Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA Minutes 2026-05-26ZBA 2026-05-26 (Filed 6/8) Pg. 1 MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ITHACA Zoning Board of Appeals May 26, 2026 Minutes Present: Connor Terry Chair; Larry Sallinger and Stuart Friedman Absent: Kim Rittter, Matthew Minnig, and Barry Segal Marty Moseley, Director of Codes; Ashley Colbert, Deputy Town Clerk; Chris Balestra, Senior Planner and Susan Brock, Attorney for the Town Mr. Terry opened the meeting at 6:03 p.m. ZBAA-26-6 Appeal of Cornell University, Owner, 320 Caldwell Rd. Low-Density Residential District Zone Tax Parcel 67.-1-8, Todd Bittner, Agent, seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code sections 270-254 (Residential and Conservation Zones) and 270-219.5 E and F (Stream setback). Town of Ithaca Code section 270-254 limits signs to 16 square feet of aggregate area and limits the maximum freestanding sign height to 6 feet, where the applicant is proposing to exceed the aggregate sign area and exceed the maximum height for free standing signs. Town of Ithaca Code section 270-219.5 E. and F. does not allow a sign structure to be placed in zone 1 or zone 2 of the Town of Ithaca stream setback area, where the applicant is proposing to install a sign structure in the Town of Ithaca stream setback area. The property is currently located in the Mr. Bittner gave an overview of the importance and need for the bloom board and interpretive sign. The Botanic Gardens hosts over 750,000 visitors annually. They are looking to place the signs in the Mundy Wildflower Garden near the parking lot and trail system, which is the main visitor entrance. The sign is essential for visitor wayfinding and for educational purposes. The new signs would consolidate the wayfinding and educational material that is currently scattered throughout several locations. Mr. Bittner also explained the significance of the bloom board, where one side of the sign would continue the tradition that was started in 1964, where staff and volunteers track which plants are blooming on a weekly basis. Lois Levitan was a long-time volunteer, and the bloom board was also dedicated to her memory, to honor her commitment to nature education. While the other side would have the wayfinding and interpretive content He also noted that the current residential zoning of the area does not account for the institutional needs, as they are part of Cornell University and in a Low-Density Residential Zone. Mr. Terry opened the public hearing at 6:17 pm where there was no one wishing to be heard. The public hearing was closed at 6:18 pm. Questions Mr. Friedman asked about it being self-created and how we approach that requirement. ZBA 2026-05-26 (Filed 6/8) Pg. 2 Mr. Terry responded that in the past they have made the finding that it is self-created in that there is a desire to have a sign that is outside of the requirements, but it is not self-created in that is a college that is subject to low residential zoning which doesn’t really apply to a university. ZBA Resolution ZBAA-26-6 Area Variance – Sign Height, Area, & Stream Setback Encroachment 320 Caldwell Rd. TP# 67.-1-8 LDR Resolved that this Board grants the appeal of Cornell University, owner, 320 Caldwell Rd., TP 67.-1-8 seeking relief from Town of Ithaca Code section 270-254 (Residential and Conservations Zones) which limits the total sign area to 16’ square feet in aggregate and limits a freestanding sign height at a maximum of 6’ feet where exceeding both area and height are requested; and Town of Ithaca Code 270-219.5 E and F which prohibits signs placed in Zones 1 or 2 of the Stream Setback Area, where the applicant is proposing to install a sign in said setback, with the following: Conditions: 1. That the sign be installed substantially as shown on the drawings submitted to the board. Findings: That the benefit to the applicant does outweigh any detriment to the health, safety, and welfare of the community, specifically 1. That the benefit that the applicant wishes to achieve cannot be achieved by any other means feasible given that the sign needs to be large enough and tall enough to contain the information necessary for the sign to be effective in assisting and directing the public in this public garden; the requested placement is as close to the parking area as possible while maintaining a safe distance from vehicles moving and parking in the area; the information on the requested sign is similar to that of other signs in the garden and would orient visitor parking at this lot similar to that in other lots; and 2. That there will not be an undesirable change in the neighborhood character or detriment to nearby properties given that the location is surrounded by other Botanical Garden property and therefore would be consistent in character and is very similar to signage used in similar public facilities and there are other existing structures within the stream setback; and 3. That the request is substantial given that the approved sign area is approximately 33.3’ sqft where 16’ sqft is allowed, and the encroachment into the stream set back is approximately 28’ into the required 100’ foot setback, but the disturbance to the land is minimal for the posts, and the request is not substantial as to the height were the approved sign is approximately 6.6’ feet where 6’ feet is the maximum, and ZBA 2026-05-26 (Filed 6/8) Pg. 3 4. The request will not have adverse physical or environmental effects as evidence by the fact that this is a Type 2 action under the Town’s Type 2 SEQR list of exempted review, but nevertheless, the ground disturbance is minimal, and the signs fit the existing area and use, and 5. That while the alleged difficulty is not self-created in regard to the area and height as the University is in a low-density residential zone because there is no “institutional” zoning as of yet that would more aptly apply to a college setting and that the alleged difficulty is self-created in regard to the Stream Setback encroachment. Moved: Connor Terry Seconded: Stuart Friedman Vote: ayes – Terry, Friedman, Sallinger Other Business Mr. Moseley noted that there is a conflict with the scheduled July meeting. Discussion followed and the meeting scheduled for July 28, 2026 was canceled/moved to August 11, 2026, if there was any business requiring a meeting; unanimous. The meeting was adjourned upon a motion and a second; unanimous. Submitted by Ashley Colbert, Deputy Town Clerk