Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PWC Agenda 2026-07-21 and packet
AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE July 21, 2026, 9:00a.m. ZOOM Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81695207215 1. Approval of Minutes a. May 19, 2026 2. Member Comments/Concerns a. Consider Modifications to Agenda 3. SouthWorks concepts for utilities/dedication for Beacon Woods Project 4. Commonland Traffic 5. Fleet Replacement Schedule 6. Capital Improvement Projects Project Updates 2026 CIP Paving Updates Interceptor Study Town Hall Court Mezzanine 113 East Chemung Place | Elmira, New York 14904 | 607.734.2165 | FaganEngineers.com July 16, 2026 Joe Slater, Director of Public Works Town of Ithaca 114 Seven Mile Drive Ithaca, NY 14850 RE: SouthWorks Woods Public Infrastructure Request SWBR Project No. 22232.00 FE Project 2011.104-008 Dear Joe, As per our previous discussions, Beacon Communities LLC (Beacon) and Shift Capital (Shift) are developing the first phase of the SouthWorks project known as the Woods. The proposed development involves the new construction of a mixed-income rental community located in both the City of Ithaca and Town of Ithaca. The new community is part of the larger, comprehensive redevelopment that will transform the 95-acre former Morse Chain/Emerson Transmission Plant industrial complex. The larger redevelopment project is a master-planned community that will repurpose the former manufacturing site into a placemaking destination neighborhood with approximately 915 mixed-income residential units, commercial space, and public and outdoor space. Attached please find the Woods Site and Utility Plans, as well as an updated version of the GEIS Concept Plan (including current projects) for reference. Project Description and Purpose For Phase 1, Shift and Beacon are proposing the new construction of a 230-unit mixed-income rental community that will include a mix of 1, 2, and 3-bedroom apartments. Of the total 230 units, 100 will be located in the City of Ithaca and 130 will be located in the Town of Ithaca. The proposed SouthWorks Woods community in the Town of Ithaca will involve the new construction of 8 buildings with a total of 130 mixed-income apartments. Of the total 130 apartments, there will be 52 1-bedroom units, 53 2-bedroom units, and 25 3-bedroom units. In addition to the residential units, the development will provide a range of amenities, including community room, lounge, fitness center, and an exterior playground. Supporting spaces will include offices, maintenance areas, and storage. The SouthWorks Woods project will be subdivided from the remaining SouthWorks parcel as part of the approval process. The Applicants respectfully request that the Town of Ithaca accept dedication of the following public infrastructure upon completion, certification, and acceptance in accordance with the Town's Standards and Specifications: • Road B and Rotary. (AKA Drive V), • Road A (roadway between Buildings B and C from Morse Place to the Rotary), • Public Water System, and • Public Sanitary Sewer. Road B: Road B is an access intersecting with Danby Road. Road B represents the future northern access to the remaining undeveloped portions of SouthWorks. Although the adjacent development is not part of the current phase, this roadway establishes the public street network contemplated by the GEIS and provides long-term redundancy for traffic circulation and emergency access. Page 2 July 16, 2026 113 East Chemung Place, Elmira, New York 14904 | 607.734.2165 | FaganEngineers.com Road A: Road A is more than an internal access drive. It functions as the principal east-west collector roadway serving the Woods neighborhood and is intended to become part of the interconnected SouthWorks public street system. It provides emergency access, accommodates future traffic circulation, and will ultimately connect multiple phases of development. As additional phases of SouthWorks are constructed, Road A will transition from serving a single development to functioning as a neighborhood