270-59: Except as may be specifically otherwise authorized in this chapter, in Low Density Residen al Zones no building shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed 38 feet in height from lowest interior grade nor 36 feet in height from lowest exterior grade, whichever is lower. No structure other than a building shall be erected, altered, or extended to exceed 30 feet in height. Town Code Telecommunications height provisions: 2003 Town Code §270-219.B: If the proposed height of the telecommunications facility exceeds the permitted height of structures in the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located, notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, a height variance from the Board of Appeals shall also be required. 2023 Town Code §270-219.N(3): All personal wireless service facili es shall comply with the height, setback, frontage, minimum lot size, and (except as specified below) yard standards of the underlying zoning district and the fall zone requirements of this sec on. To the extent there is a conflict, the more restric ve provision shall govern. If the proposed height of the facility exceeds the permi ed height of structures in the zoning district in which the facility is proposed to be located, notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, a height variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals shall also be required. CONCLUSIONS: Height provisions for structures have been in the Town Code since 1968, but they were revised over the years, as buildings got larger and taller. The current height provisions in Town Code are exactly the same as the 1997 provisions. The first collocation of cell antennas happened on a farm silo at 385 West King Road in 2001. The town did not have telecom provisions in place then. Telecom provisions were not added to the Town Code until 2003. The first cell tower proposal was proposed at 651 Five Mile Drive in 2009. The Town Code height provisions were NOT revised to apply to telecommunications facilities. They apply to all structures and were modified at least 4 years before the first telecom proposal (1997 revised height provisions – 2001 first cell antenna project); and at least 8 years before the first cell tower proposal (2009). Additionally, the height provisions in the current revised telecommunications provisions (2023) are EXACTLY the same as those that were drafted in 2003…six years before the first cell tower proposal. PB RESOLUTION 2024-023: Preliminary & Final Site Plan & Special Permit Verizon Wireless Personal Wireless Service Facility 111 Wiedmaier Court Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Planning Board, November 19, 2024 WHEREAS: 1. This action is Consideration of Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval and Special Permit for a personal wireless service facility located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, off Slaterville Road/NYS Route 79. The proposal involves the construction of a 138' +/- monopole tower with nine antennas, two equipment cabinets, a generator, and other equipment within a 50' x 50' +/- chain link fenced area. S. Roberts WC Land, LLC, Owner; Verizon Wireless, Applicant; Jared C. Lusk, Nixon Peabody, LLP, Agent; 2. This is an Unlisted Action for which the Town of Ithaca Planning Board, on October 29, 2024, acting in an uncoordinated environmental review with respect to the Verizon Wireless Personal Wireless Service Facility proposal, made a negative determination of environmental significance, after having reviewed and accepted as adequate a completed Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1, submitted and prepared by the applicant, and Parts 2 and 3 prepared by staff; 3. The Planning Board, at a public hearing on October 29, 2024, reviewed application materials dated November 13, 2023, and May 29, 2024, including Exhibits A-Y; additional application materials dated August 7, 2024, including Exhibits Z-EE; additional application materials dated October 22, 2024, including Exhibits FF and GG and revised drawings titled “Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon, Site Name: Sunny View WBS#: VZ-00049818.C.9341, MDG#: 50000072226,” with sheets T-1, AD-1, SB-1, C-1A, C-1B, C-2, C-3, C-4A, C-4B, C-5, and ECS-1 through ESC-7, prepared by Tectonic, dated 02/16/24 and revised 10/21/24; additional application materials dated October 28, 2024, including Exhibits HH and II; consultant report prepared by William P. Johnson and Steven Ciccarelli, dated October 21, 2024 and November 4, 2024 follow-up document; and other plans and materials; 4. The Planning Board, at their meeting on November 19, 2024, reviewed and accepted additional application materials, including a letter from William P. Johnson (RF Engineering Consultant to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board), dated November 4, 2024, a letter with Exhibits JJ, KK, and LL from the applicant, dated November 14, 2024, and a letter with Exhibits MM and NN from the applicant, dated November 18, 2024; and 5. Project plans, and related information, were duly delivered to the Tompkins County Planning and Sustainability Department per New York State General Municipal Law §§239-l et seq., and such Department responded in a September 13, 2024, letter from Katherine Borgella, Tompkins County Commissioner of Planning, pursuant to §§239-l, -m, and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law, determining that the proposed action will have no significant county- wide or inter-community impact; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Special Permit for the project, finding that the Special Permit standards of Article XXIV Section 270-200, Subsections A – H, of the Town of Ithaca Code, have been met, specifically that: PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 2 A. The project will be suitable for the property on which it is proposed, considering the property’s size, location, and physical site characteristics. The property is 12+/- acres in size, whereas the facility and all appurtenances will only encompass .46+/- acres. The proposed facility will be located on an existing cleared, previously disturbed, flat portion of the property; B. The proposed structure design and site layout are compatible with the surrounding area. The site layout will not change. Access to the cell tower will utilize an existing gravel drive. The tower will be constructed on an existing cleared site. The closest residence is 578 feet from the proposed tower. Parts of the facility will be screened from most vantage points by existing and additional new vegetation; C. Operations in connection with the proposed use do not create any more noise, fumes, vibration, illumination, or other potential nuisances than the operation of any permitted use in the particular zone. During operations, the facility will not emit noise, fumes, vibration, illumination (other than one safety light) or other potential nuisances. D. Community infrastructure and services, such as police, fire and other protective services, roadways, schools, and water and sewer facilities are currently, or will be, of adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use. There are no needed changes to existing infrastructure and services. All infrastructure to accommodate the existing use is in place and is of adequate capacity. E. The proposed use, structure design, and site layout will comply with all the provisions of the Town Code and with the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan. If the Zoning Board of Appeals grants an area variance for height, then the project will comply with all provisions of Chapter 270, Zoning, with the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan, and, to the extent considered by the Planning Board, all provisions of the Town Code. F. The site layout, with proposed vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access, traffic circulation, and parking and loading facilities, is sufficient for the proposed use and is safely designed for emergency vehicles. There is no bicycle or pedestrian access permitted or associated with the proposed tower. There is no public access associated with the project – the existing gravel drive, slightly widened to accommodate the project, will provide appropriate access for emergency vehicles. The project includes a small parking area and turnaround area for such vehicles. G. The project includes sufficient landscaping and/or other forms of buffering to protect surrounding land uses. Existing vegetation is preserved to the extent possible. There will be no loss to existing trees and vegetation. There is a very large no disturbance area of trees and vegetation surrounding the project site that will remain in natural growth in perpetuity as required by an existing deed restriction mandated by the Planning Board for a previous unrelated matter. The project includes additional landscaping around the base of the tower to screen equipment from adjacent residences. H. To the extent deemed relevant by the Planning Board, the proposed use or structure complies with all the criteria applicable to site plan review set forth in Chapter 270, Zoning. Page 3 of 8 PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 2. That the Planning Board further finds that not all of the requirements of §270-219.R(1) have been met, specifically: a) The proposed personal wireless service facility complies with all relevant federal statutory and regulatory requirements, including all applicable Federal Communication Commission, Federal Aviation Commission, National Environmental Policy Act, and National Historic Preservation Act requirements. Subject to condition 4.g. below, applicant’s exhibits show compliance with these laws, including Exhibits P, MM, and NN, and letter from GSS, Inc., dated November 19, 2024. b) The applicable standards in Chapter 270 (Zoning), Article XXIV (Special Permits and Special Approvals), § 270-200 (Considerations for approval) are met. See #1 above; and c) All of the following additional standards are met: 1] Public utility status. Services provided by the proposed PWSFs are considered public utility services, and the provider of such services is considered a public utility, in the State of New York. Application materials Exhibit C provide information supporting this finding. 2] Need. The applicant has proven a compelling need to address any significant gaps in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) through the proposed facilities and not through any other solution, and the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. a] To determine whether a gap is significant, the Planning Board shall consider, among other things, dropped call and failure rates, whether a gap is relatively large or small in geographic size, whether the number of the applicant's customers affected by the gap is relatively small or large, whether or not the location of the gap is situated on a lightly or heavily traveled road or in a sparsely or densely occupied area, and whether the applicant's customers are affected for only a limited period of time. A significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. b] In making the finding of compelling need, the Planning Board shall consider the evidence of a significant gap, the applicant's consideration of other sites and other means of addressing the gaps, and the feasibility of addressing the gaps through the use of other sites or other means. The following information shows a compelling need to address significant gaps in the applicant’s personal wireless services through the proposed facilities and not through any other solution, and it shows the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community: The consultant report prepared by William P. Johnson and Steven M. Ciccarelli dated October 21, 2024, and November 4, 2024, follow-up document support this finding. Some of the report and document statements that support this finding include: 1. From October 21, 2024, report, page 1 of 5: “Need. The applicant has proven a compelling need to address any significant gaps in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) through the proposed facilities and not through any other solution, and the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community.” PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 4 2. From October 21, 2024, report, page 3 of 5: “In addition to the existing low-band RF coverage shown in Exhibit H pages 15 and 17, Exhibit Z slides 10 and 11 shows “dropped connections” and “access failure” locations for all frequency bands discussed in the exhibit. Low-band signals propagate with less loss than mid-band signals, but low-band spectrum represents only about 10% of Applicant’s bandwidth. These data are collected by the LTE controller using GPS data reported from the user’s mobile device. We note that the maps are titled “Dropped Connections” and “Access Failures” which, from an LTE perspective, may not be only voice call dropped connections or access attempts. However, the fact that LTE sessions were dropped or could not be initiated implies generally that voice calls in progress could also be dropped or attempts to dial out may not be successful. Based on the map locations markers, the dropped connections and access failures were in a mix of outdoor, in-vehicle and in-building locations along and between area roads and demonstrates the potential inability to place and receive phone calls for convenience and emergencies. The wireless communication environment is such that when unavoidable “fading” occurs, connections may be dropped, but it does not mean that every existing connection or access attempt will fail as long as conditions provide at least minimal signal strength and user capacity at the PWSF serving the area. The issue in either case is predictable reliability. The data shows that reliability is poor in the test area. We therefore conclude that Applicant has shown a compelling need” since wireless reliability in the targeted improvement area is poor.” 3. From October 21, 2024, report, page 3 of 5: “Based on the information in Exhibit H for low-band, we would anticipate that low-band mobile device connections inside vehicles and inside buildings may be unreliable for in-vehicle and in-building users since penetration of vehicles and structures reduces signal strength. Applicants’ Exhibit Z page 9 states that the Dropped Call Rate (DCR) for the proposed service area is 11.84% compared to their standard DCR of 1%. The stated DCR is for both low-band and mid-band operation. If a call is in progress in mid-band frequencies when a user transits into an area the mid-band call will drop. If a user is already in an area that lacks mid-band service and there are either low-band capacity limitations or insufficient low-band signal strength (e.g., in-vehicle or in- building locations) it is likely that access will be denied or, if initiated, the connection may drop.” 4. From November 4, 2024, document, pages 1 and 2: “Our revised preliminary report hesitated to acknowledge a “significant gap” as we interpreted Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) in a manner that was, on review by town counsel, narrower than intended. Applicants’ propagation plots for low-band 700/850 MHz) showed usable signal strength in some of the target improvement area. We therefore concluded that, if there is a gap, it may not be a “significant gap.” By contrast the dropped call data shows more than 11% dropped calls which exceeds the 1% national goal. While there are likely several factors that are causing such a high dropped call rate, one of the causes is due to lack of mid-band RF coverage in the target improvement area. Calls in progress using mid-band spectrum will drop when a mobile user enter the area where there is no mid-band RF coverage. As a result, part of the 11% dropped call rate is due to an RF coverage gap in mid-band. Mid-band spectrum accounts for about 90% of Applicant’s licensed spectrum and is necessary to avoid dropped calls as mobile users enter the coverage gap area. Given the high dropped call rate, it is arguably reasonable to then conclude that there is a “significant gap” in mid-band RF coverage. That gap is confirmed by the propagation plots in application materials Exhibit H. By way of explanation, our over-interpretation that was corrected by town counsel derived from the statement that ‘[a] significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap.’ Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [2] [a]. Therefore, based on town counsel’s explanation of the meaning of the section quoted above in light of an excessive dropped call rate, as is the case here, results from some form of a coverage gap. Whether the gap is the result of weak low-band signals in building or vehicles as noted in our last report, or whether it is the result of mid-band calls-in- progress dropping as a mobile user enters the target improvement area, the results point to a significant gap” regardless of reference to a preferred frequency band. The remedy for the “significant gap” requires a new base station or other hybrid solution in the vicinity of the target improvement area that can provide sufficient low-band and mid-band RF signal strength to initiate, maintain and hand-off voice telephone traffic. Sufficient signal strength and capacity will also facilitate availability of data services since both the transmission and reception use the same LTE technology to allow two-way exchange of information.” Application materials Exhibits Z, AA, and BB contain drive test results and dropped call records. Applicant’s October 28, 2024, submission notes that, as stated at the October 1, 2024, Planning Board meeting, the dropped call data provided as Exhibit Z is for voice calls only. Wasif Sharif, Verizon RF Page 5 of 8 PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) Engineer who prepared these exhibits, reiterated on the record at the October 29, 2024, Planning Board meeting that the 11.84% dropped call rate experienced for the proposed service area, noted on page 9 of Exhibit Z, was for voice calls. Application materials Exhibits H and HH provide propagation plots and analysis showing coverage gaps in significant portions of the area to be served by the proposed facility. There are coverage gaps along portions of heavily traveled NYS Route 79/Slaterville Road, and in a number of locations where there are residences. Application materials Exhibits GG and II, and applicant’s supplemental submission dated November 14, 2024 (including Exhibits JJ and KK), show that the significant gap cannot be addressed through other solutions such as alternate locations, shorter towers, or one or more small cells. These materials also show that the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. Some of the alternate locations that are large enough to host the facility would require a higher tower, and many of these alternate locations would be closer to the nearest residence and require removal of more trees than the proposed Wiedmaier Court location and facility. The analysis in Part 3 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form section 9 (Impact on Aesthetic Resources), and the application materials on which the analysis is based, show that the project will be visible only from adjacent residences and by those travelling along NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road or Burns Road. One would need to deliberately look for the tower in order to see it while traveling in a vehicle on those roads. 3] Compliance with Chapter 270 (Zoning) and other Town Code requirements. Complies with all requirements of this § 270-219, with all other requirements of this Chapter 270 unless expressly superseded by this § 270-219), and all other applicable Ithaca Town Code requirements. See #1 E above. 4] Co-location on proposed towers. For non-SWFs, when construction of a tower is proposed, such a tower is designed to accommodate future shared use by at least two other PWSF providers. Tower is such designed, per application materials Exhibit L. 5] Aesthetic impacts. The proposed PWSFs will inflict a significant adverse aesthetic impact upon properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s) or upon any other properties situated in a manner that such properties might reasonably be expected to sustain adverse aesthetic impacts. Because of the site-specific characteristics of the property, the terrain, lack of vegetation, and direct sight lines from the public way and adjacent residential properties, the project will inflict a significant adverse aesthetic impact upon properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site. See Exhibit Q, figure S-1. The significant adverse aesthetic impact cannot be mitigated by site landscaping or other visual screening. 6] Impacts upon real estate values. The proposed PWSFs will not inflict a significant adverse impact upon the property values of properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s). This finding is based on application materials Exhibits Y and CC. 7] Impact upon the character of the surrounding community. The proposed PWSFs will not be incompatible with the use and character of properties located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s), or with any other properties situated in a manner that the PWSFs might reasonably be expected to be incompatible with such properties. This finding is based on the information and analysis in the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Attachment, and per Special Permit findings in resolved clause #1 above. PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 6 8] Mitigation. The applicant has mitigated the potential adverse impacts of the proposed PWSFs to the greatest extent reasonably feasible through siting, location, and design. Although immediately-adjacent properties on Wiedmaier Court, Burns Road, and NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road will be impacted by the project, the applicant has mitigated potential adverse impacts to the greatest extent reasonably feasible. The closest affected property is 578-feet from the proposed tower. Parts of the facility will be screened from nearby properties and vantage points by existing and proposed new vegetation. The facility is located on property that does not require clearing of trees or other vegetation and is not on a significant steep slope that requires significant grading. The facility is also situated as far from existing residences as is feasible on the property and at the shortest possible height to achieve the coverage needs of the applicant. Camouflaging the proposed tower as a “stealth” tree would increase potential adverse impacts rather than mitigate them. This is further explained in the application materials Exhibit Q. 3. That the Planning Board further finds that §270-219.R(2) below has been met, as follows: If the applicant asserts that a denial would constitute an effective prohibition, and the denial is based on a failure to comply with any of the standards in Subsection R(1)(b) or c) above, then pursuant to federal law, the Planning Board must consider whether the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. a) The Planning Board shall consider, among other things, a) whether the proposed site is the least intrusive location at which a personal wireless service facility that remedies an identified significant gap may be located, and the applicant has reasonably established a lack of potential alternative less intrusive sites and lack of sites available for co-location, b) whether the specific location on the proposed portion of the selected site is the least intrusive portion of the site for the proposed installation, c) whether the height proposed for the personal wireless service facility is the minimum height necessary to remedy an established significant gap in service, d) whether a preexisting structure can be used to camouflage the personal wireless service facility, e) whether the installation mitigates adverse impacts to the greatest extent reasonably feasible, through the employ of stealth design, screening, use of color, and noise mitigation measures, and f) whether there is a feasible alternative to remedy the gap through alternative, less intrusive substitute facilities, such as the installation of more than one shorter facility instead of a single facility. b) If the Planning Board finds that the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services, then pursuant to federal law, the Planning Board must grant site plan and special permit approvals. There are significant gaps in the applicant’s personal wireless services, as stated in Section 2(c)[2] above. Application materials Exhibits GG and II, and applicant’s supplemental submission dated November 14, 2024 (including Exhibits JJ and KK), show that the significant gap cannot be addressed through other solutions such as alternate locations, shorter towers, or one or more small cells. These materials also show that the facility is the least intrusive means to address the significant gap. Some of the alternate locations that are large enough to host the facility would require a higher tower, and many of these alternate locations would be closer to the nearest residence and require removal of more trees than the proposed Wiedmaier Court location and facility. The analysis in Part 3 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form section 9 Impact on Aesthetic Resources), and the application materials on which the analysis is based, show that the project will be visible only from adjacent residences and by those travelling along NYS Route Page 7 of 8 PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 79E/Slaterville Road or Burns Road. One would need to deliberately look for the tower in order to see it while traveling in a vehicle on those roads. The specific location on the proposed portion of the selected site is the least intrusive portion of the site because there is nowhere else on the site to place the proposed facility. The proposed height is the minimum height necessary to remedy the significant gap, as shown by the propagation maps and Applicant’s November 14, 2024, submission, including Exhibits KK and LL. No pre-existing structure can be used to camouflage the facility. The installation mitigates adverse impacts to the greatest extent reasonably feasible. William P. Johnson’s report did not recommend stealth design, and screening is being required to mitigate impacts at the base of the tower. There is no feasible alternative to remedy the gap through alternative, less intrusive substitute facilities, as shown by, among other things, Exhibit GG and Applicant’s November 14, 2024, submission, including Exhibits KK and LL. Pursuant to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, because the Planning Board finds that the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services, then pursuant to federal law, the Planning Board must grant site plan and special permit approvals. 4. That the Town of Ithaca Planning Board hereby grants Preliminary & Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed personal wireless service facility located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, off Slaterville Road/NYS Route 79, as described in Whereas #3 above, subject to the following conditions: a. Before issuance of a building permit, receipt of any necessary variances from the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals, b. Before issuance of a building permit, submission of revised landscaping plans with a planting schedule satisfactory to the Director of Planning, that show additional plantings of evergreen and deciduous trees along the south side of the access drive, c. Submission of revised fence details; any proposed fence slatting or boards (and other buffering materials) installed in fencing shall be made of wood or other natural materials, and shall be regularly maintained with natural coloration and surfaces, d. Before issuance of a building permit, approval of the Basic Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (SWPPP) by the Town of Ithaca Engineering Department; e. Before issuance of a building permit, submission of the required documents, permits, and fees listed on the “Town Code Enforcement Department Comments” list, dated 8-14-24; f. Per the requirements of Town Code, §270-219 P (2), prior to the installation of any personal wireless service facilities, execution and filing with the Town Clerk of a bond or other form of security or undertaking which shall be approved as to form, manner of execution, and sufficiency for surety by the Attorney for the Town and the Town Engineer; and g. Completion of the National Environmental Policy Act process with use of a categorical exclusion, or if an Environmental Assessment is required to be prepared, issuance by the Federal Communications Commission of a Finding of No Significant Impact. Moved: Fred Wilcox Seconded: Bill Arms Vote: Ayes - Wilcox, Cameron, Arms, and Stewart Nays - Reynolds, McGurk, and Kaufman Motion passed, 4 to 3. PB 2024-023 (Filed 2024-11-21) 8 STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF TOMPKINS) SS: TOWN OF ITHACA: I, Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk of the Town of Ithaca, do hereby certify that the above resolution is an exact copy of the same adopted by the Town of Ithaca Planning Board at a meeting on the 19th day of November, 2024. SEAL Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk Law Office of Robert J. Berg PLLC 19 Carriage House Lane Mamaroneck, New York 10543 914) 522-9455 robertbergesq@aol.com October 28, 2024 Members of the Planning Board Fred Wilcox, Chair Caitlin Cameron, Vice Chair William Arms Elizabeth Bageant Cindy Kaufman Sara Reynolds Gary Stewart Alternate member, Kelda McGurk Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us) Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless - Application for Cell Tower Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval on Property Located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.-4.1.22) in the Town of Ithaca ("Sunny View" Site) Dear Chairman Wilcox and Honorable Members of the Town of Ithaca Planning Commission: Introduction I am the attorney for Ithacans for Responsible Technology and certain Town of Ithaca residents and property owners, most of whom live in close proximity to 111 Wiedmaier Court, the so-called "Sunny View" site on which Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon"), proposes to construct and operate a 138-foot tall monopole cell tower including a four-foot tall lightening rod, nine associated antennas and equipment) in a proposed 50 foot by 50 foot compound. This site is on a private lot owned by S Roberts WC Land LLC. This lot is located in a Medium Density Residential ("MDR") and Conservation ("C") zone. I have been retained to assist my clients in challenging Verizon Wireless' application. My clients are not opposed to cell towers generally speaking. Rather, they are opposed to the irresponsible siting of a tall, unsightly, uncamouflaged industrial cell tower immediately adjacent (400 feet) to a developed residential neighborhood in a conservation zone such as 2 Verizon is proposing. My letter demonstrates that Verizon has utterly failed to meet its burden of proof under the Section 270-219 of the Town Code, supported by controlling federal case law in the Second Circuit, that requires an applicant for a special use permit for a macro cell tower on private property to (a) establish a significant gap in coverage in its wireless network in the area where it proposes to site the cell tower; and (b) show that its proposed solution is the least intrusive technologically feasible means of solving the demonstrated significant gap in coverage. In summary, I show that Verizon's attorney misleadingly sets up a "straw man" "public necessity" test for this Planning Board to consider when that test only applies to a Zoning Board of Appeals' determination of an application for a "use variance," an iss ue which is outside of the Planning Board's statutory authority and is not even at issue in Verizon's application. Moreover, I explain that Verizon's RF expert fails to answer meaningfully the Planning Board's request that Verizon analyze whether two shorter cell towers or other technology could "solve" Verizon's purported significant coverage gap in place of Verizon's proposed single 138 -foot tall cell tower at the Sunny View site. Finally, I illustrate one example of Verizon's failure to meet its burden of proof in establishing that its application meets the criteria for site plan approval and issuance of a special use permit under Section 270-219 of the Town Code -- I demonstrate that Verizon's alternative site analysis is based upon a flawed, gerrymandered search area and a wholly unexplained 1,000' AMSL maximum elevation restriction, and Verizon has rejected the four alternative sites located therein without providing any detailed RF analysis for any of those sites. In particular, my clients have asked me to reply to the Response to Planning Board Comment 2 set forth in the letter from Jared C. Lusk, Esq., of the law firm Nixon Peabody, dated October 22, 2024, to the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals on behalf of his client Verizon. At the Planning Board's October 1, 2024 meeting on this application, the Planning Board issued two comments to Verizon, and requested that Verizon provide the Board with responses to those comments. Planning Board Comment 2 stated: Please analyze whether reliable service to the Sunny View coverage area can be accomplished through two (2) shorter, less visible towers rather than the single 134' tower as proposed or other technology. In his October 22, 2024 letter, Mr. Lusk responds to Planning Board Comment 2 by referring to Exhibit GG, a supplemental report from Verizon's RF design engineer, which Mr. Lusk contends shows that neither two shorter cell towers nor the use of small cells are feasible to provide reliable coverage to the Sunny View coverage area. That response, whatever its merits, doesn't fully answer the question posed by the Planning Board. The Planning Board actually asks a broader question -- whether any "other technology" or two shorter cell towers can provide reliable service to the Sunny View coverage area rather than the proposed 134 -foot tall cell tower plus the four-foot high lightning rod). "Other technology" does exist, including the use of small cell wireless communications facilities. Indeed, in his Preliminary Report, dated September 20, 2024, William P. Johnson, the Town's independent RF Engineering Consultant, addressed the variety "of other approaches to deliver wireless communications that could avoid tall towers in a given area." See Johnson Preliminary Report at Appendix G. Among these "other" technologies, Mr. Johnson discusses Distributed Antenna Systems ("DAS"), micro cells, and 3 satellite-based systems. The use of these "other" technologies, especially small cell wireless facilities attached to existing utility poles in the public right of way or on existing buildings, are growing wildly. Elon Musk's satellite-based Starlink communications network is expanding explosively and is revolutionizing wireless communications in rural and remote regions. Tall, ugly, visually intrusive industrial cell towers are fast becoming albatrosses as rapidly developing less intrusive and effective technologies are being deployed. Verizon's RF designer fails to address the usability of such technologies, perhaps in conjunction with one or more shorter cell towers, to "solve" Verizon's purported "coverage gap." Turning to Verizon's Exhibit GG, the Supplemental Report, dated October 21, 2024, submitted by Wasif Sharif, Verizon's RF Design Engineer, the report utterly fails to live up to Mr. Lusk's billing. Mr. Sharif's analysis is entirely general and conclusory. He provides no specific analysis of any alternative technological means to provide similar RF coverage to the area purportedly to be served by Verizon's proposed 134-foot tall monopole cell tower at the Sunny View site. Notably, Mr. Sharif fails to model any scenarios using "two (2) shorter, less visible towers rather than the single 134' tower as proposed...," despite the Planning Board's request for such an analysis. Instead, Mr. Sharif summarily dismisses the Planning Board's perfectly reasonable request, stating: "When compared with a small cell site alternative (or a cluster of smaller cell sites) in a rural area like this which is subject to significant terrain, large geographic coverage area, and laced with foliage challenges the small cell coverage capability is unsuitable. Small cells or smaller macro tower sites would be blocked (shadowed) by terrain and foliage rendering them ineffective." That's a couple of conclusory statements. Mr. Sharif provides no detailed engineering or topographic analysis at all. Mr. Sharif performs no modeling of any possible small cell antenna deployments or of any other existing technologies. Verizon simply fails to answer the Board's question. Moreover, the RF engineer's thesis is actually implausible. I respectfully refer the Planning Board Members to Google Maps and ask that you take a look at the Sunny View site. Oddly, Verizon's selected site, the Sunny View site, sits at an elevation of only 824.4 feet AMSL above mean sea level). Though Verizon touts the need for the tallest possible tower to close its purported network coverage gap (seeking the widest line of sight covereage), perhaps the chief problem is that Verizon has selected a site that is 400 feet lower in elevation than nearby sites north of Slaterville Road (Route 79) on the Eastern Heights or off of Snyder Hill Road. These sites, just a couple of thousand feet away from the Sunny View site, would offer Verizon tremendously enhanced line-of-sight coverage and would avoid the problematic, topographically challenged steep cliffs and gorges from the Ithaca Reservoir northwest to the Second Dam and towards Wells Falls. It's hard to believe that a cell tower at the Sunny View site will provide adequate coverage deep down by the creek bed in the twisty gorge leading to the reservoir. For some reason, as I discuss below, Verizon's RF engineer has artificially constrained the maximum AMSL elevation for the tower at 1,000'. There appears to be no Town Code requirement for 4 such an elevation limitation, and the Verizon RF engineer provides no explanation whatsoever -- which is highly suspicious. Moreover, looking at the satellite image of the area on Google Maps, one sees a vast higher elevation area north of Slaterville Road (Route 79) up to Snyder Hill Road which is mostly undeveloped forest or rural land. There is no developed residential neighborhood on those vast parcels. Further, the Finger Lakes Stone Quarry, an industrial mining site, at an elevation of 1,200 feet, is present. What a perfect site for a cell tower! -- an existing industrial quarry at an elevation four hundred feet higher than the Sunny View site. Given the rural nature of the area -- and the paucity of residential properties in the area other than the development immediately adjacent to the Sunny View site) -- the need for a macro cell tower at the Sunny View site seems dubious. The likely major need for better cell coverage in this area is for drivers on the two main roads -- Route 79 and Snyder Hill Road. The forests and fields in the area don't have much need for expanded cell phone coverage. This strikes me as the perfect situation for using a series of small cell wireless antennas attached to existing utility poles alongside the two main roads. That "solution" would provide fine cell coverage for drivers on these roads and to the few residences that exist close to those roads. Of course, Mr. Sharif never models such a solution. Mr. Sharif's summary conclusions, with no actual modeling of any other possible technologically feasible but less intrusive "solutions" to Verizon's putative coverage gap, are grossly inadequate to meet Verizon's burden of proof on this Application. Respectfully, this Planning Board should have its independent RF expert, Mr. Johnson, opine on this point. Verizon Misstates the Legal Framework Underlying the Planning Board's Consideration of the Application A General Warning to the Planning Board In the second part of Mr. Lusk's response to Planning Board Comment 2, he provides a highly misleading analysis of the applicable law which he contends governs the Planning Board's review of Verizon's permit application. Before I address Mr. Lusk's analysis, I respectfully offer the Planning Board the following comments. I represent clients across the country who are trying to protect their families, businesses, and communities from the uncontrolled and unsafe deployment of wireless communications facilities within their municipalities. The wireless industry is insatiable in its quest to blanket the entire nation in an endless, willy -nilly sprawl of cell towers and small cell facilities, and is deaf to the concerns of the residents who live and work near the industry's desired wireless communications facility sites . According to statistics published by the Wireless Infrastructure Association on April 16, 2024, at the end of 2023, 153,400 purpose-built macro cell towers were in operation in the United States. There were 244,800 macrocell sites, and 202,100 outdoor small cells in 5 operation, with 775,800 indoor small cell nodes in use. Verizon, as the largest wireless carrier, is one of the worst offenders I come across when it comes to the irresponsible siting of cell towers. Verizon simply doesn’t care what disruption its facilities cause to your community – the degradation of views, the destruction of property values, the desecration of neighborhood character, and the public safety dangers its towers pose to nearby persons and property from icefall, falling debris, fire, and tower collapse. You have been appointed to the Planning Board to safeguard the lives and properties of your fellow residents and to protect the future of your Town from development that is inconsistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Your responsibilities under Section 270 of the Town Code to oversee development in the Town and to ensure that the Comprehensive Town Plan and Zoning Code are followed with respect to development projects are very broad and important. Residents of the Town are fortunate that the Town Board had the wisdom and foresight to enact a comprehensive wireless telecommunications code within the Town Code that encourages -- yet responsibly regulates -- the placement, design, and construction of wireless communications facilities within the Town of Ithaca, fully consistent with the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the "TCA") and State and federal law. See Section 270-219. Personal wireless service facilities. As Members of the Planning Board, you have the critical duty and responsibility to ensure that Verizon has met its burden of proof in meeting the criteria set forth in Section 270- 219 of the Town Code. You sit as a regulatory board when reviewing a site plan and when considering an application for a special permit. You act as the trier of facts and make factual and legal determinations based on the evidence and legal arguments presented to you by the applicant, by the Town's independent consultant, and by residents and other members of the public, and their attorneys and/or witnesses. Your job is extremely important, and will greatly impact the lives of your fellow residents and the future development of your town. The applicant’s proposed 134-foot tall uncamouflaged, industrial cell tower will be a blight upon the surrounding long-established residential neighborhood. The soaring cell tower will be a glaring visual intrusion, destroying the rural residential viewshed of the immediate neighbors, and decimating their property values. The industrial cell tower will be an eyesore to travelers on adjacent Slaterville Road (Route 79). The cell tower will generate no revenues for the Town. To suggest, as Verizon does, that the tower presents just a “minimal intrusion” to the community, is a lie. You have to live here after Verizon moves on to desecrate the next residential neighborhood. I also warn you that Verizon may well try to intimidate this Board by threatening to bring an action against the Town of Ithaca in federal court for violation of the TCA should this Board deny Verizon's application for site plan approval and the special us e permit for its proposed cell tower at 111 Wiedmaier Court. Verizon makes this threat -- and, indeed, acts upon it -- frequently. Many municipalities and their municipal attorneys buckle under these malicious coercive efforts because they fail to understand the very broad powers that federal law provides local governments to control the siting and operation of wireless communications facilities within their boundaries. Moreover, they don't realize that a wireless carrier can never sue for and recover from a municipality monetary damages or attorneys' fees if the municipality refuses 6 to allow the carrier to build and operate a requested wireless communications facility, even if a court eventually decides the municipality actually has violated the TCA. As to the latter point, the United States Supreme Court has expressly held, in City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 544 U.S. 113 (2005), that neither monetary damages nor attorneys' fees are available to a prevailing plaintiff in an action brought under the TCA. So even if Verizon does sue the Town in federal court for denying final site plan approval and a special use permit -- and the Town somehow loses that lawsuit -- the Town can never be liable for monetary damages or Verizon's attorneys' fees. The worst that could happen is that the Town would be required to grant final site plan approval and to issue the special use permit for the project. Any fears or implied threats that a wireless carrier will bankrupt the Town through litigation if the Town denies a permit for a wireless communications facility are completely baseless. Verizon's "Public Necessity" Legal Argument is Misplaced and Confusing Verizon's lawyer, Mr. Lusk, in his October 22, 2024 Letter, argues: "Even if a 'two (2) tower solution' were viable, however, applicable law prevents the Town from requiring Verizon multiple facilities, when a single 134' wireless telecommunications facility will provide reliable coverage to the area." Mr. Lusk, invoking New York's "public utility" test, is attempting to mislead you about the law and your duties thereunder. While it is true that under New York case law (not the federal TCA), cell towers are deemed to be "public utilities," that is for the limited purpose of relaxing the legal standard to obtain a zoning "use" variance (not an "area" variance) from a zoning board. The New York case law cited by Mr. Lusk has nothing to do with a local Planning Board's determination as to whether a wireless communications facility applicant has met its burden of proof in meeting the criteria for approval for a special use permi t called for under a municipality's zoning code provisions for wireless communications facilities. Nor does that New York "public utility" state case law have anything to do with whether a local Planning Board's denial of an application for site plan approval and a special use permit for a cell tower constitutes a violation of the federal TCA. That determination is governed by the TCA itself and by federal case law interpreting the relevant provisions of the TCA. Mr. Lusk's goal appears to be to confuse you by inserting a legal test that simply doesn't apply to your consideration of the application before you. Let's unpack the "public utility" test for cell towers under New York case law accurately. Most significantly, the “public utility” legal standard does not apply to the Planning Board’s consideration of the applicant's request for site plan approval and a special use permit. Rather, the test applies only to requests for use variances under the zoning law. The Planning Board, of course, has no power or authority to consider requests for zoning variances. That power is reserved for the Town's Zoning Board of Appeals to which Verizon has already applied for an "area variance" for this proposed tower since the proposed 138-foot tall tower greatly exceeds the height limit for structures at the site under the zoning code. The "public utility" legal standard was established by the New York Court of Appeals in Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman, 43 N.Y.2d 598 (1978), and was extended to the siting of 7 cell towers by the Court of Appeals in Cellular Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y2d, 364, 372 1993). In Consolidated Edison, the Court created a “public utility” exception to the traditional unnecessary hardship” standard that zoning boards utilize in determining whether an applicant qualifies for a “use variance.” The traditional “unnecessary hardship” test sets forth the following factors that a zoning board must consider before finding unnecessary hardship warranting the granting of a use variance: (1) the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that zone; (2) the plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood which may reflect the unreasonableness of the zoning ordinance itself; and (3) the use to be authorized by the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.” Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372, quoting In Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N.Y. 71, 76 (N.Y. 1939). The Rosenberg Court described the Consolidated Edison “public utility” exception test as follows: "Instead [of meeting the traditional unnecessary hardship test], the utility must show that modification is a public necessity in that it is required to render safe and adequate service, and that there are compelling reasons, economic or otherwise, which make it more feasible to modify the plant than to use alternative sources of power such as may be provided by other facilities" (Matter of Consolidated Edison,43 N.Y.2d 598, 611, supra). The Court stated further that "where the intrusion or burden on the community is minimal, the showing required by the utility should be correspondingly reduced" (id., at 611). Matter of Consolidated Edison supra), applies to all public utilities. It also applies to entirely new sitings of facilities, as well as the modification of existing facilities. The Rosenberg Court applied the test to the siting of cell towers. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372. The Rosenberg tri-partite test for considering use variance applications for cell towers under New York state law consists of the following: 1) have the applicants demonstrated the existence of a significant coverage gap? 2) will the proposed facility resolve the significant coverage gap? and 3) most importantly, will the proposed facility present a minimal intrusion upon the community? See Cellco P’ship v. Town of Clifton Park, 365 F.Supp.3d 248, 257 N.D.N.Y. 2019); Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Town of LaGrange, 658 F.Supp.2d 539, 556 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). The state court cases Mr. Lusk then uses to illustrate his point only prove mine -- i.e., the public utility" test applies only when the local zoning board considers an application for a use variance. In Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Town of Ft. Ann , 1 A.D.3d 89, 766 N.Y.S.2d 712 (3d Dep't. 2003), the appellate court simply affirmed the trial court's ruling annulling a Town Board's decision to deny Nextel's application for a zoning use variance to build a 110-foot tall cell tower as arbitrary and capricious under the Rosenberg test. In Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals for the Town of Guilderland, 173 Misc.2d 874, 662 N.Y.S.2d 717 (Sup. Ct. Albany 1997), the trial court ruled that the Town of Guilderland's decision to deny a zoning use variance to allow Sprint to construct a 100-foot tall cell tower in a residential neighborhood where such structures are banned was arbitrary and capricious under the Rosenberg public utility test. Indeed, the court made a point to emphasize that Rosenberg "established the current requirements for the approval of use variances with respect to telecommunications towers." 8 In the instant matter, the issue of a zoning use variance is completely outside the scope of the Planning Board's statutory duties. Moreover, even with respect to the Town's Zoning Board of Appeals, Verizon's application does not seek a zoning use variance. That's because the Town Code actually allows as a permitted use wireless communications facilities in all zoning districts in Town, provided that the Planning Board, upon consideration of all the evidence -- pro and con determines that the applicant successfully meets the criteria set forth in Section 270-219 of the Town Code for site plan approval and issuance of a special use permit for the proposed cell tower. Respectfully, you Members of the Planning Board need to stay focused on your responsibilities. Do not be misled by Mr. Lusk into a diversionary legal analysis that is not in your bailiwick. You do not need to worry about the "public necessity" test. Nor should you be distracted by Mr. Lusk's false suggestion that you are mandating that the applicant build two cell towers of lesser height rather than the single 134-foot tall cell tower (plus the 4-foot tall lightning rod) which Mr. Lusk claims is beyond the scope of your authority. Your "mandate" is only to vote "yea" or "nay" on the Verizon's application for site plan approval and a special use permit, with or without conditions. You can't require the applicant do anything, but you do have the power to approve or disapprove of its application. Please don't fall into Mr. Lusk's trap. You should be aware that the Town of Ithaca Town Code provisions regarding wireless telecommunications facilities were carefully drafted to comply with the federal TCA and with the controlling federal Second Circuit Court of Appeals decisions interpreting the TCA. As such, Section 270-219 of the Town Code closely follows the guidance and legal tests of the Second Circuit. The TCA limits to some degree state and local regulation 'of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities.' Omnipoint Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of White Plains, 430 F.3d 529, 531 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)). Such regulation I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; and II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.' 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(i). "The Second Circuit has clearly stated that this subclause precludes denying an application for a facility that is the least intrusive means for closing a significant gap in a remote user's ability to reach a cell site that provides access to land lines.'' Verizon Wireless of E. LP v. Town of Wappinger, 2022 WL 282552 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2022), at 12 (quoting Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Willoth, 176 F.3d 630, 643 (2d Cir. 1999)). "If an applicant's proposal is not the least intrusive means of closing a significant gap in coverage, a local government may reject [the] application ... without thereby prohibiting personal wireless services." T-Mobile Ne. LLC. v. Town of Ramapo, 701 F.Supp.2d 446, 456-57 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) internal quotations omitted); ExteNet Sys., Inc. v. Village of Plandome, 2021 WL 4449453 E.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2021), at *20 ("[T]o be sure, [a] local government may reject an application for construction of a wireless service facility ... without thereby prohibiting personal wireless services if the service gap can be closed by less intrusive means." (Internal quotations omitted"). Section 270-219 of the Town Code expressly requires the Planning Board to consider the evidentiary record while following these controlling federal legal standards. Section 270- 9 219(G)(2)(r) provides for the applicant to conduct an alternative site analysis; Section 270- 219(G)(2)(s) requires the applicant to conduct a significant gap analysis; and Section 270 - 219(G)(2)(t) provides for the applicant to demonstrate that its proposed wireless facility is the least intrusive means of addressing the significant gap in coverage. To meet its evidentiary burden of proof with respect to each of these subsections, the applicant cannot simply make conclusory statements. The subsections each require the applicant to provide evidentiary substantiation. While I was only very recently retained by my clients, I have reviewed Verizon's submissions, and they fall woefully short of meeting Verizon's burden of proof. Due to time and other constraints, I will focus on Verizon's alternative site analysis -- required under Section 270-219(G)(2)(r) -- and point out a number of glaring deficiencies in its submission. In my considerable experience representing clients in these matters, I find that all tower developers tend to play the same phony game with respect to alternative site selection, but Verizon tends to be the worst player. The game goes as follows: the tower developer's RF engineer defines an extremely narrow search radius -- often 1/2 mile or less -- arguing that topographical peculiarities and foliage considerations require that the cell tower be sited within the resulting small search zone. The reality is that the RF engineer typically locates the best site for the carrier's RF needs using a computer software package, and the RF engineer has no personal familiarity with the site; the search zone is gerrymandered to fall within the RF engineer's narrow "best choice" area, and then the area is provided to a third party site acquisition team whose mandate is to find a property owner who is willing to lease a portion of his property very cheaply to the carrier and who doesn't give a damn about his neighbors. If the site acquisition specialist is successful, then that "winning" site instantly becomes the only technologically feasible site for the tower, and the other few alternative sites within the small search zone are quickly discarded on pretextual grounds. While I say this slightly "tongue-in- cheek," the sad truth is that this is really how the telecoms act. Verizon's own alternate site analysis in the instant application proves my point. In its application at Exhibit I, Verizon provides a "Sunny View Site" Site Selection Analysis, dated September 19, 2023. The Site Selection Analysis was prepared by Brett Morgan of Airosmith Development, a consultant to Verizon Wireless. The critical "search ring" was determined by Tim Zarneke, a Verizon Wireless RF engineer, who describes its creation in his "Engineering Necessity Case - 'Sunny View,'" submitted as an exhibit to Verizon's Application. According to Mr. Zarneke, on page 14 of his report, "[a] Search Area is the geographical area within which a new site is targeted to solve a coverage or capacity deficiency. Three of the factors taken into consideration when defining a search area are topography, user density, and the existing network." Mr. Zarneke imposes a very odd elevation constraint into his search area algorithm. He states on the bottom of page 15: "The site needs to be located within the search area but also at a ground elevation below the ridge of 1,150' or below [sic] to keep the site contained. The proposed site is located at 824' AMSL which meets this requirement and is strategically located within the ring to allow for Line of Sight (LOS) to the coverage objective area." At the top of page 15, Mr. Zarneke states: "The below image is absent any coverage to help the viewer with area orientation as well as visualizing the need for the below 1,000' AMSL (maximum ground elevation requirement)." 10 Mr. Zarneke provides no explanation for the purported need to keep the proposed cell tower site at an AMSL below 1,000' or below the ridge of 1,150'. The Town Code does not appear to contain any restrictions on locating otherwise conforming cell towers or wireless communications facilities at AMSLs of 1,000' or greater. The 1,000' AMSL maximum ground elevation requirement has enormous ramifications -- it grossly limits the possible search radius to the absurdly narrow radius defined by Mr. Zarneke. As I stated above, vast areas of land on the Eastern Heights and along Snyder Hill Road are 400 feet higher in elevation than Verizon's proposed Sunny View site. Yet Mr. Zarneke excludes them entirely from his search radius because of his completely unexplained 1,000' AMSL maximum elevation constraint "to keep the site contained" (whatever that means). The Planning Board needs to question Verizon extensively about this apparently artificial constraint which I strongly suspect is intended to gerrymander the boundaries of the search area in order to support the Sunny View site. In my experience, if the Planning Board charges Mr. Johnson, its own independent consultant, to come up with an appropriate search radius for a possible cell tower site, he will determine one that is far more expansive than Mr. Zarneke's and one which opens up scores of potentially feasible alternative sites. I respectfully urge the Planning Board to do so or to simply to reject Mr. Zarneke's artificially narrow and seemingly unjustified search area. Unsurprisingly, given the gerrymandered tiny search area concocted by Mr. Zarneke, Verizon's site acquisition consultant found no existing towers or tall structures within the search area, nor any municipally-owned properties in the search area. Mr. Morgan, the site acquisition consultant, purportedly conducted a "comprehensive investigation of the Sunny View Search Area" and found five private properties to analyze as potential sites for the proposed tower. Interestingly, when Mr. Morgan reached out to the five property owners, each was initially interested in leasing his property to Verizon for use as the cell tower site. (Often, some landowners are not interested in tying up a portion of their land for 30 years or more -- and/or restricting the development potential of their property -- for the small revenue stream offered by a cell tower developer). But despite all the landowners' interest, after Mr. Morgan forwarded the site information for each of the parcels to Verizon's RF engineer, Verizon's RF engineer determined that none of the locations except for the Sunny View site would be adequate, as those locations "would have not adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location." That incomprehensible "word salad" is the entirety of the explanation Mr. Morgan provides for the rejection of the four alternative sites. Verizon provides no RF analyses for each rejected site demonstrating the veracity of the explanation. Simply put, the explanation is completely inadequate to meet Verizon's burden of proof under the Town Code. The foregoing represents just a taste of the litany of well-founded reasons why the Planning Board should deny Verizon application for site plan approval and for a special use permit. Please give me a call to discuss any questions you may have. Best regards, Robert J. Berg s/ Robert J. Berg ii. Describehowtheproposedactionwouldaffectthatwaterbodyorwetland, e. g. III'' NIXON Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. Lusk PEABODY 1300 Clinton Square Partner Roche ster, NY 14604-1792 Attomeys at Law nixonpeabody.com @Nixon PeabodyLLP December 9, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Codes Department (codes e town.ithaca.n us) T / 585.263.1140 F / 866,402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: Verizon Wireless representatives were scheduled to present additional RF data at the upcoming December 16th Zoning Board of Appeals meeting regarding the above -referenced project, as requested at the November 26th meeting. Verizon Wireless has not yet completed their data analysis. As such, we respectfully request to adjourn the matter until the January 28, 2025 meeting. We understand any materials will need to be submitted by January 14, 2025. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. JCL/mkv cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Deve Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabo 4928-7560-781 l .1 III'' NIXON Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. Lusk PEABODY 1300 Clinton Square Partner Roche ster, NY 14604-1792 Attomeys at Law nixonpeabody.com @Nixon PeabodyLLP December 9, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Codes Department (codes e town.ithaca.n us) T / 585.263.1140 F / 866,402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: Verizon Wireless representatives were scheduled to present additional RF data at the upcoming December 16th Zoning Board of Appeals meeting regarding the above -referenced project, as requested at the November 26th meeting. Verizon Wireless has not yet completed their data analysis. As such, we respectfully request to adjourn the matter until the January 28, 2025 meeting. We understand any materials will need to be submitted by January 14, 2025. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. JCL/mkv cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Deve Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabo 4928-7560-781 l .1 NIXON PEABODY Nixon Peabody LLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 Attorneys at Law nixonpeabody.com @NixonPeabodyLLP February 10, 2025 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Marty Moseley, Director of Code Enforcement & Zoning mmoseleygtownithacany. gov) Jared C. Lusk Partner T / 585. 263.1140 F / 866. 402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility ( with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court ( Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: By application dated May 29, 2024 and supplemental applications dated August 7, October 22, October 28, November 14 and November 18, 2024, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/ b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") submitted the above -referenced Application to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals in connection with the above - referenced project ( the "Project"). Thereafter, on November 19, 2024 the Planning Board granted the required special use permit and site plan approval (the "Planning Board Approvals"). Following receipt of the Planning Board Approvals, we appeared at the November 26, 2024 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. At that meeting, the Zoning Board requested additional information from Verizon Wireless' RF team (the "ZBA Comment"). Below is the ZBA Comment in bold italicized text, followed by Verizon Wireless' response in regular text. Please provide RFPlots showing coverage from reduced Antenna Center Line ACL') heights of 90' and 70' and information on whether the dropped calls and access failures would still occur at these lowerACL heights. Enclosed as Exhibit 00 (lettered to follow Exhibits A-NN previously submitted in support of the Application) are the requested additional mid -ban coverage plots at ACL heights of 90' and 70' (the "Reduced Height Study"). Mid -band coverage maps for 140' ACL, 130' 4912-0649- 4999.2 Town of Ithaca February 10, 2025 Page 2 ACL (proposed), 120' ACL, and 110' ACL were previously provided in Exhibit H to the Application. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, any reduction in height from the originally proposed 130' ACL height significantly diminishes the coverage footprint within the intended service area. As discussed more fully below, 110-foot, 90-foot, or 70-foot ACL heights are not feasible options to remedy the service inadequacies in and around the Sunny View Coverage area in the Town. To assist the Board in its review, the Reduced Height Study identifies eight (8) areas where mid -band coverage changes dramatically when the ACL is reduced from 130' to 90' or 70' each, an "Area"). Impact of Reduced Heiiaht on Areas: Area 1: This Area is the Southwoods Drive neighborhood, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, approximately thirty-three 33) homes are located in this area. The New York State Department of Transportation data provided to Verizon Wireless by the Town' (the "2023 Traffic Count"), is not available for this neighborhood, but the Annual Average Daily Traffic ("AADT") on the approximately two-mile stretch of East King Road from NY 96B to Coddington Road, which passes Southwoods Drive, was 2,497 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a 110' or 90' ACL height would significantly reduce the coverage provided in this Area. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with an ACL height of 70', this Area would have almost no coverage. Area 2: This Area is near the intersection of East King Road and Coddington Road, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, approximately ten (10) homes are located in this area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the approximately 2.2-mile stretch of Coddington Road from East King Road to Ithaca City Line was 1,269 vehicles. The AADT on the approximately two-mile stretch of East King Road from NY 96B to Coddington Road was 2,497 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with an ACL height of 110' would reduce the signal strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with ACL heights of 90' or 70', this Area would have almost no coverage. Area 3: This Area is near Route 79 (Slatersville), north of German Cross Road, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, approximately eight (8) homes and a religious institution are located in this Area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the approximately 2.4-mile stretch of Route 79 Slatersville) from CRl 15/Brooktondale Road to CR 174/Pine Tree Road was 8,045 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with an ACL height of 110' would reduce the signal https://nysdottrafficdata.drakewell.com/publicmultinodemap.asp 4912-0649-4999.2 Town of Ithaca February 10, 2025 Page 3 strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless was to construct a tower with an ACL height of 90', the coverage would be further reduced. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with an ACL height of 70', only a small portion of this Area would have service, leaving the remainder without service. Area 4: This Area is near the intersection of Route 79 (Slatersville), south of Wiedmaier Court, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, there are approximately six (6) homes and a nursery business located in this area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the approximately 2.4-mile stretch of Route 79 (Slatersville) from CR115/Brooktondale Road to CR 174/Pine Tree Road was 8,045 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with ACL heights of 110' or 90' would significantly reduce the signal strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with an ACL height of 70', this Area would have significant coverage gaps, leaving residents and travelers without reliable service. Area 5: This Area is on Burns Road, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, there are few homes in this area. However, according to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the one -mile of Burns Road was 2,356 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with ACL heights of 110', 90', or 70' would significantly reduce the signal strength to this Area, leaving many of the homes and travelers without reliable coverage. Area 6: This Area is near the intersection of Route 79 (Slatersville) and Park Lane, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, approximately six (6) residential structures and Six Mile Creek Winery and Distillery are located in this area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the .5-mile of Park Lane from Route 79 (Slatersville) to Joanne Drive was 437 vehicles. The AADT on the approximately 2.4- mile stretch of Route 79 (Slatersville) from CR115/Brooktondale Road to CR 174/Pine Tree Road was 8,045 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with an ACL height of 110' would significantly reduce the signal strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with ACL heights of 90' or 70', a portion of this Area would have no service, and the remainder would have reduced signal strength, leaving residents, the winery and travelers without reliable coverage. Area 7: This Area is near the intersection of Troy Road and Coddington, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the enclosed satellite map, three (3) or more residential structures are located in this Area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the approximately 2.2-mile stretch of Coddington Road from East King Road to Ithaca City Line had an AADT of 1,269 vehicles. The approximately .85-mile of Troy Road from East King Road to Coddington Road had an AADT of 493 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with an ACL height of 110' would reduce the signal strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless were to construct a tower with ACL heights of 90' or 70', a portion 4912-0649-4999.2 Town of Ithaca February 10, 2025 Page 4 of this Area would have no service and the remainder would have reduced reliable signal strength. We will also note that coverage provided on Coddington Road would be lost. Area 8: This Area is near the intersection of Updike Road and Coddington Road, for which Verizon Wireless provided both dropped connections data and access failure data in its Supplemental Application dated August 7, 2024 (Exhibits Z-AA). As shown in the satellite map, approximately six (6) residential structures are located in this area. According to the 2023 Traffic Count, the AADT on the approximately one -mile stretch of Coddington Road from East King Road to Ithaca Town Line was 1,193 vehicles. The AADT on the approximately two-mile stretch of East King Road from NY 96B to Coddington Road was 2,497 vehicles. As shown in the Reduced Height Study, a tower with ACL heights of 110' or 90' would reduce the signal strength to this Area. If Verizon Wireless was to construct a tower with an ACL height of 70', this Area would lose coverage. Notably, constructing a tower with ACL heights of 90' or 70' would also lose coverage south of Updike Road, including a number of residences and the Coddington Road Community Center. As demonstrated in our Application, there is a gap in service, the proposed tower with an ACL height of 130' remedies those gaps, and a tower with ACL heights of 110', 90', or 70' would leave approximately seventy-five (75) homes, two (2) businesses, and two (2) community gathering spaces unserved. Moreover, a tower with ACL heights of 110', 90', or 70' would not remedy service gaps for the between 8,045 and 15,0972 vehicles that travel in the Sunny View Coverage area every day. The benefit of upgraded reliable wireless telecommunications service to the Sunny View coverage area sought by the proposed 134' tower (with an ACL height of 130') cannot be achieved by any other means. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. JCL/mkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon I 2 We acknowledge that the AADT data identified in the Areas described above may be duplicative by nature (e.g., a majority, if not all, of the 2,356 vehicles on Burns Road per day would also contribute to the 8,045 vehicles on CR 79), and therefore present this figure as a range, so as not to overstate the AADT in the area. 4912-0649-4999.2 Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. LuskNIXON PEABODY Rochester, Clinton Square Partner NY 14604-1792 Attomep at Law nixonpeabody.com NixonPeabodyLLP August 7, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestra(cDtown.ithaca.ny.us) T / 585.263.1140 F / 866.402.1491 jl uskonixon pea body.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at I I I Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56. 4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: By application dated May 29, 2024, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") submitted the above -referenced Application to the Town of Ithaca in connection with the above -referenced project (the "Project"). Thereafter, we received correspondence dated June 7, 2024 from the Town's Senior Planner, Christine Balestra (the "Planning Comments"). The Planning Comments are reproduced below in bold italicized type, with Verizon Wireless' responses in regular type: Evidence that a significant gap in coverage exists (Town Code §270-219.0 (2) (s) (21) — Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The Town Code requires in -kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include each frequency, in table format: a. The date and time for the test, See Exhibit Z (lettered to follow Exhibits A-Y previously submitted in support of the Application) is a supplemental RF report documenting the details of the drive 4868-0982-2919.1 Town of Ithaca August 7, 2024 Page 2 test.' As outlined in Exhibit Z and Exhibit AA, the drive test occurred on July 17, 2024 at approximately 3:30 p.m. b. The location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded, See Exhibit AA. C. Each signal strength recorded, measured in decibel milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. See Exhibit AA. 2. Dropped call records (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (s) [41) — Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, percentage, and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. See Exhibit Z and Exhibit BB. Between 7/16/24 — 7/31/24, approximately 11.84% of the calls were dropped, compared to Verizon national standard of less than 1 %. 3. Economic analysis study (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (v)) —Exhibit Yacknowledges the following application requirement, but the economic analysis was not conducted on properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which tite PWSF is located. The Town Code requires the submission of an economic analysis of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF may have on all adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. See Exhibit CC. Colliers has completed an economic analysis and determined that the Project will not adversely impact property values in the vicinity of the Site. 4. Insurance requirements (Town Code §270-219. V (1) — Insurance requirements as follows will need to be supplied for the building permit process: 1) Minimum Coverages. Each PWSFPermittee shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a PWSF Permit, an insurance policy, or policies. As stated in our May 29, 2024 application materials, Verizon's RF design team does not rely on drive test data to design its network and such data is therefore, of limited, if any, value in modern wireless telecommunications network design. Notwithstanding the fact that the drive test data clearly confirms the need for the Project, Verizor is providing this information under protest and reserves all rights and waives none regarding same. The information included in Exhibits Z, AA & BE is highly confidential and if disclosed could potentially harm the business interests of Verizon. As such, Verizon hereby demands that this information be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. 4868-0982-2919.1 Town of Ithaca August 7, 2024 Page 3 Such policy or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the Permittee's operations, as follows: a) Commercial Umbrella insurance with limits of not less titan $5,000,000, Verizon will provide proof of insurance following receipt of the zoning approvals. b) Pollution Liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate, with any deductible not to exceed $25,000 each occurrence. Verizon will provide proof of insurance following receipt of the zoning approvals. 5. Electrical Permit Application - An electrical permit application needs to be submitted, in addition to the building permit application, at the following link: Code Enforcement Zoning Department - TOI - Electrical Permit Application - Viewpoint Cloud opengov.com) Comment acknowledged. This information will be provided following receipt of the zoning approvals. 6. Town Code Chapter 125-5C requires the following items to be provided in addition to what has already been provided: a. One hard copy set ofplans needs to be submitted as part of the process for the building permit, One set of the Project Zoning Drawings is enclosed. Construction drawings will be submitted following receipt of the zoning approvals. b. A statement that the work shall be performed in compliance with Chapter 270, Zoning, the Uniform Code, the ECCCNYS, the ECS, this chapter, and other applicable state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, See Exhibit DD. C. It appears that the documents were submitted by an engineering firm and not a sole practitioner professional engineer, which requires the firm's certificate of authorization number to be placed on the title block, See the Title Caption of Exhibit R (at the bottom of the Tectonic Caption box). The Certificate of Authorization No. is 019591. d. Please provide a statement of special inspections for this project, 4868-0982-2919.1 Town of Ithaca August 7, 2024 Page 4 See Exhibit EE. e. Please provide the building permit fee, when prompted by the permitting system, Verizon will so comply. f. Please provide proof of workers compensation and disability or the proper exemption documentation from the NYS Worked Compensation Board. Comment acknowledged. This information will be provided following receipt of the zoning approvals. 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Engineering Comments — The Engineering Department still requires the following information: a. Please fill out a SWPPP application on the Town of Ithaca online permitting system Engineering page, and upload all SWPPP information: https.Ilithacany. viewpointcloud. com/categoriesll080, The SWPPP online application was completed on August 6, 2024. b. Please include the Construction Sequence/Erosion and Sediment Control Sequence in the construction drawings, The Construction Sequence is also included on the SWPPP report. See Sheet ESC-7 of Exhibit R. C. Please include a contractor certification form certifying compliance with the terms and conditions of the submitted SWPPP. A sample of the form can be found attached (as requested in the SWPPP), Verizon will provide same once the zoning approvals are received and the Project is bid out to qualified contractors. d. According to the provided SWPPP, all excess materials from the work will be sent to a state approved solid waste facility. If any of the excess material is spread outside of the limits of disturbance or sent to another site within the Town limits, a revision of the drawings shall be required to be submitted for review. Comment acknowledged. 8. Consultant Escrow Fee (§270-219.Q, §153-2D) — The following minimum consultant escrow fee applies to this Project: $3,000.00, pursuant to Town Code §270-219.Q, which states: 4868-0982-2919.1 Town of Ithaca August 7, 2024 Page 5 1) The Town, at the expense of the applicant, may employ its own consultants to examine the application and related documentation. The consultants that the Town may retain include, but are not limited to, professional structural and/or electrical engineers, attorneys, and other experts reasonably required by the Town to competently and fully evaluate any application and the resulting construction. Such consultants may be requested, among other matters, to make recommendations as to whether the criteria for granting approvals and permits have been met, including whether the applicant's conclusions regarding a significant gap in coverage, co -location, safety analysis, visual analysis, and structural inspection are valid and supported by generally accepted and reliable engineering and technical data and standards and whether the personal wireless service facility as constructed will be in compliance with the approved plans and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards. (2) To assure sufficient funds are available to the Town to pay for the consultants referred to in the preceding subsection, an applicant shall be required to deposit review fees in escrow, in accordance with the terms of, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Town Board shall set from time to time by resolution the minimum initial escrow deposit for any personal wireless service facility application which anticipates construction of any type of tower exceeding 50 feet. The Town Board set the minimum initial escrow deposit at $3,000 in Town Board Resolution No. 2023-110. A check payable to the Town of Ithaca in the amount of $3,000.00 is enclosed. The shot clock remains tolled while the application remains incomplete. Please advise whether the Town to place this application on Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals agendas for their considerations and actions while the application remains incomplete. Nothing in this letter shall be construed to waive any application requirements or any consequences of an incomplete application. We respectfully request that this Application be placed on the agenda for the next available Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board meetings. In the meantime, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. JCL/mkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon I 4868-0982-2919.1 Exhibit Z E 011 TA19a1: E i'. is E nrucanewrs xi ^_A e f N 3oogleEarth 3m Table of Contents Call Testing Data — Town's requirement and Verizon's feedback 0 Drive Route 0 700 MHz Test Map 0 850 MHz Test Map 0 1900 MHz Test Map 0 2100 MHz Test Map Dropped Calls and Denial of Service Records — Town's requirement and Verizon's feedback o Dropped Connections Plot 0 Access Failures Plot Summary verizwl 2 Call Testing Data Town's Requirement Evidence that a gap exists shall include in -kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include for each frequency, in table format: jalThe date and time for the test; jblThe location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded; and LclEach signal strength recorded, measured in decibel-milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. The applicant shall also submit test maps, depicting the actual signal strengths recorded during all in - kind call testing, for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. Verizon's Feedback: Please refer to the attached "Sunny_View_Drive_Test_07-17-2024.csv" document for call testing results in table format. Also, please refer to slides 5 through 8 for test maps depicting the actual signal strength recorded during call testing. verizonNI 3 Drive Route r xS y,p` x.• I.0 •v9 bv1 I mi verizonv' Layers J 1 RSRP-700MHz RSRP-850MHz j 1 - RSRP - 1900MHz RSRP-2100MHz J'w Samy V'Search Are kmz j • Dropped Conmctims Access Failwes J eV OpenStre. Map Drive Test Data - 70OMHz RSRP (d6m) 1 F r a\ LS- t ii s a 1 rn R ucF 0 I mi Ir r ' ram fl ir I serwdo.ror Layers A •.Y„-xPl Sunny_Vlew_Drive _Route - 78 rr J-140--95 J 95 - -85 J • _85-0 RSRPP. 850MHz RSR - 1900MHz 7 RSRP - 2100MHz J f? Su wView Search Atezlonz Dropped Connectluns Access Failures J. Op—streetMap verizoW 5 Drive Test Data - 850MHz RSRP (d6m) Layers w * n Sunny Vlew_Dr1a<_Route w _ _ • • RSRP - 700MHz J -95 - -85 J • -85-0 a RSRP -1900MHz a RSRP - 7100MHz J' W Sunny Vie Search Area.imtacDroppedconnections Access Faitures JOpmStreetMp Y7o rlr A 4 l ` r. is r ' • j .. t/ r r 1 verizon-I s Drive Test Data - 190OMHz RSRP (dBm) f verizon,' I mi Layers 0 Sunny dfieRwie RSRP - 70OMH, RSRP 850M., V , -140- -95 If -95- -85 0 -85-0 RSRP 210OMHz If jSumqlf"wSearch Are knur Dropped Connectiorts Access failures F openstrfetmap 7 Drive Test Data - 2100MHz RSRP (dBm) 4+p Layem A El Sunny Vies°_Deise_Route RSRP 70OMHr RSRP - 850MHe r RSRP -1900MHr S J isfj • -95--85 W • -85-0 J; (sue Swny VLw Search Are mrz Dropped Connections Access Fai(uree OpenSt—map Il° i v. 1 • nt» sty 4 r, n i s1 h 'I t.t s • s I 0 Imi F verizon 8 Dropped Calls and Denial of Service Town's requirement: The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, percentage and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. Verizon's feedback: Please refer to the attached files "Dropped_Connections.csv" and "Access Failures.csv" for dropped call records and denial of service records. Data window is July 161h through July 31st. Also, please refer to slides 10 and 11 for dropped calls and access failure locations. Drop Call rate for "Sunny View" project area is 11.84%, significantly higher than Verizon's standard DCR drop call rate) which is less than 1 %. verizon 9 Dropped Connections Layers wl La, ' r'a.., Sunny -View -Drive Route 8• • tiE, n. iO N RSRP - 700MHe t RSRP - 850MH: RSRP - 1900MHz i N RSRP - 2100MHz m k"`„ • J = AreaJm MEN., r w„ • Access Failures J tree[ 40 go Ye. . • N 11 Y: c l:c furry4oM • • t•N Nei om s ` ro, o* 0 is v' Imi verizoW 10 Access Failures a o D 00 moo O ... . t.. o 80 0 CP Layers p Suney_Wew Drive Root, s RSRP - 70OMHz t ' - RSHP - BSOMHz t R5RP-1900MHz t RSRP - 2100MHz Stwry Utew Starch Aredl Dropped Camtertio s P" 0, 0 . dam J o Access Faives Cp ZS 0 0 'e Ope StreetMap 0 a°80 0% O 0 B °° 0 o 00 o ® 0 800 o o; o o Ctho o`O E o 8"0" 0 ° o B ° _' o 0 0 0 8 0 0a0 - o$;, o moo 0 c 0 d `0 0 0 80 0 5+ ° O 00 O' O 0O 6 O a-9o a- Uo 6BW O •' O vZo am Bo 0o B 0,..,fYz rb . t mo o q0 ® 000 o yry{yq p`,° ddTT""" 8 OOQO O 80 o ° o C 0 9 0 ti o g 1 miverizon,' 11 L-' Summary The call testing data along with dropped call and denial of service data confirm that `Sunny View site' is necessary to address the coverage and capacity issues in the southeastern portion of the Town of Ithaca. verizonV 12 Exhibit AA InmeStamp Latitude Longitude Frequency Band RSRP 7/171202415:32 42.4259838 76.46173 850MHz 110.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4258264 76.46167 700MHz 104.44 7/17/202415:32 42.4258054 76.46172 700MHz 110.44 7117/202415:32 42.4257987 76.46171 850MHz 111.31 7117/202415:32 42.4256358 76.46166 700MHz 106.25 7117/202415:32 42.4256141 76.46169 700MHz 109.31 7/17/202415:32 42.4256094 76.46169 850MHz 112.5 71171202415:32 42.4254356 76.46166 700MHz 106.5 7/17/202415:32 42.4254093 76.46168 700MHz 113.19 71171202415:32 42.4254061 76.46168 850MHz 106.44 71171202415:32 42.4252311 76.46165 700MHz 105.81 71171202415:32 42.4252061 76.46167 700MHz 116.25 7117/202415:32 42.4252011 76.46166 850MHz 113.5 7/17/202415:32 42.425021 76.46164 70OMHz 107.38 7/171202415:32 42.4250021 76.46166 700MHz 114.38 7/17/202415:32 42.4249929 76.46165 850MHz 115.19 7/17/202415:32 42.4248123 76.46163 700MHz 113.5 7117/202415:32 42.4247907 76.46164 700MHz 121.12 7117/202415:32 42.4247897 76.46163 850MHz 115.94 7/171202415:32 42.4246134 76.46163 700MHz 113.5 7117/202415:32 42.4245977 76.46162 850MHz 115.38 7/17/202415:32 42.4245972 76.46164 700MHz 121.94 7117/202415:32 42.4244278 76.46162 70OMHz 114.06 7117/202415:32 42.4244207 76.46161 850MHz 116.81 7117/202415:32 42.4244193 76.46163 700MHz 119 7/171202415:32 42.4242599 76.46161 700MHz 113.81 7/17/202415:32 42.4242571 76.4616 850MHz 115.94 7117/202415:32 42.4242569 76.46161 700MHz 120.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4241045 76.4616 700MHz 117.06 7/17/202415:32 42.424101 76.46159 850MHz 112.56 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4241 76.4616 70OMHz 122.12 7/171202415:32 42.4239559 76.46159 700MHz 119 7/171202415:32 42.4239471 76.46158 850MHz 111.75 71171202415:32 42.4239443 76.46159 700MHz 124.94 7/171202415:32 42.4238057 76.46158 700MHz 113.88 7/17/202415:32 42.4237903 76.46167 850MHz 114.38 7/171202415:32 42.4237893 76.46158 700MHz 121.12 7/17/202415:32 42.4236529 76.46157 700MHz 116.31 7/171202415:32 42.4236323 76.46156 850MHz 110.94 7/17/202415:32 42.4236317 76.46157 700MHz 113.56 7/171202415:32 42.4234979 76.46156 700MHz 104.56 7/171202415:32 42.4234688 76.46156 700MHz 109.75 7/17/202415:32 42.4234677 76.46155 850MH2 110.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4233397 76.46155 700MHz 108 7/171202415:32 42.4233118 76.46156 700MHz 116.75 7/17/202415:32 42.4233118 76.46154 850MH2 113.5 7/17/202415:32 42.4231869 76.46154 700MHz 109.19 7/171202415:32 42.4231639 76.46153 850MHz 108.5 7/17/202415:32 42.423162 76.46155 70OMHz 112.88 7/17/202415:32 42.4230479 76.46154 700MHz 105.88 7/171202415:32 42.4230305 76.46153 850MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4230265 76.46155 700MHz 116.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4230265 76.46155 700MHz 111.94 7/171202415:32 42.4229254 76.46153 700MHz 111.06 7/17/202415:32 42.4229143 76.46153 850MHz 114.31 7/171202415:32 42.4228224 76.46153 700MHz 112.56 7/17/202415:32 42.422812 76.46152 850MHz 114.12 7117/202415:32 42.4227407 76.46152 700MHz 114.25 7/171202415:32 42.4227322 76.46152 850MHz 115.62 7/171202415:32 42.4227205 76.46154 700MHz 120.62 7/171202415:32 42.4226791 76.46152 700MHz 115.94 71171202415:32 42.4226328 76.46153 700MHz 105.12 7/171202415:32 42.4226214 76.46152 850MHz 114 7117/202415:32 42.4226214 76.46152 850MHz 110.44 7/171202415:32 42.4226081 76.46154 700MHz 114.62 71171202415:32 42.4226081 76.46154 700MHz 108 7/17/202415:32 42.4225991 76.46153 700MHz 107.38 7117/202415:32 42.4225859 76.46152 SSOMHz 110.25 7/17/202415:32 42.4225813 76.46153 70OMHz 111.62 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225736 76.46153 70OMHz 114.5 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225727 76.46154 70OMHz 108.5 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225725 76.46153 70OMHz 114.38 7/17/202415:32 42.4225725 76.46153 70OMHz 107.94 7/17/202415:32 42.4225661 76.46152 85OMHz 115.44 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225651 76.46153 70OMHz 113.75 7/17/202415:32 42.4225573 76.46153 85OMHz 114 7/17/202415:32 42.4225552 76.46153 850MHz 115.25 7/171202415:32 42.422554 76.46153 85OMHz 112.06 7117/202415:32 42.4225517 76.46154 70OMHz 116.38 7117/202415:32 42.4225495 76.46154 70OMHz 107.69 7/17/2024 15:32 42.422549 76.46153 85OMHz 112 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225403 76.46155 70OMHz 116 7/17/202415:32 42.4225382 76.46155 70OMHz 116.81 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225371 76.46155 70OMHz 218 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225358 76.46153 85OMHz 112.69 7/17/202415:32 42.4225293 76.46155 70OMHz 109.69 7/17/202415:32 42.4225259 76.46155 70OMHz 115.44 7/17/202415:32 42.4225163 76.46154 85OMHz 113.38 7/17/202415:32 42.422509 76.46156 70OMHz 110.81 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4225074 76.46155 70OMHz 116 7/17/202415:32 42.422496 76.46154 85OMHz 107.75 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224912 76.46157 70OMHz 114.75 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224874 76.46156 70OMHz 114.94 7/17/202415:32 42.4224793 76.46155 85OMHz 111.19 7/17/202415:32 42.4224666 76.46157 70OMHz 114.56 7/171202415:32 42.4224635 76.46156 85OMHz 108.44 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224502 76.46158 70OMHz 117.06 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224344 76.46156 85OMHz 110.75 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224263 76.46159 70OMHz 114.88 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4224193 76.46157 70OMHz 109.56 7117/202415:32 42.4223882 76,46155 85OMHz 112.94 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4223774 76.46159 70OMHz 114.25 7/171202415:32 42.4223611 76.46154 70OMHz 110.94 7/17/2024 15:32 42.4223331 76.4615 85OMHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:32 42.422318 76.46154 70OMHz 114.94 71171202415:33 42. 4222908 76.46148 70OMHz 112 7/171202415:33 42.4222708 76.46142 85OMHz 114.38 7117/202415:33 42.422215 76.46138 70OMHz 116.44 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4221968 76.46132 850MHz 113 7/17/202415: 33 42.422179 76.46139 70OMHz 115.81 7/17/202415: 33 42.422131 76.46127 70OMHz 115.94 7/171202415:33 42.4221164 76.4612 85OMHz 113 7117/202415:33 42.4220999 76.46127 70OMHz 117.56 7117/202415:33 42.4220336 76.46113 70OMHz 116.25 7117/202415:33 42.422023 76.46107 85OMHz 115.19 7/17/202415: 33 42.4220068 76.46113 70OMHz 113.25 7/17/202415: 33 42.4219294 76.46098 70OMHz 117.81 7/17/2024 16:33 42.4219165 76.46092 B5OMHz 113.5 7/17/202415: 33 42.4218103 76.46081 70OMHz 115.38 7/17/202415: 33 42,4217992 76.46076 85OMHz 116.94 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4217869 76.46079 70OMHz 117.19 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4216753 76.48063 70OMHz 116.31 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4216634 76.46057 85OMHz 116.06 71171202415:33 42. 4216538 76.4606 700MHz 114.94 7/171202415:33 42.4215323 76.46043 70OMHz 115.38 71171202415:33 42. 4215102 76.4604 70OMHz 115 7117/202415:33 42.4213786 76.46021 70OMHz 113.44 7117/202415:33 42.4213602 76.46019 70OMHz 115.56 7117/202415:33 42.4212252 76.45999 70OMHz 115.31 7/17/202415: 33 42.4210749 76.45975 70OMHz 109.44 7/171202415:33 42.4210615 76.45974 70OMHz 111.81 7/17/202415: 33 42.4209271 76.45951 70OMHz 114.12 7/17/202415: 33 42.4209113 76,4595 70OMHz 115.25 7/17/202415: 33 42.4207762 76.45927 70OMHz 114.19 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4207599 76.45926 70OMHz 119.44 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4206254 76.45902 700MHz 115.75 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4206072 76.45901 700MHz 116.31 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4204782 76,45877 700MHz 115.44 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4203296 76.45852 700MHz 113.94 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4203105 76.45852 700MHz 112.75 711712024 15:33 42.4201904 76.45829 700MHz 112.38 7117/202415:33 42.4201775 76.4583 700MHz 113.88 7117/202415:33 42.4200663 76.45808 700MHz 113.44 7117/202415:33 42.4200534 76.4581700MHz 116.12 7117/202415:33 42.4199457 76.45789 700MHz 113.75 7/17/202416:33 42.4198304 76.4577 700MHz 115.44 7/17/202415:33 42.419823 76.45772 700MHz 115.12 7117/202415:33 42.4197227 76.45752 700MHz 111.88 7/17/202415:33 42.4197126 76.45754 700MHz 115.5 7/17/202415:33 42.4196113 76.45734 700MHz 113.12 7117/202415:33 42.4196032 76.45736 700MHz 114 7/17/202415:33 42.4195025 76.45717 700MHz 113.12 7117/202415:33 42,4194924 76.45718 700MHz 117 7117/202415:33 42.4193987 76.45699 700MHz 116.62 7/17/202415:33 42.4192999 76.45682 700MHz 113.62 7/17/202415:33 42.419281 76.45683 700MHz 118.5 7/17/202415:33 42.4191988 76.45664 700MHz 115.25 7/17/202415:33 42.4191767 76.45665 700MHz 116.56 7/17/202415:33 42.4190953 76.45647 700MHz 113.12 7/171202425:33 42.4190734 76.45648 700MHz 116.12 7/17/202415:33 42.4189938 76.45629 700MHz 113.31 7/17/202415:33 42.4188887 76.4561700MHz 113.82 7/171202415:33 42.4188658 76.45612 700MHz 119 7117/202415:33 42.418777 76.45592 700MHz 115.06 7/17/202415:33 42.418758 76.45594 700MHz 118.06 7/171202415:33 42.4186646 76.45574 700MHz 115.69 7117/202415:33 42.4186456 76.45575 700MHz 116.94 7/17/202415:33 42.4185501 76.45555 700MHz 117.12 7/17/202415:33 42.4185335 76.45557 700MHz 120 7/17/202425:33 42.4184362 76.45536 700MHz 106.56 7117/202415:33 42.4183193 76.45516 700MHz 106.25 7/17/202415:33 42.4183023 76.45518 700MHz 126.25 7/171202415:33 42.4182031 76.45496 700MHz 105.81 7117/202415:33 42.4181862 76.45498 700MHz 121.88 7117/202415:33 42.4180916 76.45477 700MHz 104.56 7/17/202415:33 42.4180749 76.45479 700MHz 109.19 7117/202415:33 42.4179855 76.45459 700MHz 107.25 7/17/202415:33 42.4178956 76.45442 700MHz 106 7117/202415:33 42.4178784 76.45446 700MHz 105 7117/202415:33 42.4178124 76.45428 700MHz 108 7/17/202415:33 42.4177919 76.45431 700MHz 113.06 7117/202415:33 42.4177268 76.45413 700MHz 111.06 7117/202415:33 42.4177077 76.45416 700MHz 113.12 7/171202415:33 42.4176371 76,45399 700MHz 110.5 7/17/202415:33 42.4176209 76.45401 700MHz 112.44 7117/202415:33 42.4175408 76.45383 700MHz 108.62 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4174418 76.47992 700MHz 112.5 7117/202415:33 42.4174412 76.45365 700MHz 110.25 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4174332 76.47992 700MHz 119.75 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4174249 76.45366 700MHz 113.38 7/17/2024 15:51 42.417413 76.47993 1900MHz 116.56 7/171202415:33 42.4173376 76.45348 700MHz 109 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4173237 76.45349 700MHz 111.19 7/171202415:51 42.4172958 76.47976 700MHz 110.75 7117/202415:51 42.4172889 76.47977 700MHz 120 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4172683 76.47977 1900MHz 115.5 7117/202415:51 42.4172683 76.47977 1900MHz 108.88 7/17/202415:33 42.4172317 76.45329 700MHz 108.38 71171202415:33 42.4172167 76.4533 700MHz 110.94 7/17/202415:51 42.4171516 76.4796 700MHz 110.75 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4171479 76.47961 700MHz 119.94 7117/202415:33 42.4171224 76.4531 700MHz 112.19 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4171065 76.4531 700MHz 114.06 7117/202415:33 42.4170124 76.4529 70OMHZ 111.62 7117/202415:51 42.4170062 76.47945 700MHz 109.94 71171202415:51 42.4170012 76.47947 700MHz 119.12 7/17/202415:51 42.4169821 76.47945 1900MHz 116.19 7/17/202415:33 42.4168977 76.45269 70OMHz 113.06 7/17/202415:33 42.4168755 76.45268 700MHz 114 7/17/202415:51 42.4168696 76.4793 700MHz 111.19 7/17/202415:51 42.4168594 76.47932 70OMHZ 115.38 7/17/202415:51 42.4168468 76.4793 1900MHz 111.81 7/17/202415:33 42.4167801 76.45246 700MHz 108.81 7/171202415:33 42.4167552 76.45246 700MHz 109.69 7/17/202415:51 42.4167281 76.47916 70OMHz 109.69 7/171202415:51 42.4167055 76.47915 1900MHz 110.31 7/171202415:33 42.4166593 76.45224 700MHz 109.12 7/171202415:33 42.4166279 76.45223 70OMHZ 109.69 7/171202415:51 42.4165891 76.47901 700MHz 114.38 7/171202415:51 42.4165834 76.47901 700MHz 118.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4165613 76,47901 1900MHz 110.94 7/17/202415:33 42.4165368 76.45201 700MHZ 108.81 7/17/2024 15:5 42.4164536 76.47885 700MHz 116.19 7117/202415:51 42.4164532 76.47886 700MHz 119.12 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4164276 76.47885 190OMHZ 112.94 71171202415:33 42.4164178 76.45179 700MHz 110.5 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4163871 76.45178 700MHz 114.31 71171202415:51 42.4163252 76.4787 700MHz 107.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4163214 76.47871 700MHz 122.62 71171202415:51 42.4162978 76.4787 1900MHz 108.06 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4162976 76.45157 700MHz 109.25 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4162687 76.45157 70OMHZ 110.38 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4161976 76.47855 700MHz 107.88 7117/202415:51 42.4161908 76.47856 700MHz 115.94 7/17/2024 15:33 42.4161741 76.45134 700MHZ 108.19 7/17/202415:51 42.4161703 76.47855 1900MHz 109.56 71171202415:33 42.4161487 76.45135 700MHz 110.25 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4160697 76.4784 700MHZ 107.94 7117/202415:51 42.4160623 76.47841 700MHz 119.81 71171202415:33 42.4160582 76.45112 700MHz 110.62 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4160393 76.4784 190OMHz 107.81 7117/202415:33 42.4160288 76.45113 700MHz 110.12 7/171202415:33 42.4159461 76.4509 700MHz 109.62 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4159327 76.47825 70OMHz 109.5 7/171202415:51 42.4159315 76.47826 700MHz 113.94 7/171202415:51 42.4159034 76.47825 700MHz 100.19 7/171202415:33 42.4158328 76.45069 700MHz 106.94 7/171202415:51 42.4158015 76.47811 700MHz 115 7/17/202415:51 42.4157998 76.4781 700MHz 108 7/171202415:33 42.4157875 76.4507 70OMHZ 107.69 7/171202415:61 42.4157711 76.4781 700MHz 103.56 7/17/202415:33 42.4157131 76.45047 700MHz 111.5 7/17/202415:51 42.4156705 76.47794 70OMHZ 112 7/17/202415:51 42.4156671 76.47795 700MHz 118.38 7/17/202415:33 42.415661 76.45048 700MHz 110.81 7117/202415:33 42.4155917 76.45026 70OMHZ 109.62 7117/202415:33 42.415538 76.45027 700MHz 109.69 7/171202415:51 42.4155239 76.47777 700MHz 112.38 7/17/202415:51 42.4155193 76.47778 700MHz 119.56 7117/202415:51 42.4154915 76.47777 700MHz 102.94 7117/202415:33 42.4154737 76.45005 700MHz 108.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4153748 76.4776 70OMHZ 113.06 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4153625 76,4776 700MHz 119.56 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4153606 76.44984 70OMHZ 110.88 7117/202415:51 42.415339 76.4776 70OMHZ 105.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.415304 76.44985 70OMHz 109.81 7/171202415:34 42.415252 76.44963 70OMHz 109.19 7/171202415:61 42.4152169 76.47742 700MHz 113.25 7/17/202415:51 42.4152031 76.47742 700MHz 120.88 7117/202415:34 42.4151917 76.44965 70OMHz 111.19 7117/202415:51 42.4151792 76.47742 700MHz 109.44 7117/202415:51 42.4151792 76.47742 70OMHz 104.69 7/17/202415:34 42.4151423 76.44942 700MHz 106.25 7/17/202415:34 42.4150794 76.44945 700MHz 109.56 7/171202415:51 42.4150574 76.47724 70OMHZ 116.56 7/17/202415:51 42.4150434 76.47724 700MHz 126.69 7/17/202415:34 42.4150376 76.44924 700MHz 107.31 7/171202415:34 42.4149726 76.44926 700MHz 111.81 7/171202415:34 42.4149416 76.44907 70OMHZ 108.81 7/171202415:51 42.4148911 76.47705 700MHz 116.69 71171202415:51 42.4148813 76.47704 700MHz 127.06 7/171202415:34 42.4148578 76.44892 70OMHZ 106.94 7/171202415:51 42.4148536 76.47705 700MHz 109.56 7117/202415:34 42.4147962 76.44895 700MHz 110.56 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4147814 76.4488 70OMHZ 107.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4147268 76.44883 70OMHZ 113.19 7117/202415:51 42.4147256 76.47685 700MHz 114.19 7/17/2024 15:51 42.414719 76.47686 700MHz 126.56 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4147182 76.44872 70OMHZ 108.56 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4146924 76.47687 70OMHz 110.19 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4146696 76.44875 700MHz 113.12 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4146617 76.44865 700MHz 109.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.414618 76.44853 70OMHZ 109.94 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146166 76.44853 700MHz 122.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146154 76.44849 700MHz 108.94 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146129 76.44848 70OMHZ 118.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146052 76.44846 700MHz 112.25 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4146048 76.44863 700MHz 107.56 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146042 76.44859 70OMHZ 119.25 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146035 76.44859 70OMHZ 111.5 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4146014 76.44845 700MHz 117.69 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145901 76.44843 700MHz 112.25 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145875 76.44842 70OMHZ 114.62 71171202415:48 42.4145834 76.4485 2100MHz 110 71171202415:48 42.4145834 76.4485 2300MHZ 107.44 7/171202415:48 42.4145743 76.44847 210OMHZ 111.69 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145733 76.44865 700MHz 115.25 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145718 76.44865 700MHz 106.19 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145712 76.4486 210OMHZ 108.44 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4145671 76.47667 700MHz 116.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4145648 76.44838 700MHz 121.56 71171202415:48 42.4145647 76.44838 70OMHZ 112.56 7/17/202415:34 42.4145609 76.44867 700MHz 109.62 7/171202415:48 42.4145607 76.44844 2100MHz 110.88 7117/202415:51 42.4145585 76.47667 70OMHz 123.39 7117/202415:34 42.4145474 76.44867 700MHz 109.19 7/171202415:48 42,4145392 76.4484 2100MHz 109.88 7/171202415:51 42.4145336 76.47668 70OMHz 111.19 7/171202415:48 42.4145315 76.4487 700MHz 118.56 7/17/202415:48 42.4145305 76.44832 700MHz 117.81 7/17/202415:48 42.4145281 76.44869 70OMHZ 110.19 7/17/202415:48 42.4145258 76.44832 700MHz 112.12 7/17/202415:48 42.4145066 76.44835 2100MHz 114.69 7117/202415:48 42.4145066 76.44835 210OMHZ 110.44 7117/202415:48 42.4145066 76.44835 2100MHz 109.44 7/171202415:34 42.4145026 76.44869 700MHz 113.31 7/17/202415:48 42.4144966 76.44869 210OMHZ 111.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4144966 76.44869 2100MHz 110 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4144888 76.44824 70OMHZ 118.25 71171202415:34 42.4144883 76.4487 700MHz 110.31 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4144877 76.44827 700MHz 113.25 7/171202415:48 42,4144825 76.44874 70OMHz 117.56 7/171202415:48 42.4144797 76.44874 700MHz 111.5 7/171202415:48 42.4144497 76.44874 210OMHz 110.88 7/17/202415:34 42.4144446 76.44873 700MHz 107.5 7/171202415:48 42.4144346 76.44814 700MHz 121.81 7/17/202415:48 42.414434 76.44878 700MHz 110.06 7/17/202415:48 42.4144296 76.44816 70OMHz 114.38 7117/202415:48 42.4144294 76.44878 700MHz 118.31 7/17/202415:34 42.4144266 76.44877 700MHz 109.06 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4144123 76.4765 70OMHZ 216.25 7/171202415:48 42.4144008 76.44878 2100MHz 108.62 7117/202415:51 42.4143958 76.47649 70OMHZ 125.5 7/17/202415:48 42.4143847 76.44884 700MHz 109.81 7/17/202415:34 42.4143803 76.44879 700MHz 110.38 7/17/202415:48 42.4143787 76.44883 700MHz 116.69 7117/202415:51 42,4143742 76.4765 700MHz 110 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4143742 76.4765 70OMHZ 109.88 7117/202415:51 42.4143742 76.4765 70OMHZ 108 71171202415:48 42.4143671 76.44802 700MHz 120.88 71171202415:48 42.4143578 76.44803 700MHz 113.06 7/171202415:34 42.4143547 76.44886 700MHz 112.62 71171202415:48 42.414352 76.44883 2100MHz 108.81 7/171202415:48 42.4143374 76.44805 2100MHz 112.5 7/17/202415:48 42.4143364 76.4489 70OMHZ 109.5 7/171202415:48 42.4143262 76.44889 700MHz 116 7/171202415:48 42.4143013 76.44889 2100MHz 110.12 7/171202415:48 42.4143013 76.44889 2100MHz 108.06 7/17/202415:48 42.4142892 76.44787 700MHz 120.06 7/171202415:48 42.4142825 76.44897 700MHz 111.38 7/171202415:48 42.414282 76.4479 70OMHZ 106.88 7/171202415:34 42.4142777 76.44897 700MHz 109.94 7/17/202415:48 42.4142703 76.44895 700MHz 118.19 7/17/202415:48 42.4142595 76.44792 2100MHz 109.38 7/171202415:51 42.4142467 76.47632 700MHz 114.94 7/17/202415:51 42.4142341 76.47631 700MHz 126.38 7/17/202415:34 42.4142334 76.44898 700MHz 110.06 7/171202415:48 42.4142189 76.44906 700MHz 111.31 7/17/202415:48 42.4142014 76.44772 700MHz 118 7/17/202415:34 42.4141956 76.44908 700MHz 108.75 7/171202415:48 42.4141911 76.44774 700MHz 107.12 7/171202415:48 42.4141854 76.44905 210OMHZ 107.25 7/17/202415:48 42.4141688 76.44776 2100MHz 105.69 7/17/202415:48 42.4141529 76.44916 700MHz 111.31 7/171202415:34 42.4141524 76.449170OMHZ 112.88 7/17/202415:48 42.4141344 76.44914 700MHz 116.38 7/17/202415:48 42.4141179 76.44916 2100MHz 109 7/171202415:48 42.4141103 76.44756 70OMHZ 119.25 7/171202415:34 42.4141079 76.44922 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:48 42.4140954 76.44758 700MHz 110.44 7/171202415:51 42.4140868 76.47614 70OMHZ 114.31 7/17/202415:48 42.4140824 76.44928 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:51 42.4140755 76.47614 700MHz 120.75 7/171202415:48 42.4140744 76.4476 2100MHz 108.56 7/271202415:48 42.4140744 76.4476 2100MHz 103.69 7/17/202415:34 42.4140687 76.44924 700MHz 111.88 71171202415:48 42.4140668 76.44926 70OMHZ 116.88 7/171202415:48 42.4140475 76.44928 2106MHz 110.06 7/17/202415:34 42.4140231 76.44938 700MHz 107.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4140154 76.44738 70OMHZ 117.81 7117/202415:48 42.4140098 76.44943 700MHz 105.69 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4140002 76.44741 700MHz 109.62 7117/202415:48 42.4139947 76.44941 70OMHZ 116.56 7/17/202415:34 42.4139862 76.4494 700MHz 111 71171202415:48 42.4139757 76.44942 2100MHz 111.94 71171202415:34 42.4139434 76.44955 700MHz 108.62 7117/202415:48 42.4139421 76.44959 700MHz 105.44 7/17/202415:48 42.4139258 76.44956 700MHz 116.81 7/171202415:51 42.4139247 76.47596 700MHz 112.69 7/171202415:51 42.4139174 76.47596 700MHz 120.69 7/17/202415:48 42.4139154 76.44721 70OMHZ 115.62 7/17/202415:48 42.4139066 76.44959 2300MHz 110.38 7117/202415:34 42.4139044 76.44959 700MHz 110.56 7/171202415:48 42.4138973 76.44723 70OMHZ 105.25 71171202415:51 42.4138949 76.47597 700MHz 109.75 7/17/202415:48 42.4138789 76.44725 2300MHz 103.94 7117/202415:48 42.4138786 76.44976 70OMHZ 105.5 7117/202415:34 42.413872 76.44976 70OMHZ 109.31 7/17/202415:48 42.4138604 76.44975 70OMHz 113.62 7/17/202415:48 42.4138423 76.44977 2100MHz 110.5 7117/202415:34 42.4138337 76.44979 700MHz 111.31 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4138217 76.44996 70OMHZ 109.12 71171202415:48 42.4138142 76.44704 700MHz 109.81 7/171202415:34 42.4138091 76.44998 700MHz 108.12 7117/202415:48 42.4138034 76.44994 700MHz 116.31 71171202415:48 42.4137934 76.44705 70OMHz 107.69 7117/202415:48 42.4137857 76.44996 2100MHz 112.81 7117/202415:48 42.4137765 76.44707 2100MHz 105.75 7/17/202415:34 42.4137693 76.4500170OMHZ 114.19 7/17/202415:48 42.413767 76.45017 70OMHz 112.38 71171202415:51 42.4137653 76.47578 700MHz 111.5 7/171202415:51 42.4137559 76.47577 700MHz 122.88 7/17/202415:48 42.4137507 76.45014 700MHz 116.69 7/17/202415:34 42.4137468 76.45023 700MHz 110.75 7/171202415:48 42.4137337 76.45016 2100MHz 113.12 7/171202415:51 42.4137305 76.47578 70OMHZ 107.44 7/17/202415:48 42.413709 76.44686 70OMHz 116.38 7/171202415:48 42.4137048 76.45038 700MHz 114.38 7/171202415:34 42.4137038 76.45025 700MHz 112.88 7/17/202415:48 42.4136906 76.44686 700MHz 110.12 7/17/202415:48 42.4136894 76.45035 700MHz 117.25 7117/202415:34 42.4136756 76.45048 700MHz 111.25 71171202415:48 42.413672 76.44689 2100MHz 107.94 7/171202415:48 42.413672 76.44689 2100MHz 104.31 7117/202415:48 42.4136705 76.45038 2100MHz 112.75 7117/202415:34 42.4136322 76.45049 70OMHZ 118.31 7/171202415:48 42.4136301 76.45059 700MHz 113.81 7/17/202415:48 42.4136089 76.45057 700MHz 119.69 7117/202415:48 42.4136006 76.44667 700MHz 115 7117/202415:51 42.4135965 76.47559 700MHz 110.25 7/171202415:48 42.4135939 76.45059 2300MHz 111.94 7/17/202415: 51 42.4135881 76.47559 700MHz 120.06 7/171202415:34 42.4135871 76.45071 700MHz 113.81 7/171202415:48 42.4135833 76.44667 700MHz 108.69 71171202415:48 42, 4135667 76.4467 2100MHz 108.19 7/171202415:48 42.4135667 76.4467 2100MHz 107.62 7/17/202415: 51 42.4135648 76.4756 700MHz 108.75 7/17/202415: 34 42.4135405 76.45073 700MHz 117 7/171202415:48 42.4135382 76.45079 700MHz 111.88 7/17/202415: 48 42.413515 76.45078 700MHz 119.44 7/171202415:48 42.4135003 76.45079 2100MHz 110.12 7/171202415:48 42.413496 76.44648 70OMHz 113 7/17/202415: 34 42.4134807 76.45095 700MHz 111 7/17/202415: 48 42.413476 76.44648 70OMHz 108.81 7/171202415:34 42.4134273 76.45096 700MHz 116.94 7/17/202415: 48 42.413427 76.451 70OMHz 109.81 71171202415:51 42. 4134237 76.4754 700MHz 110.88 7/171202415:51 42.4134194 76.4754 70OMHz 117.62 7127/202415:48 42.4134022 76.45099 700MHz 119.31 7/171202415:51 42.4133965 76.47541 70OMHZ 106.12 71171202415:48 42. 4133904 76.4512100MHz 109.25 7/17/202415: 48 42.4133895 76.44629 700MHz 116.38 7/17/202415: 48 42.4133712 76.44628 70OMHZ 111.06 7/17/202415: 34 42.4133498 76.45117 700MHz 112.88 7/17/202415: 48 42.4133007 76.4512 700MHz 109.25 7117/202415:34 42.4132969 76.45117 70OMHZ 114.69 71171202415:48 42. 4132874 76.44609 700MHz 117.12 7/17/202415: 48 42.4132737 76.45119 700MHz 114.75 7/17/202415: 48 42.4132719 76.44609 700MHz 108.75 7/17/202415: 48 42.4132665 76.45119 2100MHz 107.62 7/17/202415: 48 42.4132531 76.44612 2100MHz 107.69 7/17/202415: 51 42.4132496 76.47521700MHz 117 7/17/202415: 51 42.4132264 76.47522 700MHz 104.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4132047 76.4514 70OMHZ 112.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4131868 76.4459 700MHz 117.19 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4131709 76.4514 700MHz 110.88 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4131703 76.44589 700MHz 109.56 7/17/2024 15:48 42,4131501 76.44592 2100MHz 112.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4131456 76.45139 70OMHZ 116.38 7/171202415:34 42.413142 76.45139 700MHz 114.38 71171202415:51 42.4130901 76.47502 700MHz 117.12 7/17/202415:48 42.4130814 76.4457 700MHz 117 71171202415:51 42.4130736 76.47502 700MHz 119.06 7117/202415:48 42.4130669 76.44569 700MHz 108.06 7/17/2024 15:34 42.413055 76.45163 700MHz 112.31 7/17/202415:51 42.4130533 76.47503 700MHz 104 7/171202415:48 42.4130484 76.44572 2300MHz 107.94 7/171202415:48 42.4130457 76.45162 700MHz 110.81 7/17/202415:48 42.4130186 76.4516 700MHz 116.94 7/17/202415:48 42.4130076 76.45161 2100MHz 113.19 7117/202415:48 42.4130076 76.45161 2300MHz 113.06 7/171202415:48 42.4129792 76.4455 700MHz 115.44 7/171202415:48 42.4129658 76.44549 700MHz 109.69 7117/202415:48 42.412947 76.44552 2100MHz 110.81 7/17/2024 15:48 42.412947 76.44552 2300MHz 109.31 7/17/2024 15:48 42.412947 76.44552 2100MHz 107.19 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4129224 76.45185 700MHz 111.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4129215 76.45188 700MHz 111.19 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4129122 76.47482 700MHz 113.19 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4128969 76.47483 70OMHZ 115.56 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4128922 76.45183 700MHz 122.44 7/17/2024 15:48 42,4128858 76,45184 2100MHz 114.44 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4128804 76.4453 700MHz 114.75 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4128774 76.45186 700MHz 111.88 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4128767 76.47483 700MHz 101.88 7/17/202415:48 42.412863 76A4529 700MHz 111.75 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4127904 76.45209 700MHz 110.38 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4127879 76.45213 700MHz 113.75 71171202415:48 42.4127805 76.4451700MHz 119.69 7/17/202415:48 42.4127664 76.44509 700MHz 111.75 7/17/202415:48 42.4127633 76.45207 700MHz 121.19 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4127552 76.45208 2100MHz 114.5 7/17/2024 15:34 42.412741 76.45213 700MHz 117.56 7/17/202415:51 42.4127379 76.47463 700MHz 111.75 7/17/202415:51 42.412724 76.47463 70OMHz 121.06 7/17/202415:48 42.4126836 76.44491 700MHz 115.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4126697 76.4449 700MHz 111.38 7/17/202415:48 42,4126622 76.45234 700MHz 115 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4126519 76.45239 700MHz 114.69 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4126478 76.44493 2100MHz 109.44 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4126311 76.45232 700MHz 125.75 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4126213 76.45232 2100MHz 116.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4126034 76.45238 700MHz 119.94 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4125875 76.44471 700MHz 119.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4125727 76.44471 700MHz 112.69 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4125673 76.47443 700MHz 113.5 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4125507 76.44474 2100MHz 113.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4125444 76.47444 70OMHZ 119.56 7/17/202415:51 42.4125349 76.47444 700MHz 106.88 7/17/202415:51 42.4125349 76.47444 700MHz 102.75 7/171202415:48 42.4125266 76.45259 700MHz 115.69 7/17/202415:34 42.4125066 76.45264 700MHz 115.81 7/17/202415:48 42.4124939 76.45257 700MHz 123.5 7/17/2024 15:47 42.412492 76.44452 70OMHz 119.5 7/17/202415:47 42.4124775 76.44452 700MHz 112.56 7117/202415:47 42.4124548 76.44455 2100MHz 111.19 7/17/202415:47 42.4124549 76.44455 2100MHz 109.25 7/17/202415:47 42.4124548 76.44455 2100MHz 105.69 7/17/202416:47 42.4124003 76.44434 700MHz 117.25 7/17/202415:51 42.4123997 76.47424 700MHz 111.69 7117/202415:48 42.4123857 76.45284 700MHz 115.81 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4123855 76.44433 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4123691 76.47424 70OMHz 118.44 7117/202415:51 42.4123619 76.47425 700MHz 103.69 71171202415:34 42.4123583 76.45289 700MHz 117.38 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4123547 76.45282 70OMHz 125.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4123419 76.45283 2100MHz 121.44 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4123419 76.45283 2100MHz 119.94 7/17/202415:34 42.4123213 76.45288 700MHz 121.44 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4123054 76.44414 700MHz 115.12 7/171202415:47 42.4122925 76.44413 700MHz 109.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4122529 76.45308 700MHz 117.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4122251 76.47404 700MHz 113 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4122174 76.45306 700MHz 122.31 7/17/2024 15:47 42.412215 76.44396 700MHz 112.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4122124 76.45314 700MHz 118.25 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4122078 76.45306 2100MHz 122.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4122047 76.44395 700MHz 109.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4121929 76.47404 700MHz 119.94 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4121882 76.47405 700MHz 108.88 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4121806 76.44398 2100MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4121783 76.45313 700MHz 123.31 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4121301 76.45328 700MHz 121.81 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4121272 76.44378 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4121197 76.44377 700MHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4120929 76.4438 2100MHz 111.62 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4120901 76.45327 700MHz 126.81 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4120792 76.45327 700MHz 114.25 7/17/2024 15:34 42.412061 76.45338 700MHz 120.44 7/17/2024 15:51 42.412046 76.47384 700MHz 114 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4120423 76.4436 700MHz 114 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4120314 76.44358 700MHz 108.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4120226 76.45337 700MHz 124.19 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4120185 76.47385 700MHz 119.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4120162 76.45336 700MHz 113.94 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4120115 76.47385 700MHz 105.12 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4120053 76.44362 2100MHz 108.12 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4120037 76.45346 700MHz 120.94 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4119632 76.45345 700MHz 128.38 7/17/202415:47 42.4119625 76.44342 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4119571 76.45344 700MHz 120.56 7/17/202415:47 42.41195 76.44341 70OMHz 102.62 71171202415:47 42.411924 76,44344 210OMHz 104.06 71171202415:34 42. 4118962 76.45359 700MHz 125.81 7/17/202415: 47 42.4118822 76,44325 700MHz 111.88 71171202415:48 42. 4118714 76.45362 700MHz 122.5 71171202415:47 42. 4118714 76.44323 700MHz 106.94 7117/202415:51 42.4118692 76.47364 70OMHz 111.75 7/17/202415: 34 42.4118667 76.45358 700MHz 127.38 7/171202415:34 42.4118546 76.45356 700MHz 117.12 7/17/202415: 47 42.4118442 76.44326 2100MHz 105.56 7/171202415:47 42.4118442 76.44326 2100MHz 101.38 7/171202415:51 42.4118436 76.47365 700MHz 120.88 7/17/2024 15:51 42.411837 76.47365 70OMHz 109.44 7117/202415:51 42.411837 76.47365 700MHz 108.44 7/17/2024 15:48 42.4118306 76.4536 700MHz 128.56 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4118048 76.44307 700MHz 114.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4117947 76.44306 700MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4117282 76.4429 700MHz 110.88 7/171202415:48 42.4117217 76.45376 700MHz 122.44 71171202415:34 42.4117188 76.45377 700MHz 122.94 7/171202415:47 42.4117147 76. 44288 700MHz 104.75 7/17/202415:34 42.4116957 76.45376 700MHz 127.38 7/171202415:51 42.4116941 76. 47344 700MHz 112.12 7/171202415:47 42.4116863 76. 44291 2100MHz 105.06 7/171202415:48 42.4116811 76. 45374 700MHz 128.69 71171202415:34 42.4116795 76.45373 700MHz 114.94 7/17/2024 15:48 42. 4116732 76.45373 700MHz 122.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42. 4116678 76.47346 700MHz 122.69 7117/202415:47 42.411658 76. 44271 700MHz 112.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4116325 76.4427 700MHz 106.56 7/17/202415:47 42.4116067 76.44273 2100MHz 105.38 7/171202415:47 42.4115756 76.44253 700MHz 114 7/171202415:48 42.4115618 76.45388 700MHz 121.88 7/17/202415:47 42.4115519 76.44253 700MHz 108.56 7/17/202415:34 42.411538 76.45392 700MHz 122.75 7117/202415:47 42.4115266 76.44256 2100MHz 106.5 7/171202415:48 42.4115243 76.45386 700MHz 127.69 7/171202415:48 42.4115187 76.45385 700MHz 113.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4115174 76.47325 700MHz 110.31 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4115035 76.45391 700MHz 123.75 7/17/2024 15:47 42,4114933 76.44235 700MHz 112.06 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4114893 76.47325 700MHz 118.25 7117/202415:34 42.4114878 76.45388 700MHz 115 7/17/202415:51 42.4114808 76.47325 700MHz 108.12 7/171202415:47 42.4114734 76.44236 700MHz 105.88 7117/202415:47 42.4114468 76.44239 2100MHz 108.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4114468 76.44239 2100MHz 106.31 7/17/202415:47 42.4114109 76.44218 700MHz 113.25 7/17/202415:47 42,4113933 76.44218 700MHz 106.31 7/17/202415:49 42.4113905 76.45399 700MHz 121.19 7/171202415:47 42.4113675 76,44221 2300MHz 104.5 7/17/202415:49 42.4113596 76,45397 700MHz 128.19 7/17/202415:49 42.4113557 76.45396 700MHz 113.06 71171202415:34 42.4113457 76.45405 700MHz 125.81 7/17/202415:51 42.4113392 76.47305 700MHz 111.81 7/171202415:47 42.4113307 76.44201 700MHz 111.88 7/171202415:47 42.4113147 76.442 700MHz 105.62 7117/202415:51 42.4113139 76.47306 700MHz 119.12 7/17/202415:34 42.4113133 76.45403 700MHz 122.81 71171202415:51 42.4113077 76.47306 700MHz 107.31 71171202415:34 42.4112992 76.454 700MHz 114.12 7/171202415:47 42.4112885 76.44204 2100MHz 108.31 71171202415:47 42.4112528 76.44185 700MHz 113.75 7117/202415:47 42.4112311 76.44183 700MHz 106.5 71171202415:49 42.411215 76.45411700MHz 123.06 7117/202415:49 42.4111908 76.45408 700MHz 126.56 7117/202415:49 42.4111834 76.45408 700MHz 112.88 71171202415:47 42.4111738 76.44168 700MHz 116.12 7117/202415:51 42.4111662 76.47286 700MHz 114.12 71171202415:34 42.4111515 76.45419 700MHz 125.94 71171202415:47 42.4111508 76.44166 700MHz 109.44 7/17/202415:51 42.4111368 76.47286 700MHz 122.88 7/171202415:51 42.4111319 76.47286 700MHz 113 71171202415:34 42.4111246 76.45416 700MHz 122.25 7117/202415:47 42.4111233 76.44168 2100MHz 106.25 7/171202415:34 42.411107 76.45413 700MHz 110.38 71171202415:47 42.4110921 76.4415 700MHz 114.81 7117/202415:47 42.4110691 76.44148 700MHz 109.75 7/171202415:49 42.4110434 76.45423 700MHz 122.19 7/171202415:47 42.4110414 76.4415 2100MHz 110.44 7/171202415:49 42.4110188 76.4542 700MHz 124.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4110151 76.44133 700MHz 117.38 7/17/202415:51 42.4109896 76.47266 700MHz 113.56 7/171202415:47 42.4109888 76.44129 700MHz 111.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4109634 76.44132 2100MHz 114.75 7117/202415:47 42.4109634 76.44132 2100MHz 110.25 7117/202415:51 42.4109625 76.47266 700MHz 125.06 7117/202415:51 42.4109567 76.47267 700MHz 112.19 7117/202415:34 42.4109561 76.45432 70OMHZ 122.38 7/171202415:47 42.4109392 76.44114 700MHz 121.12 7117/202415:34 42.410931 76.45429 700MHz 122.5 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4109143 76.45427 70OMHz 111.38 7/17/2024 15:47 42.410914 76.44111 70OMHz 112.44 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4108738 76.45434 700MHz 117.19 7/171202415:47 42.4108664 76.44095 700MHz 117.69 7/17/202415:49 42.4108479 76.45432 700MHz 121.5 7/171202415:47 42.4308432 76.44092 700MHz 111 7/17/202415:49 42.4108414 76.45431 700MHz 112.06 7117/202415:49 42.4109414 76.45431 700MHz 110.38 7/17/202415:47 42.4108169 76.44095 2100MHz 108.5 71171202415:51 42.4108121 76.47246 700MHz 114.31 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4107942 76.44075 700MHz 114.31 7/171202415:51 42.4107866 76.47246 700MHz 126.19 7/171202415:51 42.4107804 76.47247 700MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:47 42.4107703 76.44073 700MHz 108.88 7/17/202415:34 42.4107618 76.45446 700MHz 121.81 7/17/202415:47 42.4107469 76.44076 2100MHz 110.44 7/171202415:34 42.410741 76.45443 70OMHz 119 7/171202415:34 42.4107321 76.45441 700MHz 109.31 7/17/202415:47 42.4107275 76.44056 700MHz 115.5 7117/202415:49 42.4107071 76.45448 700MHz 116.88 71171202415:47 42.4107023 76.44054 700MHz 106.62 7117/202415:49 42.4106848 76.45445 700MHz 122.12 7117/202415:47 42.4106833 76.44057 2100MHZ 108 7117/202415:49 42.4106779 76.45445 700MHz 106.94 7117/202415:47 42.4106638 76.44037 700MHz 113.19 7/17/202415:47 42.4106371 76.44035 70OMHz 104.62 7117/202415:51 42.4106294 76.47226 700MHz 115.12 7117/202415:51 42.41061 76.47227 700MHz 127.56 7/17/202415:51 42.4106049 76.47227 700MHz 111.25 7117/202415:47 42.410598 76.44018 70OMHz 115.62 7117/202415:34 42.4105829 76.45462 700MHz 118.69 71171202415:47 42.4105715 76.44016 700MHz 104.44 7/17/202415:34 42.410564 76.4546 70OMHz 120.5 7/17/202415:47 42.4105569 76.44019 2100MHz 106 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4105569 76.44018 2100MHz 104.38 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4105569 76.44018 210OMHZ 104.38 7117/202415:34 42.4105566 76.45458 700MHz 107.06 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4105516 76.45463 700MHz 115 7/171202415:49 42.4105364 76.4546 700MHz 116.25 7117/202415:49 42.410526 76.4546 700MHz 105.62 7/171202415:47 42.4105241 76.43999 700MHz 114.5 7/171202415:47 42.4105038 76.43996 700MHz 105.06 7/17/202415:51 42.4104581 76.47207 700MHz 114.88 7/171202415:47 42.4104486 76.43979 700MHz 112.75 7/171202415:51 42.4104341 76.47207 700MHz 126.75 7/17/202415:51 42.4104301 76.47208 700MHz 109.19 7/171202415:47 42.4104294 76.43976 700MHz 106.69 7/17/2024 15:34 42.410426 76.45479 70OMHz 119.19 7/171202415:47 42.4104223 76.43979 2100MHz 106.31 7/171202415:34 42.4104147 76.45477 700MHz 115.75 7/171202415:34 42.4104147 76.45477 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4104118 76.4548 70OMHz 111.38 7/17/202415:34 42.4104035 76.45476 700MHz 104.62 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4103967 76.45477 700MHz 116.88 7/17/202415:49 42.4103851 76.45478 70OMHz 106.5 7/17/202415:47 42.4103718 76.43959 700MHz 114.88 7117/202415:47 42.4103526 76.43957 700MHz 109.19 7117/202415:47 42.4102925 76.43939 700MHz 112.19 7/17/202415:51 42.4102898 76.47188 700MHz 115.62 7117/202415:49 42.4102894 76.45498 700MHz 110.81 7117/202415:34 42.4102859 76.45497 700MHz 109 7117/202415:49 42.4102757 76.45495 700MHz 117.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4102753 76.43937 700MHz 107.38 7117/202415:34 42.4102711 76.45495 700MHz 102.44 7117/202415:47 42.41027 76.43939 2100MHz 105.06 7117/202415:51 42.4102636 76.47188 70OMHz 126.06 7/171202415:51 42.410257 76.47189 70OMHz 112.94 7/17/202415:47 42.4102085 76.43919 700MHz 115.56 7/171202415:47 42.4101901 76.43917 700MHz 107.38 7/171202415:47 42.4101866 76.43919 2100MHz 102.81 7/171202415:49 42.4101795 76.45517 700MHz 110.06 7/171202415:34 42.4101685 76.45517 700MHz 109.88 7/171202415:49 42.4101682 76.45515 700MHz 116.19 7/17/202415:34 42.4101671 76.45517 700MHz 112 7/171202415:49 42.4101586 76.45515 700MHz 106.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4101586 76.45515 70OMHZ 103 7/17;202415:34 42.4101576 76.45515 700MHz 104.44 7117/202415:47 42.4101229 76.43899 700MHz 115.75 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4101128 76.47168 70OMHZ 110.88 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4101025 76.439 2100MHZ 108.88 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4101025 76.439 2100MHz 103.31 7/171202415:47 42.4101024 76.43897 700MHz 110 7/17/202415:51 42.4100899 76.47168 70OMHZ 126.38 7/17/202415:51 42.4100807 76.47169 700MHz 112.62 7/17/202415:49 42.4100792 76.45537 700MHz 106.19 7/17/202415:34 42,410071 76.45537 700MHz 109 7/171202415:49 42.4100681 76.45535 700MHz 112.5 7/17/202415:34 42.4100665 76.45536 700MHz 107.31 71171202415:34 42,4100565 76.45535 700MHz 103.12 7/17/202415:49 42.4100558 76.45535 70OMHZ 100.25 7/171202415:47 42.4100296 76.4388 700MHz 114.38 7117/202415:47 42.4100143 76.43878 700MHz 107.81 7117/202415:49 42.4099818 76.46557 700MHz 103.25 7117/202415:34 42.4099785 76.45557 700MHz 107.12 7117/202415:34 42.409974 76.45556 700MHz 106.5 7117/202415:49 42,4099728 76.45555 700MHz 108.56 7117/202415:34 42,4099623 76.45555 700MHz 101.44 7117/202415:49 42.4099586 76.45555 700MHz 101.75 7117/202415:51 42.4099407 76.47148 700MHz 111.88 7117/202415:47 42.409936 76.4386 700MHz 114.62 7/17/202415:51 42.4099211 76.47149 700MHz 125.31 7117/202415:47 42.4099197 76.43858 700MHz 107.81 7117/202415:47 42,4099174 76.4386 210OMHZ 106.69 7117/202415:47 42.4099174 76.4386 2100MHZ 106.44 7/171202415:51 42.4099153 76.4715 700MHz 112.56 71171202415:49 42,4098828 76.45575 700MHz 105.75 7117/202415:34 42.4098807 76.45575 700MHz 109.25 7/171202415:34 42.4098788 76.45575 700MHz 108.94 71171202415:49 42.4098711 76.45574 700MHz 110.06 7117/202415:34 42.4098625 76.45574 2100MHz 110.62 7/171202415:49 42.4098588 76.45573 700MHz 100.25 7/17/202415:47 42,4098427 76.43841 700MHz 110.81 7117/202415:47 42.4098242 76.43839 70OMHZ 106.75 7117/202415:34 42.4097758 76.45592 700MHz 108.44 7/17/202415:51 42.409773 76.47129 700MHz 115.81 7/171202415:49 42.4097722 76.45592 70OMHZ 105.19 7/171202416:34 42.4097673 76.45592 700MHz 107.75 7/17/202415:34 42.4097592 76.4559 2100MHz 110.25 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4097576 76.45592 70OMHZ 110.75 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4097488 76.4713 70OMHZ 123.56 7/17/2024 15:51 42.409746 76.47131 70OMHZ 110.38 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4097453 76.43822 70OMHZ 107.81 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4097257 76.43822 2100MHz 104.81 7117/202415:47 42.4097255 76.43819 700MHz 105.19 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4096569 76.45608 70OMHZ 107.56 71171202415:49 42.4096519 76.45609 700MHz 106.62 7/171202415:47 42.4096505 76.43803 700MHz 111.88 7/17/202415:34 42.4096451 76.45606 2100MHz 109.69 7/17/202415:49 42.409634 76.45609 700MHz 113.38 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4096306 76.43803 2100MHz 101.94 7117/202415:47 42.4096296 76.438 70OMHZ 107 7117/202415:49 42.4096215 76.45608 700MHz 101.81 7/171202415:49 42.4096215 76.45608 700MHz 100.69 7/17/202415:51 42.4096099 76.4711 70OMHZ 114.19 7/171202415:51 42.4095779 76.47111 700MHz 122.5 7117/202415:51 42.4095764 76.47111 70OMHZ 109.5 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4095565 76.43784 700MHz 113.44 7/17/2024 15:47 42.40954 76.43781 70OMHZ 107.12 7117/202415:34 42.4095399 76.45622 70OMHZ 109 7117/202415:34 42.4095395 76.45622 700MHz 108.38 7117/202415:47 42.4095366 76.43784 2100MHz 106.75 7117/202415:47 42.4095366 76.43784 210OMHZ 103.94 7117/202415:34 42.4095251 76.4562 2100MHz 110.5 7/171202415:49 42.409518 76.45625 700MHz 107.56 7/17/202415:49 42.4095 76.45624 70OMHz 114.12 7/171202415:49 42.409486 76.45624 70OMHz 103.5 7/171202415:47 42.4094632 76.43765 70OMHZ 115.31 7/171202415:47 42.4094472 76.43762 70OMHz 110.38 7/171202415:51 42.4094418 76.47091 700MHz 113.69 7117/202415:34 42.4094173 76.45636 700MHz 108.31 7117/202415:34 42.4094151 76.45635 70OMHz 110.06 7/17/202415:51 42.4094106 76.47092 700MHz 119.81 7117/202415:51 42.4094101 76.47092 700MHz 106.81 7/17/202415:34 42.4094016 76.45633 2100MHz 109.12 7117/202415:49 42.4093819 76.45639 700MHz 108.69 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4093712 76.43747 700MHz 114.06 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4093621 76.45639 700MHz 113.25 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4093575 76.43744 70OMHz 109.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4093529 76.43746 2100MHz 106.19 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4093521 76,45638 700MHz 102.3E 7/17/2024 15:34 42,4092974 76.45649 70OMHZ 108.19 7/17/2024 15:34 42.409289 76.45649 700MHz 108.25 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4092801 76.43729 700MHz 112.75 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4092773 76.47072 700MHz 115.06 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4092763 76.45647 210OMHz 107.75 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4092695 76.43726 700MHz 108.69 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4092638 76,43728 2100MHz 107.62 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4092492 76.47073 70OMHz 120.5 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4092485 76.47074 700MHz 108 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4092485 76.47074 700MHz 106.69 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4092413 76.45654 70OMHZ 107.56 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4092219 76.45653 700MHz 112.56 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4092133 76.45653 700MHz 103.62 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4091938 76.43712 700MHz 111.5 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4091855 76.43708 70OMHz 107.94 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4091764 76.4371 2100MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4091736 76.45662 700MHz 110 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4091509 76.4566 210OMHZ 112.75 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4091232 76.47055 700MHz 114.69 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4091104 76.43695 700MHz 115.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4091036 76.43691 70OMHz 109.88 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4090997 76.45669 700MHz 110.06 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4090924 76.43693 2100MHz 108.94 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4090921 76.47056 700MHz 118.75 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4090813 76.45669 700MHz 116.06 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4090494 76.45675 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4090372 76.45676 700MHz 112.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4090275 76.45674 2100MHZ 111.5 71171202415:47 42.4090245 76.43678 700MHz 111.56 7117/202415:47 42.4090226 76.43674 70OMHZ 107.88 7117/202415:47 42.4090103 76.43676 2100MHz 105.88 7/171202415:51 42.4089765 76.47038 70OMHZ 114.75 7/17/202415:49 42.4089613 76.45685 700MHz 110.75 7/171202415:49 42.4089462 76.45684 700MHz 116.19 7/17/202415:47 42.4089444 76.43661 700MHz 110.38 7/17/202415:47 42.4089443 76.43657 700MHz 102.06 7/171202415:51 42.4089436 76.4704 70OMHz 108.94 7117/202415:51 42.4089434 76.47039 700MHz 119.69 71171202415:49 42.4089357 76.45683 70OMHz 106.12 7/27/2024 15:49 42.4089357 76.45683 700MHz 104.81 7/17/2024 15:47 42,408931 76.43659 2100MHz 108.88 7/171202415:34 42.4089286 76.45689 700MHz 111.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4089187 76.45689 700MHz 109.94 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4089087 76.45687 2100MHZ 112.38 7117/202415:47 42.4088685 76.43641 700MHz 103.62 7117/202415:47 42.4088648 76.43645 700MHz 108.81 7/171202415:47 42.4088518 76.43643 2100MHz 106.5 7/171202415:49 42.408831 76.457 70OMHz 112.44 7/17/2024 15:51 42.4088298 76.47022 700MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:34 42.4088163 76.45702 70OMHz 112.88 7/171202415:49 42.408814 76.45699 700MHz 116.5 7/17/202415:34 42.408805 76.45702 700MHz 114.38 7/17/202415:49 42.4088047 76.45699 700MHz 110.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4088047 76.45699 700MHz 108.81 7117/202415:51 42.4088027 76.47023 700MHz 120.81 7117/202415:51 42.4087988 76.47023 700MHz 110.38 7117/202415:34 42.4087979 76.457 2100MHz 113.94 7/17/202415:47 42.4087887 76.43625 700MHz 105.75 7117/202415:47 42.4087863 76.43629 700MHz 109.75 7/17/202415:47 42.4087724 76.43627 2100MHz 106.38 71171202415:47 42.4087114 76.4361 700MHz 106.19 71171202415:49 42.4087057 76.45715 700MHz 111.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4087056 76.43615 700MHz 112.56 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4086964 76.43612 2100MH2 103.44 7/171202415:34 42.4086949 76.45715 700MHz 112.56 7/171202415:34 42.4086938 76.45716 700MHz 112.94 7/171202415:51 42.4086915 76.47007 700MHz 112.5 7/171202415:49 42.4086889 76.45714 700MHz 118.56 71171202415:34 42.4086874 76.45714 2100MHz 114.62 7/171202415:47 42.4086301 76.43594 700MHz 105.44 7/17/202415:47 42.408629 76.436 70OMHz 110.88 7117/202415:47 42.4086166 76.43596 2100MHz 103.81 7117/202415:34 42.4085904 76.45728 700MHz 117.06 7/17/2024 15:49 42,4085899 76.45731 700MHz 113.06 7/17/2024 15:34 42.4085854 76.45728 2100MHz 115.25 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4085757 76.4573 700MHz 119.62 7/17/202415:49 42.4085686 76.4573 700MHz 109.69 7117/202415:51 42.4085588 76.46992 700MHz 110 7/17/202415:47 42.4085514 76.43584 700MHz 112.12 71171202415:47 42.4085486 76.43578 700MHz 106.06 7/17/202415:47 42.4085366 76.4358 2100MHz 100.94 7/17/202415:51 42.4085348 76.46994 700MHz 106.69 71171202415:51 42.4085348 76.46994 700MHz 105.62 7/171202415:35 42.4085022 76.45743 700MHz 114.81 71171202415:35 42.4084977 76.45741 700MHz 113.31 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4084955 76.45742 2300MHz 115.38 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4064852 76.45748 700MHz 114.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4084754 76.4357 700MHz 108.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4094719 76.45747 700MHz 121.31 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4084676 76.43561 700MHz 105.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4084554 76.43563 2100MHz 104.69 71171202415:51 42.4084368 76.46978 700MHz 111.19 71171202415:35 42.4084266 76.45757 700MHz 116.38 71171202415:35 42.4084257 76.45757 700MHz 117.25 71171202415:35 42.4084193 76.45757 2100MHz 114.94 71171202415:51 42.4084102 76.46979 700MHz 107.62 71171202415:49 42.4084082 76.45766 700MHz 115.31 7/17/202415:47 42.4083921 76.43551 700MHz 107.81 71171202415:49 42.4083912 76.45764 700MHz 122.94 71171202415:47 42.4083851 76.43544 700MHz 101.62 7/17/202415:49 42.4083846 76.45765 700MHz 109.25 7117/202415:49 42.4083846 76.45765 700MHz 109 7117/202415:47 42.4083739 76.43546 2100MHz 101.62 7117/202415:35 42.4083664 76.45773 700MHz 119 7117/202415:35 42.4083657 76.45772 700MHz 113.56 7117/202415:35 42.4083582 76.45772 2100MHz 119.44 7117/202415:49 42.4083447 76.45783 70OMHz 115 7117/202415:49 42.4083237 76.45782 700MHz 124 7/17/202415:49 42.4083223 76.45782 700MHz 112.31 7/17/202415:35 42.4083182 76,45788 700MHz 118.69 7/17/202415:51 42.4083154 76.46964 700MHz 111.56 7/17/202415:47 42.4083094 76.43533 700MHz 111.44 7/17/202415:35 42.4083045 76.45788 2100MHz 119.44 7/17/202415:47 42.4083024 76.43527 700MHz 106.19 7/17/202415:47 42.4082928 76.43529 2100MHz 104.12 7/171202415:51 42.4082897 76.46965 700MHz 104.25 7/171202415:49 42.4082842 76.45801 700MHz 116 7/17/202415:35 42.4082766 76.45802 700MHz 120.88 71171202415:49 42,4082668 76.45799 700MHz 225.06 7/17/202415:49 42.4082627 76.458 700MHz 113.5 7/17/202415:35 42.4082625 76.45804 700MHz 119.31 7/17/202415:35 42.4082536 76.45803 2300MHz 116.81 7/17/202415:49 42.408231 76.45818 700MHz 117.69 7117/202415:35 42.4082307 76.45817 700MHZ 118.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4082244 76.43515 700MHz 110.94 7/171202415:47 42.4082199 76.4351700MHz 105.31 7117/202415:35 42.4082124 76.45819 700MHz 118.94 7/17/202415:49 42.4082117 76.45816 700MHz 123.62 71171202415:47 42.4082094 76.43512 2100MHz 102.75 7/171202415:49 42.4082054 76,45816 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:35 42.4082032 76.45818 2100MHz 120.44 71171202415:51 42.408194 76.4695 70OMHz 111.38 7/17/202415:35 42.4081773 76.45833 700MHz 117.69 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4081744 76.45834 700MHz 118.88 7/17/202415:51 42.4081708 76.46951 700MHz 112.06 7/17/202415:35 42.4081567 76.45834 700MHz 118.38 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4081561 76.45833 700MHz 120.94 7/171202415:49 42.4081493 76.45832 700MHZ 115.19 7/17/202415:35 42.4081481 76.45833 2100MHZ 118.88 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4081425 76.43496 700MHz 111.38 7/17/2024 15:47 42.408134 76.43492 700MHz 103.12 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4081243 76.43495 2100MHZ 103.56 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4081198 76.45849 700MHz 119.38 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4081149 76.45849 700MHz 118.19 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4081013 76.45849 700MHz 119.62 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4080991 76.45848 700MHz 123.81 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4080918 76.45848 2100MHz 121.81 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4080902 76.45848 70OMHZ 112.12 7/17/2024 15:60 42.4080812 76.46936 700MHz 113.38 7/17/2024 15:35 42.40806 76.45863 700MHz 119.19 7/17/2024 15:47 42.408057 76.43478 700MHz 110.69 7/17/202415:50 42.4080554 76.46938 700MHz 108.94 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4080551 76.43475 700MHz 106.75 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4080544 76,45864 700MHz 120 7/17/2024 15:47 42.4080419 76.43478 2100MHZ 101.31 7/17/202415:49 42.408038 76.45863 700MHz 125.94 7/17/2024 15:35 42.408034 76.45862 2100MHz 120.62 7/171202415:49 42.4080268 76.45863 700MHz 115.75 7/171202415:49 42.4080268 76.45863 700MHz 112.31 7117/202415:35 42.4079964 76.45876 700MHz 118.5 71171202415:49 42.4079869 76.45878 700MHz 118.31 7/171202415:35 42.4079844 76.45876 700MHz 118.19 71171202415:47 42.4079718 76.4346 700MHz 111.69 7/171202415:35 42.4079715 76.45874 2100MHZ 121.25 7117/202415:47 42.4079712 76.43458 700MHz 104.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4079695 76.46923 700MHz 111.25 71171202415:49 42.4079693 76.45878 700MHz 124.69 7/17/202415:47 42.4079586 76.43461 2100MHz 100.5 7/17/202415:50 42.4079411 76.46924 700MHz 108.19 7/17/202415:50 42.4079411 76.46924 700MHz 107.06 7117/202415:35 42.4079303 76.45887 700MHz 119 7117/202415:35 42.4079193 76.45887 700MHz 117.44 7117/202415:49 42.4079148 76.45891 700MHz 117.56 71171202415:35 42.4079062 76.45885 2100MHz 120.88 7/171202415:49 42.4078957 76.4589 70OMHZ 122.88 7/171202415:47 42.4078886 76.43443 700MHz 112.12 7/17/2024 15:47 42,4078849 76.43441 700MHz 104 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4078821 76.45889 700MHz 106.69 7/17/2024 15:47 42.407876 76.43444 210OMHz 101.31 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4078512 76.45897 700MHz 115.62 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4078497 76.46909 70OMHz 108.75 7/171202415:35 42.4079464 76.45897 700MHz 115.62 7/17/202415:49 42.4078357 76.459 700MHZ 116.81 7/17/202415:35 42.4078353 76.45895 2100MHz 120.75 7/17/202415:49 42.4078146 76.459 700MHz 118.56 7117/202415:47 42.4078049 76.43426 70OMHZ 111.75 7117/202415:49 42.4078022 76.45899 70OMHz 110.62 7/17/202415:47 42.4077975 76.43424 700MHz 102.56 7/17/202415:47 42.4077945 76.43427 2100MHz 103.75 7117/202415:35 42.4077695 76.45906 70OMHZ 114.19 7/17/202415:35 42.4077556 76.45903 2100MHz 117.69 7/171202415:49 42.4077471 76.45908 700MHz 115.56 7/17/2024 15:50 42,4077313 76.46894 70OMHZ 111.94 7/17/202415:49 42.4077247 76.45908 70OMHZ 120.31 7/17/2024 15:47 42.407723 76.43408 70OMHZ 108.88 7/171202415:47 42.407716 76.43407 700MHz 104.19 7/17/202415:47 42.407711 76.43412100MHz 104.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4077098 76.45907 700MHz 111.62 7117/202415:50 42.4077038 76.46896 700MHz 106.5 71171202415:35 42.4076831 76.45912 70OMHZ 112.56 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4076812 76.45912 700MHz 113.25 71171202415:35 42.4076699 76.45912100MHz 121.25 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4076482 76.45915 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4076441 76.43392 70OMHZ 111.81 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4076374 76.4339 700MHz 103.56 71171202415:46 42.4076318 76.43394 2100MHz 104.56 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4076245 76.45914 70OMHZ 115.75 7/17/2024 16:49 42.4076118 76.45913 700MHz 102.69 7117/202415:50 42.4076103 76.46879 700MHz 113.56 71171202415:35 42.4075886 78.45918 700MHz 112.31 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4075836 76.45918 70OMHZ 111.19 7117/202415:50 42.407581 76.46882 700MHz 111.19 71171202415:35 42.4075731 76.45915 2300MHz 112.81 71171202415:46 42.4075655 76.43375 70OMHZ 110.88 7/17/202416:46 42.4075624 76.43374 700MHz 102.38 7117/202415:46 42.4075542 76.43377 2100MHz 105 71171202415:49 42.407544 76.4592 70OMHZ 112.81 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4075202 76.45919 700MHz 117.31 7117/202415:49 42.4075102 76.45918 700MHz 108.38 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4074936 76.46865 700MHz 115.31 7/17/2024 15:35 42.407487 76.45923 70OMHZ 112 7117/202415:46 42.4074857 76.43359 700MHz 110.38 71171202415:35 42.4074823 76.45923 700MHz 113.88 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4074822 76.43357 70OMHZ 102.69 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4074759 76.43361 2100MHz 101.94 71171202415:35 42.4074727 76.4592 2100MHz 119.31 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4074578 76.46867 70OMHZ 111.19 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4074297 76.45926 700MHz 109.31 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4074131 76.43343 700MHz 109.06 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4074114 76.45924 70OMHZ 113.06 7/171202415:46 42.4074078 76.43341 700MHz 102.62 7/171202415:46 42.4074002 76.43345 2100MHz 107 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4073991 76.45923 700MHz 108.62 7/171202415:35 42.4073894 76.45927 700MHz 110.62 7/17/202415:35 42.4073789 76,45927 700MHz 114.25 7/17/202415:50 42.4073723 76.46849 70OMHZ 116.75 7/17/202415:35 42.4073699 76.45925 2300MHz 112.94 7117/202415:46 42.4073378 76.43326 700MHz 107.44 7117/202415:50 42.4073348 76.46851 70OMHZ 112.19 7/17/202415:46 42.4073345 76.43326 700MHz 103.62 7/171202415:46 42.4073258 76.4333 2300MHz 101.31 7117/202415:49 42.4073088 76.45931 70OMHZ 110.38 7/171202416:49 42.4072952 76.45929 700MHz 116.31 7117/202415:35 42.4072854 76.45931 70OMHZ 112.5 71171202415:46 42.4072675 76.43311 70OMHZ 107.5 7/17/202415:35 42.4072648 76.4593 2100MHz 111.44 7/171202415:46 42.4072608 76.43311 700MHz 98.62 71171202415:46 42.4072512 76.43314 2300MHz 97.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4072477 76.46834 700MHz 115.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4072146 76.46836 70OMHZ 109.88 7/17/202415:46 42.4071927 76.43295 700MHz 108.19 7/17/202415:46 42.4071868 76.43296 700MHz 101.06 7/171202415:49 42.4071845 76.45936 700MHz 111.38 7/17/202415:35 42.4071771 76.45935 700MHz 109.25 71171202415:46 42.4071765 76.43299 2100MHz. 98.94 7117/202415:49 42.4071676 76.45934 700MHz 115.31 7/17/202415:35 42.4071643 76.45936 700MHz 116.38 7/17/202415:35 42.4071541 76.45935 2100MHz 108.25 7/17/202415:49 42.4071522 76.45934 700MHz 107.38 7/171202415:49 42.4071522 76.45934 700MHz 305.75 71171202415:50 42.4071252 76.46819 700MHz 114.81 7/171202415:46 42.40711 76.43279 70OMHz 102.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4071089 76.43279 700MHz 113.12 7/171202415:46 42.4070996 76.43283 2100MHz 98.06 7/17/202415:50 42.4070948 76.46821 70OMHz 109.81 7/171202415:35 42.4070651 76.4594 700MHz 109.31 71171202415:49 42.4070538 76.45941700MHz 109.5 7/17/202415:35 42.407049 76.4594 700MHz 112.94 7117/202415:35 42.4070393 76.4594 2100MHz 111.12 71171202415:49 42.4070353 76.4594 700MHz 112.44 71171202415:46 42,4070332 76.43264 700MHz 103.44 7117/202415:46 42.4070313 76.43263 70OMHz 116.31 7117/202415:49 42.4070251 76.4594 700MHz 106.38 7117/202415:46 42.4070246 76.43267 2100MHz 104.44 7/171202415:50 42.4070062 76.46805 70OMHz 114.75 71171202415:50 42.4069731 76.46806 700MHz 109.94 7117/202415:46 42.4069548 76.43248 700MHz 102.31 7/17/202415:46 42.4069538 76.43248 700MHz 112.81 7117/202415:35 42.4069484 76.45945 70OMHz 115 7117/202415:46 42.4069474 76.43251 2300MHz 105.25 7117/202415:35 42.4069314 76.45946 700MHz 107.12 7/17/202415:35 42.4069187 76.45946 210OMHz 111.88 7117/202415:49 42.4069161 76.45948 700MHz 107.44 7117/202415:49 42.4068993 76.45947 700MHz 112.88 7117/202416:49 42.406889 76,45946 700MHz 105.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4068785 76.46789 700MHz 113.62 7117/202415:46 42.4068758 76.43232 700MHz 102.56 7117/202415:46 42.4068751 76.43232 700MHz 114.81 7117/202415:46 42.4068686 76.43235 2100MHz 98.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4068494 76.46791 700MHz 108.69 7117/202415:35 42.4068252 76.45949 700MHz 113.75 7117/202415:35 42.4068067 76.45952 700MHz 108.44 7117/202415:46 42.4067983 76.43216 700MHz 102.81 7117/202415:46 42.4067975 76.43216 700MHz 111.38 7/17/202415:35 42.4067942 76.45952 2100MHz 112.62 7/17/202415:46 42.406791 76.43219 2300MHz 100 7117/202415:49 42.4067778 76.45955 700MHz 108.06 7117/202415:49 42.4067584 76.45954 70OMHz 113.81 7/171202415:50 42.4067573 76.46774 700MHz 112.62 7117/202415:49 42.4067459 76.45954 700MHz 104.56 7117/202415:50 42.4067326 76.46776 70OMHz 104.94 7/17/202415:46 42.4067197 76.43199 700MHz 104.94 71171202415:46 42.4067173 76.432 700MHz 116 7117/202415:46 42.4067132 76.43203 210OMHz 99.81 7/171202415:35 42.4066924 76.45958 700MHz 116.81 7117/202415:35 42.4066672 76.45959 2300MHz 109.06 71171202415:49 42.40664491 76.45962 70OMHz 116.69 7/17/202415:46 42.4066404 76.43183 700MHz 104.5 71171202415:50 42.4066397 76.46758 700MHz 113.44 71171202415:49 42.4066388 76.45964 70OMHz 110.31 7/17/202415:46 42.4066366 76.43184 700MHz 116.25 7/17/202415:46 42.406636 76.43187 2100MHz 102.88 7/171202415:49 42.4066181 76.45963 700MHz 115.25 7/171202415:50 42.4066137 76.4676 700MHz 108.31 7/171202415:49 42.406608 76.45963 700MHz 101.94 71171202415:35 42.4065674 76.45967 700MHz 115.44 7/17/202415:46 42.4065631 76.43167 700MHz 104.38 7117/202415:46 42.4065571 76.43168 70OMHz 111.62 7117/202415:46 42.4065554 76.4317 2300MHz 102.38 7/17/202415:35 42,4065508 76.45968 700MHz 112.88 7117/202415:35 42.4065438 76.45968 210OMHz 109.88 7/17/202415:50 42.4065205 76.46742 700MHz 115.69 71171202415:49 42.4065046 76.45974 700MHz 110.5 71171202415:50 42.406492 76.46744 70OMHz 109.94 7/171202415:46 42.4064807 76.43149 700MHz 101.19 7117/202415:49 42.4064769 76.45974 70OMHz 104.88 7/17/202415:46 42.4064744 76.43151 700MHz 110.31 7/171202415:46 42.4064726 76.43153 2300MHz 104.5 7117/202415:35 42.4064486 76.45977 700MHz 115.88 7/17/202415:35 42.4064337 76.45978 700MHz 113.94 71171202415:35 42.4064242 76.45978 2100MHz 108.31 71171202415:50 42.4063996 76.46727 700MHz 117.38 7117/202415:46 42.4063996 76.43132 70OMHz 106.75 7/17/202415:46 42.4063915 76.43134 700MHz 111.81 7117/202415:46 42.4063911 76.43136 2100MHz 103 7117/202415:49 42.4063796 76.45985 70OMHz 108.88 7117/202415:50 42.4063696 76.46728 70OMHz 108.94 71171202415:49 42.4063564 76.45985 700MHz 111.75 71171202415:49 42.406353 76.45985 700MHz 100.75 7117/202415:35 42.406336 76.45987 700MHz 113.06 7/171202415:35 42.4063165 76.4599 700MHz 104.94 71171202415:46 42.4063164 76.43116 700MHz 103.88 71171202415:46 42.4063099 76.4312 2100MHz 102.88 71171202415:46 42.4063094 76.43118 700MHz 112 7/171202415:35 42.4063081 76.45989 2100MHz 103.62 71171202415:50 42.4062743 76.46711 70OMHZ 115.62 71171202415:49 42.4062599 76.45996 700MHz 108 7/171202415:50 42.4062465 76.46713 700MHz 116.75 7/171202415:49 42.4062391 76.45996 700MHz 109.94 71171202415:49 42.406237 76.45996 700MHz 100.38 7/171202415:35 42.4062362 76.45999 700MHz 115.25 7117/202415:46 42.4062333 76.431700MHz 102.62 71171202415:46 42.406226 76.43102 700MHz 107.81 71171202415:46 42.4062257 76.43104 2100MHz 101.12 7/17/202415:35 42.4061996 76.46 2300MHz 103.44 7117/202415:50 42.4061655 76.46696 700MHz 119.75 7/17/202415:46 42.406153 76.43084 700MHz 102.75 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4061493 76.43086 700MHz 112 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4061465 76.43088 2100MHz 104.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4061442 76.46008 70OMHz 104.62 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4061354 76.46011 700MHz 111.19 71171202415:50 42.4061279 76.46698 700MHz 115.38 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4061249 76.46007 700MHz 109.5 7/17/202415:49 42.4061223 76.46007 700MHz 105.12 7/17/202415:35 42.4061032 76.46011 700MHz 105.19 7/17/202415:35 42.4060946 76.46011 210OMHZ 103.12 7/171202415:46 42.4060747 76.43068 700MHz 104.44 7/171202415:46 42.4060709 76.4307 700MHz 111.19 7117/202415:46 42.4060686 76.43072 2100MHz 104.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4060433 76.46682 700MHz 117.44 7/171202415:49 42.4060345 76.46019 700MHz 104.44 7/171202415:35 42.4060342 76.46021 700MHz 112 71171202415:49 42.4060151 76.46018 70OMHz 109.56 7117/202415:49 42.4060149 76.46018 210OMHZ 104.5 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4060124 76.46683 700MHz 113.88 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4060028 76.46021 700MHz 99.12 7117/202415:46 42.4059984 76.43052 70OMHZ 104.44 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4059926 76.43057 2100MHZ 104.81 7/17/202415:46 42.4059916 76.43055 700MHz 112.25 7/171202415:35 42.4059914 76.46021 210OMHZ 105.81 7/17/202415:35 42.4059318 76.46032 70OMHz 114.06 7/171202415:49 42.4059303 76.46028 700MHz 104.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4059271 76.46667 700MHz 118.62 71171202415:46 42.4059251 76.43037 70OMHz 103.62 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4059159 76.43042 2100MHZ 104.75 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4059119 76.43039 70OMHz 109.5 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4059081 76.46028 2100MHz 104.56 7117/202415:49 42.4059079 76.46028 70OMHZ 109.38 7/171202415:35 42.4059037 76.46031 70OMHz 105.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4058998 76.46669 700MHz 117.38 7/171202415:35 42,4058942 76.4603 210OMHZ 106.12 7/17/202415:46 42.4058517 76.43023 700MHz 98.31 7/171202415:46 42.4058428 76.43028 2300MHz 104.31 7/17/202415:46 42.4058387 76.43025 700MHz 104.75 7/17/202415:35 42.405833 76.4604 70OMHz 112.94 7/17/202415:49 42.4058222 76.46039 700MHz 104.62 7117/202415:50 42,4058122 76.46652 700MHz 118.44 7/171202415:35 42.4058072 76.4604 700MHz 110.31 7117/202415:49 42.4058 76.46039 70OMHz 110.94 7117/202415:49 42.4057992 76.46039 2100MHz 108 7117/202415:35 42.4057979 76.46039 2100MHZ 108.19 7117/202415:50 42.4057875 76.46654 700MHz 116.19 7117/202415:46 42.4057857 76.43011 700MHz 103.5 7117/202415:46 42.4057772 76.43015 2100MHz 101.81 7/17/202415:46 42.4057722 76.43012 700MHz 109.06 7117/202415:35 42.4057307 76.46047 700MHz 117.88 71171202415:46 42.4057221 76.42999 700MHz 101.31 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4057171 76.43003 2100MHz 100.81 7/17/2024 15:49 42.405714 76.46049 700MHz 109.12 71171202415:46 42.4057106 76.43 700MHz 106.81 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4057083 76.46047 2100MHz 112.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4056982 76.46638 700MHz 117.81 71171202415:49 42.405696 76.46049 2100MHz 111.88 7/171202415:49 42.4056938 76.46049 700MHz 114.62 7117/202415:50 42.4056738 76.46639 700MHz 115.69 7/171202416:46 42.405663 76.42987 700MHz 103.06 7/171202415:46 42.4056593 76.42991 2100MHz 96.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4056582 76,42988 700MHz 106.69 7/17/202415:35 42.4056429 76.46056 700MHz 118.38 7/171202415:35 42.4056319 76.46056 700MHz 109.88 7/17/202415:35 42.4056217 76.46056 2100MHz 110.81 7117/202415:46 42.4056133 76.42977 700MHz 101.25 71171202415:46 42.4056121 76.42978 700MHz 108 7/171202415:49 42,4056096 76.46059 700MHz 108.44 7/171202415:46 42.405609 76.42981 2100MHz 98.31 7/17/202415:49 42.4055913 76.46058 2100MHz 113.31 7/17/202415:49 42,4055884 76.46059 700MHz 118.12 71171202415:50 42.4055854 76.46623 700MHz 117.94 7/17/202415:46 42.405569 76.42969 700MHz 107.88 7/171202415:46 42,4055633 76.42971 2100MHz 101.56 7/171202415:46 42.4055633 76.42971 2100MH2 101.56 7117/202415:46 42.4055625 76.42966 700MHz 101.88 71171202415:35 42,4055623 76.46063 700MHz 219.44 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4055581 76,46625 700MHz 115.06 71171202415:50 42.4055581 76.46625 700MHz 114.94 7/17/202415:35 42.4055513 76.46064 700MHz 110.88 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4055418 76,46063 2100MH2 112.69 7/17/202415:46 42.40553 76.4296 70OMHz 107.88 7/17/202415:46 42.4055165 76.42958 700MHz 100.81 7117/202415:49 42.4055102 76.46069 700MHz 111.69 7117/202415:46 42.405495 76.42952 700MHz 109.56 7117/202415:35 42.4054883 76.46071 700MHz 119.06 7/17/202415:49 42.405486 76.46068 700MHz 115.94 7/17/202415:46 42.4054779 76.42955 2100MHZ 100.06 71171202415:35 42.4054774 76,46072 700MHz 112.5 7117/202415:46 42.4054725 76.42951 700MHz 100.06 7/17/202415:35 42.4054675 76.46071 2300MHz 114.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4054647 76.46608 700MHz 117.75 7/171202415:46 42.4054578 76.42946 700MHz 105.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4054405 76.42949 2300MHz 99.31 7/17/202415:46 42.4054323 76.42945 700MHz 96.81 7117/202415:35 42.4054243 76.46078 700MHz 119.94 7117/202415:46 42.4054162 76.42942 700MHz 103.38 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4054072 76.4608 700MHz 113.25 7/171202415:46 42.4054058 76.42945 2100MHz 100.5 7/17/202415:35 42.4053973 76.46079 2300MHz 112.75 7117/202415:46 42.4063895 76.42941700MHz 95.12 7/17/202415:49 42.4053872 76.4608 2100MHz 113.81 7117/202415:49 42.4053872 76.4608 2100MHz 111.94 7/17/202415:49 42.4053847 76.46079 700MHz 117.75 7/171202415:46 42.4053795 76.42942 700MHz 104.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4053722 76.42943 2100MHz 104.12 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4053609 76.46085 700MHz 120.69 7117/202415:46 42.4053538 76.42943 700MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053535 76.4294 700MHz 97.94 7117/202415:46 42.4053456 76.42944 2100MHZ 103.38 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053456 76.42944 2300MHz 100.19 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4053451 76.46086 700MHz 117.19 71171202415:50 42.4053432 76.46593 700MHz 117.81 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053386 76.42945 700MHz 108.88 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4053342 76.46086 2100MHz 113.81 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053341 76.42945 700MHz 107.56 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053328 76.42945 700MHz 107 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053327 76.42946 700MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053327 76.42945 700MHz 106.5 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053326 76.42945 700MHz 107.88 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053325 76.42946 700MHz 106.38 71171202415:46 42.4053325 76.42946 700MHz 106.06 71171202415:46 42.405332 76.42946 700MHz 108.44 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053318 76.42946 700MHz 111.5 71171202415:46 42.405331 76.42946 700MHz 111 7/171202415:46 42.405331 76.42946 700MHz 110.44 7/17/202415:46 42.4053286 76.42946 70OMHz 106.81 7/17/202415:46 42.4053258 76.42941 700MHz 103.38 71171202415:46 42.405323 76.42946 2300MHz 102.06 7117/202415:46 42.4053225 76.42946 2100MHz 99.62 71171202415:46 42.4053225 76.42946 2100MHz 97.19 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053221 76.42946 2300MHz 99.75 71171202415:50 42,4053216 76.46594 700MHz 127.69 7117/202415:46 42.4053215 76.42946 2100MHz 101.94 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053214 76.42946 2100MHz 103.38 7/171202415:46 42,4053214 76.42946 2100MHz 102.44 71171202415:46 42.4053214 76.42946 210OMHz 101.94 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053214 76.42946 2300MHz 101.56 7117/202415:46 42.4053214 76.42946 2100MHz 101.31 71171202415:46 42.4053214 76.42946 210OMHz 100.81 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053211 76.42947 700MHz 110.12 7/17/2024 15:46 42.405321 76.42946 2100MHz 106.25 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4053185 76.46595 70OMHz 112.75 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053091 76.42942 700MHz 103.56 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053081 76.42948 2300MHz 102.19 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4063065 76.42944 70OMHz 103.06 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053056 76.42943 700MHz 103 7/171202415:49 42.4053052 76.46093 700MHz 112.56 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4053049 76.42943 70OMHz 101.88 7117/202415:46 42.4053049 76.42943 700MHz 101.81 7117/202415:46 42.4053047 76.42943 700MHz 102.94 7/17/202415:46 42.4053047 76.42943 70OMHz 101.94 7117/202415:46 42.4053046 76.42943 700MHz 101.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4053042 76.42944 70OMHz 100 7/17/202415:46 42.4053037 76.42943 700MHz 102.88 7/17/202415:46 42.4053029 76.4295 700MHz 111.56 7/17/202415:46 42.4053028 76.42944 700MHz 101.94 7117/202415:46 42.4053026 76.42943 70OMHz 101.88 7117/202415:35 42.4053015 76.46091 700MHz 116.94 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4052992 76.42945 700MHz 100.88 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4052909 76.42951 2100MHz 106.88 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4052906 76.46093 700MHz 117.25 7/17/2024 15:46 42.4052903 76.42946 700MHz 103.62 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4052887 76.46093 2100MHZ 117.75 7117/202415:49 42.4052855 76.46091 700MHz 118.19 7/17/202415:35 42.4052803 76.46092 2100MHz 109.12 7/17/202415:46 42.4052752 76.42956 700MHz 111.5 7/17/202415:46 42.4052741 76.42949 70OMHz 104.88 7/17/202415:46 42.4052631 76.42957 2100MHz 102.31 7/17/202415:35 42.4052544 76.46099 700MHz 118.44 7117/202415:46 42.405248 76.42954 700MHz 106.12 7117/202415:35 42.4052403 76.46101 70OMHz 121.38 7117/202415:46 42.4052392 76.42964 70OMHz 106 7117/202415:35 42.4052295 76.4612300MHz 110.5 7/171202415:46 42.4052273 76.42965 2100MHz 106.75 7/17/202415:50 42.4052246 76.46578 70OMHz 117.62 7/171202415:49 42.4052142 76.46105 700MHz 109.69 7/17/202415:46 42.4052131 76.42962 700MHz 100 7/17/202415:35 42.4052059 76.46106 70OMHz 115.06 7/171202415:50 42.4052008 76.46579 70OMHz 126.88 7/171202415:50 42.4051993 76.4658 700MHz 113.25 7/171202415:49 42.405198 76.46105 2100MHz 113.19 7/17/202415:46 42.4051967 76.42974 70OMHz 110.56 7/171202415:35 42.4051945 76.46108 700MHz 120.06 71171202415:49 42.4051913 76.46105 700MHz 117.06 7/17/202415:46 42.4051839 76.42974 2100MH2 106.44 7/17/202415:46 42.4061839 76.42974 2100MHz 103.19 71171202415:35 42.405183 76.46107 2100MHz 111.62 71171202415:46 42.405169 76.42972 700MHz 102.31 7/17/202415:35 42.4051604 76.46113 700MHz 116.12 7117/202415:46 42.4051505 76.42985 700MHz 114.31 71171202415:35 42.405139 76.46114 2100MHz 113.38 71171202415:46 42.405137 76.42985 2100MHz 106.81 7117/202415:46 42.4051221 76.42983 700MHz 105.38 71171202415:49 42.405122 76.46119 700MHz 110 7/171202415:35 42.4051156 76.4612 700MHz 116.88 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4061087 76.46563 70OMHz 116.25 7117/202415:35 42.4051078 76.46122 700MHz 115.12 71171202415:49 42.4051044 76.46119 2100MHz 110.19 7/171202415:46 42.4051005 76.42998 700MHz 114.81 7117/202415:49 42.4051 76.46118 70OMHz 115.56 71171202415:35 42.4050971 76.46121 2100MHz 111.31 71171202415:50 42.4050818 76.46563 70OMHz 123.25 7/17/202415:50 42.4050792 76.46564 700MHz 115.5 7117/202415:35 42.4050742 76,46127 700MHz 118.62 71171202415:46 42.4050727 76.42996 70OMHz 108.19 7/17/202415:35 42.40507 76.46129 700MHz 119.31 7117/202415:35 42.40506 76,46128 2100MHz 114.19 71171202415:46 42.4050466 76.43011 70OMHZ 113.56 7117/202415:35 42.4050396 76.46135 700MHz 116.12 7/17/202415:35 42.4050359 76.46132 700MHz 116 7117/202415:46 42.4050341 76.43011 2100MHZ 108.31 7/17/202415:35 42.40503 76.46134 2100MHz 109.94 7/17/2024 15:49 42.4050251 76.46133 700MHz 110.19 7/17/202415:46 42.4050217 76.43009 700MHz 106.75 7/171202415:35 42.4050087 76.46137 70OMHZ 120.75 7/17/202415:35 42.405006 76.46139 2100MHz 113.12 7/171202415:49 42.4050038 76.46132 700MHz 116.56 7/171202415:35 42.4049952 76.46143 700MHz 119.75 7/17/202415:46 42.4049941 76.43025 700MHz 117.25 7/17/2024 15:35 42,4049861 76.46142 2100MHz 115 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4049858 76.46546 70OMHz 113.44 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049847 76.46141 700MHz 118.12 7/17/2024 15:35 42.404982 76.46145 700MHz 117.88 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049816 76.46151 70OMHz 112.75 7/17/2024 15:46 42.404981 76.43025 2100MHz 108.19 7/17/202415:39 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 112.88 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 112.06 71171202415:38 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 111.75 71171202415:38 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHZ 111.62 7/17/202415:39 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 110.69 7/17/202415:38 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 110.62 71171202415:38 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 110.31 7/17/202415:38 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 110.25 7/171202415:38 42,4049768 76.46147 70OMHZ 110.12 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 109.75 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 109.44 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 109.44 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049768 76.46147 70OMHz 109.38 7/17/202415:39 42.4049768 76.46147 700MHz 104.94 7117/202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 111.5 71171202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 110.88 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 110.62 71171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 110.31 7/17/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 110.31 7/171202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.62 7/17/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.62 7/171202415:39 42,4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.62 7/17/202415:38 42,4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.56 7/171202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.44 71171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.38 7117/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.25 7/17/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.19 7117/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 109.06 71171202415:38 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.94 7/17/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.69 7117/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.56 7117/202415:39 42.4049767 76,46147 700MHz 108.38 7/171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.25 71171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.19 7/171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 108.12 7117/202415:39 42.4049767 76,46147 700MHz 107.81 7/17/202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 107.38 71171202415:39 42.4049767 76.46147 700MHz 106.44 7/17/202415:38 42.4049766 76.46147 700MHz 111.06 7117/202415:38 42.4049766 76.46147 700MHz 110.81 7/171202415:38 42.4049766 76.46147 700MHz 110.56 7/17/202415:38 42.4049766 76.46147 700MHz 109.75 7117/202415:38 42.4049765 76.46147 700MHz 116.31 7117/202415:38 42.4049765 76.46147 700MHz 116.25 7117/202415:38 42.4049765 76.46147 700MHz 115.44 7/17/202415:38 42.4049765 76.46147 700MHz 114.06 7117/202415:38 42.4049765 76.46147 700MHz 111.25 7117/202415:38 42.4049764 76.46147 700MHz 111 7117/202415:38 42.4049764 76.46147 700MHz 110.75 7117/202415:38 42.4049763 76.46147 700MHz 110.62 7/171202415:38 42.4049763 76.46147 700MHz 109.75 7/17/202415:38 42.4049763 76.46147 700MHz 109.44 7117/202415:38 42.4049762 76.46147 700MHz 111.38 7/171202415:38 42.4049761 76.46147 700MHz 112.81 71171202415:38 42.4049761 76.46147 700MHz 111.94 7/17/202415:38 42.404976 76.46147 70OMHz 112.5 71171202415:38 42.4049759 76.46147 700MHz 114 7117/202415:38 42.4049759 76.46147 700MHz 113.94 71171202416:38 42.4049759 76.46147 700MHz 113.62 7117/202415:38 42.4049759 76.46147 700MHz 113.38 7117/202415:38 42.4049759 76.46147 700MHz 112.5 71171202415:38 42.4049758 76.46147 700MHz 115.81 7117/202415:38 42.4049758 76.46147 700MHz 114.06 7/17/202415:38 42.404975B 76.46147 700MHz 113.88 7/17/202415:38 42.4049758 76.46147 700MHz 112.62 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049757 76.46147 700MHz 113.62 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049757 76.46147 700MHz 112.38 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049757 76.46147 700MHz 112.25 7/171202415:38 42.4049757 76.46147 700MHz 111.81 7/17/202415:38 42.4049756 76.46147 700MHz 112.75 7/171202415:38 42.4049756 76.46147 700MHz 111.56 7/17/202415:38 42.4049755 76.46147 700MHz 112.25 7117/202415:38 42.4049755 76.46147 700MHz 111 7117/202415:38 42.4049754 76.46147 700MHz 110.75 7/171202415:38 42.4049754 76.46147 700MHz 110.56 7/17/202415:37 42.4049753 76.46147 700MHz 111.56 7/171202415:38 42.4049753 76.46147 700MHz 110.44 7/17/202415:38 42.4049753 76.46147 700MHz 110 71171202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 112.38 71171202415:38 42.4049752 76,46147 700MHz 112.25 71171202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:38 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 111.19 71171202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 70OMHZ 110.88 71171202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 110.56 7117/202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 110.06 7/171202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 70OMHZ 109.31 7117/202415:37 42.4049752 76.46147 700MHz 109.31 71171202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 112.25 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 112.08 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.88 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.81 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.69 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 70OMHZ 111.5 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.38 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.25 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.19 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 111.19 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.94 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049751 76,46147 700MHz 110.81 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 70OMHZ 110.75 7117/202415:38 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.5 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.5 7/17/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.44 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.38 71171202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.25 7117/202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110.06 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110 7/171202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 110 71171202415:37 42.4049751 76.46147 700MHz 109.88 7117/202415:37 42.4049761 76.46147 700MHz 109.75 7/171202415:37 42.404975 76.46147 700MHz 112.31 71171202415:37 42.404975 76.46147 700MHz 111.56 7117/202415:37 42.404975 76.46147 700MHz 111 7/17/202415:37 42.404975 76.46147 700MHz 109.31 71171202415:37 42.4049748 76.46147 700MHz 109.44 7117/202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 120.69 7/17/202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 120.5 71171202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 119.81 7/17/202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 119.62 7117/202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 119.25 7/17/202415:35 42.4049747 76.46146 700MHz 114.5 71171202415:37 42.4049747 76.46147 700MHz 109.44 7117/202415:35 42.4049746 76.46146 700MHz 120.12 7/171202415:37 42.4049745 76.46147 700MHz 110.94 7/17/202415:37 42.4049744 76.46147 700MHz 110.88 71171202415:35 42.4049743 76.46146 70OMHZ 119.5 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049743 76.46147 700MHz 111.81 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049741 76.46146 700MHz 118.19 71171202415:37 42.404974 76.46147 70OMHZ 115.88 7/17/202415:37 42.4049736 76.46147 700MHz 113.31 71171202415:37 42.404973 76.46147 700MHz 120.88 71171202415:37 42.404973 76.46147 700MHz 120.25 7/17/2024 15:37 42.404973 76.46147 700MHz 119.56 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049729 76,46147 700MHz 122.31 7/17/202415:37 42.4049729 76.46147 700MHz 121.31 7/17/202415:37 42.4049729 76.46147 700MHz 120.81 7117/202415:37 42.4049729 76.46147 700MHz 119.94 7117/202415:37 42.4049729 76.46147 700MHz 119.62 7/171202415:37 42,4049729 76.46147 700MHz 119.12 7/17/202415:37 42.4049729 76.46147 70OMHZ 117.94 7/17/202415:37 42.4049728 76.46147 700MHz 117.56 7/17/202415:37 42.4049726 76.46147 700MHz 122.31 7/17/202415:37 42.4049726 76.46147 70OMHZ 118.44 7/17/202415:37 42.4049725 76.46147 700MHz 121.06 7117/202415:37 42.4049725 76.46147 700MHz 120.06 7/17/202415:37 42.4049725 76.46148 70OMHZ 112.94 7117/202415:37 42.4049725 76.46148 700MHz 112.62 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049725 76.46148 700MHz 111.81 71171202415:37 42.4049724 76.46147 700MHz 120.94 7/17/202415:37 42.4049724 76.46148 70OMHz 113.12 7/17/202415:37 42.4049724 76.46148 700MHz 112.31 7/17/202415:37 42.4049724 76.46148 700MHz 112.25 7/171202415:37 42.4049724 76.46148 700MHz 112 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049724 76.46148 700MHz 111.88 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049723 76.46147 700MHz 119.25 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 112.69 7117/202416:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 112.31 7/171202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 112.12 7/171202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.94 7117/202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.94 71171202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.75 71171202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.69 7/17/202415:37 42,4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.56 7117/202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 111.31 7117/202415:37 42.4049723 76.46148 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 114.19 7117/202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 70OMHz 114.06 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.88 7/171202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.88 7/171202415:37 42.404972.2 76.46148 700MHz 113.75 7/17/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.56 7/17/202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.38 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 70OMHz 113.25 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46149 700MHz 113.06 7117/202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113.06 7/17/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 113 7/171202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 112.75 7117/202415:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 112.56 7117/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 112.5 7/171202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 112.31 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049722 76.46148 70OMHz 112.25 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 112.12 7/17/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 111.88 7117/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 111.38 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 111.31 7/17/202416:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 111.12 7117/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 110.44 7117/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 110.25 7/17/2024 16:37 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 109.38 7117/202415:38 42.4049722 76.46148 700MHz 108.88 7117/202415:37 42.4049721 76.46147 700MHz 116.81 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 115.06 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 114.69 7117/202415:37 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 114.44 7117/202415:37 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 114.31 71171202415:37 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 114.31 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76,46148 700MHz 114.06 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76,46148 70OMHz 113.5 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46149 700MHz 113.38 7/17/202415:37 42.4049721 76,46148 700MHz 113.31 7/171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7/17/202415:37 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 113 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.94 7/171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.88 7/17/202415:37 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.56 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.44 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.31 7/171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.31 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 112.12 7/171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.06 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.06 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112.06 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 112 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 111.88 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.69 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.62 7/17/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.56 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 111.56 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.5 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.44 7117/202415:39 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 111.44 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 111.38 71171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.38 7117/202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 111.25 7117/202415:35 42.4049721 76.4615 700MHz 110.81 7/171202415:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 110.81 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049721 76.46148 70OMHz 110.56 7/17/2024 15:38 42.4049721 76.46148 700MHz 110.06 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 115.31 7117/202415:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 114.81 7/17/2024 15:37 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 114.62 7117/202415:39 42.404972 76,46148 700MHz 114.38 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 114.25 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.75 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.44 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.44 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.44 7/17/2024 15:37 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7117/202415:39 42,404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7117/202415:37 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 113.19 71171202415:38 42. 404972 76.46148 700MHz 113 71171202415:39 42. 404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.94 7/17/2024 15:39 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.69 7/171202415:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 112.69 71171202415:37 42. 404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.62 7/171202415:39 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.62 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 112.5 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.38 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 112.19 7/171202415:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 112.06 7/171202415:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.88 7/171202415:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.75 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.62 7117/202415:39 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.38 7/171202415:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.06 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 111.06 7/17/2024 15:38 42,404972 76,46148 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 111 7117/202415:38 42.404972 76.46148 70OMHz 110.69 7/17/2024 15:38 42.404972 76.46148 700MHz 110.5 71171202415:38 42. 404972 76.46148 70OMHz 110.06 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049719 76.46145 700MHz 117.19 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4049719 76.46148 70OMHz 115.44 7117/202415:35 42.4049719 76.46144 210OMHz 115 7/17/2024 16:37 42.4049719 76.46148 700MHz 113.88 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049719 76.46148 700MHz 113.69 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049719 76.46148 700MHz 113.06 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4049719 76.46148 700MHz 112.62 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4049719 76.46148 700MHz 111.38 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049719 76.46148 70OMHz 110.19 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049718 76.46147 70OMHz 122.5 71171202415:37 42. 4049718 76.46148 70OMHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049718 76.46148 70OMHz 113.06 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049718 76.46148 70OMHz 112.88 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 70OMHz 121 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 700MHz 120.88 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 700MHz 120.81 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 700MHz 119.75 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 70OMHz 119.5 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 70OMHz 119.19 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049716 76.46147 70OMHz 118.81 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049716 76.46148 700MHz 111.75 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049716 76.46148 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049716 76.46148 70OMHZ 110 7/17/202415:36 42.4049715 76.46147 700MHz 114.94 71171202415:37 42.4049715 76.46148 700MHz 111.5 7/171202415:36 42,4049714 76.46147 700MHz 120.31 71171202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 220.12 7117/202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 120.12 7117/202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 119.56 7117/202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 119.5 7/17/202415:35 42.4049714 76.46145 700MHz 118 7117/202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 117.62 7/17/202415:36 42.4049714 76.46147 700MHz 116.62 7117/202415:37 42.4049713 76.46148 700MHz 111.56 71171202415:36 42.4049712 76.46147 700MHz 119.38 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049712 76.46148 700MHz 112.94 7/17/202415:36 42.4049711 76.46147 700MHz 120.06 71171202415:36 42.404971 76.46147 70OMHZ 121.56 7/17/2024 15:36 42.404971 76.46147 700MHz 119.06 7/17/2024 15:36 42.404971 76.46147 700MHz 118.31 7/17/2024 15:37 42.404971 76.46148 700MHz 113.06 7/17/202415:36 42.4049709 76.46147 700MHz 120.12 7/171202415:36 42.4049708 76.46147 700MHz 118.75 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049707 76.46147 70OMHZ 120 7/17/202415:36 42.4049706 76.46147 700MHz 120.19 71171202415:36 42.4049706 76,46147 700MHz 119.56 7/171202415:36 42.4049706 76.46149 700MHz 118.25 7/17/202415:36 42.4049706 76.46149 700MHz 118.19 71171202415:37 42.4049706 76.46148 700MHz 112.38 71171202415:36 42.4049705 76.46147 700MHz 120 7/171202415:36 42.4049705 76.46147 700MHz 119.62 7117/202415:37 42.4049705 76.46148 700MHz 112.75 7117/202415:37 42,4049705 76.46148 700MHz 110.94 7117/202415:36 42.4049704 76.46147 70OMHZ 120.19 71171202415:36 42.4049704 76.46147 700MHz 120.06 7117/202415:35 42.4049704 76.46147 700MHz 117.06 7117/202415:36 42.4049703 76.46147 700MHz 119.56 7117/202415:36 42.4049703 76.46147 700MHz 118 7117/202415:36 42.4049702 76.46146 700MHz 122.44 71171202415:36 42.4049702 76.46147 70OMHZ 121 7117/202415:36 42.4049702 76.46146 700MHz' 120.25 7117/202415:36 42.4049702 76.46147 700MHz 119.75 7117/202415:36 42.4049702 76.46147 70OMHZ 119.69 7117/202415:36 42.4049701 76.46147 700MHz 119.25 7117/202415:36 42.4049701 76.46147 70OMHZ 118.75 71171202415:35 42.4049701 76.46146 700MHz 118.44 7/171202415:36 42.40497 76.46147 70OMHZ 122.81 7117/202415:36 42.40497 76,46147 70OMHZ 121.5 71171202415:36 42. 40497 76.46147 700MHz 120.44 7/17/202415: 36 42.40497 76.46147 70OMHZ 120.19 7/17/202415: 36 42.40497 76,46147 70OMHZ 117.25 71171202415:36 42. 4049699 76.46147 700MHz 120 7/17/202415: 36 42.4049699 76.46147 700MHz 119.94 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049699 76.46147 700MHz 119.38 7/17/2024 15:37 42.4049699 76.46148 70OMHZ 110.44 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049698 76.46147 700MHz 120 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049698 76.46146 700MHz 119.69 7/17/202415: 36 42.4049698 76.46146 700MHz 118.44 7117/202415:36 42.4049698 76.46147 700MHz 118.38 71171202415:36 42. 4049698 76.46147 700MHz 118.31 71171202415:36 42. 4049698 76.46147 700MHz 117.38 7117/202415:36 42.4049697 76.46147 700MHz 118.44 7117/202415:36 42.4049697 76.46149 70OMHZ 117.12 7117/202415:36 42.4049696 76.46147 700MHz 120.06 7/17/202415: 36 42.4049696 76.46147 700MHz 119.81 7117/202415:36 42.4049696 76.46147 700MHz 118.62 7/17/202435: 36 42.4049695 76.46146 700MHz 118.12 71171202415:36 42. 4049693 76,46149 700MHz 111.12 71171202415:36 42.4049692 76.46146 700MHz 118.25 7/171202415:35 42.404969 76.46149 700MHz 117.75 7/17/202415:35 42.4049689 76.46144 70OMHZ 118.94 7/17/202415:36 42.4049689 76.46149 700MHz 117.19 7/171202415:37 42.4049688 76.46149 700MHz 117.56 7/171202415:35 42.4049687 76.46145 700MHz 117.38 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049684 76.46146 70OMHz 119.56 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049684 76.46145 700MHz 116.62 7117/202415:36 42.4049681 76.46149 700MHz 117.56 7/17/2024 15:35 42.404968 76.46146 70OMHZ 118.75 7117/202416:35 42.404968 76.46145 700MHz 116.69 7117/202415:35 42.4049678 76.46145 700MHz 117.25 7117/202415:37 42.4049678 76.46149 700MHz 116.62 7117/202415:36 42.4049676 76.46146 700MHz 122.12 7117/202415:46 42.4049675 76.43023 700MHz 109.31 7/17/202415:36 42.4049671 76.46149 700MHz 118.12 71171202415:35 42.404967 76.46146 700MHz 218.12 7/17/202415:36 42.4049669 76.46148 700MHz 118.69 7/17/202415:36 42.4049669 76.46148 700MHz 118.25 71171202415:36 42.4049669 76.46148 700MHz 117.44 7/171202415:36 42.4049669 76.46148 70OMHZ 116.06 7/17/202415:36 42.4049668 76.46148 700MHz 118.38 71171202415:36 42.4049668 76.46149 700MHz 117.38 71171202415:36 42.4049668 76.46148 70OMHZ 116.62 7/17/202415:36 42.4049667 76.46148 700MHz 118.94 71171202415:36 42.4049667 76,46148 700MHz 118.25 71171202415:36 42.4049667 76.46148 70OMHZ 218.19 7117/202415:36 42.4049667 76.46148 700MHz 117.5 71171202415:36 42.4049667 76.46148 700MHz 117.5 71171202415:36 42.4049667 76.46148 700MHz 117.25 71171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 70OMHZ 122 7/17/202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 121.69 7/171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 121.69 7/171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 70OMHZ 119.81 7/17/202416:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 119.5 71171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 119.44 7/171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 70OMHZ 118.81 7117/202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 118.44 7/171202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 118.19 7117/202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 70OMHZ 117.56 7127/202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 116.31 7/17/202415:36 42.4049666 76.46148 700MHz 114.69 7/17/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 70OMHZ 122.81 71171202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 700MHz 122.06 7/17/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 700MHz 121.19 7117/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 70OMHZ 119.38 7117/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 700MHz 118.94 7/17/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 700MHz 117.88 7/17/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 70OMHz 116.94 7117/202415:36 42.4049665 76.46148 700MHz 115.81 7/171202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 700MHz 120.94 71171202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 700MHz 120.62 7/17/202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 700MHz 120.12 7/17/202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 700MHz 119.19 7/17/202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 70OMHz 117.88 71171202415:36 42.4049664 76.46148 700MHz 117.69 7/17/202415:36 42.4049663 76.46148 700MHz 115.94 7/171202415:36 42.4049663 76.46148 700MHz 115.5 7/171202415:36 42.4049663 76.46148 700MHz 115.5 7/17/202415:36 42.4049663 76.46148 700MHz 115.12 71171202415:36 42.4049662 76.46148 700MHz 119 7/17/202415:36 42.4049662 76.46148 700MHz 118.62 7117/202415:36 42.404966 76.46148 700MHz 113.88 7117/202415:35 42.4049658 76.46146 700MHz 119 7/17/2024 15:36 42.4049657 76,46148 700MHz 119.25 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049657 76.46146 70OMHz 119.25 7/17/2024 15:35 42.4049655 76.46146 700MHz 120.38 7/171202415:36 42.4049655 76.46148 700MHz 113.31 7/171202415:35 42.4049654 76.46145 2300MHz 112.69 7/17/202415:39 42,4049653 76.46148 70OMHZ 111.69 7117/202415:36 42.4049651 76.46148 700MHz 116.12 71171202415:36 42.404965 76.46148 700MHz 108 7/171202415:36 42.4049649 76.46148 700MHz 111.25 7/171202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHZ 119.19 7/17/202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHz 117.88 7/171202415:35 42.4049645 76,46145 2100MHz 117.12 7/171202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 210OMHZ 117.06 7/17/202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHZ 115.94 7/171202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHz 115.88 7117/202415:36 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHz 115.5 7117/202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 210OMHZ 114.94 7/171202415:35 42.4049645 76.46145 2100MHz 114.62 7117/202415:35 42.4049642 76.46145 2100MHz 119.12 7117/202415:35 42.4049642 76.46145 2100MHz 118 7/17/202415:35 42.4049642 76.46145 2100MHZ 114.56 7117/202415:50 42.4049604 76.46547 700MHz 121.81 7117/202415:39 42.4049546 76.46149 700MHz 108.62 7/17/202415:39 42.4049532 76.46149 70OMHZ 113.44 7/17/202415:46 42.4049398 76.4304 700MHz 116.19 7117/202415:39 42.4049359 76.4615 700MHz 114.75 7/17/202415:49 42.4049299 76.46148 70OMHZ 109.88 7117/202415:46 42.4049274 76.43039 2100MHZ 111.38 7117/202415:46 42.4049274 76.43039 2100MHz 111.12 7117/202415:39 42.4049269 76,46152 700MHz 109.12 7117/202415:46 42.4049146 76.43037 70OMHZ 109.19 7/17/202415:39 42.4049134 76.46152 700MHz 112.19 7117/202415:49 42.4049092 76.46148 2100MHz 113.12 7/17/202415:49 42.4049092 76.46148 210OMHz 111.38 7117/202415:49 42.4049077 76.46147 700MHz 117.31 7117/202415:46 42.4048843 76.43054 700MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:39 42.4048829 76.46158 70OMHZ 106.75 7/17/202415:39 42.4048806 76.46156 700MHz 113.88 7117/202415:50 42.4048671 76.46531700MHz 114 7117/202415:46 42.4048609 76.43052 70OMHZ 108 7/17/202415:50 42.4048405 76.46532 700MHz 119.19 7/171202415:39 42.4048347 76.46164 700MHz 109.12 7117/202415:49 42,404833 76.46161 70OMHZ 112 7117/202415:39 42.4048301 76.46161 700MHz 113.06 7117/202415:46 42.4048284 76.43069 700MHz 111.94 7/171202415:46 42.404815 76.43068 2100MHz 109.75 7117/202415:49 42.4048134 76.46161 2100MHz 115 7/17/202415:49 42.4048091 76.46161 700MHz 120.5 7/17/202415:46 42.4048029 76.43066 700MHz 104.81 7/171202415:39 42.4047914 76.46166 70OMHZ 114.69 7/17/202415:39 42.4047768 76.4617 700MHz 106.5 7/17/202415:45 42.4047706 76.43083 700MHz 111.81 7/17/202415:45 42.404759 76.43082 2100MHZ 111.56 7/17/202415:39 42.4047489 76.46172 700MHz 115.88 7117/202415:50 42.4047446 76.46516 70OMHZ 112.44 71171202415:45 42.4047446 76.4308 70OMHZ 105.12 71171202415:50 42.4047346 76.46173 700MHz 112.62 7/17/202415:50 42.4047173 76.46516 700MHz 120.5 7117/202415:39 42.4047166 76.46178 70OMHZ 109.31 7117/202415:50 42.4047155 76.46518 700MHz 110.25 7117/202415:50 42.4047155 76.46518 70OMHZ 109.81 7117/202415:50 42.4047155 76.46518 700MHz 108 71171202415:45 42.4047152 76.43097 700MHz 117.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4047148 76.46174 210OMHZ 116.94 7/171202415:60 42.4047122 76.46173 700MHz 119.5 7/17/202415:45 42.4047022 76.43097 210OMHZ 111.31 7/171202415:45 42.4046876 76.43095 70OMHZ 110.12 7117/202415:39 42.4046805 76.46179 700MHz 111.69 7117/202415:45 42.4046573 76.43112 700MHz 115.06 7/17/202415:39 42.4046505 76.46185 700MHz 110.56 71171202415:45 42.4046433 76.43112 2100MHz 114.75 7/17/202415:50 42.4046356 76.46186 70OMHZ 112.56 7117/202415:45 42.4046297 76.4311700MHz 106.81 7117/202415:50 42.4046246 76.465 70OMHZ 114.19 7/17/202415:39 42.4046149 76.46186 70OMHZ 114.75 7117/202415:50 42.404614 76.46186 2100MHz 117.19 7/17/202415:50 42.4046139 76.46186 700MHz 117.44 7/17/202415:50 42.4045954 76.46501 70OMHZ 122.88 7/17/202415:45 42.4045947 76.43128 700MHz 114.38 7/17/202415:50 42.4045937 76,46502 700MHz 112 7/17/202415:45 42.4045811 76.43128 2100MHz 116.25 7/17/202415:45 42.4045811 76.43128 2100MHz 112.88 7/17/202415:39 42.4045766 76.46193 700MHz 111.12 71171202415:45 42.4045685 76.43125 700MHz 111 7/17/202415:39 42.404545 76.46195 700MHz 115.94 7117/202415:50 42.4045343 76.46199 700MHz 114.31 71171202415:45 42.4045306 76.43143 700MHz 114.12 7/171202415:50 42.4045123 76.46199 700MHz 118.81 7/17/202416:45 42.4045067 76.43141700MHz 108.88 71171202415:50 42.4045061 76.46485 700MHz 115.12 7/171202415:39 42.4044995 76.46202 700MHz 112.31 7/17/202415:50 42.4044748 76.46486 70OMHz 106.69 7117/202415:39 42.4044717 76.46204 700MHz 117.38 7/17/202415:45 42.4044672 76.43158 700MHz 114.44 71171202415:45 42.4044557 76.43158 2300MHz 110 7/17/202415:45 42.4044448 76.43156 700MHz 107.06 7117/202415:50 42.404432 76.46211 70OMHZ 115.69 71171202415:39 42.4044149 76.46211 700MHz 111.69 71171202425:50 42.4044081 76.4621270OMHZ 121.25 7/17/202415:50 42.4044074 76.46212 2100MHz 121.94 71171202415:50 42.4044074 76.46212 2100MHz 119.06 71171202425:45 42.4044048 76.4317570OMHz 118.44 7/17/202415:45 42.4043916 76.43174 2300MHz 114.19 7/17/202415:39 42.4043908 76.46212 700MHz 116.38 7117/202415:50 42.4043878 76.46469 70OMHZ 114.88 7/17/202415:45 42.4043836 76.43172 700MHz 109.69 7/17/202415:50 42.40436 76.4647 70OMHz 117.31 7117/202415:50 42.4043594 76.46472 700MHz 109.69 7117/202415:50 42.40435051 76.46469 700MHz 122.5 7/17/202415:45 42.4043454 76.4319 700MHz 115.25 7117/202415:39 42.4043353 76.4622 70OMHZ 115.19 71171202415:45 42.404331 76.4319 2100MHz 112.25 7117/202415:45 42.4043249 76.43188 700MHz 111 71171202415:50 42.4043232 76.46223 70OMHZ 118.69 71171202415:39 42.4043122 76.46222 70OMHz 121.56 7/17/202415:50 42.4043019 76.46224 700MHz 124.5 7/17/202415:45 42.4042853 76.43206 700MHz 114.75 7/17/202415:50 42.4042778 76.46455 70OMHZ 116.25 7117/202415:45 42.4042718 76.43205 2100MHz 111.88 71171202415:45 42.4042718 76.43205 2100MHz 108.25 7/17/202415:45 42.4042636 76.43203 70OMHZ 108.62 7117/202415:39 42.4042522 76.4623 700MHz 114.94 71171202415:50 42.4042509 76.46456 700MHz 121.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4042502 76.46457 700MHz 109.62 71171202415:45 42.4042301 76.43221 700MHz 119.06 7/17/202415:39 42.4042274 76.46232 700MHz 119.62 71171202415:39 42.4042225 76.46233 70OMHZ 114.5 7/17/202415:45 42.4042147 76.4322 2100MHz 109.38 7/17/202415:45 42.4042069 76.43217 70OMHZ 109.75 7/17/202416:50 42.4042065 76.46236 700MHz 119.38 7/17/202415:50 42.4041872 76.46237 700MHz 123.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4041827 76.46237 210OMHZ 124.12 7/17/202415:45 42.4041766 76.43234 700MHz 120 7/17/202415:50 42.4041744 76.46442 700MHz 116.44 7117/202415:39 42.4041623 76.46239 700MHz 116.19 7117/202415:45 42.4041549 76.43231 700MHz 109.5 7/17/202415:50 42.4041437 76.46443 70OMHZ 124.44 7/17/202415:50 42.404143 76.46444 70OMHZ 107.44 7117/202415:39 42.4041419 76.46242 700MHz 120.12 7117/202415:39 42.4041324 76.46242 700MHz 115.56 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4041224 76.43247 700MHz 118 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4041066 76.43247 2300MHz 107.44 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4041008 76.432" 700MHz 108.19 71171202415:50 42.4040893 76.46249 700MHz 115.5 71171202415:45 42.4040758 76.43259 700MHz 121.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4040704 76.4625 700MHz 124.12 7117/202415:39 42.40407 76.4625 70OMHz 114.69 7/17/202415: 50 42.4040698 76.4625 700MHz 113.88 7/17/202415: 50 42.4040697 76.46429 700MHz 117.81 7117/202415:45 42.4040672 76.4338 700MHz 109.94 7117/202415:45 42.4040668 76.43368 700MHz 110.69 71171202415:45 42. 4040648 76.43391 700MHz 106.88 7/17/202425: 45 42.4040641 76.43357 70OMHZ 107.94 71171202415:45 42. 4040606 76.43259 2100MHz 109.75 7/171202415:45 42.404058 76.43345 70OMHz 108.81 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040576 76.43401 700MHz 112.75 7/171202415:45 42.4040574 76.43256 700MHz 110.31 7/171202415:39 42.4040523 76.46252 700MHz 120.31 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4040486 76.43366 700MHz 105.38 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040485 76.43354 700MHz 103.94 7/17/2024 15:45 42.404048 76.43333 700MHz 111.81 71171202415:45 42. 404047 76.43377 70OMHz 105.56 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4040463 76.43411 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4040462 76.43387 700MHz 105.25 71171202415:45 42. 404043 76.43272 700MHz 116.75 71171202415:50 42. 4040417 76.46431700MHz 111.25 7117/202415:39 42.4040414 76.46252 70OMHZ 112.38 7117/202415:50 42.4040401 76.4643 700MHz 123.31 7117/202415:45 42.4040399 76.43367 2100MHz 103.38 71171202415:45 42. 4040396 76.43397 700MHz 104.88 7117/202416:45 42.4040387 76.43342 700MHz 106 7117/202415:45 42.4040379 76.43389 2300MHz 100.31 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040374 76.43321 700MHz 115.75 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040374 76.43356 2100MHz 105.38 711712024 15:45 42.4040374 76.43356 2300MHz 104.38 7117/202415:45 42.4040325 76.43344 2100MHz 106.12 7/17/202415: 45 42.404031 76.434 210OMHZ 105.94 7117/202415:45 42.4040305 76.4333 700MHz 107.56 7117/202415:45 42.404028 76.43407 700MHz 103.81 7117/202415:45 42.4040279 76.43271 2100MHz 110.44 71171202415:45 42. 4040274 76.43421 700MHz 113.94 7117/202415:45 42.4040266 76.43309 700MHz 117 7117/202415:45 42.4040259 76.43268 700MHz 110.5 7/171202415:45 42.4040257 76.43284 700MHz 108.44 711712024 15:45 42.4040242 76.43332 2100MHz 105.44 7117/202415:45 42.4040202 76.43296 700MHz 112.19 7/171202415:45 42.4040192 76.43318 700MHz 109.69 7117/202415:45 42.4040173 76.43412100MHz 105.75 71171202415:45 42. 4040158 76.4332 2100MHZ 105.75 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040094 76.43305 700MHz 110.5 71171202415:45 42. 4040091 76.43281700MHz 107.25 7117/202415:45 42.4040084 76.43417 70OMHz 105.5 7117/202415:45 42.404008 76.43283 2100MHz 109.81 7/17/202415: 45 42.4040053 76.43293 700MHz 107.81 7/17/2024 16:45 42.4040019 76.43295 2100MHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4040019 76.43295 2100MHz 109.25 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4039989 76.4343 700MHz 107.94 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4039942 76.4342 2100MHz 107.06 7/17/202415: 45 42.4039942 76.4342 2300MHz 105.25 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4039828 76,43426 70OMHz 102.88 7/171202415:39 42.4039789 76.46261 700MHz 115.81 7117/202415:50 42.4039753 76.46262 700MHz 118.25 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4039713 76.46416 70OMHz 114.56 71171202415:39 42. 403966 76.46262 700MHz 120.5 7/17/202415: 45 42.4039638 76.43439 700MHz 106 7117/202415:50 42.4039565 76.46263 700MHz 114.62 7/17/202415: 50 42.4039552 76.46263 700MHz 125.88 7117/202415:39 42.4039517 76.46263 700MHz 114.62 7/17/202415:45 42.4039454 76.43436 700MHz 102.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4039444 76.46418 70OMHz 122.94 71171202415:50 42.40394" 76.46419 700MHz 110.19 7/171202415:45 42.4039276 76.43439 2100MHz 103.88 7/171202415:45 42.4039205 76.43449 700MHz 109.38 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4038939 76.46272 70OMHz 113.19 7/17/202415:45 42.4038887 76.43445 70OMHz 105.62 7117/202415:45 42.4038849 76,43448 2300MHz 105.69 71171202415:39 42.4038768 76.46274 70OMHz 118.56 71171202415:50 42.4038753 76.46405 700MHz 114.44 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4038697 76.46275 700MHz 118.5 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4038692 76.4346 700MHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4038673 76.46274 70OMHz 112 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4038514 76.46408 700MHz 110.19 7117/202415:50 42.403851 76.46406 700MHz 121.44 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4038497 76.46277 700MHz 112.56 7/17/202415:50 42.4038457 76.46276 700MHz 124.69 7117/202416:45 42.4038419 76.43455 700MHz 106.75 7117/202415:45 42.4038339 76.43459 2100MHz 107.81 7117/202415:39 42.4038192 76.46283 700MHz 115.06 7/17/202415:45 42.4038151 76.4347 70OMHz 112.88 71171202415:39 42.403801 76.46294 700MHz 121.44 7117/202415:39 42.4037929 76.46284 70OMHz 113.19 7/17/202415:45 42.4037891 76.43466 700MHz 106.75 71171202415:50 42.4037876 76.46394 700MHz 116.94 71171202415:45 42.4037801 76.43469 2100MHz 108.44 7117/202415:45 42.4037801 76.43469 2100MHz 106 71171202415:45 42.4037801 76.43469 2100MHz 102.25 7/171202415:50 42.4037721 76.46289 700MHz 116.75 7/171202415:50 42.4037641 76.46396 70OMHz 123.62 7/17/2024 15:50 42.403764 76.46397 70OMHz 111 71171202415:45 42.4037596 76.43481 700MHz 111.25 71171202415:50 42.4037564 76.4629 70OMHz 114.5 7117/202415:39 42.4037563 76.46293 700MHz 115.19 71171202415:50 42.4037485 76.4629 700MHz 124.62 7/171202415:39 42.4037332 76.46294 70OMHz 119.81 7117/202415:45 42.4037322 76.43476 700MHz 104.56 71171202415:39 42.4037252 76.46294 700MHz 113.38 71171202415:50 42.4037053 76.46385 70OMHz 119.12 7/171202415:45 42.403702 76.43492 70OMHz 112.25 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4036939 76.46303 700MHz 107.69 71171202415:50 42.4036876 76.46303 70OMHz 116.5 7117/202416:50 42.4036835 76.46386 700MHz 122.94 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4036835 76.46387 700MHz 107.19 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4036772 76.43487 700MHz 104.56 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4036749 76.46303 700MHz 120.31 7/17/202415:50 42.4036715 76.46304 700MHz 114.38 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4036666 76.46304 700MHz 115.12 7117/202415:50 42.403664 76.46303 700MHz 122.62 7/17/202415:45 42.4036453 76.43502 700MHz 115.56 7117/202415:39 42.4036431 76.4631170OMHz 109.31 7117/202415:50 42.4036291 76.46375 700MHz 118.06 71171202415:39 42.4036222 76.46313 700MHz 119.31 7117/202415:50 42.4036213 76.46315 700MHz 118.19 71171202415:45 42.4036211 76.43498 700MHz 107.88 7117/202415:39 42.4036156 76.46312 700MHz 113 7/171202415:50 42.4036112 76.46378 70OMHz 109.44 7/171202415:50 42.403609 76.46377 700MHz 122.12 7/17/202415:45 42.4036079 76.43502 2100MHz 109.31 7/17/202415:45 42.4036079 76.43502 2100MHz 109.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4036024 76.46316 700MHz 114.69 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4035978 76.4632 70OMHz 113.19 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035955 76.46316 700MHz 119.94 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4035874 76.43513 700MHz 115.12 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4036746 76.46322 70OMHz 121.38 7117/202415:39 42.40357 76.46321 70OMHz 112.38 7/17/202415:50 42.4035663 76.46325 700MHz 112.12 7/17/202415:50 42.4035617 76.46367 70OMHz 118.56 7117/202415:45 42.4035589 76.43509 700MHz 108.62 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4035579 76.46326 70OMHz 109.12 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035463 76.4637 700MHz 104.62 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035459 76.46326 700MHz 112 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035429 76.46326 700MHz 118.38 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035403 76.46369 70OMHz 126.56 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4035342 76.46329 700MHz 120.06 7/17/2024 15:39 42.403533 76.46328 700MHz 112.06 71171202415:39 42.4035265 76.46332 700MHZ 112.19 7/171202415:45 42.403526 76.43524 700MHz 113.56 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4035216 76.46334 700MHz 111 71171202415:50 42.4035102 76.46361 700MHz 116.31 71171202415:39 42.4035056 76.46336 70OMHz 112.44 7/17/202415:39 42.4035042 76.46333 700MHz 114.81 7/171202415:39 42.4035028 76.46334 700MHz 120.25 71171202415:50 42.4035025 76.46334 700MHz 111.31 7117/202415:50 42.4035004 76.46335 700MHz 117.44 7/171202415:45 42.4034962 76.4352 700MHz 109.06 71171202415:50 42.4034922 76.46363 700MHz 103 7/17/202415:39 42.4034919 76.46338 70OMHz 116.75 7/17/202415:50 42.4034897 76.4634 700MHz 115.38 7/171202415:45 42.403489 76.43523 2100MHz 109.81 7/17/202415:50 42.4034855 76.46362 700MHz 125.56 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4034844 76.46337 70OMHz 112.19 71171202415:39 42.4034826 76.46338 700MHz 115.19 71171202415:39 42.4034816 76.4634 700MHz 109.69 7117/202415:39 42.4034785 76.4634 700MHz 113.88 7117/202415:39 42.4034767 76.46341 700MHz 114.12 71171202415:39 42.4034761 76.46341 700MHz 111.62 71171202415:50 42.4034748 76.46354 70OMHz 118.75 7/17/202415:39 42.4034724 76.46339 700MHz 110.94 7/171202415:50 42.4034715 76.4634 700MHz 112.94 7117/202415:39 42.4034713 76.46341700MHz 111.25 71171202415:50 42.4034712 76.46341 700MHz 123.06 7/17/202415:39 42.4034704 76.4634 700MHz 118.69 71171202415:50 42.4034686 76.46344 70OMHz 116.38 71171202415:50 42.4034656 76.46349 70OMHz 115.81 71171202415:39 42.4034647 76.46341 700MHz 111.88 7/17/2024 15:45 42,4034644 76.43535 70OMHz 114.5 71171202415:39 42.4034642 76.4634170OMHz 114.81 7/171202415:39 42.4034626 76.46341700MHz 111.75 7/17/2024 15:39 42,4034625 76.46341 70OMHz 119.06 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4034609 76.46341 70OMHz 117.5 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4034606 76.46342 700MHz 109.5 7117/202415:39 42.4034587 76.46342 700MHz 108.31 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4034586 76.46342 70OMHz 108.12 7117/202415:39 42.4034585 76.46344 700MHz 112.94 7/171202415:39 42.4034584 76.46342 700MHz 108.06 7/17/202415:50 42.403458 76.46356 70OMHz 102.56 7/17/202415:39 42.4034573 76.46341 700MHz 117.44 7/17/202415:39 42.4034568 76.46341 700MHz 117.94 7/17/202415:50 42.4034545 76.46355 70OMHz 124.75 7/171202415:50 42.4034537 76.46346 700MHz 120.69 7/17/202415:39 42.4034533 76.46343 70OMHz 107.88 7/17/202415:39 42.403453 76.46342 700MHz 117.94 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4034524 76.46345 700MHz 109.56 7/171202415:50 42.4034483 76.4635 70OMHz 118.38 7/17/202415:39 42.4034459 76.46346 70OMHz 106.25 7/17/2024 15:50 42.4034457 76.4635 700MHz 107.56 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4034437 76.46344 70OMHz 108.56 7117/202415:45 42.4034417 76.4353 700MHz 108.06 7117/202415:39 42.4034409 76,463" 70OMHz 116.19 7/17/202415:39 42.4034331 76.46347 70OMHz 117.88 7/17/202415:39 42.4034303 76,46346 700MHz 109.56 7/171202415:45 42.40342B1 76.43534 2100MHz 110 7/17/202415:39 42.4034243 76.46347 70OMHz 109.69 7117/202415:39 42.4034135 76.46349 700MHz 118.81 71171202415:39 42.4034107 76.46348 70OMHz 107.44 7117/202415:45 42.4034041 76.43546 700MHz 116 71171202415:39 42.4033946 76.46348 700MHz 111.06 7117/202415:39 42.4033934 76.4635 700MHz 112 711712024 15:45 42.4033862 76.43541 700MHz 107.69 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033842 76.46348 700MHz 110.88 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4033666 76.43546 2100MHz 108.81 7/171202416:45 42.4033666 76.43546 210OMHz 106.12 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033562 76.46348 700MHz 111.81 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033542 76.46346 700MHz 106.81 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033534 76.46347 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415:45 42.4033482 76.43557 70OMHz 114.94 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4033312 76.43552 700MHz 107.31 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033202 76.46342 700MHz 103.69 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4033199 76.46341 700MHz 108.88 7117/202415:39 42.4033191 76.46345 700MHz 115.69 7117/202415:45 42.4032908 76.43568 700MHz 111.81 71171202415:39 42.4032845 76.46339 700MHz 111.06 7117/202415:39 42.4032824 76.46336 700MHz 104.12 7117/202415:39 42.4032823 76.46335 700MHz 103.94 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4032747 76.43563 700MHz 106.31 7/17/202415:45 42.4032521 76.43567 2100MH2 106.88 71171202415:39 42.4032433 76.46331 700MHz 108.5 71171202415:39 42.4032421 76.46328 700MHz 110.31 7/17/2024 15:39 42.4032417 76.46328 2100MHz 102.44 711712024 15:45 42.4032291 76.43578 700MHz 111.5 71171202415:45 42.4032136 76.43574 700MHz 105.69 7117/202415:40 42.4031998 76.46323 700MHz 111 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031993 76.4632 700MHz 107.5 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031985 76.46321 2300MHz 106.81 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4031914 76.43577 2100MHz 102.62 7117/202415:45 42.4031598 76.43588 700MHz 111.69 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031544 76.46314 700MHz 107.88 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031534 76.46312 700MHz 106.06 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031529 76.46312 2100MHz 106.38 7/17/2024 15:45 42.403146 76.43594 70OMHz 104 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4031229 76.43587 2100MHz 109.31 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031053 76.46303 2100MHz 102.06 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031027 76.46303 700MHz 105.19 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4031025 76,46306 700MHz 109.62 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4030824 76.43596 700MHz 106.19 7/17/202415:45 42.4030632 76.43593 700MHz 101.75 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4030593 76.46293 700MHz 106.75 7/17/2024 15:40 42.403059 76.46293 2100MHZ 103.69 7/171202415:40 42.4030519 76.46297 700MHz 110.12 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4030423 76.43596 2100MHz 106.62 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4030127 76.46284 2100MHz 100 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4030105 76.46284 700MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4030051 76.46287 700MHz 111.06 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4029922 76.43604 700MHz 112.69 7/17/2024 15:45 42.4029713 76.43601 700MHz 107.75 7117/202415:40 42.4029604 76.46273 2300MHz 101.69 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4029577 76.46274 700MHz 106.25 7/27/2024 15:40 42.4029572 76.46276 700MHz 107.38 7/17/202415:45 42.4029537 76.43604 2100MHz 108.44 71171202425:45 42.4029537 76.43604 2100MHZ 107.31 7117/202415:40 42.4029048 76.46263 2100MHz 104.62 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4029002 76.46266 700MHz 108.56 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4028997 76.46264 700MHz 106.56 7/17/202415:45 42.402893 76.43612 700MHz 112.19 7/17/202415:45 42.4028742 76.43609 700MHz 105.62 71171202415:40 42.4028469 76.46252 2100MHz 102.94 7117/202415:40 42.4028421 76.46255 700MHz 112.31 7117/202415:40 42.4028409 76.46253 700MHz 109 7117/202415:40 42.4027936 76.46241 2100MHz 106.12 7/171202415:40 42.4027935 76.46242 700MHz 105.81 7117/202415:40 42.4027883 76.46244 700MHz 107.94 7/17/202415:45 42.4027874 76.43619 700MHz 110.94 7/171202415:45 42.4027731 76.43617 700MHz 105.75 7/17/2024 15:45 42.402753 76.4362 2100MHz 108.69 71171202415:40 42.4027448 76.46231 700MHz 106.31 7117/202415:40 42.4027427 76.4623 210OMHZ 105.06 7117/202415:40 42.4027339 76.46232 700MHz 110.56 71171202415:40 42.4026964 76.46219 700MHz 107.81 7117/202415:40 42.4026915 76.46218 2300MHz 105.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4026836 76.46221 70OMHz 112.81 7/17/202415:45 42.4026822 76.43627 700MHz 109.25 7117/202415:45 42.4026686 76.43625 700MHz 101.19 7117/202415:40 42.4026515 76.46208 70OMHZ 107.25 7/17/202415:45 42.4026507 76.43628 210OMHZ 105.31 7117/202415:40 42.4026425 76.46208 2100MHz 103.62 7117/202415:40 42,4026352 76.4621 700MHz 114.12 7117/202415:40 42.4026066 76.46198 700MHz 109.31 7/17/202415:40 42.402597 76.46197 2100MHz 100.5 7117/202415:40 42.4025915 76.462 700MHz 112.38 71171202415:45 42.4025758 76.43635 700MHZ 111.25 7/17/202425:40 42.4025597 76.46187 700MHz 108.06 7117/202415:45 42.4025579 76.43635 700MHz 102.12 7/171202415:40 42.4025501 76.46187 2100MHz 102.25 7117/202425:45 42.4025484 76.43636 210OMHZ 97.44 7117/202415:40 42.4025462 76.4619 700MHz 112.75 7/171202415:40 42.4025104 76.46177 700MHz 109.75 7/171202415:40 42.4025044 76.4618 70OMHz 109.25 7/17/202415:40 42.4025037 76.46177 2300MHz 103.94 7117/202415:45 42.4024723 76.43645 700MHz 105.81 7117/202415:40 42.4024657 76.46167 70OMHZ 109.75 7/17/202416:45 42.4024606 76.43645 70OMHz 93.88 7/17/202415:40 42.4024596 76.4617 700MHz 116.19 7117/202415:40 42.4024582 76.46167 2100MHz 103.94 71171202415:45 42.4024492 76.43646 210OMHZ 95.44 7117/202415:40 42.4024164 76.46157 700MHz 108.38 7/17/202415:40 42.4024157 76.4616 70OMHz 113.94 7/171202415:40 42.402414 76.46157 2100MH2 105.06 7117/202415:45 42.4023761 76.43658 700MHz 114 7/17/202415:40 42.4023708 76.46148 700MHz 109.75 71171202415:45 42.4023702 76.43657 700MHz 101.12 7117/202415:40 42.4023697 76.46151 700MHz 113.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4023679 76.46148 2100MHz 107.69 7117/202415:45 42.4023553 76.43659 2100MH2 105.31 7117/202415:45 42.4023553 76.43659 2100MHz 103.31 7/17/202415:40 42.402325 76.46141700MHz 116.25 71171202415:40 42.4023221 76.46138 700MHz 111.75 7/17/202415:40 42.4023191 76.46138 2100MHz 109.31 71171202415:45 42.4022866 76.43673 700MHz 108.31 71171202415:40 42.4022812 76.46132 700MHz 116.94 71171202415:45 42.4022796 76.43673 70OMHz 103.12 7117/202415:40 42.402274 76.46129 700MHz 112.88 7/17/202415:40 42.4022712 76.46128 2100MHz 118.12 71171202415:40 42.4022338 76.46123 70OMHz 112.44 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4022259 76,46119 700MHz 114.88 7/17/202415:45 42.4022015 76.43691 700MHz 111.5 7/17/202415:46 42.4021975 76.4369 700MHz 105.94 7/17/202415:40 42.4021867 76.46113 700MHz 118.75 7/171202415:45 42.4021804 76.43691 2100MHz 108 7/171202415:40 42.4021794 76.46109 700MHz 113.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4021781 76.4611 2100MHz 108.31 7117/202415:40 42.4021402 76.46104 700MHz 119.19 7117/202415:40 42.4021343 76.46170OMHZ 115.12 7/17/202415:40 42.4021325 76.4612300MHZ 108 7/17/202415:45 42.4021142 76.437170OMHZ 111.25 7/17/202415:45 42.4021116 76.43709 700MHz 106.75 7/17/202415:40 42.4020975 76.46095 70OMHZ 120.25 71171202415:45 42.4020949 76.4371210OMHz 108.44 7/171202415:40 42.4020921 76,46091 700MHz 114.81 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4020896 76.46091 2100MHz 105.31 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4020553 76.46085 70OMHz 118.31 7/171202415:40 42.4020533 76.46082 700MHz 111.88 7/171202415:40 42.4020469 76.46082 2100MHz 108.75 7/171202415:45 42.4020223 76.43729 700MHz 114.44 7/17/202415:45 42.4020193 76.43729 70OMHZ 107.44 71171202415:40 42.402012 76.46073 700MHz 111.56 7/171202415:40 42.4020118 76.46076 700MHz 114.56 7/171202415:45 42.402004 76.4373 2100MH2 108.88 7/17/202415:40 42.4020039 76.46073 2100MHz 114.12 7/171202415:40 42.4019685 76.46064 700MHz 111.75 7/171202415:40 42.4019643 76.46067 70OMHZ 117.81 7/171202415:40 42.4019571 76.46063 210OMHz 108.06 7/17/202415:45 42.4019322 76.43749 700MHz 108.12 71171202415:45 42.4019316 76.43748 700MHz 104.75 7117/202415:40 42.4019244 76.46054 70OMHZ 113.94 7/171202415:40 42.4019191 76.46057 700MHz 122.44 7/171202415:45 42.4019147 76.4375 700MHz 102.19 71171202415:45 42.4019147 76.4375 700MHz 102.12 7/17/202415:45 42.4019147 76.4375 70OMHZ 99.31 71171202415:40 42.4019098 76.46053 2100MHz 106.56 7117/202415:40 42.4018793 76.46044 700MHz 110.81 7/17/202415:40 42.4018729 76.46047 70OMHZ 117.44 7/17/202415:40 42.4018612 76.46043 2100MHz 111.12 7117/202415:45 42.4018444 76.43767 700MHz 108.88 7/17/202415:45 42.4018427 76.43768 70OMHZ 111.94 7117/202415:40 42.40183 76.46034 70OMHZ 116.62 7117/202415:40 42.4018243 76.46037 700MHz 121.94 7117/202415:40 42.4018116 76.46033 2100MHz 114.69 7117/202415:40 42.4017809 76.46024 70OMHZ 116.5 7/171202415:40 42.4017751 76.46027 700MHz 117.69 7117/202415:40 42.4017618 76.46023 2300MHz 110 7/17/202415:45 42.4017523 76.43785 70OMHZ 110.88 7/17/202415:45 42.4017503 76.43786 700MHz 114.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4017348 76.46014 700MHz 112.19 7117/202415:40 42.4017257 76.46016 700MHz 116.06 7117/202415:40 42.4017131 76.46012 2100MHz 112.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4016905 76.46003 700MHz 111.88 7117/202415:40 42.401678 76.46006 700MHz 115.94 7/17/202415:40 42.4016649 76.46002 2100MHz 110.81 7/17/202415:45 42.4016607 76.43803 700MHz 111.62 7117/202415:45 42.4016601 76.43804 70OMHZ 117.38 7117/202415:40 42.401646 76.45993 70OMHZ 112.56 7/17/202415:45 42.4016402 76.43805 700MHz 102.75 71171202415:40 42.4016305 76.45995 700MHz 116.62 7117/202415:40 42.4016177 76.45992 2100MHZ 112.31 7117/202415:40 42.401599 76.45983 700MHz 115.62 7117/202415:40 42.4015832 76.45985 700MHz 118.5 7/171202415:45 42.4015732 76.43821 70OMHZ 110.19 71171202415:40 42.4015714 76.45982 2100MHz 104.38 7/17/202415:45 42.4015698 76.43822 700MHz 113.75 7/171202415:40 42.4015514 76.45973 70OMHZ 117.5 7/171202415:45 42.4015505 76.43823 700MHz 101.5 7/17/202415:40 42.4015379 76.45976 700MHz 118.56 7/171202415:40 42.4015264 76.45972 210OMHZ 108.81 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4015074 76.45964 700MHz 114.38 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4014936 76.45967 70OMHZ 118.5 71171202415:44 42.401488 76.43837 70OMHZ 109.62 71171202415:44 42.4014861 76.43839 700MHz 115.38 7/17/202415:40 42.4014829 76.45963 2100MHz 105.31 71171202415:44 42.4014673 76.43839 700MHz 102.75 7/17/202415:40 42.4014622 76.45955 700MHz 114.5 7117/202415:40 42.4014504 76.45957 70OMHZ 114.56 7/17/202415:40 42.4014394 76.45954 2100MHz 115.12 71171202415:40 42.4014157 76.45945 70OMHZ 102.12 7/17/202415:40 42.4014074 76.45948 70OMHZ 116.44 7/171202415:44 42.4014043 76.43854 700MHz 113.69 7/17/202415:44 42.4014033 76.43852 700MHz 111.38 7/171202415:40 42.4013957 76.45944 210OMHZ 107.56 7/171202415:44 42.4013842 76.43854 700MHz 105.94 7/17/2024 15:44 42.4013842 76.43854 70OMHZ 104.31 7/171202415:40 42.4013724 76.45936 700MHz 104 7/171202415:40 42.4013602 76.45939 700MHz 107 7/17/202415:40 42.4013498 76.45935 2100MHz 107.88 7/17/202415:40 42.4013295 76.45927 700MHz 102.62 7/17/202415:44 42.401318 76.43869 700MHz 117.44 7/171202415:44 42.4013135 76.43867 700MHz 113.75 7/17/202415:40 42.4013131 76.45929 700MHz 103.38 7117/202415:40 42.4013028 76.45926 2100MHz 105.69 7117/202415:40 42.4012817 76.45917 700MHz 103.5 7117/202415:40 42.4012632 76.4592 700MHz 107.38 7/17/202415:40 42.4012538 76.45916 2100MHz 113.75 71171202415:40 42.4012308 76.45907 700MHz 101.88 7/17/202415:44 42.4012263 76.43881 700MHz 121.31 7/17/202415:44 42.4012235 76.43878 700MHz 113.06 71171202415:40 42.4012098 76.4591700MHz 109.62 71171202415:44 42.401204 76,43882 700MHz 104.81 71171202415:40 42.4012025 76.45906 2100MHz 114.31 7/171202415:40 42.4011767 76.45896 700MHz 106.06 7117/202415:40 42.4011584 76.45899 700MHz 109.88 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4011517 76.45896 2100MHz 110 7/17/202415:44 42.4011299 76.43891 700MHz 119.62 7/171202415:40 42.401127 76.45886 700MHz 109.38 7/171202415:44 42,4011228 76,43889 700MHz 112.06 7/17/202415:40 42.4011063 76.45889 700MHz 110.94 7/171202415:44 42.4011047 76.43892 700MHz 107.06 7/171202415:40 42.4011008 76.45885 2100MHz 108.5 7/171202415:40 42.4010724 76.45876 700MHz 102.31 7/17/202415:40 42.4010554 76.45879 700MHz 116.75 7/171202415:40 42.4010486 76.45875 2100MHz 112.62 7/171202415:44 42.4010274 76.43899 700MHz 117.75 7/17/202415:40 42.401022 76.45866 700MHz 102.5 7/17/202415:44 42.4010183 76.43896 700MHz 111 7/17/202415:40 42.4010047 76.45868 700MHz 106.06 7/17/202415:44 42.4010021 76.439 700MHz 105.75 7/171202415:40 42.4009959 76.45865 2100MHz 107.81 7117/202415:40 42.4009764 76.45856 700MHz 102.06 7/17/202415:40 42.4009546 76.45858 700MHz 103.62 7/17/202415:40 42.4009445 76.45855 2100MHz 112.31 7117/202415:40 42.4009304 76.45846 700MHz 96.06 7117/202415:44 42.4009207 76.43905 700MHz 122.19 7/171202415:44 42.40091 76.43903 70OMHz 112.31 7/17/202415:40 42.4009062 76.45849 700MHz 101.06 7117/202415:44 42.4008946 76.43906 70OMHz 105.69 7/17/202415:40 42.400894 76.45845 2100MHZ 109.69 7/171202415:40 42.4008894 76.45837 700MHz 102.81 7/17/202415:40 42.4008552 76.45839 700MHz 109.12 7/171202415:40 42.4008459 76.45836 2100MHZ 108.69 7/17/202415:40 42.4008426 76.45828 700MHz 102.5 7/17/202415:40 42.4008059 76.4583 700MHz 104.69 7/171202415:44 42.4008056 76.43911 700MHz 122.06 7/17/202415:40 42.4007981 76.45819 700MHz 101.25 7/17/202415:40 42.4007972 76.45826 2100MHz 112.06 7/17/202415:44 42.4007944 76.43909 700MHz 113.06 7/17/202415:44 42.4007778 76.43912 700MHz 107.88 7/171202415:44 42.4007778 76.43912 700MHz 105.88 7/17/202415:40 42.4007612 76.45821 700MHz 112.12 7/171202415:40 42.4007519 76.45818 2100MHz 107.5 7117/202415:40 42.4007504 76.4581 700MHz 102.81 7/17/202415:40 42.4007176 76.45813 700MHz 111.19 71171202415:40 42.4007075 76.45809 2100MHz 105.62 71171202415:40 42.4007035 76.45802 700MHz 106.38 7/17/202415:44 42.4006768 76.43918 700MHz 120.69 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4006722 76.45804 700MHz 114.62 7/17/2024 15:44 42.4006662 76.43915 700MHz 111.25 7/17/202415:40 42.4006632 76.45801 2300MHz 106.38 7117/202415:40 42.4006569 76.45794 700MHz 108.56 7117/202415:40 42.4006287 76.45796 700MHz 117.19 7/171202415:40 42.4006191 76.45793 2100MHz 111.56 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4006101 76.45786 700MHz 108 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4005845 76,45789 70OMHZ 212.38 7/17/2024 15:40 42.4005743 76.45785 2100MHz 103.81 7117/202415:40 42.4005613 76.45778 700MHz 106.19 71171202415:40 42.4005361 76.45781 700MHz 122.31 7117/202415:44 42.4005319 76.43925 70OMHZ 118.44 7117/202416:40 42.4005264 76.45778 2100MHz 103.31 7/171202415:44 42.4005248 76.43922 700MHz 108.38 71171202415:44 42.4005103 76.43926 70OMHZ 105.25 7/17/202415:40 42.4005099 76.4577 700MHz 106.88 71171202415:40 42.4004851 76.45772 700MHz 113.06 7/17/202415:40 42.4004765 76.4577 2300MHz 108 7117/ 202415:40 42.400456 76.45762 700MHz 108.19 71171202415: 40 42.4004305 76.45764 700MHz 110.81 7117/ 202415:40 42.4004213 76.45761 2100MHz 109 71171202415: 40 42.4004006 76.45753 700MHZ 105.06 7/ 17/2024 15:44 42.4003765 76.43933 70OMHZ 120.19 7117/ 202415:40 42.400372 76.45755 700MHz 112.62 7/ 171202415:44 42.4003687 76.4393 700MHz 110.12 7/ 27/2024 15:40 42.4003632 76.45752 210OMHZ 109.12 7117/ 202415:44 42.4003569 76.43934 700MHz 105 7/171202415:41 42. 4003394 76.45744 700MHz 104.69 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4003125 76.45746 70OMHZ 110.19 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4003025 76.45743 210OMHZ 102.69 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4002742 76.45735 700MHz 104.25 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4002531 76.45737 700MHz 107.56 7/171202415:41 42.4002401 76.45735 210OMHZ 102.94 7/17/202415:44 42.4002264 76. 43941 700MHz 120.88 7/17/2024 15:44 42.4002195 76. 43938 700MHz 111.38 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4002143 76. 45727 70OMHZ 105.75 7/17/2024 15:44 42.40020" 76. 43942 700MHz 105.94 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001916 76. 45729 700MHz 110.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001813 76. 45726 2100MHz 105.56 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001612 76. 45719 70OMHZ 104.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001337 76. 45721 700MHz 110.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001253 76. 45718 210OMHZ 98.5 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4001126 76. 45712 700MHz 104.31 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4000815 76. 45713 700MHz 107.19 7/17/2024 15:44 42.4000765 76. 43948 70OMHZ 123.31 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4000727 76. 45711 2100MHZ 107.88 7/17/2024 15:44 42.400069 76. 43946 700MHz 115.38 7/17/2024 15:41 42,4000641 76. 45704 70OMHZ 101.62 7/17/2024 15:44 42.4000565 76. 43949 70OMHz 107.44 7/17/2024 15:41 42.4000318 76. 45706 700MHz 107.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.400021 76. 45703 2100MHz 105.62 7/17/2024 15:41 42.400011 76. 45696 700MHz 106.75 7/27/2024 15:41 42.3999827 76. 45698 700MHz 111.56 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3999695 76. 45696 2100MHz 106.12 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3999637 76. 45689 70OMHZ 103.19 7117/202415:41 42.3999362 76.45691 700MHz 105.88 7/17/2024 15:44 42.399929 76. 43956 70OMHZ 117.25 71171202415:44 42.3999233 76.43953 70OMHZ 113. 81 7117/202415:41 42.39992 76.45689 2100MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3999139 76. 45683 700MHZ 104.44 71171202425:44 42.3999097 76.4395770OMHZ 106.38 7117/202415:44 42.3999097 76.43957 700MHz 105.81 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3998882 76. 45684 700MHz 108.62 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3998712 76. 45682 2300MHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3998619 76. 45676 700MHz 105.12 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3998392 76. 45677 70OMHz 110.69 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3998227 76. 45675 2300MHz 106.06 71171202415:41 42.3998148 76.4567 70OMHZ 105. 69 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997918 76. 45671 70OMHz 110.38 7/17/2024 15:44 42.3997831 76. 43963 700MHz 119.44 7/17/2024 15:44 42.3997763 76. 4396 70OMHZ 112.44 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997759 76. 45669 2106MHz 107.69 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997697 76. 45664 700MHz 106.44 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997455 76. 45665 700MHZ 111.19 7/171202415:41 42.3997304 76.45663 2100MHz 98.81 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997252 76.45658 700MHz 107.81 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3997006 76.4566 700MHz 111.25 7/17/202415:41 42.3996881 76,45657 2300MHz 103.5 7/17/202415:41 42.399683 76.45652 700MHz 106 7/171202415:41 42.3996563 76.45654 700MHz 108.38 71171202415:41 42.3996452 76.45652 2100MHz 102.56 7/17/202415:44 42.3996401 76.4397 700MHz 114.44 71171202415:41 42.3996361 76.45646 700MHz 108.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3996263 76.43968 700MHz 114.62 7/17/202415:44 42.3996189 76.4397 70OMHz 109.12 7/17/202415:41 42.3996092 76.45648 700MHz 110.75 7117/202415:41 42.3995981 76.45645 2100MHz 100.88 7/17/202415:41 42.3995885 76.45639 700MHz 104 7117/202415:41 42.399563 76.45641 700MHz 108.06 7117/202415:41 42.3995506 76.45639 2100MHz 101.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3995418 76.45632 700MHz 102.12 7/17/2024 15:41 42.399514 76.45634 700MHz 106.69 71171202415:44 42.399504 76.43976 700MHz 123.25 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3995015 76.45632 2100MHz 105.56 7117/202415:41 42.3994907 76.45625 700MHz 100.5 7/17/202415:44 42.399489 76.43973 700MHz 119.38 7/17/2024 15:44 42.3994825 76.43976 700MHz 110.25 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3994596 76.45627 700MHz 104.31 7/17/202415:41 42.3994502 76.45625 2100MHz 98.88 7/17/202415:41 42.399438 76.45618 700MHz 99.44 7/17/202415:41 42.3994065 76.4562 700MHz 105.5 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3993968 76.45618 210OMHz 103.69 7/17/202415:41 42.3993839 76.45611 700MHz 97.5 7/17/202415:44 42.3993705 76.43981 700MHz 123.69 71171202415:44 42.3993555 76.43978 700MHz 119.5 7/17/202415:41 42.3993513 76.45613 700MHz 104.06 7/17/202415:44 42.3993475 76.43981 700MHz 110." 71171202415:41 42.3993412 76.4561 2100MHz 99.62 7/17/202415:41 42.3993274 76.45603 70OMHz 97.44 7117/202415:41 42.3992932 76.45604 700MHz 98.75 71171202415:41 42.3992823 76.45602 2300MHz 99.69 71171202415:41 42.399263 76.45594 700MHz 98.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3992363 76.43985 700MHz 128.19 71171202415:41 42.3992333 76.45596 700MHz 101.19 71171202415:41 42.39922 76.45594 2100MHz 98.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3992194 76.43982 700MHz 121.06 7117/202415:44 42.399213 76.43986 700MHz 113.69 71171202415:41 42. 3991919 76.45585 700MHz 96.94 7117/202415:41 42.399165 76.45586 700MHz 101.69 7/17/202415: 41 42.399152 76,45584 2300MHz 104.06 7/171202415:41 42.3991214 76.45576 700MHz 99.19 7/171202435:44 42.399108 76.43989 700MHz 122.94 7/17/202415: 41 42.3990929 76.45577 700MHz 102.75 7/171202415:44 42.3990922 76.43985 70OMHz 116 7/171202435:44 42.3990843 76.43989700MHz 111.94 7/17/2024 15:44 42.3990843 76,43989 700MHz 110.06 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3990811 76.45574 210OMHz 106.31 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3990493 76.45565 700MHz 101.38 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3990187 76.45566 700MHz 108.19 7/17/2024 15:44 42.3989831 76.43991 700MHz 124.38 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3989694 76.45554 700MHz 103.62 71171202415:44 42. 3989655 76.43988 700MHz 115.75 71171202415:41 42. 3989406 76.45556 700MHz 109 7/17/202415: 41 42.3989296 76.45554 2100MHz 105 7117/202415:41 42.3989296 76.45554 2100MHz 103.62 7117/202415:41 42.3988876 76.45543 700MHz 105.62 7117/202415:41 42.3988637 76.45545 700MHz 109.94 7117/202415:44 42.3988612 76.43994 700MHz 125.38 7117/202415:41 42.3988513 76.45543 2100MHz 102.81 7/17/202415: 44 42.3988418 76.43991 700MHz 119.19 7117/202415:44 42.3988318 76.43995 700MHz 111.56 7/17/202415: 41 42.3988156 76.45533 700MHz 105.94 7/17/202415:41 42.3987841 76.45534 700MHz 109.56 7117/202415:41 42.3987737 76.45532 2100MHz 105.5 7/171202415:41 42.3987414 76.45523 70OMHZ 106.25 7/17/202415:44 42.3987369 76.43997 700MHz 123 7/17/202415:44 42.3987139 76.43994 700MHz 120.12 7117/202415:44 42.398707 76.43997 700MHz 112.25 7/17/202415:41 42.3987068 76.45524 70OMHz 108.94 7/17/202415:41 42.3986975 76.45522 2100MHz 103.94 7/17/202415:41 42.3986607 76.45513 700MHz 105.69 7117/202415:41 42.3986222 76.45513 70OMHZ 109.94 7/17/202415:41 42.3986156 76.45511 2100MHz 102.19 7117/202415:44 42.3986133 76.43999 700MHz 123.06 7117/202415:44 42.3985938 76.43997 70OMHZ 117.44 71171202415:44 42.3985855 76.44 700MHz 111.12 7117/202415:41 42.3985699 76.455 700MHz 103.88 7/17/202415:41 42.3985327 76.45502 700MHz 108.75 7/17/202415:41 42.3985244 76.45499 210OMHZ 104.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3984971 76.44002 70OMHz 122.19 7/17/202415:44 42.3984762 76.43999 700MHz 115.81 71171202415:41 42.3984743 76.45488 700MHz 100.31 7117/202415:44 42.3984666 76.44002 70OMHz 112.38 7/17/202415:44 42.3984666 76.44002 700MHz 110.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3984666 76.44002 700MHz 109.75 7117/202415:41 42.3984353 76.45489 70OMHz 107.94 7117/202415:41 42.3984268 76.45486 2100MHz 107.88 7/17/202415:44 42,3983818 76.44004 700MHz 123.12 7/17/202415:41 42.3983703 76.45474 70OMHZ 105.62 7/171202415:44 42.3983613 76.44002 70OMHz 114.5 7/17/202415:41 42.3983319 76.45475 700MHz 108.06 7/171202415:41 42.3983226 76.45472 2300MHz 114 7/171202415:44 42.3982705 76.44007 70OMHz 124.06 7/171202415:41 42.3982548 76.45459 70OMHz 110.25 71171202415:44 42.3982507 76.44004 700MHz 115.88 71171202415:41 42.3982172 76.4546 70OMHz 113.25 7/171202415:41 42.3982107 76.45457 2100MHz 110.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3981682 76.44008 700MHz 122.94 7/17/202415:44 42.3981479 76.44006 70OMHz 117.88 7117/202415:41 42.3981414 76.45444 70OMHz 108.94 7/17/202415:44 42.3981389 76.44009 700MHz 113.19 7/17/202415:41 42.3980998 76.45444 70OMHz 114.81 71171202415:41 42.3980934 76.45442 210OMHz 104.75 7/171202415:44 42.3980684 76.4401700MHz 128.25 71171202415:44 42.3980493 76.44007 70OMHz 118.12 7/171202415:44 42.3980389 76.4401700MHz 113.44 7/17/202415:41 42.3980212 76.45427 700MHz 107 7/171202415:44 42.3979782 76.440170OMHZ 128.69 7/17/202415:41 42.3979779 76.45428 70OMHz 110.38 7/171202415:41 42.3979725 76.45425 2300MHz 107.38 7/17/202415:44 42.3979614 76.44007 70OMHz 120.56 7/17/202415:44 42.3979494 76.4401170OMHZ 114.62 7/171202415:44 42.3978961 76A4011700MHz 127.94 7/17/202415:41 42.3978947 76.454170OMHZ 111.38 7/171202415:44 42.3978805 76,44008 70OMHz 120 71171202415:44 42.3978661 76.44011 700MHz 115.19 7/171202415:44 42.3978661 76.44011 70OMHz 113.88 7117/202415:41 42.3979497 76.454170OMHZ 116.56 7117/202415:41 42.3978431 76.45407 210OMHZ 113.88 7/17/202415:44 42.3978218 76.44011 70OMHz 125.69 7117/202415:44 42.3978043 76.44008 700MHz 117 7/171202415:44 42.3977899 76.44011 70OMHZ 115.25 7/17/202415:44 42.3977899 76.44011 70OMHz 112.31 7117/202415:41 42.3977611 76.45391 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415:44 42.397756 76.44011 70OMHz 127.56 7117/202415:44 42.3977388 76,44008 70OMHz 122.12 71171202415:41 42.3977206 76.45392 700MHz 120.5 7/17/202415:41 42.3977155 76.45389 2100MH2 110.38 7117/202415:44 42.3976964 76.440170OMHZ 127.94 7117/202415:44 42.397684 76.44007 700MHz 116.81 7117/202415:44 42.3976447 76.4401700MHz 130.12 7117/202415:44 42.3976384 76.44007 700MHz 119.44 7/17/202416:41 42.3976246 76.45371 700MHz 116.56 7117/202415:44 42.3976187 76.4401700MHz 114.94 7117/202415:44 42.397606 76.44009 700MHz 129.62 7117/202415:44 42.3976042 76.44006 700MHz 120.38 7117/202415:41 42.3975842 76.45372 700MHz 121.31 71171202415:44 42.3975806 76.44009 700MHz 115 71171202415:41 42.3975798 76.45369 2100MHz 117.06 7/17/202415:44 42.3975769 76.44009 70OMHz 129.75 71171202435:44 42.397576 76.44005 700MHz 120.56 7117/202415:44 42.3975564 76.44009 700MHz 128.25 7117/202415:44 42.3975535 76.44006 70OMHz 121.62 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975516 76.44009 700MHz 115.88 7117/202415:44 42.3975516 76.44009 700MHz 113.44 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975453 76.44008 700MHz 127.88 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975418 76.44005 70OMHz 121.12 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975396 76.44008 700MHz 128.44 7/171202415:44 42.3975392 76.44008 700MHz 127.25 7/171202415:44 42.3975379 76.44008 700MHz 127.31 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975366 76.44008 700MHz 129.69 7/171202415:44 42.3975363 76.44008 700MHz 131.12 7/171202415:44 42.3975363 76.44008 700MHz 127.31 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975361 76.44008 700MHz 131.62 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975357 76.44008 700MHz 126.75 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975356 76.44008 700MHz 133.44 7/171202415:44 42.3975355 76.44008 70OMHZ 129.75 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975354 76.44008 700MHz 128.88 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975347 76.44008 700MHz 129.06 7/171202415:44 42.3975322 76.44006 700MHz 123.88 7/171202415:44 42.3975322 76.44006 700MHz 118.44 7/17/202415: 44 42.397532 76.44006 700MHz 120.12 7/171202415:44 42.3975318 76.44006 700MHz 120.38 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 121.25 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 120.56 7/171202415:44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 120.5 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 119.38 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 119.19 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 118.75 7/171202415:44 42.3975317 76.44006 70OMHz 118.5 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975317 76.44006 700MHz 117.44 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975313 76.44008 700MHz 128.62 7/171202415:44 42.3975292 76.44006 70OMHz 125 7/17/202435: 44 42.3975278 76.44008 700MHz 127.12 7117/202415:44 42.3975269 76.44006 700MHz 122 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975231 76.44006 70OMHz 122.06 71171202415:" 42.3975205 76.44008 700MHz 129.62 7/17/202415: 44 42,3975172 76.44008 700MHz 116.88 7/17/202415: 44 42,3975085 76.44008 70OMHz 118.25 71171202415:44 42. 3975083 76.44008 700MHz 117.12 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975083 76.44008 700MHz 116.25 7/171202415:44 42.3976082 76.44008 70OMHz 115.88 71171202415:44 42. 3975081 76.44005 700MHz 120.81 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975081 76.44008 700MHz 116.69 7117/202415:44 42.3975081 76.44008 70OMHz 116.62 7117/202415:44 42.3975081 76.44008 700MHz 116.06 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975081 76.44008 70OMHz 115.69 7117/202415:44 42.3975081 76.44008 70OMHz 115.19 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975081 76.44008 700MHz 115 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975081 76.44008 70OMHz 114.81 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975081 76.44008 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415: 44 42.3975078 76.44007 700MHz 127.38 7117/202415:44 42.3975054 76.44008 70OMHz 116 7117/202415:44 42.3975011 76.44008 70OMHz 117.31 7/171202415:41 42,3974965 76.45351 700MHz 113.25 7/171202415:44 42.3974945 76.44008 70OMHz 116.56 71171202415:44 42. 3974934 76.44007 70OMHz 126.69 7/171202415:44 42.3974902 76.44005 700MHz 124.19 7/171202415:44 42.397481 76.44008 70OMHZ 116.12 7/17/202415:44 42.3974727 76.44007 700MHz 126.81 7117/202415:44 42.3974703 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.81 7/17/202415:44 42.3974652 76.44008 70OMHZ 116.38 7117/202415:41 42.3974655 76.45351700MHz 116.5 7117/202415:41 42.3974485 76.45348 2300MHz 122.56 7117/202415:44 42.3974454 76.44008 70OMHZ 118 7117/202415:44 42.3974432 76.44007 700MHz 128.5 7117/202415:44 42.3974423 76.44005 700MHz 123.75 7/171202415:44 42.3974174 76.44008 700MHz 119.25 7/17/202415:44 42.3974083 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.56 7117/202415:44 42.3974056 76.44007 700MHz 127.44 71171202415:44 42.3973827 76.44008 700MHz 116.38 71171202415:41 42.3973719 76.45329 70OMHZ 114 7/17/202415:44 42.3973694 76.44005 700MHz 120.69 71171202415:44 42.3973633 76.44007 700MHz 124.62 71171202415:44 42.3973449 76.44008 700MHz 115.31 7/17/202415:43 42.3973301 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.75 7/171202415:41 42.3973263 76.45329 700MHz 116.62 71171202415:43 42.3973231 76.44007 700MHz 128.81 71171202415:41 42.3973178 76.45326 210OMHZ 113.44 7/171202415:43 42.3973056 76.44008 700MHz 117.25 71171202415:43 42.3972987 76.44005 700MHz 123.25 71171202415:43 42.3972959 76.44007 70OMHZ 128.06 7117/202415:43 42.3972805 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.44 7/171202415:43 42.3972802 76.44007 700MHz 126.75 7117/202415:43 42.39728 76.44007 700MHz 127.12 71171202415:43 42.39728 76.44007 70OMHZ 126.81 7/17/202415:43 42.39728 76.44007 70OMHZ 125.19 71171202415:43 42.3972799 76.44007 700MHz 127.75 71171202415:43 42.3972799 76.44007 70OMHZ 125.25 71171202415:43 42.3972798 76.44007 70OMHZ 129 7/171202415:43 42.3972798 76.44007 700MHz 127.62 71171202415:43 42.3972798 76.44007 70OMHZ 127 71171202415:43 42.3972798 76.44007 70OMHZ 126.94 7/17/202415:43 42.3972796 76.44007 700MHz 128.69 71171202415:43 42.3972795 76.44007 70OMHZ 126.25 71171202415:43 42.3972793 76.44007 70OMHZ 127.25 7/17/202415:43 42.397279 76.44007 700MHz 126.5 7/17/202415:43 42.3972788 76.44007 70OMHZ 127.94 71171202415:43 42.3972788 76.44007 70OMHZ 124.94 7/17/202415:43 42.3972786 76.44007 700MHz 126.44 7117/202415:43 42.3972783 76.44007 70OMHZ 128.5 7117/202415:43 42.3972782 76.44005 70OMHZ 123.88 7117/202415:43 42.3972781 76.44005 700MHz 120.12 7/17/202415:43 42.3972779 76.44007 70OMHZ 127.56 7117/202415:43 42.3972775 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.12 7117/202415:43 42.3972775 76.44005 700MHz 121 7/171202415:43 42.3972773 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.31 7/17/202415:43 42.3972772 76.44007 70OMHZ 126.88 7/17/202415:43 42.3972772 76.44005 700MHz 120.31 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44007 70OMHZ 128 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44007 70OMHZ 126.19 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 122 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.88 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.88 71171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 121.88 71171202415:43 42,3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.75 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 121.38 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 121.06 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.88 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.62 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.44 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.44 7/17/202416:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 120.44 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.44 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 70OMHZ 120.25 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 120.12 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 120.12 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 120.06 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 119.88 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 119.5 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 119 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 118.88 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 118.81 7/171202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 118.81 7117/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 118.81 7/17/202415:43 42.3972771 76.44005 700MHz 118.44 7/17/202416:43 42.3972765 76.44007 700MHz 129.56 71171202415:43 42.3972764 76.44007 700MHz 125.94 71171202415:43 42.3972748 76.44005 700MHz 122.06 7117/202415:43 42.3972743 76.44007 70OMHz 125.81 7117/202415:43 42.3972741 76.44005 700MHz 119.62 7117/202415:43 42.3972724 76.44007 700MHz 118.25 7117/202415:43 42.3972719 76.44007 700MHz 127.81 71171202415:43 42.3972708 76.44007 700MHz 128.44 7117/202415:43 42.3972704 76.44008 700MHz 126.62 7117/202415:43 42.3972701 76.44007 700MHz 126.06 7117/202415:43 42.3972694 76.44008 70OMHz 126.25 7117/202415:43 42.3972687 76.44005 700MHz 120.69 7117/202415:43 42.3972684 76.44007 700MHz 127.88 7117/202415:43 42.397268 76.44007 70OMHz 127.12 7/17/202415:43 42.3972676 76.44007 700MHz 126.56 7/17/202415:43 42.3972654 76.44007 700MHz 127.62 7/17/202415:43 42.3972611 76.44007 700MHz 126.25 7117/202415:43 42.3972574 76.44005 700MHz 120.12 7/17/202415:43 42.3972533 76.44007 700MHz 115.06 7/17/202415:43 42.3972504 76.44007 700MHz 129.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3972456 76.44007 70OMHz 114.81 7/17/202415:43 42.3972454 76.44007 700MHz 113.94 7/17/202415:43 42.3972453 76.44007 700MHz 115.25 7/171202415:43 42.3972451 76.44007 70OMHz 114.19 7/17/202415:43 42.397245 76.44007 70OMHz 114.06 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 116.56 7/171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 115.94 71171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.81 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 115.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.5 7/171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 115.44 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.38 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.38 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.38 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.31 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.25 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 115.19 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.19 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115.12 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 115 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114.94 7/171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114.75 71171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 114.69 7117/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114.62 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114.56 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 70OMHz 114.56 71171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114 7/17/202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 114 7/171202415:43 42.3972449 76.44007 700MHz 113 71171202415:43 42.3972433 76.44007 70OMHz 115.06 7/171202415:41 42.39724 76.45306 70OMHz 109.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3972372 76.44005 700MHz 120.44 7/17/202415:43 42.3972368 76.44007 70OMHz 113.56 71171202415:43 42.3972259 76.44006 700MHz 126.06 7117/202415:43 42.397224 76,44007 70OMHz 114.06 7/171202415:43 42.3972037 76.44007 700MHz 113.31 7117/202415:43 42.3972025 76.44005 700MHz 119.88 7/17/202415:41 42.3971896 76.45306 700MHz 109.88 7/17/202415:43 42.3971885 76.44006 700MHz 129.5 7117/202415:41 42.397185 76.45303 2100MHZ 111.56 7/171202415:43 42.397169 76.44007 700MHz 114.5 7/17/202415:43 42.3971501 76.44005 700MHz 121.69 7/171202415:43 42.3971361 76.44006 700MHz 130.38 71171202415:43 42.3971157 76.44007 700MHz 114.69 7/171202415:41 42.3971086 76.45282 700MHz 106.38 7117/202415:43 42.3970771 76.44005 700MHz 115.25 7/17/202415:43 42.3970618 76.44006 700MHz 124.56 7117/202415:41 42.3970594 76.45282 700MHz 109.25 7/17/202415:41 42,3970526 76.45279 2100MHz 113.56 7117/202415:43 42.3970425 76.44007 700MHz 123.62 7117/202415:43 42.3969867 76.44005 700MHz 113.69 7/17/202415:41 42.3969783 76,45257 700MHz 106.06 7/17/202415:43 42.3969703 76.44006 700MHz 124.62 7/17/202415:43 42.3969526 76.44007 700MHz 127.06 7/171202415:41 42.3969255 76.45257 700MHz 109.75 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3969207 76.45254 2100MHz 110.69 7/171202415:43 42.3968752 76.44005 700MHz 116.81 7/171202415:43 42.3968672 76.44006 700MHz 124.88 7/171202415:41 42.3968492 76.45233 700MHz 104.12 7/171202415:43 42.3968404 76.44006 700MHz 118.38 7/171202415:41 42.3967921 76.45232 700MHz 107.25 71171202415:41 42.3967879 76.45229 2100MHz 105.81 7/17/202415:43 42.3967559 76.44004 700MHz 120.81 7/171202415:43 42.3967547 76.44005 700MHz 123.62 7117/202415:43 42.3967189 76.44005 700MHz 121 71171202415:41 42.396715 76.45206 700MHz 104.44 7117/202415:41 42.39666 76.45206 70OMHz 108.31 71171202415:41 42.3966564 76.45203 2100MHz 103.25 7/171202415:43 42.3966391 76.44005 700MHz 118.56 7/17/202415:43 42.3966279 76.44003 700MHz 120.81 71171202415:43 42.3965927 76.44005 2100MHz 122.38 71171202415:41 42.3965737 76.45179 700MHz 104.56 7/171202415:41 42.3965207 76.45179 700MHz 106.38 7/171202415:41 42.3965196 76.45176 2100MHz 109.62 7117/202415:43 42.3965002 76.44007 700MHz 118.56 71171202415:43 42.3964942 76.44003 700MHz 118.25 7/171202415:43 42.3964559 76.44004 2100MHz 122.5 7/17/202415:41 42.3964495 76.45152 700MHz 107.19 7117/202415:41 42.3963889 76.45152 700MHz 110.75 7/171202415:41 42.3963879 76.45149 2100MHz 110.75 71171202415:43 42.3963645 76.44006 700MHz 119.12 7117/202415:43 42.396358 76.44002 700MHz 117.69 7/171202415:43 42.3963228 76.44003 2100MHz 119.25 7/171202415:41 42.3963166 76.45126 700MHz 107 7117/202415:41 42.3962621 76.45123 2100MHz 107.5 7/171202415:41 42.3962603 76.45125 700MHz 112.31 7/171202415:43 42.3962193 76.44002 700MHz 115 7/17/202415:43 42.3962191 76.44006 700MHz 116.06 7/17/202415:43 42.3961837 76.44003 2100MHz 117.5 7117/202415:41 42.3961793 76.45098 700MHz 107.75 7/171202415:41 42.3961268 76.45095 2100MHz 120.19 7117/202415:41 42.3961264 76.45098 700MHz 112.81 71171202415:43 42.3960691 76.44002 700MHz 116.12 71171202415:43 42.3960688 76.44005 700MHz 117.25 7/17/202415:41 42.3960443 76.45071 700MHz 113.44 71171202416:43 42.3960346 76.44003 2100MHz 121.5 7/171202415:41 42.3959921 76.45068 2300MHz 107.75 7/171202415:41 42.3959898 76.4507 700MHz 111.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3959154 76.44001 700MHz 111.75 7/171202415:43 42.3959056 76.44005 700MHz 110.12 7/171202415:41 42.3959041 76.45044 700MHz 112.88 7/171202415:43 42.3958773 76.44002 2100MHz 112.81 71171202415:41 42.3958592 76.4504 2100MHz 106.94 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3958548 76.45043 700MHz 114.81 7117/202415:41 42.3957712 76.45016 700MHz 116.44 7117/202415:43 42.3957487 76.44001 700MHz 111.81 71171202415:41 42.3957265 76.45013 2100MHz 113.44 7117/202415:41 42.395719 76.45016 70OMHz 124.19 7/171202415:43 42.3957174 76.44002 2100MHz 112.25 7/171202415:43 42.3957091 76.44003 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415:41 42.3956315 76.44988 700MHz 107.25 7117/202415:41 42,3955913 76.44986 2100MHz 116.5 7117/202415:43 42.3955874 76.44001 700MHz 113 7117/202415:41 42.3955818 76.44988 700MHz 118.56 7117/202415:43 42.3955595 76.44002 2100MHz 116.31 7/17/202415:43 42.3955595 76.44002 2100MHz 111 71171202415:43 42.395554 76.44004 700MHz 113.88 7/171202415:41 42.3954993 76.44961 700MHz 112.25 7/171202415:41 42.3954551 76.44958 2100MHz 114.81 71171202415:41 42.395445 76.4496170OMHz 113.94 7117/202415:43 42.3954297 76.44 700MHz 108.75 71171202415:43 42.3953938 76.44003 700MHz 111.06 7117/202415:41 42.3953699 76.44935 700MHz 107.06 7/171202415:41 42.3953242 76.44932 2100MHz 119.44 7/17/202415:41 42.3953148 76.44934 700MHz 117.94 7/17/202415:43 42.3952751 76.44 700MHz 109.56 7/17/202415:43 42.3952494 76.44001 2100MHz 112.19 7/17/202415:41 42.3952423 76,44908 700MHz 111.81 7/171202415:43 42.3952372 76.44005 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415:41 42.3951989 76.44906 2100MHz 113.44 7/17/202415:41 42.395188 76.44908 70OMHz 112.94 7117/202415:43 42.3951197 76.44 700MHz 109.38 7/171202415:41 42.3951194 76.44882 700MHz 106.12 7117/202415:43 42.3950979 76.44001 2100MHz 112 7117/202415:43 42.3950864 76.44003 700MHz 109.25 7117/202415:41 42.3950747 76.44882 2100MHZ 116.31 7117/202415:41 42.395061 76.44883 700MHz 119.12 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3949889 76.44859 700MHz 108.69 7117/202415:41 42.3949517 76.44858 2100MHZ 109.12 7117/202415:43 42.3949463 76.44 700MHz 110.5 7/17/2024 15:43 42.3949441 76.44002 2100MHz 110.75 7/17/202415:41 42.3949372 76.4486 700MHz 118.19 7/17/2024 15:43 42.3949281 76.44003 700MHz 107.81 7/17/2024 15:41 42.3948715 76.44837 700MHz 105.19 7117/202415:41 42.394833 76.44835 2100MHZ 113.69 7/17/202415:41 42.3948198 76.44837 700MHz 117.75 7/17/2024 15:43 42.3947763 76.44003 2100MHz 109.81 7/17/2024 15:43 42.3947579 76.44005 700MHz 108.75 7/17/202415:42 42.3947575 76.44814 700MHz 101.19 7/17/2024 15:43 42.3947233 76.44002 700MHz 111.31 7117/202415:42 42.3947193 76.44812 2100MHz 113.12 7117/202415:42 42.3947063 76.44814 700MHz 107.62 7/17/202415:42 42.3946471 76.44792 700MHz 103.94 7117/202415:42 42.3946128 76.4479 2100MHz 111.62 7117/202415:43 42.3946073 76.44005 2100MHz 111.12 7/17/202415:42 42.3945968 76.44792 700MHz 106.69 7/17/202415:43 42.3945939 76.44007 700MHz 106.31 7/17/202415:43 42.3945534 76.44005 700MHz 110.31 7/17/202415:42 42.3945375 76.44769 700MHz 110.44 7/171202415:42 42.3945025 76.44768 2100MHz 108.69 7/17/202415:42 42.3944894 76.4477 700MHz 103.75 7/17/202415:43 42.3944374 76.44009 2100MHz 109.06 7/171202415:42 42.3944325 76.44748 700MHz 115.31 7117/202415:43 42.3944287 76.44011 700MHz 103.56 7117/202415:43 42.3944048 76.44008 700MHz 108.56 7/17/202415:42 42.394397 76.44747 210OMHz 102.19 7117/202415:42 42.3943839 76.44748 700MHz 109.06 7/17/202415:42 42.3943306 76.44727 700MHz 110.69 71171202415:42 42.3942946 76.44726 210OMHz 102.69 7/17/202415:42 42.3942804 76.44727 700MHz 110.89 7/171202415:42 42.3942771 76.44013 2100MHz 107.25 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3942694 76.44015 700MHz 103 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3942573 76.44012 700MHz 105.44 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3942279 76.44706 700MHz 109 7/17/202415:42 42.3941954 76.44705 2100MHz 106.31 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3941801 76.44706 700MHz 112.38 7/171202415:42 42.3941298 76.44686 700MHz 109.44 7/171202415:42 42.3941158 76.44021 700MHz 95.56 7/17/202415:42 42.3941147 76.44017 700MHz 102.94 7/17/202415:42 42.3941138 76.44019 2100MHz 104.56 7/17/202415:42 42.3941007 76.44685 2100MHz 106.69 7/17/202415:42 42,3940848 76.44686 700MHz 114.12 7/17/202415:42 42.3940394 76.44667 70OMHz 112.62 7/17/202415:42 42.3940075 76.44665 2100MHz 99.56 7/17/202415:42 42.3939903 76.44667 700MHz 114.25 7/17/202416:42 42.3939662 76.44024 700MHz 100.81 7/171202415:42 42.3939563 76.44027 700MHz 94.75 7117/202415:42 42.3939514 76.44026 2100MHz 100.56 7/171202415:42 42.3939477 76.44648 700MHz 111.56 7/171202415:42 42.3939154 76.44646 2100MHz 107.12 7117/202415:42 42.3938989 76.44647 700MHz 113.19 7/171202415:42 42.3938577 76.4463 700MHz 109.69 7/171202416:42 42.3938272 76.44628 2100MHz 103.12 7/17/202415:42 42.3938247 76.44033 700MHz 101.31 7117/202415:42 42.393B301 76.44629 700MHz 111.38 7/171202415:42 42.3938043 76.44036 700MHz 98.75 7/17/202415:42 42.3937985 76.44034 2100MHz 102.44 7117/202415:42 42.3937709 76.44612 700MHz 112.25 7117/202415:42 42.3937374 76.44612100MHz 103 7/17/202415:42 42.3937214 76.44611 700MHz 114.38 7/17/202415:42 42.3936841 76.44594 700MHz 109.25 7117/202415:42 42.3936819 76.44043 700MHz 98.75 7/171202416:42 42.3936612 76.44045 700MHz 98.06 7/171202415:42 42.3936537 76.44044 2300MHz 101.81 7/17/202415:42 42,3936505 76.44592 2100MHz 102.88 7/17/202416:42 42.3936355 76.44594 700MHz 107.69 7/171202415:42 42.3935984 76.44576 700MHz 112.81 7/17/202415:42 42,3935669 76.44575 2100MHz 102.94 7/17/202416:42 42.3935509 76.44576 700MHz 108.75 7/171202415:42 42.3935461 76.44054 700MHz 203.06 7/17/202415:42 42.3935226 76.44056 700MHz 97.75 7/171202415:42 42.393513 76.44055 2100MHz 103 7/17/202415:42 42.393512 76.44559 70OMHz 109.81 7117/202415:42 42.3934799 76.44557 2100MHz 102 7/171202415:42 42.393464 76.44559 70OMHz 106.56 7/171202415:42 42.3934285 76.44541 700MHz 106.12 71171202415:42 42.3934187 76.44066 700MHz 99.81 7/171202415:42 42.393396 76.4454 210OMHz 104.31 7/171202415:42 42.3933891 76.44068 700MHz 95.44 7/171202415:42 42.3933819 76.44541 700MHz 106 71171202415:42 42.3933796 76.44067 2100MHz 101.25 71171202415:42 42.3933471 76.44525 700MHz 107.94 7/17/202415:42 42.3933124 76.44522 2100MHz 107.44 7/17/202415:42 42,3933034 76.44078 700MHz 100.5 7/17/202415:42 42.3932992 76.44524 700MHz 105 7/17/202415:42 42.3932656 76.44508 700MHz 105.06 7117/202415:42 42.3932585 76.44081 700MHz 97.75 7117/202415:42 42.3932506 76.4408 2100MHz 102.81 7/17/2024 15:42 42.393231 76.44087 700MHz 101.12 7/17/202416:42 42.3932291 76.44505 2100MHz 99.12 7/17/202415:42 42.3932197 76.44507 700MHz 102.56 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3931801 76.4449 700MHz 104.56 71171202415:42 42.3931477 76.44488 2100MHz 103.19 7117/202415:42 42.3931352 76.4449 700MHz 102.81 7/171202415:42 42.3931349 76.44093 700MHz 98.38 71171202415:42 42.3931266 76.44092 2100MHz 104.06 7117/202415:42 42.3930969 76.44473 700MHz 106 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3930927 76.44099 700MHz 106.25 71171202415:42 42.3930625 76,444712100MHz 110.75 71171202415:42 42.3930493 76.44473 700MHz 103.25 7117/202415:42 42.3930144 76.44457 70OMHZ 106.31 71171202415:42 42.3930131 76.44104 700MHz 104.38 7/17/202415:42 42.3930041 76.44104 2300MHz 104.25 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3929801 76.44454 2100MHz 103.88 7/17/202415:42 42.3929682 76.44456 700MHz 104.62 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3929617 76.44111 700MHz 107 7117/202415:42 42.392934 76.44441 70OMHz 107.31 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3929016 76.44438 2100MHz 108.12 7/17/202415: 42 42.3928906 76.44116 700MHz 108.06 7/17/202415: 42 42.3928902 76.4444 700MHz 106.56 7117/202415:42 42.3928834 76.44115 2300MHz 107.88 7117/202416:42 42.3928581 76.44425 700MHz 106.62 7/171202415:42 42.3928395 76.44122 700MHz 109.56 7/171202415:42 42,3928265 76.44423 2100MHz 101.38 7/17/202415: 42 42.3928143 76.44424 70OMHZ 106.62 7/171202415:42 42.3927833 76.44409 700MHz 107.69 7/17/202415: 42 42.3927758 76.44127 700MHz 106.44 7/171202415:42 42.3927729 76.44126 2100MHz 108.12 7/17/202415: 42 42.3927523 76.44407 2100MHz 111.31 71171202415:42 42. 3927423 76.44409 700MHz 109.19 71171202415:42 42. 3927271 76.44133 700MHz 108.81 7/17/202415: 42 42.3927113 76.44393 700MHz 109.56 7117/202415:42 42.3926808 76.44392 2100MHz 111.12 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3926723 76.44393 700MHz 107.12 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3926644 76.44137 2100MHz 110.56 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3926636 76.44137 700MHz 108.62 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3926404 76.44377 700MHz 113.69 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3926137 76.44376 2100MHz 104.94 7/171202415:42 42.3926107 76.44378 700MHz 109.31 7/171202415:42 42.3926082 76.44144 700MHz 113.88 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3925763 76.4436 700MHz 112 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3925632 76.44147 210OMHZ 109.44 7/17/202415: 42 42.392662 76.44146 700MHz 109.62 7117/202415:42 42.3925519 76,4436 2100MHz 115.06 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3925479 76.44362 70OMHZ 111.56 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3925098 76.44342 700MHz 111.88 7/17/202415: 42 42.3925039 76.44154 700MHz 112.69 7117/202415:42 42.3924883 76.44344 70OMHZ 109.62 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3924872 76.44342 2100MHz 108.5 7/17/202415: 42 42.3924698 76.44156 2300MHz 109.75 7117/202415:42 42.3924673 76.44155 70OMHZ 111.94 7117/202415:42 42.3924453 76.44325 700MHz 113.5 7/17/202415: 42 42.3924298 76.44327 700MHz 109.5 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3924238 76.44325 2100MHz 108.25 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3924035 76.44163 700MHz 110.62 7/171202415:42 42.3923861 76.44308 700MHz 112.88 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3923858 76.44164 2100MHz 110.81 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3923847 76.44164 700MHz 111.44 7/171202415:42 42.3923701 76.44311 700MHz 107.56 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3923635 76.44308 2100MHz 109.06 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3923364 76.44292 700MHz 114.19 7117/202415:42 42.3923122 76.4417 700MHz 115.25 7/17/2024 15:42 42.3923116 76.44172 70OMHZ 112.56 71171202415:42 42. 3923103 76.44171 2100MHz 115.25 7/17/202415: 42 42.39231 76.44295 70OMHZ 111.12 71171202415:42 42. 3923081 76.44292 210OMHz 111 7117/202415:42 42.392288 76.44277 70OMHz 107.38 7/171202415:42 42.3922559 76.44277 2100MHz 108.56 7/171202415:42 42.3922555 76.44279 70OMHz 108.31 7/17/202415: 42 42.3922417 76.44178 700MHz 112 7/171202415:42 42.3922416 76,44178 2100MHz 109.69 7/171202415:42 42.3922406 76.44178 700MHz 109.75 7/17/202415: 42 42.392235 76.44263 700MHz 110.62 71171202415:42 42. 3922034 76.44262 2100MHz 111.88 7/171202415:42 42.3922021 76.44265 700MHz 113.62 7117/202415:42 42.3921823 76.44248 700MHz 108.88 7117/202415:42 42.39218 76.44194 2100MHz 111.56 7/171202415:42 42.3921766 76.44184 700MHz 112.19 7/17/202415:42 42.392176 76.44184 700MHz 109.12 71171202415:42 42.3921532 76.44248 2100MHz 110.88 7117/202415:42 42.3921488 76.4425 700MHz 111 7117/202415:42 42.3921364 76.44236 700MHz 111 7117/202415:42 42.3921275 76.44188 2300MHz 108.12 7/171202416:42 42.3921267 76,44189 700MHz 110 7117/202415:42 42.3921249 76.44188 700MHz 107.75 7117/202415:42 42.3921078 76.44235 2100MHZ 105.62 7/17/202415:42 42.3921001 76.44237 700MHz 110.5 71171202415:42 42.3920913 76A4224 700MHz 107.5 7/171202415:42 42.392082 76.44192 210OMHZ 108.19 7/17/202415:42 42.3920812 76.44193 700MHz 107.88 7/17/202415:42 42.3920767 76.44192 700MHz 108.5 7/17/202415:42 42.3920643 76.44224 2100MHz 106.88 7/171202415:42 42.3920628 76.44226 700MHz 112.31 7/171202415:42 42.3920522 76.44214 700MHz 113.38 7/17/202415:42 42.3920488 76.44196 700MHZ 111.06 71171202415:42 42.3920424 76.44195 2100MHZ 109.81 71171202415:42 42.3920353 76.44196 700MHz 109.31 71171202415:42 42.3920296 76.44206 700MHz 111.44 7117/202415:42 42.3920281 76.442 700MHz 111.5 7117/202415:42 42.3920274 76.44214 2100MHz 102.56 7/17/202415:42 42.3920266 76.44216 700MHz 112 7117/202415:42 42,3920158 76.442 2100MHz 110.94 7117/202415:42 42.3920107 76.44201 700MHz 110.75 7117/202415:42 42.3920095 76.44206 2300MHz 111.44 7/17/202415:42 42.3920071 76.44207 700MHz 214.69 Exhibit BB StartTime Latitude [degrees] Longitude [degrees] Final Disposition 7/ 16/20245:31 42.398331 76.440863 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202413:56 42.411173 76.471891 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/20249:35 42.411732 76.467786 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202411:26 42.403504 76.436102 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202413:46 42.404642 76.462818 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/202417:28 42.411905 76.473778 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/202421:34 42.405614 76.465181 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202417:10 42.396367 76.441106 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202410:45 42.419653 76.456925 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202420:11 42.407252 76.467876 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202411:28 42.403504 76.436102 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202416:49 42.413663 76.475745 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/202417:45 42.403417 76.46757 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/20247:23 42.422422 76.459396 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202410:24 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202418:29 42.41755 76.458291 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202419:04 42.413217 76.469241 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202415:02 42.413689 76.469708 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202410:31 42.401587 76.468729 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202415:07 42.410661 76.466708 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/20249:25 42.416638 76.47261 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202410:30 42.409309 76.439857 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202410:35 42.407545 76.463573 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202420:02 42.410827 76.472574 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202410:33 42.411586 76.473418 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202410:29 42.410687 76.471757 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202414:57 42.411193 76.472987 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/202417:29 42.394322 76.446882 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/20249:54 42.400308 76.450493 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/20248:23 42.395747 76.440414 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/20247:15 42.397245 76.453161 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/20249:28 42.417271 76.473257 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/20247:45 42.41309 76.46872 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/20249:54 42.401447 76.468127 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/20247:43 42.402758 76.436201 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202415:06 42.406979 76.431665 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202416:22 42.411533 76.474092 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 19/202421:17 42.409722 76.471739 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/20248:36 42.402485 76.463573 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 17/202412:06 42.396866 76.451077 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202414:05 42.415087 76.477353 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 16/202417:12 42.393597 76.446532 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/ 18/202419:48 42.420745 76.457087 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:24 42.400575 76.438887 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20248:55 42.414069 76.470086 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:19 42.414189 76.476338 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202413:44 42.411732 76.467786 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17120247:47 42.404103 76.464471 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202412:47 42.414195 76.450637 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202412:27 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202419:10 42.415234 76.471209 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202411:58 42.397219 76.453117 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:21 42.408171 76.43718 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202412:09 42.40901 76.465037 DROPPED CONNECTION 7119/202417:02 42.422382 76.461552 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:24 42.39923 76.455955 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202413:45 42.422116 76.4621 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202410:57 42.415586 76.47155 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:40 42.399989 76.468621 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202419:32 42.416791 76.472772 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202413:19 42.409815 76.470499 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202410:58 42.407252 76.467876 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202413:27 42.410527 76.472233 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202414:52 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202413:20 42.400275 76.45097 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202415:37 42.397019 76.452739 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:33 42.407605 76.467912 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20249:56 42.40905 76.434674 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202419:40 42.400575 76.438887 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202413:25 42.39921 76.446954 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202413:18 42.394795 76.451374 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20248:37 42.404742 76.457662 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:21 42.415433 76.477748 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202410:08 42.405887 76.466726 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/20248:40 42.4154 76.47137 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:46 42.415267 76.471236 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20248:31 42.40644 76.431045 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202417:04 42.401646 76.45998 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:08 42.411413 76.47323 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:04 42.413843 76.469861 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202410:45 42.416365 76.472331 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:30 42.408976 76.458363 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202414:06 42.417437 76.473427 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202418:09 42.403378 76.469789 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202416:19 42.406673 76.466394 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202420:36 42.417031 76.473023 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20248:35 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202417:01 42.400175 76.434521 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202418:26 42.397026 76.450808 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:22 42.409249 76.458237 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202417:20 42.400315 76.466519 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202418:06 42.409749 76.43745 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20247:11 42.409629 76.436013 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:12 42.392944 76.443693 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202418:37 42.405475 76.460662 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202411:10 42.402559 76.436659 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202410:27 42.398198 76.454554 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:44 42.402359 76.459566 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202410:49 42.407578 76.463609 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202416:04 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202411:43 42.42155 76.460402 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:45 42.396633 76.451284 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:27 42.415001 76.474793 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202421:26 42.397592 76.453673 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20247:52 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20248:08 42.408544 76.437306 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202415:59 42.411173 76.471891 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202416:08 42.407545 76.469897 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202414:34 42.397625 76.448742 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202415:24 42.422116 76.4621 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20247:59 42.412797 76.474775 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202411:20 42.406706 76.431287 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:14 42.412152 76.474056 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202419:52 42.394496 76.440073 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:11 42.396913 76.452533 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202418:05 42.417783 76.449856 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20248:39 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:50 42.415746 76.446577 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20245:07 42.407658 76.458605 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:13 42.417257 76.459369 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202414:17 42.393124 76.440926 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:14 42.41516 76.477443 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202413:03 42.420772 76.459225 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202412:14 42.416092 76.450556 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:49 42.402126 76.469403 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20248:48 42.414868 76.477685 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:42 42.410414 76.466456 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:28 42.412837 76.474829 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202412:02 42.399736 76.459342 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20248:04 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202415:03 42.420718 76.459144 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202411:42 42.407252 76.450925 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202416:46 42.409249 76.458237 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202415:31 42.402226 76.469744 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:08 42.412964 76.47402 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:10 42.407252 76.450925 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:10 42.416751 76.450637 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:12 42.409815 76.455722 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:11 42.399962 76.459315 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:12 42.408976 76.458363 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:11 42.416032 76.449272 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:12 42.404975 76.461336 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202421:46 42.415713 76.471667 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:05 42.409063 76.47181 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20244:39 42.407658 76.458605 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202419:40 42.395448 76.440055 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202413:38 42.415713 76.471667 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:07 42.401986 76.460689 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202413:27 42.41755 76.473535 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202411:41 42.396573 76.452335 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202416:55 42.413403 76.46943 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202420:29 42.399596 76.459351 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202411:46 42.402199 76.460483 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:49 42.398637 76.444879 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:51 42.408091 76.469457 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202411:15 42.3964 76.452542 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202414:03 42.414828 76.478099 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202414:05 42.398364 76.448472 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202418:55 42.409343 76.469951 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202421:13 42.39377 76.448373 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202412:38 42.396813 76.459171 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:55 42.410022 76.47358 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20249:46 42.408384 76.470723 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202415:48 42.415893 76.477847 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:13 42.409249 76.458237 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:14 42.414362 76.476832 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202419:55 42.39652 76.438052 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202414:20 42.398477 76.448328 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202414:40 42.411053 76.472826 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202413:05 42.406347 76.466421 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202415:11 42.406706 76.431287 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202415:30 42.417324 76.45344 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202410:30 42.397106 76.45291 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202418:12 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:04 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:47 42.413763 76.476131 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202418:59 42.406946 76.432608 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:13 42.405042 76.465648 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:38 42.416818 76.472799 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:10 42.397612 76.43983 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:50 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/20249:12 42.399103 76.446595 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202412:17 42.41552 76.478422 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202410:39 42.400049 76.454275 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202412:25 42.421171 76.460779 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202415:32 42.400721 76.450736 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202417:37 42.411599 76.473436 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/20248:30 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202416:22 42.408424 76.464462 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202416:21 42.418129 76.453269 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:13 42.421557 76.461309 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202421:03 42.398817 76.445526 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/20249:17 42.412844 76.445391 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202411:46 42.414149 76.470158 DROPPED CONNECTION 7118/202416:38 42.401753 76.460195 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:41 42.410401 76.472296 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:16 42.411439 76.473257 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202415:07 42.412245 76.468136 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:06 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202417:41 42.398923 76.44593 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202417:45 42.402119 76.460959 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202417:45 42.403397 76.463573 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:44 42.410022 76.47358 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:10 42.40142 76.468532 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:04 42.421817 76.4636 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202412:13 42.411393 76.467112 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202423:46 42.403444 76.466645 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202411:22 42.403504 76.436102 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202410:07 42.398504 76.459279 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202412:02 42.400128 76.459279 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:30 42.413776 76.469798 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202416:36 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202411:07 42.408331 76.433003 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202416:28 42.39917 76.439884 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/18/202411:09 42.41546 76.477775 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/16/202414:06 42.414947 76.47552 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/202414:28 42.411406 76.473221 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/19/202414:52 42.42155 76.460402 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/17/20249:46 42.409249 76.458237 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/20249:10 42.406114 76.43789 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202412:23 42.409183 76.465217 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/20248:32 42.411732 76.467786 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202414:40 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202421:03 42.397026 76.450808 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202414:08 42.416652 76.452811 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202420:02 42.409296 76.452173 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202421:25 42.414395 76.446756 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202417:41 42.408144 76.464184 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202419:30 42.410328 76.472008 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202417:45 42.399989 76.468621 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202414:19 42.402352 76.470229 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:05 42.399596 76.459351 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:51 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202421:26 42.396107 76.440073 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20248:48 42.399596 76.459351 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202421:02 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202421:21 42.404569 76.460986 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202412:52 42.416412 76.472385 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:34 42.4109 76.441286 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:57 42.400515 76.466492 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202419:56 42.421497 76.459207 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202414:23 42.396899 76.459441 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:53 42.398191 76.459252 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:05 42.401726 76.460141 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:05 42.399336 76.459333 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202413:41 42.416751 76.455533 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202410:37 42.40636 76.467328 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:19 42.39393 76.44028 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202412:55 42.402872 76.46254 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202413:36 42.412638 76.468675 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202411:50 42.406327 76.467283 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202411:41 42.407538 76.46881 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202417:32 42.399323 76.436722 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/20249:59 42.403704 76.46537 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/231202418:31 42.402026 76.433416 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202420:34 42.402199 76.460483 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202411:34 42.411992 76.453341 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202412:04 42.420905 76.459423 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:58 42.404789 76.463142 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20248:13 42.408584 76.470032 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202411:14 42.406393 76.430407 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202411:48 42.395281 76.449281 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202419:59 42.416725 76.450583 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/211202420:33 42.412391 76.468433 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/231202411:47 42.402918 76.45883 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/20249:40 42.416691 76.454581 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202411:56 42.403417 76.467615 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202415:41 42.413756 76.46978 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202411:51 42.417783 76.449856 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202413:14 42.410148 76.443055 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202420:52 42.401433 76.468011 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:18 42.402479 76.461713 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202421:06 42.40168 76.460052 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202414:21 42.42197 76.461345 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:38 42.408504 76.469942 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/231202418:06 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202421:19 42.399989 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202420:31 42.420951 76.459495 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202420:45 42.414322 76.470328 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202418:30 42.414568 76.47614 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202420:07 42.395361 76.439633 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202420:51 42.400881 76.457635 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202418:23 42.394902 76.448526 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202411:00 42.411819 76.453566 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202411:51 42.416518 76.451518 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:44 42.408264 76.450619 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:23 42.40427 76.462243 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202413:28 42.413363 76.444385 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202410:36 42.402006 76.460734 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202410:17 42.401999 76.460716 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202420:32 42.41104 76.472817 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20249:10 42.411253 76.467301 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202410:22 42.403504 76.436102 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202411:50 42.401101 76.467139 DROPPED CONNECTION 7122/202411:26 42.400987 76.466852 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202416:10 42.407605 76.433425 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/20249:15 42.396213 76.451158 DROPPED CONNECTION 7121/202411:15 42.402445 76.454841 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/20248:49 42.405927 76.428934 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202416:52 42.396879 76.459162 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/20249:11 42.404769 76.46245 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202413:05 42.409436 76.456252 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202410:20 42.400069 76.466762 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202414:05 42.401533 76.461704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20248:04 42.410454 76.466492 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202420:40 42.416938 76.472915 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202412:44 42.407751 76.463789 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202416:23 42.397026 76.450808 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202411:17 42.417264 76.473257 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202416:23 42.414242 76.446173 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202416:20 42.420745 76.460177 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:48 42.411939 76.443567 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:40 42.396866 76.451077 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:40 42.41761 76.452281 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:40 42.399349 76.447511 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:12 42.411679 76.473526 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202412:34 42.40377 76.457464 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202414:59 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20249:07 42.417204 76.451518 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20249:08 42.403138 76.456243 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202415:05 42.396866 76.451077 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202412:45 42.409023 76.434602 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202413:14 42.409755 76.471694 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202413:41 42.407479 76.468738 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202415:10 42.400927 76.468657 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202410:56 42.403417 76.467436 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202415:14 42.408644 76.468532 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202413:12 42.421617 76.460492 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202411:55 42.407439 76.433623 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:39 42.410294 76.470948 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202415:48 42.407532 76.468208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20241:32 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20248:51 42.407532 76.467831 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20244:29 42.419833 76.457213 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202412:31 42.413536 76.469556 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/20247:16 42.398757 76.455317 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202415:27 42.396999 76.451212 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202412:53 42.422389 76.461552 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202411:11 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202415:56 42.403903 76.457716 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202417:32 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202417:29 42.405927 76.428934 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202412:06 42.408504 76.469942 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/20246:43 42.393577 76.445831 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202413:10 42.399596 76.459351 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:49 42.403491 76.463699 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202413:39 42.408524 76.464552 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202410:08 42.408976 76.458363 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202412:30 42.401107 76.467157 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202418:24 42.419414 76.456485 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202416:31 42.403557 76.457051 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/202419:41 42.403105 76.434459 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20248:33 42.400175 76.434521 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202415:09 42.409063 76.47181 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202411:04 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202418:00 42.403437 76.46678 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202416:07 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202411:12 42.394089 76.440208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20249:01 42.403564 76.457069 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202411:36 42.403411 76.467759 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202419:13 42.412624 76.460617 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:21 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202411:37 42.411373 76.467427 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/20247:55 42.412039 76.47393 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202415:26 42.397359 76.453332 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:22 42.398457 76.444223 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202412:12 42.403211 76.463258 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/20249:49 42.393923 76.448688 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202420:25 42.400022 76.466888 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/20246:54 42.418256 76.455075 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202415:14 42.408171 76.43718 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/22/20247:56 42.400887 76.439058 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202419:12 42.42181 76.464319 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202415:27 42.408211 76.469601 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202416:14 42.401886 76.438294 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/20/202411:54 42.406147 76.461929 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/21/202423:40 42.398504 76.459279 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/23/202417:22 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20246:22 42.41122 76.474002 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:24 42.397192 76.459171 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202410:20 42.400368 76.452299 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202415:52 42.39933 76.440298 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20247:28 42.414595 76.478099 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20248:01 42.409502 76.472062 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20249:12 42.410361 76.441016 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:16 42.413377 76.445472 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20247:51 42.413996 76.470005 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202415:38 42.407339 76.432509 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:07 42.421817 76.4636 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202411:04 42.396793 76.453673 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202416:22 42.412272 76.468316 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202410:13 42.405927 76.428934 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202410:15 42.409982 76.436749 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:27 42.410148 76.443055 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202410:32 42.415001 76.474793 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202413:16 42.417324 76.473311 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:16 42.41098 76.441897 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202417:54 42.41351 76.446289 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202410:02 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202411:44 42.402931 76.462666 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202421:05 42.407339 76.432509 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:32 42.414888 76.475035 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202418:06 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20248:51 42.412325 76.474254 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20244:44 42.408371 76.46978 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20249:31 42.408604 76.464633 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202421:11 42.421111 76.456341 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202410:30 42.412258 76.443819 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:34 42.403923 76.464615 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20249:25 42.402026 76.453952 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202411:27 42.411373 76.467418 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:30 42.408264 76.45194 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202418:16 42.39345 76.44558 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:33 42.393856 76.447358 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:26 42.41536 76.471325 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202410:59 42.400295 76.450475 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:52 42.399989 76.46704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202412:54 42.403537 76.465998 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:10 42.408384 76.470723 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202417:57 42.415247 76.447906 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202412:05 42.408524 76.457294 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:18 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202422:08 42.409123 76.434836 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:41 42.402925 76.465028 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:24 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:27 42.414488 76.477317 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:30 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202412:05 42.408504 76.469942 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202413:03 42.39371 76.446101 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202414:50 42.408191 76.469574 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202418:16 42.401027 76.466951 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202420:57 42.421457 76.460258 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202415:10 42.399989 76.468621 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202415:13 42.395734 76.451059 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202410:59 42.407106 76.46828 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:31 42.413603 76.469619 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202415:40 42.400315 76.466519 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:51 42.403557 76.457051 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202415:42 42.394695 76.448122 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:31 42.414195 76.450637 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202412:46 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202411:46 42.400049 76.454275 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:23 42.413716 76.469735 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202413:42 42.406799 76.466609 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202411:12 42.398431 76.444106 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202420:30 42.40118 76.467346 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202414:00 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202420:10 42.412245 76.474164 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202418:35 42.411306 76.467355 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202411:10 42.405788 76.47022 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20246:55 42.411566 76.4734 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202411:45 42.398018 76.454302 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202412:45 42.401374 76.459423 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:53 42.400728 76.458129 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:51 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:58 42.40138 76.467858 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202419:38 42.396899 76.459441 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202413:01 42.403391 76.462459 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202419:46 42.403045 76.46687 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:50 42.406247 76.462064 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202415:34 42.409715 76.471757 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202410:11 42.399636 76.452173 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:36 42.401533 76.461704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20247:38 42.409249 76.458237 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20246:25 42.394449 76.4515 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202412:32 42.39933 76.440298 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202419:47 42.403704 76.465361 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202414:49 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:57 42.39373 76.448697 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20248:12 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:04 42.396473 76.449263 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20249:12 42.410993 76.467031 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202414:19 42.403923 76.464247 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202416:31 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:05 42.402905 76.455802 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202416:50 42.413969 76.469987 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202422:24 42.421683 76.460582 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202413:26 42.414222 76.446137 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202416:26 42.40415 76.462396 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:07 42.402093 76.469286 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:23 42.416219 76.451419 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:30 42.400175 76.434521 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:24 42.400515 76.466492 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/241202412:59 42.40911 76.465145 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20249:53 42.403417 76.467552 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202419:47 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20249:35 42.397678 76.448751 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:16 42.397971 76.459234 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202410:16 42.411826 76.473688 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202410:51 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:02 42.417983 76.454976 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:10 42.400581 76.468648 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20248:43 42.409076 76.465109 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202411:49 42.407039 76.46819 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202419:50 42.406979 76.431665 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:38 42.41319 76.469214 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:45 42.400881 76.457635 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202416:06 42.408011 76.469367 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:49 42.41526 76.471236 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202414:51 42.399283 76.447511 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202410:47 42.399596 76.459351 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202419:25 42,402266 76.469879 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:05 42.397931 76.454194 DROPPED CONNECTION 7126/202412:03 42.403484 76.466304 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:44 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:48 42.396367 76.441106 DROPPED CONNECTION 7124/202421:13 42.41102 76.442579 DROPPED CONNECTION 7125/202415:40 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:15 42.414668 76.446909 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/20249:40 42.408743 76.464777 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20246:23 42.399296 76.447304 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20248:44 42.410148 76.443055 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202414:51 42.405062 76.463636 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:51 42.411087 76.46713 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20248:05 42.394163 76.447044 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20249:02 42.417577 76.473562 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202419:41 42.394922 76.451338 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:21 42.407252 76.450925 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20248:19 42.408271 76.46431 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202412:25 42.402898 76.455785 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202412:47 42.402885 76.466555 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202411:29 42.410394 76.471298 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/261202413:02 42.40911 76.465145 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202413:13 42.408557 76.464588 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202413:03 42.403417 76.467499 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202413:20 42.410734 76.472466 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20248:45 42.406826 76.467346 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202420:21 42.408031 76.469187 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/20248:05 42.400495 76.45167 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:09 42.400155 76.466663 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:20 42.409915 76.439408 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202418:14 42.403777 76.465118 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:44 42.420173 76.456315 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202413:23 42.410474 76.46651 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202419:43 42.394895 76.451347 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202412:00 42.406893 76.468002 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:08 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202414:08 42.404443 76.457671 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:33 42.401553 76.455731 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/20249:40 42.407725 76.463762 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202410:18 42.403664 76.463923 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:27 42.398018 76.45512 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202414:59 42.402299 76.454527 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202411:23 42.397965 76.45423 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:10 42.415893 76.450817 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:23 42.41773 76.452515 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202418:28 42.402179 76.461085 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:00 42.400881 76.457635 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/20248:30 42.400401 76.457572 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:06 42.400135 76.45953 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202414:10 42.408544 76.437306 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/202415:36 42.407259 76.45927 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202416:05 42.398943 76.455569 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:24 42.405568 76.466313 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202412:01 42.398604 76.448149 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:30 42.398331 76.440863 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/24/202417:29 42.413377 76.469403 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:23 42.403397 76.463573 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/27/202421:22 42.400022 76.466888 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20247:36 42.397612 76.43983 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:46 42.414009 76.47809 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202415:56 42.411566 76.467615 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202419:00 42.411053 76.454141 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202417:22 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/26/20248:29 42.406846 76.46669 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/25/202422:27 42.412331 76.444394 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20249:26 42.402585 76.461929 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20249:20 42.414342 76.470355 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202411:37 42.414229 76.470238 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20249:19 42.417224 76.459468 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20249:49 42.415334 76.448059 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202420:23 42.421111 76.456341 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:35 42.394695 76.45211 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202411:45 42.410947 76.466995 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202422:36 42.39606 76.450835 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202417:04 42.401673 76.449649 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20247:13 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20249:25 42.402259 76.461255 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20249:34 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20249:21 42.414109 76.470122 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202420:07 42.415114 76.474946 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20247:13 42.400967 76.468666 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202422:35 42.398158 76.4545 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202410:36 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202417:57 42.40365 76.463905 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202413:40 42.403211 76.456386 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202417:47 42.415067 76.475206 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202417:30 42.405927 76.428934 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:51 42.403504 76.436102 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202411:54 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202419:48 42.414195 76.450637 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202410:06 42.408504 76.469942 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202416:44 42.402332 76.47014 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202411:39 42.419833 76.457213 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202413:10 42.408211 76.469601 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202416:04 42.403384 76.469116 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202411:38 42.42153 76.460375 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202416:20 42.399989 76.46775 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202419:59 42.397372 76.459189 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202418:08 42.397146 76.452245 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202416:13 42.402772 76.461597 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202414:15 42.417117 76.450907 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20247:12 42.410208 76.471038 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:38 42.397026 76.450808 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:35 42.399869 76.439579 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202417:00 42.401533 76.461704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:16 42.410687 76.472412 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:59 42.403391 76.468891 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:05 42.399323 76.436722 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202412:33 42.393483 76.444627 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:44 42.409036 76.470544 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202416:59 42.421011 76.459584 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:09 42.39646 76.451661 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20248:42 42.407885 76.469493 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202411:34 42.392771 76.44416 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202417:47 42.410115 76.471766 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:14 42.403424 76.467256 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:49 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202413:06 42.401533 76.461704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202418:16 42.403171 76.459477 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202414:30 42.417783 76.449856 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202422:42 42.407332 76.467525 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:22 42.399622 76.448616 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:25 42.406706 76.431287 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20246:32 42.398504 76.459279 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:47 42.396087 76.455982 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:05 42.405927 76.428934 DROPPED CONNECTION 7129/20248:39 42.410334 76.471218 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:28 42.403431 76.466879 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202410:46 42.413183 76.469214 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:13 42.394316 76.451544 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202417:21 42.399583 76.456719 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202417:58 42.41321 76.475242 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20248:11 42.400481 76.468639 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202414:44 42.406886 76.469529 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202413:16 42.412445 76.468487 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202411:22 42.410767 76.47199 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202420:01 42.401959 76.43736 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202420:02 42.403637 76.465585 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:09 42.402119 76.460959 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20248:18 42.397612 76.459207 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20248:41 42.396866 76.451077 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20248:42 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202413:06 42.410022 76.47358 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:18 42.408317 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:35 42.408351 76.469762 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202416:48 42.402652 76.467445 DROPPEUCONNECTION 7/31/20248:57 42.408644 76.468532 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202419:52 42.393131 76.444915 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:29 42.398278 76.443469 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202411:59 42.416691 76.454581 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:17 42.407984 76.469331 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:59 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/291202414:15 42.397219 76.453117 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202417:56 42.397232 76.453593 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:24 42.406393 76.466474 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:04 42.396573 76.438213 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202414:43 42.395068 76.451284 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:12 42.414675 76.476006 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:22 42.397026 76.450808 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202411:33 42.411399 76.473212 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202414:41 42.393843 76.444268 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:32 42.400461 76.457141 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202412:34 42.406999 76.468136 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202411:50 42.42181 76.464319 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20248:17 42.400987 76.466852 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/20248:20 42.412398 76.442373 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:55 42.409675 76.465711 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:30 42.400994 76.438986 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202418:45 42.408011 76.467454 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202418:28 42.409489 76.47208 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202417:54 42.39859 76.444735 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/291202415:36 42.39397 76.44664 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:09 42.404769 76.46245 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202423:42 42.415194 76.475431 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:14 42.401533 76.461704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:11 42.4109 76.466942 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202421:27 42.396999 76.451212 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:07 42.398018 76.45512 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202412:01 42.403351 76.470876 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202411:21 42.402552 76.461866 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20249:00 42.413476 76.469502 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20249:19 42.39885 76.445634 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/20249:00 42.403531 76.466025 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202415:56 42.407305 76.46333 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202411:23 42.421384 76.457967 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:10 42.409083 76.439651 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:16 42.401453 76.468154 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/301202412:09 42.402525 76.432931 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202415:13 42.399955 76.454689 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202411:35 42.395747 76.440414 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202410:40 42.402346 76.46254 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:56 42.406899 76.462908 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202411:06 42.416998 76.460276 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202413:51 42.394695 76.45211 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202414:53 42.398644 76.455165 DROPPED CONNECTION 7130/202412:48 42.407219 76.467328 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:22 42.396879 76.450916 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202420:32 42.405415 76.466115 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202417:42 42.415101 76.475107 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202410:59 42.407931 76.468298 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/311202410:37 42.407865 76.43506 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202414: 18 42.414388 76.4704 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:40 42.404749 76.463052 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:09 42.400561 76.468648 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202410:03 42.397039 76.452775 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202411:51 42.408644 76.468532 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:10 42.401194 76.438806 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:12 42.406493 76.431674 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:15 42.402559 76.436363 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:11 42.403218 76.435698 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:15 42.403997 76.433273 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202413:20 42.407459 76.451535 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202417:12 42.403724 76.462989 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202412:14 42.404403 76.431665 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:13 42.411905 76.467957 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202418:38 42.415141 76.471119 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202421:31 42.418668 76.453611 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202413:10 42.411453 76.442516 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202417:39 42.397179 76.453036 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:38 42.415001 76.474793 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202415:32 42.400135 76.45953 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202410:42 42.414408 76.470409 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:55 42.403484 76.466304 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:41 42.397099 76.448724 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:51 42.412358 76.444448 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202416:58 42.414002 76.470023 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:22 42.407265 76.45927 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202417:13 42.411493 76.47332 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202414:06 42.403943 76.469717 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:11 42.39933 76.440298 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202415:29 42.394922 76.448571 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202418:52 42.397598 76.441016 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202412:30 42.398144 76.442957 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202413:30 42.406194 76.433201 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:47 42.413037 76.469071 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202417:07 42.403358 76.470688 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/20247:02 42.420745 76.460177 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20249:20 42.397505 76.453548 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/31/202415:09 42.39861 76.459288 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202421:46 42.411872 76.473742 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20248:52 42.39919 76.45591 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202414:36 42.406041 76.466924 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202414:53 42.412811 76.468846 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/28/202411:46 42.410874 76.466915 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/20247:12 42.397572 76.453647 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/30/202417:06 42.403391 76.468837 DROPPED CONNECTION 7/29/202416:03 42.39632-76.449371 DROPPED CONNECTION Start Time Latitude (degrees] Longitude (degrees] Finat Disposition 7/16/20240:00 42.420725 76.459153 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20240:00 42.421457 76.458066 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120240:02 42.39329 76.444322 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20241:27 42.4036" 76.433354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202411:50 42.410255 76.443046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202419:36 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240:38 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202418:46 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20242:19 42.396633 76.452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202417:34 42.402172 76.435761 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:41 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:46 42,416146 76.472107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202411:30 42.400728 76.439139 FAILEDATTEMPT 711812024 13:28 42.420785 76,45715 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:52 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20247:55 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202410:29 42.416092 76.450556 FAILED ATTEM PT 7117/202423:50 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20241:50 42.394016 76.440235 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120241:40 42.414961 76.470948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202410:58 42.396293 76.46132 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20241:44 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202423:06 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20240:00 42.407339 76.432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202414:20 42.415101 76.475107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202411:40 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120244:14 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120241:41 42.415127 76.47111 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202421:08 42.400335 76.466639 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202417: 41 42.416485 76.452425 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:58 42,398444 76.444151 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202422: 55 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202415: 46 42.400848 76.468657 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202415:48 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202419:51 42.394735 76.448194 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20242: 32 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120242:27 42. 410361 76.441016 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202421:11 42.393683 76.445544 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20240:13 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202423:56 42,410454 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244: 15 42.396846 76.438968 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:29 42.401187 76.467355 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202415:48 42. 414262 76.470274 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202413:09 42.407958 76.469304 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202412: 44 42.414482 76.477856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202415:21 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20244:04 42.406074 76.459656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202422:54 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245: 05 42.422282 76.461408 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202417:49 42. 