street serving multiple properties and users. Public Water: As per our discussions with you and Town Staff, the proposed connection point to the existing Town Water System will be at Danby Road. The current configuration is that of an individual service with only one connection to the Town system. As future phases are constructed, the water system will evolve from a single service connection into a looped public distribution system. Public ownership will facilitate future interconnections, improve operational reliability, increase fire protection, and simplify long- term maintenance and expansion of the municipal water system. Sanitary Sewer: The sanitary sewer extension is designed as a conventional public gravity sewer system consistent with Town standards. Public ownership will ensure coordinated operation and maintenance as the SouthWorks redevelopment expands and additional phases connect to this infrastructure. The proposed infrastructure is intended to serve not only the initial Woods development, but the broader SouthWorks redevelopment envisioned by the adopted GEIS and Planned Development Zone. Acceptance of these facilities as public infrastructure will: • Establish the backbone infrastructure for future phases; • Promote interconnected public streets rather than isolated private drives; • Improve long-term emergency access and neighborhood connectivity; • Create a looped public water system capable of improved reliability and fire flows; • Provide a public sanitary sewer network consistent with conventional Town practice; and • Avoid future reconstruction or conversion of private facilities as additional phases develop. The Applicants believe public ownership of these improvements is consistent with the long-term vision of the SouthWorks Planned Development Zone and represents the most efficient means of providing safe, reliable, and interconnected public infrastructure for the entire redevelopment. Acceptance of these facilities at this stage will establish the backbone public infrastructure necessary to support future residential and mixed-use development while ensuring that the Town's infrastructure standards are incorporated from the outset. We look forward to presenting our proposal to the Public Works Committee at their next meeting. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, FAGAN ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS, P.C. James B. Gensel, P.E., CPESC President 2 0' S A N I T A R Y S E W E R R - O - W 2 0 ' S A N I T A R Y S E W E R R - O - W N. Y. S. R O U T E 9 6 B - D A N B Y R O A D variable width 18 16 23 21 5 28 PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PROPOSED 12 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B3 FFE BASEMENT: 753.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 765.11 PROPOSED 6 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B1 FFE BASEMENT: 751.85 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 763.35 PROPOSED 9 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B2 FFE BASEMENT: 752.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 764.11 PROPOSED 27 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C1 FFE BASEMENT: 739.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 750.90 PROPOSED 26 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C2 FFE BASEMENT: 740.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 751.90 PROPOSED 30 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C3 FFE BASEMENT: 741.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 752.90 PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING A2 FFE BASEMENT: 776.0 F F E : 1 S T F L O O R : 7 8 6 . 3 3 MAINT.SHED LOADING AREA PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING A1 FFE BASEMENT: 775.50 F F E : 1 S T F L O O R : 7 8 5 . 8 3 EV FEVEV FEV FEV FEV FEV FEV FEVFEV FEV EV EV EV FEV FEV FEV FEV EV FEV FEV FEV FEVFEVFEVFEVFEVFEV FEV FEV DANBY ROAD DRIVE V 00 30'60' SWBR NYS Certificate of Authorization #: 235221 260 East Main Street Rochester NY 14604 585 232 8300 | rochester@swbr.com These documents and all the ideas, arrangements,designs and plans indicated thereon or presentedthereby are owned by and remain the property ofSWBR and no part thereof shall be utilized by anyperson, firm, or corporation for any purposewhatsoever except with the specific writtenpermission of SWBR. All rights reserved. © FI L E P A T H : Checked By: Project Manager: Drawn By: Revisions SWBR Project Number 4/16/2026 Town Sketch Plan Comments 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 06/12/2026 6/29/2026 Addendum #1 7/07/2026 Town Preliminary Plan Submission 12 / 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 2 : 4 5 : 4 6 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 5 1 8 9 . 0 0 B e a c o n T h e W o o d s / 2 5 1 8 9 _ B e a c o n T h e W o o d s _ A r c h R 2 5 _ C e n t r a l . r v t 25189.00 JBG JBG RSN BEACON COMMUNITIES - THE WOODS Beacon Southworks - The Woods 505 Ellicott St. Suite 44Buffalo,NY 14203 Ithaca, NY LEGEND Note : Utility information has been plotted from available sources and their locations and size should be considered approximate only. The contractor is responsible for determining exact utility locations, sizes, and elevations prior to commencing construction. Ifuncharted or misplotted utilities are encountered, the contractor is required to notify the owner immediately. New York State law requires excavators to contact the one-call notification system prior to digging to prevent damage to buried facilities. IT'S THE LAW! Call three days before you dig!1-800-962-7962 Dig Safely New York(non-members must be contacted separately) FE Project Number 2011.104-008 113 East Chemung PlaceElmira N.Y. 14904Phone (607) 734-2165Fax (607) 734-2169 www.FaganEngineers.com OVERALL SITE PLAN C300 2 0' S A N I T A R Y S E W E R R - O - W 2 0 ' S A N I T A R Y S E W E R R - O - W N. Y. S. R O U T E 9 6 B - D A N B Y R O A D variable width W W W W W W W W W PROJECT BOUNDARY PROJECT B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y PR O J E C T B O U N D A R Y W W ST ST ST ST SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SA N SA N SA N SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SA N SA N SA N SA N ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST UG / E UG/ E ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W UG / E UG / E UG/ E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/ E UG/ E UG/ E PROPOSED STORM W A T E R TREATMENT CHAMBER S (UPPER) PROPOSED STORM WATER TREATMENT CHAMBERS (LOWER) D D PROPOSED 12 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B3 FFE BASEMENT: 753.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 765.11 PROPOSED 6 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B1 FFE BASEMENT: 751.85 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 763.35 PROPOSED 9 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B2 FFE BASEMENT: 752.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 764.11 PROPOSED 27 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C1 FFE BASEMENT: 739.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 750.90 PROPOSED 26 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C2 FFE BASEMENT: 740.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 751.90 PROPOSED 30 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C3 FFE BASEMENT: 741.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 752.90 PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING A2 FFE BASEMENT: 776.0 F F E : 1 S T F L O O R : 7 8 6 . 3 3 MAINT.SHED LOADING AREA ST ST ST PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING A1 FFE BASEMENT: 775.50 F F E : 1 S T F L O O R : 7 8 5 . 