39367 76.446029 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20247: 44 42.408038 76.4357D7 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202413:21 42.396753 76.45918 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20240:08 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20245:41 42.408537 76. 4690" FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202414:56 42.413716 76. 447511 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202421:23 42.404117 76.431314 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202413:04 42.400135 76. 45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202411:29 42.394136 76.4477 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:41 42.414388 76.4704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202423:57 42.399849 76.457096 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 17/202422:05 42.402359 76.459566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20246:53 42.395361 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202421:26 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 18/202414:30 42.411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202412:00 42,418395 76.454462 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422:60 42.400049 76.454276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202423:30 42.396865 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18/202418:07 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120242: 13 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20248:29 42.412658 76.474622 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/ 202417:39 42.407545 76.469897 FAILEDATTEMPT W21/ 20248:27 42.392704 76.443999 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202417: 58 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:42 42.412631 76.468666 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202414:06 42.398504 76.459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20241:59 42.406034 76.431386 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202410:19 42.419168 76.456099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202417:26 42.401733 76.433129 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20241:44 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202420:36 42.406973 76.466906 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20242:43 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423: 22 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20249: 34 42.391559 76.44089 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202417:28 42.420745 76.460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245: D3 42.422169 76.459045 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202417:36 42.410022 76.47358 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202419:25 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20249: 13 42.420359 76.454644 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202416: 53 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20249:25 42.407239 76.451302 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202410:16 42.409063 76.437728 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202419: 55 42.405368 76.465603 FAILEDATTEMPT 71181202413:47 42. 400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202423: 26 42.395747 76.440414 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202412: 19 42.413317 76.475359 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202422:04 42.392778 76.444187 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202416: 44 42.412791 76.473859 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20241: 00 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20242: 28 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20243: 18 42.406393 76.466474 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120243:19 42.406826 76.467346 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120243:29 42.408936 76.456818 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20247: 30 42.401886 76.438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202411: 47 42.420439 76.458138 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120244:21 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 11 42.410907 76.441295 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202413: 04 42.400688 76.458866 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241: 29 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20240: 47 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202410: 59 42.392152 76.442552 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202416:58 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120248:34 42.394229 76.440145 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:23 42.416998 76.460276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120242:16 42.391845 76.441672 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202411: 07 42.404156 76.466241 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202414: 14 42.392644 76.444726 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202413:12 42. 410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422: 45 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202421:15 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202423:31 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419: 45 42.407532 76.468208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202417:59 42.421497 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202420: 22 42.402492 76.454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120244:52 42.406826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202411: 33 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202416: 49 42.413936 76.476051 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202415: 35 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120241:14 42.405861 76.429922 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202411: 00 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202421: 28 42.408976 76.458363 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20242: 02 42.394229 76.440145 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202417:48 42.39644 76.437872 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20242: 15 42.422522 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244: 23 42.411559 76.440226 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202410: 23 42.393317 76.441277 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202421:49 42. 417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202422:31 42.392258 76.442849 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202416:20 42.397025 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202413:45 42.399955 76.454689 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202411: 13 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20246: 25 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202414:26 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202423:25 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 71181202416:27 42. 41082 76.454302 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202420:11 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202420:42 42. 39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20244: 55 42.414102 76.476248 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202418:15 42.406926 76.4690" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202416:55 42.409063 76.47181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20247:24 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202418:53 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202421:54 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120242:54 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118120249:56 42.40911 76.465145 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20245:20 42.409735 76.45203 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20247:29 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202411:02 42.412791 76.473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202415:46 42.402272 76.45715 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202420:59 42.398231 76.443343 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20247: 41 42.394822 76.448616 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20241: 40 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202422: 48 42.413989 76.446954 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202411: 13 42.392598 76.445553 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120249:39 42.420232 76.458102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422: 26 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202410: 27 42.403997 76.433354 FAILED ATTEMPT 71181202419:58 42. 414388 76.4704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202420: 11 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20242:52 42.396706 76.453197 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202416:34 42.418668 76.455767 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202419: 46 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20249: 08 42.396879 76.450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20247: 07 42.40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:23 42.396624 76.444825 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202411:02 42.420232 76.458102 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202413:55 42. 400022 76.439507 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202413:18 42.399636 76.456512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20242: 15 42.394229 76.440145 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202416:31 42. 39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20243: 25 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202415:31 42.412005 76.443711 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202412:15 42. 407716 76.463753 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20240: 40 42.397712 76.453862 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20247: 19 42.411852 76.440971 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202410:40 42. 411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20248: 34 42.395421 76.440055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202414: 58 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202415:00 42. 420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202421:04 42.402419 76.463276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202421:51 42.414695 76.446954 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20247:54 42.398018 76.454302 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20243:16 42.402552 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20243: 19 42.406826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20247: 28 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20248: 09 42.421371 76.461049 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20248:43 42.391752 76.44142 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120249:13 42.395954 76.449658 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120247:11 42.402492 76.457743 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202413:50 42.410454 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202413:07 42.421544 76.460393 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120248:36 42.394522 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120247:32 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202422:25 42. 400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202420:10 42.409063 76.47181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20249: 06 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20242: 16 42.393723 76.440396 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202414: 16 42.414249 76.470256 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202422:46 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202419:46 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202416:29 42.417963 76.457678 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202419: 17 42.398497 76.444367 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202420:49 42. 399409 76.439803 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20247: 21 42.411972 76.441025 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202416:43 42. 407252 76.450925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20240: 55 42.414395 76.446756 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20243: 24 42.418176 76.457725 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202412:11 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202422:21 42.40895 76.469861 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120241:16 42.396853 76.439624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202420:15 42.409702 76.455901 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202411: 00 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202415:31 42.407126 J6.432967 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20248:34 42.39315 76.44496 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20240:39 42.400195 76.450655 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20242:59 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202421:54 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20247:19 42.412405 76.4424 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202411:51 42.399449 76.459342 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20247:53 42.399915 76.459324 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/20243:20 42.40644 76.466564 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20246:21 42.410294 76.470948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202411:04 42.406074 76.459656 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202416:48 42.399622 76.448616 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20247:43 42.420592 76.458947 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202413:43 42. 404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202411:33 42. 415413 76.477721 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202421:42 42.397026 76. 450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202411:14 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:19 42.39901 76.446253 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202423:25 42.408644 76. 468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202411:00 42.39652 76.438052 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20244:22 42.411819 76. 440699 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202420:11 42.397026 76. 450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20244:50 42.394695 76. 45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202417:00 42.407865 76.43506 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202422:30 42.40377 76.432563 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202411:38 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20242:53 42.396879 76. 450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120247:14 42.391885 76.44107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20242:01 42.392445 76. 445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202416:34 42.417983 76. 454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20242:08 42.39377 76. 448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202412:34 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202413:48 42.40614 76. 470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:23 42.39875 76.445283 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202411:05 42.3964 76. 452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20247:17 42.411393 76.442382 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:44 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20242:15 42.39347 76. 440585 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202412:27 42.393597 76. 446532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202419:44 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202417:54 42.403164 76. 456297 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202413:16 42.405734 76.46042 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202413:17 42.408517 76. 464552 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202413:27 42.40911 76.465145 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202414:39 42.40614 76. 470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202414:56 42.408644 76. 468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20241:D0 42.396706 76. 453197 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120242:31 42.396879 76,450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202418:05 42.403371 76.469924 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20243:48 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120244:36 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202417:39 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202412:35 42. 412518 76.450359 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202414:00 42. 400575 76.438887 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202414: 23 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 20/202411:21 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 19/202413:51 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 21/202420:43 42.416811 76.453108 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 17/202413:46 42.41114 76.439157 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18/20247:29 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 181202414:20 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 18120247:36 42.40407 76.432518 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 20/202411:25 42.404742 76.457662 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20242:02 42.39355 76.440522 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/ 202413:35 42.405934 76.467247 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 16/202414:57 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20241:09 42.394229 76.440145 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120241:31 42.399955 76.458399 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202420: 41 42.407658 76.456605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202417: 52 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/ 202417:57 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202422: 00 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202412: 15 42.408377 76.436857 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202422: 40 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20243:45 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20246:51 42.412564 76.446191 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202417:38 42412485 76.47517 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202420:32 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202421:22 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202413:50 42.402226 76.454365 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202415:39 42.420199 76.4583 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/2D2420:11 42.398018 76.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202423:48 42. 407339 76.432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202423:48 42.407439 76.433165 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202423:48 42. 407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20241:49 42. 421171 76.460779 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20248:48 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202410:54 42. 406001 76.46687 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202411:50 42.405947 76.459737 FAILEDATEMPT 7121/202412:34 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202414:39 42.421504 76.459665 FAILEDATEMPT 7/211202415:42 42. 400009 76.459306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202416:12 42,40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202416:12 42. 402066 76.46086 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202416:13 42. 402951 76.458911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202416:13 42.402499 76.457761 FAILEDATEMPT 7/211202418:28 42. 402246 76.457087 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:21 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.397665 76.45379 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.397718 76.459216 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.401845 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202423:36 42. 421497 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.398244 76.454617 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202416:15 42.402525 76.461121 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202411:52 42.406693 76.459539 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202410:51 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202410:54 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATEMPT 7/211202411:52 42. 40869 76.450682 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202412:46 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATEMPT 7121/202414:45 42. 417257 76,459369 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202415:56 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202436:11 42.403597 76.460537 FAILEDATEMPT 7121/202416:13 42. 400282 76,439911 FAILEDATEMPT 7/211202416:14 42. 402359 76.459566 FAILEDATEMPT 7121/202416:13 42. 402845 76.462486 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202418:29 42.40395 76.434288 FAILEDATEMPT 7/211202423:22 42. 396899 76.459441 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.400588 76.451958 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:24 42.399503 76.459342 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:23 42.397279 76.453206 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:36 42.421497 76.459207 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423:29 42.397292 76,452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202417:53 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATEMPT 7/21/202423;41 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATEMPT 7/19/202421:23 42.415114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202414:39 42. 40895 76.469861 FAILEDATEMPT 7/17/202422:49 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20247:43 42.42339 J6.444439 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202420:31 42.419314 76.457626 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202421:25 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20246:49 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATEMPT 7/181202411:19 42. 409489 76.47208 FAILEDATEMPT 7/18/20247:34 42.398144 76. 442957 FAILEDATEMPT 7/191202421:23 42.415114 76.474945 FAILEDATEMPT 7117/202420:27 42.40118 76.467337 FAILEDATEMPT 7/171202423:17 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATEMPT 7118/202412:08 42.400501 76.466501 FAILEDATEMPT 7/18/202420:31 42.420745 76. 460177 FAI LED ATTEM PT 7/18/202420:35 42.396999 76. 451212 FAILEDATEMPT 7/18/202420:32 42.394322 76. 446882 FAILEDATEMPT 7/191202417:29 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATEMPT 7120/202411:21 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATEMPT 7/18/202412:42 42.401533 76. 461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202414:20 42.41753 76. 453817 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202420:46 42.400774 76.466582 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202422:01 42.396706 76.453197 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202417:56 42.397026 76. 450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202410:56 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATEMPT 71191202423:14 42.416568 76.453557 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202411:25 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202413:46 42.400328 76.439696 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202415:16 42.400961 76.468666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120243:16 42.394163 76.4470" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202417:57 42.394582 76.451455 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422:01 42.398018 76.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202412:32 42.40423 76.464633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202423:18 42.401733 76.433129 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202415:57 42, 408172 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202411:22 42.421171 76.460779 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202413:46 42.401886 76. 438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202415:16 42.401427 76.468684 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202420:44 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202422:03 42.394562 76.451455 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120248:19 42.406913 76.462917 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20248:25 42.41552 76. 478422 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202423:16 42.412564 76. 446191 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202418:37 42.401061 76. 460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240:40 42.402492 76. 454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202415:18 42.402332 76.470149 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202413:58 42.397785 76. 459225 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202413:28 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20241:04 42.396633 76. 452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120244:36 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202413:11 42,406027 76.468262 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:34 42.395361 76. 439633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202420:18 42.402931 76.465962 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202410:41 42,398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202413:39 42.397026 76. 450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202414:28 42.413164 76.475913 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202417:06 42.409249 76.438366 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120241:08 42.397219 76.453117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20248:32 42.421371 76.461049 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202410:34 42.402419 76. 463276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120244:36 42.412398 76.442382 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:34 42.396853 76. 439624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:36 42.412624 76. 442894 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202416:52 42.404097 76.464471 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202423:07 42.4147" 76.449352 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20241:03 42.397645 76. 459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120243:16 42.394522 76.447772 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202411:36 42.414195 76.450637 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120244:22 42.412272 76.442049 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20248:34 42.39592 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 16/202413:17 42.39634 76.451419 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202417:31 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202415:29 42.400575 76.438887 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 161202421:08 42.400461 76.457141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 17120241:00 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 17/20248:30 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202410:31 42A09249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119120244:35 42.412145 76. 441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244:38 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20243:26 42.394243 76.447206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244:34 42.396853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120244:36 42. 395361 76.439633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202415:23 42. 430847 76.472592 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20241:08 42.398018 76.454302 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202411:09 42. 396939 76.452587 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:21 42. 4013 76.454239 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20241:03 42. 398397 76.45927 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202410:35 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202421:59 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20243:15 42.396446 76.449272 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120244:36 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202410:12 42.406194 76.433201 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120243:16 42.394516 76.447745 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20245:56 42.411912 76.442454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:34 42.396853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20244: 36 42.395853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20249:10 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20241:08 42. 399629 76.456647 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202418:10 42.412092 76.473984 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20242:45 42.416811 76.453108 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202418:20 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20241:27 42.406347 76.466421 FAILED ATTEMPT' 7/16120242:42 42.408377 76.464417 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202416:41 42.402985 76.435554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120240:39 42.398211 76.454572 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202422:01 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120240:13 42.422149 76.459018 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202421:21 42.407865 76.43506 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202414: 50 42.414115 76.450395 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202423:53 42.398018 46.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202411:45 42.400362 76.451248 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202416:18 42.410907 76.43992 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202417:24 42.396953 76, 460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20244:16 42.394922 76.448571 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120241:59 42.420432 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202419:54 42.406034 76.466906 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20247:37 42.399682 76.448787 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20248:03 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202418:19 42.402359 76.459566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20249:10 42.431972 76.441025 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20249:24 42.412118 76.443963 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20246:52 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/ 202413:14 42.412145 76.441369 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244: 15 42.39614 76.437109 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20248: 38 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202416:12 42.400315 76.466519 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202418: 03 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202415: 50 42.399336 76.447466 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/ 202413:40 42,409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/ 20245:06 42.401753 76.437252 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/ 20241:16 42.40186 76.461345 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/ 202417:49 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 20244:36 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202410:06 42.406979 76.433665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202410:27 42.407605 76.433425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202412:15 42.402292 76.436668 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/ 20242:21 42.407199 76.467301 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244: 15 42,3963 76.437522 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202421: 29 42.401087 76.467103 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202412:57 42.409489 76.47208 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 202415:54 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202419:36 42.392485 76.443469 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20242:19 42. 394815 76.451374 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202410: 24 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202422:26 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:44 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20246:42 42.417031 76. 473023 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:41 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18/20241:50 42.393956 76.440262 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/ 202417:36 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 21120248:29 42.392638 76.443837 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/ 202418:15 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/ 202419:38 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/ 202420:07 42.393836 76.447044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/ 202412:00 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 17/202423:55 42.396633 76.452003 FAILEDATFEMPT 71171202414:08 42. 397612 76.43983 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202420:30 42. 411952 76.453395 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20241:43 42. 415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20241:42 42.410807 76.472547 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202422:23 42. 430255 76.443046 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121120240:14 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202414:15 42. 406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20245:44 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20241: 41 42.412152 76.474056 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202419:02 42. 399163 76.446774 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202413:07 42.40614 76.470535 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202416:32 42. 406447 76.468235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120245:03 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120120241:40 42.413949 76. 469969 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202421:00 42.396793 76. 453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:42 42.413916 76.469933 FAILEDATFEMPT 7/17/202421:27 42.416086 76.451562 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20246:54 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419:57 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:41 42.410834 76.471918 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202412:44 42.413922 76.477802 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202417:24 42.413716 76.447511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202420:23 42.400109 76.44999 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202417:48 42.409036 76.434638 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20249:06 42. 408018 76.464058 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202414:22 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202418:21 42.42181 75.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202420:57 42. 405115 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202422:54 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249:25 42.408184 76,451913 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:31 42. 394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20247:52 42. 415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202410:16 42.397525 76.453575 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20242:31 42.422555 76.461785 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202419:36 42.408357 76.469771 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116120249:38 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202421:19 42.393856 76.447358 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20249:58 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120247:54 42. 396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202412:10 42. 413716 76.447511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20248:36 42. 39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202419:11 42.393697 76.445113 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20248:34 42.397891 76.442058 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202411:13 42. 394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120242:08 42. 393104 76.444652 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202413:49 42. 398517 76.44063 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20247:58 42. 398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202411:31 42. 412145 76.474847 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202411:36 42. 404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202418:54 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202423:45 42. 403118 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202417:54 42. 403384 76,469304 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202413:08 42.394789 76.448634 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202420:11 42. 395999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202421:31 42. 400049 76,454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20240:52 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202410:17 42.416245 76.451464 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202411:52 42.393697 76.446083 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202420:11 42. 396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 71191202421:54 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120249:11 42. 4082" 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202410:49 42.40407 76.464983 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202413:10 42. 415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202411:13 42.394163 76.447044 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202420:47 42. 421171 76.460779 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202423:06 42.413716 76.447511 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20242:44 42. 411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202410:29 42.412564 76.446191 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202416:34 42.398158 76.459252 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20241:44 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202420:10 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202416:32 42.409868 76.470571 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20247:42 42.420845 76.457222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202417:01 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419:" 42. 406393 76.466474 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202416:27 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202410:41 42. 412651 76.450152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249:10 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118120242:16 42.392711 76.441331 FAILEDATTEMPT 71191202416:59 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202414:38 42. 416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202413:19 42.415527 76.471487 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202416:21 42. 402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202421:46 42. 416086 76.451562 FAILED ATTEMPT 71181202422:10 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202417:59 42. 400122 76.459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202422:17 42. 402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/20248:11 42. 419414 76.456485 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202420:12 42. 407252 76.467876 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120247:26 42. 419367 76.455255 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202416:43 42. 40564 76.462594 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202410:27 42.408663 76.433767 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20243:10 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202413:01 42.415194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:13 42.41982 76.454985 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202420:10 42.409868 76.465909 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202420:02 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202416:46 42. 409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20242:15 42.394635 76.440064 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202412:13 42.394868 76.439812 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202418:48 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20248:34 42.396853 76.439624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202419:45 42. 406393 76.466474 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20242:01 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20247:54 42. 397359 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202411:33 42.410514 76.452048 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120242:14 42. 394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202417:48 42. 403923 76.461255 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419:46 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120243:24 42. 397026 46.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202421:03 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202411:14 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120249:53 42, 416019 76.451419 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202422:33 42.391939 76.441932 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202416:49 42.399503 76.455785 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118120242:15 42.39351 76.440558 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202417:55 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202410:56 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202413:49 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202423:26 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419:44 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120120242:05 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20248:35 42.395414 76.440055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:27 42. 410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:50 42.410255 76.443046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20240:00 42.416392 76.449927 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20240:03 42. 393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20240:19 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202410:26 42. 407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202412:15 42.40401 76. 433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:39 42.403098 76.45618 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202418:47 42.4036" 76. 433354 FAI LED ATTEMPT 7/17/202417:02 42,401473 76. 452802 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:53 42.396953 76. 460034 FAI LED ATTEMPT 7/17/20247:55 42.403404 76. 46828 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202410:58 42.396213 76. 451158 FAI LED ATTEMPT 7/19/20240:12 42.397612 76. 43983 FAI LED ATTEMPT 7120/20243:16 42.412145 76.443169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202419:38 42.391679 76.441223 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117120242:19 42.396633 76.452003 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202417:35 42.4D2985 76.435554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202412:24 42.408098 76.43427 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244:16 42.394163 76.447044 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202411:44 42.405721 76.46651 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120241:42 42.408737 76,433937 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:59 42.398111 76. 440109 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202423:54 42.410148 76. 443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20241:50 42.392651 76A42166 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20243:39 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202417:23 42.401267 76. 46757 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202414:15 42.408264 76. 450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:40 42.414734 76.470723 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202419:51 42.392638 76.445526 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116120242:32 42.408497 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202418:16 42.391885 76. 44107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:25 42.412458 76.474398 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202421:01 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:22 42.415114 76. 474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202417:11 42.406098 76.43427 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20244:15 42.396566 76. 438195 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202413:13 42.394509 76.441034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202412:53 42.392252 76. 4409" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202414:20 42.420432 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202410:29 42.415993 76.450152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202421:08 42.401121 76.467184 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120245:30 42.407925 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202415:23 42.400135 75.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202412:59 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120244:09 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202413:09 42.4083" 76.469753 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202422:54 42.392252 76.440944 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:42 42.413809 76.469825 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:05 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202417:49 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116120240:12 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20241:10 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20241:16 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120242:54 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202419:59 42.410294 76.470948 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202422:28 42.392678 76.441358 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20243:30 42.39389 76A46487 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20243:30 42.393916 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202413:52 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202413:37 42.402359 76.459566 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202417:44 42.42181 76.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 71181202420:51 42,393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:50 42.412232 76.441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202410:07 42.421277 76.459998 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120249:23 42.40889 76.434306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202411:04 42.408411 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202417:22 42.40614 76.470535 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202421:53 42.393776 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20246:14 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20241:24 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:35 42.414734 76.470732 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20240:29 42.409083 76.439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240:19 42.39628 76.451284 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20240:24 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202414:19 42.403371 76.464849 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:20 42.412232 76.441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20248:07 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202420:33 42.395008 76.448742 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202414:29 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20241:59 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 71181202417:31 42.418316 76.454105 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20249:10 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202417:13 42.410361 76.441016 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202421:52 42.406034 76.431386 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202422:17 42.398351 76.45927 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202419:43 42.41976 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202411:55 42.413763 76.476131 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20246:47 42.39658 76.439724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202423:40 42.412085 76.444681 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120242:51 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20244:51 42.412791 76.473859 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20241:13 42.414395 76.446756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202410:02 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202410:55 42.408444 76.437037 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202430:46 42.403404 76.468226 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/16/202421:55 42.392884 76.444403 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/171202417:40 42.408517 76.451589 FAILED ATTEM PT 7118120242:26 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202411:32 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:34 42.412298 76.468343 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20247:57 42.402465 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202411:54 42.407831 76.43445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202410:33 42,399676 76.459342 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20246:25 42.396866 76.439031 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20247:40 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20244:14 42.42181 76.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120247:02 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202417:23 42.406886 76.469529 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422:11 42.414515 76.447044 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20246:42 42.421817 76.4636 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202417:27 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202411:47 42.391945 76.442445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20241:33 42.411173 76.47296 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202415:55 42.393836 76.446361 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202421:24 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202411:59 42.398251 76.44337 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244:51 42.412957 76.443558 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:37 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202413:12 42.392644 76.444726 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202410:53 42.398018 76.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202421:53 42.392598 76.445553 FAILEDATTEMPT 71181202420:16 42.397092 76.452874 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202416:38 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20241:28 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202420:36 42.398058 76.442678 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20240:17 42.413383 76.448885 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20245:06 42.399955 76.458399 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202410:24 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202410:37 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202413:11 42.421198 76.459872 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202413:50 42.40164 76,459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202416:06 42.39891 76.445885 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202412:54 42.400362 76.450601 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423:42 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202414:05 42.412258 76.443819 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202412:20 42.40417 76.430659 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202423:49 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202414:18 42.397339 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202414:54 42.407911 76.432006 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202416:00 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120248:51 42.409489 76.47208 FAILEDATTEMPT 71191202411:18 42.41566 76.478 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202419:51 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202412:38 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202413:39 42.414395 76.446756 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423:41 42.399336 76.447466 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202414:30 42.412505 76.442642 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202419:59 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202426:54 42.413377 76.469403 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/203411:19 42.403404 76.468351 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20247:37 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120248:55 42.412791 76.473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202420:30 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202420:30 42.41351 76.446289 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202420:35 42.405D09 76.465603 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20245:44 42.396879 76.450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202414:30 42.40861 76.433659 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20246:25 42.413257 76.469601 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202422:33 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202418:51 42.399622 76.448616 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202419:33 42.405788 76.47022 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20245:44 42.397126 76.452928 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202412:01 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202422:36 42.393683 76.4455" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202411:17 42.409489 76.47208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20248:10 42.421817 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202419:31 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202419:35 42.409083 76,439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20245:43 42.411173 76.471891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20245:45 42.400828 76.45273 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20249:17 42.406886 76.469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202422:37 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202422:34 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20249:41 42.410255 76.443046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20245:44 42.395674 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202418:54 42.410028 76.455344 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202420:34 42.404716 76.431907 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202414:42 42.399136 76.459315 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202419:31 42.391885 76.44107 FAILED ATTEMPT 71171202419:35 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20245:44 42.400754 76.452497 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120245:45 42.397499 76.453539 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20247:48 42.4086" 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202422:33 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202422:36 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20249:41 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202416:37 42.421184 76.456884 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202418:64 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202416:54 42.401959 76.456306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/2024 19:31 42.392638 76.443226 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20246:43 42.411173 76.471891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20245:45 42.396893 76.452506 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20245:45 42.400961 76.453143 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20246:31 42.409775 76.47199 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20249:04 42,404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202422:33 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202420:35 42.42181 76.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202420:36 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/2024 15:36 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202423:49 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120249:41 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/2024 13:58 42.413456 76.469475 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20249:41 42.394769 76.440046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2024 12:50 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/2024 12:41 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/2024 13:28 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202423:49 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20249:41 42.394835 76.440046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2024 14:04 42.412232 76.44195 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2024 17:03 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:30 42.40135 76.467804 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:32 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202422:35 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:31 42.402652 75.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 71211202421:33 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202416:03 42.408277 76.456641 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/2024 18:46 42.40624 76.462055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/2024 15:36 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20249:41 42.392911 76.444466 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/2024 10:04 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/2024 14:00 42.417943 76.452919 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/2024 18:46 42.407112 76.463124 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202420:33 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202420:35 42.392252 76.440944 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202422:39 42.406194 76.433201 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202421:31 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:50 42.401307 76.467669 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202421:50 42.40126 76.467552 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202421:53 42.400342 76.468639 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:53 42.400601 76.468648 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202421:53 42.402152 76.469493 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202420:34 42.418395 76.454482 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:30 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202420:35 42.416219 76.472188 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202421:32 42.40114 76.467247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2024 16:01 42.394529 76.448652 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2024 19:29 42.392005 76.441097 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/2024 12:47 42.400515 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202422:35 42.393164 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/2024 18:51 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20246:47 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202421:53 42.392891 76.444412 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/2024 19:47 42.404523 76.470795 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20248:48 42.40172 76.460132 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/2024 15:24 42.405614 76.465181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/2024 17:44 42.402279 76.469924 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202423:10 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/2024 0:22 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20249:01 42.400395 76.450673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/2024 11:24 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202423:42 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202420:15 42.395488 76.440064 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202423:39 42.414794 76.470786 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/2024 13:21 42.41301 76.4515" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20245:02 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/2024 1:54 42.393164 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/2024 13:37 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/2024 16:57 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/2024 18:06 42.403511 76.466151 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20248:14 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/2024 0:25 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/2024 13:59 42.400328 76.439696 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/2024 17:41 42.416086 76.451562 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202424:38 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20240:33 42.411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117120244:04 42.407532 76.468208 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119120243:01 42.395367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20245:21 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120241:34 42.41343 76.469448 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20244:27 42.396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202414:55 42.407658 76.458605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20249:46 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 711712024 17:08 42.408171 76,43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20244:25 42.402026 76.433416 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202417:17 42.392445 76.445507 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202410:41 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202422:36 42.41122 76.474002 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120246:54 42A02652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/20241:12 42.405614 76.465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120240:22 42.402332 76.460276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:33 42.414195 76.450637 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120249:46 42.411173 76.472206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120242:29 42.407798 76.468145 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202422:28 42.392232 76.442768 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202410:50 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120246:54 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202419:44 42.402991 76.459009 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116120240:15 42.417237 76.47323 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20241:12 42.396586 76.440091 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20240:21 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120249:32 42.410361 76.441016 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:45 42.409522 76.470571 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20242:26 42.40644 76.466564 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120242:57 42.406393 76.466474 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202417:19 42.394136 76.4477 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202410:44 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20243:30 42,398664 76.444996 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202410:37 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202420:18 42.409063 76.47181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202421:53 42,392651 76.445526 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20240:22 42.401027 76.45335 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20241:59 42.396853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202419:46 42.412551 76.446352 FAILED ATTEMPT 71181202412:59 42.403144 76.463125 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202410:06 42.391885 76.44107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202416:38 42,407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120246:47 42.396853 76.439624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202410:12 42.413763 76.476131 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20241:13 42,417131 76.45229 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202419:47 42. 391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202411:06 42. 402872 76.45574 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202414:09 42. 419168 76.455099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202417:09 42.409749 76. 43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120249:04 42.395361 76.439633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202413:58 42.399756 76. 439642 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202414:36 42.41751 76.452092 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202423:40 42.394895 76.451347 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202421:55 42.39315 76. 44496 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202417:40 42.407538 76.46881 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120240:33 42.411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202423:41 42.40D335 76.450556 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202414:56 42.4086" 76. 468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202417:36 42.393843 76. 444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/20247:25 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202414:42 42.403497 76.466232 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20248:54 42.392944 76.443693 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202423:40 42.400774 76.466582 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18/202410:34 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 20120240:51 42.412098 76.468145 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/ 202417:45 42.419168 76.456099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 19120246:25 42.415527 76.449505 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/ 202411:25 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 19/202420:41 42.392638 76.443226 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 20120241:34 42.41518 76.471355 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116120243:30 42.393617 76.445921 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202413:54 42.40863 76.464669 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/ 202417:22 42.406207 76.46863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:33 42.413736 76.469753 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202412:39 42.403444 76,466672 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202421:54 42.392112 76.442436 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240:25 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:20 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120241:25 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202423:40 42.395608 76.440064 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202420:34 42.395168 76.449065 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202418:43 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20241:59 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20240:19 42.396446 76.451625 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202413:37 42.419933 76.456 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202421:22 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120244:50 42A31719 76.440639 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202413:11 42.401733 76.433129 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202412:59 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202415:55 42.409249 76. 458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202417:44 42.403923 76.469547 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202416:13 42.397612 76.43983 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:36 42.409542 76.47199 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202410:07 42.420925 76.459459 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20246:54 42.400741 76.451338 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20241:13 42.405614 76.465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202417:17 42.413496 76.448751 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:36 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:46 42.412791 76.473859 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20246:43 42.407731 76.433794 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/16/20241:26 42.405115 76.466492 FAILED ATTEM PT 7117120242:20 42.394502 76.451482 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/ 20245:41 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120246:23 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121120240: 12 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120246: 54 42.393197 76.441456 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18/202410:07 42.40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202412:04 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 211202421:29 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 17/202412:44 42.414828 76.47B647 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202422:06 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/ 202417:23 42.412085 76.444681 FAILEDATTEMPT 71191202420:21 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20245: 03 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 19/202419:53 42,414395 76.446756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202410:58 42.402525 76.461121 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120243:30 42.393783 76.446253 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202417:10 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 36/202421:49 42.393483 76.445652 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202410:53 42.416705 76.451832 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202422:15 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/ 202419:45 42.415527 76A49505 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20241:10 42. 402366 76.436552 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:51 42.411699 76.440594 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202413:16 42.400981 76.453206 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202419:40 42. 393723 76.440396 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120246:47 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20248:24 42.409063 76.47181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202414:58 42.415114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/ 202419:49 42.40136 76.459396 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202421: 55 42.392465 76.443433 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20240:17 42. 411173 76.472206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117120240:25 42.396879 76.450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202411:48 42.392445 76. 445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202419:16 42. 414142 76.447781 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202410:33 42.402465 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:22 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:33 42.409489 76.47208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20249:39 42.405248 76.429572 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202413:07 42. 409749 76.43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20247:55 42.409749 76.455847 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202417:40 42.40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202410:54 42.394023 76.446424 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/16120244:18 42.39397 76. 446244 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/16/202413:51 42.407252 76. 450925 FAILED ATTEM PT 711912024 1:53 42.39377 76. 448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202420:30 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202414:18 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202415:11 42.399955 76.454689 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202421:53 42.3933" 76.445355 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20245:02 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120241:23 42.406746 76.433354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20246:48 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202415:25 42.415101 76.475107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202422:29 42,391845 76.441681 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120244:36 42.402985 76.435554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202415:12 42.402745 76.45547 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120249:25 42.408011 76.451832 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202420:53 42.4017 76.468792 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202419:36 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202422:53 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202410:21 42.41554 76.471505 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202421:23 42.403105 76.434459 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20241:43 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202421:03 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202421:00 42.397006 76.453736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:50 42.393976 76.440253 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20241:41 42.413543 76.469565 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202410:16 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20242:13 42.394622 76.451437 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118120242:46 42.407925 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202418:11 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120248:28 42.393104 76.444861 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20248:47 42.410334 76.466376 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202412:27 42.398903 76.445858 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:42 42.415267 76.471245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202411:27 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202419:34 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202410:38 42. 414661 76.478099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202417:44 42.393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202418:07 42.394848 76.451356 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20240:23 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202414:51 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202414:16 42.405788 76.47022 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:19 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120241:35 42. 414508 76.478099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202420:00 42.405786 76.47022 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202414:53 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202416:06 42. 399955 76.454689 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202412:25 42. 403191 76.45635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120240:44 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202417:41 42.406913 76.468029 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202415:43 42. 400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202413:37 42.407219 76.468424 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120240:21 42. 407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202415:05 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202423:41 42.400981 76.439004 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120247:50 42. 410022 76.47358 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20249:56 42.411732 76.467786 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202416:55 42.399456 76.457958 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202413:47 42. 400155 76.466663 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20249:34 42. 39339 76.440666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202422:06 42, 39917 76.439884 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202410:40 42.392351 76.442094 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202420:51 42.419088 76.454859 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202412:56 42. 400501 76.45088 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/20249:21 42. 401287 76.43869 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202420:48 42.394156 76.447026 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423:42 42.399922 76.449469 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202413:58 42.405142 76A29796 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202423:27 42. 408444 76.46987 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20240:36 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20240:40 42.420432 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20241:47 42.402885 76.466555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20243:00 42.393836 76.447044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20243:00 42,393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20249:43 42. 417384 76.453548 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202419:49 42. 416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244:09 42. 394815 76.448355 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202423:07 42. 400734 76.4598 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20242:34 42.418848 76.455605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202415:12 42.409749 76,43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202413:57 42.41576 76.478108 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20248:28 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:19 42.412232 76.441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240:15 42.407951 76.432114 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120247:09 42,402925 76.465028 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20244:29 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20243: 07 42.403846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120246:29 42.412817 76.474802 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120245:15 42.396207 76.437288 FAILED ATTEMPT 712112024 22:12 42.403404 76.468047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202415: 37 42.402386 76.461526 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202422:06 42.410294 76.470948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202410:29 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202421: 38 42.403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202416: 48 42.414388 76.4704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202419:45 42.391945 76.443028 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202423:05 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120244:07 42.324642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20249:54 42.392731 76.444061 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120243:06 42.407312 76.463339 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20246:48 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20248: 25 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202412:48 42.39347 76.445625 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20245:11 42.400575 76.438887 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202419: 26 42.403331 76.456611 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202419:08 42.415373 76.449397 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20246:35 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202419: 46 42.409595 76.470247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120248:54 42. 413816 76.445301 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202417: 16 42.4154 76.450511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202413: 02 42.401733 76.433129 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20248:53 42.41102 76.442579 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20245: 15 42.40377 76.457464 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/191202422:47 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202415: 16 42.418848 76.455605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202412: 47 42.411007 76.441555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20248: 32 42.413763 76.476131 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20249:37 42,396367 76.443106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20242: 30 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202410: 22 42.399276 76.459324 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202417: 15 42.406886 76.469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20244:06 42.394309 76. 447331 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202413:30 42.404389 76.470596 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 19/202419:25 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202419: 42 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20120247:58 42.417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202413:02 42.402019 76.46916 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20245: 13 42.400455 76.459207 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21120245: 15 42.400461 76.457141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20249: 24 42.400022 76.45653 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/ 20249:41 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120240:18 42.393017 76.441025 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:16 42.400082 76.439471 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202422:13 42.403411 76.46766 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20247:07 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202423:05 42. 405348 76.429832 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20246:01 42. 408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202411:20 42.406207 76.46863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202412:52 42.407365 76.463384 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202423:00 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118120244:08 42. 396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202421:30 42. 421504 76.459665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20241:48 42.4017 76.468792 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202412:01 42.393603 76.445139 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202412:17 42.412471 76.44611 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20243:38 42.402652 76.457445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120244:26 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/ 20249:53 42.393344 76.445355 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 16/20241:47 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20242:59 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20243:06 42.407146 76.467202 FAILEDATTEMPT 71161202418:13 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202419: 49 42.415713 76,471667 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202412:34 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120242:35 42,396703 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202422:42 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202418:58 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:15 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202410:20 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120248:12 42.409655 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120244:02 42.393543 76.445768 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202415:14 42.397006 76.453736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202410:00 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20249:39 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20240:17 42.400375 76.459234 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20245:15 42.396207 76.437288 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:12 42.400987 76.466852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202415:38 42.411173 76.472206 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202416:11 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202410:37 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202412:50 42.402172 76.433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202416:49 42.415054 76.475251 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202419:47 42.391945 76.443028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202423:05 42.405568 76.42932 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120244:07 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249:57 42.398078 76.44275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120243:07 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20245:44 42.40132 76.468972 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202413:34 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202411:07 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:12 42.4D2239 76.436767 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202417:16 42.406886 76.469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:10 42.403424 76.466987 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202421:52 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20240:47 42.402925 76.465666 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120244:51 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120246:30 42.397612 76.43983 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20246:41 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202419:44 42.403298 76.465531 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202417:15 42.401347 76.452551 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202418:52 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20245:15 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202419:20 42.402226 76.436803 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202413:01 42.398238 76.459261 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202410:24 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20242:46 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20242:34 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20247:57 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16120248:43 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20249:55 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202415:00 42.391885 76.44107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20249:43 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202416:26 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20249:29 42.419314 76.454186 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20247:28 42.421164 76.459818 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202416:09 42.394555 76.440603 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20243:20 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120246:43 42.396873 76.45247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20246:47 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119120244:42 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20243:23 42.394329 76.447376 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20246:46 42.408264 76.45194 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20241:16 42.402525 76.461121 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20248:58 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20245:14 42.400882 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244:21 42.395068 76.448867 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202412:54 42.391885 76.44307 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202414:22 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20249:58 42.407605 76.433425 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20249:46 42.412764 76.4446 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202419:25 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202412:08 42.416998 76.460276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202415:04 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20249:26 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202416:43 42.419833 76,457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:49 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202414:41 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118120244:21 42.399276 76.447511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202421:12 42.422436 76.46121 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202412:54 42.415653 76.448203 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/18/20243: 23 42.393543 76.445768 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20246: 02 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120244:06 42,394349 76.447412 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20248: 40 42.391945 76.443028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/20249:55 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202412:04 42.402985 76.435554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20249: 44 42.39867 76.445005 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20243: 23 42.394342 76.447412 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20246: 00 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20249: 28 42.416265 76.449685 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202415:04 42, 405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202410: 37 42.393697 76.440414 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202416: 41 42.40614 76.470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20244:49 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120243:24 42.394282 76.447277 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120242:25 42.412145 76.441369 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120244:21 42.397099 76.448724 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202416: 56 42.397465 76.453465 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202419:43 42.401673 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202412:08 42.406746 76.433354 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202412: 48 42.407658 76.458605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202421: 15 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202412:55 42.400155 76.466663 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118120243:24 42. 398624 76.444861 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120246:07 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120244:20 42.394309 76.447331 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/202414:15 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202416:47 42.412218 76.474128 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120246:43 42.398098 76. 454419 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120246:47 42.391692 76. 441259 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202415:29 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202414:44 42.411972 76.441025 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202413:02 42.396793 76. 453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20249:39 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202415:31 42.397146 76.452245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/171202420:42 42.416652 76.452811 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120246:44 42.397479 76.453512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120248:57 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20249: 06 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202422: 03 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202422:04 42.414515 76.4470" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202417:04 42.411027 76.441591 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202422:05 42.413583 76.444834 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21120244:06 42.402172 76.433524 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202420: 47 42.396367 76.441306 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/ 20246:48 42.395241 76.451221 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/ 18120244:36 42.409063 76.47181 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/18/ 20245:28 42.401287 76,43869 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/ 18/202411:10 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEM PT 7118/ 202422:39 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120245:31 42. 415373 J6.449397 FAILEDATTEMPT 7112120245:36 42.412718 76.443073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20245:37 42. 412505 76.442642 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202420:28 42.405947 76.459737 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202421:29 42. 396943 76.446011 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202423:50 42. 407865 76.43506 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202423:50 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202423:58 42. 408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202423:58 42.407339 76. 432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20243:21 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121120245:44 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/2L20245:59 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20246: 18 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/ 20247:15 42.407731 76,433794 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/ 20247:16 42.417783 76.449856 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/ 20247:32 42.417783 76.449856 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202412: 17 42.405242 76.4659 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202412:18 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202413: 01 42.403364 76.435833 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202412:45 42.412871 76.443397 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202414:47 42. 40146 76.452784 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202415:50 42.40168 76.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202415:54 42.409083 76.439651 FAILED AT TEMPT 7/211202415:54 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202415:54 42.404569 76.460986 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202418:16 42.40911 76.465145 FAILED AT TEMPT 7/21/202418:21 42.400049 76,454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202418:23 42.42181 76.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202418:26 42.402885 76.455767 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202419:13 42.420745 76,460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202420:39 42.403837 76.434566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:01 42.399989 76.467292 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:08 42.401593 76.468738 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:07 42.401287 76.467624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202422:08 42.402259 76.469852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:07 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202422:08 42.401793 76.468873 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202422:43 42.408264 76,450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2D2422:07 42.402306 76.47005 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202422:09 42,3931" 76.443909 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202418:16 42.42197 76.461345 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/2D2421:01 42.408271 76.451949 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202412:17 42.403431 76,466888 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202421:00 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/2L202412:18 42.403943 76.432312 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202421:01 42.407186 76,451167 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/20247:15 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20247:16 42,400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20245:59 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20246:18 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/20243:23 42,400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202416:07 42.397339 76.453296 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202422:04 42.413942 76.445571 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20244:39 42.398331 76,440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20247:59 42.405741 76.46749 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20245:37 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202422:06 42.403397 76.463573 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119120245:34 42.411972 76.441025 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202422:04 42.414395 76.446756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202417:11 42.397951 76.442247 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21120249:29 42.41556 76.448454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120249:51 42.397655 76d4125 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116120249:44 42.412564 76.446191 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202413:57 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18120248:23 42.401187 76.452218 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120245:17 42.393537 76.44575 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:14 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120247:08 42.402931 76.465962 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202417:40 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/2D2411:23 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202419:49 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202423:06 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120244:08 42.397971 76.442346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202423:06 42.407219 76.468415 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20240:44 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120241:48 42.40U31 76.466951 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202412:20 42.403171 76.463178 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202416: 10 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20244:28 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 54 42.407305 76.451428 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202420:06 42.391732 76,441376 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/20241:27 42.404516 76.432114 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20246: 50 42.324642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20248: 45 42.402985 76.435554 FAILEDATTEMPT 71171202422:02 42. 412258 76.443819 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202413:01 42.400461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202414:54 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202423:55 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19120240:15 42.421417 76.458012 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:26 42.401533 76.451704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 37 42.400648 76.452146 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119120245:01 42. 413496 76.446631 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20247: 33 42.418322 76.457617 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202423: 21 42.392005 76,441097 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202417:25 42.410068 76.471047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/202414:28 42.399163 76.455865 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202417:34 42.400954 76.459701 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/161202413:43 42.4129" 76.449685 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120241:44 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/20249:32 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20249:11 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20249:24 42.408044 76.45185 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/20244:19 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/202415:09 42.404742 76.457662 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/20246:53 42.394668 76.439812 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202419:51 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 71181202410:37 42.402925 76.465666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/202413: 42 42.40614 76.470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20245: 08 42.41757 76.473553 FAILED ATTEMPT 71191202416:51 42. 412551 76.446352 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202422:02 42.400887 76.439058 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202419: 19 42.410255 76.473571 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/20241:47 42.411459 76.442525 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116/20241:47 42.403424 76.467004 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17120245:17 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20246: 02 42.40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 56 42.393983 76.446676 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202423:36 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202421:33 42.412298 76.476985 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116120241:48 42. 403421 76.46784 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202423: 33 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202412:19 42.407532 76.468208 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120244:26 42. 397292 76,452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249:54 42.408384 76. 452003 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21120244:16 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7116120241:47 42.402419 76.463276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202415: 57 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/ 202419:19 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/ 202423:00 42.400734 76.4598 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 19/202415:40 42.417131 76.45229 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/ 20244:02 42.394669 76.448058 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244: 06 42.394828 76.448382 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244: 07 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/ 202412:31 42.413629 76.450799 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 21/202422:12 42.403384 76.469385 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118120244: 09 42.394163 76.447044 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20246: 37 42.396533 76.438097 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20247:08 42.404782 76.465325 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20247:09 42.403737 76. 465244 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/202413:32 42.412518 76. 444259 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/202412:26 42.416998 76.460276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/181202418:00 42.420232 76.458102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20246:49 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20240:43 42.402352 76.457366 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120248:52 42.410148 76A43055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/20244:06 42.398131 76.442939 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20244:07 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20246:30 42.396593 76.438258 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 21/202422:12 42.403391 76.462459 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 18120244:07 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202422: 11 42.403457 76.466519 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20244: 08 42.398131 76.442939 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/ 202410:00 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/20248:27 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202410:33 42,392738 76.444079 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202416:49 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/ 202422:40 42.412085 76.444681 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202412: 17 42.397006 76.453736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/ 202410:55 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/ 202423:06 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202416:25 42.40879 76.464822 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20249:51 42.398384 76.443873 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/20245:53 42.415114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/191202412:16 42.421171 76.460779 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202417:46 42.400315 76.466519 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:44 42.408038 76.435707 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20243:35 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/20241:48 42.414868 76.450152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 20/202412:22 42.407252 76.450925 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202416:10 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16120248:11 42.407731 76.433794 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/16/202413:08 42.4D76D5 76.468891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20242:04 42.40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423:54 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121120240:13 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119120244:15 42.39652 76.438052 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202421:29 42.401427 76.467984 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20248:08 42.40377 76.457464 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202416:01 42.411719 76.453656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7116/202416:33 42.40407 76.468334 FAILEDATTEMPT 7119/20242:54 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241:40 42.414741 76.470732 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20246:55 42.395747 76.440414 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/16/202419:36 42.391952 76.441968 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202411:17 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/20241:44 42.425001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202412:44 42.414961 76.477919 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/202423: 49 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120241:50 42.392911 76.441133 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240: 55 42.398151 76.459252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117120240:55 42. 396899 76.459441 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:56 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20243: 15 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/181202413:25 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:59 42.39897 76.455605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202417:31 42.40168 76.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20241: 42 42.414914 76.470894 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17120240:55 42.398557 76.459279 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240; 59 42.397805 76.459225 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20243: 15 42.419061 76.453961 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18120241:40 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20240: 59 42.398171 76.459282 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/17/20242: 19 42.394749 76.451392 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/171202420:06 42.416665 76.450466 FAILEDATTEMPT 7118/202411:31 42.411173 76.472206 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202420: 38 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 00 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/20249:03 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 07 42.411666 76.453709 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202414: 01 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202414:30 42.421504 76.459665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202419: 21 42.399416 76.456207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120241:39 42.412258 76.443819 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/20249: 53 42.410255 76.43851 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202410: 17 42.39351 76.440558 FAILEDATTEMPT 71201202414:32 42. 41361 76.450799 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 03 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20249: 04 42.394509 76.441034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202413:22 42.410814 76.466852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/202413: 2.2 42.401533 75.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120/202414:31 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21120249:53 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202411:21 42.411852 76.44098 FAILEDATTEMPT 71211202412:37 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202415:28 42.398737 76.447915 FAILED ATTEMPT 71211202419:00 42. 400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202417:24 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/211202418:17 42.395361 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202423: 17 42,416265 76.449685 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202421: 46 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202414:07 42.403105 76.434459 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202421: 17 42.392058 76.44452 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202410:58 42.393317 76.441277 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202412: 15 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202415: 27 42.400308 76.450493 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202415:28 42.398377 76.443855 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202418:44 42.410294 76.470948 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202420:56 42.402652 76. 467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202423:10 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202421:46 42.39377 76. 448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202418:37 42.40166 76.460016 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202413:24 42.413895 76.445472 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/201202414:34 42.400135 76. 45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/2D249:58 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202411:22 42.407425 76.451509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202412:38 42.400927 76.46678 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202415:28 42.398131 76.442939 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202419:05 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202417:07 42.411925 76.442939 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202418:18 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202420:57 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/211202421:49 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202419:27 42.413164 76.476913 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202411:20 42.405541 76.466412 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202412:36 42,397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/21/202414:09 42.421184 76.458884 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202415:27 42.398637 76.444879 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202416:25 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202423:12 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202421:46 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202418: 45 42.405741 76.46749 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202414: 52 42.409309 76.439857 FAILED ATTEMPT 71211202426:31 42. 402359 76.459566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20248: 38 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/21/202436: 32 42.407838 76.431826 FAILED ATTEMPT 7119/202420:23 42.403943 76.469717 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20242: 21 42.408191 76.464229 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/202417: 21 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120/20241:41 42.414042 76.470059 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202421: 00 42.404776 76.461606 FAILED ATTEMPT 7121/202417:40 42.400495 76.457725 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202422:53 42.404689 76.46643 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19/20245:04 42.412145 76. 441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202417:49 42.393597 76.446532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/20249:07 42.39397 76. 446244 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202414:25 42.413763 76.476131 FAILED ATTEMPT 71161202415:55 42.407032 76.463052 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202416:25 42.39658 76.439714 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/16/202419:20 42.394868 76.439812 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20248:26 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 17/202412:00 42.418316 76.454105 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202417:39 42.406799 76.467885 FAILED ATTEMPT 7118/ 20247:51 42.406966 76.462971 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 19/202415:54 42.41745 76.458569 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202420:35 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 18/202418:57 42.398491 76.444331 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/161202422:54 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 18/20241:43 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/202422:28 42.415194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/18/20248:01 42.401101 76.46713 FAILED ATTEMPT 7120120241:42 42,410754 76.471801 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/19120245: 44 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 16/202418:24 42.409536 76.456144 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/202410:49 42.409915 76.439408 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/ 202421:23 42.404117 76.43241 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 20/20241:41 42.411766 76.473625 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/20/20241:57 42.396367 76.443106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/17/20240:38 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7117/20247:53 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 71201202410: 15 42.400049 76.454276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20/20248:58 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/201202419:50 42. 392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7117/202410:58 42.394629 76.451437 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/18/202423:28 42. 408504 76.469942 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/19/202423:01 42.406074 76.459656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/20120244:28 42. 397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7120120249:54 42.395108 76. 440045 FAILEDATTEMPT 7121/202423:51 42.406706 76. 431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120240:00 42.397092 76.459171 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120240:00 42.397152 76.459171 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120243:31 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413:22 42. 405741 76.46749 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202415:40 42. 416086 76.451562 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202417:49 42.400828 76.45273 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20244:26 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122120245:33 42.400495 76.457725 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20245:36 42.397026 76,450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:40 42.400575 76.451023 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:12 42.397026 76,450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202419:17 42.41769 76.454554 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202414:08 42.413989 76.476122 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20240:18 42.395361 76.439633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:39 42.40614 76.470535 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202417:13 42.395747 76.440414 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202412:48 42.422888 76.45998 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202421:26 42.393377 76.448706 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202410:50 42.404369 76,465298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123120244:34 42.414681 76.475997 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202417:27 42,402925 76.465028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20248:51 42.402346 76.46254 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202412:40 42.40128 76.454168 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202412:24 42.401913 76.460528 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202412:05 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202419:20 42.392911 76.441133 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202417:48 42.415247 76.447906 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120244:58 42.400461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20243:08 42.418861 76.45538 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120245:34 42.398883 76.455488 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120247:37 42.400461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202411:33 42.394136 76.4477 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202421:42 42.402925 76.465666 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123120241:48 42.418322 76.455192 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20247:35 42.394236 76.4477 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:40 42.402133 76.454168 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202420:31 42.412032 76.441438 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:14 42.406826 76.467346 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126120248:11 42.402392 76.461534 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:53 42,401733 76.437827 FAILED ATTEM PT 7123/202412:44 42.403371 76.469888 FAILED ATTEM PT 71241202416:52 42.408197 76.458713 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/202416:25 42.408232 76.432779 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/202420:48 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25/202414:48 42.414388 76.4704 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/22/202419:26 42.412471 76.44631 FAILED A17EM PT 7124/202410:57 42.406979 76.431665 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/24/202414:07 42.415101 76.475107 FAILED ATTEM PT 7125/202415:24 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123120243:06 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20245:02 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202420:24 42.40423 76.432716 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202415:13 42.406886 76.469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202418:58 42.417763 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202412:11 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202418:56 42.401733 76.433129 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202422:04 42.408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20247:42 42.402346 76,46254 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202420:19 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:04 42.399595 76.459351 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244:28 42.411972 76.441025 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:09 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20245:34 42.396753 76.45918 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:55 42.397818 76.454024 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20249:30 42.407285 76.45141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202422: 22 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202421: 43 42.400982 76.459045 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202412: 44 42.400621 76.466528 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202419: 38 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202411: 36 42.420745 76.460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202413: 40 42.394496 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202422: 50 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202418: 42 42.405102 76.429895 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202417:17 42. 420745 76.4601T FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20244: 34 42.415101 76.475107 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/20243: 08 42.419168 76.456099 FAILED ATTEM PT 7122/202421:22 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/2D2412: 44 42.398517 76.44063 FAILED ATTEM PT 71241202414:08 42. 411546 76.473374 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20245: 07 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202418:53 42.405568 76.42932 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413: 25 42.398364 76.448472 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20245: 15 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202415:10 42.406074 76.459656 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20248:06 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202416:45 42.41972 76.454545 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/20246:24 42.398171 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202419:19 42.403058 76.45609 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120240:15 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:19 42.400754 76.458165 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20241:41 42.401846 76,433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122120241:56 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202421:44 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123120241:51 42.419713 76.455713 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20249:58 42.398517 76.44063 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202414:13 42.394509 76.441034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202419:53 42.399962 76.449568 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:53 42.419108 76.453997 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20248:41 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202421:10 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202410:08 42.405826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20240:50 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417:54 42.408706 76.466448 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20248:17 42.407865 76.43506 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202417:04 42.403364 76.470499 FAILEDATTEMPT 71251202410:34 42.403777 76.462908 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20243:13 42.418861 76.45538 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202412:28 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20241:53 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202417:53 42.402086 76.469259 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202411:23 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202420:52 42.399782 76.457545 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120248:03 42.411819 76.453566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20242:59 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20247:13 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20242:00 42.403837 76.434566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20249:12 42.403717 76.464579 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20249:40 42.39658 76.439724 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:27 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202416:17 42.404742 76.457662 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202419:11 42.406034 76.431386 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202418:39 42.409749 76.43745 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202417:07 42.402925 76.465666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20241:53 42.420552 76.455371 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202420:04 42.400155 76.450502 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202412:49 42.400621 76.466528 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202413:36 42.402252 76.461237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20242:04 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:20 42.417783 76.449856 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202411:00 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413:01 42.407252 76.463267 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126120243:38 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:34 42.407652 76.451679 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202412:09 42.400135 76.459054 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202415:54 42.417031 76.473023 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202416:34 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126120248:03 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202422:29 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20241:01 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120241:02 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20242:14 42.41098 76.441897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122120242:51 42.397292 76. 452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202410:30 42. 402146 76.456809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202412:47 42. 409249 76.438366 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202422:48 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202418:02 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202422:13 42.391692 76. 441268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202410:11 42. 41122 76.474002 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202421:27 42. 396899 76.459"1 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202417:02 42.402192 76.454293 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202418:15 42. 410255 76.43851 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202417:01 42. 405568 76.42932 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/202414:02 42.411313 76.44222 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202411:30 42. 408038 76.435707 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202418:45 42. 418229 76.453269 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202422:58 42.39397 76. 446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202422:40 42.399776 76.459333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202414:04 42.414346 76.470355 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20249:31 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202420:32 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202419:53 42. 401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120242:43 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202416:05 42. 404875 76.465441 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20246:12 42. 398597 76.444753 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20242:59 42. 401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202415:34 42.400022 76.466888 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:24 42. 416194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202422:16 42. 392225 76.442768 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202413:13 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20242:09 42. 400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20242:11 42.404776 76.463106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202414:37 42. 408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202423:15 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202417:05 42.404216 76.463663 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202422:41 42. 40034B 76.466639 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20248:12 42. 415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7124/202417:22 42.402292 76.469987 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202426:18 42. 417803 76.454293 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20246:09 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202419:11 42.397332 76.453287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202420:53 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20246:56 42. 400641 76.466537 FAILED ATTEMPT 71261202413:17 42.416359 76. 451203 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202420:09 42.411466 76.442543 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20243:27 42. 402073 76.437118 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20246:12 42.398111 76.442876 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20246:38 42.411832 76.473697 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20242:44 42. 393164 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20249:34 42. 413922 76.477802 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202412:22 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20247:37 42. 408038 76.434863 FAILED ATTEMPT 71251202419:48 42.404756 76. 465289 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202421:51 42. 394462 76.448652 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202413:28 42. 399143 76.459315 FAILED ATTEMPT 71261202423:31 42.410687 76. 471757 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20242:12 42. 397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120242:18 42.403717 76.434117 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20243:27 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20246:32 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120242:43 42.394023 76.446424 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20249:31 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20248:37 42.408976 76.458363 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/20247:37 42.407472 76.433695 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202411:50 42.405614 76.465181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 251202415:09 42.413536 76.469556 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 20245:09 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/202423:30 42.402359 76.459566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20242:25 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/20242:54 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120245:22 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/ 202414:45 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/20247:09 42.412232 76.44173E FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20240:34 42,402925 76.465666 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202412:32 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202418:03 42.403118 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 241202422:13 42.393377 76.440684 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/202410:35 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202415:31 42.403011 76.456009 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417:05 42.403351 76.435456 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202416:36 42.412331 76.468379 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122120244:00 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 22/202422:40 42.400461 76.459207 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20243:12 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20242:46 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202413:58 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25120246:48 42.399423 76.439794 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202422:40 42.399989 76A67669 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 261202412:11 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 261202413:17 42.397532 76.453564 FAILEDATTEMPT 71261202417: 41 42.402678 76.458228 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120242: 59 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20248:51 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202413:01 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202422:17 42.404909 76.430389 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20242:40 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202414:18 42.415034 76.475305 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202422:40 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20246:12 42.398717 76.447942 FAILED ATTEM PT 7124/202416:58 42.420552 76.455111 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/20242:17 42.39658 76.439714 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202415:25 42.408504 76.464534 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202418: 58 42.40435 76.462618 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202420:57 42.400987 76.466852 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202418:41 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202422:41 42.400668 76.458021 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202423:53 42.392651 76.442166 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120247:38 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202413:32 42.41769 76,454554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202421:26 42.399456 76.457958 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202413:17 42.399902 76.456871 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202423:36 42.395348 76.440055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20241:02 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20241:20 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 22/20241:24 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/ 20242:51 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/ 20245:21 42.399276 76.459324 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202410:14 42. 409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410:32 42. 402492 76.454931 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202417:02 42. 403011 76.456009 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202422:28 42.400461 76.457141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126120249:32 42.408264 76. 450519 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120243:07 42.394642 76. 447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202418:02 42.408317 76.469071 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202422:14 42.394769 76.440046 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20242:44 42.393483 76.444627 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/2V20243:13 42.401906 76.460528 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:24 42,403524 76.466079 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20244:14 42.422116 76.4621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202411:42 42.409968 76.470706 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20246:14 42.398404 76.444017 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410: 29 42.407492 76.468756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/ 20242:02 42.403943 76.469717 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 24/202416:05 42,408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/ 20242:17 42.399989 76.46704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20242: 24 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243: 04 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202412:48 42.399989 76.467633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202420:37 42.394023 76.446424 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:11 42.403364 76,435833 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:18 42. 397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202417:04 42. 416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202410:29 42.415101 76, 475107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202417:35 42.397019 76. 459162 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202417:36 42.407439 76. 467705 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202413:15 42.411173 76.471891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/20244:00 42.398684 76.459288 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 221202422:40 42.402445 76.457617 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202418: 39 42.41114 76.439157 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413: 55 42.420359 76.454644 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202417:05 42.404862 76.463285 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20248: 18 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/ 20246:59 42.398184 76.443154 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/ 202423:29 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22120242:59 42.403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 22/20243:02 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:13 42.401413 76.452685 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120243:18 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410:29 42.41777 76.473751 FAILED ATTEMPT 71241202416:57 42.392252 76.440944 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 22/20243:44 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:45 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/20243:48 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20246:33 42.421817 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202417: 39 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202411:05 42.406893 76.4325 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20243:45 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202416:23 42.403637 76.465585 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202411:02 42.410294 76.470948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202415:56 42.393916 76.446541 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20242:15 42.4083" 76.435483 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:45 42.399323 75.447421 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243: 49 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244:31 42.404216 76.463663 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244:37 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244:38 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20247:12 42.411147 76.439175 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202420:20 42.407538 76. 46882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120246:52 42.402152 76. 469493 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202416:38 42.406174 76. 459989 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202418:19 42.402133 76.454168 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202416:01 42.401533 76. 461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202416:39 42.403324 76. 43551 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24120248:05 42.398331 76. 440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202423:32 42.402652 76. 467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:54 42.400315 76.466519 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202419:24 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120249:20 42,402312 76. 470077 FAILED AT TEMPT 7122/202416:38 42.407239 76. 43321 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202420:24 42.41104 76. 441618 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:59 42.401999 76.450716 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:53 42.403537 76.465998 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202418:21 42.40168 76.437001 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202413:30 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202421:06 42.400222 76.459261 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202417:51 42.408217 76. 454256 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20246:52 42.402312 76.470059 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20246:54 42.399622 76. 448616 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202419:25 42.393697 76.445313 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244:38 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20245:46 42.414395 76.446756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20247:14 42.394509 76.441034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202420:22 42.412232 76. 441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126120246:52 42.403857 76.462782 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:38 42.402386 76.457446 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202418:20 42.409136 76. 439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:39 42.403231 76.456431 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/24/202419:24 42.414482 76.47049 FAILED ATTEM PT 7122/202416:57 42.403058 76. 459189 FAILED ATTEM PT 712612024 6:54 42.399989 76. 468621 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/20246:51 42.403537 76.465998 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/202415:59 42.402492 76.454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20249:22 42.397199 76. 448724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202413:36 42.401001 76.45185 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202420:24 42.411486 76.440037 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 20246:53 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 221202414:41 42.399989 76.46749 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/202414:42 42.400561 76.468648 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20241:39 42.410255 76.43851 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/202411:42 42.402172 76A35761 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/ 202411:48 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 22/202414:42 42.405621 76.466385 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202416:10 42.402006 76.469142 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202416: 10 42.392005 76.441097 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202421: 08 42.414868 76.477685 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/221202416:13 42.400724 76.456564 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25/20249:41 42.402419 76.463276 FAILED ATTEM PT 7122/202416:12 42.407365 76.463393 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/20245:50 42.403018 75.461929 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/20245:55 42.403298 76.462809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23120245:58 42.402199 76.460483 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/20248:59 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23120245:59 42.401899 46.46051 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23120247:25 42.415993 76.450152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/20245:55 42.402525 76.461121 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20245:58 42.400515 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/ 20247:21 42.408091 76.469466 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/202410:11 42.412298 76.476985 FAILED ATTEM PT 7123/202411:21 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEM PT 71231202413:00 42.41994 76.456 FAILED ATTEM PT 7123/202413:04 42.400315 76.466519 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202417:57 42.416485 76.452425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202413:41 42.416652 76.452811 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202413:06 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20247:50 42.418668 76.453611 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202415:45 42.416678 76.450484 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20246:37 42.403757 76.457437 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20246:41 42.422662 76.459728 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20240:39 42.408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:40 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20248:57 42.404389 76.470598 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202411:56 42,408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202413:51 42.402179 76.461094 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202413:55 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124120246:44 42.406773 76.459495 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20248:50 42.406307 76.462154 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20247:50 42.417597 76.45821 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202415:40 42.40668 76.467732 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20247:20 42.397046 76.452793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423:26 42.400688 76.458866 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202415:16 42.420232 78.458102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202413:52 42.40168 75.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24120246:45 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20248:53 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202410:42 42.406347 76.465421 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20247:23 42.409063 76.47181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20241:28 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202419:37 42.421817 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20246:42 42.400575 76.438887 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202413:00 42.399596 76.459351 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202420:23 42.411253 76.439444 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:40 42.421497 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202417:57 42.412298 76.476985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20244:47 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202421:09 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202416:13 42.402639 76.436893 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202423:50 42.400575 76.438887 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202416:39 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202411:46 42.413909 76.469924 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202414:42 42.405495 76.460968 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202414:42 42.413037 76.469071 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202416:51 42.407328 76.468559 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20248:01 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202411:43 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202418:23 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202411:42 42.421817 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202411:47 42.41745 76.473436 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202423:52 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202416:37 42.403943 76.469717 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202419:26 42.396899 76.459441 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:52 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202423:32 42.409063 76.47181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202417:54 42.404862 76.459629 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202413:05 42.423001 76.460105 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202411:45 42.399223 76.447008 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:49 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202416:24 42.399583 76.456719 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202411:02 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20246:31 42.394476 76.451491 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202410:45 42.402485 76.463573 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243:18 42.408271 76,43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20240:34 42.402925 76.465028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202410:34 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202410:29 42.41528 76.477578 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202422:02 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/2D2418:43 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122120243:06 42A01886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202422:16 42.392378 76.443199 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:37 42.415606 76.477928 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120242:45 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202413:47 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120246:48 42. 3967 76.438564 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417: 25 42.40644 76.466564 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125120243:27 42. 402006 76.437261 FAILED ATTEMPT 71221202422:41 42.40166 76.460016 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202420:56 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202421:51 42.394123 76.44857 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202413:17 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25120246:12 42.398317 76.443621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202412:05 42.401753 76.437252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202421:32 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202423:52 42.411173 76.472205 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202419:12 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120247:37 42.408031 76.434854 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120246:09 42.408064 76.432374 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202412:16 42.407252 76.450925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202423:31 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120241:54 42.410135 76.451994 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:56 42.399969 76.468594 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202411:59 42.407285 76.45141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20241:36 42.413929 76.476051 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20248:42 42.402485 76.463573 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202415:23 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202417:05 42.400515 76.466492 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202420:48 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20243:14 42.415194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202414:16 42.39658 76.439714 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202419:27 42.415101 76.475107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26120249:59 42.401886 76.438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202419:03 42.407339 76.463366 FAILED ATTEMPT 7IM20242:00 42. 402152 76.436956 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120242:01 42.401886 76.438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20249:45 42.403105 76. 434459 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20241:53 42.41982 76.454985 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202414:30 42.393164 76. 446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202410:31 42.407339 76. 432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202412:40 42.404949 76. 465531 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202415:57 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20247:00 42.398078 76.442714 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202416:18 42.390193 76.437243 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:53 42.40911 76.465145 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23120241:51 42.420213 76. 456359 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20245:54 42.40869 76. 450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202410:41 42.40431 76.431916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20240:40 42.403923 76. 469547 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202414:12 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20242:59 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 71261202417:50 42.407658 76.458605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122120242:14 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202419:50 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120243:27 42.396959 76. 439273 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20246:32 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120249:33 42.391759 76.441447 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202416:53 42.402326 76.470122 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20242:43 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20247: 37 42.408118 76.435024 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202421:51 42.395188 76.451248 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202419:48 42.406806 76.462809 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202413:28 42.40869 76.436803 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202423:30 42. 408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120242:29 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20242:58 42.405162 76.430138 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202413:56 42.402152 76.456827 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202412:32 42.412564 76.446191 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 202422:16 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 241202418:05 42.404356 76.431799 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20247:51 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 221202415:34 42.400022 76.466888 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 231202414:00 42.41351 76.446289 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202413:48 42.400362 76.468639 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202419:59 42.409749 76.43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202416:38 42.405262 76.460914 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202423:10 42.412471 76.44611 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202422:40 42.402359 76.459566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20243:12 42.394322 76.446882 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202416:18 42.407339 76. 432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20246:00 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202413:58 42.406347 76.466421 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126120242:47 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20246:48 42.397978 76.440127 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202422:40 42.401121 76.467193 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202413:16 42,394642 46.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202420:07 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120248:28 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202414:18 42,415101 76.475107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202418:11 42.404063 76.466304 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202422:40 42.4D2199 76.469654 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202418:33 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20249:55 42.405115 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126120242:18 42,395361 46.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26120242:43 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202418:59 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202422:43 42.40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20246:12 42.396331 76.440663 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202416:05 42.405794 76.465609 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202418:01 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202414:00 42.407658 76.458605 FAILED ATTEMPT 71221202412:09 42.407246 76.45132 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:23 42.406979 76.431665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202415:47 42.405614 76.465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20241:53 42.420039 76.454823 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202411:50 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20241:01 42.414951 76.477919 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/251202410:07 42.405242 76.4659 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202421:17 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202420:58 42.417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202418:44 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202421:27 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202423:54 42.400175 76,434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202421:17 42.407885 76.434548 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20240:49 42.395351 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 71241202414:15 42.397292 76,452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202420:00 42.396866 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202420:09 42.410255 76.473571 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202419:52 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202416:34 42.422116 76.4621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:51 42.419341 76.455219 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20244:17 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202410:49 42.409083 76.439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202410:10 42.404742 76.467662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20240:34 42.405981 76,430256 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:35 42.409083 76.439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:51 42.414648 76.447619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:54 42.403717 76.434117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:56 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20241:15 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20244:01 42.406826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202421:15 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202420:05 42,396666 76.449319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20249:59 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20241:15 42.399429 76.447843 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120246:51 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202422:08 42.407072 76.468235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:22 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202419:56 42400774 76.466582 FAILED ATTEMPT 712212024 1:15 42.407439 76.433165 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120246:58 42.414888 76.475035 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202410:07 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202411:09 42.41769 46.454554 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23120241:53 42.420379 76.456584 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20240:48 42.414961 76.475494 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24120248:41 42.400674 76.45803 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120247:05 42.404622 76.430281 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202419:53 42.421497 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20241:30 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:34 42.401973 76,460662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:55 42.40377 76.432563 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20241:15 42.399163 76.446774 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20242:06 42.402812 76.43657 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:51 42.419534 76.454374 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20246:52 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202410:06 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202411:05 42.406979 76.433665 FAILED ATTEMPT 71251202410:35 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120247:02 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202417:04 42.415194 76,475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202415:20 42.411533 76.474092 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202416:34 42.407532 76.468208 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20241:14 42.397146 76.452245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120241:16 42.399335 76.447466 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202414:14 42.397146 76.452245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202412:09 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202417:54 42.406545 76.467561 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20242:40 42.397026 76,450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20245:06 42.397028 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120245:06 42.399456 76.457958 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:07 42.398018 76.459243 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120245:09 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:07 42.399589 76.455728 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20247:36 42.405561 76.459935 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:07 42.398684 76.445041 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120248:02 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20249:53 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202419:49 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:55 42.417251 76.452775 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202413:22 42.403118 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202422:36 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421:17 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202410:37 42,400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202421:36 42.413716 76.447531 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202412:39 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421:10 42.393683 76.448597 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202422:33 42.399989 76.46722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25120243:40 42.399163 76.446774 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20245:29 42.392351 76.442094 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202410:58 42.407865 76.43506 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202421:07 42.406979 76.431665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202422:37 42.400069 76.466762 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202412: 22 42.396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20240: 02 42.397099 76.448724 FAILED ATTEMPT 7124/202412:16 42.404769 76.461138 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202412: 22 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202413:39 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202421:12 42.40887 76.437809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202410: 31 42.398923 76.44593 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20243: 49 42.397026 76.450608 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202422: 35 42.401247 76.467508 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20243: 15 42.41084 76.473032 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20243:44 42,398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20247: 29 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20249: 29 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20249: 51 42.421497 76.459207 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20243:10 42.409309 76.439857 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20243: 40 42.405641 76.42897 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410: 10 42.405009 76.463537 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410: 16 42.403411 76.460069 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202419: 53 42.420033 76.457518 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202422: 36 42.401001 76.466888 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202413:43 42.410068 76.471047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202413: 49 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421: 13 42.4215" 76.460393 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20248:48 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202410: 31 42.402792 76.455569 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202415: 08 42.41626 76.471236 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416: 19 42.402852 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20242: 13 42.420359 76.454644 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202418:03 42.411173 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 71221202420:09 42. 403417 76.467517 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202412:22 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421:32 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20248:42 42,403018 76.461929 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20247:19 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202422:30 42.405927 76. 428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202419:56 42.402419 76. 463276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20248:38 42.400262 76. 466573 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123120249:40 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123120249:40 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/20249:40 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202412:09 42.400451 75.457141 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/202412:10 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20249:24 42.406966 76.432644 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202418:52 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202413:59 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202412:10 42.397951 76.448688 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202412:14 42.40D461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:47 42.401886 76.438294 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/23/202411:53 42.395866 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20247:16 42.412857 76.468891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20249:40 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202411:28 42.422116 76.4621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20241:01 42.412152 76.441753 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202413:23 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:47 42.407392 76.468639 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202411:53 42.397086 76.452856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202431:55 42.408936 76.464965 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:47 42.40U77 76.433345 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202412:18 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202426:47 42.407665 76.468963 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20248:48 42.401979 76.437306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20243:45 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202422:36 42.403378 76.469637 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202412:23 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20240:01 42.392598 76.445553 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202413:36 42.42181 76.464319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202413:49 42.399836 76.459333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414:39 42.41132 76.473122 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20248:47 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202415:06 42.396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/231202421:06 42.402073 76.460869 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202421:10 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20241:22 42.4086" 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20243:49 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 71251202422:33 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417:49 42.403431 76.463618 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/22/20245:08 42.397019 76.459162 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20249:22 42.413377 76.445472 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20245:06 42.405614 76.465161 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:07 42.395953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202417:24 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:07 42.397585 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202410:09 42.40178 76.436992 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20245:06 42.399456 76.457958 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20245:07 42.3980" 76.442624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202419:31 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:09 42.399583 76.456719 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120243:13 42.415194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20242:45 42.40431 76.430901 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20247:47 42.412817 76.44328 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/20245:29 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202421:49 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20246:03 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:46 42.395361 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202419:33 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20244:21 42.397006 76.453736 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20241:53 42.409595 76.452048 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202417:53 42. 405368 76.455603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20246:59 42.399376 76.439812 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202415:28 42. 396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25120242:51 42. 393723 76.448697 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202421:48 42. 394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20249:13 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20242:01 42.403164 76.435797 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20249:40 42, 397099 76.448724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:57 42.409083 76.434737 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20242:53 42. 41982 76.454985 FAILED AT TEMPT 7/25/202414:32 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20242:19 42.400175 76. 434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202410:07 42.419653 76. 456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20240:32 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202416:16 42.396127 76,437064 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:37 42.412791 76.473859 FAI LED ATTEMPT 7/23/20241:50 42.401886 76.438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202411:31 42.40895 76.469861 FAILED ATTEMPT 71231202416:29 42.40642 76.43153 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24120247:33 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20240:39 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202418:13 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202418:44 42.410814 76.454311 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20245:40 42.39658 76.439714 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/261202423:46 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20240:34 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120240:48 42,408271 76. 3718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20242:01 42.403171 76.435788 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:24 42.401979 76.453862 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20248:00 42.422948 76.460043 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/251202421:18 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202420:50 42.402073 76.437118 FAILEDATTEMPT 71261202411:23 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417:53 42.406886 76.469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202418:08 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413:01 42.417597 76.45821 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/22/202418:47 42.397092 76.452874 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25/202419:28 42.417743 76.473733 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20247:10 42.412085 76.444681 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/22/20241:53 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20249:12 42.403684 76.464247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202419:10 42.40423 76.432716 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:18 42.41098 76.441897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20248:44 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202414:10 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:52 42.418622 76.453584 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202418:26 42.403417 76.467597 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202421:43 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202415:54 42.39624 76.437369 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20242:23 42.41982 76.454985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202416:15 42.402259 76.461255 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/202419:03 42.405954 76.461642 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20241:56 42.402639 76.436893 FAILED ATTEM PT 7122/202417:54 42.407166 76.467238 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20247: 00 42.398377 76.443864 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202417:04 42. 400774 76.466582 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25/202410: 32 42.408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20242: 59 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202412:27 42.413763 76.476131 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120242:01 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202414:20 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202419:07 42. 3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241: 53 42.419673 76.456602 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202414:33 42.414388 76.4704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241: 05 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202410: 07 42.405934 76.467247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202421:10 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202411: 00 42.395148 76.440046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20243: 34 42.398704 76.459288 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20244:24 42.418229 76.455021 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245: 34 42.398118 76.459252 FAILED ATTEMPT 71221202414:51 42. 402652 75.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202419: 20 42.39371 76.440405 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202414:07 42.416745 76.472727 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202419: 21 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202418:56 42.417557 76.453862 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202423: 50 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202416: 22 42.40869 76.457105 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202412:42 42.406194 76.433201 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20243:26 42.397092 76. 440109 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122120245:57 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202413:56 42.412232 76. 441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202412:04 42.418316 76.4541D5 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202412:31 42.413716 76.447511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202416:40 42.402226 76.436803 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:44 42.411652 76.442948 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202417:19 42.42149 76.460321 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:47 42.419946 76.454742 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20244:47 42.392085 76.443864 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20243:00 42.39397 76.4462" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:05 42.407525 76.459153 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202418:26 42.41964 76.457366 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20242:22 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120247:49 42.394095 76.450934 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/202419:59 42,402172 76.45688 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202412:08 42.403584 76.457096 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23120249:21 42.407878 76.451778 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202420:04 42.396686 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202421:38 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202419:30 42.417204 76.473194 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202419:52 42.403903 76.468325 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123120241:51 42.420299 76.454994 FAI LED ATTEM PT 7/26/20249:55 42.416691 76,454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202414:12 42.400861 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413:21 42.406393 76.466474 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20240:02 42.398517 76.459279 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20243:33 42.394555 76.440603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:22 42,398131 76.442939 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413:23 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202415:45 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244:24 42.418009 76,457852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244:26 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120246:44 42.400282 76.439931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202421:26 42.403943 76.469717 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202412:40 42.415087 76.471074 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20243:08 42.419573 76.456602 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20245:15 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120246:21 42.410294 76.470946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20247:36 42.400115 76.439453 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202417:09 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202420:56 42.414388 76.4704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:09 42.397365 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122120245:50 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202412:42 42.400575 76.438887 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20242:20 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202413:51 42.402925 76.465666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202417:14 42.394542 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202410:26 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202419:01 42.415933 76.471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202412:54 42.408976 76.458363 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202417:29 42.403684 76.464247 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20247:44 42.412551 76.446352 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/26/202415:14 42.404776 76.463106 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/22120245:34 42.398963 76.455595 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120245:37 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202412:31 42.414395 76.446756 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202416:39 42.407885 76.434548 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202421:42 42.402332 76.460276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:46 42.419307 76.455183 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24120248:34 42.408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202415:51 42.397558 76.453629 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120246:16 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202418:51 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202419:20 42.393723 76.440396 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202419:43 42.404842 76.46492 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202422:35 42.400774 76.466582 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202413:31 42.408038 76.435707 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202418:28 42.414834 76.447368 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202417:42 42.408644 76.468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22120248:18 42.410255 76.443046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122120249:30 42.405614 76.465161 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202410:52 42.4086" 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202420:15 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241:12 42.418815 76.456009 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202411:32 42.403637 76.463887 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202415:38 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202420:04 42.416725 76.4727 FAILEDATTEMPT 71261202415:55 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202413:23 42.421817 76.4636 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/221202413:27 42.417251 76.452775 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20248:07 42.393597 76.446532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417:15 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202417:43 42.410454 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202423:59 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202415:52 42.404849 76.465405 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202410:21 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414:51 42.403391 76.468756 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202413:20 42.41098 76.441897 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/2D2416:51 42.406946 76.462953 FAILED AT TEMPT 7/22/202416:51 42.409968 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202416:53 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202411:35 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202420:13 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202417:45 42.401713 76.461067 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202420:04 42.401187 76.452218 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20245:35 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202417:10 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23120246:41 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246:41 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23120246:42 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20249:50 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202415:16 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414:27 42.407865 76.43505 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:57 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20247:09 42.406706 76.467759 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:56 42.40911 76,465145 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202414:22 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202415:21 42.405381 76.466079 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202416:59 42.420432 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246:41 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246:46 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20247:57 42.399116 76.455802 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202414:20 42.402852 76.462495 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246:54 42.400887 75.439058 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202412:06 42.396806 76.452335 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414:45 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202415:13 42.409149 76.470104 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421:49 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202412:34 42.408377 76.436857 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414:44 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202415:13 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202421:43 42.408557 76.470005 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202410:16 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202410:17 42.414641 76.450287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202411:14 42.409063 76.437728 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:43 42.406041 76,466924 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20246:21 42.400441 76.439291 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202414:46 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202410:54 42.410907 76.43992 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202411:00 42.403045 76.46687 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202417:52 42.394063 76.448679 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202415:14 42.408031 76,469287 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202410:18 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202415:13 42.405826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202417:50 42.407319 76.434198 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20248:21 42.397625 76.440127 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202421:43 42.4086" 76.468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/202411:02 42.408524 76.457294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202414:44 42.409063 76.47181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202412:17 42.413377 76.445472 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20248:21 42.399856 76.439588 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20248:56 42.416998 76.460276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202422:34 42.417031 76.473023 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202416:59 42.411652 76.442948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202422:19 42.406953 76.466879 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124120241:40 42.400987 76.466852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20241:41 42.403577 76.465855 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202422:36 42.406886 76.467993 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123120246:41 42.403903 76.468325 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414:26 42.399989 76.46704 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202416:57 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20247:09 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202415:29 42.398417 76.45485 FAILED ATTEMPT 7124/20247:53 42.403903 76.464687 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/202415:39 42.40614 76.470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416:53 42.407345 76.463356 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202417:40 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/2D242D:00 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202410:06 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATEMPT 7122/202420:06 42.392445 75.445607 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/20241: 12 42.416319 76.472287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413: 32 42.414568 76.446729 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202415: 35 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATEMPT 7126/202415:53 42.410973 76.441456 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202416: 08 42.409769 76.454617 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202410: 03 42.42157 76.460429 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/20245: 34 42.397279 76.45918 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202411: 34 42.397838 76.454051 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202428: 05 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATEMPT 7/221202421:22 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20244:33 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202412: 44 42.420439 76.458713 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20243: 25 42.393317 76.441277 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202414: 54 42.412764 76.4446 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202412: 18 42.412964 76.47402 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202419: 37 42.391945 76.443028 FAILEDATEMPT 7/231202416:25 42.408191 76.43268 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202414: 08 42.41532 76.471289 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202422: 19 42.399989 76.468064 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202420:19 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/20240: 07 42.396699 76.459441 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20245: 36 42,397026 76.450808 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202415: 35 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202416: 35 42.410022 76.455353 FAILEDATEMPT 7124120247:05 42. 399323 76.436722 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202414: 08 42.412611 76.474568 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202420: 24 42.404842 76.431189 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20243: 08 42.419414 76.456485 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20243: 50 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATEMPT 7/25/202413: 12 42.398018 76.45512 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/20245: 00 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATEMPT 71231202412:44 42. 392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202417: 10 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATEMPT 7/251202418:53 42.420033 76.457518 FAILEDATEMPT 7/25/202411: 58 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202413: 43 42.396819 76.452362 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/20244: 34 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATEMPT 7124/202421:43 42.402359 76.459566 FAILEDATEMPT 7/25/202420: 45 42.403324 76.459845 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/202412: 40 42.397572 76.453647 FAILEDATEMPT 7/25/20245: 35 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202415: 12 42.40614 76.470535 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202422: 56 42.402419 76.463276 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/20245: 15 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202410: 27 42.416485 76.452425 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202417: 48 42.397192 76.453063 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/20243: 00 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202411: 10 42.413623 76.476814 FAILEDATEMPT 7126/20246:25 42.398504 76.444394 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/20241:29 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATEMPT 7122120241:39 42. 406979 76.431665 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22120241:39 42.402465 76.436444 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/2D2413:14 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/202414:54 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATEMPT 7126/202421:15 42.399456 76.457958 FAILEDATEMPT 7125/202410:56 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20242:30 42.420745 76.460177 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202412:38 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202417:36 42.401873 76.468936 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20248:19 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202414:44 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20246:33 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202415:33 42.40869 76.450662 FAILEDATEMPT 7/22/202420:40 42.402359 76.459566 FAILEDATEMPT 7124/202411:23 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202421:55 42.398937 76.447502 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20243:46 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATEMPT 7/24/20244:15 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20242:37 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATEMPT 7/23/20240:02 42.416245 76.472215 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/20240:03 42.395361 76.439633 FAILEDATEMPT 7/26/202421:31 42.41353 76.444717 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202414:53 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202417:41 42.404869 76.431009 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202411:33 42.398527 76.444457 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202413:45 42.421837 76.460797 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20247: 10 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202412:06 42.427137 76.453485 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202422:52 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20242:36 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126120248:34 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/24/202417:07 42.401187 76.452218 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20249:18 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20244:16 42.411173 76.472206 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/25120241:07 42.408617 76. 451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:18 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 202419:45 42.407605 76.433425 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/ 202417:31 42.41749 76.453745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/20246:02 42.402419 76.463276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/202418:50 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/20247:10 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/202423:29 42.410907 76.43992 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202416:04 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 20242:35 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/ 202414:51 42.401227 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 24/202417:06 42.403261 76.46333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202410:17 42,403065 76.462953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202414:57 42.417111 76.451338 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/20246:35 42.396865 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 241202420:12 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/ 202414:24 42.394136 76.4477 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/20245:14 42.393457 76.440603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26/202419:24 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/202416:02 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/202423:47 42.393131 76.445391 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 24/20249:36 42.410694 76.466735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/ 202423:33 42.393856 76.447358 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125120247:11 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20248: 42 42.402346 76.46254 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 202422:09 42.414262 76.477075 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202411: 20 42.39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 202421:16 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202431:04 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 251202410:47 42,409249 76.438365 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/ 202417:09 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/ 20249:17 42.405561 76.459935 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202422: 57 42,403511 76.466169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 202416:23 42.409063 76.437728 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202419:46 42.399163 76.446774 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 26120242:37 42.392977 76.445409 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202416: 19 42.394675 76.448077 FAILED ATTEM PT 71241202422:40 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202412:35 42.401613 76.438079 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/ 20241:39 42.403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/221202417:37 42.417783 76.449856 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/221202420:41 42.40162 76.459926 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 202419:08 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 25/202410:59 42.399583 76.456719 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 261202421:17 42.409269 76.465307 FAILEDATTEMPT 71251202416:00 42.40857 76.43356 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120242:33 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202412:38 42. 400588 46.458866 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202417:42 42. 405035 76.430605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202411:33 42.397206 76.448724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202413:52 42.400734 76.4598 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202411: 17 42.402192 76.469637 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202422:55 42.400734 76.4598 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202413:50 42.395793 76.459171 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20248: 20 42,416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202411:00 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126120246:33 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202418:33 42.40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:21 42.416998 76.460276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20242:38 42.392684 76.443954 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202419:22 42. 394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202417:08 42.397099 76.448724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202422:54 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20247:11 42.398517 76.44063 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202412:06 42.418116 76.45777 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20240: 04 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202419: 45 42.400135 76.459054 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20242: 37 42.395108 76.440046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202412: 58 42.397732 76.440136 FAILEDATTEMPT 71251202423:03 42. 41102 76.442579 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246: 19 42.405102 76.463699 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20249: 17 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414: 15 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20248:35 42.404456 76.461354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20244: 17 42.405861 76.429922 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202421: 03 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20242:31 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20243: 22 42.41098 76.441897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120244:51 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244: 55 42.398524 76.455003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202417:41 42.406626 76.462576 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202412: 06 42.399243 76.459324 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202412:25 42.420232 76.458102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202420:20 42.411173 76.471891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20241:51 42.411426 76.467472 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202418:52 42.40911 76.465145 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423: 17 42.401733 76.455605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202416: 02 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202423:15 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25120247:11 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202422:22 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20241: 27 42.400069 76.466762 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202418: 18 42.40407 76.468334 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202415:37 42.407698 76.434162 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202415:38 42.408171 76.435141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20248: 25 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20243:39 42.408151 76.435096 FAILEDATTEMPT 71251202416:10 42. 408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20247:46 42.414388 76.4704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202410: 21 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 71261202418:20 42. 406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202423:15 42.402599 76.458003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20240: 03 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20244:53 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202422: 51 42.406653 76.462603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202421: 30 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202411: 05 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20242: 35 42.395361 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/261202414:51 42.420432 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20243: 50 42.393697 76,445113 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244: 13 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20244: 52 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202417:06 42.396546 76.449209 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202415: 54 42.414801 76.470795 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23120247:40 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202416:05 42.411819 76.453566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202415:38 42.403837 76.434566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202423:14 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202414:58 42.399989 76, 468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20246:20 42.404716 76.431907 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:33 42.412997 76. 475537 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20243:28 42.416691 76. 454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202415:38 42.399782 76. 457545 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202418:29 42.4154 76.450511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20241:51 42.411659 76. 467705 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202416:09 42.405788 76. 47022 FAILEDATTEMPT 71231202420:46 42.400515 76.466492 FAILED AT TEMPT 7/23/20243:22 42.416691 76. 454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20249:06 42.40186 76. 45362 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20246:45 42.404303 76. 462207 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/20249:39 42.392252 76. 440944 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202410:44 42.406886 76, 469529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202412:10 42.407285 76.45141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202412:13 42.402925 76.465028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/202410:28 42.399915 76. 459324 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202414:48 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20245:10 42.417131 76.45229 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20246:23 42.405368 76.465603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246:25 42.405614 76.465181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202416:17 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20245:16 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20246:24 42.403411 76.467984 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20248:33 42.396633 76.452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/20249:47 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202411:17 42.412232 76.441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202422:13 42,4086" 76AI34678 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202422:13 42.417251 76.452775 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202414:31 42.419414 76.456465 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202422:15 42,420745 76,460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202414:37 42.400774 76.466582 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202414:30 42.409469 76.456216 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202419:48 42.392638 76.443226 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202422:12 42.4080" 76.464076 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/2N20245:43 42.407392 76.468639 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202414: 25 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202414:26 42.407319 76.434198 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202421:25 42. 412791 76A73959 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202421: 21 42.405788 76.47022 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20243: 57 42.397891 76.459234 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124120249:08 42. 415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202419: 36 42.400448 76.466501 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202422: 15 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202422:14 42.420745 76.460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/20249:08 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20243: 55 42.399989 76.45704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20243:58 42.412471 76.44611 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202414: 34 42.396367 76.443106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202414:53 42.402372 76.470283 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/231202414:52 42.407545 76.469897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/2D2419: 03 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124120240:19 42. 403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202414: 56 42.400461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20246: 27 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124120244:22 42. 412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202412:10 42.407285 76.45141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202412:18 42.41122 76.474002 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/231202415:05 42.412145 76.441169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202421: 51 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20245: 13 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 712312024 5:19 42.405614 76.465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20246: 22 42.403957 76.467795 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20246:24 42.403404 76.468047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20248:35 42.406393 76.432761 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/202411:19 42.408617 76. 451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/202424:31 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/241202414: 36 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 202414:39 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/ 202414:52 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202414: 52 42.407252 76,467876 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/ 20240:19 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 24/20247:14 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/202414:56 42.420432 76,459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/ 202423:14 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/ 20246:24 42.405626 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 23/20246:27 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202416:17 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 221202419:30 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 23120243:28 42.414515 76.447044 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 23/202415:02 42.404523 76.470795 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202418:26 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7124120245:05 42.420232 76.458102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26120243: 15 42.408644 76.468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 26/20246:38 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120244:54 42. 397931 76.454194 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202411:19 42.399323 76. 436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202415:04 42.403957 76.467795 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202420:38 42. 407538 76.46881 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20248:20 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423:15 42. 399456 76.457958 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20240:15 42.394322 76.446882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202420:20 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20249:51 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20249:15 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20244:13 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:18 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202422:58 42.397006 76.453736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202422:25 42.405641 76.42897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/20243:50 42.394868 76.439812 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244:51 42.396859 76.459162 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244:58 42.402359 76.459566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202417:33 42.418668 76.453611 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202414:44 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120248:48 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202413:11 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202420:23 42.399955 76.454689 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/202420A4 42.396986 76.44885 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423:15 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423:17 42.399742 76.456656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202416:03 42.417424 76.473409 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20241:51 42.436998 76.460276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:01 42.401966 76.460644 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202419:10 42.400575 76.438887 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202418:19 42.412924 76.468954 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202423:09 42.402885 76.466555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202416:12 42.407605 76.433425 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202418:22 42.409083 76.439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202410:22 42.4086" 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202423:15 42.402306 76.457249 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20246:32 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120244:53 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202420:40 42.400721 76.458121 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202422:50 42.391945 76.443028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202411:23 42.412618 76.444259 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126120242:37 42.419014 76.455829 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202416:21 42.40417 76.430659 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244:24 42.418748 76.457357 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24120242:28 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202414:47 42.419833 76.457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/202417:47 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202421:19 42.401753 76.437252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202421:18 42.411985 76.45335 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202417:49 42.402492 76.454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22120244:52 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202414:06 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7122/202415:04 42.391859 76.441708 FAILED ATTEMPT 7123/20247:43 42.394183 76.44867 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202418:17 42.398044 76.454347 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/202420:46 42.400401 76.46651 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202410:20 42.402006 76.460734 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/241202423:15 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125120243:05 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202415:26 42.399849 76.459333 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202423:16 42.402658 76.458174 FAILEDATTEMPT 7125/20249:55 42.412471 76.44611 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202415:54 42.407925 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7122/202420:21 42.402386 76.454707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/23/20243: 39 42.396899 76.459441 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202422:11 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/20240: 23 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 71241202415:37 42. 403524 76.435141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202415: 38 42.408377 76.436857 FAILEDATTEMPT 7124/202415:38 42.40397 76.432913 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25120243:39 42.39921 76.446945 FAILED ATTEMPT 71241202415:37 42. 407192 76.433111 FAILED ATTEMPT 7124/202415:38 42.40845 76.436642 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20248:25 42.399409 76.439803 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202414: 51 42,413363 76.444385 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419: 30 42.401533 76,461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/20242:30 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/25/20241: 52 42.411732 76.467766 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/261202412:37 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20244: 55 42.409249 76.438366 FAILED ATTEMPT 71251202417:12 42, 40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/20249:19 42.398424 76.444088 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/20245:34 42.397126 76.459171 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202413:53 42.411952 76.453395 FAILEDATTEMPT 71221202414:53 42.404569 76.460986 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202423:54 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202412:43 42.421304 76.45786 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/20241:55 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/22/202419:20 42.393723 76.440396 FAILEDATTEMPT 7123/202416:24 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/251202419:23 42.417217 76.459566 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/24/202414: 07 42.414568 76,47614 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202413: 22 42.406393 76.466474 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202416: 40 42.402119 76.45415 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202417: 10 42.415467 76.448293 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/202417: 19 42.404063 76.458021 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/22/202419: 49 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/20244: 47 42.391885 76.44107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202418: 35 42.402259 76.469852 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/20243: 01 42.408617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/23/20241: 48 42.4194 76.455299 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/25/202412: 22 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/24/20249: 38 42.412471 76.44611 FAILED ATTEMPT 7125/202410:48 42.396953 76.460034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7126/202421:50 42.396899 76.459441 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120240:11 42.404569 76.460986 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20240:51 42.397765 76. 453979 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/2a24a:55 42.397292 76. 452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120240:58 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202411:21 42.4086" 76.458532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202418:05 42.41552 76. 478422 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202421:58 42.405614 76. 465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20248:22 42.411173 76. 471891 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202418:16 42.41112 76.467166 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30120245:32 42.407339 76.432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202418:56 42.402985 76. 436022 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202422:55 42.400175 76. 434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202414:15 42.396986 76.452362 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20248:08 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/ 20249:21 42.420745 76.460177 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/ 202416:45 42.408324 76.457716 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 31/202419:11 42.408171 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/ 202413:38 42.411732 76.467786 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/ 20242:09 42.403105 76.434459 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202416:42 42. 406194 76.433201 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202423:53 42. 420465 76.455075 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202412:33 42. 403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202414:08 42. 405375 76.465289 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202412:51 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202419:12 42. 403264 76.456485 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129120245:51 42.401846 76. 433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120249:15 42.396706 76.449092 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/ 202410:30 42.402925 76.465666 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:55 42.393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:56 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20241a:03 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202414:04 42.401533 76.4617a4 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:24 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 30/202416:05 42.412551 76.474505 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20241:32 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20247:48 42.410907 76.43992 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202416:00 42.39359 76.440495 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120245:01 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/ 202419:41 42.393697 76.445313 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 28/202412:47 42.413037 76.469071 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202418:59 42.422322 76.460806 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202414:59 42.404456 76.461354 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202417:55 42.40377 76.457464 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202416:00 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20249:02 42.410022 76.47358 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202423:21 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/2a2410:19 42.397718 76.459216 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20240:06 42.39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20247:09 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120242:53 42. 399383 76.446541 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120241:04 42.400741 76.468657 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20242:25 42.39618 76.451086 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202418:12 42.402352 76.470229 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20244:55 42.406074 76.459656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20249:43 42.407925 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202421:03 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20241:23 42.400102 76.466726 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202419:08 42.400515 76A66492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20248:46 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202416:43 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:06 42.400887 76.439058 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20247:32 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202410:08 42.399503 76.455785 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20242:46 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20244:21 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20249:16 42.410201 76,466241 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202415:32 42.409682 76.47128 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202414:12 42.407252 76.467876 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202417:55 42.407339 76.432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202419:51 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202418:03 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202422:15 42.40845 76.436641 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20241:48 42.414961 76.477919 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120249:29 42.402652 76.46744E FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202418:12 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202413:38 42.405927 78.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410:17 42.3983" 76.45927 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202416:11 42.408617 76.451569 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20245:33 42.408098 76.43427 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202418:58 42.422322 76.460806 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20242:24 42.396633 76.452003 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30120240:02 42.3926" 76.444726 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20249:15 42.406953 76.462962 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20242:52 42.394322 76.446882 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:57 42A19414 76.456485 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202423:58 42.419414 76.456485 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202417:01 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202421:00 42A08617 76.451589 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202423:29 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202419:18 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:43 42AD0049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20246:56 42.391945 76.443028 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202415:31 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20245:08 42,415114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20241:34 42.419168 76.456099 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20248:09 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202414:10 42,399589 76.448481 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202417:54 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202438:20 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202419:41 42.40849 76.433381 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202421:57 42.406393 76.466474 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120248:58 42.40D135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202416:30 42.409489 76.47208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120249:13 42.403644 76.457222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202436:44 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417:28 42.403504 76,436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202410:58 42.419414 76.456485 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20241: 29 42.402812 76.43657 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202412:17 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202412: 45 42.415001 76.474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202411:11 42.404389 76.470598 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202422:56 42. 396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202419: 14 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202423:07 42.399756 76.456674 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20242:47 42.397146 76.452245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20245:31 42.407605 76.433425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202410:18 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202414: 12 42.405927 76.426934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20247: 34 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:54 42.394036 76.446783 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20240: 13 42.40379 76.433587 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202416:16 42A20745 76.460177 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20246: 15 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120241:05 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20247:07 42.416578 76.450287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202422:50 42.419833 76.457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20242:28 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20248:07 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202412:30 42.398504 76.459279 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:05 42.399323 76.436722 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:23 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202414:59 42.405561 76.459935 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:03 42.400248 76.46863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202419:10 42.401407 76.452676 FAILEDATTEMPT 7132/202417:49 42.412491 76.452479 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:51 42.398018 76.454302 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202419:53 42.404436 76.458695 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127120240:58 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20245:06 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202411:22 42.405861 76.429922 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202422:10 42.408377 76.436857 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20248:58 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202416:10 42.406393 76.466474 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20245:32 42.407605 76.433425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202414:51 42.416485 76.452425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202418:56 42.410255 76.43851 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202414:22 42.401061 76.46704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20249:22 42.408976 76.458363 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202410:16 42.403078 76.456135 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202416:48 42.407186 76.451167 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202413:38 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202416:43 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202423:57 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202412:34 42.402925 76.465028 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202417:47 42.396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202419:14 42.407285 76.45141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20242:21 42.396793 76.453673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20245:51 42.401846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20249:14 42.404975 76.465558 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202410:28 42.417111 76.451338 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:58 42.396187 76.449478 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:57 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:40 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:27 42.420432 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20241:32 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120246:51 42.408517 76.437234 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202414:05 42.401886 76.436294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20248:08 42.413716 76.447511 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202416:20 42.410294 76.470948 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202419:41 42.393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202421:58 42.406393 76.466474 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20244:57 42.402299 76.470014 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202416:10 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20249:13 42.402419 76.463276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:58 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202410:55 42.393483 76.444627 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:44 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20241:28 42.400734 76.4598 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202412:14 42.404496 76.433443 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202410:09 42.403943 76.469717 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202410:17 42. 402039 76.453988 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202422:56 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202419:12 42.419168 76. 456099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202423:01 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202414:12 42.405927 76. 428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20242:47 42.402652 76. 467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20246:02 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20247:32 42.392598 76.445553 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410:19 42.398531 76.459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30120240:07 42.399556 76. 447286 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202412:39 42.40614 76. 470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202416:13 42.402885 76.466555 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:54 42.394203 76. 447116 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20241:04 42.400135 76. 45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120242:26 42.400495 76.466501 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202415:28 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20249:02 42.402485 76. 463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202414:59 42.408264 76. 450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202422:50 42.400282 76,439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:23 42.418848 76.455605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202421:00 42.406976 76.434494 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202416:01 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202418: 14 42.398018 76.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423: 51 42.3986" 76,448068 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202419: 52 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20241: 34 42.396706 76.453197 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20243: 39 42.408038 76.435707 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202410:35 42.41771 76.458075 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202411:32 42.393597 76.446532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20245: 42 42.412791 76.473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202414:09 42.421617 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20247:56 42.39658 76.439714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202418: 13 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246: 13 42.39668 76.452092 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:34 42.411406 76.452272 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202413:17 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423: 39 42.413976 76.449317 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20248: 44 42.403444 76.456836 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202416:53 42.402852 76.462495 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202419: 52 42.392445 J6.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20244:14 42.422296 76.462351 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20249:00 42.398158 76.459252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120249:01 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129120246:04 42. 401753 76.437252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120240:22 42. 400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202410:53 42.391885 76.44107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202416:53 42.410148 76.443055 FAI LED ATTEM PT 7/30/20249: 21 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130120242:27 42. 398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20249: 42 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20241: 20 42.409309 76.439857 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120240:21 42. 408384 76.470723 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20249: 31 42.414947 76.47552 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202417: 30 42,403524 76,46607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414: 43 42.399596 76.459351 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249: 25 42.394322 76.446882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202421:09 42.407665 76.463699 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202421: 10 42.412258 76.443819 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246: 11 42.397578 76.453656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202411:23 42A09249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202419: 32 42.394362 76.448661 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:59 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202410:16 42,406194 76.433201 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202413:05 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202421: 04 42.416685 76.452263 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423: 34 42,412937 76.45167 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20240: 09 42.420432 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246: 16 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202421: 05 42.403424 76.466978 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202412: 27 42.406074 76.459656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20242:29 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202414:55 42.405947 76.459737 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417: 25 42.398204 76.44319 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120243:37 42. 394322 76.446882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202416:44 42.402312 76.457249 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416: 14 42.406027 76.468262 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/221202418:59 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413: 44 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202419:58 42.403864 76.431835 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243: 38 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20243:41 42.407172 76.433075 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20243: 41 42.407991 76.434773 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20246:42 42.414075 76.476212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120246:57 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120248:38 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202410: 53 42.41303 76.475035 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20247: 26 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202421:56 42.406826 76.467346 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20248: 39 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202414:18 42. 402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20240: 09 42,420126 76.454886 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20241: 53 42.414515 76.447044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20248:39 42.406746 76.433354 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202410:06 42.40393 76.464256 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202413:29 42,402272 76.469906 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:20 42.396853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/281202416:21 42.414648 76.447619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202416:25 42.398291 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202416:25 42.39652 76.438052 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202416:21 42.396633 76,438384 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202416:24 42.397545 76.440127 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202416:21 42.395235 76.440055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202417:38 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:51 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202418:42 42.414774 76.470768 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202418:46 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202422:34 42.417856 76.4527" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202420:06 42.406447 76.468235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:20 42.395627 76.440064 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202416:25 42.397505 76.440755 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202420:03 42.40869 76.436803 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202420:06 42.403684 76.464247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202418:59 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:28 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202411:49 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202422:21 42.416412 76.472385 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202422:28 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202417:49 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202422:24 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202415:05 42.412085 76.444681 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202422: 37 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202416:21 42.397738 76.441501 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202420:58 42.392445 76. 445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202420:24 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202420:52 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202422:31 42.408377 76.436857 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128120240:10 42.418622 76.453584 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20240:15 42.420359 76. 454644 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20240:22 42.398504 76. 459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202415:43 42.411173 76.472206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202422:58 42.412937 76. 45167 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20243:23 42.399989 76.467831 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:59 42.393364 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202414:24 42.402259 76. 469852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202419:36 42.409749 76.43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20240:28 42,400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20248:06 42.411413 76.47323 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20240:38 42.40168 76. 437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20242:18 42,401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202422:58 42.414854 76. 450161 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20243:35 42.402346 76.436579 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20244:56 42,402172 76. 435761 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120241:41 42.417031 76. 473023 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20241:43 42.422089 76. 458938 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202422:15 42,410068 76. 471047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202422:19 42.396551 76. 444538 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202422:18 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202422:18 42.401886 76. 438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202421:45 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20240:38 42.402172 76.433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130120243:22 42.410148 76,443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:28 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26120248:37 42.4086" 76. 468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20240:31 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120240:28 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20248:36 42.418449 76.455398 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202417:26 42.415194 76. 475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:58 42.413823 76.449703 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202411:20 42.401833 76. 460366 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20243:23 42.401081 76.467085 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202410:11 42.397026 76. 450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202417:14 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202417:17 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120242:06 42.40417 76. 430659 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:28 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20243:23 42.40136 76.467813 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120243:11 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422:58 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 713112024 14:23 42.394509 76.441034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20240:47 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202422:24 42.403298 76.462333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202422:37 42.408976 76.458363 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20244:35 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202420:06 42.405614 76.465181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202422:22 42.41576 76.478108 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20248:20 42.403354 76.435833 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202417:54 42.401101 76.453593 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20240:40 42.396999 76.448832 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202416:20 42.397778 76.443609 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202416:24 42.396799 76.438851 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202422:26 42.412232 76.441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120240:47 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410:00 42.398138 76.459252 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202416:24 42.396866 76.4401 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20245:06 42.401846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202419:03 42.403537 76.466016 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120249:00 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202412:46 42.407319 76.434198 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202417:23 42.391945 76.442445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202414:40 42,416572 76.472547 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20248:39 42.406194 76.433201 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202412:09 42.407718 76.434216 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20248:00 42.403837 76.431692 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202417:54 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20245:03 42.409063 76.47181 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20249:31 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202421:07 42.39363 76.440468 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202411:44 42.416405 J6.449954 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420:28 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20248:39 42.401939 76.436605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202419:50 42.408264 76,450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202413:51 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202414:18 42.414262 76.477075 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202410:50 42.399576 76.448454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202416:50 42.400708 76.468648 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202412:49 42.405015 76.461273 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20245:49 42,398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20243:48 42.407865 76.43506 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202416:27 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:54 42.405927 76,428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202417:35 42.401314 76.468675 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202416:08 42.412145 76.474847 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202419:31 42,4013 76.452443 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202418:32 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202423:38 42,413962 76.449344 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202420:45 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202410:11 42.405515 76.46625 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/2024021 42.412791 76.473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202413:28 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127120243:46 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202415:53 42.401407 76.452676 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128120246:13 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20242:28 42.394023 76.446424 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202418:50 42.403637 76.465594 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:41 42,41572 76.450511 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:34 42.410288 76.452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:24 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202410:23 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202411:25 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120247:37 42.407439 76.433165 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20246:13 42.408903 76.452272 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202419:15 42.40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202411:00 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202415:59 42.407179 76.463195 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202418:05 42.394143 76.44867 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202415:24 42.402432 76.457581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20243:37 42.394529 76A47152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202421:11 42.406806 76.462809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202422:59 42.393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20241:22 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:11 42.394802 76.451374 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202417:48 42.416652 76.452811 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202415:03 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127120243:50 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243:52 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202410:23 42.406353 76.433084 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202415:18 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202416:58 42.402346 76.46254 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120242:56 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:18 42.396633 76.452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202422:15 42.407658 76.43409 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202423:21 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202418:58 42.421504 76.459665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:01 42.409309 76.439857 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202413:38 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202410:50 42. 39329 76.444322 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202423: 39 42,418622 76.453584 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20241: 03 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20242:52 42.39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120242:26 42.396866 76.451077 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202410: 19 42.397139 76.459171 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20247: 07 42.414648 76.447619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20240: 04 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423: 57 42.416884 76.472861 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20244: 58 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120246:16 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202414: 31 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 31 42.402492 76.454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 32 42.401427 76.467984 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202422: 56 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 38 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20244:02 42.392944 76.443693 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421: 02 42.400049 76,454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202418:07 42.39397 76.44664 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202416:42 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20241:21 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202410: 29 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202419:08 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202413:44 42.405248 76,46395 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202411: 03 42.415527 76.449505 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20249:41 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202421:24 42.415001 76,474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20246:00 42.408537 76.469044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202414:32 42.40168 76.453251 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202423:52 42.400328 76.439696 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20245: 58 42.406027 76.468262 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 36 42.40369 76.457689 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20247: 43 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246: 57 42.402259 76.461255 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20247: 03 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20249: 42 42.406826 76.466654 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202410: 34 42.41353 76.476284 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128120245:59 42. 407538 76.46881 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202414:32 42,402152 76.46104 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20243: 09 42.401733 76.433129 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120249:14 42.401713 76.461067 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202421:50 42,393397 76.448715 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131120249:40 42. 407332 76.433407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202421: 51 42.395414 76.44955 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120246:26 42.397219 76.453117 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20247: 10 42.410255 76.43851 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20M 14: 36 42.410288 76.437387 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120247:41 42.394529 76.447781 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202419:27 42.408424 76.43321 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120242:45 42.407312 76.433929 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20249: 44 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202415:26 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 39 42.407252 76.467876 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20248:13 42.400155 76.466663 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202411: 47 42.406979 76.431665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202410: 07 42.398018 76.45512 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202421:53 42.408644 76.468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202417:22 42.399842 76.459333 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20248:54 42.398238 76.459261 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202420:41 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20248:18 42.410148 J6.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:31 42.401061 76.451985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421:51 42.394209 76.44867 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20249:11 42.408384 76AW17 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20247:56 42.396513 76.440091 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202415:31 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202414:10 42.39644 76.437872 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20248:42 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120246:46 42,401753 76.437252 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20249:16 42.406034 76.431386 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20249:47 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20248:17 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202413:40 42.418661 76.45538 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202415:35 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120244:02 42.391945 76.443028 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202414:25 42.41556 76.449649 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202418:28 42.420432 76.459189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202413:43 42.396586 76.440091 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202415:44 42.402159 76.469511 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202419:25 42.393976 76.446667 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202420:07 42.404789 76.463133 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202415:31 42.405614 76.465181 FAILED ATTEMPT 71281202415:39 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202417:43 42.393264 76.445229 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202419:51 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:32 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202417:43 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202414:42 42.400528 76.45176 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422:51 42.414601 76.450296 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:55 42.396353 76.440082 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202410:40 42.400854 76.468657 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20243:16 42.39397 76.446244 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202421:34 42.400315 76.466519 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202420:09 42.404596 76.462648 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20246:04 42.40417 76.430659 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20249:12 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202413:51 42.408644 76.468532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202417:37 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202419:25 42.398031 76.44257 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202413:43 42.39636 76.440082 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202418:50 42.39652 76.438052 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420:08 42.40433 76A62172 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202415:37 42.402772 76.461597 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20241:05 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410:56 42.406979 76.431665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202422:51 42.41323 76.451185 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202422:56 42.39315 76.440899 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202422:54 42.394509 76.441034 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202421:36 42.420672 76.457878 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202419:10 42.39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202417:43 42.393364 76.445391 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202414:42 42.400069 76.466762 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202421:50 42.394109 76.446936 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410: 08 42.400109 76.459288 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 32 42.406227 76.462046 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120249:17 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202410:19 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202412:16 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202414:27 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120246:24 42. 4036" 76.433354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202417:54 42.408098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:47 42.408264 76. 450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20249:17 42.399989 76.46704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202413:44 42.398897 76.445849 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202410:06 42.403364 76. 470463 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202410:54 42.408098 76. 43427 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202414:31 42,401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202421:50 42.393677 76. 448697 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202411:06 42.406393 76. 430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202414:26 42.416552 76.452811 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202419:20 42.408384 76.470723 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202419:25 42.398131 76. 442939 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202420:09 42.407545 76. 469897 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20247:14 42,39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202419:56 42.403045 76.46687 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202412:38 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420:07 42.404642 76.462818 FAILED ATTEMPT 71281202415:37 42.402419 76.463276 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120241:05 42.402172 76.435761 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202414:42 42.402259 76.469852 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202417:43 42.392445 76.445607 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:51 42.415087 76.449406 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:55 42.396413 76.4378 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:51 42.413816 76.447197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421:35 42.400774 76.466582 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120249:42 42.416092 76.450556 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202413:44 42.39373 76.446146 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202419:29 42.403637 76.465603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20249:16 42.40168 76.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202410:36 42,397612 76.4537 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202410:49 42.395954 76.450628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202412:55 42.399856 76.459333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20241:51 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202414:41 42.402872 76.45574 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422:55 42.3967 76.438564 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202410:40 42.407532 76.468208 FAI LED ATTEM PT 7131/202420:08 42.404456 76.461354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:59 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202419:24 42.393843 76.444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20246:01 42.406593 76.467624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20246:05 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20246:24 42.399596 76.459351 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/26/202418:39 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202421:22 42.411173 76.471891 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202421:26 42.407166 76.451167 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20246:03 42.406207 76,46863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20247:29 42.402172 76.433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120246:07 42.402865 76.466555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202413:43 42,39859 76.444726 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202410:49 42.400262 76.450907 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202411:58 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202412:50 42.396353 76.437648 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120241:52 42.401733 76.433129 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20249:50 42.394642 76.447628 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202416:06 42.414222 76.446137 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202419:51 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202415:36 42.401533 76.451704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120241:50 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422:51 42.413423 76.448832 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420:07 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202417:43 42.39377 76.446235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421:51 42.394269 76.448661 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:36 42.40176 76.453413 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120249:43 42.420958 76.459504 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202421:25 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20248:43 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120242:20 42.400175 76.434521 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120247:43 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120246:29 42.407252 76.450925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120243:51 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202410:25 42.408038 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202419:41 42.409629 76.436013 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120242:58 42.421171 76.460779 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:05 42.415101 76.475107 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202419:12 42.401733 76.460159 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/31120249:21 42.419673 75.456602 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202412:32 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202414:08 42.417251 76.452775 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202422:52 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202423:24 42.419673 76,456602 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:00 42.411573 76.453781 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202421:58 42.406447 76.468235 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20241:30 42.39933 76.440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202423:54 42.39369 76.446074 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20242:28 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202422:34 42,393743 76.446382 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20241:01 42.410341 76.439256 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20246:15 42.401733 76.433129 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202410:49 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120243:59 42.407339 76.432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20249:31 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422:23 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202416:45 42.40893 76.434396 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20241: 29 42.401753 76.437252 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202410: 50 42,406746 76.433354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20248: 08 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249: 13 42.402133 76.454368 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202412:06 42.411286 76.467337 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:56 42.414488 76.477317 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202418:03 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202412:18 42. 39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120247:35 42.400535 76.439247 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202411: 14 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202414:59 42.411107 76.472879 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202420:42 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20240: 35 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202418: 10 42.407532 76.468208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20246:12 42.402219 76,457015 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120248:40 42.405089 76.463672 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202412: 20 42.394529 76.447152 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/26/202414: 43 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202415:06 42.40164 76.459423 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202419:22 42.39933 75. 440298 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202423:34 42.412937 76.45167 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202416:15 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20244:31 42.413037 76.469071 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20245: 31 42.407605 76.433425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202410:19 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202414:13 42. 413037 76.469071 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20240:14 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20240:42 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20241:16 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20241:16 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20241:19 42.400768 76.458192 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20245:14 42.396999 76.451212 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20244:43 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202420:13 42.410294 76.4709" FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202418:21 42.404842 76.431189 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202419:37 42.400575 76.438887 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/ 202420:59 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/ 20240:21 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/ 20248:01 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20244: 37 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202415:47 42.407738 76.463771 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202419:48 42.420432 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417:19 42.408717 76.46475 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20244:50 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20248:30 42. 405115 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202420:13 42. 415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202418:34 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:18 42. 397219 76.453117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202411:05 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:05 42. 414874 76.470867 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202417:59 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120247:02 42.414748 76. 449362 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:27 42.392598 76. 445553 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120242:00 42.403278 76. 463384 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202414:09 42.406447 76.468235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202420:10 42.403464 76.463663 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202410:58 42. 393856 76.447358 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/2D2421: 33 42.393697 76.445313 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423: 30 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202422:19 42.393397 76.445463 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422: 49 42.414115 76.449301 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202412:16 42.400202 76.439408 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202417: 50 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20243:27 42.408098 76.43427 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20245: 30 42.3964 76.452542 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20242: 32 42.401846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:32 42. 408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246:47 42.399989 76.46704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:11 42.393716 76.446128 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20240:00 42.41787 76.473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202414:06 42.400874 76.458417 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202410:52 42.405074 76.459656 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120241:14 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202416:36 42.404503 76.461956 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/32120249:19 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20245:14 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202412:54 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20248:16 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20248:57 42.422915 76.460016 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202412:42 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20247:53 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202414: 10 42.407312 76.433929 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202419:46 42.40134 76.467759 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202419: 25 42.403644 76.465576 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202419:35 42.408036 76.435707 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202418: 43 42.415074 76.477335 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120240:10 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202412:31 42.420086 76.454859 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202411:33 42.407652 76.463681 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:01 42.409323 76.435303 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202423:36 42,419553 76A55925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202413:58 42.401054 76.467013 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:31 42.404982 76.43073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20240:51 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202416:07 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20242:40 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120243:29 42.408584 76. 433587 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20244:33 42.394509 76.441034 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20245:13 42.396879 76.450916 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20248:57 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202410:16 42.407172 76.459306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20243:37 42.39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202413:06 42.410401 76.452021 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202421:38 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202420:10 42.402552 76. 461866 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120246:43 42.400308 76.450493 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202411:04 42.407865 76.43506 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202417:57 42,402199 76, 460483 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202413:30 42.402485 76.463573 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202411:43 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:10 42.39397 76. 446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20240:09 42.417251 76. 452775 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:14 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:34 42.404456 76. 461354 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202412:00 42.401074 76.467058 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202413:35 42.412551 76. 446352 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202413:58 42.403504 76. 436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244:28 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417A2 42.405774 76. 466582 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202417:16 42.403504 76. 436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:27 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202418:26 42.397645 76. 453763 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202416:36 42.40166 76.460007 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120244:37 42.415114 76. 474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20248:13 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202417:59 42.396899 76.459441 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20245:55 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202419:49 42.409249 76. 458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 71281202411:30 42.40164 76.459423 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202412:06 42.398883 76.459306 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202423:35 42.414129 76.47014 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202422:49 42.393843 76. 444268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202416:47 42.400515 76.466492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:33 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202418:38 42.39373 76.446146 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202417:08 42.397985 76. 442418 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413:49 42.414195 76.450637 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202413:07 42.404389 76.470598 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20249:29 42.400921 76. 43904 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202411:59 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202413:35 42.409489 76. 47206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20240:08 42.425114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202414:09 42.412078 76.453206 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202410:55 42.418748 76.455892 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:17 42.418316 76.454105 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20241:18 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202417:09 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423: 11 42.39395 76.446604 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202411:23 42.414861 76.475718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202412: 25 42.406027 76.468262 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202422:40 42.417783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202423: 32 42.410255 76.43851 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202410: 58 42,394529 76,447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202419:34 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:04 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:36 42.400282 76,439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244:35 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:46 42.407355 76. 463384 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202413:10 42.399782 76.457545 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202419:42 42.40647 78.433327 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20241:19 42,404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243:28 42.40893 76.434396 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20247:10 42.409489 76.47208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20247:07 42.402492 76. 454931 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20244:37 42.415001 76. 474793 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130120248:04 42.3926" 76.444726 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202417:11 42.405947 76. 459737 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:10 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202413:34 42.402872 76,45574 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202417:41 42.411313 76. 473113 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202416:36 42.414648 76. 447619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120244:54 42.402445 76.454832 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202422:18 42.396853 76.439624 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:34 42.415194 76. 475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202417:05 42.404569 76. 460986 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413:47 42.40168 76.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202412:24 42.394522 76. 440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202410:59 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202416:47 42.400728 76.466564 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202419:49 42.420232 76. 458102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:32 42.415114 76. 474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129120240:21 42.410727 76.4393 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202422:49 42.412258 76. 452892 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413:10 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20245:13 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20248:31 42.405202 76.465855 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:50 42.400328 76. 439696 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202417:59 42.402199 76.460483 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:17 42.419833 76.457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202413:34 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202414:36 42.410255 76.473571 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202413:04 42.404769 76, 46245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20248:16 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:55 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:11 42.393623 76.445939 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 27/202417:27 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202417:07 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20242:00 42.399989 76.468397 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202420:10 42.403637 76.465603 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202413:02 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 28/202413:21 42.409655 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202421:33 42.393697 76.445113 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20240:00 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202410:12 42.403371 76.464849 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202417:56 42.40364 76.459423 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202414:08 42.40644 76.466564 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120242:34 42.40417 76.430659 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202410:54 42. 41755 76.458291 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20240:06 42. 41982 76.454985 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202416:38 42. 401959 76.460626 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20241:14 42.400401 76.46651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202411:23 42.416565 76.450269 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202410:57 42.410146 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202411: 08 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/ 202410:45 42.403883 76.462746 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20248: 24 42.401873 76.468936 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202415:46 42.405062 76.463635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20240:14 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202419:38 42.409189 76.465217 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202412:25 42.393883 76.44646 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:36 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202418:25 42.403164 76.465873 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:02 42.408271 76.43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202415:45 42.399323 76.436722 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202419:34 42.393364 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202418:50 42.404569 76.460986 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120241:19 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20241:20 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127120242:41 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202411:44 42.404769 76.46245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:31 42.413949 76,44558 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20246:44 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:11 42.393037 76.444717 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20240:00 42.417204 76.473185 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20248:12 42.403118 76.435222 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:02 42.400461 76.457141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202413:35 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244:17 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244:42 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120248:56 42.415114 76.471092 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202418:29 42.417071 76.473059 FAILEDATTEMPT 71281202419:24 42.392598 76.445553 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120245:20 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/2024D:40 42.396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202417:42 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:13 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202416:36 42.400688 76.458866 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202417:59 42.416691 76.454561 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/2D248:15 42.402885 76.466555 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120241:12 42.399989 76.467508 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20247:45 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:13 42.4D3364 76.435833 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202413:46 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20246:40 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20249:29 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20244:14 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202414:44 42.407605 76.433425 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120244:42 42.403837 76.431692 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202421:40 42.40614 76.470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120243:19 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202414:25 42.402812 76.43657 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202419:23 42.394702 76.45141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120240:57 42.39658 76.439714 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20247: 08 42.410907 76.43992 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202422:39 42. 41982 76.454985 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20241:24 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202423:39 42.418209 76.454985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20247:38 42.394642 76.447628 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20248: 15 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417: 27 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202422: 59 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:35 42.418316 76.454105 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20249:04 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202410:43 42.420232 76.458102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202411:30 42.40164 76.459423 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202413:59 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417: 31 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120241:20 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20245: 13 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202410:14 42,405861 76.429922 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202418: 35 42.415114 76.474946 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423: 18 42.415114 76.474946 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202411: 04 42.402885 76.466555 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202423: 26 42.414155 76.449038 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20247: 00 42.403171 76.435788 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127120246:12 42. 401686 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120248:14 42.406194 76.433201 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202410:07 42.396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414: 09 42.406" 76.466564 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202410:59 42.394529 76.447152 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:30 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:06 42.411067 76.440917 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202417:59 42.402525 76.461121 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20240:51 42.402172 76.433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244:43 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202422:49 42.413443 76.448805 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202412:15 42.397598 76.440127 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202415: 56 42.393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202413: 23 42.41542 76.471388 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202418: 52 42.414515 76.447044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20245: 23 42.401733 76.433129 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20245:47 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20244: 43 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20244:36 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417: 16 42.402346 76.436911 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202415:47 42.405694 76.464714 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202419:48 42.410294 76.470948 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202422:44 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20248: 13 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202421: 30 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29120248:33 42.403417 76.467588 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:05 42.405788 76.47022 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202412: 05 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423: 37 42.419673 76.456602 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202421:00 42,412232 76.441735 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202423:00 42.392824 76.442876 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20245: 31 42.402672 76.458201 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202417:50 42.404389 76,470598 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414: 26 42.409915 76.439408 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20248: 00 42.403717 76.434117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202419:34 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20244: 14 42.40401 76.432671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20244:43 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202420:10 42.405341 76.464112 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20247: 48 42.409749 76.43745 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120241:34 42,396999 76.451212 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243: 38 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243: 41 42.407945 76.434674 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/27120243:46 42,407865 76.43506 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202418:32 42. 400686 76.458866 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202412:51 42.397099 76.448724 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120240:28 42.41982 76.454985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20241:20 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/2D2411: 32 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202416: 53 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:59 42.404842 76.46492 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/2D2410: 54 42.408171 76.43718 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20245: 48 42.412964 76.47402 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202421:11 42.406806 76.462809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28120244:19 42.4017 76.468792 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20249:01 42.409063 76.437728 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202418: 06 42.394868 76.439812 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130120249:21 42. 400282 76.439931 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20242:27 42.394023 76.446424 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202414:18 42.403943 76.489717 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202419:08 42.393164 76. 446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20247:37 42.401753 76.437252 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/3D/20248:59 42.408264 76.450619 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:39 42.416831 76. 452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20246:34 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20247:56 42.405641 76. 42897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202412:16 42.400135 76. 45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202417:35 42.412145 76. 441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20246:13 42.397166 76.453018 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 291202423:33 42.413556 76.448679 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 31/202416:24 42.404316 76.464274 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202414:59 42.408071 76.434944 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20245:21 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202421:57 42.405741 76.46749 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202414:43 42.403411 76,467876 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202412: 28 42.41114 76.439157 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 30/202420:43 42.392085 76.443854 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202419:22 42.4015 76.438303 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20246:11 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120249:00 42.397845 76.459225 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20242:47 42. 397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20240:21 42.413909 76.446406 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202417:33 42.419833 76.457213 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202419:32 42. 407758 76.434288 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202410:46 42.402925 76. 465666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202416:07 42.402525 76. 461121 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20249:36 42.406194 76. 433201 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202413:54 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202419:50 42.407339 76,432509 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202412:20 42.397745 76. 448733 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202416:16 42.399596 76.459351 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202423:34 42.412604 76. 450224 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202421:26 42.394096 76. 450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202410:18 42.402652 75. 467445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202421:06 42.400049 76. 454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202416:29 42.407285 76. 45141 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202412:15 42.397472 76.440675 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20247:46 42.409749 76. 43745 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202411:03 42.391566 76. 440917 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202412:13 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202416:08 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202419:03 42.408504 76.469942 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:14 42.396367 76. 441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202412:20 42.403471 76.45688 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202413:08 42.403943 76.469717 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202422:44 42.404842 76. 431169 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20247:45 42.407339 76. 432509 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202411:23 42.415101 76. 475107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202418:46 42.404769 76.46245 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202411:23 42.40T85 76.469098 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20244:52 42.412471 76. 44611 FAILED ATTEMPT 71311202415:47 42.403171 76.435788 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202412:25 42.400168 76.45927 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202418:41 42.406393 76. 430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20248:34 42.391845 76. 441672 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120244:49 42.400375 75.459234 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202413:14 42.400521 76.45176 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202421:26 42.398504 76.459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202411:23 42.415467 76. 477784 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20245:52 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202418:55 42.404496 76.433443 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120240:26 42.413982 76,449308 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20240:31 42.408257 76.464292 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20240:39 42.416691 76. 454561 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20246:19 42.402172 76.433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20248:41 42.401533 76. 461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202415:24 42.394695 76.45211 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20249:58 42.405927 76, 428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202413:05 42.408011 76. 467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20249:50 42.401473 76. 438357 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:00 42.405927 76, 428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202411:50 42.391945 76.443028 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202420:32 42.408011 76. 467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20242:00 42.396793 76. 453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20243:08 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202415:02 42.408743 76.436309 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202413:22 42,3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/20249:55 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:44 42.419168 76. 456099 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20246:39 42.406773 76. 43224 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20246:36 42.412232 76. 441735 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20247:43 42.406706 76. 431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20249:01 42.402212 76. 454347 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20245:02 42.40614 76,470535 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120245:16 42.406447 76.468235 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202422:02 42.407731 76.433794 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202418:15 42.408597 76.43736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20242:13 42.39432.2 76.446882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:01 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7126/202414:00 42.403391 76.468936 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414:38 42.3926" 76. 444726 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20245:15 42.402172 76. 433524 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421:17 42.412791 76. 473859 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20248:15 42.406706 76.431287 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202414:38 42.400022 76.45653 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202410:16 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202415:41 42.407146 76.46316 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20247:24 42A17783 76.449856 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20249:03 42.413763 76.476131 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202415:21 42.410248 76.466286 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:08 42.396866 76.452077 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202423:11 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202423:35 42.406347 76.466421 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202423:56 42.394868 76.439812 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120247:11 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202414:49 42.39628 76.437468 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414:39 42.414841 76.470831 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202417:25 42.399596 76.459351 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202414:27 42.402785 76.455552 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202422:59 42.408537 76.469044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120245:33 42.411007 76.441555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202414:13 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202422:08 42.410148 76.443055 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202417:20 42.419653 76.456925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202413:46 42.418149 76.454895 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20240:48 42.394496 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202412:15 42,401953 76.456297 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414:02 42.397752 76.441555 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202414:11 42.406347 76.466421 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202416:29 42.407439 76.433165 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:00 42.415001 76.474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202423:04 42.397206 76.45918 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:09 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202423:16 42.4086" 76.466532 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20241:38 42.401846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20241:28 42.400282 76.439911 FAILED ATTEMPT 713012024 7:05 42.403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20248:53 42.40407 76.464983 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20247:40 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 71271202414:11 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120243:21 42.402846 76.433039 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20249:07 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20245:58 42.3931" 76.443909 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20242:52 42.402013 76.469151 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202419:37 42.407811 76. 431773 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20241:08 42.394095 76. 450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202414:01 42.401886 76. 438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:00 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:09 42.398957 76.446047 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:03 42.39925 76.459324 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:14 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202418:09 42.404769 76.46245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202419:18 42.40893 76. 434396 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202412:33 42.393164 76.446047 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202417:15 42.405162 76.460752 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202423: 48 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20248: 49 42.407658 76.458605 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 27/20248:59 42.407006 76.432734 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20249:02 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/2D2416:10 42.399955 76.454689 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202416:12 42.399955 76.454689 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202422:47 42.406826 76.467346 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/20245:26 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202420:04 42.404676 76.430973 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202412:56 42.408644 76.468532 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202411: 34 42.403298 76.462333 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202417:31 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202420: 27 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 28/202420:54 42.392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20245:29 42.401726 76.460141 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202423:07 42.397219 76.453117 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202416: 11 42.400049 76,454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202419:27 42.393603 76.445885 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128120245: 27 42.404283 76.458444 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/ 202414:48 42.403258 76.459692 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/311202414:45 42.413763 76.476131 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202421:16 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202423:26 42.418848 76.455605 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202416:02 42.401846 76.437594 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120245:26 42.404742 76.457662 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202413:18 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202413:19 42.396367 76.441106 FAILED ATTEMPT 71281202415:15 42.405614 76.465181 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:38 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202417:20 42.393697 76.445313 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202417:22 42.416865 76.450853 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:24 42.395361 76.439633 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202419:35 42,397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202410:34 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202412:42 42.407392 76.468639 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202420:37 42.392684 76.443954 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20242:14 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/20245:04 42.406027 76.468262 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202414:06 42.403923 76.469547 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:23 42.407232 76.433192 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414:38 42.405262 76.463977 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202422:58 42.408537 76.469044 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120248:37 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120249:01 42.404443 76.457671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120249:19 42.409063 76.437728 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:06 42.394316 76.4515" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20249:38 42.401886 76.438294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20246:42 42.408597 76.43736 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202411:11 42.409489 76.4371" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202414:08 42.409775 76.46581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202414:13 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202416:12 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202419:26 42.395947 76.440073 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20245:26 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202414:47 42.408524 76.457294 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202414:44 42.396953 76.460034 FAILEDATTEMPT 71271202418:18 42.3967 76.452128 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202420:37 42.406347 76.466421 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202415:13 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:20 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20241:10 42.404117 76.432401 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20241:14 42.4032" 76.456449 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:25 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202416:34 42.409083 76.439651 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202422:00 42.40168 76.437001 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202422:06 42.424888 76.475035 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20241:11 42.40401 76.432671 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/281202422:08 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202419:02 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202423:26 42.409249 76.458237 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202421:39 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20241:18 42.409136 76.439902 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202420:00 42.412145 76.441169 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202420:28 42.403251 76.46333 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20248:12 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202415:01 42.407186 76.451167 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202416:19 42.401061 76.460123 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202423:27 42.415194 76.475431 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202420:00 42.421497 76.459207 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128120245:26 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128/202413:19 42.41331 76.475359 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202417:22 42.402266 76.469897 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202420:26 42.397026 76.450808 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202416:10 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202411:17 42.397006 76.453736 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20241:17 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202419:34 42.391865 76.44107 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202420:50 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20245:27 42.403937 76.457779 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202414:47 42.414868 76.477685 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202416:22 42.402359 76.459566 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20245:36 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 71291202412:58 42.40391 76.434414 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20242:13 42,393597 76.446532 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202414:37 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202423:01 42.397019 76.459162 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202421:49 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:04 42.412564 76.446191 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/20243:02 42.396946 76.452604 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202412:44 42.416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202413:32 42.397219 76.453117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202415:14 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120241:38 42.404549 76.429922 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120243:20 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202413:48 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202413:24 42.403457 76.466439 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202414:44 42.397092 76.459171 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202422:09 42.393843 76.444268 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20240:51 42.40849 76.457348 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202414:22 42.404443 76.457671 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202412:29 42.396899 76.459441 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202414:32 42.414428 76.470436 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202422:03 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129120246:41 42.417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20249:08 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202422:58 42.406074 76.459656 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202412:33 42.413037 76.469071 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202413:46 42.418901 76.453817 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202410:24 42.414715 76.47729 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202417:13 42.403504 76.436102 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20240:42 42.39397 76.446244 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202423:11 42. 396705 76.453197 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/202422:02 42.407518 76.433794 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20246:45 42.400175 76.434521 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/ 202414:27 42.40413 76.458156 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202413: 59 42.401533 76.461704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:10 42.398471 76.448337 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202418:10 42.401287 76. 43869 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202412:13 42.422322 76.460806 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202421:49 42.394289 76.451553 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 30/202423:15 42.397219 76.453117 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202410:39 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20246:57 42.402126 76.469394 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/ 202423:47 42.4172" 76.460052 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:13 42.391945 76.442445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:45 42.407598 76.463636 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/ 202421:07 42.408617 76.451589 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/ 20242:32 42.395907 76.450529 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202417:38 42. 39397 76.446244 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202416:55 42. 404742 75.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202423:42 42.419833 76. 457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:18 42.394322 76. 446882 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202411:39 42.418296 76. 455138 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202419:47 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20240:36 42.417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202422:39 42. 400022 76.45653 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20248: 51 42.403298 76.462809 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202416:52 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20242:32 42. 408011 76A57454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20249:18 42.39397 76.446244 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120246:35 42.421504 76.459665 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20249:53 42.408144 76.432563 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31120249:59 42. 405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:02 42. 395255 76.451221 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20246:17 42.401846 76.433039 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202411:58 42. 397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413:09 42. 408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:51 42. 40D595 76.45105 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20249:19 42.396367 76.441106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202413:02 42.401533 76. 461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20242:34 42.396087 76.450698 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30120248:55 42. 395361 76.439633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131120249:57 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202419:48 42.409249 76.458237 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127120240:35 42.41771 76.458075 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/20240:39 42.417983 76.454976 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202420:06 42.40883 76.464866 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202414:19 42.402652 76. 467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120246:29 42.407252 76.450925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/2D249:53 42.407658 76.434081 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:01 42.405062 76.429994 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202411:58 42.407592 76.468873 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20242:31 42.394456 76.451491 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131120249:58 42.396853 76.439624 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420:35 42.408011 76.467454 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127/20241:41 42. 410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7127120242:00 42.397146 76.452245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243:01 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202414:11 42. 412564 76.446191 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202414:41 42. 40855 76.470876 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202416:44 42. 407292 76.459261 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20241:38 42. 402172 76.433524 FAILED ATTEM PT 7/311202417:05 42. 409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEM PT 7129120245:39 42.416691 76.454581 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20241:26 42. 400788 76.4666 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202423:17 42. 419168 76.456099 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202414:11 42.407252 75.467876 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202416:26 42. 40869 76.450682 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202422:08 42. 39377 76.448373 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202413:47 42.396793 76,483673 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202414:22 42. 402925 76.465028 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202413:23 42. 396879 76.450916 FAILED ATTEMPT 71281202412:37 42.401886 76,438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202410:19 42.400515 76.466492 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202418:16 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202415:41 42.402525 76.461812 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202422:03 42.40893 76.434396 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20247:24 42.396899 76.459441 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:12 42.417983 76.454976 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20247:12 42.407925 76.469834 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417:10 42.400987 76.466852 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20249:56 42.421171 76.460779 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202412:26 42.399716 76.43966 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202422:37 42. 406347 76,466421 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423:45 42. 419168 76.456099 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202412:43 42,419613 76.45733 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202413:32 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202414:04 42.400881 76.457635 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202416:23 42, 421817 76.4636 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/311202418:00 42. 409749 76.43745 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202422:02 42.403504 76. 436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/20246:43 42,405927 76. 428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202414:26 42.402119 76.45415 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202417:35 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202410:37 42.406347 76.466421 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120249:08 42.406706 76.431287 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 30120245:59 42.409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/ 30/202412:33 42.397079 76.439597 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/ 202423:15 42.394316 76.4515" FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30120248: 53 42.404316 76.464274 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202421: 49 42.399902 76.459324 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202422: 58 42.408011 76.467454 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/ 20242:59 42.40887 76.437809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 28/202410:06 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 28/202411:28 42.413377 76.445472 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/ 20249:06 42.406979 76.431665 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/ 202413:59 42,404769 76.46245 FAILED ATTEMPT 71301202423:48 42. 399622 76.448616 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27120243:02 42.399895 76.449487 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202412:46 42. 407705 76.463744 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202413:36 42.41982 76.454985 FAILEDATTEMPT 7127/202415:15 42. 420432 76.459189 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202412:58 42. 416691 76.454581 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:41 42.404429 76.465765 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202413:30 42.416998 76.460276 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202413:24 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202414:09 42,412505 76.442642 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202414:13 42.399989 76.468621 FAILED ATTEMPT 712912024 6:42 42.408597 76. 43736 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202414:23 42,400035 76.449757 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202413:46 42.418855 76. 454482 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202422:13 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202421:49 42.39377 76.448373 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202414:36 42.414388 76.4704 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202421:15 42.403045 76.46687 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202412:32 42.40869 76.450682 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202423:14 42.396793 76.453673 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417:13 42.404496 76.433443 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130120240:48 42.39315 76.44496 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20242:52 42.399989 76.468621 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202422:07 42.400135 76.45953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202414:52 42.403364 76.470436 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202417:08 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202414:26 42.406393 76.430407 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:11 42.419653 76.456925 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/20245:17 42.406027 76,468262 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129120249:54 42.402172 76.433524 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20247:25 42.401866 76.438294 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202414:10 42.405741 76.46749 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202422:59 42.397219 76. 453117 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202422:03 42.408091 76. 43498 FAILED ATTEMPT 71291202418:10 42.395221 76.448975 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202423:15 42.415001 76. 474793 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28/202410:27 42.408171 76. 43718 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/202420:34 42.401267 76.454123 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/20241:29 42.405348 76.429832 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202412: 14 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/ 20247:03 42.407545 76.469897 FAILEDATTEMPT 71301202410: 39 42.400282 76.439911 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/20246:58 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202423: 48 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/ 202414:13 42.414395 76.446756 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 29/202415:46 42.407332 76.463357 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202419:17 42.396633 76.452003 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31120242: 33 42.400155 76.46863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/20246: 26 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/ 202416:57 42.400881 76.457635 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202423:42 42.419833 76.457213 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/ 20249:18 42.393683 76.445544 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 301202411:39 42.4D8098 76.43427 FAILEDATTEMPT 71311202410:48 42.416086 76.451562 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20240: 37 42.397292 76.452533 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/ 202421:12 42.394096 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/ 20248:52 42.404769 76.46245 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 30/202416:55 42.402652 76.467445 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/ 31/20242:32 42.396027 76.450934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130120249: 18 42.400049 76.454275 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246: 38 42.407252 76.450925 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20249:54 42. 408191 76.43268 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202410:42 42.400375 76.459234 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202410:03 42.403358 76. 470607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20241:06 42.3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27120241:34 42.397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243:39 42.403504 76.436102 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20244:06 42. 396706 76.453197 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/20242:14 42. 397026 76.450808 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202412:45 42. 403231 76.456422 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202414:40 42. 417031 76.473023 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202414:52 42. 393683 76.445544 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20242:29 42. 404496 76.433443 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/20249:26 42. 398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202417:20 42. 408417 76.469843 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246:10 42. 3964 76.452542 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202411:22 42. 406" 76.466564 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/30/202419:31 42. 402259 76.454437 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202413:28 42. 392445 76.445607 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/20243:41 42. 408011 76.434809 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128120249:41 42.397006 76. 