8 3 ST ST ST ST ST ST UG / E UG / E UG / E UG / E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG / E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E PROPOSED STORM WATER TREATMENT CHAMBERS (LOWER) W W W W W W SAN SAN SAN DANBY ROAD DRIVE V SAN SAN ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST UG/E UG / E UG/ E UG / E UG / E UG / E UG / E UG/ E UG/E UG/E UG/E UG/E SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN STST STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME:RIM ELEV.PIPES IN:PIPES OUT STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME:RIM ELEV.PIPES IN:PIPES OUT STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME:RIM ELEV.PIPES IN:PIPES OUT STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE NAME:RIM ELEV.PIPES IN:PIPES OUT BY OTHER S LEGEND Note : Utility information has been plotted from available sources and their locations and size should be considered approximate only. The contractor is responsible for determiningexact utility locations, sizes, and elevations prior to commencing construction. Ifuncharted or misplotted utilities are encountered, the contractor is required to notify the owner immediately. New York State law requires excavators to contact the one-call notification system priorto digging to prevent damage to buried facilities. IT'S THE LAW! Call three days before you dig!1-800-962-7962 Dig Safely New York(non-members must be contacted separately) 00 30'60' SWBR NYS Certificate of Authorization #: 235221 260 East Main Street Rochester NY 14604 585 232 8300 | rochester@swbr.com These documents and all the ideas, arrangements,designs and plans indicated thereon or presentedthereby are owned by and remain the property ofSWBR and no part thereof shall be utilized by anyperson, firm, or corporation for any purposewhatsoever except with the specific writtenpermission of SWBR. All rights reserved. © FI L E P A T H : Checked By: Project Manager: Drawn By: Revisions SWBR Project Number 4/16/2026 Town Sketch Plan Comments 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 06/12/2026 6/29/2026 Addendum #1 7/07/2026 Town Preliminary Plan Submission 12 / 9 / 2 0 2 5 1 2 : 4 5 : 4 6 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 5 1 8 9 . 0 0 B e a c o n T h e W o o d s / 2 5 1 8 9 _ B e a c o n T h e W o o d s _ A r c h R 2 5 _ C e n t r a l . r v t 25189.00 JBG JBG RSN BEACON COMMUNITIES -THE WOODS Beacon Southworks - The Woods 505 Ellicott St. Suite 44Buffalo,NY 14203 Ithaca, NY 113 East Chemung PlaceElmira N.Y. 14904Phone (607) 734-2165Fax (607) 734-2169 www.FaganEngineers.com FE Project Number 2011.104-008 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C500 1 M O R S E P L A C E ROAD A ROAD B DRIVE C DRIV E D 21 22 18 16 23 21 5 28 PROPOSED 12 UNIT TOWNHOUSEBUILDING B3 FFE BASEMENT: 753.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 765.11 PROPOSED6 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B1 FFE BASEMENT: 751.85 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 763.35 PROPOSED9 UNIT TOWNHOUSE BUILDING B2 FFE BASEMENT: 752.61 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 764.11 PROPOSED 27 UNIT APARTMENTBUILDING C1FFE BASEMENT: 739.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 750.90 PROPOSED 26 UNIT APARTMENTBUILDING C2FFE BASEMENT: 740.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 751.90 PROPOSED30 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING C3 FFE BASEMENT: 741.40 FFE: 1ST FLOOR: 752.90 PROPOSED 50 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING G1 PROPOSED 50 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING G2 PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING A2 FFE BASEMENT: 776.0 FFE: 1S T F L O O R : 7 8 6 . 3 3 MAINT.SHED LOADINGAREA PROPOSED 9 UNIT APARTME N T BUILDING A1 FFE BASEMENT: 775.50 F F E : 1 S T F L O O R : 7 8 5 . 8 3 EVEV FEVFEV FEVFEV FEVFEV EV FEVEVFEV FEVFEVFEVFEV FEVFEV FEV EVEVEVFEVFEVFEVFEVEV FEVFEVFEV FEVFEVFEVFEVFEVFEV FEV FEV DRIVEIV DANBY RO A D ROA D F U P P E R M O R S E P L A C E DRIVE G L O W E R M O R S E P L A C E DRIVEV 4139955.22 Sf.95.040 Acres Parcel A C H A I N D R I V E S . C A Y U G A S T R E E T S C O U T P A T H LOADINGDOCK LOADINGDOCK Retaining Wall B U S S T O P U P P E R M O R S E P L A C E B U S S T O P P A R K I N G A R E A P A R K I N G A R E A 95 PARKING SPACES 45 PARKING SPACES LOADINGDOCK L O W E R M O R S E P L A C E U P P E R M O R S E P L A C E L O W E R M O R S E P L A C E T H O M A S L A N E F U T U R E A C C E S S DRIVE I DRIVEII DRIVE III DRIVE IV DRIVE V LOADINGAREA E17 E18 E1 E8 E13AE13B E35 E34E24 E21 E10 E2 E3 E4 M O R S E P L A C E Retain i n g W a l l EASEMENT (ii)0.098 Acres E33 N2 C N13 C N14 CN15 N21 C C N24 N25 C B N28 A C N27 B N32 B N36 B N38 A C N37 A C C AN35 C N34 A C C AN31 C N30 C C N33 N29 OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E OH/E D D N16 15 34 32 FENCEDPLAY AREA(5-12 Y.O.) FENCEDPLAY AREA(2-5 Y.O.) 4 6 210 E5-6 LOADINGDOCK 19 32 39 10 EVEVFEVFEVFEVFEV 65 PARKING SPACES The Woods Gateway Empowerment Found Center TOWN OF ITHACA CITY OF ITHACA CITY OF ITH A C A TOWN OF I T H A C A TOWN OF ITHACA CITY OF ITHACA Volume by Speed Penny Lane, WB End: 2026-07-07 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-06-25 Speed Bins: Size 5, Range 1 to 150 Time View: By Hour (Total Volumes) Time 1 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 20 21 to 25 26 to 30 31 to 35 36 to 40 41 to 45 46 to 50 51 to 55 56 to 60 61 to 65 66 to 70 71 to 75 76 to 80 81 to 85 86 to 90 91 to 95 96 to 100 101 to 150 Avg Speed Total 0:00 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 4 1:00 0 12 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 16 2:00 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.9 7 3:00 4 23 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.1 31 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 5:00 1 2 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 11 6:00 1 5 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.0 12 7:00 4 7 3 5 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 28 8:00 2 21 9 7 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.1 59 9:00 5 99 18 19 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 159 10:00 2 19 13 18 27 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.5 89 11:00 2 17 134 32 29 18 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.3 234 12:00 3 25 37 25 27 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.5 130 13:00 3 27 23 27 21 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.9 117 14:00 10 31 30 39 33 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.6 161 15:00 14 27 41 42 46 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.3 196 16:00 6 38 29 33 57 11 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.0 179 17:00 3 16 11 27 32 12 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19.4 108 18:00 6 19 21 14 29 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.2 104 19:00 11 15 20 13 14 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14.8 77 20:00 0 16 7 10 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.2 45 21:00 0 7 5 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.4 36 22:00 0 3 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.4 12 23:00 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.4 5 Total 77 439 411 340 376 146 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 1820 Generated by Connor Crandall on 07-08-2026 Volume by Speed Penny Lane, WB End: 2026-07-07 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-06-25 Speed Bins: Size 5, Range 1 to 150 Time View: By Hour (Total Volumes) Generated by Connor Crandall on 07-08-2026 Summary of Violators Lois Lane from Thu-Jun-25-2026-12-00-PM to Tue-Jul-07-2026-09-59-AM Lois Lane, Ithaca NY 14850 Starting Hour Count Average Speed of all Traffic Violator Counts Average Speed of Violators 00:00:00 1 18.0 0 0.0 01:00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A 02:00:00 1 20.0 0 0.0 03:00:00 1 21.0 0 0.0 04:00:00 8 20.1 0 0.0 05:00:00 16 18.8 0 0.0 06:00:00 34 19.3 1 37.0 07:00:00 48 19.1 0 0.0 08:00:00 49 17.5 0 0.0 09:00:00 37 19.4 0 0.0 10:00:00 63 19.6 0 0.0 11:00:00 34 19.3 0 0.0 12:00:00 47 19.5 0 0.0 13:00:00 50 19.6 0 0.0 14:00:00 36 18.9 0 0.0 15:00:00 52 19.3 0 0.0 16:00:00 41 19.6 0 0.0 17:00:00 30 18.9 0 0.0 18:00:00 26 19.3 0 0.0 19:00:00 8 19.6 0 0.0 20:00:00 7 19.1 0 0.0 21:00:00 8 16.8 0 0.0 22:00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A 23:00:00 1 19.0 0 0.0 Summary of Violators Lois Lane from Thu-Jun-25-2026-12-00-PM to