453736 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202416:42 42.401533 76. 461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202422:25 42.394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202422:34 42.421817 76.4636 FAILED ATTEMPT 7129/20241:22 42. 409136 76.439902 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202423:34 42.416092 76.451185 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20246:15 42.412145 76.441369 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202421:04 42.407006 76.468145 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/291202411:04 42.394695 76.45211 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202421:16 42. 394096 76.450934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20243:37 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/20249:31 42.398331 76.440863 FAILEDATTEMPT 7130/202416:12 42.396586 76.440091 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202419:24 42.410148 76.443055 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/27/202418:33 42.399456 76.457958 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/271202421:17 42.396367 76.443106 FAILEDATTEMPT 7128120248:24 42.40116 76.467292 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202410:12 42.416652 76.452811 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/301202415:15 42.421497 76.4592D7 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202423:30 42.400734 76.4598 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20246:12 42.39933 76.440298 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202418:11 42.405927 76.428934 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202415:09 42.407532 76.468208 FAILEDATTEMPT 7129/202415:57 42.416086 76.451562 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/291202416:09 42.406393 76.430407 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202418:01 42.410294 76.470948 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/202410:50 42.404742 76.457662 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/2024 D:21 42.410022 76.47358 FAILEDATTEMPT 7131/202414:17 42.415194 76.475431 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/31/20248:4D 42.4037" 76.462953 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/27/202419:50 42.408264 76.450619 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/28/202412:24 42.399529 76.439759 FAILEDATTEMPT 7/29/202423:34 42.4111 76.4522 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/20242:20 42.394322 76.446882 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202414:08 42.405481 76.430335 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/271202421:57 42.40644 76.466564 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/281202421:09 42.408597 76.464633 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/20248:02 42.400049 76.454275 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20244:38 42.401533 76.461704 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/28120249:00 42.398504 76.459279 FAILED ATTEMPT 7128/202416:50 42.402093 76.469295 FAILED ATTEMPT 7130/202411:32 42.392598 76.445553 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29120246:18 42.402026 76.433416 FAILED ATTEMPT 7131/202411:58 42.397292 76.452533 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/202420: 29 42.403577 76.463241 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202419: 03 42.403631 76.465612 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/29/202419: 54 42.391945 76.442445 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30/202415: 22 42.400135 76.45953 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20249: 57 42.405927 76.428934 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/30120249:19 42.398331 76.440863 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/301202413:04 42.399503 76.455785 FAILED ATTEMPT 7/31/20243: 04 42.402652 76.467445 FAILED ATTEMPT Exhibit CC SUNNY VIEW - ITHACA CELL TOWER 111 WIEDMAIER COURT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY. NEW YORK MARKET STUDY REPORT Date of Report: July 31, 2024 Colliers File #: SYR240210 PREPARED FOR JARED C. LUSK PARTNER NIXON PEABODY, LLP 1300 CLINTON SQUARE ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14604 PREPARED BY COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES Jared C.Lusk Partner Nixon Peabody, LLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604 RE: Market Study of Sunny View — Ithaca Cell Tower 111 Wiedmaier Court Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York Dear Mr. Lusk: At your request, the attached market study has been completed to analyze single-family residential property sale prices before and after the construction of a cell tower that is proposed to be constructed at 111 Wiedmaier Court, in the town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York. The proposed subject is a 134-foot tall monopole cellular tower to be constructed on the 12.34± acre site identified as tax map 56.-3-1.22 that is reputedly owned by S. Roberts LLC and classified by the assessor as rural vacant land. The GPS coordinates for the proposed cell tower site are Latitude at 42.412566 and Longitude at-76.450436, and the ground elevation is 824.4 feet above mean sea level. The report is presented as a restricted market study in accordance with Standards Rule 2-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), 2024-2025 Edition. Additional documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analysis are retained in our work file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific for the intended use/user stated herein. The appraiser is not responsible for any unauthorized use of this report. We are of the opinion that this report is not so limited as to result in a misleading opinion of value. It is also understood that the restricted market study report may not contain all of the supporting rational for all of the opinions and conclusions. The lower degree of detail does not reflect less investigation but rather a streamlined reporting of the pertinent information based on the needs of the client. Nixon Peabody, LLP is the client and the only intended users of this report are the client, Verizon Wireless and the Town of Ithaca. This report may not be distributed to or relied upon by any other persons or entities for any purpose whatsoever, without our written permission. All other uses and users are unintended, unless specifically stated in the letter of transmittal. SYR240210 An extraordinary assumption that the subject property has no environmental issues has been made for this market study. It is noted that the use of this extraordinary assumption might affect the assignment results. Please refer to the complete list of Underlying Assumptions and Limiting Conditions included at the end of this report. For this market study, no hypothetical conditions are assumed. The intended use of this market study is to analyze single-family residential property sale prices before and after the construction of a cell tower. The opinion of value trends is based upon the assumption that the proposed Cellular Tower will be similar to other recently constructed cellular towers in Upstate New York, as of the date of this market study (July 31, 2024), and that the actions and re -actions of buyers in each study area are reflective of the future buyers of single-family residential properties in the neighborhood of the proposed cellular tower identified in this market study. The conclusion of this market study is that the construction of a cellular tower does not have a negative impact on the prices of single-family residential properties within 500 feet of the boundaries of the parent property on which the cellular tower was constructed. The signatures below indicate our assurance to the client that the development process and extent of analysis for this assignment adhere to the scope requirements and intended use of the report. If you have any specific questions or concerns regarding the attached report, or if Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services can be of additional assistance, please contact the individuals listed below. Sincerely, COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES DaraV Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Valuation Services Director I Syracuse NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-0060 DAF/bah (File #SYR240210) Susaan_DD.. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS Managing Director I Syracuse NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-3166 SYR240210 TABLE OF CONTENTS: PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: ..................... DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE: ...................................... DEFINITION OF LEASED FEE ESTATE: ..................................... DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: ............................................... SCOPEOF WORK: ....................................................................... LOCAL MARKETING AREA ANALYSIS: ...................................... PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ........................................................ PARENT PROPERTY SITE DESCRIPTION: ................................ ASSESSMENT AND TAXES: ........................................................ ZONING: ......................................................... .............................. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM): ................. .................. HIGHEST AND BEST USE: .......................................................... VALUATION PROCESS: ............................................................... SUMMARY: ................................................................................... CERTIFICATION: .......................................................................... UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS:.. ADDENDA..................................................................................... PROPERTY & ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW R r Wk r ` r bl} 2024 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES 1 SYR240210 DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE: Fee simple estate is known as the "absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat."' Utility easements along public roads are common encumbrances on fee simple estate ownerships; however, we recognize that the availability of public utilities generally enhances the potential uses and developability of the land through which they pass. Since it is typical for the comparable sales to have similar utility easements along their respective road frontages, no adjustments are required for rights conveyed regarding these utility adjustments and the subject's ownership is considered to be equivalent to fee simple estate. The subject property is an owner -occupied vacant site to be improved with a cellular tower. Long-term leases do not encumber the subject property; however, Verizon Wireless is proposing to lease the site for the purpose of constructing a new cellular tower. DEFINITION OF LEASED FEE ESTATE: A leased fee estate is "the ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the"right to receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversionary right when the lease expires".2 The subject site is proposed to be improved with a cellular tower by Verizon Wireless; however, the valuation of the subject property will not be analyzed in this market study report. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The definition of market value, as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency — 12 CFR 34.42(g), Federal Reserve Board — 12 CFR 225.65(b), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — 12 CFR 323.5(b), Office of Thrift Supervision — 12 CFR 564.5(b), National Credit Union Administration — 12 CFR 722.5(b) in compliance with Title XI of FIRREA, is as follows: Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: Buyer and seller are typically motivated; Both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider their own best interest; A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 1 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2022) 73. 2Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2022) 105. SCOPE OF WORK: The descriptions of the subject property and the comparable cellular tower properties were obtained from the client and public records. The intended use of this market study is to measure the change of the range of sale prices of single-family residential properties before and after the construction of a proposed cellular tower. This market study is being reported in a restricted format that relies on a limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach, consisting of the research of sales of single-family residential properties in the vicinity of the relatively newly constructed cellular towers to see what the change in the property values were from the two years prior to the construction of the cellular tower compared to the two years after the cellular tower construction. In some cases only the year of the tower's construction was identified, so we would use the two calendar years prior to the year of the tower's construction and two calendar years after the year of the tower's construction. We have been providing this type of impact market study to private and municipal clients for over a decade, with similar types of impact market studies prepared for proposed cellular towers, proposed solar farms, proposed water towers, and other types of infrastructure structures that might represent unusual or atypical protrusions from the natural landscape. Usually, the radii of the research areas for these types of market studies are one-half to one mile within the viewshed of the proposed structure. However, the Town of Ithaca has requested that the radius of the study areas around each cellular tower identified be limited to 500 feet from the boundaries of the tax parcel on which the cellular tower was constructed. While we would normally expect to find at least a few to several sales within the before and after study periods for proposed cellular towers or solar farms that were surrounded by residential development, reducing the research radius to 500 feet (approximately one -tenth of a mile) is more challenging. To accomplish this research, the client has provided a list of 34 cellular towers that have been constructed in Tompkins County ranging from the 1990s to the current time. Towers constructed within the past two years were eliminated because there was not a sufficient "after" period of time for sales of residential properties to have occurred. A description of the market study process and the results of our study are included in the Market Study section of this report. PROPERTY & ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW i•+ -t 1 - q/F H a}hl-Itl HEYNOLOS GAME 4 y Ithaca •1j,J'rJtrl Pcl "- ........ FARM =. 1.O[ PARR Flrip: 170$oFv Rd Hi a s Hungerfwd - r Hill Ithaca. r O sQ ' `•tr' '.. a„sIEKN Ce}•yid/ !( 7( f.(/\ II1IGf.T5 PARK Qa J v O1ITH HILL. Bethelr / East Grove 50 Rv "dal M` n/ c J..I=_nn Rd 0 2024 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES 4 SYR240210 The relationship of a property to the surrounding properties forms the basis of neighborhood analysis. "Social, economic, governmental, and environmental forces influence property values in the vicinity of a subject property. As a result, they affect the value of that property." (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 15th Edition, page 138). Thus, a marketing area analysis is a study of forces and factors, which will influence the value of a property in the future. Within a given community, there are various groupings of land areas. Areas devoted to various uses that are somewhat similar are known as marketing areas. The marketing area is generally considered to be a subsection of a larger community where there is a general level of similarity structures and property uses. Marketing area boundaries may consist of natural or man-made boundaries that are usually obvious, with divisions that can be physical, political, or otherwise defined usually with a distinct change in land use. Thus, a marketing area may be either used as a residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, or rural areas. There might possibly be a mixture of these uses within any given marketing area; however, there is normally a predominant characteristic to the marketing area. The various social, economic, physical and political forces within a marketing area also influence the individual properties within the area. The subject's parent property is in a generally rural area with most of the land uses comprised of woods and agricultural properties, and with rural residential development along the existing public roads. Six Mile Creek flows northwesterly toward Ithaca and Cayuga Lake a short distance southwest of the parent property's southwestern boundary, and flows through two reservoirs for the City of Ithaca's water supply. Most of the land to the northwest, west, south, east, and northeast is wooded recreational or conservation land. A few residential properties are located along Wiedmaier Court, Burns Road, Burns Way, and Slaterville Road in or near the vicinity of the subject property. A residential subdivision is located about one-half mile to the north, and additional residential subdivisions are located along the north side of Slaterville Road going northwesterly toward the city of Ithaca. The next closest highway arterial road is Coddington Road about one mile to the south. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject is a vacant site to be improved with a cellular tower consisting of 12.34± acres and is identified by the Town of Ithaca as tax parcel 56.-3-1.22. The property has not been the subject of any arm's length transfers in the past five years. The most recent transfer found for the subject property is shown as follows: We are not aware of any recent listings, pending sales, orwritten offers involving the subject's parent property except for the proposed lease from Verizon Wireless for the proposed construction of a cellular tower on the parent property. PARENT PROPERTY SITE DESCRIPTION: SITE SIZE: FRONTAGE: SHAPE/TOPOGRAPHY: INGRESS/EGRESS: UTILITIES: SITE IMPROVEMENTS: COMMENTS: According to the Town of Ithaca tax map, the site size is 12.34± acres. Parcel is at the south end of Wiedmaier Court and has 631.92 feet of frontage on the southeast side of Burns Road. The subject site is slightly irregular in shape. Topography is generally level to slightly sloping. Adequate ingress and egress is assumed to be available from Wiedmaier Court because this is the address identified for the subject property. Additional ingress and egress is available from abutting Burns Road. Public utilities available to the subject include electric and telephone. There are no known site improvements. The subject site is 12.34± acres of vacant land that is physical suitable for the construction of a cellular tower. Copies of site sketches, aerial photographs and the proposed antenna orientation follow for the reader's reference. SYR240210 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISiINC - --- w ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) CONTRA PAVEAiE' PROPOSED 12' WIDE2 WIRELE'. NON-EXCLUSIVE GRAVEL ` 5 ACCESS DPIPE . PROPOSED 50'X5O' FENCED COMPOUND / i ' PROPOSED MONOPOIE 1 1 { APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 1 / F 1 / ` 1 y 5 1 / _ 1 ! 1 ! 5/ 4• J C+ yy VERIZO PROPERTY & ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW a Y Vier. S f1• • .4., , LM 4 r. yy i1 I 5. six y r i... i' .,!i, i•;. Y 3a.tii Rw yJ v , IF Y r 0 2024 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL VALUATION & ADVISORY SERVICES SYR240210 N I & V REWIREMENM verhow4. NI eM7NNAUr f qE, L,EVATONSB- 1 91V0Z18)1K( ASSESSMENT AND TAXES: According to the Town of Ithaca, the current assessment for the parent parcel is as follows: Tax Parcel Land Assessment Improvements Total Assessment The New York State Equalization Rate for the Town of Ithaca is 100% (final as of June 21, 2024); therefore the property has an equalized value of $60,000. We are not providing an estimate of the market value of the subject property in this market study report; therefore, we cannot render an opinion of the accuracy of the subject property's assessment. The 2023-2024 Ithaca School District tax and the 2024 County/Town tax, as reported by the Tompkins County Department of Finance Office, are as follows: Tax Parcel School Tax County/Town Tax Total Taxes Copies of the Town of Ithaca tax map follows for the reader's reference. SYR240210 G74 0 07 F SYR240210 ZONING: According to the Town of Ithaca Codes Enforcement Office, the subject is zoned C; Conservation District. This district is intended to preserve the outstanding natural features in certain areas of the Town and to provide a regulatory framework through which development can occur with minimal negative environmental impact in those areas. Permitted principal uses include one family dwellings; two-family dwellings; garden, nursery or farm; roadside stand; forest management; public water supply; and small wind energy facilities. Principal uses permitted by special permit include church and places of worship; public, parochial and private schools; publicly owned park or playground; fire station; bed -and -breakfast; equestrian facility; and deposit, removal or moving of earth, fill or related products. Height limitations for non-agricultural buildings shall exceed 30 feet. Yard regulations include front yard are not less than 50 feet, rear yards less than 200 feet, and side yards less than 50 feet. Lot coverage has minimum lot areas of seven acres, minimum lot widths of 300 feet at the street, and minimum depth of 450 feet. The subject's use, as a vacant site to be improved with a cellular tower, is currently being reviewed by the Town of Ithaca. A copy of a portion of the zoning map is included in the Addenda. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM): From review of Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel #3608510025C (Town of Ithaca), dated June 19, 1985, the subject property is in Flood Zone X. This designation is described by FEMA as follows: Zones B, C, and X are the flood insurance rate zones that correspond to areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent annual chance sheet flow flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent annual chance stream flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, or areas protected from the 1-percent annual chance flood by levees. No Base Flood Elevations or depths are shown within this zone. Insurance purchase is not required in these zones. It is noted that flood insurance maps are drawn in varying scale and lacking in detail. It is suggested that a surveyor be contacted for a final flood zone determination. Based on our review of the flood map, we conclude that the subject property is not in a flood zone. However, the Six Mile Creek corridor, which is southwest of the subject's southwest boundary, is within the 100-year zone. A copy of the flood map is included in the Addenda. HIGHEST AND BEST USE: The highest and best use of the subject's parent property, as vacant, is for potential rural residential development. The subject's parent property is currently vacant land; therefore a conclusion of the property's highest and best use as improved is not applicable. SYR240210 VALUATION PROCESS: The intended use of this market study is to analyze single-family residential property sale prices before and after the construction of a cell tower. This market study relies on a limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach, consisting of the research of sales of single-family residential properties in vinicity of relatively newly constructed cellular towers to see what the change in property values were from the two-year period prior to the construction of the cellular tower compared to the two- year period after the cellular tower construction. Supporting documentation concerning the sales data and analysis are included in the Addenda. The client provided a list of 34 existing cellular tower locations for our market study research. The following list references the Site Identification, Address, Structure Built date, Latitude and Longitude, and other characteristics about each cellular tower location. SIM ID Site Name County On Mr Site State Site Type She Structure Owner Address Site structure TypeStructure Built ISite Latitude Site Longitude 435589 COY GLEN Tompkins W/13/1017 Live MACRO VZW 651 Five mile Drive ( Monopole 01/01/2010 42,423611 76.526456 4354W CAYUGA Tompkins 08/17/W20 Live MACRO Vedaon Wireless 1861/2 Pleasant Go, Monopole 01/01/2" 42.466481 76.479575 438128 SAPSUCKER Tompkins 12/20IM21 Live MACRO VERIZON WIRELESS 150i Hanshaw Road Self Support(Utti 11/12/2009 42.469681 76.447681 435545 COLUEGETOWN Tompkins 04/29/2019 Uve MACRO TTEPA Associates, LLC 110 Dryden Road Rooftop 12/31/2008 42.44102 76.485E64 SEEM LWSING Tompkins 10/29/M21 Live MACRO Tompkins County A9Warren RD Self Support ftal01/01/1999 42.49252n2 76.4667881 3628291 DAN BY -A Tompkins OW01/2018 Live MACRO Tarpon Towers II, LLC 1231 Denby Road Monopole W01/2018 42.39332A7 76.4955 34231D 1 RISH SBITLEMENT - A Tompkins W/05/2024 Uve MACRO Tarpon Towe rs 11, LLC 21MCry an Read Self Su ort Lattic 03/17/2001 42,491325 76.33286944 36W865 MILIARDHILL-A Tompkins 12/14/2022 Live MACRO Tarpon 1129 West Denby Be Wompoie 2022 42.38977258 76.55078019 1316590 LANSING NORTH Toni 09/26/2013 Llve MACRO SBA 425 Conlon Road Se if Support ftattic pol 42.564675 76.511825 32910M Trumansbur, DT-A Tompkins 09/27/2016 Live MACRO MethodistChurch &parsonage W East Main Street Stealth structure over45 years old 42.54050833 76.658202M 666755 ITHACA DT Tompkins 03/18/2021 Live MACRO Lenroc L.P. 222 South Cayuga Si Rooftop 01101/19M 142.43r14 J6.499036 3411T/ 3 lthaw West - A Tompkins 03/06/2021 Live MACRO IJac H&F&Green Street Associat 3IOTauhannock Bl Rooftop 01/01/2oDS 142.44186388 76.51344722 31MM7 WEST DANBY- BrashearI Tompkins 08/30/2012 Live MACRO Horvath Communication 126TupperRoad Self5uport fLattic 01/06/2015 42.325556 76.541667 21283255UNDOWNS Tompkins 0/29/2014 Live MACRO Diamond 230914orth Tripham Monopole 2014 42.483656 26.W064 M6526 CAYUGA HEIGHTS Tompkins 061OV2014 Live MACRO Crown Castle (CC) Rt. 13 NYSEG Propert Monopole 2005 42.468925 76.4 933 666594 DRYDEN Tompkins 07/13/2017 Live MACRO Crown Castle (CC) 2%Walker Road Guyed structure 01/01/2W3 42.505308 76.29586 M6756 ITHACA SOUTH Tompkins 36/01/2014 Live MACRO Crown Castle CC 292 Durfee Hill Road Guyed structure 03/15/2003 42.340522 76.43911 656897 NEWFIELD HD Tompkins W/01/2014 Live MACRO Crown Castle CC Bull Hlll Road 05/24/2000 42.3d8999 776.62525 662195 TRUMANSBURG Tompkins 06/01/2014 Live MACRO Crown Castle (CC) 3250 McKeel Road Self5uli(Lattic 01/01/1999 42.503592 76.623636 3382951 V ihaven Rd -A Tompkins W/IZ/2017 Live MACRO Crown Castle (CC) 1338 Mecklenburg R Self Su rrt(Lettic 2017 42.45186111 76.5412M M65B CORNELL Tompkins 08/17/2020 Live MACRO CORNELL UNIVERSITY 43OCampus Rd panic Building with towei 01/01/1914 42.445623 76.481472 712052CORNELLAG Tompkins 04/13/2021 Live MACRO Cornell University 111Wing Drive. Building Side -Moe 01/01/1903 42.446019 176,47159 666903 NORTH CORNELL Tompkins 02/15/2021 Live MACRO Cornell University 115 Northccoss Road Building Side -Mau 42.4550133 7647T2 1637485 VARNA REW Tompkins 09/18/2015 Live MACRO Cornell University 156 Pelustri s Drive Monopole 06/06/2014 42.452786 76450808 6. 11E08 Brooktondale Tompkins 02/22/2022 11 MACRO ChySwitch 330Bald Hill Roatl Mercurio 42.365018 76.383761 5050405 ENFIELD-A Tompkins 10/29/2020 Live MACRO APCTowers 35 Fish Road Monopole 11/21/2016 62.44128611 76,63563333 3412904 Sheldon Rd - A Tompkins 10/15/2020 Live MACRO ARC En Route 34b Monopole 04/15/2019 42.54958055 76.412616W 3074597 HAYTCORNER Tompkins 07/11/2021 Live MACRO American Tower Company (ATC) 241Van Dom Road IN Monopole pre-2022 42.46945 76.58RU56 W6754ITHACA Tompkins 0/29/2019 Live MACRO American Tower Company ATC) 815South Aurora Sir Guyed structure 04/22/2008 42.429A8 76.496556 1511M MCLEAN Tompkins 06/07/2017 Live MACRO American Tower Company ATC MSalt Road Self Supporry Lactic 06/02/2014 42.555361 76.326353 5044558 NUBIA - A Tompkins 10/23/2019 Live MACRO American Tower Company ATC 422Cham lin Road Monopole 42.59393889 76.30306111 1298318 RPTR BYS WHOLESALE-ITHACA Tompkins Live MACRO 40 Graham Road 42.487039 76.492172 438024 RPTR CORNELL NMR Tompkins 01/05/2022 Live MACRO Martha Van Beni 42,451111 46.481944 nOUS31 RPTR LOWERY CONSTRUCTION Tompkins Live MACRO 80Etna Lane 1 42.480878 76,378242 Each of these sites was checked for location of the parent parcel, location of the cellular tower, and for the availability and density of single-family residences in proximity to the parent parcel. Some of the cellular tower sites identified in the above table were eliminated from the market study analysis due to incomplete information or age (e.g. the Trumansburg DT-A site includes a tower that was over 45 years old). In order to identify cellular towers that had the potential for at least one "before" sale and one "after' sale which were similar enough to compare the before and after sale prices, we have utilized several sources of data including: OnX Hunt —an on-line application that incorporates aerial photography, tax map boundaries, owners' names, roads, and other locational information. This application was used to identify properties on which cellular towers had been constructed using the addresses provided by the client, which identified tax parcel boundaries, acreage, locations and owners' names, but not the tax map parcel identification. The entire tax parcel is commonly identified as the "larger parcel" or "parent parcel." New York State Freshwater Wetlands Mapper — after identifying the location of the parcel, this source identified the tax map number. SYR240210 Tompkins County ImageMate — this is a database that summarizes the assessor's information of each tax parcel, including property type and acreage, but not the owners' names (that information is restricted in Tompkins County but is usually available in other counties). c Some of the tax parcels included a "slash" account which is usually presented as #XX.-X-XX/99 or something similar, where the'Y99" would pertain tojust the cellulartower built on that parent property. When these slash accounts existed, we compared the information in the assessor's records to the information provided by the client, as well as confirming the existence of the cellular tower WWW.real-info.com is a data base that also summarizes the assessor's information for each tax parcel but also includes an advanced sales search feature that allows us to search for historic sales by location, property type, date range, and other characteristics. Using the client's list of existing cellular tower sites and the date each was constructed, we could use Real -Info to complete a search residential sales for both the before and after study periods. o The search parameters used were sale date ranges, property classification code (PCC = 210 for single-family residential properties), and a search radius around the address of each cellular tower site. o Depending upon the size of the parent parcel and the density of residential properties in the area, the search radius was started at 0.25 to 0.35 miles in order to capture the 500-foot radius around the parent property's boundaries. o The location of each sale identified in these searches was then checked with OnX for the distance from the parent property's boundaries to the residence on the sale parcel. Sales that were beyond 500 feet from the parent property's boundaries were removed from the data set. After researching all 34 cellular tower sites, we found a total of three parent properties with one or more sales of single-family residential properties in both the before and after study periods that were within 500 feet of the parent property's boundaries. For each of these market studies, we compared the characteristics of the "before" sales to the same characteristics of the "after' sales, and considered adjustments for any significant differences including: Time — the difference between the average sale date of the "before" sales was compared to the average sale date of the "after' sales, and an appropriate appreciation rate or time trend rate was applied. c Economic trend indicators such as median sale prices in Tompkins County, economic cycles such as average appreciation rates but which were interrupted by the Great Recession period of late 2007 through mid-2012 and the Covid-19 pandemic from 2020 through 2022 were recognized; the "before" average sale price was adjusted to the time of the average "after" sale price. Site Size — if there was a significant difference in the "before and after' average site sizes, then the average before" site size was adjusted to match the average "after' site size. Building Size — similar to site size differences, significant differences in "before and after' average house sizes was adjusted from the "before" average size to the "after' average size. The unit prices of the sales Sale Price divided by Building Size in Square Feet) is used which reduces the need to adjustment for several elements of comparison, which recognizes that there is an inverse relationship between size and unit price, indicating that as the building size increases, the cost or value per square foot of building size decreases. This trend is evident in single-family residential properties in the Ithaca market. The Marshall Valuation Service includes a table of Single -Family Floor Area Multipliers that were used to adjust for significant differences in average house sizes. Building Style — the house style was considered for adjustment because there are unit price differences between the construction of Colonial, Ranch, Old Style and Bungalow style residences. However, some of these differences can be accounted for in the room counts for the numbers of bathrooms and bedrooms. Number of Baths — houses with more baths generally sell for higher prices per square foot. Number of Bedrooms — houses with more bedrooms generally sell for higher prices per square foot. Building Age — houses that are newer usually reflect less physical deterioration and functional obsolescence than houses that are older, and therefore usually sell for higher prices per square foot. 4VA0101YS[i7 Our research identified three existing tower sites that had at least one single-family residential property sale in the two-year period before the construction of the cellular tower and at least one single-family residential property sale in the two-year period after the construction of the cellular tower. The other 31 sites provided by the client were not suitable for before and after unit price analysis for a variety of reasons because sale data was not available in the two time periods or the date of the construction of the cellular tower was too old and sale data was not available. Many of the cellular tower sites provided by the client were in rural areas surrounding by large tracts of agricultural land, woodland, or abandoned farmland without many or no nearby single-family residential properties. Some of the cellular tower sites were surrounded by educational properties (e.g. Cornell University), commercial and retail buildings, the Tompkins County airport, industrial properties, or apartment buildings which did not meet the research criteria for this market study. The following tables summarize the results of the before and after residential sale price comparisons for cellular towers constructed in the towns of Dryden and Enfield and in the city of Ithaca. MAMUN EFFYR BLDG T.RAPq STA STREET BLOGSF BUILT STYLE BMW FOR 1504 HANSHAW WAS, ACRES #SA #BR TOWN OF OFFICER. SALEOATE CELLTOWEA SALE PRICE C. 1111=009 PRICEPERBLOC9E SELLER BEERBOOK BEERPAGE OISTANCEFROM BVYER TOWER PARCEL DIFFERENCE WE TO CELL TOWER MARKET STUDY OF 241 VAN BORN ROAD NORTH, TOW N OF MnaG, CELL TOW ER C.20B9 PRICE GREYS BLDG PER BLW GEED SEED OISTANCEFAOM TAK I.IIAFI STREET BLDGSG BUILT STYLE ACRES A ..N SALEOATE SALE PRICE SF SELLER BORN PACE U. TOWERPARCEL 115:1-18 308 GRANDVIEWPL LDGSF A2 SAFRET COLT STYLE 1930 RUNGAL STUDY FOR 815 SOUTH AURORA ACRES IBA PER 0.1 1 1 STREET ITHACA, F LFDATC 1006,06-30 QFJ. TMER SAILEPENDIS SMG)j C. MDLIPRIDE BE 101 SELLER ESCH EMILY BOOK 49289FIE PAGE BUYER RIPARCEL OW 113:2-1 209 GRANDVIEWAVE 936 19B RANCH DQ 2 3 3006W-0T 156,S00 16T PERSHING 493BANDREWI IW:1-10 108 GRANDVIEWAVE 1D66 1920 SOOUD 0.12 1 3 200Z0T-12 142,500 131 AUBLE DAWNM 51183 AVERAGE NB 1938 023 td 2.3 N34,333 135 MJII6TMENT9 RIOMBWRETO AFTER TIME6RESME 0% KDOSME 0% BLOOSTYLE 0% x6 0% BEDROOMS 0% BLDGAGE 0% TOTALAOIH6TEDBEFOREUNRPMCE 140 113:2-1 209 GRANDVIEWAVE 936 1963 RANCH 0.42 2 3 2008­06-12 159,600 I71 SALTER STEV EN 52812 4001 VALLESNICHOVS 4T5 115: 1-18 106 GRANOVIEWPL 732 1930 SUNDIALWO 0.1 1 1 200&05_11 112,500 154 LIEBESMANDAVIOSYPATT 54339 2001 CRANECATHERINEL 100 AVERAGE 834 1947 0.26 1S 2.0 5138,050 163 OIETFRENCEOUETOCELLTOWER 17% 0 2024 COWERS• N & ADVISORY SYR240210 The following table summarizes the results of the above three market studies and calculates the overall difference between the average before unit prices and the after unit prices of the sales of single-family residential properties identified within 500 feet of the boundaries of the parent parcel on which each cellular tower was constructed: ADDRESSBEFORE & AFTER STUDIES WITHIN CELLULAR TOWER 1504 Hanshaw Road, Town of Dryden 500 FEET RADIUS Up to 480 Feet OF TOWER 102 PARCEL BOUNDARIES 164 62% 241 Van Dorn Road N, Town of Enfield Up to 100 Feet 89 87 2% 815 South Aurora Street, City of Ithaca Up to 475 Feet 135 163 17% Overall Average 26% As noted in the above tables, the results of the before and after unit sale price comparisons resulted in two of the cellular tower sites with positive changes in the unit prices, indicating that there were no net negative impacts on the sale prices or market values of the single-family residential properties within 500 feet of the boundaries of the parent property on which a cellular tower was constructed. While one of the three studies did show a slight negative impact of -2%, this is not a reliable conclusion because the house styles of the before and after sales were significantly different (Ranch versus Colonial). Overall, the net results of the three market studies for cellular towers where both before and after sales of residential properties were identified was that the presence of the cellular towers had no negative impact on the sale prices or market values of the nearby residences. As indicated previously, most of our prior market research for cellular tower impacts had used wider radii from the location of the tower. Also, those prior studies had measured impact areas from the location of the cellular tower and not the perimeter of the parent parcel, so there were allowances for distances greater than the 500-foot impact areas referenced by the Town of Ithaca. While researching the 34 existing cellular tower sites provided by the client, we did identify four additional tower sites that had sufficient before and after residential property sale activity to measure impacts from the construction of a cellular tower. The following tables summarize the before and after unit price comparisons for these additional four cellular tower sites: MARKETSTUOY MR 651 ME MULEDRIVE.TOWN OF ISHACA.CELLTOWER ETTYR BLBS REETTAS11A1ST. 51BLDGSF WILT STYLE ACRES I ..B SALEOATE SALE PRICE G MInD10 PRICEPERELBESFDEED DEED DISTANCE IROM SELLER BOOK PAGE BUYER TOW ER PARGEI 58: 83 201 FLORALAVE 1192 SRW OLDSIYL 0.09 2 3 2002-12-06BORH00 PRIDE ACA OU51 K 2514 RASE 7350 BUYER RITERROBERT NM. FEPAR1,11 665 53: 5-7 221 HECTORST U69 1925 OLD STYLE0.39 3 3 200b06Q6MMER ARK03501 5001 REPPERT NELSONR730 AVERAGE 1331 1903 0.i4 2.5 3.0 W-% AORISTMENTSFROMBFT91tETOAFTERTIME SITE36EBLOC02EBLDGSTYLEp BATHO EGROOMS3% BLOGAGE 0% TOTALADUM E BEFORE UNIT PRICE 12% 91 5B: 1.6 1016 SENECA ST 1262 1900 OLOSTYL 0.09 1.1 2 2007-02-19 3601000 127 MYERS BEVERLY 50188 4003 BROWP IUUE 380 53: 5-1 239 HECTOR ST 1443 1929 OLD 57L D.83 2 3 2007-10-25 1%,000 110 HARIAN JUSTIN 52695 BOOT EICMTEN DEBRAO835 AVERAGE 1S53 1915 OAK 1.8 3.5 1 159.500 118 DIF£ FRFNCEDUETO CFLLTOW 46%ER {8% SYR240210 1. 'A, 46.1-2-8 T. 49 STREET DARTDR BLOG SF 1296 MARKET BUILT STYLE 19M STUDY MR ACRES 0R8 2309 N. TIMPHABIMM I SA 1 PER 3 ROAD. TOWN OFLANSING. SALEDATE 3013-05-31 CELL SALE PRICE 140,500 TOWER C. PRICE F 108 2014 BETTER ARLOSWILUA 20B PACE 7109 ECHWAN2ACHARY TOW OR PARC EL 2500 46.1.3-7 33 DARTDR BOA 19W 710.18 68 2 5 2011P}12 215,000 g3 WIVELLDAVIDIOHN 2013 12433 GORDON JR WILLIEI 1695 AVERAGE 1800 125i 13 4.0 177,750 99 AOIIIBTMENTS FROM BFTORETO AFTER TIME 10% SITESI2E 0% BLDGBQE 0% BLW9TYLE 0% A BATHS 5% M BEDROOMS 5% BLOGAGE 0% TOTALADJUSTEDBISMREUNITPRICE 0% 99 46.1-1-11 22 DARTDR 1344 1959 RANCH 0.45 1.1 3 2015.08.20 in," t14 STEVEN 2015 9994 ECKERTANN1130 MARIE46.1.2-8 49 DARTDR 1296 19M RANCH 068 1 3 2015-C8-21 145,000WANLRHARY46.1.2-10 2015 11082 IADICK MARK nOO 53 DARTDR 1192 1955 RANCH 0.61 1 3 2016-03-09 3W,oJDN SEANR 2016 1W90 YANGIINTING 2825 AVERAGE 1277 1956 0.58 1.0 3.0 143.333 DIFIFERENCEDUE CELLTOWER TA MAP ST4 MARKET STUDY FOR 422 CHAMPLIN ROAD, TOWN OF GROTON. EFFYR SLDD STREET OLOGSF WILT STYLE ACRES %BA YBR SALE DATE CELL TOWER SALE PRICE 12010PRICEPERBLDGSF DEED DEED DSTANCE FROM SELLER BOOK PAGE BUYER TO. ER PAGCEL llll®IIIIIIIIII E! I The following table summarizes the results of all seven market studies and calculates the overall difference between the average before unit prices and the after unit prices of the sales of single-family residential properties identified within 2,900 feet (approximately 0.55 miles) of the boundaries of the parent parcel on which each cellular tower was constructed: BEFORE•IES WITHIN ADDRESSCELLULARTOWER 1504 Hans haw Road, Town of Dryden 0.55 MILE RADIUS Up to 480 Feet OF • BOUNDARIES 102 $164 62% 241 Van Dorn Road N. Town of Enfield Up to 100 Feet 89 $87 2% 815 South Aurora Street, City of Ithaca Up to 475 Feet 135 $163 17% 651 Five Mile Drive, Town of Ithaca Up to 1,800 Feet 93 $100 7% 310 Tau hannock Boulevard, City of Ithaca Up to 835 Feet 81 $118 46% 2309 N. Triphammer Road, Town of Lansing Up to 2,825 Feet 99 $112 14% 422 Champlin Road, Town of Groton Up to 2,580 Feet 135 $120 11% Overall Average 19% SYR240210 SUMMARY: The market studies of before and after unit sale prices of single-family residential properties within 500 feet of the boundaries of parent parcels on which cellular towers were constructed showed no credible market evidence that the existence of a new cellular tower would negative affect the sale price or market value of nearby single-family residences. The following table summarizes the results of the three study sites that were found to have residential sales that occurred both immediately before and after the construction of a cellular tower which allowed the comparison of unit sale prices. TOWERBEFORE & AFTER STUDIES WITHIN CELLULAR .. 1504 Hanshaw Road, Town of Dryden 500 DISTANCE UP FEET RADIUS RANGE to 480 Feet OF TOWER BEFORE 102 PARCEL BOUNDARIES 164 62% 241 Van Dorn Road N, Town of Enfield Up to 100 Feet il 89 1 $87 1 -2% 815 South Aurora Street, City of Ithaca Up to 475 Feet 1 135 1 $163 1 17% Overall Average I 1 1 26% As shown in the above table, two of the three before and after studies showed a significant increase in the unit prices of the after sales, indicating no negative impact from the nearby cellular towers. The third study does show a slight negative impact, but this comparison is not as credible as the othertwo due to the difference in house styles between the before and after sales and that there was only one before sale and one after sale to measure. Adding four additional market studies that had expanded radii of up to 0.55 miles also showed an overall positive, although to a smaller degree, change in residential unit prices following the construction of a nearby cellular tower. We do not conclude that the construction of a cellular tower actually enhances the value of nearby single-family residences. But the results of this market study did not find sufficient and consistent credible evidence that the construction of a cellular tower has a negative impact on the sale prices and market values of nearby single-family residential properties. SYR240210 CERTIFICATION: We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions of the signers are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. The signers of this report has no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA has provided an opinion letter concerning the client's project that is identified in this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. Susan D. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS has performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. The signers are not biased with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. The engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. The compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this report. The reported analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA and Susan D. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS did not inspected the property that is the subject of this report No one provided significant real property assistance to appraisers signing this certification. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA has completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. As of the date of this report Susan D. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. SYR240210 Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Valuation Services Director I Syracuse NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-0060 1 315 422 7107 donald.fisher(a)col I iers.com Susan D. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS Managing Director I Syracuse NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-3166 1 315 579 3160 Susan. baldwin(cDcolliers.com 31, 2024 Date 31, 2024 Date SYR240210 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: This report is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: The appraisers may or may not have been provided with a survey of the subject property. If further verification is required, a survey by a registered surveyor is advised. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character, nor do we render any opinion as to title, which is assumed to be marketable. All existing liens, encumbrances, and assessments have been disregarded, unless otherwise noted, and the property is appraised as though free and clear, under responsible ownership, and competent management. The Addenda of this report is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. We have made no survey of the property and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. Unless otherwise noted herein, it is assumed that there are no encroachments, zoning, or restrictive violations existing in the subject property. The appraisers assume no responsibility for determining if the property requires environmental approval by the appropriate governing agencies, nor if it is in violation thereof, unless otherwise noted herein. Information presented in this report has been obtained from reliable sources, and it is assumed that the information is accurate. This report shall be used for its intended purpose only, and by the party to whom it is addressed. Possession of this report does not include the right of publication. The appraisers may not be required to give testimony or to appear in court by reason of this market study, with reference to the property in question, unless prior arrangements have been made therefore. The statements of value and all conclusions shall apply as of the dates shown herein. There is no present or contemplated future interest in the property by the appraisers which is not specifically disclosed in this report. Without the written consent or approval of the authors neither all, nor any part of, the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. This applies particularly to value conclusions and to the identity of the appraisers and the firm with which the appraisers are connected. This report must be used in its entirety. Reliance on any portion of the report independent of others, may lead the reader to erroneous conclusions regarding the property values. Unless approval is provided by the authors no portion of the report stands alone. The valuation stated herein assumes professional management and operation of the buildings throughout the lifetime of the improvements, with an adequate maintenance and repair program. The liability of Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services, its principals, agents, and employees is limited to the client. Further, there is no accountability, obligation, or liability to any third party. If this report is placed in the hands of anyone other than the client, the client shall make such party aware of all limiting conditions and assumptions of the assignment and related discussions. The appraisers are in no way responsible for any costs incurred to discover or correct any deficiency in the property. The appraisers are not qualified to detect the presence of toxic or hazardous substances or materials which may influence or be associated with the property or any adjacent properties, has made no investigation or analysis as to the presence of such materials, and expressly disclaims any duty to note the degree of fault. Colliers SYR240210 International Valuation & Advisory Services and its principals, agents, employees, shall not be liable for any costs, expenses, assessments, or penalties, or diminution in value, property damage, or personal injury including death) resulting from or otherwise attributable to toxic or hazardous substances or materials, including without limitation hazardous waste, asbestos material, formaldehyde, or any smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids, solids or gasses, waste materials or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. The appraisers assume no responsibility for determining if the subject property complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services, its principals, agents, and employees, shall not be liable for any costs, expenses, assessments, penalties or diminution in value resulting from non-compliance. This market study assumes that the subject meets an acceptable level of compliance with ADA standards; if the subject is not in compliance, the eventual renovation costs and/or penalties would negatively impact the present value of the subject. If the magnitude and time of the cost were known today, they would be reduced from the reported value conclusion. An on -site inspection of the subject property was conducted. No evidence of asbestos materials on -site was noted. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment was not provided for this analysis. This analysis assumes that no asbestos or other hazardous materials are stored orfound in or on the subject property. If evidence of hazardous materials of any kind occurs, the reader should seek qualified professional assistance. If hazardous materials are discovered and if future market conditions indicate an impact on value and increased perceived risk, a revision of the concluded values may be necessary. A detailed soils study was not provided for this analysis. The subjects soils and sub -soil conditions are assumed to be suitable based upon a visual inspection, which did not indicate evidence of excessive settling or unstable soils. No certification is made regarding the stability or suitability of the soil or sub -soil conditions. This analysis assumes that the financial information provided for this report, including rent rolls and historical income and expense statements, accurately reflect the current and historical operations of the subject property. EyP`z.1#A18] ADDENDA Zoning Flood map Marshall Valuation Page Valuation Glossary Qualifications of Appraisers Qualifications of Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services Community Commercial (CC) lakefront Commercial (LC) Agricultural (AG) Conservation (C) Planned Development Zone Light Industrial (LI) Industrial (I) Tovm of Iduca, 2015 North Tloga Street Ithaca, NY 148! NOTE: Refer also to Ithaca Town Code Chapters 270,271 Board local laws and ordinances rezoning certain areas to on specific boundaries. The official signatures below certify this map as the Ofhci Town of Ithaca, effective April 1. 2004, adopted by the To No. 195 on December 8. 2003. revised December 11, 20 Resolution No, 2012.263, revised on August 13, 2012 by No. 2012.152, revised on January 23. 2014 by Town Boa 2014-013. revised on December 11.2017 by Town Boan 2017-143. revised on January 24, 2022 by Town Board R J 1 ioo`saaa aaam i N Vie i iamaa .aam .m"8, w QQ qq pp S 44 g g p 5R d525g: 25 d5F i5$ffi F ug km TLL u a N L =.i V NaN O q€ m 6;i G t mas xxx L9 S P 5x § emA ty9 d aggc oDzqfat3 N O M- a YrSu Z Hy^„c EE' e^a Hip yyam 1 Hrn m .gym a;.et mQ r NET o.s Ft; Me o F g o do g ocraLL 3n U r c d p'._a g h g m8 cN s..m a m€''A a'S O m tkMH d QQ ti8 § § yG ca€ mau v`- wa eto a a 8. 3 PL Umc o g a o 5 E G g= bEoNLLo8 E Foc 53 o PA J LL fib Jymi$ NLL UU N Ci nN el8 11 I I I9 3 I y OZ f J 7a E qIg EA9IIII = mpp. 51 _ gg faPI S g III N b gggpV s'' p im E.CI; n;gla w z3E utesae=°uu n uIlccvC O 7y's d.HE Ea"I' IS ppJ. c zslxe eQa n n w m slm m alz we`! iL e} y N U Valuation Glossary 2024 Unless specified otherwise, these definitions were extracted or paraphrased from the following sources or publications: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Seventh Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 2022 (Dictionary). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, 2020-2023 Edition (USPAP). The Appraisal of Real Estate, Fifteenth Edition, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 2020 (15th Edition). Absolute Net Lease A lease in which the tenant pays all expenses including structural maintenance, building reserves, and management; often a long-term lease to a credit tenant. (Dictionary) Ad Valorem Tax A real estate tax based on the assessed value of the property, which is not necessarily equivalent to its market value. (15th Edition) Arm's-length Transaction A transaction between unrelated parties who are each acting in his or her own best interest. (Dictionary) As -Is Market Value The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal date. Dictionary) Assessed Value The value of a property according to the tax rolls in ad valorem taxation; may be higher or lower than market value, or based on an assessment ratio that is a percentage of market value. Dictionary) Average Daily Room Rate (ADR) In the lodging industry, the net rooms revenue derived from the sale of guest rooms divided by the number of paid occupied rooms. (Dictionary) Band of Investment A technique in which the capitalization rates attributable to components of an investment are weighted and combined to derive a weighted -average rate attributable to the total investment. (Dictionary) Cash -Equivalent Price The sale price of a property that is equivalent to what a cash buyer would pay. (Dictionary) Common Area The total area within a property that is not designed for sale or rental but is available for common use by all owners, tenants, or their invitees, e.g., parking and its appurtenances, malls, sidewalks, landscaped areas, recreation areas, public toilets, truck and service facilities. (Dictionary) Contract Rent The actual rental income specified in a lease. (15th Edition) Cost Approach A set of procedures through which a value indication is derived for the fee simple estate by estimating the cost new as of the effective date of the appraisal to construct a reproduction of (or replacement for) the existing structure, including an entrepreneurial incentive; deducting depreciation from the total cost; and adding the estimated land value. The contributory value of any site improvements that have not already been considered in the total cost can be added on a depreciated -cost basis. Adjustments may then be made to the indicated value of the fee simple estate in the subject property to reflect the value of the property rights being appraised. (Dictionary) Curable Functional Obsolescence An element of depreciation; a curable defect caused by a flaw involving the structure, materials, or design, which can be practically and economically corrected. (Dictionary) Debt Coverage Ratio (DCR) The ratio of net operating income to annual debt service, which measures the relative ability of a property to meet its debt service out of net operating income; also called debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). (Dictionary) Deferred Maintenance Items of wear and tear on a propertythat should be fixed now to protectthe value or income -producing ability of a property. Dictionary) Depreciation In appraisal, a loss in the value of improvements from any cause; the difference between the cost of an improvement on the effective date of the appraisal and the value of the improvement on the same date. (Dictionary) Direct Costs Expenditures for the labor and materials used in the construction of improvements; also called hard costs. Dictionary) Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis The procedure in which a discount rate is applied to a set of projected income streams and a reversion. The analyst specifies the quantity, variability, timing, and duration of the income streams and the quantity and timing of the reversion, and discounts each to its present value at a specified yield rate. ( Dictionary) Accelerating success. Discount Rate A rate of return on capital used to convert future payments or receipts into present value. (Dictionary) Disposition Value The most probable price that a specified interest in property should bring under the following conditions: 1. Consummation of a sale within a specified time, which is shorter than the typical exposure time for such a property in that market. 2. The property is subjected to market conditions prevailing as of the date of valuation. 3. Both the buyer and seller are acting prudently and knowledgeably. 4. The seller is under compulsion to sell. 5. The buyer is typically motivated. 6. Both parties are acting in what they consider their best interests. 7. An adequate marketing effortwill be made duringthe exposure time. 8. Payment will be made in cash in U.S. dollars (or the local currency) or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto. 9. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition can also be modified to provide for valuation with specified financing terms. (Dictionary) Easement The right to use another's land for a stated purpose. Access or right-of-way easements may be acquired by private parties or public utilities. Governments may be the beneficiaries of easements placed on privately owned land that is dedicated to conservation, open space, or preservation. (15th Edition) Economic Life The period over which improvements to real estate contribute to property value. (Dictionary) Effective Age The age of property that is based on the amount of observed deterioration and obsolescence it has sustained, which may be different from its chronological age. (Dictionary) Effective Date The date on which the appraisal or review opinion applies SVP) (Dictionary) Effective Gross Income (EGI) The anticipated income from all operations of the real estate after an allowance is made for vacancy and collection losses and an addition is made for any other income. (Dictionary) Effective Gross Income Multiplier (EGIM) The ratio between the sale price (or value) of a property and its effective gross income. (Dictionary) Effective Rent The total base rent, or minimum rent stipulated in a lease, over the specified lease term minus rent concessions - e.g. free rent, excessivetenant improvements, moving allowances, lease buyouts, cash allowances, and other lease incentives. 15th Edition) Eminent Domain The right ofgovernmentto take private property for public use upon the payment of just compensation. The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the takings clause, guarantees payment of just compensation upon appropriation of private property. {Dictionary) Entrepreneurial Incentive The amount an entrepreneur expects or wants to receive as compensation for providing coordination and expertise and assuming the risks associated with the development of a project. Entrepreneurial incentive is the expectation of future reward as opposed to the profit actually earned on the project. (Dictionary) Entrepreneurial Profit A market -derived figure that represents the amount an entrepreneur received for his or her contribution to a past project to compensate for his or her time, effort, knowledge, and risk; the difference between the total cost of a property cost of development) and its market value (property value after completion), which represents the entrepreneur's compensation for the risk and expertise associated with development. An entrepreneur is motivated by the prospect of future value enhancement (i.e., the entrepreneurial incentive). An entrepreneur who successfully creates value through new development, expansion, renovation, or an innovative change of use is rewarded by entrepreneurial profit. Entrepreneurs may also fail and suffer losses. Dictionary) Excess Land Land that is not needed to serve or support the existing use. The highest and best use of the excess land may or may not be the same as the highest and best use of the improved parcel. Excess land has the potential to be sold separately and is valued separately. (Dictionary) Excess Rent The amount by which contract rent exceeds market rent at the time of the appraisal; created by a lease favorable to the lessor and may reflect superior management, a lease execution in an earlier, stronger rental market, or an agreement of the parties. Due to the higher risk inherent in the receipt of excess rent, it may be calculated separately and capitalized or discounted at a higher rate in the income capitalization approach. (15th Edition) Expense Stop A clause in a lease that limits the landlord's expense obligation, which results in the lessee paying any operating expenses above a stated level or amount. (Dictionary) Accelerating success. Exposure Time An opinion, based on supporting market data, of the length of time that the property interest being appraised would have been offered on the market prior to the hypothetical consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal. (USPAP) Extraordinary Assumption An assignment -specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or the integrity of data used in an analysis. An extraordinary assumption may be used in an assignment only if: It is required to properly develop credible opinions and conclusions; The appraiser has a reasonable basis for the extraordinary assumption; Use of the extraordinary assumption results in a credible analysis; and The appraiser complies with the disclosure requirements set forth in USPAP for extraordinary assumptions. (USPAP) External Obsolescence A type of depreciation; a diminution in value caused by negative external influences and generally incurable on the part of the owner, landlord, or tenant. The external influence may be either temporary or permanent. There are two forms of external obsolescence: economic and locational. Dictionary) Fair Market Value In nontechnical usage, a term that is equivalent to the contemporary usage of market value. As used in condemnation, litigation, income tax, and property tax situations, a term that is similar in concept to market value but may be defined explicitly by the relevant agency or interpreted differently by court precedent. (Dictionary) Feasibility Analysis A study of the cost -benefit relationship of an economic endeavor. (USPAP) Fee Simple Estate Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power and escheat. (Dictionary) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The relationship between the above -ground floor area of a building, as described by the zoning or building code, and the area of the plot on which it stands; in planning and zoning, often expressed as a decimal, e.g., a ratio of 2.0 indicates that the permissible floor area of a building is twice the total land area. (Dictionary) Functional Obsolescence The impairment of functional capacity of improvements according to market tastes and standards. (Dictionary) Functional Utility The ability of a property or building to be useful and to perform the function for which it is intended according to current market tastes and standards; the efficiency of a building's use in terms of architectural style, design and layout, traffic patterns, and the size and type of rooms. Dictionary) Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) Business trade fixtures and personal property, exclusive of inventory. (Dictionary) Going -concern An established and operating business having an indefinite future life. (Dictionary) Going -concern Value An outdated label for the market value of all the tangible and intangible assets of an established and operating business with an indefinite life, as if sold in aggregate; more accurately termed the market value of the going concern or market value of the total assets of the business. (Dictionary) Gross Building Area (GBA) Total floor area of a building, excluding unenclosed areas, measured from the exterior of the walls of the above -grade area. This includes mezzanines and basements if and when typically included in the market area of the type of property involved. (Dictionary) Gross Leasable Area (GLA) Total floor area designed for the occupancy and exclusive use of tenants, including basements and mezzanines; measured from the center of joint partitioning to the outside wall surfaces. (Dictionary) Gross Living Area (GLA) Total area of finished, above -grade residential space area; calculated by measuring the outside perimeter of the structure and includes only finished, habitable, above -grade living space. (Finished basements and attic areas are not generally included in total gross living area. Local practices, however, may differ.) (Dictionary) Highest & Best Use The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity. The use of an asset that maximizes its potential and that is possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible. The highest and best use may be for continuation of an asset's existing use or for some alternative use. This is determined by the use that a market Accelerating success. participant would have in mind for the asset when formulating the price that it would be willing to bid (IVS). (Dictionary) Hypothetical Condition A condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. (USPAP) Income Capitalization Approach In the income capitalization approach, an appraiser analyzes a property's capacity to generate future benefits and capitalizes the income into an indication of present value. The principle of anticipation is fundamental to this approach. Techniques and procedures from this approach are used to analyze comparable sales data and to measure obsolescence in the cost approach. (15th Edition) Incurable Functional Obsolescence An element of depreciation; a defect caused by a deficiency or superadequacy involving the structure, materials, or design that cannot be practically or economically corrected as of the effective date of the appraisal. (Dictionary) Indirect Costs Expenditures or allowances for items other than labor and materials that are necessary for construction, but are not typically part of the construction contract. Indirect costs may include administrative costs, professional fees, financing costs and the interest paid on construction loans, taxes and the builder's or developer's all-risk insurance during construction, and marketing, sales, and lease -up costs incurred to achieve occupancy or sale. Also called soft costs. (Dictionary) Interim Use The use contemplated by the market participants that the subject real estate can be put to while waiting for certain subsequent factors to occur. (Dictionary) Investment Value The value of a property to a particular investor or class of investors based on the investor's specific requirements. Investment value may be different from market value because it depends on a set of investment criteria that are not necessarily typical of the market. (Dictionary) Leased Fee Interest The ownership interest held by the lessor, which includes the rightto receive the contract rent specified in the lease plus the reversion right when the lease expires. (Dictionary) Leasehold Estate The right held by the lessee to use and occupy real estate for a stated term and under the conditions specified in the lease. Dictionary) Legal Nonconforming Use A use that was lawfully established and maintained, but no longer conforms to the use regulations of its current zoning; sometimes known as a legally nonconforming use. (Dictionary) Liquidation Value The most probable price that a specified interest in property should bring under the following conditions: 1. Consummation of a sale within a short time period. 2. The property is subjected to market conditions prevailing as of the date of valuation. 3. Both the buyer and seller are acting prudently and knowledgeably. 4. The seller is under extreme compulsion to sell. 5. The buyer is typically motivated. 6. Both parties are acting in what they consider to be their best interests. 7. A normal marketing effort is not possible due to the brief exposure time. 8. Payment will be made in cash in U.S. dollars (or the local currency) or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto. 9. The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition can also be modified to provide for valuation with specified financing terms. (Dictionary) Market Area The geographic region from which a majority of demand comes and in which the majority of competition is located. Depending on the market, a market area may be further subdivided into components such as primary, secondary, and tertiary market areas, or the competitive market area may be distinguished from the general market area. (Dictionary) Market Rent The most probable rent that a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair lease transaction, the lessee and lessor each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the rent is not affected by undue stimulus. (Dictionary) Market Study An analysis of the market conditions of supply, demand, and pricing for a specific property type in a specific area. Dictionary) Market Value (Most Common Non-FRT) The most probable price, as of a specific date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue distress. (Dictionary) Accelerating success. Market Value (Interagency Guidelines) The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration forthe property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. ( 12 CFR, Part 34, Subpart C - Appraisals, 34.42(h)). Marketability Analysis The study of how a specific property is expected to perform in a specific market. A marketability analysis expands on a market analysis by addressing a specific property. (Dictionary) Neighborhood Analysis The objective analysis of observable or quantifiable data indicating discernible patterns of urban growth, structure, and change that may detract from or enhance property values; focuses on four sets of considerations that influence value: social, economic, governmental, and environmental factors. Dictionary) Net Net Net Lease An alternative term for a type of net lease. In some markets, a net net net lease is defined as a lease in which the tenant assumes all expenses (fixed and variable) of operating a property except that the landlord is responsible for structural maintenance, building reserves, and management. Also called NNN lease, triple net lease, or fully net lease. (Dictionary) Net Operating Income (NOI) The actual or anticipated net income that remains after all operating expenses are deducted from effective gross income but before mortgage debt service and book depreciation are deducted. Note: This definition mirrors the convention used in corporate finance and business valuation for EBITDA earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). (15th Edition) Obsolescence One cause of depreciation; an impairment of desirability and usefulness caused by new inventions, changes in design, improved processes for production, or external factors that make a property less desirable and valuable for a continued use; may be either functional or external. (Dictionary) Off -site Costs Costs incurred in the development of a project excluding on - site costs such as grading and construction of the building and other improvements; also called common costs or off -site improvement costs. (Dictionary) On -site Costs Costs incurred for the actual construction of buildings and improvements on a particular site. (Dictionary) Overage Rent The percentage rent paid over and above the guaranteed minimum rent or base rent; calculated as a percentage of sales in excess of a specified breakeven sales volume. (15th Edition) Overall Capitalization Rate (OAR) The relationship between a single year's net operating income expectancy and the total property price or value. (Dictionary) Parking Ratio The ratio of parking area or parking spaces to an economic or physical unit of comparison. Minimum required parking ratios for various land uses are often stated in zoning ordinances. Dictionary) Potential Gross Income (PGI) The total income attributable to property at full occupancy before vacancy and operating expenses are deducted. Dictionary) Potential Gross Income Multiplier (PGIM) The ratio between the sale price (or value) of a property and its annual potential gross income. (Dictionary) Present Value(PV) The value of a future payment or series of future payments discounted to the current date or to time period zero. Dictionary) Prospective Opinion of Value A value opinion effective as of a specified future date. The term does not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as effective at some specific future date. An opinion of value as of a prospective date is frequently sought in connection with projects that are proposed, under construction, or under conversion to a new use, or those that have not achieved sellout or a stabilized level of long-term occupancy. (Dictionary) Qualitative Adjustment An indication that one property is superior, inferior, or similar to another property. Note that the common usage of the term is a misnomer in that an adjustment to the sale price of a comparable property is not made. Rather, the indication of a property's superiority or inferiority to another is used in relative comparison analysis, bracketing, and other forms of qualitative analysis. (Dictionary) Accelerating success. Quantitative Adjustment In the application of the sales comparison and income capitalization approaches, a numerical (dollar or percentage) adjustment to the sale price, rent, or expense amount of a comparable property to account for the effect on value of a difference between each comparable property and the subject property. (Dictionary) Rentable Area The amount of space on which the rent is based; calculated according to local practice. (Dictionary) Replacement Cost The estimated cost to construct, at current prices as of a specific date, a substitute for a building or other improvements, using modern materials and current standards, design, and layout. (Dictionary) Replacement Cost for Insurance Purposes The estimated cost, at current prices as of the effective date of valuation, of a substitute for the building being valued, using modern materials and current standards, design and layout for insurance coverage purposes guaranteeing that damaged property is replaced with a new property (i.e., depreciation is not deducted). (Dictionary) Reproduction Cost The estimated cost to construct, at current prices as of the effective date of the appraisal, an exact duplicate or replica of the building being appraised, using the same or similar materials, construction standards, design, layout, and quality of workmanship and embodying all the deficiencies, superadequacies, and obsolescence of the subject building. Dictionary) Retrospective Value Opinion A value opinion effective as of a specified historical date. The term retrospective does not define a type of value. Instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific prior date. Value as of a historical date is frequently sought in connection with property tax appeals, damage models, lease renegotiation, deficiency judgments, estate tax, and condemnation. Inclusion of the type of value with this term is appropriate, e.g., "retrospective market value opinion." Dictionary) Sales Comparison Approach The process of deriving a value indication for the subject property by comparing sales of similar properties to the property being appraised, identifying appropriate units of comparison, and making adjustments to the sale prices (or unit prices, as appropriate) of the comparable properties based on relevant, market -derived elements of comparison. The sales comparison approach may be used to value improved properties, vacant land, or land being considered vacant when an adequate supply of comparable sales is available. (Dictionary) Scope of Work The type and extent of research and analysis in an appraisal or appraisal review assignment. Scope of work includes, but is not limited to: The extent to which the property is identified; The extent to which tangible property is inspected; The type and extent of data researched; and The type and extent of analysis applied to arrive at opinions or conclusions. (USPAP) Shopping Center Types Neighborhood Shopping Center: The smallest type of shopping center, generally with a gross leasable area of between 30,000 and 100,000 square feet. Typical anchors include supermarkets. Neighborhood shopping centers offer convenience goods and personal services and usually depend on a market population support of 3,000 to 40,000 people. Community Shopping Center: A shopping center of 100,000 to 400,000 square feet that usually contains one junior department store, a variety store, discount or department store. A community shopping center generally has between 20 and 70 retail tenants and a market population support of 40,000 to 150,000 people. Regional Shopping Center: A shopping center of 300,000 to 900,000 square feet that is built around one or two full -line department stores of approximately 200,000 square feet each plus small tenant spaces. This type of center is typically supported by a minimum population of 150,000 people. Super -Regional Center: A large center of 600,000 to 2.0 million square feet anchored by three or more full -line department stores. This type of center is typically supported by a population area of 300,000 people. (15th Edition) Sum of the Retail Values The sum of the separate and distinct market value opinions for each of the units in a condominium; subdivision development, or portfolio of properties, as of the date of valuation. The aggregate of retail values does not represent the value of all the units as sold together in a single transaction; it is simply the total of the individual market value conclusions. An appraisal has an effective date, but summing the sales prices of multiple units over an extended period of time will not be the value on that one day unless the prices are discounted to make the value equivalent to what another developer or investor would pay for the bulk purchase of the units. Also called the aggregate of the retail values or aggregate retail selling price. (Dictionary) Superadequacy An excess in the capacity or quality of a structure or structural component; determined by market standards. (Dictionary) Accelerating success. Surplus Land Land that is not currently needed to support the existing use but cannot be separated from the property and sold off for another use. Surplus land does not have an independent highest and best use and may or may not contribute value to the improved parcel. (Dictionary) Tenant Improvements (Tls) 1. Fixed improvements to the land or structures installed for use by a lessee. 2. The original installation of finished tenant space in a construction project; subject to periodic change for succeeding tenants. (Dictionary) Usable Area The area that is actually used by the tenants measured from the inside of the exterior walls to the inside of walls separating the space from hallways and common areas. (Dictionary) Useful Life The period of time over which a structure or a component of a property may reasonably be expected to perform the function for which it was designed. (Dictionary) Vacancy and Collection Loss A deduction from potential gross income (PGI) made to reflect income deductions due to vacancies, tenant turnover, and nonpayment of rent; also called vacancy and credit loss or vacancy and contingency loss. (Dictionary) Yield Capitalization A method used to convert future benefits into present value by (1) discounting each future benefit at an appropriate yield rate, or (2) developing an overall rate that explicitly reflects the investment's income pattern, holding period, value change, and yield rate. (Dictionary) Accelerating success. Education or Qualifications State University College at Cordand - B.A. Economics State Certifications New York Pennsylvania Susan D. Baldwin, MAI, AI-GRS Area of Expertise Susan D. Baldwin serves as the Managing Director for Colliers' Syracuse Office which provides valuation and advisory services throughout Upstate New York. Prior to joining Colliers, Susan was the President CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Susan has valuation experience in numerous types of real property including restaurants, apartment complexes, warehouses, offices, retail properties, self - storage facilities, auto service facilities, manufacturing plants, hotels, motels, inns, golf courses, and single-family homes. In 2005, Susan served as President of the Upstate New York Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and has always been active with the local chapter to include being on the Board of Directors, and Syracuse District Chair. She was also a Candidate Advisor for practicing Affiliates of the Appraisal Institute. She has provided expert testimony in the New York State Supreme Court. Professional Background CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Armory Square Valuation Services, Inc. Summit Associates The Peatfield Company, Ltd. National Bank and Trust Company Affiliations or Memberships Member - Appraisal Institute (MAI, AI- GRS) Past President- Upstate Chapter of the Appraisal Institute New York State Department of Transportation Approved New York State Board of Real Estate Appraisal. Community Activities Chairman for Light Up Fenner. Raised 125,000 to install lights on the fields for the Cazenovia School District. Served on the Cazenovia Youth Soccer Board for 12 years. Served on Cazenovia Youth Lacrosse for 5 years. Served on the YMCA board for 7 years. Current serving on the Board of Directors for the Cazenovia Golf Club. Serving on the Town of Cazenovia Grievance Board for over 15 years. Accelerating success. w rd LLJ z cli 0 LU LULL (50' Lr d 1> Lo w LLE i3 0- xw LL LL 0 0 L- 4 0 0 0 L.Oz 20 UAm o riU) F LUwtll to 0 CL CL Ln n w Id. Ix 0: u o tA. F W to z z <C m ZZ wM wED tans Q z CL w z C n < w0 z z twA w S n uj z >- > W j) t-4 a: Z - cl 3CyIxwJ LLI Ix 1 0 m 0 z l6 (n a. L 4 w m ct: W CL 3 z z D w w uim Z) IL W n lij z Education or Qualifications Cornell University: Bachelor of Science - College of Agriculture Life Sciences Syracuse University: graduate studies State Certifications New York Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Area of Expertise Donald Fisher is a Valuation Services Director in the Syracuse office of Colliers Valuation & Advisory Services throughout Upstate New York. Prior to joining Colliers, Donald was the Executive Vice President CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Donald has valuation experience in numerous types of real property including all types of agriculture and rural properties, restaurants, apartment complexes, warehouses, offices, retail properties, self -storage facilities, auto service facilities, manufacturing plants, hotels, motels, inns, golf courses, and single-family homes. In 2011 and 2012, Donald served as President of the Upstate New York Chapter of the Appraisal Institute and has always been active with the local chapter to include being on the Board of Directors, Chairperson for Candidate Admissions, and served on the AIREA/SREA Unification Community and Regional Standards Panel. He has been active with the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers since 1975 including Executive Council for three years, Chair of the National Appraisal Review Committee for six years, and Chair of the National Editorial Committee for 19 years. He also served as Chapter President from 1991 through 1993. Affiliations or Memberships MAI #6935 Appraisal Institute Appraisal Institute (1979-present) ARA #623 American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers [ASFMRA] American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (1 975-present) International Right -of -Way Association - Chapter #18 (1982-2023) International Association of Assessing Officers (1982-2020) Colliers Professional Background 2023-current: Valuation Services Director, Colliers Valuation & Advisory Services 2016-2023: Executive Vice President - CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 1994-2015: President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1986-1994: Executive Vice -President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1984-1986: Vice -President / Secretary - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1974-1984: Staff Appraiser - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. Awards Appraisal Professional of the Year by ASFMRA - 2012 G. Richard Kelley Memorial Award formerly Presidents Award)- 2014, presented by Upstate New York Chapter, Appraisal Institute Gold Quill Award forJournalism from ASFMRA -1985 and 2011 Volunteer of the Year Award - ASFMRA - 2017 Silver Plow Award -10+years as Chapter Secretary/Treasurer from ASFMRA (1989) Silver Cow Award for Contribution to Agribusiness from Onondaga County Dairy Promotion Committee (1999) Accelerating success. Licensing and Certifications Certified by Appraisal Institute through December 31, 2028 (5-year renewal period) Certified byASFMRAthrough December 31, 2025 (3-year renewal period) NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-000000060 (1991 to present) Certified by NY Department of State through October 7, 2025 (2-year renewal period) Certificate of Completion - Valuation of Conservation Easements course - AI/ASFMRA/ASA (2008) Certificate of Completion -Yellow Book - Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions ASFMRA (2006 and 2018) NYS Consultant Appraiser - New York State (1978 to present) NYS Qualified Appraisal Course Instructor - all appraisal course levels (1991 to present) Certificate of Appreciation - Appraisal Review Committee Chairman (6 years) Certificate of Appreciation - Editorial Committee Chairman (19 years) Publications A Case Study of Upstate New York Landlocked and Restricted Access Land Values" -journal of the ASFMRA, May 2020 An Environmental Trade Case Study: Agricultural Conservation Easement Pays Off Environmental Penalty" Journal of the ASFMRA, June 2011 (ASFMRA 2011 Gold Quill Award) Is Your Forest Land Fairly Assessed7' - Empire Envoy, Empire State Forest Products Association, Vol. 97, No. 5, August 2004 Conservation Easements: A Review of Alternative Valuation Methods" -Journal of Property Economics, co -published by American Society of Appraisers, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, International Association of Assessing Officers and National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2004 The Appraisal of Rural Property, 2nd Edition, 2000, co -published by ASFMRA and Appraisal Institute - Dairy Farm Chapter Timberland Assessments" - Farming, January 2001 Gas Pipelines: Are They a Detriment or an Enhancement for Crops?" Journal of ASFMRA, 2000; republished in International Right -of -Way Magazine, Dec. 2000 Timberland Valuation" - CFA News, Catskill Forest Association, Inc., Fall 1999 Understanding Development Rights from Both the Appraiser and Consultant Perspective" Seminar for ASFMRA, May 1997 Farm Assessment Problems" (5-part series) - New York Farmer, 1996-1997 Accelerating success. Publications (continued) Conservation Easements & Valuation Issues" - Appraisal Views, Valuation International, Ltd., 20d Quarter, 1996 Rural Appraisal Manual, ASFMRA, 6th Edition, 1986 - Revision Committee Using the Income Approach for Specialized Agricultural Properties" Journal of the ASFMRA, April 1985 (ASFMRA 1985 Gold Quill Award) Do You Need a Professional Appraiser?" - American Agriculturist, January 1983 Teaching and Lecturing Experience Upstate NY Chapter (Appraisal Institute): Valuations in Indian Land Claims, Eminent Domain Analysis, Catastrophic Event, Natural (Tourist) Attraction, Current Use v. Highest and Best Use, Land Under Elevated Highway, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Utility Easements, Determination of Economic Units, Market Value Impact from Solar Systems on Residential Properties, Effects of Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land ASFMRA & Northeast Chapter: Agricultural Valuation, Conservation Easements, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Dairy Farms, Cost Approach; Utility Easements ASFMRA Ohio Chapter: Conservation Easements International Right -of -Way Association Chapter 18: Conservation Easement Valuation, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Effects of Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land NYS Assessors Association: Farm Valuation, Income Capitalization Approach, Conservation Easement Valuation, Waterfront Valuation, Mini -Marts and Convenience Stores, Partial Interests Valuation, Appraisal Report Review, Mixed -Use Property Valuation NYS Association of County Directors: Conservation Easements: Alternative Valuation Methods Cornell Cooperative Extension: Farm Assessment Problems, Agricultural Conservation Easements Cornell University: Appraisal Issues, Eminent Domain, Conservation Easements, Indian Land Claims Federal Land Bank: Highest & Best Use Analysis US Army/Tug Hill Tomorrow Land Trust/ Ducks Unlimited: Fort Drum Army Compatible Use Buffer Program (2012): Conservation Easements New York Farm Show / Woodsmen's Field Days (2010, 2011, 2012): Conservation Easements Ohio State University: Conservation Easement Valuation Onondaga Community College: Real Estate Principles Onondaga County Assessors Assoc.: Farm Valuation, Conservation Easements, Convenience Stores, Property Classifications and Current Use v. Highest and Best Use Issues Accelerating success. Court Experience Testified before US Federal District Court*; NY State Court of Claims; NY State Supreme CourtA; Massachusetts Court; Commissions and Hearings throughout NY State; 2010 NY Court of Appeals favorable decision on current use valuation certiorari project (Gordon v. Town of Esopus); 2 Appellate Division favorable decisions on current use and economic unit valuation for certiorari (Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Towns of Keene and North Hudson; Corvetti v. Town of Lake Pleasant) 1981 Oneida Nation Land Claim was reviewed and upheld by the US Supreme Court (March 1984) Community Activities Cornell University Athletics: Heavyweight Rowing National Champion -Varsity 1971 and Freshman 1970; International Rowing - Silver Medalist, Brazil 1972 Cornell University: Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network (1989-2006); Alumni Career Link (1989-present) Onondaga County Waste -to -Energy Facility: Citizens Advisory Committee (1991- 2000), Chairman (1993-1994); Property Value Stabilization, Sub -Committee Chairman (1991-2000) TownofOnondaga: Environmental Advisory Council (1976-81); Fire Training Center Bylaws (Chairman 1986); Length Of Service Awards Program (Town Committee Chairman 1989-91, 2000-02, 2004-05, 2017-18, 2019) Onondaga Central Schools Committees: Facilities Advisory (1989-90); Citizens Advisory(1994-96); Building Planning (1994-96); Facilities Development 1997); Academic/Building Advisory (2000-2003); Capital Project Advisory 2005-12); Citizens' Budget Advisory (2015-16) St. Camillus Health & Rehabilitation Center: Trustee (1987-1992); Development Comm. (1990-1992) South Onondaga Fire Department: Member (1970-present); President (1978-85, 1989-94, 2000-2014); Immediate Past President (2014-2025); Director (1985- 87; 1988-89; 1994-2000); supervised new fire station construction (1990-91); Life Member (since 2004); Length of Service Awards Program Trustee/Administrator (1989-present); Sign amendment to Town zoning 2022); 751h Anniversary (2023-2024); Quarter Century Firefighter Award 1994-2024) Onondaga County Volunteer Firemen's Association Red Jacket Distinction Award 2012 New York State Emergency Medical Technician for over 30 years Corpus Christi Catholic Church: Building Committee (1991-92); Lector (2006-2016) South Onondaga Water District - proposed and approved (2000-01); extension project(2022-23) Accelerating success. I YY v LU w z C) >- 0 LLJ z Qt0 0 w no w U) 0 LLUL d 0 0-4 4 w LO LL ui x Z w E ELL LL 0 0L WE 000 LL ()Z EM, 3-6 5.19 W M z IL J J D tj - ul m CC cc m U) 0 a: rq IL W m Ea zCLu j z Ln z z 0 0 U) z 0 0 V) z LU jL w UJ 1.q Lu tr W IX w C) m 0 z LL cn a. w < LG.Um Ix x W CL 3 U CL Z uj w uj 0 Co 0 E• IL W U) w z M 0 cr- w 0 2 NO 0 7... I I wzzz; WNZ-" zZ ", " A Valuation & Advisory Services Real estate valuations play a pivotal role in todays business climate. An accurate and well supported opinion of property value can mean the difference between reaching a critical goal —securing a loan, closing a sale, reporting to investors, choosing the best asset —or failing to achieve it altogether. Colliers Valuation &Advisory services'reports are designed to deliver insight into a property sfundamentaIs, its competition and the overall market dynamics affecting value. A solid valuation report can be a strategic asset for investors, lenders and owners, provided that it addresses both a property s unique characteristics and the most current market conditions. Commitment to high -end client service, coupled with Colliers' unparalleled market intelligence and resources, differentiates us as the firm of choice in the real estate industry. Professional Our the Information professionals share a commitment to deliver Today's business climate places valuation in a more highest level of service and consistent results. We go the extra mile for our clients, whether this means meeting a tight deadline or working with a complex and challenging property. Technology Our unmatched report creation technology speeds appraisals through the pipeline. This secure, centralized production system generates a wide range of reports and high volume portfolio orders without delays. pivotal position than ever before. All our appraisals are evaluated and approved by an experienced review team to ensure our clients receive concise and timely appraisals. With clear, prompt reporting and a comprehensive, big picture approach, Colliers' valuation and advisory reports give our clients the information they need to make better business decisions. MopFjn g, Pd A) yCOJ a bN c(. I' I I• 03 DC y PF 1 Real estate advisors in 501 offices in 65 countries. 1` 1 WORLDI GREENBUILDING A COUNCIL COUNCIL Founding member of the World Green Building Council Recognized and ranked 17 consecutive years, more than any other real estate firm Lipsey Ranked in the top 3 most recognized global commercial real estate brands by The Lipsey Company Forbes Ranked in the world's top female -friendly companies. Why work with Colliers? We act as an extension of your team. Our approach is collaborative, nimble and informed by uncommon knowledge. By O aligning with your core business needs, we develop and execute customized real estate solutions to support your growth strategy. We are both results and process -driven. C1 From the first handshake to the last, we manage the valuation process to minimize disruption, mitigate risk and mediate competing perspectives so that you can focus on what you do best. You can count on us to stay focused on your priorities. We are defined byour people. We attract an exemplaryary roster of top valuation experts across the United States - specialists who save you time and money by cutting through the noise to deliver the most favorable outcome. Colliers Exhibit DD Y Vvi,erizon Network Engineering - UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 August 6, 2024 Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (ebalestra a town.ithaca.nv.us) RE, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56. 4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: Verizon Wireless' work for the above -referenced Project shall be performed in compliance with Chapter 270, Zoning, the Uniform Code, the ECCCNYS, the ECS, this chapter, and other applicable state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. This statement is made as required by the Town of Ithaca Town Code Chapter § 125-5C. Please feel free to contact me at (585) 321-5446 if you have any questions. Sincerely, r' pd* Katie Jaeckel 4879-2874-3135.1 Exhibit. EE Statement of Special Inspections Project: Verizon Wireless Telecommunications Facility "Sunny View" Location: 111 Wiedmaier Court, Ithaca NY Owner: Verizon Wireless Design Professional in Responsible Charge: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists, and Land Surveyors, DPC This Statement of Special Inspections is submitted as a condition for permit issuance in accordance with theSpecialInspectionandStructuralTestingrequirementsoftheBuildingCode. It includes a schedule ofSpecialInspectionservicesapplicabletothisprojectaswellasthenameoftheSpecialInspectionCoordinatorandtheidentityofotherapprovedagenciestoberetainedforconductingtheseinspectionsandtests. This Statement of Special Inspections encompass the following disciplines: Structural M Mechanical/ElectricaVPlumbing . Architectural Other: The Special Inspection Coordinator shall keep records of all inspections and shall furnish inspection reportstotheBuildingOfficialandtheRegisteredDesignProfessionalinResponsibleCharge. DiscovereddiscrepanciesshallbebroughttotheimmediateattentionoftheContractorforcorrection. If suchdiscrepanciesarenotcorrected, the discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of the Building OfficialandtheRegisteredDesignProfessionalinResponsibleCharge. The Special Inspection program does notrelievetheContractorofhisorherresponsibilities. Interim reports shall be submitted to the Building Official and the Registered Design Professional inResponsibleCharge. A Final Report of Special Inspections documenting completion of all required Special Inspections, testing andcorrectionofanydiscrepanciesnotedintheinspectionsshallbesubmittedpriortoissuanceofaCertificateofUseandOccupancy. Job site safety and means and methods of construction are solely the responsibility of the Contractor. Interim Report Frequency: As respective components of the project are constructed Prepared by: Steven Matthews, PE type or prM name) 41MMI OU"mf/terc"J S/16/24 Signature Date Owner's Authorization: Signature Date or per attached schedule. I Vesrgn Professional Seal I Building Official's Acceptance: Signature Date CASE Form lol e Statement of Special Inspections e @CASE 2004 Qualifications of and Page of Technicians The qualifications of all personnel performing Special Inspection and testing activities are subject to theapprovaloftheBuildingOfficial. The credentials of all Inspectors and testing technicians shall be provided ifrequested. Key for Minimum Qualifications of inspection Agents: When the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge deems it appropriate that the individual performing a stipulated test or inspection have a specific certification or license as indicated below, suchdesignationshallappearbelowtheAgencyNumberontheSchedule. PE/SE Structural Engineer — a licensed SE or PE specializing in the design of building structuresPE/GE Geotechnical Engineer — a licensed PE specializing in soil mechanics and foundationsEITEngineer-In-Trainingn.a graduate engineer. who. has. passed the. Fundamentals. of ngineering exa i ation American Concrete Institute (ACI) Certification ` ACI-CFTT Concrete Field Testing Technician — Grade 1 ACI-CCI Concrete Construction Inspector ACI-LTT Laboratory Testing Technician — Grade 1&2 ACI-STT Strength Testing Technician American Welding Society (AWS) Certification AWS-CWI Certified Welding Inspector AWS/AISC-SSI Certified Structural Steel Inspector American Society of Non -Destructive Testing (ASNT) Certification ASNT Non -Destructive Testing Technician — Level II or III. International Code Council (ICC) Certification ICC-SMSI Structural Masonry Special Inspector ICC-SWSI Structural Steel and Welding Special InspectorICC-SFSI Spray -Applied Fireproofing Special InspectorCC-PCSI Prestressed Concrete Special Inspector ICC-RCSI Reinforced Concrete Special Inspector National Institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies (NICET) NICET-CT Concrete Technician — Levels I, 11, III & IV NICET-ST Soils Technician - Levels I,11, III & IV NICET-GET Geotechnical Engineering Technician - Levels I, 11, III & IV Exterior Design Institute (EDI) Certification EDI-EIFS EIFS Third Party Inspector Other CASE Form 101 0 Statement of Special Inspections 0 @CASE 2004 Quality Assurance Plan Quality Assurance for Seismic Resistance Page of Seismic Design Category NOT APPLICABLEQualityAssurancePlanRequired (Y/N) Description of seismic force resisting system and designated seismic systems: Quality Assurance for Wind Requirements Basic Wind Speed (3 second gust) 109 M P H Wind Exposure Category C Quality Assurance Plan Required (Y/N) NO Description of wind force resisting system and designated wind resisting components: N/A - SELF SUPPORTING MONOPOLE TOWER Statement of Responsibility Each contractor responsible for the construction or fabrication of a system or component designated abovemustsubmitaStatementofResponsibility. CASE Form 10l 8 Statement of Special Inspections 0 ©CASE 2004 Schedule of In ection and Testing A Page of ncies This Statement of Special Inspections / Quality Assurance Plan includes the following building systems: Soils and Foundations Cast -in -Place Concrete Spray Fire Resistant Material WoodPrecastConcrete Masonry Construction Exterior Insulation and Finish System Structural Steel Mechanical & Electrical Systems Architectural Systems Cold -Formed Steel Framing Special Cases 1. Coordinator ca 5. Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists, & Land Surveyors, DPC tic Engineering Itants, Geologists, & Land Tors, DPC Atlantic Testing Laboratories Reese Tower Services 36 British American Blvd Latham, NY 518-346-1890 smatthews@tectonicenginee 36 British American Blvd Latham, NY 518-346-1890 smatthews@tectonicengineerii 22 Corporate Drive, Clifton Park, NY 518-383-9144 award@atlantictesting.com 1044 St. John's Road Drums, PA 18222 570)359-3293 sales@ reesetowerservices Note: The inspectors and testing agencies shall be engaged by the Owner or the Owner s Agent, and not bytheContractororSubcontractorwhoseworkistobeinspectedortested. AndisclosedtotheBuildingOfficial, prior to commencing work. y conflict of interest must be CASE Form 1o1 9 Statement of Special Inspections • ®CASE 2004 Soils and Foundations Item Page of 1. Shallow Foundations Inspect soils below footings for adequate bearing capacity consistency with geotechnical report. PEIGE Inspect removal +btr a!emmaterial and preparation ofsubrottoplacementofcontrolledfill Perform sieve tests (ASTM D422 & D1140) and afcontrolled modifed Pro, tests (ASTM DIV) of each source offill matPE/GEInspect placemen[ ness and compact or Test density of each lift offill by nuclear methods (ASTM D2922) Verify extent and slope offill placement. Inspect and log pile dr'in g operations. Record pile driving PFIGE resistance and verify compliance with driving criteria. Caisson foundation for tower Inspect pilesjordamagefromdrivingandplumbness. Verify pile size, length and accessories. Inspect installation of drilled pierfoundations. VertOpier diameter, bell diameter, lengths, embedment into bedrock and suitability o end bearing strata 4. Load Tectinn 4. Other: CASE Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections 0 ®CASE 2004 Cast -In -Place Concrete I Scope Page of 1. Mix Design Review concrete batch tickets and verify compliance with approved mix design. Verify that water added at the site does not Caisson foundation ACI-CCI exceed that allowed by the mix design. ICC-RCSI 2. Material Certification 3. Reinforcement Installation Inspect size, spacing, cover, positioning and grade of reinforcing steel. Verify that reinforcing bars are free offarm ail or other Caisson foundation ACI-CCI deleterious materials. Inspect bar laps and mechanical splices. ICC-RCSI Ver fy that bars are adequately tied and supported on chairs or bolsters 4. Post -Tensioning Operations Inspect placement, stressing, grouting and protection o t- tensioning tendons. V e correctly positioned tte and wrapped. Record tendon elongations. ICC-PCSI of Visually inspect all reinforcing steel reinforcing steel. Insnerr ornhnaA..-_ SIA 6. Anchor Rods Inspect size, positioning and embedment of anchor rods. Inspect concrete placement and consolidation around anchors. Monopole tower anchors to caisson foundation Caissonfoundation ACI-CCI ICC- RCSI Inspect placement of concrete. Verify that concrete conveyance and depositing avoids segregation or contamination. Verify that concrete is properly consolidated. 8. Sampling and Testing of Test concrete compressive strength (ASTM C31 & C39), slump ConcreteASTMC143), air -content (ASTM C231 or C173) and Caisson foundation ACI-CF1T temperature (AS7MC10ti4). ACI- STT 9. Curing and Protection Inspect curing, cold weather protection and hot weather protection procedures. Caisson foundation ACI-CCI ICC- RCSI CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections • ®CASE 2004 Precast Concrete Page of CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections . ®CASE 2004 Masonry Required Inspection Level: 1 2 Page of CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections • ®CASE 2004 Structural Steel Page of Agency # Qualif ) Scope 1. Fabricator Certification/ Review shop fabrication and queQualityControlProcedures Fabricator Exempt AWSIAISC- ICC-SWSI 2. Material Certification Review certified mill test reports wide flange shapes, high-strengtl AWS/AISC- elecerodes field welding 4. Bolting propriighten' sect istallation and tightening of high -strength bolts. Veri asplies have separated from tensi . enfyAWSIAISC- eontinuous inspection of bolts in 5. Welding Visually inspect all welds. Inspect pre -heat, post -heat an rface preparation between passes. ngt of filletwelds. AWS-CWI Ultrasonic testing of all fullpenetration welds. AS1JT 6. Shear Connectors Inspect size, number, positioning and welding o she connectors. Inspect suds or ash. Ring test all AWSIAISC- shear i a 3 lb hammer. Bend test all questionable studs to IS degrees. ICC- SWSI 7. Structural Details Inspect steel frame far compliance with structur a including bracing, membersaafiRrrart and c onnectiondetailsPEISE 17if1 deck. AWS- CWI of metal roof and floorpost installation inspection Inspect all components of tower and antenna mou of monopole tower TIA-222-H installation, including safety climb, branching, mop and related hardware, slip joints, base plate, and anchorrods. CASE Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections • mCASE 2004 Cold -Formed Steel Framing I - Agency # Scope Qualif.) 1. Me er Sizes 2. Material Thick ss 3. Material Properties 4. Mechanical Connections 5. Welding 6. Framing Details 7. Trusses 8. Permanent Truss B cing 9. Other: Page of CASE Form tot . Statement of Special Inspections • ©CASE 2004 SPMYLAWied Fire Resistant Material Page of CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections . @CASE 2004 Wood Construction Page of CASE Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections . @CASE 2004 Exterior Insulation & Finish Systems (EIFS) Page of CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections . ©CASE 2004 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Page of Item Agency # Scope Qualif.) 1. Smoke Control 2. Mechanical, HVAC & Piping 3. Electrical System Electrical metering equipment MDIA or equal, 3rd party underwriter 4. Other: CASE Form 101 1 Statement of Special Inspections . ©CASE 2004 Architectural Systems Page of CASE Form lot . Statement of Special Inspections • ©CASE 2004 Special Cases Page of CASE Form 101 0 Statement of Special Inspections . @CASE 2004 NIXON Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. Lusk 1300 Clinton Square Partner PEABODYRochester, NY 14604-1792 Attorneys at Law nixonpeabody.com @NixonPeabodyLLP November 18, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestragtown.ithaca.n us) T / 585.263.1140 F / 866.402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: By application dated May 29, 2024 and supplemental applications dated August 7, October 22, October 28 and November 14, 2024, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") submitted the above -referenced Application to the Town of Ithaca in connection with the above -referenced project (the "Project"). On November 15, 2024, Town Planner Balestra and Town Attorney Brock requested additional information regarding Verizon's compliance with applicable federal requirements as outlined in § 270-219(G)(2)(h) of the Town Code. In response, enclosed are the following that collectively demonstrate that the Project complies with applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA and NHPA requirements: Exhibit MM1: FAA Analysis (commonly known as the Towair Report). Note that it indicates that notice to the FAA is not required. Exhibit NN: Correspondence from GSS Inc. regarding the status of the NEPA process. Lettered to follow Exhibits A-LL previously submitted. 4870-6419-1226.1 Town of Ithaca November 18, 2024 Page 2 Verizon's FCC licenses for Tompkins County were previously provided as Exhibit J to the Application. Note that a couple of the FCC licenses have expired since our initial submission, so we have enclosed copies of the updated licenses; Proof of compliance with the federal emissions requirements (originally submitted as Exhibit P to the Application). We believe the information referenced herein and enclosed demonstrates that the Project complies with all applicable federal regulations. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. n truly Lusk JCL/mkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Developmen Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP 4570-6419-1226A EXHIBIT MM ANALYSIS REPORT Federal Airways & Airspace Summary Report: New Construction Antenna Tower BITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LOCATION : Ithaca College, NY RURAL TOWER ID: 10612 LATITUDE: 421 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. NOTICE CRITERIA FAR 77.9(a): NNR (DNE 200 ft. AGL) FAR 77.9(b): NNR (DNE Notice Slope) FAR 77.9(c): NNR (Not a Traverse Way) FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straight -In Notice Criteria FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Offset Notice Criteria FAR 77.9: NNR (DNE EMI Notice Screening Criteria) FAR 77.9(d): NNR (Off Airport Construction) NR = Notice Required NNR = Notice Not Required PNR = Possible Notice Required(depends upon actual IFR procedure) Review Air Navigation Facilities at bottom of this report. Notice to the £AA is not required The maximum height to avoid notice is 1025 ft. AMSL. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS Civil airport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Airport Surface FAR 77.19(a): DNE - Horizontal Surface FAR 77.19(b): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.19(c): DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.19(d): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.19(e): DNE - Transitional Surface Department of Defense (DOD) airport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.21(a)(1): DNE - Inner Horizontal Surface FAR 77.21(a)(2): DNE - Conical Surface FAR 77.21(a)(3): DNE - Outer Horizontal Surface FAR 77.21(b)(1): DNE - Primary Surface FAR 77.21(b)(2): DNE - Clear Zone Surface FAR 77.21(b)(3): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.21(b)(4): DNE - Transitional Surface Heliport imaginary surfaces FAR 77.23(b): DNE - Approach Surface VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: ITH : ITHACA TOMPKINS INTL Type: A RD: 26361.41 RE: 1099.2 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Height not greater than 200 ft. AGL. VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Primary Surface: DNE VFR Approach Surface: DNE VFR Transitional Surface: DNE VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: NO3 : CORTLAND COUNTY/CHASE FLD Type: A RD: 89637.36 RE: 1198.3 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft. AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM VFR Horizontal Surface: DNE VFR Conical Surface: DNE VFR Primary Surface: DNE VFR Approach Surface: DNE VFR Transitional Surface: DNE MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) FAR 77.17(a)(4) MOCA Altitude Enroute Criteria The Maximum Height Permitted is 17615 ft. AMSL TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260.3, Volume 4) FAR 77.17(a)(3) Departure Surface Criteria (40:1) DNE Departure Surface PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES FAC TYPE NAME IDNT BEARING To RANGE DELTA ARP FAA IFR FACIL IN NM ELEVATION NK72 AIR HENION PVT FLD 239.05 4.25 -341 No Impact to VFr Transitional Surface. Below surface height of 325 ft above ARP. NK05 AIR TOM N' JERRY 220.05 4.53 -531 No Impact to VFr Transitional Surface. Below surface height of 353 ft above ARP. AIR NAVIGATION ELECTRONIC FACILITIES FAC TYPE ST FREQ VECTOR DIST DELTA ST LOCATION GRD APCH IDNT AT (ft) ELEVA ANGLE BEAR ITH LOCALIZER I 108.7 350.38 31960 118 NY RWY 32 ITHACA 21 325 TOM ALP NDB I 24 233.13 105863 328 NY ALPINE 18 CFB VOR/DME R 112.2 137.68 125943 624 NY BINGHAMTON 28 BGM LOCALIZER I 110.3 119.43 143567 672 NY RWY 34 GREATER 27 340 BI BGM RADAR I 119.24 145857 770 NY BINGHAMTON 3 REGION UEK LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.38 146229 5 NY RWY 06 ELMIRA/ 0.00 62 COR BGM ATCT I A/G 120.64 147189 719 NY BINGHAMTON 28 REGION KBGM RADAR WXL Y 162.47 121.77 147954 772 NY BINGHAMTON 3 AAJ LOCALIZER I 110.3 120.56 149636 616 NY RWY 16 GREATER 24 158 BI ITH ATCT I A/G 358.82 150079 174 NY ITHACA TOMPKINS 07 R ELM RADAR I 2750. 234.9 151520 670 NY ELMIRA-CORNING 25 RE ELM ATCT I A/G 232.72 151655 79 NY ELMIRA/CORNING 03 RE ELM LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.24 155681 28 NY RWY 24 ELMIRA/ 01 242 COR ZNY CO Y A/G 193.95 178403 592 PA SAYRE 19 PYA NDB I 26 297.52 183772 102 NY PENN YAN 03 ULW VOR/DME R 109.6 233.08 194031 673 NY ELMIRA 2 GGT TACAN I 117.8 50.55 216837 1081 NY GEORGETOWN 29 SECTION 2110 FAA EXTENSION, SAFETY AND SECURITY ACT - RURAL AREA ANALYSIS Warning! The object is within a rural area and not on agricultural land(View agricultural land -use image). Verification is required to determine if the studied location is adjacent to agricultural land.Please use the Rural Tower Analysis (RTA) certification tool to confirm the object is compliant with the Section 2110 FAA EXTENSION, SAFETY AND SECURITY ACT, is eligible for an exemption, or if additional actions are required. Agriculture Area Map Legend Non-agricultural land at this location CFR Title 47, §1.30000-§1.30004 AM STUDY NOT REQUIRED: Structure is not near a FCC licensed AM station. Movement Method Proof as specified in §73.151(c) is not required. Please review 'AM Station Report' for details. Nearest AM Station: WNYY @ 3064 meters. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 OBSTRUCTION CRITERIA SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42' 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76' 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. 77.17(a)(1) A height more than 499 ft. Above Ground Level (AGL). DOES NOT EXCEED ************* THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS: ....... 1324 ft. AMSL THE GROUND ELEVATION AT THE SITE IS: ... 825 ft. AMSL THE OVERALL CASE ELEVATION IS: ......... 959 ft. AMSL THE CASE IS BELOW THE ALLOWABLE BY: .... 365 ft. AMSL BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR ITH 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ ITH THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1099.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..4.7416 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 175.611 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS: ....... 1473 ft. AMSL 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> ITH <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 14/32 EXISTING RUNWAY 14/32 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 14/32 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 19614.33 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1099.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 17412.92 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 3111.938 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 11502.392 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................19614.33 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 17412.92 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 14 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 15/33 EXISTING RUNWAY 15/33 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 15/33 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 20740.93 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1100.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 18866.89 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 2011.689 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 13729.241 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................20740.93 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 18866.89 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 15 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR NO3 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ NO3 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1197.3 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..15.0341 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 223.952 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> NO3 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 06/24 EXISTING RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 3479.601 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1198.3 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 89360.34 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 13654.05 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 39360.34 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................3479.601 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 89360.34 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 2N4 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 2N4 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1380.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..19.5038 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 175.361 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 2N4 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 11/29 EXISTING RUNWAY 11/29 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 11/29 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 115801.1 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1377 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 23547.2 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 2479.72 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 108321.38 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................115801.1 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 23547.2 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 11 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR D82 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ D82 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1062.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..21.1302 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 133.54 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> D82 « . DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY O1L/19R EXISTING RUNWAY O1L/19R 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY O1L/19R THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 94338.38 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1088 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86385.72 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 8763.572 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36385.72 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................94338.38 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86385.72 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 01L IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 01R/19L EXISTING RUNWAY O1R/19L 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY O1R/19L THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 93851.87 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1095 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86164.84 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 8741.485 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36164.84 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................93851.87 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86164.84 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY O1R IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR BGM 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ BGM THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1635.6 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..24.2730 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 300.466 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> BGM <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 83321.72 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1591.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 120106.8 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 18266.02 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 70106.8 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................83321.72 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 120106.8 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 16/34 EXISTING RUNWAY 16/34 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 16/34 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 69374.81 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1636 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 125413.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 19312.01 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 75413.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................69374.81 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 125413.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 16 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 PROPOSED RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 83328.66 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1591.1 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 119549.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 18182.45 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 69549.6 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................83328.66 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 119549.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 16/34 PROPOSED RUNWAY 16/34 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 16/34 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 69413.26 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1636 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 125489.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 19073.41 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 75489.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................69413.26 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 125489.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 16 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR ELM 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ ELM THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 955.1 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..24.8114 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 52.224 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> ELM <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 05/23 EXISTING RUNWAY 05/23 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 05/23 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 4849.441 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................944.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 148077.9 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 14932.79 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 98077.9 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................4849.441 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 148077.9 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 05 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 06/24 EXISTING RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 5072.341 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................954.3 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 146779.4 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22516.92 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 96779.4 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................5072.341 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 146779.4 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 50 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 50,000 feet with a 50:1 Slope for the first 10,000 feet and a 40:1 Slope for 40,000 feet. The obstacle approach surface is centered symmetrically along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Precision instrument procedures will have the greatest impact between the final approach fix (FAF) and the runway end. The FAF is located approximately 5 NM from the runway end. This type of approach usually has a non -precision and a circling approach also. A circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 91590.84 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................944.5 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 118257.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 17988.66 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 68257.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................91590.84 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 118257.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as anon -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 06/24 PROPOSED RUNWAY 06/24 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 06/24 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 5065.283 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................955 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 146779.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22266.96 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 96779.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................5065.283 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 146779.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 06 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 PROPOSED RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 91590.74 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................945 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 118257.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 17988.66 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 68257.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................91590.74 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 118257.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 23/05 PROPOSED RUNWAY 23/05 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 23/05 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 4849.499 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................945 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 148077.9 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 22461.69 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 98077.9 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................4849.499 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 148077.9 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 23 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR CZG 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ CZG THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 832.7 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..25.4974 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 321.89 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> CZG <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 03/21 EXISTING RUNWAY 03/21 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 03/21 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 136548.3 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................826.5 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 70532.57 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10829.89 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 20532.57 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................136548.3 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 70532.57 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY'03 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet 20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 03/21 PROPOSED RUNWAY 03/21 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 03/21 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 136550 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................826.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 70370.36 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10805.55 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 20370.36 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS .........................136550 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 70370.36 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 03 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR PEO 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ PEO THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 988.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..29.9292 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 116.961 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> PEO <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 01/19 EXISTING RUNWAY O1/19 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 01/19 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 157920 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................990 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 86781.43 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 13267.21 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 36781.43 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS .........................157920 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 86781.43 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY O1 IS: 34 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a non -utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 10,000 feet 34:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsG Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 87464.44 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................903.2 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 158214 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 23982.09 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 108214 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................87464.44 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 158214 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet 20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 6B9 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 6B9 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 1039.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..30.0728 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 180.807 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 6B9 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 04/22 EXISTING RUNWAY 04/22 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 04/22 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 75422.89 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................1000 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 164795.1 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 16604.51 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 114795.1 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................75422.89 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 164795.1 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 04 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 10/28 EXISTING RUNWAY 10/28 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 10/28 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 182018.9 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................994 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 12159.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 1340.96 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE NOT WITHIN APPROACH SURFACE AREA, OUT BY ....... 175677.94 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................182018.9 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 12159.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 10 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps@ Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 4N7 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 4N7 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 935.0 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..30.2109 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 282.651 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 4N7 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 07/25 EXISTING RUNWAY 07/25 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 07/25 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 143095.6 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................904 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 115063.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 11631.37 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 65063.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................143095.6 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 115063.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 07 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR OG7 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ OG7 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 491.8 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..31.8223 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 152.717 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> OG7 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 01/19 EXISTING RUNWAY 01/19 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 01/19 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 75535.83 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................490.7 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 175765.7 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 26614.85 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 125765.7 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................75535.83 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 175765.7 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 01 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a non -precision approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet 20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or runway exist use TerpsO Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. Non -precision instrument procedures can extend 10 NM from the runway and a circling approach to the airport or runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE RUNWAY 11/29 EXISTING RUNWAY 11/29 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 11/29 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 161199.4 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................465.7 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 105079.6 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 10632.96 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 55079.6 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................161199.4 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 105079.6 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 11 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE BEGIN AIRPORT ANALYSIS FOR 7N1 77.17(a)(2) A height AGL or airport elevation, whichever is higher. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BECAUSE: Proposed height does not exceed 200 feet AGL. THE REFERENCE AIRPORT IDENT IS: ........ 7N1 THE AIRPORT ELEVATION IS: .............. 962.4 ft. AMSL THE DISTANCE FROM THE CASE TO ARP IS:..32.9835 NAUTICAL MILES THE BEARING AIRPORT TO CASE IS: ........ 64.757 DEGREES THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE IS: ........ 134 ft. 77.19(a) A height exceeding a horizontal surface 150 ft. above airport elevation within a radius of >> 7N1 <<. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED HORIZONTAL SURFACE AREA 77.19(b) A height exceeding a conical surface (a slope outward 4000 ft. from the horizontal surface at 20/1 ratio). DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED CONICAL SURFACE AREA BEGIN RUNWAY ANALYSIS RUNWAY 13/31 EXISTING RUNWAY 13/31 77.19(c) A height exceeding runway primary surface. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY PRIMARY SURFACE 77.19(d) A height exceeding an approach surface of RUNWAY 13/31 THE ABEAM DISTANCE TO CENTERLINE FROM CASE IS ....... 159911.4 ft. THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD ELEVATION IS...................956.9 ft. THE DISTANCE FROM THRESHOLD + 200' TO THE CASE IS ... 120212.5 ft. THE CRITICAL WIDTH OF HALF THE APPROACH IS .......... 12146.25 ft. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** BEYOND DEFINED APPROACH & TRANSITIONAL AREAS. CASE MEETS ANGULAR CRITERIA BUT IS LOCATED GREATER THAN 50,000 ft. FROM THE START OF ANY APPROACH TYPE, OUT BY 70212.5 ft. RUNWAY CENTERLINE OFFSET IS.........................159911.4 ft. DISTANCE FROM THE THRESHOLD TO OFFSET IS ............ 120212.5 ft. THE SLOPE OF RUNWAY 13 IS: 20 TO 1. The FAA has defined this runway as a utility runway. It has a visual approach. The obstacle surface extends 5000 feet (20:1 Slope) symmetrically centered along the runway centerline extended. This airport may have a circling approach. Please review the US Terminal Procedures volume associated with this airport. If a procedure for this airport and/or this runway exist, use Terps® Professional software to determine the height limits (if any) the procedure will have on the proposed structure. A circling approach to the airport or any runway can extend out up to 4.5 NM from every runway end. 77.19(e) A height exceeding a transitional surface runway. DOES NOT EXCEED ************** NOT WITHIN SPECIFIED RUNWAY TRANSITIONAL SURFACE Airspace@) State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 6:12:11 VFR - TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE ANALYSIS SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. Traffic Pattern Airspace, a structure that exceed any of the following maximum allowable heights is considered to constitute a hazard to air navigation : 1. The height of the transition surface (other than abeam the runway), the approach slope, the horizontal surface, and the conical surface(as applied to visual approach runways). 2. Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and in the climb/descent area - 350' above airport elevation or the height of part 77.17(a)(2), whichever is greater not to exceed 499' above ground level (AGL). The climb / descent area begins abeam the runway threshold being used and is the area where the pilot is either descending to land on the runway or climbing to pattern altitude after departure. 3. Beyond the lateral limits of the conical surface and NOT in the climb/descent area of any runway. —Above Airport Elevation not to exceed 499' AGL. Landing Facility Identifier************************ ITH FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Maximum height is 1473.16 feet AMSL. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. The structure is within VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace. Structures that exceed horizontal, conical, and / or traffic pattern will receive a hazard determination from the FAA. Existing Runway 14/32 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 15/33 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ NO3 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ 2N4 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 11/29 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ D82 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR —Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01L/19R Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 01R/19L Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ BGM FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Proposed Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 16/34 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Runway 16/34 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ ELM FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 05/23 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 06/24 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 23/05 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ CZG FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 03/21 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Proposed Runway 03/21 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ PEO FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01/19 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ 6B9 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 04/22 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 10/28 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ 4N7 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): Does Not Apply. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 07/25 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ OG7 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 01/19 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Existing Runway 11/29 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. Landing Facility Identifier************************ 7N1 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE - Maximum Height Less Than 499 feet AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Greater than 5.99 NM. Does Not Exceed VFR Horizontal Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR Conical Surface. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Runway Side Area. Does Not Exceed VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Existing Runway 13/31 Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Approach Runway. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Transitional Surface. Does Not Exceed Runway VFR Primary Surface. The above analysis was conducted using default parameters - Category C aircraft and a maximum of 4 like category aircraft in the VFR -Traffic Pattern at one time. To view a graphical image of VFR Traffic Pattern Airspace for these airports use Terps@ Professional Software. Open the airport and Airspace@ study. From the Map Menu select VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace'. The proposed structure, airport, and the traffic pattern will now be shown together. Use this information to locate an alternate site if necessary. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & AirspaceG Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 AIRWAY ANALYSIS FAR 77.17(a)(4) (EN ROUTE CRITERIA) MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) MINIMUM ENROUTE ALTITUDE (MEA) SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.56911 SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. LOW ALTITUDE AIRWAY AIRWAY SEQUENCE LATITUDE LONGITUDE MEA LENGTH (NM) 982 60 42-28-00.76N 076-46-23.61W 18000 21.03 Q82 70 42-30-59.71N 076-18-15.43W 18000 Minimum Obstacle Clearance Altitude (MOCA) is: 18000 AMSL. Proposed structure is between the above points along Airway Q82.The Abeam distance from the course centerline is 5.20 NM. The proposedstructure is within the width of the secondary area of this airway. The width of the primary area is 8 NM and the width of the secondary is 2 NM. The maximum allowable height permitted by the secondary area MOCA of this airway at this location is 17615 feet AMSL. Airspace® State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE® and TERPSO are registered O trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace0 Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 IFR RUNWAY DEPARTURE SURFACE ANALYSIS SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. An airport with at least one instrument approach procedure (IAP) will require all airport runways to be analyzed using 40: 1 criteria for Departure. FAA application of the 40: 1 screening criteria extendes 22.09 nautical miles and 1801 semi - circle area around the Runway centerline extended. Penetration of the 40: 1 surface will result initially in a determination of presumed hazard NPH). An extended study is normally required to remove the NPH. A specified climb gradient (CG) greater than the standard (200 ft / nm) is sometimes necessary to allow acceptable obstacle clearance. Should the proposed location exceed the maximum height you may need to determine if there is a published climb gradient and conduct additional calculations to determine if the climb gradient will provide proper clearance for the proposed structure. Should you require additional assistance please contact Federal Airways & Airspace or another aeronautical consult to perform these calculations. Ident Dep Rwy Elev Distance 40:1 Max Hgt CG Rwy Status ITH 14 1099.2 26361 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy ITH 15 1100.1 28174 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy NO3 24 1198.3 89637 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy 2N4 11 1377 118219 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy D82 19R 1088 127788 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy D82 19L 1095 127282 DNE Below DNE Existing Rwy BGM 28 1591.1 145972 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy BGM 34 1636 143828 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy BGM 28 1591.1 145520 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy BGM 34 1636 143913 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM O5 944.2 148382 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 06 954.3 147093 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 10 944.5 149369 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy ELM 06 955 147093 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM 10 945 149369 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy ELM 05 945 148382 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy CZG 03 826.5 154044 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy CZG 03 826.2 153971 DNE Beyond DNE Proposed Rwy PEO 19 990 179749 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy PEO 10 903.2 181494 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 6B9 22 1000 181420 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 6B9 10 994 182435 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 4N7 25 904 183047 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy OG7 19 490.7 191221 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy OG7 11 465.7 192871 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy 7N1 13 956.9 199424 DNE Beyond DNE Existing Rwy Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright © 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 NAVAIDS IN PROXIMITY OF CASE FAC IDNT TYPE ST AT SITE ID: 2126343 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . FREQ VECTOR DIST ft) TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LONGITUDE: 76° 825 ft. 134 ft. 959 ft. DELTA ST ELEVA 27' 1.569" LOCATION GRD ANGLE APCH BEAR ITH GLIDE I 330.5 359.27 27270 133 NY RWY 32 ITH 28 325 SLOPE ITH UN I 122.95 355.55 28802 140 NY ITHACA 28 TOMPKINS I ITH DM R 111. 355.23 30146 153 NY ITHACA 29 ITH LOCALIZER I 108.7 350.38 31960 118 NY RWY 32 21 325 ITHACA TOM NO3 UN I 122.80 43.99 91338 238 NY CORTLAND 15 CNTY/CHA NK09 UN I 122.70 268.42 99978 521 NY EAGLE RIDGE 3 ALP NDB I 24 233.13 105863 328 NY ALPINE 18 CFB VOR/DME R 112.2 137.68 125943 624 NY BINGHAMTON 28 D82 UN I 122.80 313.55 128392 103 NY OVID 05 NK49 UN I 123.05 151.29 128796 52 NY OWEGO 02 9NY3 UN I 123.05 152.06 130149 75 NY SUSQUEHANNA 03 42NY UN I 122.80 48.54 141510 601 NY WALTERS FLD 24 BGM LOCALIZER I 110.3 119.43 143567 672 NY RWY 34 27 340 GREATER BI AAJ GLIDE I 335.0 119.71 145439 663 NY RWY 16 BGM 26 158 SLOPE BGM RADAR I 119.24 145857 770 NY BINGHAMTON 3 REGION UEK LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.38 146229 5 NY RWY 06 0.00 62 ELMIRA/COR BGM ATCT I A/G 120.64 147189 719 NY BINGHAMTON 28 REGION BGM UN I 122.95 120.45 147491 676 NY GREATER 26 BINGHAMTO KBGM RADAR WXL Y 162.47 121.77 147954 772 NY BINGHAMTON 3 ELM GLIDE I 331.4 232.45 147991 13 NY RWY 24 ELM 01 242 SLOPE AAJ LOCALIZER I 110.3 120.56 149636 616 NY RWY 16 24 158 GREATER BI BGM GLIDE I 335.0 120.56 149751 614 NY RWY 34 BGM 23 340 SLOPE ITH ATCT I A/G 358.82 150079 174 NY ITHACA 07 TOMPKINS R ELM UN I 122..95 232.21 150806 4 NY ELMIRA/ 0.00 CORNING RG ELM RADAR I 2750. 234.9 151520 670 NY ELMIRA- 25 CORNING RE ELM ATCT I A/G 232.72 151655 79 NY ELMIRA/ 03 CORNING RE UEK GLIDE I 331.4 232.38 153058 23 NY RWY 06 ELM 01 62 SLOPE CZG UN I 122.80 141.89 154962 126 NY TRI-CITIES 05 ELM LOCALIZER I 109.1 232.24 155681 28 NY RWY 24 01 242 ELMIRA/COR 06NY UN I 122.80 51 156796 141 NY MURPHY FLD 05 PS81 UN I 123.05 186.84 158987 179 PA ROBERT 06 PACKER HOS FAC TYPE ST FREQ VECTOR DIST DELTA ST LOCATION GRD APCH IDNT AT (ft) ELEVA ANGLE BEAR NK89 UN I 122.80 254.79 170040 241 NY ULTRALIGHT 08 FLIGHT ZNY CO Y A/G 193.95 178403 592 PA SAYRE 19 PEO UN I 123.00 296.94 181850 29 NY PENN YAN 01 6B9 UN I 122.80 81 182746 80 NY SKANEATELES 03 AERO 4N7 UN I 122.80 102.64 183589 24 NY GREENE 01 PYA NDB I 26 297.52 183772 102 NY PENN YAN 03 OG7 VG I A/G 332.46 192315 472 NY RWY19 TCH40 14 GS300 OG7 UN I 122.80 332.71 193345 467 NY FINGER LAKES 14 RGNL ULW VOR/DME R 109.6 233.08 194031 673 NY ELMIRA 2 OG7 VG I A/G 332.83 194776 477 NY RWY01 TCH40 14 GS300 7N1 UN I 122.80 244.77 200405 3 NY CORNING- 0.00 PAINTED P GGT TACAN I 117.8 50.55 216837 1081 NY GEORGETOWN 29 NK71 UN I 122.80 6.83 219514 109 NY MARCELLUS 03 THE NEAREST AIR NAVIGATION FACILITY TO CASE COORDINATES IS: ITH (GLIDE SLOPE) Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPSO are registered O trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 175 355 AM RADIO STATIONS Disturbance of AM Broadcast Station Antenna Pattern CFR Title 47, Part 1, Subpart BB SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.237" LONGITUDE: 76° 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . . . . 959 ft. CALL FREQ POWER ANT P DIST BEARING NAD83 NAD83 CITY ST SIGN KHz Watts MOD T Meters Degrees LATITUDE LONGITUDE WNYY 1470 5,000 D T 3064 220.73 42-23-30 076-28-29 ITHACA NY This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 72'. The studied structure is not within 2039 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 2039 meters. WHCU 870 5,000 D T 8646 47.62 42-27-54 076-22-22 ITHACA NY This station has a current license. The authorized directional antenna pattern is theoretical. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 431. The studied structure is not within 3000 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 3446 meters. WHCU 870 1,000 D A 13928 246.69 42-21-47 076-36-21 ITHACA NY The authorized directional antenna pattern is augmented. This station is operating a directional type antenna system.The electrical height of the studied antenna is: 431. The studied structure is not within 3000 meters of this AM station. 10 Wavelengths = 3446 meters. DEFINITIONS: SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION: A significant modification of a tower in the immediate vicinity of an AM station is defined in CFR Title 47, Part 1.30002, as follows; 1) any change that would alter the tower's physical height by 5 electrical degrees or more at the AM frequency; or 2) in addition or replacement of one or more antennas or trnasmission lines on a tower that has been detuned or base -insulated. The addition or modification of an antenna or antenna -supporting structure on a building shall be considered a construction modification subject to the analysis and notice requirements of this subpart if and only if the height of the antenna supporting structure alone exceeds the thresholds in paragraphs(a) and(b) of this section. CALL SIGN: The Call Sign of the station or application. For applications and construction permits which do not have Call Signs a value of 'NEW' is used. FREQUENCY: in Kilohertz POWER: The nominal power of the station, as defined in Section CFR 73.14. This is not necessarily the effective radiated power, the transmitter power, the antenna input power, etc. ANT MOD: Antenna Mode, The mode of the complete antenna system. Indicates directional or non -directional. (D = Directional and N = Non -Directional) If a station is directional at one time during a day and non -directional at another time it is considered to be directional for the purpose of Movement Method Proof. If the same station has multiple locations these are listed as separate AM stations with the same Call Sign. PT: The type of antenna pattern which has been notified to (or by) foreign countries. DIST Meters: This is the calculated distance (in meters) between your proposed site and the latitude/longitude coordinates specified by the FCC data. Bearing Degrees: This is the true bearing from your proposed site to the station. LATITUDE: This is the latitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. LONGITUDE: This is the longitude of the AM Station in NAD 1983 coordinates. ST: This is the state where the AM Station is located. The material in this report on AM radio stations was obtained from the FCC who provided the data on an 'as -is' basis. Therefore, Federal Airways & Airspace@ disclaims all warranties with regard to the contents of these files, including their fitness for your use. In no event shall Federal Airways & Airspace@ be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever resulting from loss or use, data or profits, whether in connection with the use or performance of the contents of these files, action of contract, negligence, or other action arising out of, or in connection with the use of the contents of these files. Data conversion of the FCC data from NAD27 to NAD83 was accomplished using the USGS NADCON210 software program. Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES IN PROXIMITY OF CASE* SITE ID: 2126343 TRANSACTION ID: 26012295 LATITUDE: 42° 24' 45.23711 LONGITUDE: 761 27' 1.569" SITE ELEVATION AMSL . . . 825 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT. . . . . 134 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL . . . 959 ft. FACIL TYP NAME BEARING RANGE DELTA ARP FAR IDENT To FACIL IN NM ELEVATION P77 NK72 AIR HENION PVT FLD 239.05 4.25 341 NO NK05 AIR TOM N' JERRY 220.05 4.53 531 NO NY55 AIR GRUND FLD 287.8 6.83 494 NO NY18 AIR NENO 286.38 7.7 324 NO 2NY9 AIR KAYUTAH LAKE/ 258 12.36 426 NO JAMES &amp; HELENE D NY92 AIR COCHRAN 84.37 16.15 321 NO NK09 AIR EAGLE RIDGE 268.42 16.45 521 NO NK54 AIR MATEJKA FLD 210.9 16.49 731 NO 6NY3 AIR AIRY -ACRES 318.26 18.51 154 NO NK53 AIR DODGE/COPPOLA/ 228.83 18.89 71 NO WHEELER NK24 AIR TILDEN 258.24 19.45 59 NO NY29 AIR SCHUYLER 276.74 20.62 89 NO NK35 AIR MARIWILL 82 20.65 171 NO NK49 HEL OWEGO 151.28 21.2 52 NO 9NY3 HEL SUSQUEHANNA 152.06 21.42 75 NO NK74 AIR MATCH MATE 334.69 22.04 119 NO 17NK AIR RE -DUN FLD 277.01 22.39 392 NO 42NY AIR WALTERS FLD 48.55 23.29 601 NO 38NY AIR GREENLAWN FARM 290.09 23.97 51 NO 3NK9 HEL ARNOT OGDEN 221.7 25.11 50 NO HOSPITAL 06NY AIR MURPHY FLD 52 25.81 141 NO PS81 HEL ROBERT PACKER 186.83 26.16 179 YES HOSPITAL 4NY8 AIR HARRIS HILL 228.78 26.63 750 NO 94NY AIR ST BERNARD FLD 336.75 26.94 419 NO PA33 AIR LARS/PRIVATE 182.98 27.78 341 NO NK89 AIR ULTRALIGHT FLIGHT 254.79 27.98 241 NO FARM 29NK HEL UHS WILSON TOWER 129.3 28.27 26 NO 9NY1 HEL WILSON MEML RGNL 129.34 28.3 20 NO MEDICAL CENTE 8NY4 HEL GUTHRIE CORNING 234.1 28.53 58 NO HOSPITAL 1NK8 AIR CHENANGO BRIDGE 116.23 30.18 19 NO 25NK AIR LOUCKS 272.91 30.33 466 NO 4NK4 AIR WOODFORD AIRFIELD 36.96 31.19 321 NO ONY6 HEL NEW YORK STATE 346.77 31.83 359 NO POLICE 3NY5 AIR LUKE 136.85 32.06 599 NO NY12 HEL AUBURN COMMUNITY 351.01 32.1 229 NO HOSPITAL PN10 AIR CASH CREEK 184.6 32.94 291 NO 6NY1 AIR OLD PORT ROYAL 237.51 33.67 741 NO 9PN7 AIR VEIT 177.3 35.69 401 NO NK71 AIR MARCELLUS 6.84 36.13 109 NO FAA PROTECTED IFR PROCEDURE IFR Procedure FACIL TYP NAME BEARING RANGE DELTA ARP FAR FAA PROTECTED IDENT To FACIL IN NM ELEVATION P77 IFR PROCEDURE PN54 AIR AKM AIRFIELD 200.96 36.69 434 NO 59PA AIR J P REILLY 146.19 36.86 691 NO 5PN2 HEL ROBERT PACKER 179.91 37.65 159 NO HOSPITAL - TOWAN NK12 AIR CANAAN FLD 229.33 37.72 641 NO NY19 AIR WALLS 359.24 37.87 349 NO 2NY7 AIR TOWNER FARM 242.49 38.13 289 NO NY73 AIR MILLER FLD 98.79 38.29 621 NO 7PA6 AIR CARRAR FARM 138.32 38.55 588 NO NK76 AIR GRAMMAR 316.85 38.77 204 NO 46NY AIR SAVANNAH 339.42 38.88 494 NO THE NEAREST PRIVATE USE LANDING FACILITY IS: HENION PVT FLD HENION PVT FLD is an Airport type landing facility. landing facilities with IFR procedures are protected under FAR 77.17 (a) (3). Airspace@ State Data version 7/15/2024 AIRSPACE@ and TERPS@ are registered @ trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace@ Copyright @ 1989 - 2024 09-11-2024 8:12:11 EXHIBIT NN ass INC. November 18, 2024 GSS Project #D24246-19-NY Ms. Katherine Jaeckel Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street Rochester, NY 14586 Submitted via email: katie.jaeckel@verizonwireless.com 1054 Texan Trail, Ste 300 Grapevine, TX 76051 Tel:682.651.0034 Fax:817.527.4081 ustxApassmidwest.com www.gssmidwest.com RE: NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) STATUS — VERIZON SITE: SUNNY VIEW, FUZE PID# 2126343 111 WIEDERMAIER CT, ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY 14850 At the request of Verizon Wireless, GROUNDWATER SERVICE & SUPPLY INC (GSS) has prepared this NEPA Status Letter Letter) for the below -referenced proposed wireless communications facility. This letter outlines the current stage of the environmental review process set forth in Title 47 CFD Part 1, Subpart I, rule sections 1.1301 to 1.1319. PROJECT INFORMATION Verizon Site Name: Sunny View Verizon Project ID: 2126343 Site Address: 111 Wiedmaier Court (0.17 miles SW of Slaterville Rd. and Wiedmaier Ct.), Ithaca, Tompkins County, NY 14850 Project Type: Raw Land Tower Type/Height: Monopole / 134' (Overall 138') Latitude/Longitude: 42°24'45.2376" N / 76°27'1.5696" W e-106 Number: 0011318208 TCNS Number: 285451 NEPA Process Summary Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) and Notification of Organization (NOO) The FCC TCNS process for tribal consultation was initiated on September 17, 2024. A Notification of Organization (NOO) was issued to tribal entities (Tribes) on September 20, 2024. Public Notice A public notice was issued on September 20, 2024, to inform the public of the proposed project and to invite comments regarding potential environmental and cultural impacts. The notice was published in Ithaca Journal, and the public comment period ended on October 20, 2024. No comments or concerns have been received. Notice of Initiation of the Section 106 Process Letter Notice of Initiation of the Section 106 Process Letters were sent to Landmarks Preservation Commission, City of Ithaca and History Center in Tompkins County on September 17, 2024, to inform the related parties the proposed project and to invite comments regarding potential environmental and cultural impacts. The comment period ended on October 17, 2024. No comments or concerns have been received. Section 106 Submission to New York State Historic Preservation Offices (NY SHPO) and Tribes Section 106 submission was made to the NY SHPO and Tribes on November 7, 2024. We are currently awaiting a response from NY SHPO and Tribes. NY SHPO has 30 days to review the submission, with the review period concluding on December 7, 2024. Any Tribes that have not responded by December 9, 2024, and December 17, 2024, will be referred to 1054 Texan Trail, Ste 300 Grapevine, TX 76051 Tel:682.651.0034 Fax:817.527.40815755jzsstx(a passmidwest.com www.gssmidwest.com INC. the FCC to initiate the process to close out consultation. The anticipated tribal clearance date is January 4, 2025. However, this date is subject to change if significant events occur, such as requests for additional consultation, new findings, or unforeseen delays in the review process. GSS anticipates submitting the final NEPA report to Verizon Wireless on January 6, 2025. LIMITATIONS This Letter was completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you. There are no intended or unintended third -party beneficiaries, unless specifically named. GSS is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in this Letter or on the closing of any business transaction. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to Verizon Wireless. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stephen J. Blazenko, CEO GSS, Inc. EXHIBIT OO Network Engineering Group 225 Jordan Road Troy, New York 12180 N e t w o r k E n g i n e e r i n g - U P N Y 1 2 7 5 J o h n S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 0 W est H e n r iet t a , N e w Y o r k 145 8 6 Feb. 6th, 2025 Hon. Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Streetr Ithaca, NY, 14850 RE: Additional Mid-band coverage plots at 90’ and 70’ Antenna Center Line (ACL). Honorable Members of the Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals: At the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) meeting on November 26, 2024, the Vice Chairperson and other board members requested additional mid-band coverage plots for the proposed monopole at 111 Wiedmaier Court, specifically at reduced heights of 90 and 70 feet. In response, Verizon’s RF engineering team generated the requested coverage plots, which are presented below. The areas outlined in red indicate the expected sources of voice traffic (including busy roads, commercial districts, residential areas, sports grounds, and parks) where mid-band coverage varies significantly with changes to the antenna centerline. Zoomed-in Image – Area 1 Zoomed-in Image – Area 2 Zoomed-in Image – Area 3 Zoomed-in Image – Area 4 Zoomed-in Image – Area 5 Zoomed-in Image – Area 6 Zoomed-in Image – Area 7 Zoomed-in Image – Area 8 Mid-band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) – 130’ Mid-band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) – 110’ Mid-band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) – 90’ Mid-band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) – 70’ Dropped Connections – Voice Calls Access Failures – Voice Calls As illustrated above, any reduction in height from the originally proposed design significantly diminishes the coverage footprint within the intended service area. While it is neither possible nor practical to maintain an optimal signal level across all areas, achieving the target coverage wher e users are actively utilizing their devices remains a critical design criterion. In conclusion, any alternative height lower than the proposed 134 -foot monopole (130 feet ACL) would fail to meet the necessary RF objectives. Therefore, the “Sunny View” site must be constructed at the proposed height to ensure adequate and reliable coverage for the southern portion of the Town of Ithaca, specifically the “Sunny View” project area. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Wasif Sharif Wasif Sharif Radio Frequency (RF) Design Engineer NIXON PEABODY Nixon Peabody LLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 Attorneys at Law nixonpeabody.com @NixonPeabodyLLP November 14, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestragtown.ithaca.ny.us) Jared C. Lusk Partner T / 585.263.1140 F / 866.402.1491 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at I I I Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: By application dated May 29, 2024 and supplemental applications dated August 7, October 22 and October 28, 2024, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Verizon Wireless") submitted the above -referenced Application to the Town of Ithaca in connection with the above -referenced project (the "Project"). Thereafter, on November 4, 2024 Verizon Wireless received the latest report from the Town's RF Engineering Consultant, William Johnson (the "Third Johnson Report") containing certain revised findings (the "Johnson Findings"). The Johnson Findings are reproduced below in bold italicized type, with Verizon Wireless' responses in regular type: On October 29, 2024, the planning board asked for our collaboration to develop some ideas regarding alternatives for Applicant's proposed "Sunny View" site. In addition, discussions with the town's attorneys today has clarified my more restrictive interpretation of the Town Code §270-219 R (1) (c) [21 regarding identification of a "significant gap" and preferred frequency bands. Their explanations have reconciled the meaning of the Town Code and my interpretation with the engineering issues associated with reliable wireless communications. This report will address (1) the finding of a "significant gap" in the target improvement area and (2) scenarios for alternate approaches to remedy the "significant gap "for your consideration. No response necessary. 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 2 SIGNIFICANT GAP Our revised preliminary report hesitated to acknowledge a "significant gap" as we interpreted Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) in a manner that was, on review by town counsel, narrower than intended. Applicant's propagation plots for low -band (7001850 MHz) showed usable signal strength in some of the target improvement area. We therefore concluded that, if there is a gap, it may not be a "significant gap. "By contrast the dropped call data shows more than 11 % dropped calls which exceeds the 1 % national goal. While there are likely several factors that are causing such a high dropped call rate, one of the causes is due to lack of mid -band RF coverage in the target improvement area. Calls in progress using mid -band spectrum will drop when a mobile user enter the area where there is no mid -band RF coverage. As a result, part of the 11 % dropped call rate is due to an RF coverage gap in mid -band. Mid -band spectrum accounts for about 90% ofApplicant's licensed spectrum and is necessary to avoid dropped calls as mobile users enter the coverage gap area. Given the high dropped call rate it is arguably reasonable to then conclude that there is a "significant gap" in mid -band RF coverage. That gap is confirmed by the propagation plots in application materials Exhibit H. By way of explanation, our over -interpretation that was corrected by town counsel derived from the statement that a] significant gap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. " Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [21 [a]. Therefore, based on town counsel's explanation ofthe meaning of the section quoted above in light of an excessive dropped call rate, as is the case here, results from some form of a coverage gap. Whether the gap is the result of weak low -band signals in building or vehicles as noted in our last report, or whether it is the result of mid -band calls -in -progress dropping as a mobile user enters the target improvement area, the results point to a "significant gap" regardless of reference to a preferred frequency band. The remedy for the "significant gap" requires a new base station or other hybrid solution in the vicinity of the target improvement area that can provide sufficient low -band and mid -band RFsignal strength to initiate, maintain and hand-off voice telephone traffic. Sufficient signal strength and capacity will also facilitate availability of data services since both the transmission and reception use the same LIE technology to allow two-way exchange of information. No response necessary. POTENTIAL "SUNNY VIEW" SITEALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS As evidenced by the high-level view ofApplicant's wireless network, huge geographic areas can be serviced by many relatively small -diameter "cells" that allow sufficient signal levels and user capacity for safe and reliable voice communications. Where there are large numbers of wireless users, cells must be small to allow enough user capacity for reliable service. This is called "network densification. " Network densification adds additional user capacity and 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 3 targeted signal strength improvement in areas such as business centers and sport complexes where wireless subscribers congregate. Network densification often takes the form of splitting an existing cell into several smaller cells with commensurately smaller support structures or co -location on, for example, existing buildings or utility poles. In addition to network densification for capacity there are times when zoning considerations and aesthetic concerns could benefit from a similar approach. No response necessary. In the present case, the alternate sites considered by Applicant are in close proximity to each other. Town Code §279-219 R (1) (c) [SJ and following address the aesthetic impacts, property values, community character, and mitigation of those affects through siting, location and design. These items were discussed in the revised preliminary report last month. During the October 29th meeting, the planning board concluded that the close proximity of alternate sites did not offer much advantage to mitigate aesthetic concerns expressed during hearings. While Applicant did not offer any additional possible approaches identified by their site acquisition personnel, we offer some scenarios for the benefit of the planning board's consideration that have been found to work in other situations where (1) land control can be obtained and (2) technical performance was adequate when zoning a proposed macro site did not fit comfortably into the community. We offer these scenarios for possible consideration and comparison to the proposed site to assess whether the proposed site meets the minimum intrusion into the community test. First, there are parcels closer to Route 79 in the search area identified by Applicant on the south side that have hills on which a structure might be located that has a view through the Route 79 valley and has potential for RFpropagation from a similarly sized tower. We acknowledge that those parcels may not improve some of the issues of concern since there are homes in the area, but the locations may offer a shorter tower structure. With the advice of town planners, it is possible that one or more of those parcels might provide some improvement to the proposed "Sunny View" location — at least for minimum intrusion comparison purposes. This approach will need RF analysis by Applicant to determine the minimum height to achieve acceptable RF coverage, assuming land control is possible. Enclosed as Exhibit JJ (lettered to follow Exhibits A -II previously submitted in furtherance of the Application) is an aerial tax map depicting the tax parcels in and around the Sunny View search area that are of sufficient size to host the Project. Enclosed as Exhibit KK is a Third Supplemental RF Report prepared by Wasif Sharif, Verizon's RF design engineer for the Ithaca area. In this report, Mr. Sharif provides RF plots depicting coverage provided from a tower located at an assumed zoning compliant location on each of the twelve (12) alternate locations (see Slides 4-15 of the report). As demonstrated in Slides 4-15 of his report, a tower at each potential alternate location provides substantially less coverage to the Sunny View coverage area when compared to the coverage provided by the proposed 134' tower located off Wiedmaier Court. These alternate locations each fail to provide reliable coverage to the Sunny View coverage area. 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 4 In fact, while the coverage from a site at the Six Mile Enterprises LLC parcel is the best of the alternate locations, as demonstrated by Slides 16-17 of the Fourth RF Report, even tower heights of 150' and 170' fail to provide comparable coverage to what is provided by the proposed 134' tower off Wiedmaier Court. Therefore, from an RF perspective, none of the twelve (12) alternate locations are feasible alternate locations, with the "best" alternate location failing to provide reliable coverage at a height 40' taller than the proposed tower. Nevertheless, in an effort to provide a thorough analysis of the area to identify a potentially less intrusive location, Verizon's civil engineering and site acquisition team have reviewed each of the twelve (12) alternate locations to determine their feasibility for the Board's consideration. Enclosed as Exhibit LL are a series of Alternate Candidate Location Aerial Exhibits labeled 1-8 and 10-12. Based on the information contained in the Alternate Candidate Location Aerial Exhibits and information from Verizon's site acquisition team, we offer the following detailed review of each of the twelve (12) alternate locations: Cathleen McDermott Donovan 1564 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-3-26.2 Town of Ithaca 6.79 Acres and also has frontage on Park Lane Trail Easement through parcel A certified letter with a return receipt was sent to this landowner to gauge interest in leasing space to Verizon for a tower facility. No response was received. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #1 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 409' from the closest residential neighbor on Park Lane (where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 2. Wilfred Bernard Graham and Madeleine Capuano Graham 1590 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-3-25 Town of Ithaca 13.84 Acres Dr. Bernie Graham stated he was not interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon. 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 5 As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #2 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 279' from the closest residential neighbor along Slaterville Road where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court even to access the site. 3. Gary W Foote Sr. 1598 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-3-14.3 Town of Ithaca 8.79 Acres While Mr. Foote was initially interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon for a tower facility on this property, this location was rejected by Verizon's RF engineer. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #3 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 505' from the closest residential neighbors along Slaterville Road where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 4. Gary W Foote Sr. 1598 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-3-14.2 Town of Ithaca 11.36 Acres While Mr. Foote was initially interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon for a tower facility on this property, this location was rejected by Verizon's RF engineer. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #4 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 425' from the closest adjoining residential neighbor along Slaterville Road (where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 6 Conclusion: The site: (1) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (2) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (3) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 5. Gary W Foote Sr. 1698 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 71.4-1.2 Town of Dryden 16.25 Acres While Mr. Foote was initially interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon for a tower facility on this property, this location was rejected by Verizon's RF engineer. Conclusion: The site will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK). 6. Edward F and Kimberley A Klimowicz 1650 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 71.-1-5 Town of Dryden 43.02 Acres A certified letter with a return receipt was sent to this landowner to gauge interest in leasing space to Verizon for a tower facility on their property. No response was received. In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); and (3) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 7. Faline Woods, LLC PO Box 6645 Ithaca, NY 14850 71.-1-6 Town of Dryden 26.03 Acres A certified letter with a return receipt was sent to this landowner to gauge interest in leasing space to Verizon for a tower facility on the property. No response was received. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #7 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 326' from the closest residential neighbors along Slaterville Road where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 7 Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 8. Robert R. Rightmyer 1691 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 71.-1-8 Town of Dryden 54.16 Acres Robert Rightmyer said he was not interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon. In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); and (3) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court. 9. NYS Electric & Gas Corp (NYSEG) One City Center — 5th Floor Portland, ME 04101 70.-2-2 Town of Dryden 3.06 Acres This parcel was reviewed, but as depicted on Exhibit ii, it is simply too narrow to accommodate a tower facility and meet the NYSEG setback requirement of 1.5 times the height of telecommunications from electrical transmission towers (138' tower facility times 1.5 equals 207') as the parcel is only approximately 250' wide. Conclusion: The site is not a viable location given the narrow width of the parcel. 10. Robert Rightmyer 1691 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-4-2 Town of Ithaca 23.75 Acres Robert Rightmyer said he was not interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit #10 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 445' from the closest residential neighbor on Burns Road where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 8 Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the proposed Project on Wiedmaier Court. 11. Mark D. and Kathleen M. Lucas 1571 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-2-7.1 Town of Ithaca 19.02 Acres A certified letter with a return receipt was sent to the landowners to gauge their interest in leasing space to Verizon Wireless for a tower facility on the property. No response was received. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit # 11 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 406' from the closest residential neighbors along Slaterville Road (where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). In addition, the tower on this location would require the removal of substantially more trees than what is required for the Project as proposed. Conclusion: The site is: (1) not available; (2) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (see Exhibit KK); (3) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; and (4) would require the removal of substantially more trees than the proposed Project on Wiedmaier Court. 12. Six Mile Enterprises, LLC 1551 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 56.-2-1.1 Commonly known as Six Mile Creek Vineyard Town of Ithaca 25.22 Acres The landowner was interested in pursuing a lease agreement with Verizon for a tower facility on their property, but there was only one spot on the property that was acceptable to the landowner. The available location would have required crossing a feeder creek, and would have been directly behind homes along Slaterville Road. As depicted on Aerial Exhibit 91 in Exhibit LL, a tower at this location would likely need to be approximately 323' from the closest residential neighbors along Slaterville Road where currently the closest adjacent residence is 578' from the proposed tower). Conclusion: The site: (1) will not provide reliable wireless coverage to the Sunny View coverage area (even at tower heights of 150' and 170') (see Exhibit KK); (2) would be closer to adjacent homes than the proposed tower; (3) would require the removal of 4874-0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 9 substantially more trees than the Project as proposed on Wiedmaier Court; and (4) will require the crossing of a creek to gain access to the only available location (obtaining the required permits to cross the creek are unlikely as a viable alternate on Wiedman Ct. exists). Second, the landfeatures to the north of Route 79 provides a backdrop offoliage in the vicinity of the search area that, arguably, could provide a backdrop for a stealth tree structure. Normally a structure that is dramatically taller than the existing tree canopy is not a good candidate for a stealth tree, but in this case there are similarities to a stealth tree that was deployed on the east side of Lake George where a ridge provided a foliage back drop when viewedfrom the lake. From the middle of the lake, it was nearly impossible to pick out the structure that was taller than surrounding trees from the backdrop canopy. The observer's viewpoint will affect the perception of the stealth structure, but we offer this suggestion in case there are locations where the balance of other concerns may overcome the concerns for the proposed site. As outlined above, towers at any of the alternate locations south of Slaterville Road (Route 79) are simply not feasible. Third, we note that it is generally desirable to provide area coverage from a single site for impact on the broader community (i.e. one tower to mitigate rather than multiple although somewhat shorter towers, each with its own set of concerns) and cost of deployment. In the present case, the target improvement area is mainly located along Route 79 and the areas slightly to the south. Two properly positioned shorter base stations long or near Route 79 would likely have the ability to illuminate the Route 9 valley and provide some RF coverage to the south despite the lack of need for enhanced capacity that would be provided by two sites. As set forth in Exhibit GG of our October 22, 2024 supplemental application materials, a two - tower solution is not a feasible alternative to the Project. Fourth, there has been much information about the pros and cons of small -cell deployment. The limitation of equipmentfacilities, susceptibility to damage to utility pole wiring from wind gusts and falling trees, and the coverage limitations from a low -mounted set of antennas might balance the aesthetic concerns of residents while providing some reasonable service along Route 79, nearby roadways, and residences in the vicinity. We recognize that none of these options are likely preferred by Applicant, and that they have not proposed any of these options. We offer these scenarios to allow the planning board and staff to consider which, if any, might be viable and then allow Applicant to address their viability to the board. The result will provide the board an opportunity to assess the minimal intrusion on the community and decide whether the proposed site or another approach is preferable. We will be glad to assist as the board deems appropriate. As set forth in Exhibit GG of our October 22, 2024 supplemental application and discussed by Mr. Sharif with the Planning Board at the October 29, 2024 meeting, small cell design is not a viable alternative to the Project. 4874.0645-5798.1 Town of Ithaca November 14, 2024 Page 10 For the reasons set forth above, and as previously and more fully set forth by Verizon in its Application, and during appearances before the Planning Board on October 1 and October 29, 2024, Verizon has submitted substantial and compelling evidence demonstrating that (1) there is a significant gap in coverage in the Sunny View coverage areal; and (2) the subject property is the only feasible and least intrusive location to remedy the significant gap in accordance with applicable law. Thus, Verizon is entitled to receive the necessary zoning approvals from the Town to construct and operate the proposed wireless telecommunications facility at the Site. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. V4ry truly C. Lusk JCL/mkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP The existence of the "significant gap" has been set forth in the Application and testimony before the Planning Board confirmed by the Johnson Findings in its Third Johnson Report. 4874-0645-5798.1 EXHIBIT JJ John St 0 Ly- TA# OWNERNAME 1 56.-3-26.2 CATHLEEN MCDERMOTTDONONVAN a E 2 56,-3-25 WILFREDBF I ARDGRAHAM&MADELBNECAPUANOGRAHAM m r 3 56.-3-14.3 GARYW. FOOTS SR p Cn 4 56.-3-14.2 GARYW. FOOTS, SR 5 71.-1-1.2 GARYW. FOOTE, SR 6 71.-1-5 WARDF. &14MBE:Z-EYA. K IMOWCZ 1 7 71.-1-6 FAUNEWOODS, LLC A 8 71.-1-8 ROBERTRGHTMYER 56.-3-26.2 9 70.-2-2 NYSELECTRC&GAS CORP. 56.3-14.3 10 56.-4-2 ROBERTRGHTMYER 3 11 12 56.-2-7.1 56.-2-1.1 MARKD & KATHLEEN M. LUCAS SIXMILE ENTHFPRSES, U_C 12 \ 11 56.- 2-7.1 @® C cn CD Legend Q Alternate Candidates Roads Creeks 100 Yr Floodplains DEC Wetlands Federal Wetlands Urban Areas Search Ring Parcels 56.- 3-25 56.- 3-14.2 4 ` Z r 71. 4-5 m a k G a 7 56® 2 , I . -- 9 70 2 8 71. 4-8 i 171A1 _ C1 IAIAGV \11F:1A/ ti 71.4-6 gee 5 sk Rey SnYde N COSTI This product is for informatior 11/ 7/2024 TOWN OF ITHACA/TOMPKINS COUNTY orbesuitpurposes.It,engineering, s surveyingpurposes. It does not represent an 0 500 1, 000 on -the -ground survey and represents only Feet ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS EXHIBIT the approximate relative location of property boundaries. EXHIBIT KK Verizon Wireless Communications Facility Engineering Necessity Case -"Sunny View" Town Boundary Town/City Border Existing ITHACA HD Site Search Area Project Location Route 79 Existing DANBY Site Existing BROOKTONDALE S ite Prepared by: Wasif Sharif, RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Project: The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co -located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Ithaca (the "Project Facility"). verizonNI Nov 13th, 2024 RIF Justification Supplemental Materials verizonvi Alternative Sites - RF Analysis 56.-3-26.2 LL Cathleen McDermott Donovan AddressParcel 1564 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.418576 Longitude 76.452243 56.-3-25 Wilfred Bernard Graham and Madeleine Capuano Graham 1590 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.416917 76.450358 56.-3-14.3 Gary W Foote Sr 1598 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.417643 76.448339 56.-3-14.2 Gary W Foote Sr 1598 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.415457 76.447856 71.4-1.2 Gary W Foote Sr 1698 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.416553 76.446923 71.4-5 Edward F and Kimberley A Klimowicz 1650 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.415288 76.44405 71.-1-6 Faline Woods, LLC PO Box 6645 Ithaca, NY 14850 42.412875 76.44059 71.-1-8 Robert Rightmyer 1691 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.409161 76.444533 70.-2-2 NYS Electric & Gas Corp One City Center — 5th Floor Portland, ME 04101 42.411967 76.445608 56.-4-2 Robert Rightmyer 1691 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42,412063 76.448247 56.-2-7.1 Mark D and Kathleen M Lucas 1571 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.415221 76.45211 56.-2-1.1 Six Mile Enterprises, LLC 1551 Slaterville Rd Ithaca, NY 14850 42.416186 76.454064 Slides 4-15 display the individual footprint of Sunny View site from above mentioned alternative site locations, and it can be seen that alternative locations fail to provide the adequate coverage that is needed to resolve the significant coverage gap in targeted service improvement area. Slide 16 and17 display the individual footprint of Sunny View site from Six Mile Enterprises parcel at higher ACL of 150' and 170' respectively, and it can be seen that even with higher ACL (taller tower), this alternative location fails to provide the similar coverage footprint that our primary candidate (shown on Slide 18) will provide. verizon)' 3 Sunny View Low band footprint — Cathleen McDermott Donovan S5 Best Signal level (d5m) > =-85 95 Best Signal level (d5m) > =-95 J- - 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-105 SIINNY JIE14 _ erookm nu. verizonNI 4 Sunny View Low band footprint —Wilfred Bernard Graham and Madeleine Capuano Graham ic 85 Best Signal Level (dBm} >=-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBmi ; =-105 kh d t_ Y SURBr OIfiN i E Y. B nr 6roaktontlal. 0 F a V.k, 16) e H e 1 verizon-I 5 Sunny View Low band footprint- Gary W Foote Sr 35 Best Signal Level (d8m) >=-85 95 Best Signal Level (d8m) > - -95 105 Best Signal Level (d8m) >--105 verizonNI Sunny View Low band footprint— Gary W Foote Sr I 1: K! 4a rt, a w ' f V r. l A a - y M, f At Si a ler. ril. RJ—` - 85 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) s=-105 4 i 1 s'' 4 pa a p • verizonJ 7 Sunny View Low band footprint- Gary W Foote Sr 35 Best Signal Level OBm) : 95 Best Signal Level (dBmj > = -95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) , =-105 verizon)/ 8 Sunny View Low band footprint— Edward F and Kimberley A Klimowicz 85 Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-85 j 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-105 IY NEVI v Ak C 3 4 ` W*, R! k verizon/ 9 Sunny View Low band footprint— Faline Woods, LLC 85 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > --105 a r, verizon/ 10 Sunny View Low band footprint— Robert Rightmyer S5 Best Signal Level (dEml >=-S5 95 Best Signal Level (d6ft > =-95 105 Best Signal level WSmj >=-1p5 oaN " r w A 4 f 0rookloneale - verizon)/ 11 Sunny View Low band footprint— NYS Electric & Gas Corp S5 Best Signal Level (dBm; ,=-35 95 Best Signal Level (dBm; : =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBmj _ =-105 i .:.,.r ) t-.ter-. •' Y rr - I - b a c P Oki L Ar s 0 fry s e f verizon)/ 12 Sunny View Low band footprint— Robert Rightmyer O Y'•N' R rt F I., Fo ! S5 Best Signal Level (dEmi >_ 95 55 Best Signal Level i.dEm) >=-95 105 Best Signal Level fdErn; > =-105 9rooklaneni: verizonv' 13 Sunny View Low band footprint —Mark D and Kathleen M Lucas I r e 4 55 Best Signal Level (d6m( >=-85 95 Best Signal Level (d6m) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level ld6mj > =-105 b'.11k I...a I. Verizonv 14 Sunny View Low band footprint — Six Mile Enterprises, LLc 85 Best Signal level (dBm) >=-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) >--95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > --105 Broaklontlalb 0 4. 4+ Fri rr wens rw a ti. ml tale..•,,,. . VerizonJ 15 Sunny View Low band footprint — Six Mile Enterprises, LLC (150' ACL) a - 35 Best Signal Level (dBmf %=-85 a - 95 Best Signal Level (dBMI > =-95 J. 105 Best Signal Le -.'el (dBm} . =-105 4 _ A l fir. w erooktontlatx tT 1 0 t verizonv' 16 Sunny View Low band footprint —Six Mile Enterprises, LLC (170" ACL) x ti,n Yn M., .1, 85 Best Signal Level (d6m) > =-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm( s =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-105 Bluuh uptla. IS r _ ono,,. ' ; • I , W'" s ., r. verizom' 17 Sunny View Low band footprint- Suzanne Roberts 5 Ect Signal Level (dBmj 15 95 Best Signal Level (d 6m) > = -9 5 105 6 est Signal Level fd6m) > = -105 VIC, verizon)/ 18 EXHIBIT LL N N/F ESTEP, LYNETTE C 56.-3-13.34 F N/F KENNEDY,SEAN 56.-3-13.2 AMOXIMATEPARCELBOUNDS TO F9 REST RFs o N/F N MCDERMOTT DONOVAN 56.-3.26.6 N/F THLEEN MCDERMOTT DONOVAN 56.-3.26.7 / 1_1 N1. 1 N"" _ N111 N' ll APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 2 m m PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION m m O LAT: 42.418576', LONG:-76.452243` u, D mmToN 4F N/ F CATHLEEN MCDERMOTT DONOVAN 56.- 3-26.2 / J qAA qT R F< e0G OS N/ F ELIZABETH BONINI-STEWART 56.- 3-26.8 N/ F WILFRED BERNARD GRAHAM & MADELEINE CAPUANO GRAHAM 56.- 3-25 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40 80 IN FEET) I inch = 80 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING ( 585)458-302C SUNNY VIEW -ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #1 11- 08-2024 CE# 7806 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F CATHLEEN MCDERMOTT DONOVAN 56: 3.26.2 N/F ELIZABETH BONINI-STEWART 56.-3.26.B N/F MARK D RENODIN 56.-2-2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F N/F KENNEDY, SEAN TOWN OF ITHACA 56.-3.13.2 57.-2-12 138' I TOWER SETBACK ENVELOPE N/F WILFRED BERNARD GRAHAM 8 MADELEINE CAPUANO GRAHAM 56.-3-25 Q / I I lz / I I I I I I I I I a tib a9, Pc' GAO = 2 Z 2 4' \ r05 O P 2y4zt cb 0 5 N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 56.-3-14.3 v v 0O a APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF m EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER I TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS A m d z zl0 N/F K D REN( 56: 3.16.1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.416917°, LONG:-76.450358' N/F TERRY L SINGLETON 56.-3-14.1 N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 56.-3-14.2 N rs z 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 75 150 INFEET) 1 inch = 150 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE k.. o05 [ lU171 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING ( 585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #2 11- 08-2024 CE# 7806 6; N z GRAPHIC SCALE 0 40 80 IN FEET) I inch = 80 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #3 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F WILFRED BERNARD GRAHAM & MADELEINE CAPUANO GRAHAM 56.-3-25 N/F K D RENC 56.-3-16.1 N/F SCOTT CHAFFEE 56.•3.16.2 N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 56.-3-14.3 mCnm m o OCOno gymm I— N GARY WFOOTE SR 56: 3-14.2 I REST ADJOI NER425't TO NEARIAL BUILDINGRESIDE N/F TERRY L SINGLETON sl 56.•3-14.1 G 66;LlR o 0GT, J llls'' N/F JAMES R YOUNG 69.-2-3.2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER f EXISTING C APPROXIMATE R EK/STREAAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIB RJR 50 aGj APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.415598°.LONG: -76.447799' N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 71.-1-1.2 N/F TIMOTHY F LYONS 71.-1-2 N/F TIMOTHY F LYONS 56.-3-15 Z/ GRAPHIC SCALE 0 60 120 IN FEET) I inch = 120 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE 1111ESTE1, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW —ALTERNATE N/F 2ENA MEYER \ CANDIDATE LOCATIONS 71-1-112 AERIAL EXHIBIT #4 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 56: 3-14.3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEKISTREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F WILFRED BERNARD GRAHAM & MADELEINE CAPUANO GRAHAM 56.-3-25 N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 56.-3-14,2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.416079°. LONG:-76.446659` O O AapROk PP,41 \ z z O O T m x v m z N/F MARK D RENODIN. 56.-3-16.1 ' y 0 O x 1> N/F m SCOTT CHAFFEE -O 56.-3-16.2 ` n mm mOCz U) N/F \ JOHN W BRADY N!F 56.-2.9 TERRY L SINGLETON sL 56.-3.14.1 91? G 0 SRO N/F JAMES R YOUNG 69.-2-3.2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER I I w \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 168t EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER PJ / II TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS Q• I / Co C D J o g AZ P N/F GARY W FOOTE SR 71: 1.1.2 / p I z a I I u SI m. IU ui lUto w L 4I N/F TIMOTHY F LYONS 71.-1.2 N/F TIMOTHY F LYONS 56.-3-15 N/F IN ZENA MEYER 71.-1-1.12 r NINA K M/ 71 1 N/F EDWARD F KLIMOWICZ 71.-1.5 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 60 120 IN FEET) 1 inch = 120 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585)458-3020 SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #5 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 Z APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER ` N/F GARY W FOOTE SR / 71.-1-1.2 / so ciao/ J5/ e APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.415288°, LONG:-76.444050' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF / EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS l/ 0 N/F P6 SARE - 1 1.12 \ yo sL 71.-1-1.12 ? A, FR N/F DAVID R TEDEYAN 70.-2-1.2 F P Po,o GP pp oa P 0 o / I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF A / EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER m / TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS r O I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF / EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS I PER NWI MAPPER / N/F I I JAMES R YOUNG 69: 2-3.2 I I I A Mj I i i i i NO YZ o N Nm O n G oN ON DN i otN i oN N i ON I ON I N/F EDWARD F KLIMOWICZ 71.-l-5 N/F N Y S ELECTRIC & GAS CORP 70.-1.1 APPROXIMATE PARCEL BOUNDS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F FALINE WOODS, LLC 71: 1-6 138.0' TOWER SETBACKFROM, PROPERTY LINES oN ON oN OH r oN Z off O A EXISTING OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES N/F JOSHUA SAN MUGUEL 71.-1-7 N z GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 IN FEET) I inch = 200 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #6 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 W W QN y ON ON z ON N/F JAMES R YOUNG 69.-2.3.2 EXISTING OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF N/F EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS EDWARD F KLIMOWICZ PER NWI MAPPER OZ- y APPROXIMM PARCEL SOUNDS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER Or TOMPKINS COUNTY GIB OS — — — — — — — — I I I I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS I S\ N Y S ELECIC 8 AS CORP \ I 0.- 1-b \ W N/F FALINE WOODS, LLC I N/ F RO \ 71.-1-6 'a I O JOSHU7SAN MUGUEL LOCTION OF 60 \ \ PROPOSEDATOWER AOCATOIONI m LAT: 42. 412875°, LONG:-76.440590' I A N/ F \ I mI Q'- ANDREJACQUET70:1- 3.1 \ I p Z O GIDEONT STONE \ / Q E 5 J JpE y ey II sl9r 70.- 1.3.2 GRAPHIC SCALE N/F gppRO ` I 0 75 150 J T' STEVEN R LANTZ 70: 1- 4 p R`e vas N/ F — — — — — — — (IN FEET) N/F SILBER SYRACUSE I LLC — — "— 1 1t1C17 — 150 ft. SILBER SYRACUSE I LLC 70.-1-8 ' 70.-1- 5 N/F SILBER SYRACUSE I 70.-1- 6 N/F JACQUELINE S 70.-1- 7 N/F SARAH JANE BURTON 70.-1- 9 1 N/ F RENATA J LANGMAIER 70 :1- 10.1 CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW - ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT # 7 11-08- 2024 CE# 7806 N/F ROBERT R RIGHTMYER 56.-4-2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER N/F CITY OF ITHACA 55.-1-1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS JO rO EXISTING OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES O-1f o 0 or ort APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS O oS PER NWI MAPPER Qe O ue 0 SS,0 4 Fs II N/F GREGORY P HEIST 70.-2-3 N/F ROBERT R RIGHTMYER 71: 1-B O APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.409161°, LONG:-76.444533° I I y m y w I y y C IZO I I I Z Z O O zi O o I D Z I I I I I I I I I APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN I` N/F D E WRISLEY 1.-1-24.2 0 / 9Jyo\ / Oy xl E51P-0p\NG / / eU N/F e- PR 6 P SARAH JANE BURTONQP10 S 71.-1-9 0 hry0 1019¢g10E y y I I I I I I I I I I I y 738a aRo FregcR' 17NFSo,i y y y y y (y APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PER NWI MAPPER EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F MERLE MCELDOWNEY, IRREVOCABLETRUST 71:1-11.1 - N z GRAPHIC SCALE 0 125 250 IN FEET) I inch = 250 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER. NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-3020 SUNNY VIEW -ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #8 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 N/F S ROBERTS WIEDMAIER LLC 56.-4-1.24 cy,Fogoe k-- N/F \ BAJRACHARYA, SRIJANA 56.-4-1.26 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN N/F S ROBERTS WC LAND LLC 56.-4-1.22 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.412063". LONG:-76.448247' APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIB N/F ROBERT R RIGHTMYER 56.-4-2 Fj Roe TR' 0w`Go? N/F DAVID R TEDEYAN 70.-2-1.2 W CAITLIN M PAL 70: 2-1.3 z z O O oA y zz N/F / ROBERT R RIGHTMYER I alm 0 Cn ot J C,yFs&s7N oa N/F CITY OF ITHACA 55.-1-1 O-1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEKlSTREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS EXISTING OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER APPRO) EXISTIN TOMPKI GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 IN FEET) 1 inch = 200 ft. CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE ROCHESTER, NY 14608 ENGINEERING (585) 458-302C SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS AERIAL EXHIBIT #10 11-08-2024 CE# 7806 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS 7 8qO• Op`rFT c F ti4 °4' N/F SIX MILE ENTERPRISES, LLC 56.-2-1.1 N/F CITY OF ITHACA 55.-1-1 ROPOSED TOWER LOCATION 42.415221 °, LONG:-76.452110° 9) o / GRAPHIC SCALE 0 60 120 IN FEET) I inch = 120 ft. 5 / CIVIL P ENGINEERING P N/F ALBERT P GILLIS LAND QQ 56.-2-11 SURVEYING 0 LANDSCAPEIiE Qe / ARCHITECTURE Oi (, - COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE Q PAN .00ATION OF ROCHESTER, NY 14608QPQ STREAM PER P ' ENGINEERING (585)458-3020 GIS SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE CANDIDATE LOCATIONS OFTHACA / 1ERIAL EXHIBIT #11 08 2024 I / / CE# 7806 7APPROXIMATELOCATIONOF EXISTING CREEKISTREAM PER TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS N/F CITY OF ITHACA 55.-1-1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WETLANDS PER NWI MAPPER APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN W V V Y IV N N/F SIX MILE ENTERPRISES, C 56.-2-1.22 J v QG \ QP N/F P MARK 6. 2E2 ODIN \ c6frl Q 4p G Qo 60 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CREEK]STREAM PER TOMPKIMPKI COUNTYTOMPKINSCOUNTY GIS N/F SIX MILE ENTERPRISES, LLC 56.-2-1.1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION LAT: 42.416158", LONG:-76.454092" 38 / GRAPHIC SCALE pROp SFTg / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 707fj0 / EXISTING CREEK/STREAM PER 0 75 150 NFS / TOMPKINS COUNTY GIS IN FEET) 1 inch = 150 ft. o CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 0 COSTICH 217 LAKE AVENUE N/F ROCHESTER, NY 14608 MARKD&KATHLEENMLUCAS ENGINEERING (585)458-3020 56.-2-7.1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFJ SUNNY VIEW ALTERNATE EXISTING OMPKIN COUNTY GIS CANDIDATE LOCATIONSTOMPKINSCOUNTYGIS AERIAL EXHIBIT #12 N/F 11-08-2024 CITY OF ITHACA 55.-1-1 CE# 7806 ZBA 2025-01-28 Filed 2/10) 1 Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals January 28, 2025 DRAFT Minutes Present: Board Members Connor Terry, Chair; Chris Jung, Connor Terry, and Matthew Minnig Marty Moseley, Director of Code Enforcement; Ashley Colbert, Deputy Town Clerk; and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Mr. Terry opened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct.; Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent. Requesting an Extension of “Shot Clock” from January 28, 2025 until the February 25, 2025 meeting of the ZBA. Jared Lusk requested an extension to the shot clock until the February 25, 2025 meeting of this Board due to delays in gathering the information the Board requested at the last meeting. Motion made by Mr. Terry to extend the shot clock through February 25, 2025 to allow additional time to submitted requested materials, seconded by Matthew Minnig, unanimous. ZBAA-24-32 Appeal of the Town of Ithaca, Owners, 114 Seven Mile Dr., LDR., TP 33.- 2-6.1; David Oshea, Agent, seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-219.5 Stream setback) for a proposal to construct elements of an electric vehicle charging station and related construction activities/amenities, or a portion thereof, in the stream setback area where building activities are not permitted. David O’Shea gave an overview, saying that the Town would like to install an EV charging station at the Public Works Facility for town vehicles. The existing parking lot predates the stream setback zoning and is entirely within the stream setback area. The soil disturbance will be temporary and consist of a trench approximately 2’-3’ ft deep and 1’ wide to bury the electrical wire. Public Hearing – Mr. Terry opened the public hearing, there was no one wishing to speak and the hearing was closed. Determination ZBAA-24-32 Area Variance 114 Seven Mile Dr., LDR., TP 33.-2-6.1. Resolved that this Board grants the appeal of the Town of Ithaca seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-219.5 (Stream setback) for a proposal to construct elements of an electric vehicle charging station and related construction activities/amenities, or a portion ZBA 2025-01-28 Filed 2/10) 2 thereof, in the stream setback area where building activities are not permitted, with the following Conditions 1. That the facility be built substantially as shown in the application materials submitted to this board, and Findings That the benefit to the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, specifically 1. That the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve could be achieved by other means, but a different location would involve significantly more soil disturbance and increased costs. The proposed location is the least invasive location to achieve the benefit, and 2. That there will not be an undesirable change to neighborhood or to nearby properties in that this site is separated by some dense woods from nearby properties which are some distance away and a charging station is not out of character for this type of facility, and 3. That the request is substantial in that no building is permitted within a stream set back area, but this is mitigated by the pre-existing paved parking lot withing the setback zone and the minimal disturbance installing the charging station will have, and 4. That there will not be any adverse physical or environmental effects as this is Type 2 under SEQR and there is no permanent disturbance of the soil, and 5. That the difficulty is self-created in that a charging station is desired, but the Facility is a designated Emergency Station for the Town, the Green Fleet Policy requires electrical vehicles be considered preferable as fleet replacement occurs and the parking lost is pre- existing, nonconforming as the stream setback legislation occurred after the facility being constructed. Moved: Connor Terry Second: Larry Sallinger Vote: Ayes- Terry, Jung, Terry, and Minnig Other Items: Training opportunities and upcoming variance requests were previewed. Motion made by Mr. Terry, seconded by Ms. Jung for Matthew Minnig to be appointed Vice- Chair for 2025, unanimous. Meeting was adjourned upon motion and a second, unanimous. Submitted by Monica Moll, Deputy Town Clerk ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 1 Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals November 26, 2024 Present: Board Members David Squires, Chair; Chris Jung, Connor Terry, Kim Ritter, Matthew Minnig and Larry Sallinger Dana Magnason, Senior Code Officer; CJ Randall, Director of Planning; Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk; and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Mr. Squires opened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Squires introduced the new board member Larry Sallinger and then asked for a moment of silence in honor of Bruce Bates. Mr. Bates retired as the Director of Code Enforcement five years ago. ZBAA-24-28 Appeal of Hospicare Foundation Incorporated, 172 King Rd. East., TP 44.2- 1-2. LDR; seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-60 E(2) (Yard regulations) to be permitted to place an accessory building in the side yard where they are only permitted in the rear yard. Overview Kiersten Miller and Jay Salmons were present to answer any questions. Ms. Miller gave an overview, saying that the 12 x 24 shed is proposed to be placed on the western side of the parking lot near the dumpster to allow for easy access from the main building and to provide additional lighting for the parking lot in that area for security reasons. She added that due to the layout of the entrance and parking lot, the shed will be virtually unseen from the public roadway and partially shielded by trees. Discussion Mr. Squires asked how far the shed is from the road. Ms. Miller responded that it is approximately 50’ feet, one-story, and because of the trees, a mix of evergreens and deciduous trees, it will only be slightly visible when the leaves are off the deciduous trees. The shed will be clad in the same materials as the main building and in the same color palette. Mr. Squires asked what would be stored in the shed. Ms. Miller responded that the plan is to store items used for the annual Woman’s Swim event, archived documents and general storage. Ms. Jung said she was having trouble picturing the site and Ms. Miller shared her screen depicting the layout and live views from Google maps. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 2 Public Hearing Mr. Squires opened the public hearing; there was no one wishing to speak and the hearing was closed. SEQR – Type 2, Construction/placement of a nonresidential structure less than 4000 sq ft. Determination ZBAA-24-28 Area Variance 172 King Rd. East TP 44.2-1-2 LDR Resolved that this board grants the appeal of Hospicare Foundation Inc., from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-60E (2) (Yard regulations) to be permitted to construct an accessory building in the side yard where they are only permitted in the rear yard, with the following: Conditions 1. That the building be placed substantially as shown in the submitted photos and described at this meeting by the staking in the applicant’s materials submitted to the board, and with the following Findings That the benefit to the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community, specifically 1. That the benefit that the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be achieved by any other means feasible given that the location chosen will also allow for additional lighting from attachments to the shed to shine on the parking lot in that area and the dumpster; and 2. That there will not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood character or to nearby properties given that the shed is screened by trees and will not be visible from the road or the neighbors; and 3. That the request is substantial given that accessory buildings are only allowed in the rear yard; and 4. That the request will not have adverse physical or environmental effects as evidence by SEQR not being required, and 5. That the alleged difficulty is self-created in that the applicant desires additional storage in that location for lighting and accessibility from the main building. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 3 Moved: David Squires Seconded: Connor Terry Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Jung, Minnig, and Ritter ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner, 111 Wiedmaier Ct., TP 56.-4- 1.22, Conservation Zone, Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent; seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-16 (Height limitations) to be allowed to erect a personal wireless service facility tower/structure that would exceed the 30’ maximum height requirements for all non- agricultural structures. Overview Mr. Lusk went through a presentation describing the project, its approvals so far, and the need for the tower at this height. He also went through points from the Planning Board’s findings in their approval resolution and Professor Johnson’s report (independent contractor hired by the Town) Highlights from report and application materials The significant gap cannot be addressed through other solutions, such as alternate locations, shorter towers, or one or more small cells. Some of the alternate locations that are large enough to host the facility would require a higher tower, and many of these alternate locations would be closer to nearest residences and require removal of more trees than the proposed location. The facility is the least intrusive means to address the significant gap. The proposed height is the minimum height necessary to remedy the significant gap is shown by the propagation maps Mr. Lusk stated for the record, that Pursuant to the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, because the Planning Board finds that the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing this significant gap in the personal wireless services, the Planning Board must grant Site Plan approval and Special Permit, which they did. This project has gone through extensive public hearings and discussion at other meetings, and the Planning Board, after hearing all those comments and reviewing all of the application materials and independent reports, determined that the proposed tower, at its proposed height, was the least intrusive method of curing the significant gap. Mr. Lusk pointed out and reviewed certain sections of the materials to bolster his comments above, including court case references from the 4th District. Ms. Brock responded, saying that Mr. Lusk is talking about a public utility standard, and referencing the Rosenberg case, which the highest court, the New York Court of appeals, decided a few years ago. That was a use variance case, and there, instead of meeting the extremely strict standards to get a use variance, the court relaxed the use variance standard for public utilities. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 4 We're going to follow your typical area variance criteria and then if, when you work your way through it, you think that it will yield a denial, then there is an additional analysis you'll need to do under Federal law. She added that it is her opinion that the courts sometimes do not understand municipal law, and the cases sited were for a use variance, and therefore do not apply here, and we will apply the area variance criteria. Ms. Brock added that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 does have rules that apply to this Board, and one of them is that you cannot consider health impacts if the proposed facility meets the Federal Communication Commission’s emissions standards, and the applicant has submitted evidence that the facility will meet those standards. So, to the extent that we've received public comments and will hear public comment here tonight, you are legally not allowed to consider comments asserting health impacts in your decision. That has to be very clear from the outset to you all. Mr. Lusk responded, saying that he wanted to preserve for the record that that it's been held by courts, that the public utility standard is applicable to area variances. Discussion Mr. Squires asked Mr. Lusk to show the correlation between the maps and the dropped calls and the green shadings, to justify the need or the gap in service. The dropped call data versus the coverage area and the alternatives looked at. Mr. Lusk went through and displayed the maps showing coverage areas and dropped call data. There is coverage to an extent from the Brooktondale and Ithaca towers and then a depiction of the coverage that would result from the installation of this tower as proposed. The maps showed the different bands of coverage; low band, which a large area is orange, which is unreliable. You can maybe get a phone call outside, but certainly not in a building or in a wooded area. Mr. Lusk explained the dropped call data gotten by doing a drive test. The standard for a significant gap is 1-3% dropped calls and we are at almost 13%. Ms. Brock asked him to show specifically where the gap boundaries are. Mr. Lusk turned to the Exhibit Tab Z in the application materials and described the data in them. The area is around Route 79, Burns Road, Coddington Road and German Cross Road, Southwoods and the South Hill Recreational Way, parts of which are also in the Town of Dryden because the municipal line crosses the coverage area. Ms. Brock asked Staff to explain the area in terms of residences, connector roads, main thoroughfare roads etc. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 5 Ms. Randall responded that State Route 79 and Coddington Road are heavily traveled connector roads from other towns to Ithaca; Burns Road is a connector from Rte. 79 and Rte. 96; rural residential with some agriculture and some natural areas such as the Rec Way and the reservoir. Mr. Mining asked about the ratio of dropped calls, such as 1 in 10? Mr. Johnson responded that it is about 11% so that would be 11 out of 100. Both dropped calls and ineffective call attempts. Mr. Wasif added that the data at the exchange end shows these were all attempts at voice calls. Discussion and interpretation of the material continued, showing where the improvements would occur with the proposed tower. The Board asked the applicants to show why small cells or shorter towers would not cure the significant gap. Mr. Lusk responded that their engineer and the Town’s consultant concluded that a smaller tower or multiple small cell towers would not work because of the terrain. This is a large geographic area with foliage and changes in terrain that would inhibit coverage. Small cell sites are intended to cover a much smaller area, typically a few 100 feet, and are better suited for dense urban environments or specific locations where their smaller footprint can be engineered to provide hotspot coverage or capacity enhancements complementary to the area macro site. Macro sites have the structural capability of deploying Verizon's numerous license bands, a spectrum through the more capable macro antennas where small cells are limited in antenna, size, number, weight, etc. Your cell phone has to be able to see the antennae, a clear line of sight. Small cells are used in places like a mall, or say Wegman’s, where high usage is expected and constant and they enhance the signal from the macro tower. Small cells can’t shoot through obstructions such as trees and buildings, and they will result in more visual clutter. More smaller towers would increase the community impact and still provide less of a solution and effectiveness than the one taller tower. Telephone poles and/or smaller towers cannot support the type of equipment needed to cover the significant gap in coverage. Mr. Johnson agreed with Mr. Lusk’s summary, adding that the “small towers” are not 30’ ft tall but would be in the 80’-100’ foot range. As stated, small towers are appropriate for commercial office parks or the like, with maybe 100’feet in each direction being covered by service. He said multiple smaller towers are not the best option for covering the gap. Even on a roadway, the smaller cells would have to be connected by wires, probably fiber optic cable, and if a tree came down or a pole went down, everyone would lose service. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 6 Mr. Minnig asked about the alternative sites that were looked at and the reasoning behind them being rejected. Mr. Lusk responded that Mr. Wasif receives a circle of the coverage area needed and without knowing zoning or residential density etc. makes a determination of where and what is needed. The Town has a very definitive siting hierarchy and then an site engineer travels to the location and reaches out to various land owners to gauge their interest in leasing land for a site. Each site that has some interest shown is then run by Mr. Wasif and of the 12 sites, one was a NYSEG owned property, but it wasn’t large enough to meet the Town’s fall zone requirements and many of the others were residential properties whose owners were not interested and would again not meet the fall zone requirements. Mr. Lusk added that details of the complete analysis of each site is in the application materials and were discussed at length at the Planning Board meetings, but he could go through them individually if the Board wanted him to. He added that they went through the process of evaluating some sites that no interest was shown on and analyzing if they would meet the fall zones and what coverage outcomes would be if a tower were to be placed there. Not one of them provided the coverage of the significant gap identified except for the 134’ foot tower proposed here. One of them, the second best, although it wasn’t, would have needed a 178’ foot tower and still would not have provided the coverage needed, and, more importantly, the other sites would have been much closer to residential houses. Mr. Johnson agreed, saying that it's probably fair to summarize that the technical level of performance would not be very good, even though the coverage might be able to be provided to some extent. But it just wouldn't be a good site, and multiple towers throughout the community to address the need where one tower will do is counterintuitive. Public Hearing - Mr. Squires opened the public hearing. Daniel Siev spoke, saying that he lives right there on Slaterville Road and he will see this tower from his house. He was thankful that the community was speaking up and said that they do not want to see this tower erected, and they do not like the height and the fact that once it is up, attachments will make it even larger. It will be an eyesore, contrary to what the applicant is saying, and it will affect his property value. He felt that they could keep looking for a different location and he felt that if it gets denied here, there is no doubt they would find another location. He asked the board to listen to this community that has come out in strong opposition to this installation. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 7 Brit spoke, saying that she has served on many boards and committees and appreciates the time and attention this Board is spending on this topic and urged them to deny this variance. She said it was important to talk about the last Planning Board meeting where the Chair of that board was bullying people to vote for the project. He said, “I’m concerned right now that members of this Board are trying to find reasons to say no when the answer is yes.” and proceeded to take a straw poll and asked other members to state why they were opposed and after seeing how many were opposed, he worked off of the draft resolution to approve it rather than the one to deny it. She said she asked a Board member after the vote if they had approved of the tower and he told me no, that was just for landscaping, so they didn’t even know what they were doing. She said she believes the gap can be filled with small cells and she has no issues with her service. She is a nanny, and she drives all around the area and the only place is the dip in Burns Rd and that could be solved by a small tower. She turned to the Code and said that it requires that the Board grant the least intrusive remedy, and this is definitely not that. She said she doesn’t understand the data they are putting forward to prove a gap. Our home values will do down and this is a conservation area and definitely doesn’t fit the area. This is the last thing that Ithaca needs. We are at a point legally where the FCC and the telecommunications industry have yet to prove their outdated safety limits from 1996 are safe in court. The FCC lost in court in 2021, and the Appeals Court because the FCC didn’t “record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the commission’s current limits may cause negative health effect unrelated to caner,” and the agency demonstrated a “complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental concerns caused by RF radiation. The report found that the FCC ignored numerous organizations’ scientists and medical doctors who called on them to update the limits and found that the FF failed to address the issues of impacts of long-term wireless exposure impacts to children.” The testimony by people injured by wireless radiation impacts and impacts to the wildlife and environment has yet to be addressed. She said she knows we are not supposed to take health concerns into account, however, the safety limits in place are being shown to be inadequate in court right now. A member of the public spoke in person. Her interpretation of the need for the cell tower is for people driving on Route 79. She works from home and has no problem with service. She described a small cell tower as a low tower cellular base station that covers a much smaller area compared to a large cell tower. She goes on to describe that these small cell towers are placed all over cities where there are many obstructions to the signal. She is skeptical of the claims that a small cell tower would not work in the case although she admits she is not in the field. She mentions the subjective nature of undue burden. She states that most trees in the area are about 40 feet tall, a small cell tower 50 feet tall would be able to clear any tree obstructions to provide signal. It doesn’t make sense to her to put a tower in a conservation zone. She also claims the ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 8 applicant has not shown that a small cell tower would not give adequate coverage. She would like proof that the large cell tower is absolutely necessary. She says that a company that makes 33 billion per quarter, it should not be an undue burden to research more than just 12 alternate sites for this tower. Bob Babjak spoke via zoom. He began by mentioning his is the closest house to this tower on Wiedmaier Court. He thinks the tower should be denied for several reasons. Reason one: Town Code chapter 270-219 states that the bar for approval is the least intrusive means. He refers to what Professor Johnson stated in this meeting that although not the most effective, small cells would be a viable way to fill the gap in coverage. He argues that the Town Code says the least intrusive means, not the most effective. A tower 134 feet in height at the apex of the canopy around 30 and 40 feet tall would be over 100 feet higher than anything within a 100 foot radius of the surrounding area. This is completely out of character with the surrounding area. The viable alternative (small cells along Route 79)will not be as effective but will fill that gap in a much less intrusive way. He would like the ZBA to follow the Town Code and deny the tower in favor of a less intrusive solution. A member of the public spoke via Zoom. She spoke regarding the site itself. She noticed that the tower would be very close to residences on Wiedmaier Court. The alternative plots of land were large enough to put the tower father away from the residences. Using an alternative site would still have the tower be significantly above the area clutter and be seen but it would not be as intrusive, and it would not be in a conservation zone. She would like to see a balance between slightly less coverage but have the tower not be in a conservation zone. Andrew Molnar spoke via Zoom. He expounded on Daniel Siev’s comment. A 2012 federal law allows Verizon to increase the height of an approved tower by 15%. This tower could be as high as 158 feet. He states that Verizon’s claim that denying the tower would be effective prohibition is false. They have not shown any proof that this tower is the least intrusive means to fill the gap in coverage. When Susan Brock pressed them on this prohibition claim the Verizon representatives stated out of the 12 options we looked at this large tower is the least intrusive means to fulfill their project goals. No one from Verizon could explicitly say that this is the least intrusive means to fulfill the gap in coverage. He states that Verizon continues to use evasive language. They never explicitly said that small cells could not fulfill the coverage gap. He believes Verizon’s obfuscation is misleading and has never shown that small cells would not fulfill the needs of the coverage gap. He mentioned their claim that small cells could not go through the tree foliage and other objects only are true for high frequencies. Mid to low band frequencies can penetrate those obstructions just fine. A majority of the Planning Board indicated in a straw poll that they wanted to deny the tower. He believes Verizon’s misleading statements caused the Plannng Board to change their mind and vote yes. He would like the ZBA to vote no. Robert Berg, attorney retained by Ithacans for Responsible Technology spoke via zoom. He specializes in representing citizens who oppose the inappropriate sighting of cell towers and other wireless facilities. He stated at the Planning Board meeting last week he was not allowed to speak even though new evidence was presented from Verizon. He would like to question Mr. Johnson, Mr. Sharief and Mr. Lusk to create a public record for this evidentiary proceeding. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 9 Susan Brock explained this is a public hearing not an evidentiary proceeding. She continued that he is welcome to ask questions of the board or Verizon he is welcome to ask those questions. Questions: 1) For Mr. Lusk: Has he prepared any small cell analysis for Highway 79 showing the actual gap in coverage. How have they demonstrated there is a gap and how long is the gap. Is there any analysis for placing small cells on the existing utility poles to alleviate that gap in coverage and at what distances these small cells need to be. He states they have not provided this information. He would like this study done for Route 79 and other roadways where this a gap in coverage. He would also like Mr. Johnson to do his own analysis of whether putting small cells along the route can be a less intrusive solution. 2) For Mr. Lusk: Regarding alternate site selection. What are the dimensions of the search area. He believes the search area was contrived to be as small as possible so that the only available site turns out to be the site on Wiedmaier Court. He would like to know how they determine the dimensions of the search area and what is the basis for doing so. Also why the search area could not be expanded to include other sites. He states that Verizon sent out letters to the property owners and the property owners did not respond so they wrote off the site. What other efforts were made to contact those landowners at alternative sites. He continues to state that Verizon has the burden of proof that there is a gap in coverage and that this is the least intrusive site and way to meet all of the criteria. He believes the board is not asking the right questions and he would like to ask the right questions. His 3 minute time expired and he wanted noted for the record his objection that this whole proceeding has not allowed the residents to actually have their lawyer cross-examine the witnesses and ask all the questions I’d like since this is an evidentiary proceeding. Marie Skweir spoke via Zoom. See written comments submitted. She states that we do not need a tower this height and size to remedy a small gap in service. There are less intrusive ways via shorter cells and small cells to fill the gap in service without the aesthetic intrusion of such a monstrosity in our beautiful area. If you consider smaller cells you open up other site locations. The previously rejected sites could be use for a smaller cell tower. Verizon has refused to consider the less intrusive options because it does not fulfil their project goals. Not fulfilling coverage goals does not mean they cannot fill the coverage gap. She believes the language is not clear. The maps provided are predictive maps not hard data. The way she sees it the only beneficiary of such a large tower is Verizon. She believes the larger tower will Verizon to add multiple antennas for multiple carries for which Verizon collect rent. She believes a large tower would be an eyesore. She is concerned that Verzion gains at citizen costs. There is no added benefit to the town, is a blight and is not necessary to remedy the gap. If the board votes yes, she would like the board to specifically state their reasons for voting yes. Stephanie Preising spoke via Zoom. She lives very close to the proposed tower site. She states that no one has spoken out in favor of the tower. She continues to say that the ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 10 citizenry has come out in favor of small cells instead. The only people that want this tower are people profiting from in aka Verizon. They are not part of the community and any money that they will make will be funneled out of the community. She feels that it has been made very clear that the public is against this tower and they want a denial of the height variance. Jenn Feingold spoke via Zoom. She read an article from the Cornell Chronicle that was published September 21, 1999 by Roger Segelken entitled “ Birds vs. Towers: Ornithologists fear growth of communications industry” https://news.cornell.edu/stories/1999/09/communications-towers-killing- birds#:~:text=%22The%20more%20towers%2C%20the%20more,Avian%20Mortality%20a t%20Communications%20Towers.%22 Public Hearing Closed. SEQR ZBAA-24-18 SEQR 111 Wiedmaier Ct., TP 56.-4-1.22, Conservation Zone Resolved that this Board makes a negative determination of environmental impact based upon the information in Part 1 and for the reasons stated in Parts 2 & 3 of the assessment form. Moved: David Squires Seconded: Connor Terry Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Jung, Minnig, and Ritter Determination on Height Variance for Verizon Cell Tower Discussion: Connor Terry asked Bill Johnson whether small cell technology would be a feasible alternative to the large cell tower. Bill Johnson answered that from a technical point of view small cells work in a city because they can handle a lot of capacity but in a very small area. The Town of Ithaca is not a city and has a lot of rolling terrain and vegetation. Small cells are made to serve the immediate sidewalk and roadway areas. To get over the tops of the terrain and foliage you need elevated antennas to accommodate that. The claim by a member of the public that that signals propagate just fine through trees at low band and midband is categorically incorrect. You lose approximately 75% of power for each tree canopy you go through. Technically you can cover the area with a multitude of small cells yes, but it is not practical to do so. The string of small cells could go offline when a tree falls across the top of the cables or during a power outage and people can’t make emergency phone calls. A lot of people no longer have landlines and rely exclusively on wireless communications. It’s technically feasible but not practically feasible. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 11 Connor Terry asked Mr. Lusk the Verizon representative if he has an mapping to show what coverage would look like if small cells were used. Mr. Lusk responded that a map was not prepared because small cells are not an appropriate design for the coverage area. Verizon would like to cover more than just a highway. They want to cover trails, roads and inside people’s homes. Where small cells are appropriate they are used. There are several sites in the area where small cells are used but it is not appropriate for the amount of coverage they need. Therefore they have not prepared a map. He stressed that this is the least intrusive and only available location to deliver coverage to the area. Mr. Terry goes on to say that the public appear to be in acceptance of small cell technology. Verizon has not provided any evidence that small cells would not work. Mr. Johnson says it would not be practical. He summarized that the board is voting on the height of the tower and feels that a taller tower will be able to spread coverage over the area. However, how many people will this tower serve? The area is rural with not many people. The extra coverage the tower will provide is in areas that are not populated. The height of the tower seems reasonable to increase coverage, but he is not convinced it will serve anyone that does not already have coverage. He is unconvinced that you need perfect 5g coverage in the woods or at the reservoir. He also goes on to say the viewshed is important in this part of the Town. The tower being built does not belong in a conservation zone. Chris Jung spoke about the wealth of beauty in the conservation zone. She believes that this tower is substantially in the viewshed. She believes her responsibility is to the people of the Town of Ithaca and there are many unhappy people regarding this project. Susan Brock asked Marty Mosely how many people live in the area and how many people pass through the area. CJ Randall acquired DOT information to answer that question. On Burns road between Coddington Road and New York State 79 Sees between 2300 and 2400 cars per day. State Road 79 between Brooktondale Road and Pine Tree Road sees between 8000 -9000 cars per day. This is data collected between 2019 and 2023. The area is fairly sparsely populated, but no solid numbers can be determined. Discussion surrounding the dropped connection data ensued. Verizon provided information regarding 11.84% of dropped calls. Using rough math, it was determined that approximately 80,000 total calls were attempted and approximately 8,000 were ineffective during the time period of July 16 through July 31, 2024. Connor Terry stated that some of those calls were made on trails where he does not believe consistent cell service is necessary. If cell service is inconsistent going through the tree canopy the new tower will not help someone on a trail. Verizon responded that if you are out on a trail and break your ankle and need to make a call it is important to have consistent service on a trail. If you are in one of those homes within the gap of coverage and do not have a landline, you would not be able to make calls to emergency services when necessary. Verizon has an obligation to provide coverage to the entire coverage area, not just the populated areas. Bill Johnson explained that it’s not just the foliage it is also the terrain that a signal has to overcome. When the signal hits the top of the trees the signal defracts and dives towards the ground. If you are going parallel through the trees you will lose 75% of the power for every canopy. It makes the signal practically unusable by tree 4. Having the signal ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 12 higher will help the signal cut through the canopy and get to those areas where the terrain is challenging. Susan Brock asked Verizon to explain their license with the Federal Communications Commission and what does that means. Mr. Johnson explained that spectrum is a limited resource, and the FCC allocates that resource by giving out licenses. More recently they have been selling those licenses at auction. Those licenses purchased from the FCC allow systems to be built so that spectrum could be used for the purposes that the US Congress designated. This purpose is to have ubiquitous wireless service coverage. If Verizon were not able or unwilling to fulfill that purpose they would be in violation of that agreement. The FCC looks to see how well wireless providers cover their areas. The FCC has sent out independent teams in the past to determine if certain areas were being served properly. He states that the demand is consumer driven which is driving the FCC to make sure the infrastructure is there. Low frequency band is the bandwidth the very first cell phones used. Once technology advanced a midband spectrum was allocated to handle all the subscribers that were wanting to get online. Verizon does not have midband coverage in this gap area. Midband spectrum is 90% of their usable licensed bandwidth. The other 10% is lowband. There is adequate coverage at lowband for Route 79. His interpretation of town code that as long as there is adequate coverage at lowband you don’t get to use a different frequency because you want to. He stated that there was an over interpretation on his part. He further explains that 90% of the bandwidth that Verizon has a license to is not on the map in this coverage area. This is referenced in Exhibit H pages 19-22. Connor Terry reiterated that the coverage Verizon would obtain with such a large tower is excessive for the area it services. Mr. Lusk explained that the coverage currently provided to residents along route 79 is not adequate for people in their houses. Discussion ensued regarding how the height of the tower impacts the coverage area. Wasif went on to explain how the applicant arrived at the 130 foot minimum height. Page 24-25 exhibit H was discussed. It is the shortest tower that would maximize the coverage in the targeted area required. Evidence was shown both utilizing the coverage maps provided and google earth images. Clarification questions were asked by the board. Discussion whether a 110 foot tower would be adequate to cover the targeted areas. Connor Terry would like coverage map for 90 feet, 70 feet and 50 feet to see how coverage changes at different tower heights. He would like to grant the minimum height necessary to cover the gap in coverage. Minimize the impact on the view shed and maximize coverage area. The applicant agreed to provide more specificity justifying the 130 foot tower as long as the board agrees to extend the shot clock. Agreement to reconvene at the December 16th meeting. Information from the applicant will be provided showing 20 foot coverage increments from 130 foot tower down to a 70 foot tower in an overlay map. The board would also like dot data of the number of cars that travel down additional roads in the area. Further board discussion resulted in a confidence of a vote at the next meeting after additional information is provided. Matthew Minnig would like clarification if the tower would be camouflaged as a pine tree. The monopole would not be camouflaged. The tower could also be a co-locating tower where other carriers could use it. Camouflaging the tower would prevent that. ZBA 2024-11-26 Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 13 Determination Resolved that this board agrees to extend the shot clock through December 16th, 2024. Motion: David Squires Second: Connor Terry Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Jung, Minnig, and Ritter Jarrod Lusk also agreed to the waiver. Susan Brock explained to the board the rules surrounding effective prohibition and the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Other Business Resolved the board approve thes 2025 meeting schedule. Moved: Connor Terry Seconded: Chris Jung Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Jung, Minnig, and Ritter Meeting Adjourned at 10:02 pm. Submitted by Monica Moll, Deputy Town Clerk ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 1 TOWN OF ITHACA Zoning Board of Appeals December 16, 2024 Minutes Present: Board Members David Squires, Chair; Chris Jung, Connor Terry, Kim Ritter, and Matthew Minnig Marty Moseley, Director of Code Enforcement; Paulette Rosa, Town Clerk; and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Mr. Squires opened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct., Ithaca, NY, 14850; Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent; Requesting Extension of “Shot Clock” from December 16, 2024 until January 28, 2025 meeting of the ZBA. The Applicant would like more time to provide the information the ZBA requested in the November 26, 2024 meeting. Motion to extend the shot clock to January 28,2025. Moved: David Squires Seconded: Chris Jung Vote: Ayes - David Squires, Chair; Chris Jung, Connor Terry, Kim Ritter, Matthew Minnig ZBAA-24-29 Appeal of LaTourelle Partners LLC, owner of 1150 Danby Rd., Jason Sidle Applicant/Agent, Special Land District No.1/MDR, TP 36.-1-4.5 seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code sections 270-68C (Permitted accessory buildings and uses) and 270- 71E(2) (Accessory buildings) to be permitted to place an accessory building in the side and front yards where they are not permitted and the aggregate total of accessory buildings is exceeded. Mr. Sidle explained that the request is to allow the 5 existing accessory buildings on the property where only 3 are allowed. The fact that the gazebos were not permitted was discovered during a site visit after the October variance for the additional she. The gazebos will remain where they are with substantially the same footprints and the storage building be sized and placed substantially as shown in the application materials of October 22, 2024. Public hearing Mr. Squires opened the public hearing; there was no one wishing to speak and the hearing was closed. ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 2 Determination ZBAA-24-29 Area Variance 1150 Danby Road Special Land District 1, MDR, TP 36.-1-4.5 Resolved that this Board grants the appeal of appeal of LaTourelle Partners LLC, owner of 1150 Danby Rd., Special Land District No.1/MDR, TP 36.-1-4.5 seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code sections 270-68C (Permitted accessory buildings and uses) and 270-71E(2) (Accessory buildings) to be permitted to place an accessory buildings in the side and front yards where they are not permitted and the aggregate total of accessory buildings is exceeded, with the following Conditions 1. That the accessory buildings will be placed/remain as depicted in the application materials submitted, and in the same general footprint and with the following Findings That the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community is outweighed by the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve, specifically 1. That there will not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood given that 4 of the 5 buildings have been in existence for many years and some are shielded from view by the L shape of the building and it is a 15 acre parcel with only one building visible from the road, and 2. That the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be achieved by any other feasible means given the need is for storage close to the building and not interfering with space for hosted events and the building is L shaped and the open areas are used for events, the gazebos align with the size of the 54 room hotel and they are heavily used and located for maximum views of the natural area, and 3. That the request is substantial in that 3 accessory buildings are allowed and the applicant will have 5, 1 new storage shed and 4 existing gazebos, and 4. That there will not be any adverse environmental effects as no SEQR is required, and 5. That the difficulty is self-created in that the applicant desires 2 more accessory structures and some of these structures are placed in areas that are not allowed by zoning, however the balance of the benefits of the applicant outweighs any detriment to the health and welfare of the community. Moved: David Squires Seconded: Larry Sallinger Vote: Ayes - Squires, Jung, Terry, Ritter, Minnig ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 3 ZBAA-24-30 Appeal of James and Patrica Maybee, owners of 805 Coddington Rd., Ithaca, NY, 14850; are seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-223 (Fences and walls; retaining walls). Town of Ithaca Code section 270-223 allows a maximum fence height of 6’, where the applicant is seeking an area variance to exceed 6’ in height. The property is located in Low-Density Residential Zone, Tax Parcel No. 48.-1-14.5. Marty Mosely addressed the board. He explained the applicant received a building permit from the Codes Department in error. They built the fence with what they thought was a valid permit. It was not anything the applicant did or was aware of until I made a trip to their house to discuss it with them. They proceeded thinking it was legal to erect the fence as provided in the packet. Susan Brock addressed the board stating the application and the permit does say an 8 foot high fence. The permit was issued in 2022. The applicant proceeded to build the fence pursuant to what they thought was the authority the building permit gave them. When a municipal staff member makes a mistake there is a principle that says no estople against the government. Meaning the applicant cannot just work outside the law because a mistake was made by the government. The remedy for this is for the applicant to apply for a variance. Public hearing opened. No public comment. Public hearing closed. Chris Jung would like a reason behind the decision for the applicant to build an 8 foot fence. The applicant explained they originally wanted to build a 6 foot fence. It was to shield the view of a neighbor’s pool built close to the property line. The applicant tried to plant trees twice with the trees dying both times. With the slope of the land the applicant would still see the pool with a 6 foot fence, and so 8 feet is needed. No one told us the good side of the fence had to be facing the neighbor, and it was being built then, stopped and redesigned to be appealing on both sides, we stain both sides and put mulch on both sides, and more on our side. We maintain and try to beautify the fence with stain and plants. Pictures were shown of the property and the topography that necessitated the 8 foot fence. Public Hearing Mr. Squires opened the public hearing, there was no one wishing to speak, and the hearing was closed. Determination Chris Jung was worried about setting a precedent with the approval of the 8 foot fence. She recalled a denied decision for a property that also wanted an 8 foot fence. That case was running along the entire length of the property and highly visible. This one is between the two houses. Dave Squires said he did a site visited and it didn’t look high at all. Matthew stated the fence follows the house and Kim said the slope is needed as even at 6 feet it would not provide a shield. ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 4 ZBAA-24-30 Area Variance 805 Coddington Rd. LDR, TP 48.-1-14.5 Resolved that this Board grants the appeal of James and Patrica Maybee, owners of 805 Coddington Rd., seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-223 (Fences and walls; retaining walls) to retain an 8’ foot fence where 6’ feet is the maximum height, with the following Conditions That the fence does not increase in height or length and remain as constructed, and with the following Findings That the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve outweighs any detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, specifically 1. That there will not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood or to nearby properties given the fence is aesthetically pleasing, well maintained, on one side of the property and the grade of the property mitigates the visual impact of the additional height, and 2. That the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be achieved by any other means feasible, given the slope of the property requires the additional height to shield the view of the neighboring property and the applicants had tried planting foliage and shrubbery that did not survive, and 3. That the request is substantial in that 2’ feet higher is approximately 37% higher than permitted, and 4. That the difficulty is self-created in that wish is to shield the neighbor’s property and the fence was installed at the higher height after the Town issued a permit in error and the applicant based the construction of the fence on the issued permit, and 5. That there will not be any environmental impacts as no SEQR is required. Motion: Dave Squires Seconded: Matthew Minning Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Ritter, Minnig Nay –Jung ZBAA-24-31 Appeal of Michael Gladis, owner of 213 King Rd. East., Ithaca, NY, 14850; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-60F (Yard regulations). Town of Ithaca Code section 270-60F requires all garages, in aggregate, to not exceed a footprint of 780 sq.ft in size and requires a side yard setback of 40’, except that a one story garage can be ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 5 located 15’ from a side yard property boundary line in one of the side yards, where the applicant is proposing to have all garages, in aggregate, exceed the maximum allowed footprint for the zoning district and proposing to construct one of the garages (in one of the side yards), within the required 40’ side yard setback. The property is located in the Low- Density Residential Zone, Tax Parcel No. 45.-2-3. Ryan Rutledge, agent spoke for the applicant. The property was shown via google maps. The applicant would like to build two carports, one carport will be built at the top of the hill. There is a significant slope of the driveway and is where wheelchair access is for the applicant’s wife. There is an existing garage that was built in 1960 and is too small to fit modern cars. There is also an existing pole barn that was originally on a separate parcel but was combined with this parcel in 1995.This barn is being classified as an accessory building and counted in the aggregate buildings. These two carports are needs for the applicant. The 4 runner and the truck need to be covered for the wheelchair bound applicant’s wife. The only way to get to the lower driveway is steep grade or stairs. The carports will match the house in color and materials. These would give them a garage. The top of the property is the only flat area. The existing garage is being used by the tenant as it is very small. The heating unit to the house is also located in the existing garage which makes the parking footprint smaller. The pole barn appears to have been built for larger equipment vehicles like tractors. The lot is twice the size of neighboring lots and the second carport would not be seen from the road. If the pole barn was not considered a garage the applicant is only asking for 228 square foot variance above what is currently allowed. If the pole barn is counted the variance is 728 feet above what is currently allowed. Two carports are desired. The lower carport in the front of the house is for the tenant and the higher carport is for handicap accessible parking for their 4 runner and pickup truck. The lower carport would provide the tenant with a safe place to park their car in the winter. It would be in the front of the house but would be black to blend in with the foundation. The pole barn is 350 feet from the house and not being used as a garage. Public hearing Mr. Squires opened the public hearing, there was no one wishing to speak and the hearing was closed. Determination Matthew Minning asked the applicant what the pole barn structure is currently being used for. The applicant answered storage of yard equipment. It was initially built when the two properties were separate parcels. There was no permit initially granted for the pole barn. The pole barn was never built as a garage for this property. Pictures were shown of the property. The applicant stressed the need for the upper carport to make the property accessible for the wheelchair. ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 6 Chris Jung wanted a visual with the carport locations. It was explained that the upper carport would be on the driveway at the base of the handicap ramp. It will be a drive through carport. Discussion ensued regarding the size of the current garage and parking in the lower proposed carport. Further discussion regarding the deficiencies of the carport with regard to placement and lot setbacks. ZBAA-24-31 Area Variance 213 King Rd. East TP 45.-2-3., LDR Resolved that this Board grants the appeal of Michael Gladis, owner of 213 King Rd. East., seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-60F (Yard regulations) to be permitted to install two carports that exceed the maximum allowed zoning limit for garages of 780 square feet by 704 square feet by building 2 carports totaling 756 square feet. One of the carports would be within the 40 foot setback from the side lot line, with the following Conditions 1. That the carports be constructed substantially as shown in the building permits and described at the meeting tonight and located substantially as shown and described, and with the following Findings That the benefit the applicant wishes to achieve outweighs any detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community, specifically 1. That there will not be an undesirable change to the neighborhood or to nearby properties in that the front carport is compatible with the existing house and color, no excavation needed, and the car port in the rear will be substantially screened by vegetation and the topography of the rear of the property, and 2. That the benefit sought is a garage located in the front that will fit modern cars and cannot be achieved by any other means feasible given the slope and the configuration of the current garage and the requested placement with the elevation changes having a carport will allow for grip in winter conditions. The second carport at the back is the logical location for a garage for the upper unit and it is the only flat location. It is in proximity of the entrance to the unit and will be handicap accessible, and 3. That the request is substantial as the garages are limited to 756 square feet and the total is 704 square feet over what is permitted and will encroach in the 40’ foot side yard setback, and ZBA 2024-12-16 (Filed 2/14/2025) Pg. 7 4. That there will not be any environmental impacts as this is Type 2 under SEQR, and 5. That the hardship is not self-created in that the existing detached garage was not built to serve the house and built as a farm building on a separate parcel. This is a unique situation in that the structure was not built to function as a garage on the existing parcel, and the existing attached garage is not functioning as a garage. Moved: David Squires Second: Kim Ritter Vote: Ayes – Squires, Terry, Ritter, Jung Nay –Minnig Recommendation of ZBA Chairperson 2025 to the Town Board David Squires will not be renewing his board membership. Although not present, Connor Terry, Vice Chair was willing to step into the chair position. Motion to recommend Connor Terry to the Town Board to be the Chair of the ZBA in 2025. Moved: Kim Ritter Second: David Squires Vote: Ayes - Squires, Terry, Ritter, Jung, Minning Other Business Letter from a Town Resident regarding the Town expert Bill Johnson. The letter indicated Mr. Johnson was biased in favor of Verizon and may have a conflict of interest. This was based on Mr. Johnson’s LinkedIn page where a comment from a Verizon attorney Jard Lusk gave him a good review. The resident stated that this shows a previous relationship between Mr. Johnson and Verizon. Mr. Johnson wrote a response to the letter. He has advised the Town on the 5 Mile Drive cell tower and also the Town of Ontario where a tower was denied. Susan Brock sees no conflict of interest with Mr. Johnson and Verizon. Larry Sallinger says he can evaluate the comments and formulate an opinion of the voracity of what he saying within the situation. Matthew Minning feels comfortable with the expert. He uses the expert’s opinion to provide understanding not to formulate his decision. He does not see a bias. David Squires stated that he enjoyed serving on the board. It has been interesting and educational. A resolution of appreciation was read by Marty Moseley. Meeting adjourned at 8:09pm Submitted by Monica Moll, Deputy Town Clerk Town of Ithaca November 19, 2024 ZBAA-24-18 Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application Status: Active Submitted On: 5/29/2024 Primary Location 111 Wiedmaier Ct Unit S Roberts WC Land LLC Ithaca, NY 14850 Owner S Roberts WC Land LLC 1129 Avenida Sevilla 5C Walnut Creek, CA 9459 5 Applicant Jared Lusk 585-263-1140 jlusk@nixonpeabody.com 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604 Internal Only-Review Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Is Planning Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is Engineering Dept. Approval Required? Yes Is a GML-239 Review Required? Yes GML-239 Reason for Review* The right of way of any existing or proposed county or state road Type of Variance Area Variance Appearance Date for Variance 11/26/24 Variance Code Language ZBAA-24-18 Appeal of S Roberts WC Land LLC, owner of 111 Wiedmaier Ct., Ithaca, NY, 14850; Jared Lusk, Applicant/Agent; is seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code sec on 270-16 (Height limita ons). TownofIthacaCode270-16 requires a maximum height of 30’ for all nonagricultural structures, where the proposed personal wireless service facility tower/structure would exceed the 30’ maximum height requirements. The current property is located in the Conserva on Zone Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Variance Code Section 270-16 Internal Tasks to be Completed Meeting Result (First Appearance)Materials For GML-239 Were Sent 09/26/2024 Deadline for Hearing Notice to Journal 11/14/24 Public Hearing Notice Was Sent 11/15/2024 Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent 11/18/2024 Date Sign Was Picked-up Material Packets Sent to ZBA Members Historical Only Address affiliated with request Status Applicant's Information Applicant is* Owner's Agent Is the primary point of contact for application different than the applicant?* No If the applicant is NOT the owner, a letter/email from owner designating the applicant as agent or a copy of the contract with owner's signature will need to be provided. Description Brief Description of Variance Request* Height variance. Area Variance Criteria Form 1. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 2. Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 3. Is the requested variance substantial?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 4. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. 5. Is the alleged difficulty self-created?* No Reasons: See Exhibit G. Affidavit The UNDERSIGNED respectfully submit this application requesting an appearance before the Zoning Board of Appeals. By filing this application, I grant permission for members of The Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals or Town staff to enter my property for any inspection(s) necessary that are in connection with my application. I acknowledge, that completed applications are scheduled on a first-come first-serve basis and that all documents ideally be submitted forty-five (45) days advance of the proposed meeting date, together with the required application fee. Failure to do so may result in a delay in my hearing. Digital Signature* Jared C. Lusk May 29, 2024 Meeting Date 11/26/2024 PAYMENT INFORMATION After submission, Code Department Administration will review the application and materials provided. After review, and email with instructions for paying the fee online with credit card or E-check will be sent to the applicant. If it is preferred to pay by check, cash or money order: Mail to Code Enforcement, Town Hall 215 N. Tioga St, Ithaca, NY 14850 Drop off during business hours to Town Hall M-F 8-4 Place in locked box next to the door on the Buffalo St side of Town Hall Attachments Ithaca Letter.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM Determination/Denial Letter SunnyView_ZDFinal_20240220.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:04 PM EAF.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:06 PM Lease.pdf Uploaded by Jared Lusk on May 29, 2024 at 5:07 PM Exibit A-J.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Exibit Y.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Exibit K-X.pdf Uploaded by Marty Moseley on May 31, 2024 at 9:00 AM Second Letter 111 Wiedmaier Court-missing materials final.pdf Uploaded by Abby Homer on Jun 7, 2024 at 11:45 AM General Municipal Law (GML) 239 Planning and Zonin-14.pdf Uploaded by Lori Kofoid on Sep 26, 2024 at 1:33 PM ZBA - Wiedmaier cell tower Full EAF All parts and memo.pdf Uploaded by Chris Balestra (she/her) on Nov 6, 2024 at 2:09 PM History Date Activity 11/19/2024, 8:44:38 AM Lori Kofoid changed form field entry Neighbor Notification Letters Were Sent from "" to "11/18/2024" on Record ZBAA-24-18 11/19/2024, 8:44:38 AM Lori Kofoid changed form field entry Public Hearing Notice Was Sent from "" to 11/15/2024" on Record ZBAA-24-18 Survey and/or Plans Environmental Assessment Form Letter or Email of Authorization Exibit A-J.pdf Exibit Y.pdf Exibit K-X.pdf Second Letter 111 Wiedmaier Court-missing materials final.pdf General Municipal Law (GML) 239 Planning and Zonin-14.pdf ZBA - Wiedmaier cell tower Full EAF All parts and memo.pdf 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Uploaded to Town of Ithaca OpenGov online submission system, sent via E-mail to jlusk@nixonpeabody.com, and via U.S. Mail on Friday, June 7, 2024 June 7, 2024 Mr. Jared C. Lusk, Esq. Nixon Peabody, LLP – Attorneys for Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, NY 14604-1792 Dear Mr. Lusk, On Thursday, May 30, 2024, the Town of Ithaca (“Town”) received additional application materials related to the construction of a proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22, via the Town of Ithaca OpenGov online submission system and via Federal Express. Pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) regulation at 47 CFR § 1.6003 defining the presumptive “reasonable period of time” provision in 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(ii) for municipalities to act on siting applications, and Town Code §270-219. E (7), the Town is hereby notifying you in writing within 10 days of the Town’s receipt of the additional application materials that the application is still incomplete. The relevant shot clock is therefore tolled until the following materials are provided and the Town determines that the application is complete: 1. Evidence that a significant gap in coverage exists (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (s) [2]) – Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The Town Code requires in-kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include each frequency, in table format: a. The date and time for the test, b. The location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded, c. Each signal strength recorded, measured in decibel milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. 2. Dropped call records (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (s) [4]) – Exhibit V acknowledges the following application requirement, but none of the submittals provide the required material. The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, 2 percentage, and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. 3. Economic analysis study (Town Code §270-219.G (2) (v)) – Exhibit Y acknowledges the following application requirement, but the economic analysis was not conducted on properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. The Town Code requires the submission of an economic analysis of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF may have on all adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. 4. Insurance requirements (Town Code §270-219. V (1) – Insurance requirements as follows will need to be supplied for the building permit process: 1) Minimum Coverages. Each PWSF Permittee shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a PWSF Permit, an insurance policy, or policies. Such policy or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the Permittee's operations, as follows: a) Commercial Umbrella insurance with limits of not less than $5,000,000, b) Pollution Liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than 1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate, with any deductible not to exceed $25,000 each occurrence. 5. Electrical Permit Application - An electrical permit application needs to be submitted, in addition to the building permit application, at the following link: Code Enforcement & Zoning Department - TOI Electrical Permit Application - ViewPoint Cloud (opengov.com) 6. Town Code Chapter 125-5C requires the following items to be provided in addition to what has already been provided: a. One hard copy set of plans needs to be submitted as part of the process for the building permit, b. A statement that the work shall be performed in compliance with Chapter 270, Zoning, the Uniform Code, the ECCCNYS, the ECS, this chapter, and other applicable state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, c. It appears that the documents were submitted by an engineering firm and not a sole practitioner professional engineer, which requires the firm's certificate of authorization number to be placed on the title block, d. Please provide a statement of special inspections for this project, e. Please provide the building permit fee, when prompted by the permitting system, f. Please provide proof of workers compensation and disability or the proper exemption documentation from the NYS Worked Compensation Board. 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Engineering Comments – The Engineering Department still requires the following information: a. Please fill out a SWPPP application on the Town of Ithaca online permitting system Engineering page, and upload all SWPPP information: https://ithacany.viewpointcloud.com/categories/1080, 3 b. Please include the Construction Sequence/Erosion and Sediment Control Sequence in the construction drawings, c. Please include a contractor certification form certifying compliance with the terms and conditions of the submitted SWPPP. A sample of the form can be found attached (as requested in the SWPPP), d. According to the provided SWPPP, all excess materials from the work will be sent to a state approved solid waste facility. If any of the excess material is spread outside of the limits of disturbance or sent to another site within the Town limits, a revision of the drawings shall be required to be submitted for review. 8. Consultant Escrow Fee (§270-219.Q, §153-2D) – The following minimum consultant escrow fee applies to this Project: $3,000.00, pursuant to Town Code §270-219.Q, which states: 1) The Town, at the expense of the applicant, may employ its own consultants to examine the application and related documentation. The consultants that the Town may retain include, but are not limited to, professional structural and/or electrical engineers, attorneys, and other experts reasonably required by the Town to competently and fully evaluate any application and the resulting construction. Such consultants may be requested, among other matters, to make recommendations as to whether the criteria for granting approvals and permits have been met, including whether the applicant's conclusions regarding a significant gap in coverage, co- location, safety analysis, visual analysis, and structural inspection are valid and supported by generally accepted and reliable engineering and technical data and standards and whether the personal wireless service facility as constructed will be in compliance with the approved plans and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards. (2) To assure sufficient funds are available to the Town to pay for the consultants referred to in the preceding subsection, an applicant shall be required to deposit review fees in escrow, in accordance with the terms of, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Town Board shall set from time to time by resolution the minimum initial escrow deposit for any personal wireless service facility application which anticipates construction of any type of tower exceeding 50 feet. The Town Board set the minimum initial escrow deposit at $3,000 in Town Board Resolution No. 2023-110. The shot clock remains tolled while the application remains incomplete. Please advise whether the Town to place this application on Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals agendas for their considerations and actions while the application remains incomplete. Nothing in this letter shall be construed to waive any application requirements or any consequences of an incomplete application. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require clarification. I can be reached by phone at (607) 273-1721, extension 121 or by email at cbalestra@townithacany.gov. Sincerely, Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Cc: Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Rod Howe, Town of Ithaca Town Supervisor Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Inc. Marty Moseley, Town of Ithaca Director of Code Enforcement C.J. Randall, Town of Ithaca Director of Planning David Squires, Chair, Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Jeffrey Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP Fred T. Wilcox, III, Chair, Town of Ithaca Planning Board PROJECT TITLE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Contractor’s Certification All contractors and subcontractors identified as implementing any erosion control measures shall sign a copy of the following certification statement: I hereby certify that I understand and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the SWPPP and agree to implement any corrective actions identified by the qualified inspector during a site inspection. I also understand that the owner or operator must comply with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) regulations for stormwater discharges from construction activities and that it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards. Furthermore, I understand that certifying false, incorrect or inaccurate information is a violation of the referenced permit and the laws of the State of New York and could subject me to criminal, civil and/or administrative proceedings.” To be completed by president, secretary, treasurer, vice president or any person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the above-listed contracting firm: Name: (Please Print) Title: Firm: Address: Telephone Number: SWPPP Elements Responsible For: Signature: Date: To be completed by the on-site “trained contractor” that will be on site on a daily basis when soil disturbances are being performed: Trained Contractor’s Name: (Please Print) Title: Telephone Number: Site Address: Signature: Date: COMMISSIONER Katherine Borgella DEPUTY COMMISSIONER M. Megan McDonald 121 E. Court St, Ithaca, N.Y. 14850 | Phone: (607) 274-5560 | tompkinscountyny.gov/planning Creating and implementing plans that position Tompkins County communities to thrive. September 30, 2024 Lori Kofoid, Administrative Assistant IV Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga St. Ithaca, NY 14850 Re: Review Pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of New York State General Municipal Law Proposed Action: Area Variance for proposed cell tower located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel #56.-4-1.22, S Roberts WC Land LLC, Owner; Jared Lusk, Applicant. Dear Ms. Kofoid: This letter acknowledges your referral of the proposed action identified above for review by the Tompkins County Department of Planning and Sustainability pursuant to §239 -l, -m and -n of the New York State General Municipal Law. We have determined the proposed action will have no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. We look forward to receiving notification on the final action taken by your municipality within 30 days of decision, as required by State law. Sincerely, Katherine Borgella, AICP Commissioner of Planning and Sustainability PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Board of Appeals Members FROM: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner DATE: October 30, 2024 RE: Verizon Wireless “Sunny View Site” Personal Wireless Service Facility Telecommunications Tower), 111 Wiedmaier Court This memo explains the various requirements and approvals related to the personal wireless service facility located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, off Slaterville Road/NYS Route 79. The proposal involves the construction of a 138' +/- monopole tower (134’ plus 4’ lightning rod at the top) consisting of nine antennas, two equipment cabinets, a generator, and other equipment within a 50' x 50' +/- chain link fenced area. The Planning Board is responsible for considering site plan and special permit approval for the project. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) is responsible for considering a height variance. Other than the height, the proposed tower meets all of the dimensional standards of the town Personal Wireless Service Facility law in the Town Code (§270-219). The project will include minimal lighting for the equipment cabinets, which will be compliant with the town’s Outdoor Lighting Law. Federal Requirements The applicant initiated a building permit application for this project on November 13, 2023, which started a 150-day Federal Shot Clock, per the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii). The Shot Clock, by definition, is the sum of the number of days specified by federal regulation as the presumptively reasonable time for the Town to act on the relevant personal wireless service facility application type, plus the number of days of any applicable tolling period, per 47 CFR 1.6003. The Town Code, §270-219, explains the Shot Clock period, along with the requirements to comply with the regulations. The Town of Ithaca has 150 calendar days (excluding holidays and other days per federal definition) from the date of initial submission to complete the review process associated with the proposed tower. The town issued two letters of “incompleteness” to the applicant dated December 11, 2023, and June 7, 2024. The letters described and requested missing materials from the application. The applicant responded with materials on May 29, 2024 (including a narrative and Exhibits A-Y), and August 7, 2024 (including another narrative and Exhibits Z-EE). The application was deemed complete on August 14, 2024, and was then scheduled for the next available Planning Board meeting. The Planning Board began their review of this project at the October 1, 2024, Planning Board meeting. The Board continued their review on October 29, 2024, where they issued a negative determination of environmental significance and opened and closed the public hearing for the proposed site plan and special permit. The Planning Board will continue their site plan and special permit review on November 19, 2024. Project Location As indicated in the application materials and required by Town Code, the proposed facility will be constructed to support up to four total telecommunications carriers. However, Verizon is the only applicant for this facility and the only carrier that is currently planning to locate antennas on the tower. The area where the proposed cell tower will be located is a 12.3+/- acre vacant property that has been previously disturbed. The parcel was created as a result of the Wiedmaier Court 5-lot residential subdivision that was approved by the Planning Board in December 2003 (please see the FEAF Part 3 attachment for a description of the prior disturbance). The parcel is bordered on the north by woods and Burns Road, on the east by private residences on Wiedmaier Court, on the south by a stream and woods, and on the west by woods. There are no trees or other vegetation to remove to accommodate the tower and associated facilities and access drive. The Planning Bord required a landscape plan to mitigate potential aesthetic impacts of the equipment cabinets and associated facilities. As noted in the enclosed FEAF Part 3 attachment, this area is not listed among the most significant scenic views in the Town of Ithaca or Tompkins County Scenic Resources Inventory lists. Camouflaging the tower to look like an evergreen tree is not recommended, as it will be surrounded by open meadow and will stand out even more, which could potentially increase its visual impact. Finally, there is minor earth removal associated with the development of the concrete pad and gravel access drive, so an erosion and sedimentation control plan for this project (Simple SWPPP) has been submitted and will be approved by the Town Engineering Department. Please call me at (607) 273-1721 or email me at cbalestra@townithacany.gov with any questions regarding this project. Cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Inc. Jared Lusk, Esq., Nixon Peabody, LLP S. Roberts WC Land, LLC Proposed action is site plan, special permit approval by the Planning Board, and a height variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals 111 Wiedmaier s , including a generator on a 4' x 8' concrete pad. TC Planning Dept GML 239 referral mtgs 10/1 & 10/29/24 mtg 11/2024 response rec'd 9/13/2024 46 +/-(per SWPPP) Closest facilities are Coddington Road Community Center (4800+/- feet away), East Ithaca Preschool T. Dryden, 4500+/- feet away), and Ithaca Media Arts (4800+/- feet awaty). There are no hospitals or group homes anywhere near the site. Unnamed stream along eastern property boundary Unregulated by state/federal agencies 18-24 inches Page 1 of 10 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: Review all of the information provided in Part 1. Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, NO YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur E2d 9 9 b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f 9 9 c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. E2a 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons of natural material. D2a 9 9 e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year or in multiple phases. D1e 9 9 f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). D2e, D2q 9 9 g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i 9 9 h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ 9 9 a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. Notes: Please see Part 3 for items checked "yes." Unchecked boxes are "no impact." 4 4 4 Page 2 of 10 2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, NO YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ E2g 9 9 b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: _____________________________________________________ E3c 9 9 c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water NO YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. D2b 9 9 c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from a wetland or water body. D2a 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. E2h 9 9 e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. D2a, D2h 9 9 f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal of water from surface water. D2c 9 9 g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge of wastewater to surface water(s). D2d 9 9 h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. D2e 9 9 i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. E2h 9 9 j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or around any water body. D2q, E2h 9 9 k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, wastewater treatment facilities. D1a, D2d 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 3 of 10 l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________9 9 4.Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or NO YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. D2c 9 9 b.Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ________________________________________________________ D2c 9 9 c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. D1a, D2c 9 9 d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater.D2d, E2l 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. D2c, E1f, E1g, E1h 9 9 f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products over ground water or an aquifer. D2p, E2l 9 9 g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E2l, D2c 9 9 h.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 5.Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding.NO YES See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway.E2i 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain.E2j 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain.E2k 9 9 d.The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. D2b, D2e 9 9 e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding.D2b, E2i, E2j, E2k 9 9 f.If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, or upgrade? E1e 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 4 of 10 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 6.Impacts on Air The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. NO YES See Part 1. D.2.f., D,2,h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) ii.More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) iv.More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2g D2g D2g D2g D2g D2h 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. D2g 9 9 c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. D2f, D2g 9 9 d.The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, above. D2g 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. D2s 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 7.Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.)NO YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a.The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2o 9 9 b.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. E2o 9 9 c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2p 9 9 d.The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. E2p 9 9 4 4 4 Page 5 of 10 e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c 9 9 f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E2n 9 9 g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m 9 9 h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________ E1b 9 9 i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q 9 9 j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) NO YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. E2c, E3b 9 9 b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). E1a, Elb 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. E3b 9 9 d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. E1b, E3a 9 9 e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land management system. El a, E1b 9 9 f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d 9 9 g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. C2c 9 9 h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________ 9 9 4 4 Page 6 of 10 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in NO YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. E3h 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. E3h, C2b 9 9 c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ii. Year round E3h 9 9 9 9 d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E3h E2q, E1c 9 9 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. E3h 9 9 f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed project: 0-1/2 mile 3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile D1a, E1a, D1f, D1g 9 9 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological NO YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on the State or National Register of Historic Places. E3e 9 9 b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. E3f 9 9 c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E3g 9 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 Page 7 of 10 d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 e. If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Yes”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i.The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property. ii.The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or integrity. iii.The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3e, E3g, E3f E3e, E3f, E3g, E1a, E1b E3e, E3f, E3g, E3h, C2, C3 9 9 9 9 9 9 11.Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a NO YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. D2e, E1b E2h, E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource.C2a, E1c, C2c, E2q 9 9 c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area with few such resources. C2a, C2c E1c, E2q 9 9 d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the community as an open space resource. C2c, E1c 9 9 e.Other impacts: _____________________________________________________9 9 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical NO YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d 9 9 c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 4 4 Page 8 of 10 13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems.NO YES See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network.D2j 9 9 b.The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or more vehicles. D2j 9 9 c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access.D2j 9 9 d.The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations.D2j 9 9 e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods.D2j 9 9 f.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy.NO YES See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation.D2k 9 9 b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a commercial or industrial use. D1f, D1q, D2k 9 9 c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity.D2k 9 9 d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square feet of building area when completed. D1g 9 9 e.Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. NO YES See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local regulation. D2m 9 9 b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. D2m, E1d 9 9 c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day.D2o 9 9 4 4 4 4 Page 9 of 10 d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties.D2n 9 9 e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, E1a 9 9 f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________9 9 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure NO YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. Relevant Part I Question(s) No,or small impact may cccur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. E1d 9 9 b.The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation.E1g, E1h 9 9 c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. E1g, E1h 9 9 d.The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). E1g, E1h 9 9 e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. E1g, E1h 9 9 f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. D2t 9 9 g.The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste management facility. D2q, E1f 9 9 h.The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste.D2q, E1f 9 9 i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of solid waste. D2r, D2s 9 9 j.The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1f, E1g E1h 9 9 k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill site to adjacent off site structures. E1f, E1g 9 9 l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the project site. D2s, E1f, D2r 9 9 m.Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ Please See Part 3 4 4 Page 10 of 10 17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. NO YES See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). C2, C3, D1a E1a, E1b 9 9 b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. C2 9 9 c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 9 9 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use plans. C2, C2 9 9 e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. C3, D1c, D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb 9 9 f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. C4, D2c, D2d D2j 9 9 g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or commercial development not included in the proposed action) C2a 9 9 h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ 9 9 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. NO YES See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. E3e, E3f, E3g 9 9 b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire) C4 9 9 c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where there is a shortage of such housing. C2, C3, D1f D1g, E1a 9 9 d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized or designated public resources. C2, E3 9 9 e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. C2, C3 9 9 f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h 9 9 g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ 9 9 4 4 4 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. Attach additional sheets, as needed. Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: Type 1 Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Agency Use Only [IfApplicable] Project : Date : FEAF 2019 4 4 4 4 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED Wiedmaier Court Cell Tower November 26, 2024 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that: A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)). C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Name of Lead Agency: Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Title of Responsible Officer: Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: E-mail: For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html Page 2 of 2 4 Application materials dated 11-23-23, 5-29-24, 8-7-24, 10-22-24, and 10-28-24, containing narratives, reports, drawings, and studies (including Tabs A-GG), site layout drawings, SWPPP, engineering reports and drawings, consultant report dated 9-20-24, revised 10-21-24,and other materials. Verizon Wireless Wiedmaier Court Telecommunications Tower (Personal Wireless Service Facility) None - Uncoordinated review - Planning Board & Zoning Board Caitlin Cameron and David Squires Planning Board Vice Chair and Zoning Board of Appeals Chair Christine Balestra, Senior Planner 10/22/2024 Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Town of Ithaca Planning Department, 215 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 607-273-1721 extension 121 cbalestra@townithacany.gov Town of Ithaca Planning Board & Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals (uncoordinated review) PRINT FULL FORM 1 Part 3 – Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts Verizon Telecommunications Tower State Environmental Quality Review Full Environmental Assessment Form Actions: Site Plan Approval, Special Permit, Height Variance Location: 111 Wiedmaier Court, Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 Decision-Making Bodies: Town of Ithaca Planning Board & Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Description: The proposal involves the construction of a 138 +/- foot tall personal wireless service facility (monopole tower) with nine antennas, two equipment cabinets, a generator, and other equipment within a 50' x 50' +/- chain link fenced area, located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Town of Ithaca Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22. The Planning Board is considering granting Preliminary and Final Site Plan approval and Special Permit for the project. The Zoning Board of Appeals is considering granting a height variance for the project. The proposed actions are Unlisted Actions pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617 State Environmental Quality Review and Chapter 148 of the Town of Ithaca Code (Environmental Quality Review). 1. Impact on Land a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). Briefly describe the impact on land: The project site involves a 12.3+/- acre, previously disturbed, vacant property that was created as a result of the Wiedmaier Court 5-lot residential subdivision that was approved by the Planning Board in December 2003. The parcel is bordered on the north by woods and Burns Road, on the east by private residences on Wiedmaier Court, on the south by a stream and woods, and on the west by woods. Per the FEAF, Part 1, 100% of the property contains slopes of 0-10% and moderately well-drained soils. The applicant has stated that the project will be constructed over a period of approximately two months. The proposal will result in a physical change to the project site with the construction of a 138+/- foot tall monopole telecommunications tower, equipment shelters, generator, and other associated equipment within a 50-foot by 50-foot fenced area. The proposal also involves widening an existing 8- foot wide gravel/grass access drive into a 12-foot wide, 500 +/- foot long gravel driveway that will allow access to the site from the end of Wiedmaier Court. The proposed drive will dead-end in a 15- foot wide gravel parking and turnaround area located immediately adjacent to the tower. The project will result in the physical disturbance of approximately .46+/- acres to accommodate the concrete pad containing the tower, all equipment, and expanded gravel access drive. According to the FEAF Part 1, the project site contains an average depth to water table between 18 and 24 inches. This is a previously disturbed site, with very minimal excavation and earth-moving activity associated with the project. The project is not expected to negatively impact the water table; and any impacts will be mitigated with the erosion and sedimentation control plans described in sections 3-5 below. 2 The area that surrounds the project site is characterized by rural residential development. The proposal will not change the overall character of the area. Impacts to water, air, plants, aesthetics, and other resources will be evaluated in the sections below. 3. Impact on Surface Water h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. 4. Impact on Groundwater h. Other impacts: The EAF Mapper database indicates that there is a principal aquifer near the site. 5. Impact on Flooding d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. Briefly describe the impact on surface water, groundwater, and flooding: The project site is relatively flat and involves minimal grading. There will be some earth-moving activities related to the construction of the concrete pad, tower, and gravel access drive. The application materials state that the proposal will physically disturb .46+/- acres of the 12.3+/- acre project area. The Town of Ithaca Engineering Department has indicated that the project will require a simple Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (Simple SWPPP).The submitted application drawings indicate the construction of silt fencing surrounding the areas of construction (limited to a small portion of the existing cleared area and existing driveway), to help filter stormwater runoff and control site drainage. Related to water quality, the applicant proposes temporary erosion and sedimentation control practices that will control dust and minimize soil tracking and erosion off site. There is a stream that runs along the eastern property boundary that is located approximately 125- 175 feet from the existing cleared areas of the property. There is no anticipated adverse impact on the stream, provided that the proposed erosion controls are installed and properly maintained, and that no additional disturbance occurs past any of the areas marked “approximate location of no disturbance” on the plans. According to the NYS DEC EAF Mapper Program, there is a principal aquifer located near the project site. NYS DEC classifies principal aquifers as "aquifers known to be highly productive or whose geology suggests abundant potential water supply, but which are not intensively used as sources of water supply by major municipal systems at the present time". A review of the USGS Unconsolidated Aquifers in Tompkins County Water-Resources Report (published 2000) indicates that the project site is located within the “Six Mile Creek Valley” aquifer, which encompasses most of the area between Slaterville Road and Coddington Road. The project will not involve significant development that would negatively impact the aquifer. As noted above, the proposal includes very minimal grading, with any impacts to surface water, groundwater, and flooding being mitigated via the installation of sediment and erosion controls. These controls are outlined in the Simple SWPPP that has been submitted and that will be approved by the Town Engineering Department before a building permit is issued for the project. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 3 6. Impacts on Air f. Other impacts: The proposed action will include on-site air emissions, including fuel combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations. The FEAF Part 1, page 6 indicates that the project will utilize construction equipment during construction and a backup generator during operations, both of which are sources of on-site air emissions. However, the use of construction equipment is temporary and will cease once the project is completed (approximately two months). The backup generator is proposed for emergencies and will only operate in the event of an emergency. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 7. Impacts on Plants and Animals: j. Other impacts: The project is located within a Unique Natural Area. The project site is located within the designated Six Mile Creek Valley Unique Natura Area and is zoned Conservation by the town. There are no known endangered or threatened plant or animal species located on or near the site that would be impacted by the proposed tower, concrete pad, or access road. Additionally, there will be no tree cutting associated with the proposal. The proposed tower will be constructed entirely within an existing cleared area; and the existing driveway access will only be widened by four feet to accommodate the proposed use. History of impacts on plants and animals: The project site is “Lot 5” from the Wiedmaier Subdivision, approved by the Planning Board in December 2003. In 2007, the property owner at the time performed extensive earthwork and illegal tree clearing in preparation for a housing site. The clearing was in violation of the subdivision approval and other Town Code provisions. Prior to the earthwork, the site was a mix of thick meadow/brush and evergreen and deciduous trees. Topographically, the site was a hilltop, with steep sloping sides leading to streams on both sides. To create the large level site that currently exists, the property owner removed the hilltop, and spread out the excavated material, creating a large plateau with steep unstabilized sides. The property owner was required by NYS DEC to undertake additional earthwork to soften slopes and install permanent stormwater practices to remediate the site. To correct the subdivision approval violations, the property owner was required to hire a professional landscaper to re-landscape the hillside with a native seed mix and plant approximately 250 trees. The remediation plans also identified a “no disturbance zone” on the filed subdivision plat, to inform all future owners and to insure that this portion of the land would be left in a natural state in perpetuity. There has been no further clearing since the remediation plans were established. Trees and other landscaping were monitored for a period of five years, which was a condition of Planning Board approval. Nearly all of the plantings survived or were replaced. None will be disturbed as part of the proposed project. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 4 9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally ii. Year round d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism based activities Briefly describe the impact on aesthetic resources: The project site is not listed in the Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory or in the Tompkins County Scenic Resources Inventory. It is not in an area that is officially designated as a federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. The project site is located adjacent to residences and is approximately 500-feet from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road. In order to properly assess potential aesthetic and visual impacts, the applicant submitted included a visual analysis “balloon-fly” at the proposed tower height (134ft), along with before and after photo renderings and photo simulations of the tower within the landscape at various viewpoints. The simulations show the balloon inset on each page, followed by a photo showing the tower and another photo showing a camouflaged tower that is made to look like an evergreen tree. The list below includes the specific views in the visual analysis where the tower will be visible: a) P-1/S-1 – Intersection of Wiedmaier Court and NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, looking southwest [tower most visible here] b) P-3/S-3 – Looking west from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, near 1667 Slaterville Road approx. 1550-feet from project site) c) P-4/S-4 – Intersection of Burns Road and NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, looking south d) P-5/S-5 – Looking south from Burns Way e) P-6/S-6 – Looking northeast along Burns Road The visual analysis illustrates that the project will only be visible from adjacent residents, and those traveling along NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road or Burns Road, either recreationally or as part of a daily commute. Other than the South Hill Recreation Way, which will not be impacted by the tower, there are no public parks or recreation trails nearby, so only the adjacent property owners and residents on Wiedmaier Court, Burns Road, and Slaterville Road will see the tower on a consistent basis. At 134-feet tall (plus 4’ lightning rod), the tower will be taller than surrounding trees at full leaf- out. However, in most cases, one will need to deliberately look for the tower in order to see it while commuting in a vehicle. The project will be visible in the winter when the deciduous trees that surround the site have lost their leaves. However, there should be enough coniferous trees to adequately screen the tower from most views. The applicant has proposed additional landscaping around the base of the fenced-in area, to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the ground equipment on adjacent residences. Camouflaging the tower itself to look like an evergreen tree is not recommended, as it will make the tower stand out more than necessary, which could create negative aesthetic impacts. There are no similar projects visible near the proposed project. The two nearest personal wireless service towers are located at least three miles away from the project (Cornell monopole on Dryden 5 Road in the Town of Ithaca, and a tower in the Town of Danby). These facilities can be seen from a number of public and private properties. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 14. Impact on Energy e. Other Impacts: The project will utilize electric power provided by the local utility company. The applicant indicated in the FEAF Part 1 that the project will utilize electric energy that is sourced from the local utility company (NYSEG). According to the application materials, the new tower will result in a minimal increase in electrical power usage. It is unknown if the facility will need to comply with the Town of Ithaca Energy Code. Regardless, impacts associated with energy usage would be considered small in magnitude. 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light f. Other Impacts: The project will create construction noise and will require safety lighting. The applicant indicated in the FEAF Part 1 that the project will create noise during construction. The emergency generator will also create noise impacts when in use. The closest residence will be located approximately 450-feet from the tower once constructed. Noise impacts are expected to be temporary, with the majority ceasing after construction and the generator only operating during emergencies. In terms of lighting impacts, the tower itself does not require or include lighting, pursuant to FAA standards. The project does include a 25W “flood light” that will be mounted around 8-feet high and angled down towards the equipment cabinets in a manner that will comply with the Town Outdoor Lighting Law. The light is a required safety feature and is not expected to create significant adverse impacts on neighboring residences. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 16. Impact on Human Health While there is competing science upon different frequency emissions upon human health, especially for transmitters and receivers located over 150’ in the air, the FCC has wholly occupied this field and preempted federal, state, or local review of this issue (human health effects) when the project meets the minimum guidelines promulgated by the FCC. This application has met those minimum requirements, and further inquiry into alleged or potential health impacts is thus precluded under federal law. Pursuant to Town Code §270-219.Q, the Town of Ithaca hired a consultant team to examine and evaluate the application and related documentation. The consultant team specifically reviewed the electrical RF (radio-frequency) aspects of the project, and, per Town Code, evaluated the RF information provided by the applicant for completeness, consistency, and adequacy. The consultant’s written report dated September 20, 2024, revised October 21, 2024, made the finding that the Applicant provided a Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report (Exhibit P) dated March 14, 2023, 6 and signed by David C. Cotton, P.E., that shows the proposed site will not exceed the FCC General Population limits. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. 18. Consistency with Community Character f. The proposed tower will be inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. As noted above, the proposed tower will be located on a previously disturbed vacant parcel that is surrounded by rural residential development. The proposal will not change the overall character of the area but will be inconsistent with the character of the existing landscape. The tower will be set back from NYS Route 79E/Slaterville Road, with tall trees on all sides, which will mitigate impacts of the facility on the natural landscape. Based on the above information, impacts identified in this section would be considered small in magnitude. Staff Recommendation, Determination of Significance A negative determination of environmental significance is recommended for the action as proposed, based on review of the materials submitted for the proposed action, the information above, and analysis of the magnitude and importance of the project impacts. Decision-Making Body: Town of Ithaca Zoning Board of Appeals Reviewer: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Review Dates: September 24, 2024 & October 22, 2024 NIXON PEABODY Nixon Peabody LLP Jared C. Lusk 1300 Clinton Square Partner Rochester, NY 14604-1792 Attorneys at Law T / 585.263.1140 nixonpeabody.com F / 866.402.1491 VNixonPeabodyLLP jIusk@nixonpeabody.com May 29, 2024 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestra@town.ithaca.nyus) RE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application (the Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' "Shinny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") is a public utility and wireless telecommunications licensee of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). To remedy service inadequacies in and around the Town of Ithaca, Verizon Wireless submits this Application to construct and operate a wireless telecommunications facility (the "Project") at I I I Wiedmaier Court in the Town of Ithaca, New York, Tax Parcel No. 56.-4-1.22 (the "Site"). The Site consists of a 50' x 50' parcel leased from S Roberts WC Land LLC (the Landowner"), The Project would consist of the construction of a 134' monopole tower (with an additional 4' lightning rod) and wireless telecommunications antennas, associated exterior equipment cabinets, together with other site improvements, all as shown on the enclosed site plan prepared by Tectonic Engineering. (the "Site Plan"). The Site is located in the Town's Conservation ("C") zoning district. Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Ithaca (the "Code"), telecommunications facilities are permitted in the C zoning district upon the issuance of site plan approval and a special use permit from the Planning Board (Code § 270-219(D)(5)). Additionally, the 134' tower and additional attachment exceeds the C zoning district's maximum height limit, which restricts the height of nonagricultural buildings to 38 feet in height from lowest interior grade and 36 feet in height from lowest 4872-6179-2134.1 Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca May 29, 2024 Page 2 exterior, per Code § 270-16. Therefore, Verizon Wireless also submits this Application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area (height) variance. Accordingly, please accept this letter and the following exhibits and enclosures as Verizon Wireless' Application for a site plan approval and a special use permit from the Planning Board, and an area (height) variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals: Exhibit A: Copy of Town -supplied application forms; Exhibit B: Project description; Exhibit C: Applicable legal standards; Exhibit D: Proof of Compliance with the Town's Site PIan Review Requirements, as set forth in Article XXIII of the Code; Exhibit E: Proof of Compliance with the Town's Special Use Permit Requirements, as set forth in Article XXIV of the Code; Exhibit F: Proof of Compliance with the Town's Standards for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, as set forth in § 270-219 of the Code; Exhibit G: Proof of Compliance with the Town's area variance standards; Exhibit H: Radio Frequency search ring justification ("RF Justification Report"), with propagation studies setting forth the need for the Project; Exhibit I: Site selection report; Exhibit J: Copy of Verizon Wireless' FCC licenses for Tompkins County; Exhibit K: Long Environmental Assessment Form ("Long EAF" ), with visual addendum; Exhibit L: Verizon Wireless' collocation policy; Exhibit M: Removal letter; Exhibit N: Proof of the Landowner's consent to this Application; Exhibit O: Structural report; Exhibit P: Proof of compliance with federal regulations; Exhibit : Photosimulation report; Exhibit R: I I" x 17" copy of the Site Plan; Exhibit S: SWPPP; Exhibit T: Noise study; Exhibit U: Verizon Wireless' responses to the Town's December 11, 2023 pre - application comments; Exhibit V: Letter regarding the requested drive test and dropped call data; 4872-6179-2134.1 Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca May 29, 2024 Page 3 Exhibit W: Required insurance certificates; Exhibit X: Statement of special inspections; and Exhibit Y: Letter regarding the required economic analysis. Also included with this Application are: Fifteen (15) copies of this Application book; Fifteen (15) copies of the I I" x 17" Site Plan (see Exhibit R); A check in the amount of $2,925 for applicable application fees; and Four (4) full-sized copies of the Site Plan (three (3) for the Town and one (1) for referral to Tompkins County Planning). Because the Project is located within 500 feet of the Town's boundary with the Town of Dryden, this Application must be referred to the Tompkins County Department of Planning pursuant to General Municipal Law § 239-m. Please refer this Application to the Tompkins County Department of Planning as soon as possible. An extra copy of this Application is enclosed for this purpose. We respectfully request that this Application be placed on the agenda for the next available Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board meetings. In the meantime, should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. JCLJmkv Enclosures cc: Brett Morgan, Airosmith Development, Inc. Jeff Twitty, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP 4872-6179-2134.1 EXHIBIT A TOWN OF ITHACA DEVELOPMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 04 of orb, l 215 North Tioga Street REVIEW Date Received: I I f`w y9 t Ithaca, NY 14850 APPLICATION Project No. - - 607) 273-1747 ALL APPLICATIONS: Type of Application: Subdivision Lot Line Modification Site Plan X Special Permit X Rezoning/New PDZ Rezoning, other than PDZ Amend existing PDZ Stage of Review: Sketch X Preliminary Final Add'1 Meeting Project Name (if any): Verizon Wireless' "Sunny View" Site Street Address/Location of Project: 1 1 1 Wiedmaier Court Tax Parcel No.: 56.4-1.22 Owner: S Roberts WC Land LLC Owner's Address: Phone No.: 111 Wiedmaier Court Email: Applicant or Agent (if different from Owner): Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Applicant/Agent's Address: Phone No.: 1275 Jahn Street, Suite 100, West Henrietta, NY 14586 Email: (585) 313-3027 Engineer: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. Phone No.: (518) 783-1630 Architect: Phone No.: Attorney: Jared C. Lusk, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP Phone No.: (585) 263-1140 S UBDI VISION APPLI CA TIONS: Total number of lots proposed (existing + new): Are new roads or public utilities proposed? Estimated site improvement cost (exclude cost of land acquisition & prof. fees): SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS. Project is (circle or check one): Residential VNon-Residential Lot Area: 12.34 acres Total Bldg. Floor Area: N/A No. of Dwelling Units: 0 Estimated project cost (exclude cost of land acquisition & prof. fees): $150,000 REZONING APPLICATIONS. Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: ALL APPLICATIONS: The information on this application form is submitted in addition to other information, plats, andplans required by the Town of Ithaca. I attest that all information so submitted is complete and accurate to the best of my .knowledge. Also, by filing this application, permission is granted to members of the various Town Boards, Committees, Pl ruing and Engineering Staff, and Councils, and/or any otherpersons designated by the Town th ay 1, involved in the rev w of this application, enter the property specified above to inspect in connection with the revi w 'this application. AAI -"/ S a Owner's Signature Date antlAgent Si tore (if different) Date FINA[.3/K/1 744-2Q64,1 1 f DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY TYPE OF REVIEW APPLICATION FEE (non-refundable) Fee Amount Due Subdivision Review: Sketch Plat: 1-10 new lots * without new roads or public utilities 125.00 All Others * S 125.00 plus $5 / lot Preliminary Plat: 1-10 new lots without new roads or public utilities)$125.Q0 plus $25 /lot All Others * 125.00 plus $50 / lot Final Plat: 50% of Preliminary Plat Fee Plats,Re- lats whose sole purpose is to dedicate land for public use - no charge Lot Line Modification Administrative Review) 75.00 Site Plan Review: Sketch Plan: 125.00 Preliminary Plan: Estimated Project Cost: 1 - $50,000.99 250.00 50,001 - $100,000.99 350.00 I00,001 - $250,00099 400.00 250,001 - $500,000.99 500.00 500,001 - $1,000,000.99 750.00 1,000,001-$2,500,000.99 1,000.00 2,500,001 - $5,000,000.99 1,500.00 5,000,001 - $10,000,000.99 2,000.00 10,000,001 - $20,000,000.99 2,500.00 Over $20,000,00099 3,000.00 Projects With Interior Work Only 200.00 Final Plan 50% of Preliminary Site Plan Fee Rezoning: Planned Development Zone PDZ)**: 350 plus initial escrow fee of $2500 and any associated site plan and/or subdivision fees PDZ Amendment: 200 Rezoning other than PDZ: 350 Special Permit: 100.00 if not with site plan application_ Additional Meeting Fees: Agenda Processing 30.00 Public Hearing Processing 50.00 Please consult Local Law No. 3, 2016, for a complete explanation of application fees. Fees Paid: Receipt #: Check #• NOTES: * Number of new lots is the number that would exist after subdivision. PDZ = Planned Development Zone: a zone that was created to allow flexibility of uses on a property. Each PDZ is unique and contains an individualized list of permitted uses specific to that PDZ. See Town Code, Chapter 271 to review the existing PDZ's in the Town of Ithaca. Received by Date FINAL 31PAR-i i744-2064.1 3TOWN OF ITHACA DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 215 N. Tiogn St 14850 607.273.1747 wwiv.toivn. ithaca.n),.us SITE PLAN REVIEW OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION & CERTIFICATION FORM IIWe hereby affirm that I/we am/are the owner(s) of the property located at: Property Address/Location(s): 111 Wiedmaier Court City: Town of Ithaca Tax Map and Parcel Number(s): 56.-4-122 State: NY Zip Code: 14850 By signing below, f/we authorize the individual(s) identified in the following section to act as mylour authorized agent regarding any and all site plan application(s) made to the Town of Ithaca Planning Board for the activities described. The individual(s) identified below shall remain in this capacity regarding any applications and subsequently issued permits related to these activities indefinitely unless an express written request to terminate this authorization, signed by me, is submitted to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. l/we also certify that l/we have caused the land to be surveyed and the site plan to be prepared; that l/we agree and guarantee to construct the project and any required infrastructure elements in the manner presented by the finally approved site plan; and that l/we make any dedications indicated on the final site plan. Project/Activity for which Application is being made: Construction and operation of a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod). Signature of Owner(s): Date: Signature of Owner(s): Date: Printed Owner(s) Name: S Roberts WC Land LLC Printed Owner(s) Name: Printed Name of Applicant/ Owner's Authorized Agent: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless Address: 1275 John Street, Suite 100 City: West Henrietta State: NY Zip Code: 14586 Telephone Number: (585) 263-1140 (Jared Lusk, attorryey for Verizon Wireless) Email Address: jl Signature of Applicant/Ag nt: com Date: k, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, Attorneys for Veri on Wrel6ss Once completed, pl 5/1/2022 4882-9095-2592.1 ubmit this form to the Town of Ithaca Planning Department. Vimislik, Melissa From: Lusk, Jared Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 10:12 AM To: Vimislik, Melissa Cc: Twitty, Jeffrey Subject: Fwd: Message received about 111 Wiedmaier Ct (VZW - Sunny View) Please print below for the sunny application Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Brett Morgan<BMorgan @airosmithdevelopment.com> Date: November 15, 2023 at 10:09:58 AM EST To: " Lusk, Jared" <jlusk@nixonpeabody.com>, "Twitty, Jeffrey" <jtwitty@nixonpea body.com> Subject: FW: Message received about 111 Wiedmaier Ct (VZW - Sunny View) EXTERNAL E- MAIL] Be Aware of Links and Attachments BP application rejection is below. AIR*SMITH Certified Women Business Enterprise (WBENC) Brett Morgan Site Acquisition Specialist Mobile: 585- 339-8617 bmoraanCd)airosmithdevelooment. com 1900 Empire Blvd - PMB4 191, Webster, NY 14580 This e- mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you hove received this e-mail in error, please contact bmoroan@airosmithdevelopment.com. re)] 11 From: Town of Ithaca <noreply@opengov.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2023 10:02 AM To: Brett Morgan<bmorgan@airosmithdevelopment.com> Subject: Message received about 111 Wiedmaier Ct You don' t often get email from noreply@opengov.com. Learn why this is important Town of Ithaca Chris Balestra (she/her) commented on Code Dpt. Administrative Review: @Marty Moseley C.J. Randall @Abby Homer @Joseph Slater PEmilv Banwell @Ashley Colbert @Martin Kelly Hi Brent, This project requires approval by our Planning Board, along with permits from the Code Enforcement Department. Pursuant to Town Code, Section 270-219.E (2), the Directors of Code Enforcement and Planning will review your submission for completeness and will notify you if the application is incomplete and, if so, what is missing. We will notify you digitally via email and via this online platform. Message: Because this is a new non -small wireless facility, pursuant to 47 CFR 1.6003, the Town of Ithaca has 30 days from the receipt of this application (received: November 13, 2023) to respond with a notice of incompleteness. You will therefore receive notification by Wednesday, December 13, 2023. If you'd like to discuss this with staff, please contact Christine Balestra at 607) 273-1721, ext. 121 or cbalestra@town.ithaca.ny.us Where: 111 Wiedmaier Ct Type: TOI - General Building Permit Application Number: BLD-23-219 0 Powered by OpenGov EXHIBIT B a / 1 EXHIBIT B PROJECT DESCRIPTION Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") is a public utility, and federally licensed wireless telecommunications provider. It currently has service inadequacies in the Town of Ithaca (the "Town"). To remedy this service inadequacy, Verizon Wireless is proposing to construct and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility (the "Project") at 111 Wiedmaier Court on property owned by S Roberts WC Land LLC and identified as Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22 (the "Project Site"). This Application consists of a request for site plan approval and a special use permit from the Planning Board, as well as an area (height) variance from the, Zoning Board of Appeals to permit the Project to provide adequate and reliable wireless telecommunications service to emergency services, businesses and individuals in and around the Town. The Project would consist of the construction and operation of a 134' tower (plus a 4' lightning rod), exterior equipment cabinets and other associated improvements, all as shown on the enclosed site plan prepared by Tectonic Engineering. Essentially, wireless telecommunication devices operate by transmitting a very low power radio signal between the wireless telecommunication devices and an antenna mounted on a tower, pole, building or other structure. The antenna feeds the signal to electronic apparatus located near the antenna (the "base station"), where it is connected to traditional telephone systems, and is then routed anywhere in the world. The antennas and base station are known as a cell site." Because of the low power, a cell site is capable of transmitting to and from wireless telecommunication devices only within a limited geographic area. This limited geographic area is called a "cell." A cell site must be located within a prescribed area in order to provide coverage for the entire cell. Wireless telecommunications technology requires that cells overlap somewhat in order to provide uninterrupted service. When the wireless telephone user moves into a new cell, the transmission is automatically transferred to the cell site in the new cell. If there is no cell site in the new cell, there is no wireless telecommunications service. 