Tue-Jul-07-2026-09-59-AM Lois Lane, Ithaca NY 14850 Starting Hour Count Average Speed of all Traffic Violator Counts Average Speed of Violators 00:00:00 1 14.0 0 0.0 01:00:00 1 21.0 0 0.0 02:00:00 1 22.0 0 0.0 03:00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A 04:00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A 05:00:00 6 15.8 0 0.0 06:00:00 14 18.5 0 0.0 07:00:00 25 19.6 0 0.0 08:00:00 28 20.7 0 0.0 09:00:00 33 20.0 0 0.0 10:00:00 50 20.9 0 0.0 11:00:00 36 21.5 1 40.0 12:00:00 44 20.8 1 34.0 13:00:00 65 21.2 0 0.0 14:00:00 56 22.2 2 41.5 15:00:00 67 21.1 0 0.0 16:00:00 59 20.3 0 0.0 17:00:00 43 20.2 0 0.0 18:00:00 43 20.3 1 38.0 19:00:00 32 20.1 0 0.0 20:00:00 18 18.7 0 0.0 21:00:00 8 19.5 0 0.0 22:00:00 8 19.5 0 0.0 23:00:00 2 22.0 0 0.0 Speed Summary Penny Lane, WB End: 2026-07-07 Times: 0:00:00-23:59:59 Start: 2026-06-25 Speed Range: 1 to 150 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 13 Speed Limit: 30 Average Speed: 15.95 50th Percentile Speed: 15.4 85th Percentile Speed: 21.02 Pace Speed Range: 11-21 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 42 Display Mode: Speed Display Average Volume per Day: 140.0 Total Volume: 1820 Generated by Justin McNeal on 07-08-2026 # Equipment to be Auctioned / Traded & Replaced Useful Life Original Purchase Price Year Purchased Replacement Cost (Budgeted) Age of Equipment Since Purchased New Annual Repair Costs (2025) Lifetime Total Repair Costs (Parts and Labor) Projected Auction Price / Trade Mileage / Hours (as of 6/22/26)Green Fleet Options 11 2016 Interntional Dump (Water & Sewer)10 99,501.00$ 2015 200,000.00$ 10 1,883.15$ 13,855.00$ $25,000-$30,000 33,380 Yes 61 2019 Ford F450 Super Duty Dump 10 59,302.94$ 2019 100,000.00$ 7 3,344.72$ 11,638.00$ $15,000-$25,000 74,230 No 66 2019 Ford F350 4x4 Super Cab w/plow 6 46,636.01$ 2019 85,000.00$ 7 5,239.08$ 14,970.00$ $15,000-$25,000 94,954 No 80 2018 Ford F350 4x4 Super Cab w/plow 6 43,524.01$ 2018 70,000.00$ 8 2,216.17$ 17,065.00$ $15,000-$25,000 103,626 No 25 2014 Ford F150 XLT Super Cab 4x4 (E)15 29,448.50$ 2014 75,000.00$ 12 435.90$ 7,199.00$ $5,000-$14,000 42,316 Yes 42 2008 New Holland Backhoe/Loader 18 54,445.00$ 2008 150,000.00$ 18 84.50$ 11,465.00$ $22,000-$32,000 Hrs?Yes 68 2020 Caterpillar Mini-Excavator 305.5E CR 7 75,275.00$ 2020 100,000.00$ 6 484.35$ 5,173.00$ $35,000-$50,000 1,237 Yes 82 2011 Mobark Chipper 15 40,700.00$ 2011 135,000.00$ 11 1,594.96$ 17,856.00$ $10,000-$20,000 850 No T1 2022 Sure-Trac Tilt Trailer 3 8,876.00$ 2022 15,000.00$ 5 748.67$ 2,295.00$ $3,000-$6,000 NA N/A 35 2022 Giant Loader 5 98,828.70$ 2022 90,000.00$ 4 2,154.31$ 3,383.00$ $20,000-$50,000 2,487 Yes 57 2010 Finn T-75 Hydroseeder 15 25,750.00$ 2010 65,000.00$ 16 36.57$ 7,159.00$ $15,000-$25,000 1,714 No 1,085,000.00$ $180,000-$302,000 $180,000-$302,000 241,000.00$ 1,085,000.00$ 241,000.00$ 844,000.00$ Total Auction Income Average Town of Ithaca - Proposed Fleet Replacement Schedule 2027 Total New Equipment Total Projected Auction Income Total New/Replaced Equipment Total Estimated Cost Estimated Projected Auction Income Early Ideas for Evaluation of Capital Improvement Projects Public Works Committee Meeting, July 21st, 2026 Owen Linder, Planning and Sustainability Intern Why? “Explore incorporating internal (TOI) cost of carbon into project selection and planning (e.g., through CIP and/or budget process)” (Green New Deal Action Plan, 2025-2026) How can we holistically consider sustainability and other Comprehensive Plan priorities in the CIP process? Examples in Action Location Approach to CIP Project Evaluation Baltimore, MD Each project receives zero to 3 points across six categories including health/safety, asset condition (how close to failure), and environmental impact. The categories are summed to form a “score” out of 18 total points. There are guides and examples for each category, explaining what is needed for each point to be awarded in clear and consistent language. The scores are only applied to projects with flexible funding sources and inform but do not dictate decision-making. https://www.baltimorecity.gov/planning/our-work/capital-improvement-program/evaluation-criteria Kansas City, MO Each project receives up to 100 points in twelve categories that are weighted differently; for example, maintenance counts for up to 20 points, while environmental sustainability counts for up to 5 points. Points are assigned to every project by a CIP Technical Committee. https://www.kcmo.gov/city-hall/departments/finance/capital-improvements-plan/about-the-capital-improvements-plan-cip Portland, ME Each project has written criteria justifications for each of seven categories, including asset condition, climate action, and health. The justifications range from long, detailed paragraphs to single sentences. There is no formalized scoring system; there is only written paragraphs. https://content.civicplus.com/api/assets/me-portland/088901bf-7ed5-422a-8c90-c676a0cf4223 Baltimore, MD Each project receives zero to 3 points across six categories including health/safety, asset condition (how close to failure), and environmental impact. The categories are summed to form a “score” out of 18 total points. There are guides and examples for each category, explaining what is needed for each point to be awarded in clear and consistent language. The scores are only applied to projects with flexible funding sources and inform but do not dictate decision-making. https://www.baltimorecity.gov/planning/our-work/capital-improvement-program/evaluation-criteria Environmental impact Consider whether and how this project will produce measurable improvements to the environment over the life of the project. Compliance with standards can count towards measurable improvements if they improve air/water quality or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Mitigation measures that offset a negative impact of the project (such as mitigating stormwater runoff resulting from the improvement or planting trees to replace those lost due to the improvement) should not be counted, as they do not represent a net improvement in air or water quality but are rather reducing or offsetting negative environmental impacts of a project. Quantify the improvement. 3 – The project will result in significant, measurable improvements to air or water quality or measurable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - The project will result in minor improvements to air or water quality or greenhouse gas emissions. 1 – The project has theoretical environmental benefits but they cannot be quantified. 0 – The project does not have any measurable environmental benefits. Example scoring guide: Example Evaluation (using Baltimore’s categories as placeholders) Asset condition 0 1 2 3 Return on investment / cost-benefit 0 1 2 3 Health & safety 0 1 2 3 Environmental impact 0 1 2 3 Equity 0 1 2 3 Efficiency / effectiveness 0 1 2 3 PWF Light Upgrade to LED & Site Lighting (2026) The replacement and upgrade of the remaining interior lights at the PWF and installation of exterior lights near the parking areas. Baltimore’s evaluation criteria: https://s3.amazonaws.com/baltimorecity.gov.if-us-east-1/s3fs-public/2024-02/fy23_evaluation_criteria_scoring_guide.pdf “The asset is nearing the end of its expected life and replacement would be prudent.” LEDs would likely pay for themselves within ten years due to vastly reduced utility costs and labor costs for replacement. Potentially a 2 if the exterior lighting is extensive and costly to install. “The project would theoretically improve health or safety, but it is difficult to quantify the benefit.” – outdoor lights may prevent injury LEDs cause a “minor improvements” to greenhouse gas emissions due to their power savings. Needs to be “significant” to be a 3. “Project does not close a gap.” 2: “Most cost effective for asset” (most likely) 3: Most cost effective and a thorough evaluation of alternatives Score: 9 out of 18 points We could modify and adapt the scoring system to accurately reflect the Town’s priorities. Conclusion These are early ideas to be modified over time Thoughts? Questions? Comments?