4872-6179-2134.1 2- Because each cell site must be placed in such a manner as to provide service within a particular cell, and so as to provide overlapping (but not duplicate) coverage with the existing or planned cells around it, there is limited flexibility as to where a cell site can be placed. Wireless telecommunications providers conduct a thorough engineering study, including using an elaborate computer program known as a "propagation study." A propagation study shows, based on cell boundaries, topography and other factors, where a cell site needs to be located in order to provide wireless telecommunications coverage in a particular cell. The wireless telecommunication companies and RF engineers identify technologically feasible locations for the cell site. In this case, the proposed site was identified by Verizon Wireless as being an appropriate site to remedy the service deficiencies. The Project Site was located within that area and was available to Verizon Wireless to meet the technological requirements. As set forth in this application, Verizon Wireless meets the legal standards necessary for the requested approvals. Moreover, the Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not create any significant increase in traffic, will not create any environmental problems, will not increase population density, and will not create any demand on governmental facilities. Thus, the Project will not create any detriment to adjoining properties or change the character of the neighborhood. Instead, the Project will enhance governmental facilities and promote the public welfare by providing a modern, more efficient system of communications for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunication service to business, industry and individuals in and around the Sunny View cell. 4972-6174-2134.1 Exhibit C EXHIBIT C APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS In Cellular Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993), the New York Court of Appeals determined that wireless telephone facilities are public utilities. The Court held that proposed wireless telephone installations are to be reviewed by zoning boards pursuant to the traditional standard afforded to public utilities, rather than the standards generally required for the necessary approvals. It has long been held that a zoning board may not exclude a utility from a community where the utility has shown a need for its facilities.'... Application of our holding in Matter of Consolidated Edison to sitings of wireless telephone companies, such as Wireless One, permits those companies to construct structures necessary for their operation which are prohibited because of existing zoning laws and to provide the desired services to the surrounding community.... Moreover, the record supports the conclusion that Cellular One sustained its burden of proving the requisite public necessity. Cellular One established that the erection of the cell site would enable it to remedy gaps in its service area that currently prevent it from providing adequate service to its customers in the Dobbs Ferry area. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 372-74 (citing Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman, 43 N.Y.2d 598 (1978)). This special treatment of a public utility stems from the essential nature of its service, and because a public utility transmitting facility must be located in a particular area in order to provide service. For instance, water towers, electric switching stations, water pumping stations and telephone poles must be in particular locations (including within residential districts) in order to provide the utility to a specific area: Public] utility services are needed in all districts; the service can be provided only if certain facilities (for example, substations) can be located in commercial and even in residential districts. To exclude such use would result in an impairment of an essential service. 4872-6179-2134.1 2- Salkin, New York Zoning Law Practice, 4th ed., § 7:12 (2013) (hereafter "Salkin"). See also, Wireless Tel. Co. v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364 (1993); Payne v. Taylor, 178 A.D.2d 979 4th Dep't 1991). Accordingly, the law in New York is that a municipality may not prohibit facilities, including towers, necessary for the transmission of a public utility. In Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d at 371, the court found that "the construction of an antenna tower ... to facilitate the supply of cellular telephone service is a `public utility building' within the meaning of a zoning ordinance." See also Long Island Lighting Co. v. Griffin, 272 A.D. 551 (2d Dep't 1947) (a municipal corporation may not prohibit the expansion of a public utility where such expansion is necessary to the maintenance of essential services). In the present case, Verizon Wireless is suffering from inadequate service coverage in the Town of Ithaca. The Project is needed to remedy this service problem and to provide wireless telecommunications service coverage to this area. Therefore, Verizon Wireless satisfies the requisite showing of need for the facility under applicable New York law. 4872-6179.2134.1 EXHIBIT D FXHTRTT D PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUIREMENTS, AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE XXIII OF THE CODE Article XXIII of the Code contains the requirements for site plan review in the Town of Ithaca. The requirements of the Code are reproduced below in bold italicized type, followed by Verizon Wireless' response,in regular type. 270-182. Purpose. The purpose of site plan review is to provide for the review and approval of development plans to ensure that land development occurs in harmony with surrounding uses, without adversely impacting neighboring parcels, property values, public facilities, infrastructure or the natural environment," No response necessary. 270-183. Site plan required prior to building permit or certificate of occupancy or certificate ofcompliance. [Amended 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-20141 Before a building permit or certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance can be issued for any of the activities for which site plan approval is rewired, a site plan must be approved by the Planning Board in accordance with these and other applicable provisions.. No response necessary. 270-184. Applicability. The requirements set forth in this article shall apply to all activities or developments that are referred to elsewhere in this chapter as requiring a site plan approval. In addition, and supplementing such provisions, the requirements of this article shall also apply to the following actions except as to those actions specifically exempted, or for which alternative specific site plan review and approval requirements are established, elsewhere in this chapter: A. All new commercial, industrial or institutional development. No response necessary. , B. All new multifamily housing. No response necessary. C. Any modification of existing commercial, industrial, institutional or multifamily buildings, for which no previous site plan exists. No response necessary. 4972-6174-2134.1 2- D. Any conversion of an existing residential structure to a nonresidential use (except as may have occurred in connection with a home occupation established in conformity with the provisions of this chapter).' No response necessary. E. Any conversion of an existing nonresidential structure into a residential structure containing three or more dwelling units No response necessary. F. Any modification to an existing residential structure which increases the number of dwelling units in the building to three or more dwelling units. No response necessary. G. Any change of an existing'nonresidential building from one type of use specified in this chapter to another (e.g., conversion of a commercial structure to an.industrial facility or conversion from a warehouse.to a restaurant). No response necessary. H. Any other modification to any facility or structure not set forth in the preceding subsections, for which final site plan approval was or is presently required by the terms of this chapter or any modification to any previously approved site plan, except as otherwise authorized below. No response necessary. In an NT-3, NT-4, NT 4u, or NT-5 zone, the New Neighborhood Code defines the types and thresholds of actions that need site plan review. (See § 272-704.) [Added 11-9-2020 by L.L. No. 6-20201 270-185. - Procedure. A. The site plan process incorporates three successive stages: a) sketch plan review, b) preliminary site plan approval,. and c) final site plan approval. Final site plan approval is required in all cases prior to the issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance. The sketch plan review is at the option of the applicant except as may be required by the Director of Planning if the proposed project is complex, has significant potential effects on the environment, or if other conditions exist such that a sketch review would be beneficial to the applicant or the Town. Amended 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-2014J Editor's Note: Former Subsection D, regarding expansion, was repealed 9-9-2019 by L.L. No. 7-2019. This local law also redesignated former Subsections E through I as Subsections D through H. 4872-6179-2134,1 3- No response necessary. B. Sketch plan review. The sole purpose of sketch plan review is to review generally and informally the proposed project, advise the applicant as to whether it is reasonable to anticipate a positive response to a fornial application, and to Highlight any concerns that may be readily apparent to the Planning Board. No vote of approval or disapproval shall be taken with respect to a sketch plan. No response necessary. C. Preliminary site plan review. An applicant may, at his or her discretion, apply for preliminary site plan approval. Further, if the Planning Board determines that an application for final site plan approval is insufficient for an affirmative decision, the Board may grant preliminary site plan approval with such conditions and restrictions as are permitted by § 274-a of the Torun Law or any similar or successor statute. No response necessary. D. Formal application. 1) Unless other requirements of this chapter govern (e.g., the procedures for creation of Planned Development Zone) the applicant shall make formal application for site plan approval by submitting, at a minimum: a) One completed and signed development review application. See Exhibit A (copy of Town -supplied application forms). b) Applicable application fees The applicable fees are enclosed. See p. 2 of the letter. c) Deposit of review fees. Verizon Wireless will provide all applicable review fees for this Application that may be legally imposed by the Town. Please notify us of the applicable review fees for this Application. d) One fully completed and signed short environmental assessment form, Part I (SEAF), or long environmental assessment form, Part I (LEAF), whichever is required See Exhibit K (Long EAF). e) Estimate of costs of site improvements (excluding cost of land acquisition and professional fees) to be prepared (preferably) by a licensed professional engineer. 4872-6179-2134.1 M The costs of site improvements are to be determined once the Project is approved and the final plans are submitted to approved contractors as part of Verizon Wireless' standard procurement process. The costs will be shared with the Town with the building permit application. f) Four full-size dark -line prints of the site plan and 25 reduced copies of all sheets of the plan (the reduced copies to be no larger than II inches by .17 inches) with all required information. The required plans are enclosed with this Application. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). g) All other information required by this chapter or other laws, rules or regulations for site plan approval. This Application so complies. 2) The application for site plan approval shall not be deemed complete until all of the above items are received by the Town Planner and the requirements of SEAR have been met. No response necessary. E. Upon receipt of a complete application, the Planning Board shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Town Law § 274-a or any similar or successor applicable statutes and shall render a decision approving, approving with conditions, or disapproving the site plan. No response necessary. F. In making its decision, the Planning Board shall have the power to impose conditions and restrictions as authorized bye' 274-a of the Town Law or any similar or successor statute. No response necessary G. Ifpreliminary site plan approval is granted, when the developer applies for'final site plan approval the same procedures shall again be utilized, except that if the final site plan is in substantial agreement with the site plan that received preliminary site plan approval, no further action under SEQR shall be required. If the final site plan -differs significantly from the preliminary site plan, it shall be treated as a new application, including compliance with applicable SEQR requirements. . No response necessary. H. In reviewing the final site plan application following preliminary site plan approval, the Planning Board shall, in the absence of significant new information, confine its review to determining whether the final plan a) conforms to the preliminary plan, b) complies 4872-6179.2134,1 5- with any conditions imposed by the Board in granting preliminary approval, and c) complies in all other respects with the provisions of the Town Law and this chapter No response necessary. I. The owner and applicant shall be bound by the final site plan as approved by the Planning Board, and all construction and development shall occur only in accordance with the finally approved site plan, unless specifically otherwise authorized by the provisions of this chapter. No response necessary. 270-186. Site plan requirements [Amended 2-11-2008 by L.L. No. 4-2008; 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-2014, 7-11-2022 by L.L. No. I2-20227 The site plan shall include the following items, and such additional items as may be reasonably requested by the Planning Board in order to fully and adequately review the application for approval of the site plan or other permit or authorization being sought, which requirements may be articulated on one or more checklists supplied to applicants for site plan approval or modification. Without limiting the authority of the Planning Board or other reviewing board of the Town with respect to additional items, the minimum items to be included are set forth below with respect to each type of site plan being reviewed A. Sketch plan requirements. The sketch plan submission(s) shall include: 1) General project narrative that describes the project and explains the purpose of the project, including the type and density of development, water and sewer systems proposed, and general timetable far the development. See Exhibit B (Project Description) and Exhibit R (Site Plan). 2) General location reap of the proposed development in the Town. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 3) A drawing that shows. a) Approximate property boundaries ofparcel(s) involved. b) Existing land use ofproperty and immediately adjacentproperties. c) Approximate locations of existing buildings and structures (accessory buildings, walls, fences, parking areas, etc.). d) Approximate locations of existing water and sewerage facilities. e) Approximate location of adjacent or nearby highways. f) General topography ofproject area. 4872-6179-2134.1 IO W Location of potentially significant, natural, or cultural features on or adjacent to the project site (streams, wetlands, ponds, slopes, historic structures, etc.). See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4) A drawing that shows: a) Proposed land use of the property, with proposed buildings and structures. b) Approximate locations ofproposed water and sewerage facilities. c) Approximate locations ofproposed stormwater facilities d) Approximate locations of proposed roadway, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). B. Preliminary site plan requirements. [NOTE. All applications should be submitted in digital format, with drawing sizes and numbers ofpaper copies as specified by staff.] The preliminary site plan submission(s) shall include: 1) Detailed project narrative that'explains the project and any attachments, plans, and reports accompanying the submission. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 2) Drawings that are clear, legible, accurate, and contain the name and seal of the licensed land surveyor, engineer, architect, and/or landscape architect who prepared the materials and are associated with the project See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 3) Drawings must contain the project title and address, with town, county, and state, North arrow, preparer's name and address, and dates (including revision dates). Map scale should be no less than one inch equals 20 feet, or at a scale of adequate size to clearly identify all features and infrastructure throughout the limits of the project and corresponds to a ratio on a US engineering scale. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4) Key map, when more than one sheet is required to present site plan. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 5) Context/vicinity map showing the general location of the property. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4872.6179-2134.1 7- 6) Site survey/existing condition plan that shows: a) Nance and address of all owners of the property. b) Exact boundary lines of tract, indicated by a heavy line. c) Easements, navies of easement owners, and recording information for easements. d) Rights -of -way (ROW) and owners of the ROW. e) Existing buildings and all other structures on the property. f) Existing parking areas, including number of parking spaces. g) Existing streets, driveways, loading areas, sidewalks, and curb cuts. h) Existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities i) Existing hydrologic and topographical features, including drainage and runoffpatterns, flood hazard areas, streanrs,2 slopes, ponds, and wetlands. j) Existing lighting and signage. k) Existing woodlands, brushlands, significant habitats and rare plants. 1) Existing known cultural features, structures or sites listed (or eligible far listing) on the State or National Registers of Historic Places m) Existing unique natural areas on or adjacent to the project site. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 7) Site plan that shows the location of a) Property lines with dimensions and area, including property lines of adjacent properties b) Identification of any buildings or structures to be removed. c) Proposed buildings and other structures (accessory structures, dumpsters, fences, walls, etc.). d) Proposed streets, driveways, sidewalks, trails, and curb cuts, • with appropriate profiles Editor's Note: See Public Officers Law § 84 et seq. 4872-6179-2134.1 e) Proposed on -site circulation, including parking spaces (numbered, with dimensions noted), bicycle 'and pedestrian facilities, loading areas, stacking spaces with dimensions and setbacks. f) Proposed landscaping and planting plans, including proposed buffers g) Location of. proposed site signage with setbacks (directional signs, freestanding signs, etc.). h) Location ofproposed outdoor lighting. i) Accurate outlines and descriptions of any easements and/or areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use or acquisition, with the purposes indicated thereon, and of any easements or areas to be reserved by deed covenant or otherwise for common uses of some or all property owners, tenants, or other users of the property in the project. 0) References to any separate instruments, including restrictive covenants, that directly affect the land in the project. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 8) Building elevations, that include: a) Scaled elevation drawings of all existing structures to remain. b) Proposed building architectural elevations with dimensions, including inaxifnum height above grade. c) Rendered elevations showing all facades keyed to building materials. d) Proposed building materials and colors. e) Rooftop equipment and inechanicals. f) Schematic floor plans, including square footage. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 9) Grading and drainage information that includes: a) Existing and proposed contours at one foot contour intervals and spot elevations. b) Limits of grading, description of cut and fill information (volumes, fill material composition). c) Stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), pursuant to Town Code Chapter 228 and all applicable NYSDEC rules and regulations, including 4872-6179-2134.1 9- location of erosion/sediment control structures and other stormwater management measures. d) Existing trees to remain and existing trees proposed to be removed species and diameter at breast height noted). See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 10) Utility information that includes: a) Location of existing utilities, including size and flow direction of sewers, water supply lines, and culverts b) Plan and profile ofproposed utilities, including size and flow direction of sewers, water supply lines, and culverts. e) Location of existing and proposed fire Hydrants. d) Location of existing and proposed electric, gas, and telephone lines and appurtenances (transformer boxes, valves, etc.). See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 11) Landscaping/planting information, including. a) Location and type of existing vegetation. b) Planting schedule, including type and quantity of proposed plant materials (common and botanical names), root specifications and size at time ofplanting No invasive plants permitted. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 12) Signs and outdoor lighting information pursuant to Town Code Chapter 270 Article.,=) and Chapter 173, including: a) Proposed size, location, height, design, and construction materials for all proposed signs (note whether internally or externally illuminated). b) Lighting contours, photometrics, and lighting specification sheets for all outdoor lighting. c)'; Proposed size, location, height, design, and construction materials for all light fixtures. d) Proposed LED color temperature noted on plan. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4872-6179-2134.1 10- 13) Construction staging and related information that shows: a) Construction phasing diagram. b) Construction staging plan, including proposed construction fencing, fencing details, and location of stockpile materials and equipment. c) Details ofproposed tree protection devices during construction. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 14) Other information, as applicable: a) A signed owner's authorization and certification form. See Exhibit N (Proof of the Landowner's consent to this Application). b) Completion of Energy Code Supplement compliance checklist. Not applicable. c) Completion of agricultural data statement. Not applicable. C. Final site plan requirements. The final site plan shall include: 1) Project narrative, explaining any project changes since preliminary site plan approval, and how the materials comply with conditions ofpreliminary approval. To the extent applicable, see Exhibit R (Site Plan). 2) Final site plan drawings, including any required revised drawings that were necessary to comply with any conditions imposed as part of the preliminary site plan approval process. All drawings require the name and seal of the licensed land surveyor, engineer, architect, or landscape architect who prepared the materials and are associated with the project. Drawings must also contain the project title and address, graphic scale, North arrow, preparer's name and address, and date (including all revision dates). , Verizon Wireless will so comply. 3) Truck routing plans, and any other reports, studies, engineering calculations, documents, or materials that were required to he submitted before consideration offinalsiteplan approval. To the extent applicable, see Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4872-6179-2134.1 11- 270-187. Waiver of requirements. The Town Board in those circumstances where a site plan is required for Town Board review, and the Planning Board in those circumstances where a siteplan isprovided forPlanning Board review, may waive one or more items (e.g., topography) otherwise normally required to be shown on the site plan when the applicable board determines that the circumstances of the application do not require a full site plan for adequate consideration of the applicant's proposal. No response necessary. 270-188. Considerations for approval. The Planning Board's review of a site plan shall include as appropriate, but shall not be limited to, the following considerations: A. Adequacy, arrangement, and location of vehicular. access and circulation, including intersections, road widths, pavement surfaces, off-street parking and loading areas, and traffic controls. To the extent applicable, see Exhibit R (Site Plan). B. Adequacy, arrangement, and location of pedestrian and bicycle traffic access and circulation, control of intersections with vehicular traffic, and appropriate provisions for handicapped persons Not applicable. C. [Amended 2-8-2021 by L.L. No. 2-2021] 1) Adequacy, location, arrangement, size, design, and general site compatibility. of buildings, lighting, open spaces, paved areas, outdoor waste disposal facilities, and contiguity of open spaces Not applicable. 2) Adequacy, location, arrangement, and size of signs Not applicable. D. Adequacy, location, arrangement, size, design, and general site compatibility of buildings, lighting, signs, open spaces, paved areas, outdoor waste disposalfacilities, and contiguity of open spaces. To the extent applicable, see Exhibit R (Site Plan). E. Adequacy, type, and arrangement of trees, shrubs, and other landscaping, including those on site and those constituting a visual and/or noise -deterring buffer between the applicant's and adjoining lands, including the retention of existing vegetation of value to the maximum extent possible. 4872-6179-2134.1 12- To the extent applicable, See Exhibit R (Site Plan). F. In the case of a residential property, and in the case of other properties where appropriate, the adequacy and utility of open space for playgrounds and for informal recreation. Not applicable. G. Compatibility of the project with the surrounding neighborhood, including protection of adjacent properties and the general public against noise, glare, unsightliness, or other objectionable features. To the extent applicable, see Exhibit R (Site Plan). H. Adequacy of stormwater drainage, water supply, sewage disposal facilities and other community infrastructures and services. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 1. Adequacy offire lanes and other emergency provisions. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). J. The effect of the proposed development on environmentally sensitive areas including but not limited to wetlands, floodplains, woodlands, steep slopes, watercourses or bodies, viewsheds, unique natural habitats, and on other open space areas of importance to the neighborhood or community. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). K. The effect of the proposed development on any Historic structures listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Not applicable. L. The need for, and the adequacy of, any natural or man-made buffers. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). M. Whether the design of the project minimizes the increase of impervious surfaces on the site. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). N. Compliance with the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, Water Resources Ordinances, if applicable, Outdoor Lighting Law,3 Editor's Note: See Ch. 173, Outdoor Lighting. 4872-6l79-2134.1 13- Complete Streets Policy, and any other applicable laws, rules, requirements, or policies Amended 10-16-2006 by L.L. No. 12-2006, 5-11-2015 by L.L. No. 3-20151 See Exhibit R (Site Plan) 270-189. Limitations on construction. No site plan shall be approved which provides for construction or other disturbance of land in environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands, watercourses, steep slopes, unique natural areas, or rare plant or animal habitats, unless the applicant demonstrates with professional evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Planning Board that such construction may occur without adverse environmental effects upon such areas. Nothing in this subsection is intended to permit construction or other activities in areas where the same are prohibited or regulated by other laws or regulations of the federal, state, county,'or local government. To our knowledge, the site is not located on an environmentally sensitive area. 270-190. Reservation of parkland on site plans containing residential units. If the proposed project includes dwelling units, the Planning Board may, in accordance with the provisions and requirements of Town Law § 274-a or any similar or successor law, require a park or parks to be shown on the site plan, or, to the extent permitted by § 274-a, monies in lieu ofparkland. Not applicable. 270-191. Modifications of site plans. [Amended 9--9-2019 by L.L. No. 7-2019] A. A site plan that has received final site plan approval may be modified upon submission of an application for such modification. The application must comply with the provisions of this article. The procedures are the same as for an initial application for site plan approval. Not applicable. B. Planning Board approval of a modification is required if the modification involves or includes any of the following: 1) Enlarging the square footage of an existing or previously approved building by more than 20% or 2,000 square feet gross floor area, whichever is less. Enlargements that do not meet this threshold remain subject to the. determination in Subsection B(9) below; Not applicable. 2) Adding five or more parking spaces; Not applicable. 4872-6179-2134.1 14- 3) Construction, alteration, or renovation of the interior of a building involving a change in use, Not applicable. 4) Alteration of traffic flows and access, or a significant (in the judgment of the Director of Planning) increase in the volume of traffic; Not applicable. 5) A significant (in the judgment of the Director of Planning) change in the aesthetic appearance of any structure or site plan element, including landscape and lighting details, from the last approved site plan; Not applicable. 6) A change in the impacts of the project on surrounding properties, such as an increase in noise, stormwater runoff, light illumination, or obstructions to views; Not applicable. 7) Demolition, or a proposed demolition, of an existing previously approved building with a footprint larger than 3;000 square feet; Not applicable. 8) Violation of any express conditions (including, without limitation, buffer zones, setbacks, and similar restrictions) last imposed by the Planning Board for site plan approval, or Not applicable. 9) A determination by the Director of Planning that a movement or shift of a location of one or more structures laterally or vertically from the location or elevation shown on the frnal site plan: a) Materially affects the overall site layout or specific elements of the site, including roads, traffic movements, sidewalks, parking areas, viewshed, drainage, and buffer areas; or b) Violates any express conditions (including, without limitation, buffer zones, setbacks, etc.) imposed by the Planning Board for site plan approval. Not applicable. C. Numerical criteria in Subsection B(1) and (2) are an aggregate maximum (e.g., if a 700- squarefeet addition is constructed on an existing 5,000 square feet building without obtaining Planning Board approval, construction of a second addition larger. than 300 4872-6179-2134.1 15- squarefeet would require Planning Board approval of a modified site plan, and if three additional parking spaces are constructed without obtaining Planning Board approval, construction of more than two additional parking spaces would require Planning Board approval of a modified site plan). No response necessary. D. The fact that Planning Board approval is not required for some modifications shall not be construed to allow: 1) Construction that violates any other provision of Town Code Chapter 270 Zoning); or No response necessary. 2) The requirement to obtain a building permit in those circumstances when otherwise required by the terms of Town Code Chapter 270 (Zoning) or the New York State Uniforrii Fire Prevention and Building Code. No response necessary. 270-192. Letter of credit. If the Planning Board determines it is necessary to ensure that all items on the site plan that are needed to provide for adequate traffic flow, utilities, and other similar infrastructure items, are constructed in accordance with the approved final site plan and ally other pertinent specifications and requirements, no building permit shall be issued for a project with an approved final site plan until the applicant has furnished to the Town Engineer an irrevocable letter of credit in an amount to be recommended by the Town Engineer and approved by the Planning Board to ensure such construction. In determining whether to require such a letter; the Planning Board shall find that such infrastructure is so integral to the project that its construction must occur in order to provide for a safe and useful environment for the community and the occupants and users of the project. The Planning Board may, in its discretion, accept in lieu of a letter of credit other evidence or promise of completion of required facilities for the site if it determines that such other evidence adequately ensures such completion. Nothing in this section shall alter any other requirement for letters of credit related to construction offacilities intended to be dedicated to the Town. Verizon Wireless will provide same as part of the building pen -nit process. 270-193. Completion of improvements. [Amended 5-12-2014 by L.L. No. 9-20141 No final certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance shall be issued until all improvements shown on the final site plan as approved by the Planning Board, reasonably necessary to the proper and safe operation and occupancy of any completed facilities, are installed or until a sufficient performance guarantee, such as a letter of credit, has been provided to the Town for improvements not yet completed. The need for, and sufficiency of, such performance guarantee shall be determined by the Town Engineer after consultation with 4872-6179-2134.1 16- the Building Inspector or other persons designated, by the Planning Board. The Planning Board may waive the requirement for such performance guarantee if, in its discretion, it determines that the guarantee is not needed. No response necessary. 270-194. Expiration of site plan approval. A. Except when a rezoning has occurred based upon a preliminary or general site plan any approval of a preliminary site plan may be revoked by the Planning Board, after a public hearing and upon written notice in person or by mail to the applicant. 1) If a fully complete application for final site plan approval has not been submitted to the'Planning Board within 18 months of the date preliminary approval was granted, or No response necessary. 2) If an application is submitted within such eighteen -month period, such application is not diligently prosecuted by the owner to enable the Planning Board to grant final site plan approval within 24 months of the date preliminary approval was granted No response necessary. B. The Planning Board may, when compliance with the foregoing thneperiods would create a significant hardship for the owner, extend the time periods for such periods and upon such conditions as the Planning Board may reasonably determine. No response necessary. C. Unless work has materially commenced in accordance with the final site plan within one year front the issuance of the building permit authorizing such work, or within 36 months of the date the Planning Board gave final site plan approval, whichever is earlier, not only the building permit but the site plan approval (both final and preliminary) shall expire and the permissible uses and construction on the property shall revert to those in effect prior to the granting of any site plan approval. The Planning Board, upon request of the applicant, after a public hearing, and upon a finding that the imposition of the time limits set forth above would create an undue hardship on the applicant, may extend the time limits for such additional periods as the Planning Board may reasonably determine. An application for such extension may be made at the time offiling of the original application or at any time thereafter up to, but no later than, six months after the expiration of the time limits set forth above. 1) For the purposes of this section, work will not have "materially commenced" unless, at a minimum: a) A building permit, if required, has been obtained; 4572-6179-2134.1 17- b) Construction equipment and tools consistent with the size of the proposed work have been brought to and been used on the site; and c) Substantial excavation (where excavation is required) or significant framing, erection, or construction (where excavation is not required) has been started and is being diligently pursued. No response necessary. 4872-6179-2134.1 EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT E PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLE XXIV OF THE CODE Article XXIV of the Code contains the requirements for Special Use Permits in the Town of Ithaca. The requirements of the Code are reproduced below in bold italicized type, followed by Verizon Wireless' response in regular type. 270-195. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to set forth regulations, procedures, and conditions that. apply to certain permitted uses which, because of size, intensity, or other special factors, warrant special evaluation of each individual case by either the Planning Board or the Zoning Board ofAppeals. No response necessary. 270-196. Requirement preceding issuance of building permit or certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance. [Amended 5712-2014 by L.L. No. 9-20141 Before a building permit or certificate of occupancy or certificate of compliance can be issued for any of the structures or activities for which either a special permit or a special approval is required, such a permit or approval shall be obtained in accordance with these and other applicable provisions. No response necessary. 270-197. Applicability. The requirements set forth in this article shall apply to all construction, activities, uses or developments that are referred to elsewhere in this chapter as being allowed only upon receipt of a special permit or special approval. Special permits shall be issued by the Planning Board Special approvals shall be issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals Any change of use of an existing structure to a use that requires a special permit or special approval shall be subject to the requirements of this article. No response necessary. 270-198. Procedure. A. The applicant shall have the option to make an informal presubmission presentation to the appropriate Board at which time special permit or special approval (hereafter collectively referred to as "special authorization'9 application requirements may be reviewed. A sketch plan or other general description should be prepared by the applicant for use at the presubmission meeting, to indicate the general nature. of the proposal. No response necessary. 4872-6179.2t34.1 2- B. Formal application. 1) Unless other requirements of this chaptergovern the applicant shall make formal application for special authorization to the appropriate Board by submitting, at a minimum: a) One completed and signed application form prescribed by the Board hearing the matter. If a development review application is submitted far a site plan review and special permit, no additional application shall be required. b) Applicable application. c) Deposit of review fees to the extent required by this chapter or any other Town law or resolution. d) One fully completed and signed short environmental. assessment form, Part I (SERF), or long environmental assessment form, Part I (LEAF), whichever is required. e) Such other information or documentation as may be deemed reasonably necessary or appropriate by the reviewing staff person or Board to adequately consider the application. No response necessary. 2) The application for special authorization shall not be .deemed complete until all of the above items are received by the Town Planner (for special permits) or Town Building Code and Zoning Enforcement Officer (for special approvals) and the requirements of SEAR have been met. No response necessary. C. Upon receipt of a complete application, the appropriate Board shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of Town Law § 274-b or any similar or successor applicable statutes and shall render a decision approving, approving with conditions, or denying the special authorization. Such hearing may be combined with any other hearing relating to the same proposal (e.g., site plan approval and special permit hearings may be combined). No response necessary. D. In making its decision, the reviewing Board shall have the power to impose conditions and restrictions as authorized by § 274-b of the Town Law or any similar or successor statute. No response necessary. 4872-6179-2134.1 3- 270-199. Waiver of requirements. The reviewing Board may waive one or more of the normal application requirements when it determines that the particular circumstances do not require all of the full application materials for adequate consideration of the requestfor special authorization. No response necessary. 270-200. Considerations for approvaL [Amended 4-9-2018 by L.L. No. 2-20181 The reviewing Board's determination of an application for special authorization shall include findings consistent with any special criteria set forth in this chapter relating to the specific use or activity for which approval "is being sought and shall also include, as appropriate, but shall not be limited to, findings that the following standards have been met. A. The project will be suitable for the property on which it is proposed, considering the property's size, location, and physical site characteristics See Exhibit R (Site Plan); the Project is suitable for the parcel and the overall area. B. The proposed structure design and site layout are compatible with the surrounding area. See Exhibit R (Site Plan); the Project is compatible with the surrounding area as it will be surrounded by trees minimizing its visibility to the extent practicable. C. Operations in connection with the proposed use do not create any more noise, fumes, vibration, illumination, or other potential nuisances than the operation of any permitted use in the particular zone. See Exhibit R (Site Plan); the Project is an inert public utility facility that will operate with minimal noise. D. Community infrastructure and services, such as police, fire and other protective services, roadways, schools, and water and sewer facilities are currently, or will be, of adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed use. See Exhibit R (Site Plan); the Project will not adversely impact community services. E. The proposed use, structure design, and site layout comply with all the provisions of the Town Code and with the Town of Ithaca Comprehensive Plan. See Exhibit R (Site Plan); other than the tower height, the Project fully complies with the Code. F. The site layout, with proposed vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian access, traffic circulation, and parking and loading facilities, is sufficient for the proposed use -and is safely designed for emergency vehicles See Exhibit R (Site Plan); adequate access and parking facilities are provided. 4972-6179-2134.1 4- G. The project includes sufficient landscaping and/or other forms of buffering to protect surrounding land uses Existing vegetation is preserved to the extent possible. See Exhibit'R (Site Plan); the Project is preserving the surrounding trees to the extent possible to help shield the visibility of the tower to the extent practicable. H. To the extent deemed relevant by the reviewing Board, the proposed use or structure complies with all the criteria applicable to site plan review set forth in this chapter. See Exhibit D (Proof of Compliance with the Town's Site Plan Review Requirements, as set forth in Article XXIII of the Code) and Exhibit R (Site Plan). 270-201. Modifications of special permits or special approvals. A special authorization that has been issued may be modified upon the application of the owner for such modification. Such application shall be in accordance with the provisions of this article and the procedures applicable to such application shall be the same as are applicable to an initial application for a special authorization. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no approval shall be required if the change is a modification set forth in § 270-191 as not requiring approval of a modification to a site plan. The waiver of the requirement for, approval of a modification to a special permit or special approval is subject to the same conditions, and subject to the same limitations as pertain to modifications to approved site plans. No response necessary. 270-202. Expiration of special permit or special approval. Unless work has materially commenced (as defined in § 270-194C) in accordance with the special authorization within one year fronr the issuance of the buildingpermit authorizing such work, or within 36 months of the elate the reviewing Board approved the special authorization, whichever is earlier, not only the building permit but the special authorization shall expire and the permissible uses and construction on the property shall revert to those in effect prior to the approval of any special authorization. The reviewing Board, upon request of the applicant, after a public hearing, and upon a finding that the imposition of the time limits set forth above would create an undue hardship on the applicant, may extend the time limits for such additional periods as the reviewing Board may reasonably determine. An application for such extension may be made at the time offiling of the original application or at any time thereafter up to, but no later than, six months after the expiration of the time limits setforth above. No response necessary. 4872-6179.2t34.1 EXHIBIT F F,XHiRiT F PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, AS SET FORTH IN § 270-219(C) ET SEQ. OF THE CODE Section 270-219(C) et seq. of the Code contains the requirements for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities within the Town of Ithaca. The requirements of the Code are reproduced below in bold italicized type, followed by Verizon Wireless' response in regular type. 270-219. Personal wireless service facilities. [Amended 5-9-2005 by L.L. No. 5-2005, 5-12- 201.4 by L.L. No. 9-2014; 6-26-2023 by L.L. No. 12-20231 C. General approval and permit requirements for personal wireless service facilities: 1) Subject to the provisions of this section, personal wireless service facilities PWSFs) are allowed in every Zoning district in the Town. No response necessary. 2) No person shall be permitted to deploy PWSFs, or operate or prepare any site for the deployment ofPWSFs, without havingfirst obtained the applicable approvals and permits required by this section. No response necessary. 3) Repairs to and maintenance of a legally existing PWSF shall not require site plan approval, a special permit, or a PWSFpermit. No response necessary. 4) In addition to the requirements set forth in this section for the issuance of a PWSF permit and, where applicable, site plan and special permit approval, any applicant seeking to place a PWSF in the public right-of-way shall also comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in Chapter 230 (Streets and Sidewalks) of the Town Code relating to conducting construction activities within the public right-of-ivay. To the extent any provisions in Chapter 230 are inconsistent with the provisions set forth in this section, the provisions in this section shall control. Not applicable. 5) Exceptions. The requirements set forth in this § 270-219 shall not apply to: a) PWSFs on property owned or controlled by the Town are not subject to 270-219, except PWSFs within a Town (owned or by use) public right- of-way are subject to § 270-219. The Town Board has sole and absolute 4872-6179-2134.1 2- discretion to determine whether to allow an applicant to place a PWSF that is not subject to § 270-219 on Town property, and the Town Board may impose such conditions on any such placement and use as it deems appropriate. Nothing herein shall be deemed to create any right or entitlement to use Town property for such PWSF. Not applicable. b) ' Any facilities exclusively for private, noncommercial radio and television reception and private citizens bands, licensed amateur radio and other similar noncommercial telecommunications. Not applicable. 6) Nonconforming facilities The lawful use of any PWSF legally' existing on the date of adoption of this § 270-219 may be continued even though such PWSF does not conform to § 270-219. Any proposed modification to a PWSF is subject to the requirements of this § 270-219. Maintenance and repairs are not considered modifications. No response necessary. D. Approvals and permits required far each type ofpersonal wireless service facility. 1) A11 PWSFs shall require a building permit issued by a Code Enforcement Officer, where the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code or the Ithaca Town Code requires a building permit. No response necessary. 2) 'A small wireless facility proposed to be co -located on an existing small wireless facility, where the completed facility would still constitute a small wireless facility after the co -location, shall require a PWSFpermit issued by the Director of Code Enforcement. Not applicable. 3) A PWSF proposed to be co -located on an existing PWSF that is not a small wireless facility shall require a PWSF permit issued by the Director of Code Enforcement. In addition, site plan and special permit approvals by the Planning Board are required if the proposed PWSF co -location will. a) Increase the approved height of the PWSF structure by more than 15%; Not applicable. b) Increase the number of antennas by more than 50% over the previously approved number of antennas; 4872.6179-2134,1 3- Not applicable. c) Increase the square footage of accessory buildings* by more than 200 square feet over the previously approved square footage of accessory buildings; Not applicable d) Add one or more microwave antenna dishes, or Not applicable. e) Expand the footprint of the PWSF structure. Not applicable. 4) Where more than one PWSF is proposed and at least one PWSF will not be co - located on an existing structure, all ofthe proposed PWSFs (including co -located PWSFs) shall require a - PWSF permit issued by the Director 'of Code Enforcement, and site plan and special permit approvals by the Planning Board. Not applicable. 5) All. other PWSFs shall require a PWSF permit issued by the Director of Code Enforcement, and site plan and specidl permit approvals by the Planning Board. All Planning Board considerations and approvals of site plans and special permits shall be in accordance with Chapter 270 (Zoning), Article XXIII (Site Plan Review and Approval Procedures) and Article XXfV (Special Permits and Special Approvals), respectively. No response necessary. 6) Any site plan, special permit or personal wireless service facility permit granted hereunder shall be valid only for the dimensions and number of antenna facilities and PWSF structures for the facility contained in the original application as so approved. Any subsequent changes or modifications shall require a new application for same following the procedures set forth in this section. No response necessary. 7) Notwithstanding Subsection D(2) through (5) above, any application that asserts Spectrum Act § 6409(a)4 applies and that meets the requirements in 47 CFR 1.6100 for an eligible facilities request shall not require site plan or special permit approval and shall require a PWSF permit issued by the Director of Code Enforcement. A building permit issued by a Code Enforcement Officer is also Editor's Note: See 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a). i 4972-6179-2134,1 required if the New' York State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code or the .Ithaca Town Code requires a building permit. Not applicable. This Project is not an Eligible Facilities Request under the Spectrurn Act. E. Shot clock periods and tolling. 1) To comply with the requirements of 47 U.S C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) of the TCA, and unless tolled, extended by agreement, or subject to reasonable delays due to circumstances beyond the Town's control, as described in Subsection F below, the Planning Board and Town officials shall issue, grant or deny PWSF site plans, special permits, PWSFpermits, building permits and other required Town permits within the following number of days from Town receipt of an application for same: a) For individual co -located facilities: 11 Sixty days for PWSFs that meet the requirements in 47 CFR 1. 6100for an eligible facilities request. Not applicable. 2] Sixty days for co -location of a new small wireless facility upon an existing small wireless facility structure, where the completed facility would still constitute a small wireless facility after the co - location. Not applicable. 31 Ninety days far all other co -locations of a PWSF on an existing structure. Not applicable. b) For individual non -co -located facilities: 71 Ninety days for a new small wireless facility. Not applicable. 21 One hundred fifty days far all other PWSFs. No response necessary; although this is the applicable review period. 4972- 6179-2134.1 5- c) For batched applications. I] If a single application seeks authorization for multiple deployments, all of which fall within Subsection E(I)(a)C21 above or all of which fall within Subsection E(l)(b)[l] above, then the presumptively reasonable period, of time for the application as a whole is equal to that for a single deployment within the category applicable to the deployments. Not applicable. 2] If a single application seeks authorization for multiple deployments, the components of which are a mix of deployments that fall within Subsection E(I)(a)[2] and (b)[l] above, then the presumptively reasonable period of time for the application as a whole is 90 days. Not applicable. 2) Upon receipt of an application, the Director of Planning and Director of Code Enforcement shall review the application for completeness If the Director of Planning or Director of Code Enforcement determines the. application is. a) incomplete, b) the wrong type of application, or c) otherwise defective, then the Director of Planning shall send the applicant a notice of incompleteness by the Town's digital software program, email, or first-class mail to the email or mailing address provided by the applicant. No response necessary 3) For small wireless facilities, the notice of incompleteness shall be sent within IO days of the Town's receipt of the application. For all other PWSFs, the notice of incompleteness shall be sent within 30 days of the Town's receipt of the application. No response necessary. 4) The notice of incompleteness shall describe why the application is incomplete, is the wrong type, or is otherwise defective and shall specifically identify any missing documents or information and the specific rule or regulation creating the obligation to submit such documents or information. No response necessary. 5) For proposed small wireless facilities, the Director of Planning's sending of a notice of incompleteness shall reset and toll the relevant shot clock period. The reset shot clock period shall begin running at zero on the day the Town receives all the documents and information identified by the Town to render the application complete. 4872.6179-2134.1 M Not applicable. 6) For proposed PWSFs other than small wireless facilities, the Director of Planning's sending of a notice of incompleteness shall toll (but not reset) the relevant shot clock period. The shot clock period shall be tolled beginning the day after the date when the Town sends the -applicant the notice of incompleteness that specifically identifies any missing documents or information and the specific rule or regulation creating the obligation to submit such documents or information. ' The last day of tolling shall be the date when the applicant submits all the documents and information identified by the Town to render the application complete. No response necessary. 7) If upon receipt of responsive materials and information from tl:e applicant, the Director of Planning or the Director of Code Enforcement determines that the application is still incomplete or otherwise defective, then the Director of Planning shall, within 10 days of receipt of such responsive materials, send the applicant another notice of incompleteness by the Town's digital software program, email, or first-class mail to the email or mailing address provided by the applicant. Regardless of the type of PWSF, the Director of Planning's sending of this second notice of incompleteness shall again toll (but shall not reset) the relevant shot clock period. The shot clock period shall be tolled beginning the day after the date when the Town sends the applicant the second notice of incompleteness. The last day of tolling shall be the date when the applicant submits all the documents and information identified by the Town to render the application complete. The same procedure may continue to be repeated with subsequent applicant submissions and Notices of Incompleteness. No response necessary. 8) Shot clock date. The shot clock date for an application is determined by counting forward, beginning on the day after the date when the application was submitted, by the number of calendar days of the relevant shot clock period. If the date calculated in this manner is a "holiday" as defined in 47 CFR 1.4(e)(1), or is a legal holiday in New York State, Tompkins County or the Town, the shot clock date is the next business day after such date. The term "business day" means any day as defined in 47 CFR 1.4(e)(2) and any day that is not a legal holiday as defined by New York State, Tompkins County or the Town. No response necessary. F. Extensions and reasonable delay periods. 1) Shot clock period extension by mutual agreement. The Planning Board (if applicable) or Director of Code Enforcement may extend any applicable shot clock period -by mutual agreement with an applicant The agreement may either be in writing or stated on the record at any public meeting. 4972-6179-2134.1 7- No response necessary. 2) Reasonable delay extensions of shot clock periods. Any applicable shot clock period shall be extended to the extent extension is required due to circumstances beyond the control of the Planning Board- (if applicable) or Director of Code Enforcement, as follows: a) If the Planning Board and/or Director of Code Enforcement acts with reasonable diligence to complete its SEQRA review and to ascertain the applicant's compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, and these actions require a period of effort that extends beyond the expiration of the applicable shot clock period, the delays beyond such shot clock period attributable to such actions shall be deemed reasonable. No response necessary. b) If the Planning Board and/or Director of Code Enforcement acts with reasonable diligence to ascertain the applicant's compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, and these actions require a period of effort that extends beyond the expiration of the applicable shot clock period, the delays beyond such shot clock period attributable to such actions shall be deemed reasonable. No response necessary. c) If an applicant tenders last-minute submissions to the Town in the form of a) expert reports; b) expert materials; or c) materials which require a significantperiod far review due either to their complexity or their sheer volume, the Planning Board and/or Director of Code Enforcement shall be afforded a reasonable time to review such late -submitted materials If the Planning ,Board and/or Director of Code Enforcement acts with reasonable diligence to complete such review, and the review requires a period of effort that extends beyond the expiration of the applicable shot clock period, the delays beyond such shot clock period attributable to such review shall be deemed reasonable. No response necessary. d) Force majeure. In the event and to the extent that the rendering of a final decision upon a site plan or special permit application or a PWSF permit application is delayed due to events and/orforces which are not within the reasonable control of the Town (including reasonable control of the Planning Board or Town officers and employees), including, without limitation, acts of God, flood, fire, earthquake, explosion, governmental actions, war, invasion or hostilities (whether war is declared or not), terrorist threats or acts, riot, or other civil unrest, national emergency, revolution, insurrection, epidemic, pandemic, lockouts, strikes or other labor disputes (whether or not relating to the Town's workforce), or power 4872-6179-2134.1 outage, such delays shall constitute reasonable delays and shall be recognized as acceptable grounds for extending the period for review and the rendering of final determinations and permit issuance beyond the period allotted under the applicable shot clock. No response necessary, although Verizon Wireless is unaware of a force majeure exception to the 150-day review period and reserves its rights in that regard. G. Applications for personal wireless service facilities. Applications shall be made via the Town's digital software program to the Director of Planning for site plan approvals and special permits and to the Director of Code Enforcement for PWSF permits, building permits and all other Town permits and Town approvals required by local, state, or federal law or regulation. Each application for a site plan approval, special permit, PWSF permit andlor building permit shall include the following materials. An application for any Town permit or approval is incomplete if it is missing any item listed below, it does not contain everything required by law or regulation, or the Director of Planning or Director of Code Enforcement determines that the application contains inconsistent, contradictory, or unclear information. 1) Applications for Section 6409(a)s eligible facilities must include: a) Identification of all applicants, site developers and FCC -licensed wireless carriers on whose behalf the application is being submitted, as well as the property owner. of the proposed site. Not applicable. b) All applicable application and other fees then being charged by the Town for such applications, and any deposits the Town requires be submitted with the application. Not applicable. c) An email address and a U.S mail address to which the Town "lay email or mail notices to comply with any notice requirement tinder this section, as well as under any local, state and/or federal law or requirement. Not applicable. d) Copies of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license, if applicable, and of all documents submitted to the FCC or any, other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the proposed eligible facilities. Editor's Note: See 47 U.S.C. § W5(a). 4872-6179-2134.1 M Not applicable. e) Written documentation sufficient to show that the proposed deployment is an eligible facilities request. This documentation shall include a drawn - to -scale depiction containing complete calculations for all of the proposed eligible facilities to show whether they, when installed, will meet the physical size limitations and other requirements to qualify them as Section 6409(a) eligible facilities. Not applicable. f) Written documentation sufficient to show that the proposed deployment complies with all applicable, building, structural, electrical and safety codes and with all other laws codifying objective standards reasonably related to health and safety. This documentation shall include a certification by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York that the eligible facilities have been designed in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and in accordance with generally accepted industry standards (including but not limited to the most recent applicable standards of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)], and if constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with the plans the eligible facilities (including the PWSF structure), and other PWSFs and FCC -authorized wireless communication service facilities on the site will be safe, will be in accordance with all applicable governmental building codes, laws and regulations and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards, including, without limitation, acceptable standards as to stability, wind and ice loads, and bird protection. Not applicable. g) An FCC compliance report, as described in Subsection I below. Not applicable. h) Written documentation sufficient to show compliance with all relevant federal requirements, including all applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA, and NHPA requirements. If NEPA review requirements apply and the applicant asserts the proposed personal wireless service facility falls under any categorical exclusions, the applicant shall identify which categorical exclusion(s) the applicant is asserting applies and submit proof that the facility falls under the categorical exclusion(s). Not applicable. 4872-6179-2134.1 10- i) Completed Part 1 of the relevant New York State environmental assessment form. Not applicable. 6F) A11 of the information required by Town Code § 125-5 (Building permits), if applicable. Not applicable. k) Where an applicant is not the owner of the real property upon which the applicant seeks to co -locate Section 6409(a) eligible facilities, proof of the property owner's consent to the deployment of the eligible facilities on the real property and agreement to comply with this § 270-219. If the applicant is leasing all or a portion of real property upon which it intends to install its new eligible facilities, the applicant shall provide a written copy of its lease with the owner of such property. The applicant may redact any financial terms contained within the lease, but it shall not redact any portion of the lease which details the amount of area leased nor the specific portion of the real property to which the applicant has obtained the right to occupy, access, or preclude others from entering . Not applicable. 1) Where an applicant is not the owner of the existing tower or base station upon which the applicant seeks to co -locate Section 6409(a) eligible facilities, proof of the tower or base station owner's consent to the co - location of the eligible facilities onto the existing tower or base station and agreement to comply with this chapter. Not applicable. . 2) Applications far all other PWSFs must include: a) Completed project application forms in such detail and containing such information as the Director of Planning or Director of Code Enforcement may require, including identification of all applicants, site developers and FCC -licensed wireless carriers on whose behalf the application is being submitted, as well as the property owner of the proposed site. See Exhibit A (Copy of Town -supplied application fonns). b) All applicable application and other fees then being charged by the Town for such applications, including any. right-of-way fees that the Town Board may set from time to time by resolution, and any deposits required by the Town for application to the costs of any consultants retained by the Town as provided below. 4572-61*2134.1 11- Verizon Wireless will provide all applicable fees for this Application that may be legally imposed by the Town. Enclosed is a check payable to the Town of Ithaca for $2,925.00 for the applicable fees. c) An email address and a U.S. mail address to which the Town may email or mail notices to comply with any notice requirement under this section, as well as under any local, state and/or federal law or requirement Correspondence regarding this application may be directed to: Jared C. Lusk, Esq. Partner, Nixon Peabody LLP — Attorneys for Verizon Wireless 1300 Clinton Square, Rochester, NY 14604-1792 ilusk@nixoppeabody.com d) Copies of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license, if applicable, and of all documents submitted to the FCC or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the facility. See Exhibit J (Copy of Verizon Wireless' FCC Licenses for Tompkins County). e) If the applicant claims that its proposed installation qualifies as a small wireless facility within this section, a drawn -to -scale depiction that includes complete calculations for all of the components of the facility depicting that, when completed, the facility will meet the physical size limitations which enable the facility to qualify as a small wireless facility. Not applicable. fl Written documentation sufficient to show that the proposed facilities comply with all applicable building, structural, electrical and safety codes and with all other laws reasonably related to health and safety. This documentation shall include a certification by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York that the facilities (including any proposed co -locations) have been designed in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and in accordance with generally accepted industry standards (including but not limited to the most recent applicable standards of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)], and if constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with the plans the facilities will be safe, will be in accordance with all applicable governmental building codes, laws and regulations and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards, including, without limitation, acceptable standards as to stability, wind and ice loads, and bird protection. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4872-6179-2134.1 12- g) An FCC compliance report, as described in Subsection I below. See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). h) Written documentation sufficient to show compliance with all applicable federal requirements, including all applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA, and NHPA requirements If NEPA review requirements apply and the applicant asserts the proposed personal wireless service facility falls under any categorical exclusions, the applicant shall identify which categorical exclusion(s) the applicant is asserting applies and submit proof that the facility falls under the categorical exclusion(s). See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with Federal EME Regulations). i) Completed Part 1 of the relevant New York State- environmental assessment form. See Exhibit K (Long Form EAF). 0) A visual impact analysis, as described in Subsection J below. See Exhibit Q (Photosimulation Report). k) All of the information required by Town Code § 125-5 (Building pertnits), if applicable. The Project complies with this section of the Code. Any additional•and/or revisional information necessary for a building pennit will be submitted to the Town following the issuance of the required zoning approvals. 1) Where site plan review is required, a site plan and other documentation that complies with Town Code § 270-186 (Site plan requirements) and also contains the following: 1] The exact location of the proposed facility, including its geographic coordinates. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 2] The maximum height of the proposed facility, including all appurtenances. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 3] A detail of the antenna facility and PWSF structure, including engineering drawings from the facility manufacturer for any proposed towers (monopole, guyed, freestanding, or other). See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 4872-6179-2134.1 13- 4] The location, type, and intensity of any lighting on the facility. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 5] Property boundaries and navies of all adjacent landowners. See Exhibit.R (Site Plan). 6] The location of all other structures on the parcel and all structures on any adjacent parcels within 100 feet of the property lines, together with the distance of these structures from any proposed tower. See Exhibit R (Site Plan). 7] The location, nature and extent of any proposed fencing, landscaping, and screening See Exhibit R (Site Plan) 8] The location and nature of any proposed utility easements and access roads or drives See Exhibit R (Site Plan). in) Where an applicant is not the owner of the real property upon which the applicant seeks to deploy facilities, proof of the property owner's consent to the deployment of the facilities on the real property and agreement to comply with this § 270-219. If the applicant is leasing all or a portion of real property upon which it intends to install its new facilities, the applicant shall provide a written copy of its lease with the owner of such property. The applicant may redact any financial terms contained within the lease, but it shall not redact any portion of the lease which details the amount of area leased nor the specific portion of the real property to which the applicant has obtained the right to occupy, access, or preclude others from entering. See Exhibit N (Proof of the Landowner's consent to this Application). n) Where an applicant seeks to co -locate facilities and is not the owner, of the PWSFstructure upon which the applicant seeks to co -locate the facilities, proof of the PWSF structure owner's consent to the co -location of the proposed facilities onto the existing PWSF structure. Not applicable. o) An agreement by the owner and operator (if different from owner) that complies with the requirements set forth in Subsection P below for 4872-6179-2134.1 14- removal of all personal wireless service facilities and restoration of the site to its original condition if the facility becomes obsolete or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for 120 consecutive days See Exhibit M (Removal Agreement). p) An agreement that the applicant will negotiate in good faith with any subsequent applicant seeking to co -locate a personal wireless service facility on the initial applicant's PWSF structures. This agreement shall commit the initial applicant and landowner and their respective successors in interest to: 1] Respond in a timely, comprehensive manner to a request for information from a potential shared -use applicant. 2] Negotiate in good faith for shared use by third parties where such shared use is, or may be, made, technologically and structurally feasible. 3] Allow shared use if an applicant agreesin writing to pay reasonable 4] charges for same. CS] Make no more than a reasonable charge for shared use, based upon generally accepted accounting principles. The charge may include but is not limited to a pro rats share of the cost of site selection, planning, project administration, land costs, site design, construction and maintenance, financing, return on equity, and depreciation, and all of the costs of adapting the tower or equipment to accommodate a shared user without causing electromagnetic interference or causing uses on the site to emit electromagnetic radiation in excess of levels permitted by the FCC. See Exhibit L (Verizon Wireless' Collocation Policy). q) Information required by, and proof of compliance with, Subsection H Co - location) below. See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report) and Exhibit L (Verizon. Wireless' Collocation Policy). r) If site plan approval and special permit are required, and if co -location onto an existing structure is not proposed and is not feasible, an alternative site analysis of all potentially less intrusive alternative sites not involving co -location which the applicant has considered. This alternative site analysis shall document each site's respective location, elevation, and suitability to remedy a significant gap in the coverage of 4872- 6179-2134.1 15- the ' applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and front landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). For suitable alternative sites'that an applicant claims are unavailable, the applicant shall submit evidence of good faith efforts to secure use of each such site from its owner. See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report) and Exhibit I (Site Selection Report). s) If site- plan approval and special permit are required, evidence of the existence of a significant gap in the coverage of the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to "take and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). 1] Such evidence shall include the nature of each gap and its geographic location and boundaries See Exhibit -H (RF Justification Report). 21 Evidence that a gap exists shall include in -kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include for each frequency, in table format: a] The date and time for the test, 1b] The location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded; and c] Each signal strength recorded, measured in decibel- milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. See the report from Millenium Engineering, F.C. at Exhibit V indicating that the request for drive test data is both outdated and misguided. 3] The applicant shall also submit test maps, depicting the actual signal strengths recorded during all in -kind call testing, for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. See the report from Millenium Engineering, P.C. at Exhibit V indicating that the request for drive test data is both outdated and misguided. 4872-6179-2134.1 16- 4] The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, percentage and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. See the report from Millenium Engineering, P.C. at Exhibit V indicating that the request for dropped call data is both outdated and misguided. 5] The applicant shall also submit evidence'of a compelling need to address any significant gaps in the applicant's personal wireless services through- the proposed facilities and not through any other solution. The applicant shall submit evidence showing that the applicant considered other sites and other means of addressing the gaps, and evidence showing the feasibility of addressing the gaps through the use of other sites and other means The applicant shall also submit evidence that the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report) t) Where the applicant asserts that a denial would constitute an effective prohibition, the applicant shall submit evidence that the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report) u) A no study or written statement, prepared by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York, assessing the proposed personal wireless service facility's compliance with the noise requirements in Subsection M. The assessment shall include noise from equipment, such as air-conditioning units and backup generators. A noise study will be prepared in connection with this Project. Note that the Project will not generate any noise that will be noticeably audible from the Site's property lines. See Exhibit T. Noise will only be occasionally generated from the facility when the Project's generator is in use. See Exhibit K (Long EAF). v) An economic analysis study of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF may have on all adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. 4872-6179-2134.1 17- See the letter report from Colliers International Valuation and Advising Services attached as Exhibit Y. As outlined in the letter, there is insufficient sales data available to complete a statistically reliable market analysis. As indicated in his report, Mr. Fisher has completed multiple market analyses for cell tower projects in upstate New York (see copies of four (4) such reports enclosed in Exhibit Y) and has failed to identify an adverse market impact to surrounding properties located within 1-1.5 miles of a tower site. His conclusions in the prior report were based on actual sales data both before and after construction of the tower. H. Co -location. 1) The shared use ofexisting PWSF structures or other structures shall bepreferred to the construction of new PWSF structures. Arty PWSF permit or site plan or special permit application, renewal or modification thereof shall include proof that reasonable efforts have been made to co -locate on an existing PWSF structure or upon another existing structure. See Exhibit I (Site Selection Report) 2) The application shall include an- adequate inventory report specifying existing PWSF sites and any structures (except one family dwellings, two fancily dwellings, multiple residences, and accessory structures associated with such dwellings and multiple residences) within a one -mile radius of the proposed facility. The inventory report shall contain an evaluation of opportunities for shared use as an alternative to the proposed location, along with a map showing the location of each site inventoried, the heights of the PWSF structures, and the heights of other structures on the sites of the inventoried locations See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report). 3) The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed PWSF cannot be accommodated on existing PWSFs in the inventory due to one or more of the following reasons: a) The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of existing and approved PWSFs or other structures, considering existing and reasonably anticipated future use for those facilities and other structures b) The planned equipment would cause radio frequency interference with other existing : or planned equipment which cannot be reasonably prevented. c) The planned equipment would cause an exceedance of FCC RF exposure limits which cannot be reasonably prevented. - 4872-6179-2134.1 d) Existing or approved PWSFs or other structures do not have space and cannot be modified to provide space on which proposed equipment can be placed so it can function effectively and reasonably. e) Other technical reasons make it impracticable to place the equipment proposed by the applicant on existing PWSFs or other structures. The property owner or owner of the existing PWSF or other structure fails to reach agreement after negotiating in good , faith to allow such co - location. See Exhibit I (Site Selection Report). FCC compliance report. 1) The FCC compliance report required by this section shall be prepared by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York and certified under penalties of perjury that the content thereof is true and accurate, wherein the engineer shall certify that the proposed facility will be FCC compliant including compliance with applicable FCC regulations and bulletins) as of the time of its installation, including that the facility will comply with the relevant limits for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) frelds adopted by the FCC See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 2) If it is anticipated that there will be more than one RF emitter on the facility, the FCC compliance report shall take into account anticipated exposure from all emitters and shall indicate whether or not the combined exposure levels. will exceed the permissible general population exposure limits in locations accessible to the public, and, where applicable, the occupational exposure limits. Not applicable. 3) Such FCC compliance report shall provide the calculation or calculations which the engineer used to determine the levels of RF emissions and RF exposure levels. See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 4) On the cover page of the report, the report shall explicitly specify: a) Whether the applicant and their engineer are claiming that the applicable FCC limits are the general population exposure limits or the occupational exposure limits. If the applicant and their engineer are asserting that only the occupational exposure limits apply to the proposed installation, they shall provide a factual. basis as to why they claim that only the occupational exposure limits apply; and See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 4872-6179-2134.1 19- b) The exact minimum distance factor, measured in feet, which the applicant's engineer used to calculate the level of radiation emissions to which the proposed facility will expose members of the general public or, where applicable, persons in the workplace. The minimum distance factor is the closest distance (i.e., the minimum distance) to which a person shall be able to gain access to the antennas mounted upon, or which shall bea part of, the proposed facility. See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). J. Visual impact analysis. Each application shall include a visual impact analysis that contains an assessment of the proposed facility's visual impact on abutting properties and streets, taking into consideration any PWSF structure that is to be constructed, as well as the rest of the facility. The visual impact analysis shall, at a minimum, include the following: 1) . Small wireless facilities: a) Line -of -sight drawings. b) Detailed elevation maps c) Visual simulations, including photographic images, depicting the height at which the proposed facility shall stand when completed (including all portions and attachments to the facility), taken from the perspectives of the public right-of-way, and of any properties situated in closest proximity to the location being proposed for the facility siting. Photos should also be taken from the perspectives of any properties that would reasonably be expected to sustain significant adverse aesthetic impacts due to their elevation relative to the site, or due to the facility location and the property location. d) Before and after renderings. e) Alternate facility designs and color schemes f) Possible impacts to any inrportant/scenic views listed in the Tompkins County or Town of Ithaca.Scenic Resources Inventories Not applicable. 2) Personal wireless service facilities which do not meet the definition of a "small wireless facility' : a) A visibility reap to determine locations from where the facility will be seen. b) Line -of -sight drawings. 4872- 6179.2134.1 20- c) Detailed elevation maps d) Visual simulations, including photographic images, depicting the height at which the proposed facility shall stand when completed, taken from the perspectives of the public right-of-way, and of any properties situated in closest proximity to the location being proposed for the facility siting. Photos should also be taken from the perspectives of any properties that would reasonably be expected to sustain significant adverse aesthetic impacts due to their elevation relative to the site, or due to the facility location and the property location. e) Before -and -after renderings f) Alternate facility designs and color schemes g) Possible impacts to any importantlscenic views listed in the Tompkins County or Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventories. See Exhibit 0 (Photosimulation Report). K. Priority of,siting locations In determining whether a site is appropriate, and if it is determined a need exists for the facility, the preferential order of location, to the extent the sane may be, or may be made, technically feasible, is as follows: 1) Co -located on existing towers. 2) Co -located on any other existing radio or other tower that would not require any increase in height nor significant noticeable structural additions to accommodate the facility. 3) Within any industrial zones or existing planned development zones that permit industrial activities. 4) Within any light industrial zones or existing planned development zones that permit light industrial activities. 5} Within any existing community commercial zones or existing planned development zones which permit all of the activities permitted in a community commercial zone. b) On any other property in the Town. No response necessary. 4872.6179-2134.1 21 - L. Design standards. All PWSFs shall be sited, designed, and constructed in a manner which minimizes to the maximum extent practicable i) visual impact, and ii) adverse impacts upon migratory and other birds and other wildlife. 1) Aesthetic criteria applicable to small wireless facilities: a) For co -locations [except Section 6409(a)6 eligible facilities co -locations]: I] There shall be no exposed wires. All cables and wires associated with the facility leading to and away from the facility must be fully concealed, and the cable covering or conduit shall match the color of the PWSF structure on which the facility is located. There shall be no external cables and wires related to the facility hanging off or otherwise exposed. 2] Each antenna shall be located within a stealth enclosure that matches the materials, color, and design of the PWSFstructure on which the antenna is located. 3]. ' All equipment enclosures shall be as small as possible and undergrounded when possible. Building -mounted enclosures shall be located within a stealth enclosure that matches the materials, color, and design of the PWSF structure on which the enclosure is located. Ground -mounted enclosures shall have appropriate vegetative buffering to buffer the view from neighboring residences, recreation areas and public roads. The Planning Board may require screening adjacent to waterways, landmarks, refuges, community facilities, or conservation or historic areas .within common view of the public. Co -locations along New -York -State -designated scenic byways or located within an area listed in the Tompkins County or Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory must be as visually inconspicuous as possible. The views of, and vistas front, such districts and corridors shall not be impaired or diminished by the placement of PWSFs 4] There shall be no illumination, except in accord with state or federal regulations 5] No portion of the PWSF structure or other parts of the facility shall be used for signs or promotional or advertising purposes, including, but not limited to, company name, phone numbers, banners, streamers, and balloons 6 Editor's Note: See 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a). 4872-6179-2134.1 22- 61 Access to the facility shall be achieved by using existing public or private roads; no 'new accessway, driveway or parking area shall be constructed. Equipment or vehicles not used in direct support, renovations, additions, or repair of any facility shall not be stored or parked on the facility site. 71 The facility shall be located at least 300 feet front any structure that contains a dwelling unit. Not applicable. b) For small wireless facility nodes: I] If the node is located within a public ROW, then the preferable placement locations are as follows: most preferred is co -location on existing towers, utility poles or other structures; least preferred. is installing all new poles). 2] If co -location is not possible, then all new poles and equipment must be the same height, color, and finish as surrounding poles 31 There shall be no exposed wires All cables and wires associated with the facility leading to and away front the facility shall be installed underground. If undergrounding is not possible, then all cables, wires and connectors must be fully concealed on the PWSF structure, and the cable covering or conduit shall match the color of the PWSF structure. There shall be no external cables and wires related to the facility hanging off or otherwise exposed on the PWSF structure. 4] Each antenna shall be located entirely within a shroud or canister type enclosure or a stealth facility. The diameter of an antenna enclosure at its widest point should not be wider than two times the diameter of the top of the PWSF structure. 51 All antenna enclosures shall either be mounted to the top of the PWSF structure and aligned with the center line of the PWSF structure or mounted to the side of the PWSF structure such that the vertical center line of the antenna enclosure will be parallel with the PWSF structure. Stealth enclosures shall match the architecture, materials, color, and design of the PWSF structure on which they are located, (e.g., streetlight pole, building rooftop chimney, cupolas, etc.). Photo examples of stealth applications include the following (source: stealthconceahnent.com): 6] All equipment enclosures shall be as small as possible and undergrounded when possible. Ground -mounted equipment shall incorporate concealment elements into the proposed design, 4872-6179-2134.1 23 - matching the color and materials of the PWSF structure. Concealment may include, but shall not be limited to, landscaping, strategic placement in less obtrusive locations and placement within existing or replacement street furniture (see photo example of stealth pole above). 7] Tree topping is prohibited. Any proposed pruning or removal of trees, shrubs or other landscaping already existing in the right-of- way must be noted in the site plan application and must be approved by the Planning Board. 8] There shall be no illumination, except in accord with state or federal regulations, or unless the illumination is integral to the camouflaging strategy (e.g., design intended to look like a streetlight pole). 9] Guidelines on placement. Node facilities, including their PWSF structures, shall be located as follows: a] No closer than 1,500 feet away, radially, from another small wireless facility, unless the wireless carrier can prove that the facilities need to be closer together to meet a specified legal standard fib] In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetligh ts. ! c] Equal distance between trees, when possible, with a minimum of 15 feet separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical root zone of any tree. d] Shall not be located along a parcel's front lot line where a building on the parcel: is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places; is located in an historic district listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places; or has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office ofParks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places. e] At least 300 feet from any structure that contains a dwelling unit. ff] Facilities along New -York -State -designated scenic byways or located within an area listed in the Tompkins County or Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory must be as visually inconspicuous as possible. The views of, and vistas 4872.6179-2134.1 24_ from, such districts and corridors shall not be impaired or diminished by the placement of such PWSFs. g] If a streetlight is present, a combination PWSF structure and streetlight pole should only be located where an existing pole can be removed and replaced, or at a location where the Town has identified that a streetlight is necessary. 10] No portion of the PWSF structure or other parts of the facility shall be used for signs or promotional or advertising' purposes, including, but not limited to, company name, phone numbers, banners, streamers, and balloons Not applicable. c) For individual small wireless facility sites: Cl] There shall be no exposed wires. All cables and wires associated with the facility leading to and away from the facility shall be installed underground. If undergrounding is notpossible, then all cables, wires and connectors must be fully concealed, and the cable covering or conduit shall match the color of the PWSF structure. There shall be no external cables and wires related to the small wireless facility hanging off or otherwise exposed. 2] Each antenna shall be located within a stealth enclosure that matches the architecture, materials, color and design of the PWSF structure on which the antenna is located (e.g., streetlight pole, building rooftop chimney, cupola, etc.). 3] All equipment enclosures shall be as small as possible and undergrounded when possible. Building -mounted enclosures shall be located within a stealth enclosure that matches the architecture, materials, color and design of the PWSF structure on which the enclosure is located (see photo examples above). Ground -mounted enclosures shall have appropriate vegetative buffering to buffer the view from neighboring residences, recreation areas and public. roads. The Planning Board may require screening adjacent to waterways, landmarks, refuges, community facilities, or conservation or historic areas within common view of the public. Co -locations along New -York -State - designated scenic byways or located within an area listed in the Tompkins County or Town of Ithaca Scenic Resources Inventory must be as visually inconspicuous as possible. The views of, and vistas from, such districts and corridors shall not be impaired or diminished by the placement of such PWSFs. 4872-6179-2134.1 25- 2) 4] There shall be no illumination, except in accord with state or federal regulations, or unless the illumination is integral to the camouflaging strategy (e.g., design intended to look like a streetlight pole). S] No small wireless facility shall be located along a parcel's front lot line where a building on the parcel: is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places; is located in an historic district listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places; or has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register ofHistoric Places 6] No portion of the PWSF structure or other parts of the facility shall be used for signs or promotional or advertising purposes, including, but not limited to, company name, phone numbers, banners, streamers, and balloons. 7] Access to the small wireless facility shall be achieved by using existing public or private roads; no new accessway, driveway or parking area shall be constructed. Equipment or vehicles not used in direct support, renovations, additions, or repair of any facility shall not be stored or parked on the facility site. 8] The small wireless facility shall be located at least 300 feet from any structure that contains a dwelling unit. Not applicable. Aesthetic criteria applicable to non -small wireless facilities: a) Thefacility shall have the leastpractical visual effect on the environment, as determined by the Planning Board. See Exhibit ; the Project so complies. b) There shall be no exposed wires except for any guy wires. All cables and wires associated with the facility leading to and away from the facility must be fully concealed, and the cable covering or conduit shall match the color of the PWSF structure. There shall be no external cables and wires related to the facility hanging off or otherwise exposed. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. c) There shall be no illumination, except in accord with state or federal regulations and with Subsection O below. Towers shall not be artificially lighted and marked beyond the requirements of the FAA. 4872-6179-2134.1 26- See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. d) Any tower that is not subject to FAA marking as set forth above shall otherwise have a galvanized finish or shall be painted gray above the surrounding tree line and gray or green below the tree line, as deemed appropriate by the Planning Board, or be disguised or camouflaged to blend in with the surroundings, to the extent that such alteration does not impair the ability of the facility to perform its designedfunction. See Exhibit R; the.Project so complies. e) Accessory structures shall maximize the use of building materials, colors, and textures designed to blend in with the natural surroundings. Ground - mounted enclosures and fences shall have appropriate vegetative buffering to buffer the view from neighboring residences, recreation areas and public roads. The Planning Board may require screening adjacent to waterways, landmarks, parkland, community facilities, or conservation or historic areas within common view of the public. See Exhibit 0 and Exhibit R; the tower compound is surrounded by tall trees and will not be visible from adjacent properties. No portion of the PWSF structure or other parts of the facility shall be used for signs or promotional or advertising purposes, including, but not limited to, company name, phone numbers, banners, streamers, and balloons. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. g) Existing on -site vegetation shall be preserved to, the maximum extent possible. Tree topping is prohibited There shall be no cutting of trees exceeding four inches in diameter (measured at a height offour feet off the ground) in connection with the proposed facility prior to the granting of site plan approval. Any proposed pruning or removal of trees, shrubs or other existing landscaping must be noted in the site plan application and must be approved by the Planning Board See Exhibit'R; the Project so complies. h) Equipment or vehicles not used in direct support, renovations, additions, or repair of any facility shall not be stored or parked on the facility site. Verizon Wireless will so comply. i) Where permitted, accessways shall make maximum use of existing public or private roads to the extent practicable. New accessways constructed solely for PWSFs must be at least 12, but no more than 24, feet wide, and 4872-6179.2t34.1 27- closely follow natural contours to assure minimal visual disturbance and reduce soil erosion potential. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. j) Where permitted, parking areas shall be sufficient to accommodate the usual number ofservice vehicles expected on thepremises at any one time. Driveways or parking areas shall provide adequate interior turnaround, such that service vehicles will not have to back out onto a public thoroughfare. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. k) The facility shall be located at least 300 feet from any structure that contains a dwelling unit. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. M. Noise. No personal wireless- service facility shall produce noise in violation of Town of Ithaca Code Chapter 284 (Noise). In addition, noise from a personal wireless service facility shall at no time be audible at the property line of any lot i) zoned Residential or Conservation, or ii) on which a dwelling unit exists. See Exhibit T. N. Dimensional standards: 1) A fall.zone around any tower constructed as part of a non -small wireless facility must have a radius at least equal to the height of the facility. The entire fall zone may not include public roads and must be located on property either owned or leased by the applicant, or for which the applicant has obtained an easement, and may not, except as set forth below, contain any structure other than those associated with -the facility. If the tower is attached to an existing structure, relief may be granted by specific permission of the Planning Board on a case -by -case basis if it is determined by such Board, after submission of competent evidence, that the waiver of this requirement will not endanger the life, health, welfare or property of any person. In granting any such waiver, the Board may impose any conditions reasonably necessary to protect the public or other property front potential injury. See Exhibit R;'the Project so complies. 2) All non -small wireless facilities and their fall zones shall be located on a single parcel. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. 4872-6174-2134.1 3) All personal wireless service facilities shall comply with the height, setback, frontage, minimum, lot size, and (except as specified below) yard standards of the underlying zoning district and the fall zone requirements of this section. To the extent there is a conflict, the more restrictive provision shall govern. If the proposed height of the facility exceeds the permitted height of structures in the zoning district in which thefacility isproposed to be located, notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, a height variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals shall also be required. Setbacks shall be measured by the distance between any portion of a personal wireless service facility and the lot line of the parcel on which the proposed facility will be placed. Small wireless facilities do not need to meet the front yard standards of the underlying zoning district, but they must be located at least 300 feet from any structure that contains a dwelling unit. The size of the leased or owned lot shall be, at a minimum, sufficiently large to include the entire fall zone. All lots leased or owned for the purpose of construction of a tower as part of a personal wireless service facility shall conform, at a minimum, to the lot size requirements of the underlying Zoning district or the size of lot necessary to encompass the entire fall zone, whichever requirement results in a larger lot. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. 4) The front, side, and rear yard requirements of the underlying zoning district in which a facility is erected shall apply to all parts of the facility. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. O. Security. 1) Non -small wireless facility towers, anchor points of guyed towers, and their accessory structures shall each be surrounded by fencing at least eight feet in height, the top foot of which shall be comprised of three strands of barbed wire to discourage unauthorized access to the site. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. 2) Motion -activated or staff -activated security lighting around the base of a tower or accessory structure entrance may be provided if such lighting does not project off the site and otherwise complies with Town Code Chapter 173 (Lighting, Outdoor). Such lighting should only occur when the area within the fenced perimeters has been entered. See Exhibit R; the Project so complies. 3) There shall be no permanent climbing pegs within 1 S feet of the ground of any tower. The Project so complies. 4872-6179.2134.1 29- P. Removal. 1) The personal wireless service facility owner and operator (if different from owner) shall at their expense remove all personal wireless service facilities and restore the site to its original condition (including, where applicable, the seeding of exposed soils), and incur all expenses therefor, if the facility becomes obsolete or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for 120 consecutive days Removal of such obsolete or unused facilities and restoration of the site to its original condition shall take place within 90 days and shall comply with all New York State and Town stormwater laws, rules and regulations. If removal and restoration are not completed within 90 days, the bond or other guaranty secured by the owner and operator shall be used to perform and complete these actions. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 2) As security for the performance of the requirements set forth above, the owner and operator (if different from owner) shall, upon the granting of required approvals and permits under this section and prior to the installation of any personal wireless service facilities, execute, and file with the Town Clerk a bond or other form of security or undertaking which shall be approved as to form, manner of execution; and sufficiency for surety by theAttorney for the Town and the Town Engineer. Any bond or guaranty shall be provided by or placed with a solvent surety corporation duly licensed in the State of New York. Such bond or undertaking shall be conditioned upon the faithful performance of the provisions of this, section, and in the event of default, the bond or undertaking shall be forfeited to the Town, which shall be entitled to maintain an action thereon. The bond or undertaking shall remain in full force and effect until the removal of all personal wireless service facilities and all site restoration has been completed. The value of the bond shall be equal to 125% of the cost offacility removal and restoration of the site, as determined by the Town Engineer after evaluation of the applicant's detailed estimate of such cost. No such decommissioning or removal bond shall be secured. by an indemnity agreement with the owner or operator or any party affiliated with them. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 3) At least once every three years after any approval or permit is issued by the Town, the owner and operator (if different from owner) of the personal wireless service facility shall provide updated certified cost estimates far removal of all personal wireless service facilities and all site restoration. If the resulting 125% cost requirement shows that the existing security or bond is monetarily insufficient, then the owner and operator (if different froyn the owner) shall update such bond or undertaking or see to its replacement or supplementation in an amount to equal such updated 125% cost number. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 4872-6179-2134.1 30- Q. Town consultants 1) The Town, at the expense of the applicant, may employ its own consultants to examine the application and related documentation. The consultants that the Town may retain include, but are not limited to, professional structural and/or electrical engineers, attorneys, and other experts reasonably required by the Town to competently and fully evaluate any application and the resulting construction. Such consultants may be requested, among other matters, to make recommendations as to whether the criteria for granting approvals and permits have been met, including whether the applicant's conclusions regarding a significant gap in coverage, co -location, safety analysis, visual analysis, and structural inspection are valid and supported by generally accepted and reliable engineering and technical data and standards and whether the personal wireless service facility as constructed will be in compliance with the approved plans and in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices and industry standards. Verizon Wireless will so comply to the extent such fees may be legally imposed on an applicant under applicable law. 2) To assure sufficient funds are available to the Town to pay for the consultants referred to in the preceding subsection, an applicant shall be required to deposit review fees in escrow, in accordance with. the terms of Town Code § .153-2D, as the same may be amended from time to time. The Town Board shall setfrom tittle to time by resolution the minimum initial escrow deposit for any personal wireless service facility application which anticipates construction of any type of tower exceeding 50 feet. Verizon Wireless will so comply to the extent such fees may be legally imposed on an applicant under applicable law. R. Special permit approvals. 1) Except. aspro vided in Subsection R(2) below, the Planning Board may approve a special permit or special permit modification relating to a PWSF only if the Planning Board finds: a) Federal law compliance. The PWSFs comply with all relevant federal statutory and regulatory requirements, including all applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA, and NHPA requirements; See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with Federal EME Regulations); the Project so complies. b) The applicable standards in Chapter 270 (Zoning), Article =V (Special Permits and Special Approvals), § 270-200 (Considerations for approval) are met, and 4872-6179.2134.1 31- The Project so complies. c) All of the following additional standards are met. I] Public utility status. Services provided by the proposed PWSFs are considered public utility services, and the provider of such services is considered a public utility, in the State of New York. See Exhibit C (Applicable Legal Standards); the Project so complies. 21 Need. The applicant has proven a compelling need to address any significant'gaps in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network) through the proposed facilities and not through any other solution, and the facility presents a minimal intrusion on the community. See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report); the Project so complies. a] To determine whether a gap is significant, the Planning Board shall consider, among other things, dropped call and failure rates, whether a gap is relatively large or small in geographic size, whether the number of the applicant's customers affected by the gap is relatively small or large, whether or not the location of the gap is situated on a lightly or heavily traveled road .or in a sparsely or densely occupied area, and whether the applicant's customers are affected for only a limited period of time. A significantgap cannot be established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report); the Project so complies. fib] In making the finding of compelling need, the Planning Board shall consider the evidence of a significant gap, the applicant's consideration of other sites and other means of addressing the gaps, and, the feasibility of addressing the gaps through the use of other sites or other means See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report); the Project so complies. 4872-6179-2134.1 32- 31 Compliance with Chapter 270 (Zoning) and other Town Code requirements. Complies with all requirements of this § 270-219, with all other requirements of this Chapter 270 (unless expressly superseded by this § 270-219), and all other applicable Ithaca Town Code requirements The Project so complies. 4] Co -location on proposed towers For non SWFs, when construction of a tower is proposed, such a tower is designed to accommodate future shared use by at least two other PWSF providers See Exhibit R (Site Plan); the Project so complies. 5] Aesthetic impacts. The proposed PWSFs will not inflict a significant adverse aesthetic impact upon properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s) or upon any other properties situated in a manner that such properties might reasonably be expected to sustain adverse aesthetic impacts See Exhibit Q (Photosimulation Report); the Project so complies. 61 Impacts upon real estate values The proposed PWSFs will not inflict a significant adverse impact upon the property values of properties that are located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s). First, as directed in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Handbook (the "Handbook"), "[t]he potential effects that a proposed project may have ... in reducing property values in a community may not be considered under SEQR" (emphasis added) because "speculative environmental loss" is not an environmental factor. Handbook, Ch. 5, p. 60-61. Second, the evidence demonstrates that there is no statistical correlation between cell tower proximity and reduction 'in property values. The concerns about the potential negative impact telecommunication towers on surrounding property values are not unique. During the late 1980's up and through the mid- 1990's, when wireless telecommunications technology was relatively new, the need for telecommunication towers was less accepted within communities. At that time, it was not uncommon for residents or board members to raise concerns about a proposed tower's potential impact on property values. 4872-6179-2134.1 33 - In response to those concerns, Verizon Wireless' representatives, on occasion, have been asked to conduct property value analyses to determine whether a proposed telecommunications tower would cause a decrease in property values in the area surrounding it. Enclosed as Exhibit Y are four (4) property value reports/analyses completed by certified New York State Appraisers in areas around proposed tower sites in several locations throughout Upstate New York (dating from 2011 to 2022), as well as an article from a Right of Way magazine describing a property value analysis completed by an appraisal firm that explored the impact of towers on adjacent property values. In each report/analysis and in the article, the appraisers concluded that there is. no evidence that telecommunications towers adversely impact property values. These conclusions were based,on analysis of actual property sales adjacent to existing towers. In addition, a 2015 survey found that cellular coverage was more important than schools when looking for a home (cellular service ranked 76% versus 60% for schools) and cellular coverage trailed only crime rates (96%), local taxes (90%) and amenities like parks and shops (84%).7 Also, it has been estimated that the availability of high speed internet can add $5,437 to the price of a $175,000 home.$ The facts submitted herewith and with the Application demonstrate the importance of reliable wireless service to the coimunity for maintaining property values. The Town's concern regarding property values should be allayed by the attached analyses which effectively eliminate any question whether the Project will reduce property values in the area. What is more likely, as our society becomes more and more dependent on wireless technology, is that a property will be less valuable and less desirable if not served by reliable voice and data wireless telecommunication services. Concerns that the Project may reduce the market value of the property surrounding the Project are simply not supported by actual credible statistical data from professionally certified real estate appraisers located in Upstate New York. 7] Impact upon the character of the surrounding community. The proposed PWSFs will not be incompatible with the use and character of properties located adjacent or in close proximity to the proposed site(s), or with any other properties situated in a 7 RootMetrics/Money, June 2, 2015. s WSJ "How Fast .Internet Affects Home Prices," June 30,. 2015. 4872-6179-2134.1 34- manner that the .PWSFs might reasonably be expected to be incompatible with such properties. Personal wireless telecommunications facilities are a permitted use in the Town. Granting the requested approvals, which will allow for the placement of a necessary public utility in the Town, will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood and is part of the orderly and necessary infrastructure of a community. Moreover, the Project will not pollute, will not create noise or vibration, will not create any significant increase in traffic, will not create any environmental problems, will not increase population density, and will not create any demand on governmental facilities. Thus, the Project will not create any detriment to adjoining properties or change the character of the neighborhood. Instead, the Project will enhance governmental facilities and promote the public welfare by providing a modern, more efficient system of communications for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunication service to business, industry and individuals in and around the Sunny View cell. 81 Mitigation. The applicant has mitigated the potential adverse impacts of the proposed PWSFs to the greatest extent reasonably feasible through siting, location and design. The Project so complies. 2) If the applicant asserts that a denial would constitute an effective prohibition, and the denial is based on a failure to comply with any of the standards in Subsection R(1)(b) or (c) above, then pursuant to federallaw, the Planning Board must consider whether the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. No response necessary. a) The Planning Board shall consider, among other things, a) whether the proposed `site is the least intrusive location at which a personal wireless service facility that remedies an identified significantgap may be located, and 'the applicant has reasonably established a lack of potential 4872-6179-2134.1 35- alternative less intrusive sites and lack of sites available for co -location, b) whether the specific location on the proposed portion of the selected site is the least intrusive portion of the site for the proposed installation, c) whether the height proposed for the personal wireless service facility is the minimum height necessary to remedy an established significant gap in service, d) whether a preexisting structure can be used to camouflage the personal wireless service facility, e) whether the installation mitigates adverse impacts to the greatest extent reasonably feasible, through the employ of stealth design, screening, use of color, and noise mitigation measures,- and f) whether there is a feasible alternative to remedy the gap through alternative, less intrusive substitute facilities, such as the installation of more than one shorter facility instead of a single facility. No response necessary. b) If the Planning Board finds that the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significantgap in the applicant's personal wireless services, then pursuant to federal law, the Planning Board must grant site plan and special permit approvals. No response necessary. S. . PWSFpermit issuance, duration and renewals. 1) The Director of Code Enforcement shall issue a personal wireless service facility permit upon i) submission of the proof of insurance required by Subsection Y, and ii) the Director of Code Enforcement's determination that the following standards are met. a) For PWSFs that require site plan approval and a special permit. The Planning Board has approved a final site plan and special permit, and the applicant has received any necessary variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals No response necessary. b) • For Section 6409(a)9 eligible facilities: All fees and required documents for Section 6409(a) eligible facilities applications per § 270-219G have been submitted to the Town. No response necessary. . c) For all other PWSFs that do not require site plan approval and a special permit. Editor's Note: See 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a). 4872-6179-2134.1 36- C1] Federal law compliance. The PWSFs comply with all relevant federal statutory and regulatory requirements, including all applicable FCC, FAA, NEPA, and NHPA requirements. Not applicable. 2] Public utility status. The services provided by the proposed PWSFs are considered public utility services, and the provider of such services is considered a public utility, in the State of New York. Not applicable. 3] Compliance with Chapter 270 (Zoning) and other Town Code requirements. Complies with all requirements of this § 270-219, with all other requirements of this Chapter 270 (unless expressly superseded by this § 270-219), and all other applicable .Ithaca Town Code requirements Not applicable. 4] If the applicant asserts that a denial would constitute an effective prohibition, and the denial is based on a failure to comply with any of the standards in Subsection S(1)(c)[2]. or [3] above, then pursuant to federal law, the Director of Code Enforcement must consider whether the proposed facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). A significant gap is not established simply because the applicant's personal wireless services operate on a frequency which is not the frequency most desired by the applicant. An applicant's claim of need for future capacity does not constitute evidence of a significant gap. Not applicable. a] The Director ofPlanning shall make a recommendation to the Director of Code Enforcement on this determination. The Director of Code Enforcement shall consider, among other things, a) whether the height proposed for the personal wireless service facility is the minimum height necessary to remedy an established significant gap in service, b) whether the installation mitigates adverse impacts to the greatest extent reasonably feasible, through the employ of stealth design, screening, use of color, and noise mitigation measures, and c) whether there is a 4872-6179-2134,1 37- feasible alternative to remedy the gap through alternative, less intrusive substitute facilities. Not applicable. A] If the Director of Code Enforcement finds that the proposed -facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant's personal wireless services, then pursuant to federal law, the Director of Code Enforcement must issue the personal wireless service facility permit. Not applicable. 2) A personal wireless service facility permit shall have a term of two years and may be renewed for successive two-year terms pursuant to the terms of this subsection. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 3) A permittee seeking to renew a personal wireless service facility permit must file a renewal application with the Director of Code Enforcement no later than six months prior to the expiration date of the existing permit. The renewal application shall include a completed Town renewal application form, the renewal fee then being charged by the Town for such renewal applications, and the following: a) A certification of compliance with RF exposure limits that meets the rerluirements of Subsection T below, based on tests and inspections undertaken within six months prior to the certification submission; Verizon Wireless will so comply. b) A written report from a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York, based on tests and inspections undertaken within six months, prior to the report submission, certifying that the permitted personal wireless service facilities comply with the noise requirements in Subsection M; Verizon Wireless will so comply. c) The documentation listed in Subsection G(1)(fl or G(2)09 above whichever is applicable) showing compliance with all applicable building, structural, electrical and safety codes and with all other laws reasonably related to health and safety, and Verizon Wireless will so comply. 4872.6179-2134.1 38- d) An affidavit front an attorney admitted and registered to practice law in the State of New York stating that services provided by the PWSFs covered by the permit are considered public utility services, and the provider of such services is considered a public utility, in the State of New York. The affidavit shall also contain information supporting the statement. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 4) The Director of Code Enforcement shall renew a PWSF permit for a two-year term, provided that they find: a) The permittee submitted all required renewal application materials and fees; No response necessary. b) The permittee is incompliance with all terms of its permit, all requirements of this § 2.70-219, all other requirements of this Chapter 270 unless expressly superseded by this § 270-2I9), all other relevant Ithaca Town Code requirements, and all relevant- federal statutory and regulatory requirements, and No response necessary. c) Services provided by the PWSFs covered by the permit are considered public utility services, and the provider of such services is considered a public utility, in the State of New York. No response necessary. 5) If the applicant is in compliance with its permit, asserts that a denial would constitute an effective prohibition, and the denial is.based on a failure to comply with any of the non-federal standards in Subsection S(4)(b) or (c) above, then pursuant to federal law, the Director of Code Enforcement must consider whether the facilities are the least intrusive means of addressing a significant gap in the applicant' s personal wireless services (the ability of wireless telephones to make and receive voice calls to and from landlines that are connected to the national telephone network). The process and requirements in Subsection S(I)(c)[4] above shall apply. No response necessary. 6) If the Director of Code Enforcement denies a renewal application, a permittee may request a hearing before the Town Board upon an application made to the Town Clerk demonstrating that the pernittee was entitled to renewal pursuant to the terms of this subsection. Such hearing shall be requested, in writing, with the request addressed to and received by the Town Clerk within five business days of the permittee's receipt of the denial of the renewal application. Within M days 4872- 6174-2134.1 39 of the permittee's written request, the Town Board shall hold a hearing to determine whether to reverse the denial. The Town Board shall issue its written decision within 15 days after the hearing. No response necessary. 7) If a permittee does not qualify for renewal, the Director of Code Enforcement denies the renewal application, or upon appeal the Town Board upholds the denial, the permittee may file a new application for a. personal wireless service facility permit for the permitted personal wireless service facilities at the same locations. All provisions of this § 270-219 that apply to new applications shall apply to such applications. No response necessary. 8) Upon permit expiration (including where renewal is denied), the owner and operator of the PWSFs covered by the permit shall immediately cease operation of such PWSFs. Verizon Wireless will so comply. T. Certification of compliance with RF exposure limits 1) Within 45 days of initial operation or modification of a PWSF, the owner and operator (if different from the owner) of each antenna shall submit to the Director of Code Enforcement a written certification by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State ofNew York, sworn to under penalties ofperjury, that the PWSFs radio frequency -emissions comply with the applicable FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits for general population/uncontrolled exposure codified in 47 CFR 1.1310(e)(1), Table 1, or any successor regulation: See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 2) The licensed professional engineer shall measure the emissions of the approved PWSF as well as (where required by FCC regulation, bulletin, order or guidance) the cumulative emissions from other nearby PWSFs and determine if such emissions are within the FCC's MPE limits referenced above. See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 3) The PWSF owner and operator (if different front the owner) shall submit to the Director of Code Enforcement a report of these measurements and the engineer's findings with respect to compliance with the FCC's MPE limits. See Exhibit P (Proof of Compliance with applicable federal regulations). 4872.6179-2134.1 I 4) - If the report shows that the PWSF does not comply with applicable limits, then the owner and operator shall immediately cease operation of the PWSF until the PWSF is brought into compliance with such limits Proof of compliance shall be a written certification by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York, sworn to under penalties of perjury, that the PWSF's radio frequency emissions comply with the applicable FCC MPE limits The Town may require, at the applicant's expense, independent verification of the results of this analysis Not applicable. The Project complies with the FCC's acceptable limits. 5) After submission of the proof of compliance with the FCC's MPE limits described above, the PWSF owner and operator (if different from the owner) shall thereafter provide proofs of compliance with the applicable FCC MPE limits no less frequently than 12 months after the date of submission of the last proof of compliance. All of the provisions applicable to the initial submission shall apply to subsequent submissions. Verizon Wireless will so comply. 6) The Town shall have the right to employ a licensed professional engineer to conduct random and unannounced tests of PWSFs located within the Town to certify their compliance with the FCC's MPE limits The Town may cause such random testing to be conducted as often as the Town may deem appropriate. However, the Town may not require the owner and/or operator to pay for more than one Town test per PWSFper calendar year, unless such testing reveals that one or more of the owner and/or operator's PWSFs are exceeding the FCC's MPE limits. In such a case, the owner and operator shall immediately cease operation of all PWSFs that do not comply with the MPE limits until the owner or operator submits proof of compliance as described above. Within 45 days of the Town's receipt of such proof of compliance, the Town may conduct a follow- up test at the expense of the owner and the operator (if different from the owner) to verify compliance. No response necessary. U. Structural integrity ' inspections. Every personal wireless service facility shall be inspected at least every second year for structural integrity by a professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of New York. A copy of the inspection report shall be submitted to the Director of Code Enforcement. Any unsafe condition revealed by such report shall be corrected within 10 days of notification of same to the record landowner on which the facility is constructed. The time period for correction may, on application of the landowner or owner of the facility, be extended by the Director of Code Enforcement if it is impracticable to complete the correction within said 10 days and if there is no imminent danger to life, limb, or other person's property. If the unsafe condition is not corrected within the applicable time period, or if the required inspection is not provided to the Town, the personal wireless service facility permit for construction 4372-6179-2134.1 41 - of the facility may, after a hearing by the Town Board'on at least 10 days'prior notice to the landowner of recordgiven by overnight mail, certified mail, return receipt requested, or other equally effective manner of providing notice, be revoked by the Town Board. Revocation may occur only if the Town Board finds either a) that the required inspection has not been provided or b) that there is an unsafe condition which poses a risk of bodily injury or significant property damage. Upon such revocation, the facility shall be removed or dismantled to the point of removing all unsafe conditions No response necessary. V. Insurance. 1) Minimum coverages Each PWSF permittee shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a PWSF permit, an insurance policy or policies Such policy or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the permittee's operations, as follows: a) Conrmercialgeneralliability insurance with limits ofinsurance ofnotless than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate for bodily injury and property damage, including contractual liability, personal injury, products and completed operations. b) Commercial umbrella insurance with limits of not less than $5,000,000. c) Pollution liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate, with any deductible not to exceed $25,000 each occurrence. See Exhibit W. 2) Other insurance requirements. a) Said policy or policies shall include the Town and its officers and employees as additional insureds. b) Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to provide 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation or any material change to the Town. c) Should any of the required insurance be provided under a claims -made form, a permittee shall maintain such coverage continuously throughout the term of a personal wireless service facility permit, and, without lapse, for a period of three years beyond the expiration or termination of the permit, to the effect that, should occurrences during the term of the permit give rise to claims made after expiration or termination of the permit, such claims shall be covered by such claims -made policies. See Exhibit W. 4872-6179-2134.1 ZM 3) Proof of Insurance. Before the Town will issue a personal wireless service facility site permit, a permittee shall furnish to the Town certificates of insurance and additional insured policy endorsements with insurers that are authorized to do business in the State ofNew York and that are satisfactory to the Town evidencing all coverages set forth in this Subsection Y. See Exhibit W. W. Compliance required. A PWSF must comply at all times with: 1) All conditions imposed on any site plan approval, special permit approval, and variances, 2) Its PWSF permit, all relevant requirements of this ,§` 270-219, all other relevant requirements of this Chapter 270 (unless expressly superseded by this § 270-219), and all other relevant Ithaca Town Code requirements; and 3) All relevant federal statutory and regulatory requirements, including but not limited to applicable FCC maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limits for general population/uncontrolled exposure codified in 47 CFR 1.1310(e)(1), Table 1, or any successor regulation. Verizon Wireless will so comply. X. Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations. The Town seeks to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Actl ° and shall comply with same in the event that any person who is disabled within the meaning oftheActseeks a reasonable accommodation, to the extent that they are entitled to same under the Act. Not applicable. But note that Verizon Wireless will so comply with all applicable federal regulations. Y. Suspension or revocation of PWSF permit. 1) The Code Enforcement Officer may issue a notice of intent to suspend or revoke a personal wireless service facility permit for any violation. The notice of intent to suspend or revoke shall describe the violation and require the permittee to immediately correct the violation or cause the violation to be corrected No response necessary. 2) The notice of intent shall be provided to the permittee by personal service or by regular, overnight, certified or registered mail to the address submitted with the permit application. 10 Editor's Note: 36-26-2023 by L.L. No. 10-2023 4872-6179-2134.1 43 - No response necessary. 3) .If the permittee fails to immediately correct the violation or cause the violation to be corrected, the Code Enforcement Officer shall suspend or revoke the permit. No response necessary. 4) A permittee shall be entitled to request a hearing on suspension or revocation before the Town Board upon application' made to the Town Clerk demonstrating that the permittee was not in violation of the permit. Such hearing shall be requested, in writing, with the request addressed to and received by the Town Clerk within five business days of the permittee's receipt of the notice of intent. Any suspension or revocation remains in effect unless modified by the Town Board. Within 30 days of the permittee's written request, the Town Board'shall hold a hearing to determine whether to reverse or modify the suspension or revocation. The Town Board shall issue its written decision within 15 days after the hearing. No response necessary. Z. Enforcement. 1) Whenever the Code Enforcement Officer finds that there has been a violation of this section, the Code Enforcement Officer is authorized to issue an order to remedy. No response necessary. 2) An order to remedy shall be in writing; identify the facility at issue, specify the condition or activity that violates this section; specify the provisions of this section which are violated by the specified condition or activity, and include a statement that the violations must be corrected within 30 days after the date of the order to remedy (or, if the violations are not reasonably capable of cure within 30 days, shall include a statement that the owner or operator must commence to cure such violations within such thirty -day period and thereafter diligently and with continuity prosecute such cure to completion in a period not to exceed 90 days after the Town's notice). The order may direct the person served with the order to begin to remedy the violations) immediately or within some other stated period of time that can be less than 30 days after the date of the order, direct that compliance be achieved within the specified period of time; and shall state that an action or proceeding to compel compliance and/or seek penalties, fines and/or imprisonment may he instituted if compliance is not achieved within the specified period of time. No response necessary. 3) The order to remedy, or a copy thereof, may be served by personal service, by mailing by registered or certified mail sent to the address set forth in the 4872-6179-2134.1 application for any permit submitted to the Town or to the property address, or by posting a copy thereof on the premises that are the subject of the order to remedy and mailing a copy, enclosed in a prepaid wrapper, addressed to the last known address of the owner as set forth in the Town of Ithaca records, or if none, in the most recent tax roll available to the Town of Ithaca. The Code Enforcement Officer shall be permitted, but not required, to cause the order to remedy, or a copy thereof, to be served on any property owner, PWSF operator, or any other person taking part or assisting in the operation of a PWSF at the affected property personally or by registered mail or cert fled mail, provided, however, that failure to serve any person mentioned in this sentence shall not affect the efficacy of the order to remedy. No response necessary. 4) Civil penalties. In addition to the remedies (including fines, imprisonment and injunctive relief) provided in § 270-239 (Violations and penalties) and in Town Law § 268, any person who violates any provision of this section, any term or condition of any Personal Wireless Facility Service permit, order to remedy, or other notice or order issued by the Code Enforcement Officer pursuant to any provision of this section shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more than $5, 000 for each day or part thereof during which such violation continues. The civil penalties provided by this subsection shall be recoverable in an action instituted in the name of the Town of Ithaca. No response necessary. 5) An action or proceeding in the name of the Town of Ithaca may be commenced in any court of competent jurisdiction to prevent, restrain, enjoin, correct, or abate any violation of, or to enforce, any provision of this section or any term or condition of any personal wireless service facility permit, order to remedy, or other notice or order issued by the Code Enforcement Officer pursuant to any provision of this section. Such remedy shall be in addition to penalties, fines and other remedies otherwise prescribed by law. No response necessary. 6) Remedies not exclusive. No remedy fine or penalty specified in this section shall be the exclusive remedy, fine or penalty available to address any violation described in this section, and each remedy, fine or penalty specified in this section shall be in addition to, and not in substitution for or limitation of, the other remedies, fines or penalties specified in this section, or in any other applicable law. .Any remedy fine or penalty specified in this section may be pursued at any time, whether prior to, simultaneously with, or after the pursuit of any other remedy, fine or penalty specified in this section, in any other section of this chapter, or in any other applicable law. No response necessary 4872-6179-2134.1 45 - 7) Conviction of a violation of this section shall constitute and effect an immediate forfeiture of any permit hereunder held by the person or entity so convicted. No response necessary. AA. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subsection or part of this § 270-219 shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainingportions hereof, but shall be confined to the clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. No response necessary. 4872-6179-2134.1 EXHIBIT G EXHIBIT G PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S AREA VARIANCE STANDARDS The Town's required showings for area variances, as described in Town Law § 267-b(3)(b) are reproduced below in bold italicized type, followed by Verizon Wireless' response in regular type. Will an undesirable change be produced in the character of the neighborhood or be a detriment to nearby properties? The surrounding area primarily consists of woodlands, with residences interspersed along and adjacent to Slaterville Road (New York Route 79). The Project will result in increased cell coverage for motorists along Slaterville Road as well as residents within the Town living in the residential neighborhoods adjacent to the Site. The construction of the Project at the height proposed will also result in increased wireless telecommunications coverage for local emergency and public safety services. Moreover, wireless infrastructure is an essential part of the critical infrastructure of any neighborhood: The granting of the requested area variance will not create an undesirable change in the neighborhood. The proposed location of the Site is set back from the public rights of way and residential neighborhoods and will result in minimal to no visual obstruction to the neighborhood., Can the benefit sought by the applicant be achieved by a feasible alternative to the variance? A thorough radio -frequency engineering analysis of the Site (See Exhibit H (RF Justification Report)) revealed that the height of the tower is the minimum necessary to serve the current coverage gap within the Sunny View cell, while also accounting for the topography of the Site's surrounding area and the locations of obstructions which may interfere with the tower's functioning. Is the requested variance substantial? Section 270-16 the Town Code restricts the height of nonagricultural buildings in the Conservation zoning district to 38'feet in height from lowest interior grade and 36 feet in height from lowest exterior grade. The Project is proposed to be 134 feet, with an attached 4-foot lighting rod, for a total of 138 feet. The additional height is not substantial when balanced against critical service that the Project provides and the height of other similar towers serving the area. Would the variance have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood? Personal wireless telecommunications facilities are a permitted use in all of the Town's zoning districts upon the issuance of a special use permit and site plan approval. Granting the requested area variance, which will allow for the placement of a necessary public utility in the Town, will 4872-6179-2134.1 2- not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood and is part of the orderly and necessary infrastructure of a community. Moreover, the Project will not pollute, will.not create noise or vibration, will not create any significant increase in traffic, will not create any environmental problems, will not increase population density, and will not create any demand on governmental facilities. Thus, the Project will not create any detriment to adjoining properties or change the character of the neighborhood. Instead, the Project will enhance governmental facilities and promote the public welfare by providing a modern, more efficient system of communications for police, fire and other emergency services, as well as provide modern wireless telecommunication service to business, industry and individuals .in and around the Sunny View cell. Is the alleged difficulty self-created? The hardship is not self-created. Instead, it is a function of the nature of currently available . technology for the Project. As described in Exhibit B (Project Description), wireless telecommunications devices operate by transmitting a very low power radio signal between a wireless telecommunications device and an antenna mounted on a tower. In order for the antenna to transmit a signal to a wireless device that is sufficient to provide service to the device, the antenna has to be placed at a height that will allow for transmission between the antenna and the device that is unobstructed by surrounding structures or topography. 4872-6179-2134.1 X49011-:1wa Verizon Wireless Communications Facility Engineering Necessity Case -"Sunny View" Town Boundary Town/City Border Existing ITHACA HD Site Search Area Project Location Route 79 Existing DANBY Site Existing BROOKTONDALE Site Prepared by: Wasif Sharif, RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Project: The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co -located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Ithaca (the "Project Facility"). Verizon Mar 13t1, 2024 Introduction The purpose of this subsequent analysis is to summarize and communicate the technical radio frequency (RF) information used in the justification of this new site. Coverage and/or capacity deficiencies are the two main drivers that prompt the need for a new wireless communications facility/site. All sites provide a mixture of both capacity and coverage for the benefit of the end user. Coverage can be defined as the existence of signal of usable strength and quality in an area, including but not limited to in -vehicles or in -buildings. The need for improved coverage is identified by RF Engineers that are responsible for developing and maintaining the network. RF Engineers utilize both theoretical and empirical data sets (propagation maps and real world coverage measurements). Historically, coverage improvements have been the primary justification of new sites. Capacity can be defined as the amount of traffic (voice and data) a given site can process before significant performance degradation occurs. When traffic volume exceeds the capacity limits of a site serving a given area, network reliability and user experience degrades. Ultimately this prevents customers from making/receiving calls, applications cease functioning, internet connections time out and data speeds fail. This critical condition is more important than just a simple nuisance for some users. Degradation of network reliability and user experience can affect emergency responders and to persons in a real emergency situation can literally mean life or death. Note that, while Verizon Wireless provides sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a coverage gap and capacity need in this case, the FCC has confirmed that federal law does not require a provider to establish the existence of a coverag%apacity gap to establish the need for a site. There are several ways by which an applicant can establish site need. See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment," FCC 18-133, 85 FR 51867, at T 37 (October 15, 2018) (confirming that the test for establishing an effective prohibition is whether "a state or local legal requirement materially inhibits a provider's ability to engage in any of a variety of activities related to its provision of a covered service," and this test is met "not only when filling a coverage gap but also when densifying a wireless network, introducing new services or otherwise improving service capabilities') (emphasis added). erizom' z Project Need Overview The project area, located in the southern portion of the Town of Ithaca is currently served by multiple sites. The project area is subject to significant terrain and or foliage challenges for RF (signal) propagation. This terrain and or foliage combined with long distance prevent effective propagation of Verizon's RF signals into this area compounding the coverage issue with areas of variable coverage creating significant gaps in coverage, both in signal level and signal quality. The first serving site is Brooktondale, located in the Town of Caroline, is approximately four and three quarter miles southeast(of the project location) situated on an existing tower located off Bald Hill Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity. The second serving site is Ithaca HD, located in the Town of Ithaca, is approximately two and one half miles northwest (of the project location) situated on an existing tower off S Aurora St near Ithaca College. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity. A site of note is Danby, located in the Town of Danby, approximately two and one half miles southwest (of the project location) on an existing tower off Danby Rd. While this site is close by, it is blocked by a ridge and does not provide any coverage into the project area. Available (mid band Mid Band LTE) carriers at these and other area sites are not capable of effectively serving/offloading the project area due to inherent propagation losses from distance, challenging terrain and in building coverage losses negatively impacting mid band coverage and capacity offload capabilities. There are other Verizon sites in this general area but due to distance and terrain they also do not provide any significant overlapping coverage in the area in question that could allow for increased capacity and improved coverage from other sources. The primary objectives for this project are to increase capacity and provide and/or improve coverage throughout the south-eastern portion of the Town of Ithaca, specifically portions of Slaterville Rd, Burns Rd, Coddington Rd, E King Rd, Troy Road, Updike Rd, Southwoods drive, Old Gorge Rd, Park Ln, John St, as well as neighboring residential and commercial areas along and near these roads. Following the search for co -locatable structures to resolve the aforementioned challenges and finding none available, Verizon proposes to attach the necessary antenna(s) to a new 134' tower located at 111 Wiedmaier Ct, Ithaca, NY 14850. Verizon's antennas will utilize 130' for the ACL (Antenna Center Line) with a top of antenna height of 134'. This solution is the minimum height necessary to provide the coverage and capacity improvements needed. vrerizowl 3 Wireless LTE (Voice and Data) Growth Wireless smart city solutions are being used to track available parking and minimize pollution and wasted time. These same solutions are being used to track pedestrian and bike traffic to help planning and minimize accidents. Smart, wireless connected lighting enables cities to control lighting remotely, saving energy and reducing energy costs by 20%. 4G technology is utilized to track and plan vehicle deliveries to minimize travel, maximize efficiency, and minimize carbon footprint. 4G technology is also used to monitor building power usage down to the circuit level remotely, preventing energy waste and supporting predictive maintenance on machines and equipment. Wireless sensors placed in shipments are being used to track temperature -sensitive medications, equipment, and food. This is important for preventing the spread of food -borne diseases that kill 3,000 Americans each year. Source Venzon Innovation Center, Febmafy. 2018 A wireless network is like a highway system... US, mobile data traffic was 1.3 Exabytes per month in 2016, the equivalent of 334 million aVDs each month or 3,687 million text messages each second according to Cisco VNI Mobile Forecast Highlights, 2016-202],Feb 2017 erizon Wireless is a critical component in schools and for today's students. 20,000 learning apps are available for 'Pads. 72% of i7unes top selling educational apps are designed for preschoolers and elementary students, 600+ school districts replaced text books with tablets in classrooms. 77% of parents think tablets are beneficial to kids. 74% of school administrators feel digital content increases student engagement. 70% of teens use cellphones to help with homework. Source_ CTIA's Infographics Today's Wireless Family, October, 2017 Wireless facilities and property values Cell service in and around the home has emerged as a critical factor in home -buying decisions National studies demonstrate that most home buyers value good cell service over many other factors including the proximity of schools when purchasing a home. More than 7596 of prospective home Awl buyers said a gootl cel lular connectionwas important to them,' The same study showed that 83% of Millennials (those bom between 83% 19a2 and 2004) said cell service was the most lmportantfact in purchasing a home 90% of U. S. households use wireless 9a% service- Citizens need access to 911 and reverse 911 and wireless may be their only connection 2 The average North American smartphone user will consume 48 GB of data per month in 2023, up from just 5.2 GB per month in 2016 and 7.1 GB per month in 2017 .1 55% 4f American homes are wireless only.2 In North America, the average household has 13 connected devices with smartphones outnumberingf tablets 6 to 1.3 I7. Enrssc. ranirinly Repork —tte12n17 Ilr COC's 2016lVueleu SUlslrtutlon EariyftHeasenlEsemates FromtherJa4ena'Heatlhlntemew5urey.January-1uiy,201S 3 IHSHar>;et Conna*eooetic klaret!Ao.IW Q120Jry. June 7,2016 to) 240 million With over 80% of 9-1-1 calls now coming from cell phones---' 911 calls are made annually. In many areas, 80% or more are from wireless devices.' 1 IJational Emergency llum:zrnssociacon Enhanrkrg 9-1-1 CoeiationskNNneaomaiea AeanOeneCCakcack Explanation of Wireless Capacity Capacity in this analysis is evaluated with up to three metrics further explained below. These metrics assist Verizon traffic planning and RF Engineers in determining actual usage for a given site as well as can be used to project when a site is expected to run out of capacity (i.e. reach a point of exhaustion where it can no longer process the volume of voice and data requested by local wireless devices, thus no longer providing adequate service). Unfortunately capacity exhaustion has already occurred which presents an urgent need to deliver the capacity relief necessary in an effort to provide adequate and reliable coverage to this project area. Forward Data Volume ("FDV"), is a measurement of usage (data throughput) on a particular site over a given period of time. Average Schedule Eligible User ("ASEU"), is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. Average Active Connections (" AvgAC") is a measurement of the number of devices actively connected to a site in any given time slot. Verizon Wireless uses proprietary algorithms developed by a task force of traffic planning engineers to monitor each site in the network and accurately project and identify when sites will approach their capacity limits. Using a rolling two-year window for projected exhaustion dates allows enough time, in most cases, to develop and activate a new site. It is critical that these capacity approaching sectors are identified early and the site development process is started and completed in time for new solutions (sites) to be on air before network issues impact the customers. As mentioned previously, actual utilization for the last year indicates several KPI's have already exceeded 100% utilization creating a more urgent need in this project area. Note: Of the following 15 capacity utilization slides, only one neighboring (to be offloaded) site is required to forecast a single KPI as reaching 100% utilization in order to justify capacity need for the proposed network densification. In this case all five neighboring sites already have two of the three KPI's historically experiencing overloaded conditions. Historical blocking creates a more urgent need than forecasted blocking. Furthermore the third KPI (Avg AC) for each site when understood and viewed together with the context of the first two KPI's (FDV and ASEU) validate the strategy that network densification is required to solve the substantial and significant gaps in coverage that are causing these overloaded conditions. verizoW Capacity Utilization FDV (Brooktondale Gamma) Low Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) Summary. This graph shows FDV (Forward Data Volume) which is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondale site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector shown above has exceeded its capability of supporting FDV requirements as shown by the purple and dark red lines exceeding the max utilization threshold (red dashed line) frequently. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizonv' Capacity Utilization ASEU (Brooktondale Gamma) Low Band LTE - ASEU Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - ASEU Utilization 1%) F: 71 Summary: This graph shows ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User). ASEU is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RF conditions_ The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondaile site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector is showing spare capacity in regard to this statistic. ASEU is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizon' 7 Capacity Utilization AvgAC (Brooktondale Gamma) EZ Low Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) c_- z zd_--- m o Summary: This graph shows AvgAC (Average Active Connections). AvgAC utilization by carrier is a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondale site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector is showing spare capacity in regards to this statistic. AvgAC is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizon-I a Capacity Utilization FDV (Ithaca HD Alpha) Low Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%j —Mid Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) 4'u ziz'a$'_- Summary: This graph shows FDV (Forward Data Volume) which is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade..The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector shown above has exceeded its capability of supporting FDV requirements as shown by the purple and dark red lines exceeding the max utilization threshold red dashed line). In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizon 9 Capacity Utilization ASEU (Ithaca HD Alpha) Summary: This graph shows ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User). ASEU is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RE conditions. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase_ Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector cannot support the traffic demand throughout the extent of the large geographic area it covers. Ithaca HD is overloaded, as shown by the purple actual use line exceeding the red dashed exhaustion threshold. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizonv' 10 Capacity Utilization AvgAC (Ithaca HD Alpha) Low Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) Summary: This graph shows AvgAC (Average Active Connections). AvgAC utilization by carrier is a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector is showing spare capacity in regards to this statistic. AvgAC is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizon-1 11 Explanation of Wireless Coverage Note the affect of clutter on the predicted coverage footprint above Dark Green >/= -75dBm RSRP, typically serves dense urban areas as well as areas of substantial construction (colleges, hospitals, dense multi family etc } Green >1= -85dBm RSRP, typically serves suburban single family residential and light commercial buildings Yellow >/_ -95dBm RSRP, typically serves most rural/suburban-residential and in car applications Orange >/=-105dBm RSRP, rural highway coverage, subject to variable conditions including fading and seasonality gaps White = ­ 105dBm RSRP, variable to no reliable coverage gap area More detailed, site -specific coverage slides are later in the presentation Signal strength requirements vary as dictated by specific market conditions Not displayed in example ma , layer not used in all site justifications nverizo Coverage is best conveyed via coverage maps. RF engineers use computer simulation tools (in this case Verizon uses Forsk Atoll) which takes into account terrain, vegetation, building types, and other site/network specifics to model the RF environment. This prop model is used to simulate the real world network and assist RF Engineers to evaluate the impact of a proposed site (along with industry experience and other tools). Network design, performance evaluation and development needs have become far too complex for drive test data and dropped call records which for a long time now have been antiquated and simply not effective in visually communicating gaps in coverage or capacity capability for 4 and 5G networks. Tompkins County, NY Verizon Wireless sites provide customers service using several FCC licensed frequencies including 700 and 85OMHz. To resolve capacity congestion for these coverage layers higher frequency (and bandwidth) PCS (1900 MHz), Mid Band LTE (2100 MHz) and C-Band (37OOMHz) mid band carriers are added however due to differences in propagation characteristics, many gaps in coverage and capacity still remain requiring network densification to resolve. In some mountaintop or long distance situations the mid band (higher frequency) Mid Band LTE, PCS and C-Band carriers are either not or not fully effective due to excessive distance (path loss). This is because the site is located too far from the user population to provide adequate and reliable service. Although exclusively regulated by the FCC and subject to market adjustment as needed, it is worth noting that all of the propagation slides in this RF Justification are generated using the max power (32Ow) LB, MB and C-Band Samsung radio capabilities. Signal strength throughout a given site's coverage area is subject to the limitations of the frequencies used. Lower frequencies with narrower bandwidth propagate further distance, and are less attenuated by clutter than higher frequencies with wider bandwidth. Unfortunately due to relatively narrow spectrum available these low bands can become quickly overloaded especially where similar signal strength from mid band carriers are not available. Similar coverage levels from mid band carriers are needed to resolve capacity issues (including the ability to make and receive voice calls). In order to provide similar coverage levels using the higher capacity/higher frequencies, a denser network of sites is required (network densification). Modern 4 and 5G networks are designed and intended to combine or use more than one frequency band at a time. This is called carrier aggregation which is not effective when the mid band signal is too weak or nonexistent. This means that site justification including ACL requirements must be derived from mid band capabilities. It is critical to understand the relationship between low band capacity and mid band coverage especially when reviewing the need for new suburban and rural morphology sites. 12 Explanation of Sunny View Search Area A Search Area is the geographical area within which a new site is targeted to solve a coverage or capacity deficiency. Three of the factors taken into consideration when defining a search area are topography, user density, and the existing network. Topography must be considered to minimize the obstacles between the proposed site and the target coverage area. For example, a site at the bottom of a ridge will not be able to cover the other side from a certain height. In general, the farther from a site the User Population is, the weaker the RF conditions are and the worse their experience is likely to be. These distant users also have an increased impact on the serving site's capacity. In the case of a multi sector site, centralized proximity is essential to allow users to be evenly distributed and allow efficient utilization of the site's resources. The existing Network Conditions also guide the design of a new site. Sites placed too close together create interference due to overlap and are an inefficient use of resources. Sites that are too tall or not properly integrated with existing sites cause interference and degrade service for existing users. Existing co -locatable structures inside the search area as well as within a reasonable distance of the search area are submitted by site acquisition and reviewed by RF Engineering. If possible, RF will make use of existing or nearby structures before proposing to build new towers. Sunny View Search Area To resolve the coverage and capacity deficiencies previously detailed, Verizon Wireless is seeking to add one new cell facility within this area to improve wireless service capacity and coverage. By providing a new dominant signal area and offloading weak and distant traffic from Brooktondale and Ithaca HD with the proposed site, adequate and reliable service will be restored. The new Sunny View site will provide dominant and dedicated signal to the identified portions of the Towns of Ithaca, Danby and Dryden. This helps to improve not only the Sunny View project area but will also result with significant improvements to the above mentioned overloaded sites ultimately improving community wide areas in and around the Sunny View project area. verizonv 13 Area Terrain/Minimum AMSL (Ground Elevation) The below map is used to help in reference to both the preceding search area slide as well as the following coverage slides. Roads and terrain can be difficult to observe when reviewing the coverage slides i ne Deiow image is aosent any coverage io neip me viewer warn area onentarlon as weu as visuauzing the need ror me oeaow Iwu AiVIJL kmaxamum grouna elevarion CMC IBS Cayuga Lakeiwsucc R CAYIXA HEIGi{FS CAYVCJI \ CORHELL RES O 17 WUMiBMICRO ' Y1[A DT EGMANS 5 IWAL MART ITHACA 0- -1311 MICRO ELL AO Danby Rt.245 Dryden I Caroline The Sunny View project area is subject to significant terrain challenges and site placement is critical to provide the necessary coverage and capacity needed. The site needs to be located within the search area but also at a ground elevation below the ridge of 1,150' or below to keep the site contained. The proposed site is located at 824'AMSL which meets this requirement ind is strategi Ily located within the ring to allow for Line Of Sight (LOS) to the coverage objective areas. verizonv 14 Existing Low Band (700/85OMHz) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Low Band} sites. verizon 15 Proposed Low Band (700/85OMHz) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question atone threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area off loaded by the new sites The map above adds the footprint of the proposed Sunny View site in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. verizonv' 16 Existing Low Band (700185OMHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Refer to slide 12 for furtherexplana tion of these color thresholds i 85 Best Signal Level (dBmt }=-85 HEIGHTS - 95 Best Signal Level (dBmk r =-95 105 Best Signal Level (d6m) Y=-105 I Fhe map above represents existing low band signal strength coverage from existing sites. Notice the large (orange coverage) areas near the proposed Sunny View site that are subject to variable coverage conditions including fading and seasonality gaps. verizowl 17 Proposed Low Band (700/85OMHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Refer to slide 12 for furtherexplanation of these color thresholds ti 0- -- YIC- 4 t 85 Best Signal Level (d$m) >=-85 I HEIGN75 -95 Best Signal Level (d6m) >=-45 r: 105 Best Signal Level (d6mt > =-105 DALE SmI N j - - The map above adds low band of the Sunny View site to the existing signal strength (small cells removed from previous slide). The significantly improved signal strength corresponds t improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Ithaca. verizon 18 Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area off loaded by the new sites lFUL I Ilk EClI ILO & ILA Cll GQ. as sirs — On Air Coverage s_ ® Brooktondale Gamma Ithaca HD Search Area w , EW f r Vj51 r VIP The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Mid Band) sites. Notice the lack of signal or where there is signal, a dominant server throughout the Sunny View project area. This reveals several sites that are excessively stretching their mid band coverage capabilities which results with unacceptable coverage and performan ie. Verizonv' 19 Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites uominant signal area. On Air Coverage Brooktondale Gamma 0 Ithaca HD Search Area Sunny View nF.tt,nnale w r- pip H}I(k YK Iti1:nN.E The map above adds the footprint of the proposed Sunny View site in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. venzonv' 20 Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C- Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Heter to slure 12 for turther explanation or these color thresholcls Liz NFL.1 REEL s W HILHO' - EGET05Y i 4 hLyART MIiCRO', • - 4 i KIMi UhNE3Y N CRO c I AV' r~ i lr wrooki onciaie f. f The map above represents mid nand coverage from existing sites. This midband signal is very weak throughout the project area. Additional mid band network densification is required resolve these conditions. verizo, 21 Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Meter to sucie 7z for rurrner exDm yT!MC Ias Lion or rnese color rnresnoas ALA_ OT MMS i By IrlcRo l ice BY F It 1 406 1 The map above adds mid band of the Sunny View site to the existing signal strength (small cells removed from previous slide). The significantly improved signal strength corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions ofthe Town of Ithaca. verizonf 22 RF Justification Summary The proposed site resolves the coverage and capacity impacting shown above: The green shaded and capacity that the proposed resolve. Low and Mid Band Gap Low Band Gap t substantial and significant gaps in the Town of Ithaca. These gaps are area represent the gaps in coverage Sunny View site with 130' ACt_ will The network was analyzed to determine whether there is sufficient RF coverage and capacity in the Towns of Ithaca, Danby, and Dryden. It was determined that there are significant gaps in adequate LTE service for Verizon Wireless in the Low and Mid Band LTE frequencies. In addition to the coverage deficiencies, Verizon Wireless' network does not have sufficient capacity (low band or mid band) to handle the existing and projected LTE voice and data traffic in the area near and neighboring the proposed facilities ("targeted service improvement area"). Based on the need for additional coverage and capacity while considering the topography and specific area requiring service, any further addition of capacity to distant existing sites does not remedy Verizon's significant gap in reliable service. Therefore, the proposed facilities are also needed to provide "capacity relief" to the existing nearby Verizon Wireless sites, allowing the proposed facilities and those neighboring sites to adequately serve the existing and projected capacity demand in this area. With the existing network configuration there are significant gaps in service which restricts Verizon Wireless customers from originating, maintaining or receiving reliable calls and network access. It is our expert opinion that the proposed site will satisfy the coverage and capacity needs of Verizon Wireless and its subscribers in these portions of the Towns of Ithaca, Danby, Dryden and this project area. The proposed location depicted herein satisfies the identified service gaps and is proposed at the minimum height necessary for adequate and reliable service. l/U U C%a Wasif Sharif Engineer III — RF Design 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 Verizon Wireless verizon/ 23 Supplemental - Sunny View Height Justification This map shows the topographical underlay map of the Sunny View project area. Terrain is a significant consideration in determining the necessaryantenna height. Antenna design height refers to the "centerline" of the antennas (vertically) otherwise known as ACL (Antenna Center Line). A related measurement is the tip of the antennas which is often equal to the necessary tower height. We will refer to both for clarity. ii i 1 NY vnEW 13e1ha1 Grove 1 1 02M The Sunny View project area and the southeastern portion of the town of Ithaca, southwestern portion of Dryden and northeastern portion of Danby are subject to significant terrain challenges for RF signal propagation. Proper site location as well as an appropriate ACL are necessary to provide adequate and reliable coverage throughout the project area to not only resolve existing coverage and capacity challenges but to also avoid the need for additional towers in the area (tower proliferation). Areas above in the black dashed lines are the areas where mid -band coverages changes dramatically when ACL is altered. Please refer to Slide 25 Verizonv' USGS Top o Ma 24 p Supplemental - Height Justification Mid -Band Coverage (AWS/PCS/C-Band) 140' AC L 5 Best Signal Level fdbm > .85 130' ACL -95 Best Signal Level fdbmr=.g5 505 Best Signal Level (dBm) > s-105 Proposed) f l' • .r JA 4 120' ACL 11.0' ACL pc i Due to long distance (propagation) coverage challenges in every direction from the proposed Sunny View site, coverage capabilities below 130' ACL are significantly compromised causing gaps in coverage and capacity capability for Verizon's mid band licenses including but not limited to AWS, PCS and C-Band which vary in frequency from 1900-3700MHz. Specific areas circled above in the black dashed lines along the Staterville Road, Burns Road, Coddington Road, Southwoods Dr, all listed as primary objectives are all significantly impacted by reduction in ACL. verizonv' Supplemental - Height Justification Low -Band Coverage (7001850 MHz) 140 A S5 130 A 95 105 Best Signal tcvef (dBm1 , r-85 Best Signal LevtE {daml =-55 Best Signal Levef Id$mJ >=-105 P- d w R . R • f 120' AC Lto 110' AC L'* % 41 A- R • L R L Of Low band coverage capabilities are not typically the limiting factor in determining height justification unless the area is subject to terrain challenges. The above signal strength coverage plots are shown for low band context purpose only. The significant market share and customer demand that the network is subject to can not be supported with low band only coverage in portions of the project area, nor is the functionality of carrier aggregation possible without adequate and reliable mid band coverage throughout the project and primary coverage objective areas. Height justification must be determined based on a given site's limiting factor which in the case of the Sunny View project is the mid band capabilitiesINvenzon% l Supplemental - Neighboring site ACUs and Capacity offload Below is a data table of the proposed notable design data as compared to the surrounding sites for the Sunny View project area. Site Name ft) AMSL (ft) Combined (ft) Site Location Antenna Distance to Sunny View Site Tech Type SS Radlo(s) 320w Frequencies (MHz) Broaktandale 1648 1808 42.365008,-76.383761 NHH-65C-R28 4.73 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/1900/210013700 DANBY 1229 1334 42.393328,-76,4955 NHH-65C-R28 2.66 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MS/Cband 700/850/1900/2100/3700 ITHACA P76 755 920 42.429778,-76,496556 NHH-65C-R2B 2.63 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/8S0/1900/2100/3700 COLLEGETOWN 732 808 42.441672,-76.485664 NHH-65C-R2B 2.7 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/1900/2100/370000RNELLAG88395542.44G019,-76.471SG4 NHH•65C-R2B 2.55 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/1900/2100/3700 VARNA RELO 971 1 1087 1 42AS2786,36.450808 NHH-65C-R2B 2.8 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 7001850/1900/2100/3700 CAYUGA HEIGHTS 120 1122 1242 42.468925,-76.402933 X7C-S8D-21 4.6 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/19DD/210D/3700 CAYUGA 120 903 1023 42.466481,-76.479575 NHH-65C-R213 4 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/1900/2100/3700 ITHACA OT 114 407 521 42.437714,-76.499036 NHH-65C-R213 3 miles 4G/5G Samsung LB/MB/Cband 700/850/1900/210013700 SAPSUCKER 11Q 1089 1199 42.469681,76.447681 NHH-65C-R2B 3.95 miles 4G/SG Samsung LB/MB/Cband 7D0/850/1900/2100/3700 The existing neighboring sites listed above are overburdened primarily due to the excessively large geographic area they are struggling and ineffectively serving throughout the Sunny View project area. These are the areas where the existing coverage is weaker than the adequate and reliable thresholds (p12) causing excess burden on the sites primarily impacting low band) to repeatedly attempt to complete those call and data tasks demanded by users on the network. The geographic area of offload needed to be resolved in order to restore adequate and reliable coverage is shown on p23. The proposed site at 130' ACL achieves the project area objectives detailed on p3. The Sunny View site proposed by Verizon Wireless is designed to provide both coverage and capacity relief. Coverage improvements are needed in both the low band 700/85OMHz) range as well as the mid band (1900/2100/3700Mhz) range. The neighboring sites mentioned in the RF Justification are primarily overloaded on the low bands. The mid band frequencies from the existing sites do not travel far enough (these sites are too far away from the project area) to provide the necessary capacity relief which causes the need for network densification. Considering the large mid band coverage gap associated with the Sunny View project area it is necessaryto construct a new tower tall enough for the antenna centerline to allow the mid band frequencies the unobstructed ability to propagate across the project area. This is the coverage component of the site justification and is further detailed on pps 15-22 of the RF Justification. The proposed site and coverage is centrally located to the problem area and at the minimum height needed which minimizes the future need for additional tower sites in the area and solves the aforementioned coverage and capacity issues in the least intrusive way possible. Adequate and reliable low band coverage is provided to the area with the addition of the Sunny View site however the low bands by themselves will become quickly or immediately overburdened without proper mid band coverage to match which would otherwise cause a loss in adequate and reliable network performance. To prevent this, the new site is designed to maximize mid band capabilities knowing that capacity and demand on the network is increasing in a logarithmic trend over time. Mid band provides the largest combined bandwidth and coverage capabilities to mitigate or delay eventual overloading. If the ACL is lowered the site won't achieve the offload already needed by the network as shown in the RFJ (pps 6-11) let alone be capable of supporting the growing needs of the future. There isn't a site tall enough to forever prevent the need for additional network densification in the Town of Ithaca however filling in the largest gap areas with reasonable macro sites like Sunny View will minimize community impact by providing reliable low band coverage matched to mid band capacity. Building a lower ACL (c130') Sunny View site than what is proposed will result with underachieving the primary objectives listed on p3 and likely result with premature or otherwise unnecessary need for future tower proliferation necessaryto make up for an ill-advised tower height that would be too short to solve the identified problems. After careful and detailed review, it is Verizon's expert RF opinion that 130' ACL is the minimum height needed to solve the existing coverage and capacity gaps in the least intrusive way possible and with careful consideration of alternate lower ACL's as well as evolving network needs in this portion of the Town of Ithaca. This solution will minimize the overall visual impact to the community in the Town of Ithaca while maximizing wireless service improvement throughout the community. The proposed 134' tower and Verizon 130'ACL co -location at 111 Wiedmaier Court, Ithaca, NEW YORK 14850 will resolve the identified gaps in adequate and reliable coverage and capacity to this portion of the Town of Ithaca which also provides site containment impacting the coverage and capacity capabilities of the neighboring currently overloaded sites which results with a community wide benefit that will benefit mobile customers far beyond the Sunny View project area. verizonV 27 Verizon Wireless Communications Facility Engineering Necessity Case -"Sunny View" Town Boundary Town/City Border Existing ITHACA HD Site Search Area Project Location Route 79 Existing DANBY Site Existing BROOKTONDALE Site Prepared by: Wasif Sharif, RF Engineer, Verizon Wireless Project: The project is the installation and operation of a new tower co -located wireless telecommunications site in the Town of Ithaca (the "Project Facility"). Verizon Mar 13tn 2024 Introduction The purpose of this subsequent analysis is to summarize and communicate the technical radio frequency (RF) information used in the justification of this new site. Coverage and/or capacity deficiencies are the two main drivers that prompt the need for a new wireless communications facility/site. All sites provide a mixture of both capacity and coverage for the benefit of the end user. Coverage can be defined as the existence of signal of usable strength and quality in an area, including but not limited to in -vehicles or in -buildings. The need for improved coverage is identified by RF Engineers that are responsible for developing and maintaining the network. RF Engineers utilize both theoretical and empirical data sets (propagation maps and real world coverage measurements). Historically, coverage improvements have been the primary justification of new sites. Capacity can be defined as the amount of traffic (voice and data) a given site can process before significant performance degradation occurs. When traffic volume exceeds the capacity limits of a site serving a given area, network reliability and user experience degrades. Ultimately this prevents customers from making/receiving calls, applications cease functioning, internet connections time out and data speeds fail. This critical condition is more important than just a simple nuisance for some users. Degradation of network reliability and user experience can affect emergency responders and to persons in a real emergency situation can literally mean life or death. Note that, while Verizon Wireless provides sufficient evidence to establish the existence of a coverage gap and capacity need in this case, the FCC has confirmed that federal law does not require a provider to establish the existence of a coverag%apacity gap to establish the need for a site. There are several ways by which an applicant can establish site need. See Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment," FCC 18-133, 85 FR 51867, at T 37 (October 15, 2018) (confirming that the test for establishing an effective prohibition is whether "a state or local legal requirement materially inhibits a provider's ability to engage in any of a variety of activities related to its provision of a covered service," and this test is met "not only when filling a coverage gap but also when densifying a wireless network, introducing new services or otherwise improving service capabilities") (emphasis added). verizowl 2 Project Need Overview The project area, located in the southern portion of the Town of Ithaca is currently served by multiple sites. The project area is subject to significant terrain and or foliage challenges for RF (signal) propagation. This terrain and or foliage combined with long distance prevent effective propagation of Verizon's RF signals into this area compounding the coverage issue with areas of variable coverage creating significant gaps in coverage, both in signal level and signal quality. The first serving site is Brooktondale, located in the Town of Caroline, is approximately four and three quarter miles southeast(of the project location) situated on an existing tower located off Bald Hill Rd. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity. The second serving site is Ithaca HD, located in the Town of Ithaca, is approximately two and one half miles northwest (of the project location) situated on an existing tower off S Aurora St near Ithaca College. While this site provides weak/variable coverage in portions of the project area, it does so from a terrain and or foliage + distance challenged position making the site not capable of efficiently or effectively providing adequate coverage or capacity. A site of note is Danby, located in the Town of Danby, approximately two and one half miles southwest (of the project location) on an existing tower off Danby Rd. While this site is close by, it is blocked by a ridge and does not provide any coverage into the project area. Available (mid band Mid Band LTE) carriers at these and other area sites are not capable of effectively serving/offloading the project area due to inherent propagation losses from distance, challenging terrain and in building coverage losses negatively impacting mid band coverage and capacity offload capabilities. There are other Verizon sites in this general area but due to distance and terrain they also do not provide any significant overlapping coverage in the area in question that could allow for increased capacity and improved coverage from other sources. The primary objectives for this project are to increase capacity and provide and/or improve coverage throughout the south-eastern portion of the Town of Ithaca, specifically portions of Slaterville Rd, Burns Rd, Coddington Rd, E King Rd, Troy Road, Updike Rd, Southwoods drive, Old Gorge Rd, Park Ln, John St, as well as neighboring residential and commercial areas along and near these roads. Following the search for co -locatable structures to resolve the aforementioned challenges and finding none available, Verizon proposes to attach the necessary antenna(s) to a new 134' tower located at 111 Wiedmaier Ct, Ithaca, NY 14850. Verizon's antennas will utilize 130' for the ACL (Antenna Center Line) with a top of antenna height of 134'. This solution is the minimum height necessary to provide the coverage and capacity improvements needed. verizonv' 3 Wireless LTE (Voice and Data) Growth Wireless smart city solutions are being used to track available parking and minimize pollution and wasted time. These same solutions are being used to track pedestrian and bike traffic to help planning and minimize accidents. Smart, wireless connected lighting enables cities to control lighting remotely, saving energy and reducing energy costs by 20%. 4G technology is utilized to track and plan vehicle deliveries to minimize travel, maximize efficiency, and minimize carbon footprint. 4G technology is also used to monitor building power usage down to the circuit level remotely, preventing energy waste and supporting predictive maintenance on machines and equipment. Wireless sensors placed in shipments are being used to track temperature -sensitive medications, equipment, and food. This is important for preventing the spread of food -borne diseases that kill 3,000 Americans each year. SourceVenzon Innovation Center, February 2018 A wireless network is like a highway system... us, mobile data traffic was 1.3 Exabytes per month in 2016, the equivalent of 334 million DVDs each month or 3,687 million text messages each second according to Cisco VNI Mobile Forecast Highlights, 2016-2021,Feb 2017 verizon Wireless is a critical component in schools and for today's students. 20, 000 learning apps are available for Rads. 72% of iTunes top selling educational apps are designed for preschoolers and elementary students. 600+ school districts replaced text books with tablets in classrooms. 77% of parents think tablets are beneficial to kids. 74% of school administrators feel digital content increases student engagement. 70% of teens use cellphones to help with homework. Source. CT1A's Infographics Todav s Wireless Family, October, 2017 Wireless facilities and property values. Cell service in and around the home has emerged as a critical factor in home -buying decisions. National studies demonstrate that most home buyers value good cell service over many other factors including the proximity of schools when purchasing a home. w More than 75% of prospective home buyers said a good cellular connection was importantto them.' The same study showed that 83% of Miltennlals (those born between 83% 1982 and 2004) said cell service was the most Importantfact in purchasing a home 90 % of U.S- households use wireless service. Citizens need access to 911 57 p Y and reverse 911 and wireless may be theironly connection? The average North American smartphone user will consume 48 GB of data per month in 2023, up from just 5.2 GB per month in 2016 and 7.1 GB per month in 2017 .1 55% Of American homes are wireless only.z In North America, the average household has 13 connected devices with smartphones outnumbering tablets 6 to 1.3 1. EncswnMoa#gRi,pwtl`m—. er2017 CDC 2018 WNele Su IK41ugOM1 Eaa, Release0lEsama[es Fr6m ale NatOng Heallh EnleMeW su4eY AnUati-Ju11, 2018 IMS UMel Cmnaaea UvAo ut=elMmkor U1 2016. June 7.2016 With over 80% of 9-1-1 calls 80 a+ now coming from cell phones...' 240 million 911 calls are made annually. In many areas, 80% or more are from wireless devices. t 1 tlabanalEmergencytlumeerrssodalnn Enhancing9-1-10peraamsrV'HhmtemaledAnandcned Cal-xK 1 IIee. IwlualYntr iMAMvgilnONw.BrN rG.aw/rrw.M LMM hm] AI! nN ir an 5 Explanation of Wireless Capacity Capacity in this analysis is evaluated with up to three metrics further explained below. These metrics assist Verizon traffic planning and RF Engineers in determining actual usage for a given site as well as can be used to project when a site is expected to run out of capacity (i.e. reach a point of exhaustion where it can no longer process the volume of voice and data requested by local wireless devices, thus no longer providing adequate service). Unfortunately capacity exhaustion has already occurred which presents an urgent need to deliver the capacity relief necessary in an effort to provide adequate and reliable coverage to this project area. Forward Data Volume ("FDV"), is a measurement of usage (data throughput) on a particular site over a given period of time. Average Schedule Eligible User (" ASEU" ), is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. Average Active Connections (°AvgAC") is a measurement of the number of devices actively connected to a site in any given time slot. Verizon Wireless uses proprietary algorithms developed by a task force of traffic planning engineers to monitor each site in the network and accurately project and identify when sites will approach their capacity limits. Using a rolling two-year window for projected exhaustion dates allows enough time, in most cases, to develop and activate a new site. It is critical that these capacity approaching sectors are identified early and the site development process is started and completed in time for new solutions (sites) to be on air before network issues impact the customers. As mentioned previously, actual utilization for the last year indicates several KPI's have already exceeded 100% utilization creating a more urgent need in this project area. Note: Of the following 15 capacity utilization slides, only one neighboring (to be offloaded) site is required to forecast a single KPI as reaching 100% utilization in order to justify capacity need for the proposed network densification. In this case all five neighboring sites already have two of the three KPI's historically experiencing overloaded conditions. Historical blocking creates a more urgent need than forecasted blocking. Furthermore the third KPI (Avg AC) for each site when understood and viewed together with the context of the first two KPI's (FDV and ASEU) validate the strategy that network densification is required to solve the substantial and significant gaps in coverage that are causing these overloaded conditions. verizon,' Capacity Utilization FDV (Brooktondale Gamma) Low Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) am Co Summary: This graph shows FDV (Forward Data Volume) which is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondale site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade_ The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector shown above has exceeded its capability of supporting FDV requirements as shown by the purple and dark red lines exceeding the max utilization threshold (red dashed line) frequently. In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizon' Capacity Utilization ASEU (Brooktondale Gamma) a Low Band LTE - ASEU Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - ASEU Utilization (%) 3 LIU- n--' -- - - S z Q C Summary: This graph shows ASEU (Average Schedule Efigible User). ASEU is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site, The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RF conditions_ The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondale site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector is showing spare capacity in regard to this statistic. ASEU is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizom' 7 Capacity Utilization AvgAC (Brooktondale Gamma) Low Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization N —Mid Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) n. Cf u a n `' ` fc a G . i i i e c t— _— •. m -.a a a r: nc—- o- Summary: This graph shows AvgAC (Average Active Connections). AvgAC utilization by carrier is a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Gamma sector of the Brooktondale site_ The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Brooktondale sector is showing spare capacity in regards to this statistic. AvgAC is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizonv' 8 Capacity Utilization FDV (Ithaca HD Alpha) Low Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) —Mid Band LTE - FDV Utilization (%) 4w 5. it" AhA Summary: This graph shows FDV (Forward Data Volume) which is a measurement of the customer data usage that this sector currently serves. As this limit is approached, data rates slow to unacceptable levels, potentially causing unreliable service for Verizon Wireless customers. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector shown above has exceeded its capability of supporting FDV requirements as shown by the purple and dark red lines exceeding the max utilization threshold red dashed line). In order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizon,l 9 Capacity Utilization ASEU (Ithaca HD Alpha) Summary: This graph shows ASEU (Average Schedule Eligible User). ASEU is a measurement of the loading of the control channels and systems of a given site. The ASEU load is heavily impacted by distant users or those in poor RF conditions. The purple lime represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red fines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector cannot support the traffic demand throughout the extent of the large geographic area it covers. Ithaca HD is overloaded, as shown by the purple actual use line exceeding the red dashed exhaustion threshold. in order to provide adequate and reliable service to Ithaca and the surrounding project area, network densification is required. verizon 10 Capacity Utilization AvgAC (Ithaca HD Alpha) Low Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization {%) —Mid Band LTE - AvgAC Utilization (%) mry ryM 1 i g > i c=_-_ I ui i ox n a y S .: c i i i .;. .;• _ - a' e' Summary: This graph shows AvgAC (Average Active Connections). AvgAC utilization by carrier is a measurement of max active connection capacity per sector in any given time slot. When this limit is reached, no additional devices will be able to connect to the site, resulting in connection failures and dropped calls. The purple line represents the daily max busy hour Low Band LTE utilization and the dark red line is daily max busy hour Mid Band LTE utilization on the Alpha sector of the Ithaca HD site. The red dashed line is the limit where the sector reaches exhaustion and service starts to significantly degrade. The point in time where we see the purple or dark red lines reach or exceed the red dashed line is when service quickly degrades as usage continues to increase. Detail: The existing Ithaca HD sector is showing spare capacity in regards to this statistic. AvgAC is one of three capacity KPI's used to determine capacity capability in this document. verizonv 11 Explanation of Wireless Coverage Note the affect of clutter on the predicted coverage footprint above Dark Green >1= -75dBm RSRP, typically serves dense urban areas as well as areas of substantial construction (colleges, hospitals, dense multi family etc.) Green >l= -85dBm RSRP, typically serves suburban single family residential and light commercial buildings Yellow >/_ -95dBm RSRP, typically serves most rural/suburban-residential and in car applications Orange >1=-105dBm RSRP, rural highway coverage, subject to variable conditions including fading and seasonality gaps White = <-105dBm RSRP, variable to no reliable coverage gap area More detailed, site -specific coverage slides are later in the presentation Signal strength requirements vary as dictated by specific market conditions Not displayed in example ma , layer not used in all site justifications verizo. Coverage is best conveyed via coverage maps. RF engineers use computer simulation tools (in this case Verizon uses Forsk Atoll) which takes into account terrain, vegetation, building types, and other site/network specifics to model the RF environment. This prop model is used to simulate the real world network and assist RF Engineers to evaluate the impact of a proposed site (along with industry experience and other tools). Network design, performance evaluation and development needs have become far too complex for drive test data and dropped call records which for a long time now have been antiquated and simply not effective in visually communicating gaps in coverage or capacity capability for 4 and 5G networks. Tompkins County, NY Verizon Wireless sites provide customers service using several FCC licensed frequencies including 700 and 85OMHz. To resolve capacity congestion for these coverage layers higher frequency (and bandwidth) PCS (1900 MHz), Mid Band LTE (2100 MHz) and C-Band (37OOMHz) mid band carriers are added however due to differences in propagation characteristics, many gaps in coverage and capacity still remain requiring network densification to resolve. In some mountaintop or long distance situations the mid band (higher frequency) Mid Band LTE, PCS and C-Band carriers are either not or not fully effective due to excessive distance (path loss). This is because the site is located too far from the user population to provide adequate and reliable service. Although exclusively regulated by the FCC and subject to market adjustment as needed, it is worth noting that all of the propagation slides in this RF Justification are generated using the max power (320w) LB, MS and C-Band Samsung radio capabilities. Signal strength throughout a given site's coverage area is subject to the limitations of the frequencies used. Lower frequencies with narrower bandwidth propagate further distance, and are less attenuated by clutter than higher frequencies with wider bandwidth. Unfortunately due to relatively narrow spectrum available these low bands can become quickly overloaded especially where similar signal strength from mid band carriers are not available. Similar coverage levels from mid band carriers are needed to resolve capacity issues (including the ability to make and receive voice calls). In order to provide similar coverage levels using the higher capacity/higher frequencies, a denser network of sites is required (network densification). Modern 4 and 5G networks are designed and intended to combine or use more than one frequency band at a time. This is called carrier aggregation which is not effective when the mid band signal is too weak or nonexistent. This means that site justification including ACL requirements must be derived from mid band capabilities. It is critical to understand the relationship between low band capacity and mid band coverage especially when reviewing the need for new suburban and rural morphology sites. 12 Explanation of Sunny View Search Area A Search Area is the geographical area within which a new site is targeted to solve a coverage or capacity deficiency. Three of the factors taken into consideration when defining a search area are topography, user density, and the existing network. Topography must be considered to minimize the obstacles between the proposed site and the target coverage area. For example, a site at the bottom of a ridge will not be able to cover the other side from a certain height. In general, the farther from a site the User Population is, the weaker the RF conditions are and the worse their experience is likely to be. These distant users also have an increased impact on the serving site's capacity. In the case of a multi sector site, centralized proximity is essential to allow users to be evenly distributed and allow efficient utilization of the site's resources. The existing Network Conditions also guide the design of a new site. Sites placed too close together create interference due to overlap and are an inefficient use of resources. Sites that are too tall or not properly integrated with existing sites cause interference and degrade service for existing users. Existing co -locatable structures inside the search area as well as within a reasonable distance of the search area are submitted by site acquisition and reviewed by RF Engineering. If possible, RF will make use of existing or nearby structures before proposing to build new towers. Sunny View Search Area To resolve the coverage and capacity deficiencies previously detailed, Verizon Wireless is seeking to add one new cell facility within this area to improve wireless service capacity and coverage. By providing a new dominant signal area and offloading weak and distant traffic from Broohtondale and Ithaca HD with the proposed site, adequate and reliable service will be restored. The new Sunny View site will provide dominant and dedicated signal to the identified portions of the Towns of Ithaca, Danby and Dryden. This helps to improve not only the Sunny View project area but will also result with significant improvements to the above mentioned overloaded sites ultimately improving community wide areas in and around the Sunny View project area. verizoml 13 Area Terrain/Minimum AMSL (Ground Elevation) The below map is used to help in ref erenceto both the preceding search area slide as well as the following coverage slides. Roads and terrain can be difficult to observe when reviewing the coverage slides. The below image is absent any coverage to help the viewerwith area orientation as well as visualizing the need for the below 1000' AMSL (maximum ground elevation requirement). ICNC 195 SUCKER Cayuga Lake 3CvRY1JCA HEIGHTS RAYUGA ! RTH GQRNELL RELO TDRNELL 4VPRNELI NELL 15G - iHwEsi LE ETowN DrydenMICAO qHAG Di 0EG-1 SPflH' THPLA HD 1WALMART MEW YG ITHACA Ew c3NG Diner Mr - Caroline Danby Rt.245 A 92 6 0.6 C!M aODKTONOALE The Sunny View project area is subject to significant terrain challenges and site placement is critical to provide the necessary coverage and capacity needed. The site needs to be located within the search area but also at a ground elevation below the ridge of 1,150' or below to keep the site contained. The proposed site is located at 824'AMSL which meets this requirement ind is strategi Ily located within the ring to allow for Line Of Sight (LOS) to the coverage objective areas. verizonv 14 Existing Low Band (700/850MHz) Best Server-105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new site U VI IIII IQI IL Z) Y IIQI C11 GQ. eMc les yn{}•j I T W., I jM On Air Coverage Brooktondale Gamma 0 Ithaca HD Search Area The map above represents coverage from existing sites.. with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is fror other on air (Low Band sites. Verizo,1 15 Proposed Low Band (700/85OMHz) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites identified significant gap area. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. Verizon%' 16 Existing Low Band (700/85OMHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Refer to slide 12 for further expfana tion of these color thresholds 85 Best Signal Level (dBmi >=-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBmJ > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBml > =-10S t i I M 0MUY WHO 1 N w he map above represents existing low band signal strength coverage from existing sites. Notice the large (orange coverage) areas near the proposed Sunny View site that are subject to variable coverage conditions including fading and seasonality gaps. verizon' 17 Proposed Low Band (700/85OMHz) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Refer to slide 12 for further explanation of these color thresholds w ' ur . K r HG pANBr MICRO y it j . r Il d. 1 r R. j • a o a2 0.1 0.6 0.•M, t 4 A - 85 Best Signal Level (dBm) r =-85 95 Best Signal Level (dBm) > =-95 105 Best Signal Level (dBml > =-105 The map above adds low band of the Sunny View site to the existing signal strength (small cells removed from previous slide). The significantly improved signal strength corresponds t improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Ithaca. verizom' 18 Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C- Band) Best Server 405dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites aominant signal area 51G" On Air Coverage s ® Brooktondale Gamma Ithaca HD Search Area w , i - k s• i n ti • a iiNf1Y Ew 1 : E1 eq(l;alc. J z 4 0 0.2 0, O,fi 0.fim. air, 3_ The map above represents coverage from existing sites, with the sites in need of capacity offload detailed in the legend above. Blue coverage is from other on air (Mid Band) sites. Notice the lack of signal or where there is signal, a dominant server throughout the Sunny View project area. This reveals several sites that are excessively stretching their mid hand coverage capabilities which results with unacceptable coverage and performance. verizorV 119 Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Best Server-105dBm RSRP Best Server plots depict the actual footprint of each sector in question at one threshold so the viewer can accurately evaluate the area offloaded by the new sites aomrnant signal area. 5 - On Air Coverage Brooktondale Gamma Ithaca HD Search Area Sunny View i r. J i^ . _ F:1nR7 lr• f IN O! The map above adds the footprint of the proposed Sunny View site in green. The green best server footprint provides improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap area. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting the existing overloaded sectors identified in the image above. venzo6l 20 Existing Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C-Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how weak the RF conditions are in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Heter to slide 71 for rurtner explc Trmc Iss Lion or these color tnresnoras r W &TMcMo - ut EGNANS SP - Y WAA&"Y r r 4 BY o KioRamte {AW 4 iftit. f.? The map above represents mid band coverage from existing sites. This midband signal is very weak throughout the project area. Additional mid band network densification is required resolve these conditions. verizonV 21 Proposed Mid Band (AWS/PCS/C- Band) Coverage (signal strength) This coverage map shows how improved the RF conditions will be in portions of the Town of Ithaca and surrounding area. Herer to sure 71 for rurtrler exDtl tion or tnese mor tnresnoras 1, E i}I ®RNEi1 Y 4 E Mu+s o7 1 lU-MART NICFiO• " 1 - . i1' !! JJ i • 4 s• i oAWY MEW wg; 1 h it Im The map above adds mid band of the Sunny View site to the existing signal strength (small cells removed from previous slide). The significantly improved signal strength corresponds to improved coverage and capacity throughout the identified significant gap areas. This will help to resolve the coverage and capacity issues impacting portions of the Town of Ithaca. verizon' 22 RF Justification Summary Low and Mid Band Gap Low Band Gap S ZkN y,, --I 4- tj • y The proposed site resolves the substantial and significant gaps in coverage and capacity impacting the Town of Ithaca. These gaps are shown above: The green shaded area represent the gaps in coverage and capacity that the proposed sunny View site with 130' ACL will resolve. verizon/ The network was analyzed to determine whether there is sufficient RF coverage and capacity In the Towns of Ithaca, Danby, and Dryden. It was determined that there are significant gaps in adequate LTE service for Verizon Wireless in the Low and Mid Band LTE frequencies. In addition to the coverage deficiencies, Verizon Wireless' network does not have sufficient capacity (low band or mid band) to handle the existing and projected LTE voice and data traffic in the area near and neighboring the proposed facilities ("targeted service improvement area"). Based on the need for additional coverage and capacity while considering the topography and specific area requiring service, any further addition of capacity to distant existing sites does not remedy Verizon's significant gap in reliable service. Therefore, the proposed facilities are also needed to provide "capacity relief" to the existing nearby Verizon Wireless sites, allowing the proposed facilities and those neighboring sites to adequately serve the existing and projected capacity demand in this area. With the existing network configuration there are significant gaps in service which restricts Verizon Wireless customers from originating, maintaining or receiving reliable calls and network access. It is our expert opinion that the proposed site will satisfy the coverage and capacity needs of Verizon Wireless and its subscribers in these portions of the Towns of Ithaca, Danby, Dryden and this project area. The proposed location depicted herein satisfies the identified service gaps and is proposed at the minimum height necessary for adequate and reliable service. MZ C%a Wasif Sharif Engineer III — RF Design 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 Verizon Wireless 23 Supplemental - Sunny View Height Justification This map shows the topographical underlay map of the Sunny View project area. Terrain is a significant consideration in determining the necessary antenna height. Antenna design height refers to the "centerline" of the antennas (vertically) otherwise known as ACL (Antenna Center Line). A related measurement is the tip of the antennas which is often equal to the necessary tower height. We will refer to both for clarity. i 1 A weer Bethel Grove - I • t t f 0 0.1 0.31M The Sunny View project area and the southeastern portion of the town of Ithaca, southwestern portion of Dryden and northeastern portion of Danby are subject to significant terrain challenges for RF signal propagation. Proper site location as well as an appropriate ACL are necessary to provide adequate and reliable coverage throughout the project area to not only resolve existing coverage and capacity challenges but to also avoid the need for additional towers in the area (tower proliferation). Areas above in the black dashed lines are the areas where mid -band coverages changes dramatically when ACL is altered. Please refer to Slide 25 Verizonv U S G S Top o Map 24 P Supplemental - Height Justification Mid -Band Coverage (AWS/PCS/C-Band) 140' ACL SS Best Srgnat Level IdBml »-$5 SOS Bret Signal Leel Id6ml >--ro5130' A C L -95 Best Signal Level jdBm) >=- 10 Proposed) 4% t + 120' ACL 110' AC L `. .__... . ram• r . a Due to long distance (propagation) coverage challenges in every direction from the proposed Sunny View site, coverage capabilities below 130' ACL are significantly compromised causing gaps in coverage and capacity capability for Verizon's mid band licenses including but not limited to AWS, PCS and C-Band which vary in frequency from 1900-3700MHz. Specific areas circled above in the black dashed lines along the Staterville Road, Burns Road, Coddington Road, Southwoods Dr, all listed as primary objectives are all significantly impacted by reduction in ACL. verizonv Supplemental - Height Justification Low -Band Coverage (700/850 MHz) 40' A E ice` - 13 0' A L Si 6est Signal Levei {tlBm >=-85 Best Signal Leva! {dBml > =-55 teceE101pSBestSignal [d5ml > =-165 P- d Prt P r d A f f 1 z 0' AC Ley - t 11 o' AC L- Ilk T 1 P 1 w i^ r L L Y + 1 r 1 04 A f/ Low band coverage capabilities are not typically the limiting factor in determining height justification unless the area is subject to terrain challenges. The above signal strength coverage plots are shown for low band context purpose only. The significant market share and customer demand that the network is subject to can not be supported with low band only coverage in portions of the project area, nor is the functionality of carrier aggregation possible without adequate and reliable mid band coverage throughout the project and primary coverage objective areas. Height justification must be determined based on a given site's limiting factor which in the case of the Sunny View project is the mid band capabilities verizonv 13 cc O O cc U J a Y/ E O s E z ME W E 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p p ao w o aow8$ qII; M1 M1 M1 f I C C C C C C C C C G U V V V fJ c m m m m m m m c N N Vl N Vi N VI VI VI VI m 5l!1 vV'i v'Ui 5 v i v i y l7Q l7Q l7Q C7Q C7V V Q Q l7a 7V r u s E E E E E E E p Q m nm Q N N N ry N Q rvj N s N N N N m m m ry ry C V V 6 V V V m U 6 U a s s s s s s^ x x x z z z z z z x x x z z z z z z z z zz 0p N 0 N 1 1p Ali rl e•1 O M t lM1p O n a 1 l O 1%1 iG m N Q Q tNif 0QN000il0 t0 M tme V a V M rl M M1 M1 M M H H 1 m Q1 c m 4U 3 C7 O N x S r w u y p o F J z Z Q a a v=io O? V U ti a U) () a 3 ro a) a y= x U :tl A U) c `% t 0 o' ro ro o E o o ro 3:c) 0 CD ° m E 0 CO 0 3 °?0a 0 os aai 3 in 00 Ls a W - cny 3 a-' °' caCLrOUCUCO +, 0 cn ,- ro c •- + 00 +N+ c O U a) ° Q U a) E • 0 0 D 0- - L O U 0 0_ C) ' O L E a ca ,a, d N O 0= O 0 O O 0 m to Cd Q U p` O) " M O N O ~ 1 0 ro0 sn v v o a c w c F- c Ul W Cd aXWO -O-CC i°niJyynic C c°a co O1 ro U) C E.;E+_.,r O a.LI)<- c I= c U> 0 Co V U 0 0 -O ' a) y N ro c ro L 7:1 CL V a) Q :D Q) .b O 0 a O ro a) U O U U r_rocam ro 0W->CL=, Ci c3r-p_c ccu a) N O O G c' a) N N U) c: -o:L- . ' > ro O fl•a)aro) E O o.o m 0 3 o a) c 31 co U o (Dsa I- O U0 O> C O O a my O c I ca 0 U) Q 3 chCO O 0' to 0 — LF, 0 M y} ' O OL a) a) d V L y1._ a C C 1.. ai E a) fa a) 0 > 'r' a7 0 C C C CO = t O 'C 7 a m U .= E 1 O' ro 0 N r-.' ro , ' a) m 0 N a CL y= ca Ua 0 V ; _ +0, A.! ) 5.- i- Q O O Q) E E- ca cO C U) CO 0 C T UI U +•' •i7 ca D Q C+ 0 a C' a) U N +0• y U CU O 3 a) r0n 0° O roOL LO F c fUa US a) U a N C O U O a) U 0a•.np QE'c)a)oa:_.rro(D C.) +.a)'mrooa) r Ca O r-+ i a U r 07 7 a L O L C N V O_ a fl. U O 0 U Q ro a C c d 0) N OCo CO v'rn Nt cE 3 v m a E N 0) CL0) ro U a ° 0L'd 3:= E o'3- a)> mro°)o-0 rooa`)a)C:C 4) a) E c Eaa))m Cc v7 L U) r y N E E N a^ O Z O `S a c c .N LO j ro° c N Ea) 1 ' C W J a) Oa) a 0 ir oa0-0a- U aT)O a) c -a O 0U c co Z Ld 7d CL 0Q+a)0OU0V Z OO)w 0 e cm 'a 00E LC L-0 O V) CO CaO UVa) O c .- 0 - 0 a) a a) Oo ainNi)iC b nr omEENQroa) N cti o 0) a) CL -a 0 Qua• c 3 0 c o c u a a) Q.N 0) c) C . 0 +. N 0 0 E C C 0 O +>-. ' O 0 - o 0 N 0 0) 0 C) a a) 3 O c 0 a. 0-0 O x 0 Q) 3 LO CO 0 C) 0 O a 0 U ro r- 0. 0- 0 0 U- -O =- .0 l t+ a..+= O mow u=? `a-- C: o ID c ran 3 m o% G•E' o NQ ° to C) 0M= ro rnZ ro o a) o a) w 0cnEm c a 33°, is.E a) co + fl a) ti en Oa) U) U a -0 0 c a d C N U E p a v) a) cDc ° O NO 0N Q aOQU) U us e N 0U) , Ez >, 0) N U a) ro .c s oEEDc 0 u0i 0 T r + .. rN, Ca U ro O c u, a s ro :c - + 0 ' c N a) a) a) Q +. U 3 C Cl) o a °roc.o m ,J5- aa a) E m 3 o U° H a U .. -L is 0. > a) G L al rt. ro - ro a '- ca ID C ro O U) N G ac-+ • yU-_ 0 ID ram-. ra c C c c d) E U +'+ c:0 flccna) c¢Earc E (UCroUo 0 cn a E w 0 U p a) a) al 0 CD,+_•• v • a) 0 O CL ro a5 'y O 'C Q p y c 0 w,ai. a QUg CL V N:O-r0 CD - E cn Cl U C ON cO >- O ro > EO 5ao o co cDa cojEa o O= a) o sOcz NE TE rC)I = m c.EcrN mis O=a a) 3 a 0.- Lm yo`n`oCd ooE EEo 3c°n1 ,N o t O E N t caN O ; C d N U c 0 2' 0- N Q 61 F- ti 9 7 c U ca .- 9 d- ro a) 'J Q. C ¢ E .r. EXHIBIT I verizonv BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC DIBIA VERIZON WIRELESS SUNNY VIEW SITE 111 Wiedmaier Court Ithaca, New York 14850 SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 19, 2023 Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite #140 West Henrietta, New York 14586 4824-6453-9010.1 Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 SITE SELECTION ANALYSIS Verizon Wireless proposes to install and operate a new wireless telecommunications facility, including a new tower, associated antennas, ground equipment, and related appurtenances, at 111 Wiedmaier Court in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York. The property is currently a 12.34 acre parcel, and is currently vacant land. 1. NEED FOR FACILITY a) Problem The process of identifying a technologically appropriate location, as well as the need for this communications facility are as provided in the RF SEARCH RING JUSTIFICATION. As indicated in that report, when a Verizon Wireless Radio Frequency Engineer identifies coverage gaps in the system or sites that have or will reach data capacity exhaustion, they issue a "search area." A search area is a geographical area located within the inadequately serviced area, and it is designed such that if a wireless telecommunications facility is located within the search area, and at an appropriate height, it will likely provide the required coverage. For the most part, locations outside of the search area will fail to provide adequate service to the cell. Due to technological constraints, there is limited flexibility as to where a new facility can be located, and still function properly. The goal of the search area is to define the permissible location for placement of a cell site that will provide adequate service in the subject cell, and also work properly as part of the overall network. b) Solution A search area was developed based on the problems identified in the RF SEARCH RING and are attached herein as Attachment 1. These are the geographical areas within which a new wireless telecommunications facility is likely to provide the required coverage (at an appropriate height). Parameters for the search area are generally along Slaterville Road (Route 79) just South of Park Lane and to the south just past Burns Road. Again, for the most part, locations outside of the search area will fail to provide adequate service to the cell while locations within are likely, but not guaranteed, to do so. 2. SEARCH RING ANALYSIS a) Geography & Topography The Sunny View search area has some varying topography and is comprised of open fields and wooded areas. b) Land Use The Search Ring is made up of predominately residentially developed and undeveloped parcels. 3. ZONING CONSIDERATIONS a) Collocation Verizon Wireless routinely seeks to install its antennas and equipment on an existing wireless telecommunications towers or other tall structures ("collocation"), whenever feasible. Page 2 of 7 4824-6453-9010.1 Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 Local communities universally favor collocation because they can minimize the number of wireless telecommunications towers in an area and many municipalities even provide for a streamlined application review process. Collocation is often listed as the highest siting priority in a local municipality's Zoning Law. In addition to the streamlined zoning application process, collocation is preferred by wireless providers because it is generally a less expensive and more efficient option, compared to construction of a new tower facility. b) New Structure on Municipally -owned Property As its next priority, Verizon Wireless generally seeks to locate wireless telecommunication facilities on municipally -owned property. These locations are often preferred by municipalities as the second preference behind collocation as it allows municipalities to benefit from a rental stream for the leased premises. In this case, unfortunately there are not any Town of Ithaca owned parcels in the area of the search area. c) New Structure on Privately -owned Property When it is not feasible to collocate on an existing tower or tall structure, and there are no feasible municipally -owned properties in the area, Verizon Wireless must find a privately -owned site which is appropriate for and can accommodate a new wireless telecommunications structure. In doing so, the Site Acquisition Specialist attempts to identify properties in the Search Area large enough to accommodate the facility and which also meet any required area requirements such as set backs. In addition, other characteristics such as existing compatible land use and existing mature vegetation that can screen the facility are considered. Access, land use, constructability, the presence of wetlands, floodplains and other contributing factors are also examined. 4. SEARCH RING ANALYSIS After a comprehensive investigation of the Search Ring, no currently available towers or tall structures are available collocation. Per the town code for the Town of Ithaca, new wireless telecommunications Wireless telecommunications facilities are permitted in the Town of Ithaca, regardless of zoning district, upon the issuance of a special permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board. (Code § 270-219(B)). Area variances for height, setbacks/fall zone, and lot size from the Board of Appeals would also be required should the height of the proposed facility exceed 30'. (Code § 270- 219(B)). A fall zone around any telecommunications tower must have a radius at least equal to the height of the tower and any attached antennae, which fall zone may not include public roads. The lot on which the tower is located may not contain any other structure other than that associated with the telecommunications facility, which shall be located on a single parcel. All telecommunications facilities shall comply with the setback, frontage, minimum lot size and yard standards of the underlying zoning district, which also apply to all tower parts including guy wires, anchors and accessory buildings. (Code § 270-219(F)(1-4)). 5. CANDIDATE ANALYSIS A comprehensive investigation of the Sunny View Search Area was completed and several potential candidates were identified. The parcel is identified on Attachment 2. A summary of the property located within the Search Area is detailed below. A) Six Mile Creek Vineyard (Tax Parcel ID# 503089-56.-2-1.1) -- 1551 Slaterville Road This parcel, 25.22 acres in size is located on the south side of Slaterville Road, across from where Park Lane intersects with Slaterville Road. This location was submitted to the RF Page 3 of 7 4824-6453-9010.1 Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 engineer for review as a potential location for a tower facility. The owner of the vineyard was initially interested in leasing space to Verizon Wireless, but the Verizon Wireless RF engineer determined that this location would not be adequate, as this location would have not adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location. As such, lease negotiations with the owner of the vineyard were terminated. B) Gary Foote #1 (Tax Parcel ID# 503089-56.-3-14.3) — No Number Slaterville Road This parcel, 8.65 acres in size is located on the north side of Slaterville Road, close to where Burns Road intersects with Slaterville Road. This location was submitted to the RF engineer for review as a potential location for a tower facility. The landowner was initially interested in leasing space to Verizon Wireless, but the Verizon Wireless RF engineer determined that this location would not be adequate, as this location would have not adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location. As such, lease negotiations with the landowner were terminated. C) Gary Foote #2 (Tax Parcel ID# 503089-56.-3-14.2) -- 1598 Slaterville Road This parcel, 10.54 acres in size is located on the north side of Slaterville Road, across from where Burns Road intersects with Slaterville Road. This location was submitted to the RF engineer for review as a potential location for a tower facility. The landowner was initially interested in leasing space to Verizon Wireless, but the Verizon Wireless RF engineer determined that this location would not be adequate, as this location would have not adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location. As such, lease negotiations with the landowner were terminated. D) Gary Foote #3 (Tax Parcel 1D# 502489-71.-1-1.2) —1698 Slaterville Road This parcel, 16.25 acres in size is located on the north side of Slaterville Road, just to the south of where Burns Road intersects with Slaterville Road. This location was submitted to the RF engineer for review as a potential location for a tower facility. The landowner was initially interested in [easing space to Verizon Wireless, but the Verizon Wireless RF engineer determined that this location would not be adequate, as this location would have not adequately covered the intended coverage area in the same capacity as the selected location. As such, lease negotiations with the landowner were terminated. E) S Roberts WC Land LLC (Tax Parcel ID# 503089-56.-4-1.22) — 111 Wiedmaier Court This parcel, 12.34 acres in size is located on the south side of Burns Road, just to the south of where Burns Road intersects with Slaterville Road. This parcel and proposed tower location is within the search area and has proved to be the best location from a topography and terrain perspective. The chosen location on the property also offers some natural screening of the base of the tower facility from view from neighboring parcels to the north and is a significant distance from the neighboring apartment homes on Wiedmaier Court, and the homes on Burns Way and Slaterville Road. As further detailed in the RF review and analysis document - Engineering Necessity Case — Sunny View" this location adequately solves the issues that the Verizon Wireless network is currently experiencing in the area. 6. CONCLUSION Based on the requirements of the town's site plan review law, the existing conditions and land use, and the reasons identified above, as well as the results of RF review and analysis, we believe the S Roberts WC Land LLC parcel is the best location for the proposed facility. Page 4 of 7 4824-6453-9010. l Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 Prepared by: Brett Morgan Airosrnith Development Consultant to Verizon Wireless Page 5 of 7 4824-6453-9010,1 Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 ATTACHMENT 1 VERIZON WIRELESS SUNNY VIEW SEARCH RING Page 6 of 7 4824-6453-9010.1 Sunny View Site Ithaca, New York September 19, 2023 ATTACHMENT 2 VERIZON WIRELESS SUNNY VIEW PARCELS IDENTIFIED & INVESTIGATED Page 7 of 7 4824-5453-9010.1 EXHIBIT 1 ULS License AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz) License - WQVN679 - Ceiico Partnership Call Sign WQVN679 Status Active Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit? Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum Market Market BEA006 - Syracuse, NY -PA Submarket 0 3.7 GHz License Type Dates Grant 04/08/2015 Effective 02/24/2017 Buildout Deadlines 1st 04/08/2021 Discontinuance Dates 1st Notification Dates 1st 03/10/2021 lice FRN 0003290673 Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Contact Verizon Wireless Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Ownership and Quakfications Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. D i iogr Uiiit, Race Ethnicity Radio Service AT - AWS-3 (1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz) Auth Type Regular Channel Block I Associated Frequencies 001770.00000000-001780,00000000 MHz) 002170,00000000-002160.00000000 3.7 GHz Linked License Expiration 04/08/2027 Cancellation 2nd 04/08/2027 2nd 2nd 03/10/2021 Type General Partnership P:(770)797-1070 F:(678)259-1319 E:Iicensirgcompliance@verizonwireless.com P:(770)797-1070 F:(678)259-1319 E:L:icensirtgComplience@VerizonWireless.com Gender Yes ULS License AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) License - WQGA833 - Cellco Partnership Call Sign WQGA833 Status Active Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Servire Provider (RSP) bidding credit? Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum Market Market CMA562 - New York 4 - Yates Submarket 0 3.7 GHz License Type Dates Grant 01/11/2022 Effective 01/11/2022 Suildout Deadlines 1st Discontinuance Dates 1st Notification Dates 1st L cn c,_ FRN 0003290673 Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 Contact Cellco Partnership Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 Radio Service AW - AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) Auth Type Regular Channel Block A Associated Frequencies 001710.00000000-001720.00000000 MHz) 002110.000000D0-002120.00000000 3.7 GHz Linked License Expiration 11/29/2036 Cancellation 2nd 2nd 2nd 06/27/2021 Type General Partnership P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E: LicensirtgCompliance@VerizonWireless.com P:(770)797-1070 F: (770) 797-10 36 E: LicensingCompliance@Verizon Wireless.corn Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government? No Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien? No Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government? No Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one -fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or No voted by aliens or their representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? is the applicant directly or Indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one- Yes fourth of the capital stack is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof, or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? If the answer to the above question is'Yes', has the applicant received a ruling(s) under Section Yes 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act with respect to the same radio service involved in this application? Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits, Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender ULS License AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) License - WQGA903 - Cellco Partnership Call Sign WQGA903 Status Active Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit? Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum Market Market BEA006 - Syracuse, NY -PA Submarket 5 3.7 GHz License Type Dates Grant 12/21/2021 Effective 12/21/2021 Buiidout Deadlines 1st Discontinuance Dates 1st Notification Dates 1st FRN 0003290673 Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 Contact Cellco Partnership Licensing Manager 5055 North Paint Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 0." ;- ; thrp ind qua1t1cat10ns Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Race Ethnicity Radio Service AW - AWS (1710-1755 MHz and 2110-2155 MHz) Auth Type Regular Channel Block B Associated Frequencies 001720.00000000-001730.00000000 MHz) 002120.00000000-002130.00000000 3.7 GHz Linked License Expiration 11/29/2036 Cancellation 2nd 2nd 2nd 08/30/2021 Type General Partnership P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E:LicensingCompliance@Ver!zDnW!reless.com P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E : Licensi ngCompliance@ Verizon W ir,e less, corn Gender Yes Page 1 of 1 ULS License Cellular License - KNKQ423 - Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown, Inc. Call Sign KNKQ423 Radio Service CL - Cellular Status Active Auth Type Regular Market Market CMA562 - New York 4 - Yates Channel Block Submarket 0 Phase Dates Grant 08/26/2014 Expiration Effective 12/09/2016 Cancellation Five Year Buildout Date 08/02/2000 Control Points 1 500 W. Dove Rd, TARRANT, southlake, TX P:(800)264-6620 10/01/2024 FRN 0003301512 Type Corporation Licensee Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown, Inc. P:(770)797-1070 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering F:(770)797-1036 Alpharetta, GA 30022 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com ATTN Regulatory Contact Verizon Wireless P:(770)797-1070 Liensing Manager F:(202)289-6781 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Radlo Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Race Ethnicity Gender 5/12/2017 Page 1 of 1 ULS License PCS Broadband License - WQRL213 - Cellco Partnership This license has pending applications. 0007471941, 0007298013, 0006830600, 0006318836 Call Sign WQRL213 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Status Active Auth Type Regular Market Market BTA208 - Ithaca, NY Channel Block C1 Submarket 0 Associated 001902.50000000-001910.00000000 Frequencies (MHz) 001982,50000000-001990.00000000 Dates Grant 06/10/2013 Expiration 06/10/2023 Effective 02/16/2017 Cancellation Buildout Deadlines 1st 06/10/2018 2nd Notification Dates 1st 08/26/2016 2nd FRN 0003290673 Type General Partnership Licensee Cellco Partnership P:(770)797-1070 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering F:(678)259-1319 Alpharetta, GA 30022 E:licensingcompliance@verizonwireless.com ATTN Regulatory Contact Verizon Wireless Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Radio Service Type Mobile P:(770)797-1070 F:(678)259-1319 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Race Ethnicity Gender 5/12/2017 Page 1 of l ULS License PCS Broadband License - KNLF918 - Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown, Inc. Call Sign KNLF918 Radio Service CW - PCS Broadband Status Active Auth Type Regular Market Market BTA208 - Ithaca, NY Channei Block D Submarket 0 Associated 001865.00000000-001870.00000000 Frequencies (MHz) 001945.00000000-001950.00000000 Dates Grant 03/31/2017 Expiration 04/28/2027 Effective 03/31/2017 Cancellation Buildout Deadlines 1st 04/28/2002 2nd Notification Dates 1st 04/19/2002 2nd FRN 0003301512 Licensee Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems of Allentown, Inc. 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Contact Verizon Wireless Liensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Ownership and Qualification Type Corporation P:(770)797-1070 F:(770)797-1036 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireiess,com P:(770)797-1070 F:(202)289-6781 E:LicensirgCompliance@VerizonWireless.com Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Mien ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Race Ethnicity Gender 5/12/2017 ULS License - 700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership Page 1 of 1 ULS License 700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) License - WQJQ689 - Cellco Partnership This license has pending applications. 0008657811 Cali Sign WQJQ689 Radio Service WU - 700 MHz Upper Band (Block C) Status Active Auth Type Regular Rural Service Provider Bidding Credit Is the Applicant seeking a Rural Service Provider (RSP) bidding credit? Reserved Spectrum Reserved Spectrum Market Market REA001 - Northeast Submarket 0 Dates Grant 09/11/2019 Effective 09/11/2019 Buildout Deadlines 1st 06/13/2013 Notification Dates 1st 06/20/2013 Licensee FRN 0003290673 Licensee Cellco Partnership 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Contact Verizon Wireless Licensing Manager 5055 North Point Pkwy, NP2NE Network Engineering Alpharetta, GA 30022 ATTN Regulatory Ownership and qualifications Channel Block C Associated 000746.00000000-000757.00000000 Frequencies (MHz) 000776.00000000-000787.00000000 Expiration 06/13/2029 Cancellation 2nd 06/13/2019 2nd 06/17/2019 Type General Partnership P:(770)797-1070 E:LicensingCompliance@VerizonWireless.com P:(770)797-1070 E: LicensingCompliance@Ve rizon W ireless. com Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender Yes https:flwireless2.fcc.govlUlsApp/UIsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=3060316&printable 9/30/2019 EXHIBIT K Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either "Yes" or "No". If the answer to the initial question is "Yes", complete the sub -questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is "No", proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section C requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A. Project and Applicant/Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless - Unmanned Wireless Communications Facility - "Sunny View" Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): 111 Wiedmaier Ct, Ithaca, New York 14850 Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless" or "Applicant") proposes the installation of an unmanned wireless communications facility located on the existing property. Said property being located on Wiedmaier Ct 0.06 miles Southeast of Burns Road. Access to the proposed facility will originate from Wiedmaier Ct improving existing gravel driveway. In general, the installation will consist of the following: an 134' tall monopole (138' including 4' lightning rod), nine (9) antennas and related equipment to be mounted to the tower at a center -line height of 130', cellular and utility equipment at grade in a proposed 50'x50' fenced compound. The project also include the installation of power and fiber utilities to service the facility. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: (585) 313-3027 Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless; attn: Lindsay Beckwith E-Mail: lindsay.beckwith@verizanwireless.com Address: 1275 John Street, Suite 100 City/PO: West Henrietta State: NY Zip Code: 14586 Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): Telephone: (585) 263-1000 Nixon Peabody, LLP; attn: Robert W. Burgdorf, Esq. E-Mail: rburgdorf@nixonpeabody.com Address: 1300 Clinton Square City/PO: State: Zip Code: Rochester NY 14604 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: S Roberts WC Land LLC E-Mail: Address: 111 Wiedmaier Ct City/PO: Ithaca State: NY Zip Code:14150 Page 1 of 13 FEAF 2019 B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. ("Funding" includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required Actual or projected) a. City Council, Town Board, Yes No or Village Board of Trustees b. City, Town or Village mYes No Planning Board - Special Use Permit & Site Plan TBD Planning Board or Commission Approval c. City, Town or mYes No Board of Appeals - Area Variance TBD Village Zoning Board of Appeals d. Other local agencies mYes No Building Department- Building Permit TBD e. County agencies Yes No f. Regional agencies Yes No g. State agencies Yes No h. Federal agencies Yes No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ©Yes 0No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? YesVINo ffi. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? [] YesmNo C. Planning and Zoning C.I. Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 Yes ®No C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action would be located? Yes No Yes®No b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes, identify the plan(s): Yes®No c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes, identify the plan(s): Yesw]No Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes No If Yes, what is the zoning class if cation(s) including any applicable overlay district? Medium Density Residential MDR & Conservation C b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ® Yes No c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? Yes®No If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? Ithaca City school District b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Tom kins County Sheriff c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Ithaca Fire Department Station 2 d. What parks serve the project site? Eastern Heights Park Tudor Park Hun erford Heights Park D. Project Details D.1. Proposed and Potential Development a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? Unmanned telecommunications facility b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 12.34 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.28 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.13 acres c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? Yes® No i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % Units: d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? Yes ®No If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? Yes No iii. Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? Yes®No i. If No, anticipated period of construction: 2 months ii. If Yes: Total number of phases anticipated Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year Anticipated completion date of final phase month _ year Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 Does the project include new residential uses? Yes®No If Yes, show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? ®Yes No If Yes, i. Total number of structures 1 _(tower) ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 138' height; 5' width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: o square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any Yes ®No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: Ground water Surface water streams Other specify: iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons; surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): D.2. Project Operations a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? Yes2]No Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i . What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them, iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes, describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres viL What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? Yes No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment YesZNo into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? Yes No If Yes, describe: iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? Yes No If Yes: acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project.completion: purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): proposed method of plant removal: if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? Yes ONo If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day U. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Yes hlo If Yes: Name of district or service area: Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Do existing lines serve the project site? Yes No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? Yes ONO If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: Source(s) of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If, Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: Date application submitted or anticipated: Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? Yes ®No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? Yes No If Yes: Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: Name of district: Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? Yes No Is the project site in the existing district? Yes No Is expansion of the district needed? Yes No Page 5 of 13 Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? Yes No Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? Yes No If Yes: Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? Yes No If Yes: Applicant/sponsor for new district: Date application submitted or anticipated: What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point Yes ®No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non -point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres (impervious surface) Square feet or acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on -site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on -site surface water or off -site surface waters)? If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? Yes[--] No iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re -use stormwater? Yes El No f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on -site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel Yes No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? If Yes, identify: i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) NIA ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) Construction equipment iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) Backup generator g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, Yes ®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non -attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) Yes No ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N20) Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, Yes®No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: L Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? . If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): Morning Evening Weekend Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No V. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within %2 mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric Yes No Yes No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing Yes No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand Yes No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: Minimal increase in electrical power usage as necessary to operate the facility. ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on -site combustion, on -site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): Local utility iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? Yes®No 1. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: Monday - Friday: 8arn - 5pm • Monday - Friday: 24 hours Saturday: • Saturday: 24 hours Sunday: • Sunday: 24 hours Holidays: . Holidays: 24 hours Page 7 of 13 m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, m Yes No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: During construction noise associated with the operation of construction equipment. During operation, noise associated with the operation of backup generator. ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? Describe: Yes ®No n. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes No If yes: L Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: One 1 switch operated LED light fixture attached to the h-frame at grade, designed to illuminate the area in and around the Verizon equipment only. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? Describe: Yes ®No o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Yes ®No p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s) to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g., month, year) M. Generally, describe the proposed storage facilities: Yes ®No q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: L Describe proposed treatment(s): Yes ®No ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? Yes []No r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: Construction: tons per (unit of time) Operation : tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: Construction: Yes ®No Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on -site: Construction: Operation: Page 8 of 13 s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? Yes ® No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment M. If landfill, anticipated site life: years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous Yes ®No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on -site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes: provide name and location of facility: If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E. Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. Urban Industrial Commercial ® Residential (suburban) ® Rural (non -farm) Forest Agriculture Aquatic Other (specify): ii. If mix of uses, generally describe: b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Covertype Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change Acres +/-) Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces 0.50 0.50 0.0 Forested 9.26 9.26 0.0 Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) 2.58 2.58 0 0 Agricultural includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) Surface water features lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) Non -vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) Other Describe: I Page 9 of 13 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? YesONo i. If Yes: explain: d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed Yes®No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: Dam height: feet Dam length: feet Surface area: acres Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: W. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, Yes®No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: L Has the facility been formally closed? Yes No If yes, cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any Ycs® No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site Yes No Remediation database? Check all that apply: Yes — Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): Yes — Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures: W. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? Yes No If yes, provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? YesElNo If yes, DEC site ID number: I Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): Describe any use limitations: Describe any engineering controls: Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? Yes No Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? 7+ feet b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? YesmNo If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: HsC3 84.3 % HzE 15.7 % d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: Well Drained: % of site Moderately Well Drained: 100 % of site Poorly Drained % of site f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: 100 % of site 10-15%: % of site 15% or greater: % of site g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? 0YcsZNo If Yes, describe: h. Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, YesmNo ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? YesmNo If Yes to either i or fi, continue. If No, skip to E.21 iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, Yes®No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: Streams: Name Classification Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification Wetlands: Name Approximate Size Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water duality -impaired Yes ®No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? Yes ®No j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? Yes oNo k, Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? YesmNo t. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? mYes No If Yes: i. Name of aquifer: Principal Aquifer Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: Rabbits Squirrels Skunks Chipmunks oppossums Foxes Birds Raccoons Deer n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? El Yes [Z]No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): U. Source(s) of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: Currently: acres Following completion of project as proposed: acres Gain or loss (indicate + or -): acres o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as Yes[Z]No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? If Yes: i. Species and listing (endangered or threatened): p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of YesmNo special concern? If Yes: i. Species and listing: d. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? YesmNo If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to YesmNo Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? YesmNo i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? H. Source(s) of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National YesmNo Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: Biological Community Geological Feature E Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? YesmNo If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district Yes®No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: L Nature of historic/archaeological resource: Archaeological Site Historic Building or District ii. Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Yes®No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? Yes®No If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local ®Yes No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: Eastern Heights Park, Tudor Park, Hungerford Heights Park _ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): Local park _ iii. Distance between project and resource: 1 miles. L Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? Yes No F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Steven Matthews, agent on behalf of applicant Date 413123 Signature Title Director of Engineering PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, January 16, 2023 8:53 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental h r • ' assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 25 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 6i 2 7 DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper, Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. 5 -A 1.26 Otlawa TOronlO 2 1 Elt}.Xo cRosfor r, rhibany 6etrolr ' 1 Swt•a; Cleveland ;y Providence jNew York MhP l Pitlsburgh PhllsdetphfaEh:1EAITI Can; Esli Japan, 11ETI, Es China iing Kol Es dp@iaenSte# Iv1ap col> tl .i li GIS USet' COtt1111U11i B.i. i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] B.i. ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] C.2. b. [Special Planning District] E.1. h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Potential Contamination History] E.1. h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Listed] E. 1. h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Environmental Site Remediation Database] E.1. h.l [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation Site] E. 2. g [Unique Geologic Features] E.2. h.i [Surface Water Features] E.2. h.ii [Surface Water Features] E.2. h.iii [Surface Water Features] E.2. h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] E.2. i. [Floodway] E.2. j. [100 Year Floodplain] E.2. k. [500 Year Floodplain] E.2. 1. [Aquifers] E.2. 1. [Aquifer Names] E.2. n. [Natural Communities] No No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. No No No No No No Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Yes Principal Aquifer No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] j No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National or State Register of Historic Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Places or State Eligible Sites] Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] iNo Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2 EXHIBIT L verizon%l CO -LOCATION POLICY Verizon Wireless' co -location policy is as follows: Network Engineering - UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, New York 14586 Verizon Wireless encourages and promotes co -location, both by allowing other providers to locate on its towers, and by attempting to locate its facilities on other providers' towers. Verizon Wireless maintains the following requirements for other wireless telecommunication providers who desire to locate on Verizon Wireless' facilities: 1. The other provider must pay Verizon Wireless appropriate and fair compensation reflecting Verizon Wireless' investment in the engineering, legal, construction, material, and related costs for the site and facility; 2. The co -location must be technologically feasible both in terms of radio frequency transmissions and structural integrity of the tower; and The other provider must have a similar policy of co -location for Verizon Wireless and its affiliated/related companies. 4826-0041-5262.1 EXHIBIT M verizon' May 21, 2024 Network Engineering - UPNY 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, New York 14586 Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14850 Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner (cbalestra g,town.ithaca.ny.us) RE: Tower Removal Letter / Executed Removal Letter Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless' application the "Application") to the Town of Ithaca (the "Town") for a special use permit and site plan approval from the Planning Board and an area variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to construct and operate a 134' wireless telecommunications facility (with 4' lightning rod) on property located at 111 Wiedmaier Court (Tax Parcel No. 56.4-1.22) in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York (Verizon Wireless' Sunny View" site) Dear Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Board: Verizon Wireless agrees to remove its facilities and improvements if the proposed wireless telecommunications facility becomes obsolete or ceases to be used for its intended purpose for one hundred and twenty (120) consecutive days. Removal will occur within two hundred and ten (210) days following the cessation of use. Verizon Wireless will submit a removal bond at the time it applies for a building permit. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (315) 701-4621. Thank you for your consideration of our application. Sincerely, C qaK&cy Greg Hanley Project Manager 4863-2635-0728.2 EXHIBIT N SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW 51TE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NQVEMBER 2022 OPTION AND LAND LEASE AGREEMENT This Option and Land Lease Agreement ("Agreement"), made as of the date of the latter of the signature below ("Effective Date"), between S ROBERTS WC LAND LLC, a New York limited liability company with Its principal offices located at 1129 Avenida Sevilla, Unit 5C, Walnut Creek, CA 94595, hereinafter designated LESSOR and BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, hereinafter designated LESSEE. LESSOR and LESSEE are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party." LESSOR is the owner of that certain real property located 111 Wiedmaier Court, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, State of New York, Tax Map Number 56.-4-1.22, and as further described in Instrument No. 2021-14462 as recorded in the Office of the Clerk of Tompkins County (the entirety of LESSOR's property is referred to hereinafter as the "Property"). The Property is legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. LESSEE desires to obtain an option to lease a portion of said Property, consisting of approximately five thousand six hundred twenty-five (5,625) square feet of land, as shown on Exhibit "B" the "Premises"), together with non-exclusive easements as described in the attached Land Lease Agreement, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of 1), to be paid by LESSEE to the LESSOR, the LESSOR hereby grants to LESSEE the right and option to lease said Premises, for the term and in accordance with the covenants and conditions set forth herein Option"). The foregoing payment shall be made by LESSEE within ninety (90) days of execution of this Agreement. The providing by LESSOR of rental documentation described in Section 4(b) of the following Land Lease Agreement to LESSEE shall be a prerequisite for the payment of the foregoing amount or any other option or rental payment, If applicable, by LESSEE, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, LESSEE shall have no obligation to make any payment(s) until rental documentation has been supplied to LESSEE. The Option may be exercised at any time on or prior to twelve (12) months after the Effective Date of this Agreement ("Initial Option Period"). If the option has not been so exercised, It shall be automatically extended for two (2) additional perlod(s) of twelve (12) months (each an "Option Extension"), unless LESSEE gives written notice to LESSOR of the Intent not to extend prior to the end of the Initial Option Period or Option Extension (together with the Initial Option Period, the "Option Period"). If the Option is extended, LESSEE shall make an additional payment of to LESSOR within thirty (30) days of the option being extended for each Option Extension. The time during which the Option may be exercised may be further extended by mutual agreement in writing. If during said Option Period, the option is exercised, and LESSOR decides to subdivide, sell or change the status of the Property, LESSOR shall notify LESSEE in writing so that LESSEE can take steps necessary to protect LESSEE's interest in the Premises. This Option may be sold, assigned or transferred by LESSEE without any approval or consent of LESSOR to LESSEE's principal, affiliates, subsidiaries of its principal; to any entity which acquires all or substantially all of LESSEE'S assets in the market defined by the Federal Communications Commission in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization, with prior written notice to LESSOR; or by LESSEE to a third -party tower company with whom LESSEE will enter into a sublease, upon prior written notice to LESSOR. As to other parties, this Agreement may not be sold, assigned or transferred withoutthe written consent of LESSOR, which such consent will not be unreasonably 48so-0651-a694. I3 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307ss2 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 withheld, delayed or conditioned. No change of stock ownership, partnership interest or control of LESSEE or transfer upon partnership or corporate dissolution of LESSEE shall constitute an assignment hereunder. Should LESSEE fail to exercise this Option or any Option Extension thereof within the time herein limited, all rights and privileges granted hereunder shall be deemed completely surrendered, this Option terminated, and LESSOR shall retain all money paid for the option, and no additional money shall be payable by either Party to the other. LESSOR shall reasonably cooperate with LESSEE in its effort to obtain all certificates, permits and other approvals that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities which will permit LESSEE's use of the Premises. LESSOR shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property with respect to the proposed use by LESSEE. LESSOR shall permit LESSEE, during the Option Period, non-exclusive ingress and egress to the Premises to conduct such surveys, inspections, structural strength analysis, subsurface soil tests, and other activities of a similar nature as LESSEE may deem necessary, at the sole cost of LESSEE, Premises shall be restored to pre -test condition, reasonable wear and tear excluded. LESSOR agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Option and Land Lease Agreement which LESSEE may record with the Tompkins County Clerk's Office. The date set forth in the Memorandum is for recording purposes only and bears no reference to commencement of either term or rent payments. Notice of the exercise of the Option shall be given by LESSEE to the LESSOR in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service. LESSEE shall be deemed to have exercised the Option, and the following Agreement shah take effect, on the date of commencement of construction as specified in writing by LESSEE in the Notice Commencement Date"), provided such date shall not be later than the expiration of the Option Period. 2 4860-0651-0694,13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 LAND LEASE AGREEMENT This Land Lease Agreement (the "Agreement") made as of the date of the latter of the signatures below (but not effective unless and until LESSEE exercises its Option) between S ROBERTS WC LAND LLC, a New York limited liability company with its principal offices located at 1129 Avenida Sevilla, Unit 5C, Walnut Creek, CA 94595, hereinafter designated LESSOR and BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920, hereinafter designated LESSEE. LESSOR and LESSEE are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Parties" or individually as the "Party." WITNESSETH In consideratlon of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1, GRANT. In accordance with this Agreement, LESSOR hereby grants to LESSEE the right to install, maintain and operate communications equipment ("Use") upon the Premises (as hereinafter defined), which are a part of that real property owned, leased or controlled by LESSOR at 111 WEedmaier Court, Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, State of New York, Tax Map Number 56.-4-1.22 (the "Property"), The Property is legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Premises are a portion of the Property and are approximately five thousand six hundred twenty-five (5,625) square feet, and are shown in detail on Exhibit "B" (the "Premises") attached hereto and made a part hereof, LESSEE may survey the Premises. Upon completion, the survey shall replace Exhibit "B" in its entirety, upon LESSOR approval. 2. INITIAL TERM. The initial term of the Agreement shall be for five (5) years beginning on the on the date of commencement of construction as specified in writing by LESSEE in the Notice of exercise of its Option ("Commencement Date"), provided such date shall not be later than the expiration of the Option Period. 3. EXTENSIONS, This Agreement shall automatically be extended for four (4) additional five 5) year terms unless LESSEE terminates it at the end of the then current term by giving LESSOR written notice of the intent to terminate at least three (3) months prior to the end of the then current term. The Initial term and all extensions shall be collectively referred to herein as the `Term". 4. RENTAL. a) Rental payments shall begin on the Commencement Date and be due at a total annual rental of .. to be paid in equal monthly installments on the first day of the month, in advance ("Rent"), to the following beneficiaries, which cannot be changed without prior written approval from both beneficiaries: I. ) of Rent due to LESSOR hereunder shall be sent to S Roberts WC Land LLC, 1129 Avenida Sevilla, Unit 5C, Walnut Creek, CA 94595; ii. of Rent due to LESSOR hereunder shall be sent to Bella Ranch, LLC, 30 North Gould Street, Suite R, Sheridan, WY 82801. 4980-0651-4694.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW S1TE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/BATE; N P/NOVEMB ER 2022 or to such other person, firm, or place as LESSOR may, from time to time, designate in writing at least thirty (30) days in advance of any rental payment date by notice given in accordance with Paragraph 22 below. Rent for any partial month occurring before or after the Commencement Date shall be prorated. LESSOR and LESSEE acknowledge and agree that the initial rental payment may not be delivered by LESSEE until at least sixty (60) days after the Commencement Date. Upon agreement of the Parties, LESSEE may pay Rent by electronic funds transfer and in such event, LESSOR agrees to provide to LESSEE bank routing information for such purpose upon request of LESSEE. Throughout the Term, the annual Rent, including any revenue sharing payment received, shall increase on the first anniversary of the Commencement Date and on each annual anniversary thereafter (including any extension terms) such that the annual Rent and any revenue sharing payment shall equal of the annual Rent paid immediately preceding such anniversary. b) For any party to whom rental payments are to be made, LESSOR or any successor in interest of LESSOR hereby agrees to provide to LESSEE (i) a completed, current version of Internal Revenue Service Form W-9, or equivalent; (fi) complete and fully executed state and local withholding forms if required; and (III) other documentation to verify such successor owner's right to receive rental as is reasonably requested by LESSEE. Rent shall accrue in accordance with this Agreement, but LESSEE may not deliver rental payments for up to sixty (60) days after the requested documentation has been received by LESSEE. 5. ACCESS. LESSEE shall have the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress from a public right-of-way, slaterville Road, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, over the adjacent parcels in the Wiedmaier subdivision pursuant to LESSOR's existing right of wayset forth in the Declaration of Easements for Shared Road granted by Clare George Wiedmaier dated September 16, 2005 and recorded September 22, 2005 in the Tompkins County Clerk's Office as Instrument #479499-001. LE55EE shall also have a non-exclusive right of ingress and egress over the Property to and from the Premises for the purpose of installation, operation and maintenance of LESSEE's communications equipment over or along a twenty (20) foot wide right-of-way ("Access Easement'), as depicted on Exhibit "B". LESSEE shall also have the non-exclusive right to use a portion of the Access Easement and a five (5) foot wide right-of-way adjacent to the Access Easement pursuant to a separate utility easement agreement granted by adjoining owners as depicted on Exhibit "B" for the installation, operation and maintenance of wires, cables, conduits and pipes for all necessary electrical, telephone, fiber and other similar support services. In the. event it is necessary, LESSOR agrees to grant LESSEE or the support services provider the right to install such services on, through, and/or under the Property, provided the location of such services shall be reasonably approved by LESSOR. LESSEE must extend the existing paved road approximately ninety (90) feet up to the property line and then create an access road from the property line to the Premises that is graded, compacted, and graveled. The Initial construction period shall not exceed one hundred twenty (120) days from the start of construction; provided that such time period shall be tolled due to any force majeure events or delays which are not within LESSEE'S reasonable control. Easements and any areas disturbed by LESSEE due to construction staging, parking, and equipment storage shall be repaired and restored to their pre - construction state to LESSOR's reasonable satisfaction. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Premises shall include such space sufficient for LESSEE's radio frequency signage and/or barricades as are necessary to ensure LESSEE's compliance with Laws (as defined in Paragraph 29). 6. CONDITION OF PROPERTY. LESSOR shall deliver the Premises to LESSEE In a condition ready for LESSEE's Use and clean and free of debris. LESSOR represents and warrants to LESSEE that as of the Effective Date, and to the best of LESSOR's knowledge without the obligation of inspection, the 4 4980-0651.4694.11 SiTE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SiTE NUMBER: 307551 AM/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 Premises Is .(a) in compliance with all Laws; and (b) in compliance with all EH&S Laws (as defined in Paragraph 26). 7. IMPROVEMENTS. The communications equipment including, without limitation, the tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, and other improvements shall be at LESSEE's expense and Installation within the Premises shall be at the discretion and option of LESSEE. Construction drawings must be reviewed and approved by LESSOR prior to the construction start date, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. LESSEE shall have the right to replace, repair, add or otherwise modify its communications equipment, tower structure, antennas, conduits, fencing and other screening, or other improvements or any portion thereof within the Premises and the frequencies over which the communications equipment operates, whether or not any of the communications equipment, antennas, conduits or other improvements are listed on any exhibit Work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. The completed site shall be free of debris created by LESSEE or its agents. No unused parts or remnants shall be stored in or around the Premises. Within thirty (30) days after LESSEE's receipt of all final Government Approvals following the completion of the initial construction of the Communication Facility, LESSEE shall provide LESSOR with a close out package consisting of "as built" drawings, zoning approval documents, building permits, and photo documentation of the communications equipment at the time of construction completion as part of LESSOR's permanent records for the Premises. 8. UTILITIES. LESSEE shall be responsible for, and directly pay under its own account, all utility charges for electricity or telephone service, or any other utility used or consumed by LESSEE on the Premises. 9. GOVERNMENT APPROVALS. LESSEE's Use is contingent upon LESSEE obtaining all of the certificates, permits and other approvals (collectively the "Government Approvals") that may be required by any Federal, State or Local authorities (collectively, the "Government Entities"), as well as satisfactory soil boring tests, environmental studies, or any other due diligence LESSEE chooses that will permit LESSEE's Use. The Premises shall be restored to pre -test condition, reasonable wear and tear excluded, LESSOR shall reasonably cooperate with LESSEE in its effort to obtain such approvals at no cost to LESSOR, and acknowledges, consents to and joins in, as required, any application for Government Approvals and will authorize LESSEE to execute any documents required In furtherance of such applications with prior LESSOR consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. LESSOR shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Property with respect to LESSEE's Use. 10, TERMINATION. LESSEE may, unless otherwise stated, immediately terminate this Agreement upon written notice to LESSOR in the event that (i) any applications for -such Government Approvals should be finally rejected; (ii) any Government Approval issued to LESSEE is canceled, expires, lapses or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by any Government Entity; (€€€) LESSEE determines that such Government Approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, (iv) LESSEE determines any structural analysis is unsatisfactory; (v) LESSEE, in its sole discretion, determines the Use of the Premises Is obsolete or unnecessary with one hundred and eighty (180) days` prior written notice to LESSOR and with payment of a termination fee equal to six (6) months of then current Rent; (vii) with six (6) months prior notice to LESSOR and with payment of a termination fee equal to six (6) months of then -current Rent, upon the annual anniversary of the Commencement Date, provided that LESSEE shall not exercise Its annual termination right during the first five (5) years of the term; or (vi€i) at any time before the Commencement Date for any reason or no reason in LESSEE's sole discretion. 488"651-4694.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE' NP/NpVEMBER 2022 11. INDEMNIFICATION, Subject to Paragraph 13, each Party and/or any successor and/or assignees thereof, shall indemnify and hold harmless the other Party, and/or any successors and/or assignees thereof, against (i) any and all claims of liability or loss from personal injury or property damage resulting from or arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its employees, contractors or agents, except to the extent such claims or damages may be due to or caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the other Party, or its employees, contractors or agents, and (H) reasonable attorney's fees, expense, and defense costs incurred by the Indemnified Party. Where a claim Is the result of the concurrent acts of the Parties, each Party shall be liable under this Paragraph to the extent of its fault or liability therefor. The Indemnified Party will provide the indemnifying Party with prompt, written notice of any claim that is subject to the indemnification obligations in this Paragraph, The indemnified Party will cooperate appropriately with the indemnifying Party in connection with the Indemnifying Party's defense of such claim. The indemnifying Party shall defend any indemnified Party, at the indemnified Party's request, against any claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the indemnifled Party. The indemnifying Party shall not settle or compromise any such claim or consent to the entry of any judgment without the prior written consent of each indemnified Party and without an unconditional release of all claims by each claimant or plaintiff in favor of each indemnified Party. Ail indemnification obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 12. INSURANCE. LESSEE at its own cost and expense, will maintain commercial general liability insurance with limits of I for bodily injury (including death) and property damage each occurrence. LESSEE shall include LESSOR and Terabonne, Inc, as additional insureds as their interests may appear under this Agreement. LESSEE shall provide a certificate of insurance as proof of such general iiability insurance to LESSOR within seven (7) days of the Commencement Date. 13. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Except for indemnification pursuant to Paragraphs 11 and 26, a violation of Paragraph 31, or a violation of law, neither Party shall be liable to the other, or any of their respective agents, representatives, or employees for any lost revenue, lost profits, diminution in value of business, loss of technology, rights or services, loss of data, or interruption or loss of use of service, incidental, punitive, indirect, special, trebled, enhanced or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages, whether such damages are claimed for breach of contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, unless applicable law forbids a waiver of such damages. 14. INTERFERENCE. a) LESSEE agrees that LESSEE will not cause interference that Is measurable in accordance with industry standards to LESSOR's equipment. LESSOR agrees that LESSOR and other occupants of the Propertywill not cause interference that is measurable in accordance with industry standards to the then existing equipment of LESSEE. Nothing.in this Agreement grants LESSEE the exclusive right to operate wireless services atthe Property. b) Without limiting any other rights or remedies, if interference occurs and continues for a period in excess of forty-eight (48) hours following notice to the interfering party via telephone to LESSEE'S Network Operations Center (at (800) 621-2622) or to LESSOR at info@terabonne,net, the interfering party shall or shall require any other user to reduce power or cease operations of the interfering equipment until the interference is cured. 4880-0651-4694.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER; 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 c) The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this Paragraph and therefore the Parties shall have the right to equitable remedies such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance. 15. REMOVAL AT END OF TERM. Upon expiration or within ninety (90) days of earlier termination while paying Rent, LESSEE shall remove LESSEE's communications equipment and restore the Premises to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear and casualty damage excepted. Footings, foundations, and concrete shall be removed to a depth of three (3) feet below grade. LESSOR agrees and acknowledges that the communications equipment shall remain the personal property of LESSEE and LESSEE shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the Term, whether or not said items are considered fixtures and attachments to real property under applicable laws. If such time for removal causes LESSEE to remain on the Premises beyond ninety (90) days after termination of the Agreement, LESSEE shall pay then -current rent in accordance with Paragraph 16, If LESSEE fails to remove its communications equipment within sixty (60) days after receipt of LESSOR'S written notice of such failure, all communications equipment shall be deemed abandoned and LESSOR shall have the option to take possession of and title to the property and dispose of it any way LESSOR deems appropriate. Any costs associated with removal or disposition shall be billed to LESSEE at one hundred and twenty five percent 125/) of its actual documented cost. 16. HOLDOVER, IF LESSEE holds over after the expiration or earlier termination of the Term, then this Agreement shall continue on a month -to -month basis at one hundred twenty-five percent 125%) of the then existing monthly rental rate or the existing monthly pro-rata basis if based upon a longer payment term, until the removal of the communications equipment is completed. 17. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. If at any time after the Effective Date, LESSOR receives an offer or letter of intent from any person or entity that is in the business of owning, managing or operating communications facilities or is in the business of acquiring landlord Interests in agreements relating to communications facilities, to purchase fee title, an easement, a lease, a license, or any other interest in the Premises or any portion thereof or to acquire any interest in this Agreement, or an option for any of the foregoing, LESSOR shall provide written notice to LESSEE of said offer ("LESSOR's Notice"). LESSOR's Notice shall include the prospective buyer's name, the purchase price being offered, any other consideration being offered, the other terms and conditions of the offer, a description of the portion of and interest in the Premises and/or this Agreement which will be conveyed in the proposed transaction, and a copy of any letters of intent or form agreements presented to LESSOR by the third -party offeror. LESSEE shall have the right of first refusal to match the terms and conditions of such offer or by effectuating a transaction with the same financial terms, if LESSEE fails to provide written notice to LESSOR that LESSEE intends to match such offer within thirty (30) days after receipt of LESSOR's Notice, LESSOR may proceed with the proposed transaction in accordance with the terms and conditions of such third -party offer, In which event this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and the right of first refusal described in this Paragraph shall survive any such conveyance to a third -party. Further, LESSOR acknowledges and agrees that if LESSEE exercises this right of first refusal, LESSEE may have sixty (60) days to conduct due diligence and effectuate the closing of a transaction on the same financial terms of the third -party offer. For purposes of this Paragraph, any transfer, bequest or devise of LESSOR's interest in the Property as a result of the death of LESSOR, whether by will or intestate successlon, or any conveyance to LESSOR's family members by direct conveyance or by conveyance to a trust for the benefit of family members shall not be considered a sale for which LESSEE has any right of first refusal. 488b0651.4694.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMSM 307551 AMMATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 18. RIGHTS UPON SALE. Should LESSOR, at any time during the Term, decide (i) to sell or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Property, or (€€) to grant to a third -party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to any portion of the Premises, such sale, transfer, or grant of an easement or interest therein shall be under and subject to this Agreement and any such purchaser or transferee shall recognize LESSEE's rights hereunder, and such transferee shall agree in writing to assume all obligations of LESSOR under this Agreement. 19. LESSOR'S TITLE. LESSOR covenants that LESSEE, on paying the rent and performing the covenants herein, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Premises. LESSOR represents and warrants to LESSEE as of the Effective Date and covenants during the Term that LESSOR has full authority to enter into and execute this Agreement and that, to LESSOR's knowledge and without inspection, there are no liens, judgments, covenants, easement, restrictions or other impediments of title that will adversely affect LESSEE's Use. 20. ASSIGNMENT and SUBLEASE. Without any approval or consent of the other Party, this Agreement may be sold, assigned or transferred by either Party to (€) any entity in which the Party directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest; (ii) any entity which directly or indirectly holds an equity or similar interest in the Party; (ii€) any entity directly or indirectly under common control with the Party; or (€v) by LESSEE to a third -party tower company with whom LESSEE will enter into a sublease, upon prior written not€ce to LESSOR. LESSEE may assign this Agreement to any entitywhich acquires all or substantially all of LESSEE's assets in the market defined by the FCC in which the Property is located by reason of a merger, acquisition or other business reorganization without approval or consent of LESSOR. As to other parties, this Agreement may not be sold, assigned or transferred without the written consent of the other Party, which such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. No change of stock ownership, partnership interest or control of LESSEE or transfer upon partnership or corporate dissolution of either Party shall constitute an assignment hereunder. LESSEE may sublet the Premises in LESSEE's sole discretion, upon written notice to LESSOR. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the LESSEE shall not be required to obtain approval from the LESSOR for the Subletting of the Premises or part thereof. The LESSEE shall have the sole right to determine whether it will Sublet any portion of the Premises or whether it will sublease to any specific Sublessee, with prior written notice to LESSOR. Except as set forth below, in the event LESSEE subleases any portion of the Premises in accordance with this Agreement, LESSEE shall pay er month to LESSOR in accordance with paragraph 4(a) above, and is subject to the escalation terms of Paragraph 4(a) above. The rental provisions of this section shall not applyto: (i) subletting to LESSEE's affiliate d/b/a Verizon Wireless in the event of assignment of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20(11v) or (H) any public emergency and/or safety systems purposes (i.e., police, ambulance and/or fire) ("Emergency Service"), provided that such Emergency Service is not paying Rent. If such Emergency Service is not paying rent, LESSEE is required to provide proof to LESSOR of such agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the LESSEE shall not be required to obtain any approval from the LESSOR for the subletting to any Emergency Service, but shall provide prior written notice to LESSOR. 21. NOTICES. Except for notices permitted via telephone in accordance with Paragraph 14, all notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by commercial courier, provided the courier's regular business is delivery service, and provided further that it guarantees delivery to the addressee by the end of the next business day 8 4980-06514694.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 following the courier's receipt from the sender, addressed as follows (or any other address that the Party to be notified may have deslgnated to the sender by like notice): LESSOR: 5 Roberts WC Land LLC 1129 Avenida Sevilla, Unit 5C Walnut Creek, CA 94595 Attn: Suzanne Roberts, Managing Member Copy to: Terabonne, Inc. P.O. Box 6257 Edmonds, WA 98026 Attn: Ithaca Tower Leasing LESSEE: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Notice shall be effective upon actual receipt or refusal as shown on the receipt obtained pursuant to the foregoing. 22. SUBORDINATION AND NON -DISTURBANCE. If the Property is or becomes encumbered by a deed to secure a debt, mortgage or other security interest, then LESSOR will make commercially reasonable efforts to obtain a non -disturbance agreement in a form acceptable to LESSEE, LESSOR and such mortgagee, from its mortgagee(s), ground lessors and master lessors, if any, of the Property, 23. DEFAULT, It is a "Default" if either Party fails to comply with this Agreement and does not remedy the failure within thirty (30) days after written notice by the other Party. If the failure cannot reasonably be remedied in such time, and the failing Party diligently pursues the cure to completion, such cure must be completed within ninety (90) days afterthe initial written notice. The cure periods set forth In this Paragraph does not extend the period of time in which either Party has to cure interference pursuant to Paragraph 14 of this Agreement. 24. REMEDIES. In the event of a Default, without limiting the non -defaulting Party in the exercise of any right or remedy which the non -defaulting Party may have by reason of such default, the non -defaulting Party may terminate this Agreement and/or pursue any remedy now or hereafter available to the non -defaulting Party under the Laws or judicial decisions of the state in which the Property is located, 25. ENVIRONMENTAL. LESSEE shall conduct its business in compliance with all applicable laws governing the protection of the environment or employee health and safety ("EN&S Laws"). LESSEE shall indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from claims to the extent resulting from LESSEE's violation of any applicable EH&S Laws or to the extent that LESSEE causes a release of any regulated substance to the environment. LESSOR shall Indemnify and hold harmless LESSEE from all claims resulting from the violation of any applicable EMS Laws or a release of any regulated substance to the environment except to the extent resulting from the activities of LESSEE. The Parties recognize that LESSEE is only leasing a small portion of the Property and that LESSEE shall not be responsible for any environmental condition or 48H-06514654.13 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NGVEMSER 2022 issue except to the extent resulting from LESSEE's specific activities and responsibilities. In the event that LESSEE encounters any hazardous substances that do not result from its activities, LESSEE may relocate its facilities to avoid such hazardous substances to a mutually agreeable location or, if LESSEE desires to remove at its own cost all or some the hazardous substances or materials (such as asbestos, lead containing materials or soil) containing those hazardous substances, LESSOR agrees to sign any necessary waste manifest associated with the removal, transportation and/or disposal of such substances. 26. CASUALTY. If a fire or other casualty damages the Property or the Premises and LESSEE's Use is not restored within forty-five (45) days, LESSEE may terminate this Agreement. If LESSEE undertakes rebuilding or restoring the Premises and/or communication equipment, LESSEE shall have the right to place temporary facilities on the Property to the extent practicable in a mutually agreed location, until the reconstruction of the Premises and/or the communication equipment is completed, and in such event, rent shall continue while LESSEE operates a temporary facility. 27. CONDEMNATION. If a condemnation of any portion of the Property or Premises Impairs LESSEE's Use, LESSEE may terminate this Agreement. LESSEE may on its own behalf make a claim in any condemnation proceeding involving the Premises for losses related to LESSEE's communications equipment, relocation costs and, specifically excluding loss of LESSEE's leasehold interest, any other damages LESSEE may incur as a result of any such condemnation. 28. APPLICABLE LAWS. During the Term, LESSOR shall maintain the Property in compliance with all applicable laws, EMS Laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, directives, covenants, easements, consent decrees, zoning and land use regulations, and restrictions of record, permits, building codes, and the requirements of any applicable fire insurance underwriter or rating bureau, now in effect or which may hereafter come Into effect (including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act and laws regulating hazardous substances) (collectively "Laws"). LESSEE shall, in respect to the condition of the Premises and at LESSEE's sole cost and expense, comply with (i) all Laws relating solely to LESSEE's specific and unique nature of use of the Premises; and (ii) all building codes requiring modifications to the Premises due to the improvements being made by LESSEE in the Premises. It shall be LESSOR's obligation to comply with all Laws relating to the Property. 29. TAXES. a) LESSEE shall make commercially reasonable efforts, with LESSOR's cooperation, to request that the assessor separately assess LESSEE's Premises. If the assessor sets up the Premises as a separate tax parcel, then LESSEE will pay any all taxes billed to LESSEE directly to the taxing authority. If such arrangement cannot be made, LESSOR shall Invoice and LESSEE shall pay any applicable transaction tax (including sales, use, gross receipts, or excise tax) imposed on LESSEE and required to be collected by LESSOR based on any service, rental space, or equipment provided by LESSOR to LESSEE. LESSEE shall pay all personal property taxes, fees, assessments, or other taxes and charges imposed by any Government Entity that are imposed on LESSEE and required to be paid by LESSEE that are directly attributable to LESSEE's equipment or LESSEE's use and occupancy of the Premises. Payment shall be made by LESSEE within forty-five (45) days after presentation of a receipted bill and/or assessment notice which is the basis for such taxes or charges. LESSOR shall pay all ad valorem, personal property, real estate, sales and use taxes, fees, assessments or other taxes or charges that are attributable to LESSOR's Property or any portion thereof imposed by any Government Entity. 10 48840651-4694.13 SiTE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER; 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/N OVEMB ER 2022 b) LESSEE shall have the right, at its sole option and at its sale cost and expense, to appeai, challenge or seek modification of any tax assessment or billing for which LESSEE is wholly or partly responsible for payment. LESSOR shall reasonably cooperate with LESSEE at LESSEE's expense in filing, prosecuting and perfecting any appeal or challenge to taxes as set forth in the preceding sentence, including but not limited to, executing any consent, appeal or other similar document. in the event any appeal or challenge by LESSEE results in a reduction, credit or repayment received by LESSOR for any taxes previously paid by LESSEE, LESSOR agrees to promptly reimburse to LESSEE the amount of said reduction, credit or repayment. in the event that LESSEE does not have the standing rights to pursue a good faith and reasonable dispute of any taxes under this Paragraph, LESSOR will pursue such dispute at LESSEE's sole cost and expense upon written request of LESSEE. 30. NON -DISCLOSURE. Except as otherwise permitted or reasonably required to carry out the intent of this Agreement (for example, in connection with obtaining Government Approvals), the Parties agree that this Agreement and any information exchanged between the Parties regarding the Agreement are confidential. Neither party shall provide copies of this Agreement, or any other confidential information, to any third -party, excluding consultants, employees, representatives, agents, legal counsel and financial advisors, without the prior written consent of the other or as required by law. If a disclosure Is required by law, prior to disclosure, the Party shall notify the other Party and cooperate to take lawful steps to resist, narrow, or eliminate the need for that disclosure. 31. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED, 32. FREE OF LIENS. LESSEE shall keep the Premises and the Property and LESSOR's interest therein free from any liens arising from any work performed, materials furnished, or obligations incurred by or on behalf of LESSEE. LESSEE indemnifies LESSOR for, and agrees to defend, and hold LESSOR harmless from and against, all liability, losses, damages, costs or expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, expenses and court costs Incurred In connection with any such lien. Within thirty (3o) days after LESSEE's receipt of written notice of the filing of any such lien, LESSEE shall either discharge or cancel such lien of record by bonding or otherwise. If LESSEE desires to contest any such claim of lien, LESSEE will cause such lien to be released of record by bonding of said lien or by posting adequate security with a court of competent jurisdiction as may be provided by New York law. if LESSEE falls to so discharge or bond such lien within thirty (30) calendar days after LESSEE's receipt of written demand from LESSOR, then LESSOR may, at its option, bond the same by paying the amount claimed to be due at LESSEE's cost, plus twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount so paid by LESSOR, including the maximum allowable attorney's fees under New York law to procure the bonding of such lien. LESSEE will pay such amounts to LESSOR within forty-five (45) days of LESSEE's receipt of any invoice from LESSOR accompanied by reasonable substantiation of such costs. 33. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement contains all agreements, promises and understandings between LESSOR and LESSEE regarding this transaction, and no oral agreement, promises or understandings shall be binding upon either LESSOR or LESSEE in any dispute, controversy or proceeding. This Agreement may not be amended or varied except in a writing signed by all Parties. This Agreement shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns hereto. The failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any of its rights hereunder shall not waive such rights and such party shall have the right to enforce such rights at any time. The performance of this Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, construed and regulated by the laws of the state in which the Premises is located without reference to its saaaass 1-c.l a 11 SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER: 307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 choice of law rules. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, nothing in this Agreement shall grant, suggest or imply any authority for one Party to use the name, trademarks, service marks or trade names of the other for any purpose whatsoever. LESSOR agrees to execute a Memorandum of this Agreement, which LESSEE may record with the appropriate recording officer. The provisions of the Agreement relating to indemnification from one Party to the other Party shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 34. TEMPORARY EASEMENT. LESSOR hereby grants LESSEE a temporary easement (the Temporary Easement") to encumber a portion of the Property, all as shown on Exhibit "B" hereto (the Temporary Easement Area"). The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Temporary Easement shall be for the purpose of clearing any rocks, dirt, brush, trees or other vegetation, grading, excavation, and storing materials (including, without limitation, excavated soil and equipment) in order to allow for the initial construction and installation of LESSEE's communications facility as described in Paragraph 7 above. The Temporary Easement shall terminate upon completion of the initial construction and installation of LESSEE's communications facility and LESSEE shall return the Temporary Easement Area to the pre - construction condition, to be reasonably accepted by LESSOR. Signature page follows. The remainder of this page is intentionally blank.) 12 4880-0651.4694,13 SITE NAME; SUNNY VIEW SITE NUMBER:307551 ATTY/DATE: NP/NOVEMBER 2022 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals on the dates below, effective the day and year first above written. LESSOR: S Roberts WC Land LLC, a New York limited liability company Name: Suzan ri Roberts Its: Manager J Date.c-- Please See Attached CaMornia Notary Certificate LESSEE., BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: _ Name: Its: Date: 13 48SM651-4694.13 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Coyli-rc,, 065'4t% } on rNce.,y%b era % Q.beforeme, Yriy pa h 5i 17,lj C, Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personalty appeared 45Li-r-"V)ne T?.©berks Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(A whose name( is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that Iae/sheAhw executed the same in 4is/herA4erir authorized capacityoer}, and that by.Ws/herA4Nr signature(s) on the instrument the person(sj or the entity upon behalf of which the person(j) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. D Signature 41i AIAY H. PARNES it Signatur f Notary PublicNotaryPublic - Callfnm i ` [entra Costa County Commissfan A 23304S My Comm. Expfrcs `a 9, 2014 Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document, Description of Attached Document() p+-,,,,, ,,et Title or Type of Document: Lo_v Cl e- ate` Document Date: U,1-1- Number of Pages: 1:3 Siqner(s) Other Than Named Above: Lr-ssee-_ + aF `3ctt ;ifan*t Dtks` +rntL,nIrs M cb i 1 e Capacity(fes) Claimed by Signe5s) Signer's Name: a oeSigner's Name: El Corporate Officer — Title(s): Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — i JLimited © General Partner — Limited eneral Individual Attorney in Fact Individual orney in Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator El Trustee < Guardian or Conservator Other: Other: Signer is Representing: Signer epresenting: 02014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item 45907 EXHIBIT "A`• DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ALL THAT TRACTOR PARCEL OF LAND situate In the Town of Ithaca, County of Tompkins and State of New York, bounded and described as follows; COMMENCING at a point located at the Intersection of the easterly road bounds of Burns Read and the southerly road bounds of Slaterville Road (New York State Route 79) as depicted an a survey map entitled Wledmalor Court Subdivision — intersectlon of Slatervl€le Road and Burns Road —Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York" prepared by Michael J. Reagan, dated October 30, 2003, and recorded September 18, 2009 In the Tompkins County Clerk's Office at instrument k548335-001; THENCE South 55' 26' 37" West a distance of 211.67 feet along the southerly highway line of Bums Road to a pin; THENCE South 68' 14' 51" West a distance of 206.50 feet along the southerly highway line of Burns Road to a pin; THENCE South 81' 28' 05' West a distance of 119.79 feet to the True Point or Place or Beginning; THENCE South 41' 56' 06" East, passing through an Iron pin at 379.05 feet, a total distance of 409,05 feet to a point; THENCE along the centerline of a stream as Itwlnds and turns along a curve with an arc length or 858+/- feet, said curve being subtended by a chord bearing of South 56' 19' 20" West and a chord length of 770.28 feet to a point being located 3 +/• feet north of an Iron pin; THENCE along the former centerline of a brook as at winds along a curve with an arc length of 26$+/- feet, said curve being subtended by having a chord bearing of South 32' 04' 85' West and a chord length 247.31 feet to a point; THENCE along the present centerllne or a brook as It winds and turns along a curve with an arc length of 265+/- feet, said curve being subtended by a chord bearing of South 66'.13' 54" West and a chord length 247.53 feet to a point located In the centerline of the former Burns Road (now abandoned) and the center of a culvert; THENCE North 00' 44' 30" West a distance of 316,05 feet to a point THENCE northeasterly along the centerline of abandoned former Burns Road along a curve with an arc length of 611+/• feet, said curve being subtended by: (a) a chord bearing North 01' 41' 57' East a chord distance of 322.50 feet to a point, and #bl a chord bearing North 42' 15' 43" East a chord distance of 274.46 feet to a point; THENCE South 21' 25' 35' East a distance of 25.00 feet to a point marked by an iron pin; THENCE North 62' 34' 25' East a distance of 152.14 feet to a point marked by an Iron piss; THENCE North 69' 12' 53' East a distance of 137.90 feet to a point marked by an Iron pin; THENCE North 72' 07' 55" East a distance of 103.11 feet to a point marked by an iron pin; THENCE North 62. 10' 12' East a distance of 122,27 feet to a point marked by an iron pin; THENCE North 81' 29' 05" East a distance of 46.21 feet to the point or place of beginning: CONTAINING 12.338 acres of land. TOGETHER WITH and SUBJECT TO a DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS FOR SHARED ROAD dated September 16, 2005 ' and recorded September 22, 2005 in the Tompkins County Clerk's Office at Instrument a 479499.001. 4880.0651-4694.13 EXHIBIT "B° SITE PLAN OF THE PREMISES 488"63 f -4 694. 43 SITE INFORMATION COORDINATES: 42.412534' 76.450394' GROUND ELEVATION: 824.5't AMSL EXISTING OVERHEAD r , WIRE (TYP) 4 PROPOSED LESSEE 20WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT VIA EXISTTNC EXISTING TELCO PEDESTAL--, EASEMENT FOR SHARED ROAD ASSUME LOCATION OF FIBER) i EXISTING UTILITY — ; \ ,` POLE ( TYP) 4 / \ v 1 f ry i 1 .•' EXISTING,7x y . P BUILDING (TYP) EXISTING UTILITY POLE EXISTING UTILITY POLES 65- 2 (SOURCE OF J ( }J LESSEE POWER do FIBER) S— B—L- CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND EXISTING PAVEMENT 90' 1.26 . TOWARDS LESSEE LEASE AREA PROPOSED LESSEE 2O'x40' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT WIDE PROPOSEDLESSEE EEASEMENT iI PROPOSED LESSEE 20' WADE ACCESS EASEMENT I EXISTING NO r j DISTURB AREA PROPOSED LESSEE 20' WIDE ACCESS do UTILITY EASEMENT 1 PROPOSED LESSEE 75'X75' 5,625 SF) LEASE AREA EXISTING TREE —'' LINE (TYP) S_B— L: 5 -B-56.-4-2 5fi.-4-1.1.22t 1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 117 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 1 EXISTING FOREST AREA., r S— B— L: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ADJACENT I r EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP) If l NOTE 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR OPTION, LEASE, LICENSE AND OPROPERTY PLAN PERMITTING PURPOSESONLYANDISNOTTOBEUSEDLE-1 FOR CONSTRUCTION, SCALE: I" = 200' B t 2. FINALUTILITYEASEMENTLOCATIONWLLBEDETERMINEDBY THE UTILITY COMPANY. ORIGINAL SIZE IN INCHES a SUNNY VIEW - CEASE EXHIBIT Tecton Ic 1 PROJECT # 20192076415 - LOCATION CODE # 307551 PJlACTICAL 30LV770MS, 17fC11l770NAL 32111IYlCl. 111 WIEDMAIER CT - TOWN OF ITHACA - TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY 14850 Tectonte Cn iahnq Cenrvllenta. Crelogirls k Lana svnaye<,, D.P.C. BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE SYSTEMS LLC Aro/xrCenaeeInf. 36 British Amoricon Blvd. Phone: ($18) 783-1630 (LESSEE)surly 101 (eoo) e29-6531 Lathcm, NY 12114 1275 JOHN STREET, SUITE 100, WEST HENRIMA, IVY 14586 r.Nx.teeteniCangineerinq.com TEC WO:10751. 053 1 ISSUED BY: GS I DATE: 10/19/22 SCALE: AS NOTED I SHEET: LE-1 I REV: 6 EXHIBIT O Tectonic FP?[IBC SO u II4Hf EaCEPrI HF IFRV C[ Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite 4100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 ATI-W Ms. Lindsay Beckwith April 3, 2023 RE: STRUCTURAL/GROUNDING LETTER PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY VERIZON WIRELESS SITE: SUNNY VIEW 111 WIEDMAIER CT, TOWN OF ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY 14850 TECTONIC W.Q. 10751.0S3 Dear Ms. Beckwith: Verizon Wireless is proposing a telecommunication facility at the above referenced address. The site includes the installation of a Verizon Wireless antenna array at a centerline height of 130' above ground level (AGL) on a 134' monopole (138' including the 4' lightning rod). The monopole will be designed to accommodate antenna arrays for three (3) additional carriers in addition to the proposed Verizon Wireless installation, The structural loading for each future carrier will include twelve (12) panel antennas along with remote radio units and other related equipment. The make, model, and manufacturer of the proposed monopole will be provided as part of the construction documents to be submitted for the building permit application. For the purpose of structural design of the monopole, foundation and antenna supports, the most stringent criteria of the 2020 Building Code of New York State and ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017 "Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas and Small Wind Turbine Support Structures" will be applied. The proposed installation will be designed by a New York State licensed professional engineer and will meet all of the above listed criteria. The monopole will be designed to resist overturning, shear, and all other failure modes. The monopole will be designed such that, in the event of a failure, the monopole will fall within a fall zone setback of 134'. For the purpose of lightning protection, the tower, antennas, cabling, ground equipment, utility equipment, fencing, and all related objects will be grounded in accordance with the NEC/NFPA 780, ANSI/TIA-222-H-2017, and all other applicable local, state, and federal standards. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. Steven M. Matthews, PE Director of Engineering Latham Office 36 British American Boulevard, Suite 101 1 Latham, NY 12110 518.783.1630 Tel 1 518.783.1544 fax t0Ctonitengi neering.cam Equal Opportunity Employer EXHIBIT P WWATERFORD Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance Report for Verizon Wireless Site Name: Sunny View Site Structure Type: Monopine Address: 111 Wiedmaier Court Latitude: 42.412417 Ithaca, NY 14850 Longitude:-76.450629 Report Date: March 14, 2023 Project: New Build Compliance Statement Based on information provided by Verizon Wireless and predictive modeling, the Sunny View installation proposed by Verizon Wireless will be compliant with Radiofrequency Radiations Exposure Limits of 47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b)(3) and 1.1310. The proposed operation will not expose members of the General Public to hazardous levels of RF energy and will not contribute to existing cumulative MPE levels on walkable surfaces at ground or in adjacent buildings by 5% of the General Population limits. As predicted RF power densities will not exceed the FCC General Population limits, no mitigation action other than restricting access to the tower is required to achieve or maintain compliance. Certification 1, David C. Cotton, Jr., am the reviewer and approver of NEpWVthisreportandamfullyawareofandfamiliarwiththe o ES Co Rules and Regulations of both the Federal yo T10 Communications Commissions (FCC) and the * n p Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) z David C. Cotton, Jr. with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency k. Licensed Professional Engin er Radiation, specifically in accordance with FCC's OET FoA ° ' = State of New York, 086838 Bulletin 65. 1 have reviewed this Radio Frequency ROFEss+oDate:2023-Mar-14 Exposure Assessment report and believe it to be both warning: It is a violation of New York State Law, Article 145, Section §7209 for any person, unless acting true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. under the direction of licensed professional engineer, to alter this document in anyway. General Summary The compliance framework is derived from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for preventing human exposure in excess of the applicable Maximum Permissible Exposure MPE") limits. At any location at this site, the power density resulting from each transmitter may be expressed as a percentage of the frequency -specific limits and added to determine if 100% of the exposure limit has been exceeded. The FCC Rules define two tiers of permissible exposure differentiated by the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to exposure. General Population 1 Uncontrolled exposure limits apply to those situations in which persons may not be aware of the presence of electromagnetic energy, where exposure is not employment -related, or where persons cannot exercise control over their exposure. Occupational 1 Controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure, and can exercise control over their exposure. Based on the criteria for these classifications, the FCC General Population limit is considered to be a level that is safe for continuous exposure time. The FCC General Population limit is 5 times more restrictive than the Occupational limits. In situations where the predicted MPE exceeds the General Population threshold in an accessible area as a result of emissions from multiple transmitters, FCC licensees that contribute greater than 5% of the aggregate MPE share responsibility for mitigation, Page 1 7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www,waterfordconsultants.com Sunny View - New Build 03.14.2023 Table 1: FCC Limits Limits for General Population/ Uncontrolled Exposure Limits for Occupational/ Controlled Exposure Frequency MHz Power Density mWlcmZ Averaging Time minutes Power Density mW/cmz Averaging Time minutes 30-300 0.2 30 1 6 300-1500 f11500 30 f/300 6 1500-100,000 1.0 30 5.0 6 f=Frequency (MHz) Based on the computational guidelines set forth in FCC OET Bulletin 65, Waterford Consultants, LLC has developed software to predict the overall Maximum Permissible Exposure possible at any location given the spatial orientation and operating parameters of multiple RF sources. The power density in the Far Field of an RF source is specified by OET-65 Equation 5 as follows: 5, ^ E1RPZ (mW/cm2) 4-7r•R where EIRP is the Effective Radiated Power relative to an isotropic antenna and R is the distance between the antenna and point of study. Additionally, consideration is given to the manufacturers' horizontal and vertical antenna patterns as well as radiation reflection. At any location, the predicted power density in the Far Field is the spatial average of points within a 0 to 6-foot vertical profile that a person would occupy. Near field power density is based on OET-65 Equation 20 stated as rr180l 100•Pt. n5 — \ BRw! 7r• R • h ( mW/cm ) where P;n is the power input to the antenna, 9Bw is the horizontal pattern beamwidth and h is the aperture length. Some antennas employ beamforming technology where RF energy allocated to each customer device is dynamically directed toward their location. In the analysis presented herein, predicted exposure levels are based on all beams at full utilization (i.e. full power) simultaneously focused in any direction. As this condition is unlikely to occur, the actual power density levels at ground and at adjacent structures are expected to be less that the levels reported below. These theoretical results represent maximum -case predictions as all RF emitters are assumed to be operating at 100% duty cycle. Page 2 7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com Sunny View - New Build 03.14.2023 Analysis Verizon Wireless proposes the following installation at this location: INSTALL NINE (9) NEW ANTENNAS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE RADIO EQUIPMENT The antennas will be mounted on a 138-foot Monopine with centerlines 130 feet above ground level. Proposed antenna operating parameters are listed in Appendix A. Other appurtenances such as GPS antennas, RRUs and hybrid cable below the antennas are not sources of RF emissions. No other antennas are known to be operating in the vicinity of this site. Figure 1: Antenna Locations Page 3 7430 New Technology way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www,waterfordconsuftants.com Sunny View - New Build 03.14.2023 Power density decreases significantly with distance from any antenna. The panel -type antennas to be employed at this site are highly directional by design and the orientation in azimuth and mounting elevation, as documented, serves to reduce the potential to exceed MPE limits at any location other than directly in front of the antennas. For accessible areas at ground level, the maximum predicted power density level resulting from all Verizon Wireless operations is 0.3747% of the FCC General Population limits. There are no apparent inhabited buildings or structures in the immediate area as depicted in Figure 1. The proposed operation will not expose members of the General Public to hazardous levels of RF energy and will not contribute to existing cumulative MPE levels on walkable surfaces at ground or in adjacent buildings by 5% of the General Population limits. As predicted RF power densities will not exceed the FCC General Population limits, no mitigation action other than restricting access to the tower is required to achieve or maintain compliance. Compliance Requirement Diagram (Access Location) Figure 2: Mitigation Recommendations Page 4 7430 New Technology Way, Suite 150 Frederick, Maryland 21703 (703) 596-1022 Phone www.waterfordconsultants.com T a T) L L N 0 V L m m V L oN a o b m Q 3 O z Q 3 K v 7 W/• C CL CL n a t7 •• Nt9 C oM 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M 0M oM aM aM oM aM oM 00MM 0M C. M 0M 0M d•• 7 Ng m47 Imto m m Nv toLA ti T pco NV oLn toQf n ti N mto ti r t000 N 0 0) 01 TM Nd' 7LO Nr toa0 7Lil NNM ooV' tiNN f, m ICJW)NNNCf 0oV' t. ti tocm IAIANh C7N 00V hNN YI p_ •• MW to MplorMw oT MO0 Mto Ln MON tNo 000 Qmi oaO ao Io aap DOl co, W VWrrNrrtoMrrNMt~4 rCD V) w mC4 muoo w Oroa r TTtDm C "NMN0 d'N MfApNMN V'N MtA C1 N to cm It N mfnm MM Loti to M MMM(9 IAN N tDM toti MIA P7 MM IA MtDCl C'! lOM MIA MM M IONNMtDto V T r N T T r T r T r N r r r T T T r N r r r T N p Ln J O O p O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N aNN N It V NN V rNNd"Id, ED U cV oV' oN 0 0V 0 0C 0 0 0 C. 0 0 CDa a a o 0 0 0 0 0FNNVV' N N V V It N V' V N N It It V• N s y+a0 roop N o0wo 00m NommomwoO Noomm J 3Cr, m 47 N N It1 N N N to N 0 N N N N N IA N m N N N N NbwtDwwTtot0tDcototDtDTWtototototDtorototDtD L N 5 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U •• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to n to M IA to NW 0 0 0 O C O o 0 yp Nr N CV N N N N Nr rN rC" T rN rN rN rN rN NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM O 0 Q O O O O p p 0 O p p p p O p p O 0 0 0 CO^0o r`ON N'MO Mn 0NNr,0rcm cm O p O O h O M M M N pp pNV' O p N ON ppNppp NOONppOO VN 000oocoN O0 oNNoONa00000oN O aO oNNOaa m mcv m MCl m mcy m mty mty m m M m m m m m m m M0 m m m m m wIxwm m sUUU UU00Lo0 tiinLhLoLh0 7W r, 0_, to Mtt7ti tfj wLO to4 tDw tDw lDw tDw LotD lDw tD IAf0 totD lowt0f0 tohtCO LnLntititot0tot0catototo zZS 22xYYY2tD SSSTSz ztD 2Z2S sssF- xxxxxxs zz222xx- x2xx z z z z z z z z z z m z z z z z z z z z z z z zI 0 0 0 m rn 0 L W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w W W W W aaa OMMMM a.n. 0aaaaaaa 0aa0.a 3000 ZOOO0000 Z000O00a zOOOO 5uuu MUODUUUU MUODUUUU 0000 n w w w w o m(DnAUnnMO U) U) 0) h h 3ccc mcmmmmmm MCCcr 42mmmmm 2222 g000 00000000 WOO00000 00000 OOO UUUUUUU UUUUUUU UUUU C C C C C C C C C C G G G G G C C C C C C 0 G Cmo000000000oao0000000oao0 NL NL N L N L N N N N N N N N N N N Nw N0 N0 N4 N N L N L N L N caV C OCj rrr NMMMMV• V V air) tDtDtDtDnfhti OoOfmmto C Q J EXHIBIT Q VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION PROPOSED 134' TALL TELECOMMUNICATIONS STRUCTURE SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW 111 Wiedmaier Court Town of Ithaca Tompkins County New York, 14850 Submitted by: verizon%/ 1275 John Street, Suite 100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 Prepared by: ectonic 1 36 British American Blvd., Suite 101 Latham, New York 12110 518-783-1630 845-567-8703 FAX February 20, 2024 VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C., was contracted by Verizon Wireless to conduct a "Visual Resource Evaluation" to determine which areas within the Town of Ithaca will contain views of the proposed 134-foot tall wireless telecommunications structure. Setting: The proposed site is located at 111 Wiedmaier Court in the Town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York. The surrounding land use is mostly forested and residential with small areas of agricultural uses. The predominant forest species are mixed deciduous and coniferous, with an estimated height of 50 to 70 feet. The field study for this visual resource evaluation was conducted in the late -winter season during 100% leaf off conditions. The leaf off condition represents a worst case scenario in that it is a scenario in which the visibility of the structure is maximized due to the lack of leaves on existing deciduous vegetation. Methodology. On Tuesday February 14, 2023, Tectonic conducted a field investigation for the purpose of evaluating the viewshed associated with the proposed installation of the 134-foot tower. Conditions were sunny with a temperature of approximately 550, and with wind speeds of approximately 5-mph. The study area consisted of a 2-mile radius from the project site. The methodology utilized during this field investigation is referred to as a "balloon test." The height of the proposed structure was simulated by floating a 4' diameter, helium -filled weather balloon at 134-feet above ground level (AGL). The balloon provided reference points for height as well as location and also provides a known dimension that later aids in the production of photo simulations. Prior to the field study, Tectonic assessed the potential visibility in the study area by creating desktop viewshed maps using ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 10.8 in conjunction with a USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangles Map and aerial base maps and street maps. A viewshed map was created delineating areas where visibility would be blocked by topography and areas where visibility would be blocked by vegetation. Tectonic drove the study area to confirm the potential visibility of the structure. During the "in field" review the participants reviewed and documented those areas from which views of the structure may be visible" and those which are blocked by topography and vegetation. The resulting data from this analysis was reviewed and referenced on the "Photo Log" and "Viewshed Map" attached. The colors on the map delineate which areas have a line of sight to the structure. The viewshed analysis resulted in the discovery that the proposed structure would be visible from only a few locations on Coddington Road, Slaterville Road, Burns Way, Burns Road, Park Lane, Wiedmaier Court, and Golden Eagle Court. Photographs were taken from various vantage points within the study area to document the actual view towards the proposed structure, as well as the general character of the viewshed. Each photograph attached includes a brief description of the location and orientation from which it was taken, and the photo number corresponds to the key number on the photo log map. Project Number: 10751.053 Page 1 of 2 February 20, 2024 Process: Photographs of the weather balloon from the viewpoints noted were taken with a Nikon D5300 Digital 24 megapixel camera using a 55mm focal length lens to mimic the view as observed from the human eye. A 4-foot diameter red helium filled balloon was floated to a height of 134-feet. In order to analyze the potential visual impacts of the proposed structure, Tectonic took photographs of the balloon from locations within the search area for the purpose of preparing simulations of the proposed structure. Photographs for which there is a corresponding simulated view (#1, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 9) of the proposed structure were produced by first photographing an existing similar type structure, then photographing the view towards the proposed site where the marker balloon was set to a height of 134- feet AGL. The digital images of the balloons and similar structure were then merged and scaled through the use of digital image editing software. With this process, the structure is scaled to the correct height and width by scaling the similar type structure using measurements from the marker balloon. The similar type structure used has an antenna array that spans eight feet (8'). By measuring the balloon width of 4', one can determine the proper width of the antenna array by multiplying the balloon width by a factor of 2. The composite is printed out to a PDF file, producing the final image. We note that the simulations provided are artistic renderings of views from chosen locations and should not be interpreted to be the actual view of the tower following construction. While we utilize best efforts to simulate the view of the proposed tower from a particular location, some variance between sims, manufacturer products and final installed towers is to be expected. Conclusion: The Viewshed Analysis Map presents a conservative delineation of the viewshed within the study area and along public roadways. The photo slides have been prepared per the methodology described above and provide a general depiction of the appearance of the structure from the photographed viewpoints. Sincerely, TECTONIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, GEOLOGISTS & LAND SURVEYORS, D.P.C. Steven M. Matthews, PE Managing Director - Engineering Project Number: 10751.053 Page 2 of 2 February 20, 2024 Snnro Lays Credits Sportaa Eon. KRE.Otrmn_ ntnmp. eCrenrR S P Cap. GERM Lt=. FAO. W& rptC,w, CeoRase rA. eadR5W RL Ordrurce Simi Fvs Japan. IAETI Eul omoi na "I rcr SgenSrreellAan cmhfiubs, aM Ire G4 user cMi RI' Legend Proposed To r Location Tower Lo Rhon {2 mile huffed Predicted Topographic Viewshed Nol Valve dua to ToMraphy PotenliaCyVVsOfe Predicted Vegetative Viewshed Not Vrsbo due to Vegatatlon r PatentraEfy Yt5 a Sunny view Computer Generated 134ft Monopole 111 WiedmaierCt. o oz as 08Miles Viewshed MapIthaca, NY 14850 1_ . r r i r i , , I,r M low - I -- Ik tttlaca 14 IWA41PA. 4p 4 3 Oull H'Ill 241 141, 13 lihaca,City SChWD istrict lTectonic Looking Southwest from the intersection of Weidmaier CT & Slaterville RD. n i The proposed structure will be visible from this location. I Distance From the photographic location to the proposed site is 900'± 10751.053 Looking Southwest from the intersection of Weidmaier CT & Slaterville RD. C Ii The proposed monopole will be visible from this location, Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 900'± 10751,053 r. 16 i 3 LOU Tectonic 147F."F I ' Tectonic U ing West from 1667 Slaterville RD nproposedstructurewillbevisiblefromthislocation. f Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1550'± 10751.053 Looking West from 1667 Slaterville RD ^ The proposed monopole will be visible from this location. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1550'± 10751.053 Looking West from 1667 Slaterville RD The proposed monopine will be visible from this location. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1550'± 10751.053 Looking South from the intersection of Burns RD & Slaterville RD. n The proposed structure will be visible from this location. f Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 930'± 10751.053 Looking South from the intersection of Burns RD & Slaterville RD. C _ n The proposed monopole will be visible from this location. J `F Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 930'± 10751.053 Looking South from the intersection of Burns RD & Slaterville RD. C _ n aiTheproposedmonopinewillbevisiblefromthislocation. J `t Distance From the photographic location to the proposed site is 930`± 10751.053 w 00 lie AV V 40J410M.- I TVA' A Tectonic 0 j Or AP fir 0 Tectonic I . , - ri , ., ; I .. - Tectonic Looking Northeast along Burns Road. - PiTheproposedstructurewillbevisiblefromthislocation. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 400'± 10751.053 tooking Northeast along Burns Road. f he proposed monopole will be visible from this location, S-6 Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 400'± 10751"053 E 15 or JIL Looking Northeast along Burns Road. _ aTheproposedmonopinewillbevisiblefromthislocation. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 400'± 10751,053 Looking Northeast from 275 Burns Road (South Hill Recreation Trail Parking). n The proposed structure will not be visible from this location. I Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 3556'± 10751,053 Tl:- --, Tectonic I Tectonic low 010 A f vp Tectonic Looking Southeast from 211 Park Lane. S-9aiTheproposedmonopinewillbevisiblefromthislocation. Distance From the photographic location to the proposed site is 2580'± 10751.053 tooking East from the intersection of Coddington Rd & Troy Road.n* Oheproposedstructurewillnotbevisiblefromthislocation. f I Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1.4 miles 10751.053 yT}± wilt*t; • s y ' . r - - ... .`_- 1 aG"'r J tr v.. N- o- rr -• y' - ^ YZ.`"' . .. -ate r i. r t i.y v r_r, + r. - ate t•-:+ •- yr !}, . w t - a, M.} r r ! - ice- V 1 1s !. Tj. .' Yi4'=ice a :Y fi?u R•r 1ti r XI . ':+4 f - t;i• 1 .1. y _ a r - tit` , ti - -' -r^. yr S^ - Looking Northwest from an open field along Coddington Rd South of Banks Rd, The proposed structure will be visible from this location, Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 2 miles ± 10751.053 Looking Northwest from the intersection of Banks RD & Coddington Rd. nCIiTheproposedstructurewillnotbevisiblefromthislocation. I Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1.75 miles ± 10751.053 Looking Northeast from 1034/1018 Coddington RD. P -13Theproposedstructurewillbevisiblefromthislocation. Distance From the photographic location to the proposed site is 1.5 miles ± 10751.053 Looking Southeast from #2 Golden Eagle Court. n The proposed structure will be visible from this location. I Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 1 mile ± 10751.053 Looking Northeast from 920 Coddington Way (Community Center). i The proposed structure will be visible from this location. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 48001± 10751.053 Looking Northeast from 814 Coddington RD (Cemetery). n _ r The proposed structure will be visible from this location. " U Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 4960'* 10751.053 Looking Northeast from the intersection of Coddington RD & Burns RD, The proposed structure will not be visible from this location. Distance from the photographic location to the proposed site is 4820'± 10751.053 EXHIBIT R e e x sQ<a'3W ' w o o o w L % \ _ = a e a B Yr ° c g$t > z voi w z T 3 Y N g N 3 a- w 3< >W i z y -oF a P. E 8 m Z w€ Eg cn N rap wo€$pUoUo? a U <Ui mw U J wJm Q LU W co h zg W W 1 PROPOSED MONOPOLE 1 1 APPROXIMATE LOCA/ LIN OF A EXISRINC PROPERTY LINE 1 t / / I 5 1 / i 1 1 , 1 ] 1 1 NOTE: THE PROPERTY LINES HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON CIS DATA AND ARE FOR ORIENTATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY/BOUNDARY DECISION BY A LAND SURVEYOR. Z)ADJOINERS PLAN 2Bv n,.1] Nm t : ,ar Lzz.sK NZEI ID SBL OWNER ADDRESS STATE/211' 1 56.-<-1.22 5ROBERF lANDLLC 1129AVENIDASCVILIAKSC WALNUTCREEK,CA"S95 2 56.<-1.26 BAIRAHAR'ASAWINAB BAIRACNAMA IAGADISR 602 WEST XNK- ITHACA,NY1w50 3 56.-01.25 S ROBERISWIEDMAIER, LLC 1129AVENIDASEVILU.KSC WAUlUTCREEKCA-$ 169151ATERVILLERG ITRACA, NY IK850 S -A CITY OF ITHACA SOB E GREEN ST ITILACA NYl050 6 56.2-1i G1L115,A "T PS GIll15, SUE ELLEN 112 BURNS RO IT-XY IA850 56:4-1.21 SOIOENBRIN,BETHRIVA 120 BURNS R0 ITHACq NY 1A850 8 56.4.1.23 SROBERTSWIEDMAIER,LLC 1129AVENIDASEVIL-K WALNUT CREEK,OR9095 SROBERMWIEDMAIER,ILC 1129AVENIDASEVILIARSC WALNUTCREE9,CA94595 10 56: <1.2] SROBFRTS WIEDMAIER,LLC 1119AVENIDASFVIl1A45C WALNUL CREEK, CA 9A595 @ADJOINERS LIST verizon OA x11 Tectonic' WORK Oft NUMBER + WN 10] St.053 I_ 1 N0. DATE -E 02/ 17/23 FOR L-mC at/ 10/25 FOR RE-:R, a/ a/23 FOR ZoxNo tt/ ot/aT FOR 2axixo R/ 20/U PER 12.11.21 tow MB 1 R jel p0 0JRNS APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TIP) BULK REQUIREMENTS TOM OF ITNACA ZONING DI —CT: CONSERVANGN (C) NEDNIRED EXlsnxc MINIMUM YARDS (TONER)• 284P.DSED. FR 1 135 FT - SIDE: 138 FT 354 FT REAR: 138 FT - 565 FT MINIMUM YARDS (COMPOUND) FRONT: 50 FT - SDE: 50 FT - 342 FT180FT REAR: 200 FT - 5]6 FT MAXIMUM TOWER HEIGHT: 30 FT - 1J8 FT APPLICANT MILL APPLY FOR AREA VA —E FOR HEIGHT EXCEEDING 30 1 I / 1 / / SETBACK/PLAN NOTE: THE PROPERTY LINES HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON CIS DATA AND ARE FOR ORIENTATION PURPOSES t (1}aJ4.0 ONLY. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY/BOUNDARY DECISION BY A LAND SURVEYOR. verizon,/ O.—ANY ti586t O,fM'NEN.y 56 OMf` EXISTING ROAD (TYP) verizon SECTION 56. - EXISTING OHW \ I BLOCK 4 LOT 1.21 R° Te_ EXISTING UTILITY ctonhP '1'Y POLE (TYP) I'w.eJJJ--- \ BLOCK 4 LOT 1.23 wM 1B_i A SECTION 56. j cs J N0. DAIS 55VE 0 02/31/0 SECTION 56. yyXc 0uR Q. Ta m/iom BLOCK 2 LOT 11 j J 2 - / 0 SECTION 56. w/04/2.l FOR 2oww BLOCK 4 LOi 1.25 / 11~23 rox 2/2R/2e NA IZII 3 — EXISTING BLOCK 4 LOT 1.27 // ASSUMED SOURCE OF POWER &FIBER) PROPOSED UNDERGROUND 8 POWER AND FlBER (CONDUITS / EXISTING 3490 LF) 9 / BUILDING SECTION 56. CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND EXISTING PAVEMENT 90' TOWARDS VERIZON WIRELESS TOWER 94'SEpF wH"YO PROPOSED POWER AND FIBER / s PULL BOX EVERY t300 LF / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING 6 \ SECTION 56. ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) BLOCK 4 LOT 1.26 ersm APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NO DISTURBANCE LINE (TYP) \ EXISTING PROPOSED 12, EXISTING STONE TREEUNE (ttP) NON—EXCLUSNE GRAVEL COLUMN (TYP) \ f- ACCESS DRIVE EXISTING 0 O / / GRA55 AREA E INFORIMTION ss SUNNY VIEW SECTION s6. W6S#: VZ-00049818.C.9341 BLOCK 4 LOT 2 MDG#: 5000007226 PROPOSED MONOPOLE / SR.— SEE SHEET C-3) ( / i J 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA PROPOSED 50'x5O` FENCED / TOMPKINS COUNTY COMPOUND (SEE SHEET C-2) J NY 14850 SHEEP TR1E APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE OVERALL SITE PLAN EXISTING EDGE OF GRAVEL ROAD SHEEP NUMBER NOTE OVERAL(L SITE PLAN THE PROPERTY LINES HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE BASED ON GIS DATA AND ARE FOR ORIENTATION — z' i lxaie s2ii) PURPOSES ONLY. THEY DO NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY/BOUNDARY DECISION BY A LAND SURVEYOR. C EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS / t50' STABILIZED CONSRtLaN ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL 2/C-4B) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF J CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND EXISTING EXISTING PROPERTY LINE \ \ PAVEMENT 90' TOWARDS VERIZON WIRELESS TOWER (SEE DETAIL 1/C-4B) `I 9 EXISTING BUILDING (TYP) EXISTING TREE J LINE (TYP) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS U/G POWER AND FIBER CONDUITS r APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF JJ /, J EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) PROOSED ACCESS DRIVEWAYCENTWAYCENTERLINE / EO PROPOSED 12' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE TO IMPROVE EEO/E?/ UPON EXISTING (SEE DETAIL 4/C-4B)"/ 9PaC gP G."8 / . y1J'.fS JP APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE IN / POOR CONDITION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NO DISTURBANCE LINE (TYP) TOP OF CONCRETE _ 824.7' AMSL A 11 FINISH GRADE AT \ TOWER - 524.4' AMSL \ BROAD PLAN VIEW C-IB SC ( 1 - ]tl (3taH 4II)) ACCESS ROAD LENGTH = 542'3 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LENGTH - 505'2 AREA OF DISTURBANCE = 12 051 SF ± (0.28 ACRES) 870 860 850 840 830 820 1.70% 810 5+ 42.05 5+00 PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD CL GRADE TO BE CLOSE TO EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE n mo nv, d w d w d w w d mlm\, w eM d w oo d w onm+ d w m Hn d w d w d w n mm d w mn w d m' w YY e+ N d w n m d w ul d w g d w o0 d w d w d w d 870 860 850 840 830 820 810 Nm 4+ 50 4+00 3+50 3+00 2+50 2+00 1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 BROAD PROFILE VIEW verizonJ N PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 50kW GENERATOR ON 4'x8' CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS U/G PROPOSED 50'x50' POWER CONDUITS TO GENERATOR FENCED COMPOUND I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UTILITY i 8, RF EQUIPMENT ON H—FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CPS UNIT ATTACHED TO H—FRAME POST PROPOSED GRAVELSURFACING 8 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED MONOPOLE DESIGNED BY OTHERS) SEE SHEET C-3) PROPOSED 15' WIDE GRAVEL PARKING AND TURNAROUND AREA SITE DETAIL PLAN PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS U/G POWER @ FIBER CONDUITS ROUTED TO H—FRAME PROPOSED UTILITY BACKBOARD PROPOSED TRANSFORMER uc ( BY OTHERS) PROPOSED BOLLARD (TYP) 4x 0 0 \ PROPOSED VERIZ.N WIRELESS 1O'xI2'0'x12' ICE CANOPY PROPOSED 12'-6'x11'-0' CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD W PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS U/G POWER h FIBER CONDUITS W Y PROPOSED 12' WIDE DOUBLE GATE verizon,/ PROPOSED LIGHTNING ROD verizon I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS: / I ANTENNA (2/SECTOR-6 TOTAL), Tectoni/i I DUAL BAND RRH (2/SECTOR-6 TOTAL), C-BAND RRH/ANTENNA (I/SECTOR-3 TOTAL), ANTENNA MOUNT (1 /SECTOR-3 TOTAL), j 12-CIRCUIT OVP UNIT (1-TOTAL) II WORK OIIDQa NUMBER ^ MWN am 10751.053 GS II N0. DATE ISSUE I ov F/zs N wnoiv a./o./xs Fax zoxwc I ,+roa/as II anon. II + PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS fqS PANEL ANTENNA (2/SECTOR-6 TOTAL) 1 E 0 J pTOc'o• 9 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS oC-BAND ANTENNA/RRH PROPOSED MONOPOLE o ( I/SECTOR-3 TOTAL) o i ( SEE ELEVATION 1/C-3) wvy1 I PROPOSED MONOPOLE o GT QUAD COLLAR MOUNT o ; I o. I PROPOSED MONOPOLEOI PROPOSED TIEBACK 1 OF NE{yYo (7 TOTAL) o > 1II PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS I OVP UNIT (ALPHA SECTOR ONLY) F nj Fss a+" I (2) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 6.12 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 8• J u a eOTOR I HYBRID CABLES ROUTED WITHIN MONOPOLE HEAVY DUN UPNY ANTENNA FRAME 70• ASSEMBLY (I/SECTOR-3 TOTAL) OP nE rarc s+ e I h I h ro I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS I 0 P a DUAL BAUD RRH UNIT I (2/SECTOR-6 TOTAL) I SITEIIruLL ixFnlxAnai ES SUNNY VIEW ANTENNA ORIENTATION WBS#: VZ-00049818.C.9341 START OF PROPOSED >ro -+;_ aMDG: 5000007226 o; SITE ADD I CLIMBING PEGS RESS 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 EXISTING GRADE SNEET TITLE ELEVATION & ORIENTATION PLAN ELEVATION SHEEP NUMBER 3 SCALE: 1' IS' (11x17 SIZE) 1' S' (22x3 SIZE) C- 3 BARBED WIRE 3 STRANDS EXTENSION ARM GALVANIZED POST CAP TOP RAIL LINE POST SPACED ® NOT TO EXCEED 10'-0" O.C. SEE FENCING NOTES FOR DIAMETERS OF POSTS) CHAIN LINK FABRIC as INSIDES T- OUTSIDp TENSION 6RAOEOWNE o. a a 3" MIN. yo u 4,000 PSI CONCRETE FENCE DETAIL CAP (TYP ON ALL POSTS) 3) INDUSTRIAL MALLEABLE 12'-0" IRON OFFSET PIN HINGES PER GATE PANEL (PAGE—WILSON " D STEEL TRUSS M-6 OR EQUAL) ROD BOLLARD DETAIL WELDED HEAVY DUTYHASP AND STAPLE W/INTEGRAL DROP BAR AND PADLOCK 9"a9" BANDED HAND HOLE (TYP) W/CHAIN WELDED ® ONE SIDE STRANDS OF GALVANIZED BARBED WIRE TOP RAIL GATE FRAME 4" DIA SCH 40 GATE POST TENSION WIRE GRADE BCARENTER DROP SLOTTED 1'-0" MUSHROOM CAP CIA DOUBLE GATE DETAIL CONCRETE SEE FENCE DETAIL) H 40FILLED E GUARD POST ELLOW RARE 000 PSI DNCRETE DMPACTED 3/4" RUSHED STONE DMPACTEDJBGRADE 3/4" CRUSHED STONE CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 703—AGGREGATE, SUB —SECTION 703-02—COURSE AGGREGATE, TABLE 703-4 NO. 2 STONE WEED BARRIER SHALL BE _ TYPAR LANDSCAPE FABRIC OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL COMPACTED SUBGRADE GRAVEL SURFACING TREATMENT POST CAP CABLE BRIDGE SITE PRO P/N:IB72D—T3 H—FRAME CABLE BRIDGE SITE PRO P/N:IB24D—T3 ANTENNA CABLE ON SNAP —IN COAX HANGER (TYP) fl FIN GRADE TO GROUND SYSTEM r REFER TO GROUNDING o PLAN FOR CONNECTION 3" MIN. CONCRETE CABLE BRIDGE verizon%l Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER ,~ 10751.053 CS NO. GATE ISSUE 0 w ns rort t os/,o/xs cox w/w/23 cart reon tE OxNEwY g~ 9 SITE INFO ON ss SUNNY VIEW WBS#: VZ-00049818.C.9341 MDG#: 5000007226 17- 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 SHEET T E SITE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C-4A 1.5" MINIMUM OF TOP COURSE MATERIAL CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT SPECIFICATION 404.128201 -12.5 F2 80 SERIES COMPACTION 2.5" MINIMUM OF BINDER MATERIAL CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT SPECIFICATION 404.258901 -25 F9, 80 SERIES COMPACTION EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE SAW CUT, 90• REMOVED (12' FROM EXISTING EDGE) AND REPLACED W/ NEW PAVEMENT ASPHALT JOINT SEALANT CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT SPECIFICATION 418.603 12" 12' 12" EXISTING SUB -GRADE 8MINIMUM OF SUBBASE MATERIAL CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT SPECIFICATION 304. 12 -SUBBASE COURSE, TYPE 2 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY DETAIL 6" TOP COURSE CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT SPECIFICATION 733.0402, TYPE 2 SUBBASE LENGTH PER PLANS SLOPE: 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE: 1/4" PER F00T EXISTING GRADEiI 12" OF SUBBASE MATERIAL, 1 III111 I COMPACT EXISTING SUBGRADE TO CONFORMING WITH NYSDOT 95R OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY SPECIFICATION 703.0201 CRUSHED AS DETERMINED BY STANDARD STONE ( p4 & 05 STONE) PROCTOR (ASTM D-698) TEST GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI EARTH WORK SUBGRADE COMPACTION & SELECT GRANULAR FILL 50OX OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEARING & GRUBBING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ROADWAY AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, AS PREPARED FOR THIS SITE, WHEN NECESSARY, FOR SITE WORK PREPARATION, & FOUNDATION WORK. AS A MINIMUM THE TOP 3" OF GRADE SHALL BE REMOVED, THE EXPOSED SUBGRADE COMPACTED AND GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INSTALLED AS REQUIRED FOR UNSTABLE SOIL CONDITION. 2. ALL SELECT GRANULAR FILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A 95% COMPACTION AT A MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST (ASTM D-1557) AND WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 3% OF OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. 3. CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE THAT EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ARE MAINTAINED. GRAVEL DRIVE CROSS SECTION s 3' . i =C liiw sal) 50' MIN q JE RANCE ROAD6' THICKNESS OF 2' PLAN RAD. 25' CRUSHED STONE POLY - FILTER X FILTER CLOTH AS MANUFACTURED BY CARTHAGE COMPACTED MILLS OR APPROVED EQUAL SUBGRADE SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. STONE SIZE - USE 2" STONE, OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. 2. LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN SIX INCHES 4. WIDTH - 12 FOOT MINIMUM. BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. 5. FILTER CLOTH - WILL BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF STONE. 6. SURFACE WATER - ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED ACROSS THE ENTRANCE. IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5:1 SLOPES PALL BE PERMITTED. 7. MAINTENANCE - THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH SHALL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED. WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 8. WASHING - WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY. IF ACCUMULATED SOIL DOES NOT COME OFF BY WAY OF STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KNOCK OFF ACCUMULATED SOIL BY MANUAL METHODS UPSLOPE OF A SILT FENCE BARRIER. 9. SEDIMENT TRAPPING - SILT FENCE BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED DOWN) SLOPE OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO CATCH ANY SEDIMENT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY FALL OFF OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND/OR VEHICLES. 10. PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. 9KM_ LIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE verizon' r1 % Sut ' SE,OF N,1,.F r Oq40 35OMH oRini NFORIMlIOss IN SUNNY VIEW WBS#: VZ-00049818. C.9341 MDG#: 5000007226 AODRE55 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 SHEET TITLE SITE DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C- 4B PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 10'.12' ICE CANOPY 4) 3" CONDUIT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CABINETS COORDINATE FINAL CONDUITS W/VERIZON WIRELESS CE) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12'-6".11'-0" CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED CPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR UNIVERSAL PIPE ADAPTER KTT BY SITEPRO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2) ROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT (L.THON.A:: OLFL14 PE BZ M4) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 24"x24" TELCO BOX WITH LOCKABLE HASP PROPOSED L'CN' WEATH- PROPOSED COURTESY GFI RECEPTACLE WITH WEATHERPROOF COVER LEGEND FRONT ELEVATION 1', EMT CONDUIT RRRtR LMFC CONDUIT 1/z PROPOSED HYBRID CABLES ROUTED ALONG CABLE BRIDGE 0'-0" PROPOSED VERIZON 4" 4 WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE POST PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER ON OPPOSITE SIDE) PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR PROPOSED 25W FLOOD LIGHT (LITHONIA OLFL14 PE BZ M4) MOUNTED ON H-FRAME UNVERSAL -IPE ADAPTER KIT BY SITE-RO OR EQUAL (TYP OF 2) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP O o000: ( y) 3^ CONDUCT PROVIDING CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CABINETS COORDINATE FINAL CONDUITS W/VERIZON W.RELESS CEO) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED GPS UNIT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR PROPOSED 10'x12' ICE CANOPY WIRELESS CABLEABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED VER ZON WIRELESS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE BRIDGE POST 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS H-FRAME PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT, PROPOSED P1000 UNISTRUT. LENGTH & SPACING TO BE LENGTH & SPACING TO BE DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT DETERMINED IN FIELD TO SUIT EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS EQUIPMENT MOUNTING LOCATIONS PROPOSED VERIZON PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP WIRELESS H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EOUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED TRAP BOX (SITE PRO 1 P/N: O TRAPS OR APPROVED EQUAL) (TYP) PROPOSED VERIZON 1 WIRELESS 50kW DIESEL ` 3) 2" LMFC CONDUITS GENERATOR ON PROPOSED FROM CABINET TO OVP 4'x8' CONCRETE PAD 1 1 1 I. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESSPROPOSEDVEV-O" CONCRETE PAD r EXISTING GRADE y:._ EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 200A INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER PROPOSED 18"0 ASIDE ELEVATION CONCRETE PIER (TYP) PROPOSED CABLES TO BE ROUTED INSIDE MONOPOLE PROPOSEDMONOPOLE PROPOSED GPS UNIT SUPPLIED BY CORACTOR 8'-0" MAX 2'-1-I" PROPOSEDCABLEBRIDGE PROPOSED VERI20N WIRELESS EXISTING GRADE a Hu1o1 i CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPOSED 18"0 BATTERY CABINET CONCRETE PIER (TYP) PROPOSED GROUND BAR PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS REAR ELEVATION EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED TRAP BOX (SITE PRO 1 P TRAPS OR APPROVED EQUAL) (ttP) L[: '/" • '' a• (" sxh) 3) 2" LMFC CONDUITS z.s. s > FROM CABINET TO OVP PROPOSED - HYBRID CABLE (TYP) CABLE GROUND BAR a i T5 PROPOSED VERIZON 1 WIRELESS H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS OVP _. EQUIPMENT ELEVATION wrizoW AERIAL MAP WITH PROPOSED OVERLAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION suL sD' (U.IT viL) THE PROPOSED WORK CONSISTS OF INSTALLING CELLULAR ANTENNAS AND RELATED m T22.T. yg) EWIPMENT ON A PROPOSED MONOPOLE AND THE INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AT GRADE —N A PROPOSED FENCED CONPWND. INSTALLATION OF A 12' WIDE G,i iES ACCESS DR.WTHEPROJECTINCLUDESUNDERGROUND POWER AND FIBER RUT verizon Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER WN IO>Bt. 05] GB NO. DATE PT/IW. ISSUE RELEASED BY GATE M. OP er5' SSIOM" 4? D SITE INFORMATION ES SUNNY VIEW WBS#: VZ- 00049818.C.9341 MDG#: 5000007226 T RE- 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 SHEET TRUE AERIAL MAP WITH PROPOSED OVERLAY SHEET NUMBER ESC-1 N / EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EXISTING CATS / EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP) 10000, I EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) EXISTIING FORESTED LAND 00, H.C3 EXISTING MEADOW/RANGE LAND A HzE \\ EXISTING NRCS SOIL MAP UNIT SYMBOL (TYP) 1 / / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE IN POOR CONDITION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTNG SUB —BASIN RIOGEUNE EXISTIN (G CONDITIONS PLAN fft 2 u I %133.N4ff9 ) EXISTING BUILDING (TYP) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (TYP) PROPERTY AREA 511,134.83505E PROJECT AREA(LOD) 20,193.0197 SF Q08 Ac OFAIR) PF.1,) LEGEND 1 I QTJAC I ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT PROPERTY UNE uo— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED FENCE DAYLIGHT LINE EXISTING & 114 LINE a> MINOR CONTOUR ROW ARROW o — SILT FENCE MAJOR CONTOUR) VEGETATION /TREE LINE verizon Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER N 10751.053 GB N0. MTE ISSUE ovlan• X-3TOPOGRAPHY & SOILS MAP ESfX C(I Z, MZE) CUT/ FlLL TABULATIONS: ROAD BED AREA: 7.820.59 SF ROAD BED CUT: 16' ROAD BED EXCAVATION: 10,427.2 OF COMPOUND AREA 2,500 SF COMPOUND STRIP DEPTH: 8' COMPOUND EXCAVATION: 1,250.0 CF FOUNDATION EXCAVATION: 265.5 CF FENCE PIER EXCAVATION: 62.8 CF BOUABDS AND CABLE BRIDGE: 28.3 CF CONCRETE STABS: 201.5 CF TOTAL EXGVATED VOLUME 12, 235.3 OF (453.2 CT) TOTAL FILL MATERIAL: 12. 235.3 CF (453.2 CY) ASSUMED SHRINK/SWELL FACTORS: 1.0 LEGEND property Area 511AM 8354 31 Projen A —CLOD) 20.193.01973E 0. 46M Ac PROPOSED CONDITIONS: BUILDINGCOVERAGE 0.0000 SF ASPHALTAREA 1,102.1443 SF CONCRETEAREA 127 WO SF GRAVELROAD( HSGC) 6,753.37645F GRAVEL COMPOUND(HSG C) 2,388 3037 F RANGE/ MEADOW(HSG C-FAIR) 9,822. 13 SF RANGE/ MEADOW(HSG D-Fair) 0. SF FORESTED AREA(HSG C) 0. SF FORESTEDAREA SGO) 0.00005E TOTAL: 20,193.0197 SF PROPOSEDIMPERVIOUSAREA: 10,370.9684 SF 0. 2381 Ac ADJACENT PROPERTY UNE EASEMENT PROPERLY UNE w -- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED FENCE DAYLIGM LINE EXISTING BASIN LINE us— MINOR CONTOUR FLOW ARROW o SILT FENCE 310— MAJOR CONTOUR VEGETATION / TREE UNE verizon, J JOE Al-. p Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER WN 10751. 053 GB NO. DATE ISSUE ox/ w" 1 C!_GAITI CONTRACTOR TO EXTEND EXISTING - PAVEMENT 90' TOWARDS VERIZON WIRELESS TOWER (SEE DETAIL 3/C-4B) sz L14J CO'itnLR l_I._. l.J vELET-ON / --EE N PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 4 U/G POWER AND FIBER CONDUITS EXISTING CONTOUR (TYP) / 5. EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP) 1.J/ PROPOSED J—HOOK t; SILT FENCING (TYP) sHOhy 6 LF O 30' PROPOSED CONTOUR (TYP) ).-/ i E - ^— • PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LIN€ PROPOSED SILT FENCE (TYP) l ( SEE DETAIL 5/ESC-5) l PRE zY PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED UNITS WAY CENTERLINE OF DISTURBANCE PROPOSED 12' WIDE GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE TO IMPROVE UPON EXISTING (SEE DETAIL 4/C-4B)i / CONCRETE EQUIPMENT SLAB, !1 TOP ELEV 824.7 (TYP) y TOP OF CONCRETE O PROPOSED•50' X 50' FENCED COMPOUND L t Y APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1/ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP) PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONCRETE Nfi WASHOUT (SEE DETAIL 3/ESC-5) FINISH GRADE "AT / \\\ TOWER - 824.4' \ e \ PROPOSED TEMPORARY SOIL SP \ STOCKPILE (SEE DETAIL 1/ESC-5) \\\ TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO I \ CONSTRUCTIoN OF COMPOUND PROPOSED SITE PLAN verizon B Sj 1C PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS I f50- STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL 2/ESC-5) Z--_D`CONYOUR / OPOSEO UMTTS OF DISTU CE_ PROPOSED SILT FEN / PROP DAYLIGHT UNE / PROPOSED EASEMENT (TYP) ENLARGED SITE PLAN r -'o (12-sa y6` / PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONCRETEWASH (SEE DETAIL 5/C-48) FINISH GRADE AT TOWER - 824.4' AMSL PROPOSED TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILE (SEE DETAIL 1/C-48) / TO BE REMOVED PRIOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMPOUND j- j Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER 0751.053 GB N0. I-E ISSUE o2/ts/2° E. 4E OF NEtyY 9 Wz OP off o SITE INFORMATION cs SUNNY VIEW WBS#: VZ-00049818.C.9341 MDG#: 5000007226 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 SHEET TREE PROPOSED SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER ESC-4 sm my SDOOWEE (NTS) w,Pos, NAw , @TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILE DETAIL 3 = H,R 3/4- CRUSHEO RTONE CONFORMING WIN I -DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 703-AGGREGATE. SUB -SECTION 703-02-COURIE AGGREGATE. TABLE 203-4 NO. 2 STONE tic WEED BARRIER SNALE BEFABRIC ORTYPARLANDSCAPE 4 _ ENGINEER MPROYED EOUAL COMPACTED sUBGRADE GRAVEL SURFACING TREATMENT eTA,>mDDNB,W„A s, i rm axxro ARff6E nm mw emnwawro; ; CONSTRUCT Ox sP ExcEtt"Eoxron s n m" xxERFauxrNrt. x%A(,2) FDm xcNss EwEss oaz F«n GDO faoD IF PMHD itsixd"i 4eMwrc"E to MPMCI%'µ, MO MImE s llED ca sm" ACQ— INFO DONS FDR ENDSON AND sENUENT co,) srL18a 2 - SECTION i I 11 O PLAN to mxx 1- ONSNCDSTABCCRONAccess @STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASH DETAIL NE. Nls S SCNF: x3 REINFORCEO SILT FENCE BOL tyix. Wt•c c v/ Mnz s' xssx svvmcl a a- aw ANC".i .= NNw rr. ,e w,9 P,eao AaxP) N Aw r WMN,M.T9 aMII,W f ONjTRLCiINPFfIFIfAiING. I. WOVEN ARE FENCE TO BE FMDENFD SECURELY T FENCE PORTS WDH ARE TIES OR —ES. IA0.ES. — S SHALL BE STEEL ERNER l' OR 1' TYPE OR HARDWOOD. 2 LOIN TO BE —NED SECURELY TO WOVEN ARE FENCE WRH TIES SPACED EVERY 24' AT TOP AND WO SECTION. FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN ARE. 8' WHEN_ WMESH OPENING. ECRONS OF FlLTER CLON ADJOIN EACH OEHCH FR DHEY SHA:Il BE3OV -PED BY sl% INCHES D FOIDED. RLTER CLOM 5 BE OTHER FIIJER % STMNNNA TH ON. OR APPROLWD EOINVALENT. IREFABRi . IUNRS SHALL MEET T E MI REM OUIREMEHM SHOWN. R. MNNTENANCE sHM.I. BE PREFORMED AR NEEDED AND M.ATERVE REMOVED WHEN BULGES' DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE. SILT FENCE NEW S FOR EROSION AND SEDNEM CONTROL) SILT FENCE DETAIL FlGURf S'2 % Y x9xx0e s,ANE A5COMPORTFlLTERSOCR D nMAO wx DR' Owl NN DDAaR (TM) IARF Dx IW MWAL >oA«No MxeIx,WWE9.AM r A— r \\\ a AN asnaem 0 pAR WFB ADAPDED FROM OETNLS IR-11 RY: — I COMPOST FILTER SOC% NEW YORH STATE STAHDMD9 AND SPE.CIIFI—S FOR ERORgN ARD SEDIMENT CONTROL K. 5.9) COMPOST FILTER SOCK DETAIL RDALD N,R verizon,l Tectonic' 7O ORDER NUMBER WN OT51 053 CB N0. BATE ISSUE RED SEA NEWY 5' Wrr O9 eW OeT51fIFRBIDWH` D SL4\D_4RD A\D SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERAWNENT CO\STRTC'TION AARE.A PL.ASTI G paaad aLamdmW Lmenme m amuapno(60 m b cpp¢:lmn.s of nJ LsuJ msf kfedhutllefna multi o(as ]tmi<mbe oUmeG iodnamttfevlit.< waa. mph tammu<W rvaa n dm rot. ynamT or9-s lo c[egm.Wm 1[numeuvuQ mppa on®lry'n man mamuimis o[lw abme [evlz¢. xhis [eq®mm gtary[urt wa't'e vmissss pnmmappt)mf4 sne. Domf.nemmm.mss:m to Ye Plmvtl nl Didsfoo[ Oerd m h la ml at caocanmM wvm Oow 5%dvJimas my san' d@mtnl wkrama wmbly le vm and oae o!v.wvr.Gm1ApN wAp. p.csn shnoNeaybecededdmmpmlYW[mF alter Lev rassm as p:mudYmMlm.e.•navq•¢ansnxry tlnmq < ma m r:m'"eL- Sae Stmdmd msF.cStaum pe( w'rioaR Scooe L>smdma cad vm<;«cm.m,<omm m„tmm.Y r sw4d mY ®a o[ b lvv vhm m soJ u mt bum vbWpWFp. umem Fatws w-C ola (o:bsma mtluwo6able RLm1eF®msur3ssbuds( veW s4vh mPmidvaaa"rm BC. Pvwo:il.v{evtisw mmckhd spmr "..*P u{nefvvd SeexsAMii. seu ls:aktlbY'cvnsnucvoa mcisatv¢s -FavmOew Cwtnuctlonhi¢T.nauaF lfiam! mvlse mamaY utl¢em caupac CnTcalveu Fwcmvvlvmi k, adLmvtswtl m vmm m< mbde A¢ art as teed ro srtry ¢tn'ao-Gcma fill wAuaodmrvdeadeE vwaW skynm smeen: a eomn Gme-a15eM l,r w !NN Coodidvas ll'here Pracdce.lanties led Cbcw 4B URQ'. Th4 game gpry mn de, tadmeu fvN eLa P. hmmTuv2amcta,.: mamm[mat.®m.-a:_ v' msPa[ see,adwsn:vpdnm [or syeaat srwvom covmmww%c1olr coon ! o!o m Lul padvFmdseKeEP:Ran^.ov Ay'sna y cv¢ pacm! smvou will:.mme ttiwlhr mdiskW{ w P< mMe m aJm¢v eowe{ mne, n • maummdePlA et see SOJ:tesm,vo k¢dad. Tr seetlbeGmatbe m, Pt.tl loalbw peotl nil n wadcmmt ml b nd t rpc. sm mvccvapliSlu. i(m4ehpowda CY'a 3YdttodmdM wliwclar psaa M<wtbp mplecnepusspcammmWmumactmpes:ov seeSqisattemphibMavNn:l se .m fa Pme l.s SeM (PLS) horns M.11nn Lfnf_ adtroml s P a0m n GmevllY nabuy. aa0ym tivrbasxembmbs. Rmeti pm Lm Sa0.aryL5):.rsb0. vmmml min'eu smabtlebnsbomdxmhtealaKpmmpf efAwh it<d Iv:oa.uon onb seed bar label bmdmbeaaLr. wntl lvmse waA Lnm. mwura acAWeslrn fseedt yenupper. mf Nv.mm«IXi auras.. pwp'. vwdF nmm N:lnnihe pec¢vpeefpm SN mm9xyn spe¢dbe'mceym Mlmo le rypn± =°au me ctmR at saa mat htrsottm: whm tncT:v. Tr:oJsradrmbdb Produce dum.9 Stem whm phmadmdmfuavbh Mlmmir Wameavnol ameWmmhaeeded AWIY tootaov 2: orwabm:01d AAai_ Vw YoS Sum Sendarda m sp<tif ,curs Fa vosm m Sedmm[Cearel xe ttmpm. nm. Lw. s..tl mJ 1Y a<-F.ame p¢<mr ® n ma Vm'YY' m 211de path 1. to C 9maLiR san ti ' ti% 0mlvalv.%PFaIT IW Fa ¢ avpk mD'3lmala efF ;Bee Qus 5•i pciT m 9Y. lamv,aw woukb cW<u aq b kas. Fa :OD, s etDLs aea Le r= 10 .ISfb 0.A Thved¢.23. 9 ms n(seed title acm,l w'evp: n.Ved [e mmr.10@s PSL Ooadasy%i3: sub be the oaaa @mf Sate£maW tmd muesli FnuF. Pea+nn: s.'tdgn vaY'Oemtl. im a[ Tas i<<F<opf.) mhbma]<quae mume isAn:hd laxf tl=vL'tl eai)'AnPn'u mfa [ad m e tx3 W an SJiasw:minL b bnd wmom Potcw ells uvinr vYfa:ldm mA avdhat auesvemeteseemFm a fauaa obwa>E speio}. u '. H[ oaYaumr. da0krcW gvY Oye wedWra4"t<teemnFaR .p,ble memam Pmpee mY b s.M c9vc< n hY m corn sbd swlurs. swvn:.. l5LLctiorh usmOWvoblamami[mmsob e[ ueded pl¢n. Oyu GmN> o[ ml<iar new wet; wWaa 6w f <asivoo acros lar.!` aS:a aw' seetl:np mx:pes. ImpnmtasP.cW adpmcote W yat:a vY.nml m ¢;wa m m lwnm mw fa ma ou mtnbmu. aLm t t<mmm• t„an.a P:m. h Qe yaes an mm d ha sx'e maa, z;t vmrt}• v.m:oo 4sYod Sm. Studvda and Spacfimdom Par. J.J3 Yqmb¢"At6 Fnrrmmo m Setlm¢s Coapvl Table 4A Pernlancnt C- 1.11W. A.. Planting.Ni hthre Rapin—dati-, s.w. lmf.r< vml[ar awrw,aa arrw Pkal I. Naa AIh II taal4Mfmmc Fm. hwPwhv emml 3 Pmmuul n< pav Ptmf Lim J Tm ma a uadcaanm<IY fu ahakd rcn MaR SwicApna ikhv. P% A[mJn.imlM1Wn.a01.1.c11 lbi eauu Wrac li.<<ad IY+wwWhm<.<Almcbwa,w4 JnWW and of<•<trdn T. nvvf[,dp side.ckOd< hahv Inam.Bmeaeuoe cmYhapmM1lrm v.w mwtbnr of od hw<pav dwWkulJW pm<de mak cma a, sac d±Ik rtt me loot b M IOW p fi s aW 0 lwiuhprva lkkm. P W.6.TmIDLva.aehk.dl nw Nm. um Link M1la< um AkwaaC,vPu 4< Wray -caw R®p 1 wnW I. a."w Alhmc 5... .. pram FlRrnea TnJna M ddlb.n m. 01 Thin mahaa h<n aux<vfW en aaW W pmd plaubµIs u m yPcuh m«<d wivhm n wmm usav an. at<Jn wb as aTema •W JeJI nmas mnp dtu utd a evrd Ru<dl Jv n Jn Ov1[ mm<ufsm<w11k nN aah v blawm ®t ineanm<n AEaM lwicb— Vahv. paWedm. TeW1— -AE twWpuv<paa Nrvs lu3 Thu maul mlm,m.amad ciow aloq ebc ml,W dPafWYnwd[udeidci llhN I mMo.'< aJpnslsamwPeeml-ThermviueJ fa f.W JawWm rtvalw tM lNJ mnh mmmm IIi plwad by s<pmu.e ucmt.uim r,K Anwm<,a h,tipva mk rlmtd rer.mW amt.nmham,bm<tk mAmmmw<ad.m< uhw Ctaggead fs. a ItsYlta P<mLwa Oeml as Lhwnp [<aa Patmul nxpa% Pmnfx Lmo 10 P<d aloev tmmm Cceml pvpa< muma crawl ma va n h mN kx a nafPluinpa rin pomda n m< mke_ald Papt'++a v<. raY sure sbW.d.,m sl.mfkman Fa [nnwn aW SaJmmu ('pawl verizon,' am" a" imt'eh f GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES A. IN THESE DOCUMENTS THE DEVELOPER IS VERIZON WIRELESS. B. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THESE PLANS SHALL BE OF THE CURRENT REVISION. C. A WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. D. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL PRE —CAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE FABRICATION AND/OR INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. E. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER WORK BEING PERFORMED BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE HIS ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY, WITH CRUM CREEK, LLC, OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIGHTING, POWER, TELEPHONE, CABLE, GAS, ETC...). F. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE SPDES PERMIT FROM NYSDEC. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WITH THE CRUM CREEK SOLAR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT. G. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES. ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR IN THIS CONTRACT. H. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, INCLUDING DUCTBANKS NOT UNDER THE DRIVEWAY/TRAVELWAYS, MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED OR INSPECTED PRIOR TO BASE AND PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION. I. SEVEN (7) DAYS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO THE PERTINENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SITE INSPECTIONS AND/OR WITNESSING ANY SITE/CML TESTING. J. CRUM CREEK LLC WILL SCHEDULE PRECONSTRUCTON MEETINGS WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS NECESSARY. K. CONSTRUCTION SHALL ADHERE TO APPLICABLE AGENCY CRITERIA, PERMIT CONDITIONS, AS WELL AS SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY OWNER. L. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CRUM CREEK LLC CONCERNING LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TRANSITIONS, ETC. WHICH MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. M. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER OR ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY FOR RESOLUTION. SAFETY NOTES A. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, ALL OSHA AND NY STATE SAFETY REGULATIONS ARE TO BE ENFORCED. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND THE SAFETY OF HIS PERSONNEL. B. LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH BY OSHA IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CONSTRUCTION WORK PER STANDARD 1910.12. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ITS OWN SAFETY EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS HEALTH & SAFETY PROGRAM AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL AND HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONTRACTORS WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND TRAINING TO ENSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONTRACTORS AND SUB CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OCCUPATION SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS AS WELL AS THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS. THE FOLLOWING IS NOT TO BE PERCEIVED AS THE ENTIRE SAFETY PROGRAM BUT JUST BASIC REQUIREMENTS. D. ALL EXCAVATIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR'S OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULES AND REGULATIONS. PARTICULAR ATTENTION MUST BE PAID TO THE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXCAVATIONS, 29 CFR PART 1926, SUBPART P. E. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. F. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY AND ENFORCE ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND/OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS. G. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND SHALL LOCATE ALL EXISTING BURIED UTILITIES BY HAND —DIG METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERTINENT APPROVALS AND PERMITS FROM THE LOCAL JURISDICTION PRIOR TO ALL EXCAVATIONS. PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES A. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE HIS WORK AND SITE ACCESS WITH THE OTHER ENTITIES THAT MAY BE WORKING ON SITE. ANY CONFLICTS ON COORDINATION ISSUES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER FOR MUTUAL RESOLUTION. B. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SIGNIFICANT HISTORICAL OR ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 106 AND 36 CFR PART 800 OR OTHER APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL STATUTES. IF EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF HISTORIC OR ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES IS DISCOVERED OR OBSERVED AT DEVELOPMENT SITES OR DURING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AFTER FINAL APPROVAL, ALL WORK SHALL CEASE IN THE AREA OF EFFECT AS DETERMINED BY THE DIRECTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES WITHIN TWO WORKING DAYS. EXAMPLES OF EVIDENCE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES INCLUDE WHOLE OR FRAGMENTARY STONE TOOLS, SHELL TOOLS, ABORIGINAL OR HISTORIC POTTERY, HISTORIC GLASS, HISTORIC BOTTLES, BONE TOOLS, HISTORIC BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, SHELL MOUNDS, SHELL MIDDENS, OR SAND MOUNDS. THE APPROPRIATE NY STATE AGENCY SHALL ASSESS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDS AND MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS OF NOTIFICATION. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND SHALL NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS. THE DIMENSIONS OF SPECIFIED AND FURNISHED PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSIONS AND NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITIES, STRUCTURES. AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS CAUSED BY HIS/HER ACTIVITIES. E. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BRACING, SHORING, OR PROVIDING OTHER MEANS NECESSARY TO PROTECT AND SUPPORT EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES EXPOSED OR UNEXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION. F. REFERENCES TO NYSDOT SPECIFICATIONS SHALL REFER TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS. G. NYSDOT INDICES SHALL REFER TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY SAFETY ADMINISTRATION DESIGN STANDARDS. TESTING SCHEDULE ITEM TEST PIPE TRENCH BACK FILL (SEE NOTE 1 BELOW) OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY GRADATION (1 TEST PER 50 CY) OVER PIPELINES AND AROUND DETERMINED BY AASHTO T180-57 (ASTM 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS D1557-70) STRUCTURES FROM R.O.W. LINE TO R.O.W. LINE AND IN STRUCTURAL AREAS STABILIZED SUB GRADE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF NINETY—FIVE PERCENT (95%) OF THE MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (ASTM D698). BASE COURSE OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY MINIMUM 100 LBR COMPACTION OF OPEN GRADED AASHTO #57 COARSE AGGREGATE) AGGREGATE BY VIBRATORY OR PLATE COMPACTOR FOR A DUMPED HEIGHT REDUCTION OF 1' GRADATION: 100% PASSING 1-1/2' SCREEN, 95-100% PASSING 1" SCREEN. 25-60% PASSING YS_ SCREEN, 0-10% PASSING #4 SCREEN, AND 0-5% #B SCREEN CONCRETE (SEE NOTE 3 BELOW) SLUMP TEST MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PER AASHTO & ASTM SPECS) CYLINDERS AIR CONTENT RECLAIMED CRUSHED CONCRETE OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY GRADATION 1. ALL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT 3RD PARTY AND SUBSEQUENT REPORTS FURNISHED TO SUNNY VIEW WITHIN FOURTEEN 14) DAYS OF COMPLETION. 2. PIPE TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE TESTED EVERY 50 FEET FOR EACH 12 INCH LIFT. TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED ON EACH LIFT, EXCEPT THAT TESTS SHALL NOT BE FURTHER APART THAN ONE (1) FOOT VERTICALLY. FIELD DENSITIES SHALL BE TAKEN OVER ALL ROAD CROSSINGS. FIELD DENSITIES FOR SANITARY LINES SHALL BE STAGGERED TO INCLUDE RESULTS OVER SERVICE LATERALS. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TEST SERIES FOR EACH 6 INCHES OF LIFT OVER PIPELINE BETWEEN MANHOLES. TESTS AROUND STRUCTURES SHALL BE SPIRALED IN 6 INCH LIFTS. 3. FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE (CORRUGATED STEEL OR ALUMINUM), 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY (AASHTO—T99) PER NYSDOT SPECIFICATIONS AS MODIFIED. 4. APPLIES TO SITE CONCRETE SUCH AS CURBS, GUTTERS, FLUMES, DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 5. ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL RECEIVE MATERIAL TESTING REPORTS NO LATER THAN ONE (1) WEEK FROM THE TEST DATE. 6. EMBANKMENT, FILL, AND BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE (12) INCHES VERTICALLY. ONE TEST PER 2,500 SQUARE FEET. EACH COMPACTED LIFT SHALL PASS THE AFOREMENTIONED TESTING CRITERIA BEFORE PROCEEDING TO THE NEXT VERTICAL UFT. 6. IF SUCCESSIVE VERTICAL UFTS ARE PLACED. THE DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE STAGGERED SO AS TO NOT BE REPEATED IN THE SAME LOCATION. NOTE: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFROM TO THE TOWN OF ITHACA DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. verizon win -ElS R Tectonic' WORK ORDER NUMBER WN 0751 A53 NO. BATE ISSUE oz/lei:e mw g'tEOF wW F09 emsm ° OpeaE55ic^IN rvw IN E XNAII cN SUNNY VIEW WBS#: VZ-00049818.C.9341 MDG#: 5000007226 SOE ADDRESS 111 WIEDMAIER CT TOWN OF ITHACA TOMPKINS COUNTY NY 14850 SNEEf TIRE NOTES SHEET NUMBER ESC-7 EXHIBIT S Tectonic SUNNY VIEW CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 16 February 2024 Prepared by: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C., 429 Lithia Pinecrest Road Brandon, FL 33511 Manager of Engineering Project Contact Info 429 Lithia Pinecrest Road I Brandon. FL 33511 813 374 9177 Tel tectonieenginearing com Equal Opportunity Employer SECTION 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 APPENDICES TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM NARRATIVE SITE CONDITIONS METHODOLOGIES SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION PAGE pg 03-07 pg 08-11 pg 12-14 pg 15 pg 16-24 pg 25-30 Appendix A Construction Inspection Log Book and Site Assessment Checklist Appendix B Corrective Action and SWPPP Amendment Logs Appendix C Site Construction Plans Appendix D NRCS Soils Mapping Appendix E Stormwater Runoff Calculations for Basic SWPPP Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed development is an unmanned Telecommunications facility and is depicted in the attached Zoning/Development Plans. The project is located on the grounds of an existing unimproved parcel having a property area of 11.73 Ac at 111 Wiedmaier Court, in the Town of Ithaca, NY. The scope of work for this project involves the installation of cellular antennas and related equipment on a proposed monopole, the installation of equipment within a proposed 50'x50' fenced compound. Proposed infrastructure for this site, includes the installation of a 500 If access drive including underground power and fiber utilities to service the facility all to be constructed in a single construction phase. The resulting Limits of Disturbance LOD) which includes the proposed compound, entrance drive and utilities has been ascertained to be 0.464 Ac in area and is well below the 1 Ac threshold and as such does not require permit coverage under New York State's Construction General SPDES Permit. The Town of Ithaca has requested that a Basic SWPPP be prepared for the project, showing the proposed construction is in compliance with Chapter 228 of the Town Code. This Basic SWPPP has been prepared to ensure stormwater runoff and pollutants from a site during land development activities, is controlled and does not generate any adverse environmental or biological impacts downstream or to the adjacent areas. 1.2 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES The following documents were utilized in the design process: NYSDEC; New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, November 2016; and New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, January 2015. Partial Boundary and Topographic Survey (wo## 10751.053) by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C., dated Oct 5, 2023. Town of Ithaca NY, Chapter 228 of the Town Code, "Stormwater Management and Erosion and Sediment Control". Page 3 1.3 CERTIFICATION Each contractor and subcontractor who will be involved in soil disturbance and/or stormwater management practice installation shall sign a certification statement provided by the Town before undertaking any and development activity. if no contractor is involved in soil disturbance and/or stormwater management practice installation, then said statement shall be signed by the owner and any developers before any land development activities are undertaken. Said certification statement shall certify under penalty of law that the signatory understands and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the relevant stormwater pollution prevention plan or erosion and sedimentation control plan, and that the signatory understands it is unlawful for any person to cause or contribute to a violation of water quality standards established by New York State or any other government@[ authority. The certification must include the name and title of the person providing the signature, address and telephone number of the contracting firm, the address (or other identifying description) of the site, and the date the certification is made. The certification statement(s) shall become part of the SWPPP or simple erosion and sedimentation control plan for the land development activity. 1.4 SUBMITTALS The Contractor shall submit a "Construction Phasing Plan" indicating the sequence of construction, erosion and sediment control practice installation, a list of areas to be disturbed associated with each construction activity and the procedure for stabilizing inactive disturbed areas. These submittals will need to be in substantial conformance with the measures outlined in this report. Proposed dates shall be provided for all the construction activities including temporary and permanent stormwater control measures. 1.5 SWPPP AVAILABILITY The owner or operator shall maintain a copy of the SWPPP, inspection reports, responsible contractor's or subcontractor's certification statement and all documentation necessary to demonstrate eligibility with this permit at the construction site until all disturbed areas have achieved final stabilization. The documents must be maintained in a secure location, such as a job trailer, on -site Page 4 construction office, or mailbox with lock. The secure location must be accessible during normal business hours to an individual performing a compliance inspection. 1.6 PRE -CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Prior to any soil disturbance at the project site the "Construction Site Logbook" must be located on- site with all required signatures. The pre -construction meeting and inspection form must be completed. All required temporary erosion control measures must be installed for the involved phases of the project. 1.7 SITE LOCATION The project parcel is located at 111 Wiedmaier Court, in the Town of Ithaca NY. Location and Aerial maps are provided in Figures 1.a and 2.a. at the end of this section. 1.8 SITE OWNER/DEVELOPER The name and address of the Owner/Operator, including contact person is: Land Owner: S Robert WC Land LLC Address: 111 Wiedmaier Ct. Ithaca, NY 14850 Agent Contact: Klausner Cook PLLC Phone Number: (607) 272-0800 Developer: Verizon Wireless Contact: Lindsay Beckwith Address: 1275 John Street, Suite 100. West Henrietta, NY 14586 Phone Number: 585) 313-3027 Project Address: 111 Wiedmaier Ct. Ithaca, NY 14850 Tax Map No.: 056.000-0004-001.0220000 Page 5 1.9 Site Location and Aerial Maps 9 29 yt :iha[a r H 4 P Figure 1.a. - Site Location Map PROJECT r I Figure 1.,b - Project Area Map Page 6 0-0 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1. TOPOGRAPHY The USGS Topographic overlay maps and the project survey indicate the overall property exhibits localized physical slopes between 5% and 25%, however the project has been sited in an area of the property where the slopes are between 5% and 15%; and as such is not anticipated to be subject to any steep slope regulations. The moderate slope within the project area will help to minimize any possible erosion or sediment transport issues and is expected to facilitate construction of the proposed site improvements. The topography seems to indicate a general and undefined surficial gradient from the northeasterly side of the property southwest towards the existing forested Six Mile Creek system PROPERTY \ ` approximately 900 ft to the southwest. f Runoff continues in Six ML the Six Mile Creek for approximately 4.5 miles before discharging ultimately into the headwaters of Cayuga Inlet, the designated receiving waters. 2.2. FLOODPLAINS AND FLOODWAYS According to FEMA (FIRM Panel #3608510025C, 06/19/1985) the project area is located in Zone "C", outside any designated 100 year flood plain or floodway. 2.3. WATERSHED DESIGNATION The project is located in the, of the Seneca watershed (HUC 04140201). Page 8 2.4. WETLANDS AND WATERBODIES No wetlands or other waterbodies are on or adjacent to the project area and will not be impacted by the proposed development of this project. 2.5. SOILS The soil types for this project, as indicated by the NRCS soil survey, consist primarily of silty loams, with 100% of the soils within the project area hydrologically grouped as type "C/D" soils. It is noted here that only the (2) Hudson soil types (HsC3 & HzE) Map unit Map unit name Rating Acres in Percent of symbol AOI A01 Ab Alluvial land AID 0.2 1.6% EbC Erie channery silt EbC loam, Em Eel silt loam BID 0.6 4.5% HsC3 Hudson silty clay HsC3 loam, HzE Hudson and Dunkirk CID 8.9 70.1% soils, 20 to 45 percent slopes LaS Langford channery D 0.0 0.1 % silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Ws Wayland soils Ws complex, Totals for Area of Interest 12.7 100.0% occur within or around the project area. The soil boundaries are depicted in the soils mapping provided in Appendix D. as well as the ES&C sheets, with in the plan set. For the purposes of stormwater analysis and design, NCRS has the plurality of dual rated soils classified as moderately well drained, as such these soil types were assigned as HSG type C soils. The soil types present within the project area are primarily rated with a whole soil erosion K factor 0.49, which indicates a moderate to severe susceptibility of erosion by runoff, and as such standard ES&C measures are anticipated to be required and may require some enhancement/reinforcement. Page 9 2.6. VEGETATION The vegetative cover for the project area currently consists primarily of meadow and range grass in fair condition as indicated in the photo 2.6.a. below. In addition, this site also contains forested tree lines outside the LOD for the project. r Based on these observations and in conjunction with the N RCS soils mapping, base curve numbers were applied to specific basin areas for the vegetative cover Photo 2.6.a. Looking Northeasterly at proposed access drive from proposed cell site site and SCS HSG Visit by Tectonic, 0812312021 designation, in accordance with standard TR-55 methodology and guidelines from NYSDEC. 2.7. EXISTING LAND USE The existing property is currently a vacant rural residential parcel, not currently in use. For purposes of hydrological analysis, the project area is assigned curve numbers based on a land use of meadow. 2.8. SITE RUNOFF AND HYDROLOGY Based on the USDA NRCS TR-55 methodology, using current soils data, vegetation and physical gradients, this site, exhibits sheet flow patterns from the centerline of the project area outwards and ultimately southwestward towards Six Mile Creek. There is an existing g+/-8' wide gravel drive within the project area that was previously used for the residential structure located in the same area as the proposed cell tower site. Due to the small amount of area being analyzed and the access road being sited on an existing minor ridge line; the entire LOD was treated as single basin. The primary Page 10 difference between pre and post development conditions is that the existing gravel drive will be partially paved (+/-90 If) and widened to 12 ft in width. The existing range/meadow grass will be replaced with lawn grass as the primary surface vegetation. Overall, the project area (LOD) will receive slightly less than 2,000 sf of additional impervious coverage due to the installation of concrete equipment pads, 90 If of additional asphalt pavement and a wider access drive. The time of concentration was calculated at less than 5 min due to the short travel distance and moderate slopes. As per standard practice a Tc of 5 minutes was used, when the calculated value is less than 5.0. The entire area of ground disturbance has been calculated to be 20,193.02 sf (0.464 Ac) and is below the state threshold of 1.00 Ac for requiring post construction stormwater management BMPs/SMPs for stormwater management control. The hydrologic basin runoff parameters have been calculated for the pre and post developed conditions based on physical data and are provided in the tables below: Pre -developed Basin Total Area (Acres) Weighted Curve Time of Conc. Number hours A 0.4636 83.19 0.083 Post -developed Basin Total Area (Acres) Weighted Curve Time of Conc. Number hours A 0.4636 84.33 0.083 Using data above, the peak runoff rates and volumes were calculated for pre and post developed conditions from runoff hydrographs for the 1 year thru 100 year 24 hour design storm events, with the results tabulated below in Table 4.1 in Section 4. Page 11 3.0 METHODOLOGIES USED The hydrologic analysis for this report is based on the results of the Hydraflow computational model which utilized the HEC 22 and TR 55 methods to generate Runoff Hydrographs for each discrete drainage sub -basin. For continuity purposes parts of the program methodology documentation are provided below. 3.1. SCS UNIT HYDROGRAPH More specifically, the program uses the triangular D-hour Unit Hydrograph approach as used in TR-20. The peak discharge for the unit graph is computed using the following equation. Qp = (484 x A x Q)/Tp Qp = peals outflow (cfs) A = area (sq miles) Q = total excess precipitation (1 inch) Tp = time to peak (hrs) The shape factor value used for this analysis was set to 484 and reflects a unit hydrograph that has 3/8 of its area under the rising limb. The time to peak, Tp and the time base, Tb are what determines the characteristics of the unit Hydrograph. The Hydraflow program computes these values using the following relationships. Tp = (Tc + D)/1.7 Tp = time to peak (hrs) TC = time of concentration (hrs) D = unit duration of time intervals (hrs) Tc = 1.67 x Lag Time (L) L = 10.8 (S + 1)0.7/1900 x Yo.s L = Lag Time (hrs) I = hydraulic length (ft) S = (1000/CN) —10 Y = basin slope (%) Page 12 CN = SCS curve number Time Base = 2.67 x Tp Tb = time base (hrs) Tp = time to peak (hrs) 3.2. TIME OF CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS Time of Concentration calculations for this analysis utilized the 3 component TR-55 algorithm as follows: Tc = Sheet Flow Time + Shallow Conc Flow Time + Channel Flow Time Sheet Flow Time (hrs) Tsheet = [0.007(n x L)0.81 / [P20,5 X S0.4j n = Manning's roughness coefficient L = Flow Length (a value of 100' used for this site) P2 = Two Year 24-hr rainfall (in) S = Land Slope (ft/ft) Shallow Channel Time (hrs) Tshalbw = L / (3600 x V) V = Average velocity (ft/s) L = Flow Length (ft) V=CpxS0.5 V = Average velocity (ft/s) Cp = 20.3282 paved surfaces Cp = 16.1345 unpaved surfaces S = Watercourse Slope (ft/ft) Channel Flow Time (hrs) Tchannel = L/(3600 x V) V = Average velocity (ft/s) L Flow Length (ft) V = (1.486 x RZ/3 x Sl/z)/n V = Average velocity (ft/s) n = Manning's roughness coefficient R = Hydraulic Radius (ft) S = Channel Slope (ft/ft Page 13 3.3. SCS 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTIONS The analysis utilized the SCS Type II 24-hr distributions for the 1yr, 2 yr, 5 yr, 10 yr, 25 yr, 50 yr and 100 yr duration storm events with 2 minute time intervals. The incremental rainfall amounts were computed from a polynomial equation. This equation is used with coefficients that vary depending on the elapsed time of the storm. The equation is of the form: Pt = Co + C1T + C2T2 + C3T3 Pt = Fraction of 24-hour precipitation T = Elapsed time.(hrs) Co = Coefficient C1= Coefficient C2 = Coefficient C3 = Coefficient 3.4. EXCESS PRECIPITATION HYETOGRAPH The precipitation increments of the specified storm are converted to excess precipitation by use of the following equation. Q = [P — (0.2 x S)12/ [P+(0.8 x S)] Q = Excess volume of precipitation (in) P = Accumulated precipitation (in) S = Potential maximum retention = (1000/CN) - 10 S = SCS Curve Number The computed volumes are then converted to excess increments. These excess increments are then used for the final excess precipitation hyetograph. MINKK6]kVi11.31011 101:rip] .I6IhaCM Due to the configuration of this project and a hydraulically bisecting receiving stream, combining of hydrographs was required to properly ascertain pre and post developed condition runoff rates and volumes discharged into the receiving stream. Page 14 4.0 SUMMARY FOR ANALYSIS OF RUNOFF CONDITIONS 4.1. SUMMARY: The existing site conditions were analyzed based on a vegetative cover primarily comprised of range grass/meadow in fair condition (58.08%) and the balance 41.92%) as gravel drive. Pursuant to NYSDEC directives and guidelines, the project area of the parcel currently was analyzed as range/meadow in fair condition and assigned base curve numbers accordingly. This analysis also factored in the average physical gradient of each sub -basin and the predominate soils HSG rating. Runoff Hydrographs were created for the 1 yr, 2 yr, 10 yr, 25 yr and 100 yr storm events to determine peak runoff rates and discharge volumes. These values are provided in the Table below for reference only. Post developed conditions were analyzed under similar conditions with notable exceptions of the additional impervious cover and the change in the vegetative cover from range/meadow to lawn grass. The time of concentration values were recalculated for the change in surface cover and any alterations in the surface gradient needed as a result of the proposed site improvements. As expected, these values did not change significantly and as such a minimum value of 5 minutes was used for the post developed time of concentration. The increase of impervious cover from 41.92% to 51.36% was offset somewhat by the change in vegetative cover, such that the increases in peak rates and runoff volumes (2.8% - 7.7%) were deemed deminimus and did not warrant the installation of any post construction BMPs. Table 4.1. Summary of Results: Receiving Waters (Runoff From Basin A) Design Storm Event - 24 Hr 1 YR 2 YR 10 YR 25 YR 100 YR Design Rainfall Depth (in) 2.14 2.48 3.49 4.12 5.09 Peak Discharge Rate Q,,, (cfs) 0.607 0.903 1.847 2.461 2.919 Peak Discharge Rate Q,.,t (cfs) 0.655 0.959 1.915 2.535 2.994 Pre -developed Runoff Volume (cf) 1,223.00 1,813.00 1 3,771.00 5,088.00 6,080.00 Post -developed Runoff Volume (cf) 1,317.00 1,928.00 3,930,00 5,266.00 6,270.00 4.2. CONCLUSION: Based on the calculations and site construction, stormwater runoff from the proposed project will not adversely affect any adjacent/downstream water bodies or properties. Page 15 5.0 POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN 5.1 POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES All debris and waste materials from construction activities will be disposed of using an on -site trash dumpster to minimize stormwater pollution. ASPHALT Asphalt Paving 1. Reschedule paving and grinding activities if rain is forecasted. 2. Train employees and sub -contractors in pollution prevention and reduction. 3. Store materials away from drainage courses to prevent stormwater runoff. 4. Protect drainage courses, particularly in areas with a grade, by employing BMPs to divert runoff or to trap and filter sediment. 5. Stockpile material removed from roadways away from drain inlets, drainage ditches, and watercourses. 6. Disposal of PCC (Portland cement concrete) and AC (asphalt concrete) waste should be in conformance with state and local regulations. 7. Do not allow sand or gravel to be placed over new asphalt to wash into storm drains, streets, or creeks. Vacuum or sweep loose sand and gravel and then properly dispose of this waste to a state approved solid waste facility. 8. Old asphalt should be disposed of properly. Collect and remove all broken asphalt from the site and recycle whenever possible. Paving Equipment 1. Leaks and spills from paving equipment can contain toxic levels of heavy metals and oil and grease. Place drip pans or absorbent materials under paving equipment when not in use. Clean up spills with absorbent materials and dispose of in accordance with the applicable regulations. 2. Substances used to coat asphalt transport trucks and spreading equipment should not contain soap and should be non -foaming and non -toxic. 3. Paving equipment parked onsite should be parked over plastic to prevent soil contamination. 4. Clean asphalt coated equipment offsite whenever possible. When cleaning dry, hardened asphalt from equipment, remove the hardened asphalt debris off -site to a state approved solid waste facility. Page 16 CONCRETE 1. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be located a minimum of 50 ft from storm drain inlets, open drainage facilities, and watercourses, unless determined infeasible by the Engineer. Each facility shall be located away from construction traffic or access areas to prevent disturbance or tracking. 2. A sign shall be installed adjacent to each washout facility to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. 3. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be constructed above or below grade or placed in watertight bins or containers. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be constructed and maintained in sufficient quantity and size to contain all liquid and concrete waste generated. 4. Wash concrete from mixer chutes into approved concrete washout facility. Perform washout of concrete mixers, delivery trucks, and other delivery systems in designated areas only. 5. Pump excess concrete in concrete pump bin back into concrete mixer truck. 6. Concrete washout from concrete pumper bins can be washed into concrete pumper trucks and discharged into designated washout area or properly disposed offsite. 7. Once concrete wastes are washed into the designated area and allowed to harden, the concrete shall be broken up, removed, and disposed of in conformance with applicable federal, state and local regulations (WM-5). S. Washout facilities will be covered 24 hours prior to a 50% or more chance of rain. If not covered prior to rain, washouts shall be covered during rain event. No water will be allowed to overflow from washout and any accumulated rain water will be handled and disposed of as washout water. Installation of Temporary "Above Grade" Concrete Washout Facility 1. Temporary concrete washout facility Type "Above Grade" shall be constructed with a minimum length and minimum width of 10 ft, but with sufficient quantity and volume to contain all liquid and concrete waste generated by washout operations. 2. Straw bales, wood stakes, and sandbag materials shall conform to the provisions in details provided on Sheet ESC-5. 3. Plastic lining material shall be a minimum of 10-mil polyethylene sheeting and shall be free of holes, tears or other defects that compromise the impermeability of the material. Liner seams shall be installed in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations. No seams in the plastic are allowed at Page 17 the bottom of the washout. 4. The soil base shall be prepared free of rocks or other debris that may cause tears or holes in the plastic lining material. Removal of Temporary Concrete Washout Facilities 1.. When temporary concrete washout facilities are no longer required for the work and as washouts are filled, as determined by the Engineer, the hardened concrete shall be removed and disposed of in conformance with applicable federal, state and local regulations. Disposal of PCC dried residues, slurries or liquid waste shall be disposed of in conformance with all applicable laws and regulations. Materials used to construct temporary concrete washout facilities shall become the property of the Contractor, shall be removed from the site of the work, and shall be disposed of in conformance with all applicable laws and regulations. 2. Hales, depressions or other ground disturbance caused by the removal of the temporary concrete washout facilities shall be backfilled and repaired. 3. Inspect temporary concrete washout facilities weekly, and before and after every rainfall events. During extended rainfall events, inspect temporary concrete washout facilities at least once every 24 hours. 4. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be maintained to provide adequate holding capacity with a minimum freeboard of 4 inches for above grade facilities and 12 inches for below grade facilities. Maintaining temporary concrete washout facilities shall include removing and disposing of hardened concrete and returning the facilities to a functional condition. Hardened concrete materials shall be removed and disposed of in conformance with applicable federal, state and local regulations. 5. Existing facilities must be cleaned, or new facilities must be constructed and ready for use once the washout is 75% full. Temporary concrete washout facilities shall be inspected for damage (i.e. tears in polyethylene liner, missing sandbags, etc.). Damaged facilities shall be repaired immediately. Page 18 SANITATION Storage and Disposal Procedures 1. Ensure the containment of sanitation facilities (e.g., portable toilets) to prevent discharges of pollutants to the ground surface, storm water drainage system or receiving water. 2. Clean or replace sanitation facilities and inspect regularly for leaks and spills. 3. Temporary sanitary facilities shall be located away from drainage facilities, watercourses, and from traffic circulation. When subjected to high winds or risk, temporary sanitary facilities shall be secured to prevent overturning. 4. Wastewater shall not be discharged or buried on the construction site. 5. Sanitary and septic systems that discharge directly into sanitary sewer systems, where permissible, shall comply with the local health agency, city, county, and sewer district requirements. 6. Properly connect temporary sanitary facilities that discharge to the sanitary sewer system to avoid illicit discharges. 7. Ensure that sanitary/septic facilities are maintained in good working order by a licensed service. S. Use only reputable, licensed sanitary/septic waste haulers. 9. Clean up spills and leaks immediately. Spills and leaks shall not be covered or buried onsite. Contaminated soil shall be disposed of properly in accordance with permits, laws and regulations. 10.Inspect sanitary and septic waste facilities weekly, and before and after every rainfall events. During extended rainfall events, inspect sanitary and septic waste facilities at least once every 24 hours. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Expected construction materials to be stored on -site include steel support components, fencing, geotextile and aggregate fill material. No pollutants are known to be associated with any of these materials. The aggregate material will be protected to prevent sediment runoff during storm events. Potential pollutant sources due to construction activities include diesel fuel, gasoline and concrete slurry. 1. Diesel Fuel (30 to 100 gal) — Mobile fueling truck w/spill kit on board, no full time storage. 2. Gasoline (Less than 50 gal) - Mobile fueling truck w/spill kit on board, no full time storage. 3. Concrete Slurry — Used for final finishing on concrete equipment slabs and horizontal directional boring, volume as determined by contractor. Page 19 FUELS AND OILS Vehicles requiring refueling or lubrication shall be brought to a portion of the site away from environmentally sensitive areas (such as wetlands, storm drains, culverts, wells, etc.). All construction equipment shall be refueled at least 100 feet from a waterbody, wetland, rare species habitat, or unique natural community and in an upland area away from conveyance channels. The Contractor shall take precautions to ensure that drips, spills, or seeps do not enter the ground. The use of absorbent towels and/or a portable basin beneath the fuel tank is recommended. Refueling activities shall be performed under continual surveillance with extreme care. Where there is no reasonable alternative, refueling may occur within these setbacks, but only under the observation of the Trained Contractor and after proper precautions are taken to prevent an accidental spill. Drip pans shall be used, and a supply of absorbent pads shall be available and utilized, as required. In the event of a release, the spill shall be promptly cleaned up in accordance with the NY State spill response and clean-up procedures. On -site construction vehicles including Contractor employee vehicles shall be monitored for leaks and shall receive regular preventative maintenance to reduce the risk of leakage. Any equipment leaking oil, fuel, or hydraulic fluid shall be repaired immediately or removed from the site. Construction equipment and Contractor personal vehicles shall be parked at least 100 feet from a wetland, river, creek, stream, lake, reservoir, spring, well or other ecologically sensitive site, or existing recreational area along the proposed rights -of -way at the end of the working day except where it is necessary to maintain continuity of construction. Petroleum products and hydraulic fluids that are not in vehicles shall be stored in tightly sealed containers that are clearly labeled. All gasoline and fuel storage vessels with greater than a 25-gallon capacity must have secondary containment constructed of an impervious material and be capable of holding 110% of the vessel capacity. All state and federal regulations shall be followed for the storage, handling, application, usage, and disposal of pesticides, fertilizers, and petroleum products. Equipment shall have sufficient spill containment equipment on board to provide for prompt control and cleanup, in the event of a release. Page 20 Management of Spills and Releases: Should a fuel, oil, or chemical spill occur during the project, The Contractor shall be responsible for reporting the spill or release to the NYSDEC Spill Hotline 1-800-457- 7362 as applicable, within two hours of the release. Contactor is also responsible for any and all response actions. Any contaminated soil shall be removed from the worksite and disposed of in accordance with product specific MSDS and NYSDEC guidance. Petroleum spills that do not need to be reported, are those that meet the following criteria: 1. The quantity is known to be less than 5 gallons; and 2. The spill is contained and under the control of the spiller; and 3. The spill has not and will not reach the State's water or any land (A spill is cons idered to have not impacted land if it occurs on a paved surface such as asphalt or concrete. A spill in a dirt or gravel parking lot is considered to have impacted land and is reportable.); and 4. The spill is cleaned up within 2 hours of discovery. CONCRETE SLURRY The use of concrete slurry for directional boring is a fluid -assisted excavation technique that uses a semi -liquid mix to improve drilling effectiveness. It is used in horizontal directional drilling (HDD) to create pilot boreholes. Slurry boring can stabilize borehole walls as well as remove suspended spoil from the excavation site. In addition to directional boring concrete slurry is used to provide a surficial finish to the concrete equipment slabs. Slurry Management: Plan: Contractor is to provide and adhere to a written Slurry Management Plan, using but not limited to tools and techniques (CSDA-BP-001, 10/24/2017) listed below: 1. Determine the 'low point' of the specific work area to potentially let gravity assist the flow of the water/slurry and minimize the use of pumps. 2. Restrict access to the worksite as needed to minimize hazards associated with the water/slurry and/or RCS exposure. Clearly post appropriate hazard signs. 3. Use polyurethane sheets or tarps to protect surfaces from slurry splash/spray. 4. Collection and control — wet/slurry vacuums, shrouds/slurry collection rings, wands, squeegees, troughs/socks/bags/'pig' to direct flow and pumps dewatering, semi -trash or trash pumps). Page 21 5. For small to mid -sized vacuums in rough terrain, the slurry could possibly splash past the ball float and damage the vacuum motor. The size of the vacuum tank could be a limitation on the weight of a full vacuum. Slurry can sometimes foam up and the bubbles or slurry mist (both may be abrasive) can get past the ball float and damage the vacuum motors. Some slurry vacuums offer nylon or other filters to protect the motors to minimize the damage from abrasive mist/foam. Sometimes a surfactant can be added to the vacuum to minimize the foaming. Another alternative is using a super absorbent polymer in the vacuum drum that can solidify/gel the slurry as it is being collected to minimize sloshing and splashing of the slurry/water in the drum. F. Thick paste slurries can be diluted with water to help the vacuum suck up the liquid. 6. Drum vacuum heads using standard 55-gallon drums are very common to minimize the number of times the slurry is transferred (simply move the vacuum head to another drum). The drums can be used to help facilitate the settling of the slurry to recycle the water and later handling the sludge. 7. Large vacuum trucks and other mobile devices are available to handle large amounts of slurry on road jobs. Some large systems utilize centrifuges to separate out the solids from the water in the slurry so the water can be treated for disposal or recycled. S. Flocculants can be used to accelerate the settling time in recycling the water by quickly separating the solids. Flocculants require some level of agitation of the slurry to mix in the floc to properly drop out the solids from the slurry. If the slurry is thick and pasty, additional water can be added to allow the floc to mix thoroughly in the slurry and to help drop more of the solids out of the slurry. It seems counter intuitive, but the additional water will separate back out and pull out more water from the original slurry, potentially creating an even more concentrated slurry. Air bubblers can be Used to stir in the floc in lieu of mixers. 9. Recycling slurry water. The water might have a high Ph, which could potentially damage equipment so it might be worth monitoring the pH level and adding an acid to lower the pH. Note high pH alkaline solutions can be irritating to the skin. Typically, a 9-1/2 pH is the threshold for a ground dump and typically 12.5 or more is considered hazardous. In 55-gallon drums, a large drill mixer can be used to mix in the floc and as solids sink the water can be transferred (or decanted) out using a small dewatering pump or a wet vacuum with a wand. 4n larger tanks or truck vacuums, a cascading system of weirs can be used to get a larger volume of clean water available faster. The weir system acts as a Page 22 series of individual settling tanks. Only the cleanest of the water out of the slurry,in each tank is able to flow over the weir into the next tank in the series. 10.Storage of slurry. The slurry can be stored in pits, tanks, drums or other structures using liners. Be certain the structure can handle the weight of the slurry. Have a plan for handling potential leaks. 55-gallon drums are very common, and the water can be decanted off after settling. Drum dollies help move the barrels. Drums can be strapped to a pallet so a forklift or pallet jack can be used to move them around the jobsite. 11. Filter presses can be used to process slurry to squeeze out the clean water and leave cakes/bricks for disposal of the solids from the slurry. The water can be recycled. Some filter presses work more efficiently when the slurry is pretreated with a flocculent. The floc will increase the particle size in the slurry so the small openings in the filter press are more open and less susceptible to being plugged up. 12.Surfactants will make the water 'wetter' and reduce the surface tension on the water droplets. This makes the water more effective at dust control and can sometimes reduce the amount of water needed. 13.Spoil and staging areas maybe provided by the owner for temporary storage. 14.Regardless of how the slurry is collected or stored on the jobsite, plan for where and how the slurry will be properly disposed of. 15.Hauling slurry. If you decant to water prior to moving, you will be hauling less weight and volume. The liquid's center of gravity shifts as it moved during transport. In large tanks or trucks, a large shift in the center of gravity can be potentially dangerous. One technique to handle sloshing liquid is to put baffles in the tank. 16.Vacuum truck services are available in many areas. For some jobs it might be worth considering subcontracting a waste hauler/super sucker truck. 17.Some concrete batch plants will accept slurry. 18.Slurry can be solidified and treated as solid waste. Large dewatering/filter bags in a tank with a drain can allow the water to slowly drain out of the slurry. The solids remain in the bag for disposal. Settling pits or tanks can allow solids in the slurry to settle out and the water can evaporate or be decanted. Cascading tanks or weirs can be used to allow the solids to settle out of the water (used more in dynamic water flow scenarios whereby water is being continually recirculated). A filter press can be used to press out the water from the slurry and create a solid cake/brick. Flocculants can speed up the process of separating solids in slurry. Super Absorbent Polymers (SAPs) can be used to Page 23 absorb the water and dry out slurry. The SAPs have been shown to pass a paint filter test (PFT) method 9095B, which is a key consideration for disposing in a solid waste landfill. The alkalinity of slurry and some dissolved elements in the slurry can reduce the effectiveness of the SAPS, thus requiring more than a theoretical ideal amount to be used, or the slurry can be pretreated to make it more efficient with the SAP. 5.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Temporary erosion and sedimentation controls will be implemented during construction. These measures are presented in detail in the attached Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan within the plan set and are based upon the New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (Nov 2016): 1. Stabilized Construction Entrance: Install gravel entrance pursuant to construction details provided in the location indicated in the plans. To remain in place and functional for the duration of construction activities. 2. Silt Fencing: Silt fencing to be installed as per the silt fencing plan and associated details. Silt fencing to be inspected daily for damaged or failing sections. Silt fencing to be installed between graded and undisturbed areas to prevent sediment from entering the undisturbed areas or adjacent water bodies or runoff conveyances i.e. culverts). 3. Concrete Washout: Concrete washout areas are to be constructed and installed per the details provided and located adjacent to those areas where substantial concrete work is being performed (i.e. slabs). 4. Top Soil Stockpile: Enclose perimeter of stockpile with silt fencing and vegetative matting or cover. Locate the stockpile away from streams, ditches or other water bodies. 5. Site Stabilization: Any disturbed areas of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased for more than 14 days shall be stabilized with vegetative cover. Winter stabilization can be done using mulch or other Engineer approved products. 5.3 PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES Surface Stabilization: Stabilization of exposed disturbed soils following construction will be accomplished with grass and/or mulch. Page 24 6.0 CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION 6.1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND SEQUENCE The general site notes and anticipated construction sequence for the site improvements consist of the following: 6.1.a. GENERAL NOTES 1. One week prior to beginning earthwork operations, a pre -construction meeting will be held to discuss the erosion and sediment control plan and to finalize the paperwork for the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, as specified in the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Construction Activities. 2. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be provided prior to beginning any land disturbance activities. The devices providing protection to a given area shall not be removed until the disturbed lands in that area are stabilized. 3. No disturbed area shall remain exposed for more than 14 days, except for portions of the site in which work will be continuous beyond 14 days. 6.1.b. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. Stakeout entire limits of disturbance (LOD) for project at site. 2. Install 12' wide x 50' long (min.) stabilized construction access. 3. Control dust on site to prevent dust leaving the site and creating off -site damage, health hazards, and traffic safety problems. Treatment includes but is not limited to spraying disturbed soil surfaces with water. 4. Install perimeter silt fence and any required tree protection as indicated in the plans and around any other ground disturbances within the project area. 5. Clear and grub site as needed within the LOD. 6. Strip topsoil and stockpile on -site in the designated location with perimeter silt fencing. Once complete, add vegetative seeding if stockpile is to remain in place for prolonged period of time. 7. Perform earthwork cut/fill activities and contouring in accordance with approved Drainage and Grading Plans. S. Perform roadside utility trenching, install invert bedding, and compact per specifications, install conduits and piping. Backfill and compact trench to grade. 9. Excavate and rough grade any roadside collector and divertor swales. Install temporary stabilization measures on the banks and flowline. 10.Cut roadbed and deposit excavated material in the designated stockpile area. Page 25 11.Perform soil restoration for all areas outside of roadbed, for all temporary construction access road segments and gravel staging/stockpile areas, that will be converted to pervious cover in post -construction conditions. Soil restoration includes deep ripping the subsoil to a minimum depth of 12-inches, mixing 3- Inches of compost into the subsoil, and spreading 6-Inches of topsoil to the site. Seed/Sod and mulch disturbed areas. No connection to the proposed downstream basins can be made until all upstream construction has been completed and stabilized with a vigorous vegetative cover established over all the pervious surfaces of the drainage basin. 12.Final grade and contour the swales and any area outside the roadbed. Install check dams, weirs, culverts and other drainage structures if and where indicated on the plans. 13.lnstall inlet and outlet protection measures where indicated on the plans. 14.Compact roadbed subgrade as needed and install sub -base for entire length of access drive. 15.Haui-off excess excavated materials from the stockpile(s) to state approved solid waste facility. 16.Grade and contour the proposed compound area. Install temporary stabilization measures (ie matting, mulch, etc.) 17.Construct concrete wash -out in compound area. 18.Install monopole foundation, concrete equipment pads, support piers for ice bridge and perimeter fencing. 19.Remove Concrete wash -out facility once all concrete work is complete. 20.Perform soil restoration for the gravel staging/stockpile areas, that will be converted to pervious cover in post -construction conditions. 21.Install monopole, antennas, and other aerial or ground equipment. 22.Install gravel surface treatment for compound. 23.Install access drive surface course. 24.Remove construction entrance. 25.Install asphaltic final surface course on the entrance apron and any pavement extension. 26.Remove sediment from all silt fencing and inlet protection where necessary. Page 26 27.Remove all temporary erosion control methods when contributing drainage areas have reached final stabilization. 28.Install remaining permanent stabilization measures (ie mulching, seeding etc.) for any remaining disturbed areas. 6.2 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Refer to the Site Erosion Control Plan for guidelines concerning the inspection and maintenance procedures for the erosion and sediment control facilities. A Construction Site Inspection and Maintenance Log Book (Appendix A) is included with the SWPPP for inspections to be performed during construction. In addition to the Log Book, a Pre -Construction Site Assessment Checklist (Appendix A) is to be completed per the attached instructions. 6.2.a. SITE INSPECTIONS 1. The operator shall have a qualified professional conduct an assessment of the site prior to the commencement of construction and certify in an inspection report that the appropriate erosion and sediment controls described in the SWPPP have been adequately installed or implemented to ensure overall preparedness of the site for the commencement of construction. Following the commencement of construction, site inspections shall be conducted by the qualified professional at least every 7 calendar days for projects with less than 5 acres of ground disturbance. If more than 5 acres are disturbed at any time these inspections will be conducted twice during the seven calendar daytime period, with a minimum separation of 2 full calendar days. If construction has been temporarily suspended and temporary stabilization measures have been applied to all disturbed areas, the site inspection cycles may be reduced to once every (30) thirty calendar days, after written notification has been made to the DOW Water Program Contact at the regional office. During each inspection, the qualified professional shall record the required information. 2. The purpose of site inspections is to assess performance of pollutant controls. Based on these inspections, the Owner/Developer designated qualified professional may ascertain whether or not it is necessary to modify the Final SWPPP, add or relocate sediment barriers, or take whatever actions are deemed prudent to prevent pollutants from leaving the site via storm water Page 27 runoff. The contractor is required to ensure any damaged ES&C measures are repaired, modified or replaced in order to safeguard their functionality. 3. The operator shall maintain a record of all inspection reports (Appendix 1) in a site logbook. The site log book shall be maintained on -site and be made available to the permitting authority upon request. Prior to commencement of construction, the operator shall certify in the site logbook that the SWPPP meets all Federal, State and local erosion and sediment control requirements. In addition, the qualified professional shall complete monthly summaries of the compliance status of the site. The summaries of the site inspection activities will be stored on -site by the operator on a monthly basis. 6.2.b. MAINTENANCE 1. During construction, the contractor will be responsible for inspecting and maintaining the permanent and temporary erosion control facilities. Also, areas that have been seeded will be inspected regularly after seed germination to ensure complete coverage of exposed areas. 2. The operator shall initiate stabilization measures as soon as practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction activity in the portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. This requirement does not apply in the following instances: a. Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction activity temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by snow cover orfrozen ground conditions, stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable. b. Where construction activity on a portion of the site is temporarily ceased the application of soil stabilization measures must be initiated by the end of the next business day and completed within fourteen 14) days from the date the current soil disturbance activity ceased. C. Where construction activity associated with the footprint of the proposed development has temporarily ceased, temporary stabilization measures need not be initiated on that portion of the site. 3. Inspections of all devices should be completed weekly and after each rainfall event. Repairs should be completed immediately upon discovery. Page 28 6.3. REVISIONS TO THE SWPPP Based on construction activities and the results of inspections, changes to the erosion and sediment control plan are expected and shall be documented using the Report Form for Changes in Pollution Prevention Plan Appendix B). 6.4 MAINTENANCE OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 6.4.a.OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Post -construction inspections and maintenance shall be performed by the owner. Inspections and maintenance forthe various site components and stormwater management facilities shall be performed in accordance with the accompanying project plans and this SWPPP. A summary of the stormwater management system inspection and maintenance parameters is provided in Table 6.5.a below. Maintenance of the proposed stormwater facilities consist primarily of monthly mowing of the roadside swales and shoulders in order to maintain a grass height of 4 to 6 inches. It also includes monthly trash/debris removal from the catchment areas, although for this type of project those activities are expected to be minimal. 6.4.b.SEDIMENT MONITORING AND REMOVAL PRACTICES Any proposed stormwater ponds and/or swales utilized as temporary sediment basins or traps during construction shall be inspected at least every seven calendar days for accumulated buildup of sediment. Accumulated sediment buildup in excess of 50% capacity or 1/3 the height of the compost sock trap shall be removed off -site and any damages to the sediment basin/trap will be repaired immediately upon discovery. For those ponds or swale areas, where a geofilter fabric has been installed as a temporary surface protection to prevent clogging of the underlying soils; the fabric shall be replaced each time accumulated sediment has to be removed. Page 29 Table S.S. a.: General Site Post -Construction Inspection and Maintenance Maintenance Item Frequency Description of Inspection Parameters Description of Remedy Procedures Site Structures Annual & Accumulated sediment, debris and Remove After Major litter in outfall structures and drain Storms basins Damage of storm structures or associated Replace and/or repair, as necessary components Accumulation of pollutants, including oils Remove pollutants from catch basins. or grease, in drain basins Replace and/or repair pollutant source. Pavement Biannual/ Accumulated sediment in paved areas Remove (sweep min. 2 times/year) Annual Accumulated debris and litter Remove Embankments Annual Differential settlement of embankments Stabilize and restore to original specs Embankment erosion Stabilize and restore to original specs Animal burrows Remove Cracking, bulging, or sliding of Stabilize and restore to original specs embankment Grass and Annual Vegetation: 80% coverage + less than Restore original specs Landscaped areas 25% invasive plant species Unauthorized plantings Remove Undesirable vegetative growth Maw a min. of 3 times/year. May increase Accumulated debris and litter Remove Winter Maintenance Monthly Accumulation of snow and ice on catch Remove basins, inlet and outlet structures, and end sections Stock piied snow near inlets and outlets Remove Remaining deicing materials Remove in early spring by sweeping Swales Monthly Erosion of side slopes Stabilize and restore to original specs Formation of rills or gullies Repair and restore to original specs Excess grass growth Mow Undesirable vegetative growth Remove Accumulated debris, litter, or sediment Remove Residual deicing materials (sand) Remove & replace any damaged vegetation Page 30 APPENDIX A CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION LOG BOOK AND SITE ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST APPENDIX I CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LOG BOOK STATE POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CONSTRUCTION SITE LOG BOOK Table of Contents I. Pre -Construction Meeting Documents a. Preamble to Site Assessment and Inspections b. Pre -Construction Site Assessment Checklist II. Construction Duration Inspections a. Directions b. Modification to the SWPPP November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control 1. PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING DOCUMENTS Project Name Permit No. Date of Authorization Name of Operator Prime Contractor a. Preamble to Site Assessment and Inspections The Following Information To Be Read By All Person's Involved in The Construction of Stormwater Re- lated Activities: The Operator agrees to have a qualified inspector] conduct an assessment of the site prior to the commence- ment of construction and certify in this inspection report that the appropriate erosion and sediment controls described in the SWPPP have been adequately installed or implemented to ensure overall preparedness of the site for the commencement of construction. Prior to the commencement of construction, the Operator shall certify in this site logbook that the SWPPP has been prepared in accordance with the State's standards and meets all Federal, State and local erosion and sediment control requirements. A preconstruction meeting should be held to review all of the SWPPP requirements with construction personnel. When construction starts, site inspections shall be conducted by the qualified inspector at least every 7 cal- endar days. The Operator shall maintain a record of all inspection reports in this site logbook. The site log- book shall be maintained on site and be made available to the permitting authorities upon request. Prior to filing the Notice of Termination or the end of permit term, the Operator shall have a qualified in- spector perform a final site inspection. The qualified inspector shall certify that the site has undergone final stabilization3 using either vegetative or structural stabilization methods and that all temporary erosion and sediment controls (such as silt fencing) not needed for long-term erosion control have been removed. In addition, the Operator must identify and certify that all permanent structures described in the SWPPP have been constructed and provide the owner(s) with an operation and maintenance plan that ensures the struc- tures) continuously functions as designed. I Refer to "Qualified Inspector" inspection requirements in the current SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activity for complete list of inspection requirements. 2 "Commencement of construction" means the initial removal of vegetation and disturbance of soils associated with clearing, grading or excavating activities or other construction activities. 3 "Final stabilization" means that all soil -disturbing activities at the)site have been completed and a uniform, perennial vegetative cover with a density of eighty (80) percent has been established or equivalent stabilization measures (such as the use of mulches or geotextiles) have been employed on all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent struc- tures. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control b. Pre -construction Site Assessment Checklist NOTE: Provide comments below as necessary) 1. Notice of Intent, S WPPP, and Contractors Certification: Yes No NA Has a Notice of Intent been filed with the NYS Department of Conservation? Is the SWPPP on -site? Where? Is the Plan current? What is the latest revision date? Is a copy of the NOT (with brief description) onsite? Where? Have all contractors involved with storinwater related activities signed a contractor's certification? 2. Resource Protection Yes No NA Are construction limits clearly flagged or fenced? Important trees and associated rooting zones, on -site septic system absorption fields, existing vegetated areas suitable for filter strips, especially in perimeter areas, have been flagged for protection. Creek crossings installed prior to Iand-disturbing activity, including clearing and blasting. 3. Surface Water Protection Yes No NA Clean stonnwater runoff has been diverted from areas to be disturbed. Bodies of water located either on site or in the vicinity of the site have been identified and protected. Appropriate practices to protect on -site or downstream surface water are installed. Are clearing and grading operations divided into areas <5 acres? 4. Stabilized Construction Access Yes No NA A temporary construction entrance to capture mud and debris from construction vehicles before they enter the public highway has been installed. Other access areas (entrances, construction routes, equipment parking areas) are stabilized immediately as work takes place with gravel or other cover. Sediment tracked onto public streets is removed or cleaned on a regular basis. 5. Sediment Controls Yes No NA Silt fence material and installation comply with the standard drawing and specifications. Silt fences are installed at appropriate spacing intervals Sediment/detention basin was installed as first land disturbing activity. Sediment traps and barriers are installed. 6. Pollution Prevention for Waste and Hazardous Materials Yes No NA L ] L ] [ ] The Operator or designated representative has been assigned to implement the spill prevention avoidance and response plan. The plan is contained in the S WPPP on page Appropriate materials to control spills are onsite. Where? November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control 11. CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS a. Directions: Inspection Forms will be filled out during the entire construction phase of the project. Required Elements: 1) On a site map, indicate the extent of all disturbed site areas and drainage pathways. Indicate site areas that are expected to undergo initial disturbance or significant site work within the next 14-day period; 2) Indicate on a site neap all areas of the site that have undergone temporary or permanent stabilization; 3) Indicate all disturbed site areas that have not undergone active site work during the previous 14-day period; 4) Inspect all sediment control practices and record the approximate degree of sediment accumulation as a percentage of sediment storage volume (for example, 10 percent, 20 percent, 50 percent); 5) Inspect all erosion and sediment control practices and record all maintenance requirements such as verifying the integrity of barrier or diversion systems (earthen berms or silt fencing) and containment systems (sediment basins and sediment traps). Identify any evidence of rill or gully erosion occurring on slopes and any loss of stabilizing vegetation or seeding/mulching. Document any excessive deposition of sediment or pending water along barrier or diversion systems. Record the depth of sediment within containment structures, any erosion near outlet and overflow structures, and verify the ability of rock filters around perforated riser pipes to pass water; and 6) Immediately report to the Operator any deficiencies that are identified with the implementation of the SWPPP. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Inspector (print name) Qualified Inspector (print name) SITE PLAN/SKETCH Date of Inspection Page I of Qualified Inspector Signature The above signed acknowledges that, to the best of his/her knowledge, all information provided on the forms is accurate and complete. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Page 2 of Maintaining Water Quality Yes No NA Is there an increase in turbidity causing a substantial visible contrast to natural conditions at the outfalls? Is there residue from oil and floating substances, visible oil film, or globules or grease at the outfalls? All disturbance is within the limits of the approved plans. Have receiving lake/bay, stream, and/or wetland been impacted by silt from project? Housekeeping 1. General Site Conditions Yes No NA Is construction site litter, debris and spoils appropriately managed? Are facilities and equipment necessary for implementation of erosion and sediment control in working order and/or properly maintained? Is construction impacting the adjacent property? Is dust adequately controlled? 2. Temporary Stream Crossing Yes No NA Maximum diameter pipes necessary to span creek without dredging are installed. Installed non -woven geotextile fabric beneath approaches. Is fill composed of aggregate (no earth or soil)? Rock on approaches is clean enough to remove mud from vehicles & prevent sediment from entering stream during high flow. 3. Stabilized Construction Access Yes No NA Stone is clean enough to effectively remove mud from vehicles. Installed per standards and specifications? Does all traffic use the stabilized entrance to enter and leave site? Is adequate drainage provided to prevent ponding at entrance? Runoff Control Practices 1. Excavation Dewatering Yes No NA Upstream and downstream berms (sandbags, inflatable dams, etc.) are installed per plan. C ] C ] [ ] Clean water from upstream pool is being pumped to the downstream pool. Sediment laden water from work area is being discharged to a silt -trapping device. Constructed upstream berm with one -foot minimum freeboard. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Page 3 of Runoff Control Practices (continued) 2. Flow Spreader Yes No NA Installed per plan. Constructed on undisturbed soil, not on fill, receiving only clear, non -sediment laden flow. Flow sheets out of level spreader without erosion on downstream edge. 3. Interceptor Dikes and Swales Yes No NA Installed per plan with minimum side slopes 2H:1V or flatter. Stabilized by geotextile fabric, seed, or mulch with no erosion occurring. Sediment -laden runoff directed to sediment trapping structure 4. Stone Check Dam Yes No NA Is channel stable? (flow is not eroding soil underneath or around the structure). Check is in good condition (rocks in place and no permanent pools behind the structure). Has accumulated sediment been removed?. 5. Rock Outlet Protection Yes No NA Installed per plan. Installed concurrently with pipe installation. Soil Stabilization 1. Topsoil and Spoil Stockpiles Yes No NA Stockpiles are stabilized with vegetation and/or mulch. L ] L ] L ] Sediment control is installed at the toe of the slope. 2. Revegetation Yes No NA Temporary seedings and mulch have been applied to idle areas. 4 inches minimum of topsoil has been applied under permanent seedings Sediment Control Practices 1. Silt Fence and Linear Barriers Yes No NA L ] [ ] C ] Installed on Contour, 10 feet from toe of slope (not across conveyance channels). Joints constructed by wrapping the two ends together for continuous support. Fabric buried 6 inches minimum. Posts are stable, fabric is tight and without rips or frayed areas. Sediment accumulation is % of design capacity. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS Page 4 of Sediment Control Practices (continued) 2. Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Use for Stone & Block; Filter Fabric; Curb; or, Excavated; Filter Sock or Manufactured practices) Yes No NA Installed concrete blocks lengthwise so open ends face outward, not upward. Placed wire screen between No. 3 crushed stone and concrete blocks. Drainage area is lacre or less. Excavated area is 900 cubic feet. Excavated side slopes should be 2:1. 2" x 4" frame is constructed and structurally sound. Posts 3-foot maximum spacing between posts. Fabric is embedded 1 to 1.5 feet below ground and secured to frame/posts with staples at max 8- inch spacing. Posts are stable, fabric is tight and without rips or frayed areas. Manufactured insert fabric is free of tears and punctures. Filter Sock is not torn or flattened and fill material is contained within the mesh sock. Sediment accumulation _% of design capacity. 3. Temporary Sediment Trap Yes No NA Outlet structure is constructed per the approved plan or drawing. Geotextile fabric has been placed beneath rock fill. Sediment trap slopes and disturbed areas are stabilized. Sediment accumulation is % of design capacity. 4. Temporary Sediment Basin Yes No NA Basin and outlet structure constructed per the approved plan. Basin side slopes are stabilized with seed/mulch. Drainage structure flushed and basin surface restored upon removal of sediment basin facility. Sediment basin dewatering pool is dewatering at appropriate rate. Sediment accumulation is % of design capacity. Note: Not all erosion and sediment control practices are included in this listing. Add additional pages to this list as required by site specific design. All practices shall be maintained in accordance with their respective standards. Construction inspection checklists for post -development stormwater management practices can be found in Appendix F of the New York Stonnwater Management Design Manual. November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control CONSTRUCTION DURATION INSPECTIONS b. Modifications to the SWPPP (To be completed as described below) The Operator shall amend the SWPPP whenever: 1. There is a significant change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which may have a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the United States and which has not otherwise been addressed in the SWPPP; or 2. The SWPPP proves to be ineffective in: a. Eliminating or significantly minimizing pollutants from sources identified in the SWPPP and as required by this permit; or b. Achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storinwater discharges from permitted construction activity; and 3. Additionally, the SWPPP shall be amended to identify any new contractor or subcontractor that will implement any measure of the SWPPP. Modification & Reason: November 2016 New York State Standards and Specifications For Erosion and Sediment Control APPENDIX B CORRECTIVE ACTION AND SWPPP AMENDMENT LOGS 3 a 0 a v O Z O c u C2- O Q La aQ o a i r a c r n. tinc o O u qjQ v a . a a O Z O- C a O U Q a7 Ua O U aU 45 a n LC1 C m O C a CL Ln d a ro Z L O u aa a v Q O Ua Q. APPENDIX C SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SITE CONSTRUCTION PLANS: This SWPPP has been prepared in conjunction with the site Zoning/Development Plans titled SUNNY VIEW, as prepared by Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C., dated 02/16/2024, Specifically referenced are the sub -set of sheets ESC-1 thru ESC-7. A copy of the plans are to be kept on -site with this document pursuant to Section 1.5. and considered as an essential supporting document under separate cover. APPENDIX D NRCS SOILS MAPPING 42° 2454" N I 42° 24' 35' N Hydrologic Soil Group —Tompkins County, New York ry n 3B04W 3865M 3B0600 39MM W40 3 S h Map Sizzle: 1:2,W iF printed on A portrait {85' x 11") sheet. Meter N 0 40 80 160 240 Aa 1ao zao aao rr Mapprojedion: Web Mercator Correr000rdinates:WGS84 Edge ti6: UTM Zone 18N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 42° 24'54"N I 42' 24' 35" N MIC 38C 3 2/ 1312024 Page 1 of 4 z 0 a O LL z CL z w 0 w J a a O U O O -0CUNy U E RL E m y E @ N c o= CD 75 a L Of EE' t NN C OL N p N E c1 O d .LN-• u) m E cpc CD a) Nc 'O l0 c m a ai R W E c U N co L co N N N O y p L E Al y E w y No G E n a N V (D 6Lcoo C.,)7L, y m N U) y y NyO y C? L C N O O Q L.• w .: C N 07 C7 c N p l6 E dW vUi O O f6 o 0 0 UZ O N L L y d 0 ac `m Y d C N a 00 m L° I In o L) a CYf o a lC ro LE5 E L O N N d C v U O C) N O E 7i (fl N O In 41 0 9 0 C c m Ci CID 0 E -a cGG5 CDN77 U7 0S 0- b aj N A.• •N y CDROo NQ7 C aOCODRCO l0— O> 0 1N3 O a roZ 1 EQ OO Wv N y yD •N p r U UI m G7 O y, 7 L aT1 N R ?, 5N {0 L6 7 1NCLdK- r- TO Co p; 3 a m E o m a m E E eo'o c E r: c o w m o m¢ m Ro c 0 a a°o yy CDN Eo mc v EL 0Em iE d E vJ U a Q m H o co (' co c v Fes- 0 .E y mm c N L a Cc v m E dm O O o 0 c r a m d' `O m m U C) z m to C y q o o R Ld CL b c Y m m m ma ro ca Q N y Oc Oc d NC O O O o m m m a a c m w aco a° o o c n n o o a° c a d¢ m rn¢ c a m m c) is z O, ¢ 3 L m m ca U z a, ¢ a m m c Q cf) Kr It04 — O O N N C2 Qy r CV d am Z US mz 6'I Hydrologic Soil Group —Tompkins County, New York Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOl Ab Alluvial land A1D 0.2 1.6% EbC Erie channery silt loam, D 0.2 1.7% 8 to 15 percent slopes Ern Eel silt loam B/D 0.6 4.5% HsC3 2.6Hudsonsiltyclayloam, CID 20.1 % 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded HzE CID 8.9HudsonandDunkirk 70.1% soils, 20 to 45 percent slopes Langford channery silt 0.0 0.1 % LaB D loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Ws Wayland soils complex, B/D 0.2 1.9% 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded Totals for Area of Interest 12.7 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/1312024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Tompkins County, New York Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (AID, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or CID), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff., None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources web Soil Survey 2/13/2024 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX E STORMWATER RUNOFF CALCULATIONS FOR BASIC SWPPP E.1. Rainfall, Area Tabulations and Curve Number Calculations E.2. Pre -Developed Conditions Runoff Hydrographs E.3. Post -Developed Conditions Runoff Hydrographs E.4. Tabulated Results and Summary E.I. Rainfall, Area Tabulations and Curve Number Calculations E1.a. Rainfall Tables E2.b. Area Tabulations and Curve Number Calculations E1.a. Rainfall Tables NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 10, Version 3 Location name: Ithaca, New York, USA' Latitude: 42.4127', Longitude: 76.4504'. Elevation: 824 ft** source: ESRI Maps * rsource: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Sandra Pavlovic, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Arlan Wilhite NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphics i Maps & aerials PF tabular FPDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)i Average recurrence interval (years) Duration 1 2 5 14 25 50 i00 200 500 1006 0.296 0.362 0.470 0.560 7F 0.683 0.775 7F 0.873 0.986 1.15 1.295-min 0.240-0.362) 0.293-0.443) 0,379-0.577) 0.448-0.692) 0.526-0.889) 0.583.1.03) 0.635-1.22) 0.671-1,41) 0,749-1,71) 0.8171.96) 0.420 0.513 D,666 D,793 0.968 1.10 1.24 1.40 7.63 1.8310-min 0.340-0.512) 0.415-0.627) 0.537-0,818) 0.635-0.980) 0.745-1.26) 0.826.1.46) 0.900-1.72) 0.951-1.99) 1,06-2,42) 1,16-2,77) 0.494 0.604 0.784 D.933 1.14 1.29 1.46 1.64 1.92 2.1515-ruin 0.400-0.603) 0.488-0.738) 0.631-0.962) 0.747-1.15) 1(0.877-1.48) 0.973.1.72 1.06-2.03) 1 (1,12-2.34) 1,25-2,85) 1 (1.36-3.26) 0.671 0.820 1.06 1.27 1.54 1.75 1.97 2.23 2.60 2.92 30-min 0.543-0.819) 0.663-1.00) 0.857-1.31) 1 (1,01-1.56) 1.19-2,01 1.32-2.34) 1 (1.44-2.75) 1.52-3,18) 1,69-3,86) 1.854.42) 0.848 1.04 1.34 1.60 1,95 2,21 7F 2.49 28-1­11 3.29 11 3.6860-min 0.687-1.04) 1 (0.838-1.27) 1.08-1.65) 1.28-1.98) 1 (1.50-2.54) 11(1.66-2.95) 1 (1.81-3.47) 1.92-4.01) 2.144.87) 1 (2,33-5.58) 1.06 1.2T 1.61 1.89 2,28 2.56 2.87 3.24 3.80 4.272-hr 0,863-1,28) 1.03-1,54) 1.30-1,96) 1.52-2,32) 1,77-2.94) 1.94-3.41) 1 (2.11-3.99) 2.22-4.59) 1 (2.48-5.60) 1(2.71-6.43) 1.19 1.42 1.79 2.09 2.51 11 2.82 3.16 3.57 4.19 4.723-hr 0.976-1.44) 1 (1,16-1.72) 1 (1,45-2.17) 1 (1,69-2.56) 1.963.24) 11 (2.15-3.74) 1 (2.334.38) 2.44-5.04) 1 (2.74-6.15) 3.007.09) 1.44 1.72 1 2.18 2.56 3.08 3,46 3.88 4.4D 5.19 5.886-hr 1.19-1.73) 1.42-2.07 1.78-2.63) 2.08-3.10) 1 (2.41-3.95) 2.654.56 2.88-5.36) 3.02-6.17) 3.41-7.58) 3.75-878) 1,72 2.08 2,69 3.19 3,89 4.40 4.95 5.64 6.70 7.6112-hr 1,42-2.04) 1.72-2.49) 2,22-3.22) 2.61-3.85) 1 (3.064,96) 3.38-5.76) 1 (3.69-6.81) 3.89-7.86) 4.40-9.71) 4.87-11,3) 24«hr 1.57-02.38 2. 5 2792 2.67 3284) 1 (3.174561) 3. 3-5 97} 4. 3 6496 4.52 8.25) 4.7679954) 1 (5.41-i111.8 5. 8313.7 2.32 2.84 3,69 4,4D 5,37 s,08 6,86 7.82 9.30 10.fi 2-day 1.95-2.73) 2.38-3.35) 3.08-4.36) 1 (3.64-5.23) 1 (4,28-6.76) 4.73-7.87) 1 (5.16-9.32) 5.44-10.8) 6.16-13.3) 6.81-15.5) 11 3-day 2.14 2598) 2,61• 1 , 64) 3. 5 4071 3. 5-5.63) 4.62 7825) 5.161 8443) 5.56 9?97 5. 5401.5 6.62--14.2 7.31- 6.5 2.74 3-.327F 4.26 5A3 6.11 6.90 7,76 1 8.82 10.5 11.94-day 2.32-3.20) 2.80-3.88) 3.57-5.00) 4.20-5.95) 4,89-7.64) 5.39-8,86) 1 (5.86-10.5) 6.16-12.1) 6.95-14.9) 7,87-17.3) 12.8 7-day 2.79 3 81 J 3. 04 53 4. 35971 4.79 6?72) 5. 2 8.50) 6.04 9081) 6.51-611.5) 6.80 13.2) 1 (7.6016.1) 1(8.30- 8.5 3.82 4.45 5.48 6.34 7.52 8.39 9.33 10.4 12,1 13.4 10-day 3.25-4.42) 3.79-5.16 4.64-6.38) 1 (5.33-7.42) 1 (6.06-9.26) 6.59-10.6) 1 Q.05-12.3 7.33-14.1) 8.07-17,0) 8,72-19.4) 5.51 6.19 7.30 8.23 9,50 10,5 11.5 12.5 14.0 15.1 20-day 4.72-6.33) 5.30-7.12) 6.22-8.44) 1 (6.96-9.57) 7.69-11.6 8.23-13.0) 8.62-14.8) 8.86-16.8 9.40-19.5)9.85-Z1.7 6.92 7,66 8.86 9.85 11.2 12.3 13.3 14.4 15.7 16.8 30-day 5.96-7.93) 6.58-8.78) 7.58-10.2) 1 (8.36-11.4) 1 (9.10-13,5) 9.66-15.2) 1 (10.0-17,1) 10,2-19,2) 1 (10,6-21,9) 10.9-23.9) 6,68 9,49 10.8 71.9 13.4 14.6 15,8 16,8 18.2 45-day 7.50-9.90) 8.19-10.8) 9.29-12.4) 1 (10.2-13.7) 1 (10.9-16.1) 11,5-17,9) 1 (11.8-20,0) 12.0-22.4) 1 (12.3-25.1) 12.5-27.1 10,7 71.0 12,5 13.7 15.3 16.6 17,9 19.0 20.4 1 27,3 60-day 8.79-11.5) 9.54-12.6) 10.7-14.3) 11.7-15.7) 12.5-18.3) 13.1-20.3) 13.4-22.6) 13.6-25.2) 13.8-28.1j 13.9-30.2) t Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAAAtlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. I PC a 5 PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 42.4127'. Longitude:-76,4504' C C C C C a, 1 E E E L t .0 L t N A 6 1 V y U -y y D O -OU-y A O O a N OLADuration N rl t l0 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Average recurrence interval (years) NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 10, Version 3 Created (GMT}. Thu Feb 15 12:49.17 2024 Sack to Top Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence interval years) 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Duration 5-min 2-day 10-nrn 3-day 15-mm 4-day 30-min 7--day 60-min 10-day 2-hr 20-day 3-hr 30-day 6fir 45-day 12-hr Wday 24-hr This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use noyaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Mf/ka,ca 4ii U"I'c i i f= SER 3km 21ri Brooktondale Large scale terrain 6JXV VI,rJ„r, NEW Y O R _ . liatines Rochester Utica iffalU Syracuse , e 5 Sinyhamtun J C 100kin Scranton 6 mi Large scale map Falls Rochester n Utica Yfa s W6— 101 100km 6 mi Large scale aerial anton This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF files without this notice. Back to Top VS Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NatiOnai Weather Service National Water Center 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HDSC,Questions@naaa.gov gov Disclaimer This document was created by an application that isn't licensed to use novaPDF. Purchase a license to generate PDF fifes without this notice. E1.b. Area Tabulations and Curve Number Calculations Stormwater Runoff Volume Calculations SITE NAME: SUNNY VIEW Sub -basin A Total Basin Area: 20,193.02 SF 0.4635 Ac Pre -Developed Conditions: Total Basin Area 20,193.02 SF 100.00% Building Coverage 0.00 SF 0,00% CN= 98 Concrete/Asphalt Area 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 98 Gravel Road (HSG C) 8,464.23 SF 41.92% CN= 89 Gravel Road (HSG D) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 91 Range/Meadow (HSG C-Fair) 11,728.79 SF 58.08% CN= 79 Range/Meadow (HSG D-Fair) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 84 Forested Area Area (HSG C) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 73 Forested Area Area (HSG D) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 79 Weighted Curve Number: CN'PRE 20,193.02 83.1917 Post -Developed Conditions: Total Basin Area 20,193.02 SF 100.00% Building Coverage 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 98 Concrete Coverage 127.15 5F 0.63% CN= 98 Asphalt Coverage 1,102.14 SF 5.46% CN= 98 Gravel Access Drive (HSG C) 6,753.38 SF 33.44% CN= 89 Gravel Access Drive (HSG D) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 91 Gravel Compound (HSG C) 2,388.30 SF 11.83% CN= 86 Gravel Compound (HSG D) 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 89 Grassed Open Area (HSG C) 9,822.05 SF * 48.64% CN= 79 Grassed Open Area (HSG D) 0.00 SF * 0.00% CN= 84 Other 0.00 SF 0.00% CN= 73 Weighted Curve Number: CN'POST 20,193.02 84.3290 Primary Soil Type HSG "C" 100.00% Infiltration Rate "K" 2.58 µ/sec 0.3656 In/Hr Established From NRCS Soils Mapping) Pre -Developed Time of Concentration: Tca"c = 5.00 Min. Post -Developed Time of Concentration: T,.,, = 5.00 Min. Existing Conditions Impervious Coverage 8,464.23 SF 41.92% Proposed Conditions Impervious Coverage 10,370.97 SF 51.36% E.2. Pre -Developed Conditions Runoff Hydrographs Hydrograph Return Period Recap Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intellsolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Inflow Hyd(s) Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph description 1-Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 2 SCS Runoff Combine 1 0.607 0.607 0.903 0.903 1.407 1.407 1.847 1.847 2.461 2.461 2.919 2.919 3.428 3.428 Predeveloped Basin Off -site Recieving Waters Proj. file: Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 0.607 1 718 1,223 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 0.607 1 718 1,223 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflcw Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. I Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type SCS Runoff Peak discharge 0.607 cfs Storm frequency 1 yrs Time to peak 718 min Time interval 1 min Hyd. volume 1,223 cuft Drainage area 0.464 ac Curve number 83.2 Basin Slope 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method USER Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Total precip. 2.00 in Distribution Type II Storm duration 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Predeveloped Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 MO 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrogrephs by Intelisoive v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 0.607 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,223 cuft Inflow hycls. = 1 Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.20 0,20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 0.903 1 718 1,813 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 0.903 1 718 1,813 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 2 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 1 Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type SCS Runoff Peak discharge 0.903 cfs Storm frequency 2 yrs Time to peak 718 min Time interval 1 min Hyd. volume 1,813 tuft Drainage area 0.464 ac Curve number 83.2 Basin Slope 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method USER Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Total precip. 2.47 in Distribution Type II Storm duration 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Predeveloped Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year 0 (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 n o0 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Hyd No. 1 Time (min) Hydrograph Report HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 0.903 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 1 rein Hyd. volume = 1,813 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1 Contrib, drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0,70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 1.Oo 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 1.847 1 718 3,771 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 1.847 1 718 3,771 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-deve[oped_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraffow Hydrographs by Intel€solve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 3.85 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 -- 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge 1.847 cfs Time to peak 718 min Hyd. volume 3,771 cuft Curve number 83.2 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Predeveioped Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 2.00 1 0.00 1440 Time (min) Hydrograph Report HydraFlow Hydrographs by intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 " 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 1.847 cfs Time to peak = 718 min Hyd. volume = 3,771 tuft Contrib, drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (Cfs) 2.00 1.00 1 0.00 1440 Time (min) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydfaflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SGS Runoff 2.461 1 717 5,088 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 2.461 1 717 5,088 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 25 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 4.71 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 -L 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge 2.461 cfs Time to peak 717 min Hyd. volume 5,088 cuft Curve number 83.2 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Predeveloped Basin Hyd, No. 1 -- 25 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve 0.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 Will 0.00 _- 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.461 cfs Time to peak = 717 min Hyd. volume = 5,088 cuft Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cult) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 2.919 1 717 6,080 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 2.919 1 717 6,080 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 50 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflcw Hydrographs by Intelfsolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 5.34 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 3.00 r wd 1.00 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.919 cfs Time to peak 717 min Hyd. volume 6,080 cuft Curve number 83.2 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Predeveloped Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 50 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Hyd No, 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 Ulm 1.00 0.00 -i 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.919 cfs Time to peak = 717 min Hyd. volume = 6,080 cult Contrib, drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 50 Year 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 1 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description t SCS Runoff 3.428 1 717 7,201 Predeveloped Basin 2 Combine 3.428 1 717 7,201 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Pre-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydreflow Hydrographs by Inlellsolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Predeveloped Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 6.04 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 0.00 1 0 120 Hyd No. 1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge 3.428 cfs Time to peak 717 min Hyd. volume 7,201 cuft Curve number 83.2 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Predeveloped Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 4.00 i 4 2.00 1.00 0.00 __- 0 120 Hyd No. 2 240 360 Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year 480 Hyd No. 1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 3.428 cfs Time to peak = 717 min Hyd. volume = 7,201 tuft Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 1320 Time (min) Hydraflow Rainfall Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Return Period Intensity -Duration -Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) Yrs) B D E MIA) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20.8188 3.7000 0.7419 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5 26.3692 3.6000 0.7338 10 30.3649 3.6000 0.7312 25 36,0222 3.6000 0.7290 50 40.4272 3.6000 0.7278 100 44.8086 3.6000 0.7269 File name: Warren sburg_Freq uency Data.lDF Intensity = B f (Tc + D)^E Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Return Period Intensity Values (inlhr) Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 4.18 2.99 2.37 1.99 1.73 1.63 1.38 1.26 1.17 1.08 1.01 0.95 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 5A4 3.88 3,09 2.59 2.25 2.00 1.81 1.65 1.53 1.42 1.33 1.25 10 6.29 4.50 3.58 3.01 2.61 2.32 2.10 1.92 1.77 1.65 1.55 1.46 25 7.50 5.37 4.28 3.59 3.12 2.78 2.51 2.30 2.12 1.98 1.85 1.74 50 8.44 6.05 4.82 4.05 3.52 3.13 2.83 2.59 2.39 2.23 2.09 1.97 100 9.38 6.72 5.35 4.50 3.92 3.48 3.15 2.88 2.66 2.48 2.32 2.19 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60. PreciD. rile name: SUNNY VIEW.oco Storm Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr SCS 24-hour 2.00 2.47 0.00 3.22 3.85 4.71 5.34 6.04 SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 Muff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 E.3. Post -Developed Conditions Runoff Hydrographs Hydrograph Return Period Recap HydraflowHydrographsbylntelisolvev9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Inflow Hyd(s) Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph description 1-Yr 2-Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 2 SCS Runoff Combine 1 0.655 0.655 0.959 0.959 1.471 1.471 1.915 1.915 2.535 2.535 2.994 2.994 3.504 3.504 Post -developed Basin Off -site Recieving Waters Proj. file: Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used tuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 0.655 1 718 1,317 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 0.655 1 718 1,317 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge 0.655 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak 11.97 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume 1,317 tuft Drainage area = 0.464 ac Curve number 84.3 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Total precip. = 2.00 in Distribution Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Q (cfs) 1 Post -developed Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 00 0.90 I.uu 0.80 0.90 0.70 0.80 0.60 0.70 0.50 0.60 0.40 0.50 0.30 0.40 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.00 6, 0.10 1 n no 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge = 0.655 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs. Time to peak = 11.97 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,317 tuft Inflow hyds. = 1 Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 2 4 Hyd No. 2 6 8 10 12 14 Hyd No. 1 1,00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume tuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used tuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 0.959 1 718 1,928 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 0.959 1 718 1,928 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period. 2 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by InteRsolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 2.47 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 0.959 cfs Time to peak 11.97 hrs Hyd. volume 1,928 cuft Curve number 84.3 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Post -developed Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 1 -- 2 Year Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 2 4 Hyd No. 1 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15. 2024 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Peak discharge 0.959 cfs Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time to peak 11.97 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume 1,928 cuft Inflow hyds. = 1 Contrib. drain. area 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 2 Year 0 (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0 2 4 Hyd No. 2 6 8 10 Hyd No. 1 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 1.915 1 718 3,930 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 1.915 1 718 3,930 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02,15.24.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 3.85 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 _L 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge 1.915 cfs Time to peak 11.97 hrs Hyd. volume 3,930 tuft Curve number 84.3 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of cone. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Post -developed Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 2.00 MKIIlt] 1— 0.00 24 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 --L 0 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 1.915 cfs Time to peak = 11.97 hrs Hyd. volume = 3,930 cuft Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 z 0.00 24 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Summary Report HydraFlow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 2.535 1 717 5,266 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 2.535 1 717 5,266 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 25 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by intelisofve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 4.71 in Storm duration = 24 hrs Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.535 cfs Time to peak 11.95 hrs Hyd. volume 5,266 cuft Curve number 84.3 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Post -developed Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 25 Year 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 Ewe' 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.535 cfs Time to peak = 11.95 hrs Hyd. volume = 5,266 tuft Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 2.994 1 717 6,270 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 2.994 1 717 6,270 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 50 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 0.464 ac Basin Slope = 0.0 % Tc method = USER Total precip. = 5.34 in Storm duration = 24 hrs 0 (cfs) 3.00 1.00 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.994 cfs Time to peak 11.95 hrs Hyd. volume 6,270 cuft Curve number 84,3 Hydraulic length 0 ft Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Distribution Type II Shape factor 484 Post -developed Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 50 Year 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Hyd No. 1 0 (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 r 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisalve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 2.994 cfs Time to peak = 11.95 hrs Hyd. volume = 6,270 tuft Contrib. drain. area = 0.464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 50 Year 0.00 0.0 2.0 4,0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type origin) Peak flow cfs) Time interval min) Time to peak min) Hyd. volume cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ft) Total strge used cuft) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 3.504 1 717 7,403 Post -developed Basin 2 Combine 3.504 1 717 7,403 1 Off -site Recieving Waters Sunny View_Post-developed_02.15.24.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by InteNsolve v9.1 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Hyd. No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge 3.504 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak 11.95 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume 7,403 cuft Drainage area = 0.464 ac Curve number 84.3 Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length 0 ft Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) 5.00 min Total precip. = 6.04 in Distribution Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor 484 Q (cfs) 4.00 01011111 2.00 1.00 0.00 1 0.0 2.0 Hyd No. 1 Post -developed Basin Hyd. No. 1 -- 100 Year 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 18.0 20.0 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Hyd. No. 2 Off -site Recieving Waters Hydrograph type = Combine Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Inflow hyds. = 1 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 M 11 1.00 0.00 0.0 2.0 Hyd No. 2 Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Peak discharge = 3.504 cfs Time to peak = 11.95 hrs Hyd. volume = 7,403 cuft Contrib. drain. area = 0,464 ac Off -site Recieving Waters Hyd. No. 2 -- 100 Year 4.0 6.0 8.0 Hyd No. 1 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 22.0 Time (hrs) Hydraflow Rainfall Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.1 Return Period Intensity -Duration -Frequency Equation Coefficients (FHA) Yrs) B D E NIA) 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2 20,8188 3,7000 0.7419 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5 26.3692 3.6000 0.7338 10 30.3549 3.6000 0.7312 25 36,0222 3.6000 0.7290 50 40.4272 3.6000 0.7278 100 44.8086 3.6000 0.7269 File name: Warrens burg_Frequency Data.IDF Intensity = B 1(Tc + D)^E Thursday, Feb 15, 2024 Return Period Intensity Values (in/hr) Yrs) 5 min 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 4.18 2.99 2.37 1.99 1.73 1.53 1.38 1.26 1.17 1.08 1.01 0.95 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 5.44 3.88 3.09 2.59 2.25 2.00 1.81 1.65 1.53 1.42 1.33 1.25 10 6.29 4.50 3.58 3.01 2.61 2.32 2.10 1.92 1.77 1.65 1.55 1.46 25 7.50 5.37 4.28 3.59 3.12 2.78 2.51 2.30 2.12 1.98 1.85 1.74 50 8.44 6.05 4.82 4.05 3,52 3.13 2.83 2.59 2.39 2.23 2.09 1.97 100 9.38 6.72 5.35 4.50 3.92 3.48 3.15 2.88 2.66 2.48 2.32 2.19 Tc = time in minutes. Values may exceed 60, praain filo name• CI IAIAIV X11MAf r- Storm Rainfall Precipitation Table (in) Distribution 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr SCS 24-hour 2.00 2.47 0.00 3.22 3.85 4.71 5.34 6.04 SCS 6-Hr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff -1st 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-2nd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-3rd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-4th 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Huff-Indy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Custom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 EA Tabulated Results and Summary RESULTS SUMMARY SITE NAME: ISUNNY VIEW Pre Developed Conditions: Design Storm Event - 24 Hr 1 YR 2 YR 10 YR 25 YR 50 YR 100 YR Design Rainfall Depth (in) 2.00 2,47 3.85 4.71 5.34 6.04 Sub -basin A Peak Discharge Rate Qp14.T,W (cfs) 0.6071 0.9031 1.8471 2.4611 2.9191 3.428 Pre -developed Runoff Volume (cf) I 1,223,CCI 1,913.001 3,771.001 5,088.001 6,080.001 7,201.00 Post Developed Conditions: Design Storm Event - 24 Hr 1 YR 2 YR 10 YR 25 YR 50 YR 100 YR Design Rainfall Depth (in) 2.00 2.47 3.85 4.71 S.34 6.04 Sub -basin A Peak Discharge Rate Q,,,, (cfs) 0.65S 0.9591 1.9151 2.5351 2.9941 3.504 Post -developed Runoff Volume (cf) 1 1,317.001 1,928.00I 3,930.001 5,266.001 6,27C.001 7,403.00 Design Criteria: 1 year Storm Event Runoff volume (Channel Protection Volume) Channel Protection Volume: ########### cf (Rep'd) <_ 80.20 cf (Prov'd) V bK Design Criteria: 50 year Storm Event Discharge rate and Runoff volume Pastdeveloped Peak discharge Rate = 2.994 cfs <_ 2.919 cfs Design Criteria: 100 year Storm Event Discharge rate and Runoff volume Postdeveloped Peak discharge Rate = 3.504 cfs 5 3.428 cfs EXHIBIT T Te c t o We rrxe ricx focu+iar+. e.+ce.a n+ix4 za an r, , , Verizon Wireless 1275 John Street, Suite #100 West Henrietta, NY 14586 ATTN: Mr. Greg Hanley February 21, 2024 RE: NOISE ASSESSMENT LETTER PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY VERIZON WIRELESS SITE: SUNNY VIEW 111 WIEDMAIER CT, TOWN OF ITHACA, TOMPKINS COUNTY, NY 14850 TECTONIC W.O. 10751.053 Dear Mr. Hanley: Tectonic Engineering was asked to provide a noise assessment letter for this proposed Verizon Wireless telecommunications facility. Taking into account all components proposed to be installed at this facility, the generator is the only equipment that will emit any discernible noise outside the immediate vicinity of the facility. The tower, antennas, and related equipment generate no noise at all. Within the fenced compound Verizon Wireless will install base station equipment consisting of an electrical panel, fiber enclosure, cellular equipment cabinet, and a battery cabinet. The only component that generates any noise is the cellular equipment cabinet due to its integrated passive air cooler. The noise output from this unit is similar to that of a desktop computer, Outside the compound Verizon Wireless will install common utility. equipment consisting of an electrical meter bank, a fiber enclosure, and a pad mounted transformer. Here the only component that will generate any noise is the transformer which emits an almost inaudible hum due to the electromagnetic forces passing through the core of the transformer. After construction is completed there is no additional vehicular traffic associated with the facility since it's an uninhabited use, therefore there is no potential for additional noise due to vehicular traffic. Regarding the generator, we obtained noise specifications from the manufacturer MTU for their proposed standard 50kW outdoor diesel fueled AC generator, including their highest performing sound - attenuating enclosure. The average sound pressure level for this generator is 65.0 dBA at a reference distance of 23.0 feet. We understand that consistent with normal Verizon Wireless procedure, absent exigent circumstances, the generator is expected to run once every two weeks during daytime hours for approximately 30 minutes for routine testing purposes. Sound attenuation for a point source (stationary source) equals a sound level reduction of 6 dBA per doubling of distance between a noise source and a receptor when there are no obstructions present between the two elements. Using this information we can deduce the following noise levels,that one would anticipate when the equipment is in use: Latham Office 36 British American Boulevard, Suite 101 1 Latharn, NY 12110 518,783.1630Te1 1518,783.1544 Fax tectoniceng ineering.com Equal Opportunity Emp6oyer Tectt nic—I t 14CT3CaL SU07I0111. [ACSMO.AL S[Avlic. The nearest property line to the generator is located approximately 211-feet away to the south; the anticipated noise level at this point would be approximately 45.8 dBA. The nearest adjoining residence to the generator is located approximately 568-feet away to the south; the anticipated noise level at this point would be approximately 37.2 dBA. For comparison purposes, approximate decibel levels for normal conversation equal 60 dBA, for vehicular traffic equal 85 dBA, and for a running lawnmower equal 107 dBA. Based on the calculated values for the equipment, the anticipated noise levels at the nearest property line and residence will be much lower than that experienced for normal conversation. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (518) 783-1630. Sincerely, Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists & Land Surveyors, D.P.C. Steven M. Matthews, PE Managing Director --Engineering page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT U EXHIBIT IT By email dated November 17, 2023, Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/bla Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") submitted a draft of this Application (the "Draft") to the Town for preliminary review. Thereafter, by letter dated December 11, 2023, the Town responded to the draft with comments and missing items (the "Town Comments"). Below are the Town Comments in bold italicized type, followed by Verizon Wireless' responses in regular type. Pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's) 2009 Declaratory Ruling and 2014 Report and Order interpreting the "reasonable period of time "provision in 47 U.S C. ,§`332(c)(7)(B)(ii) for municipal processing of siting applications, and Town Code 270-2.19. E (3), the Town is hereby notifying you in writing within 30 days of the Town's receipt of the application that the application is incomplete. Specifically, the items that are missing include; 1. Evidence that a significant gap in coverage exists (Town Code §270-219. G (2) (s) [21) -- The Town Code requires in -kind call testing for each frequency at which the applicant provides personal wireless services. The applicant shall provide the Town with the actual testing data recorded during such tests, in a simple format which shall include each frequency, in table format: a. The date and time for the test, The need for the Project is well documented in Exhibit H. As outlined in the report from Millenium Engineering, P.C. (an independent RF Engineer) attached as Exhibit V, drive test data is neither reliable nor appropriate for determining the need for the Project. b. The location, in longitude and latitude, of each point at which signal strength was recorded, See Verizon Wireless' response above. c. Each signal strength recorded, measured in decibel milliwatts (dBm), for each frequency. See Verizon Wireless' response above. 2. Dropped call records (Town Code §270-219. G (2) (s) [41) —The applicant shall also provide dropped call records and denial of service records evidencing the number, percentage, and locations of voice calls that were unable to be initiated or maintained between wireless telephones and landlines connected to the national telephone network. This was notprovided in the application packet that was submitted. The need for the Project is well documented in Exhibit H. As outlined in the report from Millenium Engineering, P.C. (an independent RF Engineer) attached as Exhibit V, dropped cell data is neither reliable nor appropriate for determining the need for the Project. 4872-6179-2134.1 2- 3. Noise study (Town Code §270--219. G (2) (u)) —The application materials state that "A noise study will be prepared in connection with this Project "However, a noise study has not been submitted. See Exhibit T. 4. Economic analysis study (Town Code §270-219. G (2) (v)) — The applicant asserts that this information may not lawfully be considered in the Town's analysis of the application. However, the Town Code requires the submission of an economic analysis of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF may have on all adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. See the letter report from Colliers International Valuation and Advising Services attached as Exhibit Y. As outlined in the letter, there is insufficient sales data available to complete a. statistically reliable market analysis. As indicated in his report, Mr. Fisher has completed multiple market analyses for cell tower projects in upstate New York (see copies of four (4) such reports enclosed in Exhibit Y) and has failed to identify an adverse market impact to surrounding properties located within 1-1.5 miles of a tower site. His conclusions in the prior report were based on actual sales data both before and after construction of the tower. 5. Visual simulations/before--and-after renderings (Town Code §270-219.J (2) (d) and (e)) — The application materials contain photo simulations for some locations from which the monopole will be visible ("S-3," "S-6," and "S-9"), but no simulations from the most visually impacting views, which are "P-1,"P-4," and P-5". Please submitphoto simulations for P-1, P-4, and P-5. The requested simulations are included in Exhibit Q. 6. Alternate facility designs and color schemes (Town Code §270-219.J (2) (fl) — There are no alternate facility designs or color schemes in the application package. Please submit. Simulations of a monopine tower have been included in Exhibit Q. As another alternative, Verizon Wireless would be happy to discuss the use of a galvanized monopole tower or alternate colors for a monopole tower if desired by Planning Board. Based on the necessary height of the tower, other stealth designs are unfeasible. 7. Climbing pegs (Town Code §270-219. 0 (3)) —It is not clear if there are permanent climbing pegs within 15 feet of the ground of the tower. Please provide documentation that this is not occurring. See Exhibit R (Sheet CO-3); no climbing pegs will be installed within 15' of the ground level. S. Insurance requirements (Town Code §270-219. V (1) —Insurance requirements as follows will need to be supplied for the building permit process: 1) Minimum Coverages Each PWSF Permittee shall maintain in full force and effect, throughout the term of a PWSF Permit, an insurance policy, or policies. Such policy 4872.6179-2134.1 3- or policies shall, at a minimum, afford insurance covering all of the Pernzittee's operations, as follows: See Exhibit W. a) Commercial General Liability insurance with limits of insurance of not less than 1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate far bodily injury and property damage, including contractual liability, personal injury, products and completed operations, See Exhibit W. b) Commercial Umbrella insurance witli limits of. not less than $5,000,000,, See Exhibit W. c) Pollution Liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than 1,000,000 each occurrence and $3,000,000 annual aggregate, with any deductible not to exceed $25,000 each occurrence. See Exhibit W. 2) Other insurance requirements a) Said policy or policies shall include the Town and its officers and employees as additional insureds, See Exhibit W. b) Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to provide 30 days' advance written notice of cancellation or any material change to the Town, See Exhibit W. c) Should any.of the required insurance be provided under a claims --made form, a permittee shall maintain such coverage continuously throughout the term of a personal wireless service facility permit, and, without lapse, for a period of three years beyond the expiration or termination of the permit, to the effect that, should occurrences during the term of the permit give rise to claims made after expiration or termination of the permit, such claims shall be covered by such claims -made policies, See Exhibit W. 3) Proof of Insurance. Before the Town will issue a personal wireless service facility site permit, a permittee shall furnish to the Town certificates of insurance and 4872-6179-2134.1 4- additional insured policy endorsements with insurers that are authorized to do business in the State of New York and that are satisfactory to the Town evidencing all coverages set forth in this Subsection V. See Exhibit W. 9. Zoning Board of Appeals Application - The application materials correctly assert that a height variance is required for exceeding the allowable height of 30 feet, in accordance with Town Code §270-16, as the PWSF is proposed to be 138 feet tall. Please submit an area variance application at the following link: Zoning Board ofAppeals - Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Application - ViewPoint Cloud (opengov cant) When submitting the Zoning Board of Appeals area variance application, please submit a narrative describing the project, drawings/plans of the project, the applicable environmental assessment farm, an agricultural data statement (if applicable), and a fee (when prompted by the permitting system). The required electronic application was submitted on or before the date of this application.. 10. Electrical Permit Application -An electrical permit application needs to be submitted, in addition to the building permit application, at the following link: Code Enforcement & Zoning Department - TOI - Electrical Permit Application - ViewPoint Cloud opengov. com) The required electronic application was submitted on or before the date of this application. 11. PWSF Permit Application -A PWSF permit application needs to be submitted at the following link: https.IlitliacaituportaLopen-ov.com/categories/107IIrecord-typesl6571 The required electronic application was submitted on or before the date of this application. 12. Town Code Chapter 125-C requires the following items to be provided in addition to what has already been provided: a. One hard copy set of plans needs to be submitted as part of the process for the building permit, One (1) hard copy of the plans was sent to the Town via Federal Express on May 29, 2024. b. A statement that the work shall be performed in compliance with Chapter 270, Zoning, the Uniform Code, the ECCCNYS, the ECS, this chapter, and other applicable state and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, This statement has been included on Sheet T-1 of the Project Plans (Exhibit R . 4872-6179-2134.1 5- c. It appears that the documents were submitted by an engineering firm and not a sole practitioner professional engineer, which requires the firm's certificate of authorization number to be placed on the title block, The requested certificate of authorization has been added to the title block (see Exhibit R). d. Please provide a statement of special inspections for this project, See Exhibit X. e. Please provide the building permit fee, when prompted by the permitting system, The Building Permit fee was included in the enclosed $2,925 check. f. Please provide proof of workers compensation and disability or the proper exemption documentation from the NYS Worked Compensation Board. See Exhibit W. 13. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Engineering Comments — The Engineering Department has the following comments and requires the following information: a. Please identify the: i. Total Area of disturbance for the project, See Exhibit S. ii. Total Cut and Fill Volumes associated with the project, See Exhibit S. iii. Total New Impervious Area associated with the project, See Exhibit S, b. Based solely on the length of trenching indicated on the site plan, a Simple SWPPP will be required (at a minimum). Depending on the total area and volume of disturbances the SWPPP level required may escalate to a Basic or Full, The SWPPP application was submitted on or before the date of this application. c. Please fill out a SWPPP application on the Town of Ithaca online permitting system Engineering page at. https.Ilitliacany. viewpointcloud. conticategories/I080, 4872-6179-2134.1 M See Exhibit S. d. The SWPPP requirements, including required submission materials are outlined in Chapter 228 of the Town of Ithaca Code, which can be found here: https://ecode360.com/lT1944, [A Simple SWPPP is required for any projects that exceed I0,000 sf but not greater than 1 acre of disturbed area, exceed 50 cubic yards but not more than 250 cubic yards of excavation/fill, or 300 linear feet of utility trenching. A Basic SWPPP is required for any projects that exceed 10,000 sf but not greater than 1 acre of disturbed area or exceed 250 cubic yards of excavation/fill. A Full SWPPP is required for any projects that exceed 1 acre of disturbance or 10,000 sf of new Impervious cover. If the project exceeds I acre, a NYS SPDES Permit will be required.] See Exhibit S. 14. Application/Review Fees — The following application fees apply to this Project: a. Planning Board Preliminary Site Plan Review/Special Permit Development Review Fees - $400, based on project cost asserted by applicant on Development Review Application Form (special permitfee is included when site plan approval and special permit are sought at the same time) b. Planning Board Final Site Plan Development Review Fee - $200. (%z preliminary site plan fee) c. Zoning Board of Appeals Area Variance Fee - $150* d. Building Permit Fee — $1400 (based on project cost — includes electrical permit fee) * e. PWSF Fee — $775* f. Operating Fees (TCO/CO) * -No CO fee. TCO is Y building permit fee (may not be required) Building Department fee schedule: https://wfvw.town.itizaca.ny.uslresotirce library/otherdocuntents/. Please note that there is an annual renewal fee for PWSF permits TOTAL APPLICATION/REVIEW FEES: $2,925 A check payable to the Town of Ithaca for $2,925 is enclosed. In addition to the list above, the following errors were noted in the submitted documentation, specifically: 1. Applicant cover letter, Page 1 - The wrong Town Code reference is mentioned in the last paragraph, where it states that "telecontmttnications facilities are permitted in the C 4872-6179-2134,1 7- zoning district upon the issuance of site plan approval and a special use permit from the Planning Board (Code §270-219 (B)). The correct Town Code reference is §270-219. D 5). The correction was made to the Application materials. 2. Applicant cover letter, Page 2 — The Town of Ithaca Planning Board no longer requires twenty-five (25) copies of the 11 x 17 Site Plans. Please instead submit twelve (12) paper copies of the plans (in addition to the three large size sets and digital uploads, as listed on the preliminary site plan review checklist provided via email on 1111612023 and 1111712023). The number of copies included has been revised to twelve (12) in the cover letter. 3. Applicant cover letter, page 2 —Please revise the site plan and special permit fees that are listed to reflect the correct fees, as noted above. Comment noted. A check payable to the Town of Ithaca in the amount of $2,925 was submitted with the Application. 4. Full Environmental Assessment Form— The NYSDEC eliminated the Visual Addendum in 2012, when the Short and Full Forms were updated Litt s://)vww.dec.n . ov/z•e ulator / erzzzits-licenses/se r/ea -workbooks• also states in the 2020 SEQR Handbook "DEC created revised model environmental assessment forms EAF) and repealed appendix B (visual EAF addendum), which was incorporated into the new full EAF). "Please remove the Visual Addendum from the submitted Form. The visual addendum has been removed from the Application. 5. Exhibit H: Radiofrequency Search Ring Justification, page numbered 14 and titled Explanation of Sunny View Search Area"— the last paragraph lists Italy as one local area that has coverage and capacity issues that will be resolved with the current proposal. Please revise accordingly. The typo was corrected in Exhibit H. Please submit additional materials via the proper digital portals mentioned above, and all other materials listed above to my attention at the address on the letterhead. Feel free to contact me ifyou have any questions or require clarification. I can be reached by phone at 607) 273-1721, extension 121 or by email at cbalestra(dtown.ithaea.nv.us. 4872-6179-2134.1 EXHIBIT V MILLENNIUM ENGINEERING, P.C. 42 Old Barn Drive West Chester, Pennsylvania 19382 Cell: 610-220-3820 www.millenniumeng.com April 24, 2024 Attn: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca 215 N. Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14580 Email: pauldugan@comeast.net Re: Radiofrequency Design of Proposed Communications Facility Site Name: Sunny View, Proposed 134' Monopole (138' overall with lightning rod) Site Address: 111 Weidmaier Ct., Town of Ithaca, NY 14850 (Tompkins County) Latitude 42' 24' 45.24" N, Longitude 76° 27' 1.57" W (NAD83), G.E. 824.4' f/- A.M.S.L. Property Owner: S Roberts WC Land LLC Dear Ms. Balestra, I have perfonned an analysis to provide an independent evaluation and design review of the wireless communications facility proposed by Verizon at the above referenced property. As a registered professional engineer, I am under the jurisdiction of the State Registration Boards in which I am licensed to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public and to issue all public statements in an objective and truthful manner. The proposed communications facility consists of a 134' monopole (138' overall with lightning rod) and' a Verizon Antenna Centerline (ACL) height of 130'. Verizon is currently licensed by' the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide wireless communication services to Tompkins ,County and a large number of other counties in this region and throughout the nation. The license specifies the frequency band and power levels at which these carriers are authorized to operate their system. The objectives of the proposed communications facility are to provide new and improved reliable 4G LTE and 5G wireless communication coverage to a southeast portion of the Town of Ithaca and extending into small portions of the Towns of Dryden, Danby, and Caroline. This area currently suffers from unreliable wireless communications services simply due to not having a facility within 2.5 miles from the proposed structure location. The proposed facility will improve service and provide better handoff between the existing sites. The facility will provide approximately, 7 square miles of substantial new service to the community including large sections of Slaterville Road (Route 79). The proposed facility will provide substantially improved in -building and data throughput speeds to wireless devices in the target area. There are no identified existing tall structures within 2 miles of the proposed facility location suitable for collocation in this target area which I could identify. The proposed facility location is particularly suited to fulfill the objectives of providing new reliable coverage to the area in which it will serve. The new coverage will enhance public safety to the community where there currently is poor coverage. Any reduction in height from that proposed reduces the coverage footprint to the area the site is intended to serve as outlined in the objectives. Obviously maintaining optimum signal level threshold in all areas is not Page 1 of 4 possible or practical, but reaching the target level where possible and where the users are using the devices is a critical design criteria for most locations within the footprint of the area the facility is intended to serve. The design thresholds contain a margin of safety (aka fade margin) that should be maintained in the design for a higher level of reliability under all reasonable conditions. Also, the connection and download speed of broadband wireless internet services degrades dramatically at or below design thresholds. The proposed facility at this location would provide coverage to an area that spans approximately 1.0 — 2.0 miles in all directions. The proposed structure location and height is "particularly suited" to provide the necessary reliable service to this area. It is important to point out that the demand for wireless infrastructure has escalated dramatically over time and the need for reliable service is extremely important for public safety and everyday use in a post-covid era. There are alternative technology options that can be efficiently deployed in certain circumstances such as small cell technology. It is my opinion that small cell technology is not feasible or efficient for a large outdoor rural area. I have reviewed the RF submissions of this application. Verizon furnished to me a site plan, Radio Frequency Data Sheet, and a fairly comprehensive RF justification document. The RF justification includes wide area propagation modeling to demonstrate the improved coverage from the proposed facility subject to this application. It also includes capacity offloading documents to demonstrate how the proposed facility will help offload traffic from adjacent existing Verizon sites. I was also advised that the Town has required drive test and lost call data in order to move the Verizon application forward into zoning. It is my opinion that the RF evidence already presented is adequate and compelling. The town code requirement for this additional RF information is outdated or mis-guided and will not add value to the extensive RF submissions already presented. RF engineers historically have used a wide variety of tools to aid in the RF design and decision -making process. The capability and applicability of these tools and their data sets has evolved along with the increased demand and variability of usage wireless customers place on modern 4G LTE and 5G networks. While some tools and metrics like propagation modeling and network traffic statistics have become more valuable in understanding network capability, other data sets like drive tests and lost call data have become less valuable and simply create distractions and unnecessary confusion. This is due to the misconception that the network and customer needs operate at that level of simplicity which for many years is no longer the case. Presenting too much unnecessary or out of context RF information does not add to the weight of the application. Using these unnecessary datasets as leverage to deem this application incomplete is not compatible with the spirit and intent of the FCC's Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment," FCC 18-133, 85 FR 51867, at ¶ 37 October 15, 2018). In summary, upon consideration of the many factors discussed herein, it is my opinion that the proposed communications facility is particularly suited (both in location and minimum height required for Verizon to provide reliable service to subscribers in a section of the Town of Ithaca that currently suffers from a significant gap in reliable wireless service. I am not aware of any other more feasible alternatives of providing reliable wireless service is this area. The proposed communications facility in this location is necessary for the efficient operation and provision of wireless services to the area for which it is proposed. , &AAA&. Respectfully, ,4 Of NEW, E1V Paul Dugan, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer 2u, 3L`' New York License Number 79144 S t 4 FE5S40C1" Page 2 of 4 DECLARATION OF ENGINEER Paul Dugan, P.E., declares and states that he is a graduate telecommunications consulting engineer (BSEIME Widener University 1984/1988), whose qualifications are a matter of record with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). His firm, Millennium Engineering, P.C., has been retained by Verizon to perform a RF design review for justification of a proposed communications facility for suitability to meet the requirements of the Town of Ithaca and the community for which it serves. Mr. Dugan also states that the calculations or measurements made in the evaluation were made by himself or his technical associates- under his direct supervision, and the summary letter certification of FCC compliance associated with the foregoing document was made or prepared by him personally. Mr. Dugan is a registered professional engineer in the Jurisdictions of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, New York, Connecticut, District of Columbia, West Virginia and Puerto Rico with 40 years of engineering experience. Mr. Dugan is also an active member of the Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers, the National Council of Examiners for Engineering, the National Society of Professionals Engineers, the Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers, and the Radio Club of America. Mr. Dugan further states that all facts and statements contained herein are true and accurate to the best of his own knowledge, except where stated to be in information or belief, and, as to those facts, he believes them to be true. He believes under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this the 24th day of April, 2024. A Paul Dugan, F.E. Page 3 of 4 PAUL DUGAN, P.E. 42 Old Barn Drive West Chester, PA 19382 Cell: 610-220-3820 Email: pdugan@millenniumeng.com Web Page: www.millenniumeng.com EDUCATION: Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania Master of Business Administration, July 1991 Master of Electrical Engineering, December 1988 Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering, May 1984 PROFESSIONAL Registered Professional Engineer in the following jurisdictions: ASSOCIATIONS: Pennsylvania, License Number PE-045711-E New Jersey, License Number GE41731 Maryland, License Number 24211 Delaware, License Number 11797 Virginia, License Number 36239 West Virginia, License Number 20258 Connecticut, License Number 22566 New York, License Number 079144 District of Columbia, License Number PE-900355 Puerto Rico, License Number I8946 Full member of The Association of Federal Communications Consulting Engineers www.afcce.org) January 1999 to Present Elected and served on the Board of Directors for five year term 2006-2011 Full member of The National Society of Professional Engineers (www.nsl)e,org and the Pennsylvania Society of Professional Engineers (www.pspe.org June 2003 to Present Currently serving as PSPE State Director and Past President on the Board of Directors of the Valley Forge Chapter and the South East Region Vice -Chair for the "Professional Engineers in Private Practice" Executive Committee. Actively participated in NSPE Annual Conferences 7/2005 to Present. Actively participate in Chester County ARESIRACES Amateur Radio (CCAR www,w3eoc.org) which prepares and provides emergency backup communications for Chester County Department of Emergency Services, March 2005 to Present Full member of The National Council of Examiners for Engineering www.ncees.org) May 2001 to Present Full Member of The Radio Club of America www.radio-club-of-america.or December 2003 to Present Pennsylvania Real Estate License Number RS347405 Keller Williams 2/2019 to Present PROFESSIONAL. Millennium Engineering,PC., West Chester, Pennsylvania EXPERIENCE: Position: President, August 1999 to Present (www.millenniumeng.corn) Verizon Wireless, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania Position: Cellular RF System Design/Performance Engineer, April 1990 to August 1999 Communications Test Design, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania Position: Electrical Engineer, May 1984 to April 1990 PERSONAL: Date/place of birth: November 21, 1961, West Chester, Pennsylvania; United States Citizen Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT W 1 ® CERTIFICATE 4F LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMIDDNYYY) 05/13/2024 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(tes) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Aon Risk services Northeast, Inc. New York NY Office CONTACT - - NAME: iA)CNo. Ext): (866) 283-7122 No,): (800) 363-0105 E-MAILADDRESS: One Liberty Plaza 165 Broadway, Suite 3201 New York NY 10006 USA INSURERS) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED INSURERA: Liberty Mutual Fire Ins CO 23035 Veri zon wireless, LLC 1095 Avenue of the Americas INSURER B: INSURERC: New York NY 10036 USA INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 570105709740 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANCING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Limits shown are as requested INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVDSUSHI PDLICY NUMBER MM100lYY MMIDDIYYPOLICYEXP LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY TB EACH OCCURRENCE 6, 000 , 000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence)$ 6 000 , 060 X MED EXP (Any one person) 10 , 000XCUCoverageIsIncluded PERSONAL& ADV INJURY 6,000,500 GENLAGGREGATELIMITAPPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE 8,000,000 X POLICY PRO- LOC JECT PRODUCTS - COMPIOPAGG 8,000,000 OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Eaaeddenl BODILY INJURY ( Per person) ANYAUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIREOAUTOS NON -OWNED ONLY AUTOS ONLY BODILY INJURY (Poraccident) PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident UMBRELLALIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATEEXCESSLIABRCLAIMS-MADE DEC) I RETENTION WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/ PARTNER! EXECUTIVE PER STATUTE OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT IMOFFICEREMBER EXCLUDED? NIA E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEEMandataryInNH) It As, describe underDESCRIPTIONOFOPERATIONS belcw E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONSI VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached B more apace Is required) Named insured includes: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC, dba Verizon wireless. RE: Site Name: Sunny View, Site Address: 111 Wiedmaier Court, Ithaca, NY 14850, Project: Vz-00049818.C.9341, Location Code: 5000007226. Town of Ithaca and its officers and employees are included as Additional insured with respect to the General Liability policy. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Town Of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Ithaca NY 14850 USA exf4Jf c.fG YfG iZfJtAciGi6 c./ //!>RAArD e! IEL 01988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD till Policy Number TB2-691-550588-143 Issued by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION AND NON -RENEWAL This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART EXCESS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART GARAGE COVERAGE PART LIQUOR LIABILITY COVERAGE PART MOTOR TRUCK CARGO COVERAGE PART OWNERS AND CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRINTERS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SPECIAL PROTECTIVE AND HIGHWAY LIABILITY POLICY — NEW YORK WAREHOUSEMAN'S LEGAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART We will not cancel or non -renew this policy or make changes that reduce the insurance afforded by this policy until written notice of cancellation, non -renewal or reduction has been mailed or delivered to those scheduled below at least a) 10 days before the effective date of cancellation, if we cancel for non-payment of premium; or b) days before the effective date of the cancellation, non -renewal or reduction if we 30 cancel or reduce the insurance afforded by this policy for any other reason. NAME Per schedule on file with the Company ADDRESS Per schedule on file with the Company LIM 02 01 12 11 © 2011, Liberty Mutual Group. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 YOK Workers' CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE COVERAGESTATECompensation Board NYS DISABILITY AND PAID FAMILY LEAVE BENEFITS LAW PART 1. To be completed by NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave benefits carrier or licensed insurance agent of that carrier 1a. Legal Name & Address of Insured (use street address only) 1b. Business Telephone Number of Insured CELLCO PARTNERSHIP DBA VERIZON WIRELESS 585) 321.5458 1209 ORANGE STREET WILMINGTON, DE 19801 1c. Federal Employer Identification Number of Insured or Social Security Work Location of Insured (Onlyrequired if coverage is specifically Number limited to certain locations in New York State, i.e., Wrap -Up Policy) 223372889 2. Name and Address of Entity Requesting Proof of Coverage 3a. Name of Insurance Carrier Entity Being Listed as the Certificate Holder) HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY Sunny View 111 Wiedmaier Court Ithaca, NY 14850 3b, Policy Number of Entity Listed in Box is Town of Ithaca LNY728193005 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, NY 14850 3c, Policy effective period 01-01-2024 to 12-31-2024 4, Policy provides the following benefits: X A. Both disability and Paid Family Leave benefits. B. Disability benefits only. C. Paid Family Leave benefits only. 5. Policy covers: X A. All of the employer's employees eligible under the NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave Benefits Law. B. Only the following class or classes of employer's employees: Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I am an authorized representative or licensed agent of the insurance carrier referenced above and that the named insured has NYS Disability and/or Paid Family Leave benefits insurance coverage as described above. Date Signed 05-10-2024 B Signature of Insurance carrier's authorized representative or NYS licensed Insurance agent of that Insurance carrier) Telephone Number 212 553-8074 Name and Title: ELIZABETH TELLO -- ASSISTANT DIRECTOR STATUTORY SERVICES IMPORTANT: If Boxes 4A and 5A are checked, and this form is signed by the insurance carrier's authorized representative or NYS Licensed Insurance Agent of that carrier, this certificate is COMPLETE. Mail it directly to the certificate holder. If Box 4B, 4C or 5B is checked, this certificate is NOT COMPLETE for purposes of Section 220, Subd. 8 of the NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave Benefits Law. It must be emailed to PAU@wcb.ny,gov or it can be mailed for completion to the Workers' Compensation Board, Plans Acceptance Unit, PO Box 5200, Binghamton, NY 13902.5200. PART 2. To be completed by the NYS Workers' Compensation Board (Only if Box 413, 4C or 5B have been checked) State of New York Workers' Compensation Board According to information maintained by the NYS Workers' Compensation Board, the above -named employer has complied with the NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave Benefits Law (Article 9 of the Workers' Compensation Law) with respect to all of their employees. Date Signed By Signature of Authorized NYS workers' Compensation Board Employee) Telephone Number Name and Title t-tease (vote: Unty insurance earners licensea to write NYS uisawnty ant? Yafa Yarntiy Leave benef,tS Insurance policies and NYS licensed insurance agents of those insurance carriers are authorized to issue Form DB-120.1. Insurance brokers are NOT authorized to Issue this form. DB-120.1 (12-21) II I'I111111111l1 1111[I!Il11111lII'II Ds-120_1 (12-21) Additional Instructions for Form D13-120.1 By signing this form, the insurance carrier identified in Box 3 on this form is certifying that it is insuring the business referenced in Box I for disability and/or Paid Family Leave benefits under the NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave Benefits Law. The insurance carrier or its licensed agent will send this Certificate of Insurance Coverage (Certificate) to the entity listed as the certificate holder in Box 2. The insurance carrier must notify the above certificate holder and the Workers' Compensation Board within 10 days IF a policy is cancelled due to nonpayment of premiums or within 30 days IF there are reasons, other than nonpayment of premiums that cancel the policy or eliminate the insured from coverage indicated on this Certificate. (These notices may be sent by regular mail.) Otherwise, this Certificate is valid for one year after this form is approved by the insurance carrier or its licensed agent, or until the policy expiration date listed in Box 3c, whichever is earlier. This Certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This Certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policy listed, nor does it confer any rights or responsibilities beyond those contained in the referenced policy. This Certificate may be used as evidence of a NYS disability and/or Paid Family Leave benefits contract of insurance only while the underlying policy is in effect, Please Note: Upon the cancellation of the disability and/or Paid Family Leave benefits policy indicated on this form, if the business continues to be named on a permit, license or contract issued by a certificate holder, the business must provide that certificate holder with a new Certificate of Insurance Coverage for NYS disability and/or Paid Family Leave Benefits or other authorized proof that the business is complying with the mandatory coverage requirements of the NYS Disability and Paid Family Leave Benefits Law. NYS DISABILITY AND PAID FAMILY LEAVE BENEFITS LAW 220. Subd. 8 a) The head of a state or municipal department, board, commission or office authorized or required by law to issue any permit for or in connection with any work involving the employment of employees in employment as defined in this article, and not withstanding any general or special statute requiring or authorizing the issue of such permits, shall not issue such permit unless proof duly subscribed by an insurance carrier is produced in a form satisfactory to the chair, that the payment of disability benefits and after January first, two thousand and twenty-one, the payment of family leave benefits for all employees has been secured as provided by this article. Nothing herein, however, shall be construed as creating any liability on the part of such state or municipal department, board, commission or office to pay any disability benefits to any such employee if so employed. b) The head of a state or municipal department, board, commission or office authorized or required by law to enter into any contract for or in connection with any work involving the employment of employees in employment as defined in this article and notwithstanding any general or special statute requiring or authorizing any such contract, shall not enter into any such contract unless proof duly subscribed by an insurance carrier is produced in a form satisfactory to the chair, that the payment of disability benefits and after January first, two thousand eighteen, the payment of family leave benefits for all employees has been secured as provided by this article. DB-120.1 (12-21) Reverse YOK Workers' STATE Compensation Board CERTIFICATE OF NYS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE 1a. Legal Name & Address of Insured (use street address only) 1 b. Business Telephone Number of Insured Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, LLC 908-559-6176 dlbla Verizon Wireless 1095 Avenue of the Americas 1c. NYS Unemployment Insurance Employer Registration Number of New York NY 10036 Insured 26-70019 Work Location of Insured (Only required if coverage is specifically limited to 1d. Federal Employer Identification Number of Insured or Social SecuritycertainlocationsinNewYorkState, i.e., a Wrap -Up Policy) Number Ithaca,NYNY View(. 000007226) Project Location: I I I Wiedmaier Court 22-24$3217 2. Name and Address of Entity Requesting Proof of Coverage 3a. Name of Insurance Carrier Entity Being Listed as the Certificate Holder) LM Insurance Corporation Town of Ithaca 215 North Tioga Street 3b. Policy Number of Entity Listed in Box "1a" Ithaca NY 14850 WA5-69D-550588-093 3c. Policy effective period 6/30/2023 to 6/30/2024 3d, The Proprietor, Partners or Executive Officers are Z included. (Only check box if all partners/officers included) all excluded or certain partners/officers excluded. This certifies that the insurance carrier indicated above in box "3" insures the business referenced above in box "1a" for workers' compensation under the New York State Workers' Compensation Law. (To use this form, New York (NY) must be listed under Item 3A on the INFORMATION PAGE of the workers' compensation insurance policy). The Insurance Carrier or its licensed agent will send this Certificate of Insurance to the entity listed above as the certificate holder in box "2". The insurance carrier must notify the above certificate holder and'the Workers' Compensation Board within 10 days IF a policy is canceled due to nonpayment of premiums or within 30 days IF there are reasons other than nonpayment of premiums that cancel the policy or eliminate the insured from the coverage indicated on this Certificate. (These notices may be sent by regular mail.) Otherwise, this Certificate is valid for one year after this form is approved by the insurance carrier or its licensed agent, or until the policy expiration date listed in box "3c", whichever is earlier. This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policy listed, nor does it confer any rights or responsibilities beyond those contained in the referenced policy. This certificate may be used as evidence of a Workers' Compensation contract of insurance only while the underlying policy is in effect. Please Note: Upon cancellation of the workers' compensation policy indicated on this form, if the business continues to be named on a permit, license or contract issued by a certificate holder, the business must provide that certificate holder with a new Certificate of Workers' Compensation Coverage or other authorized proof that the business is complying with the mandatory coverage requirements of the New York State Workers' Compensation Law. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I am an authorized representative or licensed agent of the insurance carrier referenced above and that the named insured has the coverage as depicted on this form. Approved by: Abbv Nolan Pri-' --- - - ad agent of insurance carrier) Approved by: 5/10/2024 Signature) (Date) Title: Telephone Number of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier: Please Note: Only insurance carriers and their licensed agents are authorized to issue Form C-105.2. Insurance brokers are NOT authorized to issue it. C-105.2 (9-17) www.wcb.ny.gov 79954650 1 9-5505B8 1 6/23-6/24 - C105.2 I Erin Celing 1 5/10/2024 10:1202 AM ICDTY I Page 1 of 2 Workers' Compensation Law Section 57. Restriction on issue of permits and the entering into contracts unless compensation is secured. 1. The head of a state or municipal department, board, commission or office authorized or required by law to issue any permit for or in connection with any work involving the employment of employees in a hazardous employment defined by this chapter, and notwithstanding any general or special statute requiring or authorizing the issue of such permits, shall not issue such permit unless proof duly subscribed by an insurance carrier is produced in a form satisfactory to the chair, that compensation for all employees has been secured as provided by this chapter. Nothing herein, however, shall be construed as creating any liability on the part of such state or municipal department, board, commission or office to pay any compensation to any such employee if so employed. 2. The head of a state or municipal department, board, commission or office authorized or required by law to enter into any contract for or in connection with any work involving the employment of employees in a hazardous employment defined by this chapter, notwithstanding any general or special statute requiring or authorizing any such contract, shall not enter into any such contract unless proof duly subscribed by an insurance carrier is produced in a form satisfactory to the chair, that compensation for all employees has been secured as provided by this chapter. C-105.2 (9-17) REVERSE 79954650 1 9-550588 1 6/23-6/24 - C105.2 I Erin Celing 1 5/10/2024 10:12:12 AM (CDT) I Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT X Statement of Special Inspections Project: Verizon Wireless Telecommunications Facility "Sunny View" Location: 111 Wiedmaier Court, Ithaca NY Owner: Verizon Wireless Design Professional in Responsible Charge: Tectonic Engineering Consultants, Geologists, and Land Surveyors, pPC This Statement of Special Inspections is submitted as a condition for permit issuance in accordance with theSpecialinspectionandStructuralTestingrequirementsoftheBuildingCode. It includes a schedule ofSpecialInspectionservicesapplicabletothisprojectaswellasthenameoftheSpecialInspectionCoordinatorandtheidentityofotherapprovedagenciestoberetainedforconductingtheseinspectionsandtests. This Statement of Special Inspections enco mpass the following disciplines: M. Structural . u Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing Architectural Other: The Special Inspection Coordinator shall keep records of all inspections and shall furnish inspection reportstotheBuildingOfficialandtheRegisteredDesignProfessionalinResponsibleCharge. DiscovereddiscrepanciesshallbebroughttotheimmediateattentionoftheContractorforcorrection. if suchdiscrepanciesarenotcorrected, the discrepancies shall be brought to the attention of the Building OfficialandtheRegisteredDesignProfessionalinResponsibleCharge. The Special Inspection program does notrelievetheContractorofhisorherresponsibilities. Interim reports shall be submitted to the Building Official and the Registered Design Professional inResponsibleCharge, A Final Report of Special Inspections documenting completion of all required Special Inspections, testing andcorrectionofanydiscrepanciesnotedintheinspectionsshallbesubmittedpriortoissuanceofaCertificateofUseandOccupancy, Job site safety and means and methods of construction are solely the responsibility of the Contractor. Interim Report Frequency: As respective components of the project Prepared by: are constructed Steven Matthews, PE kLypu or Anne name) 5/16/24 Signature Date Owner's Authorization: Signature Date or per attached schedule. I Design Pratossional Seal I Building Official's Acceptance: Signature Date CASE Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections . @CASE 2004 Page Of Qualifications of Inspectors and Testing Technicians The qualifications of all personnel performing Special Inspection and testing activities are subject to theapprovaloftheBuildingOfficial. The credentials of all Inspectors and testing technicians shall be provided ifrequested. Key for Minimum Qualifications of inspection Agents: When the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge deems it appropriate that the individual performing a stipulated test or inspection have a specific certification or license as indicated below, suchdesignationshallappearbelowtheAgencyNumberontheSchedule. PE/SE Structural Engineer — a licensed SE or PE specializing in the design of building structuresPE/GE Geotechnical Engineer — a licensed PE specializing in soli mechanics and foundationsEITEngineer -in -Training —a. graduate engineer -who. has. passed- the. Fundamentals of. _ Enginae-r rng examination American Concrete Institute (ACI) Certification ~ ACI-CFTT Concrete Field Testing Technician — Grade 1ACI-CCi Concrete Construction Inspector ACI-LTT Laboratory Testing Technician — Grade 1&2 ACI-STT Strength Testing Technician American Welding Society (AWS) Certification AWS-CWI Certified Welding Inspector AWS/AISC-SSI Certified Structural Steel Inspector American Society of Non -Destructive Testing (ASNT) Certification ASNT Non -Destructive Testing Technician -- Level II or IIi. International Code Council (ICC) Certification ICC-SMSI Structural Masonry Special Inspector ICC-SWSI Structural Steel and Welding Special InspectorICC-SFSi Spray -Applied Fireproofing Special InspectorICC-PCSI Prestressed Concrete Special Inspector iCC-RCSI Reinforced Concrete Special Inspector National institute for Certification in Engineering Technologies (NIGET) NIGET-CT Concrete Technician — Levels I, II, ill & IV NIGET-ST Soils Technician - Levels I, fl, III & IV NIGET-GET Geotechnical Engineering Technician - Levels I, iI, Ii1 & IV Exterior Design Institute (EDi) Certification EDI-EIFS EIFS Third Party Inspector Other CASE Form 101 e Statement of Special Inspections • ©CASE 2004 Quality Assurance Plan rage of Quality Assurance for Seismic Resistance Seismic Design category NOT APPLICABLE' Quality Assurance Plan Required (Y/N) Description of seismic force resisting system and designated seismic systems: 9 Quality Assurance for Wind Requirements Basic Wind Speed (3 second gust) 109 M P H Wind Exposure Category C Quality Assurance Plan Required (Y/N) NO Description of wind force resisting system and designated wind resisting components: N/A - SELF SUPPORTING MONOPOLE TOWER Statement of Responsibility Each contractor responsible for the construction or fabrication of a system or component designated above. must submit a Statement of Responsibility. CASE Form lol • Statement of Special Inspections 0 ©CASE 2004 Page Schedule of inspection of and Testing Agencies This Statement of Special Inspections / Quality Assurance Plan includes the following building systems: Soils and Foundations Cast -In -Place Concrete Spray Fire Resistant Material WoodPrecastConcrete Masonry - Construction Exterior Insulation and Finish System Structural Steel Mechanical & Electrical Systems Architecture! SystemsElCold -Formed Steel Framin g Special Cases S ecial inspection Ac 1. Special Inspection Coordinator 2. S. eating Agency 5. Testing 6. Other Firm Address, Telephone, e-mail Tectonic Engineering 36 British American Blvd Consultants, Geologists, & Land Latham, NY Surveyors, DPC • . 518-346-1890 smatthews@tecton icengineerii ectonic Engineering 36 British American Blvd onsultants, Geologists, & Land Latham, NY urveyors, DPC 518-346-1890 smatthews@tectonicengineerii Atlantic Testing Laboratories Reese Tower Services 22 Corporate Drive, Clifton Park, NY 518-383-9144 award@atlantictesting.com 1044 St. John's Road Drums, PA 18222 570) 359-3293 sales@reesetowerservices. Note: The inspectors and testing agencies shall be engaged by the Owner or the Owner's Agent, and not bytheContractororSubcontractorwhoseworkistobeinspectedortested. Any conflict of interest must bedisclosedtotheBuildingOfficial, prior to commencing work. com CASE Form 101 0 Statement of Special Inspections 0 ®CASE 2004 Soils and Foundations Page of item :::Agency"scope Quaff.} 1. shallow Foundations Inspect soils below footings for adequa11 te bearing capacity and PIJJGE consistency with geotechnical report. Inspect removal a e material and preparation of subcortoplacementofcontrolledfill2_ Controlled Structural Fill Perform sieve tests (ASTM D422 & D1140) and modified Pr to tests ( ASTM D1557) of each source of fillmar qf PE/ GEInspect placement ess and compacticontrolled Cyr 3. Deep Caisson foundation for tower 4. Load Testing 4. Other: Test density of each lift of fillby nuclear methods (ASTM D2922) Verify extent and slope of fillplacement. Inspect and log pile driving operations. Record pile driving PE/ GE resistance and verify compliance with driving criteria. Inspect piles far damage from driving and plumbness. Verify pile size, length and accessories. Inspect installation of drilled pier foundations. Verify pier diameter, bell diameter, lengths, embedment into bedrock and suitability of end bearing strata. CASE; Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections 0 ©CASE 2004 Cast -in -Place Concrete Page of Item Agency # Scope Qetalifi.) 1. Mix Design Review concrete batch tickets and verify compliance with approved mix design. Verify that water added at the site does not Caisson foundation ACl- CCI exceed that allowed by the mix design. ICC- RCSI 2. Material Certification 3. Reinforcement Installation Inspect size, spacing, cover, positioning and grade of reinforcing steel. Verify that reinforcing bars are free of formoil or other Caisson foundation ACI-CCI deleterious materials.Inspect bar laps and mechanical splices. ICC- RCSI Verb that bars are adequately tied and supported on chairs or sters 4. Post -Tensioning Operations placement, stressing, grouting and protection t- 41nsp—eci sioning tendons. V e correctly positioned, tee and wrapped. Record tendon elongations. 5. Welding of Reinforcing Visually inspect all reinforcing steel welds. Verify weldability of reinforcing steel. Ins ect rf MF­nrequired AWS- CWI 8. Anchor Rods Inspect size, positioning and embedment of anchor rods. Inspect concrete placement and consolidation around anchors. Monopole tower anchors to caisson foundation 7. Concrete Placement Inspect placement of concrete- Verify that concrete conveyance and depositing avoids segregation or contamination. Verify that CaissonfoundationACl- CCI concrete is properly consolidated. ICC-RCSI S. Sampling and Tes#Ing of Concrete I Test concrete compressive strength (ASTM C31 & C39), slump ASTM C143), air -content (ASTM C231 or C173) and Caisson foundation ACI-CF7T temperature (A,STMCIp64). ACI-STT 9. Curing and Protection Inspect curing, cold weather protection and hot weather protection procedures. Caisson foundation ACI-CCI ICC-RCSI 10. Other: CASE Farm iol . Statement of Special Inspections • ®CASE 2004 Precast Concrete Page of I' " Agency # Scope -- Qualif.) I. PI t Certification / Quality Review plant operations and quality controlConIProceduresACI-CCI Fab 'cator Exempt ICC-RCSI 2. Mix C]esig Inspect concrete batching operations and ve approved mix design ACI-CCI ICC-RCSI S. Material Certificati 4. Reinforcement Installation Inspect size, spacing, positio and grade of reinforcing steel. Verify that reinforcing bar are free ofform oil or other ACl-CCI deleterious materials. C-RCSI 5. Prestress Operations Inspect placement, ressing, grouting and protection of prestressing tendAs8. Connections / Embeddei Items 7. Formwork Geomelry 8. Concrete Placement 9. Sampling and Testing of Concrete 10. Curing and Pro#echo 11. Ere/Prect Elements 12. Oth with Inspect placeme of concrete. Ver that concrete conveyance and depositing av\1',6.gregation or contamination. Verb that I- CCI concrete is propeolidated . CC- RCSI Test concrete comp ressi strength (AS7M C31 & C39), slump ASTM C143), air -consent STM C231 or C173) and ACl- CHT temperature (ASTM C1064). ACI-STT Inspect curing, cold weather prat lion and hot weather protection procedures. ACI CCI ICC-RCSI Inspect erection of precast concrete includkg member configuration, connections, welding and gro ing. PFJSE CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections • ©CASE 2004 Masonry Required Inspection Level: 1 2 Item Agency # Scope gtt rlt:.} 1. mal@rjal Certification 2. 3. Installation of 4. 5. Reinforcement 6. 7. Grouting 7. Weather protection 9. Evaluation Strength 10. 11. and Grout Inspect proportioning, mixing and grout. ICC-SMSI I son Inspect size, layout, bonding and FNIIICC-SMSI Page of and of masonry units. Inspect construction of mo ar joints including tooling and filling of head joints. ICMSI 1 n Inspect placem t, positioning and lapping of reinforcing steel. ICC-SMSI specs wel ng of reinforcing steel. AWS-CWI Inspe lacement, anchorage and stressing ofprestressing bars. ICC-SMSI Inspect placeme and consolidation of groat. Inspect masonry 1/ccs, clean-outs far high ' growling. ICC SI OOF Inspect cold weather prate on and hot weather protection procedures. Verify that wall vities are protected against ICC-SMSI precipitation. Test compressive strength of mortar grout cube samples ASTM C780). ICC-SMSI Test compressive strength of masonry pris (ASTM 0314). Inspect size, location, spacing and embedment (;dowels, anchors ICC-SMSI and ties. \ CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections 9 ©CASE 2004 Structural Steel Page of Item I. Fabricator Certification/ Quality Control Procedures Fabricator Exempt 3. Open Web Scope Review shop fabrication and quality control AWSIAISC- ICC-SWSI Review certified mill test reports and identification wide flange hapes, high-strength bolt AWSIAISC- electrodes S CC Inspect installation, field welding and bridging o "old 4. Bolting Inspect installation and tightening of high -strength bolts. Yer. that splines have separated from tensi . ertfyAWSfAISC- proper tighten' ontinuous inspection of bolts in rtttcal connections. on 5. Welding Visually inspect all welds. Inspect pre -heat post -heat and rface preparation between passes. V ngt offillet welds. A WS-C W7 Ultrasonic testing of all full penetration welds. ASNT 6. Shear Connectors Inspect size, number, positioning and welding of she connectors. Inspect suds r ash. Rang test all AWS/AISC- shea z a 3 lb hammer. Bend test all questionable studs to 15 degrees. ICC-SWSI 7. Structural Details Inspect steel frame for compliance with structural including bracing, member an connection details. PF SE S. Metal Deck Inspect welding and side -lap fastening of metal roof and floordeck. AWS CW7 9. Other: post installation inspection Inspect all components of tower and antenna mount of monopole tower TIA-222-H installation, including safety climb, branching, mount and related hardware, slipjoints, base plate, and anchor rods. CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections . ©CASE 2004 Cold -Formed Steel Framing Page of CASE Form 101 . Statement of Special Inspections • ®CASE 2004 Spmy-Applied Fire Resistant Material Page of CASE Form 901 • Statement of Special Inspections + ©CASE 2004 Wood Construction Page of CASE Form 101 9 Statement of Special inspections • ©CASE 2004 Exterior Insulation & Finish Systems (EIFS) Page of CASE Form 101 • Statement of Special Inspections • ©CASE 2004 Mechanical & Electrical Systems Page of Item Agency # Scope Quali#.) I. Smoke Control 2. Mechanical, HVAC Pi ping S. Electrical System Electrical metering equipment MDIA or equal, 3rd party underwriter 4.Other; CASE Form 101 0 Statement of Special Inspections . ©CASE 2004 Architectural Systems page of CASE Form 101 • Stalement of Special inspections • @CASE 2004 Special Cases Page of CASE Form Iol - Statement of Special Inspections . @CASE 2004 EXHIBIT Y May 7, 2024 Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Valuation Services Director I Syracuse Direct +1 315 422 7107 Donald.Fisher@colliers.com Katherine Elise ]aeckel Principal Engineer Verizon Wireless 132 Creek Circle East Syracuse, New York 13057 Phone: 1.315.701.4621; 315.794.1093 Email: katie.jaeckel@verizonwireless.com RE: Proposed Sunny View — Ithaca Cell Tower Attention: Christine Balestra, Senior Planner Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Ithaca; 215 North Tioga Street Ithaca, New York 14580 Dear Ms. 3aeckel: We have been retained to provide an opinion/consulting letter for the proposed Sunny View communications cell tower to be located at 111 Wiedmaier Court in the town of Ithaca, Tompkins County, New York. Based on our conversations to develop the scope of work for this assignment, you have indicated that the Town of Ithaca's zoning regulations require that a study radius limited to 500 feet from the boundaries of the parcel that is proposed to be improved with a communications cell tower be completed, This opinion/consulting letter addresses this objective and the difficulties in completing a market study analysis with a radius of such small magnitude. The client for this assignment is Verizon Wireless. The intended users include the client, Verizon Wireless, and the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Ithaca in Tompkins County, New York. The intended use of this opinion/consulting letter is to address the difficulty in finding market data to support the impact of a new communications cell tower on single-family residential properties within 500 feet of the boundaries of a tax parcel on which a proposed cell tower is to be constructed. For purposes of this opinion/consulting letter, real property is not being appraised; however, the fee simple estate value of each single-family residential property included in the market studies referenced in this letter represented by the arm's length transaction price is considered for analysis purposes. The effective date of this opinion/consulting letter is the date that it was completed which is represented by the date on this letter. Accelerating success. The scope of work for this opinion/consulting letter is to consider three areas: i. A review and summary of market studies for proposed cell towers recently completed, 2, The radius of study areas generally used for this type of market study. 3. Preliminary observations from available cell tower locations in the Ithaca area. We will summarize the information analyzed, the techniques employed to complete these types of market studies, and the reasoning that supports the analyses, opinions and conclusions reached in each market study for proposed cell tower construction. Each proposed cell tower identified in each market study was originally a vacant site that had been selected as meeting location and elevation criteria for construction of a communications cell tower. Some of those parcels may have included residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial, or institutional improvements on portions of the tax parcel separated from the proposed cell tower site. The scope of work for this opinion/consulting letter does not require an opinion of the highest and best use of the property that is identified for market study analysis purposes. No extraordinary assumptions or hypothetical conditions are required for this opinion/consulting letter. Because this opinion/consulting letter is not a real property appraisal report and does not provide an opinion of market value, a certification is not required as stated in Standards Rule 2-3 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). Otherwise, this opinion/consulting letter has been prepared in accordance with the 2024-2025 edition of USPAP. Introduction: You originally requested that an economic analysis study of the property value impacts that the construction and operation of the PWSF (personal wireless service facility), commonly referred to as a cell tower, be completed on adjacent properties located within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which the PWSF is located. According to Law Insider(https://www.Iawinsider.com/dictionary/personal-wireless-service-facility-pwsf), a PWSF is a staffed or unstaffed location for the transmission and/or reception of radio frequency signals or other personal wireless communications, including commercial mobile services, unlicensed wireless services, wireless broadband services, and common carrier wireless exchange access services as defined in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A PWSF usually consists of an antenna or group of antennas, transmission cables, feed lines, equipment cabinets or shelters, and may include a tower. Facilities may include new, replacement or existing towers, replacement towers, co -location on existing towers, base station attached concealed and non -concealed antenna, dual purpose facilities, concealed towers, and non - concealed towers (monopoles, lattice and guyed), so long as those facilities are used in the provision of personal wireless services as that term is defined in the Telecommunications Act I had summarized our experience in completing market studies for proposed communications cell tower throughout Upstate New York, including the likelihood of identifying a sufficient number of sales of single-family residential properties within 500 feet of existing cell tower sites. As a result, you have requested that we initially provide this opinion letter that identifies some of the proposed cell tower sites for which we completed market studies, the radius of the study areas generally used, and the preliminary observations we have made from the available tower locations in the Ithaca vicinity that were proposed for before and after residential price studies. Completed Cell Tower Market Studies We have completed market studies for proposed communications cellular towers and proposed solar Farm/photovoltaic projects throughout Upstate New York for over the past two decades, including market studies completed by predecessors of this office - CNY Pomeroy. Appraisers, Inc. and Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. The typical process is referred as a before and afteranalysis where the sale prices of single-family residential properties in close proximity to an existing cell tower are reviewed for a period prior to and following the construction of that existing cell tower. Depending upon the number of transactions in each market, a period of one -to -two years is used for the before and after study periods. Sale data bases that record transactional information about property transfers are used for this type of study; examples include www.real-info,com, www.salesweb.com, ImageMate, Multiple Listing Services (MLS), and Land Max. MLS has comprehensive information about the transfers in its system but does not always include all the property transfers (i.e., not all properties that are transferred in any given market are listed in MLS). SalesWeb includes data on every transfer but does not include property specific characteristics such as house size and style, age, or year of construction, etc. ImageMate and LandMax do include property characteristic details but are not available in all areas. Based on our experience, the Real -Info database is the most consistent in the inclusion of property characteristics and is relatively uniform in recording all of the property transfers in a given area, Our market study process incorporates the following steps for each existing communications cell tower that is identified to be studied to measure changes in nearby single-family residential properties: Identify existing cell towers that were constructed within the past decade but at least two years ago (so an adequate after period for sales can be collected). Identify sales of improved residential properties within an approximate one -mile radius of the identified cell tower for both time periods o Selection criteria for the sales included arm's length transactions, no unusual characteristics as listed in the data bases, and that had no significant missing data in the data bases o If a sufficient number of sales are identified for a smaller study radius, then the study radius could be reduced to one-half mile from the existing cell tower Compile one set of single-family residential sales for the before period - one -to -two years prior to the construction of the existing cell tower being studied. Compile a second set of single-family residential sales for the after period - one -to -two years after the construction of the existing cell tower being studied. o The unit prices are used for the before and after price change comparisons because they incorporate all of the characteristics of each sale property and eliminate the need to adjust for significant differences in most transactional and physical characteristics. Analyze each set of sales to calculate the average and median house sizes, average and median sale prices, and the average and median unit prices (sale price divided by house size). Complete an economic trends analysis for the location of the cell tower being studied to calculate the appropriate time trend to be applied to the midpoint of the before sales to adjust them to the midpoint of the after sales so that differences in time are accounted for in the analysis. Compare the average and median house sizes of the before sales to the after sales and adjust for any significant differences. o If the average and/or median house sizes are more than 100 square feet different between the before and after sets of sales, then the before house sizes are adjusted based on the Floor Area/Shape Multipliers in the Marshall Valuation Service cost manual that measures differences in prices based on building size. After adjusting for time and differences in house sizes, the adjusted average and median unit prices of the before sales are compared to the average and median unit prices of the after sales. For existing cell tower locations with sufficient before and after sales activity, we will break out specific house styles (e.g. ranch, colonial, cape cod, contemporary) to see if buyers of a particular house style react differently to a cell tower's construction than buyers of other house styles. A typical market study would complete a before and after analysis on four to five existing cell towers to measure the changes in unit prices following the construction of that cell tower. The results of the comparisons of the adjusted unit prices for the before sales to the after sales are compiled in a table to show the results of each study. Some of the recent market studies for proposed communications cell towers that we have completed include: 7532 Thompson Road, Town of Cicero, Onondaga County 275C Menemsha Lane & Creek Road, Town of Brunswick, Rensselaer County 110 Chelsea Road, Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County Farm to Market Road, Town of Athens, Greene County Off Indian Hill Road, Town of Pompey, Onondaga County Parsons Road, Town of Sharon, Schoharie County Each of these market studies included before and after unit price analyses on single-family residential properties for at least four to five existing cell towers identified based on the above criteria for each proposed cell tower. Each of these market studies reported a predominance of the before and after residential unit price comparisons to have no negative impact of the prices of single-family residential properties in close proximity to the existing cell towers that were studied. Note that we have completed similar before and after market studies to measure the effect on residential prices after the construction of a solar farm (photovoltaic ground array). These solar farm market studies follow the same general process and include similar selection criteria as those outlined above for the cell tower market studies. RadiNs of study ar as generally used: We usually start out with using a one -mile radius to identify sales within the before and after study periods around existing communications cell towers. If we identify a large number of sales, we have reduced the study radius to one- half mile. However, the primary limitation in these types of market studies is the availability of arm's length sales within the study radius. We look for existing cell towers that have one or more residential subdivisions or a large number of rural residential residences in close proximity, with the hope that high densities of residential homes will yield a reasonable number of sales of those residential properties within both the before and after study periods. It is common to review the locations of a dozen or more existing cell tower sites before finding at least four that fit the market study criteria. Without those sales, there is no practical way to measure changes in prices between the two study periods. Most veil towers range between one hundred and two hundred feet in height, which extends above the surrounding tree height and can be visible up to several miles away. Those towers usually stand out apart from the nature landscape of the tower's neighborhood, whether that neighborhood is suburban or rural. Therefore, a study radius of one mile is reasonable as a starting point to measure changes in residential unit prices both for visual impact as well as compiling enough before and after sales to measure unit price changes. In some locations, usually in or close to multiple suburban residential subdivisions, we have found enough sales to reduce the study radius to one-half mile. However, to date, we have not encountered a study area that could be as small as one -tenth of a mile (approximately 520 feet - close to the 500-foot radius stated in the Town of Ithaca's zoning ordinance). This does not mean that we have not found sales of single-family residences within 500± feet of an existing cell tower. But we would need sales of similar residences in both the before and after study periods to measure unit price changes, and to date we have not found sufficient market data to measure those unit price changes. I have reviewed the cell tower market studies that we have completed over the past ten years and did not find one before and after matched pair of sales within 500 feet of an existing cell tower that could be used to measure unit price changes. Preliminary observations from available cell tower locations in the Ithaca area: During the initial stages of this assignment, Verizon Wireless provided the location of several sites of existing cell towers that were presented as possible study sites. Examples of these cell tower sites include: Ithaca, SBA 178-foot tower located at 815 South Aurora Street, Ithaca Coy Glen, VZW 125-foot tower located at 651 Five Mile Drive (NYS Route 3A), Ithaca Westhaven Road, Crown 105-foot tower located at 1338 Mecklenburg Road, Ithaca Varna Relo, Cornell University, 130-foot tower located at 156 Palustris Drive, Ithaca Cayuga, VZW 120-foot tower located at 1861/2 Pleasant Grove Road, Ithaca VZW tower - 114-foot tower located at 1504 Hanshaw Road, Ithaca Tompkins County - 121-foot tower located at 779 Warren Road, Lansing Each of these sites was reviewed with aerial photographs and public records and, unfortunately, each cell tower was located in an area with low residential densities and/or was constructed over ten years ago. Further, our preliminary research indicated that none of the Ithaca area cell tower sites had both before and after single-family residential sales within 500 feet of the parcel boundaries on which cell towers had been constructed within the past ten years. At our request, Verizon Wireless provided existing cell tower sites in surrounding counties and then in other urban/suburban areas. To supplement this expansion of the area to be studied, we also reviewed recent market studies we had completed for other assignments (refer to the studies listed on the previous page). With these additional tower sites, we informed you that we could complete a market study report similar to what had been completed for other clients, but that none of these other studies included before and after residential sale data on properties that were within 500 feet of the cell tower's parcel boundaries. Summary: Based on our experience with this type of market analysis, we have found no significant or consistent negative unit price trends in single-family residential properties following the construction of a communications cell tower for study radii ranging from one -mile to one-half mile. After reviewing the cell tower market studies we have completed within the past ten years, we have not found any before and after residential sale data on single-family residential properties that were within 500 feet of the boundaries of the tax parcels on which cell towers were constructed. We had reviewed and analyzed multiple sets of transactional data on single-family residential properties that transferred within one-half mile and one -mile radius circles for several sites across Upstate New York, but none of the market studies we have completed required a study radius of only 500 feet nor did our experience with this type of market analysis reveal a sufficient quantity of residential sale data to project an impact of single-family residential values or prices for such a small radius. The sale data in market studies that we have completed within the past ten years was not specific enough to identify if a single residential property would be negatively impacted by a new cell tower built within 500 feet of its location. In our professional opinion, we will not be able to provide a credible market study based on the narrow parameters outlined in the Town of Ithaca's Code requiring a conclusion on value impacts to residential properties within 500 feet of the boundaries of a parcel to be improved with a communications cellular tower. Residential sale data would require one or more sales of similar residential properties both before and after the construction of a cel! tower, within a short period of time, that would be needed for this type of analysis. Our experience with completing several of these types of market studies has found no consistent residential sale data that can be used to measure value changes within a 500-foot radius of the parcel with a communications cellular tower constructed on it, Expanding the radius to one -quarter of a mile (1,320 feet) from the parcel's boundaries would provide more sales for some of the cell towers studied, but unless those tower sites were close to one or more residential subdivisions, the number of residential sales suitable for measuring price changes could still be too few to use for statistical analysis. This is why most of the market studies we've completed for communications cell towers, ground array photovoltaic projects (i.e. solar farms), water towers, and other types of infrastructure improvements needed to use one-half to one - mile radii for sale data collection. Most of these types of structures are built in relatively rural areas or on the fringe of suburban/rural neighborhoods where the number of residential properties is fewer than what is found in suburban and rural neighborhoods, and where the number of recent sales of those residential properties that are available for statistical analysis are even fewer. Respectfully, Colliers International Valuation & Advisory Services, LLC Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Valuation Services Director I Syracuse Direct +1 315 422 7107 Donald. Fisher@colliers.com JT LIA ko By Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stabler, and Olufunke 0. Fagbami 1 ell phone use has exploded Ten years ago, the Thone did not exist. 5martphones did not exist. The iPad did not exist. Black- . berries were cutting edge. There was no T tter, no Instagrarq, no Pinter- est. Facebook was still nascent, and MySpace was still popular Today, peo- ple regularly access the Internet over their smadphones and tablets. They tweet they post, they snapchat. In just an eight -year period, from 2007 to 2014, AT&T saw a 100,OD0olo increase in mobile data traffic on its wireless network —not a 100% increase, not a 1,000% increase, but a 100,0007o increase. See Randall Stephenson, Chairman's Letter, AT&T 2014Annual Report (Feb.10, 2015), www.att.com/ Investor/ATT-Annual/2014/letter_tc investors.htrnl. National mobile'data traffic is estimated to increase another sixfold from 2015 to 2020, at a com- pound annual growth rate of 42.%. See Cisco, VNI Mobile Forecast Highlights, 2015-2020,www.cLsco.com/assets/sol/ sp/vni/forecast jighlighis mobile/ index.html (last visited Feb. 23, 2016). People have responded to this tech- nology. And they like it. A lot But one thing people do not seem to like is cell towers —the infrastructure . necessary to make the network work. Despite pundits wAo predicted that technology would reduce the num- ber of towers, the need for additional towers and network capacity is greater than ever, as the network capacity to transmit data has been far outstripped by the ever-growing demands of a population abandoning its landlines in favor of the convenience of smart - phones and mobile data access. In most jurisdictions, proposed new cell towers must undergo some sort of public application process involving a public hearing. Given the chance, those in the area will oppose any proposed new tower. While the Federal Telecom- munications Act of 1996,47 U.S.C. 332 (7)(B)(iv), prohibits jurisdictions from denying cell tower applications on the basis of alleged ill -health effects, Richard A. Forsten and Wendie C. stabler are partners, and Olufunke O. Fagbami Is an associate, In the Wilmington, Delaware, office of Saul Ewing LLP. neighbors invariably argue that a new tower will adversely affect prop- erty values (specifically theirs), so the pending tower application should be rejected. Appraisers argue to the contrary. Cell towers, they point out, are much like other modem infirastructure (teIe- phone poles, utility lines, streetlights, and so on). Although cell towers may initially be noticed, they quickly fade into the background and have no appreciable effect on valuHust as telephone poles, utility lines, street- lights, and the other infrastructure of modern life do not affect value. Although this conclusion may seem counterintuitive to many, and certainly those opposing a new towerwill vehe- mently disagree, it is borne out by the statistics and studies. Recently, in Sussex County, Dela- ware, a unique set of circumstances made it possible to review the effect of aproposed tower on the property val- ues of surrounding properties before the final approval was granted. Specifically, after an approval for a proposed tower was granted, it was challenged, While' the challenge was pending, a tempo- rary tower was erected in the location proposed for the permanent tower. The challenged approval was reversed and a new hearing ordered. Because the county has a policy of allowing zon- ing code violations to remain in place while the property owner seeks a vari- ance or undertakes other remedial action (in this case, the new hearing process), the county allowed the tem- porary tower to remain. Over the course of the next two years, while the challenges to the tower played out before the Sussex County Board of Adjustment and the Delaware courts, the temporary tower remained, allowing the tower applicant to ana- lyze property values before and after the temporary tower was constructed. and to measure its effect on local prop- erty values as compared to the market as a whole. In fact, as further described herein, and consistent with the broader literature on the subject, the actual data for the site in question confirmed no effect on value. This article is divided into three parts. First, it reviews various studies and analyses available on the valuation question, all of which generally indi- cate that cell towers have little or no effect on the value of nearby proper- ties, Following this general review, the article examines the case of AT&T v. Sussex County Band ofAdjustment, No. S14A-O"l MJB, 2015 WL 1975629 Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2015), in which AT&T was able to demonstrate that its proposed tower would have no effect on value because, dining the pendency of the lengthy appeals process con- ceming the originally -approved tower, AT&T had erected a temporary tower, which was shown to have no effect on value. Put another way, unlike most cell tower applications in which opponents argue that studies from other areas are not indicative of the effect the proposed tower will have on their properties, AT&T was able to conclusively dem- onstrate that the proposed tower in the proposed location would have no effect on nearby property values. Finally, this article concludes with some other les- sons from. the AT&T case. Generally Speaking, Cell Towers Do Not Affect Property Value Generally speaking, most studies of the issue conclude that proximity to a cell tower has no significant effect on property values. For example, a 2001 study by Thom Consultants, which examined 85 transactions involving homes and 26 transactions involving vacant lots, concluded that "proximity to the cell site did not affect sale prices of homes or residential lots within the Potomac study area." See Thorne Con- sultants, Inc., Monopole Impact Study on Residential Real Estate Prices for Homes and Residential Tots in the Vcinity of the BuIiis School, Potomac, Montgom- ery County, Maryland (May 2, 2001), at 3. The 2001 study, in bunt, referenced a 1998 study in the Richmond, Virginia, area that examined six towers and 140 properties, and that also concluded there was no consistent market evi- dence suggesting any negative impact upon improved residential properties exposed to such facilities in the areas included in the study." See Alien G. Dorin Jr,, MAL SRA & Joseph W. Smith a The Impact of Communications Toms PROUAIE & PROPEM a MOW/Jur- 2016 11 on Residential Property Values, Right of Way, Mar./Apr.1999, at 17, avail-, able at https://www.irwaonline.arg/ eweb/upload/0399b.pdf. A 2004 study of homes in Orange County, Floc ida, found a minimal effect of 2% on . value. See Sandy Bond, Lasing CIS to Measure the Impact of Distance to Cell Phone 2buers on House Prices in Florida, Appraisal J., Fall 2007. A 2013 study from Chatham County, North Caro- lina, concluded that "the proposed tower willnot adversely affect prop- erty values in the general vicinity of the tower," and a study from that same year in Holly Springs, North Carolina, concluded that for an existing tower, there does not appear to be any sig- nificant or consistent change in value from the properties located [closer to or farther from the tower] ... con- cluding that the tower does not affect the value of the properties as distance increases from [thel tower." See David A. Smith, Impact Analysis of a Proposed Telecommunications 7buvr on the Val- ues of Properties in the General Vicinity of the 7bwer Located on Poythress Road, Chatham County, North Carolina (Sept. 10, 2013); at 1, available at wwwrha- ' thamnc.org/ . Rezonk%Subdiv*ionCases /2013 / 416-13 BCC/M6acham_Cel!_Lot/PH_ Comments/Impact%20Analysis 20SK011715.pdf; Tom J. Keith & Associates, Inc., Impact of Cell Tower on Surrounding Properties, available at http: //d3gpcpjksgjx5i.cloildfront.net/ media/re-research/cell tower study. pdf (Last visited Feb. 23, 2016). Finally, a 2005 study from New Castle County, Delaware, looked at eight tower sites and similarly concluded that "the rmar- ket demonstrates no ascertainable diminution of value to surrounding neighborhoods due to the installation or presence of a nearby communica- tions tower." See Appraisal -Associates, Inc., Impact of a"T'elecommunications 7bwer upon Values of Residential Prop- erties (Aug. 2003), at 93. "The data demonstrates that residences in close proximity to a tower (less than one quarter mile or 2,000 feet in the case of the vast majority of the sales studied) did not incur a measurable diminu- tion in value after development of the tower." Id. at 92. A 2W5 survey conducted by researchers in New Zealand found an interesting bias. Although the study concluded that proximity to a tower did seem to affect value, it also found that those in the "control group," who did not live near a tower, expressed a great deal more concern over the effect of a tower on propertyvalue than those who lived near a tower. See Sandy Bond & Ko-Kang Wang, The Impact of Cell Phone Tourers on House Prices in Residential Neighborhoods, Appraisal 1, Summer 2005, at 256, 262-65. SpecLfi- cally, almost half of the control group expressed concern about the effect on value, while only 13% of those living near a tower expressed concern, and more than 60% were not worried about the effect on value. Id. The researchers theorized that this difference between those who did not live near a tower versus those who did may be because those living near a tower did notwant to express fears about property value decline that would then, in fact, lead to lowerproperty values. Id. An expla- nation just as likely, if not more so, is posited by researchers whose studies find no general effect on value —that is, thatbecause cell towers are perceived as part of today's modem infra. - structure, they simply fade into the background and are not noticed. Those living near towers do not express con- cern, or do not perceive the cell towers as having a negative effect on property values, because the towers have simply faded into the -background as part of the existing landscape. Despite the general consensus that cell towers do not adversely affect property values, courts have sometimes allowed boards and admin- istrative bodies to ignore studies from other jurisdictions and locations, on the apparent theory that such studies fail to take local factors into account. For example, in C*ular Pennsylvania, LLC a. Sussex County Board ofAdjustment, No. 05A 12-003-RFS, 2007 WL 152548 Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 19, 2007), at "8, the Delaware Superior Court justified the board's m ftLW to consider two out- of-state analyses because they "were not substantially similar to the pro- posed area in question" The court then suggested that Cingular could have studied the effect its proposed tower would have on properties in the imme- diate area, but how to study an un-built tower was not explained. Indeed, this is the conundrum facing many appli- cations --while studies and data based on other towers indicate no significant effect on value, opponents claim that such studies involving other areas and other towers should not apply to their particular properties. In 2013, though, AT&T would find itself in the unique acid unanticipated position of demonstrating that its pro- posed tower would have no effect on value based on "actual market data from the actual geographic area surrounding the actual proposed tower. Thus, the challenge of disproving a negative had just become much easier. AT&T v.-sussex Conner.. One Cell Tower,, Three Hearings, No Effect on Value The case that would become AT&T u Sussex County Board of Adjustment began in the early 2000s, when New Cingular Wireless PCS (which would later be acquired by AT&T) first iden- tified the need for a new cell tower as part of its network in the general vicin- ity of Bethany Beach, Sussex County, Delaware. After several years of fits and starts, Cingular finally found a suitable site with a willing property owner —the rear of a combination Arby's Restaurant/B? Gas Station parking lot, The property was located on the east side of Route 1, the major north/south artery serving the Dela- ware beaches from Penwick Island at the Maryland line to Rehoboth Beach to the north. Alate night drive-thru for the Arby's was located on the back side of the building (the same side as the proposed tower) and a water retention pond was located at the very rear of the property. To the immediate south of the property was a furniture store and to the immediate north, a small undevel- oped parcel. To the east and a portion of the southern boundary was a small 46-unit) condominium community called "Sea Pines." To the south of Sea Pines were a Holiday Inn Express and a seafood restaurant, and to the east of Sea Pines was the much larger, and considerably taller, Sea Colony 12 PKosAT & PROPMTV Mokr/June 2016 Condominiums, consisting of multiple nine -story buildings. See Figure 1. Linder the Sussex County Zoning Code, if a cell tower "is to be erected within 500 feet of any residentially zoned lot," as was the case here, a spe- cial use exception is required from the Board of Adjustment. Sussex County Code § 115-194.2(A). In addition to meeting certain technical requirements regarding height, setback, and light- ing, among others, the applicant must also demonstrate that the special use exception will not "substantially affect adversely the uses of the adjacent and neighboring property." Sussex County Code § 115-210. Cingular submitted its origirtal cell tower application in September 2009. Neighbors opposed the tower, but the board granted the request by a 3-2 vote. Opponents of the project then appealed to the Delaware Superior Court; while the appeal was pending, Cingular, with the permission of the county, installed a temporary cell tower. After the tem- porary tower was erected and while the appeal was pending, it was discov- ered that the county had posted notice of the hearing on the wrong property the undeveloped adjacent parcel to the north). Thus, the superior court held that, even though posting of a property is not required under county rules, and all other notices (for example, newspa- per and mailings) had been properly given, if the county was going to post on a property, it needed to post on the correct property, and a new hearing was ordered. See Sea Pines Will, Condo. Ass'n of Owners v. Bd. of Adjustment, No, SIOA-01-M THG, 2010 WL 8250842 Del. Super Ct. Oct. 28, 2010). So, Cingular (now a part of AT&T) went back to the board for a new hearing. This time, more opponents showed up and the board voted 3-2 to deny the request; in doing so, the board noted in its written decision that "it was impossible for the Board to disregard the large number of indi- viduals opposing the tower." This time Cingular appealed, first to the supe- rior court, which affirmed the board, and then to the Delaware Supreme Court. The supreme court reversed the board's decision because the board applied the wrong standard in risure I evaluating the application; the board found only that the proposed tower would "adversely affect" neighbor- ing properties, not "substantially affect adversely" as required by the Sussex County Code. See New Cingular Wire- less PCS v Bd. ofAdjustment, 65 A.3d 607, 611-12 (Del. 2013). The matter then returned to the board for a third hearing, some four years after the first hearing, and the stage was now set: with a temporary tower having been in place for over three years, one could look at the movement of property val- ues in the vicinity of the temporary tower both before and after the tower was constructed and compare those movements to the movement of prop- erty values in the wider market; or, put another way, one could determine with relative certainty what effect, if any, a tower at the proposed location might have. The Temporary Tower Has No Effect on Property Value AT&T had two appraisers look at the market effects of the temporary tower. The first appraiser looked at sales of two -bedroom nonwater-view condo- minium units (that is, units comparable to the condominium units adjoining the cell tower site). He found a total of 36 sales, of which the top two sales, and six of the top 10 sales, were in the Sea Pines Condominium community immediately adjoining the cell tower site. If the tower were going to have an effect on value, one would think that the top sales prices would not be achieved in the commu- nity immediately surrounding the tower. AT&T's other appraiser tracked the movement of prices in the Sea Pines com- munity and the larger beach com- munity for two years before and through two years after the installation of the temporary tower. His analysis demonstrated that as the larger real estate market moved up and down, so did the Sea Pines community m approximately the same way. See Figure 2 on page 14. In testifying before the Sussex County Board ofAdjust- ment, the appraiser explained: In this high density mixed use area, there's a lot of influences surrounding this project already. So people, when they're making a purchase decision in Sea Pines and other areas in this resort mar- ket, there are many things that impact your decision, your view, your access. And a cell tower pole, a single monopole, really is an expected thing in today's world. As we showed, One side of this property is lined with power lines that have been there forever. People need power. They're an accepted part of the landscape. Apparently, people have been making purchase decisions in Sea Pines for many years in the pres- ence of those lines and the other uses like gas pumps and the convenience store, and we just didn't see any evidence of this one particular structure [having] a unique influence on property value. Opponents of the project testified at the hearing before the board as well. They PROBATE & PROPERTY Mar/June 2016 13 offered no appraisal or other direct evi- dence of any effect on value. In fact, some of their testimony actually bol- stered AT&T's case when two residents testified that they had experienced no problems in fully renting their units during the rental season after the tem- porary tower was installed —or, put another way, the temporary tower did not affect the ability of unit own- ers to rent their units. Moreover, no unit owners complained of having to lower rents to secure tenants or of any other adverse economic effect. One of AT&T's appraisers also did a study of rental rates and found that Sea Pines's rental rates were consistent with the local market and that there was no effect on rental rates associated with the temporary tower. In sum, then, the case of the Sus- sex County temporary tower confirms what studies have shown for years — that cell towers have become part of the suburban landscape and have no appreciable effect on value. Like tele- phone poles, power lines, streetlights, and the other infrastructure of modern life, cell towers fade into the back- ground and draw no more attention than other infrastructure, Some Other Lessons from the A)r& T Case AT&T's experience in this case provides two further lessons. First, a land use applicant needs to be absolutely cer- tain that all procedures are followed properly; and, for better or worse, this means confirming that the local gov- ernmental body has given the proper notices and made the proper mailings and postings. But for the county's inad- vertent error in posting notice of the hearing on the wrong property in 2009, AT&T could have avoided four years of additional litigation. One need not be heavy-handed in confirming that things are done properly, but confirma- tion should be obtained. More importantly, the Delaware Superior Court's 2015 opinion, fol- lowing the third hearing by the board, marks something of a watershed for Delaware courts in the way they deal with decisions by boards of adjust- ment. Under Delaware law, appeals from the board go to the Delaware 14 PRORATT; & PROPERTY a MAYMNE 2016 Superior Court, which, by statute, has the power to reverse, affirm, or modify a decision of the board. See Del. Code Ann. fit. 9, §§ 1314(0, 4918(f), 6918(f); Del. Code Ann. tit. 22, § 328(c). Signifi- cantly, unlike other Delaware statutes Average Sates Prke moo, A= AM SAO nil X» nm3 figure 2.-- ---. _-- — regarding appeals from other boards and administrative bodies, there is no power to "remand" a decision back to the board of adjustment. (For examples of statutes in which remand is specifi- cally listed as a remedy, see, e.g., Del. Code Ann. tit. 7, § 6612(b); Del. Code Arun. tit. 7, § 6214(b); Del. Code Ann. tit. 9,5 8312(c); Del. Code Ann. tit.14, 1414; Del. Code Ann. tit. 18, § 328(h); and Del. Code Ann. tit.19, § 2350(b).) And this lack of remand is most likely not an accident. Most matters before a board of adjustment involve homeowners seek- ing minor dimensional variances for things such as screened porches or additions to their homes. Judicial review, of course, can be a time-con- suming and expensive process. Rather than remands and multiple hearings, the Delaware General Assembly gave the superior court the ability to decide the matter (reverse, affirm, or modify) as part of its decision on appeal, rather than remand back to the board for fur- ther proceedings. Indeed, although most appeals are on the record, the General Assembly further provided that the superior court could receive additional evidence as part of the appeal process. Del. Code Ann. tit. 9, §§ 1314(e), 4918(e), 6918(e). The only reason for the court to receive additional evidence would be for the court to make find- ings on its own and resolve the matter once and for all, rather than remand a proceeding back to the board for another hear- ing and, potentially, another appeal. Homeowners should not be faced with years of litigation over whether they can build an additional two feet into a setback, But, despite the lack of the power to remand, when revers- ing a board decision denying a permit or variance request, courts have almost always said that reversal does not constitute a grant of the permit or vari- ance —rather, the court requires the applicant to go back to the board and re -apply for the per- mit or variance with a new hearing and an entirely new pro- cess. In other words, reviewing courts have done the functional equivalent of a remand, even though the courts do not call what they're doing a "remand." The superior court's 2015 decision is significant, then, because the court did not reverse the board and then require AT&T to go back to the board and re- apply (for what would have been the fourth time) for a special use excep- tion for the cell tower. Rather, the court specifically recognized that it did not have the power to remand and there- fore modified the board's decision by ordering the special exception granted. Specifically, the court explained: At this stage, Appellant [AT&T] has been before the Board and the Court three tunes regard- ing this project. The first time, the Board's approval was reversed on procedural grounds. The sec- ond time, the Board applied the wrong standard and denied the application, resulting in the deci- sion ultimately being reversed by the Supreme Court. Because the statute provides no authority to remand, Appellant has had to file a new application each time. While courts typically reverse rather than modify decisions of the Board of Adjustment Review, the statute clearly provides the Court with the power to modify when appro- priate. This is such an instance... , The statute in the instant case only allows the court to affirm, reverse, or modify In the absence of the option to remand, the Court finds Appellant's argument that the decision be modified to grant the permit especially compelling.... For the foregoing reasons, the deri- sion of the Sussex County Board of Adjustment is MODIFIED and AT&T's Application for a spe- cial use exception to construct a permanent 100-foot telecommuni- cations tower on [the] Property is GRANTED. AT&T, 2015 WL 1975629 at *14-15, Thus, the court granted AT&T the special use exception it needed to construct a per- manent tower. When opponents did not appeal the superior court decision, AT&T's odyssey was finally over. The court stated that it was modify- ing the board's decision, not reversing it, Certainly the statute states that a court may "affirm, reverse, or mod- ify," although one would think that granting a previously -denied apphca- tion is the very epitome of a "reversal," not a "modification." "Modifica- tion" would seem to be reserved for those situations in which, perhaps, the board imposed conditions on a vari- ance and the court modified those conditions or lessened or increased the dimensional component of a granted variance but otherwise left the grant in place. Regardless, though, the AT&T court's decision is good news for prop- erty owners and other applicants who receive denials from a board —the court has explicitly recognized that it lacks the power of remand and acted accordingly. Perhaps future applicants will now be spared the cycle of hear- ing, judicial review, new hearing, more judicial review, and so on. Conclusion Studies have long shown that cell towers have no appreciable effect on property values, but opponents of tow- ers, and some boards that consider these applications, refuse to believe these studies. Nevertheless, the results are supported by empirical data, and, although it may seem counterintui- tive, the results ultimately make sense, As one appraiser in the AT&T case observed, "a cell tower pole, a single monopole, really is an expected thing in today's world.... people have been making purchase decisions [ ] for many years in the presence of those lines and the other uses like gas pumps and the convenience store, and we just didn't see any evidence of this one particular structure [having] a unique influence on property value," The AT&T case is especially inter- esting and uniquely helpful because it allowed the cell tower applicant to demonstrate that there would be no effect on value for the very location at issue. Property values in the vicin- ity of the temporary tower moved in the same way as property values in the larger market. Not only is this con- clusion consistent with the general literature and studies in this area, but AT&T was actually able to demonstrate that its proposed tower in its proposed location would not affect property val- ues in the immediate area. LAW FINANCE GROUP PAYS YOUR BILLS WHEN YOUR CLIENT'S FUNDS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED. For EstatefinanctOinquider Wendy Mer, Estate funding Oirectadtegal Couascr n LFG stepped in to assist us when we needed them most...Many others believed in the case, but few Emil: wwalker@iawfinance.com had the wisdom to invest in it. Only one had the resources to fund It to the finish line.11 Office East zit 4a66767 RICIRIT 3. Van Dyke, Esq.. Marag;gig Par,,ne,, van Oyge & Assoc ates, : ­Y OffiaWesC 415 ee6 2313 WIYWAAWFINANCE.COM Estatefinance pays legal lees. estate taxes and persorry advances to ctients starting at S500.000 Law Finance GroupLawfinanceGroupisalicensedLenderundertteraltforIafinanretendersam, k PUMVINr 9 OVIDEa WrTA LE' -AL chi PROBATF, & PROPERTY MAYI.lUNE 2016 15 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. A RESTRICTED MARKET STUDY OF PROPOSED MENANDS US-NY-5024 CELLULAR TOWER 15 ELMWOOD ROAD EXTENSION VILLAGE OF MENANDS ALBANY COUNTY, NEW YORK Purchase Order #119154 CLIENT OF THE REPORT JOHN S. STEVENS, P.E. VICE PRESIDENT - DEVELOPMENT VERTICAL BRIDGE REIT, LLC 750 PARK OF COMMERCE DRIVE, SUITE 200 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 DATE OF VALUATION: NOVEMBER 16, 2021 DATE OF INSPECTION: NOVEMBER 16, 2021 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 25, 2022 REPORT SUBMITTED BY DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA CNY POMEROY APPRAISERS, INC. 100 EAST SENECA STREET -SUITE 200, MANLIUS, NEW YORK 13104 LIBERTY SQUARE is e rs, Inc. 100 EAST SENECA STREET - SUITE 200 MANUus, NEw YORK 13104 VOICE 315-471-3111 FAX 315-471-4009 January 25, 2022 John S. Stevens, P.E. Vice President - Development Vertical Bridge REIT, LLC 750 Park of Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 RE: Market Study of Proposed Menands US-NY-5024 Cellular Tower 15 Elmwood Road Extension Village of Menands, Albany County, New York Dear Mr. Stevens: At your request, a market study in a restricted report format has been completed to analyze the impact on market value of the improved residential properties in close proximately to the proposed cellular towner site at 15 Elmwood Road Extension, in the village of Menands, Albany County, New York. The subject is a proposed 150-foot tall monopole tower for cellular usage, to be erected on a property located at the rear of 381 Broadway with a street address of 15 Elmwood Extension in Menands. The appraisal is presented as a market study in accordance with Standards Rule 2-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), 2020-2021 Edition, which has been extended by the Appraisal Standards Board (ASB) to be effective until December 31, 2022 due to. the pandemic. As such, it includes a summary of the presentation and discussion of the data, reasoning, and analysis that were used in the appraisal process to develop our opinion of market value. ,Additional documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analysis are retained in our work file. The depth of discussion contained in this report is specific to the needs of the client (Vertical Bridge REIT, LLC) and for the intended use/user stated herein. The appraisers are not responsible for any unauthorized use of this report. We are of the opinion that this report is not so limited as to result in a misleading opinion of value. It is understood that the client is aware of the limitations and lower level of reliability inherent in a market study. E-mail: dfZsher@cnygppraisers.com Voice Mail. Extension IS CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 2 This appraisal does not include consideration for any personal property, business. value, goodwill, or other intangibles. The value reported in this appraisal report assumes that the property is free and clear of any environmental concerns and in conformance with the Village of Menands and New York State regulations, zoning, and building codes. Vertical Bridge REIT, LLC is the client and the only intended user of this report. The report may not be distributed to or relied upon by any other persons or entities for any purpose whatsoever, without our written permission. All other uses and users are unintended, unless specifically stated herein. The appraisal will develop an opinion of market value as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency —12 CFR 34.42(g), Federal Reserve Board =12 CFR 225.65(b), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation --12 CFR 323.5(b), Office of Thrift Supervision —12 CFR 564.5(b), National Credit Union Administration —12 CFR 722.5(b) in compliance with Title XI of FIRREA. A definition of market value is included in the Exhibits. A reasonable exposure time and marketing time would be 12 months or less, The extraordinary assumptions made for this assignment include the following: (1) an environmental survey was not provided for this property, so the extent of any environmental contamination, if any, is unknown; and (2) the sale data obtained from www.real-info.com is assumed to be accurate and sufficient for purposes of this market study analysis. While a recent survey map was not provided, a site plan was provided that is sufficient for purposes of this market study and does not require identification as an extraordinary assumption. It is noted that the use of these extraordinary assumptions might affect the assignment results. Please refer to the complete list of Underlying Assumptions and Limiting Conditions included in the Exhibits. For this valuation, no hypothetical conditions are assumed. Based on the client's instructions, the intended use of this market study is to measure the impact on the range of market values of residential properties after the construction of a proposed 150-foot tall cellular tower. The opinions of the -value ranges reviewed in this market study are based upon a series of surveys of sale prices of single-family residential properties in close proximity to an identified cellular tower that compares the prices of residential properties for the period immediately preceding the construction of the identified tower to the prices of residential properties for the period immediately following the year of the tower's construction. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 3 NEiGH80RHOOD DacmpTl u Location: The site of the proposed monopole cellular tower is off the east end of Elmwood Road Extension, east of Broadway (NYS Route 32), south of NYS Route 378 (limited access arterial), and west of Interstate 787 and the Hudson River, in the village of Menands, Albany County, New York. Access and Neighborhood: The access to the proposed cell tower site is off Broadway and to the eastern end of Elmwood Road Extension at the rear of the Warren Trask Lumber, the CDL School, Inc,, and the Capital District Regional Market properties. Other properties in close proximity to the proposed tower site include Adventure•In Food Trading, Midlands farms, Inc., and Menands True Value Hardware. The six properties identified here comprise a block of industrial and commercial properties bounded by Broadway/Rt. 32 on the west, East Elmwood Road 62 on the south, and Rt. 378 on the north. To the east is Image Landsat Copernicus at the end of East Elmwood Road 62 across a small body of water, 1-787 and the Hudson River. No access is available from Rt. 378 or 1-787 which are both limited access highways.- Two residential subdivisions are located about 0.4 miles to the west and 0.3 miles to the northwest of the proposed tower site, with the former subdivision across Broadway/Rt. 32 and the latter subdivision across Broadway and the Rt. 32/Rt. 378 interchange. Other residential subdivisions are located further away: 0.8 miles to the north across Rt. 378, 0.8 miles to the west across Broadway/Rt. 32, 1.1 miles to the southwest. across Broadway/Rt. 32, and 0.9 miles east across 1•-787 and the Hudson River: Most of the remaining development within a one -mile radius consists of a mixture of industrial and commercial properties plus a cemetery. Conclusion: The proposed tower site is at the rear of a complex of industrial. and commercial properties, with the nearest residential developments located at least 0.4 miles or further away and across major highways and/or.the Hudson River. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 4 PROPERTY DEscRmPTIom We have reviewed -the Village of Menands tax map, aerial and ground -level photographs, and the inspection notes in preparing the following description: SITE DESCRIPTIom We have reviewed the Village of Menands tax map, aerial and ground -level photographs, and the inspection notes in preparing the following description: Site Size: According to tax map, the proposed cell tower site is part of a parent parcel that contains is 22.70± acres. Frontage: The parent tax lot has 1.74± feet of frontage north side of Elmwood Road Extension and approximately 119f feet of frontage on the east side of Elmwood Road Extension. Shape/Topography: The proposed tower site is regular in shape, Topography is generally level. Ingress/Egress: Adequate ingress and egress are available from Elmwood Road Extension. Utilities: ,All public utilities are available. to the subject including municipal water and sewer, electric, and telephone. Legal Restrictions: We were not made aware of or given a title report of any easements, encroachments or legal restrictions that would adversely affect the site's use or value. Utility easements are typical and usually do not have a negative effect on value. However, if this is an area of concern, a title search is recommended. Site Improvements: None at the tower's.location. According to the'Village of Menands, the subject is zoned BBD; Broadway, Business District. The subject site's use, as a vacant site to be improved with a cellular tower, is a legal conforming use in this district. From review of Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel #36001CO204D- 360012 (Village of Menands), dated March 16, 2015, the subject property is located within Flood Zone AE (flood insurance is not required). CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page S Following are sketches of the proposed cellular tower site and the proposed monopole tower to be built on the site as provided by the client. dM.iPC mcreFn Y+e 4' xa- 1. ar d' o" Siai .y sf'F RW I% Qr LU23 x,F ro a e->-s MA wDTDrattica"r"E%P rw 1 arR cv AK M s c+wnL araia - Casewb e€S x rNgnx or orwati - - wh [aFsxuc rxc r MLYAGdNc aue +ar7 V W 'KCTS MWi :o t.r y. rr [++rn+r nnnvr: ro: ro 4 xe rY.tt qne ro G M YL"' KnC6 fOAYC7T ¢Ma.Yo cyFll- na Of m=: CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 6 NI al uRrw w TT a w rve R' fill ew: wry[ am erg I 11 Mtl'Mi MR ow P LN L + 1 A.M1 HIGHEST AND BEST USE.' The highest and best use of the property, as if vacant, is for potential auxiliary industrial development because the site is smaller than the typical lot in the immediate neighborhood. The highest and best use of the subject site, as improved, is for its proposed cellular tower. However, the purpose of this market study is to measure the impact on residential property values from the construction of a new cellular tower. Therefore, the highest and best use of the properties evaluated in this market study is for single-family residential use. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 7 VALUATION PROCESS. The intended use of this market study is to'develop an opinion of the trends of single- family -residential properties in close proximity to cellular towers to evaluate if the sellers and buyers of residential properties are recognizing a loss of value (i.e. reduced sale prices) after the construction of a cellular communications tower in close proximity. We have considered two types of studies of residential sale prices for this analysis —1) comparing sale prices of single-family residences in close proximity of a cell tower immediately before and after the construction of a new cell tower, and 2) the prices of the same residence which transferred under arm's length conditions before and after the construction of a new cell tower. Supporting documentation concerning the data, reasoning, and analysis is included, in the Appendix. Before and After Sales Research: The market studies comparing the unit prices of before transactions (occurring within the two-year period prior to the tower construction and adjusting for the time difference) to the unit prices within the two-year period after the tower construction. Three recently constructed cell towers were identified that were constructed within a few miles of the subject proposed cell tower location (15 -Elmwood Road Extension/381 Broadway in the village of Menands in northern Albany County) which were used to complete the before and after residential price trend studies: 1. 30 Clifton Common Boulevard, Town of Clifton Park, Saratoga County, located in the Shenendehowa School District, located about 12.5 miles northwest of the subject site; 114-foot tall monopole tower constructed in 2013. 2. 699 Mac Elroy Road, Town of Clifton Park, Saratoga County, located in the Shenendehowa School District, located about 15.5 miles northwest of the subject site; 170-foot tall monopole tower constructed in 2014. 3. 329 Moe Road, Town of Clifton' Park, Saratoga 'County, located in the Shenendehowa School District, located about 10.5 miles northwest of the subject site; 95-foot tall monopole tower constructed in 2019. The Image Mate Online data sheets showing the assessor's information for each of these cell tower sites are included in the Appendix, including an aerial photograph showing the location of each designated control cell tower. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 8 For each of the existing tower locations,*we researched the single-family residential sales within a 0.5-mile radius and a 1.0-mile radius of the designated control cell tower site. 1. For the Clifton Common Boulevard site, the sale study periods were 2011-2012 and 2014-2015. 2. For the Mac Elroy Road site, the sale study periods were 2012-2013 and 2015-2016. 3. For the Moe Road site, the sale study periods were 2017-2018 and 2020-2021. The Excel spreadsheets for each of the designated control cell tower studies are included in the Appendix. Depending upon the number of residential property sales in each area and within each 0.5-mile and 1.0-mile ring study, we have also examined the changes in before and after sale prices between house styles which are also considered in the overall summary of rates. As analyzed in the Economic Trends section, annual time trends or appreciation rates for the 2010 through 2016 period averaged about 1% per year. The average and median sale prices for the before sales from the Clifton Common Boulevard and Mac Elroy Road site studies are adjusted from the midpoint date of the before sales to the. midpoint date of the after sales so that differences in time are removed from the before and after comparison. Similarly, the Economic Trends analysis showed an overall annual time trend for the 2016 through 2021 period at 4% per year. The average and median sale prices for the before sales from the Moe Road site studies are adjusted from the midpoint date of the before sales to the midpoint date of after sales to remove the annual appreciation from the analysis. . The following tables show the summaries of each of the before and after sales analyses for the three designated control cell tower sites. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 9 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 10 Summary of Before & After Safes Analyses: After adjusting for time between the before and after periods of each designated control cell tower site, the three studies resulted in average changes in value of 2.6%, 3.5% and 8.1% for an overall average of 4.7%, and the median changes in value were -1.8%, -2.2% and +5.1% for an overall average of 0.4%. Even after adjusting for the overall appreciation rates that were applicable for each control cell tower site, the after residential sales showed overall higher ranges of sale prices than the before residential sales. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 11 Sale -Resale Transactions: As mentioned in the Economic Trends section in the Appendix, we also researched properties that sold at least twice during the three-year period before and after the year of construction for the designated control cell tower, with the first sale occurring before the year of construction and the second sale occurring within the three years after the year of the cell tower construction. 1. For the Clifton Common Boulevard site, the sale -resale study period was from 2010 through 2016 with sales from 2013 excluded from the study, 2. For the Mac Elroy Road site, the sale -resale study period was from 2011 through 2017 with sales from 2014 excluded from the study. 3. For the Moe Road site, the sale -resale study period was from 2016 through 2021 with sales from 2019 excluded from the study. The following table summarizes the rates of change between the sale -resale transactions for each of the designated control cell tower sites (same summary table that is included in the Economic Trends section in the Appendix; Excel spreadsheets showing these sale -resale transactions are also included in the Appendix); TRANSACTIONS BEFOREOF Year WER CONSTRUCTIO A Tower Location Constructed 30 Clifton Common Blvd 2013 Radius Transactions 0.5 Mile 3 Average %/Year 0.04% Median %fYear 0.59% 1.0 Mile 27 2.41% 1.04% 699 Mac Elroy Road 2014 0.5 We 0 n/a n/a 1.0 Mile 7 2.48% 0.88% 2010.2016 Overall 1.64% 0.88% 329 Moe Road 2019 0.5 Mile 7 2.03% 2.24°6 1.0 Mile 13 4.53% 4.82% 2017-2021Overall 3.28% 3.53% 2010-2021Overall 2.30% 1.0496 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January 25, 2022 Page 12 Summary of Sale -Resale Transactions: The differences in sale prices of single-family residences that sold both before and after the construction of a cellular tower for the 2010-2016 period from overall average and median rates of change ranging from 1.64%to 0.88% per year, with the midpoint of 1.26% being slightly greater than the 1.0% per year time trend derived in the Economic Trends section for this time period. The differences in the sale prices for the 2016-2021 time period ranged from 2.03% to 4.82% with overall average and median annual rates of change of 3.28% and 3.53%. The range of rates and the overall average and median annual rates are close to the 4.0% per year time trend derived in the Economic Trends section for this time period. PROPERTY SALES REVIEWED/SUMMARYAND CONCLUSIONS. - The property value trends were estimated from property sales that occurred'before and after the construction of the identified control cellular tower sites. While a few of -the before and after comparisons showed negative price trends after adjusting for time appreciation, the majority of the before and after comparisons analyzed as well as the overall net results exhibited neutral to positive rates of change following the construction of a cellular tower. Because of our investigation and analysis of the information contained in this report, as well as a general knowledge of real estate valuation procedures; It is our opinion that market values. of nearby improved residential properties in proximity to a cellular tower are not adversely affected by the construction of anew, cellular tower; and Our research could not identify any market evidence that a cellular tower is not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. We have completed similar market studies of the trends of prices paid for single- family residential properties in other locations scattered throughout Upstate New York which have all resulted in similar conclusions — that the construction of a new cellular tower does not appear to have a negative impact on the prices of nearby single-family residential properties. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. January,25, 2022 Page 13' The value opinion stated above, and every other element of the attached appraisal report are qualified by the General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions included in this report, Data, information, and the calculations leading to the value conclusion are incorporated in the report. The report, in its'entirety, including'all assumptions and limiting conditions, is an integral part of and, inseparable from this letter. A description of the property, together with an explanation of the valuation procedures used, is contained in our market study. This appraisal assignment was not made nor was the appraisal rendered. based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or amount that would result in the approval of a loan. It is our opinion that the following appraisal report was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) appraisal guidelines and standards. For your review, an Executive Summary follows this letter. Please call if you have any questions regarding our assumptions, opinions, and conclusions. Respectfully Submitted, CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Donald A. Fisher, MA[, ARA Executive Vice President NY State Certified, Gen: Appraiser #46-0060 DAF/tmc (File #21-0281) APPENDIX CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOOKING AT PROPOSED CELL TOWER SITE WARREN TRASK LUMBER - PROPOSED CELL TOWER IS TO REAR OF BUILDING Appendix 1 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: BUILDINGS ON ADJACENT CAPITAL DISTRICT REGIONAL MARKET TOWER ON RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INST, LAND EAST OF HUDSON RIVER VISIBLE FROM SUBJECT TOWER SITE Appendix CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. BUILDINGS ON CAPITAL DISTRICT REGIONAL MARKET ADJACENT TO SUBJECT SITE MIDLAND FARMS MILK PLANT ALONG BROADWAY IMMEDIATELY WEST OF SUBJECT SITE Appendix 3 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. CERTIFICATION: We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct, The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. We have no bias with respectto the property that is the.subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. - Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value'or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of. Professional Appraisal Practice and the- Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices of the Appraisal Institute, and Best in Business Ethics of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, and, Best in Business Ethics of the American Society of Farm Managers, and Rural Appraisers. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. No one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the subject property of this report within the last three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. We are not responsible for electronic sharing, or sharing in any form, of this appraisal report. The client should note that the report prepared for this assignment is an opinion of value by the appraiser, that a Court, State, or Federal agency, including the internal Revenue Service that reviews this report may disagree with or reject this opinion; and that the appraisercannot guarantee the outcome of or be financially responsible to the client for any taxes, penalties or interest imposed that may result from such review. As of the date of this report, Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA has completed the continuing education program for designated members of the Appraisal Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, and with the State of New York, CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Executive Vice President NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-0060 Appendix 4 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONSAND LIMITING CONDITIONS. - This appraisal report has been made with the following assumptions and limiting conditions: 1. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature that affect title to the property nor is an opinion' of title rendered. The title is assumed to be good and marketable. The value trend opinion is given without regard to any questions of title, boundaries, encumbrances, or encroachments unless otherwise stated. We are not usually provided an abstract of the subject property and we are not qualified to render any legal opinion concerning such a document. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 3. Responsible ownership and competent property management is assumed unless • otherwise stated in this report. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy, 5, No surveyof the property has been made by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. All engineering is assumed to be correct. Any maps, plats, plot plans, drawings and/or exhibits reproduced and included in this report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationships and to assist the reader in visualizing the property unless otherwise stated. The reliability of the information contained on any such map or drawing is assumed by the appraiser and cannot be guaranteed to be correct. A surveyor should be consulted if there is any concern about boundaries, setbacks, encroachments, or other survey matters. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that would render it more or less valuable unless so stated. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions,or for the engineering that may be required to discover such factors. Since no engineering or percolation tests were made by the appraiser, no liability is'assumed for soil conditions. 5ub- surface rights (mineral, gas, oil, etc.) were not considered in making this appraisal unless so stated. 7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. A comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property was not performed for this appraisal by the appraiser. S. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. Information and analysis shown in this report concerning these items are based on a reasonable investigation, but any significant question should be addressed to local zoning or land use officials and/or an attorney. 9. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value trend opinion contained in this report is based unless otherwise stated. This includes permits to emit any regulated substances into the air or water or onto or into the ground. Appropriate government officials and/or an attorney should be consulted if an interested party has any questions or concerns on these items since we have not made a comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property, 10, It is assumed that the utilization of land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted. Appendix 5 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 11. We assume no responsibility for economic or physical factors that may affect the opinions herein stated which might occur at some date after the date of value. 12. We reserve the right to make such adjustments to the valuation herein reported, as may be required by the consideration of additional data or more reliable data that may become available. 13. Where discounted cash flow analyses have been undertaken, the discount rates utilized to bring forecasted future revenues back to estimates of present value reflect our market investigations of yield anticipations from comparable sales, our judgment as to risks and uncertainties in the subject property, and the consequential rates of return required to attract an investor under such risk conditions. of such during the inspection unless so stated. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. Non -disclosure should not be taken as an indication that such a problem does not exist. The appraiser, however, is not qualified -to test such substances or conditions. Based on visual inspection, there appears to be no conditions, including but not limited to the above -referenced items, which would render the property more or less valuable, except as noted. The client is urged to.retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. 17. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication nor may it be used for any purpose by anyone but the client and/or an identified intended userwithout the previous written consent of the appraiser and the client, and in any event, only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety.. 14. Our forecasts of future events that influence the valuation process are. predicated on the 18. continuation of historical and current trends in the market. 15. No opinion is expressed as to the value of the sub -surface oil, gas, or mineral rights, orwhether the property is subject to surface entry for the 19. exploration or removal of such materials, except as expressly stated. 16. We are not an environmental expert, and we do not have the expertise necessary to determine the existence of environmental hazards including but not . limited to mechanical equipment or structures, or presence of chemical or toxic substances, urea - formaldehyde foam insulation, toxic. or hazardous waste, asbestos or hazardous building materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, , fire -retardant -treated substances (FRT), contaminated drywall or other building materials, lead -contaminated plumbing, soil and subsoil contamination, groundwater contamination, agricultural chemicals, electro-magnetic fields (EMFs), radon or other indoor air contamination which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental hazards or conditions on the subject or surrounding properties. None were called to our attention nor did we become aware The appraiser herein by reason of this appraisal is not required to give future consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made. Any distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 20. Unless otherwise stated, personal property has not been included in this report. - 21. Disclosure of the contents of this report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of the contents of. this report (especially any conclusions as to value,, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he or she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI designation) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the author. Appendix 6 MY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 22. The appraiser is not qualified to judge whether the property complies with laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Clean Air Act of 1990, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, etc. or any subsequent revisions to any of these laws. Employee health and safety concerns as per the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and other agencies are also assumed to be in compliance With current regulations and standards- unless specifically addressed in this report. Such categories can consist of operational procedures, storage of hazardous materials, building/property safety or protection devices, safeguards for utility entrances and distribution areas, anti -smoking legislation, etc. 23. This report is null and void if used in any connection with a real - estate syndicate or syndication, defined as a general or limited partnership, joint venture, un-incorporated association or similar organization formed for or engaged in investment or gain from an interest in real property, including but not limited to a sale, exchange, trade, development or lease of property on behalf • of others, or which is required to be registered with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission or any Federal or State agency which regulates investments made as a public offering. 24. Wells and septic systems, if any, are assumed to. be In good working condition and of sufficient size and capacity forthe stated highest and best use unless otherwise stated. 25. No chemical or scientific tests were performed by the appraiser on subject property, and it is assumed that the air,water, ground, and general environment associated with the' property present no physical or health hazard of any kind unless otherwise noted in the report. It is further assumed that the lot does not contain any type of dump site and that there are no underground tanks (or any underground source) leaking toxic or hazardous chemicals into the groundwater or the environment unless otherwise noted in the report. 26. Any proposed improvements are assumed to be completed in a good workmanlike manner in accordance with the owner's submitted plans and specifications unless stated otherwise. 27. The value trend opinion is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that would cause a loss in value unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. 28. The appraisal is an opinion of value trends based on an analysis of information known at the time the appraisal was made. We do not assume any responsibility for incorrect analysis because of erroneous or incomplete information. If new information of significance comes to light, the value given in this report is subject to change without notice. 29. Any claims, lawsuits, etc. filed against this firm and/or . author(s) are limited in monetary damages to the amount of the fee charged and collected for the completion of this appraisal report. Appendix CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE. The definition of market value, as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency — 12 CFR 34.42(g), Federal Reserve Board — 12 CFR 225.65(b), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — 12 CFR 323.5(b), Office of Thrift Supervision.— 12 CFR 564.5(b), National' Credit Union Administration —12 CFR 722,5(b) in compliance- with Title XI of FIRRE4, is as follo ais: Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation ofa sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: Buyer and seller are typically motivated; Both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider their own best interest; A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. SCOPE OF WORX The subject description was obtained from an exterior inspection, municipal records and information provided by the owner or owner's representative. Appendix 8 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers,' Inc. ECON0141C TRENDS. An'analysis of the economic trends is essential to this appraisal assignment to evaluate the change in prices over the time -period from which the comparable sales have occurred, allowing the appraiser to apply appropriate time trends to the sales used in the valuation analysis. Our analysis of subject's market considers numerous sources in arriving at an understanding oftrends in real estate values. The three identified control cell tower sites that are analyzed in this market study are all located in the town of Clifton Park which is immediately north of the.subject property's location, and are all in the Shenendehowa School District. The following economic factors are concentrated on that location for the purpose of extracting the appropriate time trends that need to' be applied to the sale prices in the before set of sales to adjust those prices to the time of the after sales so that normal market appreciation is compensated for in the analyses. Any differences in the before and after sale prices after adjusting for time will be reviewed- to determine in the presence of the construction of a nearby cell tower could have any negative impact on the values of single-family residential properties in close proximity to a proposed cell tower. INTERNAL RECORDS: CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. has maintained sales and rental records that track the economic history of this area. In addition, we regularly discuss the market with . other industry representatives including real estate professionals, contractors, and developers. New York State Equalization Rates: The State of New York publishes equalization rates annually for every municipality in New York. Equalization rates express the percentage of market value represented by assessed value. According to the New York State Office of Real Property Services, "an equalization rate is computed by dividing the tota[ assessed value of taxable real property by an estimated total market value of the property in a city, town, or village as of a specified date." For example, an equalization rate of 90% indicates that assessed value is 90%, of market value. The mathematical relationships involved are expressed as follows: Market Value x Equalization Rate = Assessed Value Assessed Value _ Equalization Rate = Market Value Appendix 5 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. The changes in equalization rates can be used to identify value trends since equalization rates express a percentage of market value. An analysis of equalization rates' for the Town of Clifton Park is shown below: Year 2010 New York State Equalization Rate 58,00°% Equalized Full Value Of 1 Assessment 1 Equalization Rate) 1.72 Change From Prior Year N/A 2011 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2012 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2013 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2014 58,00% 1.72 0.0% 2015 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2016 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2017 1 58.00% 1.72 0.0% 2018 56.00% 1,79 3.4% 2019 53.00% 1.89 5.4% 2020 51.00% 1.96 3.8% 2021 51.00% 1.96 0.0% Compound Rate of Change 2010-2016 0.0% Compound Rate of Change 2016-2021 2.5% Compound Rate of Change 2010-2021 1.2% The average value of $1.00 per the historical equalization rate suggests the Town of Clifton Park's Department of Assessment has been able to maintain generally stable assessments that reflect nominal changes for most of the past 12 years listed above with an overall compound annual rate of 1.2%. Breaking down the equalization rate changes into two periods shows a 0.0% change for 2010 through 2016 (2010 through 2012 were the final years of the Great Recession as experienced in Upstate New York), and 2.5% per year for the 2016-2021 period, showing some appreciation in value trends. This data is weighted heavily on the improved residential market as those sales occur most frequently. Municipal Profile," New York State Office of Real Property Tax Services, accessed January 20, 2022, htti3://ori)s1.orpts.ny ciov/cfapps/MuniPro/index.cfm." Appendix 10 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. MARKET STUDY SURVEY OF ONE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALES; A good indicator for market activity is the sales of one -family residences in the area; a study of one -family residences is useful in providing general economic trends. The following table contains sales of one -family residences in the Shenendehowa School District that sold for 50,000 or more. The table includes the total number, mean price and the median price from 2010 to 2021, Year 2010 Sales 728 Change N/A Mean Price 311,628 Change N/A Median Price 297,500 Change N/A 2011 690 5.1% 293,527 5.8% 280,000 5.9% 2012 847 22.8% 292,139 0.5% 295,000 5.4% 2013 859 1.4% 297,913 2,0% 299,000 1.4% 2014 774 9.9% 303,129 1.8% 287,500 3.8% 2015 802 3.6% 302,759 0,1% 286,550 0.3% 2016 828 3.2% 306,397 1.2% 293,385 2.4% 2017 842 1.7% 324,240 5.8% 311,712 6.2% 2018 872 3.6% 334,646 3.2% 325,050 4.3°% 2019 914 4.8% 344,153 2.8% 335,000 3.1% 2020 826 9.6% 343,645 0.1% 339,000 1.2% 2021 797 3.5% 381,521 11.0% 360,000 6.2% Compound Change 2010-2016 2.2% 0.3% 0.2% Compound Change 2016-2021 0.8% 4.5% 4.2% Compound Change 2010-2021 0.8% 1.9% 1.7% The data in the table above illustrates an appreciating market, although modest. For this analysis, the mean and median rates of appreciation for sales of one -family residences in the Shenendehowa School District, for the 11 years listed above, are 1.9%, and 1.7%, respectively. The overall average and median annual rates for the 2010-2016 period are -0.3% and -0.2%, respectively; and the overall average and median annual rates for the 2016-2021 period are 4.5% and 4.2%, respectively. Appendix 11 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SALE -RESALE TRANSACTIONS IN CELL TOWER MARKETS: As part of the research and analysis of residential sale prices around the designated control cell tower sites, we also reviewed the changes in sale prices of the same properties that sold twice during the study period for each cell tower site. The study period was identified as the three years prior to and following the year of construction of the control cell tower site. The Excel spreadsheets showing each pair of transactions are included in the Appendix. The following table summarizes the results of each of these studies of sale transactions for 0.5-mile and 1.0-mile radius around each control cell tower location, showing the tower location, year of construction, radius study area, number of transactions, and the average and median annual changes for each study: The sale -resale transactions for the Clifton Common Boulevard and Mac Elroy Road tower locations, which are centered around the 2013-2014 period, reflected annual rates of change ranging from about 0% to 2.5% with an overall average of 1.64% and an overall median of 0.88%. The annual rates of change for the Moe Road tower which reflect the three-year period before 2019 and the two-year period available for study after 2019 reflected annual rates of change ranging from about 2% to 4.8% with an overall average of 3.28% per year and an overall median of 3.53% per year. Appendix 12 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. The residential real estate market in the Albany -Saratoga County area has seen stable residential prices and relatively stable property transactions, as illustrated in the following chart, prepared from information available from the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Sales Albany County 2010 Median Sale Price 195,000 Change Per Year N/A NumberResidential . Sold 2,158 Year N/A 2011 190,000 2.6% 2,073 3.9% 2012 195,000 2.6% 2,403 15.9% 2013 195,000 0.0% 2,737 13.9% 2014 198,900 2.0% 2,681 2.0% 2015 204,088 2.6% 2,918 8.8% 2016 204,000 0,04% 3,272 12.1% 2017 207,000 1.5% 3,403 4.0% 2018 210,000 1.4% 3,436 1.0% 2019 217,000 3.3% 3,413 0.7% 2020 230,000 6.0% 3,541 3.8% 0.8% 7.2% 3.0% 2.0% i i i r 1.7% 5.1% SaratogaResidential Sales County 2010 Median Sale Price 250,000 Change Per Year N/A Number of Homes Sold 2,065 Change Per Year N/A 2011 247,500 1.0% 1,992 3.5% 2012 252,000 1.8% 2,326 16.8% 2013 262,500 4.2% 2,669 14.7% 2014 259,900 1.0% 2,640 1.1% 201S 269,900 3.8% 2,775 5.1% 2016 269,500 0.1 % 3,046 9.8% 2017 282,500 4.8% 3,019 0.9% 2018 290,000 2.7% 2,963 1.9% 2019 294,900 1.7% 2,954 0.3% 2020 308,500 4.6% 3,257 10.3% Compound Change i 1.3% 6.7% Compound Change 0 0 i 3.4% 1.7% Compound Change 2010-2020 Appendix 13 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PRICE INDICES: We have also reviewed annual rates of change for construction costs (of Class D buildings in the Eastern region, as reported by Marshall Valuation Service) and cost -of -living increases reflected by National Consumer Price Index. The rates from 2010 through 2021 are displayed in the following table: Year 2010 Building Cost .• 2672.0 N/A 219.179 N/A 2011 27351 2.4% 225.672 3.0% 2012 2842.0 3.9% 229.601 1.7% 2013 2949.9 3.8% 233.049 1.5% 2014 30182 2.3% 234.812 0.8% 2015 3041.6 0.8% 236.525 0.7% 2016 3052.1 0.3% 241,432 j 2.1% 2017 3143.3 3.0% 246.524 2.1% 2018 3272.7 4.1% 251.233 1.9% 2019 3261.4 0.3% 256.974 23% 2020 3423.0 5.0% 260.474 1.4% 2021 3983.1 16.4% 278.802 7.0% Compound Change 2010-2016 2.2% 1.6% Compound Change 2016-2021 5.5% 2.9% Compound Change 2010-2021 3.7% 2.2% Marshall & Swift, Marshall Valuation Service (Los Angeles; December 2021) Section 99, Page 4. 3" Consumer Price Index", United States Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed January 21, 2022, https://www.bls.gov/cpi/ Appendix 14 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC TRENDS: The following table summarizes the annual rates of change considered in this Economic Trends analysis. The Median Residential Values for Albany County is included to show the similarity in value trends between the location of the subject property (Albany County) and the location of the three identified control cell towers that were used to measure the residential price trends following the construction of a cell tower. Category, Equalization Rates - -Clifton Park 1 0.0% F !2010-2021 2.5% 1.2% Shenendehowa School District — Single -Family - Average 0.3% 4,5% 1.9% Shenendehowa School District -- Single -Family — Median 0.2% 4.2% 1.7% Sale -Resale Transactions — Average 1.64 3.28% 2.03% Sale -Resale Transactions — Median 0.88% 3.53% 1.04% Median Residential Values — Albany County 0.8% 3.0% 1.7% Median Residential Values — Sarato a County 1.3% 3.4% 2.1% Building Cost Index 2.2% 5.5% 3 7% Consumer Price Index 1.6% 2.9% 1 2.2% Average Annual Rates 1.1 % 3.6% 1.95% Annual Time Trend for Market Studies (Rounded) 1.0% 4.0% 2.0% Based on the market data analyzed which shows a mix of annual rates ranging from slightly under 0% to a maximum of 5.5%. For the entire 11-year period reviewed, a 2% per year annual appreciation rate derived from the market data analyzed. The Clifton Common Boulevard and Mac Elroy Road towers were constructed in 2013 and 2014, respectively, and the appreciation rates for that period average approximately 1.0% per year which is the rate that will be used to adjust the midpoint date of the before sales included in each market study to the midpoint date of the after sales so that the differences from normal market appreciation in house prices between the study periods is compensated for in the analysis. Similarly, a 4.0% per year appreciation rate was extracted from the market data which will be applied to the before sales in the Moe Road market study to match the midpoint date of the after sales in that analysis. Appendix 15 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DATA SHEETS ON CONTROL CELL TOWER SITES: 30 CLIFTON COMMON BOULEVARD: V14in. 1 33 PM Pm1*rFr,endty Repon • Image Mats Onlint Property Description Report For: 30 Clifton Common Blvd, Muiiicipalitt of Clifton Park Status: Active ROIL Section: Taxable Swis: 412400 Tax Map ID #: 271: 5-4.11-2 Property Class: 337 - Call Tower Site: COM 1 In Ag. District: No Site Property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Zoning Code: 08 Neighborhood Code: 24523 Total Acreage/Size: 1.52 School District, Shenendel,. Land Assessment: 2021 - $76,000 Total Assessment: 2021 - $07,400 Full Market Value: 2021 - S367,451 Equalization Rate: Property Desc: Cell Towel' deed Books Deed Page: Grid East: 0 Grid North; 0 Owners independent Towers Holdings LLC P.O. Box S12277 Boca Rabon FL 33431 sales No Sobs Information Available Utilities Sewer Type: Cgmm,/publk Water Supply: Comm/public Utilities; Gas & des Inventory Overall Eff Year Built: Overall Condition: Notmah Overall Grade: Average Overall Destrability: 3 Buildings Eff Basement Year Year Gross Floor AC010 Sprinkler% Alarrn% Elevators Type Built Built Condition Quali ty Area (s qft) Stories s^3taga.sdgnys.cflnL'rtporl_asp><"'fi1e=4 124,VOLLOCALRep014,'412400271 DDCOOO-g040I'000200?1.jDg&swisoodo= 4124DO&printk ry--2710 .. 112 Appendix 16 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 1114122. 1.32 PM Prinetr Friendly Report- Image Mate Online Site Uses Use Rentable Area (sgft) Total Units nitro trrr/Pmt st 114 0 Improvements Structure Size Grade Condition _ Year Tovrtiar- mono 114.00 sq ft Average Normal 2013 Fence-chn Ik 40 x 70 Average Normal 2013 Shad -machine 11 x 20 Average Normal 2013 Ladd Types Type Size Leased Land 1.52 awes Special Districts for 2o21 hH information available for the 2021 ro f yaar, Exemptions Year Description Amount Exempt % Start Yr End Yr V Flag H Code Own % Taxes Year Description Amount 2022 County $912.30 2021 County $909.98 Taxes reflect exemptions, but may not include recent changes in assessment. htlps:11s3ratoga.sdpnys.oaNreportaspx? ile=4124rVOLLOCAL'Fte12p 1a1a 124002710000OO r{i4011011020001.jpg3swisaode=412400&pdntke+p27 10... 2r2 Appendix 17 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Appendix 18 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 699 Mac ELROY ROAD: I t14122. 1.34 PM P!r.ler Friendly Report - 'rnage Mare Online qw Proper Description Report For: 699 Mae Elroy- Rd, Municipality kofCliftonPark Status: Active Roll Section: Taxable Swis: 412400 Tax Map ID 253: 2-84,1-1 Property Class: S37 - Cell Tower Site: COM 1 In Ag. District: No Site Property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Zoning Code: 07 Neighborhood Code: 24523 Total Acreage/Size: M23 School District: Shenendehowa Land Assessment: 2021 - s23,000 Total Assessment: 2021 - $147,900 Full Market Value: 2021 - 5290,000 Equalization Rate: Property Desc: Created 4/2015 Cell Tower Deed Book: Deed page. Grid East: 0 Grid North: 0 Owners VS S1 Assets LLC P.O. Box 460169 Ryan PT5 Dept 850 Houston TX 77056 Stiles No Sales In&rmation Available utilities Sewer Type: None Water Supply: None Utilities: Electric Inv entoly Overall Eff Year Built: Overall Condition: Normal Overall Grade: Average Overall Desirability: 3 Buildings Eff Basement Year Year Gross Floor AC4t Sprinkler%to Alarrn% Elevators Type Built Built Condition [duality Area (sgft) Stories https;rrsaratcga.sdgnys.oprnreportaspx?rde=4124%IOLLOCAL'iieUoll;41240021;840040n3844Qf4Q010001,jpgSswiscode=4124Q05pMttey-2MI) . 1+2 Appendix 19 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. N14122, 1:34 PM Printer Friendly Report- lrrrage Mate Online Site Uses Use Rentable Area (sgft) Total Units Mcro twr/Rmt st 0 0 improvements Structure Size Grade Condition Year Tower- mono 170.00 sg it Average Normal 2014 Shed -machine 11 x 12 Average Normal 2015 Land T , pes Type • Size Primary r 0.23 acres Special Districts for 2021 Description Units Percent Type Value AD001-Ambulance 0 0e% 0 district SE010-County 0 0% 0 Sewer Dist *1 L113002-Library 0 0°% 0 LT003-d[fton park 0 0% 0 light 1 FD013 Jonesville fire 0 0°% 0 Exemptions Year Description Amount Exempt a/o Start Yr End Yr V Flag H Code Oven 070 Taxes Year Description Amount 2022 County S1,217,49 2021 County S1.183.02 Taxes reflect exemptions, but may not.include recent changes in assessment. https:llsatatcga.sdgnys.comlreportaspx?51e 4124IVOLLOCALtRe12015AI24002560000DD24&1D0[€ooiD001.jpgSswiscode=312400&pdntkey=2MD._. 212 Appendix 20 IF r J CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 329 MOE ROAD: 1114M, 1111 PM Total Acreage/Size: Land Assessment: Full Market Value: Equalization Rate: Deed Book: Grid East, Printer friendly Report - fmage Mate Online Propeity Description Report For: 329 Moe Rd, Municipalitv of Clifton Park 0.94 2021 - s47,000 2021 - 5273,529 0 Status: Roll Section: Swis: Tax Map ID #: Property Class: Site: In Ag. District: Site Property Class: Zoning Code: Neighborhood Codas School District: Total Assessment: Property Desc: Deed Page: Grid North: Active Taxable 412400 277.-3-11.11-1 834 - Non -cable tv COM 1 No 837 - Cell Tower 06 24521 Shenendehowa 2021 - s139,500 Cell Tower 0 Owmers Celko 08A Veri=on Wireless Netwosic Real Estate (Taxes) 1W Washington Valley Rd Bedminster NJ 07921 Sales No .Sales Information Available utfliEes Sewer Type: Comm/public Water Supply: Comm/public Utilities: Gas & elec Inventory Overall Eff Year Built: Overall Condition: NoiTnal Overall Grade: Average overall Desirability: 3 Buildings Eff Basement Year Year Gross Floor AC% Sprinkler% Alarrn% Elevators Type Built Built Condition Quality Area (sgft) Stories https11sara:og3sdgnyscomlreportaspx'Irile-4124NOLLOCAL'Ae12__M41240027700000030110110IS01o001jpg&swsmde=4124003prntkey<2r0.., U2 Appendix 22 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 1114122. 1:30 PM Printer Friendly R.nm - l n. r t.,r. (wi— Site Uses Use Rentable Area (sqft) Total Units Mcro twr/Rmt st 95 0 Improvements Struchlre Size Grade Condition Year Fence-chn Ik 100 x 100 Average Normal 2019 Tower- mono 95.00 sq ft Avenge Normal 2019 Shed -machine 5 x 16 Average Normal 2019 Land Types Type Size Leased Land 0.94 acrss Special Districts for 2o2i No information available for tha 2021 roll year, Exemptions Year Description Amount Exempt °hr Start Yr End Yr V Flag H Code Gvm 90 Taxes Year Description Amount 2022 County S679.11 2021 County S3.99 Taxes reflect exemptions, but may not include recent changes in assessment: https:llsararoga.sdgnys.comlreport.aspx?{file--4)24iVOLLOCAL'J3ere020f41240027i000000301101100010001 jpg8srvispode=412400,lprntkey--2770... 2t2 Appendix 23 a e: CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SALE -RESALE TRANSACTIONS — EXCEL SPREADSHEETS: 30 CLIFTON COMMON BOULEVARD TOWER. TAX MAP# 270,121-17 4 7 CLIFTON SHENENDEHOWA STREET DST TEING-HAM COMMON SIF 2592 BUILT 1988 BLVD TOWER SCHOOLDISTRICT,ARA BLDG TYPE COLONIAL ACRES 0.49 SINGLE-FAMILY SALEDATE SALEPRICE 2011-09-16 $31Q900 RESIDENTIAL BLDG SIF 119.95 SALE -RESALE i•(TOWER SELLER ..BUYER TRANSACTIONS YFARS PER YEAR CHRISTOFFELTHOMAS 2011 31`785 BYRNECHRISTOPHER 270.12-1-17 7ST 2592 1988 COLONIAL 0.49 2016-08-31 3220r000 123.46 BYRNECHRISTOPHER 2016 28152 KHAN ABDUL LAH 4.96 0.59% 271.9-1-44 18 AV 1272 1965 RANCH 0,44 2011-09-14 21QO00 165.09 PELC ANDREW 2011 31814 WARD KEVIN 271.9-1-44 18 AVE1272 1965 RANCH 0.44 2016-07-21 235,000 184.75 WARD KEVIN 2016 22360 FLANDERS DONALD 4.85 2.45% 271.9-1-55 20 DAMASK DR 1750 1965 RANCH OA3 2011-08-15 269,000 153.71 TRAYNOR ANTONIETTA 2011 27401 1 LAWYER JOHN 271A-1-55 20 DAMASK DR 1750 1965 RANCH 0.43 2014-OB-29 245,000 140.00 LAWYER JOHN 2014 26564 GOULDJONATHAN 3,04 2.94% AVERAGE 4.21F 0.04% MEDIAN 4.95 0.59% Appendix 25 CD7 Q X 7. P T, zz w A t P a a s r 4 b b P P O O[ a app 4 V R R' y ti p uw C1 YY yy mm Qi i n Z S p x 2 2Z Z Z OO r Z ZZ O n y a• ppo Z 2 y y C O O N 9 m M A NA p A Z Z T i x 4 A Og pp pp x c SC q'J C C za as, O Ovo nnQg T pP SYt< Jme g F xnn n n 25 L'xxx C ssLi ya T oo nn ii O1 n O tl A O O s w n Ps x¢ RIN x w tim ii zz ii 0o° 6 zz 0 as gz pp i z zi zz oiiz g; o0 oa i oa oo' Q sz AA goz is o a i i 3gg So 00 o0 • rr S xx g g xx it nn c< m SS o N xx znAz Si 55 55 Q vi S5 SF xT 29 ss r D'S 22 P P o o pI p R W tl P A P oP I11Z2 0o 0 b tl owwP Ati PN o P 4 4tR O O tl Pa rw q'. n. w q, n-. P• P q, y,4 mQ ry aw. i i.w u TN wti q.N AH a 4^ nN)c5w W r. K w` rQrmyPtnrni5c431PP25' 2S ii S i5 S ZS S S a 2f 2S 25 2f iY if 2f 25 25 i5 S S h' W 2$ a kf S a 25 if r 1"!Pi 1`$' Ng In jW ZRr S 94 f N N'l 2n S pp o D n 2 3 i aci O z S m z i_ c A TG" x o n p n v Dz y i m c OO m n i mp oz 8i z z z n n O x i4 ^ Z N xn A CISZ Kn p-n z A o g 3 33QQ O r5 x NDnnT D O nF y OsZ Ar+ mz Zn0A mn tlz0 i g na p go 20 y3 m o" z.z-. z x4 zp z n nz p yra n v yi z i z a v zrTGn n io z zi n, ON N M 011 O jQ fly[ yP y n a 4FFi A' wOi pnpC) i; Z pNppG m sN O b ya N w i. 9n n Qp rl ypy DO n Z y 12 y Y x r0 O xn K SK Z x Z m Z n Zz p p n 3Y AxmZ Fg mA N iOr 2d 8; C om xn y 8 2 2 zm> 2 z DZ mn S p gT sam z c x FmzAn DAB ni I h 5 Sy 5 o N z"> Dx n$ sinox z> ran n az a a m n sia m x°0Ki zz0r ax z° nx z zn N w, wa c n a azc 4r z az m tSz z g xn n zn i z3 Rp nz n c5z; Fm pn zm n% 59 gmmriivN< zi xn te zo g, xT x r S xi X 7R g k 8p i iF d yq a-i aR a7 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 699 MAC ELROY ROAD TOWER: 258.11-1-17 4 GRETELTER CLIFTON PARK 14Y 1379 258.11-1-17 4 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1378 258.11-1-55 15 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1559 258.11-1-55 15 GRUEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1559 258.16-2-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3064 258.16-2-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3064 258.16-2-14 52 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2772 258.16-2-14 52 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2772 25B.16 2 3 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 258.16-2.3 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 258.20-1-1 23 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2601 258.20-1-1 23 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2601 264M-1-2 3 CEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2693 264.0-1-2 3 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2693 nra AId4UZ-lHtNLNUtHUWA RANCH 0.49 2012-08-16 S187.000 1976 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.49 2017-1026 S242,000 1977 412402-SHENENDEHOWA SPLITLEVEL U54 2011-07-29 S196,000 1977 412402-SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 054 2016-GS-26 244,000 2012 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA CONTEMPORARY 047 2012.11.20 S506,320 2012 412402 - 5HENENDEHOWA CONTEMPORARY 047 2015-05-11 S49500 2012 412402-SHENENDEHOWA CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2012-10-16 S479,550 2012 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA CONTEMPORARY 046 2017.00-21 5490,000 2012 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA CONTEMPORARY 0.59 2013-02-27 S517,795 2012 412402-SHENENDFHOWA CONTEMPORARY 0.59 2016-03-24 S625,0D0 2W7 412402-SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 1.59 2013-08-12 S590,000 2007 412402-SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 1.59 2017-06.16 610,000 2007 472402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.71 2012-09-07 485,D00 2007 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.71 2017-05-08 S472,S00 S135.70 MACLAINJAMES 2012 3N862 PASKEWICHRERECCA S175.62 PASKEWICH REBECCA 2017 34709 ALLEN CAITLYNN 5AS S125.72 GREEN RICHARD 2011 27841 WEAVER ERIN S156.51 WEAVER ERIN 2016 16232 MBERtANDJUSTINT-RED1 4.83 S165.25 LLO BROTHERS BULDE 2012 48645 REED RICHARD S161.55 REED RICHARD 2015 13642 HUNTER BARBARA ANN 247 S173.OD LLO BROTHERS SUILDE 2012 39227 HMALZ CHRISTIAN ADAM S176.77 SCHMALZ CHRISTIAN 2017 26610 RYBAK JACOB 4.85 S163.55 LLO BROTHERS BUILDE 2013 9689 NUNEZ IGNACIQ S197.41 NUNEZ IGNACIO 2016 10223 TEPLITZKY RUSSELL 3.07 S22684 NEUFELD ALAN 2013 35716 MCMAHONBRIAN S234.53 MCMAHON BRIAN 2017 19980 KONTRA RICHARD 3.84 S180.10 ONWAY CHRISTOPH El 2012 338W CHASEBENIAMIN 17545 CHASECOLLEEN 2017 14814 BOISVERT DANIEL 4.67 AVERAGE 4.13 MEDIAN 4.67 5.66% 5.07% OAS% 6.75`Y 0 88% 0S5% 2,48% 0.38% Appendix 27 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 329 MoF ROAD TOWER: 277,16-2.4 277,16-2-4 7 7 JAROSEPL JAROSE PL 2940 2940 2005 2005 COLONIAL COtON1AL 0148 0.46 20i8-04-05 2021-05-08 1420,000 S495,000 S142.86 168.37 TORRESLUIS WANG YAO 2018 1 10145 26339 LIUZHANFEI KHANNA PUNEET 3.18 5,6246 277.16-3-48 277.16-3-48 35 35 HERITAGE POINTE DR HERITAGE POINTE DR 3318 3318 2016 2016 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY 0,48 048 2017-02-06 2020.05-18 418,517 3460.000 S126.14 138.64 HERITAGEBUILDERSGROUP LLC BAH BOUBACAR 2017 2020 4433 12782 BAH SOUBACAR GLUM VIDYARANYA 3.28 3.02% 277.20-3-18 27Z20-3.18 22 22 SALSAM WAY BALSAM WAY 25M 2588 2010 2010 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY 041 0.41 2017-65.24 2021-02-19 450.000 S16,000 173,88 192,43 COCHISTIMOTHY ANCHULWAN 2017 2021 17271 7744 ANCHULWAN LEIYVF 3.74 2.85% 277,20-3-35 277.20-3-35 9 9 BALSAM WAY BAL5AM WAY 2487 2487 2008 2008 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY 0.37 0.37 2016-07-08 2020-12,11 505.000 S555.000 1203.06 1223.16 CIFORJERRY BROWN DAMEL 2016 2020 216M 36943 BROWN DANIEL CUSTER CLYDE M 4.43 2.24% 2W.20 3 42 277.20.3-42 TJ 11 CARLSON WAY CARLSON WAY 2653 2653 M12 2012 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY 0,38 038 2017-06-30 2020-I2-30 S479,900 S495,000 180.89 1186.58 STONE FINANCING LLC KIM MOON HAE 2017 M21 24(119 965 KIM YOON HAE NASH DAVIDA 3.50 0.90% 277.20-4-32 277.20-4-32 62 62 BALSAM WAY BALSAM WAY 2800 2800 2017 2017 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY Q46 0.46 2018.05-15 2020-11-20 S498,734 S498,000 S178.T2 S177A6 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP FERRARO LINCSAYC 2018 2020 14344 33297 FERRAROLINDSAY PHILIP VICTOR 2,52 0.06% 277.20-4-42 277.20-4-42 42 42 HERITAGE POINTE DR HERITAGE POINTE DR 310D 3100 2018 2018 CONTEMPORARY CONTEMPORARY 0.40 0.40 2018-08-21 2020-07-28 503.771 500,000 162.51 161.29 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP SHARKEY THOMAS 2018 2020 26284 21360 SHARKEY THOMAS ELSWORTH MICHAEL READ 1,94 0.39% AVERAGE 3-23 2.03% MEDIAN 3.Z8 2.24% Appendix 28 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 240-17-2-8 15 IW CF MALTA NY 2135 MCOLONIAL 0.2 2018-08-29 $359.000 168.15 FORTIN DONNA 2018 26818 FATTORUSO FRANKhim240.17-2-8 15 IW CT MALTA NY 2135 2009 COLONIAL 0.2 2020-11-24 S415,OW S194.38 FATTORUSO FRANK A 2020 37528 THOMPSON MARK 2.24 6.97% 277.11-3.42 28 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1967 COLONIAL 0.6 2017-09-OS $262,500 104.13 AULENSACH MARIE 2017 28694 CRADDOCK JONATHAN277,11-3-42 28 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1967 COLONIAL 0.6 2021-07-12 $325,WD 128.92 CRADDOCK;ONATHAN 2021 24W KOUMOURDAS JASON 3.85 6.19% 277.12-1-31 31 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2172 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.43 2018-0920 $273,000 S125.69 GOVEPETER M18 28711 DEMICKDANIYA277.12.1.31 31 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2172 1966 RAISED RANCH 043 2020-D7-3! $300,0W 5138.12 FUNARO MATTHEW J 2020 24799 KRAUTLE JASON 186 5-31% 277.12.2 31 21 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1782 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.43 2017.09-20 S280,100 1S7.18 HARPER MARY PATRICIA AKA MA 2017 30140 TERNG BOH HENG 277 €2-2-31 21 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1782 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.43 2021-08.24 S327,500 183.78 TERNG BOH HENG 2021 30954 WEAVER DANIEL 3.93 4.31% 277-20-3.18 22 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 25N 2010 CONTEMPORARY 041 2017-05-24 $45Q000 173.88 OCHISTIMOTHY 2017 17271 ANCHULWAN 27720-3-1B 22 BALSAM WAY CLJFTON PARK NY 25M 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2021-02-19 S498.000 519243 AN CHULWAN 2021 7744 LEI YU€ 3 M 2.85% 277. 20-3-35 9 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2487 20DB CONTEMPORARY 037 2016-07-08 $505,000 SM3.06 CIFORIERRY 2016 21660 BROWN DANIEL 277. 20.3-35 9 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2487 200 CONTEMPORARY 0.37 2020-12-T1 $555.000 223.16 BROWN DANIEL 2020 36943 CUSTER CLYDE M 4.43 224% 277203- 42 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-06-30 S479,900 38089 STONE FINANCING LLC 2017 240I9 KIM MOON HAE 277. 203-42 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 036 2020.12-30 $495,OW S186.58 KIM YOON HAE 2021 965 NASH DAVOA 3,50 0.90% 277- 20-4.32 62 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 28W 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0,46 2D18-05-15 5498,734 178.12 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 14344 FERRARO LINDSAY 27720- 4-32 62 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 28M 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-11-20 S498,000 177.86 FERRARO LINDSAY C 2020 33297 PHILIPACTOR 252 -0.06% 277.7- 4-6.2 10 KATHERINE TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1264 1973 COTTAGE 0.35 2016-01-25 $175.000 i138.45 VOPFLAK WILLIAM-TRUSTEE 2016 3280 DALY MICHAEL 277-7- 4-6-2 10 KATHERINETER CLIFTON PARK NY 1264 1973 COTTAGE 0.35 2020 10.26 $238,00 S188.29 DALY MICHAEL P 2020 33499 DAGERCOREY 4.75 7.57% 277-8- 2-12 5 KASHMIRI TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1716 1969 RA6EDRANCH 0.56 2019-09-18 $250,000 S145.69 DALY TIMOTHY 2019 27112 SWEETMATTHEW 277.8. 2-€2 5 KASHMIRI TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1716 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.56 2021-08-02 S298,5W 5173.95 SWEET DONNA 2021 28232 SALASJUL10 1.87 10.36% 2778-2- 28 15 ELM PL CLIFTON PARK NY 3851 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.41 2016.05-21 S307,5W 79.85 LAURENZO ROBERT 2016 1S533 BUCZYNSM SCOTT 277.8- 2.28 15 ELM PL CLIFTON PARK NY 3851 1968 RAISED RANCH 0-41 2020-08-12 S336,083 87,27 SAMUDRALA PAVAN K 2020 21672 JOHNSON LATIA 423 2.20% 278.5- 2.36 36 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2220 1%9 RAISED RANCH 0 S9 2016-04-11 $252,500 113.74 MARTELL GEORGE 2016 12001 BORDEN WENDY 278.5- 2.36 36 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2220 1%9 RAISED RANCH 059 2021-01-20 $M5,000 5141.89 BORDEN WENDYC. DAVID 2021 5195 SHARPIES MICHAEL THOMAS 4.78 518% 2789-2 14 62 ESOPUSDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2343 1987 COLONIAL 0.63 2016-11.04 $275,000 S117.37 TSUIYANCHEUNG 2016 36179 BALDWIN ROBERT 2789-2- 14 62 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2343 1997 COLONIAL 0.63 2820-08-14 S325,DW 5138.71 BALDWIN ROBERT R 2020 21983 ROGERS EDWARD F. III 3.78 4.82% AVERAGE 3. 50 4-53% MEDIAN 3. 78 4.82% Appendix 29 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. BEFORE AND AFTER SALES RESEARCH - EXCEL SPREADSHEETS: 30 CLIFTON COMMON BOULEVARD TOWER: CLIFTON. r•WER BEFORE AND AFTER RESIDENTIALr2013) PRICE TAX MAP 0 271.17-1-11 ST 0 39 STREET JUNIPER DR BLD TOWN G SF CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 YR SCHOOLEFFBUILT 1963 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL ACRE SALE SALE DATE PRICE 0.42 2011-03-18 $193,000 PER BLDG SF 83.55 SELLER SCHWENCKE EDWARD D ED BOOK 2011 DEED PAG E 10062 BUYER BUTSENKO IVAN 271.13-11-14 5 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2086 1987 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.51 2011-07-11 $265,000 127.04 AMERO STEPHEN 2011 28425 JENNINGS LINDA LEE 271.13-1-12 7 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1944 1987 412402- SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0,65 2011-08-01 $259,000 133.23 STEFANI GEORGE 2011 25915 BAUMESJEFFREY 271.9-1-55 20 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1750 1965 412402-SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.43 2011-08-15 $M9,000 153.71 TRAYNORANTONIETTA 2011 27401 LAWYERJOHN 271.18-1-13 28 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1963 4124M - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.86 2011-08-29 $28QOW S121.21 CAPOGNA KRISTIN 2011 29486 ANDREWS MICHAEL 271.9-1-44 18 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1272 1965 112402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.44 2.011-09-14 $21Q000 165.09 PELC ANDREW 2011 31814 WARD KEVIN 270.12-1-17 7 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY 2592 1988 412402-SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2011-09-16 $310,900 119.95 CHRISTOFFELTHOMAS 2011 31785 BYRNECHRISTOPHER 271.13-2-26 28 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2284 1%8 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 2011-09-28 $287,500 125.88 LUTTRELL MICHAEL 2011 34338 DAVID DANIEL 271.9-1-30 28 DENIM OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1318 1962 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.35 2011-09-30 $224,900 170.64 ALLEN BARBARA 2011 33490 WILSON JOANNE 271.11-1-5 42 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1947 1960 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.50 2012-01-19 $2-%500 131.74 MAGNANOJOSEPH 2O12 2801 FOSSNERNATHANIEL 271.9-1-41 12 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1318 1%5 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0,42 2012-01-27 $180,SW 513CK95 FONTAINEAMY WILLIAMS 2012 4205 KUTSCHA PAUL 271,13-2-21 31 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1897 1988 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2012-02-22 $273,000 S143.91 OTOOLE KEVIN 2012 7775 BENWAY JASON 271.10-1-36 3 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1778 1965 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2012-03-19 $249000 S140.04 LAVIGNE ROBERT 2012 10494 MARTIN TRACY 271.-5-22 485 VISCHER FERRY RDCLIFTON PARK NY 1756 1987 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.78 2012-05-10 $240,000 136.67 WOLOSS RUDOLPH 2O12 25577 AUNGST JASON 271.9-1-36 40 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1272 1964 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.34 2012-05-18 $185,000 S145.44 BOWEN DARLA 2012 1W51 MOSCA KELLI 271.9-1-43 16 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1953 1965 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2012-07-19 1261,002 S133.64 SOFKO WILLIAM 2012 28690 CASALI DAVID 270.12-1-24 12 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY.2006 1%8 412407 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 2012-11-16 1260,500 S129.86 RITTER RUTH Z012 46593 BRIGHTJAMES 17 AVERAGE 1/1/2012 $247,341 MEDIAN 1/1/2012 $259,000 271.9-1-20 14 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2456 1967 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.51 2014-01-06 $255,000 103.83 GOODELL JOHN 2014 1993 MURNANE JOHN 271.10-1-61 23 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1779 1964 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.34 2014-04-25 $23QODD 129.29 BROGNA ALEX 2014 12840 MORELLI AMY 271.9.1-55 20 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1750 1965 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0,43 2014-08-29 $245,000 140.00 LAWYER JOHN 2014 26564 GOULD JONATHAN 271.9.1-31 30 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1793 1963 412402-SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.35 2014-11-19 $244,500 136.36 PERKINS MICHAEL 2014 34318 CARBONEJOHN 271.10-1-59 27 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 7422 1963 412402 - SHFNENDFHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 035 2014-12-19 S222,000 156,12 NLAVEY ANITA ROBERT JO 2014 37442 HSUCHE-HUA 271.-5-23.12 444 VISCHER FERRY RDCLIFTON PARK NY 2625 2014 412402 - SHENFNDFHOWACONTEMPORARY 0.99 2015-02-27 $375,000 142.86 BONI BUILDERS INC 2015 9416 VERMA DIVYANSH 271.13-2-18 2 BARCLAY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1917 i988 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0-SO 2015-03-18 $264,000 S137.72 RAKUFF STEFAN 2015 9586 COMPASS MOBILITY SERVICES 1 270.12-1-11 14 SAXONYST CLIFTON PARK NY 1912 19BB 412402-SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2015-05-06 $275,000 S143.83 ROGERSELLEN 2015 12793 MCBRIDETIMOTHY 271.10.1-27 42 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1315 1965 412402-SHENENDEHOWA SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2015-06-04 $245,000 134.99 SCHAFFERPALFL 2015 16396 SAWCHUKJOHN 271.18-4-8 2 HEMPSTEAD CMNSCLIFTON PARK NY 2688 2004 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 2015-07-13 $330,000 S12277 CURRAN KEVIN 2015 22785 CHEN MIN 279.-1-31.1 21 LACELN HALFMOONNY 1542 1928 412402-SHENENDEHOWA OLDSTYLE 3.73 2015-08-14 $60,000 38.91 NES.SARAAURENTZ-TRUS 2015 27896 MCBSLLC 270.12-1-18 9 TUDOR ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2123 1988 412402 - SHENENDEFIOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2015-08-20 $286,000 1131.89 DAL LAIRD ELIZABETH 2O1S 24992 ZEBROWSKI JAMES 271.-5-1 489 VISCHER FERRY RDCLIFTON PARK NY 1428 1957 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA RANCH 0.77 2015-09-18 $18Q000 126.05 THOMAS STEPHANIE 2015 30319 SPANSWICK NICHOLAS 279.3-1-14 5 LACELN HALFMOONNY 1804 1954 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA CAPE COD 0.48 2015-12-03 $18Q000 99.78 LEBLANCWILLIAM 2015 36757 MARTUCC I CHRISTOPHER 14 AVERAGE 1/1/2015 $241,821 MEDIAN 1/1/2015 $245,000 Appendix 30 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 271.17-1-11 39 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1963 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0,42 2011-03-18 193,0W 583.55 SCHWENCKE EDWARD 2011 10062 BUTSENKO IVAN271.13-1-14 5 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2086 1987 412402 - SHENFNDEHOWA COLONIAL 051 2011-07-11 265,D00 5127.04 AMERO ST€PHEN 2011 28425 JENNINGS LINDA LEE271.13-1-12 7 GLOUCESTERST CLIFTON PARK NY 1944 1967 412402-SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.65 2011-08-01 259,000 133.23 STEFANIGEORGE 2011 25915 BAUMESJEFFREY 271.18-1-13 28 JUNIPERDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1963 412402 - SHENENDFHOWA COLONIAL 0.86 2011-08-29 280,0D0 121.21 CAPOGNA KRISTIN 2011 29486 ANDREWS MICHAEL 270A2-1-17 7 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY 2592 1988 412402-SHFNFNDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2011-09-16 310,900 119.95 CHRISTOFFELTHOMAS 2011 31785 BYRNECHRISTOPHER 211.13-2-26 28 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2284 1988 412402 - SHFNENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 ZOTI-09-28 287,500 125.88 LUTTRELL MICHAEL 2011 34338 DAVID DAWEL 271.13-2-21 31 GLOUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1897 1988 112402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2012-02-22 273,000 1143.91 OTOOLE KEAN 2012 7775 BENWAY JASON 271.-5-2.2 485 ASCHER FERRY RDCLIFTON PARK NY 1756 1987 412402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.78 2012-05-10 240.000 136.67 WOLOSS RUDOLPH 2O12 25577 AUNGST JASON 270.12-1-24 12 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY 2006 1988 412402-SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 2012-11-16 260,5M 129.86 RITTER RUTH 2O12 46593 BRIGHTJAMES 9 AVERAGE 1/1/2012 263,211 MEDIAN 1/1/2012 265,000 271.13-2-18 2 BARCLAY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1917 1988 112402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.50 2015-03-18 264,0D0 137.72 RAKUFF STEFAN 2015 9586 JCOMPASS MOBILITY SERVICES II 270.12-1-11 14 SAXONY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1912 1988 112402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.49 2015-05-06 275,000 143.83 ROGERS ELLEN 2015 12793 MCBRIDF TIMOTHY 271.18-4-8 2 HEMPSTEAD CMNSCUFTON PARK NY 2688 2004 $12402 - SHENENDEHOWA COLONIAL 0.46 2015-07-13 330,0D0 122.77 CURRAN KEVIN 2015 22785 CHEN MIN 270.12-1-18 9 TUDORST CLIFTONPARK NY 2123 1988 412402 - SHENENDFH OWA COLONIAL 0.49 2015-08-20 280,000 131.89 DALLAIRDELIZABETH 2O15 24992 ZEBROWSKIJAMES 4 AVERAGE 6/1/2015 287.250 MEDIAN 6/1l2015 S277.Sao Appendix- 31 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 273 i21 ZJ 59 GREEN MEADOW DR CNTfdE PARK NY SEEP 15@6 i0AY3NOVSE on 250i1564 9 COTICIFWOOD CT AIALTANY 1656 "1 COLONAL aUS 61zo Z OELMO IN CLI4TCFSPARK NY 3DM-IEEE. RAtFEDFAiCH 063 2']1. 14 i 12S SALE LH CLIFIOU PARK )S51 AIO CONTEMPORI 045 271 I1111 39 JLARPER DR CIJFICH PARK NY 2;W 1963 COLONIAL 0Q 265194 IF 671 BRLNORO CLIPION PARKA TON 2000 CIXONAt 046 I 191 i3 M PAYNE CI CLIPTCM PARK MY ZE12 IIM RAKEDRANCH CS0 270203E 3 ADDISLYIWAY' CLIFTGl PARK NY VZO 2000 CCIOI C43 711191_SJ 32 EL LORD CI ON PARK NI' 2AS 7917 COLONIAL C74 11771-).9 2 SEAPCFIONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY NJ0 T966 CC4CH8A1 055 2"5-125 13 MAYFIELDM CLIFSON PARK NY 1735 20Q2 RAN[N GM 075-239 16 REDFNID PARK CL IFIGN PARKNY 256a 1997 COLONIµ0% 2MM138 14 ADDISCNWAY CLIFTON PA gK NY ZESP 200± CONTEMPORARY 042 2177251 J 6ARC DONA DR CI KTON PARK NT 2M 1965 CCEONW 047 17t F.SN 34 WHEELER CA CLIFTON PARK NY TINT 1972 SPLETiM1 CS3 71p81 It 47 STIRLIAG IIELPITS DR CLI1014 PARK Ph z538 21 MORAL all 27115114 23 WERDR CLIFTON PARK NY LKJ 190 COI 055 770 Z}23 33 AIICHELLE DR Cl OTON PARK NY 2423 193E CiDIO4 At 027 211131-14 5 UCGLOESTER SIT LIFIGN PARK NY M13W COLONIAL US] M6' 5) 73 STMI4G HEIGHTS DO CLIFTON PARK HT 310E 2K6 COLCNEi.AL 0SET Nt 1D 2I11 10 101111 IN CLRION PARK HY 2564 196E COLONIAL 40 711 l8Z 15 Il ASPEN IN CL#TON PARK NY 374E 1962 COLONAL IIT 27171/12 S OLOMIESERST CLIFTDN PARK PFY ISO,! III COLONIAL am 27T 12121 00I RRI171D RP CMF7ON PARK HY 11YQ MIT CONTEMPORARY Om 2102016 19 MICHEM OR CLHFON PARKNY 2SW 1998 COLONIAL C39 27? 6.1-S 2 AI41PER 9R CLTION PARKM' 2310 19611 CC1DNIµ050 2119 I55 M Ms14SPLOR CIIFTON PARK 1750 1%5 µNCH C41 11i 191E 23 FMORIOCI LIFTOPE PARK NY 145S 196E CCIONIAL 060 21117-419 6O MICHELLE DR CNFIOK PARK HY T662 IM COLONIAL a 2111811/ M PERM CVFION PARK NY .319 198E COLONIAL OX 271E J Z9 19 PEHEYACD OR CLI FICH PARK NY LETO 196E CCL ONAL 045 2M8122 19 S7iPILINGHEICHTS 011 CC FION PARKA IIN 2001 RAW H 0M 21191. A4 1a ORK,HAMAVF CLFION PARK NY 1112 1965 RANCH 04L 2412117 1110OR51 CLIE1pI PARK I4Y 259E IM COLSNIA, 049 271614E 24 REED(N CLIFTON PARK NY "SO 158E MROµNCH 1L4 277531E 3 M4YNELD DR CLIF7IX4 PARKW MIS zml CORIEMPORAFY am 2711S)-26 A C10YCESIER 51 CL4rQF1 PARR NY 2201 19 COLOSS I CIA 7115A J0 2B DENIM OR LIFION PARK NY 1318 1962 RANCH OJS 2175313 5 SHERIDAN CI CLATION PARK HY 2151 MY COVIEMPOAM DA 2Ma 136 2B ElfPLING IoWHTS OR oLAFTON PARK NY 104M VIOL CC I ORAL 041 2F9IS 12 It VISIACI HALFMOpN HT Z9W Pull COLON:µ065 170 A, II PS MKHEIlE DR CI1T1 f5NPARKNY ZYN, 151RB CC1DNIµ01) 1702025 31 MKHEtIR OR CLIFION PARK IN 23DB I%7 C01014ia1 an N914 3 8 5 ASSACI HALFMCK NY 2491 MT C0 ONNL 053 2176.165 4 ASPEN IN C{INON PARK NY 1048 1962 RANCH 055 Z7015I4'S 44 STERLING IMISHIS M CLIFTON PARR NY IM MO4 COtOHAI ON 277E 132 S E[IMONTC NN LIFTON PARK NY A% 1902 COLONIAL 080 270&174 AS STERLING HEIGHTS DR COFTON PARK NY 1a50 2001 CWON.AL ON 2T11715 47 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARKA 1941 190 µRCll 0`A 2m 161115 36 CAOUCFSTER SI CLIFTON PARK NY I7111, 190E COLONIAL 046 2714141 12 GLNGHAM AVE CLKTON PARK NY 131E 1P65 PARCH 047 77i ]1-22. 3T CLOCCESIER 51 CLi10N PARK NY 1111 19EB CO OHAI 049 ZM 12.315 19 TISDALE LN INECIRFPAM NY MMIS CONIEMPOM a92 2MN. 2.1I 52 MKHEILE OR CLIFIDN PARK NY M= COIDNML 0L' 2MM2a S., MECHEIIF DO CLIfTON PARK NY 2306 2000 CIXONIAL 0G' 2711"' 36 3 GINGHAMAVE CI IF TOR PARK W 1179 190 1i I LEVEL 042 21752.6 57 KW*LPPARK CLNION PARK 14 16Sz 1991 CQNTEMPDRAFY C48 Zn61-Z4 30 REECHtSS50D DR CL910H PARK NY 2442 TWA COLONIAL 945 ZM 12121 1 WYEROOSCR CLIPSON PARK PO 284a MN CONTE)4/CIKLm QM 2716314 47 WHEELER OR CLRTCN PARK NY 2239 1472 SPIN LEvu 0SS 27T62.11 ID CHESTNUT IN CNFTCPIFARJC NY MR) 1961 COOOAL GS3 Ill 16 31 GREEN MEADOW DR ClIF1ON PARK NY 11/0 1905 T.0 11ISE 0.0E 27161-/ 27 TWAPA(K LN SOT ON PApK f/Y 2110 I%1 CLONAL 0.03 7771172E 24 HEMLOCK DR TI TO !PARK IN 2110 196E CLONAL O54 271322 405 OXHER FERRY RO CLRTINI PARKA 115E 1901 COLD"' 011 216811E WAARYPL CLRTON PA RKNY 2"1 May COLO".AS 03S Z77.425 10 FINFADOO DR CIFFOFI PARK NY 2105 19W CGLONVLL 0to 277 54 31 M FEOELC PARK CI.TTON PARK NV ASM 1991 COLONIAL 052 27118338 72 ALE(MWOOC CR CIRIOM PARKM 7310 19E2 COONIAL as., 215413E 47 DENIM OR CI PEON PA t)27 I%4 MNCII 0M 711 -1M1 WP BRAND RD C[#ION AARICW 180S TON MNCH IN 270123r3 5 IOCAIE IN COFION AARKA NI9 -20 11 CONTEMPORARY ORS 212.11E. 19 a SKYBROOK CAR CLIFION PARK NY 3156 2012 CONTEMPORARY 062 ZN.1 Z-3,2N 9 SKYSPOOKCIR C"FTCN PARK NY 2142 20V CCNTEMPDRARY a 2701232 3 TISDALE IN CLIFTON PARK NY 263E MII CONTEMPORARY 0.11 2111177 12 TAMARACK IN CLIFTON PARK NY ATO 1%5 COIY7NMI 01A 27T 181111 W IOCUST LN CLIP TON PARK NY 20M 194E COONWI PIS, 277III 11; 30 CLEC14WDDDDK WZ CLOION PARKW I196ERANCHGI0. 21161-4a 16 ARNOLDOR CL IF SON PARK NY 218E 3PET SPLIT LEVEL ORS 2M11.323 E ttMt[ LN CLETON PARK In 155E 2012 CONTEMPORARY 041 2102D7-2 I1 MICHEL FOR CLIFTON PARKNY ISM 1297 CMONIAI 0A 27161.27 46 W41WER OR CLFTON PARK 1491 1972 SPLIT LEM 061 2719-143 16 GINGHAM AvE CLIFSON PARKNY 195E IRE5 SALII LEY•EL 042 2713/115 ri GREENMEADOWDR CMIONPAUNY 12A 19R5 10YYSNHDL,9E 014 2N) 1.4P M STLSEINGHEIGHtSDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2195 MCIXONML 032 L 2M6141 36 STERINGHDGHTSOR CLTONPARKA2.% bk14 CLONAAL 0%1 ZI1&I 13 21 MMARACK IN CLFION PARKW $8N8 1%3 PI04; ZWO;6W 45 SujaNGHE1GHS5M CLIP PON PARK NY = 2010E CCLCFFMI all 27T65 4 ASPEN IN CLIFTON PARKW N116 196E RANCH Q55 2P01l325 SAYBROOK- LIPTON FAMM 259E Alt CONTEMPORARY OW VIP 14 31 3 VISTA CT HALFMCON W 3419 2012 COLONI4L 64e 2K112J 11 17 FISMLELN CLIFTON PARK 21104 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q42 2M121.16 N SKYEROOKCW WITCH PARK Za02 M09 Cd4IEMPOMRY a 2111915 46 NFMLOCKDR CLIFION PARK FLY 7AI2 PIPES CCLOHML 047 IRA 113.1E IS MDAIE LN CLSIGN PAKW "MA12 CONTEMPORARY SIX 7A2033Y 9 ADIASOHWAY CLOtONPARKW 7477 2MµNCH 041 771623a 5 HEMLOCK DF CLIfION PARKM M I COLON. 057 1PON36 11 AC0SIX4 WAY CNFI ON PARKNY 3211 Al2 CONTEMPORARY 130 217 SS to T POND YIIW OR H1TGAI PAAK NY M6M 2012 CONIEMPOSARY 039 2J1i52 4 6NIIGEWASEPCI CL NEON PARK NY ZB60 AM CONTEMPORARY SISTER21S IS 13 11 TFAk'V CT CLINON PARK W 2919 107 CONIEMPORARY 0L1 27762-JZ 12 PINEWOCC OR LIFION PARKA 23M IRV CCLONPLL 061 2703SIS A MKI ILF DR COTTON PARK NY MISS ZXI COLOR AL 634 21612E-To to SKY3HOOK C4R IEFNCN PARKM 255E 20.2 CONTEM10RAR1 pM ZiPES ' 1 7 WY ROOK GL{1CN FAP.K A 29m M12CONTEMPORARY 045 27012-2. 11 A CAKHLRST CT CLIFTON PARK 250 Mat COIONML a56 7Y75.4.I0 8 MPMURVC7 CIIiTON PARKFN 1914 2003 RANCH ON 21 11317 11 HEATHEA OR CL FSON PARK NY M36 19% CCICAPAL a31 27r 1.27 D GRLERMLADOWOS CLKTON PARK FII I140 SOBS TOWNHOUSE 009 27020324 12 ADDISON WAY CIRTOPI PARK NY 1J 2m5 COIONML OS6 2176164 6 ASPEN IN CLFPTON PAMPA SUE ID61 RANCH 049 211 S2:a M REDFILD PARK CLIFTON PARKM MSEEP COLOIAAL 05 17 7SS4 3 POND NEW DRCLIFTONPARRINY 2151 2012 CONTEIAPMARY a55 2M 17.114 FLOOR St CLIF TON F.AKNY XW ISBN COLONIAL 046 2" 54-T4 16 MNWIR CI CLIPSON PARK NY 1911i M02 RAW H OE 210 12+21 6 MDALE IN CLIFTON PARK NY 311S Al2 CON7EMPOPARY 04) 2M04.21 aWSTACS C{iF ;ON. M NY IF s MI2 TOWNHOUSE 019 2775.312 6 S14ERIDtN CT LFION PARK NY T719 2031 RANCH 03S 21+55-2 40 HFAFHER OR CtjF*Fl PARK IN JO15 EDP CMONINAL D49 27117-4L2 49 MICHELLE 01 tlflOi4 PgFK NY Z 3 193E OIONIi 028 SM6J 367 13 VISTA Ct LIFT ON FARK NY Intl M12 tOWN110U5E Cv 2711PI.631 SIT CLRTDNPARKCIRRO 123 CLIFIONPARKNY 164% 1%0 RANCH AVfRAl1F C41 2011-a11C f1C5m0 21n.A.23 S241= M1143-08 521SAD MH OS -10 SELSO 7M All II S1930a7 20114E-21 SM] Om A1LOJ-21 SM450 M1103-3. S, Ssom WI,KS 2E S23RI Ai 1, Ot 91 5767 SCC A11 060E S318Cm 2011 -G&I6 S1325m MIS DI . 7 139S000 M11.OE 28 1235 K0 2011. 062E S229mo 2011.XX $375000 MIT 07 09 5273.Om Mil Ol l! 133E ROD A 11 07-11 S.ti5000 M11 07.15 f385000 MT1.01. 28 5260000 2011 GF- N SEEK, 20 I Mal Sz590m 2011 Woo $ 304,m0 M1NC610 S355. 010 XII-WIl S269a60 M11.001s I m.AQ LOSS MISS SM2000 30:1M .I 12M A25 X) 0S2W000 Ml1-0907 S229m0 A11-A 12 S3M000 EI11.w 14 S21G 0A 201t 0916 $ 310" 2011091d Smm AIt IN S3YD 000 T0SX S28/Sm t. p9.3p t2N 9k7 201 D%X S295CST AI11007 t3a6 00C MtI IG07 SW70% Ai1. 10. 14 t)W" MIS. W25 $1175m 201, H 22 $376691 201112-W JITTOm 201112.09 S19S.Om 2011 T2 16 S300000 2012-0112 1310Cm 20120119 S25ESW N12012; f7YR( Ep 20110t 27 CIW Sm M1102 U 321100E ZOL 03:01 13-- 111 16 "= RoV0316J34SOWMI2-11119 Sma00 MIZ OL IS 5266000 M11DN 12 L I'M M11 CPS SAM I" 2012 IX-1f 1745Dm M17 04:1 SEES %a 2012 tx 30 1'Go 9C0 To 2M0) S2520m 2011 as,m S225 Qm ISO 2PP- 10 s74DOm 201E III 14 SEW OOO M12 OS ., S231 Om M12.p5.'1 S3ISWD 201.105.1E 126 m0 201206 SEE PEI 10 I,0S 23 III loom M17 G5 N t561 ME. A124&01 N69.513 2312.M IT t49a.SM Al2 D6 14 1-max 20124615 SEKI M1Z 01I 17YCm 20 0625 f2150m All D6a S206001 2012 IaSa SSIC INS Al2UP: 11 S1f62Q1 M120/ 17 5ISO= M1 Z0/19 ;*1 ow M11o7 M 5Im" M12 as 05 S32S56] Mt2 DE m 5325 5m 2011060E t?10pp1 2072 D613 S393000 2012061J 5255. am zon 001E MP59J7 2012 as 2z M94916 2012 m-2J 1MYTS1 X12 Op 211 f425O90 2411 ad-q f. 84K0 Milm30 S492a17 201z 09 )a S3E25m M120011 STa25m 20 09. 0, SSu, 271 NIP." 01 SW20W Q 09-12 WI M1209- N 1425Ot0 2012 0114 USA 90D M12 a&M 1315 COO M12-OP21 SMI MIZ-OP2T 1433. 72D X. 2 uYN t974 CDO XIZ-1a01 1360mo M11-1009 13MM 2012 10. 1E 11SIDm 2012142E 55400m LET,, 2fi SAS. CDG M12:1105 S3mm Al2- 1S.Us 53ag521 20121T 16 fMSm M12 I I M WOODS 2012-11,21 SLOW 107 201111.2E 52YET 4a4 Mi U 07 13A RED, 2-521117 5366500 6 1IIZIa s31a0A A1z 12 SIP "" Z5 2G1Z 12 19 SIm Om 1/1/2912 S314, 919 1134.47 GREENHDLISE TOWARD Alt ilAd14 C071LLD I OFF A11 illm YEHLE WRY Atl 113039 AMWOPE C4"4NC 201 HOME S(HWEI{CKF EPMARD Nil 1370E R0CHnfAU.YDsLPH MII 59703 4ERAIFCJOHN MII 5147SS RCI MNCENT M11 935E F) FLPAL OKIL M11 SIT$M HLI[KEMEYER EMN 2011 t t0329 LEARN WILL -I MI I VC 51294a SHDEYE PARRY 2011 11374E ..00IMAPI KIPNAIHAN MIl 11135EMALSANC`401LS 2011 111618 BARPY aWO MIl INS,15 CLRECAD SAMML Alt tm5 SOKC RAW, 20T1 f1M 32 MASON PAL: To I St27.0S AMEROSIEPHEN 2011 S.2383 DUKE BONNIE Al. SIIT 40 DESALVAIME NAND XII 9341 KFATILI RCRFRF 20t1 S133n STEFANI DECNGE Nil S17213 MI BARBARA M11 113TM BLACK IASOI ASI SI7682 CRAIIANKLATI1HW Ail 5153.71 iRAYNOR ANIOME11A MII t106. 72 MCNAIN SCOTI NI1 11114E LYIEHANJAMES MIT 512121 CAPOGFiA FAOlpi 2011 S9913 WPEIAC WILIAM MIt 1176. 5E IM LASTD T40MAS M0 5165.0E PELC ANDREW 2711 SI1955 CNPJSTOFFLL THOMAS M11 S9962 .BEHR[HS IIMF11f 2011 S14901 SCHWAREICHAMES M[ It Si25M LSLS L MKHAEL 101 SIM54 ALLENlAMARA ,Si 513715 ABBOTT) ONHKDNVON 2011 S127. "MOICM WILLIAM MI 134 Is NDMEVE ARK OEOPMEN7 GROUP I Xr11 t1402 LITILELILLDBRIEI XIIIAD tW23 MVNDINGERRC191R1 XIIS15122KOMAAK DEVELOPMENT CROUP I DKIII ME 31 CAPT ION DAIAD M11 S 125 E) MCMAHON MARTIN Mil 1101/9 1LWIHKKTIICMAS MIT VEERS GARROW BOSS 2012 ST3174 MAGNANO)DEEP' S 291E 14566 7ACHER" Or M12 six 95 FONTAINE AMYYttLI NMS EON S14391 DIME KE14N ME S14064 AMEDORF GPOLP INC M12P 54961 VAHOEN BOS Epic 2D S149. 61 '"Of N BCS E RK Ale law LAWGPR ROBERT 207 S16041 TATRO RICHARD 202 IlaM MAKIFAIODAUNO 11 t14084 ANROCK, O'C"' IN( Al2 119}.41 BOND PALL M12 t 115.90 MOBLEY BARAN .SHE 1149N WILSOH.41SAM 201E 11112E VAN ZMDI HAPPY VI 111.4 AKCEN *44 2012 S13667 WYAOSSIA100I 2012 S 13144 WANG 2HuM 2012 SBSM TAµRAVAAI W12 S 127 T4 DARY CHARLES Mlz S9740 SfALW4CHAR3ESSCOTI = 2 S14544 8009f DAPIA M12 Slit 1 5 PARKFI IDN Mil 116709 AMFDO RE NIOW REC 2012 LHlIP ANAI CAI TIC 2012 SI91al AM[DORE CA"RPC 201E LIRLEV AMFDRDH CA" INC 2GS7 W San NFNDE P-NIDRAN M12 SNI T4 NILLMMS110i MI2 114 SJIAVYHIDHIIA1,. 4NR F(IA) ONN 269E 11R G 442a AMF.00 RE CADLY R4C 2012 SIAM MVLN DAM MI1 SITS A SMITH COURT M12 S 133 (ASCFKC WPLLL1.1 AIz SiRam GRAHANIFONN All SI4p 29 IRYARI PMSNANI 0017 Il4A 29 TN:API PRASHANI 30.2 SHEER CALLENDER MARGARET MARY 2012S129HGOOOAR4THOMAS2012S137.5E CLUKIOH RAND 20 2 515E Sz AMECOAI GROUP INC M1z t1417 KDAIARK D(ALOPMENTCROLPI 612 L 156.52- AMEDOHE CRIMP INK M12 SI5203 04H DIPS. M12 111174 FROCHPO)AMLS 2012 11401 AMES90Rf GROUP IN( 2M2 I ET142 PWAIESL PHIEM MT2 1EA76 WITSMAN PAIR 2012 SM73 WF ORE LA14D DEVELOPERS LLC MS2 S1Wu TRALONGC RACERS INC M12 f 1064 IRAi-CC ESUFOERS NYC M12 Sus Do FARKCHANCASEO 20I2 5110. 3S RFRTORELLI PMEF A; 11 St27 i3 EAVKHEK IDISII 20 SPla 52 A KIEDORE GOOD, MC MIZSM951AMEDOAEOAOLNIH[ 20 S H3.58 HVOkswm M12 910009 GAYSARAH M12 S1S7.26 BRUCATOPAUI 2012 S I3121 RONNEAV KA111LEEN MS2 MMSI "ESL JOHN 111091 OREAUCWRLE M12 516301 4LAi NN M2 114149 IRALON000ADEPS INC MI2 512946 MNERAVIH MI2 S1720S KINDS ISPI- 2012 Sim 11 AMEOMIL GROIw iXC 2012 17151 TNEVISTASAT CL:FION PARK SIC MIl St9i 61 IELDM11R764 431 ST2272 VARMA ANIL M72 I13973 AOOV INWARD M13 S10 $ 1 HIE YEHAS AT CLITTON PARK SIC X13 5607E YOVNGMENS CHRILMN M13 OS14 WALD3O-ClIN B3uT LITTLEASON RIP NAGGEII IRSNSMICPIAEI 10172 CvX ING RJCHAAD 1006E A415ENK0 NAN OiE6 URBAN 4OBFA1 SOBS HIESL 51 EPRAWE 1 TW9 MATHANY EDWARD IR02S III"DIMPLE I I9.107 OIIYNYK MYKMA TIC 19FA7 H LCKEMLYER SVSAI I- IR#fY RICHARD MEN ALAFATIRAWIIAIIHi 2,1926 VALLSOPI PAIRKK 21 MS WPASOVVIIE JASpJ SAµIT 2165E WALLAERS THISASIO L2939 TURNER CHPGTCPHHI 2696E PEREZ IARATE VICIGR MANUEL N475 lEh'MINGSCWM Lfk N533 HUKPKNG 25531 VERNIZZIC A2DND W21 DESALVANDRE MYID 25915 BALRAISKNRFY z5755 9EBRJHD KWISERLY ZTBYN COI:NIIOIN A U'6 MARTIN HEATHER 2140I LAKYER)OHN 2116E Et FER1pAYIL Phu RL IlGER PAN N86 ANDREW5MKM ALI SINT PNI VNIOSEPH 10401 PAAMERTEA LINDSAY 31111 WARD KENN 11185 BYRNE CHPJ OPHkq 31614 AIItLER IIMOSITY 1PI07 SARRAFP PARDI RE2A 3133A DAVIDDA4EL 3MY1 WiLSIX4 JOANNL 31m3 DESROCHESGEBZRI 3630 LEE FAL HOOT 34340 FIANERFY IMONIAS J53PE MALKCfFSCDTT 7K61 DEPADLAlCAH1H WA 50KE WESM a 14C3 4ASPEN LANE TIC 1362t K) PAI A% NSHW ISAIRBR/GD RUN 191E GRJLIIAN MASIHFW 281E MSUNG I Sol EMSNER NAIHANNL 2576 BOILER CNRISTOPHFR 4205 KUTCMA PAUL INS SENWAY)ASON W61 11 ACANC 11M9 PRUOFNINI REIOKAT* N INC 11300 GEIOYACZRKHARD 10144 MARTIN A" 5326E ..ICKIGFORCE T6W3 IAYLOR SAMPPI 5564 IYAC4 PMVEEN i7MA BEACH CIX)IITNEV III 511IELEA GRIGCAY 16195 POL, DAR1D 1115E SPRAKFA JSP IN 20312 OSSO AWN, 2S577 ALNGSI lA50N IBI7E III HYUNG INor IUHGAS MKHAEL NIL LD%1 W74 ISIS HACYAN III tDOBt K/ INRI IBB51 MOSCA k(ttl 1WI H{NKT IY1ER zKE1 to C1HL11wD 21. 1N HU WIA0/0N0 21734 LAQVIDAM BENAtMIN 2M SCWANHQ JOSEPH 22AR 4DO0EHSANMLAH NEWS YI/SWIAI ALLYSS 2411S MARSHUt 3094RSIEHLIN ISM 25z57 SANKARAPREMACHANDRAN CHIM 1691E MARIICK MATIHfW' 3W60 DEMH ARI 20M CASW AVID SBfi19 SIADAL RICHARD 29024 CARIUSFIHANCW COPPOMIIOIE 29E25 NATAPA)AN MARADEYA STIR 299116 GI ANC MAAK 413Q EDWARDSA4MES 1075 RLANCHRTT11DA ID 31WO SUB IN WYANARUNKARIHI 3S%I RMMONS ALFRED 32021 GAO SHAMPER 3.56E TSAI HAOCHENG 302 YAPAEod. JLHN 36614 YANG BIN 3330E .,FfR51NDMAS 34131 NITS EARN I). RMUGUNFAVINKAI M WAND PI N 37303 WI IS403 PEOIC9 TAM LS MATS WILBERA JANA 35741 CHAKRAII VICTOR 3E071 WANGIE-SPIENG 39231 SHI96RO 37M YANG MNGWE, 37M7 RYAHKAIHIEEN 477M SHIYORGAIPI 39NS KELLY 101E r 43674 OLSNCIPERO 4298E Rf3GNER MARC 44051 OZXELIOANINDW 42992 SHAMS LVTFE 46W7 BUSH P TAMES Ulu KIM MYLPISESM 45062 NALLARNAGAPI RAVEEN REDDY LINES LENT III AN34 MCCIJEPAIA IREM CARSLSPHNANKALCORPCPAIld1 500E AHN SI MOYVNG 497 9HNLl7s AURCO/ 5911 MF. YSWAG LIC Appendix 32 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 2776-2 25 M HEMEPCK OR LIFTON PARK Nv 2A64 196E COLONIAL 0.44 MM 0123 2S0000 S10146 5lMMONS ALLEN 2014271512123FACEDRCLIJTONPARKNY19" 197L1 SPLIT LEVEL 049 ZOtA.-01.30 242,300 124.90 JOHNSON LYNN 2014ZTOB4IS17VISTACTCLIFTONPARKNY261E201; TOWNHOUSE 0.18 2MtA.01-31 S35L633 S134.4T NSTASATCLIfTONI ILLLE 20142T,5-516 11 PONDVIEWOR CLIFTON FARK NY 2972 2013 CONTEMPORARY 049 NIA0131 S47Z468 S15a 97 TRALONGOBL9LOfRS INC Mld2711E14112JUNIPERDRCLIFTONPARKNY209219NRANCH0472C14,C>?04 214000 D22Y COLLIE CARLOS M1427161113BLCKINGHAMCTCLIFTONFARKNY229E149ECOLONIAL046X14.0119 11 000 SM}BO PoSCHBIETERTIMOTHY M14 L.I1 311 13 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3213 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2914 X1A 45dao 141 SASAI4 DANIEL 201E27064911V15TACT16612013CLIFI04PAWTOWNHOUSE024Z01402245290.0N S114,SS WI AT CLIF70N PARK LIC Mld 2"18+1.91 1 VISTA CT CUFTCCN PARK NY 1661 2DIJ TOWNHOUSE 024 20140307 53XOW SIBS 43 NSThS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC MI/ 265, 173.19 5 MARL80R0 DR COFTON PARK NY 2522 199E COLONIAL 053 1014,03:14 400.00p 515860 FOVRA GARY ml4265. 173 J9 5 MARLBOR'DDR CLIFTON PARK NY 252E 5994 COLONIAL 053 iDi. 14 011;0 S158.60 CARTUS NNAN,LALCORPORATION 201A 27581-1 21 WAVERLY PL CLIF TON PARK NY 264T 2001 COLONIAL 0.34 2014-04-03 S3B3 OM M5W BERDAR DANIEL 2014 2713219 T7 GREEN MEADOW Di CLIFTON PARS NY 1233 198E TOWNHOUSE 0.27 Mwt22 17&000 5VIA 36 BRONSON KAR.EN MIA271.1a 161 23 DENIMDR CLIFTON PARKNY 1779 79W SIUTLEVEL 0.34 M74 d-25 5230000 12929 BROGNAALEA 2D1408.4254 9 BIRCHWOOD DR HALFMOON NY 964 t*0 RANCH 031 i014 Ol S12TAM 125 A.' GI66513PAN 204277623516PINEWOODDRCLIF70NPARKNY2SBB1962COLDNHALDS32014054512A226659361CU,.NINGS"LELINE M1427753.a 16 MAYFIELD DR CL19TON PARK NY 173E 7C07 AANCN 029 201405 $2 302000 11729, HUCKEMEYERR'CHARD 20142708441214VISTACTCLIF70NPARKNY2553M13IDWBIi4QUSE0t9Mi4O5.M 291.119 111403 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARALLC 201E 271) A-4. 12 14 VISTA C7 GLIFTOry FARKNY 2553 2673 TCWIFMOUSE 019 201ADS 21 SJd3.5% 13459 VISTASAT CLIFTONPARKLLC 2014271.6.1.40 1 GEORGE DR CLIFTON PARK NY I540 1970 SPLR LEVEL 0.54 2014060E 206, DO; 10519 SHENENOENHOWA UNITED 414Z71 .2-17 656 ERUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1210 195E CAPE COD 0.61 2014.06-06 S198.000 SI6) 64 CHASE PAMELA M14 2]0.2391 67I MILLER RD CLIFTON PARK NY IJOB. MOO CONTEMPORARY 1% 2,1A0620 5515.000 31H43 BORGEL MICHAEL M14 IT 3.14 6 MARLBOPD DR CLIFTON PA(O(NY 2534 599A COLONIM 0.53 20140627 73#000 513260 eARANROBFRT MM2651731E6MARLBOROORCLIFTONPARKNY25]A 1994 COLONIAL 053 20140623 f3#OM 113260 ARTCJ$ FINANCIAL CORPORATION 20142TO1221120CA%HUP.ST CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2S69 Z002 COLONIAL OSG M1J-06-25 5371E-0o 5144' YANGKIN"I MIA 271183.N 5 CHESTN UT LN ILIFTON PARK NY 256A 1%2 COLONIAL 0Ad 2014.%-M 5255.000 S%45 KENNEOY TODO Ml4 27T628 J CHESTNUT IN CIIF TON PARK NY 210E 195E RAISED RANCH a" MM a&26 5715pp0 510199 SWAYNE ANDFEW 201E27f6.33E 32 VIMEELER DR Cll{TON PARK NY 1779 19.. 1PL11LEVEL 0,50 M11.,la 524€000 S119 AO PEUSH MATTHEWVMARANCE 20IA471i91'16 14 PAYNECT CLIFTON PARR NY 2612 1960 RAISED RANCH 0W 20140702 527€500 10662 WELLS 201A27755T4PONDVFEWORCLIFTONPARKNY3x49201) CONTEMPORARY 046 2014,07-11 S480,051 14775 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 71 2A4 623 BRUNO AD CUFF HPARKNY 157E 1981 CONTEMFORARY 1.52 2014 07 15 f260000 16539 BRABENECTERRY 2014 27132.15E T8 GREEN MEAODW DR CUFTON PARK NT 1140 196E TOWMH01/3E O11 301E-07-16 5165,000 71 Y.74 CLTHMAN MARGARET MIA 27164E 14 SHEFFIELD DR CUFTON PARK NY 1707 1991 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 04407.22 l315,=a 51163E RATHBUN DAVID M15 2711741 59 MICHELLE OR CUFTON PARK NY IS52 MSI COLONIAL 032 2014.0F.25 S23i,000 118163 FRICHETTEC DANIEL 203dM2[26 52 MKHELLE OR GLIFTQ74 PARK Nv 230E 2LD2 COLONIAL 0.6E 20747728 S305.000 11322E f#SOVACZRCHAPD MM 270612E 6 STERLING HEIGHTS OP. CLIFTON PARK NY 3910 2003 COLONIAL 029 204N 29 5401,000 S13J.22 SAWSC KI MARK 201427161519111CLIFTDNPARKNY20N19VCOLONIALOS2NM06-06 5235,0W S117.17 VON SUTPHEN CYNTHIA 201A 2Ra 117 33 STERLING HLIGH75 DR CLIfTON PARK NY 266E 2m) COLONIAL 111 M741117 139E-000 f146.05 CASABpHNE TiMDTHY 2041"1616 45 CApUCE5TER Sl CUFTON PARK NY 201A 1909 COLONIAL 046 20"00 -..6 5273.000 135S5 CAOC4ERAUSONI 2014 277.5.410 22 DANBURYCT CLIFTON PARR NY $918 M02 RANCH 024 ZOU-0127 335, OW 17466 BYRNE N7HN 2014 270.E1 It 3) STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLFTON PARK NY 25S1 2003 COLONIAL 042 20M 08,2a S3S0OD0 117N BFL4fLBRAMANAN SIIIHAR 2014270.1224 A CAKHUASTCT CLI"011 PARK NY 2101 MI COLONIAL a(A M140629 S37ZCM 163 BA KUHN SHANNON 2014271.9-1 55 20 DAMASK DR CL1fTON PARKNY 1TW 196E RANCH 041 2014.06-29 1245WO S14000 LAWYER A)HN 201427020.2.E 39 MJCHkIlE DR CLIFTOH PARK Ni 1557 29P0 COLONIAL 027 lOt4p9-03 S28?WO 161.)3 TAGHAODOS SARSAD 2011277532EIDMAYFIELOORCLIFTONPAR%NY 17M 1901 RANCH 029 i0M 09.05 SA$5,ON 11816E CJSUGLEJOHN MM277E-A 19 6 DANIBL91YC7 CLIFTON PARK NY 162E WIN RANCH 02S 2014 09 10 314,900 f19367 SIECZKOWSIO THOMAS 2014 271617 16 WMEFLEROR CLIFTON PARK NY 1612 191 SPUTLEVEL 0.48 20140/23 24A,50O lSt E7 KUCARIKA 2ORAN 2014 277S S-14 15 BRDOEWATER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2X) MSS RANCH 047 201J.01 S627,462 S23214 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2514in5Z31' .0 VSCHER FERRY RD CL1FTON PARK NY M62 2002 RANCH 2.29 M14.10.16 S6M SM43 G.ATTO DAVID 201E 01 SAT 442 WSCHER FERRY RD CLIFTO%PARK NY 1781 ;MA RANCH 1Be 01410.16 SMT300 M625 BONI BUILDERS INC M744731114EUMICHELLEDRHALFMOGNNY2SB5Z014COLONIAL0432014.10.17 S3T0591 S1A336 BEACON HOMES LLC 20142T7.54 H 76 DANB4WY'CI CLIFTON PARK NY T918 21n2 RANCH 025 i0141024 5J24,DOG S36B.9S KIM MYUNGSUN M142774.137 18 HEMLOCK DR CUFTON PARJ(NY 2776 196E COLONIAL 0.43 DFIA 1029 53a0000 lIW.97 VALENTE BERNARDI 2014 2T7.6-1-34 9 BELMONTE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 16(E 19" RANCH 047 1014 11 13 S228,700 11744 COPPS NKA CHR-A KATHLEEN 201427191.1, 30 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1793 1963 SPLIT LEVEL 035 20141119 124LSM S136 J4 PERKINSMI'.HAEL MIA271211637BRUNOADCLIF1014PARKNY11521992RANCH0931014-11 Z1 5195 DD) 14423 CWE ALOLLWILLIAM 201J 2T061 1441 STERLING HEIGHTS OR CLIFTON PARK NY la% MU COLONIAL 039 Z01411.25 31A.Ma 51711E WU SUNG MAO M4 27442. 54 9 BIRCHYA)OOUN HAIFMOON NY W4 1%0 RANCH 031 2014 12 S1f5000 51575E LOPATNIVK ELIIABETH 201E 27110759 47 DENIM DENIMDR CLIFTON PARK NY 142E 1963 SPLITUVAL 035 2014.1219 I2>_000 115612 DUNLAVEY ANITA ROBERT JOHN 2014 27:17459 63 DR CLIFTONPARK NY 1540 200E COLONIAL 027 2074.12.19 2720M f17857 IINIPLE70NFJCHAFO 2014 271I. Ml! 6M BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 181E MtA RANCH 10T M15-01-12 f3JS IN 5184,9E EGTWFF BLOOM tl/STOMER BUEPF7 MI5 27143S.M fiA0 BRUNO AO CLK70N PARK NY 1350 201I RANCH Z50 015.U 15Cx06 5301.4W f31T% XRIPTER D.ANIEL 201E 271 523 i2 4M VI$CHERFERRY RD CLIFTON PARKNY 262E s'Old CONTEMPORARY 094 M150227 5375,000 5342% BONI6EALDERS INC MIS 2775- S-A1 8 BPJOGEWATERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 291E 1014 CONTEMPORAFY D36 201E_w 09 S454,ST7 1SS59 TRALONGOBULDERSINC 2015 27113.2. is 2 BARCLAY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 1917 1988 COLONIAL 050 20 a,III IM4OW 137./2 RAKIJFF STEFAN MIS 26$.186.E 17 SHEFNELDDR CLIFTON PI NY 2324 19" CONTEMPORARY 161 2DIS-01,30 SMO0X 4M6 E0 HASKIN ROBERT MI5 271, 13310 12 BEECHWOOO OR CLIFTON PARK NV IIII 1%1 RANCH 051 201E 04-M szRLOW S10786 SHIROKOY VLADIMIR 201E 27012111 14 SAXONY ST CLIRDN PARK NY 141E 1969 COLONAL OA9 i0150506 1275,000 J14303 KOGERS ELLEN MI5 Z70161449GLOUCESTERSICLIFTONPARKNY21391989COLON4l0.4E 201E-DS B6 1327-IOD S139M ILLINIER STEVEN MI5 250512E S OTTO NVJ=CT MAILNY 211S 197E COLONIAL 0.48 2015.OS-14 26E-000 S12S30 MCNAS KEITH 267E 277.626$ d ASPEN Lk CLIFTON PARK NY 1M6 196E RANCH O.SS 2015 OS 21 24R500 114529 BLANCHETTE DAVID 201E 2775, 5.11 24 PRIDGEYWATER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2649 IOW CONTEMPORARY OA4 201E OS x2 60S,2n3 5221 d6 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC MIS 2TI 32 ]-57 20 GAFEN MFAW.Y DR LIPTQNPARK NY 12P 796E TOWNHOUSE 017 201E D$27 S180.5O0S147 it YOi5 El12ABETH M15 27110- 1 2] A2 DAMASK OR CLIFIDN PARK NY 191E 19K6 SAM LEVEL 1 15-DG04 521180E S13A99 SCHAFFER PAIR 2C15 2T132- i 19 4 GRE NMFADOY'Y DR CLIflONPARKNY ]140 1995 TOWNHOUSSE 909 i0ES 06-10 S16A9m 51481E BRANDTOONALD MSS 27115-12 13 TRACEYCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2%3 1497 CONTEMPORARY 06t MI5:06 12 395900 515E-03 R NGELSTEIN WILLIAM MI5 27151- 10 B PECKLN CLIFTON PARK NY MI6 196E RANCH 034 201500E 19 S2J1,000 S11127 NELSON DAN JOSEPH M15 170123.18 10 SKYBR00%CIR CLIFTON PARK PIV 2S% 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0Al MI5062S SAX COD 1$619 WANG IE SHENG MIS 2,17.12344 9 SKYBROOC[IR CLIFTON PARK NY 274E M72 [ONTEMPORARr a52 M1506. 26 147b 000 115901 LAOLRDAR AENUMIN MIS i70M-322 ADO SON IVAY CLIFTON PARK NY 29M 2007 CONTEMPORARY 168 MIS 06-30 1S67.S00 195,a6 FOTI FRANCIS MIS 2716E5522HEMLOCKDRCLIFTONPARKNY2564196ECOLONIAL06) MIS-07-04 1280DOG 109.M ZMBELMAJ4N HENRY 2015 E7020. 3.38 14 AC015ON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 21159 4M7 [ON7EMPORARY OA2 20150'.13 S415 OM 114S 16 AIAPATIRAMAKANTH MIS 27TT-27 16 PAR DEL RID CLIFTON PARKW 2753 1966 COLONIAL 057 X15.OT 13 5261 EDO S9S.E0 MC[LAIN PHYLLIS 2015 70M 338 14 AWSON WAY CLIFTO 4 PARK NY 2059 3M7 CONTEMPORARY 042 2015-07 14 54S59D0 3145. 16 ROOKFIELO GLOBAL RELOCATION SE 2015 71321- 18 35 G1IFENMEADOMDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1234 1905 TOWNHOUSE OM MS-07-16 S192,901 11%.3x STROAL IPCHAPD MIS T13272d 47 GREEN MFAOG.V OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 194E TOWNHOUSE 0.17 M1f0722 S1]00w 5149.1E KAYANAUGFI ROBERT 201E 27761. 31 7 BELMONTE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1*4 19fi IIIH 047 MIS-0727 629900 SIS5.59 IURl1EK NKA BUAKEY CHRISTINE 201E 277. 61 }0 xa BEECHN'OOD OR CLIFTON PARKNY 2310 1%1 COLONIAL 04J MIi'D7L31 105.ODD 513E-03 HU HES EDWARD 2015 2716. 4. 14 6 BUCKINGHAM CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2A78 199E CONTEMPORARY OAR 201S•06.14 S34QOW S13721 ROBFRiS ESTHERTRUSTEE XIS 7741.311 21 LACE LN HAEFMOON NY 154E I92a OLD STYLE 37) 201E 061A 0000 491 ION IS SARA ADMEN TZ-IRUS7E 20I5 X12.118 9 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY Z123 1988 COLONIAL 041 201SLOBM 280000 111 ai DALLAIROELIZABETH 2015 702D- S 1O 46 MICHELLEDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2S53 200E COLONIAL miss as E3B5000 S150a0 STARNES GERALD MI5 277SSt 393 MSCHER FERRY RD CLIFION PARK NY 107E 1880 OLD STYLE 252 200MIS-D6-2• t425000 53363E CALHOUN SCD'T MIS 271 51 469 V15CHEft FE RRY RD CLIPTON PARK NY 1428 1%] RANCH 071 M150416 5110,000 IZ6 OS 7HOMAS STEP HANIE 2015 270. 6.112 45 STERIFIGHEIGHITSVPI CLIFTON PARK NY 3CM MQA COLONIAL 031 291509.0 S352W0 S126AS EDWARDS JAMES MI5 7084.13E 27 VISTA CT CL{FFON PARK NY 1`53 Z012 TOWNHOUSE 024 2015.09.2E S335.000 Sl81 BE CWNATq PAELLA m15 701212179CtOUCESTERSTCLIFTONPARKNY22341WCOLONIAL096201E-1C 21 3M900 S74011 WALCO PETER M15 17072 T3 70 GLOLK ESTER 5T CLIPION PARK NY 16W 7%9 COLONIAL 049 201E IC 2' S275.000 516667 HOPKEGREGORY 2015 016314 29 WHEELE POP CLIFTON PARK NY 3403 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 051 2015.1026 5330000 19475 STEINER ROBERT 2015 E776LJ'Rl II BELMDNTE LN CLIPTON PARK NY 22W 1969 COLONIAL 046 20tS 1021 523E-000 510613 FLORANCE CHARLES 2015 6517-)•21 9 MARLBORO DR CLIFTON PARKNY 2215 1990 COLONIAL 055 013 t102 53do am 11394E LEMMERMAN MARK M15 55173.21 9 MARLBORO DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2.`95 19M COLONIAL OSS 2015 11 W 320 ODD ST3943 AERI INTERNATIONAL RELCCAT 2015 477EA713DANBLRYCTCLITTONPARKNY21902o0SCONTEMPORARYD302OT5:20• 53AS 00D 5I5751 POTTERNFLSON M15 ET93T145LACELNHALFMCONNY1101195ECAPECOD0d5201SI1OES1$0,= S"X L€BLANC WILLIAM 2015 27755a6PONDWEWDRCLIFTONPARKNY21142015RANCH049201512,04 437627 M71 TRALONGO BOIL OFRS INC 2015 Ins a14 20 REDFIELD PARK CLIFTON PARK NY 24U 1997 COLONIAL 0.55 415-1226 1148500 STAG$$ OZZELL0 ANTHONY AND I NNIFI,R 20I5 IVAVERAGE11115109.370 34DS DICK GREGORY 3' A5 SMITH SHAUN 365E CONNOR WILLIAM 1OC66 WEBER JOSEPH 5377 RI MICHAEL 5332 CRAWFORD DEAJAN 9472 HAN YUN 5413 atANCHE GEORGE 7927 % ROLL CALV4J 7854 CARTUS NNANC3AL CORPORA71q+ 7915 CAIRO MICHAEL INS) WARO STEVEN 1Z624 KUINE LAUNE law MOAELU AMY 12543 LOPATNIUK ELLUUTH 1301E P.0,N tLY)DHIFI 917 diFW I3YLAWRENCE1443 _ _ STORY ANNE 1675E PE221CAROL 15553 A LEVIINE REALLY LL( 16615 RIC KS DAVID IT6) a NACCARATO)CiSEPH 1777A CAR7US FINANCIAL CORPORATION 17775 SCIO71 LAURIE 16574 1HANG CHENYM'EI 19115 SWAYNEANMEW 111755 DELSOIN REGGIE II CHOWYOHURY IYM:L 1% 57 HEDGE "PC 2756E COLLINS EDWARD Mass SALN4DERS M AKKOEVATI 22" 1 VICE JESSICA 21759 KELLY THOMAS ZZ199 CH IN LIAN15SHAN 22392 ANCTE BARRY 59 SONG HD YOUNG 2276E HAIGH IONAMAN 21365 KANG BYUNG CHEOL 250E- 0 CARROLL JAMES 2506E STRAND THOMAS 25127 PALIATH UMESH 25336 PER 2H02 26SFA GKARD JONATHAN 26t} 4 AGOLOA HUSSEIN 2" M SPIELMAN GLENN 2459E BORARD GEdiGE MOS3 FINN£RANTHERESE 287S5 THOMP$QN STEVEN 33225 GLASS THOMAS 31998 GATTO DAVID 31W SPICMER MATTHEW 31A23 CIULLA RICHARD U611 MCNAIR ROBERT 34861 HILL FAII 34110 CARBONS JOHN 3607E PYSKAJOSEPH 3548 PARMARTARUN 3663E ENGLERT BRAN 37442 HSU CITE-HU4 17M YEAP KO NGBOON 171E ALLISON WALLACE 5W3 SPEUUIN GREGOR- 9416 VERMA DWANSH 8123 LUNDBERG NILS 958E NUCOMPASS MO RILRY SERVICESINC 11i67 CAHILL JAMES 1130J ROBERIS SEAN 12793 MCBWDE TIMOTH'I 131S3 HANCHENG CHUNG T4265 DOKTATER JASON 14744 LEDFORD MARCUS 15438 V& KE ERC 19BR3 LUO ANDREW 16396 SAWCHUK IOH'N 1 73 11 DEVOE JAMES 1764E PROCKWAY DANO I9J32 POPHAM ADAM 15110 SANGH AGAR 188T5 KM TAE HI 19109 CLISTER CLYDE 20457 SOLOMON BENJAMIN 24310 DOOELO GLOBAL RELOCATION 5ERV( ZI521 BUCCA CHARLES ZU26 $HFNG HAIFENG 24761 EAKEA TIMOTHY 219D4 ANDRES GEORGEAN 2a106 MOORS DAVID 23"1 GAUL MATTHEW 241W LAMBRNO5 JAMES 17M IVC85LLC 2499E 2EBROWSKI JAMES 15700 RUST USA 25445 STACKEWSCZ CRAG ))SEPH 30319 $AANSVW9 NKHOLA5 28649 BARCOM€ SPANDON 29315 LANTZ ROSE MARIE Ow 'I GREGORY 32312 SNYDEROAVID 36749 BONANO JOHN 3259E WEST DAMIEN 34757 OCAN INTERNATIONAL RELOCATION SC 3415E DOMBROWSKI KERRY HAS2 CAPPIELLO WILLIAM J6757 MARIUCCICHESTGPHEA IWS HUGHIES EDWARD 317S4 DINGENFENG Appendix 33 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 271.15-1-3 11 TRACEYCT CUETONPARK NY 2919 1997 CONTEMPORARY 0.62 2011-01-24 415,000 S142.T7 D€ROSEKENNETH 2O11 6674 PARK CHANGSEO 270.12-3-4 7 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3557 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2011-03-10 S534,726 150.33 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2011 10622 CUSCINO RICHARD 270.20-3-38 14 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2859 ZW7 CONTEMPORARY C42 2011-06-17 S393,000 137.46 HOOTMAN JONATHAN 2011 20624 ALAPATI RAMAKANTH 271,-2-21.21 607 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1760 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0,99 2011-08-02 S304,000 172-73 MCCUNE BARBARA 2011 25755 DEBRINO KIMBERLY 277.5-3-19 3 MAYFIELD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2416 2001 CONTEMPORARY 0.29 2011-09-23 S36g000 149.01 SCHWARTZ CHARLES 2011 34807 SARRAFI-NOUR REZA Z773.3.13 8 SHERIDAN CT CLIFTON PARK NY Z151 2001 CONTEMPORARY 0.26 2011-09-30 1295.000 137.15 ABBOTTJOHN KENYON 2011 33309 DESROCHESGILBERT 270.12-3-15 19 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2842 2071 CONTEMPORARY 092 2D12-03-01 399,705 S1401A AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 9067 LIIIGANG 277. 5-2-6 57 REDFIELD PARK CLIFTON PARK NY 1652 1997 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2012-04-11 265.000 160.41 TATRO RICHARD 2012 13268 DAMORETCKIGEORGE 270,12-3-21 1 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2848 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q56 2012-04-19 401,121 140.84 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 15564 TYAGI PRAVEEN 270A2-3-3 5 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3479 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q45 2012.05-24 S81,292 167,09 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 2W93 LU CHILI LING 27012-3-19 8 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY ' 3156 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.52 2012-06-01 464,513 147,18 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 21224 HU SHIAOIONG 270.12-3-24 9 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2742 2012 CONTEMPORARY QSZ 2012-06-11 498,534 181.81 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 21734 LAQUTDARI BENIAMIN 270.12.3-2 3 T15DALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2632 201 T CONTEMPORARY 0.47 2D12-06-14 483,826 183.82 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 224U5 SCIARRINO JOSEPH 270.12-3-23 6 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3553 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2012-06-29 514785 5745.28 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 25252 SANKARA PR€MACHANDRAN CHIRAY 270. 12-3.25 7 SXYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2596 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2012-08-16 395,937 15252 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 31OW SUBRAMANIYAN ARUN KARTHI 270. 12-3.13 17 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2404 2072 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2012-08-23 376,281 S156.52 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 32027 GAO SHAOWEN 270.12-1-16 14 SKYBRCIOKCIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2802 2009 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2012-08-24 426,000 S152.03 DASH DIPTI 2012 32%2 TSAI HAO CHFNG 270.12-3.12 15 TISDALE LN CUFTON PARK NY 2999 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q40 2012-DB-30 432.072 144.07 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 36644 YANG BIN 27Q20. 3-6 11 AODI50N WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3211 2012 CONTEMPORARY 1.30 2012-09-07 564,271 175.73 AMEDORE LAND DEVELOPERS LLC 2012 37399 KOLUGUNTA VENKAT 277. 5-5-18 7 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 26" 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q39 2012-09-07 404000 115204 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 34269 WANG XIN 277. 5-5-2 4 BRIDGEWATER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2880 2010 CONTEMPORARY 069 2012-09-12 431.535 149-84 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 37303 WU XINHUI 271. 15-1-3 11 TRACEY Cl CLIFTON PARK NY 2919 1997 CONTEMPORARY CL62 2012-09-14 425,000 145.60 PARK CHANG SEO 2012 35403 REDICK LAMES 270.12-3-18 10 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2596 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.44 2DTZ-09-21 385,547 148.52. AMEDORF GROUP INC 2012 38W3 WANG TE-SHENG 270.12-3-27 3 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2900 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2012-09-21 433,720 S149.56 AMEDORF GROUP INC 2012 39231 SHI XIAO 277.5-5-20 3 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2753 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.55 2012-11-09 389.521 141.49 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 42992 SHAMS LUTFE 270.12-3-22 6 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3115 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.43 2012-11-21 SWI07 154,13 AMEDORE GROUP INC 2012 4506Z NALLANNAGARI NAVEEN REDDY 26 AVERAGE 1/l/2012 425,150 MEDIAN 1/1R012 420.000 277. 5-5-16 11 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2972 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2014-01-31 47Z46B 158.97 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 1006E WEBFRiOSEPH 270A2- 3-11 13 TISDALE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3213 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2D14-02-20 S45Q000 S140.06 SABAN DANIEL 2014 9472 HAM YUN 270.- 2-39.1 471 MILLER RD CLIFTON PARK NY 170B 2000 CONTEMPORARY 1.08 2014-06-20 315,000 184A3 BORGEL MICHAEL 2014 17838 NACCARATO JOSEPH 277. 5-5-7 4 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3249 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2014-07 11 S480,051 147.75 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 21562 COLLINS EDWARD 271.- 2-44 623 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY I572 1981 CONTEMPORARY 1.52 2014-07-15 260.000 165.39 BRABENEC TERRY 2014 29058 SAUNDERS MARK DEWITT 271. 6.4-8 14 SHFFFIELD OR CLIFTON PARK NY 2707 1991 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2014-01-22 315,000 S116.36 RATHBUN DAVID 2075 21759 KELLY THOMAS 271.- 5-23.12 444 MSCHER FERRY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2625 2014 CONTEMPORARY 0.99 2D1S-02-27 S375,000 142.86 BONI BUILDERS INC 2015 9416 VERMA DWANSH 277. 5-5-4.1 8 BRIDGEWATER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2918 2014 CONTEMPORARY 0.36 2015-03-09 454,017 155.59 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2015 8333 LUNDBERG NILS 265. 18-6-6 17 SHEFFIELD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2324 1989 CONTEMPORARY 0.63 2015-03-30 S340000 146.30 HASKIN ROBERT 2015 11167 CAHILLJAMES 277. 5-5-11 24 BRIDGEWATER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2649 2014 CONTEMPORARY 0.44 2015-05-22 605,203 220.46 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2015 15438 WILKE ERIC 271. 15-1-2 13 TRACEYCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2563 1997 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 201S-06-72 S399,90D S156.03 RINGELSTEINWILLIAM 2015 17646 BROCKWAYDAVID 270. 12-3-18 10 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2596 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0." 2015-06.25 S406.000 156.39 WANGTESHENG 2015 19110 SINGH)AGAR 270A2- 3-24 9 SKYBROOK CIR CLIFTON PARK NY 2742 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q52 2015-06-26 43Q000 159.01 LAQUIDARI BENIAMIN 2015 18815 KIMTAE HYUN 270. 20-3-22 51 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2909 20D7 CONTEMPORARY 1.68 2015-06-30 567,500 195.08 FOTI FRANCIS 2015 19409 CUSTERCLYDE 270. 20-3-38 14 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2859 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2015-07-13 415,000 145-16 ALAPATI RAMAKANTH 2015 24310 BROOKFIELD GLOBAL RELOCATION SERVIC 210, 20-3-38 14 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2859 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2015-07-14 415,000 145,16 ROOKFIELD GLOBAL RELOCATION Sr 2015 23426 SHENG HAIF£NG 271. 6-4-14 6 BUCKINGHAM CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2478 1992 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2015-OB-14 34Q000 S137.21 ROBERTS ESTHER TRUSTEE 2015 24704 LAMBRINOS JAMES 277. 5.4-7 13. DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2190 2003 CONTEMPORARY 030 2015-12-01 345,000 157.53 POTTER NELSON 2075 36452 CAPPIELLO WILLIAM 18 AVERAGE 1/T/2015 410,619 Appendix 34 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. CLIFTON COMMON BLVD TOWER BEFORE AND AFTER COLONIAL STYLE RESIDENTIAL SALES - 1.0,M]LE RADIUS TOWER r- 2013) TAX MAP, MS-1.564 9 STREET COTTONWOODCT TOWN SF MATTA NY 1656 BU I LT 2001 HOUSESTYLL COLONIAL ACRES 0% SALEDATI 2011-W-23 I'MCE S2430D0 BLDG SF 14674 SELLER COTILLO LORI BOOK 2011 PA6E 8301 BUYER LITTLE SASON 271.17.1-11 39 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 231D 1%3 COLONIAL 042 MI"3-E8 S193,000 583.55 SCHWENCKE EDWARD 2011 10062 B17TSfNKO NAN 265.194-16 671 BRUNO RO CLIFTON PARK NY 2094 2000 COLONIAL Q46 2DI1-03-21 5287,RM S73T,06 ROCHELEAUIO$EPH 2O11 10786 URBAN ROBERT 27020-3-2 3 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3720 20M COLONIAL 0.49 2011-03-31 MOM 5147AS AQ%I VINCENT 2011 17689 MATHANY EDWARD271.19-1-S2 32 EL LOBOCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2S15 1977 COLONIAL 0.74 2011-05-26 SMCGO 93.52 FJELDAL DIKIE loll 18025 PUGH DOMINICK2717-2-49 2 BARCELONA DR CLIFION PARK NY 2310 1966 COLONIAL 0.55 2011-05-31 5267.500 S11S.80 HUCKEMEYER SUSAN 2011 IN02 OUYNYK WKHAILO 2775-2-39 18 REDFIEtO PARK CLIFiON PARK NY 2566 1997 COLONIAL 059 2071-O(-16 5332.S00 S729.48 SUCHOEVE RAIESH 2O11 19942 OUFFY RICHARD 2T7,7-2-51 3 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 21J70 1965 COLONIAL 0.47 2011-06-28 23S,O0D S113, S3 MALSAN CHARLES 2011 W926 WILLSON PATRICK270E-1.11 47 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CDFTON PARK NY 25M 2004 COLONIAL Q31 2011.05-30 S375,000 S7477S CLKFOROSAMUEL 2011 216% WALLAERETHIBAUP271.18&1.14 23 JUNIPER DR COTTON PARK NY 2310 1963 COLONIAL Q55 2GIl-07-08 OW S9654 SOKOL NAN" 2011 22939 TURNER CHRITOPHER27Q20-2-3 33 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2323 1999 COLONIAL 0.27 2011.07-11 339.900 S34632 MASON PAUL 2011 2M66 PEREZ ZARATE VICTOR MANUEL271, 13-1-14 5 G"IUCESTER ST CLIFTON PARK NY X% 7987 COLONIAL OSI 2Qll-D7-11 S2K 000 S727.04 AMEROSTEPHEN ALIT 28425 JFNNIN61 LINDA LEE27Q8.1-S3 73 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3109 2005 COLONIAL 0.39 2011-07-15 S36%BOO 12183 DUKE ROBERT 2011 24SW HU XIANG 271.78-2-37 10 LOCUST LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2%4 1%2 COLONIAL 1L40 21111 07-28 264000 S101.40 DESALVATORE DAM 2011 26431 VERNI77I GRAMANO271.78-2-$S 11 ASPEN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3747 1962 COLONIAL 1.11 2011-07-29 S35Q000 9341 KEATING ROBERT 20t1 26121 DESALVATORE DAMO 271.13-1-IZ 7 GLOUCESTER ST CUFTON PARK NY 1944 19ST COLONIAL 065 2011-08.01 52%Ow S133.23 STEFAN!GEORGE 2011 25915 BAUMESIEFFREY 270.20-1.6 1B MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2584 199R COLONIAL 0.39 2011-C&IO SM510D0 117.36 BLACKIASON 2011 27884 CORINI MN277,6-1-S 2 JUNIPFR DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1962 COLONIAL QSO 2011-08-11 264,860 1115..82 GRATTAN MATTHEW Wl1 26708 MARTIN HEATHER 27119.1-9 23 MADRIDCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2455 1956 COLONIAL Q6D 2011-01B-16 S264000 S10672 MCNAIR SCOTT 2011 Z7762 ECKERT DANI£L 271.17.4-39 60 MICHELLE OR CLIFTON PARK NY 7882 199E COLONIAL 028 20110R-2S S27QODO S143.46 LINEHAN LAMES 2011 30$S2 REOTINGER PAUL 271.18,1.13 28 JUNIPER OR CLIFTON PARK NY 2370 1*1 COLONIAL Q06 2011.08-29 S28QW0 5121.21 CAPOGNA KRISTIN 2011 29486 ANDREWS MICHAEL 277&2-29 19 PINEWOODDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 19W COLONIAL G45 2011.04-07 SZ29.000 S99.13 VOPELAKWILLIAM ALIT 37397 PIZZUII JOSEPH 270.12.1-17 7 ILIDOR 51 CLJFTON PARK NY 2S92 198E COLONIAL 049 2011.09-16 f31Q910 S7199S CHRTSTOFFEL THOMAS Nil 31785 BYRNE CHRISTOPHER271.13.2-26 28 GLOUCESIER ST CLIFTON PARK NY 2284 1988 COLONIAL 0.46 2011-09-28 S287,50D S12588 LUTTRELL MICHAEL 2011 34138 DAVID DANIEL 2708-1.36 28 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3020 2004 COLONIAL 041 2011-TO 07 S385,000 S127.48 WIERZBICKI WILLIAM 2011 36311 LEE TAE BOON 279.ti1-2 ti VISTA CT HALFMOON NY 2960 201E COLONIAL 0.65 2011-10.07 S797.095 S134.1S LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC Nil 34M FLAHERTYTHOMAS 27020.1-11 25 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 23V 19% COLONIAL Q33 2M1-10-14 35QOOD 34602 LITTLEFIELD BRADLEY Z011 35378 MALKOFFSCOTT 2700-2 .2-5 37 MICHELLE DR CHFTON PARK NY 23M 1997 COLONIAL 0.27 2011-10-28 S337.5DO 14623 MUNDINGER ROBERT 2011 37667 DEPAOLAJOANNE 27114-3-8 5 VISTA CT HALFMOON NY 2491 2011 COLONIAL 053 2011-11-22 S376,691 SISI.22 LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 2017 A0561 SLYKE WESLEY 270.&144 44 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3065 ZOOS COLONIAL Q39 2071-12.09 S3WODD S12B87 MCMAHONMARTIN 2011 43621 GOPALAKRFSHNAN NAIR BINODKUMA 277.6.1-32 5 BELMONTE UN CLIFTON PARK NY 29% 19EO COLONIAL 080 2011-12-16 S30QODO S101.49 MINNICK THOMAS 2012 1943 GRATTAN MATTHEW 270.8-1-14 41 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1850 2001 COLONIAL 039 2012-01-12 S31Q000 S166BS GARROWROSS 2012 2286 WUSONG-MAO 270.76-1-15 38 GLOLICFSTER SF CLIFTON PARK NY 1795 1989 COLONIAL Q46 2012-01-23 26QMG S145.56 ZACHERSCOTT 2012 2876 BUTEERCHRISTOPHER 271.13-2-21 31 CAOUCESTER ST CLIFION PARK NY 1897 1988 COLONIAL Q49 2012.02-22 S273000 S14391 OTOOLE KEVIN 2012 TM BENWAY JASON 27020-2.8 52 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 23M 200L COLONIAL Q62 2012-03.16 S345.000 149.61 VANDEN BOS ERK: 2012 11299 PRUDENTIAL RELOCATION INC 27020-2.8 52 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2306 2OW COLONIAL 0,62 2012-03-16 S345.000 5149.61 VANDEN BOS ERIC 2012 11300 GELOWICZ RICHARD 2776-1.24 38 SEECHWOODDR CLIFTON PARK NY 244Z 1%4 COLONIAL 043 20124A-12 SZ250DO S9214 MAKRALO DIALING 2012 16803 TAYLORSAMANTHA 277C+2-il 10 CHESTNUT LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 7953 COLONIAL DS3 2012-DI-27 S267.SB0 5115.80 MOSLEY BRAN 2012 16107 SHEELER GREGORY 277-6-1-4 2Z TAMARACK LN CLIFTON PARK NY- 2310 i957 COLONIAL D60 2072.DS-03 257,0M 111,26 VAN ZANDT HARRY 2012 17739 SPRAAERJISTIN 277.6-2-23 24 HEMLOCK OR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1962 COLONIAL QS4 2012-05-04 S225,000 97.40 AIKEN JOHN 2012 20312 OSSOJOSEPH 271.-5-22 485 MSCHER FERRY RD CLTFTON PARK NY 1756 19B7 COLONIAL 0.78 2012-0S-10 S24QCOD S73667 WOLOSSRUDOLPH 2O12 25SR AUNGST JASON 276.8.1.12 2 WAVERLY PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2891 200-1 COLONIAL 0.35 2012-05-14 380,000 S13144 WANG ZHU.NG 2012 1B738 HAN JA HYING 277.6-2-5 IO PINEWOOD DR CUFTONPARK NY 2705 7960 COLONIAL 070 2012-OS-14 S231.000 S13540 TARARJAVAID 2072 18917 KANGAS MICHAEL WILUAM 2775-2.37 14 REDFIELD PARK CLIFTON PARK NY 24156 1997 COLONIAL Q52 2012-UG-17 S315.0DO 5127.74 DAILY CHARLES 2012 18274 GU HAIYAN 27T1B-3-38 22 BEECHWOODDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2370 1962 COLONIAL 0.52 2D12-05-18 Z2s.000 S9740 SEALING CHARLES SCOTT 2012 ISS83 LOOBY KARRI 271.17-2-7 12 TAMARACK LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2330 1963 COLONIAL 0.76 2012-06-15 S782.000 S7879 HENDERSON LORAN 2012 222BO NOORY EHSANLJLLAH 271.18-2-54 18 LOCUST LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2070 1962 COLONIAL 056 20i2-06-25 S2SZDCO S1 Z1.74 WILLIAMS ROBERT 2032 24095 YUSKO JACLYN ALLYSS 27020-2-2 31 MICHELLE OR CLIFTON PARK NY 2520 1997 COLONIAL 030 20I2-07-11 S36Q2CO S142.94 DAMN DAVID ZW2 26912 MARINCIC MATTHEW 770,8-1-41 38 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARR NY 2F9S 2001 COLONIAL 0.32 2012-WOO S325.500 SM29 TIWARI PRASHANT 2012 29824 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 2708-1-41 38 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY Z195 2004 COLONIAL 0.32 2012-131-011 S3255W 141129 TIWARI PRASHANT 2012 29826 NATARAJAN MAHAOEYA IYER 2708-1.12 45 STERLINGHEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3020 2004 COLONIAL 0.31 2012.0&13 39Q000 129.14 GOODWIN THOMAS 21312 41392 EDWARDS3AME5 27914.3.7 3 VISTA CT HALFMOON NY 3419 2012 COLONIAL Q48 2012-08-22 S494916 144.17 LANDMARK DEVELOPMENT GROLIP LLC 2012 31961 IMMONSALFRED 271.19-1.5 46 HEMLOCK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2412 1%4 COLONtAI 0.47 2012-013-29 S2WCKIO 117.74 PROCH101AMES 2012 33882 VANDISHJOHN 2T76-?,SR 5 HEMLOCK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 207D 1%4 COLONIAL 057 2012-08-31 S182,SOO S8816 RUSSMAN PAUL 2012 34131 PITTS PON 2776-2-32 72 PMEWOOD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2370 1962 COLONIAL 061 2012-09-14 5254,900 S11035 BERTORELU PHILIP 2012 364I5 WILBERJULIANA 21120-1-S 20 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2635 2001 COLONIAL 0.3A 2012.09-20 S335.000 S72Y 13 SAWCHUK JOHN 2012 IS743 CHAKRABORTY MCIOR 27Q72-2-11 20 OAKHURST CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2569 2002 COLONIAL D% 2012-09,28 S374.ODD 145. S8 HLIDES MARC 2012 37360 YANGIONGWEI 27117-3-7 21 HEATHEROR CLIFTON PARK NY 2036 19M COLONIAL 0,31 2012-10 03 S31Q000 1S226 BRUJCATO PAUL 2012 477M SHI YONGJIN 270.2D-3-24 32 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3360 2005 COLONIAL 0,56 2012-10-22 50.000 516Q71 ERfSE JOHN 2012 4XI24 QUBNCi PIERO 277.5-2-40 20 REDRELOPARK CLIFTON PARK NY 2433 1997 COLONIAL 0.55 2012-11-OS S380.Ow S151104 CLANCY JEFF 2012 44051 OZZELLOANTHONY 27001-1-24 12 TUDORST CLIFTON PARK NY 2006 M COLONIAL 046 2012-11-16 26U.500 1A% BITTER RUTH 2Q12 46593 BRIGHT LAMES 277.5-3-2 4D HEATHERIIR CLIFTON PARK NY 3015 2WI COLONIAL Q49 2012-12.17 S36KSCO 12222 VARMAANIL 2012 48069 CARTUS FINANICAL CORPORATION 271.17-1.2 49 MICHELLE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2283 19W COLONIAL 028 2012-lZ 19 9319.000 S139.71 ADDYEDWARD 2013 1003 AHN 51 GYLJNG 61 AVERAGE 1/1/2012 S30B.626 MIDIAN 1/1/2012 3DD.000 Appendix 15 CIVY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277.5-3-26 18 MAYFIELD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1735 2002 RANCH 0.29 2011-06-09 31B4OW S183.29 LEARN WILLIAM 2011 19687 HUCKEMEYER SUSAN271.9-1-55 20 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1750 196S RANCH 0.43 2011.08 1S 269,000 153.71 TRAYNORANTONIETTA 2011 27401 LAWYERJOHN270.8-1-22 19 STERLING HEIGHTS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 18% 2004 RANCH 0.28 2011-09-12 333,000 176,56 BELLARDTHOMAS 2011 30404 PARMERTER LINDSAY271.9-1-44 18 GWGHAMAVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1272 1965 RANCH 0.44 2011-09-14 21QOW S165.09 PELCANDREW 2011 31814 WARDKEVIN271.9-1-30 28 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1318 1962 RANCH 0.35 2011-09-30 224,900 170.64 ALLEN BARBARA 2011 33490 WILSON JOANNE277.6-2-65 4 ASPEN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1848 1962 RANCH 0.55 2011-12-02 S117,000 63.31 CLUXTON DAMD 2011 41403 4 ASPEN LANE LLC271.17-1-5 42 UNIFIER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1947 1960 RANCH 0.50 2012-01-19 256,5W 131.74 MAGNANOJOSEPH 2O12 2801 FOSSNER NATHANIEL271,9-1-41 12 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1318 1965 RANCH 0A2 2012-01-27 180,500 136.95 FONTAINE AMY WILLIAMS 2012 4205 KUTSCHA PAUL271.9-1-36 40 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1272 1961 RANCH 0.34 2012-05-18 185,000 S145.44 BOWEN DARLA 20T2 18851 MOSCA KELLI271.-2-20.1 609 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1805 2011 RANCH. 1.07 2012-05-23 310000 171,75 PARKERALTON 2012 18645 HURSTTYLER277.6-1-11 30 BEK14WOOD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1672 1962 RANCH 0.46 2012-06-25 5245,0W 146-53 PRUYN JOHN 2012 2411527 .6-1-13 21 TAMARACK LN CLIFTON PARK NY I848 1963 RANCH 0.47 2012-08-09 210,000 5113.64 CALLENDER MARGARET MARY 2012 29366 MARSH ELI GIULIANO MARK277.6-2-65 4 ASPEN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1848 1962 RANCH 0.55 2012-08-13 255,000 137.99 CLUXTON DAVID 2012 34478 BLANCHFITE DAVID270.20-3-37 16 ADDISON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2477 2006 RANCH 0.42 2012-08-30 382,SW 154.42 PUGUESE PHILIP 2012 33303 DIPPERTTHOMAS277.5-4-18 8 DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1914 2003 RANCH 0-24 2012-10-01 360,000 188.09 GAY SARAH 2O12 37007 RYAN KATHLEEN277.6-2-64 6 ASPEN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1848 1961 RANCH 0.49 2012-10-26 205,000 110.93 GIBEAU CAMILLE 2012 42988 ROGNER MARC277.5-4-14 16 DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1918 2002 RANCH 0.2S 2012-11-20 330,000 172.05 KINDL RICHARD 2012 44122 KIM MYUNGSUN2i7,5-3-12 6 SHERIDANCT CLIFTON PARK NY 1719 2001 RANCH 0.35 2012-12 07 334,900 194.82 REEDMARTIN 2012 48538 MCCUE PAUL271.19-1-63.1 511 CLFTON PARK CTR RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1645 1950 RANCH 0,48 2012-12-19 100.000 60.79 YOUNG M ENS CHRISTIAN 2013 5912 19 AVERAGE 1/1/2012 254.016 MK2CSWAG LLC MEDIAN 1/1/2012 255,000 271.18-3-41 12 JUNIPER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2092 1963 RANCH 0.47 2014-02-04 214,000 102.29 COLLEY CARLOS 2014 5377 RIVET MICHAEL278-4-2-54 9 BIRCHWOOD DR HALFMOON NY 984 1960 RANCH 0-31 2014-04-30 SI27,40D 129.47 GIBBS BRIAN 2014 12543 LOPATNIUK ELIZABETH277.5-3-26 18 MAYRELD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1735 2002 RANCH 0.29 2014-05-12 S300,000 17291 HLJCKEMEYER RICHARD 2014 13917 GRAY LAWRENCE277.5-4-10 22 DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1918 ZW2 RANCH 0-24 Z014-08-27 335,000 S174.66 BYRNEJOHN 2014 25068 STRANO THOMAS271.9-1-55 20 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1750 1965 RANCH 0.43 2014-08-29 245,000 140,00 LAWYERJOHN 2014 26564 GOULDJONATHAN277.5-3-22 10 MAYF15LD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1734 2001 RANCH 0.29 2014-09-05 S315,000 181.66 GRUGLE JOHN 2014 25905 SPIELMAN GLENN277.5-4-19 6 DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1626 2003 RANCH 0.25 2014-09-10 314.9(0 193.67 SIECZKOWSKI THOMAS 2014 26595 BOILARD GEORGE277.5-5-14 15 BRIDGEWATERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2703 2013 RANCH 0.47 2014-09-29 627,462 232.14 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 28755 THOMPSONSTEVEN271.-5-23.61 440 VISCHER FERRY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 3062 2002 RANCH Z29 2014.10-16 620,000 20148 GATTO DAVID 2014 33225 BLASS THOMAS271. 5-41 442 Vf!SCHER FERRY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1781 2014 RANCH 1.88 2014-10-16 367,300 S206.23 BONI BUILDERS INC 2014 31998 GATTO DAVID 2775-4-14 16 DANBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1918 2002 RANCH 0.25 2014-10-24 324,000 168.93 KIM MYUNGSUN 2014 31423 CIULLA RICHARD277.6.1-34 9 BELMONTE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1664 1969 RANCH 0.47 2014-11-13 228,700 137.44 COPPS NKA DIPAOLA KATHLEEN 2014 34861 HILL M3CHAEL271.-2-11 637 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1352 1992 RANCH 0.93 2014-11-21 195,000 144.23 CALDWELL WILLIAM 2014 36075 PYSKAJOSEPH278.4-2-54 9 BIRCHWOODDR HALFMOONNY 984 1960 RANCH 0.31 2014-12-15 155,000 157.52 LOPATNIUKELIZABETH 2O14 36832 ENGLERTBRIAN271.-2-35.12 644 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1815 2014 RANCH 1.07 2015-01-12 335.704 184.96 SRAFF BLOOM CUSTOMER BUILD[ 2015 1719 ALLISON WALLACE 271.-2-35.14 640 BRUNO RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1398 2013 RANCH 2.50 2015-02-06 303,900 217,38 SCRIPTER DANIEL 2015 5603 SPELLAN GREGORY 271.18.3-10 12 BEECHWOODDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1947 1961 RANCH 0.51 2015-04-20 210,000 S107.86 SHIROKOVVLADfMIR 2015 11303 ROBERTS SEAN277.6.2-65 4 ASPEN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1848 1%2 RANCH 0.55 2015-05-21 268,500 145.29 BLANCHETTE DAVID 2015 14744 LEDFORD MARCUS271.6-1-10 8 PECK LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2076 1968 RANCH 0.34 2015-06-19 S231,000 111.27 NELSON DAN JOSEPH 2O15 19432 POPHAM ADAM277,6-1-33 7 BELMONTE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1664 1970 RANCH 0.47 2015-07-27 WSk%0 155.59 JURUSIK N K A BURKEY CHRISTINE 2015 28106 MOORE DAVID271.-S-1 489 VISCHER FERRY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1428 1957 RANCH 0.77 2015-09-18 180,000 126.05 THOMAS STEP14ANIE 2015 30319 SPANSWICK NICHOLAS277.5-5-8 6 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2114 2015 RANCH 049 2015-12-04 437,827 207.11 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2015 36445 14UGHESEDWARD 22 AVERAGE 1/1/2015 299,754 Appendix 36 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 271,6-3-34 34 WHEELER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1928 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 0.53 2011-06-29 S229,0D0 S118.78 BARRY GERARD 2011 21105 DEPASQUALE JASON SA 271.10-1-36 3 GINGHAM AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1778 1965 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2012-03-19 249,0D0 S140,04 LAVIGNE ROBERT 2012 10494 MARTIN TRACY 271.6-3-14 47 WHEELER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2238 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 0.55 2012-04-27 245,000 109.47 BONO PAUL 2012 17288 BEACH COURTNEY 271.6-1-48 16 ARNOLD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2184 1967 SPLITLEVFL 0.36 2012-06-28 206,000 94.32 KILGOURIOHN 2012 30949 STEHLINTINA271.6-3-27 46 WHFELERDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1491 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 061 2012-07-17 256,000 S171.70 SMITH GILBERT 2012 30260 DEVINAM271.9-1-43 16 GINGHAMAVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1953 1965 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2012-07-19 261,002 133.64 SOFKOWILLIAM 2012 28690 CASALEDAVID 6 AVERAGE 1/i/2012 241,000 MEDIAN 1/1/2012 247,000 271,9-1-20 14 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2456 1967 SPLIT LEVEL 0.51 2014-01-05 S255,000 103.83 GOODELLJOHN 2014 1993 MURNANEJOHN 271.E 1 21 23 TMCE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1911 1970 SPLIT LEVEL 0.49 2014-01-30 242,5DO 126.90 JOHNSON LYNN 2014 3595 SMITH SHAUN 271.10-1-61 23 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1779 1964 SPLIT LEVEL 0.34 2014-04-25 230,000 129-29 BROGNA ALE% 2014 12840 MORELLI AMY 271.6-1.40 3 GEORGE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1940 1970 SPLIT LEVEL 0,54 2014-06-02 206,000 106.19 SHENENDFNHOWA UNITED 2014 15553 A LEVINE REALTY LLC271.6-3-35 12 WHEELER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1779 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 0.50 2014.06-30 248.000 S139-40 PELISH MATTHEW 2014 186M CHOWDHURY JAMIL 271.6-1-7 16 WHEELERDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1612 7970 SPLIT LEVEL 0.48 2014-09.23 244,500 151.67 KUCERIJA ZORAN 2C14 28953 FINNFRAN THERESE 271.9 1 31 30 DENIM DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1793 1963 SPLIT LEVEL 0.35 2014-11-19 244,500 S136.36 PERKINS MICHAEL 2014 34318 CARBONEJOHN 271.10-159 27 DENIM DR C LI FTON PARK NY 1422 1963 SPLIT LEVEL 0.35 2G14-12-T9 S222,00D 156.12 DUNLAVEYANITAROBERTJOHN 2014 37442 HSUCHE-HUA 271.10-1.27 42 DAMASK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1815 1965 SPLITLEVEL 0.42 2015-06-04 S245,000 134.99 SCHAFFERPAUL 2015 16396 S,AWCHUXJOHN 271.6 3.4 29 WHEELER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 3483 1972 SPLIT LEVEL 0.51 2015.10-26 33 DW 94.75 STEINERROBERT 2015 36749 BONANO JOHN 10 AVERAGE 1/1/2015 246,750 MEDIAN 1/1/2015 244.500 Appendix 37 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 271.32-1-70 59 GREEN MEADOW OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1227 1986 TOWNHOUSE U19 2011-02-10 165.000 134.47 GREENHOUSE HOWARD 2011 6514 WALDRON JOHN 271.32 1-16 31 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0.09 2012-04 30 169,900 149.04 WILSON WILLIAM 2012 16195 POLLAY DAVID 271.32-1-18 35 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1234 1985 TOWNHOUSE 0.14 2012 07-20 183,000 148.30 GRAHAM JOHN 2012 28679 STROAL RIC HARD 271.32-1-27 40 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 1985 TOWNHOUSE 009 2012-10-16 153,000 S134.21 BONNEAU KATHLEEN 2012 39481 KELLY KIMBERLY 2708-4-,Z1 24 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1605 Z012 TOWNHOUSE 014 201Z-11-26 S27$484 173.51 THE VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2013 4025 LENTLIE JOHN 270A-4-16.2 13 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1797 2012 TOWNHOUSE 0.24 2012-12-19 297,425 S165.51 THE VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2013 497 SHEILDS MAUREEN 6 AVERAGE 1/1/2012 207,802 MEDIAN 1/1/2012 S176,450 270-B-4.15.2 17 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2615 2013 TOWNHOUSE 0.18 2014-01-31 5351,633 134.47 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2014 3856 CONNOR WILLIAM 270.8-4 SIA 1 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1661 2013 TOWNHOUSE 0.24 2014-02-24 S29Q000 174.59 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC Z014 5413 BLANCHE GEORGE 2708-4-9.1 1 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1661 2013 TOWNHOUSE 0.24 2014-03-07 S30110M 185.43 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2014 7927 KROLL CALVIN 271.32-1-9 17 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1233 1985 TOWNHOUSE 021 2014-04-22 178,000 S34436 BRONSON KAREN 2014 12624 KUHNE LAURIE 270.8-4-4.12 14 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2553 2013 TOWNHOUSE 0.19 2014-05-14 291,119 114.03 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2014 14543 STORY ANNE 2708-4-4,12 14 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2553 2013 TOWNHOUSE 0.19 2014-05-22 343,5% 1134.59 VISTAS AT CLIFTON PARK LLC 2014 16752 PEZZI CAROL 271,32-1-56 18 GREEN MEADOW OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 1985 TOWNHOUSE 0.11 2014-07-18 SIM%000 S144.74 CUSHMAN MARGARET 2014 22091 RICEJESSICA 271.32-1-57 20 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1227 198S TOWNHOUSE 0.17 2015-05-27 180,S00 147,T1 VOSS ELIZABETH 2015 15W3 LUOANDREW 271.32-1-49 4 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 1985 TOWNHOUSE 009 2015-06 10 S168,900 1148.16 BRANDT DONALD 2015 17311 DEVOE JAMES 271.32-1-18 35 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1234 1985 TOWNHOUSE 0J4 2015-07-16 SI13Z907 S156.32 STROJIL RICHARD 2015 24761 BAKERTIMOTHY 271.32-1-24 47 GREEN MEADOW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1140 1985 TOWNHOUSE 0.11 2015-07.22 170,000 149.12 KAVANAUGH ROBERT 2015 21904 ANDRES GEORGEAN 270.8 4 13.1 27 VISTA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1783 2012 TOWNHOUSE 0.26 2015-09-28 335,000 187.89 CANNATA PAULA 2015 29315 LANTZ ROSE MARIE 12 AVERAGE 1/1/2015 247,888 MEDIAN 7/1/2015 S241-451 Appendix 38 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 699 MAC ELROY ROAD TOWER: 258.15-1-31 13 DENHELDER DR 1867 1984 COLONIAL 0.41 1/24/2012 198,000 106.05 MILLER FRANK 2012 3328 MENGES MICHAEL 258.15-1-19 8 WINKEL WAY 1269 1983 RANCH 0.51 2012-03-26 S207,500 16151 GIER GILBERT 2012 10927 WOELFERSHEIM THOMAS 258.15-1-46 40 GRETEL TER 1500 1984 COLONIAL 0.40 2013-03-20 228,000 152.00 TROY DANIEL 2013 13022 CLARK MICHELLE 258.15-1-6 13 WINKEL WAY 2181 1980 COLONIAL 0,46 2013-07-12 293,000 134.34 BYLER BENJAMIN 2013 33229 FROHNHOFFFR ARAM 258.15-1-26 3 DENHELDER DR 2395 1984 COLONIAL 0.39 2013-07-29 S293,000 122.34 GIAMALIS STEVEN 2013 33606 STRIKER TODD 5 AVERAGE 1/1/2013 243,900 MEDIAN 1/1/2013 228,000 258.15-1-16 2 WINKEL WAY 2116 1985 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2015-04-15 224,000 105.86 LARKINJAMES 2015 11128 MAYBACHRISTOPHER 258.15-1-48 44 GRETEL TER 2137 1985 COLONIAL 0.51 2015-05-14 276,000 129.15 ATTWOOD RICHARD 2015 14093 WEILAND ERIC 258.15-1-30 11 DFNHELDERDR 2020 1984 COLONIAL 0.42 2015-05-15 265,000 131.19 WEST ANGELA 2015 14186 OZIMEK PAUL JAMES 258AS-1-10 5 WINKEL WAY 2134 1983 SPLIT LEVEL 042 2015-05-29 267,500 125.35 TORRISITHOMAS 2015 15363 PHILLIPSCINDY 258,15-1-13 34 GRETEL TER 2081 1980 SPLIT LEVEL OAS 2016-05-31 259,000 124.46 KRASS ADAM 2016 17246 -ARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 258.15-1-13 34 GRETEL TER 2081 1980 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2016-05-31 259,000 124.46 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORAT 2016 17247 CUSANO CITRISTCIPHER 258AS-1-44 49 GRETEL TER 1867 1985 COLONIAL 0.42 2016-07-29 265,090 S141.94 CURLEY ROBERT 2016 23697 P E L C MICHAEL 258.-2-9 651 MACELROY RD 2796 1953 CAPE COD 2.60 2016-08-23 S202,900 72.57 DAMES DOUGLAS 2016 27191 OSTERH OUT RYAN 8 AVERAGE 1/1/2016 252.300 MEDIAN 1/1/2016 S262.000 Appendix 39 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 258.15-1-31 13 DENHELDER DR 1867 258:15-1-46 40 GRETEL TER 1500 258.15-1-6 13 WINKEL WAY 2181 258.15-1-26 3 DENHELDER DR 2395 4 258.15-1-48 44 GRETEL TER 2137 258.15-1-30 11 DENHELDER DR 2020 258.15-1-44 49 GRETEL TER 1867 3 1984 COLONIAL 0.41 1/24/2012 198,000 106.05 1984 COLONIAL 0.40 2013-03-20 228,000 15200 1980 COLONIAL 0.46 2013-07-12 293,000 134,34 1984 COLONIAL 0.39 2013-07-29 293,000 122.34 AVERAGE 1/1/2013 253,000 MEDIAN 1/1/2013 260.500 1985 COLONIAL 0.51 2015-05-14 276,000 $129.15 1984 COLONIAL 0,42 2015-05-15 265,000 $131.19 1985 COLONIAL 0.42 2016-07-29 265,00(I $141.94 AVERAGE 1/1/2016 268,667 MEDIAN 1/1/2016 265.000 MILLER FRANK 2012 3328 MENGES MICHAEL TROY DANIEL 2013 13022 CLARK MICHELLE BYLERBENJAMIN 2013 33229 FROHNHOEFERADAM GIAMALIS STEVEN 2013 33606 STRIKER TODD ATFWOOD RICHARD 2015 14093 WEILAND ERIC WEST ANGELA 2015 14186 OZI M EK PAUL )AM ES CURLEY ROBERT 2016 23697 PELC MICHAEL Appendix 40 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 258.76-1 5 10 FAIRLEIGH WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2664 2Dll CONTEMPORARY 0.51 2012-D1-D5 1379,823 14255 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2072 1428 COOK MICHAEL258.15-1-31 13 DENH ELDER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1867 1984 COLONIAL 0.41 2012.01-24 198,000 S106.05 MILLER FRANK 2012 3328 284.7-1-8 9 FIELDSTONE DR HALFMOON NY 1802 1997 RANCH 0.63 2012.01.26 S280,0W S155.38 BAILEY ANNE 2012 3334 MENGES MICHAEL NEWTON LESLIE258.16-1-9 39 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3140 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0.54 2012-03-OB S522,225 S166.31 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 9173 STEVENS BRETT258.15-1-19 8 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 1269 1983 RANCH 0.51 2012-03-26 207,SW 163.51 GIERGILBERT 2012 10927 WOELFERSHEIM THOMAS266.15-2-2 17 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2372 1997 COLONIAL 0.52 2012-03-30 360,000 151.77 FREEMAN REBECCA 2012 13534 SINGH PRADIP SINGH HARDIP258.16-1-4 12 FAIRLETGH WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3802 2011 CONTEMPORARY 1.81 2012-04-05 637,216 167.60 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 13365 STOUT MICHAEL25&8-2-52.2 171 HURR&RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2460 2W5 COLONIAL 0.46 2012-04-16 320,000 13G08 HANSON ANTHONY 2012 16746 MOHAMED RAYAD258.76-2-11 46 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3012 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2012-05-10 470,650 S156.26 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 77%0 MOONEY JOH1425&16.2.13 50 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3132 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.53 2012-07-11 S499,675 159,54 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 29214 BLANCHARD KERRY 258,12-2-52 17 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2997 1977 COLONIAL 0-54 2012-07-13 130B4O00 1102.77 SANSOM MASTON 2012 27660 MCGOVERN KARA258-11-1-29 37 DENKERS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1832 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0,46 2012-D7-18 222.775 S121.60 COLLETON TERRANCE 2012 26405 UM-CHOI JUNG SOOK258.12-1-25 25 NOORDLN CLIFTON PARK NY 2332 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.47 2012-OB-07 S26Q000 711.49 HAYNERGLEN 2012 30265 CHEROCKGABRIEL258.12-1-48 20 SETTLERS LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2SB3 2005 COLONIAL 1.02 2012-08-73 365,0DO 141.31 BARNFTT GARY 2012 30235 MORSE ROGER258.11-1.17 4 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1378 1916 RANCH 0.49 2012-08-16 L187,000 135.70 MACLAINJAMES 2012 30662 PASKEWICH REBECCA264.8-1-2 3 LEGENDSWAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2693 2007 COLONIAL 0.71 2012-09-07 W85,000 180.10 CONWAY CHRISTOPHER 2012 33803 CHASE BENJAMIN 277.5-5-18 7 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2644 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2012-09-07 402.DDD 152.04 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 34269 WANG XfN258,12-2-20 15 DENKERS OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1874 1974 RANCH 0.46 2012-09-28 1232,000 1123.80 SHANNON MICHAEL 2012 38176 HANSON KARYN258.12-2-41 24 DENKERSDR CLIFTON PARK NY 2323 1974 SPLIT LEVEL Q51 2012-10-03 S28LOW 5120.96 BARRON C HARLES 2012 37M MAROUS£KTHOMASGEORGE258.16.2-14 52 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2772 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0,46 2012-10-16 479,55D 173-00 MASULLO BROTH FRS BUILDERS INC 2012 39227 SCHMALZ CHRISTIAN ADAM 2TT5-5-20 3 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2753 21112 CONTEMPORARY 0,55 2012-11.09 S389,521 141.49 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 42992 SHAMS LUTFE264.8-1-1 1 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2574 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.81 2012-11-15 480,795 186.79 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 45246 KIRVIN WILLIAM 258.16-2-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3064 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.47 2012-11-20 506,320 165.25 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 48645 REED RICHARD258.16-2-6 53 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3657 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q80 2013-01-18 S61Q685 166.99 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 483D PELAGALLI PAUL 258.20-2-8 11 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3217 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.60 2013-02-11 S5341000 164.75 LOPR£STI MICHAEL 2013 T704 SAUNDERS LEIGH ANN 258.20-4-2 43 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3980 2012 CONTEMPORARY 2.65 2013-02-22 S611,405 S1M69 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 8190 CONWAY CHRISTOPHFR 25&16-2-3 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q59 2013-02-27 517.795 16155 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 9689 NUNEZ IGNACIO258.15-1-46 40 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1500 1984 COLONIAL 0-40 2013-03-20 228,000 S15Z00 TROY DANIEL 2013 13022 CLARK MICHELLE 258,20-2.4 19 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4082 2007 CONTEMPORARY 2.76 2013-04-01 845.000 207.01 ECKMAN EVAN 2013 15830 STUMPF DAVID 277,5-5-19 5 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2986 2012 CONTEMPORARY D.41 2013-04-19 5434,70D S145-58 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 B53 SUN KAI258.12-2-6 2 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2144 1974 SPLITLEVEL 0,42 2013-05-03 246,S00 S114-97 ANNIS MONIKA 2013 23697 HENRY ERIC2641-1-19.7 9 LEGENDSWAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3033 2013 CONTEMPORARY 2,11 2013-05-31 750,000 24728 SEM ENZA CONTRACTING INC 2013 23852 LOPRESTI MICHAEL 258.20-3-5 40 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3107 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2013-D6-07 494,SW S159.16 SHARP STEWART 2013 25811 LIU 1fNPfNG 264.8-1-9 2 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3818 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2013-06-07 580,000 151.91 ZENNER ERIC 20€3 28151 GELFMAN MICHAEL 258.15-1-6 13 WWKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 218€ 1980 COLONIAL 0.46 2013-07-12 293,000 S134.34 BYLER BENJAMIN 2013 33229 FROHNHOEFERADAM 258.15-1-26 3 DENHELDER DR CLIPTON PARK NY 2395 1984 COLONIAL 0.39 2013-07-29 293,DDO 12Z34 GIAMALIS STEVEN 2013 33606 STRIKER TODD 258.19-1-6 18 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 29N 2W7 CONTEMPORARY 0.65 2013.07-3D 530,000 S176.73 WILDER$ PAUL 2D13 33810 THIBAULTMICHAEL 258.16-1-8 42 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2719 2009 CONTEMPORARY 0.65 2013-07-31 S610,000 224.35 HALBIG ROBERT 2013 36344 PRONOLD BARRY 2S8.20-1-1 23 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2601 2W7 RANCH 1.59 2013-08.12 590,W0 22&84 NEUFELD ALAN 2013 35716 MCMAHON BRIAN 258.16-2-18 60 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 39W 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.68 2013-08-27 S672,980 1172.56 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 36568 MINCOLLA ANTHONY 284,7-1.2 21 FIELDSTONE DR HALFMOON NY 2142 1997 COLONIAL 0.49 2013-09-13 302,000 14U.99 CRANNA MARK 2013 389S4 MUMFORD MICHAEL 258.20-4-4 27 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4660 2013 CONTEMPORARY 2.59 2013-09-13 3W S173.04 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS 2013 38962 AMELL THOMAS 266.15-2-14 12 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2124 1995 COLONIAL 0.51 2013-09-27 302.SOD 142.42 MACLEOD DALE 2D13 40859 MICHALSKI JON JENNIFER 277.5-5-17 9 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2028 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2013-09-30 5425,0D0 1SO.28 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2013 43547 YU TFD 258.19 1-7 20 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2909 ZW7 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2013-10-22 550,000 189.07 GUARRACINO IOHN 2013 44182 LYNCH PAUL 45 AVERAGE 1/7/2013 S439,055 Appendix 4l CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 25820-3-4 35 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4244 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.57 2015-01-09 1555,000 258.15-1-16 2 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2116 1985 SPLIT LEVEL 042 2015-04-15 224,000 258,16-Z-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3D64 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0,47 2015-05-11 S495,000 258.15-1-48 44 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2137 198S COLONIAL 0.51 2015-05-14 276,000 258.15-1-30 71 DENH ELDER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 20ZD 1984 COLONIAL DA2 2015-05-15 265,000 258.15-1-10 5 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2134 1983 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2015-05-29 S267,500 258.12-2-72 28 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2076 1977 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2015-08-05 S232,606 258.20-2-6 7 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2980 2W9 CONTEMPORARY 0.60 2015-05-27 526,500 258.20-3-3 33 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2934 ZOU9 CONTEMPORARY 0.51 2015-09-15 154ZODO 258.20-2-5 5 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2790 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.66 2015-09-18 51MID00 258.12-2-5 56 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2180 1975 SPLIT LEVEL 0.43 2015-11-20 S269,500 258,11-1-9 7 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1925 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.48 2015-12-04 230,000 258,11-1-9 7 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1925 1976 SPLIT LEVEL R48 2015-12-04 123QOW 277.5-5-8 6 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2114 2015 RANCH OA9 201S-12-04 1437.827 258.12-1-17 9 NOORD LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2256 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.60 2016-02.11 242,250 258.16-2-3 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0,59 2016-03-24 625,000 27T5 5 6 2 PONDVIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2880 2015 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2016-04-65 5458663 258.11-1-16 29 DENKERSDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1832 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.47 2016-04-27 245000 2S8.12-2-57 7 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 1955 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.49 2016-OS-07 S25FL000 266-15-2-19 22 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 1756 1997 COLONIAL 0.46 2016-OS-25 2860DD 258.11-1-55 15 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1559 1977 SPLIT LEVEL 0.S4 2016-05-26 244,000 258AS-1-13 34 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2081 198D SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2016-05-31 259,000 258.15-1-13 34 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2081 1980 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2016-05-31 25%000 258.20-2-9 13 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3470 2008 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2016-06-09 640.00D 258.20-2-9 13 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3470 2008 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2016-06-09 640,000 258,19-1-3 12 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3650 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0,69 2016-06-10 330,000 258A1-T-4 6 HEIDIS PATH CLIFTON PARK NY 2326 1978 SPLITLEVEL 0A7 2016-06-30 260,000 258.11-1-40 32 GUILDER PC CLIFTON PARK NY 2372 1978 SPLITLEVEL 0.9D 2016-07-25 265,500 258.15-1-44 49 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1867 1985 COLONIAL OA2 2016-07-29 S265,00D 264.8-1-18.1 7 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2937 2006 RANCH 734 2016-08-03 S470,00ID 258.12-2-7 4 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2208 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.39 2016-08-05 260,D00 258.12-2-23 4 SETTLERS [N CLIFTON PARK NY 15S9 1975 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2016-08-OS 5237,000 266-15-2-12 8 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2997 1997 COLONIAL 0.72 2016-09-06 S382,500 258,11-2-8 9 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 20W 2016 RANCH 1.36 2616-11-08 S40Q900 258.15-3-8 25 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2766 2016 CONTEMPORARY 1.01 2016-11-25 S521,239 258.12-2-54 13 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2249 1918 SPLIT LEVEL 0.49 2016-12-07 271,W0 258.15-3-4 17 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2141 2016 RANCH 0.68 2016-12-16 457,616 37 AVERAGE 1/1/2016 359,989 MEDIAN 111MIS S271.000 130.77 FULMER MARK 2015 1509 AKBARIMONFAREO AMIN S105.86 LARKINJAMES 2015 11128 MAYBACHRISTOPHER 161.5S REED R]CHARD 2015 13642 HUNTER BARBARA ANN S129AS ATTWOOD RICHARD 2015 14093 WEILAND ERIC S131.19 WESTANGELA 2015 14186 OZIMEK PAUL JAMES 125.35 TORRISITHOMAS 2015 15363 PH ILLIPS CINDY 112.04 SANO HEATHER 2015 23T73 RIVERA NICHOLAS S176.68 BENNETT LEON 2015 25934 TSANG YUK 184.13 ORLANDO DONAL 2015 28004 GAUCK STEVEN - 179.21 NEWMAN BRUCE 2015 28865 KRUGER UWE 123.62 CZAPSKI STEVEN 2015 37279 LE PHATTAN 119.48 SILEN DAVID 2015 37145 DODGE NP 1R-TRUSTEE 119.48 DODGE NPIR-TRUSTEE 2015 37146 WEAVERJEREMY S207.11 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2015 36445 HUGHES EDWARD 107,38 JONESCHRISTOPHER 2016 4701 GORBYYURI 197A1 NUNEZ IGNACIO 2016 10223 TEPLITZKY RUSSELL 159.26 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2016 12357 DING WENQING 133.73 WAITE RAYMOND 2016 12W LOPEZ NELSON GONZALEZ 13D.43 FERRARA ANDREW 2016 13430 ZUBIK ANDREW 159.45 MAKI WILLIAM 2016 IU22 DEWiTT DANIEL 156.51 WEAVER ERIN 2016 16232 CHAMBERLAND JUSTIN FREDERICK 124.46 KRASS ADAM 2016 17246 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 1124.46 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORAT 2D16 17247 CUSANO CHRISTOPHER 184.44 TESAR MICHAEL 2016 20922 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 184.44 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 2016 20923 EUNSON ARTHOR 90,16 JASEN HECTOR 2016 22943 CHOPASKRISTEN 111-78 GIBBS ROGER 2016 20225 VANDERWERKEN NICHOLAS 111-93 SOLE KATHLEEN 2016 22825 MENDOZA HAROLD 141.94 CURLEY ROBERT 2016 23697 PELC MICHAEL 160.03 TYLL ARTHUR 2016 24455 MADONNA ALBERT 117.75 ROACH BUDDY 2016 24993 RUSSELL DAVID 152.02 KEMP SANFORD 2016 24603 WALSH RTCHARD 127.63 ROBERTS BENJAMIN 2016 28617 SCARINGE ERIC S192.74 ER LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC 2016 37241 TABONE ROBERT 189.45 ER LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC 2016 37615 GALLA ALLISON 120.50 DAMBOISE DANIEL 2016 39297 TAORMINA LAURA 213.74 ER LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC 2016 418M JERWANN KEVIN Appendix 42 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 258.15-1-31 13 DENHELDER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1867 1984 COLONIAL a41 2012-01-24 198,090 106.05 MILLER FRANK 2012 3328 MENGES MICHAEL266.15-2-2 17 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2372 1997 COLONIAL 0.52 2012-03-30 360,000 151.77 FREEMAN REBFCCA 2012 13534 SINGH PRADIP SINGH HARDIP258.8-2-52 2 171 HUBBS RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2460 2005 COLONIAL 0.46 2012-04-16 320,000 130.08 HANSON ANTHONY 2012 16746 MOHAMED RAYAD258.12-2-52 17 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2997 1977 COLONIAL 0.54 2012-07-13 MOW 102.77 SANSOM MASTON 2012 27660 MCGOVERN KARA258.12-1-48 20 SETTLERS LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2583 2005 COLONIAL 1.02 2012-OS-13 365.000 141.31 BARNETT GARY 2012 30235 MORSE ROGER264.8-1-2 3 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2693 2007 COLONIAL 0.71 2012-09-07 S485,000 180.10 CONWAY CHRISTOPHER 2012 33803 CHASE BENJAMIN258.15-1-46 40 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1500 1984 COLONIAL 0.40 2013-03-20 228,000 S152.00 TROY DANIEL 2013 13022 CLARK MICHELLE258.15-1-6 13 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2181 1980 COLONIAL 0.46 2013-07-12 293,000 134.34 BYLER BENJAMIN 2013 33229 FROHNHOEFER ADAM258.15-7-26 3 DENH ELDER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2395 1994 COLONIAL 039 2013-07-29 293,000 122.34 GIAMALIS STEVEN 2013 33606 STRIKER TODD284.7-1-2 21 FIELDSTONE DR HALFMOON NY 2142 1997 COLONIAL 0.49 2013-09-13 302,000 140.99 CRANNA MARK 2013 38954 MUMFORD MICHAEL 266.15-2-14 12 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2124 1995 COLONIAL 0.51 2013-09-27 3W 500 S142-42 MACLEOD DALE 2013 408S9 MICHALSKI JON JENNIFER it AVERAGE 1/1/2013 314,045 MEDIAN 1/1/2013 302,500 258.15-1-48 44 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2137 1985 COLONIAL 0.51 2015-05-14 276,0W 129.15 ATTWOOD RICHARD 2015 14093 WEILAND ERIC 2S8-15-1-30 11 DENH ELDER DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2020 1984 COLONIAL 0,42 2015-05-15 265,0W 131.19 WESTANGELA 201S 14186 OZIMEK PAULJAMES 266.15-2-19 22 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 1756 1997 COLONIAL 0.46 2016-05-25 280,000 159.45 MAKI WILLIAM 2016 16222 DEWITTDANIEL 258.15-1-44 49 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1867 1985 COLONIAL 0.42 2076-07-29 S265,000 141,94 CURLEY ROBERT 2016 23697 PELC MICHAEL 266.15-2-12 8 PATROON WAY HALFMOON NY 2997 1997 COLONIAL 0.72 2016-09-06 382,500 127.63 ROBERTS BENJAMIN 2016 28617 SCARINGF ERIC 5 AVERAGE 1/l/2016 293.700 MEDIAN 1/1/2016 276,000 Appendix 43 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 258.16.1-5 10 FAIRLEIGH WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2664 Z011 CONTEMPORARY 0.51 2012-01-05 S379,823 258.16 1-9 39 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3740 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0,54 2012-03-08 522,225 258.16-7-4 12 FAIRLEIGH WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3802 2011 CONTEMPORARY 1.81 W12-04-05 637,216 258.16-2-11 46 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3012 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2012-05-10 S470,650 258A6-2-13 50 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3132 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.53 2012-07-14 499.675 27Z5-5.18 7 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2644 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2012-09-07 S402,000 258,16-2-14 52 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2772 2012 CONTEMPORARY Q46 2012-10-16 479550 277.5-5-20 3 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2753 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.55 2012-11-09 389,521 264.8-1-1 1 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2574 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.81 2012-11-15 W.795 258.16-2-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3064 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.47 2D12-11-20 506.320 25&16-2-6 53 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3657 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.80 2013-01-18 610,685 25&20-2-8 11 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3217 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.60 2013-02-11 S53Q000 258.20-4-2 43 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3980 2012 CONTEMPORARY 2.65 2013-02-22 671,405 25&16-2-3 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.59 2013-02-27 S517,795 258,20-2-4 79 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4082 2007 CONTEMPORARY 2.76 Z013-04-01 5845,000 277.5-5-19 5 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2986 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2013-04-19 434,700 264.8-1-19.1 9 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3033 2013 CONTEMPORARY 211 2013-05-31 7W,000 258.20-3-5 40 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3107 2011 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2013-06-07 S494,500 264.8-1-9 2 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3818 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2013-06-07 580,000 258.19-1-6 18 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2999 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.65 K13-07-30 530000 258-16-1-8 42 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2719 2009 CONTEMPORARY 0.65 2013-07-31 S610,0W 258.16-2-18 60 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3900 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.68 2013-08-27 S672,980 258.20-4-4 27 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4660 2013 CONTEMPORARY 2.59 2013-09-13 W6,380 277.5-5-17 9 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2828 2013 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2013-09-30 425,000 258.19-1-7 20 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2909 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2013-10-22 S550,000 25 AVERAGE 1/1/2013 551.849 MEDIAN 1/7/2013 522,225 258.20-3-4 35 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 4244 201D CONTEMPORARY 0.57 2015.01-09 S555,000 258.16-2-10 44 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3064 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.47 2015-05-11 $495.000 258.20-2-6 7 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2980 2009 CONTEMPORARY 0.60 2015.08.27 S526,5W 258.20-3-3 33 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2934 2009 CONTEMPORARY 0.51 2015-09-15 542,000 258.20-2-5 5 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2790 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0-66 2015-09-18 S500,000 258.16-23 59 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3166 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.59 2016-03-24 625.000 277.S-5-6 2 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 28W 2015 CONTEMPORARY 0A9 2016-04-05 458,663 258.20-2 9 13 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3470 2008 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2016-06-09 4Q000 258.20-2-9 13 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3470 2008 CONTEMPORARY 0.61 2016-06-09 640,000 258.19-1-3 12 TIPPERARY WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3660 2007 CONTEMPORARY 0.69 2016-06-10 S330,000 258.153-8 25 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 276G 2016 CONTEMPORARY 1.01 2016-11-25 521,239 11 AVERAGE 1/112016 S530,309 MEDIAN 1/1/2016 526,500 142.58 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 1428 COOK MICHAEL S166.31 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 9173 STEVENS BRETT 167.60 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 13365 STOUT MICHAEL 156.26 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 17960 MOONEY)OHN 159.54 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 29214 BLANC HARD KERRY S152.04 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 34269 WANG XIN 173.00 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS 1NC 2012 39227 SCHMALZ CHRISTIAN ADAM 141A9 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2012 42992 SHAMS LUTFE 186,79 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 45246 KIRVIN WILLIAM 165.25 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2012 48645 REED RICHARD J 166,99 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 4830 PELAGALLI PAUL 164-75 LOPRESII MICHAEL 2013 7704 SAUNDERS LEIGH ANN 168.69 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 8190 CONWAY CHRISTOPHER 163.55 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 89 NUNEZIGNACIO 207.01 ECKMAN EVAN 2013 15830 STUMPF DAVID 145.58 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2014 853 SUNKAI 247.28 SEMENZA CONTRACTING INC 2013 23852 LOPRESTI MICHAEL 159.16 SHARP STEWART 2013 25811 LIU ANPING 151.91 ZENNERERIC 2013 28151 GELFMAN MICHAEL S176.73 WILDERS PAUL 2013 33810 THIBAULT MICHAEL 224.35 HALBIG ROBERT 2013 36344 PRONOLD BARRY 172.56 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS INC 2013 36568 MINCOLLA ANTHONY 173.04 MASULLO BROTHERS BUILDERS 2013 38%2 AMELLTHOMAS 150,28 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2013 43547 YU TED 189.07 GUARRACINOJOHN 2013 44182 LYNCH PAUL 13077 FULMER MARK 2015 1509 AKBARIMONFAREDAMIN 161.55 REED RICHARD 2015 13642 IT UNTER BARBARA ANN 176.68 BENNETTLEON 2015 25934 TSANGYUK 184.73 ORLANDO DONALD 2015 28004 GAUCK STEVEN 179.21 NEWMANBRUCE 2015 28865 KRUGERUWE 197.41 NUNEZ IGNACIO 2016 10223 TEPLITZKY RUSSELL 159,26 TRALONGO BUILDERS INC 2016 12357 DING WENOING S184A4 TESAR MICHAEL 2016 20922 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 184.44 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 2016 20923 EUNSON ARTHUR 90.16 JASEN HECTOR 2016 22943 CHOPAS KRISTEN 18&45 ER LAND DEVELOPMENT LLC 2016 37615 GALLA ALLISON Appendix 44 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 284.7-1-8 9 FIELDSTONE DR HALFMOON NY 1802 1997 RANCH 0.63 2012.01-26 280,000 258.15-1-19 8 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 1269 1983 RANCH 0.51 2012-03-26 207,500 258.11-1-17 4 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1378 1976 RANCH a49 2012-08-16 187,000 258.12-2-20 15 DEN KERS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1874 1974 RANCH 0,46 2012-09.28 232,000 258,20 1-1 23 LEGENDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2601 2007 RANCH 1.59 2013-08-12 590,000 5 AVERAGE 1/1/2013 299,300 MEDIAN 1/1/2013 232,000 277.5-5-8 6 POND VIEW DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2114 2015 RANCH 0.49 2015-12-04 S437,827 264.8-1-18.1 7 LFGFNDS WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2937 20D6 RANCH 2.34 2016-08-03 S47Q00D 258.11-2-8 9 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2080 2016 RANCH 1.36 2016-11-08 400,900 258.15-3-4 17 FIELDSTONE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2141 2016 RANCH a68 2016-12-16 457,616 4 AVERAGE 1/1/2016 441,586 MEDIAN 1/1/2016 447.722 15538 BAILEY ANNE 2012 163.51 GIER GILBERT 2012 135.70 MACLAIN JAMES 2012 123.80 SHANNON MICHAEL 2012 226.84 NEUFELDALAN 2013 3334 NEWTON LESLIE 10927 WOELFERSHEIM THOMAS 30862 PASKEWICH REBECCA 38176 HANSON KARYN 35716 MCMAHON BRIAN 207-11 RALONGO BUILDERS IN 2015 36445 HUGHES EDWARD 160.03 TYLL ARTHUR 2016 24455 MADONNA ALBERT 192.74 LAND DEVELOPMENT 2016 37241 TABONEROBERT 213.74 LAND DEVELOPMENT 2016 41880 JERWANNKEVIN Appendix 45 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 258.11-1-29 37 DENKERS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1832 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.46 2012-07-18 22Z775 121.60 COLLETON TERRANCE 2012 26405 UM•CHOI JUNG SOOK 258.12-1-25 25 NOORD LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2332 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.47 2012-08-07 1260,0W 111.49 HAYNER GLEN 2012 30265 CHEROCK GABRIEL 258.12-2-41 24 DENKERS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2323 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.51 2012-10-03 281,OW 120.96 BARRON CHARLES 2012 37998 MAROUSEK THOMAS GEORGE258.12-2-6 2 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2144 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2013-05-W 246,500 114.97 ANNIS MONIKA 2013 23697 HENRY ERIC 4 AVERAGE 1/l/2013 252,569 MEDIAN 1/1/2013 253,250 258.15-1-16 2 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2116 1985 SPLIT LEVEL 0,42 2015-04-15 224,OW 105.86 LARKIN JAMES 2015 11128 MAYBA CHRISTOPHER 258.15-1-10 5 WINKEL WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2134 1983 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2015-05-29 5261,SW 125,35 TORRISI THOMAS 2015 15363 PHILLIPSCINDY 258.12-2-72 28 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2076 1977 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2015-08-05 232,600 112 04 SANO HEATHER 2015 23773 RIVERA NEC HOLAS 258.12-2-5 56 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2180 1975 SPLIT LEVEL 0,43 2015-11-20 269,500 123,62 CZAPSKI STEVEN 2015 37279 LE PHAT TAN 258A1-1-9 7 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1925 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 448 W15-12-04 230,0W 119.48 SILEN DAVID 2015 37145 DODGE NP 1R-TRUSTEE 258.11-1-9 7 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1925 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.413 2015-12-04 1230,0W 119.48 DODGE NP 1R-TRUSTEE 2015 37146 WEAVER JEREMY 258.12-1-17 9 NOORD LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2256 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.60 2016-02-11 242,250 107.38 JONESCHRISTOPHER 2016 4701 GORBY YURI 258.11-1-16 29 DENKERS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1832 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.47 2016-04-27 245,O00 133.73 WAITE RAYMOND 2016 12548 LOPEZ NELSON GONZALEZ 258.12-2-57 7 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 1955 1976 SPLIT LEVEL 0.49 2016-05-02 255,O00 130.43 FERRARA ANDREW 2016 13430 ZUBIK ANDREW 258.11-1-55 15 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1559 1977 SPLIT LEVEL 0.54 2016-05-26 244,000 156.51 WEAVER ERIN 2016 16232 CHAMBERLANDJUSFIN FREDERICK 258.15-1-13 34 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2081 1980 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2016-05-31 259,000 1124.46 KRASSADAM 2016 17246 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORATION 258A5-1-13 34 GRETEL TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2081 1980 SPLIT LEVEL 0.45 2016-05-31 259,000 124.46 CARTUS FINANCIAL CORPORAT 2016 11247 CUSANO CHRISTOPHER 258.11-1-4 6 HEIDIS PATH CLIFTON PARK NY 2326 1978 SPLIT LEVEL 0.47 2016-06-30 260,000 311.70 GIBBS ROGER 2016 20225 VANDERWERKEN NICHOLAS 258.11-1-40 32 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2372 1978 SPLIT LEVEL 0.90 2016-07-25 265,5W 5311.93 SOLE KATHLEEN 2016 22825 MENDOZA HAROLD 258.12-2-1 4 PATROON PL CLIFTON PARK NY. 2W8 1974 SPLIT LEVEL 0.39 2016-OB-05 260,OW 107.75 ROACH BUDDY 2016 24993 RUSSELL DAVID 258.12-2-23 4 SETTLERSLN CLIFTON PARK NY 1559 1975 SPLIT LEVEL 0.42 2016-08-05 237,000 S152-02 KEMP SANFORD 2016 24603 WALSH RICHARD 258.12-2-54 13 GUILDER PL CLIFTON PARK NY 2249 1978 SPLIT LEVEL 0.49 2016-17-07 271,00D S120.50 DAMBOISE DANIEL 2016 39297 TAORMINA LAURA 7 AVERAGE 1/l/2016 250,079 MEDIAN 1112016 255.000 Appendix 46 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 329 MOE ROAD TOWER: ROAD TOWER. 1 RADIUS SHENENDEHOWA SCHOOL. 5-MILE 5T 277.17-}.27 45 STREET VALENCIA IN BILDC St 2310 FEE YR BUILT1.7 COLONIAL 048 2017-01.9 SALE S283,SW PRICE PER ST22.73 TRILLER DEVELOPMENT LLC 2017 2096 DRESCHERJUSTEN277.20-d-17 44 BALSAM WAY 2514 2016 RANCH 0.42 2017-01-10 S434,321 172.76 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 2226 MERRILL MARK 277.16-3-57 15 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3304 Z016 CONTEMPORARY 0BE 2017-01-13 S443,213 S134.14 HERITAGE BUILCERSGROUP 2017 1862 NAGARAJASHARATH 277, 12-1-63 19 ACORNAVE 1950 1973 RAISED RANCH 0.46 2017.02-01 S260,D00 S133.33 CASSELLA GREGORY 2017 3707 LIUZZI ARIANA 277.16.3-48 35 HERITAGE POINTE DR 331E 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2017-02-05 418.517 126.14 HERI7AGE80LOERSGROUP LLC 2017 4433 BAH BOUBACAR 277 16-3-33 8 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2578 2015 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2017-02.06 S420M 5166.25 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP LLC 2017 4491 SAPOSNiCK ERIC277.20-4-13 43 BALSAM WAY 2621 2016 RANCH C.36 2C 17.03.09 S462.114 5176.31 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 9455 K13LING ROBERT 277.20,4-15 45 BALSAM WAY 2971 2016 CONTEMPORARY 041 2017.03-24 S4135.248 163.33 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 7017 10541 BOEHRINGER EUGENE277.20.4-12 41 BALSAM WAY 2S81 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2017.04.10 456,988 153-30 HERITAGE BUILDERSGROUP 2017 1236S DVDI YAOI RECDY 27716-2-18 16 1AR05E PL 3104 2004 COLONIAL 0,48 2017-05.04 460,S00 14&36 MCCART PAUL 2017 13911 RANG LEI271.203-18 22 BALSAM WAY 2SW 200 CONTEMPORARY 041 Z017.05-24 S450000 S173,88 COCHIS TIMOTHY 2017 17271 AN CH ULWAN277.16.3-58 13 HERITAGE POINTE OR 2202 2116 RANCH 037 2017-05-26 SEIBB951 17S.73 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 16557 MAHAJAN VINAYAK277.16-3-60 9 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2189 2016 RANCH 0.39 2017-06-01 S396,783 181,26 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 17640 BERUBE DANIELLE 277.153-61 7 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2264 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.91 2017.06-GZ M410 S768.03 HERTAGE BUILDERS GROUP M17 17646 LANNON MICHELE27TKA-19 53 BALSAM WAY 2202 2015 RANCH 0.47 2017-06-09 429,127 IN 88 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 1861E SOIKO THEODORE 277.20.3.34 it BALSAM WAY 2205 20% RANCH 0.37 2017-060Z 5488,000 S221. J2 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 2017 19051 BYRNE JOHN277.20.3.79 24 BALSAM WAY 2713 2012 CONTEMPORARY 038 2017.0E-21 S43S,D00 S160.04 HWANG WONTAE 2017 21852 SOHN DONG KYUN 277.15.3.1.1 6 PARKLAND CT 2009 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.23 2017-06-30 S315,000 S1S6.79 GOODWINTHOMAS 2017 2088E DUETT MACK 277.20-3.42 _ 11 CARLSON WAY 265E 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.58 2017-06-30 S479,900 180.89 HUH YWv JUN 2017 2401E STONE FINANCING LLC 277.20.3-42 11 CARLSON WAY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.3E ZC77.05.30 479,900 SIW.89 57ONE FINANCING LLC 2017 24019 KIM YOON HAE277.4-95 534 GROOMSRO I 1952 RANCH 1,86 2017,08.25 157,000 S150.96 MARKIEWICZ TERRY 2017 27414 CONNORS IGARYN 277.20.4.35 46 BALSAM WAY 2130 2017 RANCH 034 2C17-08.30 451,025 S211.75 HERITAGE RULCERS GROUP 2617 28431 SEGOVIS PAUL 277.-3-95 534 GROOMS RD 1040 1952 RANCH 1_06 2C17-09-07 S715,0M S110.56 CHARSCNNEAUVIRGINIA 2017 3180E POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 277, 15.3-46 36 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3168 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0,35 2017-09-21 S473,M6 S149, 31 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 30567 H071EN 27720.3.6 16 CARLSON WAY Z490 W12 CONTEMPORARY 0.44 2017-11-07 541Q000 S154,66 MOON SUNG GI 2017 36554 LEE TAE JEONG277.12-1.36 10 LILAC CT 19W 196S COLONIAL 0.62 2017.12-11 S231WO S117.68 LONGABACH PAUL 2017 39S91 STRAIT COURTNEY 277.12.2-54 9 TULIP TER 1407 1970 COLONIAL 0.49 2010-01-23 i270,OW 5143.90 SALEI VIKTAR 201E 4222 HERMAN ADAM277.15.3-7.1 30 PARKLAND CT 1484 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.25 2018-02-23 S79I S795.42 CASTLE F K A CAMIA SHARON C, F 201E 5920 SIMONSON SCOTT 277.11.3-27 45 VALENCIA LN 2310 1467 COLONIAL 0.48 2018,03-09 5300.000 Si29.87 DRESCHERlUSTIN 201E 10434 LI ZHIK1A277-12.2-40 12 TULIP TER 1930 1969 RAISED RANCH 040 2018-03.21 S250,000 S134.72 GALARNEAU KEVIN 201E 11329 ROBERTS ERIC277.16-2-4 7 JARCISEPL 2940 2005 COLONIAL 048 201E-04-05 S420,D00 S142.86 70ARES LUIS 201E 10145 LIU ZHANFEI27716.2.5 9 JAROSEPL 2830 2005 CONTEMPORARY 046 2018.04-06 409.000 S144.S2 LPPAL SORESH 2O18 10306 CHOUDHERY PANKAJ 277,16.3-57 15 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3304 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.3E 2018.04-16 S468,000 5141.65 NAGARAJA 5HARATH 2O18 11263 KODALI SATISH27716-3-4 10S BALSAM WAY 3108 2017 CONTEMPORARY 041 2018-C4-26 SA96AIS 15973 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 17016 NGUYEN OANG 277.20-4.32 52 BALSAM WAY 2800 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2DIB-05-15 S498,734 S178.12 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 14344 FERRARO LINDSAY 277.20.4.39 38 BALSAM WAY 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 041 2018-DS-12 1467,719 S14603 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 201B 17392 ARISOHN MATTHEW277.11.3-24 51 VALENCIA LN 2521 1w COtONIAL 0.72 2016-07-03 S290.000 115.05 LYNCH RiCHARD 2018 20392 GRAY ERIC27712-1-37 B LILAC CT 1622 1966 RAISED RANCH 0,63 2018-07-11 S245.000 S151.05 OLSAKOVSKY LAMES 201E 21011 PRESCOTT JOEL 277,16-3-36 16 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2659 2017 CONTEMPORARY 045 2018-07-12 S434,998 S163.59 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 22505 WAI LIN TUN 277 11-3.16 40 VALENCIA LN 1923 1969 RANCH 0 55 2018.07-27 295.000 S752.37 O'CONNOLL BETTY 2018 23W WOLFERT E BRUCE 277,20.4-41 44 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2975 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.43 201E-D8-07 5517.405 S173.92 HERITAGE BU!LDERSGROUP 2018 24867 SINGH KAMRAJ 277,20-4-42 42 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3700 2018 CONTEMPORARY 040 201E-08.21 SS03,771 S16251 HE107A6E BUILDERS GROUP 201E 26284 SHARKEY THOMAS 277, 16-3.15 83 BALSAM WAY 1512 2018 RANCH 0.41 2018-08-29 422,736 S27959 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 26766 ROTON00 RONALD 249.20-1-9 2 ACORN GRV 2652 1970 COLONIAL 0.56 2018.00.30 S284, S00 S107.28 BROOKS PETER 201E 29089 MASON DOUG.AS 277.20.1.9 15 ARBOR LN 1966 1986 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2018.09-27 S290W0 5147.51 JUPIN ANDREW 2018 3OS39 JOHNSON ALTHEA 277.20.3.19 24 BALSAM WAY 2718 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2018-10-09 S44JS5W 164.2B SOHN DONG KYUN 2018 30397 CHANG KWANHO77.15-3.25.2 7 GROOMS POINTE DR 1989 1999 TOWNHOUSE 0.33 2018-10-31 342,500 172-20 ORTEL JUDITH 2O18 33261 SCHMIDT KERRY L- TRUSTEE277A5-4-5 124 MOE RD 218E 2014 CONTEMPORARY 046 20161 S361.5W S165.22 PRORSLS REAL ESTATE LLC 2018 3475E 110NGSON RIAMAR MADRIO27720,4-11 39 BALSAM WAY 3211 201E CONTEMPORARY 035 2018-11-30 S531.299 165.45 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 15753 PENG JIANWEI 277.16.3-47 37 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3243 2017 CONTEMPORARY CAB 201F,-12-03 S640,D00 19735 GHA SLLC 2018 17239 PETERS THOMAS50AVERAGE11112011303.224 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 42S,668 Appendix 47 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 329 MOE r TOWER BEFORE. AFTER RESIDENTIALI RADIUS ST SHENENDEHOWA BLDG SCHOOLDISTRICT,• FIFYR OF N SALE PARK, PRICE POR SARATOGA COUNTY(TOWER DEED DEED TAX MAP 4 9 21720-4.43 40 STREET HERITAGE POINTE OR SF 2658 201E RANCH F5 0,39 SALE DATE 2010.03.26 PRICE 54E0.OW OLDG SF 171% SELLER MEYRINGWILLIAM DATE 2020 PAGE 8383 Rum NERINO KAREN-TRUSTEE 277.16-3-3Z 6 HERITAGL POINTE DR 3249 2015 CONTEMPORARY 049 2020-D4,01 5569ACC 6175.41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 202G 8958 PATTERSON MITCHELL277.-3-98 341 MOE RD 2596 1991 COLONIAL 1.37 2020-04.15 S380,030 146.38 KONEY BRENT P 2020 5669 GIROL MICHAEL R 277.-3.61 3 TOWLINE LN 3366 2000 CONTEMPORARY 1.07 2020.05.11 5492.000 146.17 FRONTERA RICHARD 2020 11490 WEINSTEIN JUSTIN M 277.16.3.46 35 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3318 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2C20-05.18 SAW.= S138.64 BAH BOUSACAR 2020 12782 GUJI VIDYARANYA 277,20.4.1 39 HERITAGE POINTS DR 3632 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020A5.20 S590.000 S162.44 GJA SLLC 2020 13606 DEVASMAKTUNUAINENDRA B277.16-2.11 21 IAROSE PL U40 2005 COLONIAL 046 2020-05.22 S390OW 147.73 HERMAN ROBERTS 2020 15* BUDHARA,'U HARI KESHORE277.16-3.12 89 BALSAM WAY 3642 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-06. 15 S677,060 - 105.39 CROSS MAT-H EW W 2020 17&6 DECKER DAVID 27720-4.42 42 HERITAGE POIN7E OR 3100 2018 CONTEMPORARY 040 2020.07.28 5EW000 5161,29 SHARKEY THOMAS N20 21360 ELSWORTH MICHAEL READ 277,11-3-12 46 VALENCIA LN 1620 1972 RANCH 0.58 Z010.0-10 331000 M79 FAULCONER JUNEC 2WO 21265 HIGH TARED 277.16-3-55 19 HERITAGE POINTS DR_ 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 045 2020-W-04 S475000 S14830 LI JiNHAI 2020 24423 BALOGUNOLUMOROTI 277.16.3-5 103 BALSAM WAY 31W 2017 CONTEMPORARY 6..52 2020.10,08 511 OM SAA.84 RIVERA III JVANI 2021 9214 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC27716.3.5 103 BALSAM WAY 3100 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.52 20-10.10.06 S511,000 S164.64 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC 2021 9215 HILDERSfLAND JOSH LA 277-16.3.2 107 BALSAM WAY 2525 2019 CONTEMPORARY 042 2020-10-14 S450.OW 178,01 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP LLC 2020 30227 SERIOI MOUAD277,16-3.8 97 BALSAM WAY 2621 2019 RANCH 0.38 2024.11.05 S465C0C S17747 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 262G 33254 BASSI GURBINDFRS277.20.440 66 BALSAMWAY 2856 2W0 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2020-11.17 S480000 S768.07 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 SC68 MUPPANDAM SYAMALA 277,16-3.14 85 BALSAM WAY 2611 2019 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2C20-11.19 474,9W S781.91 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2i721 4370 MGLEVILLE BRYCE WILLIAM277.15-4.2 318 MOE RD 3256 2014 COLONIAL 1.18 2020-11.19 S500OM S15356 BETANCOURT LEDESAIA ALEJANDRO 2OZO 34351 POPAL OUDUS ABDUL277,20.4-32 62 BAT SAM WAY 2WO 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-11-20 S498O00 SI77.86 FERRARO LINDSAY C 2020 33Z97 PHILIP VICTOR 277.20-3-12 24 CARLSON WAY 2649 2010 CONTEMPORARY 042 2D20-11.23 S53QODD S200.08 PRICE DAVID 2020 33624 BROWN ADAM 277.16.3-53 25 HERITAGE POINTS OR 2WS 2019 CONTEMPORARY 040 2020.11-2S S48E675 5173.50 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROi1P 2020 ZW7 ZHENG JOHN277.12.1-5 22 ACORN AVE 1612 1973 RAISED RANCH G53 ZWO-72•12 27Q000 167.49 RIGNEY JUDITHB 2020 34604 ANDERSEN GREGORY IAMES277.-3.34 555 GROOMS RD Z190 1962 SPLIT LEVEL 110 2020.12-04 S245.ODD S111.87 MOON MARGARET 420 35779 WHITTLEAMANDA 277.20-3-35 9 BALSAM WAY 2487 2008 CONTEMPORARY 137 2020-12-11 SS55ODD S223.$ BROWN DANIEL 2020 3043 CUSTER CLYDEM 27726.4-23 61 BALSAM WAY 2621 2020 RANCH 0.36 2020-12>18 54ES:LCO S177.41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2020 36937 MA72ONE JEFFREYP277.20.4-20 55 BALSAM WAY 2616 2D20 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 200-12-18 5474,248 S781.29 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP M21 5264 ZHENG ZHENG LI 27720-4-25 65 BALSAM WAY 2836 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2020-12-22 S482.249 170.05 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 3193 VEMAREDDY RUTHVIK 277.23-3.42 it CARLSON WAY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2020-12.3C S49S.OW 1%58 KIM YOON HAE 2C21 965 NASH DAVIDA277.-335.1 557 GROOMSRD 1837 1963 RANCH 115 2020-12.31 315.COD S171.48 FRICKE THOMAS 2C`l 957 BOYLE JOSEPH 27716-3-39 22 H ERITAGE POINTE DR 2503 Z020 CONTEMPORARY 044 2021-01-15 S475.S65 5190.17 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 7473 NAYYAR NEHA27720-3-5 14 CARLSON WAY Z776 2013 COLONIAL 0,44 2021-02.1; S537,5M S193.62 FARIELLO JULIE 2C21 5632 FLYNN KEVIN 27716-3-54 23 HERITAGE POINTE DR 16" 2019 RANCH C.41 2021.02-16 S400000 235.43 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 7240 PUTHI SOMASEKHAR277.20-3-111 22 BALSAM WAY 2SM 2010 CONTEMPORARY OAT 2021-02-19 S498,OW S192.43 ANCHULWAN 2021 7744 LEI YUE 277.12-1.40 2 LILAC CT 1620 1966 COLONIAL 0.41 2021.05-12 S267AW 164.81 SMITH GEORGEB 2021 18217 AWEDUTI LAYNE 277.-3-93 546 ENGLEMORE RD 3956 1991 COLONIAL 243 2021-05-17 S860000 217.39 D'AMBROSIO NICHOLAS 1 2021 18171 INOUYE BRIAN M 277 16,2A 7 AROSE PL 2940 2D05 COLONIAL 048 2021.06.06 S495.000 S168,37 WANG YAO Z021 26319 KHANNA PUNEET27116.3.16 81 BALSAM WAY 3100 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.43 2021-07.15 SM6.000 518258 SHI YANXIANG Z021 26695 ARAVAPALLI III 277.2D.1, 10 14 ARBOR LN 1668 1966 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2021-05-03 325.000 194,84 LOPRESTI DANIEL 20.1 29754 ST04L AUSON 277.20.4.7 51 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3248 2018 CONTEMPORARY 042 202T-08.04 Slin.900 S793.93 MALEK SOHAIL 2D21 31D57 AROSKAR RAIARSHI 277 46-3.55 19 HERITAGE POINTE OR 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 045 2021.08.24 S582.000 S481.70 BALOGUN OLUMOROTI 2021 31605 ZHENG YISEN 277.3.5 368 MOE RD 2446 1957 COLONIAL 2-OD 2021.08.25 610,000 249. 18 CRISAFULLI DANIEL 2021 31232 ROMANOW$KI STEVEN27716-D6 11 LAROSE PL 2810 2005 COLONIAL 046 2021.10.01 520,000 S18505 ELLENBOGEN ADAM 2WI W9 HO EISEMAN STUART 2772C-4-6 49 HERITAGE POINTE DR 27W 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.37 20Z1.10-OS S5WOW S207.96 TRAN HOT 2021 36420 PATEL PRANAV 277.72.2.52 10 TULIP TER 1664 19E9 RAISEDRANCH 041 2021.10-'4 5325,000 195.31 TRUAX KRISTEN 2CZ1 38M7 KENYON KIRA FOXING277..3-66 5 TOWLINE LN 5319 1999 COLONIAL 103 2021-10 29 650,000 5195.84 SHARIFFANDALEEB ZUl 43854 QUINTANA MICHALE 45 AVERAGE 12/1/24120 485.743 MEDIAN 12/12020 492,000 Appendix 48 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277.11-3-27 45 VALENCIA LN 2310 1%7 COLONIAL 0.48 2017-01-9 283,500 277.16-2-18 16 IA ROSE PL 3104 2004 COLONIAL 0.48 2017-OS-04 460,500 277.12-1-36 10 LILAC CT 19M 1965 COLONIAL 0.62 2017-12-11 03,000 277.12-2-54 9 TULIP TER 1407 1970 COLONIAL Q49 2018-01-23 270,000 277.11-3-27 45 VALENCIA LN 2310 1%7 COLONIAL 0.48 2018-03-09 S300,000 277.16-2-4 7 JAROSE PL 2940 2005 COLONIAL 0.48 2018-04-05 S420,0W 277-11-3-24 51 VALENCIA LN 2521 1968 COLONIAL 0.72 2018-07-03 290000 249.20-1-9 2 ACORN GRV 2652 1970 COLONIAL 0.56 2018-08-30 S284,500 8 AVERAGE 1/1/2018 317,688 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 287,250 277.-3-98 341 MOE RD 25% 1991 COLONIAL 1.37 2020-04-15 380,000 277.16-2-11 21 JAROSE PL 2640 2005 COLONIAL 0.46 2020-05-22 390,000 277.15-4-2 318 MOE RD 3256 2014 COLONIAL 1.18 2020-11-19 S500,000 27720-3-5 14 CARLSON WAY 277G 2013 COLONIAL 0.44 2021-02-11 S537,500 277-12-1-40 2 LILAC CT 1620 1%6 COLONIAL 0.41 2021-05-12 S267,000 277.-3-93 S46 ENGLEMORE RD 3956 1991 COLONIAL 243 2021-05-17 S860,000 2n.16-2-4 7 JAROSE PL 2940 2005 COLONIAL 0,48 2021-06-GB 5495,0W 277.-3-5 368 MOE RD 2448 1957 COLONIAL 2,00 2021-08-25 610000 2.77,16-2-6 11 AROSE PL 2810 2005 COLONIAL 0.46 2021-10-01 S52Q000 277.-3-66 6 TOWLINE LN 3319 1999 COLONIAL 1.03 . 2021-10.29 650,000 10 AVERAGE 12/1/2020 520,950 MEDIAN 12/1/2020 S510.000 12273 TRILLER DEVELOPMENT LLC 2017 20% DRESCHERJUSTIN 148.36 MCCARTPAUL 2017 13911 JIANG LEI 117.68 LONGABACH PAUL 2017 39591 STRAITCOURTNEY 191.90 SALEI VIKTAR 2018 4222 HERMAN ADAM 129.87 DRESCHERIUSI1N 2018 10434 LIZHIXIA S14286 TORRESLUIS 2018 10145 LIUZHANFEI 115.03 LYNCH RICHARD 2018 20392 GRAY ERIC S107.28 BROOKS PETER 2018 2%89 MASON DOUGLAS 146.38 147.73 153.56 193.62 164.81 S217-39 S168.37 249.18 S185.05 195.84 KONEY BRENT P HERMAN ROBERTS BETANCOURT LEDESMA ALEJANDRO FARIELLO JULIE SMITH GEORGE B D'AMBRQSIO NICHOLAS I WANGYAO CRISAFULLI DANIEL ELLENBOGEN ADAM SHARIFF ANOALEEB 2020 69 GIROL MICHAEL R 2020 15060 BUDHARAJU HARI KISHORE 2020 34351 POPAL QUDUS ABDUL 2021 5632 FLYNN KEVIN 2021 18217 AVVELIUTI LAYNE 2021 18171 INOUYE BRIAN M 2021 26319 KHANNA PUNEET 2021 31232 ROMANOWSM STEVEN 2021 36899 HORSTMAN STUART 2021 43854 QUINTANA MICHELE Appendix 49 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277.16-3-57 15 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3304 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.36 2017-01-13 443,213 134.14 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 1862 NAGARAJA SHARATH277,16 3-48 35 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3318 201G CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2017-02-06 S41$517 126.14 HERITAGEBUILDERSGROUP LLC 2017 4433 BAH BOUBACAR277.16-3-33 8 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2578 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2011-02-06 428,600 166.25 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP LLC 2017 4491 SAPOSNICK ERIC277.20-4-15 45 BALSAM WAY 2971 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2017-03-24 485,248 163.33 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 10541 BOEHRINGLR EUGENE277.20-4-12 41 BALSAM WAY 2981 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2017-04-18 456,988 153.30 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 12365 DUDI YADI REDDY277.20-3-18 22 BALSAM WAY 2588 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2017-05-24 450,000 173.88 COCHISTIMOT14Y 2017 17271 AN CHULWAN277.16-3-67 7 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2264 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.91 2017-06-02 S380,410 168.03 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 17646 LANNONMICHELE 277.20-3-19 24 BALSAM WAY 2718 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-06-21 435,000 160.04 HWANG WONTAE 2017 21852 SOHN DONG KYUN277.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-06-30 419,900 180.89 HUH YUN JUN 2017 24018 STONE FINANCING LtCZ77.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-06-30 479,900 180.89 STONE FINANCING LLC 2017 24019 KIM YOON HAE 277.16-3-46 36 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3168 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0-35 2017-09-21 473,006 149.31 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 30567 HO TIEN 277.20-3-6 16 CARLSON WAY 2490 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0-44 2017-11-07 S410,000 S164.66 YOON SUNG GI 2017 36554 LEE TAE JEONG 277.16-2-5 9 JARDSE PL 2830 2005 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2018-04-06 S409,000 144.52 UPPAL SURESH 2O18 10306 CHOUDHERY PANKAJ277.16-3-57 15 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3304 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0,36 2018-04-16 S468,000 141.65 NAGARAJA SHARATH 2O18 11263 KODALI SATISH 277.16-3-4 105 BALSAM WAY 310E 2017 CONTEMPORARY 041 2018-04-26 496,435 159.73 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 17016 NGUYEN DANG 277.20-4-32 62 BALSAM WAY Z800 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2018-05-15 498,734 178.12 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 14344 FERRARO LINDSAY 277.20-4-39 38 BALSAM WAY 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2018-06-12 467,719 146.03 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 17392 ARISOHN MATTHEW 277.16-3-3G 16 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2659 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2018-07-12 434,998 163.59 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 22505 WAI LIN TUN 277.20-4-41 44 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2975 2017 CONTEMPORARY Q43 2018-08-07 517,405 S173.92 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 24867 SINGH KAMRAJ277.20-4-42 42 HERITAGE POINTL DR 3100 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2018-08-21 503,771 162.S1 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 26284 SHARKEY THOMAS277.20-1-9 15 ARBORLN 1966 1986 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2018-09-27 S290,000 147.51 JUPIN ANDREW 2018 30339 JOHNSON ALTHEA 27710-3-19 24 BALSAM WAY 2718 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2018-10-09 446,500 764.28 SOHN DONG KYUN 2018 30397 CHANG KWANHO 277.15-4-5 324 MOE RD 2188 2014 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2018-10-31 361,500 165.22 PRORSUS REAL ESTATE LLC 2018 34758 TIONGSON RIAMAR MADRID 277.20-4-11 39 BALSAM WAY 3211 2018 CONTEMPORARY 035 2018-11-30 531,299 S165.46 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 35753 PENGJIANWEI 277.16-3-47 37 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3243 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.48 2018-12-03 640.000 197.35 GHA 5 LLC 2018 37239 PETERSTHOMAS 277.12-1-63 19 ACORN AVE 1950 1973 RAISED RANCH 0.46 2017-02-01 260,000 S133.33 CASSELLA GREGORY 2017 1707 LIUZZI ARIANA 277.12-2-40 12 TULIP TER 1930 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.40 2018-03-21 260,000 134.72 GALARNEAU KEVIN 2018 11329 ROBERTS ERIC 277.12-1-37 8 LILAC CT 1622 1966 RAISED RANCH 063 2018-07-11 245,D00 151-05 OLSAKOVSKYJAMES 2018 21811 PRESCOTTJOEL 28 AVERAGE 1/1/2018 434,684 Appendix 50 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277-16-3-32 6 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3249 2015 CONTEMPORARY 0.49 2020-04-01 S569,900 175.41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2020 8958 PATTERSON MITCHELL277--3-61 3 TOWLINE LN 3366 2000 CONTEMPORARY 1.07 2020-05-11 S492,000 146.17 FRONTERA RICHARD 2020 11490 WEINSTEIN JUSTIN M277.16-3-48 35 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3318 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2020-05-18 460.00D 138.64 BAH BOUBACAR 2020 12782 GUJJU VIDYARANYA277.20-4-1 39 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3632 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-05-20 590,000 162-44 GJA S LLC 2020 13606 DEVABHAKTUNI JAINENDRA B27716-3-12 89 BALSAM WAY 3642 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-06-15 S677,000 185.89 CROSS MATTHEW W 2020 17846 DECKER DAVID277.20-4-42 42 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3100 2018 CONTEMPORARY Q40 2020-07-28 SS00,000 16129 SHARKEY THOMAS 2020 21360 FLSWORTH MICHAEL READ277.16-3-55 19 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 045 2020-09-04 475,000 148.30 LUINHAI 2020 24423 BALOGUN OLUMOROTI277.16-3-5 103 BALSAM WAY 3100 2017 CONTEMPORARY 052 2020-10-06 511,000 S164.84 RIVERA III JUAN 1 2021 9214 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC277.16-3-5 103 BALSAM WAY 3100 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.52 2020-10-06 S511,000 S164.84 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC 2021 9215 HILDERBRAND JOSHUA277.16-3-3 107 BALSAM WAY 2528 2019 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 Z020-10-14 S450,000 17801 HERITAGE BUILDERSGROUP LLC 2020 30227 SERiDI MOUAD277,Z0-4-30 66 BALSAM WAY 2856 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2020-11-17 M,000 16&07 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 5068 MUPPANDAM SYAMALA277.16-3-14 85 BALSAM WAY 2611 2019 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2020-11-19 474.980 181.91 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 4370 MILLFV€LLE BRYCE WILLIAM277.20-4-32 62 BALSAM WAY 28W 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-11-20 498,000 S17Z86 FERRARO LINDSAY C 2020 33297 PHILIP VICTOR277.20-3-12 24 CARLSON WAY 2649 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2020-11-23 530,000 S200.08 PRICE DAVID 2020 33624 BROWN ADAM277.16-3-53 25 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2805 2019 CONTEMPORARY 0.40 2020-11-25 486.675 S173.50 HERITAGE BUfLDERS GROUP 2020 35687 ZHENGJOHN277.20-3-35 9 BALSAM WAY 2487 2008 CONTEMPORARY 0.37 2020-12-11 555,000 223.16 BROWN DANIEL 2020 36943 CUSTERCLYDE M277.20-4-20 55 BALSAM WAY 2616 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2020-12-18 S474,248 S181.29 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 5264 ZHENGZHENGLI277.20-4-25 65 BALSAM WAY 2836 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0,42 2020-12-22 5482,249 170.05 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 3193 VEMAREDDY RUTHVIK277.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2020-12-30 495.000 S186.58 KIM YOON HAE 2021 965 NASH DAVIDA277A6.3.39 22 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2503 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.44 2021-01-15 475,985 S190.17 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 7473 NAYYAR NFHA277.20-3-18 22 BALSAM WAY 2588 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2021-02-19 498,000 19243 AN CHULWAN 2021 7744 LEI YUE 277.16-3-16 81 BALSAM WAY 3100 201H CONTEMPORARY 0.43 2021-07-15 566,000 S18258 SHI YANXIANG 2021 26695 ARAVAPALLI MANOJ277.20-1-10 14 ARBORLN 1668 1986 CONTEMPORARY 0.50 2021-08-03 325.000 S194.84 LOPRESTIDANIEL 2021 29754 STOLLALISON 277.20-4-7 51 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3248 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2021-08-04 629,900 S193.93 MALEK SOHAIL 2021 31057 AROSKAR RAJARSHI Z77.16-3-55 19 HERITAGE POINTE DR 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.45 2027-08-24 SB2000 S181.70 BALOGUN OLUMOROTI 2021 31605 ZHENG YISEN 277.20-4-6 49 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2789 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.37 2021-TO-05 580,000 S207.96 TRAN HOT 2021 36420 PATEL PRANAV 26 AVERAGE 12/1/2020 514.190 Appendix 51 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277.20-4-17 49 BALSAM WAY 2514 2016 RANCH 0.42 2017-01-10 434,321 172.76 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUT' 2017 2226 MERRILL MARK277.20-4-13 43 BALSAM WAY 2621 2016 RANCH 0.36 2017-03-09 462.114 176.31 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 945S KIBLING ROBERT277.76-3-58 13 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2202 2016 RANCH 0.37 2017-05-26 386,951 175.73 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 16657 MAHAJAN VINAYAK277.16-3-60 9 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2189 2016 RANCH 0.39 2017-06-01 S3%783 181.26 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 17640 BERUBE DANIELLE277.20-4-19 53 BALSAM WAY 2202 2016 RANCH 0.47 2017-06-09 429,127 194.88 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 18618 BOIKOTHEODORE277.20-3-3-1 11 BALSAM WAY 2205 2016 RANCH 0.37 2017-06-12 488,000 221.32 POGODA ASSOCIATES LE(_ 2017 19051 BYRNE JOHN277.-3-95 534 GROOMS RD 1040 1952 RANCH 1,86 2017-08-25 157,000 150.96 MARKIEWICZ TERRY Z017 27414 CONNORS KARYN277.20-4-35 46 BALSAM WAY 2130 2017 RANCH 0.S4 2017-08-30 451,025 S211.7S HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 28431 SEGOVIS PAUL277.-3-95 534 GROOMS RD 1040 1952 RANCH 1,86 2017-09-07 115,000 110-58 CHARBONNEAU VIRGINIA 2017 31806 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC277.11-3-16 40 VALENCIA LN 1923 1969 RANCH 0.55 201E-07-27 293,000 1S2.37 O'CONNOLL BETTY 2018 23084 WOLFERT E BRUCE277.16-3-15 83 BALSAM WAY 1512 2018 RANCH 0.41 2018-08-29 422,736 S279.59 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 26766 ROTONDO RONALD277AS-3-1.1 6 PARKLAND CT 2009 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.23 2017-06-30 315,000 156.79 GOODWINTHOMAS 2017 20686 DUETTMACK277.15-3-7.1 30 PARKLAND CT 1484 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.25 2018-02-23 290,000 S19S.42 ASTLE F K A CAHILL SHARON C. 2018 5920 SIMONSON 5COTT277.15-3-25.2 7 GROOMS POINTE DR 1989 1999 TOWNHOUSE 0.33 2018-10-31 342,500 172.20 ORTELJUDITH 2O18 33261 SCHMIDT KERRY L-TRUSTEE 14 AVERAGE 1/1/2018 355,968 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 391,867 277.20-4-43 40 HERITAGE POINTE DR 2658 2019 RANCH 0.38 2020-03-26 460,000 173.06 MEYRING WILLIAM 2020 8383 PIERINO KAREN-TRUSTEE277.11-3-12 46 VALENCIA LN 1620 1972 RANCH 0.58 2020-08-10 33S,000 206.79 FAULCONERJUNE C 2020 21269 HIGH JARED277.16-3-8 97 BALSAM WAY 2621 2019 RANCH 0.38 2020-11-05 S465,000 177.41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2020 332S4 BASSI GURBINDER S277.20-4-23 61 BALSAM WAY 2621 2020 RANCH 0.38 2020-12-18 465,000 177.41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2020 36937 MAZZONE JEFFREY P277.-3-35.1 557 GROOMS RD 1837 1963 RANCH 1.15 2020-12-31 315,000 171.48 FRICKE THOMAS 2021 957 BOYLE JOSEPH277.16-3-54 23 HERITAGE POINTE DR 1699 2019 RANCH 0.41 2021-02-16 S400,000 235.43 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 7240 PUTHI SOMASEKHAR 6 AVERAGE 12/1/2020 S406,667 Appendix 52 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. trTry4n 41 PAL54M N'Av CFR ICIIPARC NY 1 w I'S11E PANG. DQ 4I7 0t W S .311 Si12,6 IINFAQ lUKNZ,; 0 A1I 1IM 1dERRAl MAMA 21592M SL 50s*41P0 CLd TC11 PARKM 2M5 TINT 043 An-0111 M100M i-a CHACD PHRN A1x 19y µSHlOW IRAtY 22T 12.111 p NEPGPFENAV! CI[IICNP Iry )Ml Im RAG[DµllC.l DAl A1:M 30 it9iF29 fb210 IMT STPPHN fill W11 HRL(AVNSN 11,12-163 19- O WI AIE LLR1CNpANKW 19q 19T3 MGLU µRCM U46 all WCt 5X0I1M Mi33) C ASSEILAGREGCRY AI: VIP LIVZZI ARAW 27E.1 is 4RCq MS PD CtNION pAPKfn foot 196( MFKrI 10E MSS p2 ]E S1 9pp Mmn MNARE.WRPOPE.-I, 1 Pav3 SIENNLK. KW6flI tE36164 2P2 WEED CLIFTCNPARKM 1C TM CLCSTY(E 72 Yl'ILI }15i9p0 SL4l6) CLAM GEµ10K AND L0I4NA J Alx 91 R5 Rq K1AKk4il mlv3 al 1+ µ1FHCA lH CIN IgFPMKNY Ibri 39AT MHCH OS A11.O2A 5259.O1p L14192 IOuGHCMR AlF MIS NAIKIJAL IMN0ER 5EPv10ES L11 m 113.44 N MIElKw1N cul lDwµpern 1d15 I%1 MIK11 a5 Mt 1p10. N115W ikA1q NAIgIJAL IMk9FfR SERMCfS it At1 N16 HIAM000{GNN 272 A4. 13 41 PA(SAMWAY CHITC4PAPhi- ZQl V16 MNCI1 A1FbRCN w-L IIe 1116 Ei NNBIAGF IVRDm GR11JP A1x 545i Kill 1KY5R0EERl4T)A41} 4 BALSAM WAY CllITON RARKfn MI Alb CerIRPAIGMFY DOX011 ML103M R,CM 514L13 Nf4TAGF 6VKDEPSGAgJP M17 E3C.I1 Aof11RWE EUYKI:{ Mil1.40 5 PALCALIC CLHIGNPAPLW Al2 IMM"FO µ1KN O51 MI704 tYdC00 L1p26p PAYNE AM All 12116 wAt.N161pAV iRAa-tt A11 BALSAMWAI CVII-MIARKW 2i%l A16 CONtkMPDM" on An.N 16 W%W S153A HEWl-A WKR GRUPO MII 113w OVpYACI RECOK 2R Lii r2 PINE TRE[PL CLVIDNPAR1W IAA I- MJ MEArKH A11 N-21 1240OM 5141.3' HURL'MAN An 1Id55 A. WRCRI n 2P9 4)3 MOERa CUf TCNIFAR[NV 13A6 IM SPLIx LNEI 00 M1x N`]S STl[500 5155.Q THCMA5CNR1510MIT, X17 I", VAN2AIJ01ROEAND 2535A15 1 RAOMMDA. CUF TON PARKW IIs, IW3 IMNNOUSL 01Z M" Cs 17Do S166A1 LFNITNKAZKAPSW SAYNF MI2 I41, LfSNAKMIC1+pLA5 2119236 10 FICP515 DR CL-Fj PAAAW ISM IW COLDFASF An V, 12 w,l00 SIId.% MAAIRTNKHAtI MN ISISI WULDIUSIN 211M 11e 2 PlILK WAY RITCNPAEKW 2J6 AI0 CLLPIK-OMRY CAI W17CaN S C00 Sl13M WHE"WIT, MI7 11211 ANCHI ... 2183J21 2 L}pP111 OP CIRTON PARK NY 1935 INC COLONAI 0d5 Mn008 Sri69A $11131 P('WiRKA M" I]061 AUOIRYAN SITi1149 A XCABAM CIiIpNPARKW 1910 NN MIK' DAI N11 pyA SPAS` i91. ]4 WALL ACE MIRY P TMIH Ald 1160 COMPASSONiI www LiNUGN AI I1-]1 3J MIIBUPVCT CLRTCNPAPKNY IIX 199] RANCH O11 MIT%M i1C.00l 517575 IRRMMI. PETER MI1 162p6 MCCANIJM1tl vN M) 64R M YPPQXpf DR CiWTON PARK NY lri2 lAl t=. LKF Pn MI7-Wo. S2MC00 11M12 KRJGFLEVIRDHMO M" I%16 PKUNII M4M 22IM 41P 53 BAISAMWAY CilFw AAPF NY 2A2 A16 µNCH IAl A11 DR OR i421121 LI.. NJNNGE BLit DFR96ROW Alll 1. RG.D MrOWER MMiH Il RYIsAAl AAY CLITIMPARRNY "M` MI6 MIKH 03T M170R le S4sOCA sm 32 VdcglA 4550CAILS II[ All ins, BYPNFt.N m72Ao 16 SCCApA OR CLRTONPAPKPry L1O 39N COLO9JAL Alt p6-IF SAP000 {lb" CASTALOOIOSEk AI! Atg RCRIFRO JASON T71A3tP ll M[MMVAAY LLYTDN PARKIn ;11R AN CPNTFMPDRA 03p M1. OIL;, Shy Opp I.M. wN41M X0NTAT MI) 2LW sOwlO KKiii-I 2R1771 M C'.y11 KACT CLII04PA Y 2521 M65 IQLDNAI Dig Alr,0622 L3.55M SI1010 rOADRNY WTV'RO Air 199b1 ORIL WWI. 2T - Si 11 SICAM iM l1I 1pN PARK IJY ri10 l9W COLONAI Nat 2p11-W 21 fID00p0 t17124 1112GEM/OMMEF AN U131 CEMAMO IOS11I 171M1- M 1 YKDEMAS IN CIN IONMRAIry 1WI 19M MNCN 0S7 A1I"M L l"' S1]t0 gIK1 RCNAIP All tlptl RAIIA'GYLAYt 2r] 6112 1 ROYALCA[4R GLIIICN PAgA NT 2141 I%6 CCNSEMpdMRI' p5 AxF-pbA 1352500 tINN x4An g0ew A1r 2161A AVAWA x10CK42L' 211Tl45 W EARCSLCIADR C411DJI PARA Pry ]3[q 1945 COLONIAL 1 AIF CSA S¢A MN 61 OWILNAl1C4H All 21M6 OM.F EVAN m MHA2 1 K WTONWAY CIIFIONFAR%W MS3 N12 [C112[1gpMgY 031 Ail O4A iR99m MdOM H1W VUN NN MII MR ST04EFMAIKIIPKI C M W-1U N CAPLVNWAY CWlCN PARK NY 265J Al2 CCPIIEAW OIMRv pap A1.0bA HR89m 116p01 STONE FUFANC NEG, AIF boll KAI YOOII NAI m 15G 11 6 PAKKIANDC7 CIIF10INPAPKW Mal MTV ICW)NOUt[ 02h N11 nEp LJIs pA s GOCUNN"Y hIam, Atx ARR6 WfTTMACR IIR0. I4) 61 ISOPVSDR CII11CNPARKW nM 1 C¢IONAl pM MIt-DI-pI MIS C00 Si1617 CRT- Io N a" 21]ix pIlA1WAPL SHWFIA Pp4lAS d'1 ISOPVS DR CUF iON PARKW IAA 11% COIONMl OA1 AI16)i4 SAP yW 1r1SW GRSOOLN MKHAO Atl 2N11 MAC LVNAIOAFNRS[W T106 A A E10POIDA wire PARKW 2006 N16 COLANAi 061 a1.0)21 sAl SIM 1111,]S M(C(FCLA14p plyK M5i 2M12 IEECFVIN M311426 6 LRYLN C16TONPARKNY w6 ItN COIQNAI qn All CI-E MM9m SIM91 WpRCurl S[Gn ALA d165R KILIAN CHNSIOFHEF IT116110 4 LORRAJFIFLI C[1EIDH PARK try 3236 M"COMEMFOMRY 041 M097'2A IMM its" NI RItAGE RURVEPS WC Y' 21OdI NOLLWGASORTHMJDRf 2R 1619 11 VALEIKNLN CLFT-PARKNY MI 1961 COIOMIAL DO MIS.0p.01 132" s" IH54FlO TIPCMAS MIi 21215' IOTAROPR I 2117. 11 13 0 LIKQLN AYE CLNTNIPAFKW 16m tY1 <OLSK1Al ON An OldIO {xa Jpp SIy9AJ tNAY C(N1] dln be, I(E MKNAII RY Li) Il MRNCI,w CIF t-PARKW dLi T%1 ANSF4RAIKN OA) MI]ObM USA" SLow IURLIFY MI. a" 5211 2AILWSf(1 µ6A NR41N 21 IFALWdc'PA CIRTMPANXM 16R INN RAIMPAECH CA6 MII OR17 ISAOM S160M PAotlRiikO Ell 21ICia PQIAKMAWAN 21T 1- L-54 A SKAG OR CI I(TON PAKK- IW 1Md MNCN D41 MIT01i Solon Y1A643 rA[WLVJI UKRAL1 MI) N 1 6RIEN[1113610PNER 21E 11 IM 6 RCOSEVELTCI CLFPONPARE. 25A A17 4¢NIEHNOR4RY Od5 MIlINN $ill= 5Uo 511WART P[1FR IT R193 POGCMASICCA12SLLC 2113-% SEA stalb sM LI P Ig1PARRNY IND 1912 µNCH 1. MIT.0621 i15T WO &I%% MKRERNYIK7 Mill MI] EAW ONM]IS µR'IN 2M tG. 3. 161 A RWSFYQICi CIKI-ARKIM 2117 t%7 COIONAL 0415 M11-bAA 63p- $Nb% MART IIILR A17 R3E pACEIlS CxkM¢PHER nrTLN tl MS4MwAY ClPIg4BARK1Y fiM All gAKN 0.H A1.p.1 NEI A 2MJ1 SFfAMGPAVL m 12. 1 1D A SYLVAN IN CLRTGIPARKW I04 1965 PA13{OKAWN Op M1'I0Wjl 12ia,9pD $16122 dRMfR MKIIAfL All 2ANA Y4NALSWNF MAAK in 14114 M VALCESLNA5IN CLVIM PARKW AV 1 RALID RAr4C II 966 2n 09.06 IMCDO S%A lURLFYCAYD Ali 2d519 2NOU YWe11C-4p ILKITNAN m11.1.4a 2tl v.4 FN[AlH C(PiDN PARKW 1611 1%1 COLCHAL PE An.W% 54o M01 IF AIAENR4CH MARK AI+ 29A14 CEAOpW 2R 1,% 5H GNOOAy AD IKION PANG NY 101J 1y1 MFKN IC tiM M1r_w_p1 SI15OD2 INU58 LNKRIQNhILAU NPfi1M A11 I'M FOGCOAAMCAFES I IC Rr13231 31 Y1KAfd AK CIYION PAPKM 11p2 n9R _I. MNC1I 6a3 09_A MA0 M0 M571d IIAEPEP MART PKIW:V, AKA MA An wo U04.HH(NG 00.17- 2.13 31 LINCM14AW Cl OafA PARKW YNl INI COLCINAl Chi Alp ND 6)19dn S1N I6 JKKSCNMU( Eli RI916 OVx4EY A110REW 21-5139 IT NN CJ CUfION PARK- I6A 191N WS(DµK. USS AIT-105 529967] St1116 'Awl. HµdAP1wD KATHirti1 EIT JIM60 444Ru1PHRr M Is, 31 2% 6YDob%K CID CIRrgIPA . IIW IN, MI1CA1 A11-IO W 11900M SILL T9 UILKCA RDBERY MI; ASV PU711AMCOOv 27114M 6 RYANCT C[IF TCN PAR.W ]ICE M CGk0MA1 51 M111¢71 SPM DD 5141% WEPREICH Ali L,w, UDESC0l INDSAY 2765-2P 11 MIT CHfIWPAPIW I" M MIIEOMIKH 0. An. 1P31 1239 it 1591 FDIKNgR30NM At] 7y71i RDYIDfR1HEPF5A 217dp3.6 16 CMEfC. wAY C1RTDk PAP.W bG0 Att LONfEM/DRRfH trM A111 P01 M616p S1N(6 1w.$VNGU MN MIS, SFE TAEAONG t7A9 L13 a ESOPVE OR ClorlDN PARKW 11(3 14R2 COtOHA1 061 AIr 1111 LIAY11p SMiih xCg5EGV1 MN NADI IOAKKA U. 21I131A N1IC01N AYE ClIEIONRAF%FA 21i1 190J CCAOIPW ARE Mll 1111 UK= Mon k-KITEN MIT Jrm LIMLIERSIENILN 2F714I ID M VAiDEPENASLN ClITONPARKAry 2M INA PAISECPANCH 021 A1F-11W S2KSAA 1W A2 DOBEAR DAYAI Atl 3Rf53 AMIR05E DIRAKY 7ro 1J- 3-M 6 MCANWCT U111gIPARIkY tOl dN6 COIOWA( 091 EIl I2N iA61nm fT61N KUNHEF CR..IF M]T n7I2 P0H MARK RT 111 J9 M 9CACA DR CINTgFPARENY IAld I W MIRCH 9u AIFII 05 $1949D0 S10J91 :CWASS pFYfl6PMCJt NlIGPIL LI AIR IA6 RJIfWTATE IIRJ[MMNi110LCTlcrc; t m 1R13AtoLAACCICNIlClI-KW 19RS 596E CMOIRAL Ow E1T.II I, S231J0'A $U?6k LaJGAMCN PAIR MIT 19595 SIMIICJIIIRINEv M 11 J1AM CAMNIANCALI ClRI0 PARKNY .VN 196T MDWM4C. q5U A17I1M 1ASo11 LTMS4 TLYFHIASDN M.F aPI, GgLIN GfNI. VASIW 6 MWLIA IF" INiGA PARKW Mm IM Milo MIK4 a4] MN.NA 5M.W t11130 OEAMR0IFRI JD14 4N 011EACMA ovit 4 P CµNIEWTN CI IFILYl FARKW IANI 19R6 owN'AL 0.67 all 12A swop s= IANE(NI IAMEK MIA 791 RTtE 0RNN1 2I111A a6 H 5Kx LN LPIgI PARK W 1SW 19A [CNONAL pa! M164122 SIN= 1150A2 AH90N.<..EL M. MIT N[WAA414KI14fL A3]114 61 MSTBURYCt CtK1J11 PARKW 1W lAl r0M11gLy[ 001 M,PuT SiMl10 II101 AUCWE04HGECr1p Alp MY 410WCAPQI R'F I];M 9 1UL*ILK CIRIgPpARRW - 19M III= Oi3 M184111 smak, LMISO SAMAMAR MIB 42L HERWHAICAR1 24I143 S IMIAMCI CIRTCNPARKHY M16 IM [CLONAL O4! M&Wn 5M W $1N51 t MKHAn d51A K.1 PEEL A1ll1AM 278.b Ir16 SiJ ERIPL15011 CIRTCNRARKW 2121 1Nl, CO10/NL 0W MlAOI_Y /MR.CM 1145W M,"RCHARO MR QS2 MANPI'AKFFARD M15)11 M ARA UCT CIiT0U PAREW 145L MOD I0WIJx0y5[ Oh MI&W.0 IM= 11954t CAFIlk1[aCAHli1 SkARt'NJ I MIA YM OMONSON FCOII in V 45 VALMKAIH 1910HPARKW 010 1967 COSOIM( On AsP0101 SA10m IIA.M DR[SCIIERAIFINI NIBIR IOW LI NOLA RTE2 J/ 0 12 TULATCR PAH.E 9af C[RICHPARkWDRIFKH19A 1A1111 {MiCM MauR H0n-QUGAIARNEAVM, N M Itib EA*_, IRK' 2M 1E i-M 6 RCC%WtTCI Ct R ICI PARKW 2yt1 AN C0,11WFORWY CC 21 14Tl= S166W POGCE MsC .US LLC MIA VN. 1NI00UN1 DE-15 2Je,iit 1O µWMNO PER Cl PFCIIPAPKW IAI 11M µ1Sf0MIKH OE, all. -M WIMD $"gI IIU AIuIN All LMS6 rERF-RMTIAW 7T7 IS) d b5 WAV CLF30N PARK IBA )CR MI1 LONIEMPDMWY p41 M16NM Whil5 115911 HFWIAGF pAf d1R01G MIA 17016 NGWMCIAW, 1119II 3 GAFFNFIHq Ci 11. TCH PA RK N1 21% I- CM NAL M1A XV LM00] il'A9d EL4[NiLMN CRECG AIP IBA 16 NATZKRf IR. AN&I 2NIMR1 n SCPVS OR CIdTONT01, IBA - lw (CLONAL Ol 09 NLAlbwn M11LOp 1TL9W 5(Y P0AEn1L[{LEY I[FANA MIB 11011 MA R1wC NQE-TIHM REIN-125 A N-11 Gi Li AIC44 PARKW 1R4 MC1 CCLCNLAL Oil 1.05W Lily DDO 1S51 ii IDOTHNNtUGRYAKVMAR MIA MID SCIALY tDoARU 1112 V 61 UI-SA611YAY CIRTCNPAPK In ]® Ati CONIE3An0MRY CA MHOS i5 a.91. iM SI2E I2 HER114GE BIIIL01P5GPCVP MlE M)M I[AIARD LRILSPV 2M $12I1 I1 IVTNAMCT iALN-ONY IA& lS 1CN1LIH.W COl Aid IN .1 tIWCDO S1MEI 1RsplH D(NENF Mld TRAM PARKER RICABFIH R)I66M ID RALSAMWAV lU3WLPAgK HY 3AI M17 CLWIrMFDEARI cot AllN12 WArl9 {iA6oI HEWTAGESIL& LASC111Du' MIA I'm AIRMIINANTINEN RA.II y-II 6 1MNKK LN CLI(1WIRAMNY 4RM M1) C[Wl[Mi0µRY D46 M11O66 Mm bi Si%V IERA MIC-D MIA 1Y.W A-E)VAL"PICA 21A 1). 1-N 2P LINCOIN AA CLRION FAMW M!6 IN, (¢tONK 061 AIbO6 t9 Fll600O 511015 mlCO[16A04M Mid t9B'31 vWKnFR: VVOFKIOR(E MORRHV Yx M..11. 211 JT LRKOLN AYS CLRIONPARR NY 2A6 1%7 COLDHAI MIDod, {MOM SIM[d MKN[R11NRA(0KLM 7TIW M1It Alm IMInl IA14KK 221'11- R,b 51 I.V@CMLN CIPTON P ARK NY ri21 MIA COLOWAL MI LOI W 5291 $Ili& LYH(H WHAM A16 am GRAY [be lI3.RA. n A YAOONM IHI 41 P TCN VM. NY 1)S2 1W' ICWNHDVSF 72 all MIbDTDB IMOOM S1]6l2 PKVMLLISWPY A16 21I45 L KLLANAN CALIMGI FII 1FF6116 B PKITAAEGCI C1P1Ok PARK Pn 11M 1g1I CAFE CO0 01L AI16706 12Y1SW M65.73 NCSM%A1HAp NY ASA is96F D{YN PEIrtE V112 L11 R MACtr LRION PARK W l62] 1W M"EDJLW- GQ M?1111 FMS.CO MSITA DL94YANKVNM[S M11 21115 PRES[Ott1EEl 77T-A57 1S RARCEI-Olk CLRTCNPARK NY 2WI 1966 COLONIAL 0W A16 C1.12 SAROM Sn IB HOPCHK6LLfOxAAp Mid 214M FEAINRAIIFIR 2]811117 1 POOkVF[T[I CtUi04 PARKW 101I 1%2 MCILAL ON MIbC713 SHOO) yl"51 WRLAMSANH MI4 IAR AURAOUdISF MAnHFw 211O24 1 AAANty Rn CLRIGNPAAKW rill 19lx COSONNL OK A160x 11 M19.OM LIMSL 9(115. Iv..H[ A1A M]N NKSSFNPnVG KVRI A152 i12 i10 AIDE qp CLRIgIPAR[W 33l6 19W SPLTIJEWL ATL0716 1MCND SMm RDHK MTNWN 11ri1 SANIOPID-WI M9L 12 12 CLGIF CF CLAIDIJ PARKW lit 1T(d N45Ep A5HCIi 00 OSd AI6-0717 SM9O0aL11p.LL MCNA AKHAPD MIR II670 CAMPWAMTIHFW 2M 53] 1 1FTHAM CI x4LPMppH IIY 1214 19A6 iCWUHpu1[ p01 A160]-19 f1S7 Wo LIMM 4AANOLOW M Mid ZMX OAFNME UNK K.x 1HDw 21117 A11 MI wFRD CN0111, RKW 136• LTG] RANCH 6D A1b01-E %MCOD M82 0 PLFASFSEEARAC.20 All nw WKLSH MfGHMI 2I11£I01 1 KYLYAH 11 C,PICl101 W 2306 Ins M.SfDMYKH q3A A18p1 d5 {2EdoM L1p60D KNG(L6.1 2C1d r26C Al kNIMER E1 L1116 4p VAEFNCAIN LI"NFARKW 1pIJ pyy EAIKH tr55 M"ah-R IMCOU IISIN C[OIRIOIL BFRY v 2]OBI ZVERT 6PIE1 I7]12. 1 M 16 LRIOEN CI I:RIDN PAR.NY 19oA 19[6 MISED µNC. 75 AIdtlPRi 52AI, 11A932 BCLi2 AHN All bra KAiKLAl10KWiTN1 21a 11. 2M N LIIKOIH AVF CIRTNJ PARR HY MN FVni COIgWI C. A1606 N {24L.KO 4171LL pF1HORH(SAN0W MIB 2AIpy1 MVFPHv IEw.Mr1 W12121 Is W"""ICT CLKIONPARKW 2dW 1997 COLONAI 0.A M.I. 16 M60CK1 i1W.90 KIUR4LF IHOMA9 Ail MAW GRiENSASRHLIFEII Rl91M W F}OPL25W CIR ION PARKW INS 1%? t¢/01ly1 0! A:'M. ti S2A,W0 11490E CARKHA1p Alp 25691 9N4RFARfxuR Rb114 i4 15 Ff RNIT01 T CLRipNPARCW N14 19% [OL04NAL OM I'll M1A pp-1F "'C"' MI2ll WYINJ2xV M15 sill NAYALCNAKGREGCR, M1b4.1t 13 NV00510(DR C14 701 PARK HI' IV 1992 TOAwk,CUSF C11 MIAOR-21 Mki-n WDANVIL IELMN MIR 26R51 NfRINANDE: IASCN bp11-25 SS MCI MA11AW 2'n AA COAgAAI D2 MII 06 19 SJHDSp M9n 1y FCINN WI611A EIR 26a16 FA21OR13W PPA1IK R11131y N GL WAN CLRIOHRAPKIll 1511 All MNCH C41 N1S.0IM lkm 1. 12N.9/ HLRJfAGE BMLOIRSOKW wit A166 np 10NOD RIDNALO M4,1I 2 ACORN IN CLW70N PARKW 2352 19A COIDNAI CM 41606 K LM W Will BPOOKSPFTER MIA 2M KUISCN DOVOlA1 2741337 t3 NCNHAVE CIRTCEN FARKM ISAS 1"7 CDPJJwPOPARY 05. AI605-M IAt 1D] i16391 9TEMpritl-AS Mid 116N 6tnSSLAV PETER m ti 2iA 3A C.SAIWNC4 IT CIIf10N PARK Mm I RAUOM H 6S2 M156A-i1 1xi2Jp0 $1111M G UINGENEAAµGSNt al. 46TEA AURE AOfl t11N 1q1 1 vMdµSC C1P1171J P4R%IJ4 1Vt11 ti0> RANCH M OIL (M`WO $15101 HACCAM PAIWR aw mm FgIIN50N10LNF 2777.3- IG M bRCELONAN CLRTOH PARR Iry 19n I%1 RANCH 043 M160F 1) {M.9ca S1M1 SPEIKER[CAfY A 312$6 ALAANCHC_AS 215T34 IE 1 PWMER CI CIq T0N PAg1l NY Ali 3Wi CIXONAL O44 Mlb. li 1.000 y1%PI yupM; IAF51A. M16 M10I AL CNI 1oU1[R 7111 IT 1, 1.11 1 L07ILN PARK NY 1111 :%11 ANNq aSPJCk P43 M1603 A {213pA 11riW GOVEPFII. Ail MITI DEMIC DAn1YA 4T2Ai1R 12 PM1[1 tLPTON IKRKW M` 1NO PA 6EDMw NO 04ATOWA {t55 On iG0.62 1gGUE RV3SELL Mil 2A0A WLLApHfRdPYu4 Ir69-1tl V 1wPVF OP CMICIN PARK NY N41 C0i01At PA1 E1a01M Sin" 11%56 661m. C41(GORv Mil V71V IOIK AmNM inM.II IS ARBORIN CLPl"'PAPK11 1%6 IN" CCNtEMFOMRY 043 Ml",PR S29pC00 41V AMWANDII AEe Dni 2 P4KNA(THEA MX 119 IA B SAM WAY CLRIOHPARK., 014 Alt CONTEMPORARY 6A 1609 SAK S00 116AAA SOHNOONGRYU14 Mid AAT CHA140 KWANI+D 1M7$d A Wf"-CT IPIGN PARK 11 1. 1992 1pW4H6V5[ Did A16.1010 IMT900 LT2159 IMYG 1Dl1N(WHF All IONS MiZEWSIDIUSAN R1 3. 15N3 9 NY MRIRL IN ION PARR M' "" AndMANWN 4P M161610 y161p DOp M551D YAIKS lf"MIDII AIA 31165 Omits PAUL 2R [545 ll4 MO[I10 CLIPICN P4IK NY 21IN all IIHTFAAPDMfn Oa3 A161011 5161500 1185u gKCASVS REAL ESNTE ILO Mid UM TKNG101J RAMAP WOW0 tTi i11231 I [ ROOMS WIMPDFCl1P1cH PARR NY I901 190F 1CWIRIOrA ali Atb-1q-11 ISN 50C {1F2A GRIM ug11H Ala MM1 SCNMIOI MEW I TRUST([ ZRM-111 19 R4l6AMw4Y CLRION PARE NY .11 Ald I.-CIRAM 0% Atb11 ]D ISJI IFI I- HIWTA4LAotw.smg Mld Ai:] PEIK.JMIM4! m7-311 7 MRNEYRD I-PARr. FAN XAO 1961 µ"%BEAN[. Oa MA1000 I'M 56 JSUMCA MY'D A15 IaBS ICHTCAPANORFW Rd I];7 6 LONSCT CLN ION PARKW 2215 1772 µ5LDPAK. O,C2 8I.01 MTR- 12]1 SVZ= 59511 LONER S{FG Ale Alyt LEAN CNAISIICNAWES RI 1.t: 5 IA C-AP(AW IT 1M CIE 10NMRK In 2910 1%S COLDNI.1 AVOIAd[ A aidU. T. SM400 1114M S/1/d9li Sltb tRA ROFARIA N[R Mil J61% 11 MIIIPNCDIA Appendix 53 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. ZIA3H8 SKY LN CLIFTON PACK NY 259E 1995 COLONIAL S3615M SI64.03 DAGATIAKh DDVrERREBE(ILAP 2W0 N5B NOLRR MOHAMMAD 277V 311 4 CHEVtOTCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2450 1991 COLONIAL 6106t I= 01Z4 2020p7.27 f3615p0 4131.79 BrnVLES RICHARD 20."0 3537 NAGAREROHAN 2777278 10 CASAGLANCA Cr CLIFTON PARK NY 19M IS1SS RANCH 053 I=W 20 294900 S14E.71 GALRRIDALE 2020 7980 ORARD ASHLEY 277111 J7 VALENCIA LN CLIFTONPARANY 2310 1957 COLONIAL GAS 202DWOfl S3345W 314498 5LENDOM19EITFC 20M 9061 OSTF .1C1ARIINJEANETTE 277 395MtMOEROCLIFTONPARKNYZS961991COLONIAL1.37 Z=04IS SAGO DOG 11463E KONEV 9RENTP 202D 9G59 GIRC/MICHAEL9 253.1241 11 WiSHIRE DR CLIFTON PARK NY WIL 1991 COLONIAL 0.51 20Z0 GI.27 5395.W0 513125 WILD WILY 2D2P JW39 K.USE DUSTINI 277.3.61 3 TOWLINE LN CLIF79N PARK NY 3Ae 2Wo CONT(NipOPARY 1.07 I=0511 4P2 WO 5146 }7 FR.ONIERA PI 2020 11490 MINSTEIN JUSTINM 277 3. 49 75 CHEVSOt IT CLIFTON PARK 290E t992 COLONIAL 0a2 2W0-0511 4410000 SAl 23 BALLANTYNECHAISTAIN 202o II430 WALPOLE DEN"S Z770.2-13 3 KASHMIR TER CUPTQN PARK NY 1615 19T2 RAISED 059 202P OS S306030 1a701 WLSON SR MKHAELS 7020 26772 ROSYCKI ERIC5 27a.I333 III LAIR FD CLIFTON PARK NY d528 19g6 COLONIAL 095 29 20200529 354000113112 Ka4BALL KENNETH I 202P 13409 WLSON DAVID 277,1531I89BALSAMWAYCLIFTONPARKNY364E2017CONTEMPORARY04620N06I56T7000S}gS 89 CCA55 hNATiHEWW 2020 17aW DECKER ML4p 27T 151-23 23 VALDEPENAS LN CLIFTOM PARK NY 1683 1964 RANCH 062 ZW00702 299 U00 15679 CAMACHO DEW A 2020 17205 WARNIRWLLIAMF 2771A 126 3 BARNEYAD CLIFTON PARK NY 2S29 196E COLONIAL 756 2020 C710 SSGOO) SlIS62 BROWNELL ALAN CD 1020 19138 HL7CNN5 M IC ELLER 2771E t.3, 31- IINDENCr CLIFTON PARK NY 2172 1%5 RAISED RANCH 043 20200 D 3300,0o0 IA 12 FLUI MATTHEWJ 2020 247" KRAUTlf µSON 279.532ES 5 PUTNAM C7 HALFMOON NY 1214 190$ TO.SNHONSE 001 2W0.aBW SIOI Q% 151 S7 ML-ANOWSKI CARYNV9CI A 2020 20420 PATINAl1DE MEASAL 277A231 1CRANBERRYLNC['TTON PARK NY 1837 15,°$ COLONIAL 01 2D20A604 131950C 17391 MWRE MATTN6WW 2021 11229 ARCANE DEREK 2"1131246VALENCIALNCLFTONPARKNY1620197, RANCH 9,54 2W0 CB 10 335 DID SM929 FAACONER AINEC 7'0 21263 HIGH HWED 2S95t1 5 EVERGREEN AVF CLIFTDN PARK NY 18% 1970 RANCH 074 2020.01.10 265,000 515016 LUSEµMESH 2O20 251 ET2LEK BENJALIIN LARK 277827A 15 ELM PI CLFTON VARif NY "" 1968 RM9E0 RANCH 0.41 2B20 C6 I2 5)36083 SD?27 A MlAghIA PAVANK 2020 2167E K]HNSON LATIA 27B9114 62ESOpL750RCL4TONPARKNY1Y131%7 COLONIAL 063 ZON OB-14 532i000 513811 BALp1NN FUBERTR 2020 21%1 ROGERSEDWARDF PI 211.124. R3 10 WILSHIRE DR CDFTON PARK NY 425 1991 COLONIAL 047 2020W 2T 9435.%0 5146.1E 60BROWKOTTE ILYO 25059 EGERTON ANDREWJ 27714.3306CHEV107CTCLIFTONPARKNY299919% COLONIAL 09 MMZIS 424.900 11416E CLOHERTY MIC HAEL PATRICK iW9 26259 iUSULASORBJ 277.92J0 5 IVY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2256 19A5 SPLIT LEVEL 0.4E 2W00329 S33SW0 574771 SALTES KAREN 2C20 3DI14 GOODNESS STEPHEN 2781731.E 5 DENNISDA CLFTON PARK NY ZMS 19" COLONIAL 082 2020 C9.30 S415,0W S18311 MILLER ROBERTI 2h'0 17461 MCGEE.TAE ITT 1635 103 BALSAM WAY ILA TON PAWN 15W 1117 CONTEMPORARY 0. 10xD 1006 S511 Coo 516464 ARVERA III JWNI 2021 9214 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC 2711635 103 RALSAMWAY CLIFTON PARK NY 31W 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.5E 20201005 591.000 516484 FAIL CLOSING SERVICES L LC 2021 9215 HRDERBRANOICSHUA 2501924E 10 GREENFIELOCI HALFMOON NY 200E tilt COLONIAL O6a 2W0}0.09 96w0 SEW 10 SARAD ARC PONAYO ZWO E193 SMITH AISTINE 2777325 12 MAIORECA LN CUFTONPARK NY 2334 1968 COLONµL 051 2MLQ1 14 S350 OW SW 96 SVPON MATIHEW 2D20 28471 TWPPANY DIANEM M t32.9 23 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY NING 19% COLONIAL 056 01014 3400DO S169.45 O'LEAW JpSHUAE IU20 2a220 MURPITY JAMES 277 t6- 33 707 BALSAM WAY CLTIONPARK NY 252E 2019 CONTEMPORARY 042 205, 1014 45ODW SITE, III HERITAGE BuIbERS C4LWP LLC 2R20 3W21 SEJVD MOUAD 278.9 Z50 7 PUNAM LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2123 19M COLONIAL a57 2020. 1016 S320000 15073 KAUT MANHBAARYA 2021 1131 TlA`S"C 277122A 36LNOENCTCUF70NPAPAMY15601965RA15EDFLANCH0372WO.lo-19 325 ODO S20833 St HJLTZ TIMOTHY AI 1020 2962E LOBO µSOkB ITT 7. 462 1C KATHERJNE TEF CLIFTON PARK NY 1264 197.E COTTAGE 035 2020.1026 12M CDC JOBS ZEE ALLY MICHOL0 2Q20 334" DAGER COREY ZT7163E 97 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2E21 2019 RANCH 033 20201105 S465 DW 17741 HERITAGE BUILDERS CROUP 20N 73254 BASSI GUREINDERS 277 M430 B6 BALSAM SPAY CLIFTON PARK NY 26% Z920 CCNTEI.IPOPARY 04 2W0-1117 1400000 S16B.07 HEP701GE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 X64 MUPPANOAN3 SYAMALA 277734E 311MOEAOCUFTONPARKNY12562014COLONIALIlaIT19SSM= St515E BETANCOURY LEDESMAALEMMDRC 2D20 343SI POPAL QUDNSAEDUL 277163 A 85 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2611 2019 CONTEMPORARY 039 20M-11-19 S474,9W I 111 91 HERITAGE GUIDERS GROUP ZCQI 4370 MILLEYILLE III E WILLIAM 27B5245 40 EVERGREEN Ad CLIFTON PARR NY 2676 1969 RAISEDPAWH 041 20201120 SELH0cw ST2743 WALSH DFNPRSI 024 SISA WOODCOCKCOREYC 27720432 Tx BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 1A00 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 20201i a3 S498oW S}na6 FERRI LIN'OSAYC 2Ca'0 33297 PHILIPMCTCR 27720..E12 24 CARLSONWAY CLIFTONPAFIINY 2549 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0A2 202011 23 530030 12000E NICE DAVO 2W0 33624 8RpYN ARAM I40 t1. 18 IS ClM' MALTAW 213520D3COLONIAL02D3101124S415CUOS1W10FAFRANKA202017520THOMPSONMARK277aT131ROYALOAKDRCLIFTONPARKNY2601157aCOLONIAL0.53 20201130 339900 5130.66 TREIBER ROCHELL E V 2020 33920 FARNSWOATN ryATHANIEL 2771E-1. 5 ACORN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1612 187.E RAISEDIANCH 0.53 2620-1202 2%OW 3167 A9 R1Ciw IULA7Ha 2020 34604 ANDERSENGRLCARYMAMES Z77.33452GROOMSRDCLIFTONPAW: NY 2199 196E SPL IT LEVEL 11 2020. 12-04 SZ450W Si 1187 MOON MARGARE7 20M 31 WHI TILE AMANDS 576924g 111 61 ESOPS/S Oq GLIFTON PATTY NY 1671 19B5 COLONIAL 941 2020-12-08 5275.00a SI50. 19 WENGIµLANG 2W0 17756 MISHCHENKO AkTON 277.20335 9 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY SdE7 2CCa CONTEMPOPARY 037 20701E 11 SS55000 22316 BROWN PANIFL 2W0 3694.E USTBRCLYDEM 27120.A 23 61 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY Z421 2W RANCH 0A M 1216 S46S NO S177 Al HiMTAGE BUILDERS GWLP 2WO M37 MAZZONEAFRRFYP 277.20420 55 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2616 2020 CONTEMPORARY 015 2W0.1218 S474.2AEE 516129 HEI;4I BUILDERS GROUP 2021 5264 2H£NG2HENG Lf 277.20425 6S SALSAMWAY CLIFTON PARK NY 28335 204V CONTEMPORARY 042 1222 SAWIA9 SI?Sp5 HEP3TACE BUILDERS CROW 3193 VEMARIDDY RUT"" 277 ro- 3A2 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 265.E 201E CONTEMVORAW 0.3a 202012 30 L1950D0 31965B KIM YOON IT At 2021 S HASH DAWpA 2713351 S51GROOMSRDCLIFTONPARKNYIA311%1 RANCH I.15 20M 1231 S31S000 17148 FRICKE iHOMgS 1W1 957 BOYLE K05EPH 277E1 IS 5 ROYAL OAK DR CLIFTON PAW NY Z524 t919 COLONIAL 051 202101 t3 SEES W0 S140.55 MCDONALD SWAN Z42t 4350 COWARD AMLLIAMI 27A.S 236 A EVERGREEN AVE CLARION PARK NY 22M 190 RAISED RANCH 059 IEWTC120 5315000 4M199 BOROB WENDYc pAVrp 2W1 5195 SHAWESMICHAELTHDIMAS 277,7343 9 MAJORCA LN CLFTONPARK NY 2660 1%A RAISED NCH 054 2021012E 5212000 70 MONAHAN MMESI.LONAHAN RUTH I071 S267 REGISTRY PROPEA71E5 LLC 277203S 14 CARLSONWAV GLIFTON OAW NY 2n6 20T3 COLOHI 0Y M10211 SS375OO 41934L7 FARIELIO AILE 2Q.1 563E FIYHN KfNN 27a 1172 Z71 1APPRD CLIFKONPARIINY I" 198E CONTEMPORARY O.B8 2021 W 11 S3A0000 S14131 VORSMEIMGECIRGE zoos 1 MOLESKY FALLR 2772a318 tZ BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2588 2010 CONTEMPORARY 347 2W1.0519 49a000 51924.E AN C14ULWAN 2021 7744 LEI YLIE 27710-220 1 1 GUADALURE PASS CLIFTON PAR: NY T137 1966 RANCH 042 N021-03 US 306,DID 15746 NGEAT GINAM ZW1 9913 BERG KIMBERLY 277.31613E 7 TAYMOR TRL CLIFTON PARK NY 101% 200E MANSION 471 2011 W 15 S2.=000 S19C 51 ALOUSCH LLC 1021 7 SCHAFFENJOHNE 27714 J 3A 6 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2564 1177 COLONIAL aS3 20210318 5327, 500 S12773 SHERIDAN IAMESG I021 lima WES KHWAµ2771.E 43 9 MAIpRCA LN CUFTON PARK NY 26W 19M RAPADRANCH 0S4 2021 oL 5310. Coo 5116, SJ REGISTRY PROPERTIES LLC 2W1 15619 CHYLWN 270922 8 FALLENTREE LN CLIfTON PARK NY 2161 1996 COLONIAL 277 202N 05 63Row 16752 CROSSADAM 2W1 IA/91 80NO ILEONID 2785245 AL 5 N4TRP CLIFTON PARK NY 17A 1970 RAISEDIRANCH 04, 20"1 o419 WA 000 515045 HAKIME SHAFl1ALA.4 2021 14635 S'ALESALUSON 27773.27 6 MAJORCA LN CILFTON PARK NY 2660 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.56 2C21-0507 3BQCW 142 B6 OROGNA STEPHENM Z0.1 19455 MARRA STEPHEN 2837 14 4T WSJIT ILLiFTDN PARK NY 1564 19f2 TOVAWOlJ6E 009 7W105i7 S270 tKD0 317241 SKINNER MARkG 2@I 19365 ZNAN NLA 2a37113 SS HIFSLAURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY IS% 1992 7OWNHOUSE 01 M-OS.12 5290000 SIBS.19 MOORE SPA DL BY VIRGINIA E 2W1 17M BARROWS KAREN NI 27712140 2 LIULCCI CLIFTON P"K NY 16M 19" COLONIAL QAI 1W1-D512 S26ZCW JI JI 1 SMITH GEDRGE9 2021 lull AWE UTTI 1AYNE 2771513 3 DOATESC7 CLIFTON PARK NY 1973 15W RANCH 069 20¢T 05.21 265 COO SHJI 31 GRAHAM IHELEN5 2021 23713 ROCHELEAU JOSEPN 17T I. 5.1 12 ROSEMARY CT CLTION PARKNY 2916 2W6 COLONIAL 068 2Wt 05 24 9.900 119544 PANT TEAASR 2021 20014 BAC7AWARAJNM 27T8.132 SC ROVAL OAK DR CLI"ON PARK NY 2108 1979 COLONIAL 046 7W10607 17QW0 115365 HENNIGANGFPALD 2W1 22137 PETELLMATTHEWPATPICK 2771.451 12 KATHIE NE TER CLfiON PAflIL 231E 1955 RANCH 074 202106 11 PW D00 S11202 VCPELAK WILL AM 2021 22164 WALKER KNIY 27613-S- 5 5 RARA LN CLJFTONPAR4 NV 2536 20W CONTEMPORARY 035 20210611 f431,5W 517p t5 FKAIRKE SHDUHA 102t 2157E VAN AUREN CHPoSTOPHERR 283.12 A 1 29 WESTBURYCI CLIFTON PARK NY 2232 INKS COLONIAL 106 2021062.E 325000 S14561 TAEACY RICHARD 2021 22BB6 BU7TA5AD 277.11. 5-9 9 ROSEMARY (7 CLIFTON PARK NY 2400 19M COLONIAL 0.62 ZW 0624 4W000 516667 Mh5TE1tiONTNOMASIAMES 1 23327 LUANPINGSHAN 2775110 21KRIGSWOODDRCLIFTONPARKNY22331%I COLONIAL 049 2021.0628 S39S000 517609 KPEITSEK HOWARD M21 2]AI WELCHMICHAEL 25951-I9 4 EVEWAEENAVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1937 1970 RANCH 07. 20210,20 1795 OX 75230 MORGAN STEVEN I 2W74 SMITH SHEILA 2a31T.1, 3 IT 1, 15 SKY LN CLIITON PARK NY 2121 2W5 COLONIAL 0.3E 2021 07OZ 4SIG000 S219SA FERNBACKERJOHN 2021 14M DE LA PLAINTE RDDGWEQ LDPE2NE Z7 WESTBUI " CLIGTON PARK NY 2531 1991 COL ONAL 05 202101.06 1431 WO S163U LAIACONA ANTHONY W21 25317 PAKOS2 ERIK 27711217 16CASABLANCACTCLIFTONPARKNY16351965RANCH052021-O7-p9 53SO OW S21407 TRONCO JOSEPH 2WI Z$606 RAYBALL MEGAN 1TT 11 J42 28 VALENCLA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2511 1%7 COLONIAL 06 Z0210]-13 32S000 S12a92 CRAODOCKIONATHIAN ZW 24510 KOUMOUPDAS JASON 2 2t6 61 BALSAM WAY CMFION PARK NY 3100 2C10 CONTEMPORARY 041 1 11 15 S566000 5182.58 SHI TANRRING M21 TANS ARAVAPALLIMANOI 3 a 4 783847E 1CWOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY IW 1991 TOWNHOUSE 01 2W1 C720 SZ15.ODO 5101.99 HOLMES AIDTH 2011 29M KHAULY FRESHTEH 18.E- 1-15.14 232 MOERO CLIFTON PARK NY 3004 2006 CONTEMPORARY a 2W117M AS"M WE CHRZAN MICHAEL 2W7 27210 LICONG 2771A 16 7 VALENCµLN CLIFTONPARKNY 1970 1968 RANCH 048 1W 1 0730 S295O70 115445 ILAWADI FREDWA3ID If 3034 NESTUR MARGARET 277821E 5 KASHMIR TER Cl3F TON PARK NY i716 1%9 RAISEDRANCH 056 2WC8Q 52SSWU 171% SWEET DONNA Z021 28232 SALAS AAIO 27720-110 l4 ARROR LN CLIFTONPARK NY 166E 1966 CONTEMPORARY 0.5 A210603 SEO 000 19464 LOP USTI DANIEL 2021 291SA STOLL ALI$ON 278.13A IS 13 PWMERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2056 19% COLONAL 049 20210 OR 3380Doo 18165 ELMI ABOULKADR 2021 29916 SHOYYLEE90UAZ NKA FAIGAL 28371-5 39 WESTBLI'Y CT CC TON PARK NY I- t992 RANCH 014 at32T 0610 252000 S2561H MARVIN STEVEN 2C21 32611 ALKINaURGH CHAUNTELLE 2771.2.40 2C BARCELONA OR CLIFTON 11. NY 107C 1965 COLONIAL 05 202HLe 17 390 ODD 318541 OCCNNOR MATTHEW ZW1 31959 STANSFIELO µCOB 277122-11 21 EVEPGAFENAYE CLIFTON PARK NY 1782 196A PAISEDRANCH 049 202t-0A 24 317 S00 519.E Ta TERNGBOH HENG 2021 3" WIAVFREOAINIEL 2777.2,55 11 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2152 1965 P.AISEDRANCH 0.46 2N2 0624 SAOODC 514715 MARCIL SHEILA 1021 0621 FARIUNGTON1fFFREY 277.3.5 368 MDE RD CLIFTON PARK NY SIAE1 1957 COLONt4L 2 2W DE IS 610 OX 524919 CWSARXLI DANICI 2Q21 3123E ROMANOWSKI STEVEN 27714116 7 BARNEY RD CLIP ION PARK NY Z455 1968 COLONIAL 057 Ml 0112T S350 OW S1/257 STONE MARILYN 2021 3n7 AGFIA HASEEB 11 VALENCIA LN CLIF TON PARK NY 1501 19(p COLONIAL 0.4E 2WT0W 06 4375OX 5149.94 RALPH BETH. 2O21 34227 BARNES PATIN Z77141-a 2795.E-I-S 5 PUTNAM CT HALFMDOAI NY 1214 1S% TOWT4HOLISE 001 2021.0510 S21a000 17N 57 PATNAIXX MELI SSA 2021 3528.E CASEYWILLIAM 2777272 19 CASABLANCA CT CC ON PARK NY 2I10 1565 COLONIAL 055 202109-30 319/11/ Si.1242 HARDINGMMES 2WI 4076T MAF3ETT MATTHEW 2n 12.252 10 TLA{P TER CLIFtCNPAW.NY 1W 19N RAISED PAINCH 0. 202 10.14 3325.000 519531 TRUAK KNSTEN 2W1 ALI RENVtIMA FUKING 27a 119 I FPANKIE LN CUFTON PARK NY 3IX III RAISED RANCH 092 204110.27 S339.900 S10B TC PIPINOPAUL M21 4033.E KHANMUHAMMAD 277356 6 T05KINELNCLIFTONPARKNY33T9199.E COLONAL 103202!1C 29 6SOCW t9561 SHARIFFANdNEEB 2W1 431154 OLENTANA MICHELE 2789 1.19 49 PINE TREE PL CLIFTON PARK NY ISA 1569 RAISED RANCH 039 202111d4 SS25.OW JIM 91 DICE THOMAS 2WI 42010 OSBORN IOSEPH I111Z 269 3A iRJOEN CT CLIPTON PARK NY 2111 I%d COLONIAL 037 20211115 SAS 000 SIM90 CICSANU WTALIE 2WI 43315 SINGH IANPREET 277. 113-i S2 BARNEY RD CLIFtON PARK NY 16W 19% RANCH 048 20211E22 343000 120663 STRINGER ARTHUR 2021 42%7 CRACKER R08ERT 283 JL435 36 WOODSIDE DR ILIFTON PARK NY 1064 W92 RANCH 012 2P:i 1209 245000 23026 LANDRKSAN LINOA 2021 46320 WHRE SUSAN 27993.2I 2 AUTNAM [T HAlFMOOAi NY 1281 $986 TOWHOVSE 001 292I 7214 5212000 516550 P NAGLIEq JOSS H2W146%3 LOSON JENNFER 105 AVWAGF 127II $ 3aa.55a Appendix 54 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 217.11-3-27 4S VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1967 COLONIAL 0.49 2017-01,07 283,500 278.9-2-70 54 SONAT RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2205 1989 COLONIAL 0.49 2017-01-13 334000 278.9 2-58 10 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1585 1986 COLONIAL 0.47 2017-05-12 267,800 278.13-2-1 2 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1935 1986 COLONIAL G-85 2017-05-25 258,DW 277.7-2-80 16 SECADA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1964 COLONIAL 0A9 2017-05-12 S290,000 277.7-2-73 20 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1965 COLONIAL 0.49 2017-06-22 329,5W 277.11-1-54 31 SECADA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1964 COLONIAL 0.42 2017-06-23 S2W,000 277.7-2-45 10 BARCELONA OR CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1965 COLONIAL 0.47 2017.06-29 S288,000 278.9-2-47 63 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2270 1986 COLONIAL 0.48 2D17-G7-03 315,000 278.9-2-45 ' 67 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2308 1986 COLONIAL 0.47 2017-07.14 288,500 278.9-2-23 44 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2006 1986 COLONIAL 061 2017-07-21 267.500 Z83.12-4-26 6 SKY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2816 1994 COLONIAL OA7 2017-07-25 S379,9M 277.14-1-9 13 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2991 1968 COLONIAL 0,48 2017-08-03 322,000 278.17-2-33 40 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1897 1987 COLONIAL 0.54 2017-08-10 303.000 278.13-3-16.1 4 ROOSEVELT CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2137 1997 COLONIAL 0.46 2017-08-28 S310,000 277.11-3-42 28 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2S21 1%7 COLONIAL 0.6 2017-09-05 S262.5W 278.17-2-13 31 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1897 1987 COLONIAL 0.85 2017-09-22 319.000 277.7-4-38 6 RYAN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2782 2005 COLONIAL 0.51 2017-10-27 395,000 278.9-2-13 64 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2343 1987 COLONIAL 0.61 2017-11-15 320.000 278.13-3-4 7 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2137 1987 COLONIAL 0.65 2017-11-21 319.900 279.13-3-29 6 WILDBERRY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2853 2006 COLONIAL 0.59 2017-12-04 463,000 M.12-1-36 10 LILAC CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1990 1965 COLONIAL 0.62 2017-12-11 233,000 277.8-2-40 8 CRANBERRY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1874 1986 COLONIAL 0.62 2017-12-29 267.000 283.12.4-36 19 SKY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2626 1" COLONIAL 0.47 2018-01.22 39S.0W 277.12-2-54 9 TULIP TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1407 1970 COLONIAL 0.49 2018-01-23 27MOD0 278.13-4-3 5 PRIMERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2616 1997 COLONIAL 0A7 2018-02-20 362,SW 278.9-2-76 58 ESOFUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2123 1986 COLONIAL 0.92 2018-02-22 309,900 277.11-3-27 45 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1967 COLONIAL 0.48 2018-03-09 30D,000 277,8-1-2 3 GREENFIELD CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2196 1987 COLONIAL 0.46 2018-04-27 S349,00D 278.9-2-43.1 78 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2503 1987 COLONIAL 0.9 2018-04-27 325.000 278,17-3-24 20 DENNIS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2274 20D7 COLONIAL 0.33 2018-05.09 S345,000 278.17-2-11 27 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2086 1987 COLONIAL 0.61 2018.06-29 5355,0D0 278.17-2-11 27 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2086 1997 COLONIAL 0.61 2018-06-29 S355,DOD 277AI-3-24 51 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1968 COLONIAL 0.72 2018-07 03 S290,0W 277.7-2-57 15 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1966 COLONIAL 0.52 2018-07-12 28f1,OM 278.13-3-12 1 ROOSEVELTCT CLIFTON PARK NY 1897 1987 COLONIAL 0.64 2018.07-13 295,000 277A0-2-4 8 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1967 COLONIAL 0,46 2018-07.13 319,000 278-17-2-28 18 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2014 1987 COLONIAL 0.62 2018-08-03 245,000 283.12-4-21 25 WESTBURYCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2668 1992 COLONIAL 0.46 2018-08-16 360,000 2789-2-44 69 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1845 1987 COLONIAL 0.48 2018-08-17 275,000 278.13-4-14 15 PRIMERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 3014 1996 COLONIAL 0.51 2018-08-17 1403000 240.17-2-8 15 IVY CT MALTA NY 2135 20D9 COLONIAL 0.2 2018-08-29 S359,DDD 249.20-1-9 2 ACORN GRV CLIFTON PARK NY 2652 1970 COLONIAL 0.56 2018-08-30 S284,50D 278,13-4-13 17 PRIMERCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2815 2W3 COLONIAL 046 Z018-09-17 390.00D 278.9-2-40 72 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2343 1987 COLONIAL 0.45 2018-09-26 320.OW 277,7-2-75 16 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1965 COLONIAL 067 2018-12-27 S265,400 46 AVERAGE 1/1/2018 316,117 MEDIAN 1/l/2018 312.500 122.73 TRILLER DEVELOPMENT LLC 2017 2096 DRESCHFRJUSTIN 149.66 CHIECOPHILIP 2017 1939 RASHFORDTRACY S168.96 MARTIN MICHAEL 2017 15124 GOULD JUSTIN 133.33 PETERS ERICA 2017 17063 AUDI RYAN ST25.54 CASFALDO iOSEPH 2O17 20365 ROMERO IASON S130.70 POKORNY RICHARD 2017 19987 ORTIZ MARTIN 121.21 FITZGERALDJAMFS 2017 22133 DEMARCOJOSEPH 124.68 OSULLIVAN JOAN 2077 21510 OBRIEN £VAN 138.77 CREG;N BRIAN 2017 21757 BHANDARU SHWETA S125A0 GJLLOOLEY MICHAEL 2017 22911 MACDONALDANDREW S133.35 MCCLELLANDDAVID 2017 23012 LEEKEVIN 134.91 BARBOURSCOTT 2017 24659 KILLIANCHRISTOPHER 197.66 BINSFELDTHOMAS 2017 25275 TOTAROROBERT 159.73 CIVAY DENIZ 2017 25254 LEE MICHAEL 145.06 STEWART PETER 2017 27367 DIACETISCHRISTOPH€R 104.13 AULENBACHMARIE 2017 28694 CRADDOCKJONATHAN 168.16 JACKSONPAUL 2017 30910 OUIMETANDREW 141.98 DUERR ERICH 2O17 37097 TEDESCO LINDSAY 136.58 HOOSEGUY 2017 38603 MORICKJOSHUA 749.70 VOLK KEVIN 2017 37242 HEGENER STEPHEN S162.29 KUHNERDEAN 2017 38782 SMITH MARK S117.68 LONGABACHPAUL 2017 39591 STRAITCOURTNEY 142.48 LAFLECHEBARBARA 2018 797 JETTEDANIEL 150.42 HANSON MICHAEL 2018 3517 HERMAN MICHAEL 191,90 SALE] VIKTAR 2018 4222 HERMAN ADAM 138.57 LENANE MICHAEL 2018 6051 REES WILLIAM 145.97 BALBONI RICHARD 2018 6452 MANEY RICHARD 129.87 DRESCHERJUSTIN 2018 10434 LIZHIKIA 158.93 BLACKBURN GREGG 2018 12618 MATZKIN BETH ANNE 1129.84 CASEY ROBERT L CASEY ILEANA 2018 13033 MARTINGANO MATTHEW S1S3.72 BOOTHPUR UDAYA KUMAR 2018 15218 SCULLY EDWARD 170.18 HOLCOMB ADAM 2018 20699 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 170.18 WEICHERT WORKFORCE MOBILITY INC 2018 20700 SMITH PATRICK 115,03 LYNCH RICHARD 2018 20392 GRAY ERIC 111.07 HOTCHKISS LEONARD 2018 21486 FRAZIER AMBER 155.51 WILLIAMSJOHN 2018 23077 BURROUGHSMATTHEW 126. 54 PELISH JEANNINE 2019 20974 HASSFNPFLUG KURT 121.65 DETHORNE SANDRA 2018 24051 MURPHY BENJAMIN 134.93 SCHUHLFTHOMAS 2018 25860 GREEN SAMUEL BRETT 149.05 VEGA RICHARD 2018 25Wl KNAPP ARTHUR 13271 LAIYUNZHU 2018 25761 HAVALCHAKGREGORY S168.15 FORTIN DONNA 2018 26818 FATTORUSO FRANK 1107.28 BROOKS PETER 2018 29089 MASON DOUGLAS 1138.54 SHARMA SANJAI 2018 34300 BLOM ROGIER 136.SB THOMPSON GREGORY 2018 30720 LOLIK AMANDA 114,89 BOSSOLA NEIL 2018 38196 BHATTI PRICELLA Appendix 55 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 218.9-2-IA 57 SONAT RO CLIFTON PARK NY 2205 1989 COLONIAL 0.51 2020-01-06 330,000 28112-4-27 8 SKY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2152 1995 COLONIAL 0.5 2020-01-24 S35300 277.14-3-11 4 CHEVIOTCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2690 1991 COLONIAL 0.61 2020-01-27 361,S00 277,11-3-40 37 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1967 COLONIAL GAS 2DW-04-OB 334,9DO 277.-3-98 341 MOE RD CLIFTON PARK NY 25% 1991 COLONIAL 1.37 2020-04-15 S380,0DO 283.12-4-2 11 WILSHIRE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2878 i991 COLONIAL 0.61 2020-04-27 S395,000 277.-3-49 15 CHEVIOTCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2902 1992 COLONIAL OV 2020-05-11 S41QODD 278.-1-33.3 256 LAPP RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2528 1986 COLONIAL 0.95 2020-05-29 334,000 277.14-1-26 3 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2529 1968 COLONIAL 0.56 2020-07-10 300,000 277.8-2-37 1 CRANBERRY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1837 1985 COLONIAL 0.52 2020-08-04 319,500 278.9-2-14 62 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2343 1987 COLONIAL 0.63 2020-OB-14 325,000 283.12.4-23 10 WILSHIRE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2925 1991 COLONIAL 0.47 2020-08-21 435,OW 27ZU 3-9 8 CHEMOTCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2999 1998 COLONIAL 0.56 2020-09.25 424,900 278.17-3-13 S DENNIS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2265 79% COLONIAL 0.82 2020-09-30 S415,000 260.19-2-42 TO GREENFIELDCT HALFMOON NY 2004 2011 COLONIAL 0.68 2020-10-09 S405,0W 277.7-3-25 12 MAJORCA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2334 1968 COLONIAL 0.59 2020-10-14 53S0,0W 276.13-2-9 23 ESOPUS DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2006 1986 COLONIAL 0.56 2020-10-14 340,000 278.9-2-50 7 PUTNAM LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2123 1986 COLONIAL 0.57 2020-10-16 32Q000 277.15-4-2 318 MOE RD CLIFTON PARK NY 3256 2014 COLONIAL 1.18 2020-11-19 500,000 240.17-2-8 15 IVY CT MALTA NY 213S 2009 COLONIAL 0.2 2020-11-24 J415,000 277.8-1-13 1 ROYAL OAK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2601 1978 COLONIAL 0.53 Z020-71-30 339,900 278.9-2-48 61 ESOPUS OR CLIFTON PARK NY 1831 1986 COLONIAL 0.47 202D-12.00 275,OW 277.8-1-15 5 ROYAL OAK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2524 1979 COLONIAL 0.51 2021-01-13 355,000 277.20-3-S 14 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2776 2013 COLONIAL 0.44 2021.02-11 S537,500 277.14-1-34 6 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2564 1977 COLONIAL 0.53 2021-03-18 S327,S00 278.9-2-2 8 FALLENTREE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2167 1986 COLONIAL 2.17 2021-04-05 362,000 277A2-1-40 2 LILAC CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1620 1966 COLONIAL 0.41 2021-05-12 267,000 277.11-5.6 12 ROSEMARY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2916 2006 COLONIAL 0.69 2021-05-24 569,90D 277.E-1-32 20 ROYAL OAK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2408 1979 COLONIAL 0.46 2021-06-07 370.000 283.12-4-1 29 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2232 1990 COLONIAL 1.06 2021-06-23 325,000 277.11-5-9 9 ROSEMARY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 240D 1980 COLONIAL 0.82 2021-06-24 S40Qp00 277$-1 10 21 KINGSWOOD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2233 1981 COLONIAL 0.49 2021-06-28 395,000 283.11-1-3 25 SKY LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2323 2005 COLONIAL 0.33 2021-07-02 SlQ0D0 283.12-4-22 27 WESFBURYCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2631 1991 COLONIAL 0.5 2021-07-06 S431,000 277.11-3-42 28 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2521 1967 COLONIAL 0.6 M21-07-12 325,W0 278.13-4.15 13 PRIMER CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2058 19% COLONIAL 049 2021-DB-09 38Q000 277.7-2-40 20 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2070 1965 COLONIAL 0.5 2021-08-17 390,000 277--3-5 365 MOE RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2448 1957 COLONIAL 2 2021-08-25 610,000 277.14-1-16. 7 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2455 1969 COLONIAL 0.57 2G21-08-27 S350.000 277-14-1-8 I VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2501 1969 COLONIAL 0.48 2021-09-08 375,000 2777-2-79 19 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2310 1965 COLONIAL 0.55 2021-09-30 S329,W0 277.-3.66 6 TOWLINE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3319 1999 COLONIAL 1.03 2021-10-29 65Q000 277.12-2.69 34 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2111 1966 COLONIAL 0.37 2021-11-15 365,000 43 AVERAGE 12/l/2020 388,060 MEDIAN 12/1/2020 536s non 149.66 HARTUNIAN EDWARD 2020 4588 CARSTENSEN POUL S164.03 D'AGATI A K A DOWER REBECCA P 2020 4958 NOURI MOHAMMAD S134.39 BOWLES RICHARD 2020 3537 NAGARE ROHAN 144.98 BLENDOWSKI KEITH C 2020 9861 OSTROWSKI CAITLIN JEANETTE S146.38 KONEY BRENT P 2020 9669 GIROL MICHAEL R S137.25 WILD €MILY 8 2020 10439 KRAUSE DUSTIN J 141.28 BALLANTYNECHRISTIAN 2020 12490 WALPOLE DENNIS 132.12 KIMBALL KENNETH J 2020 13404 WILSON DAVID S118.62 BROWNELL ALAN C D 2020 18138 HUTCHINS MICHELLE R 173.92 MOORE MATTHEW W 2021 11229 RAGONE DEREK S138.71 BALDWIN ROBERT R 2020 21983 ROGERS EDWARD F. III S148.72 BOBROW SCOTT E 202D 2SO59 EGERTON ANDREW 1 1141.69 CLOHERTY MICHAEL PATRICK 2020 26259 DUBLEA SORIN 183 22 MILLER ROBERT K 2020 27461 MCGEE DONNA RAE S202.10 SARADJERIC PONAYO 2020 33193 SMITH JUSTIN E S149.96 SVEDIN MATTHEW 2020 28471 TRIPPANY DIANE M 169.49 01EARY JOSHUA E 2020 28220 MURPHY JAMES 150.73 KAUFMANN BARRY A 2D21 1131 TISAI ERIC 153.56 BETANCOURT LEDESMA ALEJANDRO 2020 34351 POPAL QUDUS ABDUL 194.38 FATTORUSO FRANK A 2020 37528 THOMPSON MARK 130.68 TREIBER ROCHELLE V 2020 33920 FARNSWORTH NATHAMEL 150.19 WENGJIALIANG 2020 37756 MISHCHENKOANTON 140.65 MCDONALD BRIAN 2021 4950 COWARD WILLIAM J 193.62 FARIELLO JULIE 2021 5632 FLYNN KEVIN 127.73 SHERIDAN JAMES G 2021 11868 ZAREEN KHWAJA 167.52 GROSS ADAM 2021 14491 BONDARI LEONID 164.81 SMITH GEORGE B 2021 18217 AVVEDUTI LAYNE S195.44 PAN DYATEJASR 2021 20084 BACTAWARANDRE 153.65 HENNIGAN GERALD 2021 22337 PETFLL MATTHEW PATRICK S145.61 TREACYRICHARD 2021 22886 BUTTASAD 166.67 MASTERSON THOMAS JAMES 2021 23327 LUAN PINGSHAN 176.89 KREITSEK HOWARD 2G21 23361 WELCH MICHAEL 219.54 FERNBACKER JOHN 2021 24575 DE LA FUENTE RODGRIGO LOPEZ NE 163.82 LAIACONA ANTHONY M 25317 PAKOSZ ERIK 128.92 CRADDOCK JONATHAN 2021 24W KOUMOURDAS JASON 184.65 ELMI ASDULKAUIR 2021 29916 SHOYWEEB QUAZI NKA FAIGAL 188.41 OCONNORMATTHEW 2021 31959 STANSFIELDJACOR 5249.18 CRISAFULU DANIEL 2D21 31232 ROMANOWSKI STEVEN 574257 STONE MARILYN 2021 32207 AGHA HASEES 149.94 RALPH BETH 2O21 34227 BARNESJUSTIN 14242 HARD€NGJAMES 2021 40761 MARSETT MATTHEW 195,84 SHARIFF ANDALEEB 2021 43854 QUINTANA MICHELE S17290 CUBANU VITALI€ 2021 43315 SINGH JANPREET Appendix 56 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277,20-4-15 45 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 297€ 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2017-03-24 S485,248 163.33 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 10541277.20.4-12 41 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2981 2016 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2017-04-18 456,988 153.30 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 12365 BOEHRINGEREUGENE 277.20-3-18 22 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2588 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2017-05-24 450,0W 173.88 COCHISTIMOTHY 2017 DUDI YADI REDDY 277.20-3-19 24 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2716 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-D6-21 435,000 160.04 HWANG WONTAE 17271 ANCHULWAN 277,8-1-12 2 ROYAt OAK DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2141 1986 CONTEMPORARY 0.5 2017-D5-28 35Z500 164.64 KNAPP DONN 2617 2017 21852 SOHN DONG KYUN 277.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2017-06-30 3479,9W 180.89 HUH YUN JUN 2017 21614 AIZAWA HIROKAZU 277.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0,38 2017-06-30 479,900 1B0.89 STONE FINANCING LLC 2017 24018 STONE FINANCING LLC 277,16-3-18 4 LORRAINECT CLIFTON PARK NY 3236 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2017-07-28 S504,260 155-83 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 24019 24024 KIM YOON HAE 278,13-3-26 6 ROOSEVELT CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2523 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.85 2017 08-24 86,000 S34.09 STEWART PETER 2017 HOLLINGSWORTH ANDRE 277.20-3-6 16 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2490 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.44 2017-11-07 410,000 164.66 YOON SUNG GI 27193 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 278.13-3-26 6 ROOSEVELT CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2523 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.85 2018-03-22 419,000 166.07 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 2017 2018 36554 9291 LEE TAEJEONG 277.16-3-4 105 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3108 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0A1 2018-04-26 4%435 159.73 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 17016 LINDQUIST DENNIS 277,20-4-32 62 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2800 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2018-05-15 498.734 178.12 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 14344 NGUYEN DANG FERRARO LINDSAY277.20-4.39 38 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3203 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2018-06-12 467,719 S146.03 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 17392 ARISOHN MATTHEW278.13-5-11 278.13-3-7 6 FRANKIE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2948 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2018-06-25 450,000 158,01 LEXA MICHAEL 2018 19509 AGARWAL MONICA 277.20-1-9 13 LINCOLN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1585 1987 CONTEMPORARY 0.51 2018-08-30 291,500 183.91 TEMPER THOMAS 2D18 27644 BROSSEAU PETER 27720-3-19 15 24 ARBOR LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1966 1986 CONTEMPORARY 045 2018-09-27 2%,000 147.51 JUPIN ANDREW 2018 30339 JOHNSON ALTHEA 277.75-4-5 324 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2718 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2018-10-09 S446,500 164.28 SOHN DOING KYUN 2018 3D397 CHANG KWANHO 277,20-4 11 39 MOE RD BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2188 2014 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 Z018-10-31 361,500 165.22 PRORSUS REAL ESTATE LLC 2018 34758 TIONGSON RIAMAR MADRIDCLIFTONPARKNY32112018CONTEMPORARY0.35 2019 11-30 531,299 165.46 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 35753 PENGJIANWFI20AVERAGE1/l/2018 419,624 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 450,000 277.-3-61 3 TOWLINE LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3366 2000 CONTEMPORARY 1,07 2020.05-11 492,000 146.17 FRONTERA RICHARD 2020 11490 WEINSTEIN 1USIIN M277.16-3-12 89 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3642 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2020-06-15 677,000 185.89 CROSS MATTHEW W 2020 17846 DECKER DAVID27T16-3-5 103 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 310D 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.52 2020-10-06 S511,000 164,84 RIVERA III JUAN I 2021 9214 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC277.16-3-5 277.16-3-3 103 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3100 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.52 2020-10-06 511,00D 164.84 RAC CLOSING SERVICES LLC 2021 9215 HILDERBRAND JOSHUA107BALSAMWAYCLIFTONPARKNY25282019CONTEMPORARY0.42 2020-10-14 450,000 178.01 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP LLC 2020 30227 SERIDI MOUAD277.20 4.30 66 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2856 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.4 2020-11-17 W,000 168.07 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 5068 MUPPANDAM SYAMALA277.16-3-14 85 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2611 2019 CONTEMPORARY 0.39 2020-11-19 474.980 181.91 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 4370 MILLEVILLE BRYCE WILLIAM27T20-4-32 62 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY Z80D 2017 CONTEMPORARY 0.46 2WO-11-20 498,000 177.86 FERRARO LINDSAY C 20M 33297 PHILIP VICTOR277.2D-3-12 24 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2649 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2020-11-23 530,000 200.08 PRICE DAVID 2020 33624 BROWN ADAM277,20-3-35 9 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2487 2X8 CONTEMPORARY 0,37 2020-12-11 555.000 223,16 BROWN DANIEL 2020 36943 CUSTER CLYDE M277.20-4-20 55 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2616 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2020-12-18 474,248 181.29 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 5264 ZHENGZHENGLI277.20-4-25 65 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2836 2020 CONTEMPORARY 0.42 2020-12-22 482,249 170.05 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2021 3193 VEMAREDDY RUTHVIK277.20-3-42 11 CARLSON WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2653 2012 CONTEMPORARY 0.38 2020-12-30 495,000 186.58 KIM YOON HAE 2.021 965 NASH DAVIDA278.-1-17.2 271 LAPP R CLIFTON PARK NY 2406 1989 CONTEMPORARY 0.88 2021-02-11 340,000 141.31 VORSHEIM GEORGE 2021 8546 MOLFSKY PAUL R277.20-3-18 22 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 25M 2010 CONTEMPORARY 0.41 2021-02-19 498,000 192.43 AN CHULWAN 2021 7744278.13-5-5 35 KARA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2536 2002 CONTEMPORARY 0.35 2021-06-11 431,500 170.15 ROURKE SHEILAH A 2021 21572 LEI YVE VAN BUREN CHRISTOP"ER R277A6-3-16 81 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 3100 2018 CONTEMPORARY 0.43 2021-07 15 566,000 182.58 SHI YANXIANG 2021 26695 ARAVAPALLI MANOJ283,-1-16.14 252 MOE RD CLIFTON PARK NY 3004 20D6 CONTEMPORARY 4.06 2021-07-26 650000 216.38 CHRZAN MICHAEL 2021 27218 LI CONG277.20-1-10 14 ARBOR LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1668 1986 CONTEMPORARY 0.S 2021-08-03 325,000 194.84 LOPRESTI DANIEL 2021 29754 STOLL ALISON19AVERAGE12/l/2020 496.894 Appendix 57 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 277.12.2-17 49 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2361 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.42 2017-01.30 193.829 82.10 KENT STEPHEN 2017 3973277.12-i•63 19 ACORN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1950 1973 RAISED RANCH 0.46 2017-02-01 S260,OW 133.33 CASSELLA GREGORY 2017 3707 HILL LAUREN 277.11-1-E1) 5 PALO ALTO CLIFTON PARK NY 2612 1965 RAISED RANCH 0.51 2017-04-14 S268,000 102.60 PAYNEADAM 2017 12116 LIUZZI ARIANA 277.T2-2-72 7 PINE TREE PL CLIFTON PARK NY 1674 1967 RAISED RANCH 0,44 2017-04-21 MOOO S143.37 HUBA BRIAN 2017 14855 WATKINSTOBY 27711 1.57 13 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2554 1967 RAISED RANCH OA3 2017-DB-14 S258,OD0 101.02 CURLEY DENNIS 2017 26283 MARX ROBERT ZALEWSKI KAILA2789- €-54 23 TEAKWOOD DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1682 19% RAISED RANCH 0.46 2D17-06-17 274000 1160.52 PAULI RICHARD 2017 26456 POLAK MARIAN277,12.2-10 20 SYLVAN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1674 1965 RAISED RANCH 0.49 2017-08-31 274,900 164,22 BINDER MICHAEL 2017 28246 VANALSTYNE MARK277.14-1-14 28 VALDEPENAS LN CLIFTON PARK NY 3012 1969 RAISED RANCH 066 2017-09-05 290.000 19628 HURLEY DAVID 2Q17 28579 ZHOU ZUN RONG277.12.2.31 21 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1782 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.43 2017-09-2D M100 157.18 HARPER MARY PATRICIA AKA MA 2017 30140 TERNG BOH HENG2785-2-39 13 IVY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1648 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.55 2017-10-05 259000 57.16 NIEBUHR NKA BARSHIED KATHLEEN 2017 33060 JOHNSON PHILIP2795-2-34 14 IVY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1934 1972 RAISED RANCH OAS 2017-10.31 S259000 133,92 TOUCHERJOHN 2017 35235 CROWDERTHERESA277.14-1-10 W VALDEPENAS LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2766 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.87 M17-11-30 275,0DO 99.42 BOBFAR DAVID 2017 38683 AMBROSE DERRICKZ77.11-2.18 36 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2602 1967 RAISED RANCH 0.52 2017-12-20 285.011 109.S4 TUSCH JASON 2017 40565 GILLEN GENE278.5-2-64 6 KASHMIRI TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2C09 t969 RAISED RANCH 0.47 2017-12-20 S2070D 121.30 BORAM ROBERT 2018 464 OSIERCRAIG 277-12-2-40 12 TULIP TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1930 1969 RAISED RANCH 0A 2019-03-21 S260.000 134.72 GALARNEAU KEVIN 2018 11329 ROBERTS ERIC218.5-21 10 KASHMIRITER CLIFTONPARK NY 1701 1970 RAISED RANCH 0.49 2019.04-20 S2720DO 159.91 HUALISON 2.01812654 FREEMAN BRITTANY 277.12.1-37 8 LILAC Cl CLIFTON PARK NY 1622 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.63 2018.07- Il 245,000 151.05 OLSAKOVSKY JAM ES 2018 21811 PRESCOTT JOEL 278.9-1-32 12 CLOVECT CLIFTON PARK NY 1753 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.5B 2018-07-17 S229,000 130.63 MONA RICHARD 2018 21670 CAM PtSI MATTHEW 277.12-2-89 5 SYLVAN LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2506 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.34 2018-07.25 266,000 106-06 KING CURT 2018 22601 ATTAL MUJEEB 277.12-1-14 16 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 19M 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.75 2DT8-06-03 5284,900 149,32 BOLTZJOHN 2018 25722 KIRKLANDKRISTEN 277.11-2-18 36 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2602 1967 RAISED RANCH 0.52 201E-08-31 S302,000 116.06 GILLEN GENE A AKA GENE 2018 26706 AURE JOEL 277.12-1-31 31 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2172 1966 RAISED RANCH OA3 2018-09-20 273,000 125.69 GOVE PETER 2018 28711 DEMRCK DANFYA 277.8-2-16 12 IVY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2814 1%9 RAISED RANCH 0-46 2018.09-20 255,000 190.62 HOGUE RUSSELL 2018 28930 GALLAGHER BRYAN 277.7-3-34 39 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 2660 1967 RAISED RANCH 0A6 2018-12-07 S334,000 125.56 IASKOLKA DAVID 2013 366FJ5 LIGHTCAP ANDREW 278.13-1-7 6 LOTUS CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2215 1972 RAISED RANCH 0.43 2018-12-21 21ZOD0 195.71 ZACHERMFGAN 2018 38191 JEAN -CH ARLESCHARLES 25AVERAGEi/l/2018 263,578 MEDIAN 1/l/2018 266.000 277. 8.2-13 3 KASHMIRI TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1636 1972 RAISED RANCH 0.59 2020-OS-15 30&OW S187D4 WILSON SR MICHAEL S 2020 26772 ROZYCKI ERIC S 277.12-1-31 31 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 2172 1966 RAISED RANCH 0.43 202D-07-31 130D000 S138.12 FUNARO MATTHEW J 2020 24799 KRAIJTLE JASON 277. 8.2-28 15 ELM PL CLIFTON PARK NY 3851 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.41 2W0-08-12 336,083 187.27 SAMUDRALA PAVAN K 2020 21672 JOHNSON LATIA 277.72-2-68 36 LINDEN CT CLIFTON PARK NY 7560 1965 RAISED RANCH 1.37 2020-10-19 32S.000 1208.33 SCHULTZ TIMOTHY M 2020 29622 LOBO JASON 8 278,5-2-45 48 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2676 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.41 2020-11-20 S341.000 S127.43 WALSHDENNIS) 20M 34514 WOODCOCK COREY C 277.12-1-5 22 ACORN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1612 1973 RAISED RANCH 053 2D20-12-02 S2700W 167.49 RIGNEY JUDITH B 2020 34604 ANDERSEN GREGORY JAMES 278.5.2-36 36 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 2220 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.59 2021-C1-20 315.000 141.89 BORDEN WENDY C. DAVID Z021 5195 SHARPES MICHAEL THOMAS 277. 7-3-43 9 MAJORCA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 2660 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.54 2021-01-22 21ZOM 7930 MONAHAN LAMES MONAHAN RUTH 2O21 5267 REGISTRY PROPERTIES LLC 277. 7-3-43 9 MAJORCA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 26EO 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.54 2021-04-05 S310,000 S116.54 REGISTRY PROPERTIES LLC 2021 15649 CHEN YUAN 278. 5-2-46 44 SONATRD CLIFTON PARK NY 1768 1970 RAISED RANCH 0.47 2021-04.19 S2%DW 1SOA5 HAKIMESHAFIULLAH 2D21 14635 SALESALLISON 277. 7-3-27 8 MAJORCA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 266D 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.58 M-05-07 38g0W 14286 BROGNA STEPHEN M 2021 19463 MARRA STEPHEN 277. 8-2-12 5 KASHMIRI TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1716 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.56 2021-OB-02 293,500 173.95 SWEET DONNA 2021 20232 SALAS 1ULIO 277.12-2-31 21 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1782 196E RAISED RANCH 0.43 2G21-08.24 327,9W 183.78 TFRNG BOH HENG 2021 30954 WEAVER DANIEL 277. 7-2-55 11 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 2552 1965 RAISED RANCH 0.46 2021-08-24 3SQOW 117.15 MARCIL SHEILA 2021 30921 FARRINGTON JEFFREY 277. 12-2-52 10 TULIP TER CLIFTON PARK NY 1664 1968 RAISED RANCH 0.41 2021-10-14 S325,0DO 19&31 TRUAX KRISTEN 2021 38847 KENYON KIRA FUXING 278,- 1-19 1 FRANKIELN CLIFTON PARK NY 3136 1965 RAISED RANCH 0.92 2021-10-27 339,OOD 109-10 PIPINOPAUL 2021 40333 KHAN MUHAMMAD 278. 9-1-18 49 PINE TREE PL CLIFTON PARK NY 1586 1969 RAISED RANCH 0.39 2021-11-04 1325.0D0 204.92 DICETHOMAS 2021 42010 OSBORNJOSEPH 17 AVERAGE 12/l/2020 S313,299 MEDIAN 12/1/2620 S32S.000 Appendix 58 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Z77.20-4-17 49 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2514 2016 RANCH 042 2017-01-10 S434,321 278.-1-15 464 GROOMS RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1008 1966 RANCH 1,08 2017-02-23 189,900 277.11-3-44 24 VALENCIALN CLIFTON PARK NY 1825 1967 RANCH 0.5 2017-02-28 259.000 277.11-3-44 24 VALENCIA LN CUFTON PARK NY 18ZS 1967 RANCH 0.5 2017-03-02 257,500 277.20-4-13 43 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2621 2016 RANCH 0,36 2017.03-09 S462,114 277.11-1-49 30 SECADA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1910 1964 RANCH 0.47 2017-05-26 SMSM 283.7-1-2.1 33 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1064 7992 RANCH 0.13 2017-05-30 1187.000 277,20-4-19 53 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2202 2016 RANCH 0.47 2017 06-09 429,127 277.20-3-34 11 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2205 2016 RANCH 0.37 2017-OS-12 S488.000 277,14-1-20 33 VALDEPENASLN CLIFTON PARK NY 1922 1969 RANCH 0.53 2017-06-28 SZ33.500 277.7-1-14 20 SECADA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1947 1965 RANCH 0.47 2017-08-23 289.000 277.-3-95 534 GROOMS RD CLIFTON PARK NY 10W 1952 RANCH 1.86 2017-08-2S S157,000 277.20-4-35 46 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 213U 2017 RANCH 0.54 2017-08-30 3451.025 277.-3-95 534 GROOMS RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1040 1952 RANCH 1.86 2017-09-07 115,000 283.8-4-31 28 WOODSIDE DR CL IFTON PARK NY 1160 1991 RANCH 0,1 2017-10-19 1900D0 277,11-1-49 30 SECADA DR CLFTON PARK NY 1910 1%4 RANCH 0.47 2017-12-05 S198,500 283.12-4-31 204 MOE RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1367 1997 RANCH 0.47 2018-07-20 S25Q000 277-11-3-16 40 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1923 1969 RANCH 0.55 2018-07-27 293.000 277,16-3.15 83 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 1512 2018 RANCH 0.41 2018-06-29 422,736 277.11-1.61 3 PALO ALTO CLIFTON PARK NY 1910 196S RANCH 045 2018-09-07 300,000 277.7-3-36 34 BARCELONA DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1947 1%7 RANCH 0.43 2018-09-13 W49,900 21 AVERAGE 1/1/2018 S287,9S8 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 257,500 277.7-2-78 10 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1983 1965 RANCH 0.53 2020.03-20 294,9W 277.15-1-23 23 VALDEPENAS LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1883 1969 RANCH 0,62 2020-07-02 299.000 277.11-3-12 46 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1620 1972 RANCH 0.58 2D20-08-10 5335,0W 259.5-1-8 5 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1898 1970 RANCH 074 2020-06-10 S265,000 277.76-3-8 97 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2621 2019 RANCH 0.38 2020-11-OS 465,000 277.20-4-23 61 BALSAM WAY CLIFTON PARK NY 2621 2020 RANCH 0.38 2020-12-18 465,000 277.-3-35.1 557 GROOMS RD CLIFTON PARK NY 1837 1963 RANCH 1.15 2020-12-31 315.000 277.10-2-20 11 GUADALUPE PASS CLIFTON PARK NY 1937 1966 RANCH 0.42 2021-03-03 5305.000 277.15-1.3 3 CORTESCT CLIFTON PARK NY 1973 1969 RANCH 0.69 2021-05-21 265,000 27T7-4-6.1 12 KATHERINE TER CLIFTON PARK NY 2312 1955 RANCH 0.74 2021-06-11 259,000 259.5-1-29 4 EVERGREEN AVE CLIFTON PARK NY 1937 1970 RANCH 0.72 2021-06-28 295.000 277,11-2-17 38 CASABLANCA CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1635 1965 RANCH 0.5 2021-07-09 3S0,0W 277.14-1-6 7 VALENCIA LN CLIFTON PARK NY 1910 1968 RANCH 0.48 2021.07-30 S295,0W 283.7-1-S 39 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1064 1992 RANCH 0.14 2D21-08-10 S25Z000 277.11-3-3 32 BARNEY RD CLIFTON PARK NY 166D 1966 RANCH 0.48 2021-11-22 S343,000 283.8-4-35 36 WOODSIDEDR CLIFTON PARK NY 1064 1992 RANCH 0.12 2021-12-09 245,000 16 AVERAGE 12/112020 S316,144 MEDIAN 12112a20 947 MA 17276 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 2226 MERRILL MARK S188.39 MIRABEAU PROPERTIES LLC 2017 7059 STEINAUER KR"N 141.92 LOUGH CRAIG 2017 N35 NATIONAL TRANSFER SERVICES LLC 141.10 NATIONAL TRANSFER SERVICES LLC 2017 7936 MAOSOOD ADNAN 176.31 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 9455 KIBLINGROBERT 99.74 WALLACE MARY P-TRUSTEE 2D18 7786 COMPASS DEVELOPMENT LENDING WC S175.75 DUPERROUZEL PETER 2017 16" MCCANN KAITLYN 194.88 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 19618 BOIKO THEODORE 221.32 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 2017 19051 BYRNE JOHN 121.49 ONES RONALD 2017 21027 BAILEY DYLAN 148.43 MCMULLANDERORAH 2O17 26BS3 OBRIENCHRISTOPHER 150.96 MARKIEWICZ TERRY 2017 27414 CONNORS KARYN 211.75 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2017 28431 SEGOVISPAUL S110.58 CHARBONNEAU VIRGINIA 2017 31806 POGODA ASSOCIATES LLC 163.79 DELUCCIA ROBERT 2017 33548 PUTNAM CODY 103.93 COMPASS DEVELOPMENT LENDINGILL 2018 7788 INTERSTATE INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LLC 18288 PLEASE SEE ATTACHED 2019 21980 WALSH MEGHAN 5752. 37 O'CONNOLL BETTY 2018 23094 WOLFERT E BRUCE 279, 59 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2018 267% ROTONDO RONALD 157, 07 HAGGERTY PATRICK 2018 28378 ROBINSON JOLENE S128. 35 SPENCER COREY 2018 31266 BUDA NICHOLAS 148. 71 GAUTHIER DALE 202D 798D GIRARDASHLEY 158. 79 CAMACHO DIEGO A 2020 17205 WARNER WILLIAM F 206. 79 FAULCONERIUNEC 2020 21269 HIGH JARED 150, 16 LUSE JAMES H 2O20 25626 ETZLER BENJAMIN LARR 177, 41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 2020 33254 BASSI GURBINDER S S177. 41 HERITAGE BUILDERS GROUP 420 36937 MAZZONE JEFFREY P 171. 48 FRJCKETHOMAS 2021 957 BOYLEJOSEPH IS7. 46 TYGERTGINAM 2021 9913 BERG KIMBERLY 134. 31 GRAHAM HELEN 5 2021 23713 ROCHELEAU JOSEPH 112. 02 VOPFLAK WILLIAM 2021 22164 WALKER JODY S15230 MORGANSTEVEN 2021 28670 SMITH SHEILA 214. 07 TRONCO JOSEPH 2D21 25606 RAYBALL MEGAN 154. 45 KAWADLER EDWARD 2021 34934 NESTUR MARGARET 236. 84 MARVIN STEVEN 2021 32811 ALKINBURGH CHAUNTELLE 206. 63 ETRINGERARTHUR 2021 42967 CRACKERROBERT 230. 26 LANDRIGAN LINDA 2021 46320 WHITE SUSAN Appendix 59 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 283.8-4-15 3 WOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1352 1993 TOWNHOUSE 012 2017-05-09 225,000 166.42 LEVITY N K A ZAGORSKI LAYNE 2017 14812 LFSNIAK`NfCHOLA5283.8-4-27 20 WOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 135Z 1991 TOWNHOUSE 0.17 2017-06-09 230.000 170.12 KINGSLEY RONALD 2017 19676277.15-3-1.1 6 PARKLANDCT CLIFTON PARK NY 2009 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.23 2017-06-30 315,000 156.79 GOODWINTHOMAS 2017 20686 PECUNfA MARY 283.7-1-18 63 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1566 1991 TOWNHOUSE 0.07 2018-01-22 220,000 140.49 MACINTOSH GEOFFREY 2018 2815 DUETTMACK 27715-3-7.1 30 PARKLANDCT CLIFTON PARK NY 1494 2000 TOWNHOUSE 0.25 2018-02.23 290,000 195.42 CASTLE F K A CA14ILL SHARON C. F 2018 GEDDIS CAROL 279.53-2-11 11 PUTNAM CT HALFMOON NY 1291 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0.01 2018-06-01 165,000 128.81 HISGEN DENENE 2018 5920 18032 SIMONSON SCOTT 283.8-4-27 20 WOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1352 1991 TOWNHOUSE 0.17 2018-07-06 230,000 170.12 PECUNIA MARY 2018 21245 PARKER ELIZABETH CALLAHAN GWENDOLYN279.53-2-7 283.8-4-11 7 13 PUTNAM CT HALFMOON NY 1214 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0.01 2018-07-19 157,000 129,32 ARNOLD WAYNE 2018 22436 OXENTINE DERR€CK ANTHONY 283.7-1-8 WOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1352 1992 TOWNHOUSE 0.16 2018-08-24 205.000 151.63 MCDANIEL BELTON 2018 26451 HERNANDEZ JASON 2WA5-3.25.2 45 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1064 1992 TOWNHOUSE 0.16 2018.10 10 S237,900 223,59 TRAVISKATHERINE• 2018 30B45 OLSZEWSKI SUSAN7GROOMSPOINTEDFCLFTONPARKNY19891999TOWNHOUSE0.33 2018-10-31 342.500 172.20 ORTEL JUDITH 2O18 33261 SCHMIDT KERRY L-TRUSTEE11AVERAGE1/1/2018 237.945 MEDIAN 1/1/2018 230.000 279.53-2-5 5 PUTNAM CT HALFMOON NY 1214 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0-01 2020-08-03 184,000 151.57 MLODZIANOW5KI CARYN VICTORIA 2020 20420 PATNAUDE MELISSA L283.7 1-9 47 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1566 1992 TOWNHOUSE 0,09 2021-05-11 270,000 172.41 SKINNER MARK G 2021 19365 ZHAN HUI283.7-1-13 55 WESTBURY CT CLIFTON PARK NY 1566 1992 TOWNHOUSE 0.1 2021-05-12 290,000 185.19 MOORE-BRADLEY VIRGINIA E 2021 17905 BARROWS KAREN M283.8-4-22 10 WOODSIDE DR CLIFTON PARK NY 1566 1991 TOWNHOUSE 0.1 2021-07-20 285,000 181.99 HOLMESJUDILH 2O21 2955E KHALILY FRESHTEH279.53-2-5 5 PUTNAM CT HALFMOON NY 1214 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0.01 2021-09.10 218,000 179.57 PATNAUDE MELISSA 2021 35283 CASEY WILUAM279,53.2 2 2 PUTNAM CT HALFMOON NY 1281 1986 TOWNHOUSE 0.01 2021 12-14 212,000 165.50 NAGLIERI JOSEPH 2O21 46563 LOSONJENNIFER6AVERAGE12/1/2020 243,167 MEDIAN 12/1P2020 1244.000 Appendix 60 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. QUALIFICATIONS OF DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA: EMPLOYMENT His TOR r 2016-Current: Executive Vice President- CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 1994-2015: President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates; Inc. 1986-1994: Executive Vice -President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1984-1986: Vice -President / Secretary - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1974-1984: Staff Appraiser,- Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. E6UCATION.' Cornell University: Bachelor of Science — College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Syracuse University. graduate studies Appraisal Institute: appraisal valuation courses and seminars American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers: appraisal valuation courses & seminars International Right -of -Way Association: appraisal courses and seminars NYS Assessors Association: appraisal courses and seminars PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS' MAI #6935 Appraisal Institute Member, Appraisal institute (MAI) designation is :awarded by the Appraisal Institute to those members who have years of experience, are technically trained, have passed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code of ethics. ARA #623 American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers [ASFMRA] I hold the Accredited Rural Appraiser (ARA) designation which is awarded by the American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers to those members who have years of experience, are technically trained, have passed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code of ethics. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS; Appraisal Institute (1979-present) Chapter Committees. AIREA/SREA Unification (1991-92), Regional Standards Panel (1986.91), Chapter Admissions, Chairperson (1987-89), Admissions (1985-1989) Chapter Offices: President (1/1/2011-12/31/2012 (2-yr, term]j, President -Elect (2010), Treasurer 2009), Secretary (2008), Treasurer (1992), Secretary (1991), Director (1990) American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (1975-present) National Committees: Editorial Co -Chair (1998-200z) and Chair (2002-2017); National Appraisal Review Committee Chair (1988-94); Executive Council (1995-98); Ethics & Standards Task Force 2009-2010); Publications Commission Chair, Valuation 2000 (1998-2000); By -Laws (1980-81); Young Professionals (1981-84); Appraisal Manual (1984-85); Regional Membership (1985-1988); Rural Appraisal Bdok (1993-1995); long Range Planning (1995);.Annual Meeting (1997 & 1999); The Appraisal Foundation Advisory Council (2002-04), Strategic Planning Task Force (2003-04); Recognized for40-Year Membership (2018) National Office: District I Vice President (1995-1998) Chapter (Northeast) Offices: Secretary -Treasurer (1979-89); Vice -President (1989-91); President 1991-93); Director (1993-96) International Right -of -Way Association - Chapter 418 (1982-present) International Association of Assessing Officers (1999-present) New York State Assessors Association, Inc. Past Regional Advisor - State Board of Real Estate Appraisal Appendix 61 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers; Inc. LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS. Certified by Appraisal institute through December 31, 2023 Certified by ASFMRA through December 31, 2022 NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-000000060 (1991 to present) Certified by NY Department of State through October 7; 2023 Certificate of Completion —Valuation of Conservation Easements course --Al/ASFMRA/ASA (2008) Certificate of Completion — Yellow Book — Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions ASFMRA (2006 and 2018) NYS Consultant Appraiser - New York State (1978 to present) NYS Qualified Appraisal Course Instructor— all appraisal course levels (1991 to present) Certificate of Appreciation - Appraisal Review Committee Chairman (6 years) Certificate of Appreciation — Editorial Committee Chairman (19 years) NYS Notary Public AWARDS` G. Richard Kelley Memorial Award (formerly President's Award)- 2014, presented by Upstate New York Chapter, Appraisal institute Appraisal Professional of the Year by ASFMRA - 2012 Gold Quill Award for Journalism from ASFMRA —1985 and 2011 Volunteer of the Year Award — ASFMRA - 2017 Silver Plow Award --10+ years as Chapter Secretery(Treasurer from ASFMRA (1989) Silver Cow Award for Contribution to Agribusiness from Onondaga County Dairy Promotion Committee (1999) PUBLICATIONS. A Case Study of Upstate New York Landlocked and Restricted Access Land Values" — Journal of the ASFMRA, May 2020 An Environmental Trade Case Study. Agricultural Conservation Easement Pays Off Environmental Penalty" Journal of the ASFMRA, June 2011 (ASFMRA 2011 Gold Quill Award) Is Your Forest Land Fairly Assessed?" — Empire Envoy, Empire State Forest Products Association, Vol. 97, No. 5, August 2004 Conservation Easements: a Review of Alternative Valuation Methods" —Journal of Property Economics, co -published by American Society of Appraisers, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, International Association of Assessing Officers and National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2004 The Appraisal of Rural Property, 2"d Edition, 2000, co -published by ASFMRA and Appraisal Institute — Dairy Farm Chapter Timberland Assessments" — Farming, January 2001 Gas Pipelines: Are They a Detriment or an Enhancement for Crops?" Journal of ASFMRA, 2000; republished in International Right -of -Way Magazine, Dec. 2000 Timberland Valuation" — CFA News, Catskill Forest Association, Inc., Fall 1999 Understanding Development Rights from Both the Appraiser and Consultant Perspective" Seminar for ASFMRA, May 1997 Farm Assessment Problems" (5-part series) - New York Farmer, 1996-1997 Conservation Easements & Valuation Issues" - Appraisal Views, Valuation International, Ltd., 2nd Quarter, 1996 Rural Appraisal Manual, ASFMRA, 6s' Edition, 1986 - Revision Committee Using the Income Approach'for Specialized Agricultural Properties"-Joumal of the ASFMRA, April 1985 ASFMRA 1985 Gold Quill Award) Do You Need a Professional Appraiser?" - American Agriculturist, January 1983 Appendix 62 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. TEACHING AND LECTURING EXPERIENCE: Upstate NY Chapter (Appraisal Institute): Valuations in Indian Land Claims, Eminent Domain Analysis, Catastrophic Event, Natural (Tourist) Attraction, Current Use v. Highest and Best Use, Land Under Elevated Highway, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Utility Easements, Determination of Economic Units, Market Value Impact from Solar Systems on Residential Properties, Effects of Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land ASFMRA & Northeast Chapter. Agricultural Valuation, Conservation Easements, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Dairy Farms, Utility Easements ASFMRAOhio Chapter: Conservation Easements International Right -of -Way Association Chapter 18: Conservation Easement Valuation, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Effects of Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land NYS Assessors Association: Farm Valuation, Income Capitalization Approach, Conservation Easement Valuation, Waterfront Valuation, Mini -Marts and Convenience Stores, Partial Interests Valuation, Appraisal Report Review, Mixed -Use Property Valuation NYS Association of County Directors: Conservation Easements: Alternative Valuation Methods Cornell Cooperative Extension: Farm Assessment Problems, Agricultural Conservation Easements Cornell University: Appraisal Issues, Eminent Domain, Conservation Easements, Indian Land Claims Federal Land Bank: Highest & Best Use Analysis US Army / Tug Hill Tomorrow Land Trust / Ducks Unlimited: Fort Drum Army Compatible Use Buffer Program (2012): Conservation Easements New York Farm Show/ Woodsmen's Field Days (2010, 2011, 2012): Conservation Easements Ohio State University,. Conservation Easement Valuation Onondaga Community College: Real Estate Principles Onondaga County Assessors'Assoc.: Farm Valuation, Conservation Easements, Convenience Stores, Property Classifications and Current Use v. Highest and Best Use Issues COURT EXPERIENCE. - Testified before US Federal. District Court*; NY State Court of Claims; NY State Supreme Court^; Massachusetts Court Commissions and Hearings throughout NY State; A2010 NY Court of Appeals favorable decision on current use valuation certiorari project (Gordon v. Town of Esopus); 2 Appellate Division favorable decisions on current use and economic unit valuation for certiorari Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Towns of Keene and North Hudson; Corvetti v. Town of Lake Pleasant) 1981 Oneida Nation Land Claim was reviewed and upheld by the US Supreme Court (March 1984) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Career responsibilities bridge a wide scope of public, institutional and private assignments dealing with eminent. domain, mortgage financing, tax matters, zoning, easements, estate planning, and general valuation questions. Projects include Indian land claims, rights -of -way acquisition, railroad valuation, urban redevelopment, waste disposal, water use and hydro -power valuation matters, watersheds, airports, pipeline and powerlirie corridors, agricultural crop analysis, and environmental analysis. Assignments have dealt with office buildings, shopping centers, most types of commercial and industrial properties, apartment complexes, hotels and motels, churches, schools, all types of agricultural properties, timberland, freshwater and tidal wetlands, all types of recreational and residential properties, conservation easements, and utility line easements. Appendix 63 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES. Onondaga County Waste -to -Energy Facility: Citizens Advisory Committee (1991-2000), Chairman (1993- 1994); Property Value Stabilization, Sub -Committee Chairman (1991-2000) Town of Onondaga: Environmental Advisory Council (1976-81); Fire Training Center Bylaws (Chairman 1986); Length Of Service Awards Program (Town Committee Chairman 1989-91, 2000-02, 2004- 05, 2017-18, 2019) Onondaga Central Schools Committees: Facilities Advisory (1989-90); Citizens Advisory (1994-96); Building Planning (1994-96); Facilities Development (1997); Academic/Building Advisory (2000- 2003); Capital Project Advisory (2005-12); Citizens' Budget Advisory (2015-16) St. Camillus Health & Rehabilitation Center: Trustee (1987-1992); Development Comm. (1990-1992) Cornell University: Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network (1989-2006); Alumni Career Link (1989- present) South Onondaga Fire Department: Member (1970-present); President (1978-85, 1989-94, 2000-2014); Immediate Past President (2014-2023); Director (1985-87; 1988-89; 1994-2000); supervised new fire station construction (1990-91); Life Member (since 2004); Length of Service Awards Program Trustee/Administrator (1989-present) Onondaga County Volunteer Firemen's Association Red Jacket Distinction Award - 2012 New York State Emergency Medical Technician for over 30 years Corpus Christi Catholic Church: Building Committee (1991-92); Lector (2006-2016) South Onondaga Water District — proposed and approved (2000-01) ice._ m i UNIQUE ICE NUMBFR ogQCiCCur:S:7 State of Ne+v York Department of State DIVISION OF IJCENSING SERVICES P;JRSJAtiT T C THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 6E (IF THE E E-CUTI[VE LAW AS IT RELATES TO R. E- APPRAISERS. rFISHER DONALD A 7 C/O 13f1MEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIAT LIBERTY SQUAR 100 EAST S! tNECA 5T MANLIUS, r.Y 13104 HAS BE04 DULY CERTIFIED TO TRANSACT 211SINESS AS A R. E GENERAL APPRAISER r r. 77. TT TT Tr T.T FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Control No. 154A461 EFFECTIVE DATE W I DAY I w. 10 09 21 EXPIRATION DATE Ip I DAYI 100723h Ku+..a W trod, Thy 0"Mrf[ d S,r hub 4JNd M vzaM Mal G ke ZfK7 in"d ROSSANA ROSADO SECRETARY OF STATE Appendix 64 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. A MARKET STUDY OF PROPOSED CASTLE POINT NY1136 CELLULAR TOWER 110 CHELSEA ROAD TOWN OF WAPPINGER DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK CLIENT OF THE REPORT NEIL J. ALEXANDER, ESQUIRE, LEED, AP PARTNER CUDDY & FEDER, LLP 445 HAMILTON AVENUE, 14TH. FLOOR WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK 10601 DATE OF VALUATION: AUGUST 4, 2020 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 5, 2020 REPORT SUBMITTED BY DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA CNY POMEROY APPRAISERS, INC. 100 EAST SENECA ,STREET -SUITE 200, MANLIUS, NEW YORK 13104 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers,_ Inc. August 5, 2020 Neil ]'..Alexander, Esquire, LEBD, AP Partner Cuddy & Feder, LLP 445 Hamilton Avenue, 14th. Floor White Plains, New York 10601 RE: Market Study of Proposed Castle,Point NY1136 Cellular Tower 110 Chelsea Road Town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York Dear Mr.- Alexander: LiBEftTY SQUARE 100 EAST SENECA STREET— Su1TE 200 MANLIU5, NEW YORK 13104 VoicE 3I5-471-3111 FAX 3154714009 At your request, a market study in the form of a restricted use report has been completed to analyze the "as is" impact on market value of the improved residential properties in close proximity to the proposed cellular tower site at 110 Chelsea Road, in the town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. This market study has been completed in duly and August 2020. The subject consists of a horse farm to be partly improved with a cellular tower site on a 10,000- square foot leased site that is part of the coimbined'47.91=L acres (two tax parcels) which is identified as the parent parcel or larger parcel, with the proposed cellular tower site known as Castle Point NY1136 identified as the subject property. The client is proposing to construct a cellular tower on this property. You have requested that we provide our professional opinion on the impact of whethef the proposed Castle Point NY 1136 project will have the following effects: Development of cellular tower will "substantially injure the value of abutting properties" If the proposed development of the cellular tower will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located. E-mail: Osher&nyggyraisers. coin Voice Mail: Extension 15 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc,. August 5, 2020 Page 2 This market study will not analyze value of any specific properties or of the subject property as vacant or as completed. The intended use of this market study is for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower. This market study does not include consideration for any personal property, business value, goodwill, or other intangibles. The value reported in this market study assumes that the property is free and clear of any environmental concerns. Cuddy & Feder, LLP is the client. The only intended users of this report are the client, Tarpon Towers, II, LLC, Town. of Wappinger, Verizon 'Wireless of the East LP, and AirOSmith Development. This report may not be distributed to or relied upon by any other persons. or entities for any purpose whatsoever, without our written. permission. All other uses and users are unintended, unless specifically stated in the letter of transmittal. The scope of this assignment includes the application of a limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach including research and statistical analysis of completed transfers of improved residential properties pear existing cellular tower sites in order to.project the impact on the values of residential properties in close proximity to the subject property. An analysis was made, reviewing recent transactions in the market. Depending upon the age of the cellular tower studied and the number of residential properties in close proximity to the tower (identified as a series of control cellular towers), we have analyzed the average (mean) and median sale prices. of residential properties in one or both of the following comparisons: The Before and After Analysis reviews sale prices before and after the construction of a control cellular tower if there is a sufficient time period after the construction of. the tower for an adequate number of sales to have occurred (usually at least two full years after tower construction). The "before" sale group is adjusted for time so that the two sets of sale prices can be compared within the same time frame. Sale -Resale transactions where the same residential property was sold at least twice during the study period — once before the control cellular tower was constructed and once after the tower was constructed. The difference in unit sale prices from the two sale dates were reviewed to measure the direction of sale price (latter being higher or lower) and amount of change. For two of the control, cellular tower sites, we identified some properties that transferred twice after the tower was constructed, allowing us to review additional price trend analyses. The average and median sale prices for each set of sales in each type of study are compared to determine if there is any significant difference in sale prices that could be attributable to ther presence of the control cellular tower. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. August 5, 2020 Page 3 You have also requested that we review two sets of documents in addition to our own research and analysis of residential sale prices surrounding established cellular towers. The first set of documents were opposition reports that have already been filed with the Town of Wappinger. The second set of documents consisted of several reports prepared by professionally designated appraisers for other cellular tower sites that included evaluations of the impact of cellular towers on nearby residential properties. Comments about each set of documents are contained herein. This type of valuation analysis is reported in the form of a market study. As agreed with the client, the subject property has not been personally inspected by this appraiser for purposes of completing this market study. We have reviewed aerial photographs, topographic and soil maps, public records on the parent parcel, and information provided by the client to compile a summary of the physical characteristics of the parent parcel and the subject property. It is our opinion that a personal inspection of the subject property for the purposes of this type of market study is not necessary and does not adversely affect our objective evaluation of sale prices to determine if the presence of a cellular tower adversely affects the market values of nearby residential properties. An extraordinary assumption that the data and document sources reviewed provide sufficient information to identify the characteristics of the subject property and neighborhood, as well as for the sale data used for the market study analyses, is. adopted for this assignment. No hypothetical conditions are required for this market study analysis. The market studies comparing the unit prices of before transactions (occurring prior to the tower construction and adjusting for the time.difference) to the unit prices after the tower construction resulted in overall average and median changes of positiye 5.66% and 7.59%, respectively, indicating that the surrounding residential properties did not suffer a value loss that could be associated with the nearby cellular tower. When breaking each set of before and after transactions 'into subsets based on school district and/or house style, the overall average and median changes were positive 11.59% and 12.09%, respectively, also reinforcing the market's reactions to not showing negative value trends for residential properties due to cellular tower construction in the same neighborhoods. A second set of market studies reviewing the sale prices of the same single-family residential property that transferred both before and after the construction of the control cellular tox' er resulted in overall average'and median changes of 14.67% and 17.58%, respectively, exceeding the 3% annual time trend used in the before and after market study analysis. This sale -resale paired sales market study also positive trends for post -tower construction sale -resale transactions (overall average and median values of 7.19% and 1.31%, respectively), and 12.53% and 14.11% for the overall average and median values when both sets of sale -resale transactions are combined. CITY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. August 5, 2020 Page 4 The property value trends were estimated from property sales that occurred before and after the construction of the identified cellular tower sites. Because of our investigation and analysis of the information contained in this report, as well as a general knowledge of real estate valuation procedures: It is our opinion that market values of nearby improved residential properties in proximity to a cellular tower are not adversely affected; and Our research could not identify any market evidence that a cellular tower is not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. The opposition documents include several opinions about why the client's cellular tower should not be built which we have not commented on as they are outside -of the scope of work for our market study. However, the references to the negative impacts on nearby residential values are supported by brokers' opinions without any supporting market data or statistics, or as references to professionally completed studies that dated from 1984 through 2004 with one 2012 citation. No information was included to support that eight to 36-year old studies are still relevant in 2020 or to the Castle Point Iocation. The reports prepared by other professionally designated appraisers that reviewed prices of residential properties within view of a cellular tower to prices of residential properties without cellular tower views were credibly completed. These reports each concluded that the neighborhoods studied did not reflect overall negative value impacts to nearby residential properties based on the proximity and view of a cellular tower. The value opinion stated above, and every other element of the attached appraisal report are qualified by the General Assumptions and Limiting Conditions included in this report, Data, information, and the calculations leading to the value conclusion are incorporated in the report. The report, in its entirety, including all assumptions and limiting .conditions, is an integral part of and, inseparable from this letter. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. August 5, 2020 Page 5 A description of the property, together with an explanation of the valuation procedures used, is contained in our report. This appraisal assignment was not made nor was the appraisal rendered based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or amount that would result in the approval of a loan. It is our opinion that the following appraisal report was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) appraisal guidelines and standards. For your review, an Executive Summary follows this letter. Please call if you have any questions regarding our assumptions, opinions, and conclusions, Respectfully Submitted, CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. ZCP Acyz Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Executive Vice President NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-0060 DAF/ tinc (File #20-0177) CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS. - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ......... ........................................................................................................... I CERTIFICATION: ............................. I ... ... ..................................................................... 3 UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS:...................................................................... 4 GENERAL INFORMATION: .............................. ................................................................................... 7 DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE :........... ........... ... ............................................................................... 8 DEFINITION OF APPRAISAL: ..................................................................................................................... 8 DEFINITION OF MARKET STUDY: ............................................................................................... 9 DEFINITION OF LARGER PARCEL: .............. ......... .................................... I .................... 9 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: ....................................................................... I ......... I ............. ........ 9 SCOPEOF WORK: ............................................. ...... .................. ........................................................ 10 SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR VALUATION: ............................................................................................. 12 NEIGHBORHOOD/LOCAL MARKETING AREA ANALYSIS: ....................................................................... 13 PROPERTY DATA: ............................................................... ..................................... . ............... 16 SITEDESCRIPTION:................................................................................................................................16 HIGHESTAND BEST USE: ...................... I ............................................................ .................................... 21 VALUATION PROCESS: .............................. . ............................. I ............................................................. 22 MARKET STUDIES OF RESIDENTIAL SALES: ........................................................................................... 24 SUPPLEMENTAL REVIEW: ...................................................................................................................... 29 SUMMARY AND RECONCILIATION OF VALUE INDICATORS: .................................................................. 36 APPENDIX........................... :...................................................................................................... 38 MARKET STUDIES FOR BEFORE & AFTER SALES: ...................................................................... 39 MARKET STUDIES FOR SALE -RESALE TRANSACTIONS: ............................................................. 76 MARKET STUDIES FOR POST -TOWER CONSTRUCTION SALE -RESALE TRANSACTIONS:............. 81 QUALIFICATIONS OF DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA:................................................................ 83 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc.' EXECUTM SUMMARY CLIENT: Cuddy & Feder, LLP. INTENDED USERS: Cuddy & Feder, LLP, Tarpon Towers, II, LLC, Town of Wappinger, Verizon Wireless of the East LP, and AirOSmith Development. PROPERTY NAME: Proposed Castle Point NY1136 Cellular Tower. PROPERTY LOCATION: 110 Chelsea Road, town 'of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. TYPE OF PROPERTY: Consists of a horse farm to be partly improved with a cellular tower site. SITE SIZE: According to the provided Site Plan for the Castle Point NY1136 cellular tower, a I0,000-square feet site is designated for the proposed cellular tower. Town of Wappinger and Town of Fishkill tax maps indicates the site size of the parent parcel is a combined 47.91± acres (two tax parcels). TAx PARCELS: 6056-03-339420 and 6056-03-297312. PROPERTY OWNER: Jeanne M. Radice. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED: Fee Simple Estate. PROPERTY ZONING: R-40/80; One -Family Residences District (Town of Wappinger) and R-40; One -Family Residential District Town of Fishkill). FLOOD CONDITIONS: Flood Zone X (flood insurance is not required). HIGHEST AND BEST USE: As IF vACANT: Parent parcel: Rural residential I agricultural land. Subject Property: Cellular tower site. Parent parcel: Horse farm usage with some potential As IIaROVED: for rural residential development. Subject Parcel: Proposed cellular tower on a 10,000- square foot site. , I CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS: Assumes public records provide sufficient information about the parent and subject properties as well as for the sale data analyzed for market study purposes. HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS: None. DATE OF MARKET STUDY ANALYSIS: August 4, 2020. DATE OF INSPECTION: None. DATE OF REPORT: August 5, 2020, VALUE INDICATORS: MARKET STUDY BEFORE & AFTER SALES: Overall average and median changes of +11.15% and 12.09%,. respectively, indicating no value loss from nearby cellular towers. MARKET STUDY: SALE -RESALES: Overall average and median changes of +12.53% and 14.11%, respectively, indicating no value loss from nearby cellular towers. MARKET STUDY CONCLUSION: Based on the preceding analysis, it is our opinion that the values of residential properties in close proxinaty to the proposed cellular tower site project are not adversely affected, Our review of the residential sale data did not reveal any evidence that cellular towers are not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhoods. Our review of residential sale price trends after the construction of a cellular tower showed continued appreciation for the time period studied • Our review of other market studies prepared by professionally designated real estate appraisers showed that those reports were credibly completed and produced conclusions that reflected the market data studied.. iq CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. CERTIFICATION: We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct, The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, impartial, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrencq of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, -the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices of the Appraisal Institute, and Best in Business Ethics of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. We certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics, the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, and Best in Business Ethics of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. We have not made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this market study report. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the subject property of this report within the last three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. We are not responsible for electronic sharing, or sharing in any form, of this market study report. The client should note that the report prepared for this assignment is an opinion of value by the appraiser,, that a Court, State, or Federal agency, including the Internal Revenue Service that reviews this report may disagree. with or reject this opinion; and that the appraiser cannot guarantee the outcome of or be financially responsible to the client for any taxes, penalties or interest imposed that may result from such review. As of the date of this report, Donald A. Fisher, MAX, ARA, has completed the continuing education program for designated members of the Appraisal .Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, and with the State of New York. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA Executive Vice President NY State Certified Gen. Appraiser #46-0060 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. UNDERLFING ASSUMPTIONS.AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: This appraisal report has been made with the following assumptions and limiting conditions: No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature that affect title to the property nor is an opinion of title rendered. The title is assumed to be good and marketable. The value estimate is given without regard to any questions of title, boundaries, encumbrances, or encroachments unless otherwise stated. We are not usually provided an abstract of the subject property and we are not qualified to render any legal opinion concerning such a document. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 3. Responsible ownership and competent property management is assumed unless otherwise stated in this report. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. however, no warranty is given for its accuracy. 5. No survey of the property has been made by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. All engineering is assumed to be correct. Any maps, plats, plot plans, drawings and/or exhibits reproduced and included in this report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationships and to assist the reader in visualizing the property unless otherwise stated. The reliability of the information contained on any such map or drawing is assumed by the appraiser and cannot be guaranteed to be correct. A surveyor should be consulted if there is any concern about boundaries, setbacks, encroachments, or other survey matters. 6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that would render it more or less valuable unless so stated. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, or for the engineering that may be required to discover such factors. Since no engineering or percolation tests were made by the appraiser, no liability is assumed for soil conditions. Sub -surface rights (mineral, • gas, oil, etc.) were not considered in making this appraisal unless so stated. 7. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. A comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property was not performed for this appraisal by the appraiser. 8. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. Information and analysis shown in this report concerning these items are based on a reasonable investigation, but any • significant question should be addressed to local zoning or land use officials and/or an attorney. 9. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based unless otherwise stated. This includes permits to emit any regulated substances into the air or water or onto or into the ground. Appropriate government officials and/or an attorney should be consulted if an interested party has any questions or concerns on these items since we have not made a comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property- 4 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 10. It is assumed that the utilization of land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted. 11. We assume no responsibility for economic or physical factors that may affect the opinions herein stated which might occur at some date after the date of value. 12. We reserve the right to make such adjustments to the valuation herein reported, as may be required by the consideration of additional data or more reliable data that may become available. 13. Where discounted cash flow analyses have been undertaken, the discount rates utilized to bring forecasted future revenues back to estimates of present value reflect our market investigations of yield anticipations from comparable sales, our judgment as to risks and uncertainties in the subject property, and the consequential rates of return required to attract an investor under 'such risk conditions. 14. Our forecasts of future events that influence the valuation process are predicated on the continuation of historical and current trends in the market. 17. 15. No opinion is expressed as to the value of the sub -surface oil, gas, or mineral rights, or 18 whether the property is subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials, except as expressly stated. 16. We are not an environmental expert, and we do not have the expertise necessary to determine the existence of environmental hazards including but not limited to mechanical equipment or structures, or presence of chemical or toxic substances, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, toxic or hazardous waste, asbestos or hazardous building materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, fire - retardant -treated substances (FRT), contaminated drywall or other building materials, lead -contaminated plumbing, soil and subsoil contamination, groundwater contamination, agricultural chemicals, electro-magnetic fields (EMFs), radon or other indoor air contamination which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental hazards or conditions on the subject or surrounding properties. None were called to our attention nor did we become aware of such during the inspection unless so stated. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. Non -disclosure should not be taken as an indication that such a problem does not exist. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. Based on visual inspection, there appears to be no conditions, including but not limited to the above -referenced items, which would render the property more or less valuable, except as noted. The client is urged to retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. Possession .of this report or a copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication nor may it be used for any purpose by anyone but the client and/or an identified intended user without the previous written consent of the appraiser and the client, and in any event, only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. The appraiser herein by reason of this appraisal is not required to give future consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made. 19. Any distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and building must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 20. Unless otherwise stated, personal property has not been included in this report. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 21. Disclosure of the contents of this report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he or she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI designation) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the author. 22. The appraiser is not qualified to judge whether the property complies with Iaws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Clean Air Act of 1990, Clean Water Act,•Endangered Species Act, etc. or any subsequent revisions to any of these laws. Employee health and safety concerns as per the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and other agencies are also assumed to be in compliance with current 'regulations and standards unless specifically addressed in this report. Such categories can consist of operational procedures, storage of hazardous materials, building/property safety or protection devices, safeguards for utility entrances and distribution areas, anti -smoking legislation, etc. 23. This report is null and void if used in any connection with a real estate syndicate or syndication, defined as a general or limited partnership, joint venture, un-incorporated association -or similar organization formed for or engaged in investment or gain from an interest in real property, including but not limited to a sale, exchange, trade, development or lease of property on behalf of others, or which is, required to be registered • with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission or any Federal or State agency which regulates investments made as a public offering. 24. Wells and septic systems, if any, are assumed to be in good working condition and of sufficient size and capacity for the stated highest and best use unless otherwise. stated. 25. No chemical or scientific tests were performed by the appraiser on subject property, and it is assumed that the air, water, ground, and general environment associated with the property present no physical or health hazard of any kind unless otherwise noted in the report. It is further assumed that the lot does not contain any type of dump site and that there are no underground tanks (or any underground source) leaking toxic or hazardous chemicals into the groundwater or the environment unless otherwise noted in the report. 26. Any proposed improvements are assumed to be completed in a good workmanlike manner in accordance with the owner's submitted plans and specifications unless stated otherwise. 27. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that would cause a loss in value unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. 28. The appraisal is an estimate of value based on an analysis of information known at the time the appraisal was made. We do not assume any responsibility for incorrect analysis because of erroneous or incomplete information. If new information of significance comes to light, the value given in this report is subject to change without notice. 29. Any claims, lawsuits, etc. filed against this firm and/or author(s) are limited in monetary damages to the amount of the fee charged and collected for the completion of this appraisal report. 0 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc'. GENERAL INFORMATION. EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MARKET STUDYID.4TE OF THE REPORT.' Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA did not make a personal inspection of the subject property, as an agreement for the scope of work for this assignment, but has reviewed documents provided by the client, aerial photographs and various maps of the subject location and the locations of the control cellular towers used in the market study, and has completed other appraisal assigmnents in the same region of the state over the past several decades. This market study has been prepared in July and August 2020. INTENDED USE AND C'LIENTIUSER OF THE MARKET STUDY.' Based on the client's instructions, the intended use of this market study is for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower. Cuddy & Feder, LLP is the client. The only intended users of this report are the client, Tarpon Towers, H, LLC, Town of Wappinger, Verizon Wireless of the East LP, and AirOSmith Development.. All other uses and users are unintended, unless specifically stated in this report. MARKET STUDYREPORT FoRmAT.- The appraisal is presented as a market study in accordance with ,Standards Rule 2-2 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), 2020-2021 Edition. The parent parcel currently consists of a -horse farm; however, a small portion of the parent parcel is proposed to be improved with a cellular tower. This market study will evaluate the "as is" trends in market values, reflected by published sale prices, of improved residential properties in close proximity -to similar cellular towers in neighborhoods with similar locational and physical characteristics as the subject property after it is iiproved with a cellular tower, The residential sale prices for a time period before the construction of a control cellular tower usually a two-year period prior to the year of the tower's construction) will be compared to the residential sale prices in the same neighborhood after the date of construction (for an approximate two-year period or to the preparation of this market study), with the earlier group of sales adjusted for time by an analyzed appreciation rate. The differences between the two sets of sales will be summarized to review the market's reaction to the construction of a nearby cellular tower. Those projected changes to residential properties will be considered as effective after the proposed cellular tower has been constructed. While these projected changes for the subject property are identified as prospective because it has not yet been improved with the cellular tower, it is our opinion that these trends in market values would be relevant as of the date of the preparation of this market study if the tower existed. We have also included a review of opposition documents and other reports prepared by professionally designated real estate appraisers that compare the procedures and results of those reports to the conclusions of this market study report. This market study report was prepared during July and August. 2020. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DEFINITION OF FEE SIMPLE ESTATE: Fee simple estate is known as the "absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat."' Utility easements along public roads are common encumbrances on fee simple estate ownerships; however, we recognize that the availability of public utilities generally enhances the potential uses and developability of the land through which they pass. Since it is typical for the comparable sales to have similar utility easements along their respective road frontages, no adjustments are required for rights conveyed regarding these utility adjustments and. the subject's ownership is considered to be equivalent to fee simple estate. The parent parcel is an owner -occupied horse farm to be partly improved with a cellular tower site that will be leased. We assume that other long-term leases do not currently encumber the parent parcel or that if such leases do exist, they will not impact the potential to construct the proposed cellular tower. In addition, we assume that the sales of single-family residential properties reviewed in this market study were arm's length transactions (which is one of the criteria for selecting the properties included. in the various studies) and were transferred in fee simple estate interests. Therefore, the fee simple estate is considered for both the subject's parent parcel as well as for all of the sale properties evaluated in the market studies. DEFINITION OF APPRAISAL: The act or process of developing an opinion of value; an opinion of value. Comment; An appraisal must be numerically expressed as a specific amount, as a range of numbers, or as a relationship (e.g., not more than, not less than) to a previous value opinion or numerical benchmark (e.g., to assessed value, collateral value)". However, this market study will not estimate or calculate values for the subject property or any of the residential properties ir1 the subject's neighborhood. 'The purpose of this market study is for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower. This market study is not and cannot be used as an appraisal report. Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) 90. ZThe Appraisal Foundation, USPAP 2020-2021 Edition. (Washington, DC Appraisal Foundation) 3. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DEFINITION OF MARKET STUDY: An analysis of the market conditions of supply, demand, and pricing for a specific property type in a specific area."' Note: This report is identified as a market study and cannot be considered or used as an appraisal report DEFINITION OF LARGER PARCEL: In govenurlental land acquisitions and in valuations of charitable donations of partial interests in property such as easements, the tract or tracts of land that are under the beneficial control of a single individual or entity and have the same, or an integrated, highest and best use. Elements for consideration by the appraiser in making a determination in this regard are contiguity, or proximity, as it bears on the highest and best use of the property, unity of ownership, and unity of highest and best use. In most states, unity of ownership, contiguity, and unity of use are the three conditions that establish the largei.parcel for the consideration of severance damages. In federal and some state cases, however, contiguity is sometimes subordinated to unitary use." DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The definition of market value, as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency — 12 CFR 34.42(g), Federal Reserve Board — 12 CFR 225.65(b), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — 12 CFR 323.5(b),, Office of Thrift Supervision — 12 CFR 564.5(b), National Credit Union Administration — 12 CFR 722.5(b) in compliance with Title XI of FIRREA, is as follows: Market value means the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently. and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: Buyer and seller are typically motivated; Both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider their own best interest; A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 3Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) 140. 4 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate AEpraisal, Sixth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) 127. CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SCOPE OF WORK.• To reach a value opinion for the subject, the following steps were taken: Area/Neighborhood Analysis: Data available from Dutchess County, Town of Wappinger and Town of Fishkill regarding population trends, growth forecasts, and industry and employment were reviewed. Various zoning, planning, building, and assessment and tax records were consulted as deemed necessary to complete this market study. The subject neighborhood was not personally toured for purposes of this assignment but was observed during previous appraisal assignments and from aerial photography and a variety of maps and public documents. Competitive -neighborhoods were identified and researched for sources of sale data to evaluate for this market study. Site and Improvement Description: The subject property was not personally inspected. The subject's site area and legal description was based on information obtained from the Dutchess County Real Property Offices, the Town of Wappinger, and the Town- of Fishkill assessment offices, as well as information provided by the client. Site information, such as zoning, utilities, etc., was based on discussions with representatives of Dutchess County, the Town of Wappinger, and the Town of Fishkill as needed for this market study. Once all the data was gathered, the subject property was analyzed with regards to its highest and best use as if vacant and as currently improved. Valuation Methods: The data presented in this report was studied to extract the trends in market values of improved residential properties following the construction of a cellular tower within close proximity to potentially affected single-family residential properties. The appropriate valuation model was used in analyzing the subject. A limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach, specifically an analysis of sale data of improved residential properties, was used in this analysis. The Cost Approach was considered but is not useful for evaluating market trends as the analysis of sale data will provide. Similarly, the Income Capitalization Approach was also considered but single-family residential properties are not typically rented in the neighborhood of each of the proposed or existing cellular tower sites, and, as a result, would not provide meaningful results. Additionally, a market participant would not use either the Cost or Income Capitalization Approaches as reliable indications of trends in market value. It is our opinion that the data contained in this report is accurate, and it sufficiently supports the final value. Infortrration is reported in a market study. Data Collection: The data collected included an investigation of sales of improved residential properties within close proximity of the proposed cellular tower site. The data obtained has been analyzed for overall comparability and suitability for the proposed cellular tower site. This data has been obtained primarily from www.Real-info.com and is assumed to be accurate for purposes of this market study. Ir7 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. The scope of this assignment includes the application of a limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach including research and statistical analysis of completed transfers of improved residential properties within close proximity of the proposed cellular tower site. An analysis was made, reviewing recent transactions in the market. We have identified several cellular towers in the same region of the state that were recently constructed, identified as control cellular towers, and have analyzed the average (mean) and median sale prices of residential properties in close proximity to those towers in one or both of the following comparisons: Before and After Analysis o Before Analysis reviews sale prices within a designated study area around each tower for the two-year period prior to the construction of the control cellular tower (calendar years ending at least one year prior to the tower construction to exclude the announcement and application period) o After Analysis reviews sale prices within the same designated study area around each tower for the two-year period after the construction of the control cellular tower (calendar years following the year of construction) d The Before Analysis will be adjusted by the time trend that is applicable in the study area so that both sets of sales are examined as of the same point in time . o The Before Analysis sale prices are compared to the After Analysis sale prices to determine if there is any significant difference in sale prices that could be attributable to the presence of the control cellular tower being studied Sale — Resale Transactions Analysis o Residential properties that were sold at least twice during the time before and after the construction of a control cellular tower First sale transactions occurred within a few years prior to the tower construction Second sale transactions that occurred after the tower construction It Differences between the unit sale prices were reviewed for direction of price changes and magnitude of the price changes. Where multiple sale- resale transactions were identified for each control cellular tower location, we have also analyzed the overall average and median changes in the sale price differences. o Residential properties that were sold at least twice after the construction of a control cellular tower These sale transactions were reviewed to analyze the direction of price changes and magnitude of the price changes. after a tower has been constructed. The pertinent data is included in the body and the Appendix of this report. It has been analyzed for several factors used in the valuation process. The data has been used to form a value conclusion for the subject in a market study. This report conforms to USPAP and the standards set forth by the Appraisal Institute and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. 11 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SPECIAL ASSUMPTIONS FOR VALUATION: EXTRA0RDINARYAssuY1PT1oNS; An assignment -specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncertain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions." Comment: Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or the integrity of data used in an analysis."' The extraordinary assumption made for this assignment includes the following: Since the subject property and parent parcel were not inspected for this assignnment, we also assume that the information about the subject and each of the control cellular tower sites is as depicted in the public records and information provided by the client, and from what is available from aerial photographs and other available sources. It is noted that the use of these extraordinary assumptions might affect the assignment results. Please refer to the complete list of Underlying Assumptions and Limiting Conditions contained within the.report. HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS.' - A condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. Comment: Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis."' For this valuation, no hypothetical conditions are assumed. SThe Appraisal Foundation, USPAP 2020-2021 Edition. (Washington, DC Appraisal Foundation) 4. bThe Appraisal Foundation, USPAP 2020-2021 Edition, (Washington, DC Appraisal Foundation) 4. 12 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. NEIGHBORHOOD/LOCAL MARKETING AREA ANAL YSIS: The subject property is on the south side of Chelsea Road, in the town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. N. bwoh Mrodk dope. y c ( SyNet Fd N Qp ' Qv Foxton a sr ovi i. fT v ty w.ppinper ¢ u e o n Ic f a n Ca zCha$aa Ry , 5 art a o 'Pa sn a 99Cas9eP41Rd % as a 16 a° nrcelrxa as i' Flchklll The relationship of a property to the surrounding properties forms the basis of neighborhood analysis. "Social, economic, governmental, and environmental forces influence property values in the vicinity of a subject property, which in turn, directly affects the value of the subject property itself' (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 14th Edition). Thus, neighborhood analysis is a study of forces and factors, which will influence the value of a property in the future. Within a given community, there are various groupings of land areas. Areas devoted to various uses that are somewhat similar are known as neighborhoods. The neighborhood is defined as "a portion of a larger community in which there is a homogeneous grouping of inhabitants, buildings, or business enterprises. Inhabitants of a neighborhood usually have a more than casual community of interest and a similarity of economical level or cultural background. Neighborhood boundaries may consist of well-defined natural or man-made barriers, or they may be well-defined with a distinct change in land use, or in the character of the inhabitants." Thus, a neighborhood may be either used as a residential, commercial, industrial or agricultural neighborhood. There might possibly be a mixture of these uses within any given neighborhood; however, there is normally a predominant characteristic to the neighborhood. The various social, economic, physical and political forces within a neighborhood also influence the individual properties within the area. 13 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. The parent parcel is in a suburban area with several single-family residential subdivisions, apartment complexes, governmental complexes, and commercial properties located within- a half -mile radius, intermixed with agricultural and woodland parcels. This neighborhood is'south of the city of Poughkeepsie along the east side of the Hudson River, and is across the River from the city of Newburgh in Orange County. This combination of land uses and residential properties is similar to many of the neighborhoods within commuting range of Poughkeepsie, Newburgh, Kingston and New York City in the southeastern region of Upstate New York. Interstate 84 is a short distance to the south and Interstate 87 is across the Hudson River. The Taconic State Parkway and US Route 9 are to the east, along with other State routes, and provide access to New York City to the south and the Capitol Region to the north. For purposes of this market study, we consider the southeast part of Upstate New York to include Dutchess, Putnam, Orange and Ulster counties as being relatively homogenous in demographic, character and composition. We have analyzed economic trends essential to this market study assignment to evaluate the change in prices over the time -period from which the comparable sales in the before studies Are time -trended to the mid -date of the after sales so both sets of sales can be compared within the same time period. Our analysis of subject's market considers numerous sources. in arriving at an understanding of trends in real estate values. -CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. has maintained sales and rental records that track the economic history of this area, have reviewed trends of residential sale prices in the surrounding counties, and have reviewed other economic indicators such as building costs and consumer price indices. In addition, we regularly discuss the market with other industry representatives including real estate professionals, contractors, and developers. County 2017 2018 2019 Compound Change 2017-2019 Dutchess 280,000 290,000 295,000 2.64% Orange 265,000 270,000 277,500 2.33% Ulster 218,250 228,000 245000 5.95% 14 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. We have also reviewed annual rates of change for construction costs (of Class D buildings in the Eastern region, as reported by Marshall Valuation Service) and cost -of -living increases reflected by National Consumer Price Index. The rates from 2014 through 2020 are displayed in the following table: Year Building Cost Index' Change CPIs Change 2014 2988.5 NIA 238.343 NIA 2015 3042.2 1.8% 238,638 0.1% 2016 3040.0 0.1% 241.018 1.0% 2017 3084.2 1.5% 244.955 1.6% 2018 3218.2 4.3% 251.989 2.9% 2019 3256.9 1.2% 256.143 1.6% 2020 3299.I 1.3% 257.797 0.6% Compound Change 2014-202.0 1.7% 1.3% The market data analyzed which shows a range of positive time trends ranging from 1.3% to over 5% per year. Based on our review of this data, a 3% per year annual appreciation rate will be applied to the comparable sales used in the Market Study analyses. Marshall & Swift, Marshall Valuation Service (Los Angeles; July 2020) Section 99, Page 4. 8" Consumer Price Index", United States Department of Labor— Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed July. 30, 2020, bt pt sJ/www.bls.Rov_/cp•/ 15 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PROPERTYDATA: LOCATION.' The subject's address is 110 Chelsea Road, in the town of Wappinger, Dutchess County, New York. ffisToRr The parent parcel is a horse farm to be partly improved with a cellular tower site on a combined 47.91± acres and is identified by the Town of Wappinger as tax parcel.6056-03- 339420 and Town of Fishkill as 6056-03-297312. A proposed site measuring 100 feet by 100 feet (10,000 square feet) is proposed to be used for a 150-foot high, monopole -style cellular tower. SITE DESCRIPTION: We have reviewed the Town of Wappinger and the Towno Fishkill tax maps, aerial photographs, soil and topography maps, and the provided documents in preparing the following description of the parent parcel: SITE SIZE: According to the Town of Wappinger and Town of Fishkill tax maps, the site size is a combined 47.91± acres (two tax parcels). FRONTAGE: 37f feet of frontage on the south side of Chelsea Road. SHAPE/TOPOGRAPHY: The subject site is irregular in shape. Topography is generally level to slightly sloping with some moderately steep areas. INGRESS/EGRESS: Adequate ingress and egress is available from Chelsea Road. UTILITIES: Public records indicate that public utilities available include. electricity and telephone. However, several residential subdivisions and apartments in the area indicate that public water, sewer and/or natural gas may also be available. ' LEGAL ESTRICTIONS: We were not made aware of or -given a title report of any easements, encroachments or legal restrictions that would adversely affect the site's use or value. Utility easements are typical and usually do not have a negative 'effect on value. However, if this is an area of concern, a title search is recommended. 16 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. HAZARDOUS w3sTANcEs: A Site Assessment prepared by Tectonic Engineering and Surveying Consultants, P.C., originally dated October 3, 2019 and with updates through June 2, 2020, was provided for this property. No evidence of recognized environmental conditions was not identified. As a result, no further action is recommended." After reviewing Tectonic's report, we acknowledge that the property appears to be free of any environmental issues. RELATIONSHIP OF SITE TO Properties in the immediate area are primarily, rural SURRouNDING PRoPERTIEs: residential, residential subdivision, apartments, commercial, governmental, institutional, agricultural and recreational. SITE nApROvEMENTs: There are no site improvements in close proximity to the proposed cellular tower sites. COMMENTS. The subject site. is a proposed cellular tower to be constructed on the parent parcel. As of the writing of this market study, we understand that the proposed tower will be a monopole style tower with a height of 150 feet. The parent parcel is not known to be encumbered with any long-term ann's length leases. A copy of the Overall Site Plan and an aerial photograph of the parent parcel, plus a sketch of the proposed cellular tower follow for the reader's reference. 17 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. TARP r i p' 7"gt1"b: ortw " fe ON UMEK I r ... :.'• r h•`rY.i R 9Pk r — : •' " r.cm tw.... fir.+ • r':'.3i:-: :, y 1r If f! ii i r. r To- T 1 .. r' 1 r [* 1':W Clue i¢ 18 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 44, Elil u E I 1 Fr ' Oxlk It WC410m of E-1: TIv PROPEwr Ur(iYP) 19 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. PR3PnSE7 UCHNk: ROD PROPOSSO YDIZON wIRMES5 I I_1 LEILJ A.YM"15 d RELATED EOVIPYENT II II II IV IK I-1 (-I I LWATION RESUMED FOR U 4 I ^ F11TLrR£ C RRIM EOVIPMiM n rl F I I I L-1 I I-lyLifi'1 n rl n I I-II i'i I!J I II-1111 C"i) u J kOM WWWSSS AVARG ENDI2EDSTEELNIW.TOWER "LL VE N I PROPOSED TARPON s TOWERS UCHOPDLE TP c i J I 1 WNY] W n4 f1 r . I'.HE. =. E - EAST ELEVATION 20 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. HIGHEST AND BEST USE: In appraisal practice the concept of highest and best use represents the premise upon which value is based. Highest and best use is defined as follows: The reasonably probable use of property that results in the highest value. The four criteria that the highest: and best use must meet are legal permissibility, physical possibility, financial feasibility, and maximum productivity."' The principle of highest and best use sets forth a fundamental proposition in property economics. Limited by the constraints created by law and the marketplace, the highest and best use is that which returns the highest present value to the land or improved property (as defined) as of the date of appraisal, The highest and best use is influenced by. many general and specific considerations that must lie weighed to determine if the proposed use is: 1) Legally permissible under zoning and other municipal regulations; private restrictions, and enviromnental regulations; 2) Physically possible for development considering the' size, shape, and topography of the site, available utilities; and unusual site or property conditions; 3) Financially feasible in terms of producing a positive return to the land or property; and; 4) Maximally productive for the use that produces the highest price, or value, consistent with market expectations. The result is a developmental concept that maximizes the value of the land and the rate of return on the overall investment. The highest and best use analysis considers the property's most profitable use as vacant. It considers uses that are legally permissible, physically possible, financially feasible, and maximally productive. The most profitable use under, these constraints represents the highest and best use. ASIF VACANT. - After considering the four criteria, it is our opinion that the highest and best use of the parent parcel/larger parcel, as if vacant, is for residential and agricultural purposes. The limited road frontage suggests that the property is best used as a single building site with agricultural usage for most of the remaining land, with horse farm usage being predominant in the area. The subject site containing 10,000-square feet is suitable for the site of.a cellular tower. AS IMPROVED: Based upon the preceding data, it is our opinion that the highest and best use of the parent property/larger parcel, as improved, is for horse farm usage with some potential for rural residential development. The subject property's highest and best use is for the proposed cellular tower on a 10,000-square foot site. AAppraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, sixth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2015) 109. 21 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. YALUATIONPPOCESS. The intended use of this market study is for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower on nearby single-family residential properties. This market study is being reported in a restricted report format that relies on the analysis of sales of improved residential properties before and after the construction of a proposed cellular tower. In valuing the subject, a limited version of the Sales Comparison Approach is used with the analysis of sales of improved residential sales to evaluate trends in sale prices before and after the construction of ceuular towers in the same region as the subject property is located. The results of the trends of sales prices before and after the.construction of other nearby cellular towers is projected for the expected trends in residential sale prices in the vicinity of the proposed subject cellular tower studied ("tower"). Residential sales were researched around existing nearby cellular towers using the www.real-info.com data base which shows records of all land and improved properties in New York State. For this market study, the following criteria were used to select the sales used for each part of the study: o Sales that were classified as single-family residential, with a Property Classification Code (PCC) of 210 o Sales that were identified as arm's length transactions o Sales with sale prices of at least $50,000 o Sales that included all pertinent data required for this market study o Sales within one -mile radius of control cellular tower being measured (insufficient number of sale properties were located within a one-half mile radius of most of the identified towers, requiring expansion of study area to one -mile radius) o Summaries of each set of sales for each of the towers studied are included in the Appendix o Each set of sales was analyzed to calculate the overall average unit price (average sales price divided by average house size) and overall median unit price (median sales price divided by median house size) o Price per House SF unit prices, representing the sale price divided by the house size in square feet, are recognized as moderating differences in size so that size adjustments are not required (average and median house sizes for each group are shown in each spreadsheet) o Unit prices also represent the relative contributory value of room counts, garages, basements, and all other typical components of single-family residential properties o Average and median measurements for Effective Year Built and Site Size (Acres) are also shown in each spreadsheet to show the relative uniformity of age and site size for each study o Sales of improved residential properties will include analyzing the changes in whole sale prices; however, it is our opinion that the unit prices (sale price divided by building size in square feet) reflects the most reliable changes in the trends of the sale prices 22- CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. o Two types of studies have been utilized o Before and After study reviews two sets of sales Before sales are from the two-year period prior to the year of construction of the tower After sales are from the two-year period after the year of construction of the tower A time adjustment of 3% per year is applied to the Before average and median unit prices to adjust those earlier prices to the same time frame as the After average and median unit prices The time period between the two studies is based on the difference between the midpoint date of the before average and median unit prices and the midpoint date of the after average and median unit prices Subsets of sale data consisting of the same house styles are also analyzed; the same time period used for the original data set of each control cellular tower is used throughout the subset analyses because the same time period was used for each sample of sales o Sale -resale transactions Properties that sold within a short time period prior to and after the construction of a control cellular tower Properties that sold at least twice -after the construction of control cellular tower A time adjustment is not applied to the earlier sale transaction; rather, the amount of the percentage of change per year is compared to the 3% annual time trend analyzed in the economic trends analysis to determine if the change in prices of sale -resale properties is similar, lesser or greater than the area's general time trend. o The average and median unit prices for each set of sales are compared to each other to calculate any significant differences between the sales that may potentially have been affected by the newly constructed control cellular towers to the sales that were unaffected but within the same neighborhoods. This market study will not estimate or calculate values for the parent parcel or the subject property. The purpose of this market study is for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower which will be visible above the typical height of mature trees in subject's neighborhood. This market study is not and cannot be used as an appraisal report. 23 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. MARAET STUDIES OF RESIDENTIAL SALES. - Paired Sales Analysis — Before and After Area Sales: The following table summarizes the locations of similar cellular towers that in the same region of Upstate New York and which were constructed within the past twenty years. No. Nam!/Rlglst radwNoi StmoAddress Town County Vp Latitude Lae itude TowerType Heightof tower ft Dateof[onstructlon 20 127=3 1893South Road Poughkeepsie Dutchess 12590 41.36-5&9N 73.55.03.9W Flasp+lewri 103 IW29/20DO fi 1222152 Van SldenRd. Poughkeepsie Dutchess 1260t 41.39.49.6N 73.55-S8.6W FI ale 120 2/31=1 4 1204871 PlattekillService Area Newburgh - Orange 12589 41.34-45.9N 74.05.06.SW LatticeTower 200 5/15/2001 7 1222509 209PIankRd Nowborsb Orange 125SO 41.32-12.ON 74.02-52.OW Lattice7ower 69 2/5/2002 20 1249384 178SYLVANLAKE ROAD Beekman Dutchess 12533 I 41-37.IUN 73.44-59.5W Monopole 219 4/26/20.02 15 1259621 Comar of Rte 207 and Toleman New VAndsor Orange 12575 41.2&26.6 N 74.OB-OLO W Monopole am 10/2/2002 5 12=79 37Ma le Ave Montgomery Orange 12575 41.3123.2N 74.%54.9W Monopole 173 2/20/2OD3 8 1233473 29BCedarAvenue Poughkeepsie Dutchess 12603 41.39-39.2N 73-54.17.5W Monopole 136 4/29/2W3 18 1271944 259SSouth Road Poughkeepsie Dutchess 1260L 41-35-53.5 N 73-55.5&2 W Flagpole 322 4/28/2004 9 1244362 19001d Sylvan Lake Rd East Fisfikill Dutchess 12533 41-36.17.8 N 73.45.18.8 W Monopole 90 7/28/2DD4 3 12OUSI I 120VaHe View Dr Newburgh Orange 12550 41.33.00.0N 74.04.5&5W Lattl eTower 8o 8/1/2004 17 12710M 20Barnes Rd Poughkeepsie Dutchess 12603 41.42.40.SN 73-52-18.4W Monopole 175 10/20/200S 19 1271945 2Neptune Road Poullb1ceepste. Dutchess 12601 41-38.39.9N 73.55.30.9W Fla le 121 10/20MOS 11 1255710 41Enterprise Drive Newburgh Orange 12550 41.300.419N 74.06.4&8W Monopole 125 27/2006 16 126187S 249DKent Cliffs Rd Carmel Putnam 10512 41.28.2L6N 73.45.35.2W Monopole 168 2172007 12 22MI29 80Airport Dr WappingersFall Dutchess 12590 41-37-47.2N 73-52.05.7W Monopole 8o 1272007 14 1250961 2741Route 94 Washingtonville Orange IM92 41.24-51.3N 74.10.2&2W Stealth Polo 350 2/20/2DO8 13 n9584 SSMrAI In Ave Maho ac Putnam 10541 41-22.37.5N 73.43.27.SW Monopole 122 515 WB 1 1012319 Dean kill Rd New Windsor Orange 12553 4L46144 74.07411 Lattice Tower 168 8 24/2010 2 1061739 Snake Hill Newburgh Orange 12550 41.49025 74.04139 Gu edTower 122 111/2010 21 1279282 89EMain St WashIngtonvIlle Orange 10992 41.42589 74.25697 Monopole 120 ON2011 22 1290490 722Route376 lop6iell,lunctloi Dutchess 12533 41. 59917 73,81296 Morionale 130 EAWZ13 24 13OD492 699Route 28D Gardiner Ulster U525 4L6WS7 74.13814 Monopole 254 2152015 23 1294461 17.190rrAve N awburth Orange 12550 4L49361 74.07Z42 Monopole 135 1 16 28 1304296 1-84MIlepostSSED Fishkill Dutchess 12533 4L54614 73. 72219 Monopole 126 3 18 26 1303175 20 Boardman Read Poughkeepsie Dutchess 12603 41. 65944 73.88661 Monopole 112 4 2018 27 LM3353 296 North Plank Rd Newburgh Orange 12550 4L55061 74.05958 Monopole 207 71 2019 25 1302084 1 Sid Falterin Woodbury Orange 10930 41. 3775 74.11806 lattictTower 190 16/2019 i309999 Loated off ofOrange aOr,nnrth of Orange Lake Orange Lake Orange n550 4L55103 , 74. 08317 Monopole 8o 9/16/2019 The eight tower projects shaded in the above table were constructed in the past seven years (post Great Recession) and are considered the most relevant for purposes of this market study. Using the most recently constructed control cellular towers for market study purposes will provide the most current reactions by residential home buyers in the subject property's marketing area. We have reviewed the locations of each of these cellular towers for neighborhood characteristics and potential for significant sale transaction history before and after the construction of each respective tower. After this review, the following cellular towers were identified as having a sufficient volume of residential sales in close proximity and could be used for market study purposes (identified as control cellular towers for evaluation purposes): No. TOWER NAME TOWN COUNTY DATE CONST. 22 722Route 376 East Fishkill Dutchess 6/ 30/ 2013 23 17-19 Orr Avenue Newburgh Orange 1/15/ 2016 26 244 Boardman Rd Poughkeepsie Dutchess 4/9/20I8 27 296 North Plank Road Newburgh Orange 7/ 16/ 2018 29 Off Disano Dr. . Newburgh Orange S/16(2019 24 CN Y Pomeroy Appraisers; Inc. For control cellular towers that were built more than two years ago, we reviewed the single-family residential sales activity to determine -if there were a sufficient nwnber of sales to analyze that occurred for the two-year period prior to the year of tower construction that could be compared to the sales activity for the two-year period after the tower construction (starting at least one full month after the construction date). If the tower was built within the past two years, then a before and after sales analysis will have limited "after'' sales to examine — taken from the first full month after the tower completion to the current time. The following Excel tables show the results of. each market study before and after analysis. The complete spreadsheets identifying the sales in each data set, complete with calculations for the average and median sale prices and unit sale prices (price per square foot of building area), time -adjusted average and median unit prices for the before sales' groups, and the differences between the before sales and the after sales, are included in the Appendix. We have also shown the average and median building sizes and effective ages to shove that both data sets are relatively uniform in characteristics except for the presence of a nearby cellular tower. The first table shows the summary of all residential sales within a one -mile radius of the identified control cellular tower. SUMMARY OF BEFORE & AFTER SALES ANALYSES ALL SALES WXTRIN ONE -MILE RADIUS OF CONTROL CELLULAR TOWERS TOWER VANIE TOWN CORN DATE CONST. SALESSAMPLED m BEFORE k AFTER DUCRETIMEAWSISF AFTERMF DIFFEROCE AVERAGE MEDIAN AVERAGE MEDWil AVERAGE MEDIA,V OfrDisanoDr. Nowburgh Orange 8J16+2o19 A11Saka.Mnuradius 31 a S147.17 SI54,28 S16331 172.94 1197% 12.09% 244Board=Rd Pou hkoo s' Dwchcss 419r2018 A11Sales. 1.0-nuradius lot 99 SWA9 148.91 S151.99 S16D21 5.63% 739% 722Rousc= FastFsitk0l Wichoss W012D13 All Saks,l.0aniradlus 56 47 S179M S29.11 Sly&94 156.95 11.32% 1740% 17. 190rrAwnue Nowbu h OwLc 11YW16 A11Saks, l.4mlradlus 16 18 137.43 S146$4 S139.82 SI4225 1.74Y. 2.93% 2%NoN,PlankRoad Newburgh Orange 711612D18 AD Saks,1.0•nindius 30 26 S129.26 134.16 156.98 163.08 212M 215635 OVER\LLAVERAGE SA6% OVERALL,MEDIIN 739% The net results of the five market studies of before and after residential sales, after adj usting the before set of sales for time, show overall average and median differences of 5.66% and 7.59%, respectively, indicating that the changes in improved residential sale prices for the after time period exceeded the time trend adjustment. The next table shows the differences for all 'sales for each control cellular tower, plus several sub -sets of sales based on school district and/or house style for each market study: 25 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SUMMARY OF BEFORE & AFTER SALES ANALYSES TOWER NAME T01VN CfY. DATE CONST. SALES SAMPLED R 13EFORE M AffM BEFORETIM&ADJ$IS F AFrRSISF DIFFERENCE AVI AGE MEDIAN AVERAGE MEDIAN AVERAGE MED61N OffDisano Dr. NccvbOrsh Orange I62Q19 AQSales, 1.0-miradiui 31 8 S147.17 S1S4.28 SL63,31 17294 10.97% 12,W4 Ncwbu hSchoolMt. 24 6 SI3MD 16L52 16238 164.96 6.74% 111% Ncwbu h Sch-. 2-sLy 13 6 147.94 172.71 16Z38 16496 9.84% 4.49% Ncwbu Sch: Split Lcvcl 4 3 S15205 S141.50 S153.53 S16MO 0,97% 14.94% 244 Beardnnn Rd. Peughkccpsic Dutchesi 4/912018 All Saks. l.U-rniradius 108 99 SL43.89 S143.91 151.99 S160.21 3.63% 7.5wi AgEny,tonSchoo:Dist. 35 26 SL47.62 5147.10 S162A2 S159.05 9.V% 12% AilingtOn Sch,: Ch c Cod 8 3 151.05 144.91 164.08 S16MS 8.63% 12.251A Arlington Sch.: Colonial 10 8 S145.15 S141.12 S143.33 S139.03 I.B% 1.48% Arlington Sch.; Ranch 9 6 S161.38 161.51 S197,03 199.02 2209% 2313V. Arlington Sch ; Cole 2 4 SL34-M M.82 177.50 S161.49 37.09% 20,17Yi Arlin ton Sch.; SpaLevel 4 2 S14623 143.92 157.29 S15718 7.56% 936% 722 Ric 376 Fast FLOUR Dutchas, N3012013 AllSuks, l.0-rigmdius 56 47 S179.22 SI89.13 SI58.94 SI56,95 11.32% 17.00% Wappingas Sch.; Colonial 33 30 S184-54 196.56 SI57.12 3176,04 14.%% 10,4413 Wappingers Sch,; Old St k 3 2 S144.91 125.73 S176.85 S176.85 22.04Y. 40.66% Wappin crs Sch.: R Ranch 9 6 S145.83 154.0.2 SUMS 133,46 10.48% 1335% Wappingers &hL. ROMb 5 7 S20836 SM3.78 SIS8.78 S159.90 9.40% 12.99°/. 17-19 Orr Avc, Newburgh Oracgc 1/1512016iNewbursdiScImPaiscd All Sales. l.0aniradius I6 l8 137.43 S146.54 S139.82 142.25 1.74% 293% Ncwbu dr Sch : Ca Cod 3 1 123.14 S132.10 SL63AO V63,40 32.69% 23,69% Ranch 2 6 S12M 123.89 S[53.49 SI6244 23,89'! 31,12% Newburgh Sch.: Ranch 7 9 S155.91 S161,68 125.52 S143.91 19.49Y. 10.99% Ncwbu h Sch.; S 1ir Lcvcl 2 1 115.99 115.98 SL4SA6 S145,46 25.42% 25.42% 296 N. Plank Rd. Newburgh Orange 7/1612018 All Sales.l.0-Mrudius 30 26 S129.26 3134.16 SI56.78 S163,08 21,29% 2156% NewbafghSclt.:AllSales 29 25 S1201 13436 StS4.62 S160.26 20.41% 19.27% Newburgh Scb.-. CaeCad 10 2 130.7S 169.60 St66,67 S166,67 27.471A 1.15Y. Newbu h Sch.• Colonial 7 1 124.51 3123.03 S151.74 151.74 21,M. 2334% Ncwbu h Sch,; U Style I 1 Sl1033 11033 S144.21 S144.21 30.701A 30.701% Newburgh Sch.; Raised Ranch 4 3 512d.i t 142.68 S14952 SI57,89 20.47% 10.6610 Ncwbu h Sch.; Ranch 2 8 135.79 1 $135.79 S142.63 SI55.40 S.04% 14.44% Ncwbu h Sch.; S lit Lcvcl 5 10 S135.79 3145.% S166.68 1 $17240 2275% 18.12% FRA OVERALLAVHAS% OVEPALLMIDL\ N 1 12.09% As shown in the above table, the overall average and inedian changes in single-family residential values for properties in the study areas, after adjusting the older before groups of sales for time, produced overall increases of 11.15% arid 12.09%, respectively. In conclusion, the market studies of before and after paired sales analyses, when considering a variety of combinations of before and after improved residential sales, yielded overall net results that show positive trends that exceeded the time trend adjustments proven in the economic trends analysis of the Neighborhood / Local Marketing Area section. Based on the overall results of these market data analyses, the addition of a cellular tower to a neighborhood does not adversely impact the values of the nearby residential properties. Paired Sales Analysis - Sale /Re -sale Transactions: We have also reviewed the transactions from each set up sales to identify properties that sold at least twice in the respective study periods. For this part of the'market study we used the following criteria for identifying usable Sale / Re -Sale transactions: Time period between sale dates of at least one year Sale dates to be before and after the date of tower construction Alternatively, sale dates after the date of tower construction to see if price trends were positive or negative The following table summarizes the Sale / Re -sale transactions (Excel spreadsheets identifying each sale are included in the Appendix): 26 CITY" Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SUMMARY OF SALE - RESALE TRANSACTIONS BEFORE AND AFTER TOWER CONSTRUCTION TOWER NAME TOWN COIIPITY DATE CONST. TYPEOF PAIRED TRANSACTION CHANGE PER YEAR AVERAGE MEDIAN Off DisanoDr. Newbu h Orange 81161200 Before&After Tower Construction 17.58% 17.580/a 244 Boardman Rd. Poughkeepsie Dutchess 4/9/2018 Before & After Tower Construction 33.98°h 18.77°/a 722 Route 376 East Fishkill I Dutchess 6/3012013 Before & After Tower Construction 1.56% 1.83% 17-19 Orr Aven ue Newburgh Orange 1IM2016 Before &After Tower Construction 19.81% 20.46°/a 296North Plank Road Newburgh . Orange 7/16/2018 Before& After Tower Construction 3.54°/a 14.11% OVERALL AVERAGE 14.67% 1OVERALLMEDIAN17 38% As shown in the above table, the overall average and median changes in the sale l re -sale prices of single-family residential values for properties in the study areas produced overall increases of 14.67% and 17.58%, respectively. Both the overall average and median rates of change exceed the 3 % annual time trend derived previously in this market study and which was used to adjust the sale'prices of the before sales used in the before and after paired sales analysis. The next table shows the results of two sets of sale -resale transactions after the identified tower was constructed with overall average and median increases of 7.19% and 1.31%, respectively. Note that, while the Dean Hill Road cellular tower site was not used for the before and after paired sales analysis because it was constructed in the middle of the Great Recession, we were able to identify several sale -resale transactions after the.tower was constructed and the Recession had ended. Tthese spreadsheets identifying each sale transaction are included.in the Appendix. SUMMARY OF SALE - RESALE TRANSACTIONS TOWER NAME TOWN COUNTY DATE CON5T. TYPEOFPAIREDTRANSACTION CHANGE PER YEAR AVERAGE MEDIAN 722 Route 376 East Fishkill Dutchess 6/30/2013 Post Tower Construction 9.37a/o 0.11% Dean Hill Road Newwindsor Oran a 812N2010 Pos t Tower Co ns truction 5.01% 2.72a/a OVERALLAVERAGE 7.19% OVERALL MEDIAN 1.31 27 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. The following table summarizes all of Sale -Resale transactions for each control cellular tower, combining the paired sale transactions that occurred before and after the tower construction with the post -tower construction paired sale transactions. This table shows the overall average and median rates of price changes at 12.53% and 14.11%, respectively. SUMMARY OF SALE - RESALE TRANSACTIONS TOWER NAME TOWN COUNTY DATE CONST. TYPE OF PAIRED TRANSACTION CHANGE PER YEAR AVERAGE MEDIAN Off DisanoDr, Newburgh Oran a 8/1612019 Before& After Tower Construction 17.58% 17.58% 244 Boardman Rd. Poughkeepsie Dutchess 4/9/2018 Before & After Tower Construction' 33.98% 18.77% 722 Route 376 East Fishkill Dutchess 6/30/2013 Before & After Tower Construction 1.56% 1.83% 722 Route 376 East MUM Dutchess 613012013. Post Tower Construction 9.37a/a 0.11% 17-190rrAvenue Newburgh Orange 1/15/2016 Before& After Tower Construction 19.81% 20A6% 296North Plank Road Newbu h OranLe 7/16/2018 Before & After Tower Constnuction 3.54% 14.11% Dean Hill Road New W indsor Orange 8/24/2010 Post Tower Construction 5.01% 2.72% OVERALLAVFRAGE 12,53% OVERALLMEDIAN 14.11 % In conclusion, the market studies of the sale -resale transactions, produced overall net results that show positive trends that exceeded the time trend adjustments proved in the economic trends analysis of the Neighborhood / Local Marketing Area section.• Based on the overall results of these market data analyses, the addition of a cellular tower to a neighborhood does not adversely impact the values of the nearby residential properties. 28 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. SUPPLEMENTAL REVIEW; The client has also requested that we review documents that have already been provided to the Town of Wappinger by parties that are opposing the construction of the subject's proposed cellular tower and to also review the reports that have been prepared by other professionally designated real estate appraisers for other cellular tower projects. Review of O osition documents: Memorandum In Opposition —110 Chelsea Road, undated, Prepared by Andrew J. Campanelli Point I — claims construction of 150-foot high cellular tower will violate the Zoning Code any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Point II — claims construction of the cellular tower does not meet the standards for a special permit — any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. . Point III — claims construction of the cellular tower does not meet the standards for site plan approval — any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Point III, Part A — claims construction of the cellular tower will inflict substantial losses in value of adjacent and nearby residential properties. o Several studies were cited from The Bond and Wang that were completed between 1984 and 2004 (the early years of cellular tower construction) when cellular towers were new and readily noticeable, but not significantly different than television and radio transmission towers. o The only distance referenced in the footnotes was "within 100' of a Cell Tower" the distance to the closest residences of the proposed Castle Point cellular tower location are over 550 feet. o The most recent date in the footnotes is 2012 which references a New Jersey appraiser's analysis. o While it may be possible that cellular towers presented neighborhood nuisances in the early years of cellular usage, the studies that our -firm has completed in the past ten years do not reflect the types of negative impacts on residential property values that are referenced in this Point. The results of this market study, which are based on sale transaction studies from 2013 through 2020, show overall net positive trends for both the before and after paired sales analyses and for the sale - resale paired sales analyses. 29 CNX Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. o References federal Courts decisions and the "professional opinions of licensed real estate brokers, (as opposed to appraisers) who • provide their professional opinions as to the adverse impact upon property values..." Real estate brokers are advocates for their clients and may not be unbiased; professional real estate appraisers are required to render objective opinions based on their analyses of market data. The analysis contained in this market study are a straight examination of recent sale data around control cellular towers to compare sale prices of residence before and after the construction of a cellular tower, with the older sales adjusted for time to bring the comparison into the same time frame. The four real estate brokers who provided their professional opinions which are listed in this section and have letters included in the "Exhibits in Opposition" (see next document reviewed) stated only their opinions and did not support those opinions with any market data or -statistics. Point IV -- claims Tarpon Towers' application for an area variance does not meet its standards - any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Point V -- claims Tarpon Towers would be able to increase height of proposed tower without further approvals — any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Point VI — claims Tarpon Towers failed to provide proof of need for location and height proposed — any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Point VII -- states Tarpon Towers' application should be denied — any comments are beyond the scope.of this market study. Exhibits in Opposition — Chelsea Road Tower, undated; Prepared by Andrew I Campanelli Exhibit B contains approximately 30 letters from neighboring home owners and family members stating opposition to the construction of the 150-foot high cellular tower on the 110 Chelsea Road property, primarily opposing its disruption of the scenic views each currently enjoys. These letters emphasize the view, tranquility, natural environment, and quiet environment that will be destroyed by the placement of the cell tower. The letters reference personal and/or sentimental feelings about the construction of the cell tower but do not provide any market data or statistics that support a loss of market value to their respective properties. Exhibit C contains Brokers Professional Opinion Letters o Susan Wynne of Re/Max states, in her professional opinion, the cell tower will reduce the value of the 86 Chelsea Road property by "approximately 15% to 20%" and "will make the home less marketable and more challenging to sell" but does not provide any market data or statistics to support this opinion. o Kimberlee Markarian of Berkshire Hathaway states, in her professional opinion, the proposed cell tower "reduce the value of the home at 86 Chelsea Rd, Wappingers by. approximately 20% and it. will make the home less marketable, even at a reduced purchase price." This letter does not include any market data or statistics to support this opinion. 30 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. o Diane Spiak-Pisanelli of Berkshire Hathaway refers to the value of a beautiful view and states, "the many municipalities have a `view tax' which puts a levy on some properties for their spectacular views" and "depending upon the size and location to the property in question, the negative impact could be anywhere between 15% to 25% of the property value." This broker does not include any market data or statistics to support this opinion. o Kevin Fortuna of Fortuna Realty, Inc. states "I believe the addition of a cell tower to any property will have a negative impact on that properties value" but does not include any market data or statistics to support this opinion. Exhibits D, E and F — images and articles of collapsed towers o Castle Point cellular tower is located on a site with a sufficient fall zone around it where it will not land on any structures or property owned by others. Exhibits G and H — images and articles of cell tower fires o Location of proposed Castle Point cellular tower is removed from surrounding residences and any fire or collapse will not affect surrounding properties (150- foot height of proposed tower is only 27% of the distance to the closest residence which is measured at 555 feet from the tower site). o A fire on a cell tower is not significantly different than a fire on a silo or other tall structure; any fire is potentially devastating and building codes and construction standards are designed to reduce the risk of fire and other types of damage. Exhibit I — Verizon Coverage Map for 110 Chelsea Road Site - any comments are beyond the scope of this market study. Exhibit J — Satellite images of Four Alternative Sites - any continents are beyond the scope of this market study. Review of Reports by Professionally i7esignated Real Estate Appraisers The client provided seven market study reports prepared by professionally designated real estate appraisers which analyzed sales around other cellular towers. The reports were prepared between 201 land 2014. A summary of our review of each report follows: 1. Proposed Cell Tower, 433 Cooper Road, Town of Irondequoit (Monroe County); prepared by Robert G. Pogel, SRPA of Pogel, Schumbmehl & Ferrara, LLC; dated February 4, 2011. a. Report provides a transmittal letter that includes a summary of the parent property, neighborhood and procedures employed to complete the market study. b. Analysis for Site No. 1 involved a 115-foot high cell tower constructed in 1996. The, appraiser compared the average unit sale price of sales of nine residential properties that were within view of the cell tower ($84.32 per square foot) to the average unit sale price of sales of seven residences in the same subdivision but with a view of the cell tower ($81.03 per square foot). Conclusion was there was an appreciable difference in property values regardless of the proximity of the cell tower. A summary of sales with tax map and photograph are included. 31 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. c. Analysis for Site No. 2 involved a 130-foot monopole cell tower and a nearby police department cell tower constructed in 2000. The appraiser compared the average unit sale price of six residential properties without a view of the cell towers ($76.69 per square foot) to ten sales of residences with a limited view of the cell towers ($76.63 per square foot) to six sales of residential properties with a view of the cell towers- 76.95 per square foot). Conclusion was there the sale prices do not indicate any appreciable difference relative to the proximity to the two cell towers. A summary of sales with tax map- and photographs are included. d. Our conclusion of this Pogel report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 2. Proposed Wireless Communication Facility, 2232 Route 17K, Town of Crawford; prepared by Edward I Ferrarone, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated February 2, 2012. - a. Report includes a transmittal letter that identifies the subject property, proposed 150- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the market study. b. Transmittal letter references several previous studies with the lists of each set bf sales for each study following the letter i. Town of Somers --100-foot high monopole - referenced one study since 2000 plus a•2009-2011 study which both showed nearby condominium units with a view of the cell tower had higher prices than those with no view. I Harrison, NY —100-foot monopole installed in 1997 — referenced two studies 2000-2001 and 2009-2011) that revealed homes with a view of the tower sold for higher prices than those without a view in the same neighborhood. iii. New Rochelle, Ny— I I0-foot monopole —references two studies (2000-2001 and 2009-2010) with each revealing that homes in the same neighborhood with a view of the monopole sold for higher prices than homes without a view iv. Town of Stony Point, NY — 130-foot monopole — referenced two studies 2003-2006 and 2007-2009) that reported little if any differences in sales prices with and without direct views of the tower. v. VilIage of Suffern, NY — 90-foot stealth flag monopole — referenced a 2009- . 2006 study that showed no differential in values between homes with and without views.of the tower. 1. Also references a 2007-2010 study that showed the highest unit pride paid in that time period was for a home with a view of the monopole. vi. Town of Orangeburg —monopole located on Town Hall property —referenced three studies (2003-2005, 2007 and 20080-2010) 1. First study showed unit prices of $250 for homes with a view of the monopole. compared to $207 for homes without a view 2. , Second study showed a sale with a view of the monopole at $294 per square foot compared to four sales without a view at $256 per square foot. 3. Third study showed average unit price for homes with a view of the tower at $254.57 compared to homes without a view at $231.15. 32 CN . Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. vii. Village of Spring Valley, NY -•-100-foot monopole —referenced a 2004-2006 study with average unit price ofhomes with a view at $188.96 compared to homes without a view at $196.17 (reflects a 3.69% reduction) — appraiser concludes difference is "only minor". 1. In 2007 a second monopole was erected in the same neighborhood; a 2007-2010 study showed an average unit price for homes with a view Of both monopoles at $246.33 compared to Domes without a view at 212.20. c. Appraiser states he has completed other studies and in each study the results were consistent and similar" d. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 3. Proposed Wireless Communication Facility, 23 Dartantra Drive, Hopewell Junction, Town of East Fishkill; prepared by Edward J. Ferrarone, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated March 10, 2013. a. Report includes a transmittal letteit that identifies the subject property, proposed 150- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the market study. b. Transmittal letter references the same studies that were identified in the February 2, 2012 Lane Appraisal report and includes the lists of each set of sales for each study following the letter c. An eighth study was provided from Town of Patterson on another communications tower which showed a home with a view sold for $219.54 compared to four nearby homes without a view that averaged $180.87. d. Appraiser states he has completed other studies and in each study the results were consistent and similar" e. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views . of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 4. Proposed Wireless Communication Facility, 73 Cunningham Lane, Town of Pawling; prepared by Edward J. Ferrarone, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated August 14, 2013. a. Report includes a transmittal letter that identifies the subject property, proposed 110- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the market study. b. Transmittal letter references the same studies that were identified in the March 10, 2013 Lane Appraisal report and includes the lists of each set of sales for each study following the letter c. Appraiser states he has completed other studies and in each study the results were consistent and similar" d. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 33 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 5. Proposed Monopole application, 675 Route 1, Pine Island; prepared by Edward J. Ferrarone, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated November 19, 2013. a. Report includes a transmittal letter that identifies the subject property, proposed 150- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the. market study. b. Transmittal letter references the same studies that were identified in the March 10, 2013 and August 14, 2013 Lane Appraisal reports and includes the lists of each set of sales for each study following the letter c. Appraiser states he has completed other studies and in each study the results were consistent and similar" d. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 6. Proposed Cingular Wireless application, 4377 Route 44, Town of Washington; prepared by Edward J. Ferrarone, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated May 21, 2014. a. Report includes a transmittal letter that identifies the subject property, proposed 105- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the market study. b. Transmittal letter references the same studies that were identified in the March 10, 2013, August 14, 2013 and November 19, 2013 Lane Appraisal reports and includes the lists of each set of sales for each study following the letter c. Appraiser states he has completed other studies and in each study the results were consistent and similar" d. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 7. Proposed Facility, 638 Craigville Road, Town of Goshen,; prepared by Paul A. Alfieri, III, MAI of Lane Appraisals, Inc.; dated May 31, 2017. a. Report includes a.transmittal letter that identifies the subject property, proposed 182- foot high monopole cell tower, neighborhood, and procedures used to complete the market study. b. Transmittal letter references the several studies, some of which were in the previous Lane Appraisal reports plus some additional studies; lists of each set of sales for each study following the letter - 1. South Blooming Grove — 125-foot monopole — average price of $185 per square foot for homes within sight of the tower compared to $187 per square foot for homes with no view ii. Hamptonburgh — 162-foot self-supporting pole -- average price of $143 per square foot for homes within sight of the tower compared to $143 per square foot for homes with no view iii. Lewisboro —*130-foot monopole -- average unit price of $239 per square foot for homes within sight of the monopole compared to $225 per square foot for homes with no view iv. New Castle --130-foot monopole — average unit price of $308 per square foot for homes within sight of the tower compared to $302 per square foot for homes with no view 34 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. v. Pound Ridge — 130-foot monopole — average unit price of $274 per square foot for homes within sight of the monopole compared to $271 per square foot for homes without a view vi. Pound. Ridge — 155-foot monopole — average unit price of $284 per square foot for homes with a view of the tower compared to $282 per square foot for homes without a view vii. Somers, Stony Point, Suffern, Orangeburg and Spring Valley studies were referenced in previous Lane Appraisal reports viii. Putnam Lake — monopole without height provided — one home with view sold for $219.58 per square foot compared to four sales with no view that had an average unit price of $190.87 per square foot C. Appraiser states that, in his opinion, "the installation; presence, and/or operation of the proposed Facility will not result in the diminution of property values or reduce the marketability of properties in the immediate area." d. Our conclusion of this Lane report is that the analyses of residential properties with and without views of nearby cell towers was competently completed and its conclusions were based on market data and a limited statistical analysis. 35 CNY Poimeroy Appraisers, Inc. SUMMARYAND RECONCILIATION OF VALUE INDICATORS: The subject property has a rural/near-suburban location in the town of Wappinger and the town of Fishkiil, Dutchess County, New York. The subject is a horse faun to be partly improved with a cellular tower site on a combined 47.91f acres (two tax parcels). The property is in average condition. The intended use of this appraisal is to estimate the "as is" market value of the.fee simple estate interest for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower. This appraisal does not include consideration for personal property, business value, goodwill, or other intangibles. The property is being valued as if free and clear of any potential environmental issues. Cuddy & Feder, LLP is the client. The only intended users are the client, Tarpon Towers, H, LLC, Town of Wappinger, Verizon Wireless of the East LP, and AirOSmith Development. The report may not be distributed to or relied upon by any other persons or entities for any purpose whatsoever, without our written permission. All other uses and users are unintended, unless specifically stated in the letter of transmittal. The market studies comparing the unit prices of before transactions (occurring prior to the tower construction and adjusting for the time difference) to the unit prices after'the tower construction resulted in overall average and median changes of positive 5.66% and 7.59%, respectively, indicating that the surrounding residential properties did not suffer a value loss that could be associated with the nearby cellular tower. When breaking each set of before and after transactions into subsets based on school district and/or house style, the overall average and median changes were positive 11.59% and 12.09%, respectively, also reinforcing the market's reactions to not showing negative value trends for residential properties due to cellular tower construction in the same neighborhoods. A second set of market studies reviewing the sale prices of the same single-family residential property that transferred both before and after the construction of the control cellular tower resulted in overall average and median changes of 14.67% and 17.58%, respectively, exceeding the 3% annual time trend used in the before and after market study analysis. This sale -resale paired sales market study also positive trends for post -tower construction sale -resale transactions (overall average and median values of 7.19% and 1.31%, respectively), and 12.53% and 14.11% for the overall average and median values when both sets of sale -resale transactions are combined. Based on the preceding analysis, it is our opinion that the values of residential properties in close proximity to a cellular tower site are not adversely affected by those projects. 36 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Based on the positive value trends observed from the residential markets around each of the control cellular towers investigated, there is no market evidence that a cellular tower is not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood. Three of the five before and after sales analyses showed overall unit price increases that ranged from about 1.7% to over 21% higher for the after sales after time trend adjustments, indicating that the residential markets around the control cellular tower sites were not adversely affected by the existence of the new tower in the- neighborhood. One of the before and after studies (17-19 Orr Avenue) showed mixed positive and negative trends after adjusting for time. The fifth before and after study (722 Route 376) did show negative trends after time adjustments, but this study was done in a mixed neighborhood with commercial properties and a golf course could have effects on housing prices. Overall; the combination of the five before and after market studies reflected unit price growth rates that were ten percent or more (based on average and median unit prices) higher than the region's overall appreciation rate -- indicating that the control cellular towers studied were not out of harmony with the surrounding neighborhoods. The second set of market studies reviewing the sale -resale transaction prices of the same property also support the question of whether cellular towers adversely affect the harmony of a neighborhood. Four of the control cellular tower locations had sale -resale transactions market studies that showed appreciation rates between the before and after periods (of tower construction) that were higher than the overall appreciation rates for the region, with the fifth market study (722 Route 376) exhibiting slightly negative trends, indicating that the residential prices changes were slightly less than the area's appreciation rates. Adding the two post -tower construction sale -resale studies showed overall positive rates, indicating that residential property values continued to appreciate after the' construction of d nearby cellular tower. Therefore, the matched paired sales analysis of the selling prices of residences after a tower's construction showed that residential property values continue to increase over the time period studied, providing additional evidence that a cellular tower is not incompatible with a neighborhood. Some neighborhoods that experience the construction of a new cellular tower already have existing towers (radio, television; cellular) or other nonresidential manmade structures e.g. powerlines, water towers, solar farms); the market evidence reviewed did not produce any evidence that the addition of another cellular tower would have any significant adverse impact on the area's residential property values. We have completed similar market studies for the impacts on property values from overhead powerlines, water towers, solar fanns, radio and television towers, and cellular towers across Upstate New York. For each of these studies, we found no net negative unpacts on the neighborhood's residential property values. The results of the market, study research for evaluation of the impact from a proposed cellular tower at the Castle Point NY 1136 site parallel what we have found for similar types of market study evaluation assignments. This estimate of value is subject to the Assumptions and Limiting Conditions outlined and contained in our report. Special attention is directed to the Special Assumption also discussed in this report. In reconciling these indicators, the quality and quantity of the data is considered. The strengths and weaknesses of the approaches are also .considered. 37 APPENDIX CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. MARKET STUDIES FOR BEFORE & AFTER SALES: OFFDIISANO DRIVE: OFF DISANO DRIVE, TOWN OF ORANGE LAKE, ORANGE COUNTY (130-FOOT MONOPOLE, CONSTR. DATE 8/l /2019) SINGLE-FAMILY 'R ESI DENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS CWNTY TAXMAPFI STREET B SIAFET TOWAI HOUSE Sr EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE AGES SALE DATE SA[EPIBC: PRICE PER HOUSE SF ' SELLER OEM BOOK DEW PAGE BUYER Orange 34.1-7D.1 222 HCKORYHIILLN NEWBURGHNY 2T)O 2004 3311CO-KEWMAIGH COLONIAL LOO 2017-01-21 3 000 SILL91 SEHAERLROBERT 24168 2795 KOVALLAURE OF&W 37.3.28 539 CENTERST 14EWSMGHNY 1394 3950 331100-ND110KOCH SPLITLEVEL 0.28 2817-M-13 15Z= S309M AMMYKERELTRUSTEESTORMSIM IL4207 829 FLDBESFRIWCELYISODORO Orange 34.17.22 151 MCKORYNILLRD NEWBURGUNY 1717 7987 331100-NEWIIUEGH UUSEDRANCI 1.10 1017-M-22 176.S40 SIUM REYESJOSER 241C 506 WOODBFRRYSU2EFTED OrmV I11-1-5 S MARYPHYIUSLN NEWBURGHNY 2160 1988 S35201-WAIIXILt WSEDRMa 10D 2017.OG05 274,000 51M.IL CM1ROLANN LANZER FAMRYTRLIST 14229 1474 LANIGANRICHRRD Orwee IG-3-6 1 21 FOILWOODOR NEWBURGHNY 2G82 199S 132100-KEWBMGH COLONIAL I CAL 2017.Ob-1T1 5310.000 SI25.26 HAASSTEVE 24252 955 BL0*KXZMICHAEL Orange 14.1.56 409 LEROTAVE NEWBURGHNY MG 1939 S1S20I-WAUXJLL COTTAGE 030 2017-D601 I $1 999 5179.42 THERIVERAFAMLYUMLTEOPARTNE 24M 2242 PUPIALESIRIAN Orange 28.6.9 2 MAXWAY NEWBURGNNY 2477 2011 51S201-WALLKILL COLONIAL Z 2037-M-21 S367AS0 S341ILM WATTSDENNISB 14263 ID41 TORRESGEORGE Oafte 37•5.2 S38 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 16K 2960 331100-KLWBMGM SPUTIEVEL 035 M37.OB-23 SM;CW 119,05 KERSTKENNEM 2420 ISS7 TORRESJILSON ' OpM 47.1-100.2 9 JODIDR NEYIBURGHNY 2990 2003 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL ZBD 20174W31 54410DW S14B-Bi BROWNTIMOTHY 24290 741 ASU[d D1ANNE OraW 38-2.17 3.218 UNIONAVE HEWBURGHNY 1214 I948 33nW-NEIV811RGH CAPECOD OM 2017-M28 SIM900 5124M LFFKOWIT£ WILLIAM 14300 3M AKTARHELENA orange 47-3.1 117 HICKORYHILLRD HEWBURGHNY 1488 2017 3311W-NEW8MGH WSEDRMO 3.50 2017.10-05 S279.000 187.50IVDOMINGUESCONSTRUCTION COV I4311 279 CARKESONIA On 16-I-23 124 FOXWOODDR INEMLIRGUNY 194 1995 331100•NEW8U015n UUUCIRAN 0,49 2027-10-17 S265A00 140.66 OXMFEUX JR 14327 ISW IAFFEE PATRICK 0 14-1-745 20 CHAPFLRD NEWBURGHNY 304 1997 331100-NEW&MISH COLONIAL 5AWD 2017-20-30 447,900 124.14 ESPOSrFOl1NAL 143231 1292 NB1MWDONALDP Or-ige I 2R-4-9 5 AIOR CIR NFWBURGHNY 1249 INS 331=-NEWaURGHI RANCH SM 2017-U-09 SMS5000 SII6-19 FADAMSFLVINIt 24319r413.GALIAGHRRTIMOTHY OnW 36.3.4 2S FLORAL DR NEWBURGHNY 1344 IMI 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH OA4 2OV-Ii.17 Sll -%i 124.67 OAILEYRE5MCETRUSC 14326PEFFERS ROBFRT Or.Lnge 33-I.17 377 IAKESIOERD NEMURGHNY 1140 393D 331100-NEWBURGH OrMEASTYLE O 2W7-11•YF 273,500 S739.91 WASNOR0wakENNEFH I4MBUANCHANiHONY C e 36-I-3.1. 20 FLORALDR HEMURGHNY 19M 39W 33lIM-NEWOULGH RANCH 052 2M7.12-13' 24%0110 126M LOSBEPAUL I44100ENNEYMCXANDRA Orange 37 4d7 534 CFNMST HEWBLIRGHNY 1056 15% 331100-NEWAUROH SPUTIllYEL 0.22 2W-IZ-15 20A D MM-116 WALTERKROLLINC 14339SOUVA SEAN 0 111.2]2.2 11 ROSAUNELN NEWBURGHNYr120D 19M 51520I-WALIXILL NTEMPO Q92 2018.01-26 S39MW S34ZU AWA HOME BUYERS MC 243%DLESIHGCHRISTOPKER e 211-2]22 Lin UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 1988 SIS201-WAUXILL SPUTLEVEL GM 2018-03-02 526 ow 137.59 GRUFINTHOMASM 14MBRENNAN MICHAELGARY Or-ge 34.1.12 1 DISANO DR NEWBURGHNY 1991 331IM-NEWBURGH RANCH 1.20 2M&03 S 312,500 101I0 AWDAIOHN I4377WILSONBRYAN Orange IS-3.3 L305 UNION AVE NEWBURGIINY ZOM 33UM-NEWBUKH RANCH EL46 7DIR-06•V3 1T5= 14S.83 VAN CUM PETER 241"SAMMARCO SCOTT Orange 14.1-21,I 2 SCHESTATED NEWBURGHNY 1976 S15MI-WAUXILL SmRAN L00 20184&25 S127.97 WAGERIAYA 24409 IS50 BACRLS SHAWN Onnae 34-1-2SAl 1281 UNIONAVE NEWBURGIRNY 2018 332100-NEWBLNGFI SEDRAN LD0 201&D60B ISR40 HUDSON ASS ET Homes L1C 14473 2239 SERSEFWLNCESME C e 783.22 4 IFFTAHDRO NEWBURGHNY 1903 332100-NEWBIRLGH IDRAN D-W 20194W,14 S241.36 HOMES BY LV LLC 14456 Il HERCADO 5& ASON M2.13 1220 UIIDNAVE NEWBURGHNY 1949 331IW-HEWDLYIGH CAPECOD OL34 2013-10-10 51E6.60 AENAFHLJWiN 24473 757 MOUNASFEPHANIE Oran 16.1.13 24 FOXWOO DR NEWBURGHNY 173.0 19M 3311CO-NEWOURGH SPLITLEVEL C.76 2018-10-IS F$;201k0:00 SIM92 MAYEN CHERYLM 14473 338 DEMUARCO GEOFFREY Orange S3-1-7.1 13 EIMHUR5rAVE NEWBIIRGHNY SG80 1920 33UM-NEWKNM OLDSTYLE 107 2DMIO.17 S164. 8 TIER3PROPERTIESILC 14476 X6 WILLIAMSEDWAR Orange 51-7.5 7-1R SUNSETCOVERD NEWBURGHNY 1564 1930 331100-NEWBURM COTTAGE C.O6 701&MI.9 127.89 KLRUSAMI 14479 SO MMFIO ILC Orange 2&3.3,2 IS LEEIANDRD NEWBURGHNY 1836 1%9 331100-NEWBURM EDRAN BM 701&11.OS ZMS9 LMNETTE KIM 1442S I739 CAMPORESE ANTONIOANY0NUL Onngt 14-5-17 2 DEER RUN RD NEWBURGH NY 2032 1987 S1S201-WAUXLL CAPECOD 1.40 2DIS-21.13 175.OD0 S609 KENNETHORDWN IRREVOCABLETRUS 24497 17% MINLITABULOERS INC RSAIES 31 AVERAGE 1157 JS76 1.11 WB 13B.7Z 71MEAUI.PWCE 3% 1 2 147.17 MEDIAN IS36 1987 0.42 0(0 LISAZ TIMEADJ. PRICE 3% 2 1 $15L28 PERYR BYR Crane 111.2.111 1329 LR4K)NAVE NEWBURGHNY 1926 1988 SIS201-WALLKRL PUTLE.VEL GM 20M.10.11 S.WDM 17653 BRENNANAGOIL EL 14642 SSB RLIGGFIALMARK J Orange 37-5-3 SOS GARDEN ST NEWBURGHNY 1392 1 1%1 331=-_NEWBURGH SPLITUEVEL 0.2E 1 2019-11-13 214.500 154.M STONER F K AMEHMETSIFA 1466S 11 RUSPESILVAJORGEWS Orange 311.2-10 2 ROSAUNELN NEWMJhGHNY I865 1 1"7 5152111-WAUIXLL COIINLAL EL77 2D29.21-15 SW 153 GABASTEPHFN 1460 1% ROBINSON LEFORD Orange 37.4.20 54O CENTEAST NEWBURGH NY MO 19S8 331300-NEWBURGH SPUrUWEL 0.28 2029-IZ-13 S249.0W SU&" JONESTIFFANY 14681 39V BIRCH ROBERT Orange 33.1.25 351 LAKESIDE RD NEWBURGH NY E93 19W 331300-NEWOURM OTFIERSTYIE 0.12 2D26 M•17 S=000 52% FAARDWROSEANN I46W 1750 DIEPOLOGEORGE Orange 37-4.6 537 UPPERAVE NEWRURGHNY 1056 L%g 3311o0-NEWeuRGH SPLITLEVEL 0.28 20I0-Ol•17 000 5108g0 SIMONSROGERE IR 146" 413 SPUPPERAVEUC Orange 37.3.12 1 1232 UNIONAVE NEWBURGH NY 2314 1947 331MO-NEWOURGH CAPECOD 0.33 202D 03-20 220LOOL1 S167Aa 7HANGAKA7RANTMNHU 147271 2185 RODRIGUCZSAMUEL Orange 47.1•W.32 59 HICCORYHILLRD NEWBURGH NY 290 VIA 3AII00-NEWOURGH COLONIAL 5.10 MM0501 36R000 5I47A8 SANSEVEROJOiSEPH 14743 174 CARMUNAALEIANORINA NSALFS B AVERAGE 2534 I963 1A1 M431 SIELZI MEDIAN II66 190 631 23RS00 17L94 DIFFE1LEliCEOFAVERAGE SESF 10.477E 2KFF19RNCE OF MEDAN$/ HOUSESF 72091E 39 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. OFF DISANO DRIVE, TOWN OF ORANGE LAKE, ORANGE COUNTY (80-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 8116/2019) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ONE MILE RADIUS & NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY TAX MAP N STREET N STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOLISEMYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSE 5F SELLER DEW BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 34-I.70.1 727 HICKORYHILLLN NEWBURGH NY 27M 2004 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL OD 2017.02,11 3] OM S11L91 SCHAETZLROBERT 14168 179E IKOVALLAURE Orange 37-3-29 539 CENTEAST NEWBURGH NY 1394 1950 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0.28 2617.0213 S1S2,000 W9.04 TAMMYKEIFELTRUSFEESTORMSIRR 14IW 829 FLORESFRANCELYISODORO Orange 34-1.7-22 151 HICKORYHILLRO NEWBURGH NY 1717 1987 332100-NEMURCH RAISED RANC 2.10 2017-0222 S176540 SW2M REYE5JOSER 14387 506 WOODBERRYSUZEr1ED Orange 15.3.6 21 FOXWOODDR I NEWBURGH NY 2692 199E 331100•NEWBURGH COLONIAL 0.46 2017-0-17 334000 11S,16 HAASSTEVE 24252 855 BUCHHOLZMICHAEL Orange 37-5.2 539 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 16W 1WO 33UOO-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 03S 2017-0S-23 OW S119.OS KERSTXENNEIH 14289 1557 TORRESJASON Orange 47-1-100.2 9 JODIOR NEWBURGHNY 2990 2DD3 332100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL Z.80 2M7-W31 445,000 14893 BROWNTIMOTIi1f 14290 741 CASUCCIDIANNE Orange 38.2.17 1219 LIHIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 1284 19S 331300-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 034 2017-09.29 10,900 537.4,53 LEFKOWTTZWILUAM 14300 339 AKTARHELENA Orange 47-3.1 117 HICKORYHILLRO NEWBURGHNY 1488 2017 331100-HEWOURGH RAISEDRAN[ is0 2017-10-OS 279000 18750 CVDOMINGUESCONSTRUCTION COR 34311 279 CLARKESONIA Orange 1G-1-Z3 124 FOXWOODDR NEWBURGHNY n84 199E 33UM-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH 0.49 2017-10.17 SM,000 51a% ORTIZFEIJX.JR 14317 1S84 JAFFEEPATRICK Orange 14-1-745 20 CHAPELRD NEWBURGH NY 3624 1997 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 5.90 2017-10-30 449,900 S12A14 ESPOSITOTINAL 24373 1292 MURPHYDONALDP Orange 29-4-9 5 MORLEYCIR NEWBURGH NY 124E 1986 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH SJ00 2017-11-M 145.000 S116.19 ADAMSELVINR 14328 423 GALLAGHERTIMOTHY Orange 3& 3-4 Z5 FLORALOR NEWBURGHNY 1344 1961 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH OA4 2017-11-17 S167,551 W4.67 DAILEYRESIDENCE TRUST 14326 JS49 PEFFERSROBERT Orange 33-1- 17 377 LAKLUDERD NEWDURGHNY 1140 2930 3311W-NEWBURGH OTHERSIYLE 0b'9 Z017-1127 S273,5W S73991 WASNOROWICZKENNUM 143N 1832 BIANCHIANTHONY Orange 3rr1-3, 1 20 FLORALDR NEWDURGHNY 1%4 2960 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH D52 2017-12-23 245,000 512603 LOBBEPAUL 24410 9 DENNEYALEXANDRA Orange 37-4- 17 534 CENTERST NEWBURGHNY I05G 1958 33I100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 02S 2017-12-15 210,OD0 S196.86 WALTERKROLLINC 24339 IW SOUVASEAN Orange 34-1- L2 1 DISANOOR NEWBURGHNY 1848 1991 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 1.20 2018-03-15 372,5W 16 ,10 TAYLORIOHN IQ77 411 WILSONBRYAN Orange 3-&3. 3 1305 UNIDNAVE NEWBURGH NY 1200 2004 33UW-NEWBURGH RANCH OL46 2018-DS03 175,000 S145.93 VANCURAPETER 14399 1680 SAMMARCOSCOTT Orange 34-1- 25.11 1282 UNIDNAVE NEWBURGHNY 19B8 2018 33UOD-NEWBURGH RAISEDRAN 1.00 21)2&09-08 29 AW SISO-40 IFUDSONASSETHOMFS LLC M73 1 1259 SERSE FRANCESCO E Orange 29-3- 2.2 4 LEELANDRD NEWBURGHNY 220D 1969 3311OD-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANC 0.92 201&0&14 S311AD0 S14136 IHOMESBYLV LLC 14456 1 1122 IMERCADO SR.JASON Orange 3&2- 13 121D UNIDNAVE NEWBURGH NY 936 1949 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD I 0.34 201&10-10 S1255,000 51G5.60 PENAFIELJUAN I4473 1 757 MOUNASTEPHANIE Orange 1&1- 13 24 FOXWOODOR NEWBURGH NY 1710 1992 331100-NEWBURGH SPLTTLEVEL M76 2OM10-IS 275,000 S360.82 MAYENCHERYLM 14478 338 DEVARCOGEOFFREY Orange 53.1. 7.1 13 ELMHURSTAVE NEWBURGH NY 1680 1920 333LO0-NEWBURGH OLD$TYLE 1.00 201&10.17 276,500 FA39 TIER3PRaPERTIESLLC 14476 226 WILLIAMSEDWARD Orange 51-7- 5 218 SUN5ETCOVERD NEWBUKGHNY 1564 1930 1331100-NEWBURGH COTTAGE COG 20910.19 200,000 SU7.8B KUKASAMI 14478 585 MMFLOLLC Orange 28-3- 3.1 6 LEELANDRD NEWBURGH NY 1 U36 190 3=00-14EWBURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.92 201&11.OR 405,600 a59 LEONETTEKIM VA45 2739 CAMPOKESEANTONIOANTONIF 9SALES 24 AVERAGE 1 3301 197S L16 256,2ZS U3A0 TIMEADI.PRICE 3TL 2 S1S7_13 MEDIAN 1695 IM 0.73 S269,250 15LBS TIMEADJ.PRICE 3% 2 lam PERYR NYR. Orange 37-5- 3 505 GARDENST NEWBURGHNY 1392 1%1 33UOD-NEWBURGH SPLRLEVEL 0.211 20M11-33 SZ14,500 15409 STONER FKAMEHMETSIFA 14665 11 4UISPESILVAJDRGELULS Orange 374-20 540 CEHTERST NEWBURGH NY 1320 1958 33UM-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 1129 2OM12-13 S249,000 S19g,64 JONESTIFFANY 14691 07 BIRCH ROBERT Orange 33-1- 25 351 LAKESIDERD NEWBURGH NY 893 1900 331IM-NEWBURGH OTHER STYLE 0.12 2020-01-17 209,00D 234.04 FARROWROSEANN MEW 2769 DIEPOLDGEORGE Orange 37.4. 6 S37 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY LOSS 1969 33I100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0.7E 2020-01-17 S11S.000 10830 SIMONSROGER EJR 14M 413 S37UPPERAVELLC Orange 37-3.12 1232 UNIDNAVE NEWBURGH NY 1314 1 IW-/ 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.33 1 2020.03-20 5220,000 167A3 THANG AKATRANTRAN HU 3.4727 nB5 R66RIGUEZSAMUEL Orange 47-1.54. 12 59 HICKORYHILLRD NEWBURGHNY 25M 2WS 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 10 2020.05-01. 36%000 147A8 SANSEVEROJOSEPH I474R 174 CARMDNAALFJANDRINA NSALES 6 AVERAGE 1413 1955 L07 229,417 S162.39 MEDIAN 1317 19SSS 0. 28 S217,250 16496 DIFFERENCE OF AVERAGE$/HOUSE SF 6.74% DIFFERENCEOF MEDIAN $/HOUSESF 2. 11% 40 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. OFF DISANO DRIVE, TOWN OF ORANGE LAKE, ORANGE COUNTY (80-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. HATE 8/16/2019) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL= BEFORE ANDAFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ONE MILE RADIUS & NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2-STORY RESIDENCES COUNTY TAXMAPN STREET R STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YIL BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSE SF SELLER DEED B00% DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 341.70,1 227 HICKORY14ILLLN NEWBURGHNY 2770 2004 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 1.00 2017-0111 310,8D0 11191 SCHAETZLROBERT 14168 1795 KOVALLAURE Orange 37--3-28 539 CENTERST NEWBURGH NY 1394 1950 331100-NEWBURGH 5PUTLEVFL 0.29 2017-02-13 152,000 109.04 TAMMYKEREL TRUSTEESTORM 14207 88 FLORES FRANCELY LSODORO Orange 16.3.6 21 FOHWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 2692 1.995 3311.00-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 0.46 20L7-05.17. 310,000 511S.16 HAASSTEVE 14252 8SS SUCHHOLZKC14AEL Orange 37-5-2 539 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 1680 i960 3311OD-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.3S 2017.OB-23 200,WO 119.05 KERSTKENNETH 14269 1557 TORRESJASON Orange 47-1-100.2 9 JODIDR NEWBURGHNY 2990 2003 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 2.80 2017-08-31 445,000 148.83 BRDWNTIMOTHY 14290 741 CASUCCIDIANNE Orange 38-2-17 1218 UNION AVE NEWBURGHNY 1284 1948 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0,34 2017-09.28 159,9W 124-93 LEFKOWITZWIWAM 14300 338 AKTARHELENA Orange 14-174.5 20 CHAPELRD NEWBURGHNY 3624 1997 331100-SEWBURGH COLONIAL 5.90. 2017-10.30 449,900 1244.14 ESP-OSITOTINAL- 14323 1292 MURPHYDONALOP Orange 33.1-17 377 LAKESIDERD NEWBURGHNY 1140 IM 331100-NEWBURGH OTHERSTYLE 0.69 2017-11-27 27%500 Mal WASNOROWJCZKENNETH 14329 2832 BIANCHIANTHONY range 37-4-17 534 CENTERST NEWRURGHNY 1056 1958 3311DO-NEW6URGH SPLTTLEVEL M28 2017--12-IS 2ID,W0 1%.8G WALTERKROLLINC 14339 109 SOUVASEAN Orange 38-2-13 1210 UNION AVE NEWBURGHNY 936 1949 331190-NEWBURG" CAPECOD 0.34 2018-10-10 155,000 165.60 JPENAFIELJUAN 14473 757 MOLINASTEPHANIE Orange 1&1.13 24 FOKWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 1710 1992 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.76 2018.10.15 275,000 160JQ MAYENCHERYLM 14479 338 DEMARCOGEOFFREY Orange 53.1-7.1- 13 ELMHURSTAVE NEWBURGHNY 1680 1920 331100-NEWBURGH OLD STYLE LCO 2018-10.17 276,500 164S8 TI ER 3 PROPERTI ES LLC 1447G 226 WIWAMSEDWARD Orange 51-7-5 212 SUNSETCOVERD NEWBURGHNY 1S64 930 3311DO-NEWBURGH COTTAGE 0.06 1018-10.19 20Q000 127.89 KUKASAMS 14478 585 MMFLO LLC NSALES 13 AVERAGE 1886 1964 LID 262,931 13935 TIMEAW. PRICE 3% 2 147.84 ME DUW 1680 1959 0.46 273,500 16L80 TIMEAUJ. PRICE 3% 2 172-71 PERYR NYR. Orange 37-5.9 SOS GARDENST NEWBURGHNY 1392 1961 331100-NEMURGH SPLITLEVEL 0-29 2019.11-13 214,500 154.09 STONERFKAMEHMETSIFA 14665 11 QUISPE SILVA JORGE LUIS Orange 37.4.20 540 CMMST NEWBURGHNY 1320 1958 331.100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.23 20J9.1Z13 249,D00 188.64 JONESTIFFANY 14631 2.9137 BIRCHROSERT Orange 33-1-25 351 LAKESIDERD NEWBURGHNY A93 1900 3311DO-NEWBURGH OTHER STYLE M12 2020-01-17 209,000 234.04 FARROWROSEANN 14690 1769 DIEPOLDGEORGE Orange 37-4-6 537 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY SDS6 19S9 3311DD-NEWBURGH SPLTTLEVEL 0.28 2D20-01-17 115,000 108.90 SIMONSROGER E.JR 14693 413 537UPPERAVELLC Orange 37-3.22 1232 UNION AVE NEWBURGHNY 1314 1947 3311DO-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.33 2020-03-20 220,000 167.43 THANG AKA TRAN TRAN HU 1477.7 1185 RODRIGUEZSAMUEL Orange 47-1-61.12 59 HICKORYHILLRD NEWBURGHNY 2502 20M 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 5.10 2620-OS-01 - 369,000 147.48 SANSEVEROJOSEPH 14743 174 CARMONAALFJANDRINA NSALES 6 AVERAGE 14U 5 L07 229,417 10-38 MEDIAN J317 19SLS 0.2.8 217,250 SISC96 DIFFERENCEOF AV ERAGE $/HOUSE SF 9.84% DIFFERENCE OF MEDM$/HOUSE SF 4A9% 41 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. OFF DISANO DRIVE, TOWN OF ORANGE LAKE, ORANGE COUNTY (80-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 8/16/2019) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ONE MILE RADIUS & NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, SPLIT LEVEL STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAXMAPS STREET a STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF. YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALE DATE SAIJ:PRICE PRICE PER HOUSE SF- SELLER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Oran a 37-3-28 539 CENTERST NEWBURGHNY 1394 19SO 3311M-NEWBUAGH SPUTLEVEL 0.28 2017-0213 152,000 109.04 TAVMKEITELTRUSiEESTORMS 14207 RD FLORESFRANCELYLSODORO Ora a 37-5-2 538 UPPERAVE NE4MBUAGHNY 1680 1960 33ll00-HEHIBUAGH SPIITLEVEL 0.35 2017-OB-23 200,000 I14.05 KERSI'KEHNETH 14289 1557 TORRESJASON Orange 3Y417 534 CENTERST NEWBURGHNY 1056 1958 331100-NEWBUAGH SPLITLEVEL 0.28 2017-1215 2k7,000 SM86 WALTER KROLL INC 14339 109 SOUVASEAN Orange 16.1-13 24 FOXWOODDR HEWBURGHNY 1710 1%2 3311OU-NEWBUAGH SPUTLEVELla28 2018-1I1-15 275,000 3E0.82 NViYENCHERYLM 14478 338 DEWRCOGEOFFRiY SALES 4 AVERAGE 1460 1965 209250 143.32 TIMEADJ.PRICE 3% 2 SLOB MEDIAN 107 1959 21?SAW 133-38 TIMEADJ.PRICE 3% 2 14L50 PERYR 9YR. Orange 37-5.3 05 GARDENST NEWBURGHNY 1392 1961 331100-NEWOURGH SPUTLEVEL 2019-11-13 S2I4,500 154.09 STONERFKAMEHMETSIFA 14665 11 QU15PE SILVA JORGE WIS Orange 3-14.20 540 CENTERST NEWOURGHNY 1320 1958 331100-NEWBUAGH SPLITLEVEL 2019-I2-13 249,000 I88.64 JONESTIFFANY 14681 1907 BIRCKROBERT Orange 374-6 S37 UPPERAVE 14EWBURGHNY 10% 1959 33UOO-NEWBUAGH SPLITLEVEL 0.28 2020-M-17 115,000 10s-90 SIMONSROGER F. JR 14693 413 537UPPERAVELLC BSALES 3 AVERAGE 1256 1959 0.29 192,833 SM 53 MEDIAN 1320 1959 0.25 214,SOO 16LSO DIFFERENCE OFAVERAGE$/HOUSESF 0.97% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/HOUSESF 14.84% 42 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMANROAD: 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COUNTY 1212-FOOT MONOPOLE, CONSTR. DATE 4/9/2DI8) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALLSALES WITHIN ON E MILE RADIUS COUNTY TAXMAPw STREETN STAFET TOWN HOUSESF EFF.YA WILT SCHOOL LKL49SIYLE ACRES SALEDATE SAEEPEYCE PRICEPERNOLLSE SF M M Sam DEED NOOK OECD PAGE 1R1Y61L Dulchess 62%04-921D434K100 22 RAKERRD POUGHKEEPSIENY 16W 1983 T AZ-SPACKBIIDLL RUSED RANCH 0A ZO1G-0L-04 STZLOW SIM34 - MCMMDTOANAL17A 22DS 384 SAHCHFIIALUN Duhhess 67603R-2050660000 95 ALDA DR POUGMEPSIERY 316E 196S i35W1-WAPPINGERS RAM RANCH OL41 2Q160L48 MSW 134.I5 HMSFKDMTZDONNA 2=6 777 MCCLELIANDRICLOIAS Dutdless 62640W5116T1-"B 2170 NiWNACKENSACKRO. POUGMUMIEW 30M 19W lUWl-ARUNGFDN RANCH Li. 20164L-22 S101I00 S1IL34 COMAODERY 22016 509 GARRANDANDREW Dulch40s 620001.1569621= 16 TRDMRLN POUGMEEPSIEM' 31LZ 1996 174EO1-ARUM WGN COLONIAL Q57 2MG•OL•25 S4025W 512934 ILJERGERSENC 21016 506 SElOLMAIIK Dutchess 6160049571724100 COLBLIRN DR POl1GFIKFFPSIENY 1119 1959 E3r5 1-WAPPIHGEAS RANG! 0.44 7D760t-29 S7D4470 SIRL36 FNENASSEMUYOF Z70I6 769 3OALIGHTEASHOLDINGCOII Dutchess 61002.75982440000 L32 CEDARAVH POUGMIMPSIEW IM90 19" J346MI SPA"LWLL MANSION 4.19 20160t.29 37 OM WLW CIRE0FDIJTCKWt0C 2MIG 1179 WIJ FEI Dulch 6260-63-0440560000 27 PLEASANTIYOGE DR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2266 196S 135601-WAPNNGEHS RALSEORANCH D51 ZOIGV-09 M= 124AS PASTERNAKSHERI 22016 lonz IF LOK11MGTHY Dutchess 62ED MMQN1 M00 66 COLBURNDR POUMMEPSIEW 14M 1959 IMMI-WAPPLNGERS RANCH Di6 2216-M409 5232•003 S165.24 MO-KROTMM04EY 22016 1129 ID0=NP Dulchess 616004.96020M4=0 GS COt8URN DR POUGHKimENY 1404 L%9 135601-WAPNN01R5 RANCH D.66 2016-M-09 232.000 SIM24 DODOENP 7101G 1130 H%TMAN RARCIA Duuhns 62WLY3.38E05000W 54 CARMEN DR PDUGHXEEPSIERY 35" I95S 335MI-WAPPINGEFS RANGE 0.7 ZK&W-17 942.050 515E-38 MLWAYJEAN 27016 1294 tOPEZSEW11AGO Dulchess 6160D47332360 O 57 AOIINDNLLRD POUGHIZE SIENY 3829 1958 lMWZ-SPACKENKILL RANCH Ll 2016-M-39 5724OW S32mn IARRISONOHARLES 71D16 1592 MIUERwSAN DuUlmw 6260-03-147DIS-M 1 KELLERHAUSCDR POUGHI(MIENY 2XK 19R7 BSWI1 WAPPMGERS COLONIAL IL49 20164t.23 S35:OV SIM16 NIDWISIOHN 6 I= MURAU8AWI Dulshns 620Bi 17816E-0000 3 CORALN POUGHKEEPSIENY 2642 1%6 USW1-WAPPJNGERS RJ05E0MRCH 051 2006W-14 S330,000 5724.9E WHEREIN RICIARD 22MG 324D VOSEALL Dutchess 610040047P4)OW 4 fASPERCRMSD POLIGHKEEP51ENY 1014 19S4 3346D2-SPACKENIQLL RANCH Dos 6-w.21 MECOO S155.62 MIRWRDGLORTA 23016 2A00 PIDALAMICHLAEL Dutthess 62W03.38Ml-GOOD 2.94 SPACKENKILLRD POl1GHKfIPSIENY LAU LWS 135WI-WAFNNGERS CAPECOD 046 ZMG-0345 S174000 121L66 Il1>Z MD 22026 2312 BARBAWCHANILS Ouuhns 62600I-1351SB4MW l2 BRENIWOOD DR POUGHKMSIENY 386D 1971 13SMI-WAPPIFIGM COLONIAL 06 2016Q4-Ol 424,500 SUM97 HLXWrFRED 22MG 2126 AWMALEXANDRA Duldl 6260 03-46M7GAM 13 MAINETT DR PCKMKEEPSIENY 2002 1%6 LISMl-WAPRNGEAS CAPECOD 035 20160N•19 S1SX000 SM92 STEOt10" 220M 202 LEVEITEON Du1dN G26aQ1-37596140DQ 29 GREENVA1E FARFAS RD PUtrAIKEEP5IENY 1932 i L457 LPL601-ARLWGluH SPLIILEVEL Q57 2016D4.29 S21T60m ST1LW HAOL GEOKM 22E26 3D93 AENLtiAN ANGEL Dulchess 626DW47011440030 45 WINNIELN PO11G11Kf1PSIENY IWO 1964 13SW1-WAPMNGERS CAPECOD LESS ZMG-05-06 WDADO Sifivs OLOLIGHLIN STEPHEN 22016 3067 HKSSAN WAFT DuLdN G26D03.266133-01D0 54 ALDADR POUGHKETPMENY 1975 19S4 1156O1-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD 0." 2036{d-26 SWAM S=31 ROGERIAMRSR 22026 344E 9PEEDKEFFHW Dulchess 62f0-01-23093M'YI 39 HORNSECIL PDG POUGHKEEPSIENY 477S 19% 13MM-ARLINGTOK COLONIAL 536 2D w-u SSG-%M S11A65 KIMHEESMN 22026 6= BECKTOSFA Duld- SHO0d14S3481-0000 32 SHELDON OR POWHKEEPSIENY t&W 190 L34WL-MUNGT0N CAP£COO 0.72 2W607.14 S267AM SIAM WEI%AARONC 22016 470E MCPARTLANDDAVIDADAM Dulchm G160-0L-12E73Z-OOW 17 AFtKMCF PDWHKEEP9ENY 330 203 LMGX-ARLIIG70H COLONIAL MR 2016-0720 SSIZSOD S152-+11 SEMPM1LM 2201:6 461 MATULA-EVMLSANNA Dutchess GL6010467D438-0000 ll CASPERMEEKRD POLANKEEPSIENY Im 190 134600-SPACKENKLLL CAPECDD 0.7 ZM6-W--29 S275A00 SM19 BARNEUNIGEL 22016 SUL KLAA4R DfNESH Duuh. 6260-01075066MOO 26 PIEASANTRIDGEDR PDIIGHKEEPSIEHY 30A0 196E L356Dl-WAPANGERS COLONIAL 0.68 2M608-01' S313•SOO SlOL79 RANK STOIA 22016 SOW SUGTOIRJAMESR Dutehess 61"04.80373300DD 29 R 00"LLRO POWNKEEPSIENY 2264 1970 MA600-SPACKFNKiLL COLONIAL Q43 201606-09 SnD3W S141.4I COOKRMEAT8RYAN 22016 S250 WMYJAIME Dutch.% 626DW462070D000 u MAINLTHDR POUGHICEWNEW 3DD2 19$6 13501-WAPNNGUS CAPECOD 0.35 201606-N S144M LEIHSTJON 22Dt6 S736 PAtKIRICHARD 0atch4ss 6WO-O4L900874KK10 21 HDRIZONHILLdt POLIGHKEEPSIENY 2004 44c3 1346OZ-SPACKENKILL COLONIAL 0.74 2D1609-22 SZ35L= 117.21 GRRY'SW.E Old W42 PISANF1Ll-LNZfwAltn DuLdh s 8259.OL•25R9034000 i2 PIEASAHTW INDUGHKEEPSIENY ILM VISO 135fi01-WAPPINGERS CKFECOD 13 20161Q-M 26%OOD SIELS4 HANNOMSTEVEN 16 7681 RRKFRGROLYN Dulchns 61C404l9$W94WW IZ HCHIMON HILLDR POUGHXEIEPSIENY 2150 no 134600- SPACKENKILL COLONIAL 038 201610-D6 ODD 134A2 GRIFF1111 F[AROID 2ZO26 7067 MWFSJONATIWN DuLche s 6Lf604742M400W 4 MIL1&WKAD POUGHKEEPSIENY 25116 1%9 1346UL-5PACIEHKRL RAl"RANCH Ail 2016/014 1 alUM Sn%.78 MN110NEYRORERY 22016 71$2 TIUEWUiTIN Duubm 626943AS6 -OM 315 SPACKFNKILLRO POLIGNICEEPSIENY ISW 194D 13%M- ARLYNGE0N GPECOO 0." 20161026 5232500 SL50.97 DARIYNANCY 16 6706 GON UZIASSODIEGO Dutthess 62W04-SO"7400D 98 VASSAR RD POUGHKCUPSIENY 1883 I= 13%01-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD 0.47 200610-31 V47.5M S13156 OSTERMAN LFMS 22026 726E FREEMAN EILEENF Dutckss 6161P-049C -O000 7 KAKERRD POUGHKF.EPMENY 2011 1979 LM& 2-SPACKENKLIL RAISEDRANCH 0.14 20161E-10 314•I00 15654 JWLIHOMEIRPROVEME 2xnG 7B66 VOLLAROI IG Outdh % 62WOI3 8139UMCO IS ORCHARD PARK POUGHKEEPSIENY 1255 1955 1346A7ARLWG39N RANCH Ols 2O1611-n S221.000 15.94 YAEGER MCHACL 22D16 157Q ANCGARKYSHERRI Dutthess 626443.0392938033 2 CCKBURN DR EXT POl16HKEEPSIENY 2932 NIBS 135601-WAPPINGEFS OI}ERSTYLE L14 2016LI-21 5342.500 511UI FRONTPCIRCHPROFLR U926 9W OYAQ SFNRIEIfE D+tdm, 62WD1-S70717-0D70 161 MTL%MUERD LAGRANGENY L954 067 134601-ARUNGION IIAISEORANCH am W1611.23 5227,000 S116.17 GTAPANOANTONO 72D16 6694 OAKIF(ROBERT Dutd-S 6HOW746307-0000 68 FAMOHILLRD POUGHKEEPSIENY 2AO 196E 11NISM- SPACKEN101L CAPECOD 06 20161E-29 900 S12SM TANCREDI TODD 2X06 9176 DuLde 62EO W-SING84000 5 HEATHRROOK DR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2410 ISR2 174401-ARLLNGTDN COLONIAL 0.41 201612-0L SM400 1fiL69 AMMICANINAREL 23017 19D3 L Dutchns 4%0LY3.1C4380.0000 1" CEDARVAtLEYRD P011l'HWEPSLE NY 1714 IS74 134W1-AALINGTOH SPtRLEVEL W9 200612-06 SM9.000 S15L11 SEMORANO DREICEL t2016 tld73 R O-DDNNEOJOAHN Outchns 6758.01178918400M 49 PLEKSANTLN POL1GNXEEISIENY 16-A 183$ 135601- WA NNC,ER5 COLONIAL Z87 2016-M-07 S17R000 1.W,T4 OLkNCHARDGEORGE M016 9278 Dutch"s GM01-325I624KI00 7 HOMER PL POUGHKCEPSIENY L932 1956 134W3-AREING7DH CAPECOD D4 201 42.32it S23912 STRANGFARRlr 22026 9077 Dutchess QWOZ-516Wi000O U% NE% VHACKENSACKAD POUGHKEEPSIENY 2509 L%O 13461A-ARUNGION RANCH 3S 20161Z-u I" am ROY 2201E 9407 ENito-mDENNLS Dutdh 6MQ345Q496000D S REOONDODR PCKMHKEEPSSIENY 1570 1967 134SM-ARUNGION MSTMPOBARY C42 200412.20 Siam MLVILEYCHIRSTOPHOL 16 9244 Z&wMAOEUNE Duldleu 62EDO46T0T5440t10 32 REDOAKSMLLRD IAGRANGENY L471 Liss 13SGO1-WAPPINGM CAPECDO D33 Z1I6Q-ZI 5171R1 DU55AMIt3AEt 72017 945 HUANCAYDSTEPHANIE ' DLtdhe GMMAS81730000 32 WINN%IN POUGHKCE MNY 728E US2 13SWl- WAPNNGERS CAPECOD I37 201612.230 573AZ LEO LAWRENCE 22027 349 COSFA NANCY Dutch.ss 61WO4A4i72S0000 0 C@BURFNDR POUGHKEP51ENY i800 ISS9 135W1-WAPPAGFRS KAMRANCH O.S6 2Q1632.30 S1472Z ECKERTALCH%RD 22D37 40 MEASH LINCOLN Outchess 62FD01•A35839IOMO 21 TL70MEYIHt POLKIDIEPSIEMY 130 J565 134601-ARUNGM RANCH DA4 2117.41-200 516390 CAIAOMLLELLC 17 744 WAVERSOANHIOW DutchPSs 62W03.3122000000 27 ALDA OR POLK9K£EPSIEW 163E 1% 1 13S601-WAPPINGERS CAPELDD 03Z 01.27D 11230 MORRLSSTEPHEN 22D17 1405 ANDANIOANIA Dulthass 6ZOCS33347DD0000 28 ALDADR POlNa1KEEP5fEIIY 17D7 L954 135/IA3-WAPPINGEM GiPE[OD Q33 134.74 6W00AV[D 7}D17 O4 OILLHRLSTOPfQRd17wp1 Dutdlns 62W07-S12443 OODO 1 SHELDCWOR POLJGHKEFPSIENY 15L5 L951 34Wl- ARUNGTON RANCH 0.41 RZKIV-OL-270 G10 51320E ARCH R3DGELLC 21017 3030 8t1YU MICHAEL L7ul[hess OJo SSS844aD00 131 TITUSVt"RD LACMNGENY 2R95 IIQ4 1UGOI-ARUNGTON OLD STYLE 175 5345,UA 5119.17 SIffERRO22062W01-067RE2-0000 104 8L7ARQMAN RD POIIGFRCEEPSfE NY 201i 194E 134601-ARUNGTpt CAP£TAD L9 5315,000 515311E RAKOFFJENNIFER 22017 7ATl KENGBEHIAMIN Dutchns 620003.21224S4000 42 6RENTW000 DR I POLIGMEEPSIENY 7215 I 12M 13S01-WAPPINGEItS RANCH 053 2017-W21 5350.000 I $158A1 IVJOW3AOUIE4 71Q17 2901FDWARCGRYAN 43 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Dad- fi2F0-01.219964.0000 I1 I COACHIJGHTOR POUGHCEEPSISKY 3101 1931 134601-ARUNGTON COLONIAL 46 21I17-03-23 405,000 S13DA8 CHSHIOLMROONEY 22017 ZZ42 NEATONJEREMY Dutche fi760D3.22175&DC00 30 HHORNBE(XRDG POUGHKEEPSIENY 2s70 7961 1114601-ARLUIGfON COLONIAL bb7 M37•FJT-23 344900 Ll&u 11 MADJOHN 17 2293 SWARTEDWARD Outdo s dTdD-04.8T2387•D700 E 11NNHILLSRD POLGHKEEP51ENY 1294 191L 1NISM-SPACOMILL RAM 051 ZM7.0"x 237.0W SLEi.1S lAGINDfARC"RISTINE 22907 41 GALATI REN D-chess 6°501.280.95300W 12 ALFREODR YOLUVIKEMIENY 1176 19% 135601-WAPNNGERS RAW" 21117-06-14 SW 1ALL70 FADDEN PELFR 22017 3MS PERSK:ALLIGINO Du"fm 626OD1-072790-= 121 BOARDMAN RD POLIGHKEEEPSIENY 2S13 ISM 134601-ARLINGTON CAPECOD 19 20 Lmn S38S,OM 5149AS 1TERVENSKIMARK 22017 3143 BRADBURY)ONATHAN Duldtess 6X&03317155-0000 4$ ALDA DR POUGHCEEPSIEW IAF2 1950 L"Wi-WAPPINGERS CAPE COD 0.3 20L7.Ob02 24 = SIG1.94 JDALZERWOLFCANG 22017 319L HOFFMAN MEIRIAN Du4Khess 6160-DS-8040600000 Cr SCMICOK POUGHKEEPSIENT 21% 19B 134WZ-SPACKFNKILL SPIITLEVEL 0.46 2147415,37 MGM 15714 . IYEGIINSU BRIAN ZM17 3845 SEIFMDANIFL DAthess 6160Aw94D39&= 208 SPACKENIOURD POtIpC3KEEPSIENY 1664 1962 134602-SPACKF2IXILL RANCH. LS 2017.05_25 SIES503 111-48 LASOOINViCrORANDI 22017 4039 EFGILJODANAAND CF00ST1NE Wld»•ss 626WM3MI100000 22 CARMEN DR POLGKEEPSIENY 2016 1MA 135601-WAPPINGERS CAKWO OL41 2%74CrM SMIX000 SI38.A9 FMCKE3NRAYMOND 22D17 4212 1RACEIFANE7Tc" ACEVEDO Datchess 6260-01.317%4-0000 29 HOMER PL POUGMEEPSIENY 2052 1956 LM60L-ASUNGTON SPUTLEVEL D4 2OL7.06W S255= SYM76 MUENNIALHOWDEV 22017 4241 IELFORNOMOMIJ AND NICOLEA Duldless 676400.1592RT DODO 9 CARNEW CT POIIGHKEEPSHEW 2394 L%S 2ML-WAPPINGERS COLONAL 043 2D17-0621 3u= S131LS3 I&CROKAIHILEEN 22017 4900 KEONAMSSA Duidwss 616OD4-901D5D0000 44 71N6ERl1NEDIR POLGHKEEPSIENY 2316 1963 134601-5?A0101ALL COLONIAL O4 2017-O6-21 Ull0= 14163 MARTINMMONDAND 22017 4701 VENTOSSSOHMANDIAUREN 0utthess 61WOUR3331S4000 3 CREEKBENDRD POUGHKEEPSIENIT 1848 L960 134602-SPACKENKILL RANCH O52 2DlW0&Z3 73som 127.16 RICHFERCONNNE 22M7 4926 PANMONEVANIEL Dulawn 6Z17}Ob3326214009 1JS cEDAAYAMKO POL1GfKEEP5HENY 40S5 2002 134601-AIRNNGTO21 COLONIAL in 20174&27 472.007 SISTi37 FAKHOLIAY RAMI 2XIL7 4633 VASHISHTIDEEPAKANDSCINALID D.Uh-s 67fh01.190B0DOOD0 17 HLORNAt"RDG P0024KEIPSIew 23G1 t959 134601-AAUNG70N RANCH 2.2 2DI7-06.29 S395AM SLUM KERIN EDWARD 22017 SSW LELINGYANUNEMNE Oulthess 61W01.427R7.0000 S4 TREETOP W POIJ MEEPSIENY 174E LSW LWAM-ARDNGFON RANCH OL79 20174W29 1.50000 14351 VASHARrFOBERT 2ZD17 5075 MMTIESGARMSON DuWd ss 6260-O3-2001640000 73 AMAL di POUGHKEEPSIENY 1960 190 135WI-WAPPINGM PJ0WRANCH OA 2MT-M.10 S167.000 SM22 LEVYROBERT 2200 SLIs7 SINNOWDANfE1 Dutthess 6160-04-875Z68-1L00 26 WOODWARDRD POOMWI PSIENY 23113 M7 13401-SPACKENKILL CAPECOD I.I. 2OL747-U 350= S15L91 TITMICREDIHHOMESIN 22D17 5140 , 1WTZHARRY DuldJ s 62T0-0l-20)ffiS- 0 37 HORNBECKM POUGIKFFPSIENY 2926 ISM 1346OL-ARIINGTON WECOO 3L61 201M.17 42um 314LU CSBNYFROPUMES 22OL7 S37F N)AMON DAVID Dutthess 5261.01-20053&MM 30 VASSARVIEWRO POIlGHKEEPSIENY 1140 1138 IM601I.-ARUNGTON CAPECOO 0.29 200W-20 520RSO7 I7216 NORTH LARRY 22017 SB52 NENDFASOR41NGEMANSARA Dutthess 62£0-03•L331940000 24 CARNLTLJCF POOSWEEPSIENY 1624 L974' 13SWI-WAP7INGERS COWMAL OA3 2DI740.24 5313,000 S13&28 DUFFYPATRICK 220L7 Oft VMDALVIO Dulthess 6U&a3-14IZIS4 m 0 CARNEWCT POIJGHCEEPSIEW 330 LMS 135fi01-WAPPINGFAS COLONIAL am 2D174F-24 459,6W 5135.22 KEUITSUSIW 22017 5904 VENRININI CFRISTIAN Oulthess 62MM-4400094= 30 TREETOP LN POUGMEEPSIENY 2424 t983 INWL-ARONGTON CONTEMPORARY O73 20IM-27 513E14 IRDSVN AISERT 22017 5853 GILDARDNICHOlAS CYtchest 6250-03-31301&0000 19 CARMEN DR PDUGIKFEPSIENY 1497 II53 13S601-WAPPINGERS CAPECOO 037 2DE7-OJ•D S255A00 S170.34 KIFSBYE PETER 2M17 61% SANEIAGOANGEI. Duidmn 6259.01. 113966WW 45 PLEASANTLX POUGIKEEPSIENY 2M 1964 135MI-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH am 2M7-0731 275,000 IMMAO ITCONS7RL7CHONLLC 17 Sm MONTOI'AJUUA Duldh RMDIIH-021tm41000 4 BRENIWDODDR POUGIIKEEPSIENY 2617 I966 13SWI-WAPPINGM COLONIAL OA4 2017.0&]A 13L74 MUM MARK 220L7 66T0 DAYSAIRIKA lluitlwss 6164PL7701540000 S SCENICOR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1956 19A4 L34K0-SPA[kENDLL OIONULL 03 OL741&18 355,00.7 111l.49 YLWAROIOHK 720L7 fi607 PARKRI Delthess 6260-03. 4142M}0000 8 JANESI POUG1K(EPSIENY 1638 3950 135601•WAPPINGEPS CAPECOD 034 2017418.22 S270A00 IIIAM NCCILLVIN 22017 GM LADUEMFGAN Dutthess 6264D467T382WW 26 REDOAXSMILLRD LAGRANGENY Z165 ZOO4 135601-WAPANGERS RMSMIANCH 0. 2017.08.3D S2w= 129.15 ATA1NtOK 2ML7 6739 AWRIAHMET 0ut.11- 6160- 048191B2-0000 17 SCENICDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2052 1964 L345M-SPACKENKIIL RANCH OM 211174W30 SmIL900 51BD26 CORNELLNAKCY 22017 6712 KLE1N51EYEN Dutshess 676403-166348. 0000 250 SPACKENKILLRO POUGHILLEPSIENY UP& ml 13SMI-WAPANGIRS RANCH LA 2M7.09-M 5773.000 SM&M GAUAWAY]OHN 22017 69'M ' INTERRANTEJIAIANNE Dutthess 6259-01• ZOW!I30000 22 PLEASANT IN POVGHKEEPSIENY Min 195D VISTA]-WAPANGERS CAPECOO L3 201745-M 6201000 SIM= BAKERCAROLYN 220L7 7191 CAIEB Outthns 626403.42522& 11000 22 IHETAOR'f 111 POUGHUMSIENY I040 MS3 195W1-WAPPINGM UN(31 034 2017 MIS SMOM S214Ts VALLEJAVIR 22017 7383 MARTN17IVAN Ouuhess 6IICIRISTOPHER 450- 11 46t529-0000 2 RENDO ORDO POUGHKEEPSIENY 1300 2954134601-ARLINGTON RANOi 0.62 2017-MU 245AW S186AG VANVLACKUNDA 27037 7736 ' MARTDH Dutch- 62F403.46L9fi1-0000 5 ORCHARDPARK POUGHKEEPSIENY LR78 1930 L34fi01-ARLINGTON CAPECOO 0.9 2DI7-10-04 260= SIMA5 KANECHARLES 2ZO17 7629 h1A11TINTIMOTHY Dutthess G2%D4•S7217b0W0 75 VA$MKRO PO4AHKEEPSIE* 2640 INS 135MI-WAPPINGERS CAPECOO 406 1 2012•IO.10 i S391500 1490 OCCKTNSHA 22027 SM GEORGEVANESSA Dutth9ss 626401.-38f171614J000 9 CEDARVAIIEYRO POUGHKEEPSIENY 7Hs 2002 L34SM-ARLING70H COLONIAL 2.4o 2017-I&IL S375.000 S164.11 ENGl15H DAVID 2M17 760 TCRtRES SHAIO DuldeU fi2640Z-5567K34= 6 TnUSVILLEHIS IAGRANC£NY ISS2 1953 134601-ARLINGTON RANCH 00 2017,10-11 SMSM SS= MALTLSOHSIXAN4E 2202.7 79L1 JIEDMAPLEVENTMESINC Dutthess24 RAKERRO POUGHKEEPSIENY LG60 19837 1746I2-SPACKENWIL RAISEDRANCH DLZG 7D17.10-70 76,70D S159A6 ANEMELOSELFJO M027 834 WANG"YU Dutthess 6 W044YEISM1 01 I0 Kf11ERHAUSE DR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2700 19% 135W1-WAPPINGCRS COLONIAL 0:13 2017.11-M SMCM SMA3 LEI LALRLIEA HSIEN 21011 461 NESBfTTTCLWNKT Dutthess 626"I-394891- 0OW 12 GREERVAtE FARMS RO POt HKCCPSIFNY 164D L957 134W1-ARUNMON SPUTLEVEL M73 M17-n-70 72R417 MAO 1A8tUGAKE1TH 22017 am JAMESON&t1AN Dutthess 516DD4817M M00 30 TWINHRL9RD POUWIIhEP51C I7Y 2346 19Ss 1346M-SPACKFNIOLL RANCH - OSS 2017.31.20 36OOW S159AS TJTANCFtO HOMES IN 22M2 9001 CLARKOAVID Dutthtss 62604N1.46-01134X00 49 WINNIELN POIIGHI(M.VENY 2082 19% 13SW2-WAPPiN&J6 CAPECOD 12-M 2D7-3172 270000 129AG OEPAOlONUN210 22018 0 gVINONESUZOELY Dhllthess 62613-03311725.00M 17 MEMORYW POUGJKEEP$IENY 1136 19S4 13ST01-WAPPiNGER9 RANCH 0.R9 2017.11-CS SUZ500 S125.44 COSTA ROBERT 22M SIM LRGSAUSINC Dulthess 626403.007261,M 26 COLBURN OR POU&KEEP5IETN 151SO 1951 L35601-WAPPINGERS RANCH Ilm 7017-12.W S24000 S7S9.71 EMAGAHT2EVFNN 22018 4SS KUHNHERBERT Dutthess fi7AlO4A2I3&= 70 ALDA DR POUGHKEEPSIENY ISM 1951 13SMI-WAPPIRGERS RANCH 0.43 2017.32•IL S&SAW 5145A0 MA"IRIAN 2M17 94ZG RYANMXKM3-PHWP Ilulchess 616003.200099100M 4 ALDA DR PODSHKEEPSIENY 1912 L9fi0 135G01-WAPNHIGHLS AWEDRANCH DIV 2017.12.13 ZS7.500 AB POLO RIhSELL 2201E 1109 M05HRLPMIRAHMEO Dutdwss 626001•L559660000 33 COACHUGHTDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 3258 1990 JMG01-AJWNGTON COLONIAL OAR 20?-011d S617,00D 126.M KNSAWIWAM 2201R 160 IAHIOAIOY Ouldw 61W-044593734K170 97 COLKAN DR POMMEEPSIENY L212 L90 13SW1-WAPNNGUIS RANCH DJG 2017.12-Z S259000 22170 KANEIORN 22012 365 VARGASTISSTAN Outchess 61fill.0012785= fis ROUNDHURD POLKHKEEPSIENY 181D tZ8 LU02-SPACKENULL RANCH Rl% 201mms S272350 S150.10 PARRYBARPRAAN 22018 5034 MCGOVEANKIVIN Dut[hess 6260.01.1478174=1 41 COACHUdHTDR FOUGIKEEFSENY 2980 1919 134601-ARUNGFON COLONIAL GA7 3M7.22-18 S425,000 142.62-SINHLAM81 72028 9W MOODYHEATHER Outchess 4ZE0.03-3360244= 54 KINRYRD FOLIGHILEEPSIENY 1482 t%S 13MI-WAPPIMGMS CAPECOD. 110 2017.12.18 S75S•000 150.71 ARCHFUDGELLC 72017 9666 SARAMARY Dutdw" 616404-147239.OMO 10 ROUNDHILLRD PLO! JG n7gE NY 2313 1955 134502•SPAIXENIULL CAPECOD OL43 2D17.12-M M500 117M ISMAIRCARMELLA 22011 751 MACHADO ORIANDO DAVIO Dutchess I 626401-24fiNIM1D 25 QAMA DR POUGIKEEPSIENY LWZ 1968 13SMI-WAPPINGEFIS RANCHi LLi6 2017-IZ-29 S261250 S164.10 2201H 1516 NARD110UIS inAVERAGE 2129 1260 0.ri Z85.716 SLUM MEADL PIKE ARCflFUX*ELJC 3% 2A 8L $143 MIDIAH 1943 I959 amS2fi9S00S19L70 MEADLPRIE 311 ZA 1SUL91 PLRYR. Y16. 44 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers., Iic. Dltdless I 626DO1'00127 -ww 34 C01BURN OIL POUGHKEEPSIENY ISS1 195t JUIS 01-WAPPINGERS RAHCI 0M SD18-06-1A S2ss.000 SIS151 RERHNALUAM Z2MB 4537 DU7GVICHMiLTHEW vutchess 6160DUVWQOS 3= ZS ROLNDMLLAD PODOMEEPSIEW 2243 1913 13A M-SPACKENMI CCHOMPEOMIW IM 2O1&06n 536RDw L64.07 STATEN IEFFREY DMI 49GS THOWSONMATCHEWDONAID Dutehess 61E0444154)W-0000 21 WMMNHftLDR POUGMEEP$IENY MO4 ISO 11460Q-$PACKEMKILL COLONIAL 474 20MOS126 SMDDT S17L16 PISANELU&ICCOYAMY 77DiR 49Q WHTIEDCOREY DULchsss 626C}O3-39G3/60000 21 MEMOAYUE POLVWEEPS1ENY 1223 U61 13SWI-WAPPINGEAS RANCH 1.2 21)1&07ZV smwa St93.54 SILAMTDN MICHAEL 22MA 9XIS PHIMPSKBISTOP"M Dutthe5S 6ZE0.0T033721.= 33 COlR1RNIIR POUGMEEPSIENY L540 1955 135001-WAPPINGERS RANCH nth 201R-W-27 S135.000 587.65 KIMSONIA 72MB SSSR RANGERCANOREW 0u[chess 616604-77113300000 73 ROUNDHLLRD POLKMEEPSIENY I424 1961 134WZ2 VAOLEMKILL CAPECOD 0.67 2012-07.31 5355.0W S24930 BAKIIR ERIC 22O2S 6126 DONNETIYMCIMEL D.td a 616DOt-770229-0000 S3 ROMONILLRD POLIGHKEEPSIENY 166D 1959 1-746D2-SPACKENKILL CAPECOD 74 201&0602 S31ZSW SLA934 T1TANCREOIHMESEN 2IMt 99i6 WEAVER PRLSCRIA Dutches5 616044.90727DDDOD 17 WOODWARORD POUGHKEEPMENY 2217 US6 1346OZ-SPACKEAKILL SPLITLEVFL 1 201&0114n SMUM SL43.44 SOIN PAUI.CARY 220111 S578 WIENERRACHEL Dulds4ss 6I6M.17393L0000 22 OACHIIGHTDR 7DL1fAiKEEPSIE FIY 32R9 L9R6 134fi01-AWNGTON WIONIAL n47 W 417.000 5129d3 GERBERGlF1LN 2M1t SAM MDYHENDRICK D.tdxss G1E404-"u-mW 1316 SPACKENKILLRD POU"9CPSIENY 1378 I.X4 1M4W2-SPACKEMKILL RANCH D53 E9 529D,51R3.78 ENGDKEROBOIT 2201E 7M7 CARSWELLOAIDEL D.I1h- 6266a8-OBGIffi-MOD 4S PLEASWAIDffOR POUGMEEPSWNY 2432 MG l3$B01-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL a5l 23 324000 11156 INRDENCHARLES 22DIA 6419 GLADINGIAMES Dutchess 6z6OQ9•23w3S00A 49 PLE45ANTFOOMDA POUGMEEMENY 2366 1966 135W1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL D4S 0 35 om 1SL73 SILVEKNCEIAMES 19 726E 04CCARONIOMICHAEL Dutchess 626DU0-70fi00t-0000 22 KDLERNWMDR POLIGMmPsIENY 2d1 19R7 135601-WA PINGEIK COLONIAL 654 13MZ-QwlD'_%-ZS3M= S4U1t000 5167-7E MILMACLIXORD 2ZODt 704E ROMNSKIMRDRLY Dutchess 616DOC-601114000D 32 SMICOR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2153 19W 134HR•SPAMENKILL CAPECOD 11E Samew SL34.60 TAKAYESUTED 2201E 7531 K£YJEANNUMCE Oulche55 62TODT-3Z7112-0OW 20 CARMEN DR POUGKKEEPSIENY 1416 19S4 135W1-WAPPIKGEAS CAPEODD EL39 SM000 52M.10 WRIGHTDOREEN 22019 71% ODSTEVLCTOR DOchess 616( 0M!13E01d-DODO 23 RAKER RD POl1GIVEEPSIE NY 15R2 1993 INN 2-SPACKENMLL RAISED RANCH Ills 5 GA= SLURS hMG71MtM 2201R 7ML CAMPBELLMIGNON Ou1dH SNO-M146151.OWD 7$ ALDA OR PWIC4MEEPSIE NY 206 I97O LTSMI-WAPPINGM COLONIAL Om IZ S3M= 5117.27 GREENSTEIM ALLEN 2MIR U57 HANDYGREGORY Dulchess 60:6D04.567377.00W R HOGANOR 7OUG11KEEP51ENY 14P3 MS 134OM-ARUNG M SPUTLEVLL D-36 201610-I8 SMOM SLUM WYSKIDATMVM 22019 RM DECKERJOSEPII Dulchess 616c @R'SM4S-0OOD 5 OtDSPACKENKILLAD PWK'iiIOFPSIENY 728 1456 734AM SPACKEN1111 RAHCI 12 ZOM10.34 159am S2733S DAVIS DONALD 2M11 R946 PHLUPSAeowm D.tchas 62G003-1960504= 03 AIDAOR POLGHKEEPSIERY 3160 19W 135601-WAPNNGERS RAMORANCI OA 201R-11-01 S7tg0D0 S9&10 CHLDRE26WRENZO 2201E 9109 1PHILANCEWICHAFL. DDcheSs 6L59.01.2409E00000 6 KINAYRD POUGHKEEPSCENY 1210 19S6 MEOL-WAPPINGEAS RANCH n32 2013-I1-05 230 5190AB KVASTEADFRED£TTE 2201E A341 COSCIA EU5A Dutchess 6Z6D01.389950-= is COACHUGHTDR POMUKEEP51EMY MG 1993 134OMmARGNGTDN COLONIAL DA6 2Z3B&11.13 S375,ODO S12149 EWSMN THOMAS ZKOR WS WHTECAEGORI Dulchess 05D.DCUL330-000D 33 REDOAKSNILLRD LAGRANGENY Z178 1930 135W1-WAPPIMGM CONTEAPORARY 0.3E 103&11.29 S277aro S327.11 REID740tARD 22019 521E SPAINGLAMES Dutchess 626G034211934XOD 29 WINNIEIN PO"KEEPSIENY 1480 Lou 115601-WAPPJNGM OWEOOD OS 201&LZ47 243000 164.19 COMIDDIAURA MIS 9642 WARREN KATHERLNE Dutchess GN&OL-253807.0000 20 GEHTRYEIND POUGHKEEPSIENY 2859 2D2 mm LW,01-ARIINGTON CONTEMPORARY L96 201&12-12 000 SIMS31 LRtAREKIYOSHI 7201E 9917 SWIKOURI PAYAM Dutche 6266D1.7901R7•BODO TOO NEWHACKENSACKRD POUC;4KEEP$(tKY Im 3-w 1.94E01-ARRNGTDN FMNCH DA 20163243 S2MOM SIWAZ PAIAERANNEETE 22019 9S72 RIVASERICKCU RERA Dutch45s 62GD01.113785.ODDD 44 COACHUGHTDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 2516 193E 2345M-MUNGTON COLONIAL D65 201&12.14 53M= SIS m POIANCHKLAIA 22= 293 ROAMNNICOLE Dutchess 6260-M167115.00DO 7 CARNEILIQ PO11GHKEEPUENY 2751 1966 13S601-WAPPINGFRS COIONIAS n42 201a12-1R S34Ty925 M55 uwG NICHAEL 22MB 9922 PIMGGIDJOHN Dul4hess 61G604.8113 4XM 40 ROUNDHLLRD POUGHKEEPSIENY 1744 1957 IMEM-SPACKENKILL RANCH 0.68 2018.12-20 S33Z000 S19037 TI TANCIM HOLES IN ZYH9 294 AVIKTINEAVREHE Dutchess 62G( 0MGM59.ODOD 34 R£DOAKSMILLRO LAGRANGENY 1200 201E LISW1-WAPP)MGM RANCH CL46 2019M,04 523 w 5185.48 ' BIISSARUCHAEL 220D 237 MUSOUNDPATHICN DIKhas 626DM38L225.0XID 17 MEMOAY LN POUGHKEEPSLENY 1136 1954 135®1-WAPPINGERS RANCH D35 2G3901-I4 294000 26056 LAGSAIES INC 220L9 6" Mh51AONAROIANTMONY Dalchess UUMS-166175 0ID 21 M"FWODDDR neLKEEPSIENY 2fi85 1969 1356U1-WAPNXMIS CixONLAI CL42 M19m-24 S344.000 L2112 FwRESALEK 2200 9S4 RROWN LANDON botches GXj'Ol-2039S9H1000 33 VASSARVIEWAD POUGHKEEPSIEMY 1705 1" I51W1-ARt1Nt.TON OLDSM DU 201401.25 SM9m S174]2 FIESIANDBRUM 2M39 ROB MATATIASTEPH71 Wtchess 6160-M9520%0000 15 RAKER RD POLISHKEPSIERYd1432 19R3 134WZ-SPACKENKILL AAISEDRANCI O.Z7 203402416 S272A00 S179.B9 ROTOVACOREPAOPER MU lO6fi KYRIACOL1CHRISIDS 0utchess 626DD1n21M0D00 3 ARENIWOODDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1%7 13SSM-WAPPI14GEPS COLONIAL 0.52 W19-02-22 1M Slum 6ARRETYNLLUUA 2TQ19 154E WWTCOAAUIOHN Dutchm 62S9.O1.2S79MOOM 16 ALFAEDDR POWHKEEPSIENY 29SG 135B01-WAPPINGERS RANCH 036 M19tl3-19 S26L4W S1RLS4 TANUiEDl HC4NES IN 2200 2080. RAYMO CYNTHIADutchess616DOC39505.000D 4 HOLLYLK POUGHKEEPS%EKY 1972 LM002-SPACM MKILL COLONIAL 6 Z01403-19 S7350W S12&93 SAWfER UK 72019 2M SWEEMEYSCOTT Ndlh55 6X001.1(A940-f1000 9 TROTITA LN PO11GHKEEMENY 2996 1346M-ARLINGTON COLONIAL 0.47 ZMMEI.20 412'k= S154AS VFRDFWWEIOSEPH 72M 2345 CONRADIASON D7tchess G2&SOl-2R2765.ODOD 27 HOIINBECK RDG POIIGIIKEEPSIENY 1950 174602-ARLINGTOH CONILA4PORUW 3-4 2019IM-2Z S604OW Szmn GwUNARTFIUA 27019 2351 ALTMAN RENNI Ntchtss GICOOZ-74MG-C 0U R KIMUNCT PO11G11KEEPSCENYMO2 IMOM-SPACCENKIII COLCINIAt am 2MIL04-M S MSM 173.75 16"ARIYNANry 22039 26G5 DtTOREVWIAN Dutchess 6260.01.350947-000D 25, GREEILVAIEFARNSRO POl1GICKEEPSIENY 1956 1.34601-ARUNGTON RANCH 0&1 2039-04.12 sm5 sw SMU TANUM HOMES IN 22M 23R9 CORKERYROBERT Dtchess 62610/03 4gA0RA 8 MALNETO DR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1956 13SMI-WAPPRlGDG RANCH QA7 2D39D4.15 21151000 S10.61 COICIENNIFER 22019 2257 JONE5111CHARDEDWARD D.tchess GN0103*453W-0000 3 PINETREEDR POUWIKEJENY 1964 BAS L35601-WAPPINGES CAPECOD Di 7L1904-17 2550011 S179.54 SMaM DONALD 2MM 27S4 MCLFNOON BNOSAY Wtchess GZ6DM339L3D0000 42 AIDAOR POIIGIIKEEPSIENY 2029 1954 L35W1-WAPPINGEAS CAPECOD OM 2019-DE17 52740D0 S731D7 DRAINIDIDL zKw 0503 BOYUN MARYBETH Dutchess 62660iS11377-= 30 OACHAROPARK POl1GHKOPMENY 00 I940 1346M-ARIIHGTON CAPECOD 039 2 910E-24 S316.000 SlG SS S[HAEFFER R03ERT Z2019 29D VALVEROE6ITRAN P ARGLPDO QW01,365921OWD 24 COACHUnHYDR POIInHKOPSIENY W24 1936 L14601-AMUNGTON COLONIAL OAS 20MM431 S4 SIM.05 RILEYNISEFN 22M 3259 SHAFERSTEVEN 62GD01354135.00W 4 CIAYTON PL POUGHKEOPSIENY 2533 I= L35MI-WAPPINGERS CMECOD D41 2W3-27 S2MM) S1 43 DISILVESTROJESSICA 22M 3578 BANKERIAH 626D01.439687-WW 4R TREE TOP LN POUGHKEEPSIEMY 1560 Im 13LW1-ARIINGTON CONTEMPORARY I.W 203?OS-29 SM,$W 512L24 SOIELLTIMOiW 22M 4ZW BERENZONDMTRIY 626O.(w506471-0000 211E NEWHACKENSACCRD PO11G10EEP51ENY 169R 155D IMMI-ARLINGTON GIPECOII D49 M19.D5.13 SX&ODO SIRL9a tweJOHN 2M39 4769 GILMANPLT9ttREPW51256&ORA S WATHRROOK OR POUGHKEEMIENY 2440 1982 1346M-ARLLNGTON COLONIAL D41 W19- 20 S4 4100 S1fM SMENCK WHAEL 22M 4T72 ROIDRHHRMAN V6001.39MZ41000 4 REDONDDDR PO11G11KUFSIENY 3M5 2WZ 34OM-ARW6TON CLLONIAL 642 M19AU&M 4®-400 1.S4.6L MCLOHGHUN EDWA ZM19 4115 GRECOANGELA 6IMM70246R-0000 6 tASPERCREEKRO POMME"StPUY 1315 IVA 134602-SPACKENKILL RANCH GAG 2019 20 5259A00 SM47 RODRIGIMACIRA 22019 U14 MRAHAMAMLELINE 616OOB-965429.0000 SQ3 COLWAN DR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1L96 1960 135W1-WAPPINCWS RANCN L164 2D19M27 S7-UAGO ST97.32 DUAMNNCINO 22019 4312 MYLE55AN7A 626P01.3WB63-IOW 2 HOMUC PL PODGBKEEPSIENY 1152 29S7 134601-ARUHMON RANCH 1137 201406-21 s2sSioco S22135 MARTWOSANDRA 22019 4457 AAFrn4FZA4755ELL OuKchess fiM044-6213734000 IR RONCARD IAGRANGENY 301D 1954 L15MI-WAPPINOW CAPECOD 0M 201907.12 St1D501 M71 CISBAWMA 22019 4952 3McHLMC15FNEE.HOEDING Duchess 6MO-01401M&OOOD 23 TREETOP LN POCIGHKEEMEM' Iasi 1%0 134601-ARWIGTON RANCH OL73 ML9.07.15 3M750 172.20 AUNNSIi1N MERYL FlI 22019 460 QUNNTF106M5 Dulchas 616Dt1FT23411-0000 10 HRLLAANKRD PL7l1GHKEEPSIENY 2168 M 134OM-SPACKENMLL RAISEDRANCH QW Z019-07.15 Mom S11XAS CAKINOAVWXA 0 AM RIURNDEROEBORAR Duldim 6M-M-059965-000D 13 PLFASAMwwm PC3UG"KLEP51ENY 307fi 1968 IMMI-WAPP1NTiR5 COLONIAL OL97 2OM07.17 53 100 S104-00 SCIMINNIL WLA 22019 4w IVUMUSDTN Dwchess 61MM95B30J•ODOD 85 COtRDRNIXt N1CdIKEEPSIENY 1992 19W 135G01-WAPIIX= SPHTLEVH. OL43 ML9-07.17 6345tm SIM19 ChRCAALIADOR 22019 4962 KEYIIIINSFAN 0uech4ss QG&034VNS0000 3i BAEN7AA4OD 0R POLIGHKEEPSIENY 25i2 198E 13S6DL-wAFPLNCERS.I COLONIAL 0.311, 20140748 404000 SIM" CA1DWEl1LRAIG 21W9 S115 EPF9IAMBOBBY D.ldless 616OU4859045-0000 14 HORWM HILL OR I POLIGHKEEPSIENY I551 1964 1 LWM-SPACCENIOLL I AANCI U41 24]34U7.19 S305.000 1%65 SMOH LAMES 22039 D RMINCOREY 45 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DuldNss R6602-33597S-0000 2G IIOMMPL POUGHKEEPSIENYR24-n L957 134601-ARIANGIOH RACH O37 2019-D7-23 527 OM 18939 PHELPS DAVID 22M9 5121 HENNESSYIOHM DUHh445 6250413.23305MR) 27 KINRYRD POUGRKERSIENY MS 1356O1-WAPPMERS CAPEC03 054 WLI-D7-26 SMAOM 5IX31 KENOVACOREPROP 22M9 4165 DINGEEMATTHEW Oulchtss 626DOI-15MUS000D 31 COACHUGHTDR POWNIKEEPSIENY JIM 134001-ARLWGION COLONIAL • 049 2019-D729 397.900 517931 KAHRKEVIN 22019 5027E 1NNIARWEIHK Duldx 6260-03JAM14f000 7 WINNIEUI PDUGHKEEPSIENY 1435 13SMI-WAPPINGM CAPECOO 0.34 20IM-06 IMADO SID-29 WILMWGTONSAVI 77019 KENOVACOREPMDPMOCS INC Dutcte 62W-01-3965O1-0ODO 10 REDONDO OR POUGHKEEPSfENY IMI LUMI-ARLINGEON PUTLEVEL L28 2O1901F32 529L000 SMM HENRYMOMLYN 22019 5WL7 CARPETLfIDSANORA Outshms GIGO0t1%G 7 4TKO 1a RAKER RD POl1GHKEEPSLE NY 1972 1MM-SPACKENIOIL RALSEDRANCH OIA 2t114ffi-13 Zf = S1Y1,7LL MARSH RICHARD 2M19 E439 HIEVESERLC Dutdt 616D04-7343T7-00W 2D CREEKMORO POUG"MuYS(RY 1961 134®2-SPAOLENKILL RANCH 0173 203 WIG MOOD0 519018 HOEF70AHBARA 22M SAL2 WAGNERJEFFKEII IJulchess 6266DA24073241000 B DARIADR POIIGIOXMIEW I967 135601-WAPPINGERS RALSEORANCH 04 20J9-06-21 331,2511 SU60 KRAUSERIC ZN19 ISM OIAIAONOAIEGAM Dukhefs 060-01.206OM41000 22 KELLERHAUSE DR POUGHKEFPSIENY 1M7 235101-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0,54 2019.OR-21 S4L,CO3 S173A0 ROHRING KIMMILLY 2M19 632E PICCONEAWHONY Outdless fi26f1-02-467I09-0D00 SO WINNIE IN POUGHOMIENY 1370 1957 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH am ZD942-26 33,900 WAS RAGONESEANGLEA 220" 6M ALZIU.SAH Outchm 6M4^'.-r a"`^'"" N 1VINNIE LN POLWAMSEPSIENY 14L9 1950 135000-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD OLn 20"-26 2 O00 17L25 GA1OJO5£PH 21019 ISMT DEGAOATTIMOTM' wchtss 626603-357225-= fig PLFASANTALDGEDR POLIGHKKEEPPME NY 2632 1965 85601-WAPPINGERS RASEDRANCH 0.4E Z0194)9-24 S311.= SI11L16 FANTONEJOSFPH 320LO 50441 SW6EFROYRORIN Outd— 6160-01-2107114= 29 HORNBECKRDG POUGHKEEPSIE NY 23OO 19W 134601-ARUNGTON CAPECOD LOL 2019.09.30 mom SIS4.29 MCDOMALO REMEE 22M9 7113 PARIUDWRO191T vwKbasl 615603,166348.00DD 25D SPACKENIOLLRD POUMXEEP54EW 1LRB 19Y9 235F91-WAPPINGERS RANCH 14 2019.2"1 33AO0 SLR217 INTERRANTEJLUANNE M2019 GM RtRE: DANIEL autctxss 626E41340nHS00011 14 PIMFTAEEDR POUGHKEEPSLENY 1913 19" 1356M-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD 034 201%10-22 3MDM 516675 GHOSHFMIYOH 22019 7120 MMKEMM DDtd— 610004942042-0000 21 RAKERRD POUGHKEEPSIEMY 143E 1979 134602•SPACKENKILL RAISEDRANCH OL29 2019.1625 519ODO0 SM31. WATSONFAOH ZM9 71V VANOMMACF SHAWN Dukh 6266®-LLg2MAYY91 42 PLFASANTRIIIGEOR POUGHIREEPSIEW 32" 1172 13SM-WAPPINGM SPUTLEVEL 042 201410-21 399=1 SLE791 IAFALCE USA ZM9 50590 HPINESM1EHAFL DPtdHDT 624600-11517E-0000 LS CARMELO CT POUGHKEEPSIENY 2474 IY71 135W1-WAPPIKGEJU CONIEILRORAWr 0.54 201$-20.21 S32AM2 SLUM MILLSQUINCY 223139 7I92 CHAMCHERKWAH DONhesl 625B-Ol•040991•D000 2 PAYDR POUGHKEEPS1ENY 192R 29% MMIL.WA PINGERS RAISED RANCH G321 ZO19.111.31 337,900 SIMM HVHOMESOLIMONS Z2019 7340 ROWFILEIEN Dut& K 6266M-39259L-OMO 3 IMTOPLN POUGHKEEPSIENY 299E L9R 12461-ARUNGTON CONTEMPORARY L1 2M9-11-15 39O010 SM27 IRDANDRARRY 221M 4DFL LP30NJAM DPkhtss 6160,044411216(090 16 AGLINDFDLLRD POUGHKEEPSIENY MAS 1l57 IwAX-5PAOILM)0LL RANCH OO 2019.11.15 37QO03 SL7L49 HAGSIROM DAVID Z2019 7544 SCHWARTLMNRCY Wlch[ ss 61W-M,dSZlO4X 0 S ROUND wil RD POMISEEPSIENY 2329 1957 134602-SPACKEHKILL RANCH 11 209-n-22 mom S12fi72 SUM BMDILT 2=9 7R73 LOPEZ PHIWP Oulchess 676002-3602ES-0000 6 PIMETREEIM POUGHIKEEPSIENY IRO 1950 MMI-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD OL31 21119-11.25 5115000 SM99 HAGYCHRISTINE 22019 7932 77TAFiC1MHDMESINC Dutchcu M0411230M-0000 30 DARMOU POUGHKEEPSIEW 1964 19T2 135601-WAPPHLGERS AUSED RANCH OL46 2019-11•27 MOM Sew WAGNERTHEODORE 19 LR39 SEGGERMMNKA7HMNE Dalchm 6259.01.1M9060000 6 DONNAOR POLICAKEFPSIENY 1M AI LIM 13560L-WAPPIRGEILS RAISED RANCH 0.SS 2014-I1.27 530$000 Sl6dI4 ADAIRJOFW M 7960 RERAKJSANTHONY DuGh" s GM 03-430W14000 L9 MAINEM DR POUGFIFELPSILNY i93S 1*5 135601-WAPPIHGERS CAPECOD EL32 2019.12.12 3A7OO 5167.29 COLTONAFJREY 22419 WX GIRTONDANNY Dukhess 62MAYL-43581600G0 3R TOOMEY OR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1656 1950 L34WL-AfU1NGTON RAISED RANCH Q24 2D19-22-30 S264000 SIGL84 PViICXWDANIEL 720M 42 PI22DLJAANDREA Mchus 62003-Z09168-COM 1 NILOECT POUGFKEEPSIENY 1926 11M 13%M•WAFPIMGM COLONIAL U41 2019.12.23 1MOS 12LW TJTANCREDIHOMESIN 22019 SM DONDEADLAMES 0u1chas 616604 30460000 39 TIMBERUNEOR POLIMPKEEPSIFNY TM 19R 1346M.SPACKEHIOLL SPUTLEVEL OL47 2OO.12.2I SM000 SIMAO WKSMOSPH 22MO SR DTANCREDIHOMESINC IlutchKis 62601MI70M3 0000 3 CARNELUCT POLNMEEPSIENY 2422 1974 1156M-WAPPINGFRS COLONIAL an MOMI2.27 MOM SIMS4 KUSAN IL0 72019 MM MMANTONIO Dutchus 61WD49B0T73-0000 44 COIAIXWOR POVGFKEEPSIENY 1152 156O IMMI-WAPPINGERS RANCH 06 2M"L-M OM 5236-91 OANESTADAM 22NO 4M MMOLOIDIENDA WWI— 62J3DOl-3SSM4-0000 59 CEDARVALLIYRD POUGHKEEPSIENY 20% 190 1346M-ARUNGION RAISED RAMOI OL12 2M*4OrL-17 WISAM 1943R MARMNEKROREIIF 22020 SR CARDINAIEJAMYN 0ulchtss 62WOB-360215.0000 6 PINETREEDR P0uGKcE9MFMY L62O LWO 135601-WAPPINGERS CAPE ODD O38 2MO-M-30 Sl S00 S91S7 T17ANCREDIHOMESIN 22020 I021 FRONTPORCH PROPFRDFSLL Duld— 620003.201222-0000 3B BRENIVMDDR POU"EEPSIENY M 190 1356D1-WAPPINGERS SPUTLEVEL 0.4E 20NM-30 131,C 51733S PARAIONROMPIT 27D10 Rt SASKADAVID Dutchts! 6261-01-216562-M 29 VASSARVIEWRD POUGEKEEPSIE NY 792 I916 L3(YA1-ARUNGTOH RAIICH Q26 2020,OL-31 SZMMO 527146 Gth"ii DONATO 22JOO 6% HARGRAVESRMANIHA Outchas 61% 04.9190590000 4R TPAREAUNEDR MUGFKEEPSIE NY 29N 190R 1346R•SPARENXILL fAPI COD 031 27FN1.Ol-31 SM'DIM) 5131119 KARQ PAIR 210D 716 GEVAOFIB Dutd s 626D0i32417NMOO 33 ALOA OR POlIG1KLFEPSIE NY ISM 1952 135601-WAPPINGERS CAPEGOD CL34 2000.0-10 523S,C00 St" FJTANCREDIHOMESIN ROZO IS53 BANKEROANA Dvld-4ls 62!%0i-2429L5tOO6 33 PLEASANT LN PCUGHKEEPSIE NY 13IR 1151 135601.-WAPPINGEIS RANCH 031 210401-10 SM51030 520106 MOfiYE UNDA 220M IMI CARLYLEHARRY XSAILES 49 AVERAGE wM is" OAR 531312% SOL" MEDIUM 1935 M q46 MOM I6171 DIFFER'EECEOFAVEMGE S6SF L11FFEMIENCEOFMFDUN WHDUSESF 46 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Tile. 244 8OARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COVNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 4/B/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES VATHIN ONE -MILE RADIUS & ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY TA%MAPR S7RCET1 STRCCT TOWN HW$EST EFF.YR'. BUILT SC11007 HWSES1Yli AOLEStZWM2.1 SAIEPMCE PAIMPERNOWE SA SE41ER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYFA Wtdless 62T,002.51263I.09O9 2170 NEWHACKEF45ACKA0 P13UM XPMENY 19LN 29W 134W1-ARUNGTON RANCH LW S1Q34 COHN ROBERT 6 SW CIAARANDANDREW Dutdwss 676091.1SR9fl-000O 16 TROTTERLN POOmDDEPUENY 3112 1995 734601-RWNfiTOH COLONAL 057'5 SIA BUERGERSERIC 22MS 906 SEIOLvARK Dutdxtss 616D01.379961•D000 21 GREENVALEFARV4BD P13UUNKMIYENY 193Z 7967 IMSM-ARuNGMU SPIITIEVEL 057 716.OD0 SIUM HACKGEORGE 22016 3W3 1VRCmNAmGFL 1w,hex Q 01.23062.1-6000 39 HOHNBECKMG POUGHKW'SIENY 4775 1596 134W1-ARUNGION COLONIAL 6.% 1 SSQ S1U.lG KIMHtlSWR 22016 4= DECKTRtSHA Dutd- 621093-453994-OM 32 SH&DONDR POUaWMFAENY IR16 1M7 1.74W1-ARINGTOH CAPECOD CL77 4 7W U44M WDSSAAHONC 22M6 4MI WAYANTLAND OAVIDADAM U de ' 6TOF61.121732. DW0 17 AROOACT POUGHKEEPSIENY 3359 20M 134fi01-ARUNGTOH COLONIAL 052 D SSILSOO S15i51 SMPAULM 22D16 ANSI 1MTHA-EVANSANNA Outehen 6260n-lu15l4m 31S SPACKERMELRD POUGHKBEPSIENY 15W 2910 134SM-AKMGTON CAPECOD M44 1 SZR= S150.97 LAARBY NANCY 2XHK R3CR GaN71DE7BA55O DIEGO Wtdws 62600-MLU0001D 16 ORLTURD PARK POMHKfFPSIENY 1255 Im 134601-ARUNGTCIH mmm RANCH 025 201611-17 27LCW 521592 YAEGERNOCHAEL 27416 ISM MCGARR•YSHEWU VutOm 626D01.570717.0000 161 TMMVIUE RD tAGRANGEHY 19S4 1967 1346M-ARUNGTON PMEDRANCH cm 2016-11-23 SItS.17 CATAPAWANTONIO MD16 WA OAKLEYR06FRF Dutch"s 426002.311S6A• 000D S NEAIHBKUGK OK POUGHKEWSIENY 24W 1962 134W1-ARUR610H CDLON[At GAL 201612-D1 S395.000 SIR" AWAIUCANINMRELOGO 2aM7 1900 SCHENCK MCHAR O ,h-s 626003, 160M00m 194 CEMRVALLLYRO POMMWSICW 1714 2974 136=-ARUNGTON SPUTtEVIL 0.79 201612.M SaWn S15LSI SENBRANODREKES 22016 JIM DAWODOS&MEER 9ulchess 629"1.3L5W- 0CW 7 HGMERPL POUGHKEEPAENY 1432 19% BALM-ARUNGTON CAPECDO DQ 2 L61212 OW SIX22 SIMXGFAIM 2WIS 9072 ODONNELOOHN Dutchess GMD2.516607-DWO 21S6 NfWHAWNSACK RD POUGHKWFSIENY ism 290 194=1 ARUNGTOH ARCH 350 2D1412AS SHAM LUCASRDY 71D!6 94D2 EHRIGHTDENNIS Dutdl Q60D3450MDDD0 5 REOONDOOR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1570 1967 1346D1-ARpNGTON CON10wORAKY D42 7Dt612.2n 166900 SIOL21 MUIIl OMSTOPMER 22DIS 9344 2ATTEAMADEUNE Outdmss 62GM01-CSRi OMO 21 TDOhETDR POLIGHKEEPSJENY M I955 134601-ARUNGTON PARCH OA4 2w4t-20 SIVIO 0 163.90 CALIIOMREIIC 22D17 744 TMVOWANTHOHY Ouethess I E6004.51140-= 1 SIELOONOR POUGHWSIENY Isis l%l 13%M-ARUNGTON PARCH DAL 2017-ML13 SA0.00D Sanw Aumiu f#LCC zbU7 2010 BUtUMIC1VLEL DAdtels 62002.555544m00 231 TITL1MUE RD IAGRANGENT 20S 1324 IM=-ARUNGTON OLOSFAC I t75 70174I¢17 0m 129.37 SUTFR ROMAT 22ID17 1409 SIWATLDWEU. Du[d- 626a61.OfiDR22- m00 109 6OARDWWA0 POUGHKEEPSIENY 7DIR 1941 BAW1-ARDNGTON CAPECOD L90 21117-03.03 15.OW 535"1 MKOFPJENN LK UD17 2471 INGBENMMN Wtd- 626DA1,21SDS8-0W0 11 OOACIKIGHTOR POWHKEEPSJENY 31D4 IMP 13MM-ARUNGTON COLONAL OL46 2D174MZ3 S405.OW S13M4$ CHIAfOLMRODNEY 72M7 2M2 N(ATWJC4CW Dutlh.ss 620061.22126U0000 30 HORNGTCKRDG - POUGWBEPSIENY 2526 0 - 1i4W1-ARUNGTON COLONLRL 01T7 2W-CCL.23 5T44,9m 1364D RMSORDJDHN ZXU7 22R7 SWARFEUWARD and- E@0147727900m0 121 00AADMkN RD POMHKEPSERY 2513 1935 134W1-ARUNGION CAPECOD L90 W1745.02 ISME SI41% TERVENSKI MARK 21017 3143 BRADRALY)ONATHAN Ouk&m 626D61-3179"ww 29 HOMER PL POUGHIFEPSENY 2052 1956 134W1-ARUNGTON SPUTLEVEL I640 2W4*07 295-LIDO 243.76 MLLENKALHOAEDEV W7 4241 ORNOMGLAELIANONTOOLEA Outd- 426601.33]Q1.0060 J6 CEDARVALLEYRD P- IRMH EEPS]ERY 4056 2102 131W1-ARUNGTON COIONIALIII 2D174W77 DZCm S11647 FALHOUIRJDIM M17 4W VASHISNTOEEPACANOSONALD Ottld- 62W01490560DOW T7 HORNKXKADG POIIG"KWSIEW 2ml 1959 134W1-ARUNGTON RANCH 270 3q17-0629 W.0w 167.7[I 1LERLY EDWARD22017 96041 VANPANEIANE Dutdless QGD61.42>727.0000P54 TREEIOPLN POWRKEEPSIENY 3741 10W 134601-ARUNMON RANCH 0.7S 2017-05-29 5=000 14T51 WBl4RTROGERT 22017 51T75 77ESUARRISON WtdKss G7H101-ADfi O® HORNBECKRDG POUGHEEPSIERY 29M 1936 LA6M-ARUNGTON CAPECOD 161 2017.07--17 0% am CSO NYPROPERRESLLC 23M7 SW RMDH DAVID wufi ss R61.D1.2M53&0CC0 VASSARVIEWRD POUGHOkSIENY 7SW 1939 134W1-ARUNGTON CAPECOD 0-29 ZW437--29 5W SUL26 MUKJHLARRY 22D17 SW INGERMN SARA Dut,hm Q6001.440009O= TREETOP LH POUGHKEEPSIENY 2424 I963 134fd1-ARUNG7Ol4 CONFEMPURARY O73 2017-07--27 5IMOW SOL24 RHWN ROBERT 22017 S8$3 GILOAROMWOIASDutd- 626001.4KA00W RDONDOOR Pa&HKEEPSIENY 13m 1964 1346M-ARUNGTON RANCH 462 2017.0?22 S24S000 UK46 VAHVIAaUNDA 22017 7736 NNRTOIEZCHRISTCIPNER Dutdl- 626OD3-461361-OWO ORCNARDPARK POUGHCE£PMEW 1973 L910 134fiO1-ARUNGION CAPECOD 0.63 241T-10D4 6Q000 i3LO 7GLNECHARIES 2RU7 7629 MARTIN nMOTHY Dutthess Qf&M-311a7G&OD00CEDARVALIEYRD POUGHKEEPSIENY Z?n 2m2 BAWL-ARUNGTON COIDWAL 12 2M7-1011 OW S164.11 MSUS140AVID 22017 764S RRNAR1 Dutfhess E®B-Sfi6R&0000 TRMVILLEHTS LAGRANGENY 1552 1953 134601-ARUNGMN PARCH CL49 2017-10-u SAR-Sm S57.W MAOLSONSUZANNE 22D17 7911 REDMAPLEVERFURESINC DVtdICss QW-01-3%*l-OOm 12 GREENVAIEFARMSRD POUGHKEEnENY 15W 1957 LUMI-ARDNGTON SPUTLEVEL O73 20MU-2D S229417 S139M IARLVGA XMH 72D17 MS IAWESONRUAN Wt[hass EgiDl•1556664D® 13 CUA42HGWUR POUGHKEEPSIENY 32SS I990 LUKU-ARUNGIDN COLONAL 0Al 2017-12-24 mow 512fi46 KRISAWK.UAM 22018 260 LAHI6AIOY DPtdl.ss QW-01.1W617-0009 Al COACERIGWDR POWHKEEPVEW 2w 1919134Td1-ARUNGIDN COUINML 1147 20L742.11 SA2%Om 14LQ 54711NRAR 22111E W9 MOOOYHEAWER SALES 35 AVMAM II34 1961 y 5300.1113 523750 TIMEADJ.PWCE 3% 2.4 510.4Y MEOtA.Y 9n 1959 MOW 1 $137.01 InMEM.F.Ma 3% 1 2A 1 S147.M PE1tYJL I AYRS. 47 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Dutthett i 6i60-01. MSd1700 21 1 COAO*GMDR I POWMEEPSIE NY 3289 1996 L34601-ARUNWON COLONIAL w 701&08.07 S177007 Si29,83 GFRRERGIENN 7 Q34 9M MOYHENDRICK Dutdess Q60 DS-5673TT•0000 8 HOIiAN DR iI POUGW"SIEW 1873 tM 134601-ARUNGTON SPIITLLTIEL D36 MI&IO-M zww S1S4.83 MKtDATOMAS 22012 KM DECKEILASUN Duld- QID01-1899600000 18 CO1lEjEKTUR POIIGW"PSIE NY 2DG 1993 1346 L-ARUNGTUN C17LONML 0.46 2018.11-13 S37 M SMA9 L1lA"VOMAS 22016 8RI6 MCGRCGORI Outa.e 6266G1.253807A000 20 GENTItYRNO POUGHKEEPSTENY 2A10 20M 134WL-ARUNGTON CDNTEILMORARY L96 2DM42-12 S7M000 U M URARE KIYOSIB 21MB 99L7 SHRK0URI PAYAM Dutdle" 62MI-292w-0000 2" NRW1MAC CNSACKRO POUGHKEEMENY 1380 19% 1346D1-ARUN070N RAW" WD WMEZ-13 5=0" SLK41 PALMERANNELIE 9572 RrvAS EMO(GRRERA Dutd¢es 62SM-1137364= 44 COACHUCWTUR POUGHKEEPMENT ZSIG IM 134G01-ARU IGTON WLOtm OP 2DWn-14 S38 M SISL03 PWNCMKMVI 22019 191 ROMANNICOIE Dutdlest 626L-U1.XWSSDODD 33 VASSARVIEWRD POUGHMEPSIENY 17M 1910 134S L-ARUH6TON OLD STYLE • IL26 201901.25 5292,900 SIX72 FLESIANUBRM 22019 KIS IOATATIA STEPHEN Utitchm 626DO1-16V400000 9 TROTTERW POUWIPEEPSLENY 2w an 13M-ARWEGTUN COLONIAL 0A7 20LM-20 S4AM0 SUCAS VMDMOkPE0ISFPH 22019 Z145 CONRAD LASON DUTdRLt 6MM-18276S-Ow0 27 HORNBECKRDG POUGHMPSIE NY we 1950 134AN-ARUNGMN KaNTEMORARY 3A4 201M.27 SCUM 5211AZ CROWN AKMM 22019 235E AUM4NRENNI DUHheu 62giO3.350947-GRID 25 GREFNVALEFARMSRO FOUGHKEEPRENY 1L75 195G L34M-ARLINGTON RAMON IM I 201M-12 S253.50D SH&74 TITANCRM NO MES L44 22019 2M9 CORYERYROSERT Dutdless 02UMM-SlIM740M 30 ORCHARD PARK PO1GHMPSIENY 19-H 1.Y.0 134W1-ARUNGTON CAPECOD 039 2019-OF24 SMM0 S162-55 SCYAEFFEH ROBERT 27019 ID3 VALUER EESTERANPAMUDO DUI&ASS 5ZSDQl-l659134= 24 COACHUGHTOR POUGHPUPSIE NY 3024 I9M LWM-ARUNGMN cr]WNML D,46 70I9415-01 42Q= 139.OF RIL41'1DSFPHmmm 22019 3259 SINFERSTEYEN Duw*SS 62GOLM4396B7-0000 48 TREETOPLN POIIGI#EPSIENY 1560 1926 imm-ARUNGPw CON[ENIPORARY 1.O1 20194T5.29 S79 %u 192.24 sCHm nwTHY 2BO19 4M IMENZON DAfTMY WSShess 6Z6DM-505472.0m0 Z311 NEWHAOLUVSACKM2 POuGHMEPAENY 269E 1950 134W1-ARUNGTON CAPECOD me 2015A6.13 S339,000 SM1.96 CONTEMN 22012 4769 GRAIAN PETER Outdtess 626602-512%&ODO S HEATIIBROOK DR POU6IMSENY 244D M tV"-ARUNGTOH CUIONLKL am 2019-0F70 MfED 7" SCIENCKNRCLMA 270L9 4M 80LOR[NHERWN Outdtess 626=-38zM(l- 0D 4 REDONDU DR POUW00"9 NY 3036 2002 134601-ARIINGTON MIGNIAL 6A2 7D19-06-20 SG%4M SI54.61 LRCLBUGHUNEOWARD 220L9 4115 GRELOANGEIA ' Duumss 626M-360883-0000 2 HOMER Pt POOGMtU"INY I152 1957 LUMI-ARUNGION RANCH G37 2019.0&28 5255L000 27135 MARIWOSANDRA 72DI9 4IS7 WARTiNEZIUSSELL ' Ilutchess 6250WA03GNVDM0 23 TREETOPLN POUGHKEEPSIENY 2952 I9W LAM-ARLINLTON RANLT 1).72 ZOL9-D7--IS S31L= S172.70 RUNNSTUNMUYA 22010 4609 RLRNNTNOMAS W am" 616041.3359750000 26 HOMSRPL POLK MUSIENY I4S2 1957 LMM-ARUNGIUN RANCH 037 3MS-07-23 SM000 S199.39 PHLIPSOAVID 220I9 5121 HENNESSYIOHN Ouww s 636091.1598750000 31 COACKUGHTUR POLKOV FPSIENY 30D2 1989 134601-ARUNGMN COLONIAL 0.49 LW-29 S387.900 SM.21 KAAKKEVIN 22012 SMIS VANUIRSIO ERIK Wtdmu 62GOM-39AS094XW 10 RE ONDO OR POUGHWEPSIENY IB21 39Q 13"M-ARUNGMU 5PUTtvWrL L78 20LS-WI2 529L000 SMAG HENRYMAULYN 3ZO19 SIM17 CARPENITOSANDN4 Cutchess 61FAOI.72D7B-M 28 ILORNBECKROG POLIGHKEPSIENY 2800 19M SUM-ARUNGIOH CAPECOD LM 200-01-30 SL31000 SI5429 MCDONAIDRENEE 22019 71D PAPASONROBERT D.W.. Gz60IM392991-WW 3 TREEnWLN POLKNPEEPSIENY 29X 1972 L349D1-ARUNGTON COMMWORARY LW 209511-35 S390.000 5=37 IRELLND ARRY 22019 gill UPTONIAKE Dutdrtss 626001.43SMAX00 lg TODh%YDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 1656 19W 134W1-RRLINGTON RATSEDRANRI 024 2019.12.20 5268A00 S167.64 PE111GBEWDANIEL z= 442 PIZL6ElAANDREA Dutd.. 62001.355614-0000 59 CEOAAVALLEYRO I.PDUGHKEEPMrHV 200 1963 I L3401-ARUNGMR RAISEORAIICH OQ 2006-L•17 U60 SISCU WARFZtNEK1106ERT 22WO SQ CARDINALEJACLYN Dutd.ss 6261-01.21G652-0000 29 VASSARVIIWRU pLllKiIKEEPSIENY 791 3936 134W1-ARU146MN RANCH 026 702t41.31 SSISA00 557L" GEoWWOONATO 22000 6% 11AILGRAVESANYJGM R5ALE5 2d Al2FFAGE 2172 IM 0." SIQ.72 MEDAN 1!!B 191U 0.47 5337453 SlSA06 IFFERRENCEDFAVEAAGESMOUSESF 9M% IKP7FM:NCEOFMLYKAN DUSESF L12% 48 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 2" BOARDMAN ROAD,TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COUNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSU. DATE 4/9/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS & ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, CAPE COO STYLE HOUSES COHNIY TAKMA R STRFLY SIREEY TOWN H=ESF EW.YR. BUILY MM SORUOL HMSESTM ACM SALE DATE SATEPTOCE FNCEPERHOUSE SF SEM GEED BOOX DLED PAGE BUYER W16 626DOIASUS40000 32 SHELOON OR P0LGIREEP9ENY 1M6 190 1396D1-ARIINGTON CMEEOO 1172 201637-14 SM14M St"JS WMAARONC Il01E Ml MCPARFIANDDAVIDAOAM Dulchess 626DOE49&W 0000 315 SPACKENKIILRD POUGHKFEPSIENY 1590 199D 1346D1-ARIINGTON CAPECOD 11A4 M&107A S73 I. V nRKMNANCY 2W16 IWB GON7AIQ-IASSO DIEM DulchL g6001.37SIB2-= 7 HOMER PL POl1GNKEEPSIENY 1432 l956 139E01-ARONUMN CAPECOD OAO 2U&12.12 S240A00 512AZZ SIMNGHAMY 22016 9071 ODDNNELLIOHN DwLhe 626D01-069I12.0000 lOB ROARDMkm AD POUGHKFEMFNY 200 1941 1VAN,A1DINGTON CAPECOD L90 2017.01-03 S7-%= 15 M RAKOFFIENNIFER 22017 2471 KINGRDWAR Dulthm 62"l-OTL796OX0 In RGAROAMN A] POUGHKEEPSIENY NO 193R 1396D1-ARUNGTON CAPECOO L90 2DI7415-M 53ffi.LKY1 S249.05 TDWENSKI MARK 72W 3M IRAOILKIYIOMATI M Dukhess 6MOl-20OMSSW00 37 HORNBECKRDG PDUGHKEEPSIENY 2926 1906 LWM-ARUNGWN CAPECOD 361 2D17W-17 54AOM SL41S4 CSINYPROPERRESLLC 22017 SM W&WNDAVID D :Ei 061-01-20053&WM 30 VASSARVIEWRO POUGIOiMMENY 1690 M M4Wt-AAUNGT0N CAPECOD 0.29 2017-07.20 200.500 17226 MORVLARRY 17 5662 HENDL•ASON-INGEMANSAM Dullhess 6WM461361.00W 5 ORCHARD PARK POUGHKEUSIENY 197I 1930 13966L-AIWNGTON CMECOD 063 2017.1009 S2BO.EOD S131.45 MNEOWU S 22017 709 RSIRTINTINKJM RSALES B AVERAGE 200 Iml 5.79 S2KL090 SI" TIAAEAOLFANE 3% 2A 61S7A6 MDDIAN 1955 1909 OA 700 934M TIMEADL PACE 39i 24 1 MYIL PYRS. DuldMSS 626009.511377,= 30 ORCHMO PARK POLKMEEMIENY 1999 194D LUML-ARUNGTON CAPECOD 039 201409.24 531fyum Stfi SS 5CMEFFERROPERT 22019 2813 VMSVOIOCFSMMPARGUDD Dully 6260D450S472.9000 2111 NEWHAdfEMSRCKRO POL16HUFMIFNY Im 2%0 139fi1-AR1fNGMN CAPECM O49 906-13 S309.900 SISL9I CONTEMN 22019 4769 GLMARPEIER Dustless 626001.22MI- 000 29 HORFiBEOCROG POLFGHKEEPSIEMY 3WO 1960 139WL-ARIINGTON CAPECOD LAL 2019409630 543z= 15A.79 MCDOHALORENEE 320D 7113 RAMON RORERT 4 SAL6 7 AVERAGE 2H7 1950 0.63 5952" S164AI MR71AN 19M 1RD 0M 5316.000 law OIFFU"CEOF AVERAGE SF RA3% OIFFEROOM OFMEDUIM $IMOUSESF a% 49 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, OUTCHESS COUNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 41912029) SINGLE-FAMI LY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS & ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, COLONIAL STYLE HOUSES 21 KV TAR MMN SFREETK STREET TOWN NoW951 EFF-YR. ffumt SCmaL 401JUSME AOIYS SALE ATE SALEPIBCE i PIKCEPEAHOUSE 5F SEVER DEED Bg0K OEM PAGE RUTM Dul'he 62E001.15E7820000 16 TROTIERIN POUGWEEMENY am 1945 13460E-ARUNGTON COLOWAL 037 2MG41.25 401500 12934 BUERGERS MC 22016 W6 SEDL NNRK Dutchess 62W01-27067.M 39 HORNEECKRDG FOUGMEEMNY 477S 1956 234601•ARUNMON COLONIAL S36 2016W.il MAW SULSS KHAHEESHIN 220L8 6M REGLIRISIM Dutchess 62W011121M.0m 17 AR8 RL7 PDIIGMREEP9ENY 33S9 W03 134601-•ARUNGTON COLONIAL 052 2GL&W-20 S512,5W S15258 SFITZPAULM 22016 4161 MATIIIAAVANSANNA Dutchcll Q936M-512MI-0000 5 FFATHARDOKDR PMX4XfEPVFNY 2440 1912 134601-ARIINGTON COLONIAL D41 201412•DL 539-r%= S16L.89 PJAERICAN INFLREU 27017 1903 SCHENCKMI HAEL D9tdmss 616P01-21595&0000 11 COACHUGHTOR POUMMEPSIENY 3104 1998 234601•ARUNGM COLONIAL DA 20174n3-23 RS.000 BOAR CIDSHOLMRODNEY 2=7 2242 NEATONJEAEMf Dutchou 6260.01-22176600DO 30 HORN3EOCRDG POUGHKEEPSIENY ZRO 3961 134601•AAUNMDN COLOKLO OE7 20MM23 S14MM 51-XW AOSRORDJOHN 22017 2293 SWAMOWARD Dutdkss SZODI-332SU- C 0D RS CEDAR YAILEYRD POUGHKWSIENY 4048 2002 131601-ARIINGTOM COLONLAL 3,11 2OU-06-77 SM000 511637 FAKHOIJRYRAM 12017 4093 VASMSHT DEEPAK ANDSONALD Dutd.. 626D01-38076b0000 9 CEDAR VALLETRD POUGNKEEPSIENY 22AS 20M 134601-MUNGTON COLONIAL 2a 2D1MMI 5375.0DO 164.21 ENGM DAVID 22017 7645 ITORRESSHARI Dutdteu E26001-I5S86GD000 33 COACiUGHTDR PMMKEEPSIENY 3258 19M 334601•ARUNGTON COMLAL OAR 2M7.3Z•14 SO%= SM46 MISAtMUMM 2201E IM ULHIAI A= 0whi s 616001. 147517.0000 41 COACHUWgk PCUGHKEEPSIENY 2%D Im 134 01-OUNGWN COLOKLAL OA7 2017-1111L S425.000 5142.62 SINHA MRI 7M AW MOODY HEATHER NSALES 10 AVERAGE UM 191L 3A9 SM140 135.20 TIMEAMPIIICE 39 2.4 145,15 MWAN 3109 19953 0-Ss 408.500 513144 ITMEADJ-PRICE 3% 2.4 141.12 PERYR. XVIM Dutchm 86001-173915- 00W 22 COACIUGUTDR POMIKEE751ENY 1916 139E01• ARUNGTON CDLOKLLL 0.47 2018-MU7 5427.000 SR483 GMRLIENN 22018 56R3 MDYHENOAICK Dutchess 6mol-1099600000 1E COACHUGHTDR POLIGHKEEPSIENY 2896 190 23101-ARUNGTON CDLOWAL OA6 2MR-31-13 S37 000 5129A8 LUARNTHOMA5 22111E RR26 YAOIEGREGORI Dutdless 626R01.1137 & DDDG 44 COACHUGNTDR POUGHMOSICKY 6 1998 234601•A70JNGTON MEMEL US 2018.12.14 3f am SOLD] POWIOHKAMA 2.200 193 ROM WN"" D O.. E2B0- 01-]60M06D00) 9 790TTER LN POUGHKEEMIENY 2W 29% 13401•AKINGION EULI14ZAL D47 2019A120 5415.000 SL54.86 VEROER4ME10SE7U 22019 214S CONAAOJASON 1lutdwu 6260tl1-165923. 0000 24 eMCHUGITTDR POUGHKEEPSIENY 3024 1996 114801•ARuNGTON COLOKEAL OA6 201940&01 5410,500 S139M RLLEYJUSEPH 2ML9 32" SIfAFENSTEVEN butdMss 6260.02• SII566.0000 S NEATH1100KDA POLJf,HKEEPSIENY 2440 1992 13Ml-ARUNWON COLOWAL 0A1 2019-0S2J S40 OM 5165.98 RNENCKFAMEL 22019 4372 80LDAIN HERMAN Dutchess 6161i01.382510• DOW 4 REDONDO OR FQ"KEEPSICNY MG 20M 134661•ARUNGiON CDLONEAL C42 2M9OF20 S469ADO 154.61 MCLOUGMN EDW MIS 413s 04KOAWAIJI Outdsess Ev.6001•] SlA75-OWO 31 COJLCIUG4R DR pOUp4KEEPSIENY 10D2 1989 234601-ARING M COLONLLL O49 20M-W-29 387,9W S12921 KMWKWN VMS 50276 W118MSK1 N11K PSAIES AVERAGE 260 1993 121 4PR975 14333 M®IAN 2949 1996 OA7 54101000 U39M RFERFNCE OFAVEMGEWHDUSESF 129K DIFTERENCCOF AwMAN §AMMESF L4816 so CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COUNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 419/2018) SI NGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES (WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS & ARLI NGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, RANCH STYLE HOUSES TAAMlAPR S7 UTH STIIIET TOWN HOUSES* EFF.TA. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSEMM MIES SAEEMATE SALE PRICE PRRfP6LNOUSE SF SEM DEED BOOK OEM PAGE BUYCR 676DD1311631.Oo0D 2170 NEWHACKENSACKRD POWHIMPNEW 1008 1960 13E601•ARONGTON RANCH 1.1 20L6w01.22 S1B3t00 SNMM OOHN ROSERT 22MG SO GAARANDANDREV/ 626LT.D}481380 WCO I6 ORCPNRDPARK POUGIMM' IENY 1255 1955 1346D1-ANUNGION RANCH 0.25 201&U-17 S27,LOW 577594 YAEGERMECRM 77A1ts 8530 MCGAMYSHMKWE'.". 6260-02-516fiO3-0000 21% NEWHA[KENSAGKAD POWHKEEPSIENY 1509 19W 13401-ARUNGTDN RANCH 34 2016.22.15 124.99 OICAS KOY 22M6 9407 ENRIGHIDENNIS 6260-01.435638•DDW 21 TOONEYOR POIIGHKEEP-9ENY 13t5 M 334601•AMUNGTON RANCH DA4 2fl17-01.20 S227000 S1B90 CAMOAElE1LC 22017 74E TMVERSO AKWNV 62W-04-S12443-000M 1 SHELDONOK POUGHKEEMENY 1515 Ml 1346M-ARUNGTON RMICH OL41 2017/0243 S200,OOD Sam Aim RmE IIL 72017 30M EINUPACHAEL 6260-01-MOV00C00 17 HORNBECJCMG POUGHKEEMENY 2361 2%9 lW-01-AAUNG[ON RAOM 2.20 2017.OG•29 39S.000 SUM KERIN EDWARD 22017 SM LEUNGYANRANEIANE 62 &M-427217.OM 54 TREETOP LN POWHKEEPSEENY 1742 1981 MWI-ARLIMUON RANCH 0.79 201T•06.29 S250.000 S143S1 VILSHARTFA)DW 22M7 SO75 FMTIES GARRLSON 6260-01A64529-DODO 2 RFDONDODR POWHKEEPSIENY 1300 1964 L4601-ARUNGTOsc RANCH 0M 2017.09.22 S74S.CM SM46 VANVIACKLIMA 22017 7738 MVLRTINEZ CHFUSlWHER ' LTetchess 6260-02-56676r 0= 6 TMAY11LEMS LAGRANGENY 1552 1953 134E01-ARUNGTON RANCH 0.49 2D17.1Od1 Sn5m Sum MACKSON SUZANNE22017 MI REDMAPLEVENIWOINC i 5AlE5 9 AVERAGE 1514 1955 im S227.99 SISM31 TINIEADI.PPOCE 3% 2A SULU MEMAN 15" 1155 D.d2 S727= S]SO43 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2.4 16L51 AM MYIM ORtdtess Q(A}01-2921R1-0000 Z3 NEPIWKENSACKRD POUGHKEEPSIENY S310 1956 134EO1-ARUNG DN RANCH O!IO 7019-12-13 2240M 1%42 PALMERANNETTE 2201t 95TS RIVASEMCKCABRERA 0.tcheys w6O-01.350942.0000 29 dMINVALf FARAK RD POLMRKEEMENY 117S 1950 1346O1-AAItNGTON RANCH am X11-04-121 SM.SO0 215.74 T)TANOW"OMES 27D19 7dt9 COAKERYROBERT owd*ss 6760-01.3608H5•ODOD 2 HONERPL FOUGHKESPSIENY 1142 1957 134601-ARUNGTON RANCH GN 2019-0b28 52551M S22L35 MARTINOSANDRA 22D19 4457 MMRONEZ RUSSELL Dw.b— 62E0-01-4035MOCDO 23 TREETOP LN POUGHREEPNENY I 2950 23%M-ARUNGFON RANCH 0.78 2W9.07.15 53 750 S17220 RUINN=NNOMF 22014 4669 OURINTNDMAS Dutchess 626D01.335975 D000 26 HONUPL POUGMOEEfP9EW U52 1957 134601-ARUNGTON RANCH 0.97 20MW43 S275.000 5189M PHRPSDAVIO 72019 5121 HENNESSYJOHN Outdtess 6261.01.2I6552.D= 29 VASSAKVIESY ND POUGHKETYSEm 792 1996 34601•ARUNGTON RANCH 0.26 2020-01.31 SM.= SMA6 GERMIATI DONATO 22MO fM HA*MAVESARNNTHA ESA1E5 6 AVERAGE 1310 1452 OA3 ZSG— S797.D3 MEDIAN 1U7R is" 5254,250 199.@ VOCRENCEOF AVULVA $t..SCSF MAW DIFFZRENEEOFMEDIAH$MW5ESF 23.23X. 51 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COUNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 419/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS & ARUNGTON SCHOOL DISTRI Cr, CONTEMPORARY STYLE HOUSES COUNTY TAKMAPA SMEEYN STREET TOWN HOUSESF EEP. YR. NUILY SCHOOL HOUSESEYIE ACRES SALEDATE SALE PACE PRICEPERHOUSE SF S[LSR DEED WOK DEED FADE BUYER Dutdwss 626G03A504960000 5 REDONDODR POI SHKEEPSIENY 1570 1967 13401-ARLINGTOH COt MMORARY W2 2016-12-20 51p'900 510M MIIRLLYCHRATOP11ER 22016 9244 7AITERMADEUNE Dutchess 62MOLA40009-0000 30 7REET0PLN POUGIKEEP51ENY N24 M3 131601-ARUNWOR CONTEWORARY 0,73 2017-07.27 533 om SM14 BROWN ROBEAF 22017 5653 GILDARDNICHOLAS 95ALES 2 AVERAGE I 1997 197b 955 SZ4919M S12126 TIMEAuLwRCE 3% Z4 51343R MEDIAN 1997 197R O.SR 249.590 S=16 TRAEAOLPNOE 09 Z4 S134.36 PERM lYtii. Outdtcss 6260-M-253607-DD00 20 13ENMBND POUGHOEPSIENY 2859 20D2 1346OL-AIWNGTOR CONTEMPORARY L% 201&12-LZ SSAM S7,B5.38 URABEKMNI M 9917 SHAKOURIPAYAM Dutd— 62F401-1ffiMSODOD M HORNBECKRDG POUGHKEEPSLENY 23M L%D 1346D1-ARUNWOH CONTEMPORARY 3-40 2019M27 S=00D S271-42 GROTIITAmnmLIR 220L9 2351 ALTMAN RENNI Ouidwo 62E0.O1.439E67.0000 49 MMEMPLN POLIGHKEEPS[ENY 35G0 Mm 134601-ARUNGTON CONTEMPORARY 2.04 201 D549 m9m 19224 SCHEILnNKnHY 2)M9 4248 BEREXWN DVMlY Dutd— 060-01-39M91.0000 3 7REETOPLN POUGHKEEPSIENY 299G 1972 134601-ARUNGTON CONTEMPORARY Y10 2014-11-15 MOW 130.17 IREiANDEARRY 22" alit. UFTONIAKE B SALES 4 AVERAGE 2M3 305 1.66 51"M MEMAN 2149 1974 im 546t M SlSL49 DIFFEREN EWAVERAGE OUSESF 3ZWBL DIFFERENCEOFMUKAN VMUSESF 2%u% CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESSCOUNTY {112-FOOTMONOPoU; CONSTR. DAFE4/9/2O18) SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -AM SALES WITHI N ONE MILE RADIUS & ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SPLT LEVEL STYLE HOUSES COUNTY YAK MAP0 STREETS 5I1RF7 TOWN HOUSESF EFF.YR. BUILT SCNOot HW$65nU ACRES SALE DATE SATE MUM MCEPERHOUSE SF SELLER DODD BOOR OECD PAGE BUYER Dutchc 62T0- 01-37596E-0000 7E OREEWAtEFARMSRD POUGIMOSIENY 1932 1957 34501-ARUNIZ10N SPUTLEVEL 0.57 20LG. Mkcm vlRD MACK GFDRGE 22Mfi 30" MFAUUWANGEL DulchS % 6260- M-3w3F0.0020 1%. CEOARVALt"lD POOCA00.EMENY L714 1974 L76W1-ARUNGTON SPUTTEVEL 0.79 2016-12-06 5751.000 SISIM 5EMRANODMEL 2XIII Mn DAWOOOSA M Wdlns 6200- 0I7179B40000 29 HOMERPL POIIDHKEEMENY 2052 1956 LM6Dl-A%HNMT)H SPUTMVEL 0.4 M17-VIV 31PI= 1433.70 61UXNNTALHOME 77017 R41 OEUrDWO NRDIATLJ AND N1E0lEA Dutdless RAMI- 394M-0000 12 GIIEENVAIEFARASRD POUGHKEEPSIENY MW 190 134601-AWNSTON SPUTLEVEL 0.73 2DA-11-20 M.417 S139A9 K-UNS1 WITI 22M SM IAMESON&WN ASAIES 4 AVERAGE IM J%1 0.62 Stn DE.20 TUMEADI.FlUCE 3N 7-4 lam MEDIAN 2221 2937 am 24R20P SLUM TIMEADI.PRICE 311 2.4 S147M P[EYII. RYAS. DumMss 62SM- SM77-OM E WAN ON POIASWEEMENY 1473 1253 LMWL-ARINGTON SPUTLEVEL 035 701I-10-1E 5MODD lmj 3 wYSAIO/lTmmA5 2201E SM3 DECEERJOSEPH - Outd— 676" 3-3945090000 10 REDONDODR POUCMEEPSIENY 1E71 19E2 134W1-ARUNGTON SPUTEEVEL L2E 2029-MI2 SM.= STYIAO HENRYMWRIM M019 S0117 CAVPENITOSARM ASAIFS 2 AVENGE 3R4 I7 P 0.A2 JS7.7S MEDIAN 1M7 195" 0.52 2WADD M29 DIFFEAUCEOFAVERAGESMOUSESF 7SM WFERENCEOFMEMN YHOUSESF SIMI& 53 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, hc. 722 RO UTE 376. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELLJUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY (130-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 6/80/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; WAPPINGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY TALMAPI STREET SrNLfY TOWN HOUSESF EFF.". WILT SCHOOL HOUSESTWU ACRES SALd CA, SAIEPRIC7: PNCEPERHWJSE SF 01."t DEED now OFED PAGE BUYER• Duldtess 6351.04.8140900000 S WRIGHTSEVD EASYFISRIDLLNY 202 1 757Z 1E5601-WAPPINGEJIS AAISEDRANCH IL75 2011-01-M 340= 12&77 OSHFAGEMRD 22OLI 499 TOUW DANIEL Ouldleu F457-01-I44791-0OOD 73 FT]LTON WAY EAST F6HKILLNY 3212 2MO 13S601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.21 201L4U•19 6@.205 SWA9 TOLLLANOVF l WrMPARF 27.OUL 453 CAURINDENIT Dulchess 6457.01,0575&0000 34 HDFFMAN RD FAST FLSHKILLNY 2931 2010 L3561111WAPPINGM COLONIAL 017 2OU4I-28 S5040O2 172-64 701LLANDVILIMIMPART 22001 601 AEARWALVIRENDRAKUMAR LKuchess 6457111.24277L-00TLI SS IJOFFIMN AO EAST FISIOOLLNY 2560 2010 05601•WAPPINGM COLONIAL OL29 7A11.01-01 50040 S197S6 70LLIANDVIHN17EDPARN 22M 1192 VANRIPERRNAHR Dutdtess 6451104-S79I8Dt= 1 CAVELO RD EASTFRHKILLNY 22M 101 13SOl-WAPPINGFAS RAISED RANCH 100 2011•133-11 S295= slum DIBEJINAROOBOIERT 22MI 1502 FRUSCIANTE NCHIUID Duldtess MSS-OCO ELID0000 59 SCCFJRW EASTFISHKILLNY 1411 19% UL%ft-WAPPINGERS RAISED RANCH L11 2D31•05•OS S31S= Sn7A2 FLILTONJOHN 2301i 2190 MSOMEAT•O MAMA With ss 6457-01.733786-0000 SS IIOFFFMR RD PA MI1.KILLw 30TJ 2010 L35601•WAP%NGEIIS COLONIAL 026 2011.0&1B MA22 1DL93 70111ANOVIOMTFDPART 22011 3015 BURTONWINSFON DuUheu 6457.01-288112-900D 126 FENMNWAY EASTRSHKILLNY 3195 2011 LSWl-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL A26 2011-W27 S5B9,900 S34.63 TOULANOVI LTD PARTNERS 27p11 296 TORRES HAROtD Dutchess 64S7.D14Iw4wM A FFNTONWAY EASTMMLLNY 2597 2011 139601•WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.27 2011-D7.26 SMMI. S19307 7OILLANDVI LMTO PARTNE 2WIlL 3747 M4H00II06ER7 Du[duss 64%03.41IM27.0000 3 MONACO OR EASTFISHKILLNY ISM 2969 13=-WAPPINGEM RANCH L00 2011.0E-04 5273.000 17L91 WHFTNEYJOHN 22MI 3705 LUDWIHJONATHAN Buldcess 6457-0E-254Jt09-0000 96 FENMNWAY EASTFt5HMLLNY 311a 2011 uuM-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0,29 2011-mm S572SUO SUKLM 70LLLAHOVI IAOO PARTNEJ 22DU AM FOMPEAOBEM Dutdtess 6357-0Z9759S9-= 41) 1HADOW00DOR EASTRSHKILLNY 2240 1999 L35601-WAPPINGUS CONTEMPORARY 924 2011-wit S450400 5200.19 FIERKOSTEVEN 22M 47A5 t40RGMPFLDRILAOLEY Duldtell USS."60L362.0000 1 HENRYDR EASTFISHKILLNY 1062 2965 L35601-WAPPINGTRS RANCH 0." 2D11.011,25 SIW= SIBA9 RACK ROLERT 22OU 4328 CARLSON LAMES Ditch— 6457-0121578!•OWO 45 HDIPWWAN NO ERSTFMHKILLNY 2317 20/1 InIXII-WAPPINGM COLONIAL 028 2m14626 5565 5119.4/ TOLLIANOVI LNITO PARTNU 22OU 4141 R067AGM WCHAEL Dutdtess LA%014W5S1-%Do us BAANDYLN EASTFPSHKILLNY 3991 1976 USSR- WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH ILO 2022.0tF31 S7R6.0u1 51440 NECAISEBARIARA 22011 AM DARCYRIOURD Dutthess 6457.1312027SSAM 34 HOFFFAANRD FASTASH7atLNV 3t43 2011 LIM01-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL QZ7 202149•li S9J5 95 SLK59 OLLLANOVILIOMPAR7N 22DI1 44u wVAVINGDAVIO Dutch4ss 645&03.3273D3.000D 43 GIENNS WAY F=RSWLLNY 3307 2012 1355D1•WAPPINGEM COLONIAL km 2011.69.20 115 SX77 CLOVEGRANCH ROAD LLC 22011 4642 ODONNELL SONSINC DuNhels 665F01.204814-0000 2M FNITONWAY E4STFISHKILLNY 7MZ 20t0 135501-WAPPINGERS CONTEMPORARY Q71 2011.09.23 530,2W VI5M TOLLLANOVI VOW PAKTN 221111 4602 GESUMNCIENNE Dutdtess 645&DHi0G344-0000 31 HAMLTQUIto EWnSHKILLNY 880 1950 135601-WAPPINGERS COTI•AGE LIM 2611-SODS S190,000 S21S91 SCHIRtANKEGUS 22011 4963 CALCENJOS@H Dul4hess 6457-01.238617.000D 104 FENTOXWAY STFISHKILLNY 3237 26u 13SMI-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 028 2011.10•13 SU96,7S4 SIR4.TA TOLLLAND VI LMFD PARTHE n011 4764 DUGANOZIC MAFIA Outchess 6457A1.19W93.1i100 I01 FLNTONWAY FASTF45H&ttNY 3I64 2011 1356M-WAPP[MLRS COLONIAL 07G 20I1.10-Il SSR4,9BR SMUG OLLIANOW IMTDPARTNE 22011 S024 FULTONJOHN Dutchss 64S7-DS-2347G&OM 54 HOFFlMN RD EASTFISHKILLNY 293E 2D11 135601-WAIRMNGERS COLONIAL Q27 Wn-M21 SSSQ77B S273A5 OUL ANDVI LMU PARTNE 22011 SISS KAIDOR STEFFEN D.tchess 6457-01.1578D7•0000 77 VAN BUREN WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3D56 2DI3 mAut-WAPPIPJGFRS COLONIAL 0.30 01140-3L S561.974 S183.89 OLLLAND VI LAOD PARTNE 220t1 S409 PATELIIGESH Dutdvu 645Ml-4W5WC[XKI 4 FENWLCK DR Lw FISHDLLNY 1611 un LISSM-WAPP[NGERS RANCH LIDO 3011-11-01 S265AID S163ae SZYLOAUSJOSEPH 2zou S'404 DIKUS$OJOHN Dutdsess 64S&OS-433S740000 26 CLOVEBMHCH LLD TASTRSwaILNY 17M 197D 13%m-WAPPINGFRS RAKEORANCH im 2611.11.15 5270.000 S12419 LOIx DARREIL 22OU 5504 SML1L5MNR4CFl4EL Duldless 6457-01.20D779-0000 37 HOFTINAN RD EASTRSNLILLNY 3MG MILL 1355m-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 023 20I1•11.29 5639707 S139.i0 TOUL ANDVI LARD PARTNE Z2011 SJ05 KOONAPARWOYHMITHAOLVI Dutdtess 645&W-392404L000 5 GLZNNSWAY EWFISIKILLNY 3346 20LL 13%01-WAPPLNIERS COLONIAL 1-75 2Du-1749 570.QM S17Q35 MDHUDSONDEVELW 22011 6147 FUCKERIOHN Outd sa 6456-01-2M75&0000 73 BRANOFLN EASTASFBLILLNY 2012 2974 235602-WAPPINGERS RAISEDROWN L50 2012•m•13 5312500 S755.32 BELLOFMNR ZI012 3B9 YAILANSKYROBERT Dutdtess 5T4m-21076&M00 42 HOFFMAN RD FASTRSMILLNY 2S65 2OI1 356m-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL an 2012.01.17 SAA6,160 SIN&I TOU-IAND VI [MID PARTNF 22012 313 MIRPHYWALTER 0uNbess 6457.01.2147 &RAW B9 FENTONWAY EASTRSHKILLNY 3112 20LL 135WL-WAPP[NGERS COLONIAL 0.26 2012-m-25 997 5110115 TOLLIANO VI LARD PARTHE 22012 499 GOVINDASA&WANUKTIELVAN Dutdwss G457-01.22179600001 8S FENTONWAY EASTRSHDLLNY 21D1 2011 13S601-WAPMNGERS RANCH Q26 2012-D2-29 SS00.5w SZ4216 L-ADVi LMMPAATN 22012 1067 MHERSTANLEY Outdxs 6W4U•1cZ76T•CWU 78 VAN BUREN WAY FA5TRSHKILENY 2932 20t1 135601-WAPRAIGERS COLONIAL Q43 2012-03-29 4S"An S2tt4.33 OLLIANO VI LMIU PARTNE 12 14% MARASCACKRMWHER Dutd[ ess 6L58-0Z-4A16640000 173 SHAGBARK LN EASTRSWILLNY 37" 7004 135W1-WAPPINGERS CONTEMPORARY L" 71112.04.06 SIOLM S136-IS KOLKERMTCHELL 22012 1972 DENKOLRM Dutchess CA57-01.19R77&W00 33 HOTFMAN RD EAST RSHKILLNY 3044 2011 135661-WAPPINIERS COLONIAL 029 1W2#13 16,26D 5192.60 TOILLANOVI LWMPARTX 22012 1763 DEVITOTHOMAS Outch4ss 61S&W-2ffi34SM00 102 CATIESWAY EAWFISHKII1NY 3974 201I 13S6D1-WAPPINGEILS COLONIAL LIS ML2-04-2D S625000 S157.17 MD-HUDSON DEVELOPh1E 27012 191E MIACHMAMPAURAU Outdtess 645&044659407.0D00 21 HAMITON RD EASTRSMLLNY 1290 19BB 13SWI1 WAPPLNGERS RAISEDRANCH LIO 2 t2#30 Sifi5,OM SZ0SA3 SHERWOOD RONALD 22012 A29 HOWIEFTORIISIOPIER Outchess 6757-0I-Z8*W5-00W 517 ROUR376 FASTRSHKuNY 9% 190D 135601•WAPPINGERS OLDSLILE . C17 7A1b0&DS SI79,000 12&70 DEER RUN HOLDING U.0 2ZD12 253E RIVEMEFWN Dutchess MS7-01-2S9B3&OD00 533 F40UFE375 FASFIISEKIH-NY 14M MOD I35601-WAPANGERS OLDSTYLE Q17 201zwls St"GDD 10934 HUNTPMUREEN 22012 3019 RNLLENBUNTON Uttcheu 64S&1XIM644600W 50 CATILSWAY FAS7RSIKILLNY 281E 2012 13SWI.-WAPPINI.M COLONIAL L44 2DI2-07-06 y185,000 17L31 MID•HLASONDEVE 22012 3761 GREMWILLOJAME Dutdtess 64S&D3.3203030000 43 GLENNSWAY EASTRSIKHLNY 3300' 2012 135601-WAPPINCiRS COLONIAL A M12-07-06 SOL325 5206.03 ODOIWELL SONSINC 22012 290 PASSAMEMCHAEL Outdtess 6457-01.245994.0000 27 SI®ARDSWAY EASFHSHItt HY 307E 2014 13S60L-WAPPJNGERS COLONIAL 1,67 2012•DR-1D S11S,D01 3736 RINDIFUDELIHC 7miz 3584 PEZZAhO GEORGE Outchess- 605-02-UMNS-0000 206 cmmERYRD FASTF15mmw 3026 20M IM01-WAPPINGERS CONTEMPORARY 230 W12.0&23 S375,000 512393 ZOLLNERSTEFJLN 22012 39S7 KOYTEXHIMOAS Owchess 64S74l1.20B817.00t10 42 TILDENPL CASTFISITYJLLNY 31W 2012 I35601•WAPPINLENS COLONIAL OL35 ZD33.08.30 55HLL9O 18i72 TOLLLANDVJLMMPARTN 72012 4229 ALTMAN JARED Outche S 63S8-04.926265MM 26 WRICiRRLVO FASTMSHKiLLNY Low 19J9 13%01-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH 0,95 2012-09M 250,007 Sts"I tHOR11OFRANY 12 ABIL POKORAAGNICSUA Dutdress 6L57-Dl lfisl9&OOm 92 VAN WREN WAY EASFFM*OLNY 3064 2012 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL Q30 2DU-09-12 S506.995 5165.t4 TOLLWJOVI LMTO PARTN 27m2 452.1 CASABLANCA ELILLIETH WEchess 6157A1.190794-0000 97 FENTONWAY EASTFISHNILNY 2194 2012 13-1WI-WAPPINGW COWNIAL 0.26 2012-011­19 447,570 S171.E TOILLANDVILMTOPARTMA 12 SWO RAOHAVANSNNIVASA Duedtess 645741.151784.0000 74 VAN BUREN WAY EASTFISHOLLNY 34" 2012 1355M-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0128 2012.09.27 S623.8% SU10.00 701LLAND VI LARD PARTN 77012 S275 DIIROLJN NAtch0Js 645E- 0L-2M5200001) S FAIRHELOLN FASTFI900LLNY 1.318 19/D 13MI-WAPPINGMS RANCH Lt0 201b1046 7J om S70SM SALMON GREGORY 22012 49M SHERRANIEIRNIOHN Outdtess 6457- 01.172904-C= 10 TODEN FL EASTFISHKILLNY 2131 2011 13W01-WAPPINGSKS COLONIAL O31 7012-10-11 5562902 SL &P 710LLLANDVt HFTO AKIN 22012 4972 FULIONJOSEPH Outchess 64S1- 01•I0852-000D S. SEWARD RD FAST1KHKs1LNY 3005 2012 L35601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 027 2012-M24 5MRS 189A0 TOIIIANDVIIMIOP 22 SM KMMEAIAMES Dutch,,S 645&04-S35O07-0000 21 OIDFARMRO EASTHSHMULKY 2401 2013 13SWL-WAPPINGTRS RA58DRANCH L45 201211.06 S61,000 2S.33 VIMPROPERTISIXC 22OIZ SZ24 LWGINUAN Dutchecs 645& 04.84047D0000 W7 CRWARYRD EASTRSHKILLNY 2042 L920 056D1-WAPPINGEAS OIDSTYlE 240 2012-IL-33 SZ7 TS= SIMM L4ADDENJALAES22012AMv"UMAID Duldsess 64S7. 02-110906.0000 6 TIIDLIJPL EASTRSHKILLXY 3067 2012 13S60t-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 030 2012-31.30 SWIL710 S780.39 YOLLLJWDVIIMTDPARTNE 22012 5T53 ASS1ANTHIINY Dutdh u 645043-31Q43D0000 44 UTIESWAY EASIRSHKILLNY 2776 20L2 13SWIL.WAP INGERS COLONIAL L09 2D12-12-07 575 000 SINLIZ MD•HIASONDEYELO W 22013 2L WALIK JON Dutdtess FAS74I. 235R724W0 S47 ROUIE376 EASTRSHKILLNY 9M 1950 135WL-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD 01A 2012.12.14 5704000 5707-43 DMAXCO DEVElOPA1EN7C0 2NIA M 1UR11FRMIN Dtikheu 6458Q3. 294D17•a00o 44 SHEPARDSWAY EASFRSHKILLNY 2721 2011 1.356DL-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL L.55 3OIZ-12.24 SC71.000 L73-]D ASHLEYHOMESLLC - 22013 9M RTNEIL NSALES 56 AVERAGC 2517 7996 1@ SMGM SW.67 TILIEADJ.PRICE 3% 225 5179.a MEDIAN 7163 2011 0.33 5806,471 17G93 71FA Aa FI1LE 376 725 Sulu PMYIt RYR, ME CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Outchess 6W-01191975-mw 26 TILDEN PL TASTMHKILLHY 2612 11SWIMWAPPING903 COLONIAL 0.2Y 7013439•10 ZM735 186M TOLLMADVI wwrARINE 2201.3 AM7 HASANA1MEMDEE Outdlrss 6457-01.196B13-DDF)0 24 FENFON WAY FASTFISHKIIiNY 223E 7D13 J35(6L-WAPPINGERS RANCH 47fi M130?M 9SlI,}64 264-2i TOLLIILNDV11M1DPAMTN 73013 6L43 CARPENTOLJOEL Duchess 6457-01-19P8360000 6 SEWARD NO FASTFUHKILLNY 2511 2012 1356DL.WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.27 3013•I&M S493A73 19754 TOLLIANDVI UA7DPA!!TN 27011 6A96 CH0I SAMUEL DuUhess 645Rm01-IG45R¢-0000 80 HIISIDEIAKERD EASTRSHKILtNY 1336 1932 LTSW1-WAPPINMRS OLD STYLE 31JS 2013.10607 S2MOM S20LL0 MACK NIAAY 220I3 7001- SOIOTAROFFCRMSTOPHER Wtch9tt 6457-0I.721A151000 112 FENTON WAY EASTFISKKIILNY 3DS7 2913 13SM-WAPPINGERS COLORML 0.26 2013-SD17 411 270.74 LANDVI LMtD PAWN Mll 7099 MANCINI MICHAEL Imchess 65q-12-9S6060000 23 MOCKINGBIRDLH POUGHKEEPSIE NY IVA L964 13MI-WAMNGERS RALSMPANCN 039 20LI-11-07 SJJD,500 SUOM OAVISSIDNEY 21m 369 AfUttKOA Dutd*ss use.04.96on- 000 2 PATRICACT FASTFISHKILL MY 208D I987 13501-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL L54 2013.11•LS OM S170.6J Al8AJE55E 22014 375 MARINOJOSEPH Dutchess 645603.332377-00011 IG GLENNSWAY EASTFISHKILL NY 2fi92 21114 Li56M•WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 2.56 2013-I1-21 140.Om SSLB9 VALRO CONSTRUCTION INC 72013 62S MO-HUDSON DEVELOPMFHrm Dutchess 6MSI-12.985547.0000 I MOCKINGBIRD UN POWHICEEP51E NY I6I2 1964 L.45631-WAPPINGM ft"WRLNCH 0.3B 2013.12419 mom S73(.27 BALKEBRAN 22014 947 STABLERKENNEM Dutdsess 669-04-OW149-M 152 CLOVEBIAHCHRO EASTFLSHKILL MY 254E 1957 11.356Dt-WAPPINGERS RANCH I= 2014-01-W S2GO,D00 S129.20 DNTERM LAMES 22014 1143 GANCIA DAMAN OVtchess 6457-01.140806.0000 67 VANBLOMWAY EASTASRKILLMY 3041 2013 13SW1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 026 20144)1-09 613.6u 20LM TOLLUNDVI LMTOPAITTNE nM4 M99 SAIAMOHEGERARO Dutd141t 645T-01-L6906.0000 2 17tMPL EAStAMILLMY 2068 20L3 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 030 7014-M-23 Sm.967 S11R77 TOLLLJWDVI IALTI)PARTNE ZM14 3210 AMORIMRMRIA Dutdless 6457-01-3998400000 10 SEWARD RD EASTASHKILSNY 3172 2-m tn"-WAPPINGERS COLONMLI 02B 7014-M-13 377.34 TOLLLJWDVILWMPARTNF 2=4 153E ETCKHOFFFELIX Dutduss 645TE01.2i27E400W 47 BRANDYLN EASTHSHKILINY 1911 3974 135MI.-WAPPINGERSr7ED AL LAD 2014-0104 Swl500 17E.61 KELLYROMALO 22D14 1754 INOUEKWI Dutdo 6i5&O4RWLIi2-0(IOW A7 WRIGKTBLVD FASTFHHKILLNY IR93 INS L454M-WAPPINGERSNCH M74 3014D422 MOM LM RISING STAR Mil4LLC 22MA 2L4B FA=CHRIS1Y Dutdusss 64S8-03-291012-= 40 SHEPAROS WAY EASTFLSHKILLNY 7945 2D14 LISWL-WAPPINGERSIAL L66 20141S.14 127,500 43.29 MORGAN HOMFS INC 7=4 301E COLONELCRtsnE Autchess 6457,01.2MR45-M 57 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2933 2013 OSMI-WAPPINGERSIAL 032 2014-MIG 552R,771 SM7A TOLLLANDVI LMTOPARTN 22014 aM GOW nDANIEL Dutchess 64S&Ol-M17M-(IOW 19 BLUEIAYBLVO EASTFISHKILLNY 24M tw Lnwt-WAPPINGLW4AL L37 20144r N SD66,DOo I6R70 AA1010DOMINIC 22014 S240 HnILTIAAOIIIY Dutchess 6457-01-20s7M00W 41 HOFFRAN RD EASTF7SHKJJLMY 211E 2013 12560L-WAPPINGEASAL O78 201405.23 756,642 121.27 TOLLLANDVI IMTO PARCM 22014 331E U)ONLONG WLchess G35&O¢B063044= 37 MILERLIR EASTFISHKItL NY 1696 1970 135W1-WAPPINGERSNCH 0.6Z 30140f.73 S 51%.75 VECCHO LOUIS 72014 4702 BRENNAN BRIAN WILLAM Dutchess 6457.01•I>Q89D000D 18 TILOEN PL EASTFSHKIIANY 2351 2DJ3 LIUM-WAPPINGEASH Ori 7D14125-77 S461920 S20499 TOLLLANDVI IMTO PARTN 22014 47B0 SAMMUT ROSEMARY Outchess 645E-03.396463.00D0 40 CATIESWAY FASTFlS1IXILLNY 3789 2D13 L3%U-WkPPINGMIAL 4A2 2014-07.11 64,01M 162.32 MIOHUDAMOEVELOPMb47 22014 AM MAMDLERCHUSTOPHGI Dufth- 645B-03-3S8260033[) 22 MOaUNGMED Cr EASTFISIODLLMY 2472 1582 13M-WAPPINGERS CGLONAL 254 2OL4W-16 mow SI5252 DEFONZOWAVNE 220t4 4SQ F80DV0CKIEft0W Ouldwis 6457.02.20011fi0D000 34 TILDENPL EASTFSHIOLL NY 2426 2M3 I35601•WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 030 3114-07.17 5522AI? Snt35 - WILLANDVILMMPARTNEF 32014 SD64 DEASISCDXUDH Dvldlets 6LSB-02•210S64-M 1 6MNDYLM EASTFISIDDLLNV 2184 1"1 13S601-WAPPINGERS R&ISEORANCH L39 7D14-07.29 296,800 13590 LLKpSJAMES 22014 S331 PINNOCKCALB0. Dukhl GIS8434836445-000D 20 1ARMONYLN EASIMMLLMY MM 1997 L35MI-WAPPINGEIS COLONIAL L00 2D14-D&01 WO 5167M FKARAEIAYIM 7201A 4578 MARQUES MICFAELDIAS Duldless 645&U3.282MI-00O 98 CA71ESWAY FASIFIS7KDLLMY 396S 201S LM601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 121 20L4A&]8 S177SCO S4LSt RYAN FRANCS 22014 5571 SANTGROJAMES DAChISs G458­DI.4GWR-WW 76L CRF MERY IW EASY HSMIL NY 188 1219 13SWE-WAPPINGERS RANCH 103 70L4-0Y23 c00 S34692 FAIKOWSKISTEPHEM 22014 593E LJ"MSNSOMNORANI Olcldless 64S741.17092SI3O00 9 TILDEN PL EASTF15MIlLRY 2294 2014 13SMIL-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL D22 2014-03,26 SM642 SUL" TUILANDVILMMPARMEP 22014 6310 SPENALSKISTEVEN Duldless 6457.0I.1306880DCO 11 LEWISRD EASFFISHKILLMY 37M 2014 1IS60L-WAPPINGEAS COLONIAL 02S 2DIA-IS29 566235E 5177A2 TOLLLANDVILWMPAUNEF 22014 6856 PATUNIRAV DAdless 6457-01.230B27-00W O8 FEMMM WAY EASTRSHIDLLMY 3123 2014 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 028 7D14.11.20 SS74,181 S183.B6 TOILLANDVI LP 22014 AM PAULAUSKYPAAAE Dutchess 69S7-Ol_Zw 7-Ot100 94 FEHTONWAY EASEASHOILNY 1731 2014 I]l%Dl-WAPPJNGERS COLONIAL WA 201,4-12.05 521793 S19LSi TIXLIAlIDV1 LP 14 BO15 2ALESWFRANKA Dutchess bTS7.01•T9R]ryt-D700 47 FENTON WAY EASTflFeOLLNY 2894 2012 13560L•WAPPINGERS COLONIAL D26 70WIZ.It I60WD ISM RAGHAIWFSIUNIVASU 2202S 267 MCIAUGHIN MAUMM Duldkts Fd5&OF69B3S1.0000 I6 HAMLTONDR EASTASHIOLJ.NY 9" 1950 LMMI.WAPPLNGERS RANCH 0-84 2OM01.07 SM000 SIM67 MAPPIAMTHONYM 22015 372 HOTCHOSSPFDOPWL Outch :ss 6457-01-149OWWOO 73 VAN BUREN WAY EASTF1511K11LNY 2Ji2D 2014 135ML-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 025 2M1S01.21 579.126 SISLIR TOMIL&NOVILWIZIPARTMO 2201S 9W CAMPORESEJASON Duld- 669-034W&M-1 00 S NIDNACO DR FASTFISHKILENY 1MG 1469 135CU1-WAPPINGLRS RANCH LIO 2015.02.03 S315600D S173AIS EJSENHAUERROBENT 220L5 IM SOUTAJOSE Dutdless 645803.298396.0000 91 CAMESWAY EASTFISHKIULMY 3076 2011 13MI-WAPPINGERS CAPECOD 1,8 205:MW17 4f0MO MCIN MLROCONMUCILONINC MS2IS 13M PAP AIARDOANIHOINY Dutdtess 6457.01.214MODI I 89 FEI(TONWAY EASTRSHKLILNY 3102 2011 135FA1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 026 20L5-D3.17 S46%mo 15L19 GOVIKDASAMTANUXHELV 1634 PALMAJOHN Dw"ss 645E-03.28934SOOW 102 CALTIESWAY EASTFISHOLLNY 3974 2011 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL LIS 70LL0445 Smwo ISM VMOIACHAIAM AK2Au 220I5 22G5 GEARY WJAN tmct ss 645W03 7 WOM0 5 FCARDICT EASTFISHKILLNY 13M 1981 LMOL-WAPPINGERS CONTEMPORARY L23 201SO5-2D Mom S2D7.09 THWKESIEVFN 22DIS 3348 IDALISAA MdEh ss 665&W4h2S5811000 4 FENVACK DR EASTASHKILLNY 161E L9fi9 135W1-WAPPINGERS RANCH LOD 20MCS-27 S289,9117 17117 DIRLISSOJOHNP 22OLS 3797 MURPHYBRIANT Dutdtcss G457411-243859-D000 541 ROUTE376 FASTFSHKTLLMY 1152 192D 135601-WAPPINt7ER5 OLD S]YtE QIl 2015D7-0B 170,OR1 SL4757 TRIAARCH JOHNVINl3:NT 2201S 4222 MBE STACEYM UmdwI 43Sl4M-l16's434XXO 10 AVLSER OR FAS'FFISHCLLNY 17V6 I" 135TA1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.77 20IS457.20 2%noO 51fi4.R1 COS9FOSALUCANDEK 22tD-r 5*2 STAIMIDISVASISJOS Duldless 64574D•124BDSODOO 61 VANDMENWAY EASTFJSHOLLNY 311t 2DL4 135W1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 026 MIS-D7.28 SSS1.7B5 L772t TOLLLANOVIIMTDPARIN 22D1S 475E EIPENORO REgNA1D Duldless 6059-1294M12.0000 21 MOC MGNIRDLH POII"HPSIENY 1936 1952 135601•WAPPIMrnc RMSEDRAMCH LIO IDLSMIO 252.OD7 SL3617 ASPENTREEILC 2MIS 4995 ROCHEMAUIIICE Duxd*ss 64 7-M-27386E-M 49 TILDEN PL EASTFISHOMMY MR 20IS t3S&n_WAP?INGm COLONIAL 0127 201 MIA SS33.911 5114.83 TOLLILANDVILINITOPAXINEF 2X15 5SS4 DIEHLDAVID Dutd+ess 6459,034211010000 42 CATIESWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3781 2DIA 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL S.22 2DIS-M22 S"km 17161 MDHDSONDEVELOPMFM 22016 QS COSCHGILNOJASON SALES - 47 AVERAGE 2450 1EM4 tLm S74A408 SL" MEDIAN 24DL 2D72 61LL 5377,Dm S156-AS 6-u=c oFimusidousfir DIFFEREIICEOFMEDUN USESF 17.801C 55 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, hic. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELLIUNCPION, DUTCHESS COUNTY (130-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 6/30/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES W ITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; WAPPINGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT; COLONIAL STYLE HOUSES COUNTY TAX MAP If STREETM STREET TOWN HOUSESF EFF. YR BUILT SCHOOL HOUSE STVLC ACRES SAL90AYE SAMPRICE PRICE PER HOOSCSF SELLER DEED BOOK DFED PAIX BUYER Dutchess 64STM-244791-0001) 73 FENTON WAY. EASYFISHKILLNY 3212 2010 13S601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.7E 2D31.01-19 507.206 1117.49 TOLLIANDVI LIMITED PART 22M 453 KAURINDFRIIT Dotthess 6457.01-195756.0000 34 HOFFAMN RD EASTFISHKILLNY 2931 2010 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 027 201L401-28 SM64 TOLL IANDVJ UNWED PART 22nl 601 AGARWALVIRENDRA KLMAR Dutch= 6457.O1•242771.0000 58 HOFFAMNRD EASTFISHKILLNY 2566 2010 135W1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 028 2MI-11102 SS 19756 TOLL LANDVI LIMITED PARN 22MI 1L92 VANKIPERBRIANR Dutchess 6457-01-233786-M 55 HOFFM4NRD EASTFI5HKILLNY 30A 2010 135WI-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL MU 2DLL-06-28 S569,412 SIUM TOLL LANDVI LIMITED PAIR 22M1 303E DURTONWINSTON Dutchess 6457-OL- 1=12-0000 126 FENTONWAY FAttFISHXILLNY 3195 2011 135600-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.26 2D11.0&27 589,900 5784.63 TOLLLANDVIL-IOPARTNERS 22m1 2MS TORRES HAROLD Outchess 6457-0L- 212R14-0000 ll6 FENTONWAY FASTFISHKILLNY 26IJ7 2OU. 13SWl-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL I127 2D1L-0T26 520,701 S33.07 TOLLLANDVILMIDPARTM 22011 3747 N1IAOYROBERT Dutdl s 64574L• 254809.000D 96 FENTONWAY FASTFISHKILLNY 3168 Ell 135501-WAPPINGM COLONIAL 029 201t-MM W2,900 SlnN ITOLLILANOVILIMIMPARIN 22111 4067 jWWREROBW Dutchess 64S7.01. 215781.0000 45 HOFFMAN RD FASTFISHKILLNV 2987 2011 1356M-WAPPINGM COLONIAL 028 2Dlt•tl&2r, 565,966 SMAB TDLLLANDVILMTDPARTN 22DI1 4141 RODRIGUESANCHAEL Dutchess 6457-(U. 2D2759lWW 38 HOFFNNNRD EASTASHKILLNY 3143 2031 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 027 2Dlt4A•16 S9SMS SIMS TOLLLANDVIUMPARTMA 22M 4421 WFAVINGDAVID Outchess 64S&03- 32 f303-OD00 43 GLENNSWAY EASTFISHMLLMY' M07 2012 135E01•WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 4M 2011,09,21) 115,0W SX77 CLOVE BRANCH ROAD LLC 22MI 4642 ODONNELL SONS INC Dutdw 64S7.01. 238917.0000 104 FENTONWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3732 2011 13S6111• WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.29 2011.10.13 5596.754 S184.W TOLL LANDVI MCD PARTH 271111 4764 OMAN=MARIA Outchrs 6457.0419D793. 0000 10L FENTONWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3169 2011 1356OL-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL CX26 201I-10-18 N SM60 TOLLLANDVILMMPARTNE 22011 5024 FULTONJOHN Dutchess 6457-0L- 2M766000O 54 HOFFMAN RD EASTFISHKILLNY 29M 20ll 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 027 20LI.3D21 S1%778 113-S TOLLLANDVILM3DPAKM 22111 5151 KAU)ORSTFFFEN Dutthess 64S7.01. 15780-M 77 VAN617RENWAY EASTASHKILLNY 3056 2011 13560L-WAPMNGERS COLONIAL 030 2011.10.31 561,974 183.89 TOLLIANDVILMMPARTN 22011 S409 PATEUNSESH Dutchess 64SM11-206779. OD00 37 HOFFMANRD EASTFISHKILLNY 3L466 2011 WWI COLONIA 02E 2011.1129 5539.7w SMISO TOLLLANOVILMTDPARI 222011 SIDS KOONAPAREDDYt1ARIT DEW Dutchess 64%113. 392404.0000 5 GIENNS WAY FASTFISHKILLNY 3346 2DU 13SWl-WAPPINGERS COLONIALL75 Wn-1b09 ZMAI0 SA035 MID•HUDSON DEVELOP 72M1 6147 ERJOHN Dutchess 6457-D1- 214760= 42 HOFFMAN RD EASTFISHKILLNY 2S65 2011L 135601-WAPPINGM COLONIAL D27 201241117 160 SDI9.54 TTILLIANDVJLMWPARTM 72012 223 IMURPHYWALTER Duchess 6457.01- 214796•W00 89 FENTON WAY ENSTFISHKILLNY 3102 2011L 135MI-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL D26 2012.01-2S SW" 190-85 TOLL IANDVI LMM PAIIINEF 73012 499 GOVINDASAWANRUCHELVAN Dutchess 6457-OL- 1G2787-WOO 78 VAN BUREN WAY EA5TFISHKILLNY 2932 2011 135511-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL LL43 2012413-29 S599,062 52M33 TOLLIANDVI LMM PARTNEF 22012 1466 BMRASCACHRIS1OPHER Outchess 6457-01- 192778-0DOD 33 HOFFMAN R4 FASTFISHMU.NY 3044 2011 13SOI-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 428 2M2.04.19 S586jW S192.60 TOLLIANDVI LIVIMPARTNEF 72M7 176P DEVROTHOMAS Duchess 6459-03- 26MUS-OD00 102 CATESWAY EASTFKWILLNY 1974 241E ILISMI-WAPPINCIMS COLONIAL I-15 2012.04-20 S25,1100 157.77 MID-HUDWAI M-VELOPWM 221112 1919 VRIOINCHAtAMMURAU Dutchess 645&03. 3664404XW 50 CAT6SWAY ES"TFISMKILLNY 2819 2012 13S601-WAPPINCER5 COLONIAL 1.44 7M•07.06 S4rOX I $17L11 MID•1RASON KVIKOPMEW 22012 3761 ORENWALDJAAME Dutdwss 64S8-D342M34MM 43 GLERNSWAY EASTFISHKILLMV 3307 2012 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 4.88 2012.07.06 M-W5 20403 JODONNELL $ONSINC 22032 2989 PA$SANTE IACRML Dutchess 64S7-01. 245994-0000 27 SHEPARDSWAY EASTFISMILLMY 3076 2014 OM-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 1.67 2012.00.10t5r574M 537.3G FUNIRFLAEIINC 22MZ 3584 PEMANOGEORGE Dutchess 6457-D1- 2D888447-0000 42 TIIDEN PL FASTFISHKILLNY 3162 2012 135601-WAPPINGUS COLONIAL0.35 2012-0&30 SM72TOLLIANDYI LMTD PARTNE 22D12 4229 ALTMAN JAMED Dutchess 6457.OL• 164796-00M 82 VAN BUREN WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3D54 2012 M601-WAPPINGOtS COLONLA 030 2ND-0842 16S.14 TOLLIANDVI LMTOPARTN 72112 4521 CASABIANCA ELI2ABEIN Dutchess 64S7-01- 198794.03M 97 FENTON WAV EISTFISHMILHY 2894 7012 1356D1-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 5.26 2D1b0419 17L93 TOLL LANDVI LMTO PARTN 22012 S27D RAGHAVANSRINIVASA Dutchess 64S7-D1- 151784-M 74 VAN BVREN WAY EASTFISHXILLNY 3466 2012 13SM-WAPPINGM COLONIAL O28 2012.09.27 S2BOD0 TOLL IANOVI LMII PAM 72012 5275 UJUNJUN Dutchess 64S7.01- 172904,= 10 74LDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2331 2012 135691-WAPPINCAM COLONIAL 031 2912.2D-18 19&a TOLL LAN 0VJ LMID PARIM 22012 4972 FULTOMJOSFPH Outdwss 66J-01- 1638SZODOD S SEWARORD EASTFISHKILLNY 3005 2012 13560JL-WAPPINtERS COLONIAL0.27 2012.1424 SM07 TOLLLANOVILMMPARTN 220J2 S1IO KRAMERJAMES Datd-ns 6457. 01-16390&OOM 6 TIMEN PL EASTNSHKILLNY 30117 2012 139601-WAPPINGERS COLONIALO-M 2012.1b30 SIHCe19 TOLLULNDVILMTO PAKWE 77.012 S753 UBASUANTHONY Dutthess 645JJ•tl3. 382430-0ODO 44 CATEES WAY I EASTFISFIKILL NY 7i76 1 2012 135601-WAPPIXliFRS COLONIAL 109 2212•IZ07 SM= SIM12 jWD-A)DSOXWMOPMDIj 22M3 21 WALDORFJON Dutchess 6456.03. 294027.000D 44 5HCPAROS WAY FASTFI3HKILL NY 2721 2011 735601•WAPPtN(iERs COLONIALL55 2012.1224 5471.0D0 S773.I0 ASHLEYliOlAES LLC 220L3 4l9 STDAKTNFJL " NSAUS 33 AVERAGE 30Q 701E 0.77 067 172.62 TMIALKi. FAKE 3% Z75 SUL" MEDIAN 3678 2011 0.28 565,966 S18i: I TMEADI.PIOCE 3% 2.25 19ILS6 PERTR. IYIL 56 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Gulthess 6457.O1-196613-00OD 26 TILDENPL FAST FLSHKILL NY 2M2 2D13 135601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL D27 2013-M-10 SS1573G 1815,96 TOLL LANOVI LPAM FAME 22M3 4897 HASAMAINEKIRIEF Dutchess 6457-01-192B96-t1 W 6 SEWARDAD EASTFISHIMNY 2511 2D13 135601-WAPPINGOS COLONIAL 0.27 RI3-IO-03 473 19254 YOLLtAMOVILMWPAXTNE 22013 6599 ICHOISAMIJEEL Dutchess 64%0I-1643M.000D 112 FENTON WAY EASTFISMLLNY Mw 2D13 1356DL-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL M26 2D13-10-17 546,411 S;7B.74 TOMLANOVILPAMPAMNE 22013 70" MANCININKCHAEL Outoess 6457A1•227815.0000 2 PATRICIACT FASTF6HLGLLNY 2086 1997 135601-WAPPIMGERS COLONIAL 1 -54 2413.11.15 17D.67 AM JESSE 22014 375 MARINOIOSEPH Dutchess 6059.12.95560&ODW 16 GLENNSWAY FASfFOCILLNY 26% 2D14 336601-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 2SS 2013-U-21 140OM 51.89 WILR000NSTRLMORINC 2=3 0.55M13-HUDSON DEVELOPMENT CO Dutchess 6358-04-914422 WW 67 VANOMENWAY EASTF"tLLNY 9D41 2013 13SIM-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL M26 2D14-01-09 S6MM 201..10 TOLL LANDVIIMMPAATME 22014 10" SALAMONEGERARD Dutchess MS94n-n2377.01M 2 TILDEN PL EASYFISMMNY 2059 2013 13SU)17WAPANGMS COLONIAL 030 2014.OS-i3 S2i7-%7 11007 TOLLIANDVI IMLD PARME 22014 12MI AMOAJMWARIA Dutchess 6059-12-MS47-WW 10 SEWARDRD L49FISMLLNY 3172 2013 MMI-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 0.23 2014.02-U SS62 177.34 TOLL IANDVI EMTD PARTNE 22D14 15M EICKHOFF FELIX Dutchess 64%04-8M14&0000 47 BRANDYLN EAST FISM LLNY19111974 135601-WAPPLNURS COLONIAL 100 2014.03-M 5337,500 5176.61 KELLYRONALD 22014 17M INOUEK011 DuLchess 6457- 01-140B0&M 40 SHEPARDSWAY EASTFISMLLMY 2945 2D14 13S6M-WAPPINGEM COLONIAL 1GG 4-0544 127,5W 43.29 MORGAHNOMESINC 22014 3018 COIAMLLCR1SnE DOOM 64w- ut-1%9O€0000 57 TILDEN PL EASTFISHKILLNY 2933 • 2013 135601-WAPPINGEM COLONIAL 0.32 2014.05-I6 5586,771 200.74 TOLL tANDVI IMLD PARTNE 22%4 1 3321 IGOMMIEZDANIEL Dutrhess 6457- 01-29984D-0000 18 BLUEJAYBLVO EAST FJSMLL NY 2402 1919 13MIL-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL LP 2014.05-20 OKOOO I60.70 MAIOLODCMANIC 4 5240 IMILLUMOTHY Dutchess 6459. 01-272764.00DD 41 HOFFMAN FED EASTFLSIIIOLLNY 2118 2013 135G01-WAPPLNGERS COLONIAL Q2E 2014.O5•23 5256,642 123-17 TOLL LANDVI LMTD PARTNE 220M 333$ U%INLONG D.Mhess 6358-0t465162-DDO3 40 CATIl3WAY EASTFJSHKILLNV 3M 2013 13SOU-WAPPINGEPS COLONIAL 4.42 2014.07-11 5515,000 SUM MIDHUDSONOEVEIOPMEN 22014 JIM IVANDLERCMIMPHER Dutdtess 6458- 03-291012.0000 22 MOCKINGBIRUCT EASTFJSHKILLNY 7,472 3992 13MM-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL 254 2M4.O7:-16 5377900 I5251 DEFONZO WAYNE 22014 45M FREDERICK] RUM Dutchess I 649-01-232845.0000 34 TILDENPL FASTFJSHKIILNV 2426 2D13 13SWI-WAPPINGEM COLONIAL M90 20144D7-17 SS2Z437 nFL35 TOLL tANDVI LMM PAMNE 22014 5064 DEASISCDRAZON Dutthess 6458- 03-407262-0000 20 HARMONY IN EASTFISHKILLNY 2256 1w 135MI-WAPPINGM COLONIAL 1.OD 2014-MOl 5MOM SM55 FItARAEDWIN 22014 45M MARQUES MICWAEL DIIS Dutchess 6457- 01-20178D0000 98 CATIESWAY FASTFISHKIILNY 3%6 2015 13SWI-WAPPINGM COLONIAL 1.21 2014-MIRI 172.50D 4351 JRYAHFRANCIS 27014 557L SANTOROJAMB llletrhess 635& 04805304-0000 9 TILDEN PL FASTFiSHKILLNY 2204 2MA llAOl-WAPPIKGERS COLONk0.29 20M-0946 5256,642 116.44.TOMLAND VI lMM PARTN 22014 9310 SPEiWSRI STEVEN DUEehess 6457. 01.1929904M 11 LEWIS RD EAST FiSHIII LLNY M 2014 1MMI-WAPPINGMS COLONIAL W1M10.29 657 177AZ TOILLANDVILMTDPARTN 22014 9% PATELNIRAV Outehess 645&D3. 396463-0000 LOB FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3128 2D14 l3SBDI-WAPPINGIM COLONIA 2014-L1.20 574,181 511 36 TOLLlANO VI LP 22014 sm PAUTAUSKYPAtxAE DutthM 645&03- rA2%ww 84 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2731 2014 135COL-WAPPJMGM COLON 2014-12-0 m,133 5191-Se TOLLIMIDVI LP 22M4 1015 ZAIESITYFRANKA Dut(hess 607- 01-ZDDBM-WW 97 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY2M4 2012 BSOD1-WAPPINGERS COLONIA 2014-12-12 S4WOW IMS RAGRARANSRINIVASU 22D15 167 MCLAUGHDNAMLIREEN Dutchess G451-01- 210564000I1 73 VAN 0MUM WAY L45TSSHKILLRY MO 2014 13SMI-WAPPIIIGERS COLONIA 2015-01.22 539.12G 5191.19 TOLLIAADVILMMPARTN 220L5 9D6 CAMPORESE)AjON Dutchess G35SO4-w6" 54 ="-^• 99 FENTON WAY FASTFISHUMNY 31M 2011 135601-WAPPLHGERS COLONIA 2D1S03.17 40AM S15L19 GOVINDASAMYARMI :HEIV 22015 MM PALM410114Dutd 6459-03-2MQ-DODO 102 MESWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3974 2611 135601-WAPPIHGERS COLONLA 2015-W-15 67MM 2%01 VRIDNACHA1AMMl1RAU 22015 22FS E EARYBRIAN llutchess 6459-01- 4se577-W00 30 MLUEROR EAST FISHKILL NY 1796 1966 13SB01-WAPPINGERS COLONLA D,77 2015-U-2l nUM 16A.81 COSSIFOSAIMMDER 22015 461 STATMDiS VASMOS Dutchess 6457.OIL 170925-WW 6l VANDWWWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 31U 2D14 13S6M-WAPPLNGERS COLONIAL C26 2015-W-29 551.2115 U77.21 TOLLLANDVI LMTDPAILTNEF 22015 47M ELPENORDREGINALD Outchess 6457.01- 206MOOM 49 TILDEN PL EASTFLSH4ILLNY 3054 2015 13SG01-WAPPINGERS COLONIAL IL27 201SI16.13 SSW17 374.63 mapNovaumPARTNE3 22015 5554 DIEHLDAVID Dutchess 6457-01. 230M1TIM 41 CATIESWAY EASYFLSHKILLNY 3711 2014 135CM-WAPPINFsM COLONIA 5.22 2015.08-2Z 64JM 1MG2 MIDHL1060NDEVEWPMEMT 221116 625 COSCHGANOIASON ASALFS 30 AVERAGE 283L 2009 0M S AU 157.12 Mro" 2FS7 2013 1L30 502 176A4 DIFERERCEOFAVERAGESAJOUSESF 14.167G DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $ 1MUSE SF 10.4474 57 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELL JUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY (130-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 6/30/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; WAPPINGERS SCHOOL. DISTRICT, OLD STYLE HOUSES COUNTY TAX MAP B STREE7 9 STR&Z TOWN HOUSE: SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER W)USESE SELLER DEMT ROOK OECD PAGE BUYER Dutchess 64S7-M-290805.0000 517 ROUTE376 EASTFISHKILLNY 996 1SIM 135601-WAPPINGERS OLDSTYIE CL17 2D12.06-05 S175,000 17570 DEER RUNHOLDINGU-C 22012 2538 RNERAEFRAIN Outchess 6457-01-259939-0000 533 ROUTE37fi EASTFISHKI LNY 1488 1920 135601-WAPPINGERS OLDSME M17 2D17.0G1R 163,0OD 5I09- 4 HUNTMAUREEN 22012 3019 MALLENBURTON Outchess 6453-04-940470.ODDO 107 CREAMERYRD EASTFSHKILLNY 2042 192D 335601-WAPPINGERS OLOSTYL.E Z40 2012-1123 SU5.50D SI34.92 NK013ENJAUFS 22012 5600 VELEl1UU0 9SALE5 3 AVERAGE 1509 1913 0.91 2M,500 135.55 TIMEAD1.PRICE 3% 2.25 144.91 MEDIAN 24BB 1920 M17 1nAM 117.61 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 225 125.73 PERYR. NYJL Outchess 6457-01-ISSM-OM 80 1 HILLSIDElAKERO EASTFISHICULKY 2336 1932 135WI-WAPPINGERS OLDSTYLE 3.95 2013-aO7 270,000 8OL20 BLACKMARY 220L3 70M SOLOTAROTFCHRISTOPHER Outchess 645E-04.69335LOD00 541 ROUTE376 FASTFISHKRINY 2152 292D 135601-WAPPINGERS OLDSME all 2015-07-06 174,000 147.57 TRIMARCHIJOHNVINCENT 2201S 4221 RASESTACEYM NSALES 2 AVERAGE 1244 1926 L03 2ZOAM 176.15 MEDIAN 12" 1926 Lffi 2Z0,000 176AS DIFERENCEOF AVERAGE $/140MESF 2L04% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/HOUSE SF 40.66X 58 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELL JUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY (130-FOOTMONOPOL.E, CONSTR. DATE 613012013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; WAPPINGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT; RAISED RANCH STYLE HOUSES COUNTY TA%MAPM STREET STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF. YR. BUILT SCHOOL HDUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSESF SELIER DEER BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Dutchess 635&04-914190-OOM SS WAIGHTBLVD EASTFLSHKILLNY 2682 19M 135601-WAPPINGM RAISED RANCH 0.75 2411-01-D4 S340,000 126.77 OSHEAGERARD 2ZO11 498 TOIIWOANIEL Dutchess 645&64.579IeD0000 1 CAVELORD EASTFISHKILLNY 2299 1971 135601-WAPPINGERS RAISED RANCH 1A0 2041.03.12 295,000 12R,93 DI BERNARDO ROOM 220I1 1502 FRUSCIANTERICHARD Dutchess 635&04-9SBUD•0000 59 SECOALN EASTFLSHKILLNY 1411 1996 13560L-WAPPINGERS RAISED RAM 1.81 2OH-05-05 335,000 237.42 FULTONJOHN 22011 2190 NASCIMENTOMARIA Dutchess 64SR-01-069551-0000 11S BRANDYLN EASTFISHKILLNY 1999 1976 135601-WAPFIN6ERS RAISEDRANCH LOO 2011-08-31 S29KODO 144.07 NECAISEBARBARA 22011 4070 DARCYRICHARD Dutchess FA5&01-433529.0000 25 CLOVERRANCHRD EASTFISHKILLNY 1770 19" 13 S601 - WA P P I N GERS RAISED RANCH 1A0 2D11-U-35 S221)000 1 $124.29 ZIOEKDARRELL 22011 SSO4 SMILKSTEIN MICHAFI Dutthess 645&0I-ZI1750-0000 73 BRANDYLN EASTFISHKILLNY I 20M 1974 135Wt-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH L50 2012-01-13 S312,500 155.32 BELLO FRANK 22012 329 IYABLANSKYROBERT Dutchess 645&04-653407.0000 21 HAPALTONAD EASTFI5HKILLNY 1290 1988 135WL-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH LSO 2012.04.30 265,0W S2MA3 SHERWOODAONAID 22012 Z029 INOWLIFITCHRiSTOPHER Dutchess 635&04.92E765.0OW 25 WRIGHTBLVD EASTFISHKIIINY 14SO 1979 13560t-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH 0.95 2D12.09.07 250,OW 166.01 GIORNOFRANK 22012 473L POKOl44AGNIE52KA DutchesS 645&D4.5350Q9.OD00 21 OLDFARMRD EASTFISHKILLNY 24139 2D13 13 MI-WAPPINGERS RAISEDRANCH IAA 2012-11.06 ODD SM33 VJMPROPERPESINC 22012 5224 LEGGE BRIAN RSALES 9 AVERAGE 1928 1982 L17 SZ62,944 13441 TIMEADJ.PRECE 3% 125 14S.93 MEDIAN 1999 1976 1.t10 26 OM 244.07 TIMEADLPRECE 3% AIM 754.02 PERYR RYR- Dutchess 6457.01.14980 -RAM 23 MOCKINGBIRD IN POUGHKEEPSIENY 1696 1964 1135601-WAPPINGERS RAISED RANCH 099 201-1-U-07 1B7.SW SIMS IIAVISSIDNEY 2M14 369 ADJFIKOFI Dutchess 645&03-497434.0000 1 MD03NG91RDLN POUGHKEEPSIENY 1612 1964 1356DL-WAPPINGERS RAISED RANCH 0.3E 2DI3-12.09 S214000 13a27 SURKEBRLAN 22014 947 ISTABLERKENNM Dutchess 645&03-296396-0W0 47 WAIGHTBLVD EASTFISHKILLNY IBM 2985 135601-WAPFINGERS RAISED RANCH 0.74 7014-04-22 227.000 SM92 RISING STAR REALTY LLC 22014 I zma lwO2iKrmKwy Dutchess 645701-214796-0000 37 MILLEROR EASTFISHKILLNY 16% U70 I35601-WAPPINGERS RAISED RANCH 0.62 21)14-06-23 S26 OW S756.Z5 VECCHIOLOUIS 22014 4702 BRENNANBRIANWILLIAM Dutchess 64S&03-289345-0000 1 SRANDYLN FASTFISHIOLLNY 2184 1992 135MI-WAPPINGMS RAISED RANCH 7.39 201407-29 8W S135.90 I,UKSISJAMES 22014 533L PINNOCKCAMIEL Dutchess 64S&O1.480658.0000 21 MOCKENGBIRDW POUGHKEEPSIENY 1936 19R 1356D1-WAPPINGERS I RAISED RANCH L30 Zn5-08-10 252,000 SM17 ASPENTREELLC 22015 4995 ROCHEMILURICE SALES 6 AVERAGE 3Si6 Im IL77 239,717 SUNX55 MEDULN 1795 1967 0.68 239.500 133.46 DI FERENCE OF AVERAGE$/HOUSE SF lug% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/HOUSESF 13.3S% wl CNY Pomeroy Appraisers; Inc. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELL JUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY (130-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 6/30/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; WAPPINGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT; RANCH STYLE HOUSES COUNTY TAX MAP STREETO STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSE STYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALE PRICE IHOUSESF PRICEPER SELLER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Outchess 6458-03-486427-0000 3 MONACODR EASTRSHKILLNY 1588 1969 13S601-WAPPINGMS RANCH 2.00 2611-0&94 273,W0 17L91 WHITNEYJOHN 22OU 3705 LUDWINJONATHAN Dutchess 6458-04-601162DODO 1 HENRY DR EASTFISHKILLNY 1062 1965 13S601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 0.49 20114U9-25 18D,000 1G9.49 HACKROBERT 22011 4329 CARLSONJAMES Dutchess 645&01- 4QS5&0000 4 FENWICKOR EASTFISHKILLNY 1618 190 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 100 2D12-11-01 265,000 10.79 SZYMIAUSJOSEPH 2201i 5404 DIRUSSOIOHN Dutchess 6I57.01- 221796-0000 S5 FMCINWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 23M 2011 135WL-WAPPINGERS RANCH 0,26 2012-02-79 509,506 242-16 TOLL IANDVI LLTM PARTNE 22M2 1067 MILERSTANIEY Dutchess 6458-01- 27SS20-0000 5 FAIRFIELDLN EASTFISHKILLNY 1388 1970 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 1,10 201210-16 285,000 20533 SALMON GREGORY 221312 491% SHFAMANXEVINIOHN 0SALES 5 AVERAGE 2552 2977 0.77 302,501 LM.91 TIMEADI. PRICE 3% 225 S20B36 MEDIAN 2589 190 3-00 273,000 17141 TIMEAOJ. PRICE 3% 223 M.78 PERYR YR, Dutchess 64S8-01- 462S5&0= 124 FENTONWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2238 2M3 13SWI-WAPPJNGERS RANCH D.26 2013-U9-26 592.344 264.23 TOLL LANDVILMTOPARN 22013 6443 CARPENTERJOEL Outdwss 6457.01- 243R59.0000 152 CLOVEBR"CHRD EASTFISHKILLNY 35M I957 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 1.00 2014-01-07 200000 129.20 DFTFJ0122IJAMES 22M4 3143 GARCIADAMIAN Dutchess 635&04. 816343.ODW 18 11LDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2351 2013 135WI-WAPPINGEPS RANCH 0.27 2014-06-27 481,920 204.99 TOIL LAND VI LMTD PARTNE 22M4 479D SAMMUTRDSEMARY Dutchess 6157-01- 124305-WW 261 CRFAMERYRD ERSTF15HKILLNY 1813 2965 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 3.03 2014-09.23 27D,000 148-92 FALKOWSKISTEPHEN 22014 SM9 ILIEWINSUNNORMA Outchess GM-12- 942612OOW 26 H"tI.TONDR EASTFISHKILLNY 949 1950 135601-WAPPINGMS RANCH O.94 2OLS-0-07 I9D,000 78467 NAPPIAN'EHONYM 22015 372 HOTCHKI55PMUPWL Dutchess 6457-01- 223861-OM 5 MONACOOR EASTFISHKILLNY 6 MM 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH 1-10 20LS-02-03 315000 173.46 EISENHAUERROBERT 22015 1076 SOUSAJOSE Dutchess 645&03428443. 0000 4 FENWJCKOR EASTFISHKILLNY 1618 I969 135601-WAPPINGERS RANCH L00 201S4S•27 289,900 179.17 OIRUSSOJOHNP 22015 3797 MURPHYBRIANT SALES 7 AVERAGE 2762 3977 0.79 332,595 S368.78 MEDIAN M3 1969 1 LBO S269,900 SI59.90 D E:R: ENCEOFAVERAGESIHOUSESF 9.4MDIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN VHOUSE SF 60 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE: 17-19 ORR AVENUE„ TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (135-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 1/15/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY TAX MAP Murry STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF YR BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE FRTCEPER HDUSESF SELLER DEED SODK DEED PAGE BUYER Drange 95.1.43.1 14 LAKEVIEWDR NEWBURGHNY 2D74 L962 331I110-NEWOURGH RAISEDRANCH 037 26144&16 22Q000 S106D0 FERN LOUSEM NRRACH 13764 366 O'GARAD MARCUS Orange 95.1-35 10 HILLSr AEWBURGHNY 960 19M 331IM-NEWBURGH RANCH OAS 2014-05.16 163l M 175.96 COOX KEVIN 23797 371 CULLYL]LF1a Oran a 9&1-11 42 OLD UI- WSWAIN RD NEWBURGHNY 1044 1945 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.24 2M4-10.31 13(LOOD 124S2 FLNNERTYMICHAEL 13$32 374 M4RTINJOHND Orange 9&I.14,75 11 HERM4NAVE NEWBURGHNY 1040 195G 33L100-NEWBIAGH RANCH IL22 Zn4-R•16 58,5W 5152.40 SALOMON DORONA 331M 115 SANCHEZ JR. ROBERTO Orange 98-1-14.31 13 BRUCES7 NEWOURGHNY 960 1SM 331300-NEMURGH RANCH 0.23 201412.19 145,ODD• ELM MADFRCO-ADMN1SiMT 13832 571 BURKHDUSECHRISTNE Orange 9&&G 7 HOBST NEWBURGHNY I1114 1956 33I100-HEWBURGH RANCH OA9 2014-12-19 1L5,000 97.13 RICCIO VINCENT IM2 101 WAYHEWSMANNINGIAY Orange 9&2.7 8 CLARKVIEWRD NEWWINDSORNY 14M 1955 33UOD-NEWBMGH SPUTLEVEL S69 2015-02.20 1KODD SM14 CSUBAKKaNA 130 5 ISM MCGUIREJOHNT Orange 93-6.9 130 OLD LITTLE BWAIN AD NEWBURGHNY 720 1947 331100- N EWNURGH COTTAGE LBO 2MS-OGO9 159,WD ML67 SCOTTJR.STANCIL I402 1263 REVOCABLETRUSrMANCILA.SCOTfJR O 9kz-.M 9 HERMANAVE NEWBLIRGHNY 1360 19M 33LIM-NEWBMGII RANCH 0.35 W15SOG-29 S177LODO 125DD TI-XMASIANICEC. EXE 13916 785 CLJELLARN42RMA Orange 98-8-10 16 HERMANAVE NEWBURG14NY 924 1957 3311D0-NTWBURGH RANCH OA6 20L5-CS-3I• IS0.0DD I71.OD HAMONALTRANSFER 1. I L9C6 ROSCINO SR.JOHN N O e 98.7-9 61 DAIFONSO RD NEWBURGHNY 1315 1950 331IM-NEWBIIRGH CAPECOD O.2E 201S09.31 Una 87A5 AARTO TRLSTEEKEHHEM I39E3 1252 MURRAYNICOL.E Orange 9&8.9 35 CARKVIEWRD NEWIMNDSORNY ISM 19S7 3311M-N EWRURGH SPUTLM 0.23 201S-10-19 137,5D0 SM71 PORATH VERA 1MM 17S3 YEGARIANXIRK Ora a 98-3-10 59 WIWAMSAVE NEWBURGHNY ISM IM 331IM-NFASMGH RAISEORANCH 0.53 2015.11.03 S24;OOD 128.41 CVRiIYTHEDLTORE L3985- 16M ClAVIAMESTII Orange 9&7-9 42 OLD LITRE BRITAIN RD NEWBURGHNY 1M4 I945 33IM-NEWMAGH CAPE COO 0,24 2015-3.2•04 L%000 143.68 MUiINJOHN 3996 7fbfi IW4gpAlLALAWK Orange 99-2-32.1 21 HILLST NEWAURGHNY 112E 2956 331I00-NEVAURGH RANCH OSl 2015.12-09 1%,OW IM87 TLRNERGEORGEDJR 13982 1041 MWEI1ML31SSA RSAM 16 AVERAGE 3241 1956 0.4710.501 513L73 TIMEADJ.PIOCE 3% 2 M. MEDUkN 112E 1956 037 1SMW 514051 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2 146-54 PERYR. RYR Orange 1013.20 33 vnLUAMSAVE NEW8LRGHNY IE22 1994 331IM-NEWBLRGJI RAISEDRANCH OM 2016.03-15 215.OD0 132.55 SIFONTEVAUJAM 14026 L922 EISAYEDTAMFR Orange 101-2.2 13 KERMAN AVE NEWBiAGHNY 12CO 1965 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.22 2D16.0G07 M(0)DOS158.33 ESTATE0FJAKrRARANS 14013 339 CUELARLEONARD Orange 1004-1 4 DEWEYOA NEWBURGHNY 1964 2MO 3312OD-NEWBMGH RAISEDRANCH EL.45 2016-D&07 U63,040 13291 HOUSESOFLABORINC 14068 1476 DIROSAKAJSA Orange IMS-17 11 LAKEVIEWOR NEWBUILGHNY 1864 2952 333100-NEVMMH RANCH 0.42 2016-0&i6 S21g000 1U166 CARREAU NEWE 1409S L108 MOWN JENNIFER Ora a ODS-]A 2 HOB ST NEHBURGH NY 1129 11;3 33J100-NEW&1RGH RANCH 022 2016.111-M 146,500 129.76 FiAARLS AEVOC LNING 14155 919 pEU.EWHNII]K)IAS Orange 10L S-2S 9 H00ST NEWBURGHNY 2M J956 33=-NEVAMGH RANCH 0.49 2016-10.18 S210.DW96.21 ONTRONEDMNA 14127 SM BELLAW EVEN Orange IODS-25 T13 11TREBIIITAINRO NEWVANDSORNY 1071 1936 3311110-NEWBl1RGH CAPE COD 0.462016-1671 175,000 163.40 ADAM55ANRJELG.W 14333 ll78 DAGOSiIHOAALErAEL Orpa IMS-15 9 LEONARDAVE NEWBLRGHNY 1428 1956 331100-NEVAUP Ii RANCH 0.30 201rr11-0I 200 110.73 PUl1ARPAUL 14IIS 729 MCGLRNNESSMARY Ora a lODS•23.2 6 HILLST JY 76g 1956 3311E70-NEWBl1RGH AAN[H 0.7E 2016d1-]5 108,000 140.63 LO[07J'AANIHONY 14190 727 NOVAK PA77tlCIN Ord 10D5- 33 6 DEWEYOA NEWBURGHNY 1321 2016 331100-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH OS3 2016.11-M 299,9D0 n4ID2 KMESOFLABOItINC 14167 L712 LONGO MCHAR Orange 101- 7-14 7 BRUCE ST NY 1216 1953 33UM-NEWBURGH RANCH OM 2016-12-13 S165.OL10 133.69 ROSENCRANSGALL 1419S 45G GREM DARCEL orange lmrSsl- 1 22 RIDGEVIEWDR NY MUEMBURGH 222521316 331103-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH OS3 2D17.03-IO 29MCO 24t% HOMF.STFADBUILDKNGCO 14201 G74 BANDAIIJAN Ora 102622• 23 CIARKVIEWRD RNY 2520 I955 3311DO-NEWBURGH SPUTLiVEL 029 2017-DS-22 S221,IW 145.46 OUILPATRICIA SAM 177A GWENKE170 Orange 97- 2.21 3 RLOGEVIEWOR NY 2394 1974 3311I70-NEW&RIGH RANCH C36 ZU37-D7-28 W,5W Sm42 M4CODNALDGALL 14M I= MANGIENVERONICA Orange 10bF22 7 DEWEYOA NY 2430 2017 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL LW 2017.0 -23 343..000 141.90 SANDCASREHOWS INC 14M 59 DELGADOSAUL Orange 97. 3-114 32 CVUONSORD NY 11" 1950 331IM-NEWBURGH RANCH 037 2017-D9-08 17140DO SISE2S HIERONWAMCHELIE 14M 1900 SECRETOFRANK Orange 102. 2.32 49 LAKEVIEWDR NEWBURGHNY 1799 1965 331000-NEIAOURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.31 2D17-D9-11 194M SIO6.56 RERRYJANETI 142" 72 1BUNTEN ERIC otance 102. 6.37 12 HERMWAVE NEWBURGHNY 215G 1973 3311O0-NEWWRGH RAISEDRANCH 0.34 2017-10.30 279,900 129.92 UCkTAIFKAONTONIRO 14314 1 MAXCYCHMSTWHM R SALES 10 AVERAGE 1S17 I972 EA-3 SM14L 139.8Z MEDIAN 1406 1KA 035 20DAN 14225 DIFARENCEOF AVERAGESMDUSESF L74% DIFFERENCEW MEDIAN SMDUSESF 2_%% 61 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE, TOWN OF NEWBURGN, ORANGE COUNTY (135-FOOT MONOPOLE, CONSTM DATE 1115/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALLSALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; CAPE COD STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAX MAP If STREET* SIREET TOWN HOUSE SF EMYB. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESSYLE ACRES SALE DATE. SALE PRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 9B-1-11 42 OLDUT11EBRrrAINRD NEWBURGHNY 1044 194S 331IM-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.24 2014-30AI S13D,WO S724.52 FINNERTYMICHAEL IM12 374 MARTINIOHND Orange 98-7-9 61 OALFONSORI) NEWBURGHNY 1315 1950 3311O0-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.26 2015-09-31 US,000 97.45 BARMTRUSTEEKENNEM 1990 IM2 INIURRAYNICOLE Orange 93-7-9 42 OLD LITTLE 13MTAIN RD NEWBURGHNY 1044 1945 3331OD-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.74 2615-12-04 WO 14169 MARTINIOHN 139% 1056 MARO[ALLAUREN SALES 3 AVERAGE 1134 1947 U.2S 1334EB7 lV W TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2 173.14 MEDIAN 1044 i449 OL24 SIN'000 S124.S1 MMEAMPRICE 3% 2 3I3210 PERYR. NYR. orange 3045-2S 713 UTREBRITAINRO NEWWINDSORNY I071 2935 331100-NEWBURGN CAPECOD M46 2016-10-21 5175,0W 163AO ADAMSSAMUELG.W 14133 1279 D'AGOSTINOMLCHAEL 9 SALES 1 AVERAGE 2071 ISM OA6 5175,000 163A0 MEDAN 1071 I936 DA6 tq7 ,ODO 163.40 D I FERENCE 0 F AV ERAGE $/H O,.,U 5F 32fi9% SE DIFFERENCEOFMEDIAN $1HOUSESF 2 0% i& CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (13S-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 1/15/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS, NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, RAISED RANCH STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAX MAP 0 STREET* STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YA. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOK OEM PAGE BUYER Orange 95-1-43.1 14 IAKEVIEWDR NEWBURGHNY 2074 1962 331100-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.37 2014.05.16 221L000 SSO6.0B FERN 1OUISEM.NELBACH ELIV 13764 US O'GIIRROMARC115 Orange 9JF8•111 59 WILUAMSAVE NEWBURGHNY MIS 1968 331100-NEWSURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.S3 2015.11.08 245,ODD S128AI CURRYTHEODORE 1-3965 1644 DAYJAMEST II NSALFS 2 AVERAGE 1991 075 O.AS 232„SOO 116.76 TIMEAD7-PRICE 3% 2 12.4 MEDIAN 1941 1975 0.45 ZV.5M 116.76 TIMEAMPRICE 3% 2 17389 PERYIL ItYR- Orange 101.3.20 33 WHUAMSAVE NEMURGHNY 1622 LeA4 331100-NEWBURGH RAISEORANCH 1152 2M&03-15 21 OM 132.5S SIFONTEWILDAM 1402E 1922 ELSAYEDTAMER Orange 14o-f-I 4 DIEWEYDR NEWBURGHNY ISM 2010 331100-NEWBLWM ROUSED RANCH 0.45 201&MO7 261.010 S132.91 HOUSESOFLABDRINC 1406E 1476 DIROSAKAISA Orange IOD•5-33 6 OEWEYDR NEWBLMGHNY 1321 2016 331100-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH O.S3 2016.11.30 S2999W 5227.02 HOUSES OF LABOR INC 14167 1742 IONGOIACHAEL Orange 100-5-50.1 22 RIDGEVIEWDR NEWBLMGHNY i225 2016 331I00-NEMURM RMSED RANCH OM 201741310 SM4DO 24L96 HOM STEAD BUILDING CORP 14201 624 BANDAJUAN Orange 101.3-12 49 LA%EVIEWDR NEWBURGHNY 1708 190 3311OD-NEMUV-M RAMIMPANCH 031 2MI.09-11 M0 10G56 UEMYJANErr 14299 72 BUNTENERIC Orange 201.6.37 12 HERMANAVE NEWBURGHHY 215E M 331100-NEMURM RAISEDMNCH 034 2Oi7.10.30 279.900 SI29.32 UCATA(FXABENTON)RONNIE 14314 1 MAXCYCHRISTOPHER NSAIES 6 AVERAGE 166E L994 0.45 255,707 1SL49 MEDIAN 166S 1997 0.49 27MM 16L44 DIFERENCEOFAVERAGE L15ESF 99% OIFFEREIICE OF MEDIAN $/HOUSE SF 31.12% 63 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE [AUNTY (135-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 1/15/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; RANCH STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAKMAPN STREETA STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL NOUSESTYIE ACRES SALEDATE SALE PRICE PRICE PER WMSESF SeLER DIED IBOOK OGED PAGE BUYER Orange 95-1.35 10 HILLST NEW8LRGHNY 960 1955 33110D-NEWBURGH RANCH UAI 2014-09-16 1%920 175-% COOKKEVIN 1.3797 871 CMY MEN Orange 98-1-14.25 11 HERMANAVE NEWBURGH NY 3040 1956 31LIOO-NEMIRGH RANCH 0.22 2D14-n-16 SeASM S157AO SALOMONDORONA 13M 115 SANCHEZ JR.AOBERTO Orange 9R-1.14.31 13 BRUCEST NEWRURWW 960 1953 MOD-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.23 2M4.12-19 145000 515L04 MADER CO-ADMINISiRATORJEANNEE 13832 571 BURKHOUSECHRISTINE Orange 9946 7 HD55T NEWSUIMNY 2194 1956 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.49 2M4.12-19 SL15,OM 97.13 R1Cd0V1NCENT L3632 1031 MATHEWSMANNINGJAY Orange 98-7.19 9 1ERMAN AVE NEWRURGHNY 1360 1956 331100-NEWRURGH RANCH 0.35 2D1S06-29 370 S.000 MOO TRI JANICEC. EXECUX 14916 735 CUELLAR NORAM Orange 9841-10 16 1ERMANAVE NEWBURGiNY 924 19S7 33I100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.46 201S W31 I53.000 17LOU NlA'nONAuRANSFERsERWCEs LLC 13941 1906 110SOIND SR.IDHNN ra Oa99.2-3L1 21 HILLST NEWBURGHNY 1129 19% 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 051 2D15.1209 000 195, 172.A7RIRNERGEORGED JR 139R2 IMI M4HERMEUSSA NSIHES 7 AVERAGE Im 1956 0.39 S15g 1 5146M TIMEAW.FWOE 3% 2 1SS.91 MEDUM 1J140 1956 0.41 S158 00 S192.40 TIMEADI.PRILE 3% 2 I616B PERYR. AYR Orange 101.2. 2 13 HERMANAVE NEWBURGHNY 1200 L%5 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.22 2DI606.07 190,000 153.33 ESTATE OFJANET BARANSICI 14083 333 CUELAR LEONARD Orange IOD-5- 17 11 LAKEVIEWOR NEWBURGTJNY 7864 196Z 33110D-NEWBIIRGTI RANCH 0.42 20160R-16 S210.000 112AS CAMEAU NEWE 14095 1108 VADMAN JENNIFER Orange IOD-5- 19 2 HOBST NEWBURGHNY LIN LM MIM-NEW1101RGH RANCH 2I1616M 514G-s00 SM-75 HAIMSREVOtUVINGTRUSTLORRA 14M 919 ltFA 1NICHOLAS Orange 1 S• 25 9 H48ST NEINBURGHNY 2285 M6 3321OD-MMURGH RANCH 0.49 2016-10.19 210.0W S96.11' CINTA01461MINA 141V 933 BEGAMYSTEVEN Orange Ims-is 9 LEONARDAVE NEWSURGHNY 1423 19SG 331100-NLVMURM RANCH 039 201611.01 S]SJL2CI0 110.78 PULLARPAUL - 1413S 729 MCGXRNNFSSMARV Orange 100-5- 23.2 6 ILST NEWBURGHNY 768 1956 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.26 2DIB-12-15 SMODO 5140.63' C00O2U/ANTHONY 14190 727 HOVAN FATTOOA Orange 101-7-14 7 DRUMST NEWSURGHNY 1216 1953 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.23 2016.12-13 1KOOD 13S.69 ROSENCRANSGAIL 14I65 456 GREENDARCEL Orange 97-2.22 3 RIOGWIEWDR NEWBURGHNY nu LW4 33I100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.36 21117.07-16 130,51XI 130.42 MACDONALDGAIL 14323 a810 MANGIERIVERONK:A Orange 97.3.11. 4 32 DAIFONSORD NEWBURGINY IVO 1950 331IM-NEMURM WINCH 0.37 2017-MOB 175,000 156.25 HIERONYM NICHELLE 142M 1900 SECRETOFRANK ASAM 9 AVERAGE 1366 m 033 171,467 512s52 MEDIAN 1216 2956 0. 36 U5xm S143.91 DIFEREHCEOFAVuME SESF 19A9% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN VHOUSESF 10.9975 64 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (135-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 1/1S/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFOREAND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; SPLIT LEVEL STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAR MAP STREET# STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESWLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRJCEPER HOUSESF SEILFR OECD BOOT( DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 99-2-7 B CLARKVIEWRD NEWWINDSORNY 1400 1955 331100-NEWBURG41 SPLITIEVEL OL69 201S-02-20 195,DOD 13214 CSUBAKREGINA 13RSG 1S2 MCGUIREJOHNT Orange 98-8-9 35 CLARKVIEWRD NEWWINDSORNY 16SO 19S7 nnffl-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL CL23 7015.10-19 137,500 8&71 PORATHVERA IM76 1753 YEGARIAN KIRK SALES 2 AVERAGE 1475 1955 DAG 16LZM 1D9.32 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2 IIi96 MEDIAN 1475 1956 OAG 19um S IM32 TIMEA01. PRICE 3% 2 SLUM PERYR. NYIL Oran a 101-6-22 73 CLARKVIEWRO NEWWINDSORNY 1520 1955 3MM-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL Q29 2017.05-22 22X10D 145.46 QUILLPATRICIA 14M 1728 GREENKEITIT SALES i AVERAGE 19X0 SS 0.29 221.100 145AG MEDIAN 1520 19SS 0.29 221,100 145.4G DIFERENCE OFAVERAGE$/HOUSESF 25A2% 01FFERENCEOFMEDIAN $/HOUSESF 25A1% 65 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 MORTHPLANKROAD: 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY 4207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/16/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS COU- TAX MAP0 STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.VP- BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALFDAYE SALE PRICE PRLCEPER HOUSESF SELLER OEM BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 37--3AS GARDEN ST NEWBURGH NY IM4 1950 331300-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL- 0.31 2MS34-19 S3R9,9D0 S35265 GRECOCHRISTINAM 14041 3381 DECKERBNANR Orange 1G11-25 338 FOKWOOD DR NEWBURGH NY 1884 1995 331100-NEWBUM RAUEDRANCH QS3 20160603 233,90D 124.15 ALIEN MICHAEL 14000 700 RICCIAROIJOSEPH Oran 117-4-2000LDSPRINGI.N NEWBURGHNY 1850 ZMO 3312CO-NEWSURUH SPAT LEVEL 0.B6 2M6-07.07 MOOD S108.11 LORDCHRISTOPHER 146M 12S! CRAIG KEMNETH ' Orange 37-3.1G UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY E78 1947 331103-MEWBURGH CAPECDO 0.34 2MS-07-Z 17Q000 5193.62 GINDA JR. JOHNV 14M 1769 CRUZOSCAR Oran a 27.1.67 ROUTE32 REWBURGHNY 32&8 19SO 331IM-NEWBIJAGH CAPECOD 2.10 2M&0&16 315,000 96.30 GRZAMW MICHAELO 14095 1928 LAZIERHOWARDJR Orange 34.2.36.1 NEW RD NEWBURGHNY 1619 1954 331100-N.EWBURGH CAPECOD 0.72 201G0&30 239-9w S14&18 KELLYCHRIS7IAN 24146 396 ROIASISABEL Orange 34-3.26 269 PLANKRD NEWBURGHNY I397 1935 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.28 20I6408&31 ODD I3958 PRESIIGEREAL ESTATE OFTHE HUDS 34103 3316 WILIIAMSCHRISFOPHER Orange 17.2.21 209 FOSTERTOWNDR REWRUAGHNY I= 1%5 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD O.SS 2MG-" S227.000 S148.37 ROLABRANDON 14109 592 AMTIIORARNOLOW Orange 19.2-7&1 164 FOSTERTOWNDR IIEWBIIIIGIINY 3130 19" 931100-NPWAMGR COIONrAL 1.00 2016-0315 539JODD S124.92 RYAN SEAN 14UI 1905 tORULRIO AWTMEW Orange 3 -2-9 71 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY 19M 2016 331IM-NEWMMGH RISED RANCH 12O 2016409-25 CW SM63 SANOCASTLEHOMES INC 14170 I351 ROSE4THALDOUGIAS M Orange 17-2-912 254 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 2727 2005 33nOU-NEWSURGH COLONIAL Q90 2016-10.24 52550DD 9351 HIGH GARDEN RC DINGS LLC 141M JIM KDENIGNEIL Orange 40.1.20 5 TOW IN NEWBURGH NY am 1987 33UOU-NEWWRGH COLONIAL 0.52 7016-IZ-73 5449.9W 511122 ALSERTSIAWRENCE 24M 17 WILSONRANDAU. Coop 17-2-58 28 FOSTERTOWNOR NEWBURGHNY 1260 1B4S 3313O0-NEWMIRGH CAPECOD QAO W17-01.20 S90= S71.43 BUNORALAURAANNE 24184 739 MURPHYIMRIA Orange 37-7.5 513 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH NY I0% 39S4 3111O0-NEWRMGH SPLFFLEVEL 0.29 2DI7-GI.13 1670DD 5158.14 DOKSEYGREGORY 341% 1296 RAMOS OSMAN orange 34-2.62 40 WEYANU LR NEWBURGHNY 2352 1940 331100-1YEWBURGH COLONIAL 1.30 2017-03-29 SMODD 173.36 DDOTHTOWA FKA 14223 1S14 GORDON DOUGLAS Orange 39-1-1&22 58 NEWRD NEWBURGH NY 3570 I9A7 331100-NLWBURGH CAPFCOO AA 2D17.04.04 SM096 SSk.82 POTTERMICIIAELM 34222 163 MARINCARLOS Owne 17-1.31 60 SARVISW NEWBURGHNY 1409 19M 3311011-NEW8URGH SPUTIEVEL DAD 2017.04.20 I%OM 10653 SMITHDAVIOM 14222 451 MCQULSTONANISEAKA Orange 153-6 21 FOXWOODOR NEWBURGH NY 2692 149S 331100-NEWWRGH COLONIAL GAG 20I74)6.17 S3I0,000 SM16 NAAS STWF 34252 855 BUCHHOLZMCHAEL Orange 17.2.79.41 270 FOSTYRTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 29M 1383 3311CO-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH OM 7D1745.24 S79= S41.58 BAIWWELLOERRA 242M 729 631AOONS LLC Orange 14-1-56 4W LEROYAVE NEWBURGH NY W6 3938 SISM-WALLKILL COTTAGE D.30 2D17.06-01 149999 179A2 THE RIVERAFAMILYLIMLTEOPARTNE 14240 1242 PLIPIALESBRIAN Orange 17.2-119 151 FOSTERTOMINDR NEWBURGH NY 3284 XM 3311O0-NEWSURGH COLONIAL 1.20 2017-05-29 S37 9W 114,77 UBOLTLORRAINE 14264 I992 RENNETTROSERT Orange 37.5.2 538 VPPERAVE NEWaURGHNY 15M MW 33LIOO-NEWBURGH SPLITLrVEL 035 2D17-06-23 000 S719A5 KERSTKENNEIFI 14289 1SS7 7ORRESJASON Orange 35-2.27 1219 UNIONAVE NEW3URGHNY UN 194E 3313LA-NEWBURGH CAPECOD O-M 2017-C9.29 159,900 12453 LEFKONRTZWILLIAM 343M 339 AILTAR HELENA Orange 16.1.23 I24 FOLLWOODDR NEWBURGH NY 1E64 I99$ 331200-NEWWRON RAISED RANCH 0.49 2017-10.17 2KOW 140.56 ORTIZ raw JR 34317 ISM JAFFEEPATRICK Orange 117-3-4 29 RAMBLEWOODDR NEWSURGHNY 2352 2= 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL M67 2017.12-02 2R6,9DO 512198 RODRIGUEZIGNACIO 24317 499 CAMERON SHANEFQUA Orange 1&3.4 25 FLORALDR NLWSURGHNY 23" 1961 3311OD-NEW&1RGH RANCH OA4 2017-11-17 S167,551 17A67 DAREYRESIDENCE7RU51 1432E 190 PEFFERSROREAT Orange 34.2-33 1 PAFFENDORFDR NEWBURGHNY w 1925 331300-NEWBURGH OLDSIYIE 200 2017-3-1-27 S6"DO 10195 7EWJOYCELYNANNCO 14328 1166 G177AREWDAVID Orange 3&2.3.1 20 FLORALDK REYIBLINGHNY 3944 1960 331300-NEMURGH RANCH D32 2017-12-13 Sa4S,OW S126D3 WRILEPAUL IMID IBL19 DENNEYALEXANDRA Orange 17-7.17 117 FGSTERTOWN DR NEWBURGH NY 2056 1950 331100-NEWWRGH CAP9COD 2.70 2D17.12-14 229,OM SLGg6 BIRiG111 EDWARD 14336 1459 ZARRIELLOPASOUALE Dran a 3'9-1-IL1 32 ff. NEWBURGH NY 2371 1953 33UW-NEWOURGH CAPECOD 1,4. 7A1T-12-Z7 2RS,ppO S120.211 COWNSGLFNDA 14342 137E MIEALMM g SALES 30 AVERAGE 1945 96B B.B6 5232,252 5719.M 71MEAUJ.PRttE 3X EB7 12126 MEDIAN 1867 SO 0.53 23. $197 TIMEADI.PRIOE 336 Z17 134.16 66 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. orange 38-2-13 1210 UNION AVE NEWBLIRGNNY 936 1949 332100-NEWBUIW CAPECOD 034 2W8-ID•10 SISS,OOD 165-BO PENAfIEL1UAN 14473 7S7 MOUNASIEPHANIE Orange 16-1.23 24 FOXVVOODDR NEWBURGHNY 1710 I992 331100-NLWBLIBGH SPLTFLEVEL 0.76 2MO-ID35 5275,OOD SIM92 MRYENCHERYLM 24479 33R EIEMARCOGEOFFREY Orange 117=3-2 25 RAMBLEWOOO DR NEWBURGHNV 1274 199E 33UM-NEWBURM SPUTLEVEL LID MIS-10-16 5314,150 S24E59 PASTOREKENNEIR 14499 353 GREEN DIEGO Orange 37-3.61 532 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 13% L450 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.42 201R-11.19 S27A000 S193-9S BAZILESTEPKANIE 14492 S82 ANINIEYJOSHUA Dran a 37-7-4 515 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY IOSG 7954 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.28 2038.32.11 ZKODD 223-49 LIVE YOUR BESTREALTY 14SM BILOTTIANYHONY Orange 16-I.20 118 FOMOOO DR NEWBURGHNY M 19% 33UM-NL?WBURGH SPLITLEVEL OA7 M9.01-18 5369.900 I" BELL SR. DAM DC 14523 381 DEFALCOW LUAM Orange 39.1.6 i NLWRD NEYYBURGNNY 1SOD 1956 332100-NEWBURGH RANCH Im 2D39-02-2R C00 SZ141.03 EASTCOAST INVESTORS INTL LLC 14543 1311 LOAY7A MLAGROS Orange 37-3.55 519 THIRDST NEVJBURGHNY 1152 19SO 331100-NEWBORGH RANCH 0.44 2M9.O5-21 S ODD 5203.99 FISCHROBERT 1AWS1 20 STUHMERSAVRE Orange 17-1-44.3 143 WEYANTSLN NEVBURGHNY 2068 1975 331100-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH 0.76 2019.05.29 254,9OD 12326 MARICOWITLYMCHOK lAwl Iva I VARGASPATRICLA Orange 38-4-15 525 CIRCLELN NEVBURGHNV 790 I953 332100-NEWBURGH RANCH 037 201940-31 1110,20D SU1.03 49 MONHAGEN AVE LLC 14SWI 267 FRUSTAUJOOANA Orange 14.1-99.21 m 9 GUNSCHMTATEDR NEWBURGHNV 1536 mm 51SM-WALLKILL RAISEORANCH I 2019.E-0i 325,OOD 211.59 LEHMANNEACHA£L 145M 765 POTTSRENEE Oran n 17.2-79A1 270 FOSTFATOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 19M 1993 331100-NEWBULGH RAISEDRANCH 0.82 2019-O6.13 30gODD 157.89 63MOONS LLC 145M 2W CARPENTERMICHAEL Orange 34.2-91 46 TODDLN NEWBURGHNY 3016 1M 33I100-NEWSUFM RANCH LAO 2OM-07-I5 S3 ODD 30779 FRANKLORI 1403 47 BERKERYNAORN Orange 17-2-135 442 FOSTERTOWNAD NEWBURGHNY 1874 154G 3311W-NEWBUTGH OLDSTYIE LOO 2014-07.30 SM243 5144.21 WLNSENDOUGLAS 146% 315 ANDERSUN PATRICIAS Orange 36,1-7 3 TUUPLN NEWBURGHNY 16" 195Z 3311W-NEWBURGH• RANCH OAS 20MOS-21 S28UDOD S270.32 MCPHIWPSKATHLEENS 14M a RLnXOWSKIMICHAEL Orange 17-1-63 328 ROUTE32 NEWBLJRGHNY I560 1945 331100-NLWBURGH RANCH LOO 2D19.09.30 SWDOD 573.72 GUZWNANA 24629 2349 GHDKHOLDINGSLLC Orange 117-4-13 26 RAMBLEY=DOR NEWBURGHNY I&SO 1999 331100-NEWBUMH WUSEDRANCH 0.71 2019.10.29 5315000 TA27 XFNT £IIEfl:N 14675 1196 TAYLORTANIECED Orange 37-53 SITS GAROENST NEMLRGH NY 1392 1961 331100-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0-29 2013-11-13 57K9M 5154.09 STONERFKAMIHNIEFSIFA 146% 11 QUISPESILVA JORGE LUIS Orange 274-20 32: SARVISLN NEWBULGHMY 1152 1960 33"W-NEWBURGH RANCH 3.60 2019-12-IB 5154.SOD 5134.11 SCHAFEREVELYN 14697 i873 PEREZHECTORL Orange 17-2-11 IM FOSTFRTOWN DR NEWOURGHNY law 1966 331IDO-NEWBURGH RANCH 130 2020 l06 5250LDD0 5382.75 SAHTIAGOCARLOS 14fi91 2504 GUERRERDHECTORA Orange 37-4.6 S37 UPPERAVE NEWRURGH NY IMG i4S9 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.25 2020.01.17 5115,DD0 S106.90 SIMONS ROGER IR 24I63 413 537LIPPERAVELLC Oran a 117- -20 8 COLOSPRINGIN NEWBURGHNY I= 2000 33HW-NEWRURGH SPUTLEVEL OAS 2020.01.22 SY99,990 fizis CRAIGKENKLTH 24695 5110 LICHWICKMONICA Oran a 117-2-1 7 RAMBLEWOOD DR NEW"CiNNY 2240 0998 3311OD-NEWBURGH COLONIAL LQ 2020OZ-24 SM90D 15174 JW YGMEADOWSLLC 24709 2042 NUNEZPA04AEL Orange 37.3-65 504 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH NY 2456 I= 331300-NEMURGH SPUTLEVEL 0.25 2020•L7-38 MUM M12 SANAE"GLL 24725 2169 504UPPFRHOUSELLC Ora 37-3-12 2232 UNIONAVE• NEWRURGHW 1314 3917 33UOD-NMURGH CAPECOD 033 201RO3-M MO00 167.43 THANG AKATRAN TRAN WJ I4777 1135 RODRIGUEZSAI.RJEL crane 17-3-SG 522 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHW ISB4 1967 331300-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0.25 202LFD4.23 5255,O00 160.98 NA7ARIO VICTOR 114733 2457 BAR6FR NATALIE 1SALIES 26 AVERAGE 11W 1965 41,4110 SM41060 5756.7E MLOLM 154E 1962 0.74 252,450 SlELOB DIFFERENCE OFAVEfAGE $"USCSF 2516 DIFFERENCE OF MEOIAN$f1MSESF ZLS6 4 67 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, hic. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE, CONSTR. DATE 7/16/201$) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS, NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT TAXMAP S REE7 Y STREETTOWNSF HOUSE EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYIE ACRES SALE DATE SALE PRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER 37.3.45 502 GAROENST NEWBURGHNY 12" 195D 331100-NEWBURGH SPNTLEVEL 0.31 2016-0L-19 189,900 1516S GRECOCHRISTINAM 14041 1381 DECKERBRIANItE16-1-25 12R FOXWOODDR NEWRURGHNY I= 1935 331100-NEWBURGH WUSEDRANCH 0,53 201""3 733,90D 224,15 ALLENBACHAa 14060 700 RICCMDIJOSEPH 117-4-20 8 COLDSPRINGLN NEWBURGHNY IBM 200D 331100-NEWBURGH SPLOLEVEL 0.56 2016-07fi7 I OOD I08LII LORDCHRISTOPHEA 14076 1297 CRAIGKENNETH 37-3-10 1236 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 879 2947 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.34 2016-W-2S 170,000 193.62 GINDAIR.JOHNV 140M 1768 CRULOSCAR 17-1-67 318 ROUTE32 NEWBURGHNY- 3268 1950 331100-NEWBURGH CAPE COD 2.10 2016-WlG 315,00D 9<39 GIZZAAELUMCHAELD 14095 IM MERHOWAROIR Orange 34-2-16.1 39 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY 1619 19S4 33UOD-NRMRGH CAPECOO 0.72 1201&0&10 239,900 SlImIl KELLYCHRISTI" 141,W 3% ROIASISABEL Orange 344 -26 269 PULNXRD NEWBURGUNY 1397 1935 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD M28 2016-M31 195,000 139.58 PRESTIGEREALESTATEOFTHEHUOS 14103 1316 WIUTAWCHRISTOPHER Orange 17-2-21 109 FOSTERTOWN DR NEWBURGHNY 1S30 1945 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.55 20i&09.06_ 227,000 14937 ROIASRANOON 14IN 592 AMTHORARNOLOW Orange 17-2.76.1 16f FOSTERTOWNOR NEWRURGHNY 3130 1999 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 1.00 2016.09-15 391,00D 124.92 RYANSEAN 14117 1905 IORLANOMATTHEW Orange 34-2-9 71 NEWRD NEWBUAGHNY M 2016 331IM-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH L20 2016-09-73 290,000 15263 SANDCASTIEHOMES INC 14120 13S1 ROSENTHALDOUGIAS M Orange 17.2-9D2 2S4 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 2727 2005 331100-NEMURGH COLONIAL 0.90 2016-1b24 MOOD SM.S1 HIGHGARDENHOLDINGS LLC 14128 1150 KOENLGNEIL Orange 40-2.20 S TOMSLN NEWBURGHNY 3970 1967 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL a52 2016-12-23 SM9,50D 11322 ALBERTSLAWRENCE 14189 17 W&SONRANDALL Orange 17-2-58 28 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 1260 1945 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD M40 2017-01-10 S90.00D 71A3 BUNORALAUWLANNE 14184 739 MURPHYMARIA Orange 1 37-7-5 513 UPPERAVE ' NEWBURGHNY 1056 1 2954 331100-NEWBURW SPIITLEVEE 1 0.28 2017-91-13 197,90D IS8.14 DOYSEYGREGORY 14MI 1296 RAMOSOSMAN Orange 34-2-62 40 WEYANTSLN NEWRURGHNY 2352 1940 13"W-NEWBURGH COLONIAL L30 2017-Ce-29 W0000 SM.30 BOUM7EKRYA F KA 142DI 1524 GORDON DOUGLAS Orange 39.1.16,21 SB NEWRD NEVVBUAGHNY 3570 19R7 33=-NEWRURGH CAPECOD 3.40 2017.04.04 S297.096 S81.82 POTTERNORAELM 14MI 283 A4ARINCARIOS Orange 17-1-31 60 SARVLSIN NEWBURGHNY 1409 J%D 331IM-NEWBURGH SPIITLEVEL M40 2017.0020 150,000 106.53 SMRHDAVIDM 142221 4SI MCMISTONANIBERXA Orange 16.3.6 21 FOXWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 26A2 MS 331100-NEWBUR65H COLONIAL 0.45 2017.05. 17 5310,001) 1 SIM16 HAASSTEVE 14252 855 BUCHHOLZMICHAEL Orange 17-2-79A1 270 FOSTERTOWN DR NEWBUA13HNY 1900 1993 331100-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH 0.82 2017.05.24 579,000 41.58 BARNWELL DEBRA 14244 72H 63MOONS LLC Orange 11.2-119 151 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 3284 2ODS 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 1.20 2017.06.29 S376,900 114.77 UBOLTLORRMHE 14264 1%2 RENNESTROBFRT Orange 37-5-2 538 UPPERAVE NEWBUAGHNY 1680 l%D 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.35 1 2017.%23 5200,000 119.05 KERSTKENNETH 14289 L957 TORRESJASON Orange 39-2-17 1218 UNIDNAVE NEWBURGHNY I 1284 1948 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD _ 0,34 2017.0949 159,900 124.53 IEFKOWFTZWILLIAM 14300 339 AXTARHELENA Orange 1&1.23 124 1 FOXWOODOR NEWBURGHNY 1884 2995 331100-NMBURGH RAISED RANCH 0.49 2D27-10.17 2&SA00 140.66 ORTIZFEUKJR 14327 1584 JAFFEEPATRICK Orange 117-3-4 29 RAMBLEWODDDR NEWBURGHNY 2352 200D 3MOO-NEWBUR43H COLONIAL 0.67 2017-11-02 SM,900 5121M RODRIGUEZIGNACIO 14317 499 CAMERONSHANEMUA Orange 3&3.4 25 FLORAL OR NEWBURGH NY 1344 1%1 331100-NEWBURGH WINCH OA4 2017-11-17 S167,551 5124.67 DAILEY RESIDENCETRUST 14326 1949 PEFFEAS ROBERT Orange 34-2-33 1 PAFFFNDORFDR NEWBURGHNY 657 1925 3311W-NEWBURGH OLD STYLE ZOO 2017-21-271 69,000 10195 1 TEWJOYCELYNANN EO 14329 I16R G1ZZRREUIDAVID Orange 36.1-3.1 20 FLORAL DR NEWBURGHNY 1944 M 311100-NBWBURGI RANCH 0.52 1017.12.13 5245,000 MO3 LOSBEPALIL 14410 9R89 DENNMAI.CMDRA- Orana 1 17.2-17 117 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 1056 MD 331100-NEWBURGI CAPECOD 2.7D 20L7.12.14 2W,000 21686 BURGESS EDWARD 14336 14S9 ZARRRELLOPASQUALE Orange 39.1-111 32 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY 2371 1U53 331300-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.48 2017-12-27 SM,000 1Z0.20 COLLINSGLENDA 14342 1328 LAKEADAM NSALES 29 AVER44GE 19L3 1969 O.gB 235 $,068 SLL56 TIMEADLPRICE 3% 2.67 26. SI91 MEDULLA1894 1960 Q53 7A3,90D S124.15 TIMEADI-PRICE 3% 2.67 5134,36 68 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. Orange 38.2.13 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 936 1949 333100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD CL34 11-1D-10 155,000 165.60 PENAFIELJUAN 14473 757 MOLINASTEPHANIE Orange 1&1-13 FOXWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 1710 1992 331100-MEMURG14 SPIITLEVEL 0.76 201E610.L5 275,DD0 ILiM MAYENCHEKYLM 14473 339 DEWRCOGEOFFREY Orange 317.3.2 RAMBLEWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 3274 199E 331100-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 110 2019.10.16 S31 150 24559 PASFOREKENNEFH 14489 SM GREENDIEGO Orange 37-3.61L R24 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY IL% 19SO 331300-NEMURGH SPLIT LEVEL Q42 20MIL-19 S22Q000 1A395 RALLESTEPHANIE 14492 SU MANLEYJOSHUA Orange 37-7.4 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 1056 J:954 331100-NEWALRGH SPUTLEVEL A7B 2MS-12-11 7,36,000 SMAR UVEYOURBESTREALTY 14MG MY BILOTTIANTHONY Orange 16.1.20 FOXWOODDR NEWRURGHNY 194E 1994 331100-NEWBLJRGH SPLITLEVEL 1147 2DIMl-19 5369,9M S189.89 BELL SR.DAVIDC 14523 351 DEFALCOWILIIAM Orange 39-16 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY ISO 1956 331100-NEMVRGH RANCH LIO 2019-02-29 22 OM 141.03 EAST COASTINVESTORS INTL LLC 14543 1311 LOAYZAMLLAGROS orange 37.3-55 519 THIRDST HEMUR13HNY 1152 1 1950 133UOO-NEWBURGH RANCH OM 2M9-05-21 23SAM S2113499 I MCHROURT 1457SI 263 STUHMERSAYRE Oran a 17-1.44.3 143 WEYANTSIN NEWBURGHNY 206E 1978 33110G-NEWBUAGH RAISMRANCFL 0.76 20194IS-29 254,900 SIU26 MARKDWITZYITZCHOX 145R 1320 VARGAS PATRICIA_ Orange 39.4.15 S1S CIRCLELN NEWBURGHNY 78D 1953 33UGO-NEWBURGH RANCH Q37 20194)5-31 SIBMZW S231.03 49PMNHAGENAVE LLC JL45MI 267 . FRUSTAGWDANA Orange 17-2.79.41 270 FOSTERTOWN DR. NEWBURGH NY 1900 IM 331100-NrMLIAM RAISEDRANCH Q82 20194*41 300,000 157.89 63MOONS ILC 14SKI 2CO CARPENIERMICHAEL Orange 34.2.81 4G TODDLN J9EW8URGHNY 3016 1989 337IOD-NEWBUR6H RANCH LID 2019.47-IS 310000 102.79 FRANKLORI 146M 547 SERKERYNAOML Orange 17.2-13S 442 FOSTERTOWNRD NEWRURGHNY I874 1840 332XG-NEWBURGH OLDSTYLE LOO 2011-47-30 27D,243 14471 HANSENDOUGLAS 146M 315 ANDERSONPATRICIA S Orange 3&3.7 3 TUUPLN NEWBLJRGHNY 1644 3952 3311OD-NEWBURGH RANCH OL46 2019-08-21 S2KAM 17032 WPHILUPS KATHLEEN S 1462D 968 RUTKOWSKIMICHAEL Orange 17-1.69 329 IIOUTE32 NEWBURGHNY 1560 3945 3311DD-NEWBURGH RANCH 3.00 20MO9-I0 115000 0.72 GUZMANANA . 1462E 7348 GHDKHOLDINGSLLC Orange 117.4.13 26 1 RAMBLEWOODDR NEWBURGHNY I= 1999 331IDD-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.71 2019-ID-29 315,000 SIM27 1fENTF]MMN .14675 119A TAYLORTAHIECED Orange 37-S-3 505 GARDENST NEWBURGHNY 092 1%1 33UDD-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 1 0.29 2019-21-13 214,500 S154.09 I STONER FKAMEHMETSIFA 14665 11 QUISPESILVA JORGE LUIS Orange 17-1-30 32 SARVISLN NEWBURGHNY IM 1960 331100-NEWBUAGH RANCH 3.60 2019-12-19 154,500 134.21 SCHAFEREVELYN 14697 1973 PEREZHECTOR L Orange 17-- 2-3.1 139 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWRURGHNY LMA M 3311D0-NEWRURGH RANCH IM 2020.01.0E S250,000 SIMS SANTIAGOCARLOS 146911 ISM GUERRERO HECFOR A Orange M, 4-5 537 UPPERAVE NEWRURGHNY 1056 19S9 3311OD-NEWBURGH SPUTL.EVEL 0.2E 202O-DI-17 S115,000 SIOL9D SINIONS ROGER E. IR 14693 413 537UPPERAVELLC Orange 117. 4.20 B COLDSPRINGLN NEWBURGHNY IWO Z000 3311013-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL Q86 M20-0122 S299,999 16LI6 CRAIGKENNEiH 146% SM UCHWICKMONICA Orange 217- Z-1 7 RAMBLEWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 22.40 199E3311OD-NEMURGH COLONIAL 1-40 2020-0214 339900 ZL74 JW.YGMEADOWSLLC 14709 1042 NUNEZh4CHAEL Orange 37- 3.65 5M LIPPER AVE NEWBURGHNY 1456 1950 331I00-NEMURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.2E 2020-M-18 122,018 SM2 SANAMA0L 14M 1169 504UPPERMLISELLC Orange 37. 3-12 1232 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 13I4 3947 331TDD•NEWBLIRGH CAPECOD 033 2=433.20 SMODO SIG7,43 TRANGAXATNANTRANHU 14727 1185 RODRIGUEZSAMUEL Orange 37. 3.56 522 LIPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 1584 1967 331IDD-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0,7E 202D-M-23 2SS,000 lcA98 NAZARIOVICLOR 1473E 14S7 BARBERNATAUE ASALES 25 AVERAGE 1557 1964 0.79 24QSI2 154.6Z MEDIUM I560 1961 0.71 250,DDD IW-26 DIFFERENCE OF AVERAGE $IHOUSESF 2M51.% 01FFERENCEOPMEDIAN$ OUSESF 14.27% 69 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/16/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBU RGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; CAPE COD STYLE RESIDENCES TAX MAP* STREET STREET TOWN HOUSE. SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSE STYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER 37-3-10 1236 UNIONAVE - NEWBURGHNY 878 1947 3311OD-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.34 201607.25 170.000 193.62 GINDAJR-JOHNV 14083 1768 CRUZOSCARknge17-1-67 319 ROUTE32 NEWSURGHNY 3269 MW 33110D-NEWBUIIGH CAPECOD 2.10 20160E-16 S315.000 S96.39 GIZZARELUMICHAELO 14095 U 1AVERHOWARDA 34.2.16.1 39 NEWRD NEWSURGHNY 1619 11YA 331100.NEWBURGH CAPECOD 0.72 2016-M30 S239.900 148.18 KELLYCHRISAAN 14146 196 ROJASISASEL 34-3.26 269 PLANKRD NEWBURGHNY 1397 3935 33UDD-PJEV LJRGH CAPECOD 42B 20MM51 moon 1395a PRESTIGE REAL ESTATE OFTHV.HUO5 14103 1916 VNWAM OMISTOPHER 17-2-21 1D9 FOSTFRTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 1530 1945 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOD 055 201609.06 S22 WO 14B.37 ROLABRANDON 14109 591 AWHORARNOLOW Orange 17.2-SR 28 FOSTERTOWNOR NEWBURGHNY 1 1260 1945 3311OD-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.40 2017-01-101 90.000 73A3 BUNORALAURAANNE 14184 739 MURPHYMARIA Orange 39.1,M21 58 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY 3570 1967 33I300-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 1A0 2017-04-04 292,096 SB1.82 POTTERMICHAELM 14M M MARINCARLOS Orange 38-2.17 1219 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY IM 1.9A8 33UDD-NEWZURGH CAPECOD 034 2017-09-28 159 124,53 LEFKUWlTZWILIAM 14300 339 AKTARKUENA Orange 17.2.17 117 FOMRTOWIIOR NEWBURGH14Y 1056 1950 33119D-NEWBURGH CAPE006 7-70 2017-1214 SMO00 116.86 BURGESSEDWARD 14M 1459 ZMRIEUDPASQUALP Orange 39.1.M 32 NEWRD NEWBURGHNY 2371 1953 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOO U.48 2017-12.27 2$S00D S=20 COLUNSGLENDA 14342 829 LAKEADAM SALES 10 AVERAGE _ 1673 1451 am ZZ0.290 S22M TLMEAMPRLCE 3% 7.67 iUM75 MEDiIM 1464 1949 0.52 22V00 155.79 I TIMEAMPRICE 3% 2.67 I6L60 Orange 36-2.13 1210 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 936 1949 331100-NEW5URGH CAPE COD 0.34 1 2018-1D-10 155,000 165.60 PENAFIELJUAN 14473 7S7 MOUNASTEP14ANIE Oran a 37.3-IZ V32 UNIONAVE NEWBURGHNY 1314 1 1947 331100-NEWBURGH CAPECOO 0.33 2020-03.20 2 .OM 167.43 THANG AKATRAN TRAN HU 14727 SSBS RODRIGUE2SAMUCL SALES 2 AVERAGE im 194E 034 197,SDD 166.67 MEDIAN 1Z25 1948 0.34 187,50D l%Q DIFFERENCE OFAV ERAGE $/HOUSE5F 27.47% DIFFERENCE OFMEp1AN$ OUSESF LIS% 70 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY 1207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/1612018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; COLONIAL STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAX MAP STREET N STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOX DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 17-2-76.1 164 FOSTFRTOWNDR NEWBURGHNY 31M 3999 33UM-NEWBURGH COLONIAL LOD 2M&09-15 5391,000 124.92 RYANSEAN 14117 iMS IQRLANOMATfHEW Orange 17-2A0.2 254 FOSTFRTOWN DR NEWBURGH NY 2727 ZOOS 33IM-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 0.90 201Fr10-24 S25.5,0OD 9151 HIGHGARDEN HOLDINGS MC 14128 11W ROENIGNEIL Orange 40.1-20 5 TOMSLN NEWBURGHNY 3970 1987 33=-NEWBUR6H COLONIAL QS2 2016.12-23 M4,50D 113-22 ALBERTSIAWRFNCE 14IN 17 WILSONRANDALL Orange 34.2-62 40 WEYANTSLN NEWBURGHNY 2352 3940 33110D-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 130 2017-43-29 OOD 512330 B00THTERRYAFKA 14223 1524 GORDON DOUGLAS Orange I6-3-6 21 FO%WO060R NEWBURGHNY 202 M 93110D-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 0.46 2017-0517 53MOOD S115.16 HAA.SSTEVE 142S2 95S BUCHHOLZMICHAEL Orange 17.2-M 151 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWSUAGHNY 32M4 1 200E 331100-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 120 2017.06-29 376,900 S714.77 UBOLTLOARAME 14264 IW2 I SENNE FROBERT Orange 117-3.4 29 RAMBLEWOODOR NEWBUAGHNY 2352 20M 33UOD-NEWBURGH COLONIAL 0,67 2D17-11-02 7E6,900 IZUR RODRIGUEZLGNACIQ 14317 459 CAMERON5HANEEQVA SALES 7 AVERAGE 2930 3990 O.B6 SM043 115.05 MMEAW.PRICE 3X. 2.67 1Y4.51 MEDIAN 23Z7 2999 0.90 mom SIM" TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2.67 M03 Drop 117.2--1 7 RAMBLEWOODDA NEWBUAGHNY 2240 1998 33I300-NEWBURGH COLONIAL L40 207D_02-14 5339,900 SlSL74 JW YGMEADOWS LUC 14709 1042 NUNFZMICHAEL N SALES I AVERAGE 2240 7.90E L40 I SM A 900 75L74 MEDIAN 2240 149E L40 S3itr,900 SUL74 DIFFERENCE OFAVERAGE $/FfOUSE SF ZU7% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/HOUSE SF 2334% 71 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE7/16/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; OLD STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAXMAPM STREET R 5ET 1'pETOWNHOUSE SF EFF. YR. BUILT SCHOOL HWSES7YLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRILE PRICEPER HOUSE SF SEUFR DEED BOOK DEED PAGE BUYER Oran a 34-2. 33 1 PAFFENDORFOR NEWBLIRGHNY 667 192S 33110O-NEWBURGH OLDSTYLE 2A0 2017-11-27 00 1OL95 TEWIDYCELYNANN EO 14M 1269 Q2ZAREW DAVID fISALES 1 AVERAGE 667 M 200 WOOD 10L45 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 2.67 11033 MEDIAN 667 1925 2. 00 66.000 10135 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% Z67 1U033 Oran 17-2-135 442 FOSMTOWNRD NEWBURGHNY 1974 IM 33UOD-NEWBURGH OLDSTYLE 1.00 20B-W-30 27%243 144.21 HANSENDOUGLAS 14MB 315 ANDERSON PATRICIA S SALES 1 AVERAGE 1974 1390 LOD Z7D.243 144.21 MEDIAN W4 1W LOO 270,243 149.21 DIFFERENCE OF AVERAGE$MOUSE SF 30.70% DIFFERENCE OF MWM $/HOUSE SF 30.70% 72 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/1612018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; RAISED RANCH STYLE -RESIDENCES COUNTY TAXMAPN STREET STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL 14OUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRtCE PRICEPER HOUSE SF SELLER DEED BOOK I DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 161-25 in FOXWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 1664 J.995 331100-NEWBURGH RAISED RANCH 0.53 201rr0 S233,900 124.15 ALLENMICHAEL 140601 700 1 RtCCIARDIJOSEPH Orange 34-2-9 72 NEWRD NEWBURGiNY 190D ZM6 33I30O-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANCH 1.20 2016.09.23 290,000 352.63 SANDCASTLE HOMES INC 14120 1351 ROSENTHALDOUGLAS M OranRe 17-2-7R.41 270 F05TERTOWNUK NEWBURGHMY 1900 1983 331100-NEMURSH RAISEDRANCH 0.62 2017-05-24 79,000 41.59 BARNWELLOEBRA - 14244 726 63MOONS U.0 Orange 1f1- 23 124 FOXWOODDR NEWBURGHNY 1994 J99: 331100-NEWBURGH ROUSEDRANCH 0,49 2017-10-17 265,000 140.66 ORTIZFELIXJR I4317 1594 JAFFEEPATAICK SALES 4 AVERAGE 92 1997 0.76 21C97S 114,% TIMEAW,PRICE 3% 2.67 124.11 MEDIAN 1692 199S C.66 249,450 13L54 TIMEADJ.PRICE 3% 2.67 14ZM Orange 17- 1-44.3 143 WEYANTSLN NEWBURGH NY 2068 1972 331100-NEWBURGH RAISEORANCH 0.76 1019-05-29 2S4,900 B.26 MRRX04HTZYIiZCHOK 14592 1320 VARGAS PATRICIA Orange 17- 1-7941 270 FOSTERTOWNDR NEWBURGH NY 19DD 1983 331100-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANCH M82 2019.06.13 300M 157.69 63MOONS LTC 14SM 200 CARPENTERMICHAEL OranLe 117. 4-13 26 RAMBLEWOODDR NEWBURGH NY IM 1999 331100-NEWBURGH RAISEDRANCH 0.71 2019-10-29 315,00D 170.27 KENTEILEENN 24675 LM TAYLORTANIECED SALES 3 AVERAGE 1939 1917 IL76 2E9,967 149.52 MEDIAN 1900 1983 D.76 FOOD 157.89 DIFFERENCE OF AVERAGE$/ HOUSESF 20.A7% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/ HOUSESF MR,% 73 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc.. 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7116/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; RANCH STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAX MAP STREET B STREET TOWN HOUSE 5F EFF.YIL BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED BOOK IIDEED PAGE BUYER Orange 36-3-4 25 FLORALDR NEWBMGHNY 1344 1%1 3311O0-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.44 2017-11-27 167.S51 5124.67 DAILEYRESIDENCETRUST 14326 190 PEFFERSROBERT Orange 36-1-3.1 20 FLORALDR NEWBURGH NY IS44 196D 331300-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.52 2D17-I213 5245,000 126.03 LOBBEPAUL 14410 7889 DENNEYALEXANDRA SALES 2 AVERAGE 1644 1961 0.49 2MMkZ76 125.47. 7EMEADf.PRICE 3% 2.67 M79 MEDIAN 1644 1961 0.49 20%Z76 4IM47 TIMEADI.PRICE 3% 267 135.79 Dra2le 39-1-6 8 NEWRD NEWBURGH NY 1560 D% 31100-NEWBURGH RANCH L10 2019.02-28 22%000 143-01 EAST COASTINVESTORS INTL LLC 14543 1311 LOAYZAMILAGROS orange 37-3-SS 519 THIRDST NEWBURGH NY 1152 I 1950 331100-NEWBURG" RANCH 0.44 2D19-O 2-1 235000 203.99 FISCHROBERT 1405 M STUHMERSAYRE Orange 3B-4-15 515 CIRCLELN NEWBURGH NY 780 1953 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.37 2D19-05-31 18%200 231.03 49MONHAGENAVELLC 14580 267 FRUSTAGUODANA Orange 34-2-91 45 TODDLN I NEWBURGH NY 3016 1999 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 1.10 2019.07-15 S3I[4000 10179 FRANKLAR[ 246M 547 BERKERYNAOMI Orange 3.7 3 TUUPLN NEWBURGH NY 1644 1962 331100-NEWBURGH RANCH 0.46 2DI9.0&21 2BIRODO 1710Z MCPHILUPSKATHLEENS 14620 96B RUTKOWSKIMICHAEL Orange 17-1.68 328 FLOLFM32 NEWBURGH NY 1560 194E 33I100-NEWEIURGH RANCH 1.(1D 2019.09.10 w'O00 73.72 GUZMANANA 14628 1348 GHDKHOLDINGS LLC Orange 17-1.30 32 SARVISLN NEWBURGH NY 1152 1%O 331100-NEWBURG4 RANCH 3.60 Z019.12.19 154,S00 SIM.11 SC14AFEREVELYN 14697 1873 PEREZHECTOR L Orange 17- 23.1 139 FOSTERTOWND NEWBURGHNY 1369 L%a 331100-NEW13URG4 RANCH L30 2020-D106 250,000 S=75 SAN11AGOCARLOS 14691 1SO4 GUERREROHECTORA SALES E AVERAGE 1529 1960 L17 21AM 147-63 MEDIAN 1464 1958 L05 227.5W 255A0 DIFFERENCE OF AVERAGE $/HOUSESF 5.04lG DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $/HOUS£SF 14.4 % 74 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296 NORTH PLANK ROADJOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/16/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL -BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS -ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT; SPLIT LEVEL STYLE RESIDENCES COUNTY TAX MAP N STREET N STREET TOWN HOUSE SF EFF.YR. BUILT SCHOOL HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF SELLER DEED ROOK DEED PAGE BUYER Orange 37--34S S02 GARDENST NEWBURGH NY 1244 19M 33ll00-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.31 ZM6_Dq-l9 I$9,g00 152.65 GRECO CHRISTINA M 14041 1381 DECKER BRIANR Orange 117-470 8 COLDSPRINGLN NEWBURGH NY IM 2000 331-=-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL D.86 ZM6607-07 S200,OW 108.11 LORD04ROOPMER 14076 1297 CRAIGKENNEM Orange 37-7-5 513 UPPERAVE NEWRL41GHNY 1056 1954 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0.28 2017.01-23 167000 158.14 DOXSEYGRE43ORY 14194 1296 RAMOSOSMAN Orange 17-1-31 60 SARVISLN NEWBURGH NY 1408 SO 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL OAO 2017-04-20 150,000 Sims SMITH DAVIDM 14222 451 MCQU45TONANIBERKA Orange 37-5-2 536 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 1680 2%0 331100-NEWBURGH SPLITLEVEL 0.35 20I7-09-23 200,000 119.05 KERSTKENNETH 14229 1557 TORRESJASON SALES 5 AVERAGE 1448 INS OAr4 19L380 225.30 TDNEADl,PR10E 3% 267 13S.79 MEDIAN 1409 1960 0,35 1R9,900 S134.B7 TIMEAD1.PPJCE 3% 2-67 14S.9G Orange I6.1.13 24 FOXWOODDR NEWBURGH NY 17I0 3992 3311W-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.76 201840.15 275,000 1%32 MAYENCHERYLM 14478 338 DEMARCOGEOFFREY Orange 117.3.2 25 RAMBLEWOODVII NEWBVRGRNY 3274 39M 331300-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 3-20 201&10-16 314,I50 245.54 PASTOREKENNETH 14984 353 GREEN DIEGO Orange 37-3-61 512 UPPERAVE NEWBURGHNY 1295 1950 331100-NEWBURGH I SPLITLEVEL 0-42 2018-11-19 22Q000 183-% RAZILESTEPHANIE 14492 582 MANLEYJOSHUA Orange 37.7.4 515 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH MY 1056 1954 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0-28 2018-12-11 S236,000 223-48 LIVEYOUR REST REALTY 14506 1919 BIRTMANTHONY Orange 16.120 118 FOXWOOD DR NEWBURGH NY 1948 1994 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0-47 2019-01-18 369,900 189.89 BELL SR-DAVIDC 14523 381 DEFALCO WILUAM Orange 37-5-3 505 GARDENST NEWBURGH NY 1392 2%1 331100-NEW9URGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.28 2019-11-13 214,5W SIM.09 STONER FKAMEHN€TSIFA 14665 11 1 QUISPE SILVA JORGE WIS orange 37-4-6 537 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH MY 1056 1%9 331100.NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.22 2MO-01-17 11.= 108-90 SIWNSROGER EIR 14692 4I3 517UPPFRAVELLC Orange 117-440 B COLDSPRINGLN NEWBURGH NY 1ASO 2000 331100-NEWBURGH SPUTLEVEL 0-86 2020.01.22 S299.999 162.16 CRAIGKENNETH 14695 SW UCHWICKMONICA Orange m 37- 3-65' SO4 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH NY 1456 1950 331100-NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.28 2020-02-18 121,018 83.12 SANABRIAGIL 24726 1169 504UPPERHOUSELLC Orange 37-3-56 522 UPPERAVE NEWBURGH NY 1SR4 IW 331100•NEWBURGH SPLIT LEVEL 0.22 2020-04.23 255.000 160.98 NA7ARtOVICTOR 147M 1457 RARBERNATAUE SALES 10 AVERAGE 1452 I= R50 SM057 I $I66.E6 M> DIAN 1424 1964 O95 24S,SW 172.40 OIFFERENCEOFAVERAGEVROUSESF 22.75% DIFFERENCE OF MEDIAN $JHOUSE SF 18.12% 75 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. MARKET STUD-LES FOR SALE RESALE TRANSACTIONS: OFF DISANO DRIVE: OFF DISANO DRIVE, TOWN OF ORANGE LAKE, ORANGE COUNTY (80-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 8/16/2019) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALE - RESALE ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS PRICE PER COUNT STREET HOUSE HOUSE HOUSE DEED DEED CHG Y TAX MAP # STREET TOWN SF STYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALE PRICE SF BOOK PAGE YEARS PER YEAR Orange 111-2-12-1 1329 UNION AVE NEWBURGH NY 1926 SPLIT LEVE 0.92 2018-03-021 265,000 137.59 1 14373 1738 Orange 111-2-12.1 1329 UNION AVE NEWBURGH NY 1926 SPLITLEVEJ 0.92 2019-10-11.1 M,000 3.76.53 1 146421 558 1 1.61 17.58% 76 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 244 BOARDMANROAD: 244 BOARDMAN ROAD, TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE, DUTCHESS COUNTY (112-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 4/9/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALE -RESALE ANALYSIS COUNTY TAXMAP# MEE T# STREET TOWN HOUSE SF HOUSE STYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALE PRICE PRICE PER HOUSE SE DEED BOOK DEED PAGE YEARS CHG PER YEAR Dutchess 6260-02-512568- 5 HEATHSROOK DR POUGHKEEPSIE NY 2440 COLONIAL 0.41 2016-12-01 395,000 161.89 22017 1903 Dutchess 6260-02-512568 5 HEATHBROOK DR POUGHKEEPSIE NY 2440 COLONIAL 0.41 2019-06-20. 405,000 165.98 22019 4372 2.55 0.99% Dutchess 6160-04-850097-OU 21 HORIZON HILL DR POUGHKEEPSIE NY 20D4 COLONIAL 0.74 2016-09-22 235,00D 117.27 22016 7742 Dutchess 6160-04-850087- 21 HORIZON HILL DR POUGHKEEPSIE NY 20D4 COLONIAL 0.74 7018-05-70 345,000 172.16 27018 4942 L74 26.88% Dutchess 6260-03-381225-OODC 17 MEMORY LN POUGHKEEPSIE NY 1136 RANCH 0.35 2017-12-05 142,500 125.44 22017 9220 Dutchess 16260-03-381225-000C 17 MEMORY LN POUGHKEEPSIE NY 1136 RANCH 0.35 2019-01-14 296,000 260.56 22019 699 1.11 97.39% Dutchess 6260-03-166348-ODOC 250 SPACKENKILLRD POUGHKEEPSIE NY 1828 RANCH 1.40 2017-09-08 273,000 149.34 22017 6994 Dutchess 6260-03-166348 250 SPACKENKILLRD POUGHKEEPSIE NY. 1828 RANCH 1.40 2019-10,01 333,000 182.17 22019 6838 2.06 10.66% AVERAGE 33.98% MEDIAN 28.77% 77 CNY Pomeroy .Appraisers, Inc. 722 ROUTE 37b.- 722 ROUTE 376,_TOWN OF HOPEWELL JUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY 130-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 6/30/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - SALE -RESALE ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS COUNTY TAXMAP# STREET# STREET TOWN HOUSE SF FF. YR. BUILT HOUSE STYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSESF DEED BOOK DEED PAGE YEARS CHG PERYEAR Dutchess 6458-03-289345-0000 102 CATIESWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3974 2011 COLONIAL 1.15 201204-20 625,000 157.27 22012 1918 Dutchess 6458-03-289345-000D 102 CATIESWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3974 2011 COLONIAL L15 2015-04-15 620,000 156.01 22015 2265 2.98 0.27% Dutchess 6457-01-214796-0000 89 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3102 2011 COLONIAL 0.26 2012 07-25 560,997 1 $180.85 22012 499 Dutchess 6457-01-214796-0000 89 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3102 2011 COLONIAL 0.26 2015-03-17 469,000 151.19 22015 1634 3.14 5.M Dutchess 6457-01-198794-0000 97 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2894 2012 COLONIAL 0.26 2012 09-19 497,570 171.93 22012 5270 Dutchess 6457-01-198794-0000 97- FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2894 2012 COLONIAL 0.26 2014-12-12 46D,000 158.95 22015 167 2.29 3.39% Dutchess 6458-01-467358-0000 4 FENWICKDR EASTFISHKILLNY 1618 1 1969 RANCH 1 2011-11-01 265,000 163.78 22011 5404 Dutchess 6458-01-462558-0000 4 FENWICKDR EASTFISHKILLNY 1618 1959 RANCH 1 2015-05-27 289,900 179.17 22035 3797 3-57 7-63% AVERAGE 1569b MEDIAN I L83% 78 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 17-19 ORR AVENUE: 17-19 ORR AVENUE, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (135-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 1/15/2016) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - SALE -RESALE ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS; NEWBURGH SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNTY TAX MAP# STREET STREET TOWN HOUSE SP HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALE PRICE PRICE PER HOUSESF DEED BOOK DEED PAGE YEARS K CHG PERYEAR Orange 100-5-18 2 HOBST NEWBURGH NY 1129 RANCH 0.22 2016-10-04 146,500 729.76 14155 919 Orange 101 6-6 2 HOBST NEWBURGH NY 1129 RANCH 0.22 2018-09-17 205,000 18L58 14480 1887 1.95 20.46% Orange 98-6.6 7 HOBST NEWBURGH NY 1184 RANCH 0.49 2014-12-19 S115,000 97.13 M32 1031 Orange 101-5-7 7 HOBST NEWBURGH NY 1184 RANCH 0.49 2018-08-20 220,ODD 185.81 14449 1598 3.67 24.89% Orange 98-1-11 42 OLD LITRE BRITAIN RD NEWBURGH NY 1044 CAPE COD 0.24 2014-10-31 130,000 124.52 M12 374 Orange 98-7-9 42 OLD LITTLE BRITAIN RD NEWBURGH NY 1044 CAPE COD 0.24 2015-32-04 150,000 143.68 13996 1056 1,09 14.08% AVERAGE 19.81% MEDIAN X46% 79 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 296NORTHPLANKROAD: 296 NORTH PLANK ROAD, TOWN OF NEWBURGH, ORANGE COUNTY (207-FOOT MONOPOLE; CONSTR. DATE 7/16/2018) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - SALE -RESALE ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS COUNTY TAXMAP# STREET STREET TOWN HOUSE SF HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDATE SALEPRICE PRICE PER HOUSESF DEED BOOK DEED PAGE YEARS CHG PERYEAR Orange 117-4-20 8 COLD SPRINGLN NEWBURGH NY 1850 SPLIT LEVEL 0.86 2016-07-07 200,000 108.11 14076 1297 Orange 117-4-20 8 COLD SPRINGLN NEWBURGH NY 1850 SPLIT LEVEL 0.86 2020-01-22 299,999 162.16 W95 580 3.54 14.11% so CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. MARKET STUDIES FOR POST -TOWER CONSTRUCTIONSALE-RESALE TRANSACTIONS: 722 ROUTE 376. 722 ROUTE 376, TOWN OF HOPEWELL JUNCTION, DUTCHESS COUNTY 130-FOOT MONOPOLE, CONSTR. DATE 6/30/2013) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - SALE -RESALE ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE RADIUS POST -TOWER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD (AUGUST2O13 THROUGH 2O20) COUNTY TAX MAP If STREET If STREET TOWN HOUSE SF HOUSE STYLE ACRES SALE DATE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF DEED BOOK DEED PAGE YEARS CHGPER YEAR Dutchess 6457-01230817--0000 109 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3123 COLONIAL 0.28 2014-11-20 574,181 183.86 22014 W40 Dutchess 6457-01230817--DODO 108 FENTON WAY EASTFISHKILLNY 3173 COLONIAL 0.28 2016.06-01 499,000 159.78 22016 4411 1.53 8.56% Dutchess 6458.03.497434-DODO 5 MONACO DR EASTFISHKILLNY 1816 RANCH 1.10 2015-02-M 315,000 173A6 22015 1076 Dutchess 6458.03.497434.0000 5 MONACODR EASTFISHKILLNY 1816 RANCH L1O 2016-04-18 322,OD0 177,31 1 22016 34115 L20 1-84% Dutchess 6457-01-192836-DWO 6 SEWARDRD EASTFISHKILLNY 2511 COLONIAL 0.27 2013-10-03 493,473 192.54 22013 6898 Dutchess 6457-01192836.00DO 6 SEWARDRD EASTFISHKILLNY 2511 COLONIAL 0.27 2017-06-07 480,000 191.16 22017 4385 3,68 0.20% Dutchess 6457-01-15590S-DODO 2 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2058 COLONIAL 0.30 2014-01-23 227,967 110.77 22014 1240 Dutchess 6457-01-129925-0000 2 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 3059 COLONIAL 0.47 2019-07-25 646,000 211-25 22D19 480 5.50 33.34% Dutchess 6457-01-187883-OD00 22 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 3012 COLONIAL 0.27 2013-07-02 5311120 176,93 22013 4731 Dutchess 6457-01-187883.00D0 22 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 3012 COLONIAL 0.27 2017-06-29 520,000 172.64 22017 5123 3.99 0.52% Dutchess 6457-01-191975-DODO 26 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2812 COLONIAL 0.27 2013.09-10 5Z5,736 186.96 22D13 4897 Dutchess 6457-01-191875-DODO 26 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2812 COLONIAL 0.27 2018-09-07 25,000 196.70 22018 6810 4.99 0.03% Dutchess 6457-01201896.0000 29 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2M COLONIAL 0,27 2015.09-30 225000 102.97 22015 6316 Dutchess 6457-01-100847-OOM 29 TILDENPL EASTFISHKILLNY 2992 COLONIAL Q28 20134Y7-22 650,050 224.78 22D19 5524 3.81 49.6D% Dutchess 6457-01149W9-DODO 73 VAN BURENWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2820 COLONIAL 0.25 2015-01-22 539,126 191.18 22015 906 Dutchess 6457-01-149W9.0000 73 VAN BURENWAY EASTFISHKILLNY 2820 COLONIAL 0.25 2020-01-31 525,000 186.17 22020 W8 5.02 0.52% VERAG 9 37% MEDIAN I0.11% 81 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DEAN HILL ROAD: DEAN HILL ROAD, TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR, ORANGE COUNTY 168-FOOT LATTICE TOWER; CONSTR. DATE 8/24/2010) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - POST TOWER CONSTRUCTION BEFORE AND AFTER SALES ANALYSIS - ALL SALES WITHIN ONE MILE COUNTY TAXIHAPM STREET M STREET TOWN HOUSE SF HOUSESTYLE ACRES SALEDAfE SALEPRICE PRICEPER HOUSESF DEED BOOR DEED PAGE SALES CHG PERYEAR Orange 77-2-18 2710 COLONIALDR NEWWIN050RNY 2808 COLONIAL 0.23 2023.08.09 309,000 110.04 13M 1643 Orange 77-2-19 2710 COLONIALDR NEWWINDSORNY 2808 COLONIAL 0.23 2017-08-14 380,000 13S.33 14277 1291 4.01 5.72% Orange 643-8.2 3720 COLONISTTRL NEWWINDSORNY 2557 COLONIAL 0.00 2015-02-12 340,000 132.97 13848 1951 Orange 64.3-8.2 3720 COLONfSTTRL NEWWINDSORNY 2557 COLONIAL O00 2018-10.04 410,000 160.34 144811 1011 3.64 5.65% Orange 65-1-120 9 COOPER Cr NEWWfNDSORNY 3104 COLONIAL OdO 2022.08-13 440,000 14L75 13394 1458 Orange 65-1-120 9 COOPERCT NEWWINDSORNY 3104 COLONIAL 0,00 2018-01-30 465,000 149.81 14367 226 SAG L04% Orange 64-2-2 2077 INDEPENDENCEDR NEWWINDSORNY 2498 COLONIAL 0.28 2016-10-111 359,000 14429 14224 1605 Orange 64-2-2 2077 1 INDEPENDENCEDR NEWWINDSORNY 2488 COLONIAL US 201.9.OS-31 363,000 145.90 14574 1454 2.63 0,42% Orange 64-2-32 2641 LIBERTYROG NEWWINDSORNY 2808 COLONIAL 0.29 2015-07.17 375,000 133.55 13M 64 Orange 64-2-32 2641 LIBERTYROG NEWWINDSORNY 2808 COLONIAL 0.23 2018-06-07 415,000 147.79 14413 343 1 2.89 3.69% Orange 76-4-1 3019 MOLLY PITCHER DR NEWWINDSORNY 2842 COLONIAL 0.38 2012-03-29 240,000 84.45 13355 880 Orange 76-4-1 301.9 MOLLY PITCHER DR NEWWINDSORNY 2942 COLONIAL 0.38 2013-06-211 370,000 13D.19 13594 1733 1.23 44.06% Orange 75-4-1 3W9 1 MOLLYPITCHEROR NEWWINDSORNY 2842 COLONIAL 0.38 2017-05-01 390,000 137.23 142&7 391 4.M 1.29% Orange 65-1-35.12 249 RILEYRD NEWWINDSORNY 923 CAPECOD 1.00 2011-11-18 180,000 195.02 13255 392 Orange 65-1-35.12 149 RILEYRD NEWWINDSORNY 923 CAPECOD 3-00 2017-044D 1$i,750 399.08 142271 513 5.42 1 0.38% Orange 65-1-22.3 200 RILEYRD NEWWINDSORNY 2076 RAISED RANCH 1.80 1 201&10-28 244,000 117.53 14184 241 Orange 65.1-22.3 200 RILEY RD NEW WINDSORNY 2076 RAISED RANCH 1.80 2020-01-29 199,500 96.10 14700 383 3.25 5.61% Orange 67-4-15 1098 ROUTE94 NEWWINDSORNY 3" OLD STYLE a29 2013-10-30 1A5,0W 207.89 13679 1431 Orange 67-4-15 1099 ROUTE94 NEWWLNDSORNY 1344 OLD STYLE 0.29 2018-D7-19 202,000 150.30 14437 284 4.7L 8.33% Orange 77-8-14 24OR SETTLERS RDG NEW VANDSOR NY 2431 COLONIAL 0.23 201&DG-27 370,000 15120 14072 1952 Orange 77-8-14 2408 SETTLERS ROG NEWWINDSORNY 2431 COLONIAL 0.23 2019-06-20 400,000 164.54 14M 496 2.99 2.72% Orange 77-11-5 2419 SEfTLERSRDG NEWWLNDSORNY 3075 COLONIAL 0.35 201108.12 430.000 139.84 13232 UN Orange 77-11-5 2419 SETTLERS ROG NEWWINDSORNY 3075 COLONIAL 0.35 2013-12-M 370,000 120.33 13691 1437 233 6.00% Orange 77-11.10 2479 SEfTLERSROG NEWWiNDSORNY 3096 COLONIAL 0.35 2013-05-30 MOOD 122.74 13577 1667 Orange 77-11-10 2429 SETTLERS ROG NEW WINDSOR NY 3D96 COLONIAL 0.35 2019.07-19 5461,000 148.90 14597 271 6.14 3,47% AVERAGE 5.01% MEDIAN L72% 82 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. QUALIFICATIONS OFDONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA: EMPLOYMENT HISTORY.' 2016-Current: Executive Vice President — CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. 1994-2015: President - Pomeroy: Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1986-1994: Executive Vice -President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc, 1984-1986: Vice -President / Secretary - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. I974-1984: Staff Appraiser - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. EDUCATION; Cornell University: Bachelor of Science -- College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Syracuse University: graduate studies Appraisal Institute: appraisal valuation courses and seminars American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers: appraisal valuation courses & seminars International Right -of -Way Association: appraisal courses'and seminars NYS Assessors Association: appraisal courses and seminars PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS: MAI #6935 Appraisal Institute Member, Appraisal Institute (MAI) designation is awarded by the Appraisal Institute to those members who haveyeasofexperience, are technically trained, havepassed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code of ethics. ARA #623 American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers [ASFMRA] I hold the Accredited Rural Appraiser (ARA) designation which is awarded by the American Society ofFarm Managers & Rural Appraisers to those members who have yeas of experience, are technically trained, have passed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code of ethics. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS, Appraisal Institute (1979-present) Chapter Corrunittees: AIREA/SREA Unification (1991-92), Regional Standards Panel (1986- 91), Chapter Admissions, Chairperson (1987-89), Admissions (1995-1989) Chapter Offices: President (1/1/2011-12/31/2012 [2-yr. term]), President -Elect (2010), Treasurer (2009), Secretary (2009), Treasurer (1992), Secretary (1991), Director (1990) American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (1975-present) National Committees: Editorial Co -Chair (1998-2002) and Chair '(2002-2017); National Appraisal review Committee Chair ('1988-94); Executive Council (1995-98); Ethics & Standards Task Force (2009-2010); Publications Commission Chair, Valuation 2000 (1998- 2000); By -Laws (1980-81); Young Professionals (1981-84); Appraisal Manual (1984-85); Regional Membership (1985-1988); Rural Appraisal Book (1993-1995); Long Range Planning 1995); Annual Meeting (1997 & 1999); The Appraisal Foundation Advisory Council (2002- 04); Strategic Planning Task Force (2003-04); Recognized for 40-Year Membership (2018) National Office: District I Vice President (1995-1998) Chapter (Northeast) Offices: Secretary -Treasurer (1979-89), Vice -President (1989-91); President (1991-93); Director (1993-96) International Right -of -Way Association - Chapter #18 (1982-present) International Association of Assessing Officers (1999-present) New York State Assessors Association, Inc. Past•Regional Advisor - State Board of Real Estate Appraisal 83 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. DaNSESAND CERTIFICATIONS: Certified by Appraisal Institute through December 31, 2023 Certified by ASFMRA through December 31, 2019 NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-000000060 (1991 to present) Certified by NY Department of State through October 7, 2021 Certificate of Completion — Valuation of Conservation Easements course — A11ASFMRA/ASA (2008). Certificate of Completion — Yellow Book --Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions ASFMRA (2006 and 2018) NYS Consultant Appraiser - New York State (1978 to present) NYS Qualified Appraisal Course Instructor — all appraisal course levels (1991 to present) Certificate of Appreciation - Appraisal Review Committee Chairman (6 years) Certificate of Appreciation — Editorial Committee Chairman (19 years) NYS Notary Public WARDS.- G. Richard Kelley Memorial Award (formerly President's Award)- 2014, presented by Upstate New York Chapter, Appraisal Institute Appraisal Professional of the Year by ASFMRA - 2012 Gold Quill Award for Journalism from ASFMRA —1985 and 2011 Volunteer of the Year Award — ASFMRA - 2017 Silver Plow Award - 10+ years as Chapter Secretary/Treasurer from ASFMRA (1989) Silver Cow Award for Contribution to Agribusiness from Onondaga County Dairy Promotion Committee (1999) PUBLICATIONS: A Case Study of Upstate New York Landlocked and Restricted Access Land Values" — Journal of the ASFMRA, May 2020 An Environmental Trade Case Study: Agricultural Conservation Easement Pays Off Environmental Penalty" Journal of the ASFMRA, June 201.1(ASFMRA 2011 Gold Quill Award) Is YourForest Land Fairly Assessed?" —Empire Envoy, Empire State Forest Products Association, Vol. 97, No. 5, August 2004 Conservation Easements: a Review of Alternative Valuation Methods" -- Journal of Property Economics, co -published by American Society of Appraisers, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, International Association of Assessing Officers and National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2004 The Appraisal of Rural Property, 2' d Edition, 2000, co -published by ASFMRA and Appraisal Institute — hairy Farm Chapter Timberland Assessments'— Fanning, January 2001 Gas Pipelines: Are They a Detriment or an Enhancement for Crops?" Journal of ASFMRA, 2000; republished in International Right -of -Way Magazine, Dec. 2000 Timberland Valuation" -- CFA News, Catskill Forest Association, Inc., Fall 1999 Understanding Development Rights from Both the Appraiser and Consultant Perspective" Seminar for ASFMRA, May 1997 Farm Assessment Problems" (5 part series) - New York Farmer, 1996-1997 Conservation Easements & Valuation Issues" - Appraisal Views, Valuation lnternational, Ltd., 2nd Quarter,1996 Rural Appraisal Manual, ASFMRA., 6'' Edition, 1986 - Revision Committee Using the Income Approach fo'r Specialized Agricultural Properties" -Journal of the ASFMRA, April 1985 (ASFMRA 1985 Gold Quill Award) Do You Need a Professional Appraiser?" - American Agriculturist, January 1983 84 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. TEr1 mm.IND LECTURING EXPERIENCE.' Upstate NY Chapter (Appraisal Institute): Valuations in Indian Land Claims, Eminent Domain Analysis, Catastrophic Event, Natural (Tourist) Attraction, Current Use v. Highest and Best Use, Land Under Elevated Highway, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Utility Easements, Determination of Economic Units, Market Value Impact from Solar Systems on Residential Properties, Effects of Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land ASFMRA & Northeast Chapter: Agricultural Valuation, Conservation Easements; Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Dairy Fanns, Utility Easements ASFMRA Ohio Chapter: Conservation Easements International Right -of -Way Association Chapter 18: Conservation Easement Valuation, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Effects of. Stigma, Landlocked and Restricted Access Land NYS Assessors Association: Farm Valuation, Income Capitalization Approach, Conservation Easement Valuation, Waterfront Valuation, Mini -Marts and Convenience Stores, Partial Interests Valuation, Appraisal Report Review, Mixed -Use Property Valuation NYS Association of County Directors: Conservation Easements: Alternative Valuation Methods Cornell Cooperative Extension: Farm Assessment Problems, Agricultural Conservation Easements Cornell University: Appraisal Issues, Eminent Domain, Conservation Easements, Indian Land Claims Federal Land Bank: Highest & Best Use Analysis US Army / Tug Hill Tomorrow Land Trust/ Ducks Unlimited: Fort Drum Army Compatible Use Buffer Program (2012): Conservation Easements New York Farm Show / Woodsmen's Field Days (2010, 2011, 2012): Conservation Easements Ohio State University: Conservation Easement Valuation Onondaga Community College: Real Estate Principles Onondaga County Assessors Assoc.: Farm Valuation, Conservation Easements, Convenience Stores, Property Classifications and Current Use v. Highest and Best Use Issues COURTEXPERIENCE: Testified before US Federal District Court*; NY State Court of Claims; NY State Supreme Court^; Massachusetts Court; Commissions and Hearings throughout NY State; A2010 NY Court of Appeals favorable decision on current use valuation certiorari project (Gordon v. Town of Esopus); 2 Appellate Division favorable decisions on current use and economic unit valuation for certiorari Adirondack Mountain Reserve v. Towns of Keene and North Hudson; Corvetti v. Town of Lake Pleasant) 1981 Oneida Nation Land Claim was reviewed and upheld by the US Supreme Court (March 1984) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE. - Career responsibilities bridge a wide scope of public, institutional and private assignments dealing with eminent domain, mortgage financing, tax matters, zoning, easements, estate planning, and general valuation questions. Projects include Indian land claims, rights -of -way acquisition, railroad valuation, urban redevelopment, waste disposal, water use and hydro -power valuation matters, watersheds, airports, pipeline and powerline corridors, agricultural crop analysis, and environmental analysis. Assignments have, dealt with office buildings, shopping centers, most types of commercial and industrial properties, apartment complexes, hotels and motels, churches, schools, all types of agricultural properties, timberland, freshwater and tidal wetlands, all types of recreational and residential properties, conservation easements, and utility line easements. 85 CNY Pomeroy Appraisers, Inc. C'OwMUNITYACT vmES: Onondaga County Waste -to -Energy Facility: Citizens Advisory Committee (1991-2000), Chairman 1993-1994); Property Value Stabilization, Sub -Committee Chairman (1991-2000) Town of Onondaga: Environmental Advisory Council (1976-81); Fire Training Center Bylaws Chairman 1986); Length Of Service Awards Program (Town Committee Chairman 1989-91, 2000-02, 2004-05, 2017-18, 2019) Onondaga Central Schools Committees: Facilities Advisory (1989-90); Citizens Advisory (1994-96); Building Planning (1994-96); Facilities Development (1997); Academic/Building Advisory 2000-2003); Capital Project Advisory (2005-12); Citizens' Budget Advisory (2015-16) St. Camillus Health & Rehabilitation Center: Trustee (1987-1992); Development Comm. (1990-1992) Cornell University: Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network (1989-2006); Alumni Career Link (1989- present) South Onondaga Fire Department: Member (1970-present); President (1978-85, 1989-94, 2000-2014); Immediate Past President (2014-2021); Director (1985-87; 1988-89; 1994-2000); supervised new fire station construction (1990-91); Life Member (since 2004); Length of Service Awards Program Trustee/Administrator (1989-present) Onondaga County Volunteer Firemen's Association Red Jacket Distinction Award - 2012 New York State Emergency Medical Technician for over 30 years Corpus Christi Catholic Church: Building Corm-nittec (1991-92); Lector (2006-2016) South Onondaga Water District — proposed and approved (2000-01) U+rIQUE ID NUMBER I r P J I i I. n to i v State uf''Vell. Ynr Cont ral 46000000060 Uelmlimenr nJ' Stare No, MVI510N OF LICENSING SERVICES EFrECTiVE aATI. I PURSUANT TO Ti-x PROVI,IGNS, OF ART1CLE dE Cf THE W EXECLITIVE LAW AS IT RELATES TO R F APPRAISPRS 10ipF3l1; Fk!'MIATiON DArL F i SWFr, DONALD . CIQ POM RGY r,F r ;,;,; •;sL ASSIICIAT 10, 07In21 LIBEr:TV 5UL t--: - 100 EAST F-rJEin 1fAtVLILIS, i- . l.` lOr I HAB PEEN DU0 CERTIFIED TO TRANS^Cr SUSINESE AS A i F. E. GENERAL_ AFrRAISER N rNksw r.0 r w'vss-b s"J.rt ROSSANA RLISADO SF-CRETAR,y nF STATF TTom_..... ,_ .T..T... .T.T ,_. T..T T.".[ T:T 86 APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT - MARKET STUDY Of VERIZON - PROPOSED BUELLVILLE CELL TOWER OFF INDIAN HILL ROAD AND POMPEY CENTER ROAD TOWN OF POMPEY, ONONDAGA COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK MADE FOR MR. JARED C. LUSK NIXON PEABODY, LLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604-1792 PREPARED BY DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 225 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1 Syracuse, New York 13202 DATE OF STUDY MAY 21, 2015 DATES OF PREPARATION MAY 2015 2015 Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. y Real Estate Appraisers - Consultants POMEROY PLACE, 225 WEST JEFFERSON ST. SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13202 APPRAISAL CONSULTING REPORT - MARKET STUDY Of VERIZON - PROPOSED BUELLVILLE CELL TOWER OFF INDIAN HILL ROAD AND POMPEY CENTER ROAD TOWN OF POMPEY, ONONDAGA COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK MADE FOR MR. JARED C. LUSK NIXON PEABODY, LLP 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604-1792 PREPARED BY DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 225 West Jefferson Street, Suite 1 Syracuse, New York 13202 DATE OF STUDY MAY 21, 2015 DATES OF PREPARATION MAY 2015 Q2015 Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Real Estate Appraisers - Consultants POMEROY PLACE, 225 WEST JEFFERSON ST., SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13202 TELEPHONE: 315.422-7106 POMIROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. FAX: 315-476-1011 Ilea! Estate Appraisers — Consultants E-MAIL: porneruy@pJirierOyappraiSa LLOrn POMEROY PLACE, 225 WESTIEFFERSON ST., SYRACUSE, NY 13202 httPl/uameroyappraisal.Lum May 27, 2015 Mr. Jared C. Lusk Nixon Peabody, LLC 1300 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604-1792 Re: Appraisal Consulting Report - Market Study for Proposed Buellville Cellular Tower off Indian Hill and Pompey Center Roads Town of Pompey, Onondaga County, New York Dear Mr. Lusk: At your request, we have prepared this Appraisal Consulting Report - Market Study in a Restricted Use Report fornnat for estimating the value impact on neighboring residential properties in the viewshed of the proposed installation of a I50-foot monopole tower for cellular transmissions to be installed by Verizon Wireless. This proposed tower is to be erected at the rear of 8144 Indian Hill Road in the town of Pompey on a 24.31-acre tract of land improved with a rural residence. This Iocation of the proposed cell tower with a half -mile radius identified in red is shown below on the aerial map. 2 POMEROY 9 APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. You requested that only this limited Market Study be prepared at this time for internal purposes to help evaluate the potential for damages and/or value impact of nearby residential properties as associated with a tower structure. This consulting report shall examine sale patterns of improved residential properties adjacent to cell towers within the Onondaga -- Madison County area of Central New York. This market study has been completed in May 20IS. The intended users of this Market Study are identified as the client, Verizon Wireless, and their assigns. The purpose, intended use, and Scope of Work for this Market Study is to estimate the value impact to residential properties and analyze value patterns from cell towers associated with neighboring residential properties. In this regard, we assume that you and other designated principals will be users of our report and that it may be shared with others in whatever discussions could ensue. The proposed tower is planned to be erected near the southeastern corner of this property that neighbors residential strip development to the east with less intensive rural residential development to the north, west and south as shown in the previous photograph. The parent property is located along the south side of Indian Hill Road, east of Pompey Center Road, south of the village of Manlius. The laud is a mixture of open, wooded and brush -covered sloping terrain that is improved with a 3,267-square foot Cape Cod style residence near its northwestern corner. Following are copies of portions of the tax map and aerial photograph outlining the subject's parent property in red. 23 40.764(C) 2.72S(C) bMy AI" / J 12, 15 2S,3ia(C) tt,u a osu 2.e5ap y wf.s 1 B.3 The proposed tower site is bounded on the east by residences ranging from ten to over one hundred years in age and consisting of ranch, cape cod, old style, colonial and contemporary house styles on lots ranging from less than one acre to over five acres. Pompey Pines, a residential subdivision, is located north of Indian Hill Road and Pompey Center Road, with the southern section consisting mostly of colonial -style homes (about one thousand feet north of Indian Hill Road) having been developed in the past ten years. The rural residences to the north, west and south are more scattered in location, range from relatively new to over one hundred years in age, include a mix of house styles and are on lots ranging from about one acre to several acres. 3 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. A water tower already exists along the southern boundary of Pompey Pines, south of Killarney Lane and north of Indian Hill Road, is readily visible from most of the southern portion of Pompey Pines. A transmission tower in excess of 900 feet in height, owned by Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., located at 7228 Sevier Road approximately 3.5 miles southwest of the Buellville tower site, is also visible from most open areas in subject's neighborhood. Cd POMEROY 6 APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC, The proposed tower site was viewed from abutting road, and the neighborhood of the subject property has been inspected to evaluate the area's rural residential characteristics, The following photograph shows a typical monopole cell tower like the one that is being proposed for the Buellville site. A monopole tower consists of a single metal pole that is used for a variety of communications purposes and is the least intrusive of the various tower designs.. Other tower styles include a guyed tower which secured with cables and a lattice tower that has a grid -like appearance. An example of a monopole tower is shown in the following photograph (Howlett Hill cell tower, located off Harris Road in the town of Onondaga). This assignment is developed and in conformity with the Appraisal Institute's Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as well as the appraisal guidelines required as outlined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) mandating the adherence of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) issued by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation as established by Title XI of the Federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, as amended since that initial date. This type of Market Study/Appraisal Review Report is not and cannot be used as a substitute for a qualified real estate appraisal report. It is intended to provide a basis for illustrating the range of market value impact of the presence of cell towers on neighboring residential properties. 5 POMEROY APPRAISALAS,SOCIATES, INC. Scone of Work for Market Study: In order to evaluate market data that will show the level of prices willing buyers will pay for residences within the viewshed of cell towers compared to residences that don`t have views of cell towers, residential subdivisions with homogeneous characteristics are one of the preferable areas of study. This type of analysis is referred to as paired data analysis which is defined as: A quantitative technique used to identify and measure adjustments to the sale prices or rents of comparable properties; to apply this technique, sales or rental data on nearly identical properties is analyzed to isolate and estimate a single characteristic's effect on value or rent. Often referred to as paired sales analysis. " 1 As such, we will identify and analyze the sale prices of groups of residential sales that do not include views of cell towers to the sale prices of groups of residential sales that are similar in neighborhood and physical characteristics in all significant categories except that this latter group includes views of cell towers. The differences between the two groups of sales will reflect the market's (i.e. buyers) perception of the impact of cell tower views on residential properties. However, the proposed Buellville tower location is in a relatively rural area with subdivisions only in pant of the tower's sphere of influence. Due to the scattered and rural locations of cell towers in Central New York, we have expanded our research area to several cell towers in a variety of locations that include both rural locations and residential subdivisions. The research and analysis for. this Market Study included three phases. Initial research for the first phase was conducted from our office as follows: 1. Identifying existing cellular towers in Onondaga and Madison Counties that have been erected 2. Identify sales of improved residences that were within an approximate one mile radius of the identified cell tower a, A period of time from January 1, 2013 through the preparation of this Market Study was utilized to minimize time differences and which represents a period of consistent change since recovery from the Great Recession (early 2008 through slid-2012). b. The www.real-info.com (a.k.a. realRecord) data base was used for sales research; this data base includes records of transactions of real property in each municipality which identify date of sale, sale price, characteristics of houses (style, age, size, limited description of rooms, basement, utilities), lot size, and other information contained in the respective assessor's files. 3. Locate identified sales on a road map The second phase of this assignment involved field research, including: 4. Inspect the location of each sale from the road to determine if the nearby cell tower was within the parcel's viewshed or if it was obstructed or out of the viewshed 5. Evaluate quality and quantity of sales in each neighborhood to determine if there were sufficient data to analyze for comparison of sale prices of houses within and outside of the viewshed of the nearby cell towers Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago; Appraisal Institute, 2010) 142. 6 POMEROY qqr APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 6. Sales or neighborhoods were eliminated from the study when the variety of residential sales was too diverse to produce viable analyses a. Some rural neighborhoods do not include residential sales within similar age, style and/or size ranges b. Some neighborhoods did not. include a sufficient number of recent sales that could be used for a view — no view comparison The third.phase of this assignment including inserting the sale data into a series of Excel spreadsheets that could be used for limited statistical analysis to compare sales prices of residential properties that were within the viewshed of a cell tower compared to residential properties in the same neighborhoods that did not have views of the same cell tower. 7. The sale data included in the spreadsheets includes the location of the test tower site, identification of the town, and address, house age and style, sale date, sale price, house size and unit price (sale price divided by house size). 8. Unit price (sale price divided by house size) is the best unit of measure for this type of market study'because it reflects overall prices of the sale properties, evening out the fluctuations in size, rooms and associated features. 9. Average and median unit prices for each group of sales — SALES WITH VIEWS OF TOWERS and SALES WITHOUT VIEWS OF TOWERS — were then compared to measure the difference in unit prices paid by typical residential buyers in each neighborhood 10. Due to the diversity of sale data in some neighborhoods, multiple sets of comparisons could be completed to demonstrate the trends reflected by different house styles, different sub - neighborhoods, different age ranges, etc. 11. A table compiling all of the data analyzed in each cell tower location studied is compiled at the end of this section. Market Stud -- Price Analysis Tower sites within Onondaga and Madison Counties were identified that were located in suburban/village, rural/subdivision and rural/open space locations. Sales were researched for each location, with some of the rural locations dropped from the study due to insufficient numbers of sales and/or too great a diversity of property types among the sales found. Most of the cell towers that were utilized in this Market Study included residential subdivisions that were generally homogenous in age and house style, allowing for reliable comparisons of residential properties with and without tower views. The Buellville Tower site is in a relatively rural area with the dominant land usage being agricultural and forest, but with strip residential development along most roads and some residential subdivisions to the north. The following aerial photograph identifies three existing cell towers (red circles near the north -central, southwest and southeast areas) and the proposed Buellville Tower site (red circle near the center of the photograph). 7 POMEROY GAPPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Extent and Description of Market Data Research: This Market Study has included an investigation of recent improved residential sales exhibiting characteristics similar to the subject area. The data accumulated from this research was assimilated to project a range of value trends associated with improved residential properties located near cell tower sites. Our search identified the following cellular towers that were used as focus points for residential sales research. After reviewing these tower sites and their neighborhoods, several were acknowledged as having sufficient sales data that could be used for analysis purposes. Reasons for the elimination of some of the tower sites are referenced in this table. Cell Site Street Town Tower Tower Comments NameTTypeHeightCell tower sites with sufficient residential sale data or market stud North of village; visible from parts of some subdivisions; 4 sets of paired sales analyses; some houses Chittenango1326KinderhookRoadSullivanGuyed180ft. have views of a different tower which are included in the second aired sales analyses Near subdivisions; low height Howlett Hill 5077 Harris Road Onondaga Monopole 140 ft, powerline; 2 neighborhoods with 5 sets of paired sales analyses, I aired sale analysis with powerline Near water tower; homogeneous Peck Hill Peck Hill Road Dewitt Monopole 96 ft, residential area east of Peck Hill Road; I paired sale analysis Residential development to east; Radisson 8803 N. Entry Road Lysander Monopole 152 ft. partly influenced by golf course; 3 aired sales analyses Homogeneous residential development to north and east; 3 neighborhoods with 10 paired sales Lake Shore 6270 Route 3I Cicero Guyed 160 ft. analyses; I neighborhood along Thompson Road contaminated by existing powerline corridor and is not used POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Cell tower sites without sir !dent sale data or market stirdywithreasons or exclusions Lake Shore Manlius 1 Arkie Albanese Ave, Manlius Lattice 160 ft. Village location, mixed house styles Cazenovia 4466 Woodfield Rd. Cazenov is Guyed 185 ft. Rural Iocation, few sales' Pompey 7245 Sevier Rd. Pompey Lattice 180 ft. Rural location, few sales, cell tower dwarfed by TV 900f-fL tower, 9 additional towers close b Mandana Henco22 Road Skaneateles Lattice 195 fi. Rural location; few sales Last Manlius 5350 Townsend Rd. Manlius Lattice 145 ft. No recent sales with tower views Each of these tower sites has been inspected and the 'surrounding residential properties have been viewed from their respective road frontage for the purpose of determining if the residence had a view of the nearby cell tower structure. Adjustment for time is the only adjustment made to the comparable sales as this can be done from external sources and New York State Office of Real Property Services database records. As reported in the May 24, 2015 edition of The Post -Standard page H-3), the Greater Syracuse Association of Realtors data for Onondaga and Madison Counties shows an overall change in average unproved residential sale prices from $169,000 to $173,100 5,100 or 3% annual trend) for Onondaga County, and for Madison County a change from $189,200 to $170,300 (418,900 or -9.99% annual trend). Since the Buellville tower. site is in Onondaga County, and because most of the towers identified in this Market Study are located in Onondaga County, more weight is given to the time trend reflected by the Onondaga County sale data than the Madison County data. As a result, an overall rate of 2% per year is utilized as the annual time trend that will be applied to all sales in each of the paired sales analyses, trending each sale to the approximate date of this Market Study (May 1, 2015). Further adjustment would require additional data from field inspections not included in our Scope of Work. Ex lanation of Data Included in Paired Sales Tables: Following are a series of tables that lists groupings of single-family residential sales that don't have cell towers visible from the house locations (shown first) and similar single-family residential sales with nearby cell towers in sight shown second). Each table is entitled with the name of the tower (from the above table) with its address, tower height and tower type on the first line; and with the neighborhood and identification of the group of sales analyzed on the second line. The tables show the street number and street address. house style, year constructed, house size in square feet, sale date, sale price, time adjustment, time - adjusted sale price and price per square foot (time -adjusted sale price divided by house size). The average and median sizes, time -adjusted sale prices and unit prices are shown for each group of sales e.g. for paired sales analyses), using the first group (residential sales without tower views) as the base level for analysis, and comparing the average and median unit prices (sale price per square foot) of the first group to the second group (residential sales with tower views). The last column in each table shows the differences between the average and median unit prices of the sales without tower views (first group) compared to the respective average and median unit prices of the sales with tower view (second group). A negative number in the last column indicates that residential properties with tower views sell for less than similar residential properties without tower views. Contrarily, a positive number in the last column shows that residential properties with tower views sell for higher unit prices than residential properties without tower views. The numerical amount of each percentage number shows the magnitude of difference between the two groups of sales. 6 POMEROY'p` APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Chittenan o Tower Town of Sullivan Chittena a Tower -1325 Klnderbvol; Road, gu E Town of Sullivan-180-ft. ed tower Kinderhoak Bollyar - Rt. 5 Nei liharhvod -All Sales c.1960 Z014 2013 Z015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Study 51112015 treet Street House Style Year House Sale Date Sale price Time Ad . ale Price Price/ S>~ Dlff. F AI-J. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE ' 530 Tuscarora Rd Colonial 1989 1748 7/30/2014 148,900 1.5% 151,134 86.46 103 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1993 1824 6127/2013 157,000 3.7% 162 84Q 89.2$ 106 Richmond Cir. Colonial 2001 1816 913120I3 170 000 3.3% 175 661 96.73 1007 Margot Ave Ra'dRanch 1980 2324 7124120I4 150,500 1.5% I52$18 55.76 IOOS Rondo Ave Ra'd Ranch 1984 150$ 12/23/2013 126,000 2.7% 129 415 85.82 4013 Brick Kiln Dr Colonial 2013 2980 711212013 278,730 3.6% 288,848 96.93 AVERAGE 1993 2033 176 786 86.94 8% MEDIAN 1991 1820 157 8z9 587.87 0% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 102 13uxnin Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 1736 512712014 I70000 1.9% 173 145 99.74 103 Burnin Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 2224 9/19/2013 I$2 000 3.2% 187,897 84.49 111 Burnin Hollow Dr. Colonial 2008 224$ 5/1312013 215 S00 3.8% 224 7b5 99.96 112 Burning Hollow Dr, Colonial 2009 2224 12/9/2013 170,000 2.$% 174,743 78.57 300 Bialek Wa Colonial 2007 2048 10/15/2013 180,000 3.1% 185,580 8$.45 306 Bialck Way Colonial 2007 2224 10/2312013 187,000 3.1% 192,704 6.65 202 Horizon Dr. Colonial 2006 2530 5/31/2013 190000 3.9% 197,353 78.01 145 Na Dr. Colonial 2007 2748 611712013 235 000 3.8% 243,860 88.74 116 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1992 1952 1/23/2013 155100 4.6°10 162,219 83.10 132 Richmond Cir. Colonial 2004 2041 4l17/2014 17$ 000 2.1% 181702 89.03 1335 KinderhookRd Ra'dRanch 1960 1890 5128/2414 148,300 1.9% 151,044 79.92 802 Tuscarora Rd Ranch 1987 1464 4/22/2014 S85000 2.1% 86,743 59.25 925 Tuscarora. Rd Ra'd Ranch 1968 2200 5/26/2014 I54 9Q0 1.7% 157 SIS 71.60 4005 Brick Kiln Dr Ranch 2013 1704 5/17/2014 259,900 1.7% 264,422 155.18 4014 Brick Kiln Dr Ranch 2014 1704 8/14/2014 254 843 1.4% 258,462 151,68 4015 Brick Kiln Dr Ranch 2013 1896 7/30/2413 1250,000 3.5% 258825 136.51 AVERAGE 2001 2055 193 808 94.30 MEDIAN 2007 2070 186,738 87.55 POMEROY CAr APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Chittenan o Tower -1326 Kinderhook Road Town of Sullivan -180-it. 2uyed tower Kinderhook - Bolivar Rt. 5 Nele hborhood - All Two"-S Residence Style Sales c.1960-2014 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House Style Year House R Sale Date Sale rice Time Ad . Adj. ale Price 1 F o D1ff. e TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 530 Tuscarora Rd Colonial 1989 1748 7/30/2014 148,900 1.5% 151,134 86.46 103 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1993 1824 6/27/2013 157 000 3.7% 162 840 89.28 106 Richmond Cir. Colonial 2001 1816 9/3/2013 170,000 3.3% 175,661 96.73 1007 Margot Ave Raised Ranch 1980 2324 7/24/2014 150 500 1.5% 152 818 65.76 1005 Rondo Ave Raised Ranch 1984 1508 12/23/2013 126 000 2.7% 129 415 85.82 4013 1 Brick Kiln. Dr Colonial 2013 2980 1 7/12/2013 1 $278,730 3.6% 288.848 96.93 AVERAGE 1993 2033 5176 786 586.94 2°/a MEDIAN 1991 1820 S157 829 97.87 3% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 102 Buming Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 1736 5/27/2014 170,000 1.9% 173,145 99.74 103 Burning Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 2224 9/19/2013 182,000 3.2°/a 187,897 84.49 III Burning Hollow Dr. Colonial 2008 2248 6/13/2013 216.500 3.8% 224,705 99.96 112 Biuming Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 2224 12/9/2013 170,000 2.8% 174743 78.57 300 Bialek MLay Colonial 2007 2098 10/15/2013 180 000 3.1% 185,580 88.46 306 Bialek Way Colonial 2007 2224 10/23/2013 187 000 3.1% 192 704 86.65 202 Horizon Dr. Colonial 2006 2530 5/31/2013 190,000 3.9% 197,353 78.01 145 Na Dr. Colonial 2007 2748 6/17/2013 235 000 3.8% S243 860 98.74 116 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1992 1952 1/23/2013 155100 4.6% 162 219 83.10 132 Richmond Cir. Colonial 2004 2041 4/17/2014 178 000 2.1% 181,702 89.03 1335 Kinderhook Rd Raised Ranch 1960 1890 5/28/2014 148 300 1.9% 151,044 79.92 925 Tuscarora Rd Raised Ranch 1969 2200 6/26M14 154,900 1.7% 157,5IS 71.60 AVERAGE 1999 2176 1 186 039 85.49 MEDIAN 2007 2212 183,641 85.57 Chittenan o Tower -1326 Kinderhook Road Town of Sullivan-180-ft guyed tower Kinderhook- Bolivar - RL 5 Neil 7.bbiorhood -Raised Ranch S lc Sales c.1960.1984 2013 2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 511/2015 tree, Street House Style Xear Sale bate alle price Time le Price a1/6. Diff. SF Ad'. Adi.S3k Price F TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 1007 Margot Ave Raised Ranch 1980 2324 7/24/2014 150 500 1.5% 152,818 65.76 1005 Rondo Ave Raised Ranch 1984 1508 12/23/2013 126,000 2.70/a 129,415 85.82 AVERAGE 1982 1916 141116 73.65 2% MEDIAN 1982 1916 141116 75.79 0% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 1335 Kinderhook Rd Raised Ranch 1960 1890 5/28/2014 148,300 1.9% 151 044 79.92 925 Tuscarora Rd Raised Ranch 1968 2200 6/26/2014 154900 1.7% 157,518 71.60 AVERAGE 1964 2045 154 281 75.44 MEDIAN 1964 2045 154 281 75.76 11 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Chittenan o Tower -1326 Kinderhook Roa Town of Sullivan-180-ft. a d tower Kinderhook - Bolivar - Rt, 5 Nel hborhood - Colonial S le Sales c-1989-2009 2013-2015 Time Trend 2°/a Date of Market Stud 5/ l/2015 treet Street House Stvle I Year House I Sale Date Sale Pcice Time Ad'. Adi. Sale Price / DIMSFPrice5F TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 530 Tuscarora Rd Colonial 1989 1748 7/30/2014 S148,900 LM 151134 8fi.46 103 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1993 1824 6/27/2013 157,000 3.7% 162,840 89.28 106 Richmond Cir. Colonial 2001 1816 9/3/2013 l?0,000 3.3% 175 661 96.73 AVERAGE 1994 1796 163 212 90.98 4% MEDIAN 1993 1816 162 840 89.28 2% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 102 Burning Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 1736 5/27/2014 170000 1.9% 173,145 99.74 103 EIMpliag Hollow Dr. Colonial 2009 2224 9/19/2013 182,000 3.2% 187,897 84.49 III Buming Hollow Dr. Colonial 2008 2248 6/13/2013 216,500 3.8% 224 705 99.96 112 Burning Hollow -Dr. Colonial 2009 2224 12/9/2013 S170000 2.8% 174,743 79.57 300 Bialekyay Colonial 2007 2099 10/15/2013 180 000 3.1% 185 580 88A6 306 Bialek Way Colonial 2007 2224 10/23/2013 187 000 3.1% 192 704 86.65 202 Horizon Dr. Colonial 2006 2530 5/31/2013 190,000 3.9% 197 353 78.01 145 Naymik Dr. Colonial 2007 2748 6/17/2013 235,OD0 3.8% 243 860 88.74 116 Richmond Cir. Colonial 1992 1952 1/23/2013 155,100 4.6% 162219 83.10 132 ' Richmond Cir. Colonial 2004 2041 4/17/2014 178000 2.1% 181702 99.03 AVERAGE 2006 2203 192 391 87.35 MEDIAN 2007 2224 186 738 87.55 12 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. HowIeit Hill Tower. Town of Onondalra Howlett Hill Tower - 5077 Harris Road, Town of Oaonda a -150-foot monopole tower West Side Harris Road - All Sales c.19684990 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S le Year House SF Sale Date ale In Time Adi. Adi. Sale Price Price 1 SF Dli% TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 3994 Foothill Path Raised Ranch 1971 1725 12/27/2013 122 000 2.7% 125,282 72.63 3998 Foothill Path Colonial 1976 2104 9/12/2014 142,500 1.3% 144296 68.58 4876 Coventry Rd. Colonial 1996 1996 5/6/2013 185 500 4.0% 192 939 96.66 4896 Coventry Rd. Colonial 1968 2144 6/26/2013 202 500 3.7% 210 033 97.96 4908 Westview Dr. Colonial 1968 1908 3/25/2013 205000 4.3°% 213,713 112.01 4848 1 Pembridge Or Colonial 1975 2247 1 3/31/2014 175 000 2.20/6 178,798 79.57 4849 Pembrid eCir Colonial 1975 2157 1 4/18/2013 201,000 4.1% 209261 97.01 4850 GlindenLn. Colonial 1980 1481 8/2/2013 215.000 3.5% 222,547 150.27 3938 Stetson Circle Contemporary 1985 1829 7/19/2013 229 900 3.6°/a 238,153 130.21 AVERAGE 1977 1955 192 780 98.63 6% MEDIAN 1975 1996 209 61 97.01 12°10 TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5067 1 Sta ecoachRd Colonial 1990 2342 7/2/2014 261000 1.7% 265,333 113.29 4864 CapperfieldRd Contemporary 1986 2328 11/10/2014 182900 0.9% 183711 78.91 4888 Capperfield Rd Split Level 1990 1808 9/26/2014 152,000 1.20/a 153 794 85.06 AVERAGE 1985 2159 200 46 93.06 MEDIAN 1986 2328 183,711 385.06 Howlett Hill Tower - 5077 Harris Read Town of Onondaga -150 foot monopole tower West Side Harris Road Colonial House Style Sales c.1968-1990 2013-2015 Time Trend 20/0 Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House Style Year House Sale Date Sale Price Time Aj, Adj. Sale Price Price / SF Diff. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 3998 Foothill Path Colonial 1976 2104 9/12/2014 142,500 1.3% 144 96 68.58 4876 Coventry Rd. Colonial 1996 1996 5/6/2013 185 500 4.0% 192,939 96.66 4896 Coven Rd. Colonial 1968 2144 6/26/2013 202 500 3.7Vo 210,033 97.96 4909 Westview Dr. Colonial 1968 1908 3/25/2013 205,000 4.3% 213,713 112.01 4848 Pembrid eCir Colonial 1975 2247 3/31/2014 175,000 2.2% 178798 79.57 4849 Pembrid a Cir Colonial 1 1975 2157 4/1SY2013 201,000 4.1% 209 261 97.01 4850 Glinden Lu. Colonial 1980 1481 8/2/2013 215 000 3.5% 222 547 150.27 AVERAGE 1977 2005 195 41 97.71 MEDIAN 1975 2104 209 61 97.01 f17% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5067 Stagecoach Rd Colonial 1990 2342 7/2/2014 26.1,000 1.7% 265,333 113.29 AVERAGE 1 1990 2342 265 33 113.29 MEDIAN 1 1990 2342 265 33 113.29 13 POMEROY APPRAISALASSOCIATES, INC. Howlett Hill Tower - 5077 Harris Road Town of Onondaga -150-foot monopole tower West Side Harris Road -Colonial House Style Bales c.1985-199 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street I Street House Style Year House. 8F Sale Date S alg Price Time Adi. Sale Mee Price / NF L Diff. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 4876 Coventry Rd. Colonial 1996 1996 5/6/2013 I85 500 4.0% 192,939 96.66 3938 Stetson Cir Contemporary 1985 1829 7/19/2013 229,900 3.6% 238153 130.21 AVERAGE 1991 1913 215 546 112.70 10 MEDIAN 1991 1913 215 546 113A4 0% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5067 Stagecoach Rd Colonial 1990 2342 7/2/2014 261,000 1.7% 1 $265,333 1 $113.29 AVERAGE 1990 2342 265 33 3113.29 MEDIAN 1 1990 1..2342 265 333 113.29' Howlett Hill Tower - 5077 Harris Road, Town of Ononda a -150-foot mono ole tower East Side Harris Road - Ail Sales c.1965-200 2013 2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street reet House Style Year House ale Date Sale Price Time Add . Ad . Sale Price Price 1 Diff. SF SF TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5132 Harris Rd. Colonial 1961 2334 1/7/2013 181,000 4.7% 189,471 81.19 4168 Saint John Dr. Colonial 1965 1914 6/27/2014 196 000 1.7% 199 293 104.12 4175 Saint John Dr. Colonial 1965 2009 11/12/2013 167,000 2.9% 171910 85.61 4868 Burrstone Rd. Colonial 1980 1904 7/29/2013 193,000 3.5% 199 832 104.95 4274 Woodstock Way Colonial 1993 2356 5/22/2014 269,900 1.9% 274 974 116.71 4724 Rushmore Dr. Colonial 2007 2092 5/20/2014 280 000 1.9% 295 292 136.37 4725 Rushmore Dr. Colonial 2007 3498 11/26/2013 434,560 2.9% 446,988 127.78 4370 Barford Rd. Colonial 1969 2191 5/21/2014 I67,200 1.9% 170 360 77.75 4375 Barford Rd. Colonial 1970 1720 1/28/2014 136,000 2.5% 139,414 81.05 4906 Crestwod Ln. Colonial 1964 1888 5/31/2013 175 000 3.9% 181,773 96.28 4865 Manor Bill Dr. Colonial 1977 1616 7/2/2014 199 500 1.7% 202,812 125.50 4900 Manor Hill Dr. Colonial 1976 2100 9/2/2014 170,000 1.3% 172,244 82.02 4963 Manor Hill Dr. Colonial 1969 1680 3/9/2014 160,000 2.3% 163 664 1977 2100 215 233 9% MEDIAN' 1970 2908 189471 LS97.42AVERAGE 13% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5067 1 Stagecoach Rd Colonial 1990 2342 7/2/2014 261,000 1.7% 265 333 113.29 4864 2gpperfieldRd ContemporaryCantemporary1986 2328 11/10/2014 182,000 0.9% 183 711 78.91 4888 Lo erfieldRd Slit Level 1980 1808 9/26/2014 152,000 1.20/0 153 794 85.06 AVERAGE 1985 2159 200 46 93.06 MEDIAN 1986 2328 183 711 85.06 14 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Howlett Hill Tower - 6077 Harris Road To" of Onondaga -150-foot monopole tower But Side Harris Road - All Sales c.198 9931 2013 20.15 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House le Year House SF Sale Date Sale Price Time Ad'. Adj._Sol e_ Price Price SF Dif{ TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 4868 Bun -stone Rd. Colonial 1980 1904 7/29/2013 193,000 3.5% 199 832 104.95 4274 Woodstock Way Colonial 1993 2356 5/22/2014 269,900 1.9% 274,974 116.71 AVERAGE 1987 2130 237 403 111.46 20/6 MEDIAN 1987 2130 237 403 110.83 2% TOWERIN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5067 Stagecoach Rd Colonial 1 1990 1 2342 7/2/2014 1 $261000 1 1.7% 1 $265,333 113.29 AVERAGE 1 1990 2342 265 33 113.29 MEDIAN 1 1990 2342, 265 33 113.29 Alternative_ Stigma Analysis Howlett Hill Powerline As a check on the reasonableness of this Market Study, we also analyzed the differences in residential unit prices for a house in the same Howlett Hill subdivision that was adjacent to a powerline corridor to measure for the value impact of powerline on residential properties. The sales found applicable for this supplemental analysis are shown in the following table: Howlett Hill]Powerline - 4189 Saint Jota Ar. Town of Onondaga - Distribution Trausmivaan Line East Side Harris Road - Ala Was 2013 2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House Style Year House Site Date Sale Price Time Adi. Sale Prate Price/ SF Diff. SF Ad'. POWERLINE NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 5132 Harris Rd. Colonial 1961 2334 1/7/2013 18I 000 4.7% 189,471 81.18 4168 Saint John Dr. Colonial 1965 1914 6/27/2014 196,000 1.7% 199,293 104.12 4175 Saint John Dr. Colonial 1965 2008 11/12/2013 167000 2.9% 171,910 85.61 4868 Burrstone Rd. Colonial 1980 1904 7/29/2013 193 000 3.5% 199,832 104.95 4274 Woodstock Way Colonial 1993 2356 5/22/2014 269 900 1.9% 274 974 116.71 4724 Rushmore Dr. Colonial 2007 2092 5/20/2014 280 000 1.9% 285 292 136.37 4725 Rushmore Dr. Colonial 2007 3498 11/26/2013 434,560 2.9% 446,988 127.78 4370 Barford Rd. Colonial 1969 2191 5/21/2014 167 200 1.9% 170 360 S-77,75 4375 Barford Rd. Colonial 1970 1720 1/28/2014 I36,000 2.5% 139 414 81.05 4906 CrestwodLn. Colonial 1964 1888 5/31/2013 175,000 3.9% 181773 96.28 4865 Manor Hill Dr. Colonial 1977 1616 7/2/2014 199 500 1.7% 202,812 125.50 4900 Manor Hill Dr. Colonial 1976 2100 9/212014 170,000 1.3% 172,244 82,02 4963 Manor Hill Dr. Colonial 1968 1680 3/9/2014 160,000 2.3% 163664 97.42 AVERAGE 1977 2100 215 233 102A9 30% MEDIAN 1970 2008 S189 471 97.42 26°/a POWERLINE ADJACENT TO HOUSE 4189 Saint John Dr. Raised Ranch 1 1965 2282 3/2812014 160,000 2.2% 1 $163504 71.65 AVERAGE 1 1965 2282 1 $163 904 71.65 MEDIAN 1 1965 2282 1 1 1 $163 504 71.65 The negative difference reflected by this supplemental study is similar to what we have observed with powerline corridors adjacent to residences and supports the credibility of this Market Study analysis. 15 POMEROY qqr APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Peck Hill Tower Torun of DeWitt Peck Dill Tower - 5026 Peck Hill Road Town of DeWitt - 96-Foot Monopole Tower & Water Tank Peck Hill Road - Jamesville Road Nei hhorhood -All Sales c,19684990 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% f Date of Market Stud 5/ 112015 treat treat Horse Style aar House SF Sale Date Sale prjc Time Adi. Sale Price rrice-L q]? ML A& TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6362 Tull wood Ln. Colonial 2002 2915 9/17/2013 350 000 3.3% 361,410 123.99 4986 YeUowWoodPkwy Colonial 2004 2590 7/12/2013 S300,000 3.60/a 310 890 120.03 AVERAGE 2003 2753 336150 122.13 1% MEDIAN 2003 2753 336150 122.01 0% TOWER IN SIGHT OR HOUSE 5004 1 Yellow Wood PLaa Colonial 2003 2997 2/11/2014 347,000 2.4% 355 467 118.61 4997 Yellow Wood PIEU Colonial 2004 3412 6/21/2013 360,000 3.9% 373 500 109A7 5019 Yellow Wood Pkwy Colonial 2004 2975 3/29/2013 282,000 4.2% 293 900 98.79 6443 River Birchfield Rd. Colonial 2002 3010 6/14/2013 365 000 3.8% 378 834 125.86 6434 River Birchfield Rd. Colonial 2001 2786 8/9/2013 330 000 3.5% 341451 122.56 6421 Tuliwoad Ln. Colonial 2000 1 2757 4/10/2013 355 000 1 4.2% 369,769 134.12 5103 Hardstone Rd. Colonial 1999 2787 6/25/2013N$ 350, 000 00 3.7% 363,055 130.27 5126 Cmenbank Dr. Colonial 1999 3145 10/2/2014 1.2% 354,025 112.57 5135 GreenbankDr. Colonial 1999 Ml S/301201300 3.9% 386,396 108.20 5066 Azalea Dr. Colonial 2003 2347 7/28/201400 1.5% 326 862 139.27 5071 Azalea Dr. Colonial 2002 2568 4/4/201300 4.2% 359 456 139.97 AVERAGE 2001 2941 1 S354 792 120.62 MEDIAN 2002 1 1 2975 1 $359 456 122.56 Radisson Tower. Town of Lysander Radisson Tower - 9803 North Entry Roa Town of Radisson -152-Foot Monopal Tower & Golf Course North Entr r Road - Willett Parkway - Potter Raad Nel hborhood - All Sales c.19794932 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House Style Year House SF Sale ate SF ge Price Time Adi. Sale Price Price 5F Diff. Ad . TOWERNOT IN SIGHT Of HOUSE 8767 Vallin b Cir Townhouse 1 1979 1784 I1/1/2013 156 000 3.0% 160,680 90.07 8772 Radbum Dr. Colonial 1979 1976 9/22/2014 180,000 1.2% 182 178 92.20 8769 Vallingby Cir Townhouse 1979 1738 1/28/2013 135,000 4.6%. 141156 81.22 8742 Radbum Dr. Contomporary 1979 1560 5/29/2014 147,900 1.8% 150621 96.55 AVERAGE 1979 1765 158 659 389.92 20% MEDIAN 1979 1761 S155 651 91.13 6% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 8726 Radbum Dr. Colonial 1981 2280 1/2/2013 200,000 4.7% 209,420 91.85 9724 Radbum Dr. Colonial 1979 2016 10/29/2014 192 500 1.0% 194,425 96.44 8714 Radbum Dr. Contemporar y 1982 2080 10/24/2014 282,000 1.00/6 284 905 136.97 AVERAGE 1981 2125 229 583 108.02 MEDIAN 1981 2080 209 420 96.44 16 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCfATES, INC. Radisson Tower - 8803 North En Road Town of Radisson -152-Foot Monopole Tower & Golf Course ' North Entry Road - Willett Parkway - Potter Road Neighborhood - Colonial Style Sales (c.1979-1981) 2013-2015 Time Trend 2°/a Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S e Year House SF ale Date Sale Price Time Ad . Adj. Sale Price price Diff. SF TOWER NOTIN SIGHT OF HOUSE 8772 Radburn,Dr. Colonial 1979 1976 9/22/2014 180000 1.2°/a 1 $182,178 92.20 AVERAGE 1979 1 1976 182178 S92.20 2% MEDIAN 1979 1976 182178 92.20 20/- TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 8726 Radburn Dr. Colonial 1981 2280 1/2/2013 200,000 4.7% 209,420 591.85 8724 RadburnDr. Colonial 1979 2016 10/29/2014 192500 1.0% 194,425 96.44 AVERAGE 1990 2148 201923 94.00 MEDIAN 1990 2148 201923 94.15 Radisson Tower - 8903 North Entry Road Town of Radisson -152Foot Monopole 'dower & Golf Course North Entry Road - Wlliett Parkway - Potter Road Neighborhood - Contemporary Style Sales (c.1979-1982) 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Study 5/112015 Street Street EGA ae S le Year House F Sale bate 8.1e Price Tien_ Adi, Sale. Price Price 1 SF u Diff. Adj. TOWER NOT,IN SIGRT OF HOUSE 8742 RadburnDr. Conlempormy 1979 1560 5/29/2014 147,900 1.8% 150621 96.55 AVERAGE 1979 1560 150621 96.65 42% MEDIAN 1979 1560 150 621 96.55 42% TOWER W SIGHT OF HOUSE 8714 Radburn Dr. ContempoLug 1982 2080 10/24/2014 282 000 1.0% 284,905 136.97 AVERAGE 1982 2080 284 05 136.97 MEDIAN 1 1982 1 2090 284 05 136.97 17 POMEROYAPPRAISM-ASSOCEATES, INC. Lake Shore Tower, Town of Cicero Like Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero-160Foot Gn ed Tower WS Button Road -Rt. 31- Lakeshore Road Nei hborhood - AllSales c.1979.199 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street House Street House Stvle Year SF Sale Date price T1me Ad . Sale price Price / SR ifi: d . TONMRNOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6216 Wynmpor Dr. Split Level 1985 1620 8/28/2013 136,400 3.4a/o 140 997 87.03 6228 W oor Dr. Ra'd Ranch 1985 1609 9/9/2014 127 440 1.3% 129 071 90.27 8452 Ba kzid eRd. S IitLevel 1979 1568 11/18/2014 138,500 0.9% 139733 89.12 8453 Ba brid eRd. Colonial 1983 1722 5/30/2013 140 000 3.9% 145 418 84.45 8485 Ba brid eRd. Slit Level 1979 1520 4/3/2013 127,000 4.20/a 132,334 87,06' 9488 Ba brid a Rd. Slit Level 1983 IS68 8/28/2013 S125,000 3.4% 129 213 94.45 8496 Ba brid a Rd. Split Level 1989 1968 2/28/2014 100 000 2.3% 102,340 74.81 8504 Ba brid oRd. Colonial 1980 1704 12/24/2013 119927 2.7% 123,177 72.29 9458 Torchwood Ln. Slit Level 1986 1428 12/8/2014 119 500 0.8% 120,432 84.34 8466 Torchwood Ln. Split Level 1986 1428 7/31/2013 127 500 3.5% 132,001 92.44 8478 Torchwood Ln. Split Level 1983 1568 12/27/2013 125,000 2.7% 128,363 91.86 6170 pinion Dr. Slit Level 1980 1520 10/7/2013 I37,000 3.1% 141302 92.96 6153 Palisades Dr. Ra'd Ranch 1987 1820 6/18/2014 130 000 1.7% 132,249 72.66 6128 Palisades Dr. 5 lit Level 1987 1444 7/1/2013 127 900 3.7% 132,620 91.84 6136 Palisades Dr. Ra'd Ranch 1986 1800 10/16/2014 126 500 1.1% 127,854 71.03 6252 Tartan Dr. S Ra'd Ranch 1996 1460 5/24/2013 139 900 3.9% 145,370 99.57 6247 Tartan. Dr. S Ra'd Ranch. 1987 1368 2/12/2014 135 000 2.4% 13$ 281 101,08 AVERAGE 1985 1548 131809 99.19 8iA MEDIAN 1935 1520 132 249 87.03 10% TORE&IN SIGHT OF HOUSE. 449 1 Chinks in Cir Split Level 1984 1368 8/21/2014 123,000 1.4% 124 697 91.15 6190 W or Dr. SpilitLevel. 1983 1754 9/15/2014 S136,300 1,20/a 137 990 78.67 6198 Wynmoor Dr, Ra'dRauch 1984 1660 10/21/2013 110 000 3.1°% 113 377 68.30 AVERAGE 1984 1594 1R,355 S78.64 MEDIAN 1984 1660 124 697 78.67 18 POMEROY APPRAISAL. ASSOCIATES, INC. Lake Shore Tower - b2T1! NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero -1fi0 Root Guyed X9 Tower PV/S Button Road Rt. 31- Lakeshore Road Nei borhood -Raised Ranch S Ie Sales e.1979-19 2013-2415 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S le Year House 5F 5ale Date s Price Tlme A Ad . Sale rice Price Diff. F TOWERNOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE' 6216 W oorDr. Split Level 1985 1620 8/28/2013 136400 3.4% 140997 97.03 8485 Ba brid oRd Split Level 1979 1520 4/3/2013 127,000 4.2% 5132334 87.06 5488 Baybridge Rd S LitLevel 1983 1368 8I28120I3 1250D0 3.4% 129,213 94.45 8496 Ba brid a Rd Split Level I989 1368 2128/2014 100 000 2.3% 102 340 74.81 8458 Toxchwood Ln. Slit Level 1986 1428 12/8/2014 S119 500 0.8% 120 432 84.34 8466 TorehwoodLn. SIitLevel 1986 1428 7/31120I3 127,500 3.5% 132,001 92.44 847$ TorchwoodLn, Slit Level 1983 1568 12/27/2413 125000 2.7% 128,363 81.86 6170 Pinion Dr. Split Level 1980 1520 10/7/2013 137000 3.1% 141,302 92.96 6128 Palisades Dr. Split Level 1987 1444 7/112013 127 900 3.7% I32 62D 91.84 AVERAGE 1984 1474 128 844 S87.42 4% MEDIAN 1985 1444 S132 001 87.06 2% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 8449 Chinks inCir Slit Level 1984 1368 8121/2014 123,000 1.4% 124697 91.15 6190 W oor Dr. Slit Level 1983 1754 9/15/2014 136 300 1.2% 137,990 78.67 AVERAGE 1984 1561 131 44 84.14 MEDIAN 1984 1561 5131344 84,91 Lake Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero-160-i'oot Guyed Tower EIS Button Road - Rt. 31-Lakeshore Read Nel hborhoad All Sales c.1979-199 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House Style Year House SF ale Date Sale Price lime Ad .Sale rice Price 1 SF Diff. Ad'. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 8460 Flat Car Cir. Raised Ranch 1993 1660 8/23/2013 145 000 3.4% 149 930 90.32 6293 Locomotive Ln. Slit Level 1991 1304 7/1/2013 123 000 3.7% 127 539 97.81 6394 Jane Ls. Ranch 2011 1500 12/1912013 193,000 2.7% S198,288 132.19 6306 Jane Ln. Ranch 1960 990 4/30/2014 92,000 2.4% 93,840 94.79 6303 WoodertonPa Conteary mo1990 2314 1111012014 194,500 0.9% 196,328 84.84 AVERAGE 1989 1554 153185 98.60 11% MEDIAN 1991 1500 149 930 94.79 8% TOWLR IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6303 Tanker Txl Slit Level 1993 1471 8/12/2013 124,500 3.5% 128,808 87.56 AVERAGIC 1993 1471 128 808 87.56 MEDIAN 1993 1471 128 808 S87.56 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Lake Shore rower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero - 160Raat Guyed 20 Tower EIS Button Road - Rt. 31- -Lakeshore Road Net hhorhoad - ory Style Sales c.1979-199 2013 20l5 Time Trend 2% Date, of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S le Year House SF Sale Date Sate Price Time Adj. Sale•, Price rice / Diff. Ad . F TOWER NOT, IN SIGHT OF HOUSE .. 8460 Flat Car Cir, Raised stanch 1993 1660 812312013 145 000 3.4% 149,930 90.32 6293 Locomotive Ln. Slit Level I991 1304 7/1/2013 123 000 3.7% 127 539 97.81 6303 WoodertonPa Contemporary 1990 2314 11/10/2014 194,500 0.9% 196,328 84.84 AVERAGE 1991 1759 157 932 59.77 2% MEDIAN 1991 1660 149 930 90.32 3% TOWER IN SIGHT.OB HOUSE 6303 TankerTrl Slit Level 1993 1471 8/12/2013 124500 3.5°10 128,808 87.56 AVERAGE 1993 1471 5128 808 87.56 MEDIAN 1993 1471 128808 587.56 Lake Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero -160-Foot Guyed Tower SIS Rt. 31 Nei boyhood -Alt Sties c.19fi3 2013 2013 Z015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street treet House S le Year House F Sale Date Sale Price Time Adi. Sale Price Price SF fs Dill. d . TOWERNOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6257 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 2904 4/18/2013 259,000 4.1% 269,645 92.85 6280 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 3178 7/31/2013 324,950 3.5% 336,421 105.86 6347 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2212 6110/2013 230,000 3.8% 238,763 107.94 6319 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2618 4/26/2013 240 000 4.1% 244,768 95.40 6325 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 1968 6/21/2013 3.8% 225138 114.40 6295 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2002 1970 9126/2014 1.2% 237,267 120.44 6317 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2003 1688 5/22/2013 t17O 3.9% 225506 133.59 6455 Electric ltaiiwa Ranch 2002 3200 ZIZ7/2014 6%$353,9Di$110.59 8421 Aners Clb Colonial 2003 2878 Sllfxpl3 4.D% 34292 118.93 838I Aners Clb Colonial 2004 2668 6I7/20I3 3.8% 295,916 110.91 AVERAGE 2003 2528 277 62 109.74 3% MEDIAN 2003 2643 S259 706 110.75 4% TOWER IN SIGHT OR HOUSE 6381 Electric RaiIwa Colonial 2002 2056 11/4/2014 234 000 1.0% 236 70 114.92 6384 Electric Railway Colonial 2002 1970 7/22/2014 237,000 1.6% 240,674 122.17 6385 Electric Railway Colonial 2004 2018 6110/2014 212 500 1.8% 216 283 107.18 8329 An ers Clb Colonial 2004 2992 10/23/2013 294 000 3.1% 302 967 101.26 8392 Cicero Spa a Colonial 2004 2472 9/I912014 210 000 1.2% 212 562 85.99 8376 Cicero Sta a Colonial 2003 2126 11/2612014 263,000 0.9% 265,236 124.76 8305 SaadraAve Slit Level 1963 1416 5l17/2013 119,000 4.0% 123,761 87.36 8322 Notes Lane Colonial 2005 2326 7/9/2013 232 000 3.7% 240468 143.38 8345 Notes Lane Colonial 2013 2508 5/6/2013 330,000 4,0% 343,233 136.86 8337 Notes Lane Ranch 2013 1796 8/712013 203 00 3.5% 211,016 1I7.49 8325 Notes Land Ranch 2005 1680 12/8/2014 237,000 0,8% 238 849 142.17 AVERAGE 2002 2124 239 205 5112.64 MEDIAN 2004 2056 S238 $49 114.92 POMEROY qq6r APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Like Shore Tower - 6270 NXS Route 37 Town of Cicero-16D-Faat Cu ed Tower SI5 Rt. 31 Nel borhaod -All Sales c.2002 Z413 2013 Z015 Time Trend Z°!o Date of Market Stud 5/112015 Street Street House Style House Year SF ale Date Stele Price Time, Ad . Adi. Sale Price Price / SR Riff. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OR HOUSE 6257 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 2904 411 B/2013 259 OOO 4.1% 269 645 92.85 62$0 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 3178 7/31/2013 324 950 3.5% 336 421 105.86 6307 Matilda a Colonial 2003 2212 6/10/2013 230,000 3.8% 238,763 107.94 6319 Matilda gap Colonial 2003 2618 4/2612013 240 000 4.1% 249 768 95.4D 6325 Matiida Gage Colonial 2003 1968 6/2112013 217 000 3.8% 225138 114.40 6295 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2002 1970 9/26/2014 234,500 1.2% 237,267 120.44 6317 AsaF.astwoad Rauch 2003 1688 5/22/2013 217,000 3.9% 225,506 133.59 6455 lceicic Railwa Ranch 2002 3200 1/17/2014 345,000 2.6% 353 901 i 10.59 8421 An era Clb Colonial 2003 287$ 5/1013 329,0OD 4.0% 342 292 1I$.93 8381 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 266$ 6/7/2013 285 ODD 3.8% 295 916 110.91 AVERAGE 2003 2528 277 462 109.74 4% MEDIAN 2003 2643 259 706 110.75 5% TOWER IN SIGg'I` OF HOUSE . 6381 Electric Railwa Colonial 2002 2056 1114/2014 234,000 1.0% 236,270 114.92 6384 Electric I2silwa Colonial 2002 1970 7/22/2014 237,000 1.6% 240 674 122.17 6385 Electric Railwa Colonial 2044 2018 6/1012014 212,500 1.$% 216 283 107.18 8329 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 2992 10/23/2013 294 000 3.1% 302 967 101.26 8392 Cicero Stage Colonial 2004 2472 9/19/2014 210,000 1.2% 212562 5.99 8376 Cicero Stage Colonial 2003 2126 11/2612014 263 000 0.9°1° 265 236 124.76 8322 Notes Lane Colonial 2405 2326 7/9/2013 232 000 3.7% 240468 103.38 8345 Notes Lane Colonial 2013 2508 5/612013 330 OOO 4.0% 343,233 136.86 8337 NateaLaue Rauch 2013 1796 8/7/2D13 203900 3.5% 211,016 117.49 8325 Notes Lane Ranch 2005 1680 1218/2014 237,000 4,8% 238 849 142.17 AVERAGE 2006 2194 5250 756 3114.27 MEDIAN 2604 2091 239 658 S116.20 POMEROYQ7X- APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. LRke Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero -160-Foot Guyed Tower S/S Rt: 31 Neighborhood - Sales a2002-200 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market SWy 5/1/2015 Street I Street Hnsg,styte Year House SF Sale Date Sale rice Time. Ad . Ad . Sale Pr1c Price I SF DI TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6257 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 2904 4/18/2013 259000 4.1% 269,645 92.85 6280 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 3178 7/31/2013 324 950 3.5% 336 421 105.86 6307 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2212 6/10/2013 230,000 3.8% 238 763 107.94 6319 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2618 4/26/2013 240.000 4.1% 249 768 95.40 6325 Matilda Page Colonial 2003 1968 6/21/2013 217 000 3.8% 225,138 114A0 6295 AsaEastwood Ranch 2002 1970 9/26/2014 234,500 1.20/6 257,267 120.44 6317 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2003 1688 5/22/2013 217,000 3,9% 225,506 133.59 6455 Electric Railway Ranch 2002 3200 1/17/2014 345000 2.6% 353 901 110.59 9421' Anglers Clb Colonial 2003 2878 5/1/2013 329 000 4.0% 342 92 118.93 8381 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 2668 6/7/2013 285 000 3.8°% 295 916 110.91 AVERAGE 2003 2528 S277462 S109.74 1% MEDIAN 2003 2643 259 706 8110.75 0% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6381 Electric RaUway Colonial 2002 2056 11/4/2014 234,000 1.0% 236 270 114.92 6384 Electric Railwa Colonial 2002 1970 7/22/2014 237 000 1.6% 240 674 122.17 6385 Electric Railway Colonial 2004 2018 6/10/2014 212,500 1.8% 216,283 107.18 8329 Anslars Clb Colonial 2004 2992 10/23/2013 294 000 3.1% 302 967 101.26 8392 Cicero Sta a Colonial 2004 2472 9/19/2014 210 000 1.20/6 212 562 85.99 8376 Cicero Stage Colonial 2003 2126 11/26/2014 263 000 0.9% 265,236 124.76 8322 Nates Lane Colonial 2005 2326 7/9/20I3 232000 3.7% 240,468 103.38 8325 Nates Lane Ranch 2005 1680 12/8/2014 237,000 0,8% 238,849 142.17 AVERAGE 2004 2205 244163 110.73 MEDIAN 2004 2091 239 658 111.05 22 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Lake Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero-160-Foot Guyed Tower S/S Rt.31 Nei hborhood - Colonial Style Sales c.20022013 2013 2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S le year House 5F Sale Date Sale rice Time . Ad . Ad Price Price I SF Din TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE ' 6257 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 2904 4/18/2013 259,000 4.1% 269 645 92.85 6280 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 3178 7/31/2013 324,950 3.5% 336421 105.86 6307 MatildaGa e_ Colonial 2003 2212 6/10/2013 S230,00D 3.9% 238,763 107.94 6319 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2619 4126/201S 240 000 4.1"% 249 768 95.40 6325 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 1969 6/21/2D13 217 000 3.8% 225138 114.40 8421 1 Anglers Clb Colonial 2003 2878 5/1/2013 329 000 4.0% 342 292 1 $119.93 8381 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 2668 6/7/2013 285,000 3.8% 295,916 110.91 AVERAGE 2003 2632 279 706 106.26 57/o 11EDIAN 2003 2668 5269 645 107.94 3% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6381 Electric Railway Colonial 2002 2056 11/4/2014 234,000 1.0% 236 270 114.92 6384 Electric Railway Colonial 2002 1970 7/22/2014 237 000 1.6% 240 674 122.17 6385 Electric Railway Colonial 2004 2018 6110/2014 212 500 1.8% 216 283 107.18 8329 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 2992 10/23/2013 294,000 3.1% 302,967 101.26 8392 Cicero Sta a Colonial 2004 2472 9/19/2014 210 000 1.2% 212,562 85.99 8376 Cicero Stage Colonial 2003 2126 11/26/2014 263 000 0.9% 265,236 124.76 8322 Nates Lane Colonial 2005 2326 7/9/2013 232 000 3.7% 240 468 103.38 8345 Nates Lane Colonial 2013 2509 5/6/2013 330,000 4.0% 343 33 136.86 AVERAGE 2005 2309 257 11 111.42 MEDIAN 2004 2226 240 571 111.05 23 POMEROY cAr APPRAISAL ASSOC IATES, INC. Lake Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero - 160Root Guyed Tower SIS Rt. 31 Net hborhood Coloxutal style Sales c.2002-200 2013-2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 treet Street Dose S le Year House ale Bate Sale Price Time. Adf. Safe Prue Price F y Biff. Adj. TOWER NOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE' 6257 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 2904 4/18/2013 259,000 4.1% 269,645 92.85 6280 Addison Loomis Colonial 2002 3178 7/31/2013 324,950 3.5% 336,421 105.86 6307 Matilda Gage Colonial 2003 2212 6/10/2013 • 230,000 3.8% 238 763 107.94 6319 Matilda Gage Colonial 2603 2618 4/26/2013 240 000 4.1% 249,768 95.40 6325 Matilda Ga a Colonial 2003 1968 6/21/2013 217 000 3.8% 225,138 114,40 8421 Anglers Clb Colonial 2003 2978 5/l/2013 329 000 4.0% 342 292 118.93 8381 Anglers Clb Colonial 2004 2669 6/7/2013 285 000 3.8% 295 16 110.91 AVERAGE 2003 2632 279 7Q6 106.26 1 % MEDIAN 2403 2668 269 645 10734 1% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6381 Electric RaiLv!LaX Colonial 2002 2056 11/4/2014 234,000 1.0% 236 770 114.92 6384 Electric Railway Colonial 2002 1970 7/22/2014 237,000 1.6% 240 674 122.I7 6385 Electric Railway Colonial 2004 2018 6/10/2014 212 500 1.8% 216 283 107.18 8329 An lcrs Clb Colonial 2004 2992 10/23/2013 294,000 3.1% 302 967 101.26 8392 Cicero Stage Colonial 2004 2472 9/19/2014 210,000 1.2% 212 562 85.99 8376 Cicero Sia a Colonial 2003 2126 11/26/2014 263 000 0.9% 265,236 124.76 8322 Nates Lane Colonial 2005 2326 7/9/2013 232 000 3.7% 240 468 103.38 AVERAGE 2003 2280 244,923 107A2 MEDIAN 2004 2126 S240 468 107.18 Lake Shore Tower - 6270 NYS Route 31 Town of Cicero - 160Foot Guyed Tower S/S RL 31 Nei hborhood - Ranch Style Sales c.2002-2013 2013 2015 Time Trend 2% Date of Market Stud 5/1/2015 Street Street House S 1e Year House SF Sale bate Sale Price Time Ad . Sale Price Price / 0/ 0 SF Diff. Adj. TOWERNOT IN SIGHT OF HOUSE 6295 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2002 1970 9/26/2014 234,500 1.2% 237 67 120.44 6317 Asa Eastwood Ranch 2003 1688 5/22/2013 217,000 3.9% 225,506 133.59 6455 Electric Railway Ranch 2002 3200 1/17/2014 345 000 2.6% 353,901 110.59 AVERAGE 2002 2286 272 225 119.08 9% MEDIAN 2002 1970 237 67 1.20.44 8% TOWER IN SIGHT OF HOUS11 . 8337 Nates Lane Ranch 13 1796 8/7/2013 203 900 3.5°% 211016 117.49 8325 Nates Lane Ranch 05 t2009 168012/8/2014 237,000 0,8% 238 849 142.17 AVERAGE 1738 224 32 129.42 MEDIAN 2009 1738 224 32 129.83 24 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Qaaoou Summary of Paired Sales Grouoines: The following table summarizes the results of each set of paired sales' comparisons, including both groups of "paired" sales and single -sale match ups. This table includes data from all of the preceding Market Data tables, including the Tower name, Tower Type, Neighborhood (sub -set of sales in the vicinity of each designated Tower), House Style, House Age (shown by year of construction), and the Average and Median Prices Per Square Foot (Time - Adjusted Sale Price divided by House Square Foot) - all as shown in the previous tables: Tower Tower Type Nelshriorhood House Style House A¢e Aver a Median SISFSISF Chittenango Guyed Kinderhook-Bolivar-Rt. 5 Mixed 1960 2014 8% 00/0 Kinderhook Bolivar Two -Story 1960 2014 22% 3% Kinderhook-Bolivar Rt. 5 Raised Ranch 1960-1984 2/0 0% Kinderhook Bolivar Rt. 5 Colonial 1989-2002 4% 21D/o Howlett Hill Monopole W/S Harris Road Mixed 1968-1990 6% 12% WIS Harris Road Colonial 1968-1990 16% 17% W/S Harris Road Colonial 1995-1996 1% 0% E/S Harris Road Mixed 1965-2007 9% 13% EIS Harris Road Mixed 1980-1993 2% 2% Peck Hi1l Monopole Peck Hill-Jamesville Roads Mixed 1968-1990 1% 0% Radisson Monopole N En -Willet P -Potter Mixed 1979-1982 20% 6% N En -Willet P -Potter Colonial 1979-1981 2% 2% N Entry -Will P -Potter Contem or 1979-1982 42% 420/a Lake Shore Guyed W/S Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore Mixed 1979-1996 8% 10% W/S Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore Raised Ranch 1979-1987 4% 2% E/S Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore Mixed 1979-1996 11% 8% EIS Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore 2-Story 1979-1996 20/6 3% SIS Rt. 31 Mixed 1963-201-3 3% 4% SIS Rt. 31 Mixed 2002-2013 4/0 5 /o SIS Rt. 31 Mixed 2002-2005 1% 0% SIS Rt. 31 Colonial 2002-2013 5% 3% SIS Rt. 31 Colonial 1 2002-2005 1% 1% SIS Rt. 31 Ranch 2002-2013 9% 8% AVERAGE 3% 2% MEDIAN 1% 0% The average price per square foot calculations for each analysis range from an 11% discount from the residential sales without tower views compared to residential sale prices of tower -view properties to a 42% positive difference, with overall average and median positive differences of 3% and 2%, respectively. These overall differences show that buyers pay slightly higher prices for residential properties that have cell towers within their respective viewsheds compared to residences in the same neighborhoods without cell tower views. The median price per square foot calculations for each analysis range from a 13% discount from residential sales without tower views compared to residential sale prices of tower -view properties to a 42% positive difference, with overall average and median differences of 1% and 0%, respectively. In summary, the median unit prices show that buyers pay about the same to a slightly higher price for residences with cell tower views compared to residences in the same neighborhood without cell tower views 25 POMEROYCCn APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. We recognize that these comparisons include analyses with mixed house styles which could tend to mis-represent actual market trends for residential sales with views of cell towers. Therefore, we removed the sale comparisons involving mixed house styles, with the following table showing matched pair compariisons with Colonial, Raised Ranch„ Contemporary and Two -Story house styles. Tower Tower Type Neighborhood House Style House Age AvgE%ge S SF Median SF Chittenango Guyed Kinderhook-Bolivar Two-story 1960-2014 2% 3% Kiuderhook-Bolivar Rt. 5 Raised Ranch 1960-1984 2% 0% Kinderhook-Bolivar-Rt.5 Colonial 1989-2002 4% 2% W/S Harris Road Colonial 1968-1990 16% 17% Howlett Hill Monopole WIS Harris Road Colonial 1965-1996 1% 0% Radisson Monopole N Entry -Willa P -Potter Colonial 1979-1981 2% 20/0 N En -Willet P -Potter Contemporary 1979-1982 42% 42% W/S Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore Raised Ranch 1979-1987 4% 2% Lake Shore Guyed EIS Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore 2-Story 1979-1996 2% 3% S/S Rt. 31 Colonial 2002-2013 5% 3% S/S Rt. 31 Colonial 2002 2005 1% 1% S/S Rt. 31 Ranch 2002-2013' 9% 8% AVERAGE 601. 5% MEDIAN 1 2% 0% The one paired sale comparison for the Contemporary house style included a single pair of house sales, and represented a large positive change from the house without a cell tower view compared to the house with a cell tower view. Due to the magnitude of this single comparison, it is also eliminated from the final summary table, resulting in the following: Tower Tower Typa Neighborhood House Style House AQe Average Median SF S/SF Chittenango Guyed Kinderhook-Bolivar Two-sto 1960-2014 2% 3% Kinderhook-Bolivar-Rt. 5 Raised Ranch 1960-1984 20/0 0% Kinderhook-Bolivar-Rt.5 Colonial 1989-2002 49/o 2% W/S Harris Road Colonial 1968-1990 16% 17% Howlett Hill Monopole W/S Harris Road Colonial 1985-1996 1% 0% Radisson Monopole N Era -Willet P Potter Colonial 1979-1991 2% 2% W/S Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore Raised Ranch 1979-1987 10/a 20/a Lake Shore Guyed EIS Button-Rt. 31-Lakeshore 2-Story 1979-1996 2% 3% SIS Rt. 31 Colonial 2002-2013 5% 3% SIS Rt. 31 Colonial 2002-2005 1% 1% SIS Rt. 31 Ranch 2002-2013 9% 8% AVERAGE 2% 2% MEDIAN 1% Oo/a The average price per square foot calculations derived from the analyses in the above table range from a 4% discount in unit prices for residences without tower views to the unit prices of residences with tower views up to a 16% positive difference in unit prices for residences with tower views. The overall average and median positive differences from this summary are 2% and 2%, respectively, showing that buyers are paying slightly higher prices for residences with cell tower views compared to similar residences in the same neighborhoods that lack tower views. W POMEROY Q---011 APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. The median price per square foot calculations resulting from the analyses in the last table range from a 3% discount in unit prices for residences without tower views compared to the unit prices of residences with tower views up to a 17% positive difference in unit prices for residences with tower views. The overall average and median differences from this summary are 1% and 0%, respectively, showing that buyers are paying about the same price to slightly higher prices for residences with cell tower views compared to similar residences in the same neighborhoods that lack tower views. These twenty-three sets of paired sales analyses, and the eleven sets of paired sales analyses of single house styles, show that buyers are paying about the same to slightly higher prices for residences with cell tower views compared to similar residences without tower views in the same neighborhoods. As a result of this Market Study, it is our opinion that residential properties do not suffer from a stigma or adverse affect when located within the viewshed of a cell tower. We recognize that the real estate market is imprecise. However, while there are some variations in the paired sales data analysis contained in this Market Study, the overwhelming definitive conclusion is that the presence of a neighboring cell tower does not result in a loss of market value. This Market Study report strongly shows that a cell tower has no adverse influence in the overall price paid for improved residential property. We conclude that significant market data exists which confirms that cell towers do not negatively impact improved residential sale prices. We acknowledge that a stigma can be present in certain sales just as a kitchen that is an undesirable color or a house with undersized rooms. Our experience in other studies has also shown that initial "stigma" impacts tend to vanish after a relatively short period of time has passed and the "presence" of a tower starts blending in with the rest of the landscape. This report has analyzed several sets of paired sales within and outside the view of a cell tower. Our conclusion from analysis of this market data clearly shows that cell towers do not negatively affect nearby residential values. Note: as stated previously, our research is based on a review of area sale prices without making adjustments for any significant differences other than time / market conditions. This appraisal consulting report / market study is subject to revision if significant physical changes (e.g. added improvements, decrease in physical condition, change in area development potential) have occurred to any subject property and/or if a detailed investigation of current comparable sales is conducted and utilized in a full appraisal analysis. If you have any questions, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. O'nJR-4 Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-0060 For his help in the development of the factual material and analyses of this report, I hereby acknowledge the assistance of William H. Benedict, NYS Real Estate Appraiser Assistant #48-46541. 27 POMEROY 9 APPRAISAL. ASSOCIATES, INC. CERTIFICATION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions, limiting conditions, and legal instructions, and are the personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions of the appraisers. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. We have not performed services as appraisers, for the property that is the subject of this report, within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. The compensation received by the appraiser for the appraisal is not contingent on the analyses, opinions, or conclusions reached or reported. Our compensation for completing this assigmnent is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value, or direction in value, that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. The appraisal was made and the appraisal report prepared in conformity with the Appraisal Foundation's Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The appraisers have made a personal inspection of the property appraised from the street and that the property owner, or his/her designated representative, was given the opportunity to accompany the appraisers on the property inspection. For their help in the development of the factual material and analyses of this report, I hereby acknowledge the assistance of William H. Benedict, NYS Real Estate Appraiser Assistant #48-46541. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report Donald A. Fisher, MAI, ARA has completed the requirements under the continuing education programs of the Appraisal Institute, the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, and the State of New York. Past experience includes appraisals of this property type and purpose. We are not responsible for the electronic sharing, or sharing in any form, of this appraisal report. The client should note that the report prepared for this assignment is an opinion of value by the appraisers; that a Court, State or Federal agency that reviews this,report may disagree with or reject this opinion; and that the appraiser cannot guarantee the outcome of, or be financially responsible to the client for, any taxes, penalties or interest imposed that may result from such review. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report as well as the control cell tower sites used for the paired sales analyses referenced in this Market Study. Our conclusion from the market data analyzed in this Market Study is that cell towers do not adversely affect the values of nearby residential properties. Date of Preparation: May 2015 DONALD A. FISBER, M, ARA NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-0060 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. POMEROY C APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. DEFINITIONS & TERMINOLOGY Appraisal Terris: Arm's Length Transaction: "A transaction between unrelated parties who are each acting in his or her own best interest "2 As Is Market Value: "The estimate of the market value of real property in its current physical condition, use, and zoning as of the appraisal date. "3 Bundle Of Rights Theory: "The concept that compares property ownership to a bundle of sticks with each stick representing a distinct and separate right of the property owner, e.g., the right to use real estate, to sell it, to lease it, to give it away, or to choose to exercise all or none of these rights." 4 Economic Unit: 1. A portion of a larger (parent) parcel, vacant or improved, that can be described and valued as a separate and independent parcel. Physical characteristics such as location, access, size, shape, existing improvements, and current use are considered when identifying an economic unit. The economic unit should reflect marketability characteristics similar to other properties in the market area. In appraisal, the identification of economic units is essential in highest and best use analysis of a property. 2. A combination ofparcels in which land and improvements are used for mutual economic benefit. An economic unit may comprise properties that are neither contiguous nor owned by the same owner. However, they must be managed and operated on a unitary basis and each parcel must make a positive economic contribution to the operation of the unit."s Elements of Comparison: ""The characteristics or attributes of properties and transactions that cause the prices of real property to vary; include real property rights conveyed, financing terms, conditions of sale, expenditures made immediately after purchase, market conditions, location, physical characteristics, and other characteristics such as economic characteristics, use and non - realty components of value." 5 Extraordinary assumption: "An 'assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the assignment, results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. Comment: Extraordinary assumptions presume as fact otherwise uncertain information about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. r7 2 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 6. 3 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fitch Edition (Chicago: Appraisal institute, 2010) 12. 4 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate A raisal Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 24. s Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 5465. 6 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 66. 7 The Appraisal Foundation, USPAP 2012 2013 Edition (Washington: Appraisal Foundation) U-3. 29 PomEROY G APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Fee simple estate: "Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. " 8 Hypothetical condition: "A condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. Comment. Hypothetical conditions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis.,s Market 'Value: "The major focus of most real property appraisal assignments. Both economic and legal definitions of market value have been developed and refined * 1. The most widely accepted components of market value are incorporated in the following definition: The most probable price that the specified property interest should sell for in a competitive market after a reasonable exposure time, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under duress. 2. Market value is described in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice USPAP) as follows: A type of value, stated as an opinion, that presumes the transfer of a property (i.e., a right of ownership or a bundle of such rights), as of a certain date, under specific conditions set forth in the definition of the term identified by the appraiser as applicable in an appraisal, (EgPAP, 2010-2011 ed.) USPAP also requires that certain items be included in every appraisal report. Among these items, the following are directly related to the definition of market value: Identification of the specific property rights to be appraised. Statement of the effective date of the value opinion. Spec fcation as to whether cash, terms equivalent to cash, or other precisely described financing terms are assumed as the basis of the appraisal. If the appraisal is conditioned upon financing or other terms, specification as to whether the financing or terms are at, below, or above market interest rates and/or contain unusual conditions or incentives. The terms of above- or below -market interest rates and/or other special incentives must be clearly setforth; their contribution to, or negative influence on, value must be described and estimated; and the market data supporting the opinion of value must be described and explained."10 a Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 78. The Appraisal Foundation, USPAP 2012-2013 Edition, (Washington: Appraisal Foundation 2012) U-3. 10 AppraisaI Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate_ Appraisal Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 122-123. 30 POMEROY qW APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Mean: "A measure of central tendency. The sum of values for a variable in a sample or population divided by the number of items in the sample or population. The arithmetic average. r11 Median: "A measure of central tendency identified as the middle value in, an ordered array of numerical values, e.g., 7 is the median of (1, 4, 6, 6, 7, 9, 11, 22, 41). If the ordered array contains an even number of values, then the median is the mean of the two values on either side of the Middle. 112 Midpoint: "The arithmetic mean of the upper and lower limits of a class interval. " 13 Retrospective' Value Opinion: "A value opinion effective as of a specified historical date. The term does not define a type of value, instead, it identifies a value opinion as being effective at some specific prior date. Value as of a historical date is frequently sought in connection with property tax appeals, damage models, lease renegotiation, deficiency judgments, estate tax, and condemnation. Inclusion of the type of value with this term is appropriate, e.g., "retrospective market value opinion.'> 14 Subject Property: "The property that is appraised in an assignment. " rs USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice): "Current standards of the appraisal profession, developed for appraisers and the users of appraisal services by the Appraisal Standards .hoard of The Appraisal Foundation. The standards are endorsed by the Appraisal Institute and by other professional appraisal organizations, and state and federal regulatory authorities enforce the content of the current or applicable editions of the standards. i16 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary.of Real Estate Appraisal. Fifth Editions (Chicago. Appraisal Institute, 2010) 316. 12 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 316. Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged (Merriam -Webster Inc., 1986) 1431. F4 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 171. 15 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal. Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 188. 16 Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition (Chicago: Appraisal Institute, 2010) 202. 31 POMEROY Q.0 APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Descriptive Terms: The following terms used for descriptive purposes reflect ratings regarding structure/improvement condition or observed trends from economic and/or market activities. In order for the reader to properly understand the relationships among affiliated adjectives, the definitions of these terms, as related to real property description and valuation, taken from. Webster's Illustrated Encycogedic Dictionary, published by Tormont Publications, Inc., 1990, are: Excellent- indicates that the component/building is of the highest quality, exceptionally good of its kind, and indicates a ranking superior to all other rankings. Good reflects high quality, is superior to "average" but is inferior to "excellent." Average is defined as something that is considered typical, normal, or representative of its age, style, and/or usage; is inferior to "good" but is superior to "fair." Fair means moderately good, is inferior to "good" or "average" but superior to poor." Poor reflects inferior, inadequate or inefficient characteristics, lacking in desirable elements, and is considered inferior to all other rankings. High is defined as being of relatively great quantity, magnitude,'value, or degree. Low means below average in quantity, degree, or intensity. Strong indicates being economically or financially sound or thriving; showing firmness and a tendency to rise in price or value. Weak is defined as lacking physical strength; having or showing less than average resources; marked by or showing lack of firmness and a falling tendency in prices or value. Kya POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Page 1 of 4 1. No survey of the property has been made by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. All engineering is assumed to be correct. Any maps, plats, plot plans, drawings and/or exhibits reproduced and included in this report are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial relationships and to assist the reader in visualizing the property unless otherwise stated. The reliability of the information contained on any such map or drawing is assumed by the appraiser and cannot be guaranteed to be correct. A surveyor should be consulted if there is, any concern about boundaries, setbacks, encroachments, or other survey matters. 2. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature that affect title to the property nor is an opinion of title rendered. The title is assumed to be good and marketable. The value estimate is given without regard to any questions of title, boundaries, encumbrances, or encroachments unless otherwise stated. We are not usually provided an abstract of the property being appraised and we are not qualified to render any legal opinion concerning such a document. 3. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless non-compliance is stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. A comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property was not performed for this appraisal by the appraiser. 4. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a non -conformity has been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report. Information and analysis shown in this report concerning these items are based on a reasonable investigation, but any significant question should be addressed to local zoning or land use officials and/or an attorney. 5. It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in this report is based unless otherwise stated. This includes permits to emit any regulated substances into the air or water or onto or into the ground. Appropriate government officials and/or an attorney should be consulted if an interested party has any questions or concerns on these items since we have not made a comprehensive examination of laws and regulations affecting the subject property. b. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 7. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable but its accuracy is not warranted. 33 POMEROY APPRAISAL. ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 2 of 4 Responsible ownership and competent property management is assumed unless otherwise stated in this report. 9. This appraisal should not be considered a report on the physical items that are a part of this property. Although the appraisal may contain information about the physical items being appraised (including their adequacy and/or condition), it should be clearly understood that this information is only to be used as a general guide for property valuation and not as a complete or detailed physical report. The appraisers, are not construction, engineering, environmental, or legal experts, and any statement given on these matters in this report should be considered in that context. 10.0bserved condition of the foundation, roof, exterior walls, interior walls, floors, heating system, plumbing, insulation, electrical service, and all mechanicals and construction is based on a reasonable inspection unless otherwise stated. However, we are not licensed building inspectors. The structures and mechanicals were not checked for building code violations, and it is assumed that all buildings meet applicable building codes unless so stated in report. 11.Some items such as conditions behind walls, above ceilings, behind locked doors, or under the ground are not readily apparent nor easily accessible and therefore were not inspected. The existence of insulation, if any is mentioned, was found by conversation with others and/or circumstantial evidence. Since it is not exposed to view, the accuracy of any statements about insulation cannot be guaranteed. 12.It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that would render it more or less valuable unless so stated. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions, or for the engineering that may be required to discover such factors. Since no engineering or percolation tests were made by the appraiser, no liability is assumed for soil conditions. Sub -surface rights (mineral, gas, oil, etc.) were not considered in making this appraisal unless so stated. 13.Portions of the United States are considered to be located within designated earthquake hazard zones. Such classification, if present in subject case, may be shared by the comparables considered in this appraisal, and would be reflected in any impact on value. 14.Wells and septic systems, if any, are assumed to be in good working condition and of sufficient size and capacity for the stated highest and best use unless otherwise stated. 15.1t is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless otherwise stated in this report. 34 POMEROY61!1, APPRAISALASSAcIATrm, INC. Page 3 of 4 16. We are not environmental experts, and we do not have the expertise necessary to determine the existence of environmental hazards including but not limited to mechanical equipment or structures, or presence of chemical or toxic substances, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, toxic or hazardous waste, asbestos or hazardous building materials, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, fire -retardant -treated substances (FRT), contaminated drywall or other building materials, lead -contaminated plumbing, soil and subsoil contamination, groundwater contamination, agricultural chemicals, electromagnetic fields (EWs), radon dr other indoor air contamination which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental hazards or conditions on the subject or surrounding properties. None were called to our attention nor did we become aware of such during the inspection unless so stated. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. Non -disclosure should not be taken as an indication that such a problem does not exist, however. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. Based on visual inspection, there appear to be no conditions, including but not limited to the above referenced items, which would render the property more or less valuable, except as noted. The client is urged to retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. 17, No chemical or scientific tests were performed by the appraiser'on subject property, and it is assumed that the air, water, ground, and general environment associated with the property present no physical or health hazard of any kind unless otherwise noted in the report. It is further assumed that the lot does not contain, any type of dump site and that there are no underground tanks (or any underground source) leaking toxic or hazardous chemicals into the groundwater or the environment unless otherwise noted in the report. 18. The appraiser is not qualified to judge whether the property complies with laws such as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Clean Air Act of 1990, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, etc. or any subsequent revisions to any of these laws. Employee health and safety concerns as per the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and other agencies are also assumed to be in compliance with current regulations and standards unless specifically addressed in this report. Such categories can consist of operational procedures, storage of hazardous materials, building/property safety or protection devices, safeguards for utility entrances and distribution areas, anti -smoking legislation, etc. 19, Any proposed improvements are assumed to be completed in a good workmanlike manner in accordance with the owner's submitted plans and specifications unless stated otherwise. 20. The value estimated is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that would cause a loss in value unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in that field, if certainty is desired. 35 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 4 of 4 21.The comparable sales and other market data relied upon in the appraisal are believed to be from reliable sources. Though all the comparables were examined, it was not possible to inspect them all in detail. The value conclusions are subject to the accuracy of said data. 22.The appraisal is an estimate of value based on an analysis of information known to us at the time the appraisal was made. We do not assume any responsibility for incorrect analysis because of erroneous or incomplete information. If new information of significance comes to light,,the value given in this report is subject to change without notice. 23.Any claims, lawsuits, etc, filed against this firm and/or author(s) are limited in monetary damages to the amount of the fee charged and collected for the completion of this appraisal report. 24.Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication nor may it be used for any purpose by anyone but the client and/or an identified intended user without the previous written consent of the appraiser and the client, and in any event, only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. 25.The appraiser herein by reason of this appraisal is not required to give fiuther consultation, testimony, or be in attendance in Court with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. 26.The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 27.Personal property has not been included in this report unless otherwise stated. 28.Disclosure of the contents of this report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute and other professional organizations to which the appraiser belongs as a member. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or the MAI designation or other professional appraisal organizations and their respective designations) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the author(s). 29.This report is null and void if used in any connection with a real estate syndicate or syndication, defined as a general or limited partnership, joint venture, un-incorporated association or similar organization formed for or engaged in investment or gain from an interest in real property, including but not limited to a sale, exchange, trade, development or lease of property on behalf of others, or which is required to be registered with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission or any Federal or State agency which regulates investments made as a public offering. cm POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA voice -mail: 315422,7106, ext. 302 e-mail: dfisher(a-)Pomerovappraisal.com Pomeroy Place, 225 West Jefferson Street, Syracuse, New York 13202-2334 1 of 3 IEMPLOYMENT MSTORY: I 1994-Current: President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1986-1994: Executive Vice -President - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1984-1986: Vice President / Secretary - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 1974-1984: Staff Appraiser - Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. Cornell University: Bachelor of Science - College of Agriculture & Life Sciences Syracuse University: graduate studies Appraisal Institute: appraisal valuation courses and seminars American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers: appraisal valuation courses & seminars International Right -of -Way Association: appraisal courses and seminars NYS Assessors Association: appraisal courses and seminars PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONS: MAI #6935 Appraisal Institute Member, Appraisal. Institute (MA) designation is awarded by the Appraisal Institute to those members who have years of experience, are technically trained, have passed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code ofethics. ARA #623 American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers [ASFMRA) I hold the Accredited Rural Appraiser (ARA) designation which is awarded by the American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers to those members who have years of experience, are technically trained, have passed a rigid examination and subscribe to a high code of ethics. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Appraisal Institute (1979 present) Chapter Committees: AIREA/SREA Unification (1991-92), Regional Standards Panel (1986- 91), Chapter Admissions, Cha#erson (1987-89), Admissions (1985-1989) Chapter Offices: President (1/l/2011-12/31/2012 [2-yr. term)) , President -Elect (2010), , Treasurer (2009), Secretary (2008), Treasurer (1992), Secretary (1991), Director (1990) American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (1975-present) National Committees: Editorial Co -Chair (1998 2002) and Chair (2002 2015); National Appraisal Review Committee Chair (1988-94); Executive Council (1995-98); Ethics & Standards Task Force (2009-2010); Publications Commission Chair, Valuation 2000 (1998- 2000); By -Laws (1980-81); Young Professionals (1981-84); Appraisal Manual (1984-85); Regional Membership (1985-1988); Rural Appraisal Book (1993-1995); Long ' Range Planning (1995); Annual Meeting (1997 & 1999); The Appraisal Foundation Advisory Council (2002-04); Strategic Planning Task Force (2003-04); National Office: District I Vice President (1995-1998) Chapter (Northeast) Offices: Secretary -Treasurer (1979-89); Vice -President (1989-91); President (1991-93); Director (1993-96) International Right -of -Way Association -Chapter #18 (1982-present) International Association of Assessing Officers (1999-present) 37 POMP-ROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA of PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: (continued) 1 New York State Society of Real Estate Appraisers New. York State Assessors Association, Inc. Empire State Forest Products Association Past Regional Advisor - State Board of Real Estate Appraisal LICENSES and CERTIFICATIONS: Certified by Appraisal Institute through December 31, 2018 Certified by ASFMRA through December 31, 2016 NYS Certified General Appraiser #46-000000060 (1991 to present) Certified by NY Department of State through October 7, 2015 NYS Consultant Appraiser - New York State (1978 to present) NYS Qualified Appraisal Course Instructor— all appraisal course levels (1991 to present) NYS Notary Public AWARDS: G. Richard Kelley Memorial Award - 2014, presented by Upstate New York Chapter, Appraisal Institute Appraisal Professional of the Year by ASFMRA - 2012 Gold Quill Awards for Journalism from ASFMRA —1985 and 2011 Silver Plow Award - 10+ years as Chapter Secretary/Treasurer from ASFMRA Certificate of Completion— Valuation of Conservation Easements course (2008) Certificate of Appreciation - Appraisal Review Committee Chairman Silver Cow Award for Contribution to Dairy Agribusiness from Onondaga County Dairy Promotion Committee An Environmental Trade Case Study: Agricultural Conservation Easement Pays Off Environmental Penalty" Journal of the ASFMRA, June 2011 (ASFMRA 2011 Gold Quill Award) Is Your Forest Land Fairly Assessed?" — Empire Envoy, Empire State Forest Products Association, Vol. 97, No. 5, August 2004 Conservation Easements; a Review of Alternative Valuation Methods" -- Journal of Property Economics, co - published by American Society of Appraisers, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, International Association of Assessing Officers and National Association of Independent Fee Appraisers, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2004 The Apsraisal of Rural Property, 2' Edition, 2000, co -published by ASFMRA and Appraisal Institute —Dairy Farm Chapter Timberland Assessments" — Farming, January 2001 Gas Pipelines: Are They a Detriment or an Enhancement for Crops?" Journal of ASFMRA, 2000; republished in International Right -of -Way Magazine, Dec. 2000 Timberland Valuation" — CFA News, Catskill Forest Association, Inc., Fall 1999 Understanding Development Rights from Both the Appraiser and Consultant Perspective" Seminar for ASFMRA, May 1997 Farm Assessment Problems" (5-part series) - New York Farmer, 1996-1997 Conservation Easements & Valuation Issues" - Appraisal Views, Valuation International, Ltd., 2n6 Quarter, 1996 Rural Appraisal Manual, ASFMRA., 6th Edition,1986 - Revision Committee Using the Income Approach for Specialized Agricultural Properties" -Journal of the ASFMRA, April 1985 ASFMRA 1985 Gold Quill Award) Do You Need a Professional Appraiser?" - American Agriculturist, January 1983 38 POMEROY APPFWSAL ASSOCIATES, INC. DONALD A. FISHER, MAI, ARA Page 3 of 3 TEACHING AND LECTURING EXPERIENCE: Upstate NY Chapter (Appraisal Institute): Valuations in Indian Land Claims, Eminent Domain Analysis, Catastrophic Event, Natural (Tourist) Attraction, Current Use v. Highest and Best Use, Land Under Elevated Highway, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Utility Easements, Determination of Economic Units ASFMRA & Northeast Chapter: Agricultural Valuation, Conservation Easements, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights, Dairy Farms, Utility Easements ASFMRA Ohio Chapter: Conservation Easements International Right -of -Way Association Chapter 18: Conservation Easement Valuation, Avigation Easements, Wind Development Rights NYS Assessors Association: Farm Valuation, Income Capitalization Approach, Conservation Easement Valuation, Waterfront Valuation, Mini -Marts and Convenience Stores, Partial Interests Valuation, Appraisal Report Review, Mixed -Use Property Valuation NYS Association of County Directors: Conservation Easements: Alternative Valuation Methods Cornell Cooperative Extension, Farm Assessment Problems, Agricultural Conservation Easements Cornell University: Appraisal Issues, Eminent Domain, Conservation Easements, Indian Land Claims Federal Land Bank: Fhghest & Best Use Analysis US Army/Tug Hill Tomorrow Land Trust/Ducks Unlimited: Fort Drum Army Compatible Use Buffer Program (2012): Conservation Easements New York Farm Show / Woodsmen's Field Days (2010, 2011, 2012): Conservation Easements Ohio State University: Conservation Easement Valuation Onondaga Community College: Real Estate Principles Onondaga County Assessors Assoc.: Farm Valuation, Conservation Easements, Convenience Stores COURT EXPERIENCE: TestiOed before US Federal District Court*; NY State Court of Claims; NY State Supreme Court^; Massachusetts Court; Commissions and Hearings throughout NY State; A2010 NY Court of Appeals favorable decision on current use valuation certiorari project 1981 Oneida Nation. Land Claim was reviewed and upheld by the US Supreme Court (March 1984) Career responsibilities bridge a wide scope of public, institutional and private assignments dealing with eminent domain, mortgage financing, tax matters, zoning, easements, estate planning, and general valuation questions. Projects include Indian land claims, rights -of -way acquisition, railroad valuation, urban redevelopment, waste disposal, water use and hydro -power valuation matters, watersheds, airports, pipeline and powerline corridors, agricultural crop analysis, and environmental analysis. Assignments have dealt with office buildings, shopping centers, most types of commercial and industrial properties, apartment complexes, hotels and motels, churches, schools, all types of agricultural properties, timberland, freshwater and tidal wetlands, all types of recreational and residential properties, conservation easements, and utility line easements. Property Value Stabilization, Sub -Committee Chairman (1991-2000) Town of Onondaga: Environmental Advisory Council (1976-81); Fire Training Center Bylaws (Chairman 1986); Length Of Service Awards Program (Chairman 1989-91, 2000-02, 2004-05) Onondaga Central Schools Committees: Facilities Advisory (1989-90); Citizens Advisory (1994-96); Building Planning 1994-96); Facilities Development (1997); Academic/Building Advisory (2000-2003); Capital Project Advisory 2005-12) St. Camillus Health & Rehabilitation Center: Trustee (1987-1992); Development Comm. (1990-1992) Cornell University: Alumni Admissions Ambassador Network (1989-2006); Alumni Career Link (1989 present) South Onondaga Fire Department: Member (1970-present); President (1978-85, 1989-94, 2000-2014); Director (1985-87; 1988-89; 1994-2000; 2014-16); supervised new fire station construction (1990-91); life Member (since 2004) Onondaga County Volunteer Firemen's Association Red Jacket Distinction Award - 2012 New York State Emergency Medical Technician for over 30 years Corpus Christi Catholic Church: Building Committee (1991-92); Lector (2006-present) South Onondaga Water District —proposed and approved (2000-01) 39 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. WMLIAM H. BENEDICT voice -mail: 315-422-7106, eat. 313 e-mail: bbenedict@pomeroyappraisal.com Pomeroy Place, 225 West Jefferson Street, Syracuse, New York 13202-2334 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Current: Appraiser Assistant, Pomeroy Appraisal Associates, Inc. 2006-2013: Appraiser, Advanced Appraisals, Inc. 1989-2006: Residential Design Build Services 1988: Summer Intern -- Delaware County Planning Board EDUCATION: University of Buffalo -- BS Architecture (1989) Appraisal Institute — Appraisal Valuation Courses and Seminars SPECLAL STUDY EXPERIENCE: 2006: Basic Appraisal Principles & Procedures, Basic Income Capitalization 2007: General & Advanced Applications 2008: Appraising Historic Preservation Easements 2012: Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property Intangible Business Assets 2014. Introduction to Green Buildings 2014: Case Studies In Appraising Green Residential Buildings 2014: Residential and Commercial Valuation of Solar PROFESSIONAL LICENSES: NYS Real Estate Appraiser Assistant ##48-000046541 (4112-Present) ACTIVITIES/AWARDS: Secretary— Canadarago Snowtoppers Organization (2005-Present) 40 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A SUNDAy, MAY 24,. ?015 THE,PJ0St-S*AlkPPL14p1 PAQ ln• IE RECORD AM* :H0.fA9--SALE6 me-fiye. s. Ki I I by to J;p s t i4 a A- te'M. Cruz on,may. St. 05.630 j'.Mj6jn, Esq., as Refdree, le Mae+ al'sn.known as Noftft rialMoage'As- 6 : 00;100 ncitiMarch3. Do x: 1 0., 3jgjjc; rf6 J.6n aier 7.- . - .. ' - — — . . . I. - j . 0 . . . . . . . 1. _ cipme ; 4-! p DeVe[ .npOrtyV. ocfissmlllaPlo'slirrun" L 6 dlikacR 1 ind Heather LaiWpn`. ki ` line5r 'q atte Blvd$sr s Refpre.blo-D, U dho - ey " 4htonal'- rr'Uhub E, ROTI •.ai: r,y•.1':: :. •iY'4':^: _ •. ;;': ;a. O, TAXI., p W of'` lftftbAb 0 Ft'39* ft di- IgNp L: a fj' eJy. PjsAM*. recove Kkpup p 4 I M. M. MC. kr1Pea Am, IN0-1of-M-WAN,, ITO X' TAte rem Anq. : S I -'WI Ift rcl 15 q:.9 V, -'--t assiay GMstSlctBY0MIX-120-18jFogprid Ae877TUmi.ory R"i W, n Yt 11h ayPMErld. wh* - 2 'n MWh tt. k Y 4VIA r Proposed Buellville tower c• s t kt r x _ s 40 a im-76 2 iG • . u v o Q , ao H 739oQRIB.o055( 1••y''• -p; 'i, V 1 N' .'. •Gi 'G .. J 736.72(cl)- Vto- pip • 2.g7(d)' o Military Lot 2 755(s} 64(d r o.. - 959.65(d) 0 a 4 49 i it CX) 361-34 j 200 .- • 99„ v rn u l NI 6u -.' oa o y i m v o' 156 Oo{ I 41150N mb S • $ p / 397 58 32d(d) 30 n 350 150 2DO--•.:_.:. 182 it150 252 treise sfi : - p ..-P' 3£ N !.'B19Y6:,' - S LVli ; Page 1 of 2 Indian Hill Road May 21, •2016 Municipalities O Address Points j Parcels i:4,5i 4 0 0.0375 0.075 0 15 ni 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km http://www.fsihost.com/arcgis/restldirectories/arcgisoutputlUtilitiesIPrintingTools_GPServer/ ags_33ObOb256e22471aa4Ob3c2e9... 5/21/2015 6121/2015 real-Infoxom I realRecord7' ry realRecordT14 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ALCONE, TRUDY A 8144- INDIAN HILL RD POMPEY NY 13104-8759 CK'\ -:; PARCEL NO. 008.-01.-12.2 Mail. 8144 INDIAN HILL RD MANLIUS NY 13104-8759 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0157.00 PROPERTY CLASS, 240 - RURAL RESIDENCE ACREAGE WITH SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/06/1998 Price $ 0 Deed Date 08/11/1998 Arms Length N Libre 4259 Page 300 # Total Parcels 1 Seller UNKNOWN Buyer UNKNOWN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE IF DATEIF LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 3,267 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,178 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,089 Fln. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1985 Bldg Style CAPE COD Units 1 Stories 1.50 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 2 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT; 1985, 676 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 26 X 26), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT 1,058,944 Lot Size Acres 24.31 Zoning 07 Nbad Code 3 313801- School District FAYETTEVILLE- MANLIUS Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer PRIVATE Water PRIVATE Utilities ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314600 TAX 'INFORMATION Tax ID# 008.-01-12.2 Assessed Value $ 365,000 Land Assesment $ 86,900 School Tax $ 10,311 County/Town Tax $ 3,033 City/Vlilage Tax $ Total Tax $ 13,344 Full Tax Value $ 365,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 86,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector, Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL; (OIL) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1 PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1985, 42.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL j4e: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real -info. corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htlpJlweaapp.real-inFo.comir"Print.asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F31460000840000010120020000 III POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX B Street Atlas USAO 2008 Plus t..................... r t' ore GEaoaa pB i'r,[L4vr•, vl•n,Eco-1a4E Re rn iPY I PU fJ 0• I,l'AI f 1335 Kinderl,ock Rd y mni n,c,o' rT' 145 11¢vmik D= 100. 3Uu Bialik W¢r 4006, 4007, 4011 4013. 4014. 4015.4010 MU' Kiln Dr 103 Richnwnd Cn 106 Richmond Cis 102. ] 12 BuTnmp Hlw Di 102 Horizon Ds 103, 111 Buroinp HIw DI 4 n cP41 116 Richmond Co 1007 MarQ01 Ave a 025 Tuscarora Rd 132 Richmond Or yT UiCrrBl% r.P PU nAAP2, Ti$LAMI,F M¢ Sr w 530 Tuscarora Rd a SFFLbf AYC Aar y. rk rOxFn'IbO CVf o :Mn S1.O Y 1 802' fuscarornRli M I( 1 IT S) a Cr,CP C5 th tJ 5 , YA;FA11184G Ba11EryT 3 6 ` 1005 Rondo Ave J4 on..Gfnfrrf 5. G e yA 9' Iv Data use subject to license, TR Scale 1 . 19,200 2007Del. orme- Street AllasUSAO200aPItis. www. delerme.cnm 1" = 1.600.0 ft Data Zoom 14-0 r6W'fnf6.6om IrealRecord"' Page 1 of 1 TMriArealRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO. 40.-1-57.14 CROWN ATLANTIC CO. LLC Mail: PM8 353 4017 WASHINGTON RD 1326 KINDERHOOK RD 15317-0000 SULLIVAN NY 13037-0000 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: MADISON CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 831 - TELEPHONE FACILITY .SWIS SBL: 25488904000000010570140000 SALE DEED ARMS P)ERS. PRICE SELLERJ[LIBRE PAGEDATEDATE LENGTHI FBUYER # PARCELSPROP No sale history in database for this parcel, STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION Overall Eff. Yr Built 0 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Overall Grade Land SQFT 241,322 Overall Condition Lot Size Acres 5.54 Construction Type Zoning RES TAX INFORMATION Nbad Code 48040 SOL(Tax ID)#: 40.-1-57.14 254801 - School District Assessed Value $ 167,800 CHITTENANGO Land Assesment $ 38,600 Desirability SUPERIOR School Tax $ 3,494 Water Front N County/Town Tax $ 1,424 Sewer PRIVATE City/Village Tax $ Water PRIVATE Total Tax $ 4,918 Utilities ELECTRIC Full Tax Value $ 167,800 Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Equalization Rate 1.00 Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Prior Tax ID# 40.-1-57 Res. Sites 0 Full Land Value $ 38,600 Comm. Sites i Swis Code 254889 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No speclal district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04/09/2015 1:42 pm BUILDING USAGE USE AS: NOWCONTRIB BUILDING BREAKDOWN IDENT. BOECKH YR. GROSS STORY BSMT. BSMT. BLDS. MODEL BUILT QUALITY CONDITION PERIMETERSQ.FT. STORIESHEIGHT AC% SPRINKLER% ALARM%TYPE SQ.FI'. UNKNOWN IMPROVEMENTS: 1) FENCE-CHN LK, BUILT 2003, 312.00 SQFT, CONDITION FAIR 1) , BUILT 2003, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION FAIR 3) , BUILT 2003, 1.80 SQFT, CONDITION FAIR 1) , BUILT 2003, 185.00 SQFT, CONDITION FAIR Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. http://webapp.,real-info.com/reaiPrint.asp?rc=NY%2pNY%2F053%2F25488904000000010570140000 4/27/2015 lezlam i a G S f 2ea J To ] J 7 J E z real-infoxem j realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GOODHINES MICHAEL 102 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9651 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 41.17-1-5.30 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: CHITTENANGO NY 00000-0000 SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 05/27/2014 Price $ 170,000 Deed Date 05/28/2014 Arms Length N Libre 2014 Page 2606 *Total Parcels 1 Seiler UNKNOWN Brayer UNKNOWN Personal Property 0 PRIOR ARMS SALES PRICE DATE LENGT SELLER BUYER 1 $ 165,000 05/27/2014 Y HAGEN RANDAL GOODHINES MICHAEL 2 $ 150,790 12/21/2009 Y NVR, INC. HAGEN RANDAL 3 $ 31,500 . 09/21/2009 Y BURNING HOLLOW DEV. CORP. NVR, INC. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,736 Sqft. 1st Floor 728 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,008 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2009 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00 0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.35 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMM ERCIAL/PU 5 LIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 0 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2009, 440.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2009, 16.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2010, 160.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Dispfay indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. 7AX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-1-5.30 Assessed Value $ 146,200 Land Assesment $ 30,900 School Tax $ 3,865 County/Town Tax $ 1,575 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,440 Full Tax Value $ 146,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 30,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector, Updated;05102/2015 1:12 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real -info. corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn://wehann.real-info.com /rea 010F7 SdRn 1 n41 n i 7nnn i nn5 ni nnnnn c 11,E »n I c real-info.com I realRecordTm Wage 1 of 1 rear[RecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GREGORY ERICA 103 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9649 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS, 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCIEL NO: 41.17-1-5.27 Mail: 103 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITi'ENANGO NY 13637-9649 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: IIIINFORMATION Sale Date 09/19J2013 Price $ 182,000 Deed Date 09/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 6452 # Total Parcels i Seiler WOLTERDING Boyer GREGORY Personal Property 0VALERIEERICA PRIOR I SALES II PRICE DATE LENGTHARMS 11LENTHI1 SELLER II BUYER,, 166,755 09/25/2009 31,500 06/29/2009 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,224 Sqft. 1st Floor 932 Sqft. end Floor 1,292 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2009 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type UNKNOWN Y NVR, INC. WOLTERDING VALERIE L,DENNY V Y BURNING HOLLOW DEVEL. COR P. NVR, INC. LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.47 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITCENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 COMM. Sites 0 Swis code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT 2009, 440.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2009, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-1-5.27 Assessed Value $ 170,400 Land Assesment $ 32,600 School Tax $ 4,540 County/Town Tax $ 1,850 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,390 Full Tax Value $ 170,400 Equalization Rate I.DO Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 32,600 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly From the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015 1;12 pm real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-infoxom shall not he Iiable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn:llwebant).real-info.com/realPnnt.am?rc=NY%2FKY%2PD53 %2F2549010410170On I O0502700no 511 4/2015 real-infoxom [ realRecordTm Page 1 of 1 rea lRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO. 41 REALE 3ENNIFER Mail: 111 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9649 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: MADISON CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INIORMATION Sale Date 06113/2013 Price $ Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page III BURNING HOLLOW DR CHMENANGO NY 13037-9649 216, 500 Dead Date 06/ 14/2013 3800 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MONTGOMERY BRIEN Buyer REALE personal Property 0 AND THERESA JENNIFER SALESPRIORPRICE DATELENGTHSELLERBUYER 1 $ 208,370 02/ 29/2008 Y NVR INC MONTGOMERY BRIEN H/THERESA 2 $ 31,500 11/29/2007 Y BURWINE HOLLOW REVEL. COR P. NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,248 Sqft. 1st Floor 11086 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,162 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2008 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2. 00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: O. 00xO.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0. 43 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swls Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2008, 480.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2008, 44. 00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Ute: Display indicates first residential site and up to fottr improvements: TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17- 1-5. 19 Assessed Value $ 179,200 Land Assesment $ 32,100 School Tax $ 5,330 County/Town Tax $ 2,172 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7, 502 Full Tax Value $ 179,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 32,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated,.05/02/2015 1:12 pm real-infoxam makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. situ:/lwehann.real-info.crtmlrealPrint. asn? r NY%2FNY%7.F053°i 7. .saRn t n4i nl nnn r nnSn Y nnnnn S 11 A19M real-infoxom j realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 r ealRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION DEVENDORF STEVEN DEVENDORF 112 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9651 PARCEL NO. 41.17-1-5.20 Mail: 112 BURNING HOLLOW DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9651 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: MADISON CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/09/2013 Price $ 170,000 Deed Date 02/03/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 553 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BLOUET HELEN Buyer DEVENDORF STEVEN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES 1 2 PRICE tl DATE I ARMS LENGTH 180,695 12/22/2009 31,500 10/09/2009 STRu GT U RAL. INFORMATION Square Feet 2,224 Sgft. 1st Floor 932 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,292 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2009 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2009, 420 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 21), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays i Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 SELLER Y NVR, INC. Y BURNING HOLLOW DEV. CORP LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.31 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254B01 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2009, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2009, 420.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. BUYER BLOUEf HELEN NVR, INC. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID#' 41.17-1-5.20 Assessed Value $ 167,800 Land Assesment $ 29,500 School Tax $ 4,657 County/Town Tax $ 1,898 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,555 Full Tax Value $ 167,800 Equalization Rate . 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 29,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015 1:12 prn real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. bttn:Ilwebann.real-info.com/realprint.asa?rc=NY%2FNY°/n2FO53%2F2i4RO104l01700f)1 (1050701)00n 5/14/901 S real-info.com I realRecord"m Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SCALZO ANTHONY CHAMBERLIN 300 BIALEK WAY CHITTEIYANGO NY 13037-1431 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 41.13-1•-1.20 Mail: 300 BIALEK WAY CHITTENANGO NY 13037-1431 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/15/2013 Price $ 180,000 peed Date 10/16/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 7108 # Total Parcels i Seller BUNCE GRAEMI= Buyer SCALZO ANTHONY Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE p DATE I1 ARMSLENGTHI SELLER II BUYER 1 1 $ 206,050 11/09/2007 Y NVR INC BUNCE GRAEME 2 $ 30,000 08/28/2007 Y BURNING HOLLOW DEVELOPMENT CORPO NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,098 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,090 Sqft. 2nd Floor 11008 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2007 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, i HALF ' Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dlm.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.34 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHI7TENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAI_/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT', BUILT 2007, 519.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2007, 30.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first resldentlal site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.13-1-1.20 Assessed Value $ 173,300 Land Assesment $ 30,600 School Tax $ 5,067 County/Town Tax $ 2,065 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,132 Full Tax Value $ 173,300 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 30,600 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based an town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015,1:12 pm real-info.com mattes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources. real-Info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htfn://wehann.reaI-infn rnTnIrealPrint 5I1A1?A11; real-info.com I reaLRecordTM Page 1 of I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MCCASE PATRICK WHITTON 306 IBIALEK WAY CHIT ENANGO NY 13037-1431 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 HELSEL MCCABf Seller CHRISTOPHER Buyer PATRICK PARCEL NO: 41.13-1-1.12 Mail: 306 BIALEK WAY CHITTENANGO NY 13037-1431 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 1B7,000 Deed Date 11/25/2013 Page 7980 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SAES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 192,940 10/09/2007 Y NVR, INC. HELSEL CHRISTOPHER R 2 $ 30,000 07/25/2007 Y BURNING HLLW DEVLP CORP NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,224 Sqft. 1st Floor 932 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,292 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2007 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2,00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL:(GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.31 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254601 - CHIiTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMIENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2007, 440.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 30.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2009, 346.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.13-1-1.12 Assessed Value $ 174,700 Land Assesment $ 29,500 School Tax $ 5,049 County/Town Tax $ 2,058 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,107 Full Tax Value $ 174,700 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 29,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/20i5 1:12 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.eom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn://wehann.real4nfn.cnm/reaiPrint.aen?rc=NY%2FNY%?.PO53a/2F254R(11041011n0l11001(11?(tOf)0 5/14/7015 real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 reelRe,corld TM OWNI=RSHIP INFORMATION MOORE LINDSEY B AND 3ORDAN SAMU 202 HORIZON DR CHITI'ENANGO NY 13037-9647 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND f RESIDENCE PARCEL 140. 41.17-1-3.24 Mail: 202 HORIZON DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9647 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date05/31/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 FRIEDMAN DAVID MOORE LINDSEY B Seller M AND COLLEEN Buyer AND IORDAN I SAMU PRIOR SALES I PRICE DATE ARMSIILENGTI 232,790 10/27/2006 Y 28,500 08/16/2006 Y STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,530 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,330 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,200 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2006 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 I• % Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL:(GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL Price $ 190,000 Deed Date 06/05/2013 Page 3531 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SELLER NVR, INC. BURNING HOLLOW DEVLP CORP LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.32 zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801- CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2006, 32.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2006, 480.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PAVNG-CONCR, BUILT 2009, 262.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. BUYER FRIEDMAN DAVID NVR INC TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-1-3.24 Assessed Value $ 204,000 Land Assesment $ 29,900 School Tax $ 5,620 County/Town Tax $ 2,291 Clty/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,911 Full Tax Value $ 204,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 29,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/0212015 1:12 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. ittn:Ilwebann.real-info. com/realPrint. aslo?rL=NY%2FNY°/n2FO53 %2F254901()4 i n ] 70f) n l 003 0?4f)0(10 5 / 14/7015 real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of I OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PAGE CHARLES E AND KATHLEEN 145 NAXMIK.I)R CHITTENANGO NY 13037-1081 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/17/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Seller SITYNE SCOTT S Buyer PAGE CHARLES. E AND HEATHER L y AND KATHLEEN PARCEL NO: 41.13-1-1.8 Mail: 145 NAYMIK DR CHITENANGO NY 13037-1081 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 235,000 Deed Date 06/17/2013 Page 3875 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property0 AARMSLBS PRICE DATE LENGTHIL SELLER BUYER 1 $ 230,922 06/29/2007 Y NVR INC SITYNE SCOTr 2 $ 30,000 :04/04/2007 N BURNING HOLLOW NVR INC STRUCTURAL" INFORMATION Square Feet 2,748 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,452 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,296 Fin. Basement Sqft. 516 Year Built 2007 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.0Dx0,00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0:27 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2007, 399.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL, 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 528,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 32.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2009, 16.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax 10* 41.13-1-1,8 Assessed Value $ 219,200 Land Assesment $ 28,100 School Tax $ 5,971 County/Town Tax $ 2,433 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 8,404 Full Tax Value $ 219,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 28,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptlons have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015 1:12 pm real-infoxam makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hf.n://wshann.real-info.cram/realFrint.asn?rrLNY%7,FNY%2F1151%?F754ROI n4I01If OOI ftOI Of)ROftni) 5/14/2015 real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FRENCH BRIAN 216 RICHMOND CIR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9442 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCIEL NO: 41.17-2-1.28 Mail: M1:ItzEt4 T1iLrelpi0 t'L+hI+I+I+aiI+I+I+] PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/23/2013 Price $ 155,100 Deed Date 01/24/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 506 # Total Parcels 1 Seller TERRITO CHARLOTTE Buyer FRENCH BRIAN Personal Property 0 PRIOR IF- SALES PRICE DATELENGTH ARMS I SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,952 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Sqft, Znd Floor 912 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1992 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT; 1992, 440 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS; 22 X 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT 15,246 Lot Size Acres 0.35 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 48051. School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS; 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1992, 32.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 1992, 160.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1992, 440.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2009, 140.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-2-1.28 Assessed Value $ 154,900 Land Assesment $ 30,900 School Tax $ 4,294 County/Town Tax $ 1,750 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,044 Full Tax Value $ 154,900 Equalization hate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 41.17-1-1.28 Full Land Value $ 30,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015 1:12 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. ttn:/lwehan».ren]-infra.rnm /rPa iPrint. asn7rr.=NY%?•FNY°/n F(15% F7 SdR fl7 (141 f117(1fl fl fl f11 fl'7 Rflllflfi 4/1 d/7 n 1 real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 t realRecard r m OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FLINT 30SSEPH FLINT 132 RICHMOND CIR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9442 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE 4 PARCEL NO: 41.17-2-1.134 Mall: 132 RICHMOND CIR CHITCENANGO NY 13037-9442 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407,00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/17/2014 Price $ 178,000 Deed Elate 04/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 1872 # Total Parcels 1 Seller LIVINGSTON DAVID Buyer FLINT JOSEPH personal Property 0 SALES PRIOR PRICE DATE LENGTH[ SELLER _ BUYER 1 $ 0 05/21/2009 N LIVINGSTON DAVID - SURV SPOUSE/I LIVINGSTON DAVID 2 $ 202,625 06/29/2004 Y NVR INC LIVINGSTON DAVID N/CAROL I STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,041 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,119 Sqft. 2nd Floor 922 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2004 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2004, DIMENSIONS: Garage Type 20.00 X 21,00), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: B Garage Says 2 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT 47,916 Lot Size Acres 1.10 Zoning Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-i.O ATT, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 2005,'210.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: DlsDIav Indicates flrst residential site and ut) to four imorovements. TAX INFORMATION Tax 10# 41.17-2-1.134 Assessed Value $ 178,000 Land Assesment $ 39,400 School Tax $ 5,241 county/Town Tax $ 2,136 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,377 Full Tax Value $ 178,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 41.17-1-1.134 Full Land Value $ 39,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included, All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/02/2015 1:12 pro real-info.corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information Is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn-Ilwehann.real-info.cnm/realPrint.asn?rc--NY%2FNY%?FO51°/n7.F9.54ROl f)41 n l 7f)009.On 11 g4f1f100 51141,)n i S real-infoxom I realRecoxdTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordT'M OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MILLS JEFFREY H & JADE A 1335 KINDERHOOK RD SULLIVAN NY 13G37-9425 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/28/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Seller OLIVER Buyer MILLS JEFFREY H & JOSHUA R y JADE A Yt'5 PARC E L NO: 40.-i-IS Mail: 1335 KINDERHOOK RD CHITiENANGO NY 13037-9425 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 'l"k v r Price $ 148,300 Deed Date 05/30/2014 Page 2656 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ L28,500 09/22/2009 Y MAXWELL PAULA A OLIVER JOSHUA R 2 $ 122,900 09/09/2004 Y MAZZEO PHILIP & MARIE MAXWELL PAULA A STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,890 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,144 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 746 Year Built 1960 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 2 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1966, DIMENSIONS: Garage Type 22.00 X 25.00), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 2 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FUEL: (OIL) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 MPROVEMENTS: LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim,: O.00x0,00 Land SQFT 20,038 Lot Size Acres 0.46 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 48040 School District 254801 - CHITfENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer PRIVATE Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254889 0) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1966, 220.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 1966, 550.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1960, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1950, 240,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION -77 Tax ID# 40.-1-15 Assessed Value $ 120,800 Land Assesrnent $ 16,300 School Tax $ 3,050 County/Town Tax $ 1,243 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,293 Full Tax Value $ 120,800 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 16,300 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated; 04/10/2015.11:11 am real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn-1/we.hann real -info 51617n t c real-infoxom I rea3Recordrm Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ROMAN 3AMES P ROMAN 802 TUSCARORA RD CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9724 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE I PARCEL NO: 41.17-1-3.3 Mail: 7400 BOLIVAR RD CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9427 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 SALE INFORMATION 15ale Date 04/22/2014 Price $ 85,000 Deed Date 04/23/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 1915 *Total Parcels 1 Seller MUIR FRANK L Buyer ROMAN JAMES P Personal Property 0 PRIO SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,464 Lot Size Dim.: D.004.00 Tax ID# 41.17-1-3.3 Sgft. 1st Floor 1,464 Land SQFT 31,799 Assessed: Value $ 137,000 Sgft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.73 Land Assesment $ 29,600 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,097 Year Built 1987 Nbad Code 48041 County/Town Tax $ 1,262 Bldg Style RANCH School District 234801 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 CHITTENANGO Total Tax $ 4,359 Stories 1.00 Desirability INFERIOR Full Tax Value $ 137,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 41 17 13 Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,600 Kitchens 1 Utilities . GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.D ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT-, 1987, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts DIMENSIONS: Res. Sites L or exemptions have been included, All Garage Type 20.00 X 20.00), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verifiedCNDTN: NORMAL, Swis Code 254801 directly from the local tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 2 Updated:04/09/2015 1:41 pm Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS: 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1987, 80.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1987, 16.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1987, 400.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1990, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1990, 312.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1990, 384.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1995, 77.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accurady or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn://wehann.real-info.com/reelPrintacn`rc=Nv%7FNY%7.Ff1ST%9.F9A4R0104101W()!11M';nolf f)f) 41Fnf11; real-info.com realRecorffm Page 1 of 2 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION JONES TIFFANY JONES 925 TUSCARORA RD CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9717 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE Y PARCEL NO: 40.20-1-8 Mail: 925 TUSCARORA RD CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9717 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 SALIE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/26/2014 Price $ 154,900 Deed Date 06/27/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 3268 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CAPPELLO SUSAN Buyer JONES TIFFANY Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES 1 PRICE11 DATE L R 7H MS SELLER IF BUYER 1 127,900 04/16/2004 Y GALLATIN PROPERTIES, LLC CAPPELLO SUSAN M 2 80,100 11/25/2003 Y DEVINE JAMES J JR, REFEREE GALLATIN PROPERTIES LLC 3 126,000 06/16/2000 Y TUCKER AUDREY A LONERGAN LAWRENCE J 4 4,000 08/01/1993 Y NUKAZA JOHN TUCKER AUDREY 5 84,900 05/03/1990 Y BUSH DANIEL & PAMELA TUCKER AUDREY STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,200 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,144 Sqft, 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 1,056 Year Built 1968 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 CAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1968, DIMENSIONS; Garage Type 18.00 X 24.00), CNDTN; NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 2 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x300.00 Land SQFT 29,621 Lot Size Acres 0.68 Zoning Nbad Code 48041 School District 254801 - CHTITENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer PRIVATE Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2000, 252.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1.0 ATr, BUILT 1968, 432.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1994, 512.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1968, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -UP OPN, BUILT 2000, 56.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 40.20-1-8 Assessed Value $ 138,500 Land Assesment $ 23,500 School Tax $ 3,370 County/Town Tax $ 1,373 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,743 Full Tax Value $ 138,500 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 28,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact, No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:41 pm b"://webann.real-info.com/realPrint.&en?rc=NY%2FNY%2FAS3%2F25490I 04002000() l 0OR000000ft 5/6t7015 real-info_com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GROVER CHARLES GROVER 4006 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY 13037-8555 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS; 210 - ONE: FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL. NO: 40.4-1-1.50 Mail: 4006 BRICK KILN DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-8555 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT., SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/17/2014 Price $ 259,900 Deed Date 06/20/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 3109 # Total Parcels 1 Seller OOT SUSAN Buyer GROVER CHARLES Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE ARMSILENGTHI SELLER I BUYS 1 No sale history In database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,704 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,704 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Erin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2013 Bldg Style RANCH Units Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2013, Garage Type 634 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type NEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.; 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.33 Zoning Nbad Code 48060 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254889 EX9M PTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 634.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID* 40.4-1-1.50 Assessed Value $ 142,000 Land Assesment $ 39,000 School Tax $ 130 County/Town Tax $ 53 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 183 Full Tax Value $ 142,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 39,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated; 04/10/2015 11:11 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htt .Ilwebat)n.real-info.com/realPrint.asn2rc=NY°/n2FNY%2FO53%2F254RRo04f1(N)4f)00100105nnf)flO 516/7n15 real-infoxorn I realRecordTM Page 1 of I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ROBERTS CHARLES L ROBERTS 4014 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY 13037-8555 PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-1.59 Mail: 4014 BRICK KILN DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-8555 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY., MADI50N CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/14/2014 Price $ 254,843 Deed Date 08/14/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 4310 # Total Parcels 1 Seller OOT 5USAN Buyer ROBERTS CHARLES L Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENARMS GTH SELLER BUYER No safe history In database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFOR.MATION Square Feet 1,704 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,704 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Year Built 2014 Bldg Style RANCH Units Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL A Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1.0 ATf, BUILT: 2014, Garage Type 634 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT IN FORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.30 Zoning Nbad Code 48060 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254689 EXEMPTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2014, 634.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2014, 36.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 40.4-1-1.59 Assessed Value $ 5,000 Land Assesment $ 5,000 School Tax $ 130 County/ Town Tax $ 53 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 183 Full Tax Value $ 5,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 5,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated. 04/10/2015 11:11 am real- info.corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn- fluephann rpal-infn rnm/rPm1Print acn9rn=MVCI')PVVO/7Rn520l7F'KaRltQndnnndnnn t nntfKQnnnn VA/In1 r, real-info.com j realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 07 =f : TM 7 realFcard OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LAMPERT DOUGLAS LAMPERT 4016 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY 13037-8555 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Data 07/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Seller ZELLAR HOMES Buyer LAMPERT LTD. y DOUGLAS PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-i.60 Mail: 4016 BRICK KILN DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-8555 PRONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 250,000 Deed Date 08/01/2013 Page 4991 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHH ARMS I SELLER BUYER Y I 1 $ 45,000 11/26/2012 Y OOT BROS INC ZELLAR HOMES LTD STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATIONI TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,896 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Tax II]# 40.4-1-1.60 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,896 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 248,500 Sqft. Ind Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.48 Land Assesment $ 40,000 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Zoning School Tax $ 130 Year Built 2013 Nbad Code 48060 County/Town Tax $ 53 Bldg Style RANCH School District 254801 - City/Village Tax $ Units CHITTI_NANGO Total Tax $ 183 Stories 1.00 Desirabillty TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 248,500 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 40,000 Kitchens 1 utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2013', Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts 462 SQFT, Res. sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIDIMENSIONS, DI SI numbers are estimated based on Garage Type Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 254889 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type NORMAL, GRADE: C i NONE HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) NORMAL FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2013, 66.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 A-T, BUILT 2013, 462.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Uote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. Updated: 04/1.0/2015 11:11 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. tsfn//urahann rral-infn rnrn/r aiUrint acn7rr=lVVo/7x'T TV/'7Ff154/F']SdRRafld(iflfldnMi Mi(,Mf1M S1tiYyl11 F real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 freal ecorrdTDI OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PRATT ANTHONY PRATT 103 RICHMOND CIR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9441 COUNTY., MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 41.17-2-1.23 Mail- 103 RICHMOND CIR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9441 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407. 00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/27/2013 Price $ Arms Length Y Libre Seiler NOBLE JOHN T JR Buyer 157,000 Deed Date 07/01/2013 2013 Page 4 PRATT ANTHONY Personal Property 0 234 # Total Parcels 1 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH MS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 150,000 06/27/2013 Y NOBLE JOHN T JR PRATT ANTHONY 2 $ 161,500 01/26/2007 Y GREER DAVID NOBLEJOHN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,824 Sqft. 1st Floor 912 Sqft. Znd Floor 912 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1993 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1993, 528 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 24), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT 15,246 Lot Size Acres 0.35 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 48051 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGODesirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites i' Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 25480.1 EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX -WAIL PERIOD -COMBAT IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1993, 528.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 1993, 168.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 196.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1994, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL lote: Display Indicates first resldentlal site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-2-1.23 Assessed Value $ 149,200 Land Assesment $ 30,900 School Tax $ 3,982 County/ Town Tax $ 1,623 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,605 Full Tax Value $ 149,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 41.17-1-1.23 Full Land Value $ 30,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 05/02/2015 1:12 pm real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained *am many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. httn: llwebartn.reni-info.enmlrea]Print.ncn9ra=NV%9.FWOI.*?..Ff1510179 IARilin4inl7Mf19(1n1(19'4nn0A S11dMntS real-info.com I realRecordrM Page I of I realRecordTM COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 41.17-2-1.19 Mail: 106 RICHMOND CIR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9442 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 SALE XNFORMATION Stile Date 09/03/2013 Price $ 170,000 Deed Date 09/04/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 6015 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CULLEN LUCAS Buyer DELONG MICHAEL Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES II PRICE ! DATE I LLeNr.,rm 1I SEARMSLLERBUYER 1 $ 170,000 06/07/2004 Y JULIAN THOMAS W JR CULLEN LUCAS B 2 $ 164,585 04/30/2002 Y NVR INC JULIAN THOMAS W JR STItUCTURAI. INFORMATTQN LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,816 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Tax ID# 41,17-2-1.19 Sq t. 1st Floor 1,088 Land SQFT 21,780 Assessed Value $ 157,200 Sgft. grad Floor 728 Lot Size Acres 0.50 Land Assesment $ 33,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,644 Year Built 2001 Nbad Code 48051 County/Town Tax $ 1,893 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 234801 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 CHITTENANGO Total Tax $ 6,537 Stories 2.00 Desirablilty TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 157,200 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# 41.17-1-1.19 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 33,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2001, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts DIMENSIONS: Res. Sites i or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type 20.00 X 22.00), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are based on CNDT town values. Taxis shouldmatedhould be verified NORMAL, Swis Code 254801 directly from the local tax collector. GRADE: B Garage Bays 2 Updated:05/02/2015 1:12 pm Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2001, 28.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2001, 440.00 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2001, 180.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Nate; Display Indlcates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Infarmation is obtained from many sources. reaI-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn://wshnnn.real-infn•cnm/realPrintasn?rri TY%2FNY%7,Ff153%7FJStfRO1114tf1l7f)fl11711ninionnnn Z/1A11)A1c real-info.mm I realRecordrM Page I of 1 real 'Record" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ROBINSON 3AMIE DUDA 100S RONDO AVE CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9743 COUNTY., MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Seiler PANEBIANCO Buyer ROBINSON DANIEL y JAMIE PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE I, 1 $ 125,000 12/15/2010 Y 2 $ 84,900 03/01/2002 Y 3 $ 73,000 02/09/1995 Y STRUCTURALINFORMATION Square Feet 1,508 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,028 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 480 Year Built 1984 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 Garage Type 1 BSMT GARAGE Garage says 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL:(GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL PARCEL NO: 40.20-1-41.6 Mail: 1005 RONDO AVE CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9743 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 Price .$ 126,000 Deed Date 12/24/2013 Page 8605 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 ARMS 11 SELLERENGTH YEOMANS DAVID JOHNSON MARK R SLIKE BARRY M BUYER PANEBIANCO DANIEL YEOMANS DAVID R & AUDREY C JOHNSON MARK R LOT INFORMATI Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Land SQFT 15,682 Lot Size Acres 0.36 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 48041 School District 254801 - CHTTTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Cods 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1984, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1999, 256.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1984, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID* 40.20-1-41.6 Assessed Value $ 120,000 Land Assesment $ 25,000 School Tax $ 2,687 County/Town Tax $ 1,095 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,782 Full Tax Value $ 120,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID* 4020141 Full Land Value $ 25,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verined directly from the local tax collector, Updated:04/09/2015 1:41 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee conceming the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn.-Itwehann.real-infn_cnm/realPrint.asnhrc=NYO/n2FNY°1n2FO5l%7.F254Rfi1T}401}9onnn1minfiF(onn IVAII) 115 real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION BARNARD SCOTT BARNARD 530 TUSCARORA RD CHrrTENANGO NY 13037-9731 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS; 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/30/2014 Arms Length Y Libre Seller DUINK ROBERT Buyer f PARCEL NO: 41.17-2-1.4 Mail: 530 TUSCARORA RD CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9731 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 2014 Page BARNARD SCOTT personal Property 9407.00 5J 148,900 Deed Date 07/31/2014 3976 # Total Parcels 1 PRlOFt SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH 1 ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 117,500 08/28/2001 Y PFOHL JEFFREY A/STACEY L DUINK ROBERT L/BETH A STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,748 Sqft. 1st Floor 983 Sqft. 2nd Floor 765 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1989 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL,.1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1989, 420 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 21), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 1. LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Land SQFT 16,117 Lot Size Acres 0.37 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 48041 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254801 IMPROVEMENTS; 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1989, 420.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1989, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION POOR 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1989, 55.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2002, 96.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 41.17-2-1.4 Assessed Value $ 151,700 Land Assesment $ 25,100 School Tax $ 3,422 County/Town Tax $ 1,394 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,816 Full Tax Value $ 151,700 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax 10# 41.17-1-1.4 Full Land Value $ 25,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Takes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:41 pm real -info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hitn /hvwhar.areal-infnrnm/rPalPrinPflfll(iAInl711An)nrlI WA nnn ;1,<mnI z real-infoxont f realRecordTM Page 1ofI realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION BUSA PAULA 1007 MARGOT AVE CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9747 7 PARCEL NO: 40.20-1-35 Mail: 1007 MARGOT LN CHITTENANGO NY 13037-9727 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: MADISON CENSUS TRACT: 9407.00 PROPERTY CLASS: RESIDENCE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND ' f a SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/24/2014 Price $ 150,500 Deed Date 07/24/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Page 3842 #'total Parcels 1 Seiler CAMPBELL TODD Buyer BUSA PAULA Personal Property 0 PRIOR Il PRICE I DATI: I . ARMS 145,000 10/15/2012 Y STRUCTURALINFORMATION Square Feet 2,324 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,604 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 720 Year Built 1980 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR-2.0 ATT, BUILT: 1999, DIMENSIONS; Garage Type 24.-00 K 24.00), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 2 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterlor ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL SELLER MARSHALL DONNA LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x150.00 Land SQFT 14,610 Lot Size Acres 0.34 Zoning Nbad Code 48041 School District 254801 - CHITTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 5wis Code 254801 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-2.0 ATf, BUILT 1999, 576.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1997, 216.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1997, 555.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2000, 96.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note; Display Indicates 11rst residential site and up to four improvements. BUYER CAM PBELL TODD H TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 40.20-1-35 Assessed Value $ 138,500 Land Assesment $ 25,000 School Tax $ 3,053 County/Town Tax $ 1,244 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,297 Full Tax Value $ 138,500 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 25,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact, No special district tax amounts or exemptlons have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:41 pm. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site.•In€ormation is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hfin-//wehnnn real-infn rnm/rP.alprint IOAMInnAntnzsnnnnnnn ;/Amni c real-info.coi n f realRecordTM Page 1 of 2 realR.ecord T!4 DWNERSHIP INFORMATION MURPHY SEAN 4013 BRICK KILN OR SULLIVAN NY 13037-8556 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-1.58 Mail: 4013 BRICK KILN DR CHITi'ENANGO NY 13037.8556 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/12/2013 Price $ 278,730 Deed Date 07/16/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 4570 # Total Parcels 1 Seller NVR, INC Buyer MURPHY SEAN Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE I DATE L LENGTH f1ARMS SELLER 1I -- - — BUYER- 1 $ 45,000 04/12/2013 Y OOT BROS INC NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,980 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Tax ID# 40.4-1-1.58 Sqft, 1st Floor 1,870 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 277,900 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,110 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 532 Zoning School Tax $ 130 Year Built 2013 Nbad Code 48060 County/Town Tax $ 53 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 254801 - City/Village Tax $ Units CHITTENANGO Total Tax $ 183 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 277,900 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC TOTAL GAR: 2, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts BUILT: 2013, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All 420 SQFT, numbers are estimated based on DIMENSIONS: Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified 20 X 21) Swis Code 254889 directly from the local tax collector. CN DTN : NORMAL, Garage Type GRADE: C GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2013, 240 SQFT, DIMENSIONS: 12 X 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 2 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (.GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 420.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2013, 28.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 240.00 SQFT-, CONDITION NORMAL Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am lten•//wi-hsnn rr nl-infn rnm /real Print I nn me unnnn 41r rm 7 c real-info.com J realRecord"u Page I of I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION XEHELDEBORAH 4015 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY•13037-8556 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Seller OOT SUSAN Buyer ZEHEL DEBORAH PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-1.61 Mail: 4015 BRICK KILN DR CHITTENANGO NY 13037-8556 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price # 45,0 Deed Date 09/26/2014 Page 5218 *Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 ARSALESPRICEDATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history In database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION I F-LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,897 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Tax ID# 40.4-1-1.61 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,385 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 5,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 512 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Land Assesment $ 5,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning School Tax $ 130 Year Built 2014 Nbad Code 48060 County/Town Tax $ 53 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 254801 - City/Village Tax $ Units CHITTENANGO Total Tax $ 183 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 5,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 5,000 Kitchens i Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2014, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22) Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 254889 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am Garage Days 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS• 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2014, 484.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2014, 32.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Infomiation is oblained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. httn://Wehnnn.rnAl-infn rnm/real Print acn9rr.=WVO/.IFNY0/")Pnlil0/`'7F7SdRRQfldnflfldlll)nln11inAi (tiini) I c real-Wo.com I realRecordTM Page I of 1 ' TN reapalRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION CISU CEZAR CISU 4012 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY 13037-SSSS PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-1.37 Mail: 7305 DARTMOOR XING FAYETTEVILLE NY 13066-2477 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: MADISON CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/05/2013 Price $ Date 10/02/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 2013 Page 6700 # Total Parcels 1 Seller OOT SUSAN Buyer CISU CEZAR Personal Property 0 PRIO SALES I PRICE I DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER No sate history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURALINFORMATION Square Feet 1,878 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,290 Sqft. 2nd Floor 588 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2013 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT; 2013, Garage Type 390 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0,004.00 Land SQIT Lot Size Acres 0.29 Zoning Nbad Code 48060 School District 254801 - CHrfTENANGO Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 254889 EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 390.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2013, 123.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote; Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 40.4-1-1.57 Assessed Value $ 235,000 Land Assesment $ 39,000 School Tax $ 130 County/Town Tax $ 53 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 183 Full Tax Value $ 235,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 39,00D The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated;04/10/2015 11:11 am real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages iu connection with the use of the information contained herein. hm+/lwr.hannrPal-infornmhr+alPrinteIOVIMte real-info.com [ realRecordTM Page 1 of I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION TEMPLE 3AMES E TEMPLE 4007 BRICK KILN DR SULLIVAN NY 13037-8596 COUNTY: MADISON PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/12/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 2014 Seller OOT SUSAN Buyer TEMPLE JAMES E PARCEL NO: 40.4-1-1.52 Mail: 249 OARLOCK CIR EAST SYRACUSE NY 13057-3121 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 50,00 d Date 05/12/2014 Page # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR ARMS BUYER r SALES LENGTH PRICE DATE _ SELLER _ - 1 $ 50,000 05/06/2014 Y OOT SUSAN TEMPLE JAMES E 2 $ 105,000 , 12/13/2013 N COT BROS. INC. OOT SUSAN STRUCTURAL- INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,717 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0.00 Tax ID# 40.4-1-1.52 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,717 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 5,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.30 Land Assesment $ 5,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning school Tax $ 130 Year Built 2014 Nbad Code 48060 County/Town Tax $ 53 Bldg Style RANCH School District 254801 - City/Village Tax $ Units CHITTENANGO Total Tax $ 183 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 51000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 51000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT, 2014, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts Garage Type 634 SQFT, CNDTN: Res. sites 1 or exemptions have been Included, All numbers are estimated based on NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE; C Swis Code 254889 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 1 NONE HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) NORMAL FULL Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am EXEMPTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2014, 634.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL • 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2014, 36.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Nate; Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. zttn:llwehann.real-info.cnmlrealPrint:.asn?rc=NY%2FNY%7.F(153at 7.F7.54RR9040f)n4f)nOi nnl ni*?w0 V611)01.5 POMEROY G APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C real-info.com I real.RecordTM Page 1 of I real ecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 009.-01-01.011 SBA TOWERS II LLC Mail: 5900 BROKEN SOUND PKWY 5077 HARRIS RD BOCA RATON FL 33487-2797 ONONDAGA NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0164.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 837 - CELLULAR TELEPHONE TOWERS SALE INFORMATION Sale Date Price $ 0 Deed Date Arms Length Libre Page # Total Parcels Seller Buyer Personal Property I PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS I SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 800 Lot Size Dim.: 0.004.00 Tax Ira# 009.-01-01.0/1 Sqft. ist Floor Land SQFT 1,555,093 Assessed Value $ 350,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor Lot Size Acres 0.01 Land Assesment $ 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,158 Year Built 1980 Nhhd Code 42002 County/Town Tax $ 2,751 Bldg Style UNKNOWN School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 9,909 Stories ' 1.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 350,000 Baths 0 Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 0 Sewer NONE Prior Tax ID# 009.-01-01.0 Fireplaces Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 0 Kitchens Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 0 Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail NONE Res. Sites 0 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on Heat Type UNKNOWN Comm. Sites 1 town values. Taxes should be verified Exterior Swis Code 314200 directly from the local tax collector. Condition Basement Type Updated:04/09/2015 1:52 pm EXEMPTIONS: JIMPROVEMENTS: 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1970, 160.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) FENCE-CHN LK, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) TOWER- MONO, BUILT 2008, 150.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates First residential site and up to four Improvements, real-Wo.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. hftn-//wP.hann real -infra rnzn/rpalPA*it nI nn I nnnnnni Printer Friendly Report - Image Mate Online Page 1 of 2 Property Description Report For: 5077, Harris Rd, Municipality of Town of Onondaga Status: Active Roll Section: Taxable Swis: 314200 Tax Map ID #: 009.-01-01,0/1 NO Photo Property #: Available property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Site: coM 1 In Ag. District: No Site Property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Zoning Code: 02 Neighborhood Code: 42002 Total Acreage/Size: 0.01 School District: West Genesee Land Assessment: 2014 - $0 Total Assessment. 2014 - $350,000 Full Market Value: 2014 - $350,000 Equalization Rate: Legal Property Desc: Location #k813235 Harris Rd Sub Es-235 Deed Book: Deed Page: Grid East: 594115 Grid North: 1099710 owners SBA Towers 11 LLC 5900 Broken Sound Pkwy NW Boca Ratan FL 33487 Sales No Sales 1nthrmation Available Utilities Sewer Type: None Water Supply: Comm/publlc Utilities, Gas & elec Inventory Overall Eff Year Built: overall Condition: 0 Overall Grade: Overall Desirability: 3 Idings Basement Year Gross Floor AC°/a Sprinkler% Alarm% Elevators Type Built Condition Quality Area (sgft) Stories httn-I/nrfintnYannnvnPt/TmafP/rannrha7ftflP.,,.;,,r1.e,.-nnnnnnnnnynn nnnnnn Har..._.1 Road 24.2015 1:4,54Q Infiltration Test Rits At 8SCGPR2 Boundary Limits of Cuhural Resources and Biological Surrey Approved Variance Workspace Permanent Woftpace Temporary Workspace Aslriiinnol Tamnnrary Wmkq=m 0.05 0.1 0.2" 0.0T5 0.15 0.31m 02015 OgHPOObs range Owrlmy 01 USOS FMOM fr r5mgmor SIO 0 2015 ARwsofl Carporrxbn O 2016 Mot in O Al1O t _ Worid - United States - NY • Onondaga Co. - Onondaga 0 iEwa i =,'a-•u. t ., p 21 ' V&2015 real-into.com I realRecordTM cy 4 W +C— P__ T realRecord "' OWNIERSHIP INFORMATION bEI N. AMYN SETH BEN9AMIN 5d67 STAGECOACH RD ONONDAGA NY 13031-9794 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 009.-OS-05.0 Mail: CAMILLUS NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0164,00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/02/2014 Price $ 261,000 Deed Date 07/03/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5287 Page 157 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BYRNE WILLIAM Buyer BENJAMIN SETH Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER11 BUYER 1 $ 164,900 09/25/1995 Y PRESCOTT JOHN M PRESCOTT JANIE BYRNE WILLIAM C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I F-TAXINFORMATION Square Feet 2,342 Lot Size -Dim.: O.00xO.00 Tax ID# 009.-08-05.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,274 Land SQFT 21,310 Assessed Value $ 224,100 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,068 Lot Size Acres 0.59 Land Assesment $ 32,000 Fn. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,823 Year Built 1990 Nbad Code 42262 County/Town Tax $ 1,853 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 6,676 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 224,100 1 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 32,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 1990, Nbad. 'type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax Type 500 SQFT, CNDTNGarage Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated NORMAL, NORMAL, f# Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should GRADE: C Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Garage Bays 1 tax collector. Cooling Data!] NONE HEAT: ( HOT Updated: 04/10/2015 11:11 am Heat Type AI R) FUEL. ( GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1990, 500.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL I) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFI-, CONDITION NORMAL te; Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hftlAvebann. real-info.com/realPrint.asn?rcaNY%2FNY%2Ff%7°/69F'4949rkfrAOraYvl mqwYnw +f+ 611812015 real•info.com I realRecord- c .tf \ 4 cc9 ee, rea«ecordrM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I INICK PROCOPIO TELp RD 13215-1100 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 015r02-01.0 Mail: 4864 COPPERFIELD RD SYRACUSE NY 13215-1100 PHONE NUMBER. - CENSUS TRACT: 0160,02 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/10/2014 Price $ 182,000 Deed Date 11/10/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5303 Page 635 # Total Parcels 1 Seller GRAHAM DONNA Buyer PROCOPIO DOMINICK Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE JLENGTH SELLER BUYER1 1 $ 0 03/27/2006 N GRAHAM RONALD GRAHAM DONNA 2 $ 127,500 08/29/1996 Y KORBAS PATRICIA GRAHAM RONALD STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,328 Sqft. lot Floor 1,688 Sqft. Ind Floor 640 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1986 Bldg Style Units Stories Baths Bedrooms Fimplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 93.00x113.00 Land SQFT 10,509 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 CONTEMPORARY School District 312001 - WEST 1 GENESEE 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC 1 Water COMMERCIAL,/PUBLIC 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE 2 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN CENTRAL Res. Sites 1 HEAT: (HOT Comm. Sites 0 AIR) Swis Code 314200 FUEL: (GAS) ALUM/VINYL NORMAL FULL . EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -UP COV, BUILT 1986, O SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1996, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFF, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1986, 48.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 015.-02-01.0 Assessed Value $ 201,000 Land Assesment $ 21,300 School Tax $ 4,326 Cdunty/Town Tax $ 1,662 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,988 Full Tax Value $ 201,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 21,300 The calculated tax amounts are not exact, No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated rased on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxoth shalL not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. http:f$webaDp.real-info.com/realPrintwp7rc=NY%2FNY%2FOBNo2F3i42000l5oomoo2miawmm ,r, 611&2016 real-infacom I realRecordTm C P, reaff ecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION iVABEWANIEC BENIAMIN NABEWANIEC DAGA NY 13215-1112 PARCEL NO: 015.-02-18:0 Mail: 3488 WARNERS RD CAMILLUS NY 13031-9676 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/26/2014 Price $ 152,000 Deed Date 09/26/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5297 Page 682 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SWEENIE Buyer NABEWANIEC Personal Property0 WILLIAM BEN)AMIN P R IFSALESPRICE:]E DATE LENGARM TH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Oeet 1,808 Lot Size Dim.: 94.00x170.00 Tax ID# 01.5.-02-18.0 Sqft. lot Floor 1,232 Land SQFT 15,980 Assessed Value $ 163,800 qft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0,37 Land Assesment $ 25,600 Fin. Basement Sqft. 576 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,525 Year Built 1980 Nbad Cade 42261 County/Town Tax 1,355 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 4,880 1 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 163,800 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equallzatldn Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 25,600 Kitchens 1 utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1980, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 462 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: Included. All numbers are estimated Garage Type 21 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 based on town values, Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays i Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: ( HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 36.00 SQFf, CONDITION NORMAL 0) GAR-1.0 DIET, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFC, CONDITION NORMAL iVote: Display indicates first resldentlal site and up to four improvements. real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information hffpJ/ webapp.real-info.comfreWPrtnl.asp?rc=NY°A2FNrlo2F06 %2F314200015000oDDZ0180o000o0 17 V612015 real-info.com I realRecord7A1 realReCoridTM OWNERSHIP XNF,ORMATION MARZZALlE 30HN MARZIALE 5116 STAGECOACH RD ONONDAGA NY 130k-9793 COUNTY: 0 NO N DAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 009.-10-02.0 Mail: 5116 STAGECOACH RD CAMILLUS NY 13031-9793 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0164.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/06/2013 Price $ 375,000 Deed Date 09/09/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5252 Page 36 # Total Pamels 1 Seller WISEMAN Buyer MARZIALE JOHN Personal Property 0GREGORY PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE IL RM$ I SELLER BUYER 1 $ 353,000 08/30/2011 Y COLE MARY KAY WISEMAN GREGORY 2 $ 30,000 10/30/2001 N BSB NEWPRO INC COLE MARY KAY 3 $ 0 10/30/2001 N BSB BANK & TRUST COMPANY BSB NEWPRO INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,822 Lot Size Diet.: 158.13x200.42 Tax 10* 009.-10-02.0 Sqft. Ist Floor 2,822 Land SQFT 31,692 Assessed Value $ 360,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.73 Land Assesment $ 34,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 1,800 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,470 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 42262 County/Town Tax $ 2,871 lldg Style RANCH School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ 4 Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 10,341 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 360,000 Baths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 5 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 34,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad• Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage 'type 778 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN; FOOD, GRADE: B Cornet, Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Cooling Detail CENTRAL tax collector. HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: _ GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 778.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 64.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with W-1twfehann rea4-1nfn r:am1rPR1 Pri nt 4111 5118I2015 real-Infacom I realRecordl" A realRecor+dTi+;r OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SQLLIVAN GEORGE SULLIVAN 4863 THUNDER CLOUD DR ONONDAGA NY 1.3215-1264 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 015.-23-02.0 Mall: 4863 THUNDER CLOUD DR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1264 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/25/2013 Price $ Arms Lingth Y Libre 5236 Page Seller HANSEN GREG Buyer SULLIVAN GEORGE Personal Property 345,000 Deed Date 04/29/2013 644 # Total Parcels 1 0 PRIlPR SALES PRICE BATE ILNGTH11 SELLER il— ABUYER _ 1 $ 330,000 05/16/2008 Y SANELLI BREfT HANS__E__NGREG L,LAURA L 2 $ 322,100 04/21/2006 Y SUMMERSET HOMES SANELLI BRETT STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feat 3,267 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,578 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,689 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2006 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 3 FULL Bedrooms 5 Fireplaces 2 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: ( HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior UNKNOWN Condition EXCELLENT" Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 115.00x200.20 Land SQFT 23,023 Lot Size Acres 0.53 Zoning Nbad Code 42272 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS - BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2006, 771.00 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFr, CONDITION EXCELLENT 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Mote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 015.-23-02.0 Assessed Value $ 333,000 Land Assesment $ 45,000 School Tax $ 6,779 County/ Town Tax $ 2,605 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 9,384 Full Tax Value $ 335,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 45,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the Total tax collector. Updated: 05/03/2015 5:09 am real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Imp: Nwebapp.real-Info.corn/FealPrint.asp7rc=NY%2FNY962FO67%2F3142000150000023002000000D ill Sl18W15 real-Infocom I realReeordTm realRecordTl"' GEISS GERALD L AND.MARGUERITE K 4885 THUNDER CLOUD DR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1264 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 015.-02-41.0 Mail: 4805 THUNDER CLOUD DR S1fRACUSE NY 13215-1264 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date06/18/2013 Price $ 365,006 Deed Date 06/18/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5242 Page 227 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BUCK PETER Buyer GEISS GERALD L Personal Property 0ANDANDREALANDMARGUERITEK PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE ARMS LENGTHIN SELLER l BUYER I 1 $ 335,000 10/27/2006 Y SIGNATRUE CREST REVEL. CORP BUCK PETER 2 $ 50,000 07/14/2004 N GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATES LLC AD -CAMP DEVELOPMENT CORP STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I F-TAXINFORMATION Square Feet 2,904 Lot Size Dim.: 153.54x209.99 Tax XD# 015.-02-41.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,508 Land SQFT 32,242 Assessed Value $ 345,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,396 Lot Size Acres 0.74 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ , 7,209 Year Built 2006 Nbad Code 42272 County/Town Tax $ 2,770 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ I Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 9,979 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 345,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad• Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2006, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage e5Type 452 SQFT, Q Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DTN: GOOD, GRADE, GRADE: B Comm. Sites D included. All numbers are estimated . based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Sw is Code 314200 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Gaoling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior UNKNOWN Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS• BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2006, 452.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD w.^) POOL ST/VNYL, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.eom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htb:l vebaon.real-info.com/real Print.asn?rr.=NY°A2FNYQI.2Ff)R7%7F3149n rnir,OnriflfY7nAlrNUlf7fYx1 117 5It8l2015 real -Info can I realRecordTM re.+GlRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION CAppEI,.LA 36SEPH CAPPKLA 4892 THUNDER CLOUD DR ONONDAGA NY 1321,5-1!63 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date Arms Length Y Libre Seller LIPARI JOHN Buyer PARCEL NO: 015.-25-05.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 11/08/2013 Price $ 5259 Page CAPPELLA JOSEPH Personal Property SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 365,000 Deed Date 11/08/2013 627 # Total Parcels 1 SALES PRICE DATE ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 1 08/23/2013 N LIPARI JOHN 2 $ 0 12/08/2004 N GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATES LLC STRUCTU RAL 'INFORMATION Square Feet 3,207 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,994 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,026 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2005 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 t Baths 3 FULL Bedrooms 5 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2005, Garage Type 750.00 SQFr, CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: C Garage Bays 3 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim—, 218.14x190.09 Land SQFT 41,466 Lot Size Acres 0.95 zoning Nbad Code 42272 School District 312001 - WEST GENE -SEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL,IPUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 A-T7, BUILT 2005, 750.00 SQFF', CONDITION GOOD 0) POOL- ST/VNYL, BUILT 2007, 0 SQF7, CONDITION NORMAL te: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. LIPARI JOHN SUMMERSET HOMES LLC TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# O1S.-25-05.0 Assessed Value $ 269,000 Land Assesment $ 45,000 School Tax $ 5,789 County/Town Tax $ 2,225 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 8,014 Full Tax Value $ 269,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 45,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No speclaI district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector, Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am real-info,com maces no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.cotn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Mp:I/webapp,real-info.comlrealPrint,asp?re=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F314200015DDWO250050000000 ill 511812015 real-infoxom I realRecord"11 realftcorld " OWNERSHIP INFORMATION hi 1kdiN. igypREY SHUkRT ---- _ . 4837 COPAERFiIELb RD bNONDAGA NY W15-11.05 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: CIS.-24-06.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08116/2013 Price $ 355,000 Dead Date 08/19/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5249 Page 436 # Total parcels 1 Seller DRURY MARTIN Buyer BERGIN JEFFREY Personal Property 0 PMEOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER11 BUYER 1 $ 315, 000 06/77/ 2008 Y SIGNATURE CREST DEVELOPMENT DRURY MARTIN V CORP 2 $ 55,000 01/ 24/ 2008 N STERWOOD PARTNERS LLC SIGNATURE CREST REVEL. CO RP. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,764 Lot Size Dim.: 130.06x252.51 Tax ID# 015.-24-06.0 Sqft. I.st Floor 1, 540 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 335,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,224 Lot Size Acres 0.74 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 6,564 Year Built 2008 Nbad Code 42272 County/Town Tax $ 2,522 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ l Units GENESEE Total Tax $ 9,086 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL hull Tax Value $ 335,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATf, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 2008, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage e 9 Type 614 SQFT, Ras. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. 'Faxes should Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Garage Days 1 tax collector. Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:05/ 03/2015 5:09 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMEPROVII: MENTS: k) GAR -ILO ATT, BUILT 2008, 614.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2008, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvernents. real-infoxam makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hftpl/webapp.real-info.com/ rea]Print.asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F,9142OW150MM2400B0000000 1112 5118=15 real-Ir<foxom I realRecordTM rm iealRe cord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL N0: 015.-25-01.0 PURDY DAVID IN PURDY Mail: 4854 COPPERFIELD RD 4. 54 dQ0PERF'!91P RD SYRACUSE NY 1321S-1100 ONONDAGA NY 13215-1100 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/02/z013 Price $ 365,000 Deed Date 05/08/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5237 Page 91.0 # Total Parcels 1 Seller GABRIEL REGINA E Buyer PURDY DAVID W Personal Property 0 PRIORSALESF PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 1 06/01/2007 N ESHELMAN REGINA GABRIEL REGINA 2 $ 279,950 07/15/2005 Y SUMMERSEi HOMES LLC- ESHELMAN REGINA E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 3,408 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,889 Soft. 2nd Floor 1,519 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2005 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 1 Stories 2.00 Baths Sedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 3 FU LL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 233.62x117.93 Land SQF1r 27,551 Lot Size Acres 0.63 Zoning Nbad Code 42272 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE 0 Nbad.Type SUBURBAN NONE Res. Sites 1 HEAT: (HOT Comm. Sites 0 AIR) Swis Code 314200 FUEL: (GAS) UNKNOWN GOOD FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS- 0) GAR-1,0 ATf, BUILT 2005, 771.00 SQFf, CONDITION GOOD 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFi-, CONDITION GOOD 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2005, 231..00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2005, 65.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) POOL-CONCRET, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 015.-25-01.0 Assessed Value $ 348,000 Land Assesment $ 45,000 School Tax $ 6,198 County/Town Tax $ 2,382 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 8,580 Full Tax Value $ 348,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 45,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verlfied directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. MpJlwebapp.real-irTfo.com/rea[Prtnl,asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2FO67°/a2F31420001500000250010000(M ill 5J18l2016 real•info.com J realRecord'"" real ecordT14 QWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 01S.-01-11,0 CHESTNUT RICHARD CHESTNUT Mail: 3994 FOOTHILL PATH 3994 FOOTHILL PATH SYRACUSE NY 13215-1102 ONONDAGA NY 13215-1102 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/27/2013 Price $ 122,000 Dead Date 01/02/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5266 Page 509 # Total Parcels 1 Seller COLLINS JOHN Buyer CHESTNUT RICHARD Personal Property 0 PRIORF PRICE DATE ARMSF SELLER BUYERSALESLENGTH :1 No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,725 Lot Size Dim.. 0.00x0.00 Tax ID# 01S.-01-11,0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,400 Land SQFT 13,958 Assessed Value $ 139,400 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.80 Land Assesment $ 3 1,50 0 Fln. Basement Sqft. 325 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,000 Year Built 1971 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,153 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 4,153 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 139,400 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 31,500 IUtchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC 2 BSMT Nbhhd. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Type GARAGE Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax Garage Bays 2 Ras. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated Cooling Detail CENTRAL Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should HEAT: (HOT Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Heat Type AIR) tax collector. FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS. - BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: Note: Display indicates first residential site and .up to four Improvements. real-info.corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hWtwebagp.real-info.comfteaWPrintasp?rc=NY%2FNY%2FOW%2F3142000t500oQ00lG11000000O im 5J18124i5 real-ln<oxom i realRecord"" realRecord TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 015.-01-12.0 BAKOWSKI DANA SAKOWSKI T Mail., 3998 006THILL PATH SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 ONONDAGA NY 13215-1102 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 21D - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE XNFOR14ATI Sale Date 09/12/2014 Price $ 142,500 Deed Date 09/15/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5296 Page 207 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KALLFELZ Buyer BAKOWSKI Personal Pro perty0TIMOTHYDANA SALES PRIOR PRICE]F DATE ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 149,500 10/21/2005 Y BELL CATHERINE KALLFELZ TIMOTHY 2 $ 139,900 OB/08/2003 Y INFANTINO LAURA L BELL CATHERINE 3 $ 1 04/11/1996 N UNKNOWN UNKNOWN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION rAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,104 Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Tax ID# 015r-01-12.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,220 land SQFT 9,998 Assessed Value $ 148,400 Sqft, and Floor 884 Lot Sire Acres 0.60 Land Assesment $ 27,500 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,194 Year Bullt 1976 Nbad Code 42261 Cognty/Town Tax $ 1,227 gldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 -- WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax .$ 4,421 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 148,400 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooernx 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 27,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATi, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Tile calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1976, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 528 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptlons have been DIMENSIONS: included. All numbers are estimated Garage TypegyP 22 X 24), tesComm.. 0 based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1976, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL httn:ltwebaoo.real-info.comfrealPrim,:asn7rrrNYOA:-)FNYah FWDAPP.IIA? xxii.mnrmini nr +11) 511MG15 real-Info.com I realRecordTm rea[ReCor TM 0A0EL MICHAEL 4$76 COYENTRY RD ONONDAGA NY 13215-1002 PARCEL NO: 013.-03-11.0 Mail: 4876 COVE:NTRY RD SYRACUSE NY 13215-1002 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/06/2013 Price $ 185,500 Deed Date 05/06/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5237 Page 621 # Total Parceis 1 Seller CASPER CHRISTA Buyer VRABEL MICHAEL Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE RMS FSELLER BUYERSALES 1 1 $ 185,400 05/03/2013 Y CASPER CHRISTA VRABE9L MICHAEL 2 $ 1 08/19/2003 N CASPER JAY CASPER CHRISTA 3 $ 129,000 04/30/1998 Y WALTERS JOHN C/ROBERTA C CASPER JAY V JR/CHRISTA M STRUCTURAL INFORMATIDN LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,996 Lot Size Dim.: 95.00x276.00 Tax ID# 013.-03-11.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,078 Land SQFT 26,220 Assessed Value $ 201,700 Sqft, Ind Floor 918 Lot Size Acres 0.55 Land Assesment $ 32,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,341 Year Built 1996 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,668 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST Clty/Vlllage Tax $ l` Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 6,009 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 201,700 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization state 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 32,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1967, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: included. All numbers are estimated Garage Type 20 X 22), Comm. Sites D based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exteri o r WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 4PROVEMENTS; 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1967, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1982, 756.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1967, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. hNnAmphannmd-InfnrnmlrPalPrint=n7rr..NY9L.9FNYD/.9FM7W.9Fg9e9lMlWVVTVV 2MlnnrVir l RW 618/2016 real-Wo.com I realRecordTM realRecordT14 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WURLEY SCROLL ANNE 4agG COVENTRY RD ONONDAGA NY 13215-1002 PARCEL NO. 013.-03-16.0 Mail: 2713 LAKE RD SKANEATELES NY 13152-9029 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY., ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/26/2013 Price $ 202,500 Dead Date 06/27/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 221 # Total Parcels 1 Sailer HOGEL Buyer HURLEY SCHOLL Personal Property 0WILBURANNE SALES PRICE DAT>: LARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 0 10/07/2002 N HOGEL WILBUR R HOGEL WILBUR R IR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,144 Lot Size Dim., 136,00x169.00 Tax ID# 013,-03-16.0 Scift. 1st Floor 1,064 Land SQFT 21,970 Assessed Value $ 190,000 Sgft. 2nd Floor 1,080 Lot Size Acres 0.42 Land Assesment $ 27,700 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,865 Year Built 1968 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,485 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,350 0 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 190,000• Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 27,700 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1968, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: included. All numbers are estimated Garage Type Z2 Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swim Code 314200 be verified directly from the focal NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Says 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE TEAT; (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS; I) GAR-1-0 AT`T, BUILT 1968, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: PORCH-OPEN, BUILT 1968, 336.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained heroin or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httpl/webapp.real-info.com/reaJPrint.asp7rc=NY°k2FNY°A2FO67%2F31420001300W0030i50000000 lip 618r2015 real-inro.com I reaReoxdTm realRecordT14 OWNERSHIP- INFORMATION i40400y CONOR MII,RPky 49Q8 WLESTVIJ0W'-DR ONONDAGA NY 132118-1048 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL. NO; 013.-02-16.0 Mall. 4908 WESTVIEW DR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1048 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 SALE INFORMATION Sate Date 03/25/2013 Price $ 7-05,000 Deed Date 04/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5233 Page 857 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler BIVENS TIMOTHY Buyer MURPHY CONOR Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMSF, SELLER T_ ' BUYERSAUS11ILLENGTH 1 $ 135,600 05/08/2001 Y MICHAELS WILLIAM R/SHARON T BIVENS TIMOTHY R/SUSAN M STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,908 Soft. Ist Floor 1,076 Sqft. 2nd Floor 832 Fin. Basement Sgft. 0 Year Built 1968 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2,00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF 4 Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens' 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1968, 440 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Beat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement 'type FULL LOt INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.. 100.00x213.00 Land SQFT 21,300 Lot Size Acres 0.45 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS. BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENT5: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1968, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 1968, 384.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2008, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2008, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax XD# 011-02-16.0 Assessed Value $ 195,000 Land Assesment $ 28,300 School Tax $ 3,658 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,064 Full Tax Value $ 195,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 28,300 The cdiculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated.,05/03/2015 5:09 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information http:Nwebapp.real-info.com/reWPdntasp7rc--NY%2FNYclo2F067%2F31420001300000020160000000 112 6/18/2015 real -info aom I r"RecordTM realRecord"' OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LEDQENWOOp ADXM1 D DESMIET 4848 POMBRID6E CIR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1024 PARCEL NO: 013.-OS-32.0 Mail: 4848 PEMBRIDGE CIR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1024 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT. 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESII]ENCE SALE INFORMATION Sala Date03/31/2014 Prion $ 175,000 Deed Date 03/31/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5275 Page ISO # Total Parcels 1 Seller KEUCHLER Buyer LEDGENWOOD Personal Property 0CHARLESIADAMD PRIOR IFSALES PRICE DATE f L ARMS SELLERIF7 BUYER 1 $ 157,500 03/14/2012 Y BUCKMAN WALTER KEUCHLER CHARLES 2 $ 157,500 03/07/2012 N BUCKMAN WALTER KEUCHLER CHARLES STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I F-TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,247 Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Tax ID# 013.-05-32.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,160 Land SQFT 10,920 Assessed Value $ 199,700 Sgft. 2nd Floor 952 Lot Size Acres 0.78 Land Assesment $ 29,300 Fin. Rimement Sqft. 0 zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,298 Year Built 1975 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,652 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units i GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,950 do Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 199,700 Baths 2 FULL, I. HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.5 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1975, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 528 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should22X24), CNDTN: GOOD, Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the focal GRADE. B tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL IEXE: MPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 MPROVE ME NTS: PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.5 ATT, BUILT 1975, 0 sQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1975, 148.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-E=NCLSD, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1975, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. hfp)lwebapp.real-info.com/rea[Print.asp7rc= NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F3142000130000005D32O000000 112 611812015 real-lnfacom I realRecordTm realRecordTM IQWNARSHIP INFORMATION BROWN THOMAS BROWN 4849 PEMBRIDGE CIR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1023 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 013.-05-31.0 Mall: 4849 PEMBRIDGE CIR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1023 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/18/2013 Price $ 201,000 Deed Date 04/22/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5235 Page 801 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler BARRETT TIMOTHY Buyer BROWN THOMAS Personal Property 0 LPRIOR PRICE I DATE AIMS I SELLER BUYERSALESLi: NGTH No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,157 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,205 Sqft. 2nd Floor 952 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1975 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 y Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF 4 Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 975, 525 S QFrr Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 21 X 25), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays i Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior AWM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.0ox0.00 Land SQFT 12,740 Lot Size Acres 0.77 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 312001 - WEST GENESE=E Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbhld. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 013.-05-31.0 Assessed Value $ 192,900 Land Assesment $ 29,300 School Tax $ 4,151 County/Town Tax $ 1,595 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,746 Full Tax Value $ 192,900 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID* Full Land Value$ 29,300 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated. 05/03/2015 5:09 am t) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 975, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 9 PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFf, CONDITION NORMAL 4) PORCH-COV.ERD, BUILT 1975, 180.00'SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL Nate: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real -info. corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many source& real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hUpJAvebapp.real-i nfo.com/rea] Print.asp?rcm NY°/.2FNY%2FO67%2F31420001300000050310000000 112 6118/2015 reef-lnfoxom I realRecordTK realRecordTM 1OW14ERSHIP INFORMATION KELLEY DAt4bN C KELLEY 4850 GLIND>Ek LN ONONDAGA NY 13215-1010 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 013.-05-18.0 Mail: 4850 GLINDEN LN SYRACUSE NY 13215-1010 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 SALE INFORMATION Said Date 08/02/2013 Price $ 215,000 Dead Date 08/05/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5247 Page 769 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WALTERS MARK L Buyer KELLEY DAMON C Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLERSALES11LENGTH 1 $ 165,000 12/08/2010 Y WYNYARD PETER STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,481 Sqft. 1st Floor 845 Sqft. 2nd Floor 636 Fin. Basement Sqft. 800 Year Built 1980 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 1 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF A Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 ICtchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT; 1980, 462 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 21 X 22), CNDTN; NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT; (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 0.00x0A0 Land SQFT 9,800 Lot Size Acres 0.48 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 11) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Cl) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 60.00 SQFF, CONDITION NORMAL 1[ote; Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. BUYER WALTERS MARK TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 013.-05-18.0 Assessed Value $ 195,000 Land Assesment $ 26,000 School Tax $ 3,359 County/Town Tax $ 1,291 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,650 Full Tax Value $ 195,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 26,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/201.5 5:09 am httpYAvebapp.real-info.com/rea)Print.asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2F067Vo2F3142000130MM50180000000 119 5/18/2015 real-lnfo.com I realRecordTm T M A realRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION DRISCO.I. MA'. 171 0W DRISCOLlL 393 8. STETSON CIR ONONDAGA NY 19216-1028 PARCEL NO: 013.-06-06.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 COUNTY, ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0160.02 PROPERTY CLASS; 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 07/19/2013 Price $ 229,900 Dead Date 07/22/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5245 Rage 848 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MILLER Buyer DRISCOLL Personal Property 0THEODOREMATTHEW PRIOR PRICE FBATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALESLENGTH No sale hPsitory in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,829 Lot Size Dim.: 0.00K0.00 Tax ID# 013.-06-06.0 Sqft. ast Floor 993 Land SQFT 34,365 Assessed Value $ 215,000 Sqft. and Floor 836 Lot Size Acres 0.42 Land Assesment $ 40,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,100 Year Built 1985 Nbad Code 42272 County/Town Tax $ 1,575 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School district 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,675 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 215,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 40,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. hating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1987, Nbad. Type UNKNOVVN exact. No special district tax 360 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: included. All numbers are estimated Garage Type 18 X 20), Comm.. Sites 0 rased on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 TMi?ROVEMENTS: GAit-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1985, 416.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1985, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. J. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information Mpllwebapp.real-Info.comlrealPrint.asp?rc=NY°h2FNY%2F067%2F314200013000MOO600DWW 112 5f4&2015 real-Infacom I realRecordT" 41 TM realRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PORCELLO THOMAS 4189 SAINT 30HN DR ONONDAGA NY 1.3215-1248 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS,. 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 03/28/2014 Arms length Y Libre 5274 Seller KINGSTON Buyer PORCErLLO RONALD y THOMAS gel PARCEL NO: OILS.-03-13.0 Mail. SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 Price $ 160,000 Deed Date 03/28/2014 Page 934 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 I SALES II PRICEI DATE LENGTH 11 BUYER 1 $ 110,900 03/10/2000 Y BYARS DAVID L/MARIA S P KINGSTON RONALD ]/ELIZA M 2 $ 115,900 08/30/1996 Y RESCIGNANO DONALD BYARS DAVID L & MARIA S P STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,282 Lot Size Dim.: 119.00x212,00 Tax ID# 015.-03-13.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,470 Land SQFT 25,228 Assessed Value $ 152,100 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.58 Land Assesment $ 30,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 812 zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,273 Year Built 1965 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,258 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 4,531 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 152,100 Baths 3 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 30,000 Kitchens I. Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 2 BSMT Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not GARAGE Nbad, Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax Garage Bays 2 Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated Cooling Detail NONE Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should NEAT: {HOT Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Heat Type WATER/STEAM} tax collector. FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1965, 200.00 SQF, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Mp•Jlwebapp.real-info.canlrea]Print•asp. fo=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F31.420001600000030130m00 ill real-infoxom J realRecordTM Page 1 of I I1 read' ecordTM COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 00$.-02-37.0 Mail: 5132 HARRIS RD CAMILLUS NY 13031-9718 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0164.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/07/2013 Price $ 181,000 Deed Date 01/06/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5226 Page 204 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PECORI HANNELORE Buyer HELAK ADAM Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES I PRICE I DATE I L>ENGTIi L- AR SELLER _ I BUYER 1 $ 179,000 01/07/2013 Y PECORI HANNELORE HELAK ADAM 2 $ 0 10/05/2008 N WOLFRAM GERHARD WOLFRAM GERHARDT STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX XNFORMATION Square Feet 2,334 Lot Size Dim.: 124.O0x193.00 Tax ID# 008.-02-37.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,348 Land SQFT 23,932 Assessed Value $ 169,800 Sqft. 2nd Floor 986 Lot Size Acres 0.60 Land Assesment $ 13,500 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,654 Year Built 1961 Nbad Code 42341 County/Town Tax $ 1,404 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,058 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 169,800 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer PRIVATE Prior Tax Ia# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 13,500 Kitchens 1 utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT, 1961, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22)1 Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1961, 0 SWj CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1964, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1961, 96,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info,com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. i.. I! t , P ! - - -._.n.w--'_.....__..'___..----------------------- 5f1812016 real-lr foxom I realRecord'm realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION HUbSON ANDREW CASWELL 4158 SAINT ]OHN DR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1229 PARCEL NO: 015.-08-25.0 Mall: 4168 SAINT JOHN DR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1229 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE IN IFORMATION-7 Sale Date 06/27/2014 Price $ 196,000 Deed Date 06/30/2014 Arms Length Y Lure 5286 Page 411 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WHITESIDE Buyer HUDSON ANDREW Personal PropertyDAVID PkIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 195,770 06/27/2014 Y WHITESIDE DAVID HUDSON ANDREW 2 $ 179,900 08/16/2013 Y VANBEVEREN KEVIN WHITESIDE DAVID 3 $ 169,900 08/06/2004 Y EVANS NORBERT VANBEVEREN KEVIN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,914 Lot Size Dim.: O.00xO.00 Tax ID# 015.-08-25,0 Sqft. Ist Floor 1,074 Land SQFT 20,000 Assessed Value $ 180,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor . 840 Lot Size Acres 0.73 Land Assesme>nt $ 35,000 Fin. Basement Scift. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,874 Year Built 1965 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,489 Idg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ r# Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,363 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 180,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prlor Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 35,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1965, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 420 SQFr, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: Includ# are ) matedQonGarageType XCNDTN Comm. Sites 0 based townd. values.allues Taxesmbersshould(2D Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Says 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE HEAT:(HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: ASIC STAR 1999-2000 111MPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1965, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1978, 280.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1965, 180.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, hftp: lwebapp.real-info.comlrealPrinl.asp?rc=NY%2FNrA2FO6rlo2F314200015000DOD80250DOODOO 119 5/1&2015 real-]nfo com I rea]Record'l" realRecordTM Foy.,1,,14:" : Ikll7p IirA 0 [elk, DAVIS MARK 4195 SAINT,30HN DR ONGNDAGA NY 13215-1230 PARCEL NO: 015.-09-06.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/12/2013 Price•$ 167,000 Deed Date 11/21/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5261 Page 198 # Total Parcels 1 Seller DRISCOLL EILEEN Buyer DAVIS MARK Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE SELLER BUYER SALES LENGTH 1 $ 0 04/01/1990 N UNKNOWN UNKNOWN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,008 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,008 Fin, Bosom ant Sqft. 0 Year Built 1965 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF 4 Bedrooms 5 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1,0 ATT, BUILT, 1965, 400 S4F T, Garage Type; DIMENSIONS: 20 X 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: ( HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 107.00x192,00 Tax ID# 015.-09-06,0 Land SQFT 20,544 Lot Size Acres 0.47 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: I) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1965, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PATIO- CONCR, BUILT 1967, 360.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1965, 60.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note; Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. Assessed Value $ 182,800 Land Assesment $ 29,600 School Tax $ 3,934 County/ Town Tax $ 1,512 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,446 Full Tax Value $ 182,800 Equalization Rate. 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 29,600 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special -district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 05/03/2015 5:09 am real- inf6xom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-in£o.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httpltwebapp, real-info.comlrealPrintasp7rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F'31420009S000000900600d0b0f) 119 6148/2016 real-info.Gom I realRecardTm realRecoridTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION COi,WOLL JON COLWELL 4868 SURRSTO E RD ONONDAGA NY 132IS-1204 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 015.-03-14.0 Mail-, SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION jSale Date 07/29/2013 Price $ 193,000 Dead Date 07/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5246 page 925 # Total Parcels 1 Seller HERRINGTON DAVID Buyer COLWELLJON Personal Property 0 P ISALES PRICE DATERIOR LENGTH E-s 1ELLERBUYER 1 $ 0 11/09/2007 N HERRINGTON DAVID HERRINGTON DAVID 2 $ 97,500 10/26/1993 Y PALMER ROBERT D HERRINGTON DAVID P STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION L TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,904 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x283.00 Tax ID# 015.-OS-14.0 Sqft. let Floor 1,008 Land SQFT 26,300 Assessed Value $ 190,400 Sqft. 2nd Floor 896 Lot Size Acres 0.65 Land Assesment $ 31,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 4,097 Year Built 1980 Nbad Codes 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,575 Bldg Style COLONIAL 312001 - WEST School DistrictGENESEE City/Village Tax $ Units 1 Total Tax $ 5,672 11 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 190,400 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 31,000 Kitchens. 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1900, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 400 SQFT, Res, Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers -are estimated Garage Type( 2D IMENSIONS: X 20), Comm, Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN. Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling, Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: . BASIC STAR 1999-2000 MPROVEMENTS: GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1996, O SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) FENCE-STOCKD, BUILT 1996, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1996, 656.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1980, 24.00 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL hffoltwebann.real-frTro.com/reAPrint.asn7rr.=NYOA2FNYOA2FrA70/,2FRld9f=lSfxL7n gnlArfVWYM -W) 611812015 rea6info_com I reaft=d'M v' realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WHii'E jOHN WHITE 4274 WOODSTOCK WAY ONONDAGA NY 13215-1354 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: DIS.-16-10.0 Mali: 4274 WOODSTOCK WAY SYRACUSE NY 13215-1354 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/22/2014 Price $ 269,900 Deed Date 05/23/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5281 Page 364 # Total Parcels 1 Seller THROWER ALAN Buyer WHITE JOHN Personal Property 0 STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,356 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,288 Sgft. 2nd Floor 1,068 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1993 . Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 7 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT: 1993, 484 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: B Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 110.00x200.00 Land SQFT 22,000 Lot Size Acres 0.31 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42272 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS. t) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1993, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL j PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1993, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 572.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 015.46-10.0 Assessed Value $ 244,200 Land Assesment $ 39,400 School Tax $ 5,255 County/Town Tax $ 2,020 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,275 Full Tax Value $ 244,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 015-04-08.0 Full Land Value $ 39,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am MlpJ&vebapp.real-Info.com/real PrinLasp7rc=NY%2FNrA2FO67%2F31420001500000160100000DW 112 W80015 real-iMo.mm I realRecordT" y . _. . I TM real Record OWNERSHIP -INFORMATION _J BIEkAPA JEFFREY BIESIADA 47Z4 RUSHMORE DR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1311 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCIL NO: 015.-20-02.0 Mall: 4724 RUSHMORE DR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1311 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/20/2014 Price $ 280,000 Dead Date 05/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5281 Page 79 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PHILLIPS BRIAN Buyer BIESIADA JEFFREY Personal Property 0 PRICE LENGTH ARMS SELLER II BUYER SALES 11DATE 1 $ 260,999 11/07/2011 Y GILBERTSEN DAVID PHILLIPS BRIAN 2 $ 261,000 11/04/2011 Y GILBERTSEN DAVIT] PHILLIPS BRIAN 3 $ 295,000 09/21/2007 Y FEMANO RICHARD GILBERTSEN DAVID 4 $ 286,920 03/29/2007 Y TAROLLI CONSTRUCTION CO FEMANO RICHARD STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Fast 2,092 Lot Size: Dim.: 100.00x190.27 Tax ID# 015.-20-02.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,252 Land SQFT 19,027 Assessed Value $ 275,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 840 Lot Size Acres 0.44 Land Assesment $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 900 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 5,595 Year Built 2007 Nbad Code 42272 County/Town Tax $ 2,150 Idg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ 4 Units 1 GENESEEr Total Tax $ 7,745 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 275,000 Laths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 6 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# 015,-04-08.1 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2007, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should22X20), GCNDTN: OOD, Swis Code 314200 be•verifled directly from the local GRADE: B tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior UNKNOWN Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXE° MPTIONS: x3ASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2007, 0 S.QFIr, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 216.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 40te: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. w..•e....e...--.....1 t-t .., r....db.t•.`..n..7rn..A1VD/ I)C IVN. )Fzr 1bl^17i4 AeMnnn•vu_nnnnnn 5/1812016 real-Info.com i realRecordw realRecord pWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL. NO: 015.-19-30.0 ARNDT Nil:CHAEL D AND WENDY A Mail: 12 BLOOMS END 4729 RUSHMORE OR WEBSTER NY 14580-4317 ONONDAGA NY x321S-1389 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY; ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/26/2013 Price $ 434,560 Deed Date 11/27/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5261 page 804 # 'Total Parcels 1 LOCKWOOD ARNDT MICHAEL Sailer CHARLES C AND Buyer D AND WENDY A Personal Property 0KRISTINM I SALES u PRICE II DATE II LEIS! TH MS If SELLER 11 BUYER I 1 $ 400,000 06/21/2007 Y TAROLLI CONST CO INC LOCKWOOD CHARLES C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,498 Lot Sixe Dim.: 140.00x200,00 Tax ID# 015,-19-30.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,000 Land SQFT 28,000 Assessed Value $ 410,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,498 Lot Size Acres 0.64 Land Assesrnent $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 8,350 Year Built 2007 Nbad Code 42272 County/Town Tax $ 3,209 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax # 11,559 i Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 410,000 W# Baths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 015.-04-08.1 Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2007, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 832 SQFT, CNDTN: Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated EXCELLENT, Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should GRADE: B Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local Garage Bays 1 tax collector. Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior UNKNOWN Condition EXCELLENT Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROViEMENTS: 11) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2007, 832.00 SQFr, CONDITION EXCELLENT PORCH-COVERDr BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. MtnAvetmon rmi- nfn rnmlrpalPri nt acrY7rr l IYAL,9FNY 9FltF7o 9 A d9rYY19 YxYtmnrtan rYYwn a ra 6fla12015 real-Infoxom I r"RecordTM realRecordTM pWNERSHI.P INFORMATION MICIiEL DAVID MICHEL 4370. BARFORD RD ONONDAGA NY 13Z15-13115 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS. 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 016.-04-01.0 Mail: 4370 BARFORD RD SYRACUSE NY 13215-1316 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/21/2014 Price $ 167,200 Deed Date 05/22/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5281 Page 208 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WALDRON DANIEL Buyer MICHEL DAVID Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALES11 _- LENGTH No sa1P history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,191 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,323 Sqft. 2nd Floor 868 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1969 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 t Baths 2 FULL 4 Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1969, 483 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 21 X 23), CNDTN; NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FULL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 124.00x182.00 Land SQFtr 22,568 Lot Size Acres 0.48 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 312001 - WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIA€.jPUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad, Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENT$: I) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 1969, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1973, 512.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1969, 186.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note, Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 016.-04-01.0 Assessed Value $ 167,200 Land Assesmant $ 30,100 School Tax $ 3,878 County/Town Tax $ 1,490 City/Village Tax # Total Tax $ 5,368 Full Tax Value $ 167,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full band Value, $ 30,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am real-info.aom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httol/webaon.rest-info.r-omlreal print.aso7m=NYOA2FNYOAPFfIA7DA9F.gie2nmtcrvvrunemsmrvvm U1812015 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION fl)RYCK TIMOTHY I4375 BARFORD RD O)iONDAGA NY 13215-1309 real-Infoxom I realRecordvm COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date01/28/2014 Arms Length N Libre 5269 Seller ROMANO Buyer STURICK ANTHONY y TIMOTHY PARCEL NO;. 016.-02-02.0 Mail: 4375 BARFORD RD SYRACUSE NY 13215-1309 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 Price $ '136,000 Deed Date 02/04/2014 Page 470 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SALES 11 11 LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 0 05/07/2003 N ROMANO ANTHONY ROMANO ANTHONY STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,720 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x177.00 Tax ID# 016.-02-02.0 Sqft. let Floor 940 Land SQFT 17,700 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 780 Lot Size Acres 0.40 Land Assesment $ 25,300 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,260 Year Built 1970 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,253 Bldg styie COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE: Total Tax $ 4,513 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 136,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL,/PUBLIC Prior TaxID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 25,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 A7T, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1970, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: included. All numbers are estimated e egarageType 2,2 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) a Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition: NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL ci) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1972, 400,00 SQFf, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1970, 64.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information httpJlwebann.real-info.com/realPrint.aso?rc=NY%2FNY°k2F1167%2F3142=1E000o(Ic)2cwrAxKM in S1812095 real-infoaom I realRecordTM realRecord T14 SOWNERSHIP INFORMATION iRYL STEVEN BRADY 06 CRiSTWOOD LN ONDAGA NY 13215-1315 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE BALD INFORMATION Sale Date 05/31/2013 Arras Length Y Libre 5240 Seller HURWITZ JANET Buyer HORYL STEVEN PARCEL NO: 016.-06-08.0 Mail: 4906 CRESTWOOD W SYRACUSE NY 13215-1315 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 Price $ 175,000 Deed Date 05/31/2013 Page 242 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR ARMS SALESLENGTH BUYER SAL P SELLER.,_..,...,, , No _ J sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,888 Sqft. 1st Floor 900 Sqft. 2nd Floor 988 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1964 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 1 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 ltitchens I GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1970, 420 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 21), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lat Size Dim.: 108.00x150.00 Land SQFr 16,200 Lot Size Acres 0.37 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 42261 School District 313201 - WESTHILL Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2060 IMPROVEMENTS: 11.) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vi) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1964, 64.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 016.-06-08.0 Assessed Value $ 166,300 Land Assesment $ 25,000 School Tax $ 4,175 County/Town Tax $ 1,324 C1ty/VIIIag6 Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,499 Full Tax Value $ 166,300 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 25,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Wo:itwebann.real-info.comlrealPrins.asn?rc=NYOlo2FNY%2F067%2F3'1420009 117 611812015 real-into.com I realReeord- realRecordTM IOWN-ERSHIP INFORMATION JAVIS;30tO.ME BENTER 4136i5 MANDR HILL. DR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1336 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS; 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 016.-01-78.0 Mail: SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/02/2014 Price $ 199,500 Deed Date . 07/03/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5287 Page 179 # Total Parcels 1 Sailer COST MICHAEL Buyer DAVIS JEROME Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE - DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,616 Lot Size Dim.: 130.00x200.00 Tax ID# 016.-01-28.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,016 Land SQFT 26,000 Assessed Value # 175,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 600 Lot -Size Acres 0.60 Land Assesment $ 36,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 600 zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,452 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,327 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 G15NESEE Total Tax $' 4,779 Stories 2.00 Deslrability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 175,000 4* Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rats 1.00 Bedroom* 4 Sower COMMERCIALIPUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 36,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1977, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special distrlcttax 528 SQFr, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 24 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Data]] NONE FEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL BASIC STAR 1999-2000 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2010, 540.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL i) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1977, 60,00 SW, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to flour improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Mtp:ftwebapp.real-info.comlrea]Print.asp?rca N Y°%2FNY°k2FQ67%2F3142000160000001028Doom 1/2 5+161201"a real-info.com I realRecord"" realRecor+dTM IOWNERSHIP INFORMA_TIO_ N ARLISS MATTHEW ARLISS 4940 MANOR HILL OR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1321 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 016.-04-21.0 Milli: SYRACUSE NY 00000•-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/02/2014 Price $ 170,000 Deed Date 09/02/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5294 Page 739 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KELLER DAVID Buyer ARLISS MATTHEW Personal Property 0 SALES RICE BATE Il LENGTH ARMS SELLER II BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,100 Lot Size Dim.: 140.00x152.00 Tax ID# 016.-04-21.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,148 Land SQFT 21,280 Assessed Value $ 175,300 Sqft. 2nd Floor 952 Lot Size Acres 0.49 Land Assesment $ 30,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,772 Year Built 1976 Nbad 'Code 42261 Co'untV%To>ain Tax $ 1,450 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 -• WEST City/Village Tax $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 5,222 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 175,300 11 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 30,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 1976, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 484 SQFr, Rw. Bites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS; 22 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should Swis Code 314200 be verified directlyY from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE; C Garage Bays 1 Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1982, 419.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL C) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1976, 60.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information Mpll ebapp.real-info.comlrealPrintasp?rc=NY%2FNY°%2F067°%2F3142OWi6000000402100DWffl +i 611=15 real-Infoxom j realRecordTm rea, #.eCord TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Ip51 YY IKTOR MASNA .. d963 MANOR HILL DR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1320 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 016.-01-11,0 Mail. SYRACUSE NY 00000-0000 PHONIC NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 03/09/2014 Price $ 160,000 Dead Date 04/17/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5277 Page 248 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CAMUGLIA ROBERT Buyer MASNYY VIKTOR Personal Property 0 PRIOR II PRICE u DATE ARMS - LENGTH SELLER BUYERSALES 1 $ 111,000 10/15/1998 Y DRUCE GEROGE E CAMUGLIA ROBERT & CHRIS STRUCTURAL INFORMATZO—W-1 LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,680 Lot Size Dim.: 100,00x183.00 Tax ID# 016,-01-11.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 980 Land SQFT 18,300 Assessed Value $ 158,100 Sqft, 2nd Floor 700 Lot Size Agee 0.42 Land Assesment $ 28,300 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 3,402 Year Built 1968 Nbad Code 42261 County/Town Tax $ 1,307 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312001 - WEST City/Village Taut $ Units 1 GENESEE Total Tax $ 4,709 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 158,100 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Pront N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land value $ 28,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1970, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax 484 SQFr, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), Comm. cluded. amtn, Sites 0 All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 314200 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 UPdated:05/03J2015 5:09 am Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: rl) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1970, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1968, 64.00 SQFI-, CONDITION NORMAL l) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Mpllwebapp.real-irtfo.com/reWPrintasp?rc=NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F314200016DD000010110000D00 117 5/1812015 real-infacom I realRecordTk° OWNERSHIP INFORMATION HASE ROBERT 3 & ELLEN MCCAULY 4181 WOODED HEIGHTS CIR ONONDAGA NY 13215-1223 COUNTY-. ONONDA A PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ON f RESIDENC SALE INFORMATION IS Arms Length Y LI r--e-- Seller DALEY Buyer 3OHN N LY YEAR-ROUND 1994 RASE ROBERT 3 & LLEN MCCAULY PRIORf PRICE DATE SALES No sale history in database for STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,307 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,219 Sqft, 2nd Floor 1,088 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1980 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 AT7, BUILT° 1980, 560 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 28), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE MEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL PARCEL NO: 015.-06-26.0 Mail: 4181 WOODED HEIGHTS CIR SYRACUSE NY 13215-1233 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0163.00 Price $ 127,900 Deed Date 08/09/1994 Page 181 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 ARMS SELLER LENGTH parcel. LOT INFORMATION Lot ze Dim.: 107.00x231.00 Land QFT 24,717 Lot Si z Acres 0.53 Zoning 02 Nbad Co 42261 School Dis 31. -WEST GENESEE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer OMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water MMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities G S/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UN NOWN Nbad. Type UNK OWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 314200 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 28.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note; Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, BUYER TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 015.-06-26.0 Assessed Value $ 196,100 Land Assesment $ 31,000 School Tax $ 4,220 County/Town Tax $ 1,622 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,842 Full Tax Value $ 196,100 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 31,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:05/03/2015 5:09 am http://webapp. real - i nfo. com/real Pri nt. as p?rc= N Y%2F N Y°/a2F O67%2F 3142000150o0000$026e000000 110 POMEROY APPRAISAL. ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX D real-info.com I realRecordrm CCa!I i cif n D1 ` N 17 P Page I of 1 TM A realRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 07I..-02-09.4 TOWN OF DEWITT Mail: 5400 BUTTERNUT DR CK HILL RD EAST SYRACUSE NY 13057-8510 Y 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: Z COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 822 - WATER SUPPLY SWIS SBL: 3126890710000002DO90040000 SALE F 11DE. D LIBRE PAGE ARMS 5ELLER BUYER P1i;RS' # PARCELSDATEDATELENGTHPROP No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION Overall Eff. Yr Built 0 Lot Size Dlm.: 0.00x0.00 Overall Grade Land SQFT 43,560 Overall Condition AVERAGE Lot Size Acres 1.00 Construction Type Zoning 02 TAX INFORMATION Nbad Code 26006 SBL(Tax ID)#: 071.-02-09.4 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE- AssessBd Value $ 41,000 DEWITT Land Assesment $ 10,800 Desirability SUPERIOR School Tax $ 908 Water Front N County/Town Tax $ 415 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC City/Village Tax $ Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Total Tax $ 1,323 utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Full Tax Value $ 41,000 Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Equalization Rate 1.00 Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Prior Tax ID# Res. Sites 0 Full Land Value $ 10,800 Comm. Sites 1 Swis Code 312669 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. Ail numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:52 pm BUILDING USAGE USE AS: NON-CONTRIB BUILDING BREAKDOWN IDENT, BOECKH YR. GROSS STORY BSMT. BSMT. BLDS. MODEL BUILT QUALITY CONDITION PERIMETER SQ.Fr. STORIES HEIGHT AC°/a SPRINKLER% ALARM% TYPE SQ.Fr. UNKNOWN XMPROVEMENTS : 0) MISC. IMPRV., BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) MISC. IMPRV., BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) MISC. IMPRV,, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) MISC. IMPRV., BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) MISC. IMPRV., BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) MISC. IMPRV., BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-Vo.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infa.wm shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein, http://webatn).real-info.corm/realPrint.asn?rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F312689071OnO0002.f1OW040(inn ah rint s Xr e' I OIF- L5 41,1 rj OP , r'F _71 IlI-- PI-1 pop% el i - 7,11 Pock loll Road 24. 201 5 Infiltration Test Pits All BSCGP•2 Boundary Limits of Cultural Resources and Biological Survey Approved Variance Workspace Permanent Workspace Temporary Workspace MAr innni T mnnrnrv'Odnrkanaro 1:4,540 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Jon 02D 15 Qgilerlohe Image o ,-Oe y of USG5 Enrrhsw C- ogncr S10020IS f`rfoa OCorporarion92e45.Jot is p And ao. 4127/2015 real-lnro.com I realRecordn" i, realRecor rill OWNERSHIP INFORMATION J AIKOLAVSKY DMITRXY NIKOLAVSKY 6421 TULIPWOOD LN DEWITT NY 13078-8400 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/10/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5234 Seiler KIRCHOFF Buyer NIKOLAVSKY WILLIAM DMITRIY PARCEL NO: 071.5-03-07.0 Mail: 6421 TULIPWOOD LN JAMESVILLE NY 13078-8400 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 Price $ 355,000 Deed Date 04/10/2013 Page 794 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRXOR PRICE DATE MS LENTH E_ SELLER I-_- BUYERSALES IY1 $ 355,000 04/09/2013 KIRCHOFF WILLIAM NIKOLAVSKY DMITRIY 2 $ 317,500 02/27/2004 Y KARDJIAN PAUL M/CHERYL KIRCHOFF WM E/]ENNIFER J 3 $ 39,950 11/17/2000 Y THE LINBROOK GROUP KARDIIAN PAUL & CHERYL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,757 Lot Size Dim.: 112.00x200.00 Tax ID# 071.5-03-07.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,447 Land SQFT 22,400 Assessed Value $ 314,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,193 Lot Size Acres 0.51 Land Assesment $ 40,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 6,952 Year Built 2000 Nbad. Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,178 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEWITT City/Village Tax $ Units 1 Total Tax $ 10,130 y# Stones 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 314,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 40,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATP, Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2000, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 621 SQFT, Res, Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE; B Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated fused on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL; (GAS) Exterior A LU M/VI NY L Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL ExEmPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2000, 228.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2000, 621.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. MP.'//webapp.real-Info.com/realPrint.asp?rc--N Y°%2FN Y°A2F0670/,)2F312669071005MMOD700[xmr) 119 4/27/2015 real-info.com I realRecordl" realRecord"" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION IU HAIZHU P 5103 HARDSTONERD DEWITT NY 13078-9672 PARCEL NO: 071.5-02-28.0 _ Mail. 5103 HARDSTONE RD JAMESVILLE NY 13078-9672 PHONE NUMBER: I COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147,00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/25/2013 Price $ 350,000 Deed Date 06/28/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 104 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler MAZUMDAR TRIDIB AND Buyer LIU Personal Property 0CHANDRIMEHAIZHUP PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALESLENGTH _ No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,787 Lot Size Dim.: 130.02x198.20 Tax ID# 071.5-02-28.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,529 Land SQFT 25,770 Assessed Value $ 321,800 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,146 Lot Size Acres 0.52 Land Assesment $ 44,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,125 Year Built 1999 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town 'lax $ 3,257 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVI LLE- DEWITT Total Tax $ 10,382 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 321,800 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 44,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1999, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax Garage Type9YP 477 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been GOOD, included. All numbers are estimated GRADE GRADE : ]3 Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1999, 477,00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1999, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1999, 102.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD e: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infa.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. http:1lWAbapp.real-info.comlreal Pr i nt.asp?r c= N Y%2F N Y%2F067%2F 31268907100500020280wcwc) ill 4/27/2015 real-infacom I realRecord- r L1 realRecord EOWNERSHIP INFORMATION _ GROAT]OHN GROAT 5126 GREENBANK DR DEWITT NY 13078-9493 COUNTY: O NO NDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.5-02-06.0 _ Mail: 528 PLUM ST SYRACUSE NY 13204-1452 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/02/2014 Price $ 350,000 Deed Date 10/02/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5298 Page 529 # Total Parcels 1 Seller DEXTER JUSTIN Buyer GROAT JOHN Personal Property 0 PRICE DATE 11 ARMS I_.. SELLER 1 BUYERSALESLENGTH 1 $ 338,000 09/19/2011 Y HETZ ROBERT DEXTER JUSTIN 2 $ 338,000 09/16/2011 Y HETZ ROBERT DEXTER JUSTIN 3 $ 242,900 07/06/1999 Y J.M.G. INC D/B/A JMG OUST OM HOM HETZ ROBERT E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,145 Lot Size Dim., 100.00x260.79 Tax ID# 071.5-02-06.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,656 Lard SQFT 26,079 Assessed Value $ 343,900 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,072 Lot Size Acres 0.64 Land Assesment $ 33,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,614 Year Built 1999 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,480 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 Desirability JAMESVILLE-DEWITT TYPICAL Total Tax $ 11,094 Stories 2.011 Full Tax Value $ 343,900 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 2 Hater COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 33,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. gating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1999, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No speclaI district tax Garage Type 665 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated GRADE: B based on town values. Taxes should Garage Says 1 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local Goofing Detail CENTRAL tax collector. HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1999, 665.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PI) PORCH -OPEN', BUILT 1999, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1999, 106.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. In€ormation is obtained from many sources, real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htipJ/webapp.real-i nfo.com/real Pri rt.asp?rc=NY°lo2FNY%2F067°%2F312689071005000200600p0000 112 4/27/2015 real-info.com I rea[Recordym realReCORod r l.'! ZONES CHRISTOPHER JONES 51.35 GREENBANK DR DEWiTY NY 13078-9494 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date05/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre, 5240 Seller CUMMINGS Buyer ]ONES MICHAEL y CHRISTOPHER IPARCEL NO: 071.5-02-10.0 Mail: 5135 GREENBANK AR ^ JAMESVILLE NY 13078-9494 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 Price $ 372,000 Deed Date 05/30/2013 Page 9 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE I LENGTH ARMS SELLER .. 1 UYER 1 $ 372,000 05/29/2013 Y CUMMINGS MICHAEL ]ONES CHRISTOPHER STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,571 Lot Size Dim.. 0.00x0.00 Tax xD# 071.5-02-10.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,409 Land SQFT 43,996 Assessed Value $ 376,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 684 Lot Size Acres 1.01 Land Assesment $ 38,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 8,325 Year Built 1999 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,805 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units I JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 12,130 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 376,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Pull Land Value $ 38,000 IGtchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1-0 AZT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1999, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax 528 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: GOOD, Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local GRADE; B tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EKEMPTI0NS.- BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMP ROVE Mir PITS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1999, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1999, 161.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Aldte: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliabiTityof the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hltpJlwebapp.real-info.comireal Print.asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F31268907100500020100000000 1!4 4/27/2015 real-Info.com I realRecordTm i realRecor+dTM NERSHIP IN JOUGHERTY JAMES DOUGHERTY 5004 YELLOW WOOD PKWY DNWITF NY 13078-8528 PARCEL NO: 071.5-03-40.0 Mail., PHONE NUMBER: JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 COUNTY. ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 02/11/2014 Price $ 347,000 Deed Date 02/12/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5270 Page 294 # Total Parcels 1 Seller LANCE SCOTT Buyer DOUGHERTY JAMES Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALESILLENGTH 1 $ 283,290 11/20/2003 Y NVR INC LANCE SCOT!' A/COLLEEN M 2 $ 51,000 07/21/2003 Y BOULDER HTS ASOC NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,997 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,574 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,293 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2003 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 V Stories 2.00 1 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF. Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2003, Garage Type 666 SQFT, CNDTN. GOOD, GRADE: B Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dime 71.64x307.85 Land SQFT 22,054 Lot Size Acres 0.98 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 26269 Schaal District 312611 - AMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites I. Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 106.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2003, 666.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 11.) FENCE-STOCKD, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD FENCE -PICKET, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD cl) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2005, 6 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.5-03-40.0 Assessed Value $ 337,400 Land Assesment $ 50,000 School Tax $ 7,470 County/Town Tax $ 3,414 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 10,884 Full Tax Value $ 337,400 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 50,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am real-info.coin makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information Mp://wehapp.real-InfacomfrealPrirrt.asp?rc-NY%2FNY%2F067%2F3126890710050U03440DQ00000 112 4127/2015 real-info.com I rea]RecordTm f: P' realRecordTr4 1-.OWNERSHIP INFORMATION AN3BARAN JAHROMI HOOMAN HADISERAJI 4997 YELLOW WOOD PKWY DEWM NY 13078-8559 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/21/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5242 Seiler GIRNIK Buyer RANJBARAN CHRISTINE Y JAHROMI HOOMAN PARCEL NO: 071.5-06-03.0 Mail: 4997 YELLOW WOOD PKWY JAMESVILLE NY 13078-8559 C 7 1 ilrJvi-7 CENSUS TRACT: 0147,00 Price $ 360,000 Dead Date 06/25/2013 Page 868 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property D PRIOR SALES PRICE I - DATE II LENGTH IARMS I SELLER ii BUYER I 1 $ 317,519 03/31/2004 Y NVR INC GIRNIK CHRISTINE E 2 $ 51,000 01/23/2003 Y BOULDER HTS ASSOC NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,412 Lot Size Dim.: 296.12x208.98 Tax ID# 071.5-06-05.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,793 Land SQFT 61,883 Assessed Value $ 360,000 Sqft, 2nd Floor 1,416 Lot Size Acres 0.63 Land Assesment $ 51,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 zoning 02 School Tax $ 8,362 Year Built 2004 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,822 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 CitV/Vlllage Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 12,184 Storlas 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL pull Tax Value $ 360,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUSLIC Full Land Value $ 51,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2004, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage 'type 487 SQFF, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, included. All numbers are estimated GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 31.2689 be verlFed directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 35.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1.) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 487.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD e. Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the. use of the information contained herein. httplAvebapp,re4-info.com/reatPdnLasp?rc7-NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F3l26M71017SM00500000oo ty 4l2a=5 real-Wo.eom I realRecordw realRecordTM 1,0WNERSHIP INFORMATION ZHILCOTE 3EFF A CHILCOTE 5019 YELLOW WOOD PKWY DEWITT NY 13078-8521 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.S-06-03.0 Mail: 5019 YELLOW WOOD PKWY JAMESVILLE NY 13078-8521 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 03/29/2013 Price $ 282,000 Deed Date 04/02/2013 Arms length Y Libre 5234 Page 85 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler SINGH VINTA Buyer CHILCOTE JEFF A Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICK DATE LENGTH I11ARMS SELLER _If BUYER 1 $ 251,200 05/28/2004 Y NVR, INC, SINGH VINITA 2 $ 51,000 03/18/2004 Y BOULDER HTS ASSOC NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION 1 TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,975 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x210.00 Tex ID# 071.5-06-03.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,417 Land SQFT 21,000 Assessed Value $ 300,000 Sqft. and Floor 1,558 Lot Size Acre* 0.48 Land Assesment $ 51,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 6,301 Year Built 2004 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 2,880 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 9,181 at Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 300,000 r Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 51,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2004, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special dlstrlct tax 480 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptlons have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN• GOOD, Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local GRADE: B tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEEMENTS• l) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 28.00 SQF7, CONDITION GOOD GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFf, CONDITION GOOD l) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display Indicates first residentlal site and up to four improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from.many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with hhDVANebaDD.real-i nfo.com/rea]Print asD?re=NY%2FNY°/n2Fr)67%2F312fi13907inn..9rMM'4Yr iu3f1 uo 4T27/2016 real-Info.com I realRecord"' a' realR corT{ d OWNERSHIP INFORMATION REED FREDERICK REED 6443 RIVER BIRCHFIELD RD DEWITT NY 13078-8401 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.5-03-15.0 Mail: 3AMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/14/2013 Price $ 356,000 Deed Date 06/17/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5242 Page 1S # Total Parcels 1 Seller ZUKHER DAVID Buyer REED FREDERICK Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE L DATE LENGTH SELLER - BUYERI- 1 $ 285,000 09/13/2002 Y 3 M G INC ZUKHER DAVID E 2 $ 46,000 08/21/2002 Y BOUDLER HTS ASSOC I M G INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,010 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x202.15 Tax ID# 071.5-03-15.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,709 Land SQFT 20,215 Assessed Value $ 348,200 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,103 Lot Size Ames 0.46 Land Assesment $ 48,500 Fin. Basement Sgft.0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,709 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,524 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 11,233 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 348,200 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Sedroonns 4 Sewer PRIVATE prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 48,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 684 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Cade 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated.04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 244.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 30.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 11) GAR-1.0 A7T, BUILT 2002, 684,00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 160.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-info.aom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. Mp.,IMebapp,real-Info.com/real Print.asp?rc=NY%2FNY°A2Fo67%2F31268907lnO,siXx1,w.gl xxx m » 4/27/2015 real-in[o.com I realRecord"M j realR cord 14 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION J CABILES RYAN AND KARA 6434 RIVER BIRCHFIELD RD DEW17T NY 13078-8403 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE Z rA PARCEL NO: 071.5-05-O2.0 Mail: 116 KINGSPORT DRIVE, B AMESVILLE NY 13090-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/09/2013 Price $ 330,000 peed Date 08/12/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5248 Page 581 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KANG CHARLIE Buyer CABILES RYAN personal PropertyANDMIMIANDKARA PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LEPRICENGTF SELLER BUYER 1 $ 235,500 01/16/2002 Y SCIUGA CORP KANG CHARLiE/MIMI 2 $ 50,900 08/30/2001 Y BOULDER HEIGHTS ASSOC SCIUGA CORP STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,786 Lot Size Dim.: 130.00x155.00 Tax ID# 071.5-05-02.0 Sqft. I.st Floor 1,506 Land SQFr 20,150 Assessed Value $ 329,300 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,091 Lot Size Acres 0.46 Land Assesment $ 51,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,291 Year Built 2001 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,333 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 AMESVILLE-DEWITi Total Tax $ 10,624 1 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 329,300 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer PRIVATE Prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 51,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No specfaI district tax Garage Type 533 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE• B Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior AWM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type PULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAID 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 533.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 11) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 30.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD e: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, hdpYiwebapp.real-I rfo.com/real Print.asp7rc-NY%2FNY%2F067%2F3i2669D71OD5MO0200000D0 ill 4127/2015 real-Infoxom I realRecardTM realRecordTI'4 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION NANG LI PHOHA 5066 AZALEA DR DEWITT NY 13078-8402 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/28/2014 Arms length Y Libre 5290 Sailer PLATENIK SCOTT Buyer WANG LI PRIOR E RICE SALES 1 $ 240,300 2 $ 53,900 PARCEL NO. 071.5-05-04.0 _ - Mail, 5066 AZALEA DR JAMESVILLE NY 13078-8402 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 Price $ 322,000 Deed Date , 07/29/2014 Page 123 # Total Parcels I. Personal Property 0 DATE ARMS 11LENGTHSELLER BUYER 03/20/2003 Y I M G INC PLATENIK SCOTT P/NIKKI R 03/07/2003 Y BOULDER HT5 ASSOC J M G INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,347 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,398 Sqft. 2nd Floor 949 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built Bldg Style Units Stories Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 2003 COLONIAL 1 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 118.31x227.47 Land SQFT 26,912 Lot Size Aches 0.50 zoning 02 Nbad Code 26269 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEW ITT 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N 4 Sewer PRIVATE I Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC I Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE BUILT: 2003, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN 552 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 CNDTN: GOOD, Comm. Sites 0 GRADE: B 1 Swis Code 312689 NONE HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) ALUMNINYL GOOD FULL EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVIEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 212.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2003, 552.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD te: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.5-05-04.0 Assessed Value $ 282,000 Land Assesment $ 47,000 School Tax $ 6,243 County/Town Tax $ 2,854 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 9,097 Full Tax Value $ 282,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 47,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact, No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04/10/2015 ,'11:11 am real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.com shall not be Iiable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. tttpJAvebapp.real-irfo.comheal Print,asp?rc=NY°%2FNYOA2F067Yo2F3126890710050005004o0D0000 1/1 27/2016 real-info.com I realRecordn" 4 realRe cord- I~ QWNERSHI'P INFORMATION HEUNG WING CHAN 5071 AZALEA DR DEINITT NY 13078-8402 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.5-05-07.0 Mail. JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/04/2013 Price $ 345,000 Deed Date 07/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 568 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BOWEN RAY Buyer CHEUNG WING Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICEIL DATE 11 SELLER BUYERSALESLIRVC,S I 1 $ 318,000 09/30/2009 Y HOLST JOHN 1L BOWEN RAY 2 $ 269,900 06/03/2002 Y CROMP DAVID S HOLST JOHN R/ANITA L 3 $ 55,900 08/16/2001 Y BOULDER HEIGHTS ASSOC CROMP DAVID S STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,568 Lot Size Dim.: 54.55x209.65 Tax ID# 071.5-05-07.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,442 Land SQFT 11,436 Assessed Value $ 318,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,126 Lot Size Acres 0.65 Land Assesment $ 55,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,041 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $' 3,218 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 10,259 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 318,000 Baths 2 FULL , 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer PRIVATE Prior Tax ID# 071.-02-04.2 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 55,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 472 SQFf, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, Included. Ail numbers are estimated GRADE: B Comm. Shea 0 based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swim Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD GAR-1.0 ATi", BUILT 2002, 472.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2009, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hfpl/webapp.real-tryfo.com/realPrint.asp?rc--NY%2FNY%2FToNo2F3l258907100MSO070DOMM ire 4127/2016 real-info.com I realRe=61m realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 071.5-02-46.0 SAVAGE ALAN SAUNDERS Mail: 6362 TULIPWOOD LN 6362 TULIPWOOD LN JAMESVILLE NY 13078-8404 DEWITP NY 13078-8404 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sala Date 09/17/2013 Price $ 350,000 Dead Date 09/17/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5253 Page 139 # Total Parcels 1 Salter MCKENNA PATRICK Buyer SAVAGE ALAN Personal Property 0 SALOS PRICE DATEF_ LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 350,000 08/13/2013 Y MCKENNA PATRICK SAVAGE ALAN 2 $ 286,820 11/15/2002 Y THE LINBROOK GROUP LLC DB A HARR MCKENNA PATRICK J 3 $ 49,900 07/09/2002 Y BOULDER HTS ASSOC THE LINBROOK GRP LLC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I E—TAX INFORMATION Square Feat 2,915 Lot Size Dim.. 135.00x195.97 Tax ID# 071.5-02-46.0 Sqft. let Floor 1,632 Land SQFT 26,456 Assessed Value $ 318,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,083 Lot Size Acres 0.58 Land Assesment $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,041 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 26269 County/Town Tax $ 3,218 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312611 - Clty/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITf TutaI Tait $ 10,259 1 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 318,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 lCtchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Says 0 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Coaling Detail NONE Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated HEAT: (HOT Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should Heat Type AIR) Swis Code 312689 be verlfied directly from the local FUEL: (GAS) tax collector. Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS- 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 35.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 644.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many source& real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. http:l/webapp.real-info.comlreal Printasp?rc=NY°lo2FNY°k2F067%2F31268907100-RM20460000000 ill M2712015 real-Info.com I realRecardTM r£alRecordTM 1 U O_WNERSHIP_INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 071.5-03-36.0 UACKENBUSH GARRETT QUACKENBUSH Mail: 4986 YELLOW WOOD PKWY 4986 YELLOW WOOD PKWY ]AMESVILLE NY 13078-8516 DEWITT NY 1307'8-8516 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date07/12/2013 Price $ 300,000 Deed Date 07/16/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5245 Page 193 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MUTANGA Buyer QUACKENBUSH Personal PropertyTEURAIGARRETT PRIORIISALIl:S ARPRICEDATE LENGTH MS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 253,500 07/14/2004 Y NVR INC MUTANGA TEURAL AND EDELINE 2 $ 51,000 04/26/2004 Y BULDER HEIGHTS ASSOC NVR INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,590 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,314 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,276 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built Bldg Style Units Stories Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces 1Gtchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 2004 COLONIAL 2.00 2 FULL, 1 HALF 4 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2004, 480 SQFT, DIMENSIONS: 20 X 24), CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B CENTRAL MEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) ALUM/VINYL GOOD FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 126.30x195.09 Land SQFT 24,640 Lot Size Acres 0,59 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 26269 School District 312611 - 7AMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res, Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD GAR-1.0 ATI- BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2008, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.5-03-36.0 Assessed Value $ 287,300 Land Assesment $ 51,000 School Tax $ 6,361 County/Town Tax $ 2,907 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 9,268 Full Tax Value $ 287,300 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 071.5-03-35.0 Full Land Value $ 51,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included, All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am hliplMebapp.real-info.com/realPrint.aspTrc=NY°lo2FNY%2F067%2F312689071005=036000p000 1!2 4127/2015 real-info.com I realRecord'"' realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ANNO CECILE IANNO 6185 WATERLOO RD DEWiTT NY 13078-6408 PARCEL NO: 070.1-01-33.0 Mail: _ 6185 WATERLOO RD JAMESVILLE NY 13078-6408 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/14/2014 Price $ 1 Dees) Date 08/22/2014 Arras Length N Libre 5293 Page 396 # Total Parcels 1 Seller IANNO CECILE Buyer IANNO CECILE Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 60,000 01/05/2012 Y PECK HILL DEVELOPMENT, LL IANNO CECILE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 3,2D1 Scift. Ist Floor 3,201 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2012 Bldg Style RANCH Units Stories 1.00 t Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2012, Garage Type 618 SQFT, CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 74.91x169.28 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.00 Zoning 01 Nbad Code 26273 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2012, 618,00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2012, 59.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 070.1-01-33.0 Assessed Value $ 456,000 Land Assesment $ 75,000 School Tax $ 2,214 County/Town Tax $ 1,012 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,226 Full Tax Value $ 456,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 75,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am i, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. MtpJlwebapp.real-irdo.comlredPrfntasp?rc=NY%2FNY°A2FQ67°.62F'3l268907ODDlOODl033DD00000 ire 4127/2015 real-info.com I realRecordTm TM A realRecord IOWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 070,1-01-37.1 BHIMIRE ANIL GHIMIREE Maii: 6171 WATERLOO RD FAYETTEVILLE NY 00000-0000 DEWI7T NY 13078-0000 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: . ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT. - PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCF SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/13/2014 Price $ 450,000 Deed Date 06/13/2014 Arms Length N Libre 5284 Page 143 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PAUL M. FOWLER Buyer GHIMIRE ANIL Personal Property 0 PRIORSALESIF PRICE DATE LENGTARMSSELLERBUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATIDN Square Feet 0 Lot Size pint.: 121.34x192,92 Tax ID# 070.1-01-37.1 Sqft. 1st Floor Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 100,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor Lot Size Acres 0:54 Land Assesment $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. Zoning 01 School Tax $ Year Built 0 Nbad Code 26273 County/Town Tax $ Bldg Style UNKNOWN School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units ]AMESVILLE- DEWITT Total Tax $ Stories 0100 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 100,000 Baths 0 Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 0 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 At Kitchens utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays Nbad. 'type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Gaoling Detail # Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated Heat Type # Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should Exterior Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local Condition tax collector. Basement Type Updated;04/ 10/2015 11:11 am EXEMPTIONS: xMPROVEMKENTS: Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infaxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hllp:Nwebapp. real-info.comlredPrlyd.asp?rc=NY%2FNY*k2F067%2F3126890700010R010370010000 n 4/27/2016 real-info.com j realRecord"" realRecordTM IOWNERSHIP INFORMATION _ JHATTA LUNA ^^ 6165 HEMINGWAY RD DEWITT NY 13678-6450 COUNTY: O NO NDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 070.1-01-18.1 Mall. JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/03/2014 Price $ 370,000 Deed Date 01/03/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5266 Page 643 # Total Parcels 1 Seller HSIE PAN Buyer BHATTA LUNA Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LARMSNGTH SELLER BUYi:R 1 $ 84,500 09/24/2010 Y PECK HILL DEVELOPMENT LL PAN SHIH-HSIE 2 $ 84,287 09/24/2010 Y PECK HILL DEVELOPMENT LL PAN SHIH-HSIE STRUCTURAL. INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,728 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x166,67 Tax ID# 070.1-01-18.1 Sgft. 1st Floor 1,728 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 365,250 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.07 Land Assesment $ 75,000 Fin. Basement Sgft. 0 Zoning 01 School Tax $ 8,087 Year Sulit 2010 Nbad Code 26273 County/Town Tax $ 3,696 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units JAMESVI LLE -DEWITT Total Tax $ 11,783 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 365,250 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 2 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 070.1-01-18.0 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 75,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 2010, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax 488 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS, 20 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN• GOOD Swiss Code 312689 be verified directly From the local GRADE: B tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated: 04/10/2015 11:11 am HEAT; (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXL°MPTIONS- IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2010, 488.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD rl) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD e: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httpl/webapp. real-lr fo.com/realPrirtasp7rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F312SM7000iomlOI80010000 111 4127/2015 real-infacom I realRecordTm j` realRec rd" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LEIB JOHN KEIB 6100 WAITSFIELD DR S DEWITI' NY 13078-9306 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 070.1-01-43.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/24/2013 Price $ 995,000 Deed Date 06/24/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5242 Page 690 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MARRONE DOUGLAS Buyer KEIB JOHN Personal Property 0 ARMS SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHIF IF7SELLER BUYER No vale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 6,127 Sqft. I.st Floor 2,874 SgtL Znd Floor 3,253 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1994 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units Stories 2..00 Baths 5 FULL Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 2 ICtchens 1 GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT: 2009, Garage Type 887 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays I, Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT:(HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL.: (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 91.46x193.64 Tax ID# 070.1-01-43.0 Land SQFT Assessed Value $ 800,000 Lot Size Acres 1.00 Land Assesment $ 55,000 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 26273 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability SUPERIOR Water Front N Sower COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL,/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 SWIs Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS: IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2009, 887.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2009, 114,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1994, 333.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL e: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. School 'Tax $ County/Town Tax $ City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ Full Tax Value $ 800,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 55,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am real-info,com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hltp:lAvebapp.real-info eomirealPrinl,asp?re=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F31268907000100a10430000000 pia 4/27/2015 real-info.com I mSRecordTTM realRecordTM JOWNERSHIP INFORMATION WALI PRATEEK _ 6603 WESTCLIFFE RD DEWITT NY 13078-9310 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 07e.-04-O2.0 Mail: 6003 WESTCLIFFE RD JAMESVILLE NY 13078-9310 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 01/15/2013 Price $ 487,000 Deed Date 01/16/2013 Arms Length N Libre 5226 Page 910 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler MORGAN DAVID Buyer WALI PRATEEK Personal Property 0 PRIIOII SALES PRICE DATE ARMS 11LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 290,000 05/24/2010 N UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MORGAN DAVID 2 $ 290,000 02/18/2010 N UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MORGAN DAVID 3 $ 352,000 08/16/1999 Y iFSSWING NORMAN J BLACK DR HARRY & LISA KAY 4 $ 305,000 12/30/1992 N THE MERCHANTS NATIONAL BA LESSWING NORMAN J & WINANNE N 5 $ 320,000 06/05/1992 N STARKWEATHER CONSTR 000 THE MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK STRUCTURAL INFORMATION 1 LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 4,852 Lot Size Dim.: 115.00456.86 Tax ID# 070.-04-02.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,175 Land SQFT 18,039 Assessed Value $ 405,000 Sqft. Znd Floor 1,798 Lot Size Acres 0.51 Land Assesment $ 30,300 Fin. Basement Sqft. 879 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 8,967 Year Built 1991 Nbad Code 26273 County/Town Tax $ 4,099 Idg Style COLONIAL School District312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAM ESVI LLE- DEWITT Total Tax $ 13,066 Stories 2.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 405,000 Baths 4 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 5 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071-01-03.1 Fireplaces 3 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 30,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR--1.0 ATT, Nbad• Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1991, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact, No special district tax 805 SQFT, Res. Sites i amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 35 X 23), Comm. Sites fl Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: B Garage Bays 1 Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am Cooling DetalI CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL CXEMPTIONS• ASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1991, 210.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1991, 468.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1991, 605.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL t t#pIMebapp.rea!-info.com/realPrintasp?rc-NY%2FNY°2FO67%2F3126M7 yn 4/27/2015 real-info.com I realRecordTm a a. realRe cordTIM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION _ AACDONALD SCOTT 6019 WESTCLIFFE RD DEWM NY 1.3076-873,5 COUNTY: ONO NDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 070.-04-15.0 Mail: 45750 SUGARLOAF MOUNTAIN TRL INDIAN WELLS CA 92210-9181 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date O5/20/2014 Price $ 456,325 Deed Date 05/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5281 Page 113 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CANINO DAVID Buyer MACDONALD SCOT!' Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALEILENGTH 1 $ 1 06/23/2006 N CANINO DAVID CANINO DAVID 2 $ 495,000 01/30/2006 Y CHABOT GARY CANINO DAVID 3 $ 375,423 06/18/2001 Y KENWOOD HOMES INC CHABOT GARY 4 $ 55,000 03/20/2001 N NEULANDER LIZA KENWOOD HOMES, INC. STRuciruRAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,816 Lot Size Dim.: 0AOxO.00 Tax ID# 070,-04-15.0 Sgft. 1st Floor 2,072 Land SQFT 57,500 Assessed Value $ 495,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 1.32 Land Assesment $ 68,000 Fin. Basement Sgft.1,744 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 10,959 Year Built 2001 Nbad Code 26273 County/Town Tax $ 5,009 gidg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 15,968 Stories 1.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Fall Tax Value $ 495,000 Baths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBL.IC Prior Tax ID# 071-01-03.1 Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Pull Land Value $ 68,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC CAR- 1.0 ATf, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2001, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type g691 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been GRADE: B DTN: GOOD, G Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swls Code 312689 be verified directly from the local collector. Cooling Detail CENTRALtax HEAT: ( HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1 GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT 2001, 691.00 SQFr, CONDITION GOOD j. PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2001, 251.GO SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2001, 96.00 SQFr, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2001, 251.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in ibis site. Information httpJlwebapp. real-Info.com/reMPrintasp?rc--NY°%2FNY°/o2FO67%2F31288907000ODD04015000DOOD 1/2 4127/2015 real-Infoxorn I realRecord"A realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ZAMPANINO JOSEPH 3036 PECK HILL RD DEWI7T NY 13078-9754 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date06/30/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5287 Seller EUSTON Buyer CAMPANINO MOUNTFORT y JOSEPH PARCEL NO: 071.-02,11.0 Mail: 6215 ROSSITER RD JAMESVILLE NY 13078-9574 PHONE NUMBER; CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 Price $ 121,500 Deed Date 07/03/2014 Page 162 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE 11 LENGTH RMS SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,062 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,132 Sqft. 2nd Floor 930- Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1965 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Flreplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1975, 576 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 24 X 24), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE, HEAT: Heat Type ELECTRIC) FUEL: ELECTRIC) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 100,OOX200.00 Land SQFT 20,000 Lot Size Acres 0.42 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 26151 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL,/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.-02-11.0 Assessed Value $ 164,600 Lund Assesment $ 24,400 School Tax $ 3,644 County/Town Tax $ 1,666 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,310 Full Tax Value $ 164,600 Equallxation Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 24,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. Ali numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am 4PROVEMENTS: 11 4 CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1975, 570.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-ROOF, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1965, 221.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL ttittpJlwebapp.real-info,comlreai Pri nt.asp7ra- NY°h2FNY°k2FO67%2F312689071000DW20l 1D0o0000 112 4127/2015 real-i nto.com l real Record"" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION sHAPIRO OWEN SHAPIRO 51.59 BURNSIDE DIR DEWITT NY 13078-3711 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.4-02-13.0 Mall: JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/13/2014 Price $ 440,000 Deed Date 11/13/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5304 Page 101 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MOLOFF LAWRENCE Buyer SHAPIRO OWEN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE LDATE ILENG TH L SELLER BUYER 1 $ 440,000 11/12/2014 Y MOLOFF LAWRENCE SHAPIRO OWEN 2 $ 365,000 09/15/2006 Y ARMBRUSTER JOHN P & MOLOFF LAWRENCE M & NANCY AVERONICAF 3 $ 294,550 05/10/2000 Y KENWOOD HOMES INC ARMBRUSTER JOHN P & VERONICA F 4 $ 102,000 01/12/2000 Y POINTE EAST DEVELOPERS, I NC. KENWOOD HOMES, INC. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,943 Lot Size Dim.: 54.55x25B.62 Tax ID# 071.4-02-13.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,133 Land SQFT 14,108 Assessed Value $ 361,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 810 Lot Size Acres 0.64 Land Assesment $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 7,993 year Built 2000 Nbad Code 26971 County/Town Tax $ 3,653 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 11,646 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 361,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071.4-01-02.0 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 IGtchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad, Rating ABOVE AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2000, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 701 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers areCNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swls Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT:(HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 iPROVEMENTS. 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2000, 35.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 2000, 701.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD- 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 2010, 151.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 2010, 92.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2010, 228.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD ht1p Awebapp.real-i rfo.comtrealPriM.asp?rG NY%2FNY°%2P067%2F31288907100400020130000000 10 4/27/2016 real-info.com f realRecordTM 6 Qltj OWNERSHIP_ INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 071.1-01-16.2 3ROER PATRICIA Mail: 5981 BAY HILL CIR S981 BAY HILL CIR JAMESVILLE NY 13078-9747 DEWITT NY 13078-9747 PHONE NUMBER. COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/12/2013 Price $ 275,000 Deed Date 06/12/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5241 Page 551 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WILL DOROTHY Buyer BROER PATRICIA Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS -- SELLER I BUYER - SALES LENGTH ii 1 $ 275,000 06/05/2013 N WILL DOROTHY BROER PATRICIA STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,099 Lot Size Dim.: 72.00x105.00 Tax ID# 071.1-01-16.2 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,139 Land SQFT 7,560 Assessed Value $ 300,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 960 Lot Size Acres 0.17 Land Assesment $ 43,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 8,842 Year Built 1987 Nbad Code 26971 County/Town Tax $ 4,042 Bldg Style TOWNHOUSE School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 12,884 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 300,000 e Baths 3 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# 071.-01-16.2 Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 43,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1987, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: included. All numbers are estimated NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should GRADE: i3 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local Garage Bays 1 tax collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1987, 440.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLG/CN, BUILT 1988, 140.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1 PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1987, 128.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1987, 128.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htip://webapp.real-info.com/realPrint.asp?rc=NY%2FNY%2F067%2F31268907100100010160020000 112 4/27/2015 real-info.com I realRecord- OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 071.4-01-40.0 U-6049 BAY HILL CIRCLE L Mall, 120 E.WASHINGTON ST.,#105 6049 BAY HILL CIR SYRACUSE NY 13202-0000 DEWITT NY 13078-3714 PHONE NUMBER; COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 PROPERTY CLASS- 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 03/05/2014 Price $ 375,000 Deed bate 03/06/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5272 Page 658 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CHOW Buyer LINDA NU-6049 BAY HILL personal PropertyCIRCLEL 3AL 3 PRICE BATE LENGTH AR SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,569 Lot Size Dim.: 95.00x95.00 Tax ID# 071.4-01-40.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,986 Land SQFI' 9,025 Assessed Value $ 360,500 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0,17 Land Assesment $ 50,000 Fin. Basement Scift.1,583 Zoning School Tax $ 7,981 Year Built 2004 Nbad Code 26971 County/Town Tax $ 3,648 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312611 - City/Village Tax $ Units I. 7AMESVILLE-DEWM Total Tax $ 11,629 Stories 1.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 360,500 j Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 50,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 2004, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage e 687 SQFT, g Type Q + Res, Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CDTN: GOOD, included. All numbers are estimated GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays 1 Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax collector. Gaoling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated: 04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 315.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD _..,. 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2004, 26.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD f1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 687.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD e: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hUp:lAwebapp.real-info.aom/realPrintasp?rc=NY°IA2FNY%2F067%2F31268907i004000i0400000000 ill 4127/2015 real-into.com I realRecord"m 4J realfRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ALLEY EDWIN KELLEY 6071 BAY HILL CIR DEWITT NY 13078-3714 COUNTY., ONONDAG PROPERTY CLASS. -ONE FAMI YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.4-01-36.3 Mail: JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/25/2014 Price $ 339,000 Deed Date 06/25/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5285 Page 590 *'Total Parcels 1 Seller CALKINS ANNE Buyer KE:LLEY EDWIN Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE 7 ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 291,500 03/09/2012 Y OLIVA JOSEPHINE 2 $ 291,450 03/08/2012 Y OLIVA JOSEPHINE 3 $ 261,500 10/03/2004 Y PAUL M FOWLER BEVEL. CORP STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,697 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,756 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sgft.1,089 Year Built 2004 Bldg Style Units Stories Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Rays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type RANCH 1 1.00 3 FULL 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2004, 467 SQFT, CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B 1 CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) ALUM/VINYL GOOD FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 48.24x80.00 Land SQFT 3,859 Lot Size Acres 0.09 Zoning Nbad Code 26971 School District 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEW ITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 266.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Y) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2004, 31.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 467.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. CALKINS ANNE CALKINS ANNE OLIVA JOSEPHINE E TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.4-01-36.3 Assessed Value $ 309,200 Land Assesment $ 43,000 School Tax $ 6,846 County/Town Tax $ 3,129 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 9,975 Full Tax Value $ 309,200 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 43,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No spa claI district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. YtfpJlwebapp.real-info.comlrealPrintasp7rc=NY%2FNY%2F067°%2F3M8907100400010360030000 in 4127/2015 reat-Enfoxw I redRecordlm realRecordTt4 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION I AAGAN ROBERT 6110 BAY HILL CIR DEWx1T NY 13078-3708 COUNTY: 0 NO NDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.4-01-12.2 Mail: JAMESVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/23/2013 Price $ 275,000 Deed Date 07/09/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5244 Page 476 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler WEHRLE GEORGE Buyer RAGAN ROBERT Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES II PRICEII DATE IILENGTH II SELLER BUYER 1 $ 238,600 08/02/2001 Y FOWLER DEV CORP PAUL M WEHRLE GEORGE & MARILYN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATIDN Square Feet 1,954 Lot Size Dim.: 72,64x90.00 Tax ID# 071.4-01-12.2 Sqft. , 1st Floor 1,954 Land SQFT 6,538 Assessed Value $ 277,500 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.15 Land Assesment $ 43,000 , Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 02 School Tax $ 6,144 Year Built 2001 Nbad Code 26971 County/Town Tax $ 2,808 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312611 City/Village Tax $ Units 1 ' JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Total Tax $ 8,952 Stories 1.00 Desirability SUPERIOR FUII Tax Value $ 277,500 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 f Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 071.4-01-12.0 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 43,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATf, Nbad, Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2001, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax Garage Type 453 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Comm. Sites 0 included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should Garage Bays I, Swis Code 312689 be verified directly from the local tax Collector. Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: ( HOT Heat Type AIR) Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS.- 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2001, 33.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2001, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1.0 ATi-, BUILT 2001, 453.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Zte: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real- info.corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httplAvebapp. real-i rkfo.com/reW Pri nt.asp?rc=NY°k2FNY%2FO67DA2F3126890710040Wl0120020WO 1/1 4127/2016 realRecord TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FORNBERG ROBERT TORNBERG 6105 BAY HILL CIR DEWM NY 13078-3709 real-Infacom I realRecordTm COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 071.4-02-20.2 Mail: 6105 BAY HILT. CIR JAMESVILLE NY 13078-3709 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0147.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date03/29/2013 Price $ 280,000 Deed Date 04/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5233 Page 893 # Total Parcels 1 Seller DENNIS Buyer TORNBERG Personal Property 0STEPHANROBERT SALES PRIGS11 DATE LENGTHF SELLER ~ BUYER 300,355 02/28/2001 Y PAUL M FOWLER DEVELOPMENT CORP DENNIS STEPHAN &ABRA STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,510 Sqft. 1st Floor 2,510 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2001 Bldg Style RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 j Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR•-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2001, Garage Type 490 SQFT, CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Garage Says 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 45.03x105.00 Land SQFT 4,728 Lot Size Acres 0.11 Zoning 02 Nbad Code 26971 School Distrlet 312611 - JAMESVILLE-DEWITT Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating ABOVE AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Cam m. Sites 0 Swis Code 312689 EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR IMPROVIEMENTS• 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2001, 0 SQFr, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2001, 490.00 SQFF, CONDITION GOOD nte: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 071.4-02-20.2 Assessed Value $ 275,000 Land Assesment $ 43,000 School Tax $ 7,342 County/Town Tax $ 3,356 City/Villages Tax $ Total Tax $ 10,698 Full Tax Value $ 275,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 071.4-01-02.0 Full Land Value $ 43,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/10/2015 11:11 am real-irsfo.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hUl l/webapp.real-€nfo.comlreMPrintasp?rc=NY°lo2FNY°h2F067%2F3126M710040=0200020000 911 POMEROY APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX E 1 i ' Street Atlas USA D 2008 Pius FlAa`L rf,e L`h F4a DANTn,6 BIND Lli y r g U,' aT1lP PD F tf 84ft 1-law ks watch 8791 HuTlaw Ln n, ' 3023. 3030. 3034 Stevcnago D, ,.a+•' `' d •, H779 Radbum Rd172 Rndb,a'n Rd . S 8742 Radbum Itd - Y' o e* rrLes l+ru as ,`r 6 8787 Radbum R 1 A P4 1 4S` y x767, 8769 Vallingby Cii 8726 Radbum Rd + - linos Vila LA g re 8750. 8752. 8760 Blue heron Cir x 8724 Radbum Rd rrrAr• fRtl.Irr i tj N F 9727 WaldcnLn 9714 Radbum Rd z 4010. 4014. 4017. 400 Brixhnm Cl 1% N vmr. Rd C'ci! Tce•:'n 8677, 8681. 8696 UtChtvarnh Ln i 1059 Aasslwod L11 Ley :•rLCalCF 41 r! i039 WaiouleLn tip r,C! Plat•' °c y4Y Kr, Cl: 3016 Yaoav Paml Ln 3067 Amberlea Ln - PNIDct Lr' "!' sI,., ce g ry C 9 an A : 2Y faalA/I ' N 3058. 1059. 3062 Hayficid Ln - se. Dee 1/1 i= ;100, 3107, 31 11 Kinysbridge Ln o LCc r4 r U a n C. 14 J LL i P[n Data use subject to license. #TN Scale 1 . 9,600 02007 Del-orme. Street Atlas USAS 2008 Pius. rPN,a,.wvl I o p 2- w. www.delorme.com FYI 1 = 800.0 ft Data Zoom 15-0 real-infoxom I realRecorffm Page 1 of 1 realRecorT14ld OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 079.-0l.-15.0 CROWN COMMUNICATION INC Mail: PMB 333 4017 WSHNGTN RD 8803 N ENTRY RD 15317-0000 LYSANDER NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT. 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 837 - CELLULAR TELEPHONE TOWERS SWIS SOL: 31368907900000010150000000 SALE DATE PRICIc DATE LIBRE PAGE LENGTH DEED F—ARMS SELLER BUYER PROP #PARCELS No sale history In database .for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION Overall Eff. Yr Built 2001 Lot Size Dim.: 106.00x141.50 Overall Grade Land SQFT 14,204 Overall Condition Lot Size Acres 0.32 Construction Type Zoning PUD TAX INFORMATION Nbad Code 34 SSL(Tax ID)#: 079.-01-15.0 School District 313601 - Assessed Value $ 242,100 BALDWINSVILLE Land Assesment $ 25,000 Desirability UNKNOWN School Tax $ 5,517 Water Front N County/Town Tax $ 1,702 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC City/Village Tax $ Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Total Tax $ 7,219 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Full Tax Value $ 242,100 Nbad, Rating UNKNOWN Equalization Rate 1.00 Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Prior Tax ID# 079.-01-10.1 Res. Sites 0 Full Land Value $ 25,000 Comm. Sites 1 Swis Code 313689 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should he verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1.52 pm BUILDING USAGE BUILDING BREAKDOWN IDENT. BOECKH YR. GROSS STORY BSMT. BSMT. BLDS. MODEL BUILT QUALITY CONDITION PERIMETER SQ.FT. STORIES HEIGHT AC% SPRINKLER% ALARM%TYPE SQ.FT. UNKNOWN IMPROVEMENTS: 1) SHED-FINISHD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) TOWER- FREE, BUILT 2001, 150.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED-FINISHD, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) FENCE-CHN LK, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real-info,com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn:/Iwehann.real-info.cnm/rPalPrint 1 gARQn7Qn01)n0n1 m ennnonnn n 117Mn1 r Printer FriOndly Report - Image Mate Online Page 1 of 3 Property Description Report For: 8803 N Entry Rd, Municipality of Town of Lysander Status: Re-Activated Roll Section: Taxable Swis: 313689 Tax Map ID #: 079.-01-15.0 No Photo Property #: Available Property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Site: COM 1 In Ag. District: No Site Property Class: 837 - Cell Tower Zoning Code: PUD Neighborhood Code: 00034 Total Acreage/Size: 106 x 141.5 School District: Baldwinsville Land Assessment: 2015 - Tentative Total Assessment: 2015 - Tentative 25,000 242,100 2014 - $25,000 2014 - $242,100 Full Market Value: 2015 - Tentative 242,100 2014 - $242,100 Equalization Rate: Legal Property Desc: A 70 Map# 11499, 3/9/2012 Deed Book: 4709 Deed Page: 180 ram' `d East: 574601 Grid North: 1162707 lOwners Crown Communication Inc pmb 353 4017 Wshngtn Rd McMurray PA 15317 Sales dba Crown Castle Communlctn pmb 353 4017 Wshngtn Rd McMurray PA 15317 Property Sale Prior Value Arms Addl. Deed Book Sale Date Price Class Type Owner Usable Length Parcels and Page 4/29/2002 $50,000 837- land Nys No No No 4709/180 Cell Only Urban Tower Devlpmt Corp Utilities Sewer Type: Comm/public Water Supply: Comm/public Utilities; Gas & elec L- . entory Overall Eff Year Built: Overall Condition: Normal Wn'llnrfintsy nnanv nn.UTmatrlrPnnv1 nQnv9fi1i-=Rr AIn')^AI r i,y^` }'; rl :; 1f'i r F,• .., II , J ,ij j p/IF?r I ,: f` Z. .s } f;ai -r Fl S Z. r,r is Per% },:s`,r.S r 1 I - F !•,}4{. 1. 1 -` Ilk FE-- J v F- T ,`Ifl *r,,' •I li fl . , ;Jf aq t, r iFJ 1t ItJ f . 7J1 E- rI •.':? { I r 'i! •l r - 1 f . xs b r + i '`i f * 1 ' s' f:P j4 r ,r rvd . iJ1 Oft r> fL-:?a I.r.'4;jai i r J,r'r"'S', aa'_`t--. i [:r Us.,".',,I.r •t,J'.f i-3r•.l irl•. _In- 5{ri l, In 9 Y Y M 0 af k-_ n I d 00 m N eas9 cu 7 amCwLa m u V j h c u> N t a v c w N J U cm F a.. O Z t, l9• N V P F lili a tr; 4 - - t Ll h real-infoxom I realRecordrM TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LISCUM MICHAEL LISCUM 8726 RADBURN DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1502 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 080.-01-24.0 Mail: 8726 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1502 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Page 1 of 2 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/02/2013 Price $ 200,000 Deed Date 01/02/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5225 Page 533 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MCCONVILLE Buyer LISCUM Personal Property 0WILLIAMMICHAEL SALES PRICE DATE FARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 200,000 12/31/2012 Y MCCONVILLE WILLIAM LISCUM MICHAEL 2 $ 192,000 11/01/2007 Y KASSAKATIS LEROY D/DONNA S MCCONVILLE WM 3 JR/ANGELA MARIE 3 $ 173,000 11/27/1990 Y AHOUGH MICHAEL B & BARBARA KASSAKATIS LEROY D & DONNA S STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,280 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x114.00 Tax iD# 080.-01-24.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,140 Land SQFT 11,400 Assessed Value $ 195,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,140 Lot Size Acres 0.26 Land Assesment $ 37,100 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,444 Year Built 1981 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,371 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,815 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 195,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax I1D# Fireplaces 2 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,100 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1981, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 22 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1981, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 1981, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL date: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com I realRecordrm Page 1 of 1 r real ec rdI• t OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 1 JORDAN CHRISTOPHER JORDAN 8724 RADBURN DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1502 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/29/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5302 Seller TANSEY Buyer JORDAN LESLIE y CHRISTOPHER OL*. $- PARCEL NO: 080.-01-25.0 Mail: 8724 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1502 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Price $ 192,500 Deed Date 10/30/2014 Page 103 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 107,500 06/13/1997 Y SILLIMAN JOHN E/JANETTE H TANSEY KEVIN L/LESLIE E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,016 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x116.00 Tax ID.# 080.-01-25.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,008 Land SQFT 11,600 Assessed Value $ 195,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,008 Lot Size Acres 0.27 Land Assesment $ 37,100 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,444 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,371 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,815 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 195,000 Baths 3 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,100 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type UNKNOWN exact. No special district tax amounts 576 SQFT, Res. Sites i or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Typegyp 24 X 24), Comm.. tes 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated;04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL; (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 2001, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2001, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote; Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in coruiection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com I realRecordrm realRecorid OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SZOT MARCIN T. 8714 RADBURN DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1502 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE au, Page 1 of I PARCEL NO: 080.-01-30.0 Mail: 8714 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1502 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/24/2014 Price $ 157,000 Deed Date 10/24/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5301 Page 355 # Total Parcels 1 Seller LOFTIS JOAN B. Buyer SZOT MARCIN T. Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER ^ BUYER 1 $ 195,000 08/31/2005 Y SULLIVAN MILLARD S & RONNY M LOFTIS JOHN H & IOAN B STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,080 Lot Size Dim.: 80.00x143.00 Tax ID# 080.-01-30.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,268 Land SQFT 11,440 Assessed Value $ 190,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 812 Lot Size Acres 0.30 Land Assesment $ 37,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,330 Year Built 1982 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,336 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,666 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 190,000 Baths 2 FULL, i HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 AT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1982, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 552 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 23 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX -WAR PERIOD -COMBAT BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS•_ 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1982, 0 SQF7, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1982, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1982, 224.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxorn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. h+r..• 111,..,A...„„---I Z-4r....„,1...,..i nnn nnnnnnnn, nnnnnnnnn. real-info,eom I TealRecordTM 1' M realRe or6A Page 1 of 1 6oV9 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 080.-04-04.0 MCALLISTER SCOTT Mail: 8757 VALLINGBY CIR SALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 LYSANDER NY 13027-1503 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY, ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/01/2013 Price $ 156,000 Deed Date 11/06/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5259 Page 334 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SMITH ROBERT Buyer MCALLISTER SCOTT Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LEND H SELLER BUYER 1 $ 89,000 12/31/1997 Y FOLTS NORINE M SMITH ROBERT T & SUSAN G STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,784 Sqft. 1st Floor 896 Sqft. 2nd Floor 888 Fin, Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1979 Bldg Style TOWNHOUSE Units i Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1979, Garage Type 624 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type SLAB/PIER LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 35.00x138.00 Land SQFT 4,830 Lot Size Acres 0.12 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 44 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: ALT VEf EX -WAR PERIOD -NON -COMBAT BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATE', BUILT 1979, 624.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1979, 98.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1979, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -UP OPN, BUILT 1979, 84.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 080,-04-04.0 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Land Assesment $ 32,400 School Tax $ 3,077 County/Town Tax $ 949 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,026 Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Equalization Rate 1,00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 32,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm real-info,com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.wm shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. real-infoxom I realRecord-Im Page 1 of I TIA JA re, a I Re c a ird OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MCGEE DAMES 8772 RADBURN DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1522 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE Lbv PARCEL NO: 050.-01-01.0 Mail: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114,01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/22/2014 Price $ 180,000 Deed Date 09/23/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5297 Page 206 # Total Parcels 1 Seller STEVENS BONNIE Buyer MCGEE JAMES Personal Property 0 PRIOR RA SALES l PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,976 Lot Size Dim.: 100A0x1B0.00 Tax ID# 080.-01-01.0 Sqft. ist Floor 988 Land SQFT 18,000 Assessed Value $ 185,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 988 Lot Size Acres 0.39 Land Assesment $ 37,800 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,216 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,301 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,517 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 185,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,800 Kitchens i Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated: 04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 1995, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1997, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 458.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL ate: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. I,t+.+•IJ.v.,L,.,.,.. r.....1 :—r--- l..Ir)-:..+....„7«..--1.iV0i fTa.ivni rnr.ni r.inran non nnnnnn.nn.nnnnnnn real-info.com I realRecordTM FM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LIU NATHAN 8769 VALLINGBY CIR LYSANDER NY 13027-1503 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE VZ Page 1 of 2 PARCEL NO: 080.-04-03.0 Mail: 8769 VALLINGBY CIR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1503 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/28/2013 Price $ 135,000 Deed Date 01/28/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5227 Page 755 *Total Parcels 1 Seller CORWIN DANIEL Buyer LIU NATHAN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS I SELLER 11 BUYER 1 1 $ 135,000 12/01/2012 Y CORWIN DANIEL LIU NATHAN 2 $ 128,000 11/15/2004 Y WHEELER RICHARD CORWIN DANIEL 3 $ 0 05/31/1994 N WHEELER RICHARD C & LOUISE K WHEELER RICHARD C & LOUISE K 4 $ 91,000 06/05/1992 Y PETFE LARNITA A WHEELER RICHARD C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,738 Lot Size Dlm.: 30.00x117.00 Tax ID# 080.-04-03.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 810 Land SQFT 3,310 Assessed Value 118,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 928 Lot Size Acres 0.08 Land Assesment $ 32,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 2,689 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 44 County/Town Tax $ 830 Bldg Style TOWNHOUSE 313601 - School District City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 3,519 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 118,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 2 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 32,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special distrlct tax amounts 280 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Typepeg 14 X 20), Comm, Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be vee rified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: Heat Type ELECTRIC) FUEL: ELECTRIC) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type SLAB/PIER EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR .1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1979, 120.00 SOFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -UP OPN, BUILT 1979, 60.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com I realRecordTm o Page 1 of 1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 080.-01-16.0 HULBERT GREGORY Mail: 8742 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 LYSANDER NY 13027-1522 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/29/2014 Price $ 147,900 Deed Date 05/29/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5281 Page 939 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BELLAIRE ]AMES Buyer HULBERT GREGORY Personal Property 0 SALESPRICE DATE ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 157,900 06/10/2005 Y FITZGERALD KENNETH W BELLAIRE ]AMES D 2 $ 108,000 02/13/1998 Y KARINS ]AMES P FITZGERALD KENNETH STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,560 Lot Size Dim.: 82.00x151.00 Tax ID# 080.-01-16.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 960 Land SQFT 12,382 Assessed Value $ 149,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 600 Lot Size Acres 0.29 Land Assesment $ 37,200 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,760 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,160 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,920 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 149,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,200 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 , FTSQ #Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type # Comm. Sites 0gYp (2G 22}, town s,a a Y < < ,e l values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 72.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real mfo,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.corn I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION BLOMGREN KIMBERLY ZAVAGE 3016 PEONY FARM LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1636 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/29/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5239 Seller KILLIAN Buyer BLOMGREN KASANDRA y KIMBERLY au ?0-o tAF'F_ Page 1 of ao b-VL-f C,5U05 6 PARCEL NO: 078.-01-02.0 Mail: 3016 PEONY FARM LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1636 PHONE NUMBER; CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Price $ 185,000 Deed Date 05/29/2013 Page 763 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR - SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH F SELLER BUYER 1 $ 185,000 05/24/2013 Y KILLIAN KASANDRA BLOMGREN KIMBERLY 2 $ 1 07/05/2005 N SMITH KASANDRA KILLIAN KASANDRA 3 $ 1 04/11/2002 N SMITH MATTHEW C SMITH KASANDRA L 4 $ 88,000 05/12/2000 N CHARTER ONE MORTGAGE INC SMITH MATTHEW C 5 $ 97,467 09/30/1999 N PALADINO FRANK P & DEBORAH L CHARTER ONE MORTGAGE,INC. 6 $ 104,000 06/13/1996 Y CARLSON ROY V PALADINO FRANK 7 $ 106,000 04/27/1995 Y HUNT JOEL S CARLSON ROY V & CYNTHIA A STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,871 Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x140.00 Tax ID# 078.-01-02.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,121 Land SQFT 10,500 Assessed Value $ 160,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 750 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 29,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,646 Year Built 1978 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,125 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,771 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 160,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1978, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on eGara TypegYP 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Gaoling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 I IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1978, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 1992, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1978, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL real-info,com I realRecordTM t to ' Page 1 of I OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-12-19.0 ENGLERT EMILY ENGLERT Mail: 3100 KINGSBRIDGE LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 LYSANDER NY 13027-1630 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 03/21/2013 Price $ 142,000 Deed Date 03/22/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5233 Page 62 # Total Parcels 1 Seller LAFAVE KEVIN Buyer ENGLERT EMILY Personal Property 0 BUYER SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER11 1 $ 80,000 12/03/1999 Y MAESTRI PAUL J/DIAHN LAFAVE KEVIN P 2 $ 87,500 07/20/1993 Y BASSETT BYRON JR MAESTRI PAUL ) 3 $ 93,500 01/03/1992 Y PELKIE TIMOTHY I BASSETT BYRON JR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,467 Lot Size Dim.: 70.00x136.00 Tax ID# 078.-12-19,0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,052 Land SQFT 9,520 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.22 Land Assesment $ 29,600 Fin. Basement Sqft. 415 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 2,963 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 914 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 3,877 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,600 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 2 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All O NIE # Res. SitesCoolingDetailN, r 1 numbers are estimated based on HEAT: (HOT AIR) # Comm- Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified Heat Type FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 290.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real -info coin snakes no warranty or guarantee concerting the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Infonnation is obtained from many sources. real -info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.corn I realRecordTM k4" Page I of I A rea(Recor RAW OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SIDLAKE RICHARD 3062 HAYFIELD LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1626 PARCEL NO: 078.-02-35.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/23/2014 Price $ 108,000 Deed Date 07/24/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5289 Page 698 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PIEDMONTE Buyer BIDLAKE Personal Property 0CINDYRICHARD P RI 0 RjSALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER F_ IBUYER 1 $ 67,000 04/26/1999 Y THOMAS GAIL L PIEDMONTE CINDY 2 $ 83,000 10/19/1990 Y EST THOMAS MCMAHON THOMAS GAIL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,332 Lot Size Dim.: 58.00x109.00 Tax ID# 078,-02-35.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,332 Land SQFT 6,322 Assessed Value $ 120,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.32 Land Assesment $ 31,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning 07 School Tax $ 2,735 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 844 Bldg Style RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 3,579 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 120,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 31,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 352 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been incfuded, All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 16 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated;D4/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type SLAB/PIER EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFf, CONDITION NORMAL 1) FENCE-STOCKD, BUILT 1995, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL slote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.com shall not be iiable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com I rea]RecordTM Aw OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PAGAN EDGAR 8696 LETCHWORTH LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1716 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS- 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE LV Page I of I PARCEL NO: 078.-04-44.0 Mail: 8696 LETCHWORTH LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1716 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114,01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/12/2014 Price $ 210,000 Deed Date 08/12/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5291 Page 894 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WELCH ELLEN Buyer PAGAN EDGAR Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH _ 11 ARMS SELLER I BUYER 1 $ 210,000 08/11/2014 Y WELCH ELLEN PAGAN EDGAR 2 $ 1 01/10/2000 N WELCH JOSEPH D WELCH JOSEPH D STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,380 Lot Size Dim.: 52,00x178,00 Tax ID# 078.-04-44.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,190 Land SQFT 9,256 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,190 Lot Size Acres 0.38 Land Assesment $ 31,800 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,558 Year Built 197'7 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,964 Stories 2.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization hate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 31,800 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1977, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts 600 SQFT, Res. Sites i or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 5, 24 X e eh Comm. Sites 0 town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: B Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX -WAR PERIOD -COMBAT ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION FAIR 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL gote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, real-infoxom I realRecordTNI ` ' () (LOage 1 of 2 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-04-10.0 SOUTHWORTH ROBERT Mail: 8752 BLUE HERON CIR S752 BLUE HERON CIR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1707 LYSANDER NY 13027-1707 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114,01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/17/2014 Price $ 204,600 Deed Date 07/22/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5289 Page 315 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SHERWOOD Buyer SOUTHWORTH Personal Property 0LYNNROBERT PRIOR BUYER SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS I SELLER11 1 $ 1 03/10/1999 N SHERWOOD LYNN E SHERWOOD LIVING TRUST DATED MARCH 10, 19 2 $ 120,000 04/18/1996 Y TEDESCO ANDREW R SHERWOOD LYNN E 3 $ 147,000 10/12/1990 Y CARYL ROBERT & ELIZABETH TEDESCO ANDREW & PATRICIA STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOTINFORMATION TAXINFORMATION Square Feet 1,892 Lot Size Dim.: 67.00x188.00 Tax ID# 078.-04-10.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,352 Land SQFT 12,596 Assessed Value $ 175,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 540 Lot Size Acres 0.58 Land Assesment $ 45,600 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,988 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,230 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,218 Stories 2.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 175,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front Y Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,600 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1977, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 576 , FTSQ #Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included, All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on eGara Type # Comm. Sites D9YP (24 X 24) town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE' C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1977, 30.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note; Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com I realRecordTM Nj 6.C,:Ll-- Page 1 of 1 t OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-04-09.0 TURCOTTE ERIC TURCOTTE Mail: 4248 LYRA CRSE 8750 BLUE HERON CIR LIVERPOOL NY 13090-1906 LYSANDER NY 13027-1707 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/05/2014 Price $ 178,500 Deed Date 09/08/2014 Arras Length Y Libre 5295 Page 509 # Total Parcels 1 Seller HUBER PHILIP Buyer TURCOTTE ERIC Personal Property 0 PRIOR] SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 162,500 O5/22/2008 Y 3AECKH EBERHARD HUBER PHILIP M STRUCTURAL INFORMATION F LOT INFORMATI FTAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,352 Lot Size Dim.: 67.00x188.00 Tax ID# 078.-04-09.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 880 Land SQFT 12,596 Assessed Value $ 175,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 472 Lot Size Acres 0.39 Land Assesment $ 39,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,988 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,230 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,218 Stories 2.00 Desirability SUPERIOR Full Tax Value $ 175,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front Y Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 39,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.5 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1977, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 504 SQFT, # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All Garage TgType CNDTN: numbers are estimated based on NORMAL, # Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE: C Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays I Cooling Detail NONE Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm HEAT: (HOT Heat Type WATER/STEAM) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.5 ATT, BUILT 1977, 504.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -UP OPN, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.cotn E realRecordTM Page Iof1T 1 -. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 1PARCEL NO: 078.-12-07.0 FULTON KARI L Mail: 3111 KINGSBRIDGE LN 3111 KINGSBRIDGE LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1629 LYSANDER NY 13027-1629 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/25/2013 Price $ 200,000 Deed Date 06/26/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 62 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BUNKER THOMAS T Buyer FULTON KARI Personal Property 0ANDBEVERLYCL PRIOR SALES RRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 210,400 08/16/2005 Y ELDAN HOMES INC BUNKER THOMAS T STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATI E TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,760 Lot Size Dim.: 90.00x71.00 Tax ID# 078.-12-07.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 660 Land SQFT 6,390 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,100 Lot Size Acres 0.26 Land Assesment $ 30,100 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,558 Year Built 2005 Nbad Code 45 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,964 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 30,100 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2005, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts FT440SQFT, , # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type # Comm. Sites 0gyP (20 X 22) town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT AIR) Heat Type FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS; 1) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first resldentlal site and up to four improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee conceming the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.cont sl}all not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the mfonnation contained herein. real-info.corn I realRecordT" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PEARCE KELLY 3107 KINGSBRIDGE LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1629 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE: FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE 00 PARCEL NO: 078.-12-08.0 Mail: 3107 KINGSBRIDGE LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1629 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Page I of I SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/01/2014 Price $ 201,000 Deed Date 07/01/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5266 Page 477 # Total Parcels 1 Seller FITZGERALD MICHAEL Buyer PEARCE KELLY Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHRIORIFARMSIFSELLERBUYER 1 $ 201,000 06/30/2014 Y FITZGERALD MICHAEL PEARCE KELLY 2 $ 189,000 10/27/2011 Y OREILLY TIMOTHY FITZGERALD MICHAEL 3 $ 184,000 10/27/2011 Y OREILLY TIMOTHY FITZGERALD MICHAEL 4 $ 198,925 07/29/2005 Y ELDAN HOMES INC OREILLY TIMOTHY S & LISA L STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,764 Lot Size Dim.: 70.00x159.00 Tax ID# 078.-12-08.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,262 Land SQFT 11,130 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 502 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 29,800 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,558 Year Built 2005 Nbad Code 45 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,964 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,800 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2005, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 420 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included, All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 21), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated;04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior UNKNOWN Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 2005, 138.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site Information is obtained from many sources. real-infacom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com { realRecordTM f OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MCARDELL LISA M 3058 HAYFIELD LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1626 Z-9--lage 1 of 2 U04); y apt Q"L PARCEL NO: 078.-02-34.0 Mail: 3058 HAYFIELD LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1626 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 09/23/2014 Price $ 127,500 Deed Date 09/24/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5297 Page 238 # Total Parcels 1 Seller STEIN ROBERT W Buyer MCARDELL LISA M Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LARVGTH SELLERE_ BUYER 1 $ 89,900 07/02/2001 Y SCOTT LYNN N STEIN ROBERT W/LINDA K 2 $ 56,903 05/08/1998 N SECRETARY OF HUD SCOTT LYNN 3 $ 105,564 12/18/1997 N REFEREE ELBADAWI SAME THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN A DEVEL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,400 Lot Size Dim.: 53.00x113.00 Tax ID# 078.-02-34.D Sqft. 1st Floor 1,080 Land SQFT 5,989 Assessed Value $ 120,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 29,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 320 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 2,735 Year Built 1978 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 844 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL 313601 - School City/Village Tax $ Units 1 District BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 3,579 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 120,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1978, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 364 SQFT, Q Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 14 X 26), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector, NORMAL, GRADE' C Updated: 04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL:( GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX -WAR PERIOD -NON -COMBAT ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1978, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL —_ 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1978, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1978, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com I realRecordTM N 0 ('%a*-of 1 OWN INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-02-33.0 MUSCATELLO JAMES M SHEFTIC Mail: 3059 HAYFIELD LN 3059 HAYFIELD LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1625 LYSANDER NY 13027-1625 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/30/2013 Price $ 131,325 Deed Date 10/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5258 Page 329 # Total Parcels 1 Seller YOUNG MATTHEW J Buyer MUSCATELLO personal Property 0ANDJENNIFERCJAMESM PRIORISALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SARMSIELLER BUYER 1 $ 98,000 04/23/2002 Y JERAM ROBERT M YOUNG MATTHEW J/JENNIFER C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,664 Lot Size Dim.: 53.00x135.00 Tax ID# 078.-02-33.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 7,155 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.25 Land Assesment $ 30,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 624 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 2,849 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 879 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 3,728 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 30,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 1 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays I Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail CENTRAL # Res. Sites I or exemptions have been included, All numbers are estimated based on HEAT: ( HOT AIR) # Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be ver#fied Heat Type FUEL.: (GAS) Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 168.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, real - info com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection wish, the use of the infonnation contained herein. W$ 5 L44a) real-info.com I realRecordTM O-D m- Page I of 1 kArealRe cordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION IPARCEL NO: 080.-03-23.0 WILSON MICHELLE Mail: 8787 RADBURN DR 8787 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1519 LYSANDER NY 13027-1519 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS., 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE: SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/28/2013 Price $ 169,900 Deed Date 07/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 539 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KURTZ RONALD Buyer WILSON MICHELLE Personal Property 0 JPRI BUYERSALESPRICEDATELENGTHLOP- F7 SELLER 11 1 $ 113,500 05/21/1996 Y RABIDEAU DANIEL J & DEBORA L KURTZ RONALD F 2 $ 122,500 12/15/1992 Y WEBSTER THOMAS D 000 RABIDEAU DANIEL J STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,976 Lot Size Dim.: 80.00x129.00 Tax ID# 080.-03-23.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,248 Land SQFT 10,320 Assessed Value $ 168,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 728 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 37,000 Fin, Basement Sqft. 0 zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,829 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,181 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,010 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 168,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS; numbers are estimated based on Garage Type ( 20 X 20), # Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1.46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT, (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 168.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the; content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-infoxom j realRecord7m realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GIANNINO LUCIANNE 8779 RADBIIRN DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1519 COUNTY: O N 0 N DAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE 0 6Q-age I of 1 PARCEL NO: 080.-03-19.0 Mail: 8779 RADBURN DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1519 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/30/2013 Price $ 159,000 Deed Date OS/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5236 Page 823 # Total Parcels 1 Seller GRAY JAYSON Buyer GIANNINO LUCIANNE Personal Property 0 SALE$ PRICE DATE ARMS ILENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 155,000 07/24/2012 Y CONKLIN KEVIN GRAY JAY50N 2 $ 157,000 07/20/2005 Y VREDENBURG CURT CONKLIN KEVIN J 3 $ 147,500 04/20/2004 N CENDANT MOBILITY FINANCIA L VREDENBURG CORP CU RTICATH E RI N E 4 $ 109,900 11/24/1993 Y HACH DAVID R HAMPTON JENEAN M STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,612 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,228 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 384 Year Built 1979 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type 2 BSMT GARAGE Garage Bays 2 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) WOOD NORMAL FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 95.00x129.00 Land SQFT 12,255 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1979, 140.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 080.-03-19.0 Assessed Value $ 155,000 Land Assesment $ 37,000 School Tax $ 3,532 county/Town Tax $ 1,090 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,622 Full Tax Value $ 155,000 Equalization Rate 1100 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 37,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com, I realRecordTM realR cordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MAXWELL GREG MAXWELL 4017 BRIXHAM CT LYSANDER NY 13027-1500 D PARCEL NO: 080.2-12-02.2 Mail: 3442 STANFORD DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1745 PHONE NUMBER: Page I of I COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/15/2013 Price $ 200,000 Deed Date 07/16/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5245 Page 244 # Total Parcels 1 Seller JOHNSON BARBARA Buyer MAXWELL GREG Personal Property 0 5ALSE PRICE DATE LENGTH ARM SELLER BUYER 1 $ 170,000 08/?4/1995 Y MERLE BUILDERS INC JOHNSON BARBARA A 2 $ 18,500 08/14/1995 N NYS URBAN DEVLP CORP MERLE BUILDERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATIONE TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,964 Lot Size Dim.: 50.00495.47 Tax ID# 080.2-12-02.2 Sqft. ist Floor 1,632 Land SQFT 9,774 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres D.21 Land Assesment $ 29,500 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,786 Year Built 1995 Nbad Code 48 County/Town Tax $ 1,476 Bldg Style RANCH School District 313601 - City/Vlllage Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 6,262 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 080.1-12-02.0 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1995, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 22), # Comm. Sites 0 town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swls Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1 A6 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 JIMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1995, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1995, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1995, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Dlsplay Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-in€o.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com I realRecordTm realR cord TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LINDA A WARMINGTON REVOCA 4031 BRIXHAM CT LYSANDER NY 13027-1500 PARCEL NO: 080.2-12-06.1 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 Page I of 1 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/15/2013 Price $ 225,000 Deed Date 12/11/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5263 Page 261 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MCWAIN Buyer LINDA A WARMINGTON Personal Property 0JANICEREVOCA PRIOR SALES pp XCE DATE LENGTHARMSSELLER BUYER 1 $ 161,900 02/08/2002 Y MERLE BLDRS INC DICE JANICE E 2 $ 22,000 09/20/2001 N NYS URBAN DEV CORP MERLE BLDRS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,880 Lot Size Dim.: 20.00x237.80 Tax ID# 080.2-12-06.1 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,556 Land SQFT 4,756 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 324 Lot Size Acres 0.41 Land Assesment $ 40,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD Schoal Tax $ 4,558 Year Built 2001 Nbad Code 45 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 Bldg Style RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,964 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 080.2-12-06.0 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC pull Land Value $ 40,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2001, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Garage Type 428 SQFT, CNDTN: Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included, All numbers are estimated based on NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE: C Swis code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2001, 428.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2001, 396.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-infoxorn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-in£o.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. t..-___/L_.,,L_____ ---_. .„r_ _- - rn...—........_. .--...-..-........------.— __- -..- zeal-info.com I realRecordTM rio realRecord'" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ROSS ROBERT ROSS 4014 BRIXHAM CT LYSANDER NY 1.3027-1333 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 080.2-22-09.1 Mail: 4014 BRIXHAM CT BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1533 PHONE NUMBER. CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Page 1 of 1 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07102/2014 Price $ 200,000 Deed Date 07/07/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5287 Page 268 # Total: Parcels 1 Seller BAMBURY EDWARD Buyer ROSS ROBERT Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH RMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 197, 900 10/ 28/2013 Y STRANEY LINDA BAMBURY EDWARD 2 $ 200,000 08/ 02/2006 Y LUTCHKO SAMUEL & ROSE A STRANEY LINDA A 3 $ 130,885 11/ 08/1996 Y MERLE BUILDERS INC LUTCHKO SAMUEL 4 $ 18,500 08/ 09/1996 N NYS URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIO MERLE BUILDERS, INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,486 Sqft. 1st Floor 1, 486 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1996 Bldg Style RANCH Units 1 Stories 1. 00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 2 Fireplaces 1 lCitchens 1 GAR-1. 0 ATT, BUILT: 1996, darage Type 428 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 39. 45x174.76 Tax ID# 080.2-12-09.1 Land SQFT 6,894 Lot Size Acres 0. 16 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 48 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL WaterFront N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX - WAR PERIOD -NON -COMBAT ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1. 0 ATr, BUILT 1996, 426.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1996, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1996, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL dote: Display indicates first residentlal site and up to four improvements. Assessed Value $ Land Assesment $ School Tax $ County/Town Tax $ City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ Full Tax Value $ Equalization Rate Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 200, 000 28,800 4,558 1,406 5,964 200,000 1.00 080.2- 12-09. 0 28,800 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special distrlct tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04/09/20IS 1.45 pm real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info. com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 1.......$1- 1--'-'- ..-- 1 ... C. ..... 1..1.I— • . — ,V,—,__—'n,—.r-n. r.__. n- nnn -------- --- ---- real-infoxom I realRecord"m realRecorld" m OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MCOMBER PAMELA 4010 BRIXHAM CT LYSANDER NY 13027-1533 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 080.2-12-10.2 Mail: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Page I of 1 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/16/2014 Price $ 199,900 Deed Date 01/16/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5267 Page 696 *Total Parcels 1 Seller HANSON PAUL Buyer MCOMBER PAMELA Personal Property 0 I PRIOR PRICE DATE RMS SELLER II BUYERSALESLENTH 1 $ 214,000 07/23/2009 Y WAGNER JOHN P HANSON PAUL 2 $ 140,000 07/31/2000 Y FELDMAN THOMAS J & GEORGANN WAGNER JOHN P 3 $ 135,000 09/30/1996 Y KRUX LISA FELDMAN THOMAS J/GEORGANN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,650 Lot Size Dim.: 117.59x188.78 Tax ID# 060.2-12-10.2 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,650 Land SQFT 22,199 Assessed Value $ 200,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.51 Land Assesment $ 33,500 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,558 Year Built 1990 Nbad Code 48 County/Town Tax $ 1,406 Bldg Style RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ ' 5,964 Stories 1.60 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 200,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 2 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 080.1-12-10.2 Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 33,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 1990, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Garage Type 428 SQFF, CNDTN: Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE; C Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Updated;04/09/2015 1;46 pm Heat Type HEAT; (HOT AIR) FUEL; (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL j EXEMPTIONS' BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1990, 24.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1990, 428.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1990, 216.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL dote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com snakes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be IiAle for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-infoxom I realRecordTM realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LAATZ NATHAN LAATZ 3059 BASSWOOD LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1617 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/06/2014 Arms Length N Libre 5291 LILLIAN E MACKIN BuyerLAATZSeller REVOCABL NATHAN Page 1 of 2 Y-') 6e VV PARGEL NO: 075.-02-06.0 Mail: 3059 BASSWOOD LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1617 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Price $ 165,000 Deed Date 08/11/2014 Page 740 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICEIF DATE LENGTHE SELLER FBUYER 1 1 155,OOD 08/08/2014 Y LILLIAN E MACKIN REVOCABL LAATZ NATHAN 2 1 07/03/2013 N MACKIN FAMILY A TRUST MACKIN LILLIAN 3 1 11/24/2000 N MACKIN REVOCABLE TRUST MACKIN FAMILY A TRUST STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,986 Sqft. ist Floor 1,004 Spit. Znd Floor 982 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1977 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1977, 484 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays i Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL - Basement Type PARTIAL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 58.D0x129.00 Land SQFT 7,482 Lot Size Acres 0.25 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: PERSONS AGE 65 OR OVER ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY W/SLAB, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1977, 264.00 SQFT', CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 078.-02-06.0 Assessed Value # 165,000 Land Assesment $ 30,000 School Tax $ 3,760 County/Town Tax $ 1,160 city/Villaga Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,920 Full Tax Value $ 165,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 30,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm e... f! • 1 r ! 1T r it +++Tne.+T-+T Tn ie Tn r.n rlV+'+.-•-Inr.n nr nn n..n-nn wwwwwn nn zeal-info.com I realRecordTu i realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION KRATZ FRANCES C 3067 AMBERLEA LN LY'SANDER NY 13027-1613 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Safe Date 01/07/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5226 Seller HARNOIS ALBERT Buyer KRATZ FRANCES J y C Page I of I PARCEL NO: 078.-02-21.0 Mail: 3067 AMBERLEA LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1613 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT; 0114.01 Price $ 172,000 Deed Date 01/09/2013 Page 270 # Total Parcels i Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE SELLER 1IARMSBUYER 1 $ 156,900 JILENGTFIJ 04/16/2004 Y INGHAM SCOTT L/GWYNETH U HARNOIS ALBER TJ/CECILE M 2 $ 110,000 03/18/2003 N CLARE RUTH T INGHAM SCOTT L/GWYNETH U STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,272 Lot Size Dim.: 102.00x135.00 Tax ID# 078.-02-21.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,272 Land SQFT 13,770 Assessed Value $ 170,800 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 29,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,893 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,201 Bldg Style RANCH School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,094 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 170,800 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT• 1977, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE' C Updated:04/09/2015 1.46 pmGarageSays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (OIL) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1977, 192.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to Four Improvements. real-info.cam makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy orreliability of the content eoantainad in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.00m I realRecordTM realRecordTMld COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 078.-04-01.0 V Mail: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 Page 1 of 1 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/16/2014 Price $ 184,900 Deed Date 07/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5289 Page 79 # Total Parcels 1 Seller ROSS ROBERT Buyer POPOVICH DEREK Personal Property 0 BUYERSALES PRICE DATE LENTH _ ARMS I SELLERIl No sale history In database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,833 Lot Size Dim.: 117.00x171.00 Tax ID* 078.-04-01.0 Sqft- 1st Floor 993 Land SQFT 20,007 Assessed Value $ 173,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 840 Lot Size Acres 0.31 Land Assesment $ 37,400 Fin, Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,943 Year Built 1976 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ I,216 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - Clty/Village Tax $ Units I BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,159 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 173,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,400 Kitchens I Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1976, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No speclaI district tax amounts 4`}1- SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 21 X 21), Comm. Sites 0 town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR JIMPROVEM ENTS: _ 1) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1976, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained real-info.com J realRecordTM TM realRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PHILLIPS JANE PHILLIPS 6760 BLUE HERON CIR LYSANDER NY 13027-1707 PARCEL NO: 078.-04-14.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 Page 1 of 1 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION 7Sale Date 09/23/2013 Price .$ 203,000 Deed Date 09/24/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5253 Page 892 # Total Parcels 1 Seller ARKER ADAM Buyer PHILLIPS JANE Personal Property 0 SALOS PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 193,500 05/14/2008 Y CHIZZONITE L DAVID ARKER ADAM G,EMILY E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,058 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,113 Sqft. 2nd Floor 945 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Year Built 1978 ISldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1978, 506 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 23 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Says 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL I.OT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 61.00X164.00 Land SQFT 10,004 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Zoning PUD Nbad Cody, 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMM ERCIALIPU BLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1978, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1978, 77.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1978, 120.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 076.-04-14.0 Assessed Value $ 195,000 Land Assesment $ 37,500 School Tax $ 4,444 County/Town Tax $ 1,371 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,815 Full Tax Value $ 195,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 37,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 5!MIS real-infacorn I realRecordTm realRecordrM f OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 080.-06-13.0 A.. . ;0 PATRICK DEFAZIO Mali; 8342 DATUM LN 8848 HAWKS WATCH BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-6201 LYSANDER NY 13027-1314 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CSNSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/22/2014 Price $ 185,000 Deed Date 04/2312.014 Arms Length Y Libre 5277 Page 867 # Total Parcels 1 Sailer HOY NORMAN Buyer DEFAZIO PATRICK Personal property 0 PRIOR PRICE I DATE I LENGTH I SELLER1i1I I BUYERSALES ARMS No main history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT 1N1FORMATI0N TAX INFORMATION Square Peet 2,300 Lot Size Dien.: 65,00x165.00 Tax ID# 080.-06-13.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,148 Land SQFT 10,725 Assessed Value $ 196,000 Sqh. 2nd Floor 1,152 Lot Size Acres 0,38 Land Assesment $ 37,800 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 4,467 Year Built 1983 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,378 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 5,845 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 196,000 1 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 A Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,800 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1983, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax 484 SQFT, Res, Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swis Coda 313689 be verifled directly from the local , NORMAL, ta?c collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT Heat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL t) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1983, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 4ote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htiplAvebapp.real-i focom/reWPdntasp?rc=NY%2FNY%2rO 7%2F3136890BODDOOOOGot30000000 ir? real-infoxom j realRecordTm Page 1 of 2 Tb$ realRecerd OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-04-50.0 THOMPSON JULIE THOMPSON Mall: 8677 LETCHWORTH LN 8677 LETCHWORTH LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1715 LYSANDER NY 13027-1715 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONEONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/18/2014 Price $ 190,000 Deed Date 06/18/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5284 Page 716 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MURPHY ROBERT Buyer THOMPSON JULIE Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 189,900 06/13/2014 Y MURPHY ROBERT THOMPSON JULIE 2 $ 1 12/27/2007 N MURPHY ROBERT MURPHY ROBERT 3 $ 153,000 05/30/1997 Y MULLANE KEITH G MURPHY ROBERT G 4 $ 168,400 09/17/1991 Y UNKNOWN UNKNOWN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,064 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,128 Sqft, 2nd Floor 936 Fln. Basement Sgft. 0 Year Built 1975 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Coaling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 2 FULL, i HALF 4 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1975, 484 SQFT, DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE; C NONE HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) WOOD NORMAL FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 65.00x147.00 Land SQFT 9,555 Lot Size Acres 0.28 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 xMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION! NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PDRCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1989, 258.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1975, 160.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: ,Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 078.-04-50.0 Assessed Value $ 196,500 Land Assesment $ 30,400 School Tax $ 4,478 County/Town Tax $ 1,381 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,859 Full Tax Value $ 196,500 Equalization Rate 1•00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 30,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No speclaI district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verifled directly from the local tax collector. Updated,04/09/2015 1:46 pm S,rF.-.•rr...e..,.... d.,3_:,;f —l—I'D.,+1•7eann-ronnnnnn a ne nnnnnnnn real-info.com I realRecordTM fit realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 078.-04-49.0 ROSS [LIMBERLY Mail: 8681 LETCHWORTH LN 8681 LETCHWORTH LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1715 LYSANDER NY 13027-1715 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 04/16/2014 Price $ 171,000 Deed Date 04/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5277 Page 395 # Total Parcels 1 Sbller KRAMER VIRGINIA Buyer ROSS KIMBERLY Personal Property 0 SALES PRIOk PRICE DATE ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 1 $ 138,000 08/30/1996 Y WRIGHT WILLIAM HUGH KRAMER VIRGINIA LEIGH STRUCTIURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,120 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,128 Sqft. 2nd Floor 992 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1975 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1975, 484 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 22 X 22), CNDTN:. NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Easement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 52.00x147.00 Land SQFT 7,644 Lot Size Acres 0.38 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 078.-04-49.0 Assessed Value $ 185,000 Land Assesment $ 31,800 School Tax $ 4,216 County/Town Tax $ 1,301 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,517 Full Tax Value $ 185,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 31,800 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm EXEM PT10NS• BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 AiT, BUILT 1975, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL - 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1975, 70.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1975, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL dote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. t1'i.1./hsraL...«««....1 .«i ....«.1 ....1i]..:«o .....-n.... 7^trninri.T rninrn.,ninr.n...r.,.................... ... ....... ..-....- real-info,com j realRecordTM re'aIReco "dTM OWNERSHXP INFORMATION SIDDON ,TERRY SIDDON 8791 HARLOW LN LYSANDER NY 13027-1506 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR=ROUNDRESIDENCE Page 1 of 1 O &ev." PARCEL NO: 080.-07-71.0 Mail: 8791 HARLOW LN BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1506 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION 7Sale Date 11/09/2013 Price $ 160,000 Deed Date 11/13/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5259 Page 716 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CRESCENZI PAUL Buyer SIDDON JERRY Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE RMS SELLER BUYERSALESLENGTH 1 $ 156,500 08/28/2009 Y MCQUAITERS ROBERT CRESCENZI PAUL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,568 Lot Size Dim.: 55.00x137.00 Tax ID# 080.-02-21.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 784 Land SQFT 7,535 Assessed Value $ 155,000 Sqft. znd Floor 784 Lot Size Acres 0.31 Land Assesment $ 37,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Toning PUD School Tax $ 3,532 Year Built 1984 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,090 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313501 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,622 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 155,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/ PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 1 # Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATI', Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type. 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector, NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 JEMPROVISMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-FLGSTN, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1984, 24.00 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-in€o.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxorn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.com I realRecord7m P realftcordT"' OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MEYER CAROLYN 3034 STEVENAGE DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1504 PARCEL NO: 080.-03-17.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CAMARILLO CA 00000-0000 Page 1 of 1 tau L COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 02/14/2013 Price $ 163,000 Deed Date 02/15/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5229 Page 682 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CARBONE MICHAEL Buyer MEYER CAROLYN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENARMSGTHIE_ ::]ESELLER BUYER 1 $ 167,00.0 06/14/2010 Y BE I I ENCOURT ELAINE CARBONE MICHAEL 2 $ 103,250 08/28/1997 Y WALMSLEY DAVID C. & AMY L BETTENCOURT ELAINE 3 $ 112,900 12/12/1994 Y SPEAD JOHN F WALMSLEY DAVID C & AMY L 4 $ 109,000 02/28/1992 Y SCHUMACHER PATRICK M SPEAD JOHN F STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,762 Lot Size Dim.: 129.00x124.00 Tax ID# 080.-03-17.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,034 Land SQFT 15,996 Assessed Value $ 165,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 728 Lot Size Acres 0.22 Land Assesment $ 36,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,760 Year Built 1981 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,160 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,920 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 165,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 36,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1981, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts 420 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 21), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE' C Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1981, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1981, 242.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.orn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-infbxom I reaiRecord"m Page 1 of I rr,l realRetard OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SVEREIKA TABATHA 3030 STEVENAGE DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1504 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE N C.r_w PARCEL NO: 080.-03-15.0 Mail: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 02/14/2014 Price $ 138,860 Deed Date 02/20/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5270 Page 852 # Total Parcels 1 Seller CARSTENS Buyer SVEREIKA Personal Property 0LAURENTABATHA PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 125,500 03/16/2012 Y DAVIS JESSICA CARSTENS LAUREN 2 $ 125,165 03/15/2012 Y DAVIS JESSICA CARSTENS LAUREN 3 $ 90,000 05/30/2000 Y BURCHFIELD ROBERT E AND DAVIS JESSICA DEBORAH 4 $ 82,500 04/29/1997 Y KRANZ BRADLEY T BURCHFIELD ROBERT E AND DEBORAH J 5 $ 10 08/26/1996 N MONTELEONE ANTHONY TODD KENNETH & CYNTHIA 6 $ 85,000 04/19/1995 Y CALO FRANK 3 KRANZ BRADLEY T STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,612 Lot Size Dim.: 85.00x120.00 Tax ID# 080.-03-15.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,144 Land SQFT 10,200 Assessed Value $ 137,400 Sqft. Znd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Land Assesment $ 37,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 468 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,131 Year Built 1982 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 966 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 School District BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,097 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 137,400 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL,/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 37,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 2 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail CENTRAL Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on HEAT: (HOT AIR) Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified Heat Type FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Updated:04/09/201,5 1:46 pm Basement Type FULL Exr;mPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1982, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PAVNG-ASPHLT, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential Site and up to four improvements. 1Ga1-111LV.Wu luanGD Vl lilt a4. —y Va I-1—llly Vt— 6Vll16111 a.Vllla11 laa ualL aaac. 1111va.UauVll" VVj41.1GU11V111 many sources. real-info.com sbali not be Iiable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 4++.-. ll__._7.-.... ...-t =.-r-----1___7n..:.. __.. n... nsn r•s,w+ern i..,nr.,n....,..,n n nnnnn wn., .,......, ........... .... real-infoxom I realReeordTM Page 1 of 2 realR cordA rraa OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LOCKE MARCOS A. MILLER LOCKE 3028 STEVENAGE DR LYSANDER NY 13027-1504 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE 30 GV.Lv PARCEL NO: 080.-03-14.0 Mail: 3028 STEVENAGE DR BALDWINSVILLE NY 13027-1504 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/03/2014 Price $ 188,900 Dead Date 06/04/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5282 Page 762 # Total Parcels 1 Seller NADZAN SCOTT E. Buyer LOCKE MARCOS A. Personal Property 0 PRIOR I ARMS SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHIL SELLER BUYERI 1 139,500 04/27/2005 Y MC CLOSKEY MATiHEW,SANDRA NADZAN SCOTT EALMEID 2 145,000 04/30/2002 Y BELLUCCI CHRISTOPHER I MCCLOSKEY MATTHEW B. 3 124,000 07/15/1994 Y RACH HERBERT W BELLUCCI CHRISTOPHER J & BETH STRUCTURAL INFFORMATION Square Feet 1,833 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,105 Sqft. 2nd Floor 728 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1981 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2,00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1,0 ATT, BUILT; 1981, 400 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 x 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dirn.: 85.00x120.00 Land SQFT 10,200 Lot Size Acres 0.26 Zoning PUD Nbad Code 47 School District 313601 - BALDWINSVILLE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 313689 TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 080r03-14.0 Assessed Value, $ 170,000 Land Assesment $ 37,100 School Tax $ 3,874 County/Town Tax $ 1,195 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 5,069 Full Tax Value $ 170,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax iD# Full Land Value $ 37,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 1981, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1981, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1981, 168.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL tote: Display indicates first residential site and up to Pour Improvements. 11 ,, , , . , 1 — - .,,,nin.,,...n.nr.n ­.--- ---------- -- --- -- •- - - - - -- real-info.eom j realRecordTM Page l of 1 realRecordTM COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE 0 us PARCEL NO: 078.-09.-24.0 Mail: BALDWINSVILLE NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0114.01 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/17/2013 Price $ 136,000 Deed Date 12/10/2013 Arms length Y Libre 5263 Page 134 # Total Parcels 1 Seller DAHM THOMAS Buyer BOSCO MARK Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES I PRICE I DATE 11 ( LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 149,000 1V12/2003 Y BURKE DAVID F/ANITA L DAHM THOMAS 1/]ANE C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,540 Lot Size Dim.: 53.00x128.00 Tax ID# 078,-01-24,0 Sqft, 1st Floor 864 Land SQFT 6,784 Assessed Value $ 136,000, 5gft. 2nd Floor 676 Lot Size Acres 0.20 Land Assesment $ 29,300 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning PUD School Tax $ 3,646 Year Built 1977 Nbad Code 47 County/Town Tax $ 1,125 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 313601 - City/Village Tax $ Units 1 BALDWINSVILLE Total Tax $ 4,771 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 136,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 29,300 ` Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1977, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQr f, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 20); Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 313689 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, Garage Bays GRADE: C 1 Updated:04/09/2015 1:46 pm Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATC, BUILT 1977, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1977, 60.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. POMEROYC7i` APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC. AZI APPENDIX F real-in£o.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 w TM j realRacor+d 1CQUISITIONS NOW LLC 6270 ROUTE31 CICERO NY 13069-0000 PARCEL NO: 051.4-12-03.1 Mall: 6268 STATE ROUTE 31 CICERO NY 13039-9217 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 330 - VACANT" LAND LOCATED IN SWIS_,SBL: 31228905100400120030010000 COMMERCIAL AREAS SALE I PRICE DEED LIBRE PAGE ARMS SELLER BUYER PERS. # PARCELSDATEDATEILENGTHPROP1 10/07/2009 $ 437,500 10/09/2009 5103 293 Y HMT PROPERTIES ACQUISITIONS 0 1INCNOWLLC 11/15/2007 $ 1 11/16/2007 5022 797 N HMT INC ACQUISITIONS 0 1NOWLLC 06/22/2007 $ 280,000 07/02/2007 5001 302 N I CT PROPERTIES HMT INC 0 1 H06/22/2006 $ 280,000 06/29/2007 5001 302 Y I MCT PROPERTIES HMT INC 0 0 12/21/0000 $ 0 11/30/1999 N STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION Overall lEff. Yr Built 0 Lot Size Dim.: 0.000.00 Overall Grade Land SQFT 294,992 Overall Condition Lot Size Acres 2.84 Construction Type Zoning TAX INFORMATION Nbad Code 22002 SBL(Tax ID)#: 051.4-12-03.1 School District 312403 - NORTH lssessed Value $ 150,000 SYRACUSE and Assesment $ 150,000 Deslraallity School Tax $ 13,308 Water Front N County/Town Tax $ 5,675 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC City/Village Tax $ Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Total Tax $ 18,983 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Full Tax Value $ 150,000 Nbad. Rating UNKNOWN Equalization Rate 1.00 Nbad. Type UNKNOWN Prior Tax ID# Res. Sites 0 Full Land Value $ 150,000 Comm. Sites 1 Swis Code 312289 The calculated tax amounts are not exact, No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:52 pm BUILDING USAGE BUILDING BREAKDOWN IDENT. BOECKH YR. GROSS STORY SSMT. SSMT. BLDS. MODEL BUILT QUALITY CONDITION PERIMETERSQ.FT. STORIES HEIGHT AC% SPRINKLER% ALARM% TYPE SQ.FT. IMPROVEMENTS : 1) TOWER- GUYED, BUILT2008, 150.00 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED-FINISHD, BUILT 2008, 216.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. 4 .. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real -info. com shall not be liable for errors contained herein, or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, httn://webana.real-info.com/realPrin#.a.5n?rc=NY%2FNY%2F'(l67°/n?.F;17.7RQ051 flfl40017.[lnion 1 nnnn ar)7t7m a View Larger Photo - Image Mate Online Page 1 of 1 Photo Photo for 051.4-12-03.1 in Town of Cicero http://ocfintax.onaov.netlimate/bigPhoto.ast)x?f le=3122891T0002311T000033.ini-,&swis=3 3 2289&sbl=0510040012003001 Q000. 4/270015 Street Atlas USAO 2008 Plus 16 1 I.iN I oil h".. 111 1.211 1—, D, I 94Y2 IIAW H-I 013 1mrn - I Ild rW4 8-1 Rd 31 .1 1 K"q Chmkamu 0, 0WJA19X.fi416fi22X W1,,—, 11. IMI H.1 1, ;3 7 11—, 1 2J U SYnl Ddin R.1 IMIn. K,1 r'jY54bFl I AW I -AN I 3 11 Puk,, I lnoxc 11.111 ly!x Ij. II.., I (d K;S4 11-4— U-1 IWM IJIIII, I&I I'M DIII, R.1 IV' Sl— A.b.. H'd H I -W, I I.— I %fl, fi 171 j h I 1.n Ad I.b110 Add— 1.mll 1.19, ih.W. Nd R411 Mpl- GO 010 IhIN, lid RA ApqlmLli,!- Id 14 1 )WI —I Q DAh" 14.1 L "A 1117 XI WSI-p 1), 14 1.134 1-1k.0Pill, KW I t—] M qp , NAW IUCL—d IA k, yuk- Ik 197 H,dd, Ir" IM H.W, 1 u Data use subject to license. TU Scale 1 12,800 0 2007 DeLorme. Street Atlas USAF 2068 Plus. MN 112A'W) L— BL—Mee —2-M—M-212W IM MI ro I= www. d(3]orme,Gom I" = 1,066.7 ft Data Zoom 15-0 5f ois real-info.com I realRecordTM ArealRecord TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION UTZCUS MATT 6303 TANKER TRL CICERO NY 1S039-8214 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE t PARCEL NO: 088.-04-06.0 Mail: 6303 TANKER TRL CICERO NY 13039-8214 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INF..ORMATION Sale Date 08/12/2013 Price $ 124,500 Deed Date 08/12/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5248 Page 541 # Total Parcels 1 Seller HOLMES TIMOTHY Buyer METZCUS MATT Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYER SALES LE NGTIi 1 $ 124,500 08/09/2013 Y HOLMES TIMOTHY METZCUS MATT 2 $ 94,050 12/27/1993 Y NVR HOMES INC HOLMES TIMOTHY L &TERESE C 3 $ 22,500 11/03/1993 Y EXIT 36 REALTY CORP NVR HOMES INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION I TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,471 Lot Size Dim.: 92.00x138.00 Tax ID# 088.-04-06.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 943 Land SQFT 12,628 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.22 Land Asses;me:nt $ 12,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 528 Zoning School Tax $ 2,836 Year Built 1993 Nbad Code 22502 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,046 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Baths 1 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 088.-01-21.0 Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 12,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1993, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No speclaI district tax 336 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 amounts or exemptions have been DIMENSIONS: Included. All numbers are estimated Garage Type 14 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 based on town values. Taxes should CNDTN: Swim Code 312289 be verified directly from the local NORMAL, tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Cooling Detail CENTRAL_ MEAT: (HOT Neat Type AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 PROVEMENTS., 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1993, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 2000, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2000, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL ote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. hBnYlwebann.real-Info.romhealPrint.asn7rr.-NY% F'NYQA2FfWO49F.;i99ASinRLgDfW ifXldrlrlt nrWY1fM -in real-info.com j realRecordfm realRe cord"' m OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GIANNUZZI JOSEPH 8460 FLAT CAR CIR CICERO NY 13039.821.0 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5250 CHRESTLER BuyerGIANNUZZISellerJESSEJOSEPH Page I of I 4 PARCEL NO: 088.-05-22.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 145,000 Deed Date 08/26/2013 Page 248 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE JDATE L.f SELLER BUYER 1 136,500 03/07/2008 Y PIERSON DAVID A AND GRETCHEN M CHRESTLER JESSE 2 105,150 09/10/2001 Y ASCH STEVEN M PIERSON DAVID A 3 93,000 04/25/2000 Y CHAPMAN ROBERT T & MARGAREf K ASCH STEVEN M 4 93,860 08/19/1993 Y RYAN OPERATIONS INC CHAPMAN ROBERTT& MARGAR 5 23,500 05/27/1993 Y EXIT 36 REALTY CORP RYAN OPERATIONS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,560 Sqft, ist Floor 1,044 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 616 Year Built 1993 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 88,00X133.00 Land SQFT 12,033 Lot Size Acres 0.20 Zoning R-10,R-12 Nbad Code 22502 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability Water Front Sewer Water I Utilities 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE 2 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN NONE # Res. Sites 1 HEAT: (HOT AIR) # Comm. Sites 0 FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 ALUM/VINYL NORMAL FULL EXEMPTIONS; BASIC STAR 1999-2000 TYPICAL N COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC GA5/ELECTRIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1993, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 432.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indlcates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 088.-05-12.0 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Land Assesment $ 16,800 School Tax $ 2,731 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,896 Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 088.-01-21.0 Full Land Value $ 16,800 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estlmated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.eom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained heroin, real-info.com I realRecord7m Page 1 of 1 realRecorld OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 088.-02-02.0 MOSHIER GERALD Mail: 2091 PEBBLE BEACH BLVD 0293 LOCOMOTIVE LN ORLANDO FL 32826-5225 CICERO NY 13039-8228 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY; ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION= Sale Date 07/01/2013 Price $ 123,000 Deed Date 07/02/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 Page 598 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SHERMAN HONOR Buyer MOSHIER Personal Property 0A. GERALD PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHARMS I SELLER BUYER 1 $ 106,000 06/30/2004 Y MORROW BRENT/CAROLYN PAUL HONOR A 2 $ 85,000 03/30/2000 N FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE MORROW BRENT ASSOC 3 $ 78,004 10/13/1999 N KOSTERS MARK A & TINA M FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 4 $ 90,300 11/20/1991 Y RYAN OPERATIONS INC KOSTERS MARK A & TINA M STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,304 Lot Size Dim.: 76.00x148.00 Tax ID# 088.-02-02.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 11,280 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Aeres 0.26 Land Assesment $ 15,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 264 Zoning R-10,R-12 School Tax $ 2,731 Year Built 1991 Nbad Code 22502 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,696 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID#;• 088-01-30.1 Fireplates 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 15,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 2 Nbad. T e SUBURBANyP exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail CENTRAL Res. Sites 1 or exemptlons have been Included, All numbers are estimated based on HEAT: (HOT AIR) Heat Type Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Updated:04/0912015 1:45 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS- 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Nate: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-infaxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.corashall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. kfFn.//... ct,n,...,. 1 "_fn nnm hnnl...f n....),.—LTVe%•1 LTT 7p/•1?;ABC'7rt/'NY")Irr,,.,. real-info.com I realRecordsM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION CUNNINGHAM KERI CUNNINGHAM 6314 LOCOMOTIVE LN CICERO NY 13039-8209 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/03/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5251 Seiler WOODS Buyer CUNNINGHAM CARMELITA R. y KERI PARCEL NO. 088.-05-04.0 Mail. 6314 LOCOMOTIVE LN CICERO NY 13039-8209 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 178,500 Deed Date 09/03/2013 Page 276 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHTHARMS SELLER 11 BUYER 1 $ 173,500 013/30/2013 Y WOODS CARMELITA R. CUNNINGHAM KERI 2 $ 149,900 10/18/2006 Y JUNE KAREN L WOODS CARMELITA R 3 $ 95,000 03/13/1997 Y BILTON JOHN JEFFREY JUNE KAREN L 4 $ 110,965 10/26/1992 Y RYAN OPERATIONS INC 000 BILTON JOHN J & BARBARA M 5 $ 22,500 08/17/1992 Y EXIT 36 REALTY CORP'000 RYAN OPERATIONS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,852 Lot Size Dim.: 77.00x133.00 Tax ID# 088.-05-04.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 864 Land SQFT 10,241 Assessed Value $ 170,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 988 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 13,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-10,R-12 School Tax $ 3,572 Year Built 1994 Nbad Code 22502 County/Town Tax $ 1,523 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 5,095 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 170,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PIIBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 13,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1994, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector, NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated: 04/09/2015 1.45 pm GarageBays1Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEmP- rxONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1994, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and uo to four Improvements. real- info.comi makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein, hffn-/ 1%vP1,ilnnrral_infnrnm/raa1Uri2ifv),7QoAQQnnnnnnznnAnnnnnnn Crean,ff rest-info.com 1 realkecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MANKE JEFFREY MANKE 6394 JANIE LN CICERO NY 13039-9261 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE Q PARCEL NO: OBS.-OB-13.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUSTRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/19/2013 Price $ 193,000 Deed Date 12/19/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5264 Page 721 # Total Parcels 1 Seller STEINFEST CLAYTON Buyer MANKE IEFFREY Personal Property 0 SALES PRIDE DATE LENGTH ARMS I SELLER BUYER 1 $ 192,500 06/30/2011 Y J.M.G. INC STEINFEST CLAYTON STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,500 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,500 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2011 Bldg Style RANCH Units Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 Garage Type Garage Bays 0 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dlm.: 80.O0x173.61 Land SQFT Lot Size Acres 0.32 Zoning AG.R-12 Nbad Code 22602 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 YMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 2011, 420.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 088.-08-13.0 Assessed Valve $ 192,500 Land Assesment $ 45,000 School Tax $ 4,044 County/ Town Tax $ 1,725 City/ Village Tax $ Total ' lax $ 5,769 Full Tax Value $ 192,500 equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full. Land Value $ 45,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated,, 04/09/2015 1:44 pm real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 1, m.•ll.:.01.,.,„ ra l_i..Fn ...,.,,1ro tDr:n+ oo..7r=TTVO/']FATVD/7L`f1 70/7 71,),)Qo 5QQnn11nnnQW 13nnnnAnn r MP%A. r real-info,com I realReeord`rm Page I of I realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FREY JUSTIN 6306 JANE LN CICERO NY 13039.9221 COUNTY, ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE 310 PARCEL NO: 088.-02-33.0 Mail: 6306 JANE LN CICERO NY 13039-9221 PHONE NUMBER. CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale pate 04/30/2014 Price $ 92,000 Deed Date 05/06/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5279 Page 322 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MISIASZEK SEAN Buyer FREYJUSTIN Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE ARMS SELLER BUYERSALESiLENGTH11 1 $ 89,900 09/16/2009 Y DELANEY JAMES MISIASZEK SEAN C STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 990 Lot Size Dim.: 80.0Dx172.00 Tax XD# 086.-02-33.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 990 Land SQFT 13,760 Assessed Value $ 102,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.32 Land Assesment $ 26,200 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Zoning AG,R-12 School Tax $ 2,143 Year Built 1960 Nbad Code 22202 County/Town Tax $ 914 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,057 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 102,000 Baths i FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 088.-01-38.0 Fireplaces 0 Water ' COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Fall Land Value $ 26,200 Kitchens i Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1960, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 315 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 15 X 21), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN, Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated :04/09/2015 1:45 pmGarageSays1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1960, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection, ith the use of the information contained herein. httn•1/wA.hann rr.nl_infn rnmlrpalPrint C1171nnt real-info.com j realRecordT'14 Page I of I realRec 1rdTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SEVERN HEATH SEVERN 6303 WOODERTON PATH CICERO NY 13039-9253 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE: PARCEL NO: 087.-02-27.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale bate 11/10/2014 Price $ 194,500 Deed Date 12/01/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5306 Page 255 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BOTTEGA MARIA Buyer SEVERN HEATH Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER I BUYER 167,000 12/14/2000 Y LA ROCHELLE THOMAS & BARBARA BOTTEGA MICHAEL J & MARIA A 165,000 06/29/1990 Y GROSSO JOSEPH M LARO CH ELLE THOMAS & BARBARA STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,314 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,292 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,022 Fin. Basement Sgft. 0 Year Built 1990 Bldg Style CONTEMPORARY units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1990, 462 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 21 X 22), CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: B Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 87.74x413.01 Land SQFT 36,237 Lot Size Acres 0,74 Zoning Nbad Code 22401 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up -to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 087.-02-27.0 Assessed Value $ 205,000 Land Assesment $ 36,400 School Tax $ 4,307 County/Town Tax $ 1,837 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,144 Full Tax Value $ 205,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# 067-01-08.1 Full Land Value $ 36,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04/0 9/2015 1:45 pm real-info,coin makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hffn•1/ta Pho...rn t..rnfn*o"')rn ATVO%•72ATVO/-r)'CAG^1oinV,21))Qnrs"AnlMnnnn-rnnnnnAn 11 1 , real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 2 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ELSEY CHRISTINE 8449 CHINKAPIN CIR CICERO NY 13039-7894 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 089,-06-18.0 Mail. CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/21/2014 Price $ 123,000 Deed Date 08/25/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5293 Page 701 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KATZ ANN MARIE Buyer ELSEY CHRISTINE Personal Property 0 SAES PRICE DATE 11LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 125,000 03/04/2009 Y VINING BRANDON D KATZ ANN MARIE 2 116,000 - 09/17/2007 Y POBUTKIEWICZ JOHN D BYERS JILLIAN M 3 104,500 10/24/2003 Y WILSON TERRY POSUTKIEWICZ JOHN & CHERYL 4 1 06/22/2003 N WILSON MELISSA WILSON TERRY 5 1 08/11/1996 N UNKNOWN UNKNOWN 6 74,000 07/19/1993 Y JACHIM MARK J & CHRIS71NE WILSON MELISSA 7 0 07/19/1993 N AMERICAN HOUSING TRUST II ACHIM MARK J & CHRISTINE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,368 Sqft. 1st Floor 936 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 432 Year Built Bldg Style Units Stories Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage ' type Garage Bays Cooling Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 1984 SPLIT LEVEL 1 1100 1 FULL, 1 HALF 3 0 1 GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1984, 264 SQFT, DIMENSIONS: 12 x 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: D CENTRAL HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) ALUM/ VINYL NORMAL PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 MPROVNMENTS: LOT INFORMATION. Lot Size Dim.: 75.00xi35.00 Land SQFT 10,125 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUHLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312.289 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1984, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-06-18,0 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900. School Tax $ 2,626 County/ Town Tax $ 1,120 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,746 Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04/09/2015 1:45 pm i' tTl•I SiIP r.q}Fl rP*I_t"fn /V1YY. Iroa7Drint oer.9rr T.TVo%7 ATVo%ryo%7L' i,1"nn9nnnnnnncni onnnnnnn cf., Inn, c real-info.com E realReeordTM tl Page 1 of I Ttl C lecora GKS Pam'` OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-OS-14.0 SALTZMANN MICHAEL SALTZMANN Mail: 6190 WYNMOOR DR CICERO NY 00000-0000 CICERO NY 13039-9210 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/15/2014 Price $ 136,300 Deed Date 09/15/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5296 Page 352 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KLUS JOHN L. Buyer SALTZMANN MICHAEL Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,754 Lot Size Dim.: 75,00x150.00 Tax ID# 089.-08-14.0 Sqft. ist Floor 1,178 Land SQFT 11,250 Assessed Value $ 145,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.26 Land Assesment $ 16,200 Fin. Basement Sqft. 576 Zoning School Tax $ 3,046 Year Built 1983 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,299 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,345 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 145,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 16,200 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATT, Nbihhd. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1983, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 528 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS; numbers are estimated based on e GaraType 9YP22 X 24) Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax col)ector. NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated: 04/09/2015 1;45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PAVNG-CONCR, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1986, 0 SQF7, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote; Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerting the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real -info corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in corutection with the use ofthe information contained herein. httn-// wehannraal-infor.nrn/rPaPrint 1')0RQARQnn0nnr190tAnnnnnnn ercjnn,c real-info.com R realRecordTM Page 1 of I TM realRecard OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO. 089.-08-16.0 { COURY DAVID GRUYERE Mail: 2140 TUNA CANYON RD 6198 WYNMOOR DR TOPANGA CA 90290-3444 CICERO NY 13039-9210 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION 7Sale Date 10/2-1/2013 Price $ 110,000 Deed Date 10/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5257 Page 479 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PETTIT MARY Buyer COURY DAVID Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE ARMS LENGTH SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,660 Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x155.00 Tax ID# 089.-08-16.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 924 Land SQFT 11,625 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.27 Land Assesment $ 17,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 736 Zoning School Tax $ 2,731 Year Built 1984 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,1396 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 17,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1984, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 288 S FT Q Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included, All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 12 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE; D Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL HEAT: Heat Type ELECTRIC) FUEL: ELECTRIC) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1984, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1997, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote; Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-i afo. corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliabilily of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn '/Aunhann raal_Fnfn rrnn/raallartnP acn9rr=Tl V i'3FANOG^7Fr1F'7a/.r1R2 Y7'1Q0(IR(]Mnnnnvn i.nnnnnnn r i inn i r real-info.com jrealRecordTM Page I of 2 ft OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SANTANA MARK T- 6216 WYNMOi D CICERO NY 13039-8862 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE Va tj'L'L_ PARCEL NO: 089.-08-21.0 n S1feK-5 I Mail: Vs CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/28/2013 Price $ 136,400 Deed Date 08/29/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5250 Page 842 # Total Parcels 1 Seller IOZZIA JOYCE Buyer SANTANA MARK Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE 11 ARMS IF- LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 92,900 10/21/2002 Y PETERSON SCOTT D/RACHELE L IOZZIA JOYCE ANN 2 $ 79,900 06/28/1995 Y CARMINA JOSEPH A JR PETERSON SCOTT D & RACHELE L 3 $ 82,500 01/09/1990 Y TARNOW JR ROBERT M & SANDRA CARNINA JR JOSEPH A & J MICHELE 4 $ 0 01/09/1990 N UNKNOWN UNKNOWN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,620 Lot Size Dirn.: 61.00x164.00 Tax ID# 089.-08-21.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,092 Land SQFT 10,004 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.30 Land Assesment $ 20,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 528 Zoning School Tax $ 2,836 Year Built 1965 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units i SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,046 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 20,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1984, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 288 SQFT, Q Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on eGara Typegyp 12 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 town values, Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1984, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1992, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1992, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. 1ttM-/h7Jahann rr RI -info rnmlrPnIPrint t,"QonQonnnnnnQrnionnonnn 'ZJ4Imi c real-info.com I realRecord=m Page 1 of I fti' N' CAO- OWNER5 P INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-08-24.0 CARR DONALD CARR Mail: 6228 WYNMOOR DR CICERO NY 00000-0000 CICERO NY 13039-8862 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/09/2014 Price $ 127,440 Deed Date 09/10/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 529S Page 730 # Total Parcels 1 Seller FOLSOM MICHAEL Buyer CARR DONALD Personal Property 0 PRIORISALES PRICE ARMS IDATdE LENGTH SELLER ir 7BUYEdR 1 $ 1 07/14/2006 N FOLSOM MICHAEL FOLSOM MICHAEL 2 $ 90,000 06/23/2006 Y SCHWEITZER FREDERICK FJR/CHRIST FOLSOM MICHAEL] 3 $ 98;000 07/18/2005 Y MCKINNEY DONALD SCHWEITZER FREDERICK F JR 4 $ 1 07/18/2004 N MC KINNEY DONALD MC KINNEY DONALD 5 $ 80,900 02/19/1993 Y DEYO CHANDLER A MCKINNEY DONALD & GLADYS STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,608 Sgft. 1st Floor 996 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 612 Year Built 1985 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATE", BUILT: 1985, 480 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 24), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 71.00x134.00 Land SQFT 9,514 Lot Size Acres 0.22 Zoning Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 TAR xNFORMATxON Tax ID# 089.-OS-24.0 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Land Assesment $ 12,400 School Tax $ 2,731 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,896 Full Talc Value $ 130,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 12,400 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. Ali numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm 1) GAR-1-0 ATG BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL j1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Dlsplay indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee conceming the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable For errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. 11t1lY1i1lrATN0jj1,1 rnal_infn r•nm /raotPr:nt go„9rn_T.TV'o/t:T t'Vai tcn 7o/-hr i pnnsnnnnnnnorr,fnnnnnnn c r N,n, real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of 2 S' realRecordTM yo OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-06-12.0 CARDONE ELAINE Mail: 8452 BAYRIDGE RD BREWERTON NY 00000-0000 CICERO NY 13039-8838 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/18/2014 Price $ 138,500 Deed Date 11/18/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5304 Page 586 # Total Parcels i Seller WEHRUNG DONALD Buyer CARDONE ELAINE Personal Property 0 PRIOR ARMS SALES PRICE F_ DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 138,500 11/17/2014 Y WEHRUNG DONALD CARDONE ELAINE 2 $ 79,000 05/21/2014 N HSBC BANK USA N A WEHRUNG DONALD 3 $ 134,605 10/10/2013 N LAURANGE DANIELLE ACE SECURITIES CORP HOME 4 $ 129,900 01/04/2007 Y PRYOR SUZANNE LAURANGE DANIELLE 5 $ 1 08/09/2002 N BERNARDINI SUZANNE M PRYOR SUZANNE M & PAUL A 6 $ 65,505 10/29/1999 N FED HOME LOAN MORT CORP BERNARDINI SUZANNE M 7 $ 1 06/08/1999 N ALFANOJAMES L FED HOME LOAN MORT CORP 8 $ 80,500 07102/1996 Y REID 1R RONALD L ALFANO TAMES L STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,568 Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x135.00 Tax ID# 069.-06-12.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 10,125 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lox Size Acres 0.23 Land Assesment $ 13,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 528 Zoning R-10 School Tax $ 2,636 Year Built 1979 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,046 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Baths 1 FULL, I HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMM ERCIALJPUBLIC Full Land Value $ 13,900 Kitchens I Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1979, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 480 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS; DIM SI numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swls Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE' D Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: Heat Type ELECTRIC) FUEL: ELECTRIC) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL CEXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: real-info.com I realRecordTm Page I of I real RecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION TAYLOR CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR 8453 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-9233 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS, 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5240 Seller FERNANDEZ Buyer TAYLOR DIANTHA CHRISTOPHER W PARCEL NO: 089.-07-07.0 Mall: 8453 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-9233 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 140,000 Deed Date 05/30/2013 Page 36 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 ARMS SALES PRICE PATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 135,000 05/29/2013 Y FERNANDEZ DIANTHA TAYLOR CHRISTOPHER 2 100,000 04/15/2010 N BANK KEY NATIONAL ASSOC. FERNANDEZ DIANTHA 3 65,250 05/05/2009 N DE ROSA DONALD KEY BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,722 Sqft. Ist Floor 846 Sqft. 2nd Floor 876 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1983 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.OD Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1983, Garage Type 240 SQFT, CN DTN : NORMAL, GRADE; C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x135.00 Land SQFT 10,125 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTHSYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: ALT VET EX -WAR PERIOD -COMBAT ALT VET EX -WAR PERIOD -DISABILITY IMPROVEMENTS- 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-07-07.0 Assessed Value $ 147,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900 School Tax $ 3,088 County/Town Tax $ 1,317 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,405 Full Tax Value $ 147,000 Equalization Rate 1,00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly From the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 1. u- 11---- 1........_-1 f_C.-..../..._11'...:...--. n.... 11vn- n.ni­ ----n.".n.nnr.nnr.nnnnnr.nnr.nnnnnnn real-info.com I realReeorffm Page 1 of 1 realRecord" M OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MIE;YERS CONNIE 8485 BAYRIDGERD CICERO NY 13039-8859 COUNTY; ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE Vo PARCEL NO: 089.-05-02.0 Mail: 8465 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8859 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sate Date 04/03/2013 Price $ 1271000 Deed Date 04/03/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5234 Rage 276 # Total Parcels 1 Seller TUPAY EDWARD Buyer MEYERS CONNIE Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE 1 $ 85,000 2 $ 77,500 DATE ARMS LENGTH 09/25/2000 Y 05/14/1997 Y STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,520 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 480 Year Built 1979 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT: 1979, 440 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 22), CN DTN: NORMAL, GRADE: D Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type MEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL SELLER PERIA WILLIAM F FIEL STEEVEN R Bt ELIZABETH LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.; 85,00x135.00 Land SQFT i1,475 Lot Size Acres 0.26 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS- 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1979, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1984, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2009, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 2012, 24,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Dote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, BUYER TUPAY EDWARD ]/TAMMY T PERLA WILLIAM F TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-05-02.0 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Land Assesment $ 16,700 School Tax $ 2,836 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,046 Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 16,700 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated.04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httw//wt?hann real -infra nnm /rPAPrint l w) Ron Qonnnnnnc nw)nnnnnnn a is i1tn i real:-info.com I realRecordlrm Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM XJQ OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-06-03.0 PELZ DALLAS Mail, 8488 BAYRIDGE RD 8488 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8838 CICERO NY 13D39-8838 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/28/2013 Price $ 125,000 Deed Date 10/02/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5254 - Page 921 # Total Parcels 1 Seller EMRICH MATI'HEW Buyer PELZ DALLAS Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DAT15 ILEN TH SELLER 1_ BUYER 1 $ 122,500 07/14/2006 Y LUPIA ANTHONY F & KIMBERLY A EMRICH MATTHEW P 2 $ 82,650 05/03/2000 Y BOUGH JAMES F LUPIA ANTHONY F & KIMBERLY A 3 $ 76,100 11/14/1990 Y GILBERT JEFFREY S AND CARMELLA BOUGH JAMES F STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,368 Lot Size Dim.: 76.00x134.00 Tax ID# 089.-06-03.0 Sqft. Ast Floor 936 Land SQFT 10,184 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Land Assesment $ 14,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 432 Zoning R-10 School Tax $ 2,626 Year Built 1983 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,120 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,745 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 14,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1983, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 264 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 12 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FUEL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real•info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in conncction with the use ofthe information contained herein. htt WwPliannrPal_infnrnmIn-glPrin+acn9rn i T/4/7F]tVv/7F(1F7o/7 77,)Qanvor1nnmo4rkrvinnnnnrin ztsMA+& real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SHANE MARK 8492 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8838 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 069.-06-02.0 Mail: 8492 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8838 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/13/2014 Price $ 136,500 Deed Date 08/13/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5292 Page 150 # Total Parcels 1 Seller FRASIER MICHAEL Buyer SHANE MARK Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE BATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 120,000 05/16/2008 Y BATEMAN DONALD FRASIER MICHAEL K,IESSICA I STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,296 Sqft. 1st Floor 900 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fln. Basement Sqft, 396 Year Built 1983 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units i Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Flreplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1983, 264 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 12 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT. (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 75.00xi35.00 Land SOFT 10,125 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swls Code 312289 EXAM PTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX XNFORMATIOH Tax ID# 089.-06-02.0 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900 School Tax $ 2,626 County/Town Tax $ 1,120 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,746 Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No speclaI district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values, Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated,04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htFn•//wehann res+l-infn nnm/rPn1Print tur11nI c real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page I of I i' realReeordM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SPURGEON DAVID 6496 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8838 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 02/28/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5272 Seller BOSTICK JANINE Buy er SPURGEON H. DAVID PARCEL NO: 089.46-01.0 Mail: C 1:7 i[%I IeIi I 19 I PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 100,000 Deed Date 02/28/2014 Page 160 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE I DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 1 I07/20/2012 N BOSTICK DANIEL BOSTICK JANINE 2 $ 0 07/20/2012 N BOSTICK DANIEL BOSTICK JANINE 3 $ 81,500 10/27/1994 Y SMITH GREGORY D BOSTICK DANIEL & JANINE H STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,368 Sqft. tst Floor 936 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 432 Year Built 1989 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1989, 264 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 12 X 22), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Beat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 83,00x128.00 Land SQFT 10,624 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1989, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1989, 173.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL lote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-06-01.0 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Land Assesment $ 15,000 School Tax $ 2,626 County/Town Tax $ 1,120 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,746 Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 15,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included, All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verlfled directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-in£o.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained hereia or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hitn•llz rai-annrcal_inf Innnnnnn 'irn,..,, real-info.com I realRecordlm Page 1 of 1 realE ecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 0$9.-02-12.0 f BRANTLEY WILLIE Mail: 310 HIGHLAND AVE 8504 BAYRIDGE RD EAST SYRACUSE NY 13057-2152 CICERO NY 13039-8841 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/24/2013 Price $ 119,927 Deed Date 12/27/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5265 Page 675 # Total Parcels 1 Seller HAMILTON GLORIA Buyer BRANTLEY WILLIE Personal Property 0 PRIORISALES L PRICE DATE LENGTH flARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 1 02/13/2006 N HAMILTON DAVID HAMILTON GLORIA STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,704 Sqft. 1st Floor 836 Sqft. 2nd Floor B68 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 1980 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 1 FULL, 2 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces I Kitchens I GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1980, 360 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS, 18 X 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: D Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size DIm.: 75.00x135.00 Land SQFT 10,125 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-200D IMPROVEMENTS; 1) GAR-1-0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL -ASV GRN, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: D€splay Indicates first residential site and up to flour Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-02-12.0 Assessed Value $ 128,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900 School Tax $ 2,689 County/Town Tax $ 1,147 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,836 Full Tax Value $ 128,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many souroes. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained heroin or for any damages in connection with the use of the Information contained herein. httn•//wphann clerlin'- real-info.eom I realRecordTM realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WELCH 3ANET 8458 TORCHWOOD LN CICERO NY 13039-9211 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE VO o'tk/ Page I of 1 PARCEL NO: 089.-07-1fi.II Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/08/2014 Price $ 119,500 Deed pate 12/08/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5307 Page 15 # Total Parcels i Seller BREYTMAN EDUARD Buyer WELCH JANET Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE[ LARMSENGTH SELLER BUYER - 1 $ 115,500 12/05/2014 Y BREYTMAN EDUARD WELCH JANET 2 $ 117,000 11/09/2012 Y VANDYKE KATHLEEN BREYTMAN EDWARD 3 $ 111,000 11/08/2012 Y VANDYKE KATHLEEN BREYTMAN EDWARD 4 $ 1 09/10/1999 N CHAPMAN OLSEN ATKINSON KATHLEEN GAIL STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,428 Lot Size Dim.. 75.00x135.00 Tax ID# 089.-07-16.8 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,092 Land SQFT 10,125 Assessed Value $ 130,000. Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Land Assesment $ 13,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 336 zoning School Tax $ 2,731 Year Built 1986 Nbad Code 22402 County/Totten Tax $ 1,165 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,896 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Baths 2 FULL, i HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC pull Land Value $ 13,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Tile calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 0 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts CoolingDetail NONE Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on HEAT; (HOT AIR) Heat Type Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verJfied FUEL: (GAS) Swls Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS' 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL_-ABV GRN, BUILT 2000, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-infoxom { realRecordTm Page 1 of 1 t realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION DOTY AARON 8466 TORCHWOOD LN CICERO NY 13039-9211 No G" PARCEL NO: 089.-07-18.0 Mail: 8466 TORCHWOOD LN CICERO NY 13039-9211 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT. PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/31/2013 Price $ Arms Length Y Libre 5247 Page Seller CLAPPER KEVIN Buyer DOTY AARON Personal Property 0103.21 127,500 Deed Date 07/31/2013 95 # Total Parcels 1 0 ARMBALESPRICEDATEIL ii SELLER 11 BUYER 1 $ 110,000 08/06/2007 Y CHARLESTON JACKIE L CLAPPER KEVIN 2 $ 89,900 03/25/2002 N DEEGAN SC07T CHARLESTON JACKIE L 3 $ 77,500 08/28/2000 Y KING CORNELIUS & LOLITHA M DEEGAN SCOTC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,428 Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x135.0:0 Tax ID# 089.-07-18.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,092 Land SQFT 10,125 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Sqft, 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Land Assesment $ 13,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 336 zoning School Tax $ 2,731 Year Built 1986 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 31896 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full band Value $ 13,900 Kitchens i Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 1 BSMT GARAGE Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 1 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail CENTRAL Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-ENCLSD, BUILT 1996, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. t.w...1/.....7..-„„ -....1 :-a- aa nn nnnn nnnnnnnnn I nnnnnnnn real-info-com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-05-05.0 APPEL LAURIE Mail: 8478 TORCHWOOD LN 8478 TORCH WOOD LN CICERO NY 13039-9212 CICERO NY 13039-9212 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/27/2013 Price $ 125,000 Deed Date 12/30/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5265 rage 940 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler RICCARDI KRISTEN Buyer APPEL LAURIE Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGG .H SELLER BUYER 1 $ 125,000 08/15/2007 Y OLIVER 3EFFREY RICCARDI KRISTEN STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOTINFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,568 Lot Size Dim.: 155.00x92.00 Tax IL]# 089.-05-05.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 14,260 Assessed Value $ 131,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Land Assesment $ 22,500 Fin. Basement Sqft. 528 Zoning School Tax $ 2,752 Year Built 1983 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,174 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,926 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 131,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 22,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1983, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts 288 SQFT, # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage 'Type ( 12 X 24), # Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04109/2015 1:45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1983, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty dr guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. 7 ----..—...+.....r .............-------........--- real-infoxom I realRecordTm Page 1 of 2 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION GRUDZINSKI GERALD GRUDZINSKI 6170 PINION PR CICERO NY 13039-8866 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/07/2013 Arras Length Y Libre 5253 Seller HOMRIGHOUSE Buyer GRUDZINSKI CHARLES y GERALD o PARCEL NO: 089.-04-01.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 137,000 heed Date 10/08/2013 Page 475 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR S SALES PRICE I DATE LENGTHII SELLER BUYER 1 $ 138,000 03/21/2008 Y DUNN CHARLES G & KATHLEEN M HOMRIGHOUSE CHARLES K 2 $ 130,500 09/14/2005 Y CON-TEM ENTERPRISES, INC. DUNN CHARLES G 3 $ 1 09/14/2005 N FENTON MICHAEL CON TEM ENTERPRISES INC 4 $ 75,000 04/11/2005 N SEC OF HUD FENTON MICHAEL 5 $ 94,137 10/07/2004 N QUEIOR MICHAEL SEC OF HUD 6 $ 86,900 07/31/2002 Y TRAN DAVID QUEIOR MICHAEL J/AIMEE M 7 $ 77,000 08/18/1997 Y VAUGH TERRY L & NANCY A TRAIN DAVID STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,520 Lot Size Dim.: 90.00x135.00 Tax ID# 089.-04-01.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 12,150 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2ndl Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.28 Land Assesment $ 18,100 Fin. Basement Sqft. 480 Zoning R-10 School Tax $ 2,836 Year Built 1980 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312.403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,046 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Baths 1 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 18,100 Kitchens i Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1-0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1980, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: D Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail NONE HEAT: Heat Type ELECTRIC) FUEL: ELECTRIC) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1980, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL attn•1/wahnnn real-infn 1-)7onn0nnnnnnnnnni nnnnnnn a or-^, . real-info.com j realRecordrm Page 1 of 1 realFtecorldTM ce--(".- a10 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-02-15.0 SHEPARD DAVID SHEPARD Mail: 6153 PALISADES DR CICERO NY 00000-0000 CICERO NY 13039-9209 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/18/2014 Price $ 130,000 Deed Date 06/19/2014 Arms Length N Libre 5284 Page 810 # Total Parcels 1 Seller GRIFFIN KELLY Buyer SHEPARD DAVID Personal Property 0 PRIOR RM51SALES PRICE DATE I LENGTH SELLER BUYER 128,700 06/18/2014 Y GRIFFIN KELLY SHEPARD DAVID 2 $ 133,000 07/21/2006 Y MCAFER GARY W & ANN M KLACK KELLY STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,820 Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x140.00 Tax ID# 089.-02-15.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 10,500 Assessed Value $ 140,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 14,700 Fin. Basement Sqft. 780 Zoning R-10 School Tax $ 2,941 Year Built 1987 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,254 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,195 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 140,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 14,700 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1,0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1987, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 288 SQFr, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: num# are i ated based on Garage Type ( 12 X 24), COMM. Sites 0 townbersval es Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS; 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-infoxon t I ]realRecordTM Page I of 1 rea[RecQrdTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SPANGENSERG ]ENIFER SPANGENSERG 6128 PALISADES DR CICERO NY 13039-9204 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION 7 Sale Date 07/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5243 PRESTON SPANGENSERG Seller STEPHEN Buyer ] ENIFER L IWV PARCEL NO: 089.-13-12.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 127,900 Deed Date 07/02/2013 Page 633 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER No sale history in database for this parcel. STRUCTURALINFORMATION Square Feet 1,444 Stitt. 1st Floor 960 Sqft, 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 484 Year Built 1987 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1987, 288 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 12 X 24); CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: 0 Garage Says 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x142.00 Land SQFT 10,650 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMFRCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1-0 A-T'T, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 1997, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-FNCLSD, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 40te; Display Indicates first residential slte and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-13-12.0 Assessed Value $ 130,000 Land Assesment $ 15,000 School Tax $ 2,731 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,896 Full Tax Value $ 130,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax. ID# Full Land Value $ 15,000 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained heroin. 1 .. 01 1 1 P I — . n -s.-... -1.n1-„---- I--- ---------- -- ---- •- real-info-com I realRecordTM Page I of I TM rea R F e c o rd v OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 089.-13-09,0 CESARINI 3AMES JONES Marl: 6136 PALISADES DR CICERO NY 00000-0000 CICERO NY 13039-9204 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/16/2014 Price $ 126,500 Deed Date 10/16/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5300 Page 390 # Total Parcels 1 Seller NASH WENDY Buyer CESARINI JAMES Personal Property 0 PRIOR I PRICE DATE ARMS 11 SELLER I BUYER I jSALE5LENGTH 1 $ 89,000 08/17/2001 Y MANOUCHEHRIPOUR ABDOLALI NASH WENDY E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,800 Lot Size Dim.: 78.00x132.00 Tax ID# 089.-13-09.0 Sqft. 3.st Floor 1,040 Land SQFT 10,296 Assessed Value $ 140,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.24 Land Assesment $ 14,300 Fin, Basement Sqft, 760 - zoning R-10 School Tax $ 2,941 Year Built 1986 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,254 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,195 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Fuil Tax Value $ 140,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization state 1X0 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full land Value $ 14,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1986, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 288 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 12 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swls Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info,com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained t -= herein. t .. I . , • , 4 1r. , n I--I----,_T.-,___ .-n-n-nn-n n-r...----------,I,--. - real-infoxom I realRecordTm *'% ti Lt/ . Page 1 of 1 mod' ealReco dT`"l OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL. NO. 089.-12-17.0 MASTRO MATTHEW R ALGER Mail: 6252 TARTAN DR 6252 TARTAN DR S CICERO NY 13039-8881 CICERO NY 13039.8881 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/24/2013 Price $ 139,900 Deed Date 05/31/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5240 Page 180 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BLAKE RYAN P Buyer MASTRO MATTHEW R Personal Property 0 ALES PRICE DATE LISN"' SELLER 191.11YER 1 $ 134,900 01/29/2010 Y MURRAY WILLIAM BLAKE RYAN 2 $ 89,000 08/02/1999 Y BAKER JULIA M MURRAY WILLIAM T. 3 $ 87,000 10/10/1996 Y M.E. WILSON DEVELOPMENT C BAKER JULIA M ORPORA 4 $ 20,000 05/22/1996 Y BUCKLEY-CLAY ASSOCIATES M.E. WILSON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,460 Lot Size Dim.: 91.39x147.12 Tax ID# 089.-12-17.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,028 Land SQFT 13,445 Assessed Value $ 135,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.29 Land Assesment $ 18,900 Fin. Basement Sqft, 432 zoning School Tax $ 2,836 Year Built 1996 Nbad Code 22402 County./Town Tax $ 1,210 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH CRY/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,046 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 135,000 Baths 1 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# 089-01-59.0 Fireplaces .0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 18,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type 2 BSMT GARAGE Nbad• Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 2 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail NONE Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on HEAT: (HOT AIR) Heat Type Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Updated;04/09/2015 1:45 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVIEMENTS: 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. L.w../6..,.1. ,,.... _-I. _-C- "-. /..._In..!. - nnnnnnnn -'_ _ real-info.com I realRecordTM r reamecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WHIPPLE BETH 6247 TARTAN DR S CICERO NY 13039-8880 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date Arms Length Y Libre Seller TAYLOR SOON Buyer 0,0 GY.I. Page 1 of 1 PARCEL NO: 089.-13-03.0 Mail: 2583 HOWLETr HILL RD MARCELLUS NY 13108-9790 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 02/ 12/2014 Price $ 5270 Page WHIPPLE BETH Personal Property 135, 000 Deed Date 02/13/2014 553 # Total Parcels 1 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER1[ BUYER 1 $ 120,000 03/29/2007 Y MUPRHY THOMAS J/SONDRA E TAYLOR SOON I 2 $ 78,750 05/08/1990 Y REBSTOCK, LYNN MURPHY, THOMAS J/SANDRA E STRUCTURALINFORMATxON Square Feet 1,368 Sqft. 1st Floor 936 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 432 Year Built 1987 Bldg Style RAISED RANCH Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 2 FULL, i HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT: 1987, 354 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 16 X 24), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOTAIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 76.00x133.00 Land SQFT 10,108 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1987, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1990, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL tote: Display indicates first resident[al site and up to four improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-13-03.0 Assessed Value $ 125,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900 School Tax $ 2,416 County/ Town Tax $ 1,030 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 3,446 Full Tax Value $ 125,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No speclal district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated: 04109/2015 1:45 pm 4 real- infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. real-info.cotn I realRecordTM NO OWNERSHIP INFORMATION RASPITHA SUSAN 8609 TARTAN DR N CICERO NY 13039-9208 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS; 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5265 LAQUIDARI RASPITHASeller MICHAEL Buyer SUSAN W Page I of I n PARCEL NO: 089.-02-36.0 _ Mail: 580204 SOUTH SALINA ST CICERO NY 13205-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 Price $ 147,000 Deed Date 12/24/2013 Page 380 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRIC1= DATE LARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 82,000 05/30/1997 Y GIECIERSKI JAMES D & JOANN A LAOUIDARI MICAHEL J STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,592 Lot Size Dim.: 97.00x130.00 Tax ID# 089.-02-36.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 968 Land SQFT 12,610 Assessed Value $ 132,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 624 Lot Size Acres 0.29 Land Assesment $ 19,100 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning School Tax $ 2,773 Year Built 1986 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,183 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units I SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,956 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 132,000 Baths i FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 19,100 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1986, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE; C Updated:04/09/2015 1,45 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1,0 ATT, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1988, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL r1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1986, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein. i.rr„-11,,.,,1•.,,, „,._--I ;—Ir ...,.—I --- In-1..a ....„ry„..—i.iAID/ nrwTvni nr-ntnn/ inn nnnnnnnnnnnnn-, ­nnnnnn real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page IofI realRecard OWNERSHIP INFORMATION CORDARO KAYLA 8464 BAYRIDGE RD CICERO NY 13039-8838 PARCEL NO: 089.-06-09.0 Mail: 6147 PALISADES DR CICERO NY 13039-9209 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/27/2014 Price $ 132,000 Heed Date 08/27/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5293 Page 928 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WHEELER DOUGLAS Buyer CORDARO KAYLA Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 125,000 08/26/2014 Y WHEELER DOUGLAS CORDARO KAYLA 2 $ 105,000 11/15/2011 Y TROCHE JAMIE L WHEELER DOUGLAS L 3 $ 105,000 11/04/2011 Y TROCHE JAMIE L WHEELER DOUGLAS L 4 $ 1 11/03/2006 N TROCHE RAYMOND TROCHE JAMIE 5 $ 106,900 03/28/2003 Y MEEKER THOMAS M TROCHE RAYMOND STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,532 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,004 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Fin. Basement Sqft. 528 Year Built 1980 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL Units 1 Stories 1.00 Baths 1 FULL Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 0 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT: 1980, 336 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 14 x 24), CN DTN : NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT I N FO RMATI O N Lot Size Dim.: 75.00x135.00 Land SQFT 10,125 Lot Size Acres 0.23 Zoning R-10 Nbad Code 22402 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT 1980, 0 SW, CONDITION NORMAL I) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 1985, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first resldentlal site and up to four'Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 089.-06-09.0 Assessed Value $ 121,000 Land Assesment $ 13,900 School Tax $ 2,836 County/Town Tax $ 1,210 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 4,046 Full Tax Value $ 121,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 13,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:45 pm real-info.cont makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. h44+.•/lsernl..a..... I-;"-F-n /...1D--t"7D"IthlonnonnArinnninnnnnnnnnn real-infoxorn I realRecordTM Page I of I realRe cordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WIDAS GEORGE WIDAS 8486 TORCHWOOD LN CICERO NY 13039-9213 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 089.-04-06.0 Mail; CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0103.21 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/24/2014 Price $ 168,900 Deed Date 04/25/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5278 Page 1844 # Total Parcels 1 Seiler COX JOHN Buyer WIDAS GEORGE Personal Property 0 PRIOR PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS I SELLER BUYER SAL1164,900 07/19/2013 Y LAMANNA FRANK I COX JOHN I 2 $ 157,940 03/31/2006 Y BOROWICZ THOMAS LAMANNA FRANK STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 11856 Lot Size Dim.: 90.00x142.00 TaxID* OB9.-04-06.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,232 Land SQFT 12,780 Assessed Value $ 150,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.29 Land Assesment $ 19,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 624 Zoning School Tax $ 3,152 Year Built 1986 Nbad Code 22402 County/Town Tax $ 1,344 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 -'NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 4,496 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 150,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 19,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR- 1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1986, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Garage Type 476 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on CNDTN: NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE: C S Nis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector, Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Updated: 04/09/2D15 1:45 pm Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL: ( GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1986, 476.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy orreliability oflhe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.cam shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. v...__/(__. _ 1. -.... ..--1 :._r_ - -In.:., .. n IT, -. n..nnnnn­.------------- real-info.com I realRecordTM Page I of 2 l OWNERSHIP INFORMATION CRISAFI NICHOLAS CRISAFI 8325 NATES LN CICERO NY 13039-8916 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 12/08/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5307 Seller CENTORE Buyer CRISAFI HEATHER y NICHOLAS ice! PARCEL NO: 051.4-13-08.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 237,000 Deed Date 12/08/2014 Page 60 ## Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE PATE ARMSILENGTH SELLER BUYERI F E 1 $ 236,900 12/08/2014 Y CENTORE HEATHER CRISAFI NICHOLAS 2 $ 0 01/31/2012 N CENTORE, III JOHN CENTORE HEATHER 3 $ 1 01/03/2012 N CENTORE, III JOHN CENTORE HEATHER 4 $ 193,970 04/04/2006 Y RUBENSTEIN MICHAEL CENTORE JOHN 5 $ 193,970 10/14/2005 Y ALBERICI GENERAL CONTRACT ORS IN RUBENSTEIN MICHAEL 6 $ 37,000 08/09/2005 Y MARRA NATHAN A ALBERICI GEN CONTRACTORS STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION E TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,680 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x130.00 Tax ID# 051.4-13-08.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,680 Land SQFT 13,000 Assessed Value $ 205,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.30 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 4,307 Year Built 2005 Nbad Code 22602 County/Town Tax $ 1,837 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 6,144 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 205,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID#k Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2005, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, Q Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on eGara Typegyp 20 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE, C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL, (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL IXEMPTIONS: 13ASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL _ _- 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. h"n //wehnnn real -info enmh-PalPrint acn)rr=N Vu/7FNV/?Fnh70G,oFq 10) RQM I Mann I' nnS?f)nnnn01) cIA/-,n, c real-info.com I realRecord.TM N I a")J_Av Page. 1 of I t r•t realRecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 051.4-13-06.0 BIELING LYNFORD A. BIE[LING Mail: 8337 NATES LN 8337 NATES LN CICERO NY 13039-8916 CICERO NY 13039-8916 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 08/07/2013 Price $ 203,900 Deed Date 08/08/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5248 Page 288 # Total Parcels 1 Seller ALBERICI BuyerGENERAL BIELING LYNFORO Personal Property 0A. SALES PRICE DATE SELLER BUYER 1 $ 37,000 12/18/2008 Y MARRA NATHAN A ALBERICI GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC STRUCTURAL INFORM ATTON LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,796 Lot Size Dim.: 200.46x130.00 Tax ID# 051.4-13-06.0 Sqft, 1st Floor 1,796 Land SQFT 12,029 Assessed Value $ 203,900 Sqft. znd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.60 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 945 Year Built 2013 Nbad Code 22602 County/Town Tax $ 403 Bldg Style RANCH 312403 _ NORTH School District City/Village Tax $ Units SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 1,348 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 203,900 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 0 Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail NONE Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on HEAT: (HOT AIR) Heat Type Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector, Exterior Condition GOOD Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources. real -info, coin shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. hrin•/hupi,a„e,raal-infnrnrnh•r+alPrin+I'ngoneinnnnntonn,cnnonnnn ran,C real-infoxom I realRecordTM V Page I of 1 BWAF OWNERSHIP INFORMATION DELBIONDO JOSEPH DELBIONDO 8345 NATES LN CICERO NY 13039-8916 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/06/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5237 Seller ALBERICI GENERAL Buyer DELBIONDO CONTRACT y JOSEPH PARCEL NO: 051.4-13-05.0 Mail: 8345 NATES LN CICERO NY 13039-8916 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: Price $ 330,000 Deed Date 05/06/2013 Page 674 # Total Parcels 1 Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHARMS I SELLER BUYER 1 $ 330,000 04/11/2013 Y ALBERICI GENERAL DELBIONDO JOSEPH CONTRACT2 $ 37,000 12/18/2008 Y MARRA NATHAN A ALBERICI GENERAL CONTRACT ORS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,508 Lot Size Dim.: 201.49x130,00 Tax ID# 051.4-13-05.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,254 Land SQFT 12,133 Assessed Value $ 330,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,254 Lot Size Acres 0.60 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 945 Year Built 2013 Nbad Code 22602 County/Town Tax $ 403 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 1,348 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 330,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces I Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 0 Nbad. T e ypSUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts Cooling Detail NONE Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: ( GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior Condition GOOD Updated: 04/09/2015 1:44 pm Basement Type PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2013, 638.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2013, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real- info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained frufn many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use ofthe information contained herein, hi# ti:l/webann.real-infn.cnttt/realPrint asn7rr.=TVY%7FNYai„7h'f1F7%7F;1'77R4f151 nnann z nnr;nnnnnnn ; rti ion t real-info.com I realRecordT"l Page 1 of 1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION NIEVES ]AMES COLLINS 8322 NATES LN CICERO NY 13039-8906 G 5 PARCEL NO: 051.4-12-15.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CICERO NY 00000-0000 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 07/09/2013 Price $ 232,000 Deed Date 07/10/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5244 Page 602 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WIEDENBECK JOSEPH Buyer NIEVES JAMES Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER RIOR 1 $ 227,000 11/16/2007 Y BOTTEON MARK A WIEDENBECK JOSPEH JR 2 $ 239,900 10/20/2006 Y ALBERICI GENERAL CONTRACT BOT EON MARK AORSIN 3 $ 37,000 08/09/200S Y MARRA NATHAN A ALBERICI GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION F TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,326 Lot Size Dim.: 100.00x190.09 Tax ID# 051.4-12-15.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,436 Land SQFT 12,992 Assessed Value $ 232,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 890 Lot Size Acres 0A4 Land Assesment $ 45,000 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 4,601 Year Built 2005 Nbad Code 22602 County/Town Tax $ 1,962 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 6,563 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 232,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 45,000 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2005, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, Q Res. Sites I or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS; numbers are estimated based on eGara Type9yP 20 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE. C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2009, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-infac!orrt makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy orreliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn://wehann real -infra rnm/realPrint acn?rc=NV°A?FNVc/) P0(;70/')F1 17'79Qo5 i oninn i om r%nnnnnon 211n1 c zeal-infoxom I realRecordTm Page 1 of 1 re a 1 Record TM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 052.-Ott-25.2 DRAKE PAUL MORSE Mail: $458 ROLLERCOASTER DR 83015 SANDRA AVE CICERO NY 13039-7823 CICERO NY 13039-8807 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0103.01 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/17/2013 Price $ 119,000 Deed Date 05/20/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5238 Page 807 *Total Parcels 2 Seller TYFAIR CRAIG Buyer DRAKE PAUL Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES I PRICE ARMSDATEILENGTH I SELLER I BUYER 1 $ 114,500 12/22/2006 Y SYMERSUZANNE TYFAILKRISTINE STRUCTURAL INFORMATION F LOT INFORMATION F TAX INFORMATION Square feet 1,416 Lot Slxe Dint.: 110.00XIS0.00 Tax ID# 052.-02-25.2 Sqft. 1st Floor 936 Land SQFT 19,800 Assessed Value $ 120,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.45 Land Assesrnent $ 34,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 480 Zoning R-15 School Tax $ 2,731 Year Built 1963 Nbad Code 22202 County/Town Tax $ 1,165 Bldg Style SPLIT LEVEL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 3,696 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 120,000 Baths 1 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMM E;RCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# 052-02-25.0 Fireplaces 0 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 34,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATr, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 1963, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 432 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 18 X 24), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: SASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 1963, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 1999, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) POOL-ABV GRN, BUILT 2014, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Npte: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-Wo.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httmt/wehannxeai-infn.cntn/realPrint.a)RI 1')7R9f15'M nArlf nln)ionl lnnn r.1AP)nt ' real-info.com. I realRecoxdTM Page 1 of 2 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION ZALLA AMY ZALLA 6381 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8684 PARCEL NO: 051.4-01-02.0 Mail: PHONE NUMBER: CICERO NY 00000-0000 COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 11/04/2014 Price $ 234,000 Deed Date ii/04/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5302 Page 840 # Total Parcels 1 FRANCONIA REAL Seller ESTATE SER Buyer ZALLA AMY Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES NICEpp DATE I LENGTH ARMS SELLER II ._ . —__ BUYER I 1 227,000 01/05/2009 Y KEYES TIMOTHY D,KARA E BROWN ALEXANDER C,KIRSTAN M 2 184,778 04/11/2003 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC KEYES TIMOTHY D 3 46,000 08/21/2002 Y EAGLE:WOOD ASSOC INC GLEASON BUILDERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,056 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,260 Sqft. 2nd Floor 796 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2002 Bldg Style COLONIAL. Units . 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2002, 400 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Says 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior COMPOSITION Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 80.00X177.96 Land SQFT 14,237 Lot Size Acres 0.36 Zoning R-12 Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURRAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR- I-0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 278,00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFr, CONDITION NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-01-02.0 Assessed Value $ 240,000 Land Assesment $ 60,500 School Tax $ 4,769 County/Town Tax $ 2,034 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,803 Full Tax Value $ 240,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 60,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm htin://Wehann reai-infn.cnm/rpnlPrint acn9rc-NYa/ ?T7NVQ/?PnA'7u/'7F2177R0[157nndnrt(iinn,)nnnnnnn C e_MAI c real-infoxom I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 I f-lj realF ecord OWNERSHIP INFORMATION COSTA MICHAEL COSTA 6384 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8687 COUNTY- ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND I RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 051.4-02-02.0 Mail: 6384 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8687 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/22/2014 Price $ 237,000 Deed Date 07/22/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5289 Page 356 # Total Parcels 1 Seller WAGONER BARBARA Buyer COSTA MICHAEL Personal Property 0 PRIOR I 7— SALES PR1[ ICE DATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 237,000 07/17/2014 Y WAGONER BARBARA COSTA MICHAEL 2 $ 1 08/12/2008 N WAGONER RICHARD WAGONER BARBARA 3 $ 157,355 05/30/2002 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC WAGONER RICHARD I & BARBARA A 4 $ 46,000 02/11/2002 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC GLEASON BUIDLERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,970 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,112 Sqft. 2nd Floor 858 Fin, Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2002 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, i HALF Bedrooms 3 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GA R-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2002, Garage Type 700 SQFT, CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE, C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: ( HOT AIR) FUEL:( GAS) Exterior COMPOSITION Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size DIMA 105.35x121.85 Land SQFT 12,837 Lot Sire Acres 0.27 Zoning R-12 Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMME;RCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad. Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS' 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 700.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL tote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-02-02.0 Assessed Value $ 240,000 Land Assesment $ 49,200 School Tax $ 4,622 County/ Town Tax $ 1,971 City/ Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 6,593 Full Tax Value $ 240,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 49,200 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated., 04/09/2015 1:44 pm real- infoxorrr makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not he liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. httn•/ hx pha, raol-infn Z')OflAcrnAAAAn'lnnnnnnnnnn Ciernni r real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of I realRecclydTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LOUDNER MICHAEL L AND AMY C 6385 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8684 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE PARCEL -NO: 051.4-01-04.0 Mail: 63B5 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8684 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/10/2014 Price $ 212,500 Deed Date 06/11/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5283 Page 697 # Total Parcels 1 Seller ENGLISH Buyer LOUDNER MICHAEL L Personal Property 0GORDONM.AND AMY C PIIIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS ISELLER BUYER ! 1 $ 1 11/10/2011 N ENGLISH CORDON ENGLISH GORDON 2 $ 166,000 07/16/2004 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC ENGLISH GORDON STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,018 Lot Size Dim.: 90.00x150.00 Tax ID# 051.4-01-04.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,284 Land SQFT 13,500 Assessed Value $ 225,000 Sqft. Inii Floor 734 Lot Size Acres 0.31 Land Assesment $ 53,600 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 4,727 Year Built 2004 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 2,016 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 6,743 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 225,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 53,600 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2004, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. EXCELLENT, GRADE' C Updated:04/09/2015 1144 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: 13ASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 A -IT, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT 1) PORCH -SCREEN, BUILT 2005, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL lote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real -info. corn shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. ht:tn:Ilwehann.real-infn.enmlrealPrinta.Gn7rr,=*NVol.?FNYo11,9FO6?01.?FRI??R9(iSlot)Anoo1noannn nnn cVd')nis real-info.com j realRecordTM _ Page 1 of 2 realRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION OKOROR TITILAYO ODENIYI 8329 ANGLERS CLB CICERO NY 13039-8681 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL N0, 051.4-02-25.0 Mail: 8329 ANGLERS CLB CICERO NY 13039-8681 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 10/23/2013 Price $ 294,000 Deed Date 11/04/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5258 Page 827 # Total Parcels 1 Seller OHARA DARRIN Buyer OKOROR TITILAYO Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES L PRICE DATE 11 ARMS LENGTH SELLER Ij BUYER IOHARA1299,900 06/1b/2006 Y MISTRETTA MICHAEL V,SUSAN M DARRIN 2 274,610 07/15/2004 Y MISTRETTA MICHAEL V,SUSAN M ELDAN HOMES INC 3 40,000 01/26/2004 N GREEN LAKE ASSOC LLC ELDAN HOMES INC 4 1 02/17/2003 N BALDWINSVILLE STRUCTURAL GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATES SYSTEMS LLC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,992 Lot Size Dim.: 89.84x162.98 Tax ID# 051.4-02-25.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,302 Land SQFT 14,642 Assessed Value $ 300,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,338 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Land Assesment $ 49,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 6,618 Year Built 2004 Nbad Code 2-2605 County/Town Tax $ 2,822 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District, - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 9,440 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 300,000 Baths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 49,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2004, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 484 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptlons have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 22 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. EXCELLENT, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT I) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDMON NORMAL 1) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2008, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site'and up to four Improvements. h!4„•//.x,oj,,na,-m.0Anfn 1''170nnc i AAAnnnnnn cnnnnnnn r is ^n, r real-infoxom ( realRecordTM Page I of 1 realRecoMTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FAIRFIELD TAMMI 8392 CICERO STAGE CICERO NY 13039-8660 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 051.4-03-03.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT. 0104,00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/19/2014 Price $ 210,000 Deed Date 09/29/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5297 Page 726 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SKRZYPEK Buyer FAIRFIELD personal Property 0MICHAELTAMMI PRIOR SALES PRICE1. DATE LENGTH 11 SELLER BUYER 1 $ 1 08/17/2004 N ELDAN HOMES INC GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATES LLC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,472 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,284 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,188 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2004 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2004, 420 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 x 21), CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 MPROVEME LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 90.17x235.85 Land SQFT 21,267 Lot Size Acres 0.49 Zoning R-12 Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTHSYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 1) GAR-1.0 ATI, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) CANPY-W/SLAB, BUILT 2004, 96.00 SQFT, CONDITION G0OD Note: Display Indicates first residential slte and up to four improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-03-03,0 Assessed Value $ 285,000 Land Assesment $ 61,500 School Tax $ 5,988 County/Town Tax $ 2,554 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 8,542 Full Tax Value $ 285,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 61,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verlfled directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-infoxom shall not be Iiable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. htto:llwebann.real-info.com/realPrimfl,en?re-NY°/n7.FNY%?Fofi701.? I1'?9R4n5tnnannn'4nnxnnnnnnn ar411nI{ real-iunfo.com I realRecordrm Page I of I rea [Record LL l 7 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION IPARCEL NO: 051.4-03-06.0 DOBRINSKI MICHAEL DOBRINSKI Mail: B376 CICERO STAGE 8376 CICERO STAGE CICERO NY 13039-8660 CICERO NY 13039-8660 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION 7Sale Date 11/26/2014 price $ 263,000 Deed Date 11/26/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5306 Page 6 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BREFKA DANIEL Buyer DOBRINSKI MICHAEL Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LENGM ,H SELLER BUYER 1 $ 250,000 09/05/2012 Y KEYES SUSAN BREFKA DANIEL 2 $ 249,900 08/31/2012 Y KEYES SUSAN BREFKA DANIEL 3 $ 173,500 06/20/2003 Y JMG INC DBA IMG CUSTOM HOMES KEYES PATRICK M,SUSAN E STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,126 Lot Size Dim.: 133.60x148.86 Tax II)# 051.4-03-06.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,292 Land SQFT 19,888 Assessed Value $ 250,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 834 Lot Size Acres 0,45 Land Assesment $ 63,300 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School 'Tax $ 5,778 Year Built 2003 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 2,464 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total "Tax $ 8,242 w Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 250,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 63,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE *The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2003, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 576 SQFT, # Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included, All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: numbers are estimated based on Comm. Sites 024X24), town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: GOOD, Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 128.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2006, 523.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) SHED -MACHINE, BUILT 2006, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 0) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2010, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL L fote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info•com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources, real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, http://webapp.real-info.com/xealPrint.asn7rc=NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F3 f 2289051004nnoi [106( DOOOM •clan n t 5 real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 realRe cord" OWNERSHIP INFORMATION WORM KIM WORM 6157 ADDISON LOOMIS CICERO NY 1.3039-8685 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 051.4-04-35.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/18/2013 Price $ 259,000 Deed Date 04/19/2013 Arms Length Y Libre $235 Page 717 # Total Parcels 1 Seller SPENARD JEFFREY Buyer WORM KIM Personal Property 0 SAALES PRICE DATE I1 ARMSLENGTHI SELLER11 BUYER 1 $ 206,325 10/31/2002 Y SUMMERSET HOMES LLC SPENARD JEFFREY C/]ULIE A 2 $ 108,000 09/06/2002 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC SUMMESET HOMES LLC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,904 Lot Size Dim.: 93.04x145.00 Tax ID# 051.4-04-35.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,876 Land SQFT 16,234 Assessed Value $ 259,000 Sqft. 3nd'Floor 1,028 Lot Size Acres 0,37 Land Assesment $ 54,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 6,618 Year Bulit 2002 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 2,822 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 9,440 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 259,000 Baths 3 FULL, 1 HALF Hater Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 5 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax XD# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 54,900 Kitchens 2 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special dlstrlct tax amounts Garage Type 748 SQFT, CNDTN: Res. Sikes 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on NORMAL, Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified GRADE: C Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detall NONE Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 prn Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 748.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indlcates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-in£oxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability ofthe content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained l herein. htfn•//wP.hnnn r.A-infn nnrnlraalPrint ncn9rr=MVO/.9P 7Ve/nFn4'7oi')F,I t 1)1Aanc t nnAnnnxn,2tnnnnnnn 4 Pc 111011 c real-info.com I realRecordTm Page 1 of I realRecordrM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION BOYD THOMAS 6280 ADDISON LOOMIS CICERO NY 13039-8686 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE yo PARCEL NO: 051.4-06-03.0 Mail: CICERO NY 00000-0000 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALIE INFORMATION Sale Date 07/31/2013 Price $ 324,950 Deed Date 08/06/2013 Arens Length Y Libre 3247 Page 926 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BALINTFY DONALD Buyer BOYD THOMAS Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE - DATE ARMSLENGTHI1 SELLER I1 BUYER _I 1 $ 285,000 12/23/2002 Y JMG INC D/B/A JMG CUSTOM HOMES BALINTFY DONALD 3 2 $ 37,500 08/23/2002 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC 3 M G INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT XNFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 3,178 Lot Size Dim.: 101.00x140,00 Tax II]# 051.4-06-03.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,862 Land SQFT 14,140 Assessed Value $ 340,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,004 Lot Size Acres 0.32 Land Assesment $ 55,900 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 7,143 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 3,046 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 10,189 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 340,000 Baths 3 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full band Value $ $5,900 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 6Z4 SQFT, aqt Res, sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All DIMENSIONS: DIM SI numbers are estimated based on Garage Type 24 Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE' C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Garage Says 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL I:XEM PTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR- 1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) POOL-ST/VNYL, BUILT 2007, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 0) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-infbxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. rvo Fn oi to szonsinnAnnntimmnnnnnnn s/AI,)nt c real-info.com I realRecordTM Page 1 of I T M realRecord T3 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 051.4-07-16.0 CHINIKAILO MARIA Mail: 6307 MATILDA GAGE 6307 MATILDA GAGE CICERO NY 13039-7919 CICERO NY 13039-7919 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/10/2013 Price $ 230,000 Deed Date 06/10/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5241 Page 259 # Total Parcels 1 Seller PHILLIPS HARRY Buyer CHINIKAILO MARIA Personal Property 0 PRIORISALES PRICEDATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 230,000 06/03/2013 Y PHILLIPS HARRY CHINIKAILO MARIA 2 $ 178,897 10/17/2003 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC PHILLIPS HARRY F & LISA M 3 $ 64,000 06/20/2003 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOCIATES INC GLEASON BUILDERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION quare Feet 2,212 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,260 Sqft. 2nd Floor 952 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Year Built 2003 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 I # Stories Baths Bedrooms Fireplaces Kitchens Garage Type Garage Bays Cooing Detail Heat Type Exterior Condition Basement Type 2.00 2 FULL, 1 HALF 3 GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT: 2003, 400 SQFT, DIMENSIONS: 20 x 20), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C 1 CENTRAL HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) ALUM/VINYL GOOD FULL EXEMPTIONS• BASIC STAR 1999-2000 LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 100,01X144.04 Land SQFT 14,405 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Zoning Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTHSYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites i Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 Arr, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL lute: Display Indlcates first resiclentlal site and up to four Improvements, TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-07-16.0 Assessed Value $ 235,000 Land Assesment $ 56,900 School Tax $ 5,147 County/Town Tax $ 2,195 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,342 Full Tax Value $ 235,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 56,900 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm real.info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. http://webal)t).real-info.com/realPrint.ast)?rGNY%2FNY%2FO67cln2F3122990510040007f ) 6nn(ionor) Vti»ni s real-infoxom I realRecord7m Page 1 of 1 realRe ordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION FORD MICHAEL DAMBROSIO 6319 MATILDA GAGE CICERO NY 23039-7919 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE N4' PARCEL NO: 051.4-07-1.8.0 Mail: 6319 MATILDA GAGE CICERO NY 13039-7919 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 04/26/2013 Price $ 240,000 Deed Date 04/26/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5236 Page 406 # Total Parcels 1 Seller RETAJCZYK DANIEL Buyer FORD MICHAEL Personal Property 0 SALES I PRICE bAT)< LENGTHARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 239,000 04/23/2013 Y RETAJCZYK DANIEL FORD MICHAEL 2 $ 223,000 11/10/2006 Y DEMORE LOUIS REl'AJCZYK DANIEL 3 $ 204,000 09/19/2003 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC DEMORE LOUTS/PAMELA C 4 $ 128,000 05/28/2003 N EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC GLEASON BUILDERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 2,618 Lot Size Dim.: 104.00x140.00 Tax ID# 051.4-07-18.0 Sqft. ist Floor 1,494 Land SQFT 14,560 Assessed Value $ 239,000 Sqft. end Floor 1,124 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Land Assesment $ 57,50D Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning School Tax $ 5,147 Year Built 2003 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $• 2,195 Bldg Style COLONIAL School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 7,342 Stories 2.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 239,000 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 4 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 57,500 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT: 2003, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 400 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 20), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:D4/09/2015 1:44 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior COMPOSITION Condition NORMAL Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2003, D SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL I) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL I) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL dote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-info.com makes no warranty orguarantes concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info,com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, nftn•//wPhwnn rnal_infn ertrnn/rPatPAn* V)'Y4llndz7nndnnn•Tn9 onnnnnnn eJein real-info.com I realRecordTm Page I of I riealRecordTM o OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL NO: 051.4-07-19.0 BARRETT ]EFFREY BARRETT Mail- 424 DAVID DR 63:S MATILDA GAGE NORTH SYRACUSE NY 13212-1929 CICERO NY 13039-7919 PHONE NUMBER; COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/21/2013 Price $ 217,000 Deed Date 07/03/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5244 Page 73 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KENNEDY RUSSEL Buyer BARRETT ]EFFREY Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH ARMS SELLER BUYER 1 $ 195,786 10/21/2003 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC KENNEDY RUSSEL W & SUSAN L STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 1,968 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,464 Sqft. 2nd Floor 504 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2003 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 3 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2003, 483 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 21 X 23), CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUMIVINYL Conelltion GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 104.00x140,00 Land SQFT 14,560 Lot Size Acres 0.33 Zoning Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIALIPUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 137.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-07-19.0 Assessed Value $ 225,000 Land Assesment $ 57,500 School Tax $ 5,147 County/Town Tax $ 2,195 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 7,342 Full Tax Value $ 225,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 57,500 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm real-info.com makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, l htto://webann.real-info.corn/realPrint.asn?rc=NY%2FNY%2FO67%2F.9122990510040011701900(100(10 VA»nt s real-infoxom J realRecordTM Page 1 of 1 reamecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Q1U XINLIANG LAN 6295 ASA EASTWOOD CICERO NY 13039-7911 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 051.4-03-07.0 Mail: 6295 ASA EASTWOOD CICERO NY 13039-7911 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 09/26/2014 Price $ 234,500 Deed Date 09/29/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5297 Page 728 # Total Parcels 1 Seller MURPHY TIMOTHY Buyer QIU XINLIANG Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTHRMS I SELLER BUYER 1 $ 183,605 10/22/2002 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC MURPHY TIMOTHY P/LUCINDA JEAN 2 $ 189,000 09/16/2002 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC GLEASON BUIDLERS INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,970 Lot Size Dim.: 109.33x141.67 Tax ID# 031.4-03-07.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,970 Land SQFT 15,489 Assessed Value $ 240,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.35 Land Assesment $ 52,300 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Zoning School Tax $ 5,042 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 2,150 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 7,192 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 240,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 52,300 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax -amounts are not BUILT: 2002, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been Included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS, 20 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: GOOD, SWis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. GRADE; C Garage Says 1 Updated.,04/0912015 1:44 pm Cooling Detail NONE Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATF, BUILT 2002, 0 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2002, 59.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2002, 240.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD Vote: Dlsplay Indicates first residential site and up to four improvements. real-info.corn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. dirt://wehann.real-infn.cnrnlrPniFrintacn rr.=I 7V%7F7vva/ Fttti7o/o><tto7Rans1nndnnngmmnnnnnnn c1411Pn-Ic real-infoxom I reaiRecordTm Page 1 of 2 real ecorldTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION MC LAUGLIN COLLEEN FARLEY 6317 ASA EASTWOOD CICERO NY 13039-7913 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE 1PARCE_L_ NO: 051.4-03-12.0 Mail: 6317 ASA EASTWOOD CICERO NY 13039-7913 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION ISale Date 05/22/2013 Price $ 217,000 Deed Date 05/23/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5239 Page 363 # Total Parcels 1 Seller TILTON CARL Buyer MC LAUGLIN COLLEEN Personal Property 0 PRIOR SALES I PRICE V DATE I LENGTH 1 ARMS L SELLER 1 BUYER 1 $ 1 08/21/2012 N TILTON CARL TILTON CARL 2 $ 1 04/14/2005 N TILTON CARL F THE TILTON IRREVOCABLE TR 3 $ 0 08/24/2004 N TILTON CARL F TILTON CARL 4 $ 174,900 02/11/2004 Y GLEASON BUILDERS INC TILTON CARL F 5 $ 132,000 08/22/2003 Y EAGLEWOOD ASSOC INC GLEASON BUILDERS INC 5TRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet 1,688 Lot Size Dim.: 86.00x140.00 Tax ID# 051.4-03-12.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,688 Land SQFT 12,040 Assessed Value $ 217,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0.28 Land Assesment $ 48,200 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning School Tax $ 4,517 Year Built 2003 Nbad Code 22605 County/'Town Tax $ 1,926 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 6,443 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 217,000 Baths 2 FULL Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 3 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID#k Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 48,200 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC GAR-1.0 ATT, Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not BUILT; 2003, Nbad. Type SUBURBAN exact. No special district tax amounts 440 SQFT, Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 22), Comm. Sites 0 numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified CNDTN: Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. NORMAL, GRADE: C Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pmGarageBays1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: ENHANCED STAR IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 AT% BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL i1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 108.00 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT2-003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PATIO-CONCR, BUILT 2003, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Vote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. kiln•//WPhsnn rPaLinfn rnmhPalPrint 11)go0ne Inn A nnAinisi%AnAAAe% ux...... I , rag< p.. i eaflRecordTM OWNERSHIP INFORMATION PARCEL •NO: 051.4-01-25.0ram KENNFLLY THOMAS KENNELLY Mail: 6455 ELECTRIC RAILWAY 6455 ELECTRIC RAILWAY CICERO NY 13039-8682 CICERO NY 13039-8682 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 -ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUNDRESIDENCE_ SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 01/17/2014 Price $ 345,000 Deed Date 01/21/2014 Arms Length Y Libre 5267 Page 928 # Total Parcels 1 Seller KEYES TIMOTHY Buyer KENNELLY THOMAS Personal Property 0 SALES PRICE DATE LARMSH11 SELLER BUYER 1 $ 365,000 01/05/2009 Y PIERCE TIMOTHY S,DEIRDRE P KEYES TIMOTHY D,KARA E 2 $ 292,640 05/31/2002 Y BALDWINSVILLE STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS PIERCE TIMOTHY S & DEIRDRE P 3 $ 58,930 05/17/2002 Y EAGLEWOODS ASSOCIATES INC BALDWINSVILLE STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS, INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION LOT INFORMATION TAX INFORMATION Square Feet •3,200 Lot -Size Dim.: 100.03x214,30 Tax ID# 051.4-01-25.0 Sqft. 1st Floor 3,200 Land SQFT 21,436 Assessed Value $ 345,000 Sqft. 2nd Floor 0 Lot Size Acres 0,03 Land Assesment $ 71,400 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Zoning R-12 School Tax $ 7,669 Year Built 2002 Nbad Code 22605 County/Town Tax $ 3,270 Bldg Style RANCH School District 312403 - NORTH City/Village Tax $ r Units 1 SYRACUSE Total Tax $ 10,939 Stories 1.00 Desirability TYPICAL Full Tax Value $ 345,000 Baths 3 FULL, I HALF Water Front N Equalization Rate 1.00 Bedrooms 2 Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Prior Tax ID# Fireplaces 1 Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Full Land Value $ 71,400 Kitchens 1 Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Garage Type Nbad. Rating AVERAGE The calculated tax amounts are not Garage Bays 0 Nbad, Type SUBURBAN exact, No special district tax amounts Coaling Detail CENTRAL Res. Sites 1 or exemptions have been included. All numbers are estimated based on Heat: Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) Comm. Sites 0 town values. Taxes should be verified FUEL: (GAS) Swis Code 312289 directly from the local tax collector. Exterior UNKNOWN Condition GOOD Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm Basement Type FULL EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 0) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2002, 642.00 SQPT, CONDITION NORMAL Note: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. real-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. IofI i http://webapp.i(ai-info.com/realPrint.asp?rc--NY%2FNY%2FO67%a2F312289051004000I0250000000 5/6/2015 zeal-infoxom j realRecord— realRecordFM k) Page 1 of I OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 1PARCEL NO: 051,4.11-06.0 MONTCLAIR DONNA Mail: 8421 ANGLERS CL8 8421 ANGLERS CILS . CICERO NY 13039-8744 CICERO NY 13039-8744 PHONE NUMBER: COUNTY: ONONDAGA CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 05/01/2013 Price $ 329,000 Deed Date OS/01/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5236 Page 933 # Total Parcels 1 Sailer LEVOS PENNY Buyer MONTCLAIR DONNA Personal Property 0 PRXOR SALES PRICE DATE LENGTH SELLER l $ 329,000 04/30/2013 Y LEVOS PENNY 336,750 02/28/2007 Y ISOM BRIAN AND JENNIFER t $ 388,322 02/10/2004 Y KENWOOD HOMES INC STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,878 Sqft, 1st Floor 1,670 Sqft, 2nd Floor 988 Fin. Basement Sqft. 0 Year Built 2003 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL, 1 HALF Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2003, Garage Type 520 SQI-f, CNDTN: GOOD, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOTAIR) FUEL; (GAS) Exterior WOOD Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 100.00X182.89 Land SQFT, 18,289 Lot Size Acres 0.42 Zoning R-12 Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 BUYER MONTCLAIR DONNA LEVOS PENNY ISOM BRIAN D TAX INFO RMA'i'IO N Tax ID# 051.4-11-06.0 Assessed Value $ 329,000 Land Assesment $ 63,100 School Tax $ 6,618 County/Town Tax $ 2,822 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 9,440 Full Tax Value $ 329,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 63,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been Included, All numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: _ 1) GAR-1.0 ATf, BUILT 2003, 520.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD — 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2003, 102.00 SQFT, CONDITION GOOD 1) PORCH -OPEN, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION EXCELLENT Jote: Display Indicates first residential site and up to four Improvemerits. real-info.eorn makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site. Information is obtained from E many sources. real-info.com shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein, lttn1/webann.r'eal-1nfA.Cnm rAalPTlnt acn?rr=AtVo/R7.TVOJ 7 l1?Q/_ 7L^4 t rl7O!]Ae tAA nnt t nnrnnnnnnn real-info.com I realRecordIm Page 1 of 1 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION' CONKLIN JESSE CONKLIN 8381 ANGLERS CLB CICERO NY 13039-8681 COUNTY: ONONDAGA PROPERTY CLASS: 210 - ONE FAMILY YEAR-ROUND RESIDENCE PARCEL NO: 081.4-11-16.0 Mail: 8381 ANGLERS CLB CICERO NY 13039-8681 PHONE NUMBER: CENSUS TRACT: 0104.00 SALE INFORMATION Sale Date 06/07/2013 Price $ 285,000 deed Date 06/10/2013 Arms Length Y Libre 5241 Page 348 # Total Parcels 1 Seller BUSH STEPHEN Buyer CONKLIN JESSE Personal Property 0 PRIOR L SALES ARMSPRICEDATE LENGTH SELLER BUYER 1 $ 244,600 05/05/2005 Y NVR INC BUSH STEPHEN 3 2 $ 160,000 03/04/2004 N EAGLEWOOD ASSOCIATES INC KATHY KOTZ HOME BUILDER STRUCTURAL INFORMATION Square Feet 2,668 Sqft. 1st Floor 1,532 Sqft. 2nd Floor 1,1.36 Fin. Basement Sqft, 0 Year Built 2004 Bldg Style COLONIAL Units 1 Stories 2.00 Baths 2 FULL Bedrooms 4 Fireplaces 1 Kitchens 1 GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT: 2004, 480 SQFT, Garage Type DIMENSIONS: 20 X 24), CNDTN: NORMAL, GRADE: C Garage Bays 1 Cooling Detail CENTRAL Heat Type HEAT: (HOT AIR) FUEL: (GAS) Exterior ALUM/VINYL Condition GOOD Basement Type FULL LOT INFORMATION Lot Size Dim.: 103.37x222.29 Land SQFT 23,045 Lot Size Acres 0.53 Zoning R-12 Nbad Code 22605 School District 312403 - NORTH SYRACUSE Desirability TYPICAL Water Front N Sewer COMMERCIAL/ PUBLIC Water COMMERCIAL/PUBLIC Utilities GAS/ELECTRIC Nbad. Rating AVERAGE Nbad.Type SUBURBAN Res. Sites 1 Comm. Sites 0 Swis Code 312289 EXEMPTIONS: BASIC STAR. 1999-2000 IMPROVEMENTS: 1) GAR-1.0 ATT, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL 1) PORCH-COVERD, BUILT 2004, 0 SQFT, CONDITION NORMAL Jote: Display indicates first residential site and up to four Improvements. TAX INFORMATION Tax ID# 051.4-11-16.0 Assessed Value $ 285,000 Land Assesment $ 68,100 School Tax $ 6,303 County/Town Tax $ 2,688 City/Village Tax $ Total Tax $ 8,991 Full Tax Value $ 285,000 Equalization Rate 1.00 Prior Tax ID# Full Land Value $ 68,100 The calculated tax amounts are not exact. No special district tax amounts or exemptions have been included. Ali numbers are estimated based on town values. Taxes should be verified directly from the local tax collector. Updated:04/09/2015 1:44 pm seal-infoxom makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the accuracy or reliability of the content contained in this site, Information is obtained from many sources. real-infoxom shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for any damages in connection with the use of the information contained herein. ittD.,//webat)D.raal-info.com/reaI Print. asn?rc=NY%?.FNY%7 PnA7e/ 7 Fq 177 R On,; IMAM) t 1 n 1 Mtn nnnn nn CELL TOWER 433 COOPER ROAD TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT PROPERTY OF ST. PAUL FIRE DISTRICT PREPARED FOR. Robert W. Burgdorf, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP i 1100 Clinton Square Rochester, New York 14604 i PREPARED BY ROBERT G. POGEL, SRPA POGEL, SCRUBMERL & FERRARA, LLC Real Estate Appraisal Services a 2509 Browncroft Boulevard Rochester, New York 14625 Pogel, Schubmehl & Ferrara, LLC Real Estate Appraisal Services 2509 Browncroft Blvd., Rochester, New York 14625 (585) 381-5600, Fax: (585) 381-5696 Robert 0. Pogel, SRPA Craig P. Schubmehl, NYS Cert Stephen V. Ferrara, SRA February 4, 2011 Robert W. Burgdorf, Esq. y I Nixon Peabody LLP 1100 Clinton Square j Rochester, New York 14604 RE: PROPOSED CELL TOWER 43 COOPER ROAD TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT Dear Mr. Burgdor£ At your request, I have prepared a report analyzing the market reactions of buyers and sellers in j the marketplace regarding properties located in close proximity to communication towers. I am professionally designated and state certified real estate appraiser, and my field of expertise relates to property valuation. I have specific experience with zoning matters regarding the placement of communication towers at several sites around the county. A question that i typically arises is whether construction of a tower will have a detrimental effect on the surrounding property values. Transmission towers are either monopoles or open lattice towers. The monopole simply consists of a steel pole anchored in a concrete base that is sufficient if the height of the tower does not greatly exceed 150 feet. Open lattice towers may be free-standing or guy wire supported. The goy wire supported towers may exceed 400 feet in height and are supported by steel guy wires. The subject property consists of a 3,45-acre site located at the southwest corner of Cooper Road and Winona Boulevard. The land is currently improved with a 16,000 square foot fire station that was constructed in 1991 after demolition of the former building, Additional improvements consist of an existing fire department communications tower that is 82 feet in height. The first step involves making an inspection of the subject neighborhood. A neighborhood is defined as "A group of complementary land uses; a congruous grouping of inhabitants, buildings, or business enterprises."', and a market area is defined as "The area associated with a subject property that contains its direct competition.s2 The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, Appraisal institute, Chicago, IL, 2010 2 Ibid Robert W. Burgdorf Esq. February 4 2011 The northern and western boundaries of the subject neighborhood follow St. Paul Boulevard to its intersection with Cooper Road. The southern boundary is more or less undefined, extending several blocks south of Winona Boulevard. Likewise, the east boundary of the neighborhood is also somewhat undefined as it extends easterly toward List Avenue. Within the immediate neighborhood are some pre-existing commercial uses including Ted's a Cooper Road Barber Shop at 451 Cooper. Road at the northwest comer of Winona Boulevard, the Genrich Garden Center at 375 Cooper Road, and a gas station/repair garage at 3392 St. Paul Boulevard, The St. Paul Fire District is located at 433 Cooper Road at the southwest corner of Winona Boulevard. The neighborhood contains a wide mix of housing stock including homes constructed between the early 1930s through the late 1940s. The most recent residential development in the neighborhood is the'Oldenburg Farms subdivision located off Placid Place. Generally, property values in the neighborhood range from homes selling under $90,000 to homes that may sell in excess of $160,000. The upper end of the value range would be represented by homes along BrentFeld Circle with sales in excess of $200,000. As part of my analysis, I have examined sales located within close proximity to existing communication towers in several locations within the greater Rochester area. The appraiser has examined four sites in which the sale prices of homes located within view of cell towers have been compared with sales of properties in the same neighborhoods without a view of the cell tower. A wide cross section of sales has been analyzed. Within any particular subdivision, the obtrusiveness of the cell tower can vary from one property to another. With some sales, the cell tower may be within fall view of the front while other properties may have a view only from the rear or side. Each of the sites will be described and a schedule indicating the sales and a t sales location map will be included. An analysis of numerous sales within the four sites does not support any credible evidence that there is any appreciable diminution in value resulting from the location of the cell tower. A wide cross section of sales was examined as part of this analysis. i Very truly yours, POGEL, SCHUBMEHL & FERRARA, LLC Robert G. Pogel, SIft3IX- -- RGP/clm J NEIGHBORHOOD MAP I I 4 r J i I! J JJ t l ? u jj v+w 54L'fc6 ! #4 3 K n. Site No. 1 7rondequoit Town HaI1/Oakcrest Village Subdivision The first site involves a neighborhood near a guyed cell tower located on the Frondequoit Town Hall property adjacent to the Department of Public Works garage at 25 Kings Highway. The cell tower has a height of 115 feet and was built in 1996. Properties located within the Oakcrest Village Subdivision along Eastgate Drive and Westgate Drive are within view of the cell tower, Sales 1 through 9 inclusive on that schedule involved homes that have a view of the cell tower. Sales 10 through 16 inclusive are located a short distance west but within the same subdivision. Those sales do not have a view of the cell tower, A review of the sales does not appear to indicate any significant difference in the overall sale price per square foot of gross building area. The average sale price of the five Colonial -style r dwellings and one Cape Cod -style dwelling is $84.32 per square foot involving sales within view of the cell tower, and $81.03 per square foot for six sales that do not have a view of the tower. The slightly higher difference in the average sale price per square foot regarding those homes within close proximity is most likely attributed to the fact that the lots are slightly larger along Eastgate and Westgate, even though they do have a view of the cell tower. Thus, the analysis does not indicate any appreciable difference in property values between the sales regardless of proximity to the cell tower. 4 Cn Sale Address No. 1 70 Eastgate 2 109 Eastgate Sale Date 6/08 5/08 Sale Price 141,000 147,900 3 155 Eastgate 7/07 $138,000 4 187 Eastggr, 10/10 $137,500 5 196 Eastgate 3/09 $159,500 6 47 Westgate 9/07 $225,000 7 8 9 10 11 12 109 Westgate 11/07 $140,000 125 Westgate 3/10 $136,000 157 Westgate 6109 124,900 50 Shadowlawn 12/07 158,000 108 Fairlawn 9/07 120,000 44 Fairlawn 7/07 127,000 13 90 Fairlawn siec t 12/08 $141,250 Site No. I Irondequoit Town Hall Dwelling Sale Price Tower Comments Size (SF) Per SF GBA View? 1,437 98.12 Yes Blt 1955 Colonial, 6 rins, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP 1,634 90.51 Yes Blt 1955 Colonial, 7 runs, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, patio, FP 1,700 81.18 Yes Blt 1956 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1 car garage, deck 1,948 70.58 Yes Blt 1948 Cape, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2 BA, 2 car garage, FP 1,850 86.21 Yes Blt 1986 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, new kitchen, FP 2,836 79.33 Yes Blt 1985 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, pool, FP 1,400 100.00 Yes Blt 1964 Ranch, 7 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, decks, finished walk -out basement 1,364 99.70 Yes Blt 1968 Ranch, 6 rm , 3 13R,1.5 BA, 2 car garage, porch, finished basement 1,169 106.84 Yes Blt 1968 Ranch, 5 rans, 2 BR, 1.5 BA,, 2 car garage, FP 2,158 733.22 No Blt 1968 Colonial, 7 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, FP, deck 1,463 82.02 No Blt 1954 Ranch, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1 car garage, FP 1,500 84.67 No Blt 1953 Colonial, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, enclosed porch 1,962 71.99 No Blt 1954, Colonial, 8 arms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, FP Site No.1 Yxondequoit Town Hall Sale Address Sale Sale Dwelling Sale Price No. Bate Price Size (SF) Per SF GBA 14 43 Fairlawn 10109 137,000 1,555 88.10 15 6 Oakcrest 5/10 125,000 1,562 80.03 16 79 Oakcrest 3/10 149,900 1,700 88.17 rn Site L Comments No Bit 1955 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BP, 1.5 BA, I car garage, enclosed porch, F1' No Blt 1954 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage No Blt 1953 Colonial, 8 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage a •' R c . •R ' .# - .# 1 r J. y r 77 LM • YI " ,m • ,{y w # yo I ! . W - .» .» O r N •1.1 r .N^ y 'A w '# N • o ' • Si k y 0 e, a ee e[ sr.L u e L , WW9tY9i---3-h--3fltMn»-.. 1 N3t KlYi! - / p 6 9 Y3S 3l11416 EF :Jd !E! M3Rl7 OH a3S • Z Yd AMWO MO I 3DY77! 1S3Y XY0 1H 3Y7 1/OOISGfaBlfS 3RY77G C y e c M w H m r .V . 1 is 2 iveLL 47-- L 109 43 O e r sr+ QOW y 1 ` `._ ---^ SLY.: I""w'' aenLa , rre .+ x + r ` a ' f. L-+ S . r O n •» O ,w. 43 OA is t 9 3 Lvwo nY LI Z r t 1 m ro- tuwm IR 1• I g LYz w, n - ><" as •- a. 7• W n fie—• ' t w1. 1 " • :] a ! v 11 i1 . G , `I • • f •r ua alN9 _Amom vH f N M t i rIJI I 7i ifl, 2Sarf! Ali 12 s17 14 rIp r 7 r. 4 la ba µM'i 1 IIlq Ian r Lf110 RsR4 y I . rar X IS ti4 w a I,fA1:9 r 1.11Ytl uip 1.1lC rn 14 ' sJ a IL 2.0 I 1 m i IS r' i ' ii Alp 9 p Ina, " ZT a: i 19 n 2 1 I7lCR Ila L4Rar aar R ss, C I rp .0a e b u DRIVE Oslo Dr r+" ai 1• .t3 lk ao'- '4xAlfo._-F-•- a'' k r I 6 7 41 2f Zp e • 43 R i' I aF 3O I tl A[C1 1 is 71 a as' 4i 3 n , gn.earr7 a'r ' rri rs p3Af, Tarr•g 31 1 - es 2 62 z4 e r aoa itIS20 73 r 33 flrIn11 as 74 69 ! Y S,i S 1 r a 26 141. lLisr 4 21 i I 3a a 014 a l s IS S. I a3 si ql is 111 - a T 13 s 1i .., I as, T, sz a 23 f In !2 ar i} r SA ag S! p a'1 r e •: 6 25, E n H.1 r 30 S4 3i - l . w S r eo : T! ay " x. sD' rla a` 5D .e •. rear, M ROAD1 wKCR£tr v/ u u aT r` 0• J Ip ai p i4 qqAa i' 7i 4x r 3 x ar ar uAw, 4 s r+T p wH sr r 1 T 3 to raa is f 1 sl So S! _ a7 s ap 1. I 34 o lBELMEADE r # DA%VIEW SCHOOLwdrg ' 76 rf. a ap =w y I TOWN DF FRONC x UAW 11'" TOWN MAL I 3i f m k l.171.OD6 3 Its zr PAL eD^ ke Iw. REa s ins-r LFwYiMiISFNT fA fGe i+ w^_ r 22,. . . r ` sw / 6 z 2` f ems, ` ) 2 < 2f . z , k \ !k ;: ^ / a. %2 a \ _ r\/ r 3 . . a \ 9 l. \ . . ..ate .Z ± ~ z «.¥: f & 2 \if «,.« ,G§ g§ . ,, K v Q!§ \: } \/ z< my G #e. 6 «\\ t \\/ « w z y/ \ y , . a• . . Site No. 2 1766 Latta. Road, Town of Greece North Greece Fire District The second site that has been analyzed is within a subdivision located adjacent to property owned by the Greece Fire District at 1766 Latta Road built in 1998. The Latta Road site is improved with a fire station as well as a 130-foot monopole cell tower. In addition, the Greece Police Department occupies a site at 400 Island Cottage Road which is approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the northwest comer of the subdivision. The parcel includes a cell tower occupied by Crown Atlantic, built in 2000. t Within the adjoining subdivision, the appraiser has included a schedule indicating 25 sales that f have transpired. The highest priced sales within the subdivision include sales along Shorecliff Drive within close proximity to the fire station. The view of the cell tower on the fire district parcel and the tower on the police department parcel varies depending on the location of the various sale properties. The majority of the properties within the subdivision have some view of the cell tower. Sales identified as numbers 17, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 24 involve properties located along Summit Hill and Lyncourt Park without a view of the cell towers. The average sale price of the six sales computes to $76.68 per square foot. Other sales, identified as Sales 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 15, 16, 20, and 25, involve properties that have a limited view of one of the cell towers. The average sale price of the eight sales is $76.63. Sales identified as 1, 7, 8, 12, 14 and 21 all involve properties with a view of the cell towers. The average sale price of these seven properties computes to 76.95 per square foot. The remaining sales along Shorecliff Drive, identified as Sales 9, 10 and 11 were all built at a later date within full view of the cell towers. These sale prices have not been tracked due to the age of the dwellings. After analyzing numerous sales within generally close proximity to the two cell towers, the analysis does not indicate any appreciable difference in property values. 10 Site No. 2 1766 Latta Road, Town of Greece North Greece Fire District Sale No. Address Sale Sale Dwelling Sale Price Tower Comments Date Price Size (SF) Per SF GBA View? 1 40 ,Arcadia 6/07 128,000 2,027 63.14 Yes Bit 1965 Split, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 1.5 car garage 2 153 Arcadia 4/07 130,000 1,670 77.84 Ltd Blt 1965 Split, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage 3 160 Arcadia 5/07 118,900 1,880 62.77 Ltd Blt 1967 Colonial, 7 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 carForeclosure garage 4 163 Arcadia 11/08 123,000 2,010 61.19 Ltd Bit 1965 Split, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, 1.5 car a as FPgarage, g 5 180 Arcadia 4/08 127,500 1,900 67.11 Ltd Bit 1965 Colonial, 7 rins, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, FP 6 195 Arcadia 5/07 142,000 1,576 90.10 Ltd Blt 1966 Ranch, 6 tins, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, shed 7 275 Arcadia 3110 109,000 1,064 102.44 Yes Bit 1966 Ranch, 5 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP 8 722 Shorecliff 5/08 170,000 2,094 81.18 Yes Blt 1968 Colonial, 9 rms, 5 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garg, IG pool, sized 9 692 Shorecliff 10109 157,900 1,800 87.72 Yes Blt 1991 Colonial, 7 rms, 5 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, deck 10 682 Shorecliff 6110 165,500 1,928 85.84 Yes Bit 1995 Colonial 8 rins 4 BR 2.5 BA 2 car garg, deck 11 672 Shorecliff 4109 138,000 1,600 86.25 Yes Blt 1996 Colonial, 6 rms 3 BR, 2.5 BA 2garage, , car gas FP 12 578 Shorecliff 3108 137,000 1,689 81.11 Yes Bit 1965 Split, 8 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP, IG pool 13 575 Shorecliff 10/09 125,000 1,420 88.03 Ltd Blt 1973 Ranch, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP 14 492 Shorecliff 3/10 127,000 1,856 68.43 Yes Blt 1964 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP, patio 15 455 Shorecliff 8/07 119,000 1,504 79.12 Ltd Blt 1966 Split, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP Sale Address No. 16 460 Shorecliff Sale Sale Date Price 10/08 121,000 Site No. 2 1766 Latta Road, Town of Greece North Greece Fare District Dwelling Sale Price Tower Comments Size (SE) Per SF GBA View? 1,640 $73.78 Ltd Bit 1965 Split, 8 rms 3 BR, 15 BA 17 90 Lyncourt Pk 6/07 130,000 2,052 63.35 No 18 93 Lyncourt Pk 10/09 115,500 1,627 70.98 No 19 121 Lyncourt Pk 8/10 102,450 1,138 90.03 No 20 164 Lyncourt Pk 6/07 138,200 1,900 72.74 Ltd 21 180 Lyncourt Pk 3/07 112,600 1,722 65.39 Yes Na 22 92 Summit Hill 8/08 122,500 1,080 113.43 No 23 202 Summit HE 4110 113,000 1,847 61.18 No 24 209 Summit Hill 2/10 123,900 2,028 61.09 No 25 291 Summit Hill 11/08 115,000 1,224 93.95 Ltd pool 2 car garage, patio, IG BIt 1964 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP B1t 1966 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, patio 131t 1966 Ranch, 5 rms, 3 BR, 1 BA, 2 car garage Blt 1965 Split, 8 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, patio Blt 1967 Split, 8 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1 car garage, deck Bit 1962 Ranch, 7 rms, 3 BR., 2 BA, 1.5 car garage, deck, finished basement Blt 1963 R/R, 8 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, finished basement, patio 1962 Split, 8 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, gas FP, patio 1965 Ranch, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 1.5 car garage, patio 0 14 I 0 E.7CAO IL7 AiCt 3 x TOWN OF GRE£CE 400 ISLAND C 3iTAGE -Pj,- 71/8 CELL TOWER,. e nra/r rnAw TIM A 4 t EDWIN J. "SOM SSTATB 302 — 23 - M+eeu •r+ ' 1 .lao S Fi/osJ +'lfsridL tdrr - .. •7r_an r narL_H. '_ .r_e. ae Ano 1a sz (FGRMLY - FiRsr dvss PMN LROAD 7; 57r,L1 -,T film 71 i w LC 4 P c i 1 •, 7 I 'f w @ i ' 2Q e At fAll!! 1@IF G IC+ OOLLICIfIlQflp,, / It 1 1/ 3' ' CELL TOWERS f 166LRD.. 1766 Latta Road (130' Cell Tower) 400 Island Cottage Road View from 782 Shorecliff Drive View from 671 Shorecliff Drive 14 1766 Latta Road (130' Cell Tower) 400 Island Cottage Road View from 578 Shorecliff Drive Greece Police Department 4001sland Cottage Road 15 Site No. 3 2040 Maiden Lane Town of Greece The site is located north of Maiden Lane, west of Hailbar Road, east of Alecia Drive, and south of Chant Way. The site contains a monopole cell tower. that is 141.5 feet in height. The age of this cell tower is unavailable; however, given the neighboring homes were built in the 1980s, and given that monopole cell towers were not built prior to the 1990s, it can be concluded that this tower was constructed after the homes. The cell tower is highly visible along Hallbar Road to the east and Alecia Drive to the west. Some of the residential dwellings located along Nymark Drive are also within sight of the cell tower. Due to a heavy stand of mature trees, the cell tower is not readily visible from homes west of 151 Charit Way in spite of the close proximity to the cell tower. A comparison has been made with colonial -style dwellings with a view of the cell tower with sales of colonial -style dwellings without a view of the cell tower. Within view of the cell tower are Sales 1, 2, 4 and 6, indicating an average sale price of $87.20 per square foot. Sales of colonial -style dwellings without a view of the cell tower include Sales 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19, indicating an average sale price of $82.45 per square foot. No appreciable difference is noted in the average sale price of homes selected due to the proximity to the cell tower. J 16 Site No. 3 2040 Maiden Lane Address Sale Sale Dwelling Sale Price Tower Comments Date Price Size (SF) Per SF GBA View? 1 151 Charit Way 7/09 142,000 1,544 91.97 Yes BIt 1982 Colonial, 9 nw, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage 2 189 Charit Way 7/07 151,900 1,624 93.53 Yes Bit 1982 Colonial, 7 rms, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, deck, fireplace 3 103 Hallbar Rd 8/07 126,900 1,076 117.93 Yes Bit 1982 Ranch, 6 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage 4 119 Hallbar Rd 4/07 162,000 1,868 86.72 Yes Bit 1993 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage 5 40 Alecia Dr 8/08 120,000 1,044 114.94 Yes BIt 1982 Ranch, 5 rms, 3 BR, 1 BA, 2 car garage 6 53 Alecia Dr 9/07 132,000 1,724 76.57 Yes Blt 1982 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, finished basement v 7 71 Alecia Dr 3/07 115,000 1,128 101.95 Yes Bit 1982 Ranch, 5 nms, 3 BR, l BA, 2 car garage 8 79 Alecia Dr 8/08 132,000 1,804 73.17 Yes Bit 1982 Split, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2 BA, 2 car garage, fireplace 9 96 Alccia Dr . 1/07 139,900 1,102 126.95 Yes 131t 1982 Ranch,' 6 rms, 3 BR, 1 BA, 2 car garage, finished basement 10 71 Cindy Ln 11/09 139,900 1,308 106.96 No Bit 1980 Ranch, 6 rms, 3 BR, 2 BA, 2 car garage, FP, deck 11 67 Nymark Dr 3/07 119,000 1,156 102.94 Yes Bit 1981 Ranch, 5 rms, 3 BR, 1 BA, 2 car garage, deck 12 101 Nymark Dr 6/07 129,900 1,550 83.81 Yes Bit 1983 Split, 6 rms, 3 BR, 2 BA, 2 car garage, patio, IG pool tit .......,. •.. :.i Site No. 3 2040 Maiden Lane Sale No. Address Sale Date Sale Price Dwelling Sale Price Tower Comments Size (SF) Per SF GBA View? 13 38 Joellen Dr 2/07 169,900 2,070 83.08 No Bit 1986 Colonial, 7 rins, 4 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, deck, Dished basement 14 54 Joellen Dr 3/10 160,000 I,824 87.72 No Bit 1985 Colonial, 8 rrns, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, finished basement, patio, gas FP 15 85 Joellen Dr 7/08 144,000 1,542 93.39 No Blt 1983 Split, 8 rms, 3 BR, 1.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP, deck 16 40 Berchman Dr 4/10 148,000 1,776 83.33 No BIt 1984, Colonial, 8 rrns, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, FP, finished basement, 2 car garage 17 72 Berchman Dr 5107 152,000 1,860 81.72 No BIt 1986 colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP, deck 18 88 Berchman Dr 5110 150,000 1,790. 83.80 No Blt 1985 Colonial, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, deck, FP 19 120 Berchman Dr ' 12l10 151,000 2,012 75.05 No BIt 1986 Colonial, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, 2 car garage, FP, AG pool, deck v 2040 MAIDEN LANE J) tislloa li LAME7 RO'NWT) : 1 1 rIfYlVabuirw ..._.. 1 fNMF IWiI I ow wfrwA n An w_r 1reiG • a ft 3 i"y fNrlllkSfATPo1F MlTMWTi (aj(prrT i rrmNrf rllr A%MrTRLYfs 11[ty/m tAf vyvut +eswer urrt+tr t w war _ r Arr meet --i r Hjlr a t1 S 1 ' eie ijl I I e ji i 3' 4 115 I f • I I I 2040 Maiden Lane (141.5' Cell Tower) View from 55 Hallbar Road View from 71 Hallbax Road 20 2040 Maiden Lame (141.5' Cell Tower) View East from End of Nymark Drive at Alecia Drive 21 Site No. 4 Deer Run Subdivision Town of Perinton The fourth and final site involves sales of residential properties in the Deer Run Subdivision in the Town of Perinton. Deer Run is located near the northeast comer of Whitney Road and Baird Road. The subdivision contains homes constructed in the early to mid 1990s with sale prices generally ranging between $230,000 and $300,000. The subdivision is bounded along the south by industrial land that borders Whitney Road. At 620 Whitney Road there is a 2.87-acre site containing a 300 foot guy wire tower and a second tower that is 286 feet in height, built about 1999. Properties located along Braeloch Crossing are located in a mixed section of the subdivision that also contains townhouse units. The southern boundary of the subdivision in this area is contiguous to industrial properties along Whitney Road. Sales to the north along Valewood Run are a homogenous mix of single-family dwellings. Due to the rolling topography of the land, the cell towers are within the line of sight. The appraiser has included an average of the sale prices of homes located within a view of the cell tower, including Sales 1 through 5 inclusive as well as Sale 15, as indicated on the schedule. The average sale price of the six properties computes to $114.38 per square foot, Six additional i sales have been included, identified as Sales 9 through 14 inclusive, involving properties that have no view or a very distant view, indicating an average sale price of $117.63 per square foot. It should be noted however that the properties analyzed outside the view of the cell tower were built by a higher quality builder than those within the view of the cell tower, which likely contributes to the difference. Sales 6, 7 and 8 are townhouse units in the neighborhood within view of the cell towers. Although in the same neighborhood, they are not included as part of the analysis. When comparing the sale prices throughout this subdivision, there is no appreciable difference regardless of the location. 22 Sale Address Sale Sale Dwelling No. Date Price Size (SF) 1 87 Braeloch 8/06 269,100 2,292 2 91 Braeloch 7/07 285,000 2,455 3 95 Braeloch 7/06 285,000 2,553 4 96 Braeloch 9/06 300,000 2,609 5 97 Braeloch 7/09 292,900 2,686 Site No. 4 Deer Run Subdivision Town of Perinton Sale Price Tower Per SF View? GBA 117.40 Yes 116.09 Yes 111.63 Yes 114.99 Yes 109.05 • Yes M 6 23 Fairdale 8/06 202,950 1,639 123.82 Yes CO 7 43 Fairdale 2/07 235,000 1,995 117.79 Yes 8 48 Fairdale 9/09 293,000 1,995 145.86 Yes 9 28 Valewood 11/06 240,000 2,072 115.83 Ltd Run 10 30 Valewood 5108 253,500 2,176 116.50 Ltd Rua 11 36 Valewood 9/03 277,000 2,249 12317 No Run 12 55 Valewood 9/10 245,000 2,289 107.03 Ltd Run 13 58 Valewood 7/06 298,000 2,383 125.00 No Run 14 66 Valewood 4/09 243,000 2,055 118.25 No Run 15 79 Valewood 8/10 274,900 2,347 117.13 Yes Run Comments (All Dwellings have 2 car garages and Fireplaces) Bit 1993, Col, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, deck Bit 1995, Col, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, deck, patio Bit 1993; Col, 9 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, finished basement, deck Blt 1990, Cal, 10 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, deck Bit 1990, Cape Cod, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, VE floor master, finished basement-3 car garage Blt 1995, Townhouse, 6 rms, 2 BR, 2 BA, finished basement Blt 1995, Townhouse, 5 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, finished basement Bit 1995, Townhouse, 7 rms, 4 BR, 3 BA, unfinished basement BIt 1990, Col, 7 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, deck Blt 1990, Col, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, finished basement, deck Blt 1990, Col, 8 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, porch BIt 1992, Col, 9 rms, 4 BR, 2.5 BA, deck, patio Bit 1994, Col, 9 rms, 5 BR, 3 BA, deck, finished basement Blt 1990, Col, 8 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, finished basement BIt 1990, Col, 8 rms, 3 BR, 2.5 BA, deck 77 4- 9 _ - Q s 1 7X S `. tC w wµ .. a•., . yRi, ww w n. j P a t _ ! 'f ! or c , ,`„..` 1 -- ems _--,; p • a - .. , r _ r'- 3 , i _ - •' Y„ y ta i ! y s .. r V.^ • ` w M ' 1 w w t [n m i + • ' 3 NP r fi. 1 01Mt ORWy{!E COURr Im 1 -- IF JE o I= --- --- -- or I a, a" . a 7 xx t\ _ .., t - mot, xk ( V • y, -: 1•i P • cL i y ` ra C r —'- jp JU IVV Is D ~ $ =b. Its a - '„ +•- ice. W k x l4 w• r u. i w - M Deer Run Subdivision 25 Deer Run Subdivision 26 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF ROBERT G. POGEL, SRPA Partner - Pogel, Schubmehl & Ferrara, LLC 2509 Browneroft Boulevard Rochester, New York 14625 585) 391-5600 - Phone 585) 381-5696 - Fax o elr chester.rr.com - email PROFESSIONAL. MEMBERSHIPS: Designated as a Senior Real Property Appraiser (SRPA) member of the APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, which requires recertification every five years (currently certified) Past Director and Education Chairman of Rochester Chapter 99, SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS Past President of Rochester Chapter 99, SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser— Certificate No. 46000009656 Associate Member MONROE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ASSOCIATION 1, i Board of Assessment Review, Town of Irondequoit (Chairman 1994-- 2009) EDUCATION: Graduated 1962 from Rochester Business Institute with a major in Business Administration Have attended seminars involving a wide range of topics including but not limited to: Appraising Apartments, Appraising Non-Confon ring Uses, Tax Considerations in Real Estate Transactions, Applied Income Property Valuation, Subdivision Analysis, Real Estate Fraud, Regression Analysis, Appraising Troubled Properties, Land Valuation, Business Practice & Ethics, Appraising Condominiums, Environmentally Contaminated Properties, Real Estate Tax Law, Enviro=ea3tai Law, and many others EXPERIENCE: Three years experience with Abstract Title Division as a Title Searcher Five years experience with Ralph Klonick Sons, Inc., as a Staff Appraiser Over five years experience with Morgan Stanwix Appraisal Associates, Inc. Partner of Fogel, Schubmehl & Ferrara, LLC, founded in 1977 Assignments as an appraiser and consultant include appraisals for condemnation actions involving both full and partial takings, easements, and rights -of -way involving residential, commercial and special-purpose properties, as well as appraisals for mortgage loans, estates, and for normal buyer/seller transactions Lectured before various groups on the Fundamentals of Real Estate AppraisingPreparedstudiesforvariousownersseekingzoningchangesorvariancesandhave testified before zoning boards Qualified as an expert witness before New York State Court of Claims, New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County Surrogate Court, and various commissions 27 ROBERT G. POGEL, SRPA PROPERTY TYPES ArPR.AISED: Subdivision Of 1BhUi1 g s Manufac mFacilities Wareho . c c Apa m,ent Projects f %Liks lr-rsemce Stations Automobile Agencies Agricultural Property Schools/Convents Waterfront Properly Development Rights 3 r ` PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS - GOVERNMENT: Churchvillb Chili School District City School. District (Rochester) I City of Rochester, Dept. of Community Development County of Monroe, Division of Engineering East Irondequoit School District Monroe County Tax Foreclosure Office Monroe County Water Authority N.Y.S. Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation State of New York, Office of General Services Town of Brighton City of Canandaigua Town of Canandaigua. Town of Chili 3 PARTL4L LIST OF CLIENTS - CORPORATE: Canandaigua National Bank & Trust Company CSX Railroad Eastman Kodak Company Fairport Savings Bank Farash Corporation Finger Lakes Land Tnmt First Niagara Bank Five Star Bank Genesee Valley Land Trust Hoselton Realty Monroe Title Insurance Company l _ f I 28 Churches Mobile Home Parks Mini -Storage Facilities Residential Properties Bulk Oil Terminal Railroad Property Golf Courses Shopping Plazas Gravel Quarry Residential, Commercial & Industrial Land Condominiums Town of Geneseo Town of Henrietta Town ofTrondequoit Town of Jerusalem Town of Macedon Town of Mendon Town of Penfield Town ofPerinton Town of Rush Town of Webster Village of Fairport Village of Mt. Morris Village of Nunda Village and Town of Victor Nature Conservancy Nazareth College Ontario National Bank Public Parking Rochester Housing Authority Rochester Institute of Technology Schantz Homes Spall Homes Urban